<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com">
<title>BMJ Open recent issues</title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com</link>
<description>BMJ Open RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>BMJ Open</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>2044-6055</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109882?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111421?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112428?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114322?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116004?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118611?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119951?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121458?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121497?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103851?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e104245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105749?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106377?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111404?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113081?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113110?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113753?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115907?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116737?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117096?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117269?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117547?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117745?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118581?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118713?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118750?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119490?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119596?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112841?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115090?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115133?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117507?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117683?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118045?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118546?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118879?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119384?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105019?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105615?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107828?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108754?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110005?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111941?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111996?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112819?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111863?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113697?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117251?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118739?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121917?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e101587?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106160?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106250?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106819?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108926?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109384?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110683?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111451?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111672?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102785?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102883?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103813?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e104484?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109130?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109272?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109865?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110852?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111638?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113483?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113549?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115010?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117632?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119277?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e104459?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106623?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114353?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116609?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e120452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e100862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102122?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103126?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106913?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107451?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109586?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109905?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110228?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117208?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117366?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121443?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103223?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106957?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108562?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109299?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109859?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110730?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111771?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113547?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113598?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113671?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113676?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113762?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114504?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114866?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116159?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117374?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117719?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118515?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102835?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105861?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106211?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106885?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107637?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107975?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108734?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111152?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111561?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113970?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114029?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114181?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115626?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115822?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115870?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117014?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e120149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109084?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108881?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110537?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112464?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113154?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117420?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117555?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118544?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e100756?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102957?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099542?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106566?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106948?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109860?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110702?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112189?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114509?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116412?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116764?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116972?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117537?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119958?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120861?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104953?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107854?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109056?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109083?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111118?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112414?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112787?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113766?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113887?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115212?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115223?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115859?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116170?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116526?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117737?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118394?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118728?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099617?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116516?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116644?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116839?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117024?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117256?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117592?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117783?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117998?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118024?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118130?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118633?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118710?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118725?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119154?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119795?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120048?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102059?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104566?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105800?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107759?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108154?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108626?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110635?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110800?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111299?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111494?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111772?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112843?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113009?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113302?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114273?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114399?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115440?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115526?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115657?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099203corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101827?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107310?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108215?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110023?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110648?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111726?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111844?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112126?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113520?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113559?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113618?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114411?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115137?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115709?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116542?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116962?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116964?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116985?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e095421?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e098210?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101177?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106522?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109989?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110628?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112065?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112550?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113841?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115518?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115635?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115691?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115968?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116566?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116834?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117387?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117840?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118679?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118771?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118867?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119354?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105381?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106382?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106835?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108683?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109264?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111387?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113943?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113984?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115283?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116404?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116443?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116702?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117329?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118744?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118766?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111954?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112342?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112617?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112794?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112922?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112999?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115062?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115675?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115755?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116172?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116230?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117615?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118910?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118914?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119037?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119136?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106685?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107240?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107462?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108251?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108893?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109404?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111370?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103938corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106055?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e095242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108694?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109040?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109839?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112643?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112788?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112790?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114881?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115464?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118949?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108442?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114628?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115254?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115860?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116013?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116945?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117077?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117575?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101376?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110475?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112564?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112693?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113503?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113565?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113681?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114078?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114571?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e096075?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e097976?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103822?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103892?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109740?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110192?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112047?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113145?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113749?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113839?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114005?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114268?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114382?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114825?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114928?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115210?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115638?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117522?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e100186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107980?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110998?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112056?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112830?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113426?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113674?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113859?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115084?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116613?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118313?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119075?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e058801ret?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e058801corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e098088?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099033?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099575?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e100150?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103029?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104741?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105765?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108598?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108775?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108947?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112204?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112680?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112961?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115169?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115344?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116086?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116226?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116993?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117937?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110916?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111512?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111614?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111661?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111701?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112032?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112630?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112817?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112893?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113384?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113491?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114703?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114763?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115088?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115297?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115546?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115825?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116163?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116408?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117799?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118656?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102637?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106406?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107772?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109139?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109856?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110503?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110564?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101258?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104560?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105630?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106634?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109727?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110724?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110895?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111625?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112441?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113991?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114262?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116199?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117016?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117488?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117775?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117974?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118612?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120232?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120416?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114084?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114260?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115068?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116084?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117630?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118438?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119450?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104128?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107681?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109911?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110096?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110631?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111403?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112451?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113682?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099036?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104029?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107582?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109563?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110060?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110420?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111194?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111213?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111791?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111898?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111913?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112219?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115383?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115990?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116684?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117431?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117588?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102899?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104877?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106846?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108768?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109693?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111714?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112179?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112719?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113402?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113927?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114122?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114436?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115323?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116442?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116758?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118137?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103857corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116832?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e096492?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101202?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102941?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107097?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108091?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109029?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109305?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110727?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111477?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113057?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114075?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114426?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116363?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116392?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116776?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115484?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118087?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118277?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e088521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103314?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105129?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106519?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107888?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108998?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109258?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109940?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110326?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110803?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112006?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113868?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113896?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114162?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114422?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114537?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115851?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116383?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116611?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116795?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e097959?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103777?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105949?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108126?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109554?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111212?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112993?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114523?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115300?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115741?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117280?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119278?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e100157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101558?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108031?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109077?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110338?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110474?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110642?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113204?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113799?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115453?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115625?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119604?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103051?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105173?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105217?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105628?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105946?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107534?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108400?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108477?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108674?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111472?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111993?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112882?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113711?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114320?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114352?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114884?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115018?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115296?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115669?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116035?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116538?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e092678?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103766?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104683?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105347?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110692?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112098?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112558?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112848?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113184?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113946?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114530?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114633?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114897?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115403?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115982?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099997?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e100026?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102846?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107274?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107976?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108268?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110013?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110976?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111868?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111920?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112217?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112623?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113198?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113826?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113949?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114031?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114584?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114769?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114864?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115007?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115855?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116003?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116809?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116936?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102316?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108568?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110930?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110984?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111168?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111810?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113486?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114587?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115162?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115439?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115612?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116911?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117846?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107555?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109286?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110057?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110509?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111116?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111780?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112527?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113405?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113950?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114908?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115230?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115236?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102926?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104083?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104121?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107572?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109712?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110222?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111824?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113738?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113829?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113833?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115434?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115973?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116065?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118509?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101718?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107760?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107830?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108073?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110008?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112976?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115342?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117087?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103702?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104751?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106362?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106815?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108573?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110668?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112010?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114414?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115587?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117565?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117726?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117963?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118090?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118275?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101629?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103045?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e100200?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102410?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103361?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103743?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103880?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106432?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109980?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110419?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110853?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110884?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111900?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112223?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112305?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113120?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113469?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113798?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114026?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114337?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114974?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115020?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115081?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115147?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115580?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117478?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112695?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111345?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111346?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112201?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114095?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115722?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e096038?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103072?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108120?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110091?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111121?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113446?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113756?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114090?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117813?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105730?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108062?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108460?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114696?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109623?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106169?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108799?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111933?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112021?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112974?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113686?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113892?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114812?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e098166?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e098386?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103070?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107282?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111113?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113343?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114480?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114632?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115673?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119342?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099888?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106039?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106230?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107604?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112648?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113795?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114240?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114924?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115614?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117063?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099965?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106337?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108273?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108362?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111001?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111713?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112066?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107440?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e094809?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e097686?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103609?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106135?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106218?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109896?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109926?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110875?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113514?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114621?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114665?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114801?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115416?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115562?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115584?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112708corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099136?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099841?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103354?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104786?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104988?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106492?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106920?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107051?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109745?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111270?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113028?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115797?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106929?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107172?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111698?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112420?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112434?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113246?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114180?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117708?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e088256?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103421?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103453?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103938?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106596?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107717?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108611?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108617?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109624?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109858?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110540?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111467?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111483?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111695?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112206?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105921?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108599?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112683?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115821?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e093618corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109677?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e097944?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100895?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102751?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109280?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109666?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110553?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111570?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111660?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111798?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112364?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112777?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112825?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113093?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113159?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113411?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114055?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114082?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114550?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115670?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115873?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117142?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104827?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106507?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108771?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109458?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109580?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110093?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110791?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111093?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111928?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112639?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112904?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112977?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114968?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e094569?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e098902?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103753?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104440?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107273?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107663?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107940?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109974?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110779?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113432?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113611?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113692?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113714?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115195?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115538?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103742?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103781?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104065?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104338?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106095?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106995?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107238?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108381?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108762?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109192?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109347?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109560?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110459?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111020?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112112?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112344?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112444?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113363?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113374?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114705?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114977?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116530?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e092372?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e095768?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102448?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103881?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104840?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106636?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108287?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108337?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109958?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110369?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112677?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113466?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114524?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115295?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103021?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104542?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109028?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109136?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111744?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113797?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115492?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117236?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e094514?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e099320?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101098?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102172?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102627?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103001?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103120?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103512?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104272?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104740?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105939?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106397?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106742?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107352?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107396?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107509?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107773?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107806?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108525?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108561?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109445?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109523?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109702?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110439?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110621?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110921?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110956?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111328?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111343?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111422?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111459?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111649?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112682?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112947?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113480?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114709?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114803?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114885?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115233?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115290?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116969?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117499?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111065?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e090247?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106587?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106707?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107343?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111289?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114232?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116461?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101505?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102594?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105035?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105991?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106124?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107127?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107512?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108450?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110074?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110673?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110840?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112369?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112478?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112678?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113430?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115656?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115815?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102586corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108316?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113812?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100314?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100835?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101276?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104471?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105215?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108406?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108999?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109584?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110675?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113194?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114024?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101666?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103389?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107754?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108286?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108729?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109072?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109931?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110319?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110995?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111778?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112394?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112627?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112903?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113203?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e096942?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e098478?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e099887?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100377?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113558?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114270?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115036?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e095757?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100094?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105529?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106313?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106622?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107028?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107067?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107381?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107929?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108513?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108996?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109575?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110041?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110251?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112224?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113011?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102179?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104480?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107035?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108911?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110799?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111221?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112382?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112453?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112494?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113095?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110831?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113729?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100412?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101227?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101858?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103004?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104771?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106029?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106381?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106687?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106982?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108203?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108492?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109903?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111727?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116180?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116480?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103035?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103495?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105136?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106396?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107850?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108022?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109764?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109782?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109943?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110580?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111367?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112563?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112768?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113185?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113691?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114079?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114238?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115028?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116847?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100158?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104174?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105055?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106797?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106837?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110929?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114478?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095699?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095874?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099993?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102647?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102844?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103398?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103638?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104039?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105738?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107941?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108228?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108623?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108987?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109747?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112430?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112552?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112826?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113212?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113455?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095089?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099489?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100282?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101697?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101868?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102932?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103971?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104198?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104570?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106677?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107743?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108188?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109725?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111268?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111364?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112225?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112405?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e116827?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e097857?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103595?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106954?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108632?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108946?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109428?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109656?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110352?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110958?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098021?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102006?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105415?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105724?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107175?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107401?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109888?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112054?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112178?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112198?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112308?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113050?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114000?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114064?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115730?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e116557?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e093113ret?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101017?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101101?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102058?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105124?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106828?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107569?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109480?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109766?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111865?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115592?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115775?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098280?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102007?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103040?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104092?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104400?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105830?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106307?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106500?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107930?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108672?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109621?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109851?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111579?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111981?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e076854?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098443?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099979?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100890?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105937?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107264?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107977?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108529?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109024?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109342?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111365?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112171?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112469?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099326?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102586?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104451?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105013?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105559?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107014?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107588?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109079?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109326?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110424?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112005?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113162?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114569?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115864?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109433corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095400?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096080?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100092?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106481?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106584?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108168?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108399?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101309?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102693?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103632?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103651?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104102?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104300?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104489?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104957?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105312?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105547?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107894?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107988?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109663?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110732?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110878?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111081?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111353?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111829?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113208?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104994corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104466?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104498?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107472?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107969?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109399?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109510?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109615?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109706?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110048?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110217?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110461?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110759?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111648?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111653?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101051?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e094395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101656?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106443?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106645?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107661?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108910?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109026?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110399?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111007?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111606?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111826?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111860?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112097?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112890?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113096?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113269?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113575?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114287?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096952?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103384?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103989?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104871?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105308?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106184?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107490?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109015?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110636?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111127?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111247?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112539?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113227?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115466?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111872corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112336?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112546?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112691?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113370?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113842?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e094491?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096783?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e097011?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098301?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099348?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101295?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101792?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102583?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103243?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104918?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105785?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110427?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110798?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111078?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111730?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111837?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112218?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095515?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103580?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105390?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105422?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105575?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107797?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108424?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109126?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111332?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111336?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111645?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112489?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112758?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112879?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115077?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e093030?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096338?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103060?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103366?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103498?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103982?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105202?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106079?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106359?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106703?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107032?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108782?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109038?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110719?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111158?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111163?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111273?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111934?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112113?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112376?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114175?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114483?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100583?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102923?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102944?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103984?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104706?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109109?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109205?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109583?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110560?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110760?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110820?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110949?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112708?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e116043?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101557corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096253?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e097167?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099614?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101626?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101867?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102853?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104483?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104530?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104689?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105555?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105870?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106082?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106903?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106978?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106999?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107055?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107178?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107586?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107685?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108063?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108550?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108718?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109409?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109414?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110381?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111045?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111295?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111334?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112124?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115773?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e073200corr1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110184?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099915?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099918?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100311?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101820?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103467?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104408?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107208?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107785?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109648?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109741?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110531?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111622?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111664?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112134?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112510?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e091880?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104923?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105768?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105923?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107625?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107647?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107687?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108329?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108752?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109328?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110684?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110772?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111036?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112086?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e116111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095529?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097874?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100070?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102358?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103547?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104757?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105101?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105140?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105713?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107453?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108130?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108641?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111817?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112442?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e092409?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101367?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102546?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104454?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104637?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104660?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104916?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106512?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106960?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108216?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108616?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109817?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110244?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110739?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111232?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111265?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111663?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112102?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112202?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112982?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e094885?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095486?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e096313?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097650?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099539?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099627?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100781?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103171?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103943?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104359?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104802?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106730?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106790?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107061?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107608?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107775?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108171?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109137?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109331?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109388?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109633?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110204?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110425?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110765?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111973?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103227?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098795?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105479?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105579?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105751?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107644?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110232?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111373?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114437?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099920?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102831?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104145?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104427?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104815?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106050?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106485?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106788?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108249?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109715?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110183?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110199?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110931?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111616?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112309?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112705?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114815?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103464?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105722?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105897?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106277?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108069?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110935?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110977?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111500?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114062?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e093419?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098713?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100708?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100947?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102185?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102976?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106299?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e096388?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104512?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105915?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106653?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107499?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110212?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101735?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e094141?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103416?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105497?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106554?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107038?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108955?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109969?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110297?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112722?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102765?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095831?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103782?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104334?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105551?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107996?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108618?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109620?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109733?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109950?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110444?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111644?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112173?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112492?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098784?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098806?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100875?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101973?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102444?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102715?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102836?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103794?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103884?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106400?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108877?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110009?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111413?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111869?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109050?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101863?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102277?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102372?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104027?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104210?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105328?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105490?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106694?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107050?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107660?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108118?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108975?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110114?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112545?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113578?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e085006?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100021?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103434?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106811?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106817?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107037?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107535?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107766?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108080?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108668?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109320?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110671?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111712?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112887?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113566?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e086005?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101218?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102879?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105161?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106427?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106630?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107146?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107557?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108681?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109226?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109402?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109777?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110417?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111220?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097323?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e089565?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097495?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097647?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098309?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099386?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100402?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100910?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103948?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107163?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107455?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107577?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107793?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109052?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109883?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111643?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112155?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114522?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e092353?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095243?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098109?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102411?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103683?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104310?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104991?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106641?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109530?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110121?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e096547?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098988?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099842?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099970?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100978?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101559?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102830?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104709?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104810?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105393?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105453?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107698?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107964?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109055?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109122?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110493?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111034?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111195?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112020?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102581?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098383?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101060?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102687?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103297?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103985?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104892?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106251?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107642?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107670?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108315?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109628?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112257?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112929?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095116?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099658?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100029?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103827?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109967?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113229?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/homepage/BMJOPEN_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/homepage/BMJOPEN_95x60.gif">
<title>BMJ Open</title>
<url>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/homepage/BMJOPEN_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108285?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social network structure and depression by gender in rural Honduras: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108285?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the relationship between the structural position of individuals within their village network and symptoms of depression and postpartum depression, among men and women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Community-based, observational, cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>176 villages in the Copan region of Honduras.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Village residents, comprising 25 605 adults surveyed in a census-based study; using data collected between October 2015 and December 2019.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Symptoms of depression and postpartum depression, among men and women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Across all participants, 34.99% reported depression symptoms (40.50% for women and 27.62% for men). Among recent parents with a new child in the last 6 months, 28.89% reported postpartum depression symptoms (31.29% for women and 24.31% for men). Women with higher social intransitivity (ie, a greater proportion of friend-pairs among their friends that were not themselves connected) had higher odds of depression symptoms (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.41), an association not found for men nor in postpartum parents. Because this coefficient is estimated on a 0&ndash;1 scale, it corresponds to approximately 2.4% higher odds of depression per 10 percentage-point increase in social intransitivity. In a signed-network decomposition that also included adversarial ties, only the proportion of incomplete/no-tie friend-pairs was associated with depression in women (OR=1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04), corresponding to approximately 3% higher odds of depression per 10 percentage-point increase.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We report that structural social network position and connectedness beyond dyadic ties, including the friendships and adversarial ties of a person&rsquo;s friends, are associated with depression. These findings highlight the importance of linking psychological health to broader social connections in the context of face-to-face relationships.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, S. T., Papamichalis, M., Raygoza-Cortez, K., Christakis, N. A., Rodriguez de la Rosa, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108285</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108285</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social network structure and depression by gender in rural Honduras: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108285</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised, double-blind clinical trial protocol to evaluate whether early and perioperative tranexamic acid administration reduces transfusion rates and blood loss of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery in Spain]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In patients with a hip fracture, anaemia has been associated with increased transfusion requirements, poor functional outcomes, prolonged hospital stays and increased mortality. While anaemia in elderly patients with hip fractures has traditionally been attributed to bleeding during or after surgery, many of these patients are anaemic on hospital admission. Thus, detecting and managing anaemia in the perioperative, postoperative and, most significantly, the preoperative period is important to avoid the need for blood transfusions and to improve patient outcomes. The protocol for this clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of both combined intravenous and topical tranexamic acid (TXA) therapy, or topical administration alone, assessing its effect on blood loss and the need for blood transfusions in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients of both sexes, aged &ge;65 years, who are admitted to the emergency department and will undergo hip fracture surgery are eligible for enrolment. Eligible patients who provide their consent will be stratified according to the type of fracture (intracapsular and extracapsular) and whether or not they are suitable for intravenous TXA therapy, and they will then be randomly allocated to receive either TXA or a placebo. The primary outcome is the blood transfusion rate from patient admission to the emergency department until discharge, while the secondary outcomes include: the preoperative, perioperative and postoperative haemoglobin and haematocrit levels; the preoperative and postoperative occult and total blood loss; the mean length of hospital stay; and any adverse events assessed for up to 1 year after patient discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the Basque Country Ethics Committee (Ref.: 2021012) and the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Healthcare Products (Agencia Espa&ntilde;ola de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios). All participants will provide their written informed consent prior to study inclusion. The trial&rsquo;s results, regardless of its outcomes, will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals, and they will be made publicly available through the European Union Clinical Trials Register after the end of the clinical trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p>EudraCT Number 2020-002144-23; EUCT Number 2024-519349-31-00.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arrieta, J., De La Herran, G., Minguez Cabeza, L. A., Fernandez Gonzalez, M. I., Revilla Guarinos, M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108380</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108380</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised, double-blind clinical trial protocol to evaluate whether early and perioperative tranexamic acid administration reduces transfusion rates and blood loss of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery in Spain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108380</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109882?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to service utilisation and management of sexually transmitted infections in India: a multicentric mixed-method approach study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109882?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have emerged as significant public health concerns, imposing a substantial burden on both individuals and the healthcare system of the country. Additionally, STIs may also result in major extensive psychological consequences that profoundly affect individuals with STIs. Despite the government&rsquo;s implementation of different initiatives aimed at addressing STI-related challenges, these conditions are associated with shame and stigma which act as barriers to the effective utilisation of healthcare services. The purpose of the present study is to generate evidence on barriers and facilitators to service utilisation and management of STIs in India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, is conducting a multi-centre study employing a mixed-method approach. The study involves different levels of healthcare systems, including both government and private healthcare facilities across seven sites in several states of India, including Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Punjab, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and New Delhi. For the quantitative data, individuals seeking healthcare services related to STIs will be enrolled and assessed using a semi-structured pilot-tested questionnaire. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions will also be conducted with different stakeholders as per the standard guidelines of the qualitative method by the designated trained project staff. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be applied to the quantitative data, while the qualitative data will be analysed using a deductive approach with thematic content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the ethics review committees of all the participating sites individually. The findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through scientific conferences and meetings among policy-makers and government agencies. AIIMS/IEC/2024/609; AIIMS/Pat/IEC/2024/1205; F. 7/BIOETHICS/AIIMS-RBL/APPROEM/2021/1; KIMSDU/IEC/11/2022; LHMC/IEC/2024/11; IEC/02/EX/2024; PGI/IEC/2024EIC000373.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aggarwal, S., Khandekar, J., Banerjee, B., Agarwal, P., Paul, S., Parashar, M., Goel, A. D., Lakshmi, P. V. M., Datkhile, K., Naik, B. N., Goel, M., Verma, V., Rajan, S., Das, C., Nigam, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109882</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109882</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to service utilisation and management of sexually transmitted infections in India: a multicentric mixed-method approach study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109882</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109882</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110241?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Symptom experience of patients after total knee arthroplasty in China: a longitudinal qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110241?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common and effective procedure for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, yet patients frequently encounter a complex and dynamic symptom experience during the initial period that can significantly impact their rehabilitation and quality of life. This study aimed to explore the symptom experience of patients within 6 weeks after TKA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A longitudinal qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted in an orthopaedics department of a tertiary general hospital in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Interviews were conducted with 16 patients at 3&ndash;5 days postoperatively, 14 patients at 2 weeks postoperatively and 10 patients at 6 weeks postoperatively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were collected between July 2024 and November 2024. A purposive sampling method was used to recruit patients. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, with data collection and analysis performed concurrently.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three themes and nine subthemes were identified: (1) symptom perception, including perceived complexity of symptoms, self-identity conflict due to functional limitations, activation of negative emotions and psychological adaptation and interaction and amplification effects among symptoms; (2) symptom evaluation, characterised by the dynamic cognitive reframing of symptom meaning, self-blame tendency and internalisation of responsibility and interference from social and medical information; (3) symptom coping, involving dynamic evolution of active coping strategies and self-efficacy reinforcement, temporal characteristics of passive coping patterns and rehabilitation barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The symptom experience of patients who had TKA is complex and dynamic. Healthcare providers should implement tailored interventions based on patients&rsquo; symptom experiences at different stages to facilitate symptom management, alleviate distress and negative emotions and improve quality of life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wu, K., Zhu, J., Liu, J., Li, N., Li, C., Chen, X., Sun, H., Zhang, H., Liu, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110241</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110241</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Symptom experience of patients after total knee arthroplasty in China: a longitudinal qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110241</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111421?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Add-on tocilizumab versus placebo for resistant major depression in psychiatric outpatients with low-grade inflammation in a tertiary public hospital in Southern Brazil: randomised triple-blind clinical trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111421?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Emerging evidence supports a role for interleukin 6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory cytokine, in the pathogenesis of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD). However, interventional studies targeting IL-6 in this population remain scarce. Tocilizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-6 signalling and is approved for the treatment of autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. The primary objective of this study is to examine whether IL-6 inhibition via tocilizumab can impact depressive symptoms, inflammation-related biomarkers and cognition in patients with TRD. A secondary objective is to compare the biological profiles of patients with TRD with elevated inflammation to those of healthy controls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a proof-of-concept, randomised, parallel-group, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. 22 adult outpatients diagnosed with TRD and evidence of low-grade inflammation (serum C reactive protein&ge;3 mg/L) will be randomised (1:1) to receive either one intravenous infusion of tocilizumab (8 mg/kg; maximum 800 mg) or normal saline, administered as an add-on to their ongoing treatment. Psychiatric, cognitive and biomarker assessments will be performed at baseline and at follow-up visits on days 7, 14 and 28 post-infusion. Additionally, 10 healthy controls with no psychiatric history will undergo the same baseline assessments for biomarker comparison.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital de Cl&iacute;nicas de Porto Alegre (Project number: 2025-0245, CAAE: 88904825.7.0000.5327). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings and, on request, lay summaries for participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07052058">NCT07052058</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Portal, P. H. G., Peixoto, G. N., de Matos, M. R., da Silva, L. C. N., Alexandrino, G. B., Dutra, P. H. G., Carniel, B. P., da Rocha, N. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111421</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111421</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Add-on tocilizumab versus placebo for resistant major depression in psychiatric outpatients with low-grade inflammation in a tertiary public hospital in Southern Brazil: randomised triple-blind clinical trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111421</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111421</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112428?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing screening, early diagnosis and treatment initiation of oral, breast and cervical cancer in selected districts of India: an implementation research protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112428?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite implementation of the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases (NP-NCD), screening coverage for oral, breast and cervical cancers remains below 2%. Screening quality is inadequately addressed and delays in diagnosis and treatment initiation continue to persist. This multisite implementation research aims to improve district-level coverage and quality of screening, early diagnosis and timeliness of treatment initiation through a model co-developed within the NP-NCD context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study will be conducted in three phases across seven districts in diverse regions of India. In phase I (formative), the current status, barriers and facilitators of cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment initiation under NP-NCD will be assessed. In phase II (optimisation), a model (package of implementation strategies) will be co-developed and iteratively optimised with multistakeholder engagement at the subdistrict level to improve screening coverage and quality and strengthen the referral system for early diagnosis and treatment initiation. In phase III (scale-up and evaluation), the model will be implemented at the district level and evaluated for improvements in screening, early diagnosis and treatment initiation. A convergent mixed-methods design will be used, incorporating household surveys, facility assessments and stakeholder interviews. Implementation Research Logic Model will guide planning, execution and evaluation in the present study. Determinants of screening coverage and quality, early diagnosis and treatment initiation will be assessed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation strategies for the model will be finalised using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change framework. Implementation and service outcomes will be evaluated using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from all study sites. The study findings will be disseminated at the state, national and global levels through meetings and conferences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CTRI/2025/08/092672.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kankaria, A., Shukla, P., Vijayakumar, M., Sachdeva, A., Subramanian, M. J., Borah, P. K., Sahoo, S. S., Nirgude, A., Prusty, R. K., T S, S., Asuri, K., Verma, P., Sharma, J., Dhaliwal, R. S., Begum, S., Kaur, T., ICMR-NHRP Cancer Screening Group, Bhatla, Pandey, Krishnan, Mony, Kumar, Gupta, Birur, Das, Srinivas, Grover, Gill, Raghunandan, Thimmaiah, Kulal, Baliga, Zubair, Singh, Chaudhary, Sarmah, Borah, Baruah, Gupt, Devkaran, Krishnaraj, Viswanathan, Pravin, Ambadekar, Nimkar, Choudhari, Marad, Karpe, Kakkar, Goyal, Bhatty, Gupta, Shetty, Naik, Prabhu, Pasha, Ismail, Tellis, Shenoy, Iffthikar, Mathew, Shetty, Sheeraz, Akbar, Priya, Malhotra, Singhal, Chirom, Vashist, Mishra, Kalaivani, Mishra, Tomar, Meena, Sagiraju, Pathak, Memeenao, Thangsuanhau, Kalita, Gupta, Gupta, Sharma, Sankhyan, Sharma, Dhanuraja, Munne, Patil, Bhise, Ludhiadch]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112428</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112428</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing screening, early diagnosis and treatment initiation of oral, breast and cervical cancer in selected districts of India: an implementation research protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112428</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112428</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114322?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Minocycline hydrochloride ointment-assisted periodontal treatment of stage III/IV periodontitis associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus targeting Chinese people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114322?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Scaling and root planing (SRP) combined with adjunctive antibiotic therapy is widely adopted in the management of periodontitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with the aims of ameliorating glycaemic control, alleviating local inflammation and facilitating periodontal tissue regeneration. As a topically administered adjunctive antibiotic for periodontal treatment, minocycline hydrochloride (MH) ointment has shown favourable clinical efficacy in systemically healthy patients with periodontitis. However, robust evidence supporting its clinical efficacy and potential glycaemic-improving effects in patients with periodontitis complicated by T2DM remains limited. The present study is designed to test the null hypothesis that no significant differences in clinical outcomes exist between SRP combined with MH and SRP alone in the management of periodontitis among patients with T2DM, with its primary objective to investigate whether MH as an SRP adjunct confers superior clinical benefits to SRP alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. 56 patients with T2DM-associated stage III/IV periodontitis will be recruited from the Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China. Eligible participants will be randomised into two groups: the experimental group will undergo SRP combined with topically administered MH ointment and the control group will undergo SRP with a matched placebo. The primary outcomes will include probing depth (PD) changes at periodontal pocket sites with a baseline PD &ge;6 mm at 6 months post-baseline, with a specific focus on the percentage of such sites with PD reduced to &le;5 mm. The secondary outcomes will comprise PD changes at pocket sites with a baseline PD &ge;5 mm at 6 months post-baseline, as well as clinical attachment loss, the plaque index, bleeding index, the levels of IL-1&beta;, IL-17, calprotectin and insulin levels in gingival crevicular fluid and serum, complete blood count, blood biochemistry, including glycated haemoglobin levels, and the composition of subgingival plaques at baseline, and 2 and 6 months post-baseline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology (PKUSSIRB-2024102139b). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400092305.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Protocol version</st>
<p>V.3.1 (date: 6 January 2026).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, H., Lin, S., He, L., Zhen, M., Yang, G., Wang, X., Cao, J., Li, Y., Hou, J., Xu, L., Meng, H., Liu, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114322</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114322</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Minocycline hydrochloride ointment-assisted periodontal treatment of stage III/IV periodontitis associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus targeting Chinese people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114322</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114322</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116004?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to digital health tool adoption for hypertension management: systematic review of qualitative studies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116004?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Digital health interventions (DHIs) show considerable promise in supporting hypertension self-management by promoting preventative care and self-monitoring. While their efficacy is increasingly evident, the long-term uptake, acceptance and sustained engagement with these tools are frequently challenged by issues such as usability, trust and varying user experiences. This review aims to synthesise qualitative evidence to identify barriers and facilitators and the key factors that impact the adoption, acceptance and engagement with DHIs for hypertension self-management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review of qualitative literature using thematic analysis following Cochrane&rsquo;s qualitative and implementation methods guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched in February 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>The searches included relevant qualitative and mixed-methods studies on the use of digital devices for hypertension management, which described the barriers and facilitators associated with these tools. We included studies published from 2015 to 2025 to capture relevant evidence. Only studies published in English with a qualitative approach were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From an initial 10 943 identified publications, 15 met our inclusion criteria, primarily originating from Europe and the USA, exploring diverse racial and ethnic group experiences. Our thematic synthesis revealed 7 analytical and 22 descriptive themes detailing barriers and facilitators encountered by patients with hypertension, healthcare providers (HCPs) and caregivers. These themes covered technology utilisation, design components, linguistic and cultural relevance, healthcare factors, trust and credibility and interpersonal interactions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our analysis underscores that factors such as the usability, design and relevance of social support profoundly influence the uptake and acceptance of DHIs in hypertension self-management among patients, caregivers and HCPs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023480389.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Motta-Yanac, E., Riley, V., Ellis, N. J., Mankoo, A., Gidlow, C. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116004</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116004</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to digital health tool adoption for hypertension management: systematic review of qualitative studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116004</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116004</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117593?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[DREAMSPHEN: a randomised controlled study comparing dose reduction of antipsychotics vs maintenance treatment in schizophrenia spectrum disorder after stratification based on patients psychotic phenotype - study protocol of a personalised medicine approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117593?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The DREAMSPHEN study (Dose REduction of Antipsychotics vs. Maintenance treatment in schizophrenia after Stratification based on psychotic PHENotype) aims to compare the benefits and risks of a hyperbolic tapering method for antipsychotics to the maintenance of antipsychotics in a sample of clinically stabilised patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A sample of 288 patients will be recruited from 12 centres in France. Inclusion criteria are: diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (according to the 5th version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders, DSM-5), minimum of 3 months remission of psychotic symptoms and in treatment with antipsychotic medication (except clozapine and long-acting antipsychotic injection). First, the psychotic phenotype of the patients (cycloid psychosis vs other psychotic phenotype) will be assessed. Then, patients will be randomised either to the maintenance of treatment (MT) or to the antipsychotics dose reduction (DR) arm. DR will follow a hyperbolic schema according to Horowitz protocol. Patients will be assessed at baseline, and every 2 months until 24 months follow-up regarding social functioning, psychotic and negative symptoms, side effects of antipsychotic medication, cognitive functioning, patient satisfaction, substance and alcohol use, and quality of life. The primary outcome will be a good social functioning after 24 months defined as a score at the Personal and Social Performance Scale &gt;70. Secondary outcome measures will include: psychotic and negative symptoms, hospitalisation for psychotic episode, antipsychotic dose, antipsychotic side effects, withdrawal symptoms, cognitive functioning, patient&rsquo;s well-being and quality of life. Safety measures will include death, admissions to psychiatric hospital, psychotic relapses and severe self-harm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The DREAMSPHEN trial aims to better identify patients with psychotic disorders who are most likely to benefit from antipsychotic tapering with an aim to inform future clinical treatment guidelines for antipsychotic treatment. DREAMSPHEN V2.0 of the 14 May 2025 has received ethical approval from Comit&eacute; de protection des personnes Ile de France IV (N&deg; 2023-509558-80-00) on 17 July 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>EU Clinical Trials Register &ndash; EudraCT no. 2023-509558-80-00. Clinical trials: <A HREF="NCT07152184">NCT07152184</A>. Registered on 9 August 2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berna, F., Horowitz, M. A., Javelot, H., Meyer, N., Foucher, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117593</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117593</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[DREAMSPHEN: a randomised controlled study comparing dose reduction of antipsychotics vs maintenance treatment in schizophrenia spectrum disorder after stratification based on patients psychotic phenotype - study protocol of a personalised medicine approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117593</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117593</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118611?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of 24-hour movement guideline adherence with mental health symptoms among Colombian university students: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118611?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to determine the associations between adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines and symptoms of anxiety and depression among Colombian university students.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1125 individuals (mean age 20.2&plusmn;2.5 years; 56.7% female).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Students sampled from a single public university.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Participants completed validated self-report instruments: the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form to assess physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to assess sleep duration. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, with a score of &ge;11 used to classify elevated symptoms. Binary logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines (meeting all three, two, one or none) and mental health outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Only 15.5% of students met all three components of the 24-hour movement guidelines. Meeting a greater number of components was significantly associated with lower odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms. In fully adjusted analyses, students who met all three guidelines were less likely to report anxiety symptoms (OR=0.26; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.54) and depressive symptoms (OR=0.42; 95%CI 0.22 to 0.79) compared with those who met none. Among individual behaviours, sufficient PA and adequate sleep were independently associated with lower odds of both outcomes, whereas high SB was associated with higher odds of elevated symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this cross-sectional study, adherence to a greater number of 24-hour movement guideline components was associated with lower levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms in a graded manner. However, the cross-sectional design precludes inference regarding directionality or causality, and bidirectional associations or residual confounding remain possible. Longitudinal and interventional studies are needed to determine whether integrated daily movement behaviours influence mental health outcomes in young adults, particularly in Latin American populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Romero-Martinez, G., Urriago-Fontal, J. C., Quirama-Garcia, H. M., Ortiz-Lopez, J. D., Arias-Alzate, C., Gutierrez-Quintero, G. A., Palma Pulido, L. H., Calderon-Gonzalez, J. C., Ramirez-Velez, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118611</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118611</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of 24-hour movement guideline adherence with mental health symptoms among Colombian university students: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118611</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118611</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119951?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of a culturally adapted heart-healthy diet with phytosterols and/or krill oil on lipid-related outcomes in familial hypercholesterolaemia: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Brazil]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119951?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>An affordable heart-healthy dietary approach is essential for the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH); however, the optimal dietary pattern and the role of adjunctive nutrient supplementation remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the Brazilian Cardioprotective Diet (DICA Br), adapted from the Portfolio Diet, with or without phytosterol and/or krill oil supplementation in individuals with probable or definite FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (Dutch MEDPED) criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The DICA-FH study is a national, multicentre, randomised, factorial, parallel-group, superiority, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. Participants aged &ge;16 years receiving age-appropriate lipid-lowering therapy will be randomised into four groups: (1) adapted cardioprotective diet (DICA-FH) plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil placebo; (2) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil placebo; (3) DICA-FH plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil 2 g/day or (4) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil 2 g/day. All participants will undergo whole-genome sequencing and receive appropriate genetic counselling. Primary outcomes will be means of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels after 120 days. Secondary outcomes will include additional lipid biomarkers, adherence to protocol and adverse events. The planned sample size is 300 participants. Follow-up is expected to conclude in July 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was registered under CAAE 65549622.2.1001.0060 and received ethical approval from the Hcor Research Ethics Committee (approval number 5.805.072) and the Brazilian National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP; approval number 6.864.951). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and channels aimed at the general public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06331195">NCT06331195</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Abreu-Silva, E. O., Vieira Machado, R. H., El Khouri, F. J., dos Santos, F. B., de Oliveira, M. A. M., Kojima, F. C. S., Peron, R. A. N., Machado, L. S., Malvezzi, G. C. d. S., Rodrigues, L. B., Veiga, T. S., Negrelli, K. d. L., de Barros e Silva, P. G. M., Santos, R. H. N., Bersch-Ferreira, A. C., Carvalho, A. B., de Oliveira, T. M., Izar, M. C., Sampaio, G. R., Damasceno, N. R. T., Rogero, M. M., Torres, E. A. F. d. S., de Luca, P. V., Batista, F. A. H., Cavalcanti, A. B., Marcadenti, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119951</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119951</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of a culturally adapted heart-healthy diet with phytosterols and/or krill oil on lipid-related outcomes in familial hypercholesterolaemia: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Brazil]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119951</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119951</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121458?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in the adult population: an umbrella review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121458?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To synthesise evidence from systematic reviews on difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in adults, focusing on definitions, diagnostic criteria, risk factors and clinical interventions to guide clinical practice and health policy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Any clinical setting involving adult patients requiring peripheral venous access (including hospital, emergency and outpatient care).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A systematic search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science in July 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Systematic reviews and meta-analyses published from 2014 to 2025 that addressed DIVA in the adult population were included. Primary studies and protocols were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Methodological quality was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Systematic Reviews tool. Data extraction followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for overviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews reporting guideline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Seven reviews (six systematic reviews and one meta-analysis) were included. Three analytical dimensions emerged: (1) the conceptual and operational definition of DIVA, identifying common elements such as &ge;2 failed attempts, lack of visible or palpable veins and a documented history of difficult access; (2) risk factors and clinical assessment, highlighting obesity, chronic diseases, prior chemotherapy, venous invisibility or non-palpability and the limited validation of diagnostic tools and (3) interventions, including organisational strategies (escalation protocols, specialised teams), technological resources (ultrasound guidance) and clinical measures (pain management and technique optimisation).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>DIVA is a multifactorial challenge that requires a standardised definition to improve clinical identification. Effective management relies on a combination of specialised training, the use of ultrasound technology and the implementation of escalation protocols to ensure patient safety and efficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251084947.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torne-Ruiz, A., Delgado, M., Moreno, S., Corral-Nunez, A., Cemeli, T., Roca, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121458</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-121458</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in the adult population: an umbrella review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e121458</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e121458</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121497?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accuracy of ophthalmic referral diagnoses by non-ophthalmologists in acute eye care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121497?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Ophthalmic complaints account for a substantial proportion of presentations to emergency and acute eye care services, yet initial assessment or referral is frequently performed by non-ophthalmologist healthcare professionals. Previous single-centre studies suggest that one-third of referrals are incorrectly diagnosed, potentially delaying appropriate management of vision-threatening conditions. However, the overall magnitude of diagnostic error and patterns of misdiagnosis across healthcare settings remain unclear. This study aims to systematically review and synthesise the evidence on the diagnostic concordance of ophthalmic referral diagnoses made by non-ophthalmologists in acute eye care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols) guidance and registered with PROSPERO. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and the Cochrane CENTRAL database will be searched from inception to April 2025. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of referrals made by non-ophthalmologist healthcare professionals in emergency or acute eye care settings will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) framework adapted for referral-diagnosis studies. The primary outcome will be diagnostic concordance between referral and final ophthalmologist diagnosis. Where appropriate, pooled concordance proportions will be synthesised using a random-effects meta-analysis. Condition-specific 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>2 diagnostic accuracy analyses will only be undertaken where valid binary target conditions and sufficient denominators are reported. Heterogeneity will be assessed using Cochran&rsquo;s Q test and the I&sup2; statistic with subgroup analyses exploring differences by referring clinician type and anatomical location of ophthalmic pathology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this study as it will synthesise data from previously published studies; findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at relevant academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420261352717.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunha Gil, L., Powis, A., Wilson, H., Thampy, R., Kousha, O., Dhawahir-Scala, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-12T03:42:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121497</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-121497</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accuracy of ophthalmic referral diagnoses by non-ophthalmologists in acute eye care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e121497</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e121497</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103851?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of the Good Limb Position Management Scale for Stroke Patients with Hemiplegia by Nurses: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103851?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A good limb position (GLP) plays an important role in the rehabilitation process of patients who have had a stroke with hemiplegia. However, there remains a lack of effective assessment tools for clinical nurses to evaluate their GLP management practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to develop and test the psychometric properties of the Good Limb Position Management Scale for Stroke Patients with Hemiplegia by Nurses (GLPMSSPHN).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A quantitative and cross-sectional design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>89 hospitals in 16 cities of China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 516 participants completed the questionnaire and were finally used for the analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>An initial scale was developed based on the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-Behaviour model combined with a comprehensive literature review, semi-structured interviews, Delphi expert consultations and a pilot test. A field survey was then performed using the initial scale to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Reliability analysis was conducted by calculating Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; coefficients and test&ndash;retest reliability. The results of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used as the validity index to further verify the model structure of the scale and develop a formal scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The GLPMSSPHN was formulated with 4 dimensions and 35 items. Exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 81.842%, and confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the scale had good construct validity. The Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; coefficient of the scale was 0.978, and the test&ndash;retest reliability was 0.863.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The GLPMSSPHN has ideal reliability and validity and provides a valid and reliable tool for clinical nurses to identify and assess the management level of GLP in patients who have had a stroke with hemiplegia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leng, M., Dong, Y., Liu, B., Zhang, X., Ji, X., Sun, F., Li, M., Yang, L., Chen, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103851</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103851</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of the Good Limb Position Management Scale for Stroke Patients with Hemiplegia by Nurses: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103851</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103851</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e104245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How do acute worsening events influence daily life and healthcare-seeking behaviour in patients with COPD: an international multicountry qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e104245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the impact of acute worsening events (AWEs), defined as clinically relevant deteriorations in peak expiratory flow, reliever use and/or symptoms, on patients&rsquo; daily lives and identify behaviours linked to their recognition and management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative international substudy was conducted in the Netherlands, Spain, the USA, Canada and the UK (2023&ndash;2024).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>19 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from a randomised clinical trial participated. Interviews, triggered by AWEs and repeated 6 weeks later, were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients varied in identifying bad days, reporting inability to perform physical activities, symptom worsening or the need for add-on treatment. Recognition of AWEs depended on their duration: shorter events (&lt;2 days) often went unnoticed, while longer events were typically recognised. Most patients indicated they would seek healthcare if needed. Barriers included difficulty obtaining timely appointments (external) and a reactive attitude to worsenings (internal).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>AWEs significantly impact daily life but vary widely in recognition and thresholds for seeking care. Limited awareness of daily disease variations may contribute to both under-reporting of worsening events to healthcare providers and suboptimal self-management in COPD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05492877">NCT05492877</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dijk, L., Driessen, M. M. G., Gerritsma, Y. H., Bolton, C., Da Silva, C., Kocks, J. W. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104245</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104245</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How do acute worsening events influence daily life and healthcare-seeking behaviour in patients with COPD: an international multicountry qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104245</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105749?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying social determinants of health subgroups and their associations with health outcomes in a prospective US adult COVID-19 cohort: an analysis of the INSPIRE registry]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105749?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify subgroups with similar social determinants of health (SDOH) characteristics using latent class analysis (LCA) and examine their associations with physical and mental health, cognitive function and missed workdays at 3 and 6 months post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. We hypothesised that intersecting SDOH factors would differentially influence COVID-19-related health outcomes across subgroups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study from the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE), with longitudinal data collection and cross-sectional analyses at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-ups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Multicentre registry across eight US academic medical centres (Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, New Haven, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults aged &ge;18 years, fluent in English or Spanish, with self-reported acute COVID-19 symptoms and a confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 test within 42 days before enrolment (9 December 2020 to 12 August 2022), and access to an internet-connected device. Exclusions included incarceration, inability to provide informed consent, lack of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or no internet access. Of 3791 eligible participants with complete baseline data, 2897 (76.4%) completed the 3-month follow-up and 2666 (70.3%) completed the 6-month follow-up; most were aged 18&ndash;49 years (74&ndash;75%), female (66&ndash;67%), white (86.6&ndash;87.5%) and non-Hispanic (86.6&ndash;87.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Prespecified primary outcomes were physical and mental health (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 V.2.1 T-scores for depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, physical function and social participation), cognitive function (PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form 8 T-scores) and missed workdays due to illness (binary: &gt;1 week vs &le;1 week, from a single-item survey). All measures were self-reported and collected at baseline, 3 months and 6 months; no changes from protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>LCA identified a 4-class model as optimal (lowest Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) after evaluating 1&ndash;7 class models; significant demographic differences (<sup>2</sup> p&lt;0.001 for gender, age, race, ethnicity, education and income distributions)). Sensitivity analysis using four age groups (18&ndash;29, 30&ndash;49, 50&ndash;64, &ge;65 years) yielded higher BIC (45 430.8) than three groups (18&ndash;49, 50&ndash;64, &ge;65 years; BIC=42 150.9), confirming the primary model. Class 3 (middle-aged, high-income non-Hispanic; n=599 (15.8%)) was the reference group. Compared with Class 3, Class 1 (lower-income, predominantly Hispanic young to middle-aged adults; n=499 (13.2%)) and Class 2 (lower-income, older, predominantly Black non-Hispanic; n=1828 (48.2%)) exhibited significantly worse outcomes across physical and mental health domains (eg, Class 1 3-month anxiety &beta;=4.41 (95% CI 3.25 to 5.56, p&lt;0.001); Class 2 3-month depression &beta;=3.58 (95% CI 2.53 to 4.64, p&lt;0.001)). Classes 1 and 2 also reported significantly worse cognitive function at both time points (eg, Class 1 3-month &beta;=&ndash;3.29 (95% CI &ndash;4.77 to &ndash;1.82, p&lt;0.001)) and Class 2 had significantly higher odds of missed workdays at 6 months (OR=1.853 (95% CI 1.192 to 2.880, p=0.006)). In contrast, Class 4 (young to middle-aged, highly educated, high-income non-Hispanic; n=865 (22.8%)) consistently reported the most favourable outcomes, including better physical function (3-month &beta;=2.04, p&lt;0.001) and lower pain interference compared with the reference group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this US prospective cohort, SDOH-based subgroups showed persistent disparities in health outcomes post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Findings highlight the urgent need for intersectional approaches to address systemic inequities in post-COVID-19 recovery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04610515">NCT04610515</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burrola-Mendez, Y., Lin, E., Parrish, C., Hsu, C., Hill, M. J., Gottlieb, M., Rising, K. L., Wisk, L. E., Gentile, N. L., Geyer, R. E., Weinstein, R. A., Santangelo, M., Gatling, K., Dyal, J. W., Elmore, J. G., Rodriguez, R. M., Watts, P., Chen, J., Diao, Z., Spatz, E. S., Chan, K. C., Stephens, K. A., OLaughlin, K. N., The INSPIRE Group, Weinstein, Santangelo, Koo, Derden, Gottlieb, Gatling, Ahmed, Hassaballa, (Marshall) Kaadan, Venkatesh, Spatz, Kinsman, Malicki, Lin, Li, Yu, Mannan, Yang, Liu, Chen, Chen, Venkatesh, Spatz, Ulrich, Kinsman, Malicki, Dorney, Pierce, Puente, Salah, Diao, Nichol, Stephens, Anderson, Schiffgens, Adams, Stober, Maat, OLaughlin, Gentile, Geyer, Willis, Zhang, Chang, Lyon, Klabbers, Ruiz, Malone, Rising, Kean, Chang, Renzi, Watts, Kelly, Schaeffer, Grau, Cheng, Shutty, Charlton, Shughart, Shughart, Amadio, Miao, Elmore, Wisk, LHommedieu, Chandler, Eguchi, Roldan, Moreno, Rodriguez, Wang, Montoy, Kemball, Chan, Chavez, Wong, Arreguin, Hill, Site, Kane, Nikonowicz, Sapp, Idris, McDonald, Gallegos, Martin, Saydah, Plumb, Hall, Briggs-Hagen]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105749</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105749</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying social determinants of health subgroups and their associations with health outcomes in a prospective US adult COVID-19 cohort: an analysis of the INSPIRE registry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105749</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105749</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106377?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The LIFE study: a cross-sectional study protocol for LIfestyle risk Factors for chronic disease across the stagEs of reproductive ageing]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106377?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The dynamic physiological and hormonal changes through the menopause transition predispose women to an increased risk of chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, depression and dementia. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear, yet it is thought that chronic systemic inflammation and changes to lifestyle behaviours play important roles. The LIfestyle risk Factors for chronic disease across the stagEs of reproductive ageing (LIFE study) is a cross-sectional study aimed to characterise how hormonal and lifestyle (physical activity, diet and sleep) differences across pre, peri and postmenopause influence chronic systemic inflammation, visceral adiposity, cognitive function and sleep health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Women aged between 40 and 65 years were recruited and classified into pre, peri or postmenopausal groups. Body composition measures and blood samples were collected. Sleep and physical activity were objectively measured using activPAL4 and ActiGraph GT9X link accelerometer over 7 days. Participants were also provided with a sleep diary. Physical function was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery. Cognitive function was evaluated using Addenbrooke&rsquo;s Cognitive Examination-III and Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Participants completed a series of questionnaires: Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21, RuSATED, Berlin Questionnaire, Insomnia Severity Index, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale and the Australian Eating Survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was received from the relevant University Human Research Ethics Committee (ethics approval number #S221718) prior to the commencement of the research project. Data collection is ongoing and expected to be completed by April 2026. Results are expected to be available from July 2026. Findings will be disseminated in national and international conferences and in peer-reviewed journals and expected to inform how differences in lifestyle behaviours across menopause influence chronic systemic inflammation, visceral adiposity and cognitive function. Understanding and characterising the links between lifestyle behaviours and menopausal symptoms will inform targeted strategies to improve long-term well-being, heart, brain and metabolic health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pernoud, L. E., Noll, J. L., Gardiner, P. A., Dean, M., Broadhouse, K. M., Walker, M. A., Wright, H. H., Villani, A., Scott, J., Metse, A. P., Schaumberg, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106377</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106377</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The LIFE study: a cross-sectional study protocol for LIfestyle risk Factors for chronic disease across the stagEs of reproductive ageing]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106377</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106377</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111404?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The association of triglyceride-glucose index with acute myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease stratified by acute myocardial infarction status: a large-scale retrospective cohort study from South China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111404?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the association of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index with the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and to inspect whether AMI mediates the relationship between TyG index and mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A large-scale, retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This single-centre study was conducted at a tertiary academic hospital in South China. The association between the TyG index and AMI was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, with progressive adjustment for demographic and clinical covariates. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the HRs for all-cause mortality associated with TyG index. Restricted cubic splines and mediation analysis were employed to examine non-linear relationships and the mediating role of AMI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 20 125 patients diagnosed with CAD during hospitalisation between January 2020 and February 2025 were initially enrolled. After applying exclusion criteria (insufficient data), 18 245 participants were included in the final analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>We examined the association of the TyG index with the risk of AMI, as well as its association with all-cause mortality across different CAD subgroups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The association between the TyG index and all-cause mortality was significantly modified by AMI status (P for interaction &lt;0.05). In the fully adjusted model, no significant association was observed in the overall CAD cohort. However, subgroup analysis revealed divergent patterns: among patients without AMI, a modest protective effect was observed (Q3 vs Q1: HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.94), whereas in those with AMI, the TyG index exhibited a harmful, dose-response relationship with mortality (per-SD increase: HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.38; Q4 vs Q1: HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.25). Additionally, each SD increment in the TyG index was associated with 12% higher odds of AMI (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.19). Mediation analysis further demonstrated that AMI mediated 9.51% of the total effect of TyG index on mortality (p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>An elevated TyG index independently predicts the risk of AMI in patients with CAD. Its prognostic value for mortality, however, is critically dependent on the presence of AMI: while a higher TyG index is associated with increased mortality in patients with AMI, moderately elevated TyG levels (Q2&ndash;Q3) are associated with lower mortality, whereas the highest quartile shows no significant association. Mediation analysis further reveals that AMI significantly mediates the association between TyG index and mortality, highlighting the importance of AMI prevention in mitigating the adverse prognostic impact of insulin resistance in the CAD population. These findings warrant validation in prospective studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Y., Zeng, C., Huang, Y.-L., Fang, Y., Rahmati, A., Zhou, Z., Chen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111404</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111404</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The association of triglyceride-glucose index with acute myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease stratified by acute myocardial infarction status: a large-scale retrospective cohort study from South China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111404</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111404</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113081?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical relevance of intracranial stenosis as false-positive findings of a deep learning algorithm trained to detect large vessel occlusions: a retrospective cohort study of a supraregional stroke centre]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113081?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to explore the ability to identify high-grade intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) by an artificial intelligence (AI) designed to detect large vessel occlusions (LVO) and the clinical relevance of these &lsquo;false positive&rsquo; findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We are presenting a retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at a supraregional stroke centre of an urban tertiary care provider.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Consecutive stroke cases treated between January 2023 and December 2023 of patients &gt;18 years of both sexes and any ethnicity were eligible for inclusion. 934 patients (52.7% male) with a mean age of 71.7&plusmn;13.6 years (25&ndash;101 years) were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>CT angiographies were analysed by a deep learning algorithm for LVO detection of the anterior circulation. AI results were compared with radiology reports and secondary focused evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Diagnostic accuracies for ICAS detection by the AI were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Primary reports identified 30 ICAS and nine additional ICAS were detected during secondary evaluation (incidence 4.2%). The sensitivity of radiology reports was 77% (95% CI 0.61 to 0.89), the specificity 99% (95% CI 0.98 to 1.00), negative predictive value (NPV) 99% (95% CI 0.98 to 0.99) and positive predictive value (PPV) 79% (95% CI 0.65 to 0.88). The AI identified 13 of 39 ICAS correctly. 18 false positive cases (neither LVO nor ICAS) were flagged by the AI. The sensitivity of the algorithm was 33% (95% CI 0.19 to 0.50), the specificity 98% (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99), the NPV 97% (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98) and PPV 42% (95% CI 0.28 to 0.58).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Detection of high-grade ICAS by an algorithm trained to identify LVO is per se a false positive finding but occurred in 13 of 39 cases. Dedicated training for ICAS might lead to a beneficial tool during the diagnostic work-up for ischaemic stroke.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>German Register for Clinical Trials (DRKS: DRKS00034019 <A HREF="https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00034019">https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00034019</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jungmann, M., Manschikow, S., Ho&#x0308;nning, A., Spohn, F., Sparenberg, P., Mutze, S., Goelz, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113081</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113081</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical relevance of intracranial stenosis as false-positive findings of a deep learning algorithm trained to detect large vessel occlusions: a retrospective cohort study of a supraregional stroke centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113081</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113081</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113110?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of supplemental hydrocortisone during stress in prednisolone-induced adrenal insufficiency: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial on health-related quality of life in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis on low-dose prednisolone treatment (the RESCUE study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113110?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patients on low-dose prednisolone may develop adrenal insufficiency causing reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and increased risk of adrenal crisis. This study examines whether supplemental hydrocortisone during mild to moderate stress improves HRQoL in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis (PMR/GCA) with adrenal insufficiency on low-dose prednisolone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial including patients with PMR/GCA receiving ongoing prednisolone &le;5 mg/day. Eligible patients undergo an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) test, and 250 patients with a stimulated cortisol&lt;420 nmol/L (biochemical adrenal insufficiency) are randomised 1:1 to supplemental hydrocortisone or placebo during mild to moderate stress (&lsquo;sick-days&rsquo;) for 6 months or until daily prednisolone is stopped. The goal is 200 patients completing &ge;3 months intervention period. Patients continue prednisolone tapering according to PMR/GCA guidelines. In the event of severe stress (risk of adrenal crisis), patients receive open-label hydrocortisone treatment. 95 patients with stimulated cortisol &ge;420 nmol/L serve as control group. The primary outcome is HRQoL measured as fatigue using ecological momentary assessments (EMA) of the General Fatigue scale from the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20, five times daily in situations of stress (&lsquo;sick-days&rsquo;). EMA will be administered via a smartphone application &lsquo;EMA live&rsquo;. Differences in mean fatigue scores during sick-days between hydrocortisone and placebo will be analysed using mixed models for repeated measures. Secondary outcomes include daily smartphone-based symptom reporting, additional HRQoL questionnaires, adrenal crises, adverse effects from glucocorticoid excess, serial ACTH tests and biomarkers of adrenal insufficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is approved by the Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark and the Danish Medicines Agency. Recruitment began June 2022. The last patient&rsquo;s last visit is expected in 2026. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p>EudraCT:2021-002528-18, CTIS:2024-518272-30-00, <A HREF="NCT05435781">NCT05435781</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borresen, S. W., Hansen, S. B., Al-Jorani, H., Tei, R., Dreyer, A. F., Boesen, V. B., Bislev, L. S., Jorgensen, N. T., Jensen, R. C., Bjergstrom, M. L. L., Christensen, L. L., Frederiksen, J. S. S., Glintborg, D., Bjorner, J. B., Feldt-Rasmussen, U., Jorgensen, J. O. L., Andersen, M. S., Klose, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113110</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113110</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of supplemental hydrocortisone during stress in prednisolone-induced adrenal insufficiency: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial on health-related quality of life in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis on low-dose prednisolone treatment (the RESCUE study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113110</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113110</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113753?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic burden of osteoarthritis in Sub-Saharan Africa and the determinants of healthcare inequities: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113753?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Access to musculoskeletal healthcare services in Sub-Saharan Africa is inadequate. As osteoarthritis is the most prevalent chronic osteoarticular disease globally, it&rsquo;s essential to understand its social and economic impact, as well as the determinants of inequities in access to healthcare services in Sub-Saharan Africa. The absence of systematised knowledge on this topic makes this review pertinent. However, due to data scarcity, assessing this burden is challenging. The objective of this scoping review is to map and summarise the available literature up to 2025 on the socioeconomic burden and health inequity determinants among the Sub-Saharan African population with osteoarthritis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A predefined search strategy will be applied to MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, African Journals Online and African Index Medicus to incorporate articles relevant to adults diagnosed with osteoarthritis who are residents of sub-Saharan Africa. We will also include grey literature sources such as Google Scholar, Research Square, manuals, books, medical society websites, secondary databases, theses and dissertation repositories and conference proceedings. Study selection will be conducted in two stages by a pair of reviewers who will independently screen titles and abstracts according to the eligibility criteria, followed by a full-text review of the selected studies. The search period was from October 2025 to January 2026. Data extraction will be performed using a standardised charting form developed by the review team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This scoping review maps evidence on OA-related socioeconomic impacts and healthcare inequities in Sub-Saharan Africa. As a secondary data analysis, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences to clinicians and policymakers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andela, L., Andrade, C. A. F. d., Augusto Bormann de Souza Filho, B. A. B. d. S., Pimentel-Santos, F., Ferreira, D. M. T. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113753</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113753</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic burden of osteoarthritis in Sub-Saharan Africa and the determinants of healthcare inequities: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113753</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113753</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115602?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of PRISm and COPD and associated factors in a university medical centre spirometry unit: a cross-sectional analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115602?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) is a new spirometric entity defined in international guidelines, associated with overall worse outcomes. It remains unclear whether this represents a distinct entity or an early phase of multiple other diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and restrictive lung diseases. There is a notable scarcity of data on PRISm, particularly in Lebanon. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of PRISm and COPD, and their associated factors, among individuals aged 40 years and above who underwent spirometry in a single university medical centre between 2022 and 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Outpatient Pulmonary Function Tests Laboratory at a Lebanese university medical centre.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All individuals aged 40 years or older who performed spirometry between 2022 and 2024</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective analysis of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and demographics was performed. Patients were classified based on the spirometry patterns that are consistent with COPD (forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>)/forced vital capacity (FVC)&lt;0.7 post bronchodilator), PRISm (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/FVC&ge;0.7 and FEV<SUB>1</SUB>&lt;80% post bronchodilator) and normal PFTs (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/FVC&ge;0.7 and FEV<SUB>1</SUB>&ge;80%). A small number of PFTs did not meet the above criteria and were classified as &lsquo;others&rsquo;; they were excluded from the main analysis but retained for descriptive estimation of PRISm and COPD prevalence over the past 3 years. The prevalence and associated risk factors of PRISm and COPD were assessed. Descriptive, bivariate and multinomial regression models were performed using IBM&rsquo;s Statistical Package for the Social Sciences V.29.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 698 PFTs were performed for 639 patients. The prevalence of PRISm and COPD in the centre between 2022 and 2024 was 11% and 17%, respectively. Compared with normal PFTs, subjects with PRISm were older (adjusted OR; aOR (95% CI)=1.03 (1.002 to 1.05); p=0.03) and more likely to be ex-smokers (aOR=2.19 (1.12 to 4.30); p=0.022); patients with COPD were older (aOR 1.09 (1.07 to 1.12); p&lt;0.001), had lower body mass index (aOR 0.95 (0.91 to 0.99); p=0.024) and were more likely to be smokers or ex-smokers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These findings highlight PRISm as a potentially relevant pattern within chronic airway disease. Within the context of Sustainable Development Goal 3 on non-communicable diseases, they underscore the importance of identifying this subgroup for closer clinical attention. Further longitudinal and multicentre studies are needed to better understand the clinical significance of PRISm and its relationship to chronic airway diseases.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akiki, Z., Khoueiry, E., Smayra, E., Nader, A., El Teress, K., Safi, C., El Ashkar, I., Majed, A., Fawaz, A., Salameh, P., Gaspard, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115602</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115602</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of PRISm and COPD and associated factors in a university medical centre spirometry unit: a cross-sectional analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115602</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115602</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115907?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lived experiences, challenges and coping strategies of patients with spinal cord injury using intermittent catheterisation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115907?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study explored the lived experiences, challenges and coping strategies of Arab male patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) who rely on intermittent catheterisation (IC) to manage neurogenic bladder.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, with data analysed using a phenomenological framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Rehabilitation Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Male patients with SCI undergoing rehabilitation and performing IC were included in the study. Although both male and female patients were approached to participate, all eligible female patients declined participation. During the recruitment process, some female patients informally expressed privacy concerns and discomfort related to discussing bladder management issues and genital care, which may have contributed to their decision to decline participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>10 male participants with SCI were recruited after eligible female patients declined participation. Three main themes, each with associated subthemes, emerged to reflect the participants&rsquo; experiences. Theme 1: Frequent use of IC in daily life, comprised four subthemes: (1) frequency of practice, (2) environmental and health-related challenges, (3) privacy during IC and (4) fluid intake and output. Theme 2: Cleanliness and general care included two subthemes: (1) catheter cleaning and (2) incontinence. Theme 3 focused on body image and sexuality. Cultural and social norms, including privacy concerns and sensitivities surrounding intimate care in the local context, played a significant role in shaping participants&rsquo; experiences and coping strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>IC was associated with challenges affecting multiple aspects of daily life among patients with SCI, including social interactions and body image. Participants described various coping strategies used to manage the physical and psychological demands associated with IC. These experiences appeared to be influenced by cultural considerations, including privacy, modesty and sensitivity surrounding urinary care within the local Saudi context.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abuzied, Y., Al-Amer, R., Abdul Halain, A., Japar, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115907</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115907</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lived experiences, challenges and coping strategies of patients with spinal cord injury using intermittent catheterisation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115907</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115907</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116737?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring global access to healthcare and utilisation for neurocutaneous syndromes: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116737?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Both dermatological and neurological manifestations characterise neurocutaneous syndromes (NCSs). Although individually rare, collectively they impose a substantial clinical, humanitarian and economic burden, often contributing to barriers in healthcare access. This scoping review aims to map global evidence on healthcare access and service utilisation in NCSs and identify barriers, facilitators and gaps in care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Bibliographic databases and hand searches will be used to identify relevant studies. Published and grey literature addressing healthcare access will be included while non-English studies will be excluded. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection and data extraction. Quality assessment will be conducted for full-text studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Findings will be mapped to evidence on healthcare access, service utilisation, treatment patterns, barriers and facilitators and will be presented using tables and geographic mapping.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This scoping review will use publicly available data and therefore does not require ethical approval. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kebede, B., Molla, A., Alemayehu, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116737</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116737</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring global access to healthcare and utilisation for neurocutaneous syndromes: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116737</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116737</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117096?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pregnancy care-seeking stress in the USA: a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117096?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To prospectively assess pregnancy-related care sought and obstacles and stress experienced by newly pregnant people.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The ADAPT Study, a longitudinal cohort study, followed 2015 non-pregnant participants aged 15&ndash;34 years for a year. Those with confirmed incident pregnancies were followed through their pregnancies and for 3 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>We recruited participants from 23 reproductive and primary care facilities located in five southwestern states with different sociopolitical reproductive health contexts (restrictive, Arizona and West Texas; protective, southeastern California, Nevada and New Mexico).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>334 people reported a new pregnancy within 1 year of enrolment; 324 with outcome data are included in this analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Types of pregnancy care sought (&lsquo;Have you looked into where or how you could get (prenatal care, abortion care or adoption services)?&rsquo;) and care-seeking stress (&lsquo;How stressful was it to find (prenatal, abortion or adoption) care for this pregnancy?&rsquo;).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most participants (83%, 270/324) sought prenatal care; 43% (138/324) sought abortion care; and 5% (17/324) sought adoption services. Overall, 17%, 29% and 23%, respectively, reported that care-seeking was extremely/quite a bit stressful. Abortion care-seeking was associated with significantly more stress than seeking prenatal care in the ordinal (adjusted odds ratio (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.62) but not logistic (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.38) model. Adoption care-seeking stress did not differ from prenatal care-seeking stress in either model. Participants who experienced any type of abortion care-seeking obstacle and those recruited in a state with a restrictive policy environment (aOR 2.72, 95% CI 1.09 to 6.80) reported more care-seeking stress than their counterparts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>People who seek pregnancy care often experience some care-seeking stress, regardless of the type of care they seek. Findings point to the need to reduce the burden of the pregnancy care-seeking process across all types of pregnancy care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT03888404">NCT03888404</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biggs, M. A., Ralph, L., Foster, D. G., Arteaga, S., Rocca, C. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117096</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117096</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pregnancy care-seeking stress in the USA: a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117096</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117096</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117269?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of Erbium:YAG laser combined with vaginal estriol therapy in postmenopausal women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117269?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a chronic, oestrogen-deficient condition that is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. Although low-dose vaginal estriol improves epithelial trophism and microbial balance, a substantial proportion of women report persistent symptoms. High-quality randomised evidence evaluating combined therapeutic strategies remains scarce. Energy-based modalities, including the erbium:YAG (Er:YAG) laser (=2940 nm), have been proposed as adjunctive treatments. This trial aims to assess the efficacy of Er:YAG laser therapy combined with vaginal estriol compared with estriol alone in postmenopausal women with GSM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Postmenopausal women aged 45&ndash;70 years with vaginal pH &ge;5.0 and at least one moderate GSM symptom (Visual Analogue Scale &ge;4) will be eligible. Exclusion criteria include current systemic or local hormone therapy, previous vaginal energy-based treatment, abnormal cervical cytology and body mass index &ge;35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. All participants will receive vaginal estriol cream (0.5 mg per dose) daily for 14 days, followed by twice-weekly administration for 16 weeks. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either estriol plus sham Er:YAG laser or estriol plus active Er:YAG laser. Three laser sessions will be delivered at approximately 4-week intervals. Assessments will occur at baseline, monthly during treatment and 4 months after the final session. The primary outcome is the Vulvovaginal Health Index, with the primary endpoint defined as the change from baseline to 4 months post-treatment, reflecting sustained effect. Secondary outcomes include GSM symptom severity, vaginal microbiome composition (16S rRNA sequencing), quality of life (Menopause Rating Scale) and sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index). Data will be analysed using repeated-measures analysis of variance or appropriate non-parametric tests, with significance set at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of UNINOVE. Written informed consent will be obtained. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and scientific meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06873971">NCT06873971</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Souza, M. C. d. C. D., de Jarmy-Di Bella, Z. I. K., Bianchi-Ferraro, A. M. H. M., Souza, S. D. L., Amanda Rafaelly Honorio, M., Sobral, A. P. T., Ribeiro, C. D. P. V., Bussadori, S. K., Fernandes, K. P. S., Chavantes, M. C., Zamuner, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117269</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117269</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of Erbium:YAG laser combined with vaginal estriol therapy in postmenopausal women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117269</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117269</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117351?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pregnant womens perceptions and experiences of social media communication for antenatal care: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117351?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To map and synthesise existing evidence on pregnant women&rsquo;s perceptions and experiences of social media communication for antenatal care (ANC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Four electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar) alongside &lsquo;grey&rsquo; and supplementary searches were conducted between December 202&ndash;January 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study selection</st>
<p>All studies reporting pregnant women&rsquo;s perceptions or experiences of social media communication for ANC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data were extracted independently by two reviewers using a structured charting framework. Extracted data were synthesised using a descriptive and narrative approach, with pregnant women&rsquo;s perceptions and experiences analysed through reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Across platforms including WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram and WeChat, pregnant women generally perceived social media communication as acceptable and beneficial, particularly for accessing trustworthy information, reassurance between visits, peer support and flexible engagement. Experiences varied by platform, moderation model and context. Key challenges included limited personalisation, variability in moderators&rsquo; capacity and responsiveness, digital literacy barriers, data affordability, privacy concerns and sociocultural influences. Equity-related considerations were recurrent, highlighting the potential for uneven experiences if digital communication is not carefully designed and standardised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Social media communication is generally experienced positively by pregnant women as a complement to routine ANC, particularly when professionally moderated and responsive to women&rsquo;s informational needs. However, variability in experiences and equity-related challenges underscore the need for further research and careful implementation. This scoping review provides a preliminary mapping of the evidence and identifies priorities for future qualitative synthesis, primary research and the development of inclusive, person-centred digital ANC communication strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Djouma Nembot, F., Nkum, C. B., Nkemngu Afutendem, B., Ateudjieu, D., Kakapen, D., Ebongo Nanje, Z., Nang Nang, F. D., Ateudjieu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117351</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117351</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pregnant womens perceptions and experiences of social media communication for antenatal care: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117351</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117351</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117547?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of ultrasound for early detection of ICU patients at risk of acquiring swallowing disorders: EIDAR, a prospective diagnostic study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117547?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postextubation swallowing disorders (SD) are common in the intensive care unit (ICU) and are associated with severe complications, including aspiration pneumonia, a three-fold increase in reintubation risk and higher mortality. While fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopy are gold standards for diagnosis, they are often impractical or impossible to perform on intubated patients. The use of ultrasound offers a non-invasive, bedside alternative to evaluate the musculoskeletal structures involved in swallowing. The Echographie Identifier les troubles de D&eacute;glutition Acquis en R&eacute;animation (EIDAR) study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of pre-extubation ultrasound in identifying patients at risk of SD following mechanical ventilation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, monocentric diagnostic study conducted at the Dijon University Hospital ICU will include 100 adult patients ventilated for &ge;48 hours. The primary outcome is the presence of SD, defined as a Penetration-Aspiration Scale score &gt;2 during a FEES procedure performed 3 to 24 hours postextubation and independently assessed by an otolaryngologist blinded to index test results. Pre-extubation cervical ultrasound (Index Test) will be performed within 3 hours prior to extubation and measure hyoid bone ascension (primary variable of interest), geniohyoid muscle surface area and digastric muscle cross-sectional area. The diagnostic performance of cervical ultrasonographic parameters will be assessed using their discriminative capacity via a receiver operating characteristic curve. The feasibility of the ultrasound procedure in a critical care setting will also be assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study received a favourable opinion from the independent ethics committee CPP Ouest III and is registered with the French health authority ANSM (national agency on safety in medicine and health products). It is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Participants or their proxies provide free and informed oral consent. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals and presented at international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p>RCB 2023-A00461-44 and <A HREF="NCT05922085">NCT05922085</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pineda, J. A., Diaz, C., Plasse, C., Ruiz de la Fuente, J. M., Duvillard, C., Bozorg-Grayeli, A., Pennecot, C., Labruyere, M., Andreu, P., Roudaut, J.-B., Taha, A., Morariu-Patrichi, A., Jacquier, M., Sow, A.-K., Fournel, I., Quenot, J.-P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117547</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117547</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of ultrasound for early detection of ICU patients at risk of acquiring swallowing disorders: EIDAR, a prospective diagnostic study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117547</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117547</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117745?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Persistent increased risk of renal replacement therapy following COVID-19: a 2-year follow-up study in Japan using propensity score matching and inverse probability censoring weighting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117745?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>This retrospective cohort study investigated the long-term risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) following COVID-19 using a nationwide database of Japanese medical claims.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Propensity score matching was utilised to form a cohort of individuals with COVID-19 and a non-infected control group using data from the National Claims Database encompassing six prefectures in Japan. The primary outcome measured was the initiation of renal replacement therapy (dialysis or kidney transplantation) after the index month of the study period. Cox proportional hazards models incorporating inverse probability of censoring weighting were employed to estimate HRs for the association between COVID-19 and ESKD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 3 073 150 pairs were matched in this study. During follow-up, COVID-19 was associated with a significantly increased instantaneous risk of the composite ESKD outcome (HR 2.79, 95% CI 2.56 to 3.04). The risk was increased for haemodialysis initiation (HR 2.77, 95% CI 2.54 to 3.02) and peritoneal dialysis (HR 5.16, 95% CI 1.93 to 13.75), whereas the estimate for kidney transplantation was imprecise (HR 5.20, 95% CI 0.62 to 43.27). Subgroup analyses showed broadly consistent associations across age, sex, hypertension, diabetes and COVID-19 severity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These findings suggest that COVID-19 may have sustained adverse effects on kidney outcomes, supporting close post-acute renal monitoring and early risk stratification in high-risk patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miyamori, D., Fukuma, S., Ikeda, K., Haratake, D., Yoshida, S., Ito, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117745</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117745</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Persistent increased risk of renal replacement therapy following COVID-19: a 2-year follow-up study in Japan using propensity score matching and inverse probability censoring weighting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117745</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117745</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118581?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of clips to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding in non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118581?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) remains a significant complication of endoscopic resection, contributing to morbidity and increased healthcare costs. Although prophylactic clipping is widely practised to mitigate this risk, evidence from recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) regarding its efficacy is inconsistent. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic clips following thermal resection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to 10 February 2026, to identify RCTs comparing prophylactic clips vs no clips in patients undergoing thermal endoscopic resection of non-pedunculated polyps. The primary outcome is DPPB within 30 days, defined as overt bleeding requiring medical intervention or a haemoglobin decrease &ge;2 g/dL. Secondary outcomes include DPPB in proximal large (&ge;20 mm) lesions, perforation, post-polypectomy syndrome and procedure time. Data synthesis will use a random-effects model. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Publication bias will be visualised using funnel plots. We will quantify the effect of potential effect modifiers by meta-regression if appropriate. The quality of evidence will be evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will not use primary data, and therefore formal ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and committee conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251246840.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wei, Y., Zhang, S., Mabenga, H. S., Ngowi, B. J., Jin, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118581</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118581</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of clips to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding in non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118581</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118581</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118713?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Translation and validation of the Norwegian ABCD Risk Questionnaire to assess cardiovascular disease knowledge and risk perception prior to myocardial infarction]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118713?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to translate the Attitudes and Beliefs about Cardiovascular Disease (ABCD) Risk Questionnaire into Norwegian and assess its psychometric properties among individuals with a history of myocardial infarction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The study adopted a cross-sectional design. The original questionnaire was translated into Norwegian and adapted for use in the target population. The Norwegian version was pilot tested in a sample of patients and then validated in the target population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Norway, using a web-based solution to collect data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients</st>
<p>A random sample of Norwegian individuals &lt;85 years old with a history of myocardial infarction and no cardiovascular disease before their first myocardial infarction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; and test&ndash;retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Difficulty and discrimination indices were determined for the Knowledge scale. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess structural validity of the Risk scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Data for 746 participants (mean age, SD: 66.4, 10.3 years), of which 26.9% females were analysed. The Norwegian version showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; 0.73&ndash;0.79) but modest test&ndash;retest reliability (ICC 0.35&ndash;0.64). The Knowledge scale showed moderate difficulty (0.39&ndash;0.84) and good discrimination power (0.44&ndash;0.60). The one-factor model CFA for each scale achieved acceptable fit, and the four-factor model showed moderate fit (root mean square error of approximation=0.05, standardised root mean squared residual=0.07, Comparative Fit Index=0.91, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.88).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The Norwegian translated ABCD Risk Questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and can be considered a useful instrument for assessing knowledge and risk perception among individuals with a history of myocardial infarction.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Martin Topranin, V., Brors, G., Saether, J. C., Gerdts, E., Vangen, S., Bye, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118713</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118713</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Translation and validation of the Norwegian ABCD Risk Questionnaire to assess cardiovascular disease knowledge and risk perception prior to myocardial infarction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118713</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118713</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118750?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of suprapubic temperature stimulation for postoperative urinary retention: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118750?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common perioperative complication that can cause delayed mobilisation and discharge, and increase the need for catheterisation. Suprapubic temperature stimulation is a simple bedside, nurse-led approach but its effectiveness and safety have not been synthesised in a focused review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will systematically search PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CENTRAL from inception to the final search date, without language or date restrictions and will also screen trial registries and grey literature. We will include randomised controlled trials evaluating suprapubic temperature stimulation for prevention or treatment of POUR, compared with usual care, sham/no intervention or other non-thermal strategies. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using RoB 2, with arbitration by a third reviewer. Where appropriate, we will pool effects using ORs for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences or standardised mean differences for continuous outcomes, each with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the <sup>2</sup> test and I<sup>2</sup> statistic, with planned subgroup analyses by thermal modality and timing, and sensitivity analyses based on risk of bias. Certainty of evidence will be appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review will be based on previously published studies; therefore, ethics approval is not required. Data searching will commence in June 2026 and is expected to be completed in January 2027. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publication and academic conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420261325021.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, X., Wu, S., Zhang, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118750</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118750</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of suprapubic temperature stimulation for postoperative urinary retention: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118750</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118750</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119490?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost analysis of the use of digital rectoscopy versus flexible sigmoidoscopy in rectal cancer patients undergoing watch and wait]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119490?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction and objective</st>
<p>Organ preservation strategies for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment require intensive endoscopic monitoring to detect early luminal recurrence. This is termed 'Watch and Wait' (WAW). Standard protocols commonly mandate flexible sigmoidoscopy every 3&ndash;4 months for 2 years. Digital proctoscopy with the LumenEye device has been shown to be a safe alternative that can be performed in an outpatient setting without the need for sedation and with less staffing requirements. The study objective is to evaluate the economic implications of using digital proctoscopy compared with flexible sigmoidoscopy for patients with rectal cancer managed under a WAW protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and design</st>
<p>The study was conducted in a secondary care National Health Service (NHS) setting. A cost comparison analysis was performed over a 2 year time horizon (seven procedures per patient). 177 procedures on rectal cancer patients undergoing WAW with digital proctoscopy between August 2023 and November 2024 were included. The control group, that is, flexible sigmoidoscopy was modelled. The base case was flexible sigmoidoscopy without sedation. Scenarios using sedation were also evaluated. Costs were categorised into fixed and variable costs. A one-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis and What-If scenarios were also performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures and results</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the minimum cost difference between the two procedures. The secondary outcome measure was the robustness of the cost differences. Over 2 years, the total cost per patient was &pound;768.92 (95% CI &pound;656.6 to &pound;900.7) for digital proctoscopy compared with &pound;1,588.15 (95% CI &pound;1458.1 to &pound;1725.2) for flexible sigmoidoscopy without sedation. The absolute minimum cost saving per patient is &pound;820.23 (95% CI &pound;648.7 to &pound;985.1). Cost savings increased to &pound;848.94 (95% CI &pound;677.20 to &pound;1013.83) to &pound;935.62 (95% CI &pound;761.02 to &pound;1103.08) when sedation was used in flexible sigmoidoscopy procedures. Personnel costs during the procedure and recovery phase were the dominant cost drivers for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis and What-If scenarios confirmed the robustness of the findings, with flexible sigmoidoscopy remaining more costly.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Digital proctoscopy with the LumenEye device is a cost-saving alternative to flexible sigmoidoscopy for patients with rectal cancer on a WAW protocol. Our findings support the integration of digital proctoscopy into WAW pathways as a cost-efficient alternative within resource-constrained healthcare systems. Endoscopy service pressures are also likely to be alleviated.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sekhon Inderjit Singh, H. K., Harper, H., Butnari, V., Beni, R., Lozano, E., Goede, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119490</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119490</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost analysis of the use of digital rectoscopy versus flexible sigmoidoscopy in rectal cancer patients undergoing watch and wait]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119490</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119490</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119596?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Surgery or radiotherapy for early-stage cancer study protocol for an emulated target trial of radical radiotherapy versus radical cystectomy, with either following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, for organ-confined muscle-invasive bladder cancer]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119596?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by definitive treatment consisting of either radical radiotherapy or radical cystectomy is the recommended treatment for patients with organ-confined muscle-invasive bladder cancer (OC-MIBC). A randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the effectiveness of radical radiotherapy and radical cystectomy but failed to recruit. Radical radiotherapy is non-invasive and organ-preserving, and observational studies have suggested this treatment may be associated with similar outcomes compared with radical cystectomy. However, in these observational studies, the risk of confounding was high, and they did not consider the receipt of NAC. The surgery or radiotherapy (SORT) for the early-stage cancer study will assess the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of either radical cystectomy or radical radiotherapy, both after NAC for OC-MIBC. We will use a target trial emulation approach to reduce the risk of bias when assessing comparative effectiveness from observational data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The SORT study will use UK&rsquo;s National Cancer Registry to identify individuals diagnosed with urothelial OC-MIBC (T2-4aN0M0) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021 who received either radical radiotherapy or radical cystectomy after NAC. The data will be linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), National Radiotherapy Data Set (RTDS) and Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy (SACT) data sets to gather information on clinical, tumour and socio-demographic characteristics and receipt of treatment. Using the target trial emulation framework, we will define the eligibility criteria and radical radiotherapy and radical cystectomy receipt. To reduce the risk of confounding, we will use advanced statistical approaches to allow for differences in measured baseline characteristics between the comparison groups.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is 3-year all-cause mortality after radical treatment receipt. Secondary outcomes will include all-cause and bladder-cancer-associated mortality at 3 and 5 years, time to death, incremental costs and incremental cost-effectiveness reported according to net health benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee (Reference number 29717 - 1). Results will be communicated in open-access journals and conferences to clinicians, researchers, patients and policymakers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kagenaar, E., Lugo-Palacios, D. G., Bromley, H., Aggarwal, A., Hutchings, A., ONeill, S., Rachet, B., Cresswell, J., Choudhury, A., Grieve, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:36:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119596</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119596</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Surgery or radiotherapy for early-stage cancer study protocol for an emulated target trial of radical radiotherapy versus radical cystectomy, with either following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, for organ-confined muscle-invasive bladder cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119596</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119596</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112841?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Aerobic exercise on depression symptoms and quality of life in Patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review Protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112841?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent mental illness characterised by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities and cognitive impairment. While pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments remain the standard for MDD management, non-pharmacological interventions, such as aerobic exercise, have gained attention for their potential benefits in reducing depressive symptoms and improving quality of life. Although several studies have explored the effectiveness of aerobic exercise in managing MDD, there is still no comprehensive synthesis of the existing evidence. This study aims to synthesise existing evidence on the effects of aerobic exercise interventions in the management of individuals diagnosed with MDD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted across Cochrane, Medline, PEDro, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and BioMed Central databases. Search terms will be developed using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and Study design (PICOS) framework, incorporating keywords and Medical Subject Headings related to &lsquo;Major Depressive Disorder&rsquo;, &lsquo;Aerobic Exercise&rsquo;, &lsquo;Depression&rsquo;, and &lsquo;Quality of Life&rsquo;. Only intervention studies, including randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental and pre&ndash;post intervention studies, will be included involving adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with MDD according to standardised criteria (eg, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems -10 (ICD-10)). For included intervention studies, the comparator will be standard care, placebo or no-exercise control groups. The primary outcome is change in depressive symptoms, and secondary outcomes include quality of life, anxiety and stress-related biomarkers. Three independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data using Covidence software (Veritas Health Innovation in partnership with Cochrane) and assess study quality using the updated Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (Rob-2) tool alongside the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. If feasible, a meta-analysis will be conducted using RevMan V.5.4 (Cochrane's Review Manager), with effect sizes determined by mean differences, standardised mean differences or ORs, depending on the outcome type. This study is currently at the proposal stage, with article searches expected to begin in November 2025 and data extraction anticipated to be completed by January 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is required as this review uses existing published data. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration</st>
<p>CRD420251151897.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bin Muaythir, S., Bello, B., Mshunqane, N., Ramano, E., Magida, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112841</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112841</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Aerobic exercise on depression symptoms and quality of life in Patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review Protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112841</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112841</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115090?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and clinical correlates of metabolic syndrome among women with polycystic ovary syndrome in Western Algeria: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115090?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and metabolic, hormonal and clinical characteristics of metabolic syndrome among women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in the Oran region (western Algeria).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Outpatient endocrinology and gynaecology services in the Oran region, western Algeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 313 women aged 16&ndash;45 years diagnosed with PCOS according to the Rotterdam 2004 criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcomes</st>
<p>Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and differences in anthropometric (body mass index (BMI)), metabolic (fasting glucose and lipid profile), hormonal (gonadotropins, androgens, anti-Mu&#x0308;llerian hormone (AMH), progesterone, vitamin D) and clinical features (hyperandrogenism, menstrual irregularity, infertility) between women with and without metabolic syndrome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 313 participants, 181 (57.9%) met the criteria for metabolic syndrome. These women had significantly higher BMI (26.70&plusmn;5.93 vs 25.06&plusmn;6.47 kg/m&sup2;; p=0.004), elevated fasting glucose (133.43&plusmn;28.52 vs 105.41&plusmn;28.54 mg/dL; p&lt;0.0001) and triglycerides (p&lt;0.0001), but lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C (p&lt;0.0001). They also exhibited elevated luteinising hormone (LH), LH/follicle-stimulating hormone ratio, total testosterone and AMH levels, and reduced progesterone and vitamin D concentrations (all p&lt;0.0001). Clinical hyperandrogenism, menstrual irregularity and secondary infertility were significantly more prevalent in this group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>More than half of women with PCOS exhibited metabolic syndrome, characterised by obesity, dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance and vitamin D deficiency. These findings highlight the need for early metabolic screening and holistic management in women with PCOS to reduce long-term cardiovascular and reproductive risks.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Messaoud, A., Zeggai, S., Zemri, K., Belkacem, A., Ouali, S., Harir, N., Zahzeh, M. R., Drici, A. E.-m., Hadj Slimene, C., Senoussaoui, F., Benmessaoud, A., Elmezouar, W. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115090</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115090</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and clinical correlates of metabolic syndrome among women with polycystic ovary syndrome in Western Algeria: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115090</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115090</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115133?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing data quality in electronic health records among health professionals in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115133?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Data quality in electronic health records (EHRs) is central to data-informed healthcare. Health professionals play a key role in ensuring data quality yet the complexities of clinical data practices remain poorly understood. Previous reviews have focused on specific documentation domains or professions, leaving a gap in understanding the broader individual, organisational, technological and contextual factors influencing data quality in hospital settings. This scoping review aims to identify and map factors that promote or hinder data quality in EHRs among health professionals in hospital settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Peer-reviewed studies will be identified through comprehensive searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts and extract data using the JBI Extraction Form. Data will be charted and mapped according to the six dimensions of the Digital Health Data Quality Dimension and Outcome (DQ-DO) framework&mdash;accuracy, completeness, consistency, contextual validity, currency and accessibility&mdash;and analysed across professional groups and hospital contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review as it is based on publicly available data. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presentations at relevant academic and clinical conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>The protocol has been registered in the Open Science Framework: <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YQ2DX">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YQ2DX</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brinkmann, E. M.-B., Haahr, A., Bossen, C., Aadal, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115133</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115133</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing data quality in electronic health records among health professionals in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115133</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117507?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Humanistic care in the ICU: effects on patient dignity, delirium and family satisfaction - a non-randomised clinical trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117507?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Critical care patients face varying degrees of physical and psychological stress; in recent decades, the increasing focus on technologies and clinical processes has led to dehumanisation. In contrast, humanistic care has been introduced as an essential care paradigm, emphasising comprehensive care and considering all stakeholders in the care process (patient, family and staff). In addition to improving clinical outcomes, this approach focuses on family satisfaction, preserving the human dignity of patients and reducing the incidence of acute cognitive disorders such as delirium; therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the impact of humanistic care on these three key areas in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This non-randomised clinical trial was performed in the ICU. There are two distinct groups (194 patients)&mdash;a control group that receives usual care and an intervention group that receives both usual care and a set of targeted interventions based on the seven components of the Humanising Intensive Care (HU-CI) model (&lsquo;open-door ICU&rsquo;, &lsquo;communication&rsquo;, &lsquo;patient well-being&rsquo;, &lsquo;caring for professionals&rsquo;, &lsquo;post-ICU syndrome&rsquo;, &lsquo;end-of-life care&rsquo; and &lsquo;humanised infrastructure&rsquo;) for three main groups including healthcare personnel, patients and their families. The primary outcome is delirium (Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit tool), and secondary outcomes are family satisfaction (Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Units Questionnaire) and human dignity (Patient Dignity Inventory). Finally, the data will be analysed through STATA V.18 software using the statistical methods of independent t-test or its non-parametrical equivalent, <sup>2</sup> or Fisher&rsquo;s exact tests, Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests, multivariate binary logistic regression models or analysis of covariance, and non-linear mixed models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Ethical code: IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1404.086). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>IRCT registration number: IRCT20250727066651N1. Registration date: 30 July 2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asgari, P., Fattah Ghazi, S., Mansoor Samaei, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117507</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117507</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Humanistic care in the ICU: effects on patient dignity, delirium and family satisfaction - a non-randomised clinical trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117507</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117507</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117683?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diabetic retinopathy treatment cascade and care continuum in the USA: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117683?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To characterise engagement across the diabetic retinopathy (DR) care continuum in the USA using a cascade-of-care framework and identify gaps contributing to preventable vision loss.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>From September to November 2025, with an updated search in March to April 2026 using the same eligibility criteria, we systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase supplemented by reviewing reference lists of relevant articles and opportunistic searches of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included English<b>-</b>language US-based cross-sectional, cohort and case&ndash;control studies and systematic reviews containing US-based data published between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2025 relevant to one of the defined DR cascade stages: (1) diagnosis of diabetes, (2) adherence to DR screening, (3) diagnosis of DR, (4) adherence to DR care and (5) DR-related blindness. We included systematic reviews only to inform DR-related blindness, where primary data were limited and excluded them from other stages to avoid double-counting. Exclusion criteria included studies not relevant to one of the defined DR cascade stages and editorial, perspective or commentary pieces.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk-of-bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool. We synthesised data narratively and organised via the DR treatment cascade framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 14 893 studies screened, 46 met the inclusion criteria. Cascade analysis revealed substantial losses in patient engagement at three stages: (1) only 15.5%&ndash;78.7% (median 59.4%, IQR 33.9%&ndash;74.0%) of individuals with diabetes obtain biennial DR screening; (2) a substantial 54.9%&ndash;88.5% (median 70.1%, IQR 62.5%&ndash;79.3%) of individuals with DR are unaware of their diagnosis; (3) only 30.9%&ndash;62.7% (median 52.0%, IQR 40.9%&ndash;59.1%) of individuals diagnosed with DR are initially linked to care and 55.3%&ndash;77.8% (median 70.3%, IQR 59.2%&ndash;77.7%) have a lapse in DR follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This review identifies major gaps in the DR care continuum, particularly in diagnosis awareness, linkage to care and follow-up adherence. The cascade framework highlights key points of disengagement and provides a basis for prioritising future research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fu, J. J., Applebaum, S. S., Granados, A., Nwanyanwu, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117683</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117683</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diabetic retinopathy treatment cascade and care continuum in the USA: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117683</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118045?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measured and supervised physical exercise for older individuals with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnoea (MIOLI): protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118045?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are prevalent chronic respiratory diseases associated with increased comorbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Physical activity and exercise are widely recommended as part of treatment for these conditions, yet the specific effects of Nordic walking (NW) remain underexplored. The aims of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) are to improve physical fitness, functional capacity and respiratory health and increase regular physical activity and quality of life of older adults with asthma and/or COPD and/or OSA through a supervised 3-month group-based NW intervention combined with resistance, balance and mobility training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-blinded, parallel-group RCT will recruit 100 adults aged 55&ndash;80 years diagnosed with asthma and/or COPD and/or OSA in the Northern Savo region of Finland. Participants will be randomly allocated to either an intervention group or a control group.</p>
<p>The intervention group will participate in a 12-week supervised exercise programme consisting of progressive NW sessions twice per week and resistance, balance and mobility training once per week. The primary outcome is a change in cardiorespiratory endurance. Secondary outcomes include functional capacity, physical activity level, spirometry parameters and quality of life. The control group will continue their usual physical activity and receive physical activity guidance after 12 weeks. Measurements were conducted at baseline, three and 9 months. Data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Group differences over time will be examined using appropriate parametric or non-parametric methods depending on data distribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Medical Research Ethics Committee of Eastern Finland Collaborative Area (892/13.00/2023). Findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The trial is registered at <A HREF="ISRCTN12097135">ISRCTN12097135</A>, registration date: 7 June 2024.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[A&#x0308;ijo&#x0308;, M., Komulainen, P., Lo&#x0308;nnroos, E., Lindholm, H., Hiltunen, S., Tikkanen, H., Rantakokko, M., Venoja&#x0308;rvi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118045</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118045</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measured and supervised physical exercise for older individuals with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnoea (MIOLI): protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118045</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118045</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118546?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in Southeast Asia: a scoping review protocol with a focused North American comparator]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118546?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is delivered across diverse health-system contexts. In Southeast Asia (SEA), PD has been promoted to expand kidney replacement therapy access where haemodialysis capacity, geography and resources constrain care. This protocol describes a scoping review focused on reported PD clinical outcomes in SEA, with North America used only as a prespecified external comparator rather than as a control group, global benchmark or proxy for best practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and will be reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PRISMA Protocols (PRISMA-P) items are addressed where applicable. The review will be conducted from 1 May 2026 to 31 October 2026. Searches will identify sources published from 1 January 2000 to the planned final search date of 31 July 2026. MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Global Index Medicus, Google Scholar, citation searching and selected registry, professional, governmental and conference sources will be searched. No language restriction will be applied at the search stage. Eligible evidence will include peer-reviewed studies, registry or professional reports, governmental or institutional reports and conference abstracts or posters with extractable PD outcome data. Non-English sources will be screened using machine translation and extracted using targeted translation of relevant sections when feasible. Outcomes of interest include patient survival, technique survival and transition to haemodialysis, peritonitis and other infectious complications, hospitalisation and health service utilisation, cardiovascular outcomes, catheter-related complications and patient-reported outcomes when reported as clinical endpoints. Findings will be summarised descriptively and mapped by outcome domain and by region, with contextual factors noted when reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required because this review will synthesise published literature only. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations, and the extracted dataset and search strategies will be shared in supplementary materials or an online repository, subject to journal policy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF): <A HREF="https://osf.io/3dkvx/">https://osf.io/3dkvx/</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mai, T., Vo, J., Ho, S., Ng, J., Nguyen, A., Nguyen, Q. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118546</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118546</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in Southeast Asia: a scoping review protocol with a focused North American comparator]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118546</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118546</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118879?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A mixed-methods longitudinal observational study exploring physical activity during pregnancy in women with pre-existing diabetes, support needs and associations with diabetes management: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118879?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pregnancy in women with pre-existing type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1D, T2D) is associated with increased risk of complications, largely driven by maternal glucose control. Hormonal changes during pregnancy make glucose management more challenging. Physical activity (PA) may improve glucose control and reduce complications; however, little is known about PA patterns in this population and no pregnancy-specific PA guidance exists for women with pre-existing diabetes. Understanding the behaviours and experiences of both pregnant women and the healthcare professionals (HCPs) who support them is needed to inform evidence-based guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This mixed-methods study comprises three sub-studies. The first will recruit 175 pregnant women (75 with T1D and 100 with T2D) who will complete three 7-day monitoring periods, one per trimester. PA will be assessed using wrist-worn accelerometers and exercise diaries, dietary intake via remote food photography, and corresponding continuous glucose monitor and diabetes-related well-being data will be collected.</p>
<p>The second involves a subsample of ~16 women participating in focus groups to explore experiences of being physically active during pregnancy.</p>
<p>The third invites ~100 HCPs involved in diabetes in pregnancy care to complete an online survey, ~10 HCPS will take part in an optional interview about their experiences of providing PA guidance.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is the change in PA across pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include associations between PA, glucose metrics, diet and diabetes-related well-being, and qualitative themes relating to experiences of women and HCP. Quantitative data will be analysed using multilevel modelling and regression analysis, and qualitative data using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was granted by the East Midlands Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee (25/EM/0190) and University of Exeter Public Health and Sport Sciences ethics committee. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, H. M., Andrews, R., Cockcroft, E. J., Doeuk, I. F., Pulsford, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118879</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118879</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A mixed-methods longitudinal observational study exploring physical activity during pregnancy in women with pre-existing diabetes, support needs and associations with diabetes management: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118879</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118879</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119384?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised multiple centre trial of conservative versus liberal fluid administration for children receiving a kidney transplant (LIMITS): clinical trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119384?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In current practice, fluid volumes administered to children following kidney transplant vary widely. Up to 52% of children experience fluid overload-related complications. Current fluid guidelines are not evidence-based and the optimal amount of fluid for children after transplant is not known. The aim of Randomised multiple centre trial of conservative versus LIberal fluid adMInisTration for children receiving a kidney tranSplant (LIMITS) is to determine whether relative limitation of fluid volume administered to children receiving kidney transplants is superior to liberal fluid volume administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>LIMITS is a pragmatic, open-label, UK-based, multicentre randomised controlled trial, with an internal pilot phase and integrated economic evaluation. A total of 140 children receiving kidney transplants will be randomised to receive either conservative postoperative fluid administration (maximum of 150 mL/m<sup>2</sup>/hour for no longer than 18 hours, followed by a fixed daily target of maximum 1.5 L/m<sup>2</sup>/day thereafter) versus the comparator of liberal postoperative fluid administration (fluid volume administered to replace urine output and insensible losses for at least 48 hours with target urine output &gt;2 mL/kg/hour). The primary outcome is mean days at home in the first 30 days after kidney transplant. The primary outcome will be analysed using a mixed linear regression model adjusted for donor type (living vs deceased donor) and participant weight (&lt;20 kg and &ge;20 kg pretransplant) as fixed effects and transplant centre as a random effect. Cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial received Health Research Authority approval on 20 August 2025 (REC reference: 25/EE/0161, IRAS project ID: 354370). Findings will be presented to academic groups via national and international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. The patient and public involvement group will play an important part in disseminating the study findings to the public domain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN21516608">ISRCTN21516608</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calder, N. D. M., Kaloyirou, F., Griffiths, J., Brown, R., Hudson, C., Sharma, R., Hardwick, H., Oni, L., Callaghan, C., Stevenson, M., Shenoy, M., Reynolds, B., Marks, S., Wray, J., Thomas, H., Peters, M. J., Hayes, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119384</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119384</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised multiple centre trial of conservative versus liberal fluid administration for children receiving a kidney transplant (LIMITS): clinical trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119384</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119384</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105019?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Completeness of the COVID-19 vaccination schedule and associated factors among persons experiencing homelessness in Brazil: a national cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105019?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To analyse the completeness of the COVID-19 vaccination schedule and identify factors associated with vaccine uptake.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data were collected through face-to-face interviews conducted in all 26 Brazilian state capitals and the Federal District between 2022 and 2023, using a sequential sampling approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1392 individuals aged 18 years or older experiencing homelessness for at least 6 months were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the completeness of the COVID-19 vaccination schedule (complete vs incomplete), based on self-reported vaccination status. Secondary analyses examined sociodemographic, institutional and behavioural factors associated with vaccine uptake using binary logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Completion of the vaccination schedule was positively associated with receiving government aid (OR: 1.58; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.30), visits from street clinic health agents (OR: 3.19; 95% CI 1.95 to 5.36), prior COVID-19 diagnosis (OR: 5.77; 95% CI 3.17 to 11.15), support for mandatory vaccination (OR: 3.76; 95% CI 2.48 to 5.76), trust in vaccine efficacy (OR: 3.92; 95% CI 2.63 to 5.89), seeking information from community sources (OR: 1.91; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.88) and trust in federal authorities (OR: 1.57; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.31).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study identified structural, social and individual factors associated with complete COVID-19 vaccination among people experiencing homelessness in Brazil. Although overall coverage was substantial, gaps in vaccination completeness persisted. Social support, healthcare outreach and trust in vaccines were associated with higher uptake, highlighting important barriers and facilitators to vaccination in socially vulnerable populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soares Tenorio de Araujo, J., Berra, T. Z., Tartaro, A. F., Rosa, R. J., Tavares, R. B. V., Alves, Y. M., Pelodan, M. E. P., Moura, H. S. D., Ferezin, L. P., Ramos, A. C. V., do Nascimento, M. C., Lima de Freitas, G., Arcencio, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105019</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105019</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology, COVID-19]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Completeness of the COVID-19 vaccination schedule and associated factors among persons experiencing homelessness in Brazil: a national cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105019</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105019</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105615?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study protocol for a pragmatic parallel-group randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of coaching with an online intervention, compared with the online intervention alone, for families of children who have experienced developmental regression]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105615?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Developmental regression is when children lose one or more skills they have established. Families caring for these children need timely recognition to assist diagnosis and tailored interventions. Families also need support to develop practical skills for caregiving and strategies to promote family well-being and community participation. Given the high caring demands, flexibly delivered approaches are needed to accommodate family routines. Online delivery of health-related interventions that provide coaching, information, or both has been found to be a feasible and effective option for families. Family Focus is a new family-centred online programme, co-designed with parents and family advocates, clinicians, and researchers to support and empower primary carers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a prospective, pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of online parent coaching plus Family Focus (Coaching+FF) to Family Focus alone (FF) for primary carers of children experiencing developmental regression. A sample of 56 families will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, post-intervention and 12-month post-randomisation. The primary outcome is parental stress symptoms at post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include parental depressive and anxiety symptoms, parental engagement in health-promoting activities, family empowerment, family quality of life and child global health outcomes. The study will also examine the uptake and acceptability of specific coaching and FF components and explore the facilitators and barriers to their delivery and implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approvals were obtained from the participating organisations (Monash Health HREC/107806). Informed consent is obtained from parents/guardians of children prior to study enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and lived experience agencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN25513446">ISRCTN25513446</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sim, W. H., Leo, M., Bourke-Taylor, H. M., Bernie, C., Brignell, A., Ure, A., Furley, K., Fahey, A. M., Bhopti, A., Odgers, S., Picking, L., Xie, J., Wu, L., Yap, M. B. H., Williams, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105615</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105615</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study protocol for a pragmatic parallel-group randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of coaching with an online intervention, compared with the online intervention alone, for families of children who have experienced developmental regression]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105615</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105615</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107828?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Driving factors and barriers to irrational antibiotic prescribing in Pakistan: a qualitative study of physicians, pharmacists and nurses perspectives in public and private hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107828?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Irrational prescribing is a major global health concern, contributing significantly to increased morbidity, mortality and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Despite existing knowledge and awareness, irrational antibiotic use remains prevalent among healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This qualitative study aimed to explore the contributing factors to irrational antibiotic prescribing, understand healthcare professionals&rsquo; perceptions, identify barriers to rational use and gather suggestions for improving rational antibiotic use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design and participants</st>
<p>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with participants. A total of 60 healthcare professionals (20 physicians, 20 pharmacists and 20 nurses) participated after providing verbal consent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals across various clinical settings in Pakistan until data saturation was reached. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was used to ensure transparent reporting. An inductive thematic analysis approach was employed and themes and subthemes were developed from the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The findings revealed a generally good understanding of irrational prescribing. Contributing factors included prescriber-related issues, patient expectations, weak regulatory oversight and underutilisation of pharmacists. Key barriers identified were financial constraints, lack of awareness and insufficient resources. Suggestions for improvement included regular audits, public awareness campaigns, an integrated healthcare system, interprofessional collaboration, drug utilisation reviews, adverse drug reaction reporting, standardising hospital policies and strengthening regulatory frameworks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlights critical factors and barriers contributing to irrational antibiotic prescribing and presents practical suggestions to improve rational use. Implementing evidence-based approaches, updating clinical guidelines, and promoting awareness among healthcare professionals are essential steps toward improving prescribing practices and combating AMR.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khan, M. E., Jamil, E., Abubakar, M., Javed, A., Abbas, D., Nawaz, E., Atiq, B., Razi, B. H., Saeed, A. R., Rasool, H., Zubair, M., Rasool, H., Khan, S. W., Shoul, A., Batool, A., Khan, M. U., Ullah, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107828</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107828</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Driving factors and barriers to irrational antibiotic prescribing in Pakistan: a qualitative study of physicians, pharmacists and nurses perspectives in public and private hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107828</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107828</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108754?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatment options for depressive disorders in children and adolescents: protocol of a network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108754?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The incidence of depression among children and adolescents has been increasing in recent years, posing significant challenges to public health and clinical care. A variety of treatments, including pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy and physical interventions, are widely used in clinical practice. However, a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of all these treatment modalities is currently lacking. This study aims to use network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and acceptability of all available treatments for depression in children and adolescents, offering valuable insights to inform clinical decision-making and guide future research in this critical area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will include randomised controlled trials evaluating active interventions for depressive disorders in children and adolescents. Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception to 2 July 2024 and updated on 2 November 2025. Two of four investigators will independently screen studies, extract data from eligible articles and assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. The primary outcome will be the change in depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes will include acceptability (all-cause discontinuation), response rate, remission rate and overall functioning. Pairwise and Bayesian NMA will be conducted. Small-study effects and publication bias will be assessed. The certainty of the evidence will be evaluated according to the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this review involves secondary analysis of previously published studies, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>PROSPERO-ID CRD42024557384.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guo, J., Lu, Z., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Kang, Z., Sun, J., Zhao, G., Feng, X., Yuan, R., Zhu, Y., Yu, T., Yang, Y., Chen, H., Yue, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108754</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108754</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatment options for depressive disorders in children and adolescents: protocol of a network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108754</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108754</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110005?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Information anxiety across populations in the VUCA era: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110005?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Information anxiety (IA) describes the distress caused by the gap between the information individuals have and what they feel they should possess. In the current digital environment&mdash;marked by volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity&mdash;IA has expanded beyond traditional academic and workplace contexts to become a pervasive concern across populations. Mapping the empirical evidence on IA is critical to understanding its prevalence, determinants, impacts and coping strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol outlines a scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will systematically search EBSCOhost, Scopus and Web of Science for peer-reviewed empirical studies published from 1 January 2000 to the planned end date of 5 November 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen records, with a third resolving discrepancies. Data extraction will be conducted using a customised tool, and results will be synthesised narratively and visually, structured around bibliometric characteristics, the Population, Concept, Context framework and a Stimulus-Organism-Response model. Subgroup analyses will be conducted across populations, disciplines and regions.</p>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>-ScR</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this study is based on secondary analysis of published data, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiang, Y., Mustaffa, N., Aziz, J., Cai, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110005</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110005</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Communication]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Information anxiety across populations in the VUCA era: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Communication</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110005</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110005</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111941?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations of perceived family economy, registry-based parental education and income with adolescent psychological distress: the Young-HUNT cross-sectional studies 2006-2008 and 2017-2019]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111941?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the associations of adolescents&rsquo; self-reported family financial stress, registry-based parental household income and parental education with adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms. Additionally, we adjust these associations for parental anxiety and depression symptoms and examine potential secular changes in these associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Family linkage study, using two cross-sectional population-based health studies, the Young-HUNT study and the HUNT study. Registry-based data from Statistics Norway (SSB).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Northern part of Tr&oslash;ndelag County, Norway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adolescent (aged 13&ndash;19 years) participating in The Young-HUNT3 Survey (2006&ndash;2008, n=8199) and The Young-HUNT4 Survey (2017&ndash;2019, n=8066) and their parents participating in The HUNT3 Survey (2006&ndash;2008, n=50 800) and the HUNT4 Survey (2017&ndash;2019, n=56 042).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measurements</st>
<p>Adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed by a short version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL), the five-item HSCL-5. Self-reported family financial stress was measured using a single-item question. Parental anxiety and depression were assessed by the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Rating Scale (total HADS score). Parental income and parental education were obtained from SSB. We use a multilevel mixed-effects generalised linear model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Adolescents who perceived their family financial stress as worse than others reported a higher SCL-5 total score compared with those with self-perceived average financial stress. The relative differences ranged from 1.16 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.23) in boys to 1.24 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.31) in girls. In contrast, little or no association was found between parental registry-based income or educational level and adolescents&rsquo; mean SCL-5 total scores. Adjusting for parental HADS scores did not alter the estimates. With a few exceptions for girls, there was no evidence for a secular change in these associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Self-perceived family financial stress, but not registry-based parental income and education, was associated with elevated anxiety and depression symptom levels in adolescents, and findings were essentially the same in Young-HUNT3 and Young-HUNT4. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating multiple measures of socioeconomic status when investigating socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent mental health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Selvik, K. L. I., Strandas, B. M. E., Olsson, C. A., Braaten, T., Bjerkeset, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111941</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111941</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations of perceived family economy, registry-based parental education and income with adolescent psychological distress: the Young-HUNT cross-sectional studies 2006-2008 and 2017-2019]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111941</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111941</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111996?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrating Dental Healthcare into Primary Health Care through an implementation model in two districts of Karnataka in India: An implementation research study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111996?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite progress in primary care, access to oral health remains limited in India. Integrating oral health into primary care can improve oral health outcomes for communities, especially in rural areas. This study aims to develop an implementation model for integrating dental healthcare into primary healthcare systems in Chamarajanagar and Mysuru districts of Karnataka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A mixed-methods implementation research approach will be adopted for this study, comprising three phases: formative, pilot and implementation and evaluation.</p>
<p>A mixed-methods study at the district level will be conducted to capture diverse perspectives and characterise inequalities in oral healthcare access and literacy levels across urban, rural and tribal areas. Oral health literacy surveys, facility preparedness checklists and in-depth interviews will be conducted. With a consultative approach involving stakeholders, we ensure their input in the design and pilot the integrated interventions to build a replicable model for integrating dental health services into primary healthcare.</p>
<p>Through this structured approach, the study seeks to improve overall oral health outcomes and achieve sustainable improvements in oral health at both community and system levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee at the Institute of Public Health Bengaluru (IPH/23-24/E/374). Findings will be disseminated through workshops, presentations and publications in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chilgod, L., Krishna B M, R., Raveendran, R., B Hebbar, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111996</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111996</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrating Dental Healthcare into Primary Health Care through an implementation model in two districts of Karnataka in India: An implementation research study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111996</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111996</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112819?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective validation of an AI algorithm to identify adult-onset type 1 diabetes misclassification: protocol for a non-interventional multicentre study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112819?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adult-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) is often misclassified as type 2 diabetes (T2D), resulting in delayed treatment, missed opportunities for referrals to specialists and increased risk of complications including diabetic ketoacidosis. An electronic medical record (EMR)-based algorithm&mdash;originally trained on a large national EMR dataset to identify likely misclassified adult-onset T1D cases&mdash;was tested and retrained on a health information exchange (HIE) dataset from HealthShare Exchange (HSX). Promising results were achieved on historical data, particularly when using the retrained algorithm. However, its prospective validation is essential to more reliably assess its clinical utility and real-world precision in flagging high-risk patients for clinician review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, multicentre, non-interventional cohort study in two HSX-member healthcare organisations (HCOs) in southeastern Pennsylvania. At the onset of the study, all adult T2D patients are scored by the algorithm analysing HIE data on relevant predictors found in the 24-month lookback period. Patients meeting a prespecified score threshold estimated in retrospective testing to yield 10% recall will be presented to designated endocrinology or primary care providers for structured chart review, attribution confirmation and guideline-concordant follow-up (including autoantibody testing where appropriate). The primary endpoint is positive predictive value for confirmed adult-onset T1D among flagged patients. Secondary endpoints characterise operational cascade metrics (attribution, provider recommendation, test ordering/results and diagnosis updates) along with 95% CIs. Exploratory endpoints will assess provider adoption, interpretability and workflow integration via structured provider interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was reviewed and approved by Advarra Institutional Review Board (protocol Pro00075945). The Institutional Review Board waived patient informed consent and granted a full waiver of HIPAA authorisation for patient records, while providers were required to provide written informed consent. HSX data were accessed and shared under its member-defined use cases. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Reporting will follow Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidance for cohort studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brusini, I., Lee, S., Lai, A., Sees, A., Hackenberg, M., Liptak, G., Rao, A. D., Anastasopoulou, C., Leavitt, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T02:44:49-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112819</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112819</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective validation of an AI algorithm to identify adult-onset type 1 diabetes misclassification: protocol for a non-interventional multicentre study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112819</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112819</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111863?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Consultation-Liaison psychiatry in a high-complexity university hospital in Turin, Italy: an observational study with a focus on delirium and predictive factors of clinical outcome]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111863?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and aim</st>
<p>This observational study aims to provide an overview of consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) activity within the high-intensity, complex hospital setting of the &lsquo;Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Citt&agrave; della Salute e della Scienza&rsquo; in Turin. The study is mainly focused on delirium-related features and predictive factors of clinical outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 500 psychiatric consultations provided by the University Facility of Psychiatry. Additional analysis was performed in a subgroup of patients with a diagnosis of delirium (143 subjects). The Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) was administered at the time of consultation (T0) and 1 week later (T1). Descriptive statistics were performed on the whole sample. In the subgroup of patients with delirium, linear regression for continuous variables and one-way analysis of variance for categorical variables were conducted. Stepwise multiple regression was performed with DRS-R-98 (difference of DRS-R-98 score between T0 and T1) as the dependent variable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The majority of requests for consultation came from the internal medicine department or from orthopaedic and trauma units and concerned male patients with a positive history of psychiatric disorders. Although psychiatric re-evaluations were frequently required, transfers to the psychiatric ward were rare (9.8%), and there were no compulsory psychiatric admissions in our sample. In addition to delirium, the most frequent reason for requesting CLP evaluation was depressive disorder. Among the 143 cases of delirium, the mean age and prevalence of males were higher than in the whole sample. Mortality was also higher (28%) than in the whole sample (17.6%). In the stepwise multiple regression analysis, variables significantly and independently associated with DRS-R-98 included: age (t=&ndash;4.074; p&lt;0.001), treatment with benzodiazepines (BDZ) (t=&ndash;5.737; p&lt;0.001) and treatment with atypical antipsychotics (t=3.104; p=0.002).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>CLP interventions in our high-complexity general university hospital were mainly requested for patients with mood disorders and delirium. CLP service provides an important opportunity to identify unknown psychiatric disorders or symptoms below the diagnostic threshold. Predictors of improvement of delirium-related symptoms are young age and the use of atypical antipsychotics, while BDZ treatment can be considered a negative predictor of outcome in patients with delirium. Further research on this topic is recommended to better understand the relevance of CLP, particularly the effects of this type of intervention in the management of delirium.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bozzatello, P., Novelli, R., Schisano, R., Montemagni, C., Rocca, P., Bellino, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111863</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111863</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Consultation-Liaison psychiatry in a high-complexity university hospital in Turin, Italy: an observational study with a focus on delirium and predictive factors of clinical outcome]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111863</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111863</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113697?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[School-based versus community-based interventions for promoting mental health among school-age children in marginalised or underserved populations: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113697?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>School-aged children frequently experience psychological distress due to academic pressures, a challenge that is often more severe for those from underserved and minority communities. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mental health interventions implemented in school and community settings for children aged 5 to 19. It also seeks to compare the outcomes between children from minority and underserved populations and their peers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify relevant studies. Major databases will be searched using a structured search strategy developed by the research team. The review will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assess the impact of interventions conducted in school or community settings to prevent psychological distress&mdash;specifically depression, anxiety and stress. To minimise bias, two reviewers will independently select studies and extract data at various stages. The quality of included studies will be assessed. A meta-analysis will be conducted to compare intervention outcomes between children from underserved/minority communities and other children. Pooled prevalence rates and subgroup analyses will be used to explore differences in effectiveness. Heterogeneity among studies and publication bias will also be assessed. Meta-analyses of proportions, ORs and relative risks will be conducted using a random-effects model to estimate effect sizes from multivariate analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was not required, as this study involved secondary analysis of published literature and did not involve human participants. To date, no systematic review has comprehensively compared school-based and community-based interventions in terms of their effectiveness in addressing anxiety, depression and stress among school-aged children. This review aims to fill that gap by providing clinical insights into the comparative effectiveness of various intervention types and settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO review registration</st>
<p>CRD42023479389.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oranye, N. O., Dibaba, A., Nwankwo, I. U., Webb, L., Lee, T., Alexander, M., Kagulire, J., Landu-Adams, V., Nnedum, O. A., Abdalla, E., Sodeke, S., Underwood, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113697</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113697</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[School-based versus community-based interventions for promoting mental health among school-age children in marginalised or underserved populations: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113697</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113697</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117251?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of yoga on musculoskeletal complaints in women during endocrine treatment for breast cancer: protocol of the randomised controlled COBRA trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117251?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Approximately 40% of women stop endocrine therapy for hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer within the first 5 years of prescribed treatment because of side effects. Musculoskeletal complaints are among the most frequently reported side effects. The Cancer Of the BReast Asanas (COBRA) study examines the effect of an 18-week yoga programme on endocrine therapy-associated musculoskeletal complaints in women with breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In total, 140 women will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or waitlist control group. The intervention programme consists of two times a week 1-hour supervised Hatha or (easy) Vinyasa yoga classes at a yoga or sports centre for 18 weeks and once per week a half-hour at home using videos. The waitlist control group is asked to maintain their habitual lifestyle during the first 18 weeks and will participate in a similar yoga programme to the intervention group for the following 18 weeks. The control group yoga programme is offered live-remote. The primary outcome (musculoskeletal complaints) is assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire at baseline and 18 weeks (primary comparison) and additionally at 36 weeks. Secondary outcomes include lower and upper extremity joint complaints, menopausal symptoms, fatigue, sleep, quality of life, anxiety and depression, cognitive complaints and habitual physical activity (all patient-reported), vital signs and anthropometrics, physical fitness, blood biomarkers, medication use, safety data and patient and teacher experiences. At baseline and 18 weeks, cognitive complaints are also assessed with an online neuropsychological test battery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The COBRA study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht. The study started on 8 October 2024, and 65 participants have been included (20 January 2026). Results will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06480513">NCT06480513</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veenhuizen, S. G. A., Gal, R., Cramer, H., Bijlsma, R. M., Blickle, P., van der Palen, J., Wagenaar, Q. R. C. M., van Leer, E., Konings, I., van den Bongard, D. H. J. G., May, A. M., Monninkhof, E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117251</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117251</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of yoga on musculoskeletal complaints in women during endocrine treatment for breast cancer: protocol of the randomised controlled COBRA trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117251</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118739?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Continuation of first-line therapy with radiotherapy for oligoprogression versus early switch to second-line therapy in oligoprogressive hepatocellular carcinoma (CROSS): study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase III trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118739?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Treatment options remain limited for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who experience oligoprogression during first-line systemic therapy (FLST), especially given the modest efficacy and restricted availability of second-line systemic therapy (SLST). This trial aims to evaluate whether continuing FLST combined with radiotherapy (RT) to oligoprogressive lesions can improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared with an early switch to SLST in patients with oligoprogressive HCC while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The continuation of first-line therapy with radiotherapy for oligoprogression versus early switch to second-line therapy in oligoprogressive hepatocellular carcinoma trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised phase III study that will enrol 132 patients with advanced HCC who experience their first oligoprogression during FLST. Oligoprogression is defined as one to five progressive lesions involving no more than one to three organs. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to either continuation of FLST combined with RT to all oligoprogressive lesions or discontinuation of FLST followed by initiation of SLST. RT will be delivered with a biologically effective dose (linear&ndash;quadratic model, &alpha;/&beta;=10) of at least 60 Gy whenever feasible. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response and quality of life. Predefined exploratory analyses include circulating tumour DNA profiling, optional paired tumour biopsies, functional imaging with fibroblast activation protein inhibitor positron emission tomography-CT and longitudinal immune profiling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (number: SDZLEC2025-025-02) and has been registered in ClinicalTrials. gov (NCT06841172). Final study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06841172">NCT06841172</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, H., Shi, F., Zhang, X., Zhu, K., Jiang, S., Feng, R., Dou, X., Xu, L., Yue, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118739</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118739</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Continuation of first-line therapy with radiotherapy for oligoprogression versus early switch to second-line therapy in oligoprogressive hepatocellular carcinoma (CROSS): study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase III trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118739</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118739</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121917?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HIV self-testing for partners of postpartum women to facilitate HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy uptake: a protocol to adapt and pilot an intervention via a pilot randomised controlled trial in South Africa]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121917?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>South African women are vulnerable to HIV acquisition during the postpartum period which can result in perinatal transmission via breastfeeding; many male partners do not know their HIV status. Biomedical approaches to preventing HIV for postpartum women include pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and antiretroviral treatment for male partners with HIV. Gaps in implementation include low uptake of PrEP among postpartum women and infrequent testing of men who may be motivated to test for HIV to protect the health of their infant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a randomised pilot trial in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Province, South Africa among postpartum women and their male partners. The study will pilot a combination intervention consisting of cognitive behavioural strategies (including communication skills training, motivational interviewing and problem-solving) to promote <I><b>H</b></I>IV self-testing (HIVST) for <I><b>P</b></I>artners and <I><b>P</b></I>rEP uptake for HIV-uninfected <I><b>P</b></I>ost<I><b>p</b></I>artum Women, the &lsquo;H4P&rsquo; intervention. The study aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the H4P intervention. We will enrol 60 HIV-uninfected women, aged 18 years and older, in their third trimester of pregnancy and reporting a partner whose HIV-serostatus is unknown. Sixty male partners will also be eligible to enrol. Enrolled women will receive three oral HIVST kits to distribute to their male partners and standard of care information on HIVST and PrEP. Women randomised to the intervention arm will receive additional counselling and reproductive health-centred HIVST information for the male partner, including information about why HIV testing is important during their partners&rsquo; postpartum period. To evaluate feasibility, we will calculate screening-to-enrolment ratios for women and men, the number of women who distribute HIVST kits to their male partners and the number of men who test. Acceptability will be evaluated using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire and qualitative interviews. Effectiveness will be assessed at 3 months by measuring the proportion of women initiating PrEP via self-report and urine tenofovir measurements or receipt of injectable PrEP and the proportion of men who test positive who link to HIV care. Qualitative interviews will explore perceptions of the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at The University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa (Reference number: 250612) and the Institutional Review Boards at Massachusetts General Brigham (2025P002271, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) and the University of Alabama at Birmingham (300015167, Birmingham, Alabama, USA) in the USA. Site support and approvals were obtained from the health facility and the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Department of Health. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed manuscripts, reports and both local and international presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07194902">NCT07194902</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psaros, C., Beesham, I., Mosery, N., Aoun, Z.-M. R., Bhardwaj, A., Ndlovu, L., Ntanzi, N., Pratt, M. C., Chikovore, J., Smit, J. A., Matthews, L. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121917</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-121917</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HIV self-testing for partners of postpartum women to facilitate HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy uptake: a protocol to adapt and pilot an intervention via a pilot randomised controlled trial in South Africa]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e121917</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e121917</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e101587?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Menopause age and hypercholesterolemia comorbidities: a region-wide retrospective cohort study in Andalusia, Spain (2016-2022)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e101587?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To quantify sex- and age-related differences in hypercholesterolaemia diagnosis and associated comorbidities around the menopausal transition, using a population-based real-world dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective, multicentre, non-interventional observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Region-wide public healthcare system data (primary and secondary care) from Andalusia (Spain), 2016&ndash;2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All adult patients meeting inclusion criteria with a recorded diagnosis of hypercholesterolaemia between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 (n=557 034; 227 834 men and 329 200 women).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were age- and sex-stratified patterns of hypercholesterolaemia diagnosis and comorbidity burden before and after age 50 years (proxy for post-menopausal age). Secondary outcomes included comorbidity-specific comparisons between sexes across age strata and trajectory-based analyses (OR trajectories and incidence-ratio summaries).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Women were diagnosed later than men (mean age 59.1 vs 56.0 years; mean difference 3.1 years, 95% CI 3.03 to 3.17). Hypercholesterolaemia diagnoses in women rose sharply around ages 50&ndash;55 and remained higher than in men at older ages. Comorbidity patterns differed by sex across age strata: compared with men, women aged &ge;50 years had higher frequencies of osteoporosis (42 255 vs 2623), anxiety disorder (94 916 vs 31 374) and hypertension (147 538 vs 91 532), with statistically significant differences for these comparisons (p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Menopause age is a pivotal period associated with a shift towards higher hypercholesterolaemia diagnosis rates and a greater burden of specific comorbidities in women. These findings support sex-specific prevention and management strategies, particularly targeting the menopausal transition and early post-menopause.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Esteban-Medina, A., de la Oliva, V., Fernandez del Valle, P., Sanchez, A., Susin, M. B., Loucera, C., Antinolo, G., Dopazo, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101587</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101587</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Menopause age and hypercholesterolemia comorbidities: a region-wide retrospective cohort study in Andalusia, Spain (2016-2022)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101587</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101587</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106160?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for moderate to severe chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (TASC-P) in China: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106160?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) affects around 35%&ndash;50% of men during their lifetime. The efficacy of current oral medication for CP/CPPS remains limited. Recent studies demonstrated that vagus nerve stimulation may improve chronic pelvic and abdominal pain. Accordingly, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) might represent a promising, non-invasive therapeutic approach for the clinical management of CP/CPPS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The trial of Transcutaneous Auricular vagus nerve Stimulation for moderate to severe Chronic Prostatitis/CPPS is a prospective, randomised, sham-controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants will be assigned randomly to either the taVNS group or the sham-taVNS group. The intervention period will consist of a 4-week treatment (a total of 40 sessions), followed by an 8-week follow-up period. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Score Index total score at week 4. Secondary outcomes include the International Prostate Symptom Score Scale, European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions-5-Levels questionnaire, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale. Safety assessments will be conducted throughout the entire study period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol and informed consent documents were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Guang&rsquo;anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (approval number: 2023-250 KY). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardians prior to trial participation. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at scientific conferences. The research data will be made available on reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06287970">NCT06287970</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wei, X., Cui, J., Zang, Z., Pang, R., Qi, L., Wang, Y., Wang, H.-B., Wu, Y., Qin, Z., Wu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106160</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106160</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for moderate to severe chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (TASC-P) in China: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106160</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106160</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106250?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Catering to patients with Parkinsons disease: a survey on self-perceived competence and barriers of speech and language pathologists in Malaysia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106250?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Referrals to speech and language pathology are infrequent for people with Parkinson&rsquo;s disease (PD), despite speech and communication being often affected and greatly impacting their quality of life. This study investigated the knowledge, self-competence and challenges faced by speech and language pathologists (SLPs) in Malaysia when managing PD cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Participants self-administered an online-survey in a cross-sectional study design. The survey consisted of 14 questions on current practices of SLPs with their patients with PD, self-perceived competence when assessing and managing PD and perceived barriers for catering to patients with PD. Inferential statistics were run on self-perceived competence across domains and their relationship with demographic/current practice factors. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse perceived barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The survey was administered in English through Google Forms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>54 Malaysian SLPs with at least one active case of PD in their caseload were invited via email and WhatsApp Messenger. These contacts were obtained from the Speech-Language Therapists Association of Malaysia (SPEAK), and snowball sampling was encouraged to recruit additional SLPs through other social networks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>To quantify Malaysian SLPs&rsquo; self-perceived competence levels (assessed on 5-point Likert scales) in assessing and managing five key domains in patients with PD: speech, language, oro-motor skills, cognition and swallowing; and to identify the frequency and types of barriers encountered in clinical practice with patients with PD through structured multiple-choice questions. Secondary outcomes included quantifying current service delivery patterns (frequency of PD referrals, stage at referral, caseload size), multidisciplinary consultation patterns and confidence levels in managing rehabilitation risks associated with PD, all measured through structured survey items with categorical or ordinal response options.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most participants had 1&ndash;5 patients with PD in their active caseload, referred at a middle or advanced stage of the disease. The majority of participants felt competent in assessing and managing motor speech and language in patients with PD. Conversely, most of them did not feel competent in assessing and managing cognition in these patients, regardless of demographic factors or current practices. This difference was significant. Most participants also reported facing barriers such as health conditions or comorbidities, family expectations on the therapy outcome and the unavailability of a multidisciplinary approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study reveals that SLPs working in Malaysia feel competent in working with motor speech and language in individuals with PD. However, it highlights a need for additional training to address cognitive assessment and management as a crucial tool to boost functional communication in people with PD. The study also reveals a need for promoting a multidisciplinary approach.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, G., Kamarulzaman, N. B., Siau, C. S., Chu, S. Y., Woo, P. J., Zhang, M. M., Yuen, M.-C., Garraffa, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106250</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106250</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Catering to patients with Parkinsons disease: a survey on self-perceived competence and barriers of speech and language pathologists in Malaysia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106250</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106731?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Threats and deprivations as predictors of IPV perpetration: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample of Bangladeshi young adults]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106731?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major public health concern in Bangladesh, where approximately two-thirds of women report experiencing partner violence and over half of young men admit to perpetrating it. While adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are among the strongest predictors of IPV, existing research has relied on cumulative ACE scores, overlooking how distinct dimensions of childhood adversity may differentially predict violence. This study examines the relationship between two dimensions of ACEs, threat (eg, exposure to violence) and deprivation (eg, lack of emotional or cognitive support) and IPV perpetration among Bangladeshi young adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Bangladeshi youths aged 18&ndash;35 years across the eight divisions who participated in the national Gender Norms Attitude Study in 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Of the 2790 participants, 2016 (mean age 28.27, SD 5.11) were included in this study as they were either married or in a committed relationship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome measures were IPV perpetration, assessed using the Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream scale. The primary exposures were two dimensions of childhood adversity (ACE): threat and deprivation, derived from the nine items commonly used in public health research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 59.88% of men and 41.53% of women reported having perpetrated IPV. Both threat (adjusted OR (aOR)=2.57; 95% CI 2.03 to 3.23) and deprivation (aOR=1.75; 95% CI 1.39 to 2.20) ACEs significantly associated higher odds of IPV perpetration. Women had lower odds of perpetration than men (aOR=0.41; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.52), as did those with higher socioeconomic status (aOR=0.83), whereas the odds varied by region (eg, highest in Barisal, aOR=4.40).</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>The findings highlight the importance of adopting a dimensional approach to ACEs and considering regional and socioeconomic factors in IPV prevention efforts. By integrating these findings into public health interventions and policy frameworks, Bangladesh and other low- and middle-income countries can develop more effective, culturally sensitive strategies to reduce IPV and its devastating consequences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Islam, A., Haque, M., Chowdhury, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106731</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106731</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Threats and deprivations as predictors of IPV perpetration: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample of Bangladeshi young adults]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106731</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106731</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106819?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prediction of ICU length of stay, hospital discharge outcomes and discharge location among ICU-admitted patients diagnosed with viral hepatitis using machine learning: a retrospective cohort study of the MIMIC-IV database]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106819?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Hepatitis, a disease characterised by inflammation of the liver, is a leading global health challenge that contributes to over 1.3 million deaths annually, with hepatitis B and C accounting for many of these fatalities. Intensive care unit (ICU) management of patients is particularly challenging due to the complex clinical care and resource demands. Despite advancements in ICU predictive analytics, limited research has specifically addressed hepatitis patients, creating a gap in optimising care for this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study focuses on predicting ICU length of stay (LoS), hospital discharge outcomes and discharge location for ICU-admitted viral hepatitis patients using a comparative assessment of machine learning (ML) models. Leveraging data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database, which includes around 94 500 ICU patient records, this study uses sociodemographic details, clinical characteristics and resource utilisation metrics to develop predictive models such as Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting Machines and Generalised Additive Model with Negative Binomial Regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 3875 ICU-admitted hepatitis patients, Random Forest classification outperformed Logistic Regression in predicting discharge outcomes, achieving higher accuracy (0.87 vs 0.82) and greater discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.95 vs 0.89). For ICU LoS prediction, Random Forest regression applied to log-transformed LoS demonstrated strong performance (R&sup2; up to 0.82), while the generalised additive model with negative binomial distribution explained approximately 76% of LoS variance. Prediction of discharge location yielded moderate performance across Gradient Boosting and multinomial logistic regression models (accuracy 0.55 and 0.56), reflecting challenges associated with multi-class imbalance. Variable importance analyses across ML models consistently identified medication counts, procedure counts, comorbidity burden, age, race and total LoS as the most influential predictors of discharge outcomes and discharge location.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study demonstrates the value of ML models for predicting clinical outcomes for hepatitis patients, including ICU LOS and hospital discharge status. The results underscore the influence of factors like race and age, revealing disparities that must be addressed in predictive care strategies. While the models show promise, challenges such as variability in prolonged stays and limited multiclass prediction accuracy point to the need for ongoing refinement and research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alluri, D. S., Pabon-Rodriguez, F. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106819</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106819</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prediction of ICU length of stay, hospital discharge outcomes and discharge location among ICU-admitted patients diagnosed with viral hepatitis using machine learning: a retrospective cohort study of the MIMIC-IV database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106819</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106819</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108926?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of a community-based intervention for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in two rural populations in Kenya and The Gambia: IMPLEMENT-IHCoR feasibility study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108926?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hypertension is the leading global risk factor for mortality, causing over 10 million deaths annually. In sub-Saharan Africa, hypertension prevalence is high, particularly in rural areas, where it is less likely to be diagnosed, treated or controlled effectively. This results in a high burden of complications, including heart failure, stroke and kidney disease. Community-centred approaches using community health workers (CHWs), risk-based approaches and simplified treatment regimens have shown promise in improving hypertension management. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of such approaches in rural sub-Saharan Africa.</p>
<p>The primary aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of a community-centred intervention for hypertension management in rural Kenya and The Gambia. The objectives are to evaluate the intervention&rsquo;s adoption, fidelity, reach and dose; understand the mechanisms of action and contextual factors affecting its implementation; assess acceptability from the perspectives of patients, healthcare providers and policymakers; estimate the costs associated with the intervention; and evaluate study procedures to inform the design of a future full-scale trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a mixed-methods, non-randomised, single-arm feasibility study, designed in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) framework and checklist for feasibility and pilot studies, including best practice guidance for non-randomised feasibility studies. The study will be conducted in two rural sites: Kilifi, Kenya and Kiang West, The Gambia. The intervention was codesigned with stakeholders and includes community-based hypertension screening by CHWs, risk stratification and hypertension-mediated organ damage assessment at primary healthcare facilities, followed by treatment initiation using single-pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive therapy for eligible individuals. Training will be provided to all healthcare providers involved in the study. We will screen 500 participants aged 30&ndash;80 years at their residence (250 from each country), and we expect that about 45% will be referred for additional assessments and of these 25% (or 10% of the total sample) will be prescribed treatment with SPC. Data collection to evaluate the intervention and its implementation will involve quantitative measures of feasibility and clinical outcomes; observations to assess fidelity and costing measures; and qualitative interviews and focus group discussions with patients, healthcare providers and policymakers to understand the acceptability and contextual influences on intervention implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the Kenyan National Committee for Science, Technology and Innovation (ref: 415561), the Gambia Government/Medical Research Council Joint Ethics Committee (ref: 31372) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee (ref: 31372). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, policy briefs, community engagement forums and accessible summaries shared via the Improving Hypertension Control in Rural sub-Saharan Africa and partner newsletters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This study is registered with the ISRCTN- The UK&rsquo;s Clinical Study Registry (<A HREF="ISRCTN81228019">ISRCTN81228019</A>), and Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202504839027548).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hassan, S., Kagwanja, N., Diallo, B., Willis, R., Hine, J., Brazeal, A., Obure, V., Kalu, C., Mwagwabi, N. C., Shah, A. S., Mumba, N., Oyando, R., Perkins, A., Nolte, E., Tsofa, B., Barasa, E., Perel, P., Jobe, M., Etyang, A., Murphy, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108926</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108926</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of a community-based intervention for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in two rural populations in Kenya and The Gambia: IMPLEMENT-IHCoR feasibility study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108926</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108926</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109384?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in displaced and non-displaced individuals after armed conflict: cross-sectional survey evidence from Kasai, Democratic Republic of Congo]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109384?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The study aims to estimate the prevalence of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the Greater Kasai region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and to examine how demographic and socio-economic factors, such as displacement status and livelihood conditions, are associated with these mental health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional two-stage multi-cluster sampling survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>In 2016&ndash;2019, a violent conflict in the Greater Kasai region of the DRC led to widespread atrocities and massive displacement. The population not only has to cope with the aftermath of interpersonal violence, loss of loved ones and displacement but also faces severe food shortages and livelihood crises.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Data were collected in 2022 from 4069 randomly selected heads of households (displaced and non-displaced) within 126 randomly selected localities in 27 health zones in the Greater Kasai. The study collected data from households with different displacement experiences: internally displaced people (IDPs), returned IDPs, repatriated refugees and members of the host community (those without a displacement history).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes are mental health disorders. Anxiety, depression and PTSD were measured with the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Primary Care PTSD Screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of anxiety, depression and PTSD was 8.3%, 18.3% and 37.8%, respectively. Anxiety affected 10% of non-displaced respondents, with a similar prevalence among IDPs (9%) and returned IDPs (8%), compared with a substantially lower prevalence among repatriated refugees (4%). About 17% of non-displaced respondents have symptoms of depression; this number is considerably higher for IDPs (22%) and returned IDPs (22%) but lower for repatriated refugees (11%). Around 40% of the non-displaced individuals, IDPs and repatriated refugees are characterised by PTSD, while this share is lower for returned IDPs (31%). Overall, a one unit increase in food insecurity (on a 0&ndash;7 scale) is associated with higher levels of anxiety (0.33 on a 0&ndash;21 scale, p&lt;0.001), depression (0.60 on a 0&ndash;27 scale, p&lt;0.001) and PTSD (0.07 on a 0&ndash;5 scale, p&lt;0.05); these associations exist for those with and without a displacement history.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Food insecurity is associated with poor mental health in Greater Kasai. Further research needs to explore how to develop synergistic interventions to improve both mental health and livelihoods in conflict-affected populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoop, N., van der Windt, P., Weber, S., Ventevogel, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109384</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109384</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in displaced and non-displaced individuals after armed conflict: cross-sectional survey evidence from Kasai, Democratic Republic of Congo]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109384</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109384</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110683?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drivers of youth mental health and wellbeing: a large-scale cross-sectional study in Morocco]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110683?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to describe the factors influencing mental health and wellbeing from the perspective of Moroccan youth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a descriptive cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All 12 regions in Morocco.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Perceived priority drivers of mental health and well-being among youth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 1182 participants were included (mean age 20.5 years, 68.2% female, 85.7% from urban settings). Regarding health and nutrition, 46.3% valued sleep, 59.7% emphasised physical health, 53.1% highlighted access to quality healthcare and 56.5% prioritised clean air. In terms of connectedness and contribution, 75.7% rated family relationships as critical to their well-being, while 42.5% emphasised positive peer relationships. Regarding safety and supportive environments, 64.7% considered personal safety essential, 70% prioritised the fulfilment of basic needs and 63.7% valued personal information protection. For education and competence, 54.4% emphasised learning opportunities and 62.2% identified self-confidence as key drivers. Regarding agency and resilience, 59.4% valued independence, 68.5% stressed having a sense of purpose and 55% identified hope and optimism as key to their well-being. In digital well-being, 37.7% believed social media helped maintain connections, 38% viewed it as a learning tool while 31.6% reported it as a source of stress and anxiety</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study provides valuable insights into priority drivers of youth mental health in Morocco from the perspective of Moroccan youth which should be the target for future interventions aiming to promote youth well-being. The findings contribute to the limited data on youth mental health in low and middle-income countries, highlighting the urgency for comprehensive mental health services and further research on subjective well-being.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bnimoussa, J., Bouaddi, O., El badisy, I., Khalis, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110683</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110683</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drivers of youth mental health and wellbeing: a large-scale cross-sectional study in Morocco]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110683</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111451?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ontologies and zoonotic risk-related knowledge, attitudes and practices: a cross-sectional survey in Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Guatemala]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111451?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine whether Indigenous Peoples&rsquo; and Local Communities&rsquo; (IPLC) ontologies are associated with knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to wildlife cohabitation and zoonotic disease transmission in biodiversity-rich areas of Latin America.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional household survey using a standardised KAP questionnaire. Ontologies were classified using latent class analysis. Associations between ontology classes and outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Urban, rural and protected areas in biodiversity-rich regions of Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Guatemala.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 2903 individuals aged &ge;10 years were recruited through random household sampling (response rate 85%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were defined according to the KAP framework. Knowledge outcomes comprised combined knowledge of zoonotic disease transmission from wildlife to humans and knowledge of zoonotic risks associated with wildlife trade. Perceived training needs related to zoonotic disease prevention were analysed as a secondary knowledge outcome measure. Attitudes were measured through risk perception, operationalised as concern about zoonotic disease transmission. Practices included self-reported hunting and slaughtering of wildlife.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analysis identified three distinct ontology classes: Relational environmentalism (52% of the population), characterised by strong spiritual connections to animals and a tendency to protect wildlife; Dualistic environmentalism (28%), with a weaker spiritual connection to animals but a commitment to wildlife conservation; and Neutral (20%), demonstrating little spiritual connection to animals and a neutral attitude towards wildlife conservation. In the logistic regression analyses, both environmentalism groups exhibited greater knowledge of zoonotic transmission and concern about outbreaks, with members of the Relational class demonstrating higher levels of these attributes. Furthermore, members of the Dualistic environmentalism class were less likely to have close contact with animals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In Latin America&rsquo;s biodiversity-rich regions, individuals whose ontology aligns with environmentalism appear to demonstrate a heightened awareness of zoonoses, particularly those who adhere to a Relational environmentalism perspective. Consequently, the integration of IPLC cultural knowledge holds potential to enhance wildlife conservation measures and contribute to the mitigation of disease transmission. Further research is needed to explore causal pathways and the integration of culturally grounded approaches into public health interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Radon, K., Kuhn, C., Pinto Navia, C. F., Vasquez-Almazan, C. R., Siqueira de Carvalho, D., Salini Abrahao Pires, L., Costa-Ribeiro, M. C. V. d., Adler, M., Burrone, M. S., Solis-Soto, M. T., on behalf of KAP Wildlife project team, Solis-Soto, Kuhn, Carvalho, Vasquez-Almazan, Burrone, Navia, Adler, Heredia, Morales, Pires, Costa-Ribeiro, Almeida, Pires, Melo, Buffon, Almeida, Vivar, Zamorra, Garrido, Radon]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111451</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111451</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ontologies and zoonotic risk-related knowledge, attitudes and practices: a cross-sectional survey in Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Guatemala]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111451</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111451</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111672?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Electronic nicotine delivery systems versus nicotine replacement therapies and risk of smoking relapse: evidence from a US nationwide prospective cohort (Cancer Prevention Study-3)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111672?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To compare use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) with nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) on risk of cigarette smoking relapse by people who had already quit cigarettes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study-3, a nationwide US cohort with follow-up every 3 years beginning in 2015.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults who in 2015 had already quit smoking (n=3112) or were smoking (n=1018) and who in 2018 reported past or current exclusive use of ENDS or NRT and provided smoking status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Relapse to cigarette smoking in 2018 among people who were already quit in 2015, and abstinence from cigarettes in 2018 among people who were smoking in 2015.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among respondents who had already quit in 2015, the unadjusted risk of relapse in 2018 was approximately three times greater for those who reported past exclusive ENDS versus past exclusive NRT use (11.2% vs 3.9%; relative risk (RR)=2.90, 95% CI 2.12 to 3.98). This association remained significant in a multivariable-adjusted model (RR=2.09, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.92). Among those smoking in 2015, the unadjusted likelihood of abstinence in 2018 was higher for those who reported current ENDS versus NRT use (RR=1.35, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.80), but the multivariable model adjusted for smoking frequency indicated no difference in abstinence (RR=1.38; 95% CI 0.93 to 2.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ENDS use was associated with greater relapse risk than NRT among people who had already quit. Although ENDS may support shorter-term cessation, further long-term observational research is needed to clarify relapse risks associated with ENDS relative to NRT.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Westmaas, J. L., Landry, M., Nighbor, T., Xue, Z., Diver, R. W., Patel, A., Kondo, K. K., Asare, S., Lori, A., Bandi, P., Nargis, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T03:27:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111672</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111672</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Electronic nicotine delivery systems versus nicotine replacement therapies and risk of smoking relapse: evidence from a US nationwide prospective cohort (Cancer Prevention Study-3)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111672</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111672</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102785?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene polymorphisms and treatment outcomes in HIV and MTB coinfection in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102785?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) is closely associated with the management of HIV and tuberculosis (TB) coinfection because it modulates the metabolism of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. The frequency of UGT1A1 polymorphisms varies widely among sub-Saharan Africans. However, studies examining the frequency of UGT1A1 polymorphisms and their impact on drug response profiles, accounting for environmental factors, drug&ndash;drug and gene&ndash;drug interactions and non-compliance remain sparse. Given that HIV and TB treatments often involve complex drug regimens with a high risk of interactions, understanding the role of UGT1A1 polymorphisms in these contexts is crucial. Therefore, this scoping review aims to map existing evidence, synthesise findings on how genetic polymorphisms in the UGT1A1 gene affect the metabolism of ARVs and antituberculosis drugs, and identify gaps in literature regarding their impacts on drug efficacy, toxicity and treatment outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The methodology for this scoping review will follow the guidelines outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology Manual. Using the keywords, UGT1A1 polymorphism, HIV and TB coinfection, treatment outcomes and SSA, we will search for articles on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus to obtain relevant articles published from January 2010 to April 2026. Two independent reviewers will screen and assess quality of titles and abstracts against the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and manage the data using Microsoft Excel. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion and where necessary a third reviewer will be consulted. Findings will be narratively synthesised across polymorphisms and treatment outcomes. The reviewers will meet and discuss the themes that will arise as well as the interpretation of the themes to minimise bias in the findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The scoping review relies on publicly available published resources, exempting it from ethical review board oversight. The review findings will be shared in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vhanda, D., Musarurwa, C., Chikwati, R. P., Muziringa, M., Dandara, C., Manasa, J., Chirenda, J., Mavenyengwa, R. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102785</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102785</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene polymorphisms and treatment outcomes in HIV and MTB coinfection in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102785</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102785</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102883?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spatial variation in HIV test non-uptake among antenatal care-attending pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional study using demographic and health survey data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102883?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study assessed the spatial distribution of HIV test non-uptake among pregnant women who attended antenatal care (ANC) in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region. 24 SSA countries were included in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data source</st>
<p>Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), 2016&ndash;2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>82 397 women who were pregnant in the last 2 years preceding the survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measure</st>
<p>HIV test non-uptake, which is a legacy indicator of HIV test among pregnant women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>The HIV test non-uptake among ANC attending pregnant women was 39.6% (95% CI 39.27% to 39.93%). The spatial autocorrelation test revealed that HIV testing non-uptake among pregnant women was clustered. The global Moran&rsquo;s I value was 0.48 with a p value &lt;0.01. Hotspot areas were those with high rates of HIV testing non-uptake. These hotspot areas were located in most parts of Mali, Mauritania, Madagascar, Guinea, Senegal, central parts of Angola, eastern part of Senegal and northern parts of Ethiopia. The Multiscale Geographical Weighted Regression (MGWR) model explained 91% of the spatial variation of HIV test non-uptake among pregnant women, who were in the age group 15&ndash;19 years, had no formal education and no health insurance, and less than four antenatal care contacts were significantly associated with HIV test non-uptake.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There was a significant geographical variation in HIV test non-uptake among pregnant women attending antenatal care (ANC) in sub-Saharan Africa. Prioritising hotspot areas with high rates of HIV test non-uptake for spatially targeted interventions is essential. Policymakers, health professionals, and other stakeholders should focus on improving women&rsquo;s formal education, expanding health insurance coverage, and increasing ANC contacts to ensure that each visit includes HIV screening. Moreover, special attention should be given to younger women to enhance HIV testing uptake among those attending ANC in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alemu, E. A., Endalamew, S. G., Alemaw, H. B., Kebede, H. A., Assefa, S. K., Andarge, E. M., Taye, E. A., Asgedom, D. K., Kebede, S. A., Zegeye, A. T., Abate, B. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102883</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102883</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spatial variation in HIV test non-uptake among antenatal care-attending pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional study using demographic and health survey data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102883</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102883</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103813?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adverse sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental healthcare in six low- and middle-income countries (MASC): a mixed-methods study with lessons for the future]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103813?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The <I>Mental health care: Adverse Sequelae of COVID-19</I> study aimed to (1) compare the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for mental health services and people with pre-existing mental health conditions (MHCs) in six low- and middle-income countries and (2) identify good practice to mitigate these impacts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An observational study, using a mixed-methods convergent design triangulating data from (1) semistructured interviews or focus groups and/or a self-completed survey, (2) routine service utilisation data, (3) local grey literature and (4) expert consultation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in Chile, Ethiopia, Georgia, Nigeria, South Africa and Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>121 key informants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We found clear evidence in all sites that the pandemic exacerbated pre-existing disadvantages experienced by people with MHCs and led to a deterioration in the availability and quality of care, especially psychosocial care. Alongside increased vulnerability to COVID-19, people with MHCs faced additional barriers to accessing prevention and treatment interventions compared with the general population. To varying extents, sites showed accelerated implementation of digital technologies, but with evidence of worsening inequities in access. In sites where primary care-based mental healthcare was more developed or prioritised, systems seemed more resilient and adaptive.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our findings have the following implications. First, these mental health service reductions are clear examples of &lsquo;structural stigma&rsquo;, namely policy level decisions in healthcare which place a low priority upon services for people with MHCs. Second, integration of mental healthcare into all general healthcare settings is key to ensuring accessibility and parity of physical and mental healthcare. Third, digital innovations should be designed to strengthen and not fragment health systems. We discuss these findings in terms of anticipating such challenges for future pandemics and preparing layers of resilience.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanlon, C., Lempp, H., Alem, A., Alemu, A. A., Alvarado, R., Ayinde, O. O., Adesola, A., Brohan, E., Davies, T., Fekadu, W., Gureje, O., Jalagania, L., Makhashvili, N., Mihretu, A., Misganaw, E., Milenova, M., Mujirishvili, T., Myshakivska, O., Pinchuk, I., Solis-Araya, C., Sorsdahl, K., Soto-Brandt, G., Susser, E., Toro-Devia, O., Votruba, N., Wickramasinghe, A., Williams, S., Thornicroft, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103813</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103813</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adverse sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental healthcare in six low- and middle-income countries (MASC): a mixed-methods study with lessons for the future]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103813</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103813</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e104484?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Financial precarity and mental health among French health students: a nationwide cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e104484?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to describe the prevalence and determinants of financial precarity and examine its associations with mental health, healthcare avoidance and academic outcomes among French health students.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nationwide cross-sectional study based on an online self-administered questionnaire. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with financial precarity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All 34 French health universities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 12 565 health students participated, including medical (56%), paramedical (21%), midwifery, odontology, pharmacy or physiotherapy students (12%) and first-year health students (11%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Financial precarity was defined as an indicator combining financial insecurity, frequent overdrafts and foregoing essential purchases. Primary outcomes included depressive symptoms, anxiety and emotional exhaustion. Secondary outcomes included healthcare avoidance and academic outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 12,565 respondents, 56% were medical students, 21% were paramedical, 12% midwifery, odontology, pharmacy or physiotherapy and 11% first-year health students. Financial precarity varies by academic fields of health, ranging from 4.6% in first-year health students to 12% in paramedical students. Adjusted analyses showed lower odds of precarity among medical (aOR=0.69; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.83), midwifery, odontology, pharmacy or physiotherapy (aOR=0.55; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.72) and first-year health students (aOR=0.54; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.77) than paramedical students. Risk factors included very low parental socio-economic status (aOR=2.96; 95% CI 2.33 to 3.89) and student loans (aOR=2.78; 95% CI 2.33 to 3.32). Financial precarity was strongly associated with depressive symptoms (aOR=4.90; 95% CI 4.13 to 5.80), anxiety (aOR=3.84; 95% CI 3.13 to 4.52), emotional exhaustion (aOR=8.49; 95% CI 5.98 to 12.06), renouncing healthcare (aOR=6.21; 95% CI 5.01 to 7.70) and repeating a year (aOR=1.80; 95% CI 1.54 to 2.10).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Financial precarity among health students is shaped by economic and academic factors, with family support protective of and low socio-economic background increasing vulnerability, and is associated with poorer mental health, reduced healthcare access and academic difficulties.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tavolacci, M.-P., Berthelot, P., Dellamonica, J., Josseran, L., Veber, B., Ladner, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104484</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104484</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Financial precarity and mental health among French health students: a nationwide cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104484</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104484</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109130?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Latent profiles of movement behaviour compositions and their associations with adiposity and health-related quality of life in Australian children: a cross-sectional and 12-month longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109130?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify profiles of compositional movement behaviour patterns among children and examine cross-sectional and 12-month associations with adiposity markers and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Secondary analysis of data from the TransformUs cluster randomised controlled trial with cross-sectional and 12-month follow-up analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary schools in metropolitan and regional areas of Victoria, Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Children aged 7&ndash;11 years with valid accelerometer at baseline, regardless of demographic, adiposity and HRQoL data available (n=792), were included in the analytical sample for the latent profile analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measures</st>
<p>Sedentary time, light-intensity physical activity (LPA) and moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) along with their respective mean bout lengths were derived from raw acceleration data. Latent profile analysis used these measures (total times, as isometric log ratios and mean bout lengths) as input variables to classify distinct profiles for us as a categorical exposure variable in regression models. Primary outcomes were age- and sex-standardised body mass index, waist circumference and parent-reported HRQoL at baseline. Secondary outcomes were the same measures assessed at 12-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four distinct profiles were identified. The <I>high MVPA-short sedentary bout</I> profile (n=184) was characterised by the highest levels of MVPA, moderate sedentary time and the shortest mean sedentary bout duration. The <I>low sedentary-high LPA</I> profile (n=54) had the lowest sedentary time, the highest LPA and the longest mean LPA bout duration. Two profiles were characterised by high sedentary time: the <I>high sedentary-long sedentary bout</I> profile (n=149), which had the longest mean sedentary bout durations, and the <I>high sedentary-shorter bouts</I> profile (n=405), which also had high sedentary time but shorter bout durations for all intensities. While <I>the omnibus Wald test for differences across profiles indicated uncertainty in the overall profile effect, the high MVPA-short sedentary bout</I> profile had favourable adiposity levels cross-sectionally compared with the <I>high sedentary-long sedentary bout</I> reference profile in pairwise comparisons. No longitudinal associations were detected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Four distinct movement profiles were identified. Few pairwise differences between health outcomes were observed. While MVPA remains a key factor for promoting healthy body weight, our findings suggest that a variety of movement patterns - including those characterised by lower sedentary time and higher LPA - may also support health in children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>This study is a secondary analysis of the TransformUs effectiveness-implementation trial, registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000204347; 1 April 2017).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verswijveren, S. J., Miatke, A., Hesketh, K. D., Ridgers, N. D., Contardo Ayala,, A. M., Dumuid, D., Timperio, A., Lund Rasmussen, C., Stanford, T. E., Gusi, N., Salmon, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109130</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109130</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Latent profiles of movement behaviour compositions and their associations with adiposity and health-related quality of life in Australian children: a cross-sectional and 12-month longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109130</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109130</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109272?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between hypertension status and severity and tinnitus: a cross-sectional analysis of the Fasa adult cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109272?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Previous studies and meta-analyses suggest an association between hypertension and tinnitus; however, the influence of hypertension severity and control status remains unclear.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We aimed to investigate the association between hypertension and tinnitus in detail using a large, population-based dataset from a rural setting.</p>
<p>Design</p>
<p>Observational cross-sectional study.</p>
<p>Setting</p>
<p>Sheshdeh, Fasa, Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We analysed data from 9775 individuals in the general population, aged 35&ndash;70 years, excluding those with a history of cancer, pregnancy or medical conditions known to cause tinnitus, such as stroke, seizures or multiple sclerosis. Additionally, although the study design aimed to exclude participants using aminoglycosides because of their significant ototoxic effects, no such users were identified during the study period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcomes</st>
<p>Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of &ge;140 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of &ge;90 mm Hg on at least two separate measurements or as current use of antihypertensive medications following a prior diagnosis. These medications included ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, diuretics, aldosterone antagonists and atenolol. Stage I hypertension was classified as an SBP of 140&ndash;159 mm Hg or a DBP of 90&ndash;99 mm Hg, while stage II was defined as an SBP of &ge;160 mm Hg or a DBP of &ge;100 mm Hg. Controlled blood pressure was defined as values below these thresholds. Tinnitus, assessed by a self-reported questionnaire, was defined as a continuous wheezing sound in the ear persisting for more than 1 week.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among participants (4446 males, 5309 females; mean age 48.55 (SD 9.53) years), the prevalence of tinnitus and hypertension was 7.4% and 19.3%, respectively. Hypertension was significantly associated with higher odds of tinnitus (adjusted OR=1.34; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.62). Notably, even participants with controlled hypertension had a 27% increased odds (OR=1.27; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.59) compared with normotensive individuals. The odds were highest in those with uncontrolled grade II hypertension (OR=2.08; 95% CI 1.25 to 3.47), demonstrating a dose-response relationship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings suggest a positive association between hypertension and tinnitus, with odds increasing alongside the severity and poor control of hypertension. Importantly, even controlled hypertension was associated with elevated odds, indicating that tinnitus screening may be warranted in all hypertensive patients, regardless of control status. These results underscore the need for heightened clinical awareness and further research into the pathophysiological mechanisms linking vascular health and auditory symptoms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Najibi, A., Bazmi, S., Moradi, M., Mohammadi, Z., Al Kamel, A., Yazdanpanah, M. H., Farjam, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109272</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109272</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between hypertension status and severity and tinnitus: a cross-sectional analysis of the Fasa adult cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109272</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109865?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Values and preferences of patients with severe mental illness regarding smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review with best-fit framework synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109865?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify values and preferences regarding smoking cessation interventions among adults with severe mental illness</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review with best-fit framework synthesis</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus from inception to 14 November 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study selection</st>
<p>Studies with any design, in any clinical and geographical setting, reporting on adult (18+) current or past smokers with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar or mood disorder, including major depressive disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder. We selected all quantitative and qualitative findings regarding patients&rsquo; values and preferences, including beliefs, attitudes, behaviours and perceived barriers and facilitators, in relation to smoking cessation interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened studies. After a pilot to increase accuracy, data were extracted by one reviewer and verified by another. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We used the best-fit framework synthesis methodology to synthesise the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 14 970 identified articles, 65 were included. Most studies were of moderate to high quality. Financial costs posed a significant barrier, while education and social support emerged as important facilitators. Patients preferred personal interactions with healthcare providers. Their motivation for cessation varied and was influenced by habits and perceived nicotine dependence. Health concerns and financial savings were primary drivers for reflective motivation. Beliefs regarding treatment varied. Although commonly used, scepticism about nicotine replacement therapy and concerns about the long-term safety of electronic delivery systems were reported. Overall, patients preferred personalised, flexible programmes and emphasised the need for tailored approaches. Digital interventions, especially mobile apps, that provide support, motivational content and relevant information, were perceived as appealing and helpful when sufficiently considering accessibility and usability aspects. Patients commonly perceived smoking as a coping mechanism for negative emotions. Developing new coping strategies and creating smoke-free environments were deemed to contribute to successful cessation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patient-centred care for people with severe mental illness should leverage behavioural and pharmacological strategies for smoking cessation. Flexibility, accessibility and ongoing support appeared important for addressing stress, withdrawal symptom interpretation and relapse vulnerability in this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42022337933.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coteur, K., Tops, L., Bekkering, G. E., de Almeida Ferreira Fonseca, L., van den Brand, F., Cloetens, H., Zeng, L., Aertgeerts, B., Delvaux, N., Agarwal, A., Agoritsas, T., Vermandere, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109865</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109865</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Values and preferences of patients with severe mental illness regarding smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review with best-fit framework synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109865</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109865</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110852?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of patient-held medication records (PHMRs) on medication management across the continuum of health care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110852?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the impact of patient-held medication records (PHMRs) on identifying and/or resolving medication discrepancies and other drug-related problems (DRPs) before, during or after care transition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review and narrative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane via Ovid and CINAHL were searched from 1990 to 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility</st>
<p>Any study design investigating the impact of PHMRs in isolation or in combination with other interventions on medication discrepancies and other DRPs was included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Quality of studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. One reviewer screened the titles and abstracts, assessed full texts and extracted data from all papers with three additional reviewers collectively reviewing 10% at each stage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 31 studies were included: 13 reported data related to the impact of PHMRs on medication discrepancies, 10 on other DRPs and eight on both. 12 studies explored use of PHMRs integrated into routine clinical flows, with 10 showing that they contributed to the detection and resolution of discrepancies. Seven studies explored use of PHMRs enabling patients to independently complete reconciliation at home (eg, via patient portals). Five of these showed favourable findings in detecting and resolving discrepancies. The remaining two compared their use against standard medication reconciliation: one showed their non-inferiority, while the other favoured the standard process but noted similarities between them. 18 studies reported on other DRPs where PHMRs contributed to detecting and improving problems such as non-adherence (n=7), adverse drug events (ADEs) (n=4), therapeutic duplications or drug-interactions (n=3) and indication without medications (n=2). Two studies evaluating the rate of ADE (per patient) did not find significant findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>PHMRs can engage patients in their medication safety and contribute to improving medication management. Further large-scale studies are needed to better understand their effectiveness as well as their unintended consequences.</p>
<p><b>PROSPERO registration number</b></p>
<p><b>(CRD42022309343) -</b> An amendment was made to update the search end date.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alsalem, N. A., Franklin, B. D., Alwhaibi, M., Garfield, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110852</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110852</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of patient-held medication records (PHMRs) on medication management across the continuum of health care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110852</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110852</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111638?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global, regional and national burden of maternal haemorrhage (2000-2021) and projections to 2050 in 204 countries and territories]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111638?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To estimate the global, regional and national burden of maternal haemorrhage (2000&ndash;2021) and its 2050 projections in 204 countries and territories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study systematic analysis of the burden of maternal haemorrhage sourced data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study. We estimated the incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years lived with disability (YLDs) and years of life lost (YLLs) due to maternal haemorrhage. Changes in the burden from 2000 to 2021 were computed using AAPC. To detect statistically notable changes in the trends of maternal haemorrhage metrics between 2000 and 2021, Joinpoint regression analysis using the Joinpoint Regression Programme was conducted. We also projected mortality rates, YLDs and YLLs through to 2050 using maps and trends generated by the GBD Foresight visualisation tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Globally, the incidence of maternal haemorrhage among women aged 15&ndash;49 years declined from 881.98 per 100 000 reproductive aged women (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 687.01 to &ndash;1150.23) in 2000 to 714.00 (95% UI 556.97 o t908.54) in 2021, with an average annual percentage change (AAPC) of &ndash;0.91 (&ndash;1.37 to &ndash;0.49). Similar downward trends were observed for maternal deaths, DALYs, YLDs and YLLs attributable to maternal haemorrhage, with AAPCs of &ndash;3.78 (&ndash;4.39 to &ndash;3.18), &ndash;4.68 (&ndash;4.83 to &ndash;4.55), &ndash;1.21 (&ndash;1.54 to &ndash;0.89) and &ndash;4.80 (&ndash;5.10 to &ndash;4.52), respectively. Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly Western Sub-Saharan Africa, recorded the highest burden in 2021, which is almost 300 times higher than in Western Europe. Elevated rates of mortality, DALYs and YLDs were also evident in Sierra Leone, Chad, Niger, Mali, Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Somalia and South Sudan in 2021 and projections for 2050. However, the high-income Asia Pacific region had the lowest incidence, DALYs and YLDs at 151.32 (109.63&ndash;203.68), 2.21 (1.72&ndash;2.86) and 0.87 (0.46&ndash;1.38) per 1 00 000 women, respectively. Australasia recorded the lowest maternal death count and YLLs attributed to maternal haemorrhage at 0.69 (0.50&ndash;0.90) and 0.56 (0.41&ndash;0.74) per 1 00 000 women, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>While the global burden of maternal haemorrhage has declined over time, significant regional and national inequities persist. Even though the 2050 projections show improvement in the burden of maternal haemorrhage, there is also regional and national variation in the rate of decrease in maternal haemorrhage burden. Targeted, context-specific interventions are urgently needed to reduce maternal haemorrhage-related mortality and morbidity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayele, M., Duko, B., Tiruye, T., Ward, P. R., Mwanri, L., Pereira, G., Kitaw, T. A., Abate, B. B., Lake, E. S., Alamrew, A., Yetwale, A., Yilak, G., Tilahun, B. D., Mulugeta, C., Emagneneh, T., Gebremedhin, A. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111638</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111638</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global, regional and national burden of maternal haemorrhage (2000-2021) and projections to 2050 in 204 countries and territories]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111638</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111638</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113483?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of emotional competence on clinical reasoning: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113483?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Given the role of emotions in reasoning, we hypothesised that emotional competence (EC), defined as the ability to identify, understand, express, regulate and use emotions, would increase the quality of physician&rsquo;s clinical reasoning (CR). The objectives of this study were to map the existing literature on the impact of EC on physician&rsquo;s CR and to identify any literature gaps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study is a scoping review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>We included articles from Medline (via Ovid), Embase and Psychinfo and articles found manually, with no limitations in terms of publication date or location.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Inclusion criteria were all physicians and medical students and articles focusing on one or more dimensions of EC (based on the model of Mikolajczak <I>et al</I>) and of CR (based on the framework of Young <I>et al</I>). We excluded non-research articles and articles concerning other health professionals, physicians&rsquo; psychiatric disorders or the impact of emotions on well-being, instrument-handling skills or students&rsquo; academic learning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Results were summarised using descriptive analyses and a narrative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After removing duplicates, we identified 12 046 articles. Following a review of their titles and abstracts, we assessed 268 articles for eligibility and included 98 in the scoping review. Most studies examined the effects of emotional regulation strategies, empathy and global EC scores on clinical performance. Positive effects of EC on uncertainty management and intuitive reasoning have been well documented, as have its effects on diagnostic and therapeutic performance and the development of CR in the context of life-threatening situations. A smaller number of studies suggest a favourable impact on clinical performance in the surgical context and on the quality of prescriptions. The impact of EC on diagnostic and therapeutic performance outside emergency and intraoperative contexts and on patient outcomes remains uncertain. The effects of EC on CR were most evident under conditions of high acute stress, likely due to the increased cognitive load associated with such conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>EC has been found to have a positive impact on CR mainly when dealing with uncertainty and life-threatening emergencies. Stress regulation and the resulting reduction in cognitive load appear to be a key modulator of EC&rsquo;s impact on CR. Further research should focus on the impact of EC on diagnostic and therapeutic performance outside emergency conditions and on patient outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joly, L., Nunes de Sousa, A., Bardiau, M., Dory, V., Bayot, M., Lenoir, A.-L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113483</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113483</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of emotional competence on clinical reasoning: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113483</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113483</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113549?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is there an association between mental health and economic prosperity? A longitudinal ecological study in England, 2011-2019]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113549?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To understand the association between population mental health and economic prosperity at the small area level in England and explore regional differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A longitudinal small area-level analysis exploring the association between a proxy for population mental health and economic prosperity across 6789 small areas in England from 2011 to 2019 (N<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>T=61 101). We apply linear regression models with fixed effects at the area level. Mental health in each area is proxied by a standardised index constructed from administrative data on the use of services related to mental health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>National study of geographical areas in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Small areas of England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome</st>
<p>Economic prosperity is measured by gross disposable household income (GDHI) per capita at the small area level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A one SD increase in the index is linked to a 1.9% (95% CI 1.4% to 2.5%) rise in GDHI. The association varies depending on the region, with the strongest association in the North East.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is evidence of a positive association between proxies for better population mental health and subsequent household income per capita, varying by region. While we cannot infer causality, these findings are consistent with the view that improving mental health may support local economic prosperity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mignon, D., Khavandi, S., Bambra, C., Sutton, M., Munford, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113549</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113549</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is there an association between mental health and economic prosperity? A longitudinal ecological study in England, 2011-2019]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113549</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113549</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115010?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Healthcare professionals perspectives on point-of-care testing quality and access in Australian healthcare services: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115010?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore healthcare professionals&rsquo; perceptions and experiences with point-of-care testing (PoCT) implementation within Australia&rsquo;s healthcare system and identify potential strategies for effective governance and improvements to regulation and guidelines that facilitate coordinated integration of quality PoCT into healthcare systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive qualitative study with thematic analysis with codes derived inductively from the transcriptions and a structured framework analysis using the six building blocks of the WHO Health Systems Framework exploring barriers and enablers to PoCT implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>Healthcare settings in Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Healthcare workers with patient care responsibilities and healthcare administrators with oversight or regulatory responsibility for a service. 18 participants were interviewed with four from hospitals, four from primary care, three from community care, three from pathology laboratories, two from emergency care and two from pharmacy settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Healthcare professionals&rsquo; perspectives on PoCT implementation were grouped into three main themes: (1) community-centric pathology testing, (2) connectivity and continuity of care and (3) quality and governance. Participants identified insufficient health system financing and health information systems as significant barriers to PoCT implementation. Improved practical guidance for workforce training and health service delivery to interpret the current regulation outside of laboratory settings was viewed as a potential enabler to establishing PoCT within healthcare services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Participants reflected that Australia has several examples of successful PoCT programmes providing patient-centred pathology to improve healthcare equity. However, the lack of information systems, funding, workforce training and diagnostic strategies prohibits the implementation of PoCT at-scale. It was recommended that adequately financing PoCT to encompass costs for testing, quality management and workforce training would incentivise services to obtain accreditation and ensure quality healthcare delivery. Despite the potential of PoCT to improve equitable healthcare access and patient outcomes, health system strengthening is required to integrate PoCT effectively across Australian healthcare services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prestedge, J., El-Murr, A., Williamson, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115010</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115010</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Healthcare professionals perspectives on point-of-care testing quality and access in Australian healthcare services: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115010</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115010</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implications of relying on manufacturer patient support programs for access to high-cost specialty and biologic medicines: a critical qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Pharmaceutical manufacturers routinely launch high-cost, specialty medicines, including biologics and biosimilars, with an accompanying patient support program (PSP). PSPs offer patients financial support, case management and clinical services to facilitate access to the promoted medicine. Because these programs are proprietary, there is little publicly available information, thus, this study aimed to generate in-depth understandings of the patient, health system and policy-level implications of relying on manufacturer PSPs for affordable access to high-cost medicines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative, critical ethnographic study conducted from November 2023 to April 2025. We conducted an interpretive, thematic analysis, triangulating fieldnotes (40 hours observations at public events), semistructured in-depth interview transcripts (n=48 interviews with 52 participants) and documents (ie, policies, media, reports).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study examined direct experiences with manufacturer PSPs across Canada. PSPs have proliferated in Canada as the universal public health insurance scheme does not cover outpatient prescription drugs or infusion services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A purposive sample of 52 participants with direct experience of pharmaceutical industry PSPs, including patients prescribed specialty medicines, clinicians, pharmaceutical industry and PSP provider employees, payers and policymakers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Manufacturer PSPs are the default pathway for people to afford and access high-cost specialty and biologic prescription medicines in Canada. Though they are the only care pathway available, participants experienced support as variably helpful, stressful and superfluous; variable over time and across patients&rsquo; experiences; and available at the discretion of the PSP. Across participants, four core themes were identified: (1) patients are required to engage with PSPs in exchange for access; (2) outsourcing supports for access to medicines gives rise to a parallel, private health system, generating additional health system complexity; (3) programs are inherently designed for physicians, thus adoption is prioritised over access; and (4) this results in calculated policy trade-offs and health system and patient risks when depending on manufacturer PSPs for affordable access to medicines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients and health systems are precariously dependent on manufacturers to afford and access high-cost, specialty medicines. As a parallel, private care system, there remains little transparency nor patient accountability, with access at the discretion of manufacturers through physician intermediaries. Thus, reliance on pharmaceutical industry resources for affordable access to medicines may incur greater costs for patients and health systems in the longer term. Policymakers need to consider how to design patient-centred, equitable, accountable systems that ensure affordable access to important medicines.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grundy, Q., Hart, D., Lexchin, J., Persaud, N., Tadrous, M., Gagnon, M.-A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117321</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117321</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implications of relying on manufacturer patient support programs for access to high-cost specialty and biologic medicines: a critical qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117321</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117632?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Auricular Point Acupressure Self-Management (APA-SM) program for chronic musculoskeletal pain among rural populations: a protocol for a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117632?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a leading cause of incurred personal healthcare costs and disability in the USA. It disproportionately affects rural populations, who are more likely to be uninsured, lack access to a regular healthcare provider and experience a higher prevalence of CMP. As a result of reduced access to non-pharmacological care, there is greater reliance on opioids. The Auricular Point Acupressure &ndash; Self-Management (APA-SM) program is a simple, needleless, evidence-based therapy that empowers individuals to self-manage their pain. Preliminary studies, including a recent UG3 pilot testing, demonstrated feasibility, safety and significant improvements in pain and function. Guided by Bandura&rsquo;s self-efficacy model and informed by stakeholder input, APA-SM integrates a smartphone application, ecological momentary assessment and personalized motivational messaging to enhance adherence and behavior change. This study protocol describes the design of a real-world, hybrid effectiveness-implementation, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical impact and sustainability of APA-SM in rural settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a pragmatic, three-arm randomized controlled trial in Texas and South Carolina, enrolling 693 adults with CMP (231 per group). Participants will be randomized to: (1) APA-SM with remote training, (2) APA-SM with in-person training or (3) education control. The primary outcome is pain impact measured by the PEG (composite score of pain intensity, interference on enjoyment of life, and general activity) scale at immediate post-intervention (4 weeks), with follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes include National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-Term Clinical Pain Core common data elements (eg, psychological functioning, disability, sleep, quality of life), opioid use and patient-reported adherence and satisfaction. Implementation outcomes will be assessed at both the patient and provider levels, guided by the RE-AIM framework. Cost-effectiveness will be estimated using implementation costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and predictive factors for APA-SM treatment response will be identified using statistical machine learning approaches and historical electronic health record data. The target sample size (231 per group) provides 90% power to detect a moderate effect size (Cohen&rsquo;s <I>d</I>=0.35), accounting for 25% attrition. Randomization occurs at the participant level to reflect real-world delivery and minimize contamination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study, sponsored under grant number 4UH3AT012728, has single Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval at UTHealth Houston, Texas, USA (HSC-SN-25-0443). A Data Safety Monitoring Board will oversee adverse event reporting and trial conduct. Dissemination will occur through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder workshops and community-based reports tailored for rural health systems and policymakers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This trial will provide the first large-scale evaluation of APA-SM in rural U.S. populations, integrating digital health tools and implementation science methods to help address disparities in pain management. By assessing clinical effectiveness, implementation outcomes, cost-effectiveness and predictive response factors, study results will inform scalable strategies for integrating APA-SM further into rural communities and healthcare systems. If successful, APA-SM has the potential to improve pain care access, reduce opioid reliance and provide a sustainable, patient-centered model for chronic pain management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07179016">NCT07179016</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kawi, J., Bolin, J., Wu, H., Min, J., Bora, R., Pace, S., Akpan, I. N., Lockman, A., Nnaka, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117632</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117632</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Auricular Point Acupressure Self-Management (APA-SM) program for chronic musculoskeletal pain among rural populations: a protocol for a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117632</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117632</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcomes of invasive mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients with interstitial lung disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) represent a heterogeneous group of disorders, which have in common persistent inflammation and/or pulmonary fibrosis, involving mainly but not exclusively the interstitium. This results in restrictive ventilatory physiology and limited respiratory reserve. Patients with ILD can have frequent exacerbations of their disease, with subsequent acute respiratory failure that may require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). The diagnosis and management of ILD in the ICU presents unique challenges due to the paucity of evidence supporting survival benefits of organ support in this cohort of patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, and the protocol will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guideline. MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare and CENTRAL will be searched for studies published from inception to 2026, involving adult patients with ILD requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), with or without comparison to non-invasive respiratory support such as high-flow oxygen, non-invasive ventilation (NIV), continuous positive airway pressure or bilevel positive airway pressure. Eligible studies will include randomised controlled trials and observational studies (cohort and case&ndash;control) in adults with ILD and acute respiratory failure requiring IMV in the intensive care setting. Case series with fewer than 10 patients, non-human or in vitro studies and studies involving perioperative lung transplant or lung cancer as the primary diagnosis will be excluded. The primary outcomes assessed will be in-hospital and 1-year mortality, and secondary outcomes will include ventilator-free days, ICU and hospital length of stay, NIV failure, reintubation and postdischarge respiratory outcomes where available. Where feasible, meta-analysis will be conducted using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I&sup2; statistic. Prespecified subgroup analyses will be performed, including ILD subtype (eg, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) vs non-IPF), presence of pulmonary hypertension, timing of IMV initiation (early vs late), baseline lung function (forced vital capacity &ge;50% vs &lt;50%), ventilation strategy (lung protective vs non-specified) and geographical region (eg, Europe, North America, Asia). Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to evaluate robustness of results. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool (RoB 2) for randomised studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised studies. The quality of evidence will be assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review will be based on published data, and as such, no ethical approval is required. Findings from this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications as well as presentations in healthcare-based settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251265836.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kola, N., Parker, R., Hall, A., Spencer, L. G., Fletcher, S. V., Welters, I. D., Johnston, B. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118165</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118165</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcomes of invasive mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients with interstitial lung disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118165</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119277?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of factors associated with severity categories of fall-related injuries among inpatients at a tertiary grade A hospital in Zhejiang province from 2015 to 2025: a retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e119277?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Understanding the factors associated with the severity categories of fall-related injuries and intervening on modifiable determinants can mitigate the risk of serious fall injuries, thereby enhancing patient safety, reducing length of hospital stay and alleviating the economic burden imposed by these injuries. This study aims to identify factors associated with the severity categories of fall-related injuries and to explore differences in the clinical characteristics of patients who sustain such injuries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary care hospital in Zhejiang Province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study included 1030 inpatient fall incidents that occurred between January 2015 and March 2025, drawn from the nursing adverse event reporting system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Based on the fall-related injury outcomes recorded in the nursing adverse event reporting system. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyse the current status of fall-related injuries. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to explore factors associated with the severity categories of fall-related injuries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The incidence of fall-related injuries in this study was 60.6% and the incidence of serious fall injuries was 12.1%. Logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with the severity categories of fall-related injuries. The analysis revealed that patients aged &ge;65 years (minor injuries OR=1.82; serious injuries OR=1.76), women (OR=1.59; 1.90), tripping falls (OR=3.94; 4.48), impact to the knee (OR=4.00) or trunk (OR=4.28; 5.34) and ambulatory status prior to the fall (OR=1.71; 1.97) were all associated with more severe fall injuries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings underscore the need to strengthen fall and fall-related injury prevention efforts among inpatients, particularly among patients aged &ge;65 years and women. Clinical professionals should prioritise protecting high-risk populations through fall prevention and control to reduce the risk of fall-related injuries.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, X., Sun, L., Quan, L., Fan, M., Wang, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-08T03:23:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119277</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119277</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of factors associated with severity categories of fall-related injuries among inpatients at a tertiary grade A hospital in Zhejiang province from 2015 to 2025: a retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119277</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an intervention to increase activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in people with severe mental illness: Walking fOR Health (WORtH) study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>People with severe mental illness (SMI) engage in less physical activity (PA) and more sedentary behaviour (SB) than the general population, contributing to poorer physical health outcomes in this population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a multi-component behaviour change intervention called Walking fOR Health (WORtH), delivered by community mental health teams, aimed at increasing PA and reducing SB compared with a one-off education session in people with SMI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Study recruitment and intervention delivery took place within four community mental health teams in the UK and Ireland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Eligible participants had a diagnosis of a SMI and no contraindications to participating in physical activity. Fifty-four participants (25 male, 29 female; mean age 51.6 years) were recruited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants were randomised to the 13-week WORtH intervention, comprising education, activity tracking and health coaching or an education-only control.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, adherence and acceptability. Clinical outcomes included device-measured (Axivity AX3) and self-reported PA and SB, body anthropometry, physical function and mental well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This feasibility study met 90% target recruitment and 94% of participants provided follow-up data. Adherence to allocated intervention and engagement with all core intervention components was &gt;80%. Qualitative feedback indicated high levels of satisfaction. Valid device-measured moderate-vigorous PA (MVPA), the intended primary outcome for a definitive trial, was obtained from 90% of participants at baseline and 75% of participants at post-intervention. Point estimates indicated a mean increase of 8.6 min/day of MVPA in the intervention group (baseline 54.7 min/day (95% CI 39.5 to 70.0); follow-up 63.3 min/day (95% CI 50.1 to 76.4)) and of 1.0 min/day in the control group (baseline 42.1 min/day (95% CI 24.6 to 59.6); follow-up 43.1 min/day (95% CI 29.6 to 56.5)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results of this study support the feasibility of the WORtH intervention in adults with SMI, and findings will be used to optimise the design of a definitive RCT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04134871">NCT04134871</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McDonough, S. M., Dillon, M., McDonough, C. M., McAuley, J., Clarke, M., Murphy, C., Clarke, M., McArdle, D., Niven, A., Williams, J., Wilson, I., Tully, M. A., Murphy, M. H., Howes, S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-07T17:00:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107567</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107567</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an intervention to increase activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in people with severe mental illness: Walking fOR Health (WORtH) study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107567</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e104459?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of medicinal herbs in an Iranian population: cross-sectional findings from the Fasa PERSIAN Cohort Study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e104459?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence, patterns and correlates of medicinal herb use in a rural Iranian population and to evaluate demographic and clinical predictors using adjusted regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Fasa Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran Cohort Study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Sheshdeh, a rural district in southern Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>10 143 adults aged 35&ndash;70 years enrolled between 2017 and 2019.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Prevalence of self-reported medicinal herb use during the past year and its associations with demographic variables and non-communicable diseases (NCDs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 84.7% of participants (95% CI 83.9% to 85.5%) reported herb use. In multivariable logistic regression, higher educational attainment was positively associated with herb use (university education vs. illiterate: adjusted OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.88). No significant adjusted associations were observed between herb use and major NCDs including diabetes, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease or depression. The most frequently used herbs were <I>Zataria multiflora</I>, <I>Echium amoenum</I> and <I>Matricaria chamomilla</I>, most commonly for anxiety/neurasthenia (81.6%), gastric pain (59.6%) and common cold (49.8%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Medicinal herb use is highly prevalent among adults in southern Iran. Educational level, but not chronic disease status, was associated with herb use. These findings highlight the need for integrated public health strategies regarding safe and evidence-based use of medicinal herbs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mosavat, S. H., Poor, A. K., Homayounfar, R., Naghizadeh, M. M., Farjam, M., Nayebi, N., Naghizadeh, A., Amini, F., Salehi, M., Hashempur, M. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-07T06:00:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104459</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104459</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Complementary medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of medicinal herbs in an Iranian population: cross-sectional findings from the Fasa PERSIAN Cohort Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Complementary medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104459</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104459</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106623?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ElucidatiNg Immunosuppressant pharmacokinetic variabilities by investigating Gut Microbiome modulations After kidney transplantation (ENIGMA): study protocol of a prospective longitudinal trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106623?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy is essential to control alloimmune reactions, prevent graft rejection and improve patient survival rates. However, commonly used drugs like tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have a narrow therapeutic window and exhibit significant inter- and intra-individual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and dose-response relationships. Recent pilot studies suggest that the gut microbiome may influence this variability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>ElucidatiNg Immunosuppressant pharmacokinetic variabilities by investigating Gut Microbiome modulations After kidney transplantation (ENIGMA) is a prospective, low-interventional, naturalistic longitudinal trial designed to identify biomarkers of TAC and MMF PK variability by examining gut microbiome changes and modulations after kidney transplantation and their link with TAC and MMF PK. Biological samples from 50 patients will be collected at nine specific timepoints pre- and post-transplantation using a rich PK and biological sampling strategy. This approach will enable the derivation of PK parameters for the investigated drugs and the creation of a biobank for future hypothesis testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The ENIGMA trial has received ethical approval from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The reference number of our project is R&amp;D/1325226 and is registered on the Clinical Trial Information System (CTIS) platform with European Union Clinical Trial number 2023&ndash;5 08 335-31-00. Results of the trial will be published in scientific journals and presented at different (inter)national conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>2023&ndash;5 08 335-31-00 EMA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbe, A., Boland, L., Kanaan, N., Darius, T., Buemi, A., France, Y., Ronsyn, M.-A., Rahal, S., Lingurski, M., Van Bambeke, F., Bindels, L. B., Haufroid, V., Devresse, A., Elens, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-07T06:00:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106623</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106623</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ElucidatiNg Immunosuppressant pharmacokinetic variabilities by investigating Gut Microbiome modulations After kidney transplantation (ENIGMA): study protocol of a prospective longitudinal trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106623</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106623</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global prevalence and determinants of hospital-acquired COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A proportion of patients hospitalised for COVID-19 acquire the disease during their hospital stay, underscoring the risk of hospital-acquired COVID-19 (HA-COVID-19). This risk is presumed to be high, given how commonly and intensely air and surfaces within hospitals are reportedly contaminated with SARS-CoV-2. However, the true extent of HA-COVID-19 worldwide remains unknown, with limited understanding of factors that influence its occurrence and how these have evolved over time. This review will therefore aim to estimate the pooled prevalence of HA-COVID-19 among hospitalised COVID-19 patients globally and investigate differences by country, type of hospitals, medical specialty, length and timing of studied periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted adhering to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. MEDLINE and PubMed Central (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase (via Ovid), the Web of Science Core Collection as well as websites of public health agencies (PHA) will be searched until 1 July 2026. All journal articles and sources from PHAs reporting any primary data on the prevalence of HA-COVID-19 will be included. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. The primary outcome will be the global prevalence of HA-COVID-19. Data synthesis will include random-effects proportional meta-analysis. Estimates will be presented with two-sided 95% CIs and heterogeneity assessed using the I&sup2; statistic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not needed as no original data will be generated. This review will be published in an international, peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251136884.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ribaric, N. L., ONeill-Byrne, Z., Hellinger, A., Pan, D., Wilson, N. M., Viola, I. M., Walsh, T. S., Lawton, T., Afanasjevs, S., Calabria, C., De Angelis, F., Brehm, T. T., Zapf, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-07T06:00:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113205</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113205</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global prevalence and determinants of hospital-acquired COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113205</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114353?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of NIV-NAVA as a primary respiratory support and its clinical impacts in a targeted group of preterm infants: protocol for a prospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114353?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) is a promising respiratory support method for avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). However, its effectiveness and safety have not been widely established through clinical evidence. In this study, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of NIV-NAVA as a primary respiratory support method after birth and its effects on short-term clinical outcomes and long-term neurodevelopment in preterm infants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this prospective multicentre observational study, 230 preterm infants will be recruited after birth. This study will include preterm infants born between 27<sup>+0</sup> and 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation who require respiratory support within the first 48 hours after birth. NIV-NAVA will be initiated as primary respiratory support either immediately after birth or during the early NICU stay, with settings adjusted according to each infant&rsquo;s clinical condition. Discontinuation of NIV-NAVA or transition to continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula will be performed based on clinical stability. A less invasive surfactant administration method will be used for infants with respiratory distress syndrome to avoid intubation whenever possible. Infants intubated at birth will be extubated to NIV-NAVA as early as is clinically feasible. Invasive ventilation may be applied if clinical deterioration occurs. The rate of NIV-NAVA failure, duration of non-invasive and invasive ventilation, rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and clinical outcomes, such as air leak, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular haemorrhage and retinopathy of prematurity, will be measured. The neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants will be assessed for up to 3 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Korea University Anam Hospital (2024AN0554) and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (IRB No. B-2507-984-304) approved this study. The results will be disseminated through scientific conferences and publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06786039">NCT06786039</A> registered on 14 January 2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cho, H., Jung, Y. H., Park, J., Yang, H. J., Kim, M. J., Lee, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-07T06:00:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114353</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114353</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of NIV-NAVA as a primary respiratory support and its clinical impacts in a targeted group of preterm infants: protocol for a prospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114353</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114353</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116609?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Temporal trends and future projections of fertility and birth rates in Georgia: a retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116609?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to analyse temporal trends in fertility and birth rates, examine maternal characteristics and forecast future demographic changes in Georgia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a retrospective observational study using population-level data from the National Statistics Office of Georgia (Geostat) and the Georgian Birth Registry (GBR). Temporal trends were analysed using Prais-Winsten regression models and annual percentage changes (APCs) and future projections were generated using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included data on 543 662 live births retrieved from the Geostat for the period 2014&ndash;2024. Additionally, maternal characteristics were analysed for 366 684 births recorded in the GBR for the period 2017&ndash;2024. Selection criteria included all live births during the study period, with no specific exclusion criteria applied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome measures were trends in the total fertility rate (TFR) and crude birth rate (CBR) over the study period (2014&ndash;2024) and their projections for 2025&ndash;2034. Secondary outcome measures were concurrent changes in maternal characteristics, including maternal age, nationality, place of residence, region of residence and parity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Between 2014 and 2024, Georgia&rsquo;s TFR declined from 2.30 to 1.68 children per woman (APC=3.12%, 95% CI &ndash;3.65 to &ndash;2.59), and the CBR dropped from 16.3 to 10.7 births per 1000 population per year (APC=4.39%, 95% CI &ndash;4.63 to &ndash;4.15). Fertility rates decreased most significantly among women aged &lt;20 (APC=&ndash;9.93%, 95% CI &ndash;10.72 to &ndash;9.13) and 20&ndash;24 years (APC=&ndash;6.41%, 95% CI &ndash;7.70 to &ndash;5.10). Advanced maternal age increased in both nulliparous (APC=3.65%, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.51) and multiparous women (APC=1.67%, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.22). ARIMA forecast based on current trends showed a continued decline in the TFR to 1.09 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.27) children per woman and the CBR to 7.07 (95% CI 5.97 to 8.16) births per 1000 population by 2034.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Georgia is undergoing a demographic transition characterised by declining fertility rates and delayed childbearing. Assuming the mechanisms underlying 2014&ndash;2024 data remain unchanged, projections indicate a continued decline in fertility and birth rates by 2034, which may pose significant social and economic challenges for the country. Further research is needed to explore the underlying factors driving these trends and to develop strategies to address the potential implications of this demographic shift.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khachidze, N., Anda, E. E., Manjavidze, T., Nedberg, I. H., Sandoy, I. F., Rylander, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-07T06:00:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116609</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116609</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Temporal trends and future projections of fertility and birth rates in Georgia: a retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116609</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116609</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e120452?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Behavioural activation for the prevention of poststroke depression in low-income older stroke survivors (LIVE WEL): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e120452?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Poststroke depression (PSD) affects approximately 33% of stroke survivors and is associated with worse outcomes, poor quality of life (QOL) and mortality. Despite its prevalence and consequences, there is no consensus on the most effective strategy for PSD prevention. Behavioural activation (BA) is an effective intervention for depression across diverse populations and is considered safer, better tolerated and a longer-lasting alternative to antidepressant medications. This study aims to test the effectiveness of a remotely delivered BA intervention to prevent PSD (Tele-BA-S).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a randomised effectiveness trial of 350 low-income adults (&ge; 55 years) within 3 months of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke and with subthreshold depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score &lt;9 and 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score &lt;15). Eligible and consented adults will be randomly assigned to Tele-BA-S or treatment-as-usual. Tele-BA-S will be comprised of an orientation session, 5 weekly BA sessions and 2 follow-up monthly booster calls delivered by trained community health workers. We will conduct assessments at 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months and 9 months after baseline. The primary outcome (PSD) will be measured by the 24-item HDRS. Secondary outcomes will include anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale), psychological well-being (Ryff Scale of Psychological Well-being), QOL (Stroke Specific QOL Scale), medication adherence (Medication Adherence Report Scale-5), rehabilitation adherence (Rehabilitation Adherence Inventory), number of emergency department visits and hospitalisations, functional outcome (Barthel Index) and degree of disability (Modified Rankin Scale). Mediating variables will include self-efficacy (Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), motivation (Motivation in Stroke Patients for Rehabilitation Scale) and activity engagement (Neuro-QOL Participation in Roles and Activities). Exploratory implementation measures will also be collected. Primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle and evaluate intervention effects over time using mixed-effects models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained by the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston&rsquo;s (UTHealth Houston) Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Institutional Review Board. The trial protocol, statistical analysis plan and code, and deidentified participant data will be made available via the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive. The results will be presented at academic conferences and submitted for publication. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06864715">NCT06864715</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beauchamp, J. E. S., Savitz, S. I., Sharrief, A., Reininger, B. M., Acierno, R., Suchting, R., Burnett, J., Rosales, L., Albaqali, J. A., Rajan, R., Choi, N. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-07T06:00:57-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-120452</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-120452</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Behavioural activation for the prevention of poststroke depression in low-income older stroke survivors (LIVE WEL): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e120452</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e120452</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e100862?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Polyneuropathy in kidney transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study in Groningen, the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e100862?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics associated with polyneuropathy in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>SENS study at the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands, December 2021&ndash;May 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>KTR, participating in the ongoing TransplantLines Biobank and Cohort Study, &ge;12 months post-transplantation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Participants underwent a structured neurological assessment including history taking, neurological examination, quantitative sensory testing and nerve conduction studies. An expert panel classified participants into no/possible, probable/definite large fibre polyneuropathy or small fibre neuropathy. Large-fibre subtypes included axonal or demyelinating, pure sensory, pure motor and sensorimotor. To assess potential associations with clinical characteristics, logistic regression analysis was conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 160 KTRs with a mean age of 59.8&plusmn;11.6 years at a median of 6.1 (95% CI 3.9 to 13.1) years post-transplantation, with 16 KTRs (10%) diagnosed with polyneuropathy before study inclusion. In total, 84 KTRs (53%) were identified with large fibre polyneuropathy and 7 KTRs (4%) with small fibre neuropathy. KTRs with large fibre polyneuropathy presented with either sensor-predominant polyneuropathy (40 KTR (48%)) or sensorimotor polyneuropathy (44 KTR (52%)). We found no neurophysiological characteristics of demyelination. Overall, 18% (95% CI 11% to 27%) of KTRs with large fibre polyneuropathy were asymptomatic. Higher age (OR=1.04 (1.01 to 1.08), p=0.01), male sex (OR=2.55 (1.19 to 5.60), p=0.02), diabetes (OR=5.58 (1.36 to 38.14), p=0.03) and elevated urea levels (OR=1.12 (1.04 to 1.23), p=0.01) were significantly associated with polyneuropathy in KTR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In contrast with previous studies, axonal sensory or sensorimotor polyneuropathy is highly prevalent and often underdiagnosed in KTR. Next to higher age and male sex, it was independently associated with diabetes and higher urea levels. Further research is needed to reveal the aetiology and course of polyneuropathy in KTRs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04664426">NCT04664426</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nolte, S., Moes, H. R., Bakker, S. J. L., Oldag, C., Lange, F., de Greef, B. T. A., Nolte, I. M., Van Londen, M., Elting, J.-W. J., Faber, C. G., Van Doorn, P. A., Berger, S. P., Drost, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100862</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100862</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Polyneuropathy in kidney transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study in Groningen, the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100862</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100862</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102122?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Harms of selected spinal and paraspinal injections and denervation procedures for chronic non-cancer spine pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised studies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102122?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To summarise the evidence on long-term and infrequent harms following selected spinal and paraspinal injections and denervation procedures for chronic non-cancer spine pain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to October 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study selection</st>
<p>Non-randomised studies reporting on harms of selected interventional procedures administered to adults living with chronic axial or radicular non-cancer spine pain with &ge;4 weeks of follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>A parallel guideline panel provided input on the scope, design and interpretation of this systematic review, including selection of adverse events for consideration. Systematic literature screening, data abstraction and risk of bias appraisal were conducted independently and in duplicate by pairs of reviewers. We used random-effects models for all meta-analyses and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the certainty of evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 60 longitudinal studies (56 non-comparative, 4 comparative) that enrolled 4966 patients with chronic non-cancer spine-related pain. 31 studies investigated radiofrequency ablation or denervation, 22 epidural injections and 11 joint injections or nerve blocks. Low certainty evidence suggests that joint targeted steroid injection and epidural steroid injection for chronic spine pain may result in temporary altered level of consciousness (incidence: 2.1%; 95% CI 1.1% to 4.0%), joint radiofrequency nerve ablation, joint targeted steroid injection and epidural injection of local anaesthetic and steroids may result in deep infection (incidence: 0.7%; 95% CI 0.3% to 2.0%), epidural steroid injection, joint radiofrequency nerve ablation and joint targeted injection of local anaesthetic and steroids may result in dural puncture (incidence: 1.4%; 95% CI 0.5% to 4.3%), and dorsal root ganglion radiofrequency and joint radiofrequency nerve ablation with or without joint-targeted injection of steroids may result in prolonged pain or stiffness (incidence: 8.6%; 95% CI 6.3% to 11.6%). Several interventional procedures may result in metabolic complications and prolonged sensory deficits, but the supporting evidence was only very low certainty. Most complications resolved spontaneously or with conservative management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Low certainty evidence suggests that several common interventional procedures for chronic spine pain show risk of deep infection, dural puncture, temporary altered level of consciousness and prolonged pain or stiffness. Other harms are uncertain due to very low certainty evidence, and catastrophic outcomes were not reported in the small studies that contributed to our analyses.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malam, F., Asif, S., Khalid, F., Leafloor, C., Hong, P., Levit, T., Zeraatkar, D., Wang, L., Couban, R., Agarwal, A., Agoritsas, T., Busse, J. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102122</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102122</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Harms of selected spinal and paraspinal injections and denervation procedures for chronic non-cancer spine pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102122</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103126?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Suicides, suicide attempts and suicidal ideation among children and young people exposed to war: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103126?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Worldwide, billions of children and young people live in areas affected by war. Suicide remains one of the three leading causes of death worldwide among people aged 15&ndash;29 years. However, little is known about the effect of war on suicidal behaviours in this group. This review aims to assess suicides, suicide attempts and suicidal ideation among children and young people exposed to war or armed conflict.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A scoping review of studies was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases from their inception to 18 November 2025, without any restrictions on geographical location. We included only observational studies with full-text, peer-reviewed English articles reporting any suicides, suicide attempts and suicidal ideation of children and young people aged 0&ndash;24 years exposed to war. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies. The protocol of the review was registered with the Open Science Framework on 29 March 2022 (<A HREF="https://osf.io/7kszh/">https://osf.io/7kszh/</A>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 3229 articles retrieved, 37 studies were eligible for review, providing data from 24 countries and covering a period of almost a hundred years (1921&ndash;2025). Most studies (&gt;20) focused on conflicts ongoing during or until the 2000s, whereas only three focused on World War II. The reported outcomes were suicides (n=9), suicide attempts (n=15) and suicidal ideation (n=21). Included studies spanned six continents, from Latin America (n=5, Colombia only) to Europe (n=10). We assessed the suicide rates during and after wars. There was some evidence of a decrease in suicide rates during war, but no clear trend in suicide rates post-war was observed. The prevalence rates of suicide attempts and suicidal ideation varied widely, without uniformity in the definitions used. War-related trauma, mental health problems, substance abuse and exposure to suicide or suicide attempts were identified as risk factors, while protective factors included family and social support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is a need for more methodologically consistent and rigorous research on suicidal thoughts and behaviours in children and young people exposed to war or armed conflicts. Future research should identify mediator/moderating factors influencing suicidal behaviours and their links to mental health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silwal, S., Westerlund, M., Wan Mohd Yunus, W. M. A., Jaakola-Siimes, S., Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103126</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103126</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Suicides, suicide attempts and suicidal ideation among children and young people exposed to war: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103126</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106913?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From victimisation to perpetration: a qualitative exploration of the lived experiences and perceptions of incarcerated women convicted of intimate partner violence in Maputo, Mozambique]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106913?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Numerous studies focus on women&rsquo;s experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV), but there is a lack of qualitative studies focusing on women who, as victims, become perpetrators. The study explored the lived experiences and perceptions of incarcerated women convicted of IPV against their partner in Maputo, Mozambique.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>A qualitative approach was utilised with females purposively sampled for one-on-one semi-structured interviews in the Maputo female prison setting. Data were analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Nine females over the age of 18 convicted and incarcerated for perpetrating IPV against their violent partners.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The analysis revealed three themes: Theme 1: Childhood exposure to violence, with subthemes: direct violence in childhood, witnessing violence in the family and the role of alcohol consumption in violence within the family. Theme 2: Living in a violent intimate relationship with subthemes: psychological violence, coping strategies as victims of IPV and use of self-defence during violent episodes. Theme 3: Consequences of IPV perpetration, with subthemes incarceration experience, mistrust of prison psychology services, disintegration of their families and plans for the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Mozambican women incarcerated for IPV described their lived experiences marked by family violence growing up and IPV in their relationships and how this may have shaped their coping strategies, risk appraisal and responses to threat. These factors were central to understanding the circumstances that preceded their offence. The women identified a current need for psychosocial services independent of prison staff. Sustained investment in IPV prevention and victim protection services is warranted to potentially reduce both prolonged victimisation and the risk of subsequent lethal violence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Macucha, C. M., Sengoelge, M., Taliep, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106913</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106913</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From victimisation to perpetration: a qualitative exploration of the lived experiences and perceptions of incarcerated women convicted of intimate partner violence in Maputo, Mozambique]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106913</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106913</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107451?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the current landscape of Klinefelter Syndrome registries: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107451?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This scoping review identifies existing registries collecting data on Klinefelter&rsquo;s syndrome (KS) patients and what data are collected, with the purpose of identifying any KS-specific registries. Findings to be used to inform future registry development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A comprehensive scoping review was conducted. Multiple sources were reviewed and articles screened based on inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Searches performed across multiple sources including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Orphanet, EU Clinical Trials Register, King&rsquo;s College London Library and charity organisation webpages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>The included studies were required to focus on KS patients with reported data from an active registry that routinely collects data on KS patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Basic information about registries identified in included articles was extracted. Registries identified were contacted with a standardised set of questions to collect additional contextual information. Findings are presented in tables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The scoping review included 18 articles. From those, 10 registries storing KS patient data were identified. Only one of those registries was KS-specific. Only three out of 10 registries collected data that encompassed genetic, clinical and social variables. Most data included in registries were collected exclusively from medical records, although some registries included data from patient surveys. Registries that received government funding had more KS participants than those that did not.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>With only one KS-specific registry existing worldwide and none within the UK, this review has identified a need for the development of further KS-specific registries. Data collected could be used to develop an accurate KS phenotype and therefore lead to increased diagnosis of the disorder, improving the lives of people with KS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephenson, F., Morris, A., Arulkkumaran, N., Lorenzo, A., Mehta, S., Cotton, A., Yap, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107451</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107451</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the current landscape of Klinefelter Syndrome registries: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107451</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107451</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109586?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oral probiotics and topical secretome to enhance clinical outcomes and microbiome restoration in acne vulgaris: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109586?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory condition primarily caused by <I>Cutibacterium acnes</I>, which disrupts skin homeostasis, thereby triggering immune responses and sebum metabolism. Dysbiosis is an imbalance in the skin and gut microbiota identified as a significant factor contributing to acne progression. Standard therapy often relies on antibiotics, but the long-term use has increased antibiotic resistance, including in Indonesia. Consequently, alternative methods, such as probiotics and mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes, are gaining attention for immunomodulatory and regenerative properties. These novel therapies have shown promising results in modulating the skin and gut microbiota while reducing inflammation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial will be conducted using a parallel group design with four arms, namely: (1) standard therapy with oral probiotics and topical secretome (placebo), (2) standard therapy with oral probiotics (placebo) and topical secretome, (3) standard therapy with oral probiotics and topical secretome and (4) standard therapy with oral probiotics (placebo) and topical secretome (placebo). Sixty-four patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris will be randomly allocated to these groups. Interventions will be administered over a period of 8 weeks, with outcomes to be measured at baseline and post-therapy. This study will be conducted at the Dermatology and Venereology Department of Bali Mandara General Hospital (RSBM). The primary outcome will be the reduction of comedones and inflammatory lesions, assessed using the Yolov8 method. Secondary outcomes will include gut and skin health parameters, such as tryptophan metabolites, collagen, pH, moisture, sebum levels and IL-6, to explore the relationship between microbiome balance, skin condition and inflammation in acne.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonisation&ndash;Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Ethical approval has been granted by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Bali Mandara Regional Hospital (Approval Reference Number: 060/EA/KEPK.RSBM.DINKES/2024). All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment. Data confidentiality and participant safety will be upheld throughout the trial. The results of this study will be disseminated through journals, scientific conferences and relevant academic platforms to ensure wide accessibility and to support further research and clinical application in the field of dermatology, particularly in addressing antibiotic resistance and microbiome-based acne therapies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="NCT06925386">NCT06925386</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lestari, K., Sutema, I. A. M. P., Latarissa, I. R., Oon, S. F., Tamsir, N. M., Noor, A., Widowati, I. G. A. R., Sartika, C. R., Ciptasari, N. W. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109586</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109586</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oral probiotics and topical secretome to enhance clinical outcomes and microbiome restoration in acne vulgaris: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109586</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109586</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109905?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the needs of technical developers and stakeholders in point-of-care technology development: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109905?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Point-of-care technologies (POCTs) are essential to providing clinical care for patients, with their potential for rapid and accurate results on site supporting efficient clinical decision-making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To understand the current key needs, barriers and challenges of POCT developers for effective development and implementation of POCTs across diverse settings particularly in the domain of cancer, nutrition and infections.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative semi-structured focus group discussion (FGDs) was employed. The FGDs were guided by the needs assessment process and the Phase Gate Framework. The qualitative data were coded and analysed in NVivo and refined into various themes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in person at Cornell Tech Campus in May 2024, New York, USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>24 participants were purposively sampled from the PORTENT (Point-of-Care Technologies for Nutrition, Infection and Cancer) network. Participants included technical developers (eg, engineers, scientists, startup leads) and expert stakeholders (eg, funders, policy advisors, clinicians and academic partners) involved in POCT development, evaluation and implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 24 participants participated in the in-person FGDs in New York (n=24). Key themes identified included gaps in stakeholder engagement, limited regulatory preparedness, insufficient market analysis, challenges in scaling and manufacturing and the need for context-specific adaptation in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings. Participants emphasised the importance of user-centred and context-responsive design, strategic partnerships and early planning for regulatory and implementation pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Technical developers and expert stakeholders in the POCT landscape face various barriers to efficient and effective development and implementation of POCTs. It is important to consider their needs when adapting POCTs in LMICs and diverse settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rukh-E-Qamar, H., Mohan, V., Eraslan, M., Erickson, D., Mehta, S., Pai, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109905</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109905</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the needs of technical developers and stakeholders in point-of-care technology development: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109905</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109905</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110228?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early health technology assessment (eHTA) approaches focused on human stem cell-related technologies: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110228?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The growing advancement of innovative stem cell technologies requires careful evaluation of their economic, clinical and societal impacts. Early economic evaluations are essential for developing new medical technologies and supporting key decisions about commercialisation and market access. This scoping review explores Early Health Technology Assessment (eHTA) approaches specifically related to human stem cell technologies. By examining how eHTA can support the commercialisation of these therapies, we aim to clarify its role in optimising resource allocation and enhancing both the clinical and societal benefits of stem cell technologies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>To explore the use of eHTA in the development of stem cell-related technologies, a scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Review Extension guidelines. Systematic searches were conducted across scientific databases (MEDLINE, International HTA database, EconLit, PAIS Index and EconPapers), grey literature sources (Overton) and through hand-searching to identify eligible articles published from inception to 14 April 2026. No limits were imposed on language. Reviewers will independently record data from eligible studies using a standard data abstraction form. The gathered information will be synthesised both quantitatively and narratively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Formal ethical approval is not required, as this study does not involve the collection of primary data. The findings will be shared through professional stem cell networks, published in national and international health technology assessment conference proceedings and submitted for open-access, peer-reviewed publication.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francis, T., Hassan, S., Bielecki, J., Abdi, A., Stewart, U., Laflamme, M. A., Rac, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110228</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110228</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early health technology assessment (eHTA) approaches focused on human stem cell-related technologies: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110228</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110285?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Area-based measures of socioeconomic status in studies assessing health outcomes among people living with HIV in Canada and the USA: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110285?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Area-based measures of socioeconomic status (SES) are increasingly used to study health disparities among people living with HIV (PLWH), with wide variation in how they are defined and applied across studies and settings. This study synthesises the types of area-based measures of SES used in Canada and the USA, the domains captured and their associations with health outcomes among PLWH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A scoping review of studies published in English between 2012 and 2025 was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science. The search combined &lsquo;HIV&rsquo; with terms related to area-based SES measures. Eligible studies included PLWH, were based in Canada or the USA, used area-based SES measures and assessed health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We screened 3470 studies: 56 met inclusion criteria. Most were US-based (n=53) and focused solely on PLWH (n=46). Area-based SES was measured using composite (n=34), single (n=16) or both types of indicators (n=6), all drawn from census data. The most common SES domain was income/poverty (n=56), the most common geographic unit was census tract (n=19) and the most common health outcome assessed was viral load/suppression (n=29). Most studies linked lower area-based SES with poorer health outcomes among PLWH (n=46).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings highlight the utility of area-based SES as an individual-level SES proxy and tool for capturing broader social determinants of health when assessing a range of health outcomes across studies including PLWH. This review contributes to strengthening methodological approaches and supports future work focused on addressing social determinants and advancing health equity for PLWH.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naidu, N., Golzar, N., Emerson, S. D., Budu, M. O., Hansen, S., Branion-Calles, M., McLinden, T., Hogg, R. S., Kooij, K. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110285</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110285</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Area-based measures of socioeconomic status in studies assessing health outcomes among people living with HIV in Canada and the USA: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110285</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117208?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diagnostic yield and safety of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy-guided pleural biopsy via semirigid thoracoscope in diagnosing patients with unknown pleural effusion: a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (COLLABORATION-I)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117208?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Semirigid thoracoscopy plays an important role in the diagnosis of pleural diseases. However, its diagnostic performance remains unsatisfactory particularly in terms of the negative likelihood ratio. Therefore, more effective supplementary diagnostic tools are required. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE), which allows live tissue imaging at the cellular level, can discriminate between malignant and benign pleura during medical thoracoscopy. However, the clinical relevance of pCLE in pleural disease remains unclear. This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial that evaluates the additional diagnostic value of pCLE in diagnosing pleural diseases using semirigid thoracoscopy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial that will be conducted at ten sites in China. A total of 158 adult patients with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions will be enrolled and randomly allocated (1:1) to undergo either a conventional pleural biopsy (control group) or a pCLE-guided pleural biopsy (intervention group) via semirigid thoracoscopy. In the intervention group, a pCLE system will be applied during thoracoscopy to identify suspicious pleural areas for targeted biopsy. The primary outcome is the diagnostic yield of the procedure in patients with unknown causes of pleural effusion. Secondary outcomes include negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic sensitivity in specific diseases, procedural time, rate of adequate specimens for achieving molecular diagnosis and complications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the China-Japan Friendship Hospital Ethics Committee (2025-KY-018). Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants. The findings will be disseminated through journal publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06741839">NCT06741839</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deng, M.-M., Hu, Y., Liu, X., Feng, Y., Zheng, Z., Tong, R., Porcel, J., Hou, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117208</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117208</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diagnostic yield and safety of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy-guided pleural biopsy via semirigid thoracoscope in diagnosing patients with unknown pleural effusion: a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (COLLABORATION-I)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117208</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117366?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between joint tenderness, patient-reported joint pain and ultrasound abnormalities in anti-CCP positive individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study from a Leeds (UK) cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117366?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>In individuals at-risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to investigate how joint tenderness and patient-reported joint pain (PRJP) relate to ultrasound abnormalities and assess whether these exploratory results could be used to assist future evaluation of symptom/signs-guided ultrasound scanning approaches in this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This is a cross-sectional analysis from a Leeds (UK) cohort of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) positive individuals with new musculoskeletal complaints and no clinical arthritis. Assessments included physical examination, a mannequin where participants ticked joints that were painful and ultrasound scans of wrists, metacarpo-phalangeal joints 1&ndash;5 (MCPs1-5), proximal interphalangeal joints 1&ndash;5 (PIPs1-5), elbows, knees, ankles, metatarso-phalangeal joints 1&ndash;5 (MTPs1-5), finger flexor tendons (2-5) and extensor carpi ulnaris. Grey scale (GS), power Doppler (PD), tenosynovitis and erosions were assessed. A generalised estimating equations model was used to evaluate potential associations between tenderness/PRJP and ultrasound findings at the joint-level, adjusting for age and sex. Positive and negative predictive values for ultrasound changes were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>323 participants were analysed. Joint tenderness was associated with ultrasound abnormalities, predominantly PD in wrists, MCPs, PIPs, elbows, knees and MTPs. GS and erosions were also associated with tenderness, but to a lesser degree. Association of PRJP with ultrasound abnormalities was more inconsistent and mostly for GS in the feet (all p<I>&le;</I>0.05). Absence of symptoms and signs had a negative predictive value between 97% and 100% in all joints, except in wrists; which was slightly lower.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In anti-CCP positive individuals at risk of RA, tenderness, predominantly in the small joints, was associated with local inflammatory changes on ultrasound. The association of PRJP and ultrasound was limited. In the absence of tenderness, the presence of PD, tenosynovitis or erosions was uncommon. These findings may inform future studies evaluating symptom/sign-guided ultrasound assessment approaches in at-risk populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT02012764">NCT02012764</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia-Montoya, L., Kang, J., Duquenne, L., Di Matteo, A., Harnden, K., Nam, J. L., Chowdhury, R., Wakefield, R. J., Mankia, K. S., Emery, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117366</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117366</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between joint tenderness, patient-reported joint pain and ultrasound abnormalities in anti-CCP positive individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study from a Leeds (UK) cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117366</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117366</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121443?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health and well-being of mothers and co-parents during the first 12 months post partum: study protocol of the national SOCRATES cohort study in Switzerland]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e121443?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The first year after childbirth is a critical yet insufficiently monitored period for parental health. Postpartum mental and physical morbidity can affect both mothers and co-parents, but national longitudinal data remain scarce. The Stress Of Co-parents Related to A Traumatic Experience of birth across Switzerland (SOCRATES) cohort study aims to describe maternal and co-parental health and well-being trajectories during the first year after childbirth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>SOCRATES is a prospective, population-based cohort study conducted in all linguistic regions of Switzerland. Eligible participants include women aged 14 and above who gave birth to a live or stillborn infant (&ge;22<sup>+0</sup> weeks&rsquo; gestation and &ge;500 g) and their cohabiting co-parents, provided they speak German, French, Italian or English. Recruitment was conducted in 81 of the 112 Swiss maternity units, birth centres and organisations of midwives over 6 weeks in spring 2025. Clinical data on pregnancy, childbirth and the early postpartum period are extracted from medical records. Postpartum hospitalisation data are obtained through linkage with national medico-administrative databases. Participants complete online questionnaires shortly after birth and at 2, 6 and 12 months post partum, including sociodemographic characteristics and patient-reported outcomes. The primary outcome is the prevalence of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder at 2 months, assessed using the City Birth Trauma Scale. Secondary outcomes include depression, physical recovery, sexual health, quality of life, healthcare use, perceived care quality and overall well-being. A weighting procedure will be used to ensure representativeness and to account for attrition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was granted by all seven Swiss ethics committees (number 2024-02262). All participants provided informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through national and international conferences, peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, social media and stakeholder engagement activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06886841">NCT06886841</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaucher, L., Desplanches, T., Sormani, J., Cattani, G., Mueller, A. N., Celetta, E., Widmer, I. N., Lorthe, E., Grylka-Baeschlin, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T08:10:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121443</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-121443</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health and well-being of mothers and co-parents during the first 12 months post partum: study protocol of the national SOCRATES cohort study in Switzerland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e121443</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e121443</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103223?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematic review and meta-analysis of complementary and alternative medicine use during pregnancy in Iran]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e103223?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence, patterns and associated factors of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among pregnant women in Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect and major Iranian databases from inception to 30 November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We included observational studies published in peer-reviewed journals that assessed CAM use among pregnant women in Iran and reported prevalence estimates or relevant associated factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using a standardised form and the Quality Assessment Tool. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared (I&sup2;) statistic. Subgroup analysis, 95% prediction intervals (95% PrIs) and sensitivity analysis were conducted to explore the sources of heterogeneity and to evaluate the robustness of the overall effects, respectively. This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>20 studies with a total of 8106 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of CAM use was 49% (95% CI 39% to 59%). The between-study heterogeneity was very high (I<sup>2</sup>=94.69%) with a wide 95% PrIs range of 3%&ndash;94%. The very high between-study heterogeneity and the wide range of PrI for the pooled prevalence were not explained by the quality of the studies, geographical regions of Iran or the methods of data collection. <I>Mentha longifolia</I>, <I>Zataria multiflora</I> and <I>Boswellia thurifera</I> were the most commonly used herbs. Across the included studies, the first trimester of pregnancy was most frequently reported as the period of CAM use, with socioeconomic factors identified as significant predictors. Family and friends were the primary sources of information regarding CAM. The most common reasons for CAM use included gastrointestinal issues, respiratory problems such as colds and coughs, and the desire to improve general health. Only 31% of participants disclosed their use of CAM to their healthcare provider.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Nearly half of pregnant women in Iran use CAM, yet disclosure to healthcare providers is low. An actionable implication is the critical need to integrate routine enquiry about CAM use into standard antenatal care to ensure safe practice. Further research is recommended to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and outcomes of CAM use among pregnant women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration</st>
<p>CRD42024618490</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Najibi, S. M., Rajaie, S. H., Hajimonfarednejad, M., Hashempur, M. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103223</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103223</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Complementary medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematic review and meta-analysis of complementary and alternative medicine use during pregnancy in Iran]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Complementary medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103223</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106957?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco use and associated factors among adults in Ghana: evidence from the 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106957?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine the prevalence and sociodemographic factors associated with tobacco smoking, smokeless tobacco and dual use among adults in Ghana using the 2022 Demographic and Health Survey (GDHS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Ghana, nationwide sample of males and females aged &ge;15 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional secondary analysis of the 2022 GDHS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Population</st>
<p>A representative sample of 22 058 individuals (females, 15 014 aged 15&ndash;49; males, 7044 aged 15&ndash;59)</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Current tobacco smoking, smokeless tobacco use and dual use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Prevalence for smoking, smokeless tobacco and dual use was 4.7 (4.1&ndash;5.4), 1.6 (1.3&ndash;2.0) and 0.6 (0.4&ndash;0.9) among males and 1.0 (0.8&ndash;1.3), 0.08 (0.05&ndash;0.1) and 0.1 (0.05&ndash;0.1) among females, respectively. Among males, smoking was associated with higher age (30&ndash;44 years: AOR: 2.3, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.1; 45&ndash;59 years: AOR: 2.6, 95% CI 1.8 to 3.7). Higher education was protective for both sexes [(males: AOR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8) and (females: AOR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8)] compared with their counterparts who had no education. Males in the Coastal zone had higher odds of use (AOR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.3) compared with males in the Middle zone, while females in the Northern/Savanna zone had lower odds of tobacco use (AOR: 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.8) compared with the Middle zone. Being Christian was associated with lower odds of smoking among males (AOR: 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5) compared with others, while being Mole-Dagbani ethnic is associated with higher odds of smoking among females (AOR: 3.0, 95% CI 1.7 to 5.4).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study provides the first national analysis across Ghana&rsquo;s 16 regions and investigates patterns of smoking, smokeless tobacco and dual tobacco use. While tobacco use in Ghana remains predominantly smoked and male-driven, the divergent patterns of use across educational, regional and ethnic groups, especially the emerging risk among females, represent a significant public health shift that demands focused gender-sensitive tobacco control interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Logo, D. D., Kodali, P. B., Ouner, J. J., Anaman-Torgbor, J., Chaffee, B. W., Bialous, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106957</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106957</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco use and associated factors among adults in Ghana: evidence from the 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106957</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106957</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108562?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the VOCORDER device for early disease detection through breath analysis: study protocol for a two-phase clinical study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108562?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The survival rate of patients with life-threatening diseases primarily depends on the speed of diagnosis. Too often, diseases are detected only after symptoms appear, which usually occurs at later stages of a disease when available treatments may be less effective. Current detection techniques primarily depend on identifying metabolites in biofluids such as blood and urine. The analysis of these fluids is typically performed in laboratories, resulting in lengthy waiting times for patients to receive their results. In severe cases, invasive biopsies and radiative methods are used to diagnose conditions such as cancer. These biopsies can cause distress for patients who are already experiencing significant emotional or physical stress, while imaging techniques involving ionising radiation may pose additional health risks. Additionally, these methods can be costly. In recent years, exhaled breath has become a biofluid matrix of interest for disease detection, allowing for the identification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or VOC profiles associated with specific conditions. To improve early disease detection through breath analysis, the VOCORDER project aims to develop a device that provides a fast, simple, user-friendly and cost-effective method for continuous health monitoring to identify diseases in their early stages before symptoms appear.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analyses</st>
<p>A literature review was initially conducted to identify five reference diseases of interest (lung cancer, stomach/colon cancer, breast cancer and kidney insufficiency) and previously reported VOC profiles associated with these diseases. In this trial, the project team from the MITERA Hospital will select patients, and the hospital staff will conduct personal interviews with these subjects. Each participant will also complete a questionnaire for the acquisition of demographic and medical history data, after being informed in detail about the purposes of the questionnaire and signing a consent form. The study protocol consists of two phases. Phase 1 is a baseline study designed to detect and identify breath biomarkers for the early diagnosis of the diseases mentioned above using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and secondary electrospray ionisation high-resolution mass spectrometry (SESI-HR-MS). Prescreening will select 120 healthy controls and 175 patients for the baseline phase of the clinical trial, for which breath samples will be collected in 1 L Supel-Inert Multi-Layer Foil gas sampling bags. New biomarkers and VOC profiles will be extracted from these data, and further statistical analysis will allow for artificial intelligence (AI) models to be produced and tested. For phase 2 (validation phase), 120 healthy controls and 100 patients will be selected. Breath samples will again be collected in 1 L gas sampling bags for analyses with GC-MS and SESI-HR-MS. The VOCORDER device will also be used, and its functioning with the newly developed AI models will be evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This clinical study has been approved by the scientific council at the MITERA hospital in Athens, Greece (#513/2024). The outcomes will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06711939">NCT06711939</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kontopidou, F., Swift, S. J., Kokkotis, C., Moustakidis, S., Kavouras, I., Vidaki, A. N., Brebou, S., Zavvos, V., Panagiotou, A., Iatrou, C., Grosomanidis, D., Zacharouli, Z., Giannoukos, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108562</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108562</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the VOCORDER device for early disease detection through breath analysis: study protocol for a two-phase clinical study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108562</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108562</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109299?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diurnal variations to proinflammatory markers in individuals with diabetes compared to healthy controls: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109299?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Diabetes mellitus is a highly prevalent metabolic disorder associated with chronic, low-grade inflammation. Of recent interest is the association between diabetes and circadian rhythm disruption. The aim of this review is to evaluate and synthesise clinical evidence for whether diabetes affects homeostatic diurnal patterns to proinflammatory markers in the human body. This could inform the optimal timing of immune-targeted therapies over the course of the day.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will include primary clinical research studies reporting on diurnal variations, defined as an afternoon/evening (PM) minus a morning (AM) value, within a timeframe of 12&plusmn;4 hours, for predefined proinflammatory markers, in individuals with diabetes (type 1 or type 2) compared with healthy controls. A search of online databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase) will be performed. Grey literature searches will be performed in clinical trial registries. Two review authors will independently screen retrieved citation records at the title/abstract and full-text levels. Study quality will be assessed using an appropriate National Institute of Health quality assessment tool. A meta-analysis will be performed if more than one study reports equivalent data for any outcome. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed using the <sup>2</sup> test. Where a meta-analysis is not possible or unlikely to be meaningful, a narrative synthesis of the findings will be provided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review as no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251115780.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reid, A. G., Wu, C. Y., Nguyen, T. H. O., Symons, R. C. A., Britten-Jones, A. C., Downie, L. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109299</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109299</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diurnal variations to proinflammatory markers in individuals with diabetes compared to healthy controls: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109299</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109299</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109859?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of the 2016 CDC opioid prescribing guideline: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109859?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>In March 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released the <I>CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain</I>, a set of voluntary recommendations for initiating and managing opioid treatment in the ambulatory setting. This scoping review examined guideline effects on patients, providers and health systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A scoping review was conducted with a preregistered protocol. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature were conducted in April 2025. Reports published between 2016 and 2025 that explored the effects of the CDC guideline were included. No restrictions on language or country of study origin were applied, though all retrieved reports were published in the USA and in English. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text reports. Data were extracted by healthcare setting, study aims and design, sample size, study population, participant characteristics and study findings and outcomes. Reports were characterised as empirical studies that evaluated guideline effects or implementation studies that assessed uptake. Study findings were presented descriptively and by evidence maps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Ninety-four studies met the inclusion criteria: 75 empirical studies and 19 implementation studies. Eighty-eight per cent measured changes in opioid prescribing; all but one found significant reductions in at least one prescribing measure, often among people receiving &ge;50&ndash;90 morphine mg equivalents per day. Effects occurred across specialties and populations, including groups not targeted by the guideline. Studies found increased rates of tapering, with mixed findings on opioid-benzodiazepine coprescription. Legal analyses showed widespread policy adoption at the state level. Implementation studies described expanded risk-mitigation strategies, sometimes beyond guideline text. Few studies reported patient-centred outcomes, participant race or ethnicity or equity measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This voluntary federal guideline had significant intended and unintended effects. The guideline was associated with reductions in opioid prescribing among groups targeted and not targeted by its design, with limited evidence on patient outcomes. Future work should prioritise equity-focused patient outcomes to inform implementation of the 2022 CDC guideline.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren, K. E., Kho, S., Mita, C., Franke, M. F., Greenfield, S. F., Weiner, S. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109859</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109859</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of the 2016 CDC opioid prescribing guideline: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109859</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109859</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110730?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Burden of COPD and lung cancer attributable to household air pollution in Morocco: a secondary analysis using population attributable fractions]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110730?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To estimate the burden of household air pollution (HAP) on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer in Morocco in 2019 using population attributable fractions (PAFs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Secondary analytical study based on sex-specific PAF estimation combining Moroccan exposure prevalence from a Moroccan population-based survey conducted in 2010&ndash;2011, pooled relative risks from an international meta-analysis, national disease frequency estimates (for COPD, two prevalence sources were used: 2010&ndash;2011 observed Moroccan data and 2019 modelling-based estimates), 2019 burden indicators and direct medical costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Morocco.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults aged 40 years and older included in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD I) survey in Fez, Morocco.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Sex-specific PAFs, attributable COPD and lung cancer cases, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and annual direct medical costs attributable to HAP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In Morocco, HAP accounted for 14.4% (95% CI 8.4% to 21.6%) of COPD cases in men and 25.3% (95% CI 17.0% to 34.0%) in women, and for 14.2% (95% CI 7.9% to 21.8%) of lung cancer cases in men and 25.0% (95% CI 16.1% to 34.2%) in women. The estimated number of COPD cases attributable to HAP ranged from 661 717 (95% CI 411 046 to 948 444) using modelling-based prevalence estimates to 815 368 (95% CI 509 160 to 1 163 973) using Moroccan BOLD I prevalence estimates, while 1356 (95% CI 775 to 2041) lung cancer cases were attributable to HAP. Total attributable DALYs were estimated at 62 561.2 (95% CI 37 588.4 to 91 439.2). Total annual direct medical costs attributable to HAP ranged from US$529.9 million (95% CI US$328.9 million to US$760.0 million) to US$651.6 million (95% CI US$406.6 million to US$930.6 million), depending on the COPD prevalence source used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>HAP contributes substantially to the respiratory and economic burden in Morocco. These estimates should be interpreted considering the regional source of exposure data and the application of pooled international relative risks to the Moroccan context.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Harch, I., Mahfoudi, H., Benmaamar, S., Tachfouti, N., El Rhazi, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110730</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110730</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Burden of COPD and lung cancer attributable to household air pollution in Morocco: a secondary analysis using population attributable fractions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110730</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110730</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111607?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Microbiota-gut-brain axis and treatment resistance in epilepsy: a multicentre prospective study protocol (CARE)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111607?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Approximately one-third of people with epilepsy (PWE) experience resistance to treatment, including pharmacological therapies, epilepsy surgery, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and dietary interventions such as the ketogenic diet (KD). Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiota may influence seizure susceptibility and treatment response through the microbiota-gut-brain axis, potentially contributing to treatment resistance. The MiCrobiota-gut-brain Axis in Resistant Epilepsy project investigates how gut microbial features and associated host epigenetic signatures affect clinical outcomes in PWE undergoing diverse treatment strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre, prospective, longitudinal study involving four clinical centres in Italy and one self-financing partner. Participants aged 3&ndash;50 years will be enrolled and stratified into four intervention cohorts: newly diagnosed drug-nai&#x0308;ve epilepsy scheduled to start anti-seizure medications, focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) undergoing epilepsy surgery, DRE receiving VNS, and DRE initiating KD. Clinical assessments (including body mass index calculation, self-reported monthly seizure count, dietary evaluation, quality of life scale and gastrointestinal symptoms scale), electroencephalography, MRI and biological sample collection (stool and blood) will be obtained at baseline and longitudinally at two or three timepoints over a 12-month observation period. Gut microbiota changes over time will be assessed via metagenomics (using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing) and metaproteomics; the associated host DNA methylation profiles will be obtained from blood using Illumina EPIC arrays. Primary endpoints include identification of microbial or host methylation changes predictive of therapeutic response (ie, reduction from baseline in monthly seizure count) to the intervention. Data will be analysed using multivariate models and mixed-effect regression. Further, omics data and corresponding metadata will be integrated using multi-omics approaches to identify molecular signatures biomarkers predictive of treatment response and prognosis in PWE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study received ethical approval from the Research Ethic Board (Comitato Etico Territoriale Lombardia 3, ID 4896 &ndash; parere numero 4896_17.07.2024_N_bis). All participants or their legal guardians will provide written informed consent. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations or lay summaries targeting patient organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier <A HREF="NCT07010445">NCT07010445</A>, registered on 2 May 2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borghi, E., Tassi, L., dOrsi, G., Uzzau, S., Pivari, F., Ricci, E., Longoni, G., Mingarelli, A., Previtali, R., Berardi, R., De Diego, L., Vigano, I., Olivotto, S., Compierchio, E., Veggiotti, P., Canevini, M. P., Vignoli, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111607</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111607</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Microbiota-gut-brain axis and treatment resistance in epilepsy: a multicentre prospective study protocol (CARE)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111607</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111607</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111771?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What are the characteristics and impacts of a patient-led conference? A qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111771?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patient engagement is the practice of "meaningful and active collaboration [of patient partners] in governance, priority setting, conducting research and knowledge translation." Patient engagement has been implemented in various settings including clinical, research, and quality improvement, with varying levels of patient contributions and decision-making responsibility. However, little is known about the experiences of patient partners who are in leadership roles in patient-led events. For Patients, By Patients (PxP) is an annual, virtual, patient-led conference that focuses on topics important to patient partners in research. Each year&rsquo;s PxP steering committee is comprised of those with patient experiences and consequently, offers an opportunity for our research team to explore patient leadership within a conference setting. Understanding more about the intricacies of patient-led events is necessary if we wish to support patient leadership as a valuable form of patient engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to explore (1) the benefits and challenges experienced by PxP steering committee members in a patient-led event and (2) how to better support patient leadership.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a qualitative descriptive study of semi-structured virtual interviews with PxP conference steering committee members. Thematic analysis was used to identify core themes that were salient to the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The Canadian Institutes of Health Research-Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis in Vancouver, Canada, and an international virtual setting via Zoom from January 2025 to April 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Purposive sampling was used to conduct interviews with thirteen PxP patient partner steering committee members.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four core themes were identified in the data: (1) institutional support: how institutions can support patient leadership, (2) steering committee environmental characteristics: what characteristics are conducive to patient leadership, (3) personal growth: how patient leadership promotes growth among patient partners and (4) new possibilities: how patient-led events foster future expansion and opportunities. Power dynamics, intersectionality, and accessibility were also identified as central to supporting patient leadership and building safe and supportive environments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patient partners are capable of leading events which promote interpersonal relationships and advance patient engagement practices and governance. Important facilitators include institutional support and governance that considers power dynamics, accessibility and intersectionality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magel, T., Strain, K., Samson, A., Richards, D. P., Mulhall, H., Khan, K. M., Lingard, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111771</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111771</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What are the characteristics and impacts of a patient-led conference? A qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111771</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111771</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113547?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and operational efficiency of AI-powered chatbots in medicine and healthcare: protocol for an AI-aided scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113547?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots are increasingly integrated into healthcare to support administrative processes, health education and chronic disease management. These systems simulate human dialogue through natural language processing and machine learning, enabling dynamic and context-aware interactions. Despite their rapid adoption, there is limited synthesis of existing research describing how these technologies are applied across different healthcare contexts and what outcomes have been reported. This scoping review aims to map and describe the existing literature on the use of AI-powered chatbots in healthcare with a focus on clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and operational efficiency. It will identify the types of studies conducted, their key characteristics and existing research gaps to guide future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, a comprehensive search will be conducted across Medline (PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and MedRxiv from database inception to 10 September 2025. Studies published in English, French, Dutch or German, involving AI-powered chatbots in any healthcare context reporting on clinical outcomes and/or patient satisfaction and/or operational efficiency will be included. Studies without full-text availability, protocols, trial registrations, reviews and studies conducted solely in educational settings will be excluded. Title and abstract screening will be supported by ASReview LAB, an AI-based active learning tool to enhance efficiency. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Findings will be synthesised narratively and presented using structured evidence tables categorised by chatbot type, clinical healthcare context and reported outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required, as this study involves the analysis of published data only. The results of this scoping review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, presentations at academic conferences and established professional networks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (OSF), <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8UE3B">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8UE3B</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goossens, E., Kemajou, P. M., Coorevits, P., Probst, S., Beeckman, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113547</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113547</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Communication]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and operational efficiency of AI-powered chatbots in medicine and healthcare: protocol for an AI-aided scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Communication</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113547</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113547</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113598?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using Donabedians model to explore healthcare providers perspectives on early recognition and initial management of paediatric acute kidney injury in rural Tanzania: a qualitative case study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113598?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Acute kidney injury is a global health concern with significant implications for morbidity and mortality when it comes to children. High morbidity and mortality result from consequences such as metabolic acidosis, hyperkalaemia, fluid overload and cardiovascular issues. Good clinical outcomes among children with acute kidney injury can be achieved through early recognition and initiation of management to prevent disease progression. However, evidence on early recognition and management of acute kidney injury in children is lacking, especially in low-resource settings such as Tanzania. This study explores healthcare providers&rsquo; experiences with early recognition and management of acute kidney injury among children attending primary healthcare facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This exploratory qualitative case study aims to capture contextual experiences using semi-structured interviews to gain thematic insights. The estimated sample size for this study is 20 informants and will be selected purposively. Data will be collected through individual interviews using an interview guide with predetermined questions followed by probing questions. Each interview session will last for about 30&ndash;60 min. Data analysis will begin during the data collection period using the six-phase thematic analysis approach by Braun and Clarke.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been provided by the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences Senate of Research and Ethical Committees with reference number DA.282/298/01.C/2630. In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and its later amendments, all respondents will provide verbal and written informed consent and will be free to participate voluntarily with no incentives. The findings will be shared with participating healthcare facilities, district and regional health authorities and relevant stakeholders through presentations and summary reports. Findings will also be presented at national and international scientific conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter, D. E., Mkoka, D. A., Temba, P., Millanzi, W. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113598</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113598</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using Donabedians model to explore healthcare providers perspectives on early recognition and initial management of paediatric acute kidney injury in rural Tanzania: a qualitative case study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113598</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113598</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113671?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to implementation of peer support after miscarriage: a systematic review using thematic synthesis methods]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113671?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Miscarriage, defined in the UK as loss of pregnancy prior to 24 weeks gestation, can have long-term psychological implications. Clinical guidelines for perinatal bereavement care do not provide guidance on how best to support the mental health of women, and their partners, after miscarriage. Peer support (support from those who share common characteristics) is often sought, but there is little understanding of its access and use. We conducted a systematic review to understand the barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of peer support to improve mental health outcomes for parents after miscarriage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and thematic synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A comprehensive systematic search across nine databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science (all databases), EMBASE, CENTRAL, LENS.org, British Nursing Index and Health Management Information Consortium) was conducted in June 2025. Grey literature was identified through website searching, contact with topic experts and a national Call for Evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring motivations, experiences and preferences for peer support after miscarriage were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen, extract and code included studies. Suitable studies were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist. Findings were extracted and subjected to a thematic synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Across nine studies included in the review, three overarching themes were developed, with seven subthemes, capturing both barriers and facilitators. &lsquo;Engaging in relational recognition&rsquo; reflects the validation and connection that arise through experiential resonance, often heightened by the context of exclusion from broader social or clinical support. &lsquo;Mechanisms of Communality&rsquo; describe how communality is enacted through dynamic peer interactions, including modelling and facilitating grief, benchmarking physical change and mattering through reciprocity, highlighting mutual support and shared coping. &lsquo;Dynamics of Access&rsquo; consider factors which shape engagement, including changing needs of individuals across time and modalities of support and their effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings form the first synthesis of peer support after miscarriage and bring a nuanced service user perspective of barriers and facilitators by examining evidence from diverse studies. Peer support after miscarriage was seen to be a dynamic, relational process shaped by shared experience, mutual exchange and context-specific factors. Findings underscore key policy and practice considerations, including the use of trauma-informed, loss-sensitive approaches and consideration of intersectionality, that should be reflected when offering peer support services, with and for, those who have experienced miscarriage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024518248.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burton, L., Charles, J., Cherry, M. G., Corcoran, R., Hassan, S., Hill, R., Little, S., Maden, M., Mulholland, H., Perkins, E., Slade, P., Wallis, S., Marshall, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113671</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113671</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to implementation of peer support after miscarriage: a systematic review using thematic synthesis methods]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113671</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113671</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113676?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is molecular breast imaging suitable for use in UK breast cancer pathways? A qualitative study exploring healthcare professionals perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113676?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore healthcare professionals&rsquo; perspectives on the potential role of molecular breast imaging (MBI) for breast cancer imaging and to inform future clinical study design and implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative interview study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>UK National Health Service (NHS) breast screening and diagnostic pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Purposively sampled stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews with key professional stakeholders explored potential MBI pathways and routes to adoption, including barriers and facilitators. Data were analysed thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>22 participants were recruited between January 2020 and October 2021. Barriers to MBI adoption were identified at three levels: scan-related, system-level, and cultural within the screening programme. Overcoming these is likely necessary for implementation. A further theme highlighted the potential for MBI to improve screening in selected patient groups, contingent on addressing these barriers. Specifically, adoption would require advances in next-generation MBI systems, particularly reductions in radiation dose and scan time, alongside prospective clinical studies in UK populations to assess diagnostic accuracy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Once identified barriers are overcome, participants perceived that MBI could improve screening pathways, particularly for women with dense breast tissue.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elliott, H., Allen, A. J., Forester, N. D., Graziadio, S., Jones, W. S., Lendrem, C., Pearce, M., Powell, T., Bray, A., Scott, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113676</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113676</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is molecular breast imaging suitable for use in UK breast cancer pathways? A qualitative study exploring healthcare professionals perspectives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113676</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113676</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113762?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency Department-initiated standard versus high-dose buprenorphine induction (ENVISION): a randomised clinical trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113762?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The initiation of buprenorphine for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) in the emergency department (ED) has been associated with improved outcomes including reduced ED visits and increased treatment engagement. Though both standard-dose (8 mg buprenorphine equivalent) and high-dose (24 mg buprenorphine equivalent) strategies to initiate buprenorphine have been used in the ED, no prospective trials comparing outcomes among patients receiving these treatments have been reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multisite randomised clinical trial is a multisite double-blind, double-dummy, randomised clinical trial enrolling 360 emergency department patients with moderate-to-severe OUD. Enrolled patients will be randomised to one of two study arms: standard-dose induction or high-dose induction, both provided in the ED. This study will engage, train and provide resources to five EDs throughout the US to recruit patients with untreated OUD into a randomised clinical trial. The primary aim is to evaluate the effects of the standard-dose induction and high-dose induction on rates of OUD treatment participation within 10 days post-randomisation. The secondary aims are to evaluate differences between standard-dose induction and high-dose induction on the outcomes of opioid craving, opioid withdrawal symptoms and illicit drug use assessed during 10 days post randomisation and evaluate the effects between treatment arms on rates of OUD treatment participation within 30 days post randomisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study is funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and has been approved by the WCG Instutitional Review Board. It has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov. This study will inform the strategy for treatment initiation with buprenorphine among diverse ED settings and will provide ongoing evidence to support the safety and efficacy of initiating treatment for OUD in the ED.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06494904">NCT06494904</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hawk, K., Herring, A., Chawarski, M., Anderson, E. S., Baumann, M., Dorey, A., Holtyn, A. F., Jones, C., Martel, S., Owens, P., Kmiecik, K., Strout, T. D., Taillac, P., Lofwall, M., Walsh, S. L., DOnofrio, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113762</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113762</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency Department-initiated standard versus high-dose buprenorphine induction (ENVISION): a randomised clinical trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113762</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113762</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114504?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tianjin Health and Chronic Disease Study (THCDS): study design and baseline characteristics of the cohort - cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114504?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Tianjin Health and Chronic Disease Study (THCDS) is a longitudinal dynamic cohort study established in 2022, aiming to investigate risk factors and intervention targets of common non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Tianjin, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 14 324 participants (average age: 53.48, 34.8% females) were recruited for the baseline survey from July 2022 to November 2023. All participants underwent routine medical examination, including anthropometric (height, weight and blood pressure), ECG, colour Doppler ultrasound (thyroid, carotid artery, heart, abdominal and reproductive system), chest imaging measurements (X-ray or computerised tomographic scanning), and plasma, urine and faeces sample test and a standardised questionnaire, including demographic information, lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, sleep factors, physical activity, cognitive activity and social activity) and self-reported history of common chronic diseases. Participants older than 60 were also invited to perform cognitive function tests using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale. Follow-ups were tracked annually through routine medical examinations and standardised questionnaires to detect their health status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>Key baseline findings revealed sex disparities in disease prevalence and clinical characteristics, with males showing higher rates of hypertension (46.60% vs 34.23%), type 2 diabetes (17.39% vs 9.54%) and gout (33.47% vs 15.59%), while females had higher prevalence of hyperlipidaemia (15.47% vs 18.26%), insomnia (5.42% vs 10.00%) and cancer (1.75% vs 3.23%) (all p&lt;0.05). Females demonstrated higher cognitive scores but lower scores in naming/abstraction compared with males. Furthermore, based on the baseline data, we also found that the combined elevation of fasting glucose and serum uric acid levels significantly correlates with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, especially in individuals without self-reported diabetes status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>THCDS is an ongoing prospective cohort with long-term follow-up (at least 15 years). Ongoing follow-ups will be used to investigate longitudinal trajectories of risk factors and chronic diseases and to identify modifiable determinants to inform NCD prevention strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400083075; pre-result.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, X., Miao, Y., Zheng, J., Zhang, Y., Hao, Y., Zhang, N., Dai, S., Lin, W., Zhang, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114504</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114504</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tianjin Health and Chronic Disease Study (THCDS): study design and baseline characteristics of the cohort - cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114504</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114504</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114866?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing civil legal actions among international and Canadian or American medical graduates in Canada: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114866?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Our aim was to compare the incidence and outcomes of civil legal cases in Canada involving international medical graduate (IMG) physicians to physicians who graduated from medical schools in Canada or the US.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study with multilevel, multivariate modelling of civil legal cases against physicians licensed to practise in Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>We used the Canadian Medical Protective Association&rsquo;s national repository of medicolegal case data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We extracted data on physicians&rsquo; demographic characteristics, geographical characteristics and undergraduate medical education.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Outcomes included physician medicolegal case rates (the number of civil legal actions a physician is involved in per year) and case outcomes (when a case proceeds and is either dismissed, settled or proceeds to trial). Our multilevel models examined associations between physician factors and the rate of civil legal actions and the distribution of civil legal outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The case rate model included 433 038 physician-year observations from 98 960 physicians (2015&ndash;2019), with 7657 civil legal cases (mean case rate per physician-year 0.0221; 98% had no cases). Case rates did not differ significantly between IMGs and Canadian/US graduates (p=0.0516). The case outcome model included 8046 cases (2016&ndash;2023). Unadjusted, cases favoured the plaintiff slightly more often for IMGs (39.1% vs 36.6%, &sup2; (2, N=8046)=14.03, p&lt;0.001, Cram&eacute;r&rsquo;s V=0.04), but IMG status was not associated with case outcomes after adjustment (OR 1.135, 95% CI 0.977 to 1.319).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our study suggests that where physicians receive their medical degree has no effect on their level of medicolegal risk in civil legal actions in Canada.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Sherif, R., Zhang, C., Jin, S., Rose, E. G., Savoy, T., Payant, L., Yang, Q., Fortier, J. H., Garber, G. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114866</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114866</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing civil legal actions among international and Canadian or American medical graduates in Canada: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114866</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114866</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116159?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adverse events in exercise interventions among older adults with frailty: a study protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116159?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Although several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated the benefits of exercise interventions in older adults with frailty, the potential harm associated with these interventions has not been systematically synthesised. This systematic review aims to examine the adverse events reported in exercise intervention trials involving older adults with frailty and to compare the risk of adverse events between the intervention and control groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Searches will be performed in four electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus) for published trials. Eligible studies will be randomised controlled trials of exercise interventions, including older adults with frailty aged &ge;60 years, with frailty identified using a validated method. Five reviewers and three referees, all with expertise in exercise interventions, will be assigned to three independent review teams to ensure efficient screening. Reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts using Rayyan, and then extract trial and adverse event data into an Excel spreadsheet. The risk of bias in eligible trials will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) tool. The referees will resolve any disagreements between the two reviewers throughout the screening, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment processes. The primary outcome is adverse events, defined as any unfavourable, unintended signs, symptoms or disease that occurred during the study period. An independent biostatistician will perform a random-effects meta-analysis using a generalised linear mixed model with a binomial likelihood and a logit link to estimate the pooled risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events in the intervention group relative to the control group. Publication bias will be evaluated using funnel plots and Egger&rsquo;s regression test. Depending on the number of available studies, subgroup analyses will be conducted to examine differences in RRs according to the study quality, duration of intervention, exercise frequency, setting and supervision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was not required because we did not use specific patient data. The findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at appropriate conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251180645.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurita, S., Suo, R., Maruo, K., Nishimoto, J., Tsujimoto, T., Sasai, H., Shigematsu, R., Nakata, Y., Osuka, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116159</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116159</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adverse events in exercise interventions among older adults with frailty: a study protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116159</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117374?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (ni-PGT) on cumulative ongoing pregnancy in infertile women of advanced maternal age: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117374?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Embryo aneuploidy increases substantially with maternal age, contributing to implantation failure and miscarriage. Conventional morphological assessment cannot determine euploidy. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (ni-PGT) evaluates cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture medium, potentially improving embryo selection without trophectoderm biopsy. Robust evidence of clinical benefit in women aged 35&ndash;42 years remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial conducted in three centres in China. Infertile women aged 35&ndash;42 years undergoing their first intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle and having &ge;2 good-quality days 5&ndash;6 blastocysts (Gardner grade &ge;4BC,defined as an expansion grade of at least 4, with an inner cell mass grade of B or better and a trophectoderm grade of C or better) will be randomised 1:1 to ni-PGT-guided embryo selection or conventional morphology-based selection. Randomisation will be stratified by study centre using variable permuted block sizes of 4 and 6 and implemented through a unified centralised randomisation system. After a multicentre set-up period for investigator training and harmonisation of spent culture-medium sampling procedures, during which no participant was enrolled or randomised, recruitment and randomisation commenced on 14 February 2025 at the lead site; additional sites started recruitment after local ethics approval and site initiation. A freeze-all strategy will be applied; frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer will start from the second menstrual cycle after oocyte retrieval.</p>
<p>For the primary endpoint, embryo transfers using embryos from the index retrieval cycle that occur within 12 months after randomisation and within the first three frozen-thawed single embryo transfer attempts will contribute to the cumulative outcome, whichever occurs first. Clinical care will not be restricted beyond this prespecified analysis range. The primary outcome is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate within 12 months after randomisation, defined as the proportion of participants achieving at least one ongoing pregnancy (clinical pregnancy continuing to &ge;12 weeks&rsquo; gestation) following a qualifying embryo transfer within the prespecified analysis range. Key secondary outcomes include early miscarriage rate (&lt;12 weeks) in the first transfer cycle, biochemical and clinical pregnancy, time to live birth, number of transfers to live birth, pregnancy/perinatal complications, neonatal birth weight and congenital anomalies. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, comparing groups using relative risks with 95% CIs. A total of 354 participants (177 per group) will be recruited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval has been obtained from all participating centres before participant recruitment at each site. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400088283</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, F., Qiu, J., Zhen, A., Gao, L., Wang, Y., Ge, H., Meng, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117374</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117374</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (ni-PGT) on cumulative ongoing pregnancy in infertile women of advanced maternal age: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117374</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117374</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117719?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between venous access-site closure device use and postoperative nausea and vomiting after atrial fibrillation ablation under propofol sedation: a single-centre retrospective observational study in Okayama, Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117719?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine whether the use of a venous access-site closure device is associated with the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation under propofol sedation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A single-centre retrospective observational study in Okayama, Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation under deep propofol sedation with adaptive servo-ventilation. A total of 686 patients were included. Patients were managed using a standardised sedation protocol with or without low-dose pentazocine. Patients treated with conventional manual compression for haemostasis (n=383) were compared with those treated using a venous access-site closure device (n=303).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Postprocedural bed rest duration and the incidence and timing of PONV were compared between groups. Associations between closure device use and PONV were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the occurrence of PONV following AF ablation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>All procedures were completed under propofol sedation without conversion to general anaesthesia. The duration of postprocedural bed rest was shorter in the device group than in the conventional-compression group (mean difference &ndash;14.7 hours, 95% CI &ndash;15.2 to &ndash;14.0).</p>
<p>PONV occurred in 6/303 patients (2.0%) in the device group and 20/383 patients (5.2%) in the conventional-compression group, corresponding to a relative risk of 0.38 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.93), an OR 0.25 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.62) and a risk difference of &ndash;3.2% (95% CI &ndash;6.0% to &ndash;0.5%).</p>
<p>In multivariable analysis, use of a venous closure device was associated with a lower likelihood of PONV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this single-centre observational study, use of a venous access-site closure device was associated with a lower occurrence of PONV after AF ablation under propofol sedation. These findings suggest that postprocedural management strategies enabling earlier mobilisation may be associated with improved patient comfort; however, causal inference is limited by the observational design.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sakanoue, H., Yamaji, H., Okamoto, S., Okano, K., Fujita, Y., Higashiya, S., Murakami, T., Hirohata, S., Kusachi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117719</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117719</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between venous access-site closure device use and postoperative nausea and vomiting after atrial fibrillation ablation under propofol sedation: a single-centre retrospective observational study in Okayama, Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117719</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117719</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118241?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the acceptability of a brief, rapid-access, self-harm focussed talking therapy: a qualitative analysis of patient experiences]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118241?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the acceptability of the Community Outpatient Psychotherapy Engagement Service for Self-harm (COPESS) intervention and trial procedures for participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A mixed-method approach and a single-blind randomised controlled trial design with 1:1 allocation to either COPESS plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Fifteen semistructured interviews were conducted with participants in the COPESS trial; eight were randomised to the intervention arm, and seven were randomised to the treatment-as-usual arm. Interviews lasted 30&ndash;60 min.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>COPESS is a brief, relational psychotherapy delivered over 4 weekly sessions plus a follow-up, focusing on understanding difficult emotional states and their links to self-harm through here-and-now relational and emotional processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>Thematic analysis allowed exploration of themes important to participants in their experiences in the COPESS trial and their experiences of care for self-harm more generally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Five themes were identified as associated with the acceptability of the COPESS intervention and trial: self-harm as a primary problem, what I needed when I needed it, being heard and understood, online delivery of the intervention and lasting impacts. Participants generally expressed positive views about the intervention, citing a need for services that specifically target self-harm and an appreciation of the rapid access to help. Strong relationships with the therapist were highly valued and not diminished by online delivery of the intervention. Positive impacts continued post therapy sessions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These results support the acceptability of the COPESS intervention, the need for self-harm specific services and support moving forward to a full trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>Pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT04191122">NCT04191122</A>) on 9 December 2019.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clements, C., Mulholland, H., Hunt, A., Mills, C., Kvamme- Mitchell, K., Tahir, N., Kullu, C., Taylor, P., Gabbay, M., Saini, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118241</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118241</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the acceptability of a brief, rapid-access, self-harm focussed talking therapy: a qualitative analysis of patient experiences]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118241</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Immersive virtual reality for cognitive rehabilitation in patients who had a stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a prevalent complication of stroke, characterised by deficits in one or more cognitive domains (eg, memory, attention, executive function). Beyond increasing mortality and disability risks, PSCI frequently co-occurs with motor dysfunction, which impairs activities of daily living and reduces quality of life. Due to the complexity of neural networks involved in PSCI, clinical practice currently lacks targeted therapeutic strategies; existing interventions (eg, pharmacotherapy, traditional cognitive training) are limited in scope and variable in efficacy. Here, we developed an innovative dynamic cognitive training system integrated with virtual reality (VR) technology, based on principles of neuroplasticity and multisensory integration. This study aimed to explore the intervention effects of this system on cognitive function in patients with PSCI while incorporating exploratory neuroimaging assessments to provide descriptive and hypothesis-generating information regarding brain functional changes associated with the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, randomised controlled, evaluator-blinded clinical trial will assess the rehabilitative efficacy of VR-based cognitive training in patients with PSCI. A total of 60 patients who had a stroke will be enrolled and randomised to either a conventional rehabilitation group or a VR intervention group. The intervention will last 2 weeks, with five sessions of 60 min each training session per week. During the 60-minute training session, both groups will receive 30 min of conventional rehabilitation training. For the remaining 30 min, the control group will undergo traditional cognitive rehabilitation while the experimental group will be subjected to VR-based cognitive rehabilitation training. The primary outcome measure is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment; secondary outcomes include the Mini-Mental State Examination, Trail Making Test and Stroop Test. Assessments will be conducted at three time points: baseline (T0), immediately postintervention (T1) and 4 weeks after completing the intervention (T2). This study aims to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of a VR-based intervention in improving multidimensional cognitive function, while incorporating exploratory neuroimaging outcomes to generate hypothesis-forming insights into potential neural correlates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2025&ndash;1933-273-02).</p>
<p>The results will be submitted to a peer review journal or at a conference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2600116040.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, J.-L., Meng, F.-L., Ma, J., Wu, J.-J., He, S., Zhang, J.-P., Xu, Z.-J., Zheng, Y.-X., Mei, Y.-D., Hua, X.-Y., Xu, J.-G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Immersive virtual reality for cognitive rehabilitation in patients who had a stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118266</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118515?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of artificial intelligence integrations on empathy in healthcare interactions between patients and practitioners: protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118515?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Empathic healthcare improves patient satisfaction with care, anxiety and pain, while reducing practitioner burnout. Artificial intelligence (AI) is continuously advancing and changing the context of empathy in healthcare. While AI may improve diagnostic accuracy or help streamline processes to reduce workload, there is a concern about how AI will impact human patient&ndash;practitioner relationships. However, patient and practitioner experiences of AI in healthcare are underexplored. We therefore aimed to synthesise the findings of qualitative studies which explore patient and practitioner experiences of empathy in AI-supported encounters in healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will include any qualitative study in which patient or practitioner experiences of empathy with AI-assisted healthcare are explored. Secondary studies, quantitative studies and those exploring other stakeholders&rsquo; experiences will be excluded. The search will include records from database inception in any language. The search strategy is based on the Population, Phenomenon of Interest, Context framework, built around the keywords: artificial intelligence, empathy, healthcare professionals and patients. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE, Scopus, APA PsycINFO and CINAHL. Additionally, grey literature searches in BASE and OpenAIRE. Forward and backward citation chasing will also be conducted. Records will be screened by two independent reviewers, data extraction will be conducted by one reviewer and checked by another. The risk of bias assessment will be conducted in duplicate using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool for qualitative studies. The results will be synthesised using thematic synthesis. The number of records identified from the search and the exclusions to reach the total number of included records will be presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. The included studies will be listed, along with summaries of relevant study characteristics and risk of bias assessments. Confidence in the evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The systematic review will include only previously anonymised data from primary studies. For this reason, ethical approval is not required for this study. Dissemination of the findings of the final systematic review will occur through publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420261301427.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conradi, L., Howick, J., Bennett-Weston, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T07:39:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118515</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118515</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of artificial intelligence integrations on empathy in healthcare interactions between patients and practitioners: protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118515</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118515</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102835?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the overuse of non-sterile gloves in operating theatres: a cross-sectional survey and interview study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102835?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify factors influencing unnecessary non-sterile glove use in operating theatres and to estimate how common these factors are across the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Mixed-methods study using interviews and a cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Imperial College Healthcare Trust for interviews and nationally across the UK for the survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>19 interviewees and 329 survey respondents, all clinical staff working in UK operating theatres.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Barriers and facilitators to unnecessary non-sterile glove use in operating theatres.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The findings highlight a combination of key drivers leading to the unnecessary use of non-sterile gloves: (1) lack of prioritisation of sustainability, (2) fears around negative patient outcomes, (3) strong social influences such as norms to use gloves, (4) the absence of clear guidelines and limited training on glove use, (5) availability of alternatives and quality of gloves and (6) beliefs about personal safety and habitual glove use. Respondents also suggested potential intervention strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>67% of participants reported using gloves unnecessarily. Our findings highlight the role of habitual behaviour, social influences and unclear guidelines in driving this practice. Interventions should address these factors, for example, by clearly communicating when gloves should and should not be worn, encouraging changes to local social norms towards waste reduction, improving access to hand gel and supporting habit change to reduce unnecessary glove use and associated environmental impact.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Batcup, C., Almukhtar, A., Menon, A., Leff, D., Judah, G., Demirel, P., Porat, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102835</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102835</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the overuse of non-sterile gloves in operating theatres: a cross-sectional survey and interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102835</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102835</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105861?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient-reported unmet healthcare needs among people with diabetic kidney disease in primary care in Peninsular Malaysia: a sequential mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e105861?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Despite adherence to guideline-based pharmacotherapy, many people with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) were unable to meet glycaemic and blood pressure targets. The purpose of this paper was to report the unmet needs of people with early-stage DKD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A sequential mixed-methods approach was used, comprising a quantitative survey followed by an exploratory qualitative phase using nominal group technique (NGT) discussions with people with DKD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Patients were recruited from 45 primary care clinics in Peninsular Malaysia from March to May 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Survey data were collected from 131 adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 30 and 89 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and with suboptimal glycaemia and blood pressure outcomes. Exploratory NGT discussions were conducted with seven participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The online survey used the WHO definition of unmet healthcare need as the &lsquo;failure to seek healthcare when needed during the past twelve months&rsquo; to assess the prevalence and associated factors. Qualitative data and ranking of other perceived unmet needs of these people with DKD and suboptimal clinical outcomes were collected through NGT discussions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of reported unmet healthcare needs per the WHO definition was 13%, with history of diabetic foot ulcer (adjusted OR (AOR) 6.67, 95% CI 1.22 to 37.25) and urban residence (AOR 3.70, 95% CI 1.26 to 12.89) reported as associated factors. NGT identified three patient-prioritised unmet needs: &lsquo;dietary support&rsquo;, &lsquo;better medication&rsquo; and &lsquo;mental health support&rsquo;. Female participants prioritised obtaining medication and kidney health information, whereas male participants emphasised self-monitoring support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The low prevalence of WHO-defined unmet need, alongside patient-prioritised concerns extending beyond standard measures, suggests that current operational definitions may not fully capture patient-perceived unmet healthcare needs in DKD.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yap, S. Y., Shah, S. A., Ambigapathy, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105861</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105861</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient-reported unmet healthcare needs among people with diabetic kidney disease in primary care in Peninsular Malaysia: a sequential mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105861</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105861</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106211?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spatial variation and distribution of anaemia among children aged 6-59 months in Madagascar: a population-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106211?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe the prevalence and spatial distribution of anaemia among children aged 6&ndash;59 months in Madagascar and to explore individual-level and community-level correlates using data from the 2021 Madagascar Demographic and Health Survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A population-based cross-sectional study using secondary data from the 2021 Madagascar Demographic and Health Survey. Spatial statistical methods were used to assess geographic clustering and hotspot areas of anaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted across community and household levels throughout Madagascar, covering both rural and urban populations within the primary and secondary healthcare delivery contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A weighted sample of 10 683 children aged 6&ndash;59 months was included. Sampling followed demographic health survey procedures, and only children with complete haemoglobin data were analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>No interventions were applied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was anaemia, defined as haemoglobin &lt;11 g/dL. Spatial autocorrelation and hotspot analyses identified geographical clustering patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall point prevalence of anaemia was 47% (95% CI 45.60 to 48.36), showing significant spatial clustering (Global Moran&rsquo;s I=0.136, p&lt;0.001), with hotspots mainly in the central and southeastern regions. Differences in anaemia prevalence were observed across population subgroups, including child age, maternal education, household wealth, place of residence and nutritional status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Anaemia among Malagasy children remains a major public health concern and shows clear geographic variation. The findings describe important differences in prevalence across regions and population subgroups, providing useful evidence for public health planning and for generating hypotheses for future analytical research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lakew, G., Gemmechu, M. M., Tiruneh, T. M., Atalay, Y. A., Yirsaw, A. N., Bogale, E. K., Gebeyehu, N. A., Tekoye, T. S., Getahun, G. K., Seid, K., Goshu, A. T., Lorato, S. S., Desalegn, M., Gelaw, K. A., Ashebir, Y. G., Getahun, O. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106211</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106211</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spatial variation and distribution of anaemia among children aged 6-59 months in Madagascar: a population-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106211</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106211</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106885?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigating haemodynamic changes during vaginal delivery in low-risk pregnant women and the association between haemodynamic and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an ambispective cohort study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e106885?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The progressive adaptation of the maternal cardiovascular system throughout pregnancy is essential to maintaining adequate uteroplacental circulation and meeting maternal physiological demands. In recent years, maternal haemodynamic parameters have gained attention as useful indicators for screening and managing pregnancy, particularly for identifying women at high risk for complications and predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the trajectory of haemodynamic parameters during labour, establish reference ranges for different stages of labour and explore the association between haemodynamics and adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is an ambispective observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary hospital in Chongqing, China. A total of 2800 pregnant women will be enrolled. After hospital admission and providing written informed consent, participants will complete a demographic questionnaire. Data collection will include maternal baseline characteristics, haemodynamic parameters at multiple stages of labour and maternal and newborn outcomes. These data will allow comprehensive analysis of haemodynamic changes during labour in women undergoing vaginal delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (ethics approval number: 2024&ndash;406-01). Participation is voluntary and initiated only after obtaining written informed consent. The findings will be disseminated through presentations at national and international conferences and through publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500097643.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, C., Guo, D., Zhou, T., Xu, W., Yang, Y., Tang, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, L., Yu, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106885</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106885</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigating haemodynamic changes during vaginal delivery in low-risk pregnant women and the association between haemodynamic and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an ambispective cohort study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106885</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106885</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107637?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to research data collection in resource-limited settings: a qualitative study of research coordinators in the Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance Network]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107637?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The increasing global burden of long-term illnesses necessitates high-quality data to inform effective interventions, particularly in low-resource settings. Despite the critical role of data collectors in health research, their lived experiences and challenges remain understudied, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nigeria. This study explored the experiences, barriers and facilitators encountered by field researchers working with individuals living with long-term illnesses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A qualitative, descriptive phenomenological design was employed, involving in-depth interviews with 12 research coordinators across 12 healthcare facilities in Nigeria. Participants were purposively selected from the Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance&ndash;Model Innovation and Research Centres. Data were analysed using Colaizzi&rsquo;s phenomenological method, with thematic analysis to identify key patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Field researchers described both rewarding experiences and significant obstacles. While they found value in contributing to impactful research, they faced emotional strain from engaging with sensitive narratives. Key barriers included low health literacy, cultural and religious constraints, hesitation to engage in the study and logistical constraints such as unreliable infrastructure. Facilitators included prefield training, trust-building and support systems. Recommendations emphasised ethical adherence, continuous skill development, context-appropriate incentives and streamlined data collection tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study underscores the need for systemic support for data collectors, including mental health resources, adaptive methodologies and institutional policies that address logistical and emotional issues. These findings advocate for participant-centred, ethically sound research practices to enhance data quality and collector well-being in long-term illness studies.</p>
<p>Future research needs to evaluate interventions to optimise data collection processes in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Idemili-Aronu, N., Jemisenia, J. O., Okoli, I. A., Salla, N. S., Abalaka, B. I., Hundu, D. K., Olawepo, J. O., Ibemere, S., Olakunde, B. O., Ezeanolue, E. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107637</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107637</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to research data collection in resource-limited settings: a qualitative study of research coordinators in the Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance Network]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107637</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107637</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107975?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of argipressin on intraoperative fluid administration in cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC): study protocol of a randomised clinical trial (HiPress Trial)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e107975?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a treatment for peritonitis carcinomatosa. These procedures often involve significant blood and fluid loss, leading to hyperdynamic circulation and vasodilation, necessitating intraoperative fluids and vasoconstrictors such as catecholamines. Excessive fluid administration to counteract vasodilation can cause intraoperative fluid overload, which is linked to increased postoperative complications. Vasopressin has emerged as a potential alternative to catecholamines, restoring vascular tone via non-adrenergic pathways and supporting perfusion pressure, potentially reducing the need for compensatory fluids solely administered to compensate for vasodilation. We hypothesise that compared with norepinephrine, vasopressin reduces cumulative intraoperative fluid administration during CRS-HIPEC within a goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) protocol, ultimately leading to a lowering of postoperative complications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>HiPress is a two-centre, two-arm randomised clinical trial with blinding of both patients and outcome assessors. A total of 70 adult patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC will be included. Patients will be randomised to receive either continuous low-dose argipressin or continuous low-dose norepinephrine. Both groups will receive standardised GDFT during the procedure. The primary endpoint is cumulative intraoperative fluid administration (mL). Secondary endpoints include direct fluid-related outcomes (eg, cumulative intraoperative fluid (ml/kg/hour), postoperative fluid balance until day five and ultrasound-assessed pulmonary oedema and venous congestion) and indirect fluid-associated outcomes (eg, quality of recovery, surgical and abdominal complications, acute kidney injury (AKI), pulmonary complications, length of ICU and hospital stay and 30-day mortality).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is enrolling patients since February 2025. The trial is approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee (hereinafter: MREC) NedMec, The Netherlands (Ref: D-25-500202). Results of the trial will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and announced at national and international scientific meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS): European Union clinical trials register (EUCT) number: 2024&ndash;5 13 598-33-00</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Zwol, J., Aalbers, A. G. J., van den Brom, C. E., Hollmann, M. W., Hulst, A. H., Lameris, W., Tuinman, P. R., Vlaar, A. P. J., Veelo, D. P., Hemmes, S. N. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107975</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107975</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of argipressin on intraoperative fluid administration in cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC): study protocol of a randomised clinical trial (HiPress Trial)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107975</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107975</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108734?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Post-discharge mortality, readmission and care seeking among postpartum women and their newborns following facility-based delivery in Uganda: a prospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108734?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality are a global concern. Understanding the epidemiology of post-discharge complications could identify opportunities for interventions. We aimed to quantify mortality, care-seeking events and readmission among mothers and newborns in Uganda following facility-based delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This prospective observational study (Apr 2022-Sep 2023) enrolled women presenting for delivery at two regional referral hospitals in Uganda. Data were collected during admission and 6 weeks after delivery by phone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 7131 women delivered 7359 newborns, of whom 7129 (99%) women and 6968 (94%) newborns were discharged alive. The newborn mortality rate was 2.7% and 32% of deaths occurred post-discharge. Following discharge, 230 (3%) women and 287 (4%) newborns were readmitted. Suspected sepsis and infections were the most common reasons for readmission among mothers (62.2%) and newborns (89.9%). Caesarean delivery (OR:2&middot;26 (1&middot;75-2&middot;93)) and perinatal death (OR:3&middot;18 (2&middot;09-4&middot;69)) were associated with post-discharge maternal readmission. Both maternal and newborn readmission were associated with household food insecurity during pregnancy (maternal OR:1&middot;56 (1&middot;15-2&middot;08); newborn OR: 1&middot;73 (1&middot;31-2&middot;25)). Newborn resuscitation with oxygen was associated with maternal readmission (OR:2.24 (1.24&ndash;3&middot;78)), newborn readmission (OR: 2&middot;74 (1&middot;54-4&middot;56)) and newborn death (OR: 4&middot;01 (1&middot;73-8&middot;21)). Although &gt;99% of women had &ge;1 antenatal care visit, only 511 (7%) had &ge;1 routine postnatal care visit. There were no routine postnatal care visits among 211 (91&middot;7%) readmitted mothers, 276 (96&middot;2%) newborns and 57 (91&middot;9%) newborns who died.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Post-discharge complications occur in a context of low routine postnatal care use. Risk-informed discharge planning, postnatal care and health education strategies may improve outcomes in mothers, newborns and their families.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pillay, Y., Nguyen, V., Komugisha, C., Lavoie, P. M., Bebell, L. M., Vidler, M., Payne, B. A., Trawin, J., Christofferson-Deb, A., Mwesigwa, D., Twinomujuni, H. A., Novakowski, S. K., Dunsmuir, D., Ansermino, J. M., Tagoola, A., Kissoon, N., Kenya-Mugisha, N., Namala, A., Ngonzi, J., Wiens, M. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108734</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108734</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Post-discharge mortality, readmission and care seeking among postpartum women and their newborns following facility-based delivery in Uganda: a prospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108734</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108734</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111152?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of a hospital deprescribing behaviour change intervention, the CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER) trial: a process evaluation protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111152?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Proactive deprescribing is the process of stopping a medicine and comprises four steps: (1) identify a patient for potential stop of a medicine, (2) evaluate a patient for potential stop of a medicine, (3) stop a medicine and (4) monitor after stopping.</p>
<p>The CHARMER (CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review) trial is a stepped-wedge design to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a behaviour change intervention to increase proactive deprescribing in hospitals. The CHARMER intervention comprises a deprescribing action plan, deprescribing briefings, videos of successful deprescribing consultations, deprescribing case studies workshop and a deprescribing performance dashboard. The process evaluation will explore trial processes, CHARMER intervention implementation, CHARMER behavioural mechanisms of action and contextual factors influencing these aspects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The convergent parallel design process evaluation will follow the UK Medical Research Council guidance. We will interview: staff involved in CHARMER implementation, geriatricians and pharmacists who receive the intervention and research delivery staff involved in patient/carer recruitment and data collection. We will also interview patients/carers and primary care practitioners. Interviews will be supplemented with recordings of implementation activities and completed implementation manuals. Questionnaires will capture the extent to which the four proactive deprescribing steps are enacted by intervention recipients, measure the behavioural mechanisms by which the CHARMER intervention operates and capture the patient experience of proactive deprescribing. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically and then mapped to Normalisation Process Theory to explore implementation and the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore behaviour change. Most quantitative data will be analysed descriptively; however, changes in staff questionnaire responses preintervention and postintervention will be analysed using a Mann-Whitney test. We will triangulate qualitative and quantitative findings to explain intervention effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical and governance approvals have been obtained by the Wales 2 Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority, respectively. The dissemination strategy will be underpinned by the evidence-based Guide to Disseminating Research (GuiDiR) targeting healthcare practitioners, policy makers and patient-facing organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN13248281">ISRCTN13248281</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin-Kerry, J. M., Bhattacharya, D., Taylor, J., Kellar, I., Atkins, B., Jones, C. E. L., Bywater-Florance, E. M., Keevil, V. L., Clark, A. B., Wright, D. J., Alldred, D. P., Scott, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111152</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111152</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of a hospital deprescribing behaviour change intervention, the CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER) trial: a process evaluation protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111152</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111152</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111561?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and psychometric evaluation of the Patient Safety Culture in Home Health Care Centers Instrument (PSCHCI): a sequential exploratory mixed-methods protocol in Iran]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e111561?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patient safety is crucial in healthcare, especially in home-based settings where unregulated environments and limited supervision pose unique challenges. With the expansion of home healthcare due to an ageing population and healthcare workforce shortages, there is a pressing need for tools to assess patient safety culture in this context. Current instruments, developed for hospitals, do not adequately address the specific dynamics of home healthcare, such as patient autonomy and caregiver involvement. This protocol outlines the development and validation of the Patient Safety Culture in Home Health Care Centers Instrument (PSCHCI), using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This sequential exploratory mixed-methods protocol consists of three phases. Phase 1 fieldwork (semi-structured interviews with 15 participants, 3 participant observations and field notes) has been completed. Qualitative data are currently being analysed using conventional content analysis. The scoping review component of Phase 1 is planned but has not yet been conducted. Phase 2 (instrument development) is planned to include item generation from qualitative results followed by expert panel review. Phase 3 (psychometric evaluation), scheduled for late 2026, will employ a cross-sectional study to assess face, content and construct validity; reliability; interpretability; and feasibility. This phase features pilot testing (n=30&ndash;50), face and content validity assessment (n=10 each), test-retest reliability (n=15) and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (n=300&ndash;400).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences. All participants will provide written informed consent. Confidentiality, voluntary participation and withdrawal rights are guaranteed. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and shared with participating home healthcare centres, policymakers and stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Etebarian Khorasgani, A., Ashghali Farahani, M., Sharif-Nia, H., Gholami, M., Golestan, F., Ghezeljeh, T. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111561</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111561</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and psychometric evaluation of the Patient Safety Culture in Home Health Care Centers Instrument (PSCHCI): a sequential exploratory mixed-methods protocol in Iran]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111561</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111561</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113970?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of digital premium payment in scaling health insurance coverage in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113970?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Health insurance coverage in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remains low and digital premium payment systems have been suggested as a potential solution to increase enrolment and retention. This systematic review will collate and distill empirical evidence on the impact of digital premium payment in scaling health insurance coverage and retention and access to health service delivery in SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This systematic review protocol has been prepared following robust methods, and it is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. We will conduct searches through relevant databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, HINARI, African Journals Online, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, Trip Pro and TOXNET from 2007 to 30 June 2026, without language restriction for studies that evaluated digital premium payment systems and reported health insurance enrolment or retention rates. The search terms and concepts include: &lsquo;national health insurance&rsquo;, &lsquo;health insurance coverage&rsquo;, &lsquo;insurance enrolment&rsquo;, &lsquo;digital premium&rsquo;, &lsquo;e-payment&rsquo;, &lsquo;online payment&rsquo;, &lsquo;electronic payment&rsquo;, &lsquo;mobile payment&rsquo;, &lsquo;telepayment&rsquo; and &lsquo;cashless payment&rsquo;, together with their alternate terms and synonyms, singular and plural forms as well as British and American spelling. The names of the countries in SSA will be included as search terms. Grey literature including dissertation repositories, national health insurance databases and conference proceedings will be searched. Reference list of retrieved articles will be reviewed, and where necessary, experts working in the field of national health insurance will be contacted for knowledge about completed studies not captured by our searches. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data (using pretested data extraction form developed from Microsoft Excel) and assess risk of bias in the included studies using the quality assessment tool for Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Exposures. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion between the reviewers. Heterogeneity will be explored graphically for overlapping CIs and statistically using the <f></f>-statistic. We will combine dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio and for continuous data mean difference employing random-effects meta-analysis and presenting weighted effect estimates with their 95% (CIs). Subgroup analysis will be performed to assess the impact of heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the pooled effect estimates. The overall level or certainty of evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review will collate empirical data on publicly available published and unpublished primary studies and no ethical approval is required. However, an eligible study with serious ethical issues will be excluded from the analysis and the reasons for exclusion documented. The review findings will be shared with key stakeholders and health authorities, agencies involved in digital premium health insurance and policymakers. The review results will be presented at scientific conferences and symposia, and a manuscript will be submitted for publication in a high impact factor journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024576134.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danso-Appiah, A., Appiagyei, N., Danso, C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113970</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113970</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of digital premium payment in scaling health insurance coverage in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113970</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113970</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114029?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of atosiban in women with previous embryo implantation failure and abnormal uterine contractions undergoing single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114029?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Atosiban may confer therapeutic benefits to specific subpopulations in assisted reproductive technology. The Phase I Atosiban study indicated potential improvements in live birth rates among women with previous implantation failure undergoing frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer who exhibited abnormal uterine contractions, although these findings did not reach statistical significance. Therefore, further investigations are warranted to thoroughly elucidate the efficacy of atosiban and to evaluate whether uterine contractions can serve as a reliable biomarker for its targeted application.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial aiming to enrol 792 infertile women aged 20&ndash;40 years with a history of at least one previous embryo implantation failure and abnormal uterine contractions prior to single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intravenous atosiban or a placebo before embryo transfer. The primary outcome is live birth rate, with secondary outcomes encompassing various pregnancy and perinatal parameters. Randomisation will be stratified by age and transfer type. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed using generalised linear models. The trial will be monitored by an independent data and safety monitoring committee, including one interim analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Northwest Women&rsquo;s and Children&rsquo;s Hospital (No. 2025-058-02). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study results will be disseminated at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07185230">NCT07185230</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cai, H., Li, W., Mol, B. W. J., Liu, D., Lei, D., Ran, X., Zhang, D., Xue, X., Gao, L., Shi, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114029</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of atosiban in women with previous embryo implantation failure and abnormal uterine contractions undergoing single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114029</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114029</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114181?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Repeated versus selective tactile stimulation for preterm infants at birth: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (NEU-stim trial)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e114181?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Preterm infants frequently receive support for inadequate breathing at birth. Though current guidelines recommend using tactile stimulation to promote breathing, guidance on its use is limited. There are few studies on the effects of tactile stimulation with a high risk of bias in these studies. We aim to generate robust evidence by comparing the effects of repeated to selective tactile stimulation of preterm infants at birth in a stepped-wedge cluster randomised study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial is being conducted from 11 March 2024 in 43 centres across Europe. All centres begin in the selective stimulation (control) arm, where stimulation is applied only when breathing effort is judged inadequate by treating clinicians. Every fortnight, one centre switches to the repeated stimulation (intervention) arm, where stimulation is provided for 10 s, alternated with 10-second pauses for at least the first 5 min after birth. Once centres switch, they continue in the repeated stimulation arm until study completion. The order of switching is prospectively and randomly assigned, with the last switch occurring on 24 November 2025. The primary outcome is achievement of a pre-ductal oxygen saturation &ge;80% at 5 min after birth. Analyses will use generalised linear mixed models to compare outcomes between groups at the individual level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained at all participating centres. The study adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki, the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the General Data Protection Regulation. Results will be shared with investigators, published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05942924">NCT05942924</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dekker, J., ODonnell, C. P. F., Ru&#x0308;diger, M., Te Pas, A. B., Pauws, S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114181</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114181</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Repeated versus selective tactile stimulation for preterm infants at birth: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (NEU-stim trial)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114181</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114181</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115457?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Underlying aetiology of acute intracerebral haemorrhage and associations between outcome measures, findings on initial computed tomography scan and ICH classification systems: an observational historical cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115457?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) accounts for approximately 15% of all strokes in Denmark and remains associated with high mortality and morbidity. It is challenging to distinguish neoplastic from non-neoplastic causes of ICH in the acute setting, and CT findings that may aid early differentiation have not been fully characterised. Existing ICH-classification systems (SMASH-U, H-ATOMIC and CLAS-ICH) have not been directly compared for diagnostic accuracy in this setting. Identifying radiological and clinical factors associated with underlying aetiology may support faster diagnosis, reduce time to workup related to potential underlying cancer and facilitate early targeted treatment of the underlying cause of ICH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a retrospective observational cohort including all patients admitted with acute ICH to the Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa between January 2014 and December 2024 (estimated approximately n=610). Medical records and initial non-enhanced CT scans will be reviewed. Two neurologists and two radiologists, blinded to final diagnosis, will independently extract clinical presentation, topographical and volumetric haemorrhage characteristics, and classify each case using the abovementioned ICH-classification systems. Primary analyses will assess associations between clinical and radiological features and underlying neoplastic vs non-neoplastic aetiology. Secondary analyses will compare diagnostic performance of classification systems using sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curves. Multivariate logistic regression models will be applied with Holm correction for multiple comparisons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been submitted to the National Danish Research Ethics Committee and the Danish Data Protection Agency. As data derive from completed disease courses, no patient contact is expected. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and scientific presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nielsen, V., Nielsen, T., Petersen, S. R., Andrade Melchiori, F., Dreis, S. K. R., Bitterling, H., Braad, P.-E., Stenager, E., Mamoei, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115457</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115457</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Underlying aetiology of acute intracerebral haemorrhage and associations between outcome measures, findings on initial computed tomography scan and ICH classification systems: an observational historical cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115457</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115457</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115626?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatable Traits for Asthma Management in Pregnancy (TTAP): protocol for an Australian multicentre prospective observational cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115626?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Asthma is one of the most prevalent long-term health conditions affecting pregnant women. Poorly controlled asthma during pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes and may predispose offspring to long-term respiratory morbidity. The current &lsquo;one size fits all&rsquo; approach to asthma management during pregnancy is not optimally effective for approximately half of the pregnant women with asthma. A personalised medicine approach to managing airways disease is required. The treatable traits approach focuses on the identification and treatment of traits in the pulmonary, extra-pulmonary and behavioural domains, which are identifiable, measurable, clinically relevant (linked to exacerbation risk or poor asthma control) and treatable. This manuscript outlines the protocol for the Treatable Traits for Asthma Management in Pregnancy (TTAP) study. The purpose of the TTAP study is to prospectively determine the prevalence of a range of treatable traits from these three domains in pregnant women with asthma and determine which traits are associated with exacerbation risk, poor asthma control and poor asthma-related quality of life. Additionally, this study will assess differences in trait prevalence and clinical relevance in pregnant women from regional versus metropolitan hospitals in Australia and in different antenatal models of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The TTAP study is a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study. Study participants are pregnant women with asthma attending antenatal clinics at 10 metropolitan and regional hospitals (public and private) in NSW and Victoria, Australia. Assessment of traits from the pulmonary, extrapulmonary and behavioural domains as well as asthma outcomes is conducted at three gestational timepoints: 12&ndash;16 weeks, 22&ndash;26 weeks and 32&ndash;36 weeks of pregnancy. A follow-up assessment of asthma outcomes is conducted at 2&ndash;4 weeks postpartum. The outcomes assessed are asthma exacerbations requiring medical intervention (primary outcome), asthma symptom control and asthma-related quality of life. Traits and outcomes will be assessed using questionnaires, direct questioning, measurement of biomarkers, physical measurements and assessment of routinely collected data from medical records.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Hunter New England Human Ethics Committee (2024/ETH01289) has approved the TTAP study protocol. Outcomes will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific conferences and disseminated online to participants, clinicians and other pregnant women with asthma and their families via the Asthma in Pregnancy Toolkit website <A HREF="https://asthmapregnancytoolkit.org.au/">https://asthmapregnancytoolkit.org.au/</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grehan, J. E., Bristow, J., Steel, K., Brew, B. K., Peek, M. J., Robijn, A. L., Barrett, H. L., Seeho, S., Fotheringham, P., Atchan, M., Harvey, S. M., Samuel, S. R. N., McDonald, V. M., Jensen, M. E., Holliday, E. G., Rees, M., Elvidge, E., Vining, L., Chapman, K., Joshi, E., Jones, A. C., Bowman, R., Brereton, C. J., Price, S. A., McNamara, K. A., Beech, A., Pennell, C. E., Murphy, V. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115626</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115626</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatable Traits for Asthma Management in Pregnancy (TTAP): protocol for an Australian multicentre prospective observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115626</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115626</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115731?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase Ib/II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab as adjuvant therapy following carbon-ion radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (VANGUARD): study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115731?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The establishment of an effective strategy for recurrence prevention following curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including radiotherapy, remains a critical unmet clinical need. Despite favourable local control and safety profiles, recurrence after particle therapy remains a major challenge, highlighting the need for effective adjuvant strategies to improve long-term outcomes. The present phase Ib/II trial is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) administered after carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) in patients with unresectable non-metastatic large HCC. This study aims to explore the potential of this multimodal approach as a novel adjuvant strategy to improve outcomes in patients at high risk of recurrence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a phase Ib/II, single-arm clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant Atezo+Bev following C-ion RT in patients with HCC. Eligible patients will be enrolled in the first registration phase. C-ion RT (60 Gy) will be administered over four consecutive treatment days ideally within one calendar week. Patients will receive a combination of atezolizumab (1200 mg) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) administered intravenously every 21 days for one treatment cycle. The primary endpoint of the phase Ib part is the proportion of patients with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT is defined as prespecified toxicities associated with the investigational drug among the adverse events that occurred from the start date of the investigational drug (Day 1) to Day 21. If there is one or fewer cases of DLT out of six cases, the trial will proceed to the phase II part. The primary endpoint of the phase II part is the 1-year recurrence-free survival rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the ethics committee of two participating institutions (Chiba University Hospital (approval No. 2024021) and National Institute for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, QST Hospital (approval No. C24-001)). Trial results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>jRCT2031240284.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koroki, K., Wakatsuki, M., Ogasawara, S., Makishima, H., Watabe, T., Anzai, H., Fujiya, M., Sawada, M., Tsuchiya, T., Katayama, K., Yoshino, R., Izai, R., Akatsuka, T., Miwa, C., Yonemoto, T., Yumita, S., Inoue, M., Nakamura, M., Kanogawa, N., Nakamoto, S., Takahashi, K., Ozawa, Y., Inaba, Y., Kurokawa, T., Isozaki, T., Takahashi, A., Kato, J., Ohtsuka, M., Ohno, T., Ueno, Y., Furuse, J., Kudo, M., Hanaoka, H., Ishikawa, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115731</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115731</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase Ib/II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab as adjuvant therapy following carbon-ion radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (VANGUARD): study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115731</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115731</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115822?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and psychosocial correlates of depression, anxiety and stress among caregivers of children with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in China: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115822?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress among primary caregivers of children with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) in China and to explore their psychosocial correlates based on the stress process model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>3 tertiary public hospitals in Hunan Province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>242 primary caregivers were invited, and 211 completed the study (87.2% response rate). Convenience sampling was used. Eligible participants were unpaid adult caregivers (aged &ge;18 years) of children (aged &lt;18 years) with cSLE, providing care for &gt;1 month. Exclusion criteria included inability to complete questionnaires independently, cognitive impairment due to major physical or mental disorders and current participation in other psychological interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes (depression, anxiety and stress) were measured using the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21. Correlates included threat/challenge appraisal, coping style and perceived social support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 211 caregivers (mean age 40.55&plusmn;8.22 years; 77.3% female), 31.8% reported depression, 27.0% anxiety and 24.2% stress. Higher threat appraisal was consistently associated with depression (regression coefficients (B) =1.012, p&lt;0.001), anxiety (B=0.514, p&lt;0.001) and stress (B=1.091, p&lt;0.001). A higher number of hospitalisations was associated with higher depression (B=0.118, p=0.005) and anxiety (B=0.099, p=0.012). Anxiety and stress were also associated with younger child age (anxiety: B=&ndash;0.339, p=0.028; stress: B=&ndash;0.393, p=0.024), lower challenge appraisal (anxiety: B=&ndash;0.252, p=0.044; stress: B=&ndash;0.421, p=0.002) and negative coping (anxiety: B=0.492, p&lt;0.001; stress: B=0.311, p=0.019).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Caregivers of children with cSLE face substantial psychological distress, with threat perception and negative coping as key modifiable correlates. Interventions to reshape cognitive appraisal and promote adaptive coping, alongside expanded health insurance coverage and optimised caregiving role distribution, are needed to alleviate caregiver burden.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[He, Y., Xu, T., Zhou, X., Chai, X., Tan, X., Li, L., Peng, J., Pan, T., Zeng, Y., Tang, J., Ho, K. Y., Wen, H., Sun, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115822</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115822</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and psychosocial correlates of depression, anxiety and stress among caregivers of children with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in China: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115822</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115822</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115870?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to the utilisation of point-of-use water treatment systems during and immediately following flood-related disasters: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e115870?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal 6 seeks to ensure universal access to safe drinking water by 2030, but vast inequities in access exist, especially among vulnerable communities including limited resource, rural, disaster-affected areas. Flood disasters, exacerbated by the climate crisis, hinder the ability of individuals and families to meet essential drinking water needs and increase their susceptibility to waterborne illnesses. Point-of-use (POU) water treatment is an effective solution for water-insecure populations during and immediately following flood emergencies. However, an initial literature search identified knowledge gaps surrounding implementation of POU water systems. This scoping review aims to synthesise published evidence between January 2015 and July 2025 on barriers and facilitators to utilisation of POU water treatment systems during and immediately following flood-related disasters. The findings will inform efforts to promote resilience and agency among water insecure communities, specifically by equipping them with actionable knowledge on sustainable access to safe drinking water.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will be guided by the work of Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Search terms will be identified through an iterative process using the PICOT method and Boolean logic. Four databases&mdash;Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar&mdash;with the addition of grey literature from UN agencies and non-governmental organisations focused on water-related issues will be searched. Two independent reviewers will apply a priori eligibility criteria to select studies. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion and a third independent reviewer absent agreement between the first two reviewers. Cohen&rsquo;s kappa statistic will be calculated to assess inter-rater reliability. Data extraction will be guided by predefined data points, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will guide evidence synthesis through a solution-based approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Institutional research ethics review is not required because no human subjects are involved. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, a policy brief, conference presentations and infographics for use by organisations serving flood disaster impacted communities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson, R., Shank, S. E., Aaltonen, P. M., Blatchley, E. R., Payne, L., Simpson, V., Bhadelia, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115870</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115870</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to the utilisation of point-of-use water treatment systems during and immediately following flood-related disasters: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115870</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115870</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117014?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cardiac cost of occupational stress among obstetricians: a cross-sectional non-invasive haemodynamic study in a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117014?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify early cardiovascular changes in normotensive obstetricians, a high-stress group, using non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring, and to examine the association between burnout and haemodynamic parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A single tertiary hospital in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 120 healthy Han Chinese adults (aged 25&ndash;45 years, both sexes) were enrolled using stratified random sampling by age and categorised into three groups: obstetricians, clinical support staff and administrative personnel. Of these, 105 (87.5%) completed the study and entered the final analysis (obstetricians n=40; clinical support staff n=33; administrative personnel n=32); 15 were excluded due to incomplete questionnaire data. Key exclusion criteria were chronic medical conditions, medication use, acute illness, a clinical shift within 24 hours before measurement, pregnancy or lactation, body mass index extremes (&le;18.5 or &ge; 28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and major life events within the past 6 months. Burnout was assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey; workload, lifestyle and family history were collected via questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Advanced haemodynamics were assessed via Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor. The primary outcome was cardiac power output (CPO). Secondary outcomes included other non-invasive haemodynamic parameters, such as cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index, Smith&ndash;Madigan inotropy index and corrected flow time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Severe burnout was associated with reduced CPO and CI (&ndash;0.152 W and &ndash;0.403 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively; both p&lt;0.05). Increased weekly exercise independently predicted higher CPO and CI (B=0.046 W and 0.155 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively; both p&lt;0.001). This protective association remained significant in obstetricians and clinical support staff, and was stronger for CI in obstetricians (interaction p=0.03). The severe burnout&ndash;haemodynamics association was consistent across all groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In high-stress populations, advanced haemodynamic patterns may serve as an early-warning biomarker for burnout, guiding personalised exercise advice. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm their predictive value.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhong, X., Li, D., Lai, S., Phillips, R. A., Wu, Q., Wei, W., Yang, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117014</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117014</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cardiac cost of occupational stress among obstetricians: a cross-sectional non-invasive haemodynamic study in a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117014</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117014</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between completing at least eight antenatal care contacts and maternal anaemia in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using causal machine learning]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Maternal anaemia remains a pressing global health challenge, with a notable burden in low- and middle-income countries. Existing studies in sub-Saharan Africa have largely relied on average associations, thereby concealing key variation among women and failing to account for heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the association between completing at least eight antenatal care (ANC) contacts and maternal anaemia in Ghana and to explore heterogeneity in this association using causal machine learning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted using a retrospective review of medical records and causal machine learning analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Juaben Government Hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Of 2326 women who delivered at the hospital, 2114 with complete data on the main exposure and outcome variables were included in the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main exposure</st>
<p>Completion of at least eight ANC contacts. ANC contact was defined as the in-person visit to the clinic with a healthcare professional for routine ANC services and follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome</st>
<p>Maternal anaemia, defined as a haemoglobin level below 11 g/dL in the last ANC before delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A causal forest model was used to estimate the association between completing at least eight ANC contacts and maternal anaemia. Conditional average treatment effects were used to explore individual-level variation in these associations, providing policy-relevant insights.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Completing &ge;8 ANC contacts was associated with a 6 percentage-point lower probability of maternal anaemia compared with having fewer visits (average treatment effect: -0.06, 95% CI &ndash;0.11 to &ndash;0.02). Predicted individual-level effects ranged from &ndash;0.21 to 0.09. Participants&rsquo; age, malaria prophylaxis, marital status, parity and educational level were the five most important contributors to the observed heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study demonstrated that completing &ge;8 ANC contacts is associated with a lower probability of maternal anaemia, with heterogeneity across subgroups. We recommend differentiated, context-specific ANC interventions that focus on high-impact subgroups while strengthening the effectiveness and quality of care delivered at each visit.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agbedinu, E. S., Owusu, F. O., Boakye, K., Addai- Manu, H., Karikari, J. K., Konadu, E., Akanwariwiak, R. A., Asenso, L., Addae, M., Kanfra, M., Opoku, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118189</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118189</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between completing at least eight antenatal care contacts and maternal anaemia in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using causal machine learning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118189</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e120149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards precision vibration therapy for poststroke balance: a domain-specific systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e120149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Balance impairment is a major contributor to falls, reduced mobility and loss of independence in individuals after stroke. Vibration therapy (VT) has been increasingly investigated as a non-invasive intervention to improve postural control and balance in individuals with stroke. However, the reported effects remain inconsistent, and a comprehensive synthesis focusing specifically on balance-related outcomes is lacking. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VT on balance function and to explore the influence of intervention characteristics and outcome constructs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Randomised and non-randomised controlled studies will be systematically identified from major electronic databases. Balance-related outcomes will be categorised using a predefined construct-based framework (eg, static postural control, dynamic balance, limits of stability, functional mobility and gait performance). Meta-analyses will be conducted only within conceptually homogeneous constructs; otherwise, findings will be synthesised narratively. Risk of bias will be assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions. Random-effects models will be applied where appropriate, and meta-regression analyses will be exploratory.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required because this study will use only previously published data and will not involve individual-level human participant data. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at relevant academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251110102.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, J.-D., Park, S.-R., Chun, J. M., Seok, J.-W., Seo, J.-W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:27:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-120149</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-120149</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards precision vibration therapy for poststroke balance: a domain-specific systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e120149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e120149</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109084?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers to healthcare access during pregnancy and after birth for adolescent girls living with disability in Sierra Leone: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e109084?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and objective</st>
<p>In 2017, Lifeline Nehemiah Projects in Sierra Leone launched 2YoungLives, a mentoring initiative for vulnerable pregnant adolescents, including those living with disabilities. Drawing from the social model of disability, we aimed to investigate the exacerbated disabling barriers which prevent these girls and their babies from accessing available healthcare and develop comprehensive solutions to improve their access.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative methods were used in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Participants were invited to participate in face-to-face interviews in one district in Sierra Leone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Six pregnant or postnatal adolescents living with disability, alongside four caregivers and five stakeholders from various organisations participated in semi-structured interviews employing thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified four key themes: (1) discrimination and financial barriers within the healthcare system, despite laws ensuring free healthcare for persons living with disabilities, (2) societal stigma manifested through abandonment by families and inadequate support, (3) lack of understanding of disability issues, particularly of those with intellectual impairments, leading to stigmatisation and exclusion, and (4) infrastructural limitations which hinder accessibility to essential services, with many facilities remaining non-compliant with disability regulations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Adolescent girls living with disability during pregnancy and after birth in Sierra Leone face barriers to accessing healthcare, including caregiver ignorance, lack of autonomy, disabling services, social stigma and ineffective policy implementation, despite existing supportive laws. These findings keep those women who are arguably the most vulnerable, adolescent and living with a disability, from accessing perinatal healthcare, exacerbating their risk and that of their babies. Solutions include the need to enforce disability-inclusive policies and infrastructure adaptations, awareness and training for healthcare providers and community advocacy to break down social stigma.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamara, P., Kamara, M., November, L., Sandall, J., Williams, P. T., Wurie, H., Fernandez Turienzo, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T02:00:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109084</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109084</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers to healthcare access during pregnancy and after birth for adolescent girls living with disability in Sierra Leone: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109084</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109084</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108881?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing the therapeutic vacuum: a qualitative study learning from experiences of care delivery during terror attacks in the UK over the past 20 years]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e108881?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The complex and dynamic care context of terror attacks must be better understood to reduce deaths. This study was designed to understand the tension between saving lives and maximising safety for emergency responders attending active terror incidents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>Qualitative study exploring the experience of survivors and emergency responders (armed and unarmed police, paramedics, doctors and fire officers) present in the hot (unsafe) zone of five major terror attacks in the UK since 2000. We used reflexive thematic data analysis to build qualitative case studies, comparing similarities and tensions between perspectives of different participant groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In our analysis of over 2000 min of interview data from 26 participants, we found a common view that the priority during a terror-related mass casualty event was to save lives. However, responder groups maintained distinct mental models that shaped their operational priorities regarding treatment for those injured within the hot zone. All responders expressed willingness to take self-assessed risks to save lives, but better interagency communication was noted to be required to achieve this safely. All responders felt it was vital to have experienced health professionals present to triage and facilitate urgent treatment and extraction decisions. Armed police commanders had dual responsibilities to achieve rapid care delivery while preventing further terrorist-inflicted injuries. Operationally, this was perceived as leading to a lack of shared mental models between responders regarding what is &lsquo;unsafe&rsquo; due to zoning, rather than communication of risk, potentially delaying vital care delivery. There were mixed survivor perspectives regarding the risks that responders should be exposed to, but broad agreement that there was a notable absence of health professionals present in the hot zone during the immediate aftermath of attacks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There is strong professional and public support for improving care delivery, including potential hot zone working, to minimise the therapeutic vacuum in active terrorist attacks. Better risk communication and better shared mental models are necessary to balance responder risk with care delivery to maximise lives saved as safely as possible.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephens, T. J., Dave, D., Hughes, A. H., Swift, B., Glasgow, S. M., Fothergill, R., Grier, G., Brohi, K., Park, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108881</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108881</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing the therapeutic vacuum: a qualitative study learning from experiences of care delivery during terror attacks in the UK over the past 20 years]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108881</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108881</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110537?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unequal harvests: AI-assisted evidence map of trends and gaps in global farmer health research along SDG 3 priorities]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e110537?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Ensuring the health of agricultural workers, the world&rsquo;s largest labour force, is key for sustainable food production and progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted evidence map of research records on global farmer health published from 2015 to 2024. We searched bibliographic databases and screened titles/abstracts using SWIFT-Active Screener, a collaborative review platform that uses machine-learning prioritisation to rank records for human review. We retrieved 32 006 records. After manually screening 8533 records and stopping when the tool estimated &ge;94% recall of relevant records, we included 1684 studies. We mapped research output by health topic category (non-communicable diseases (NCDs), communicable diseases, injuries and mental health) country income groups and alignment with SDG 3 targets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Despite 98% of the agricultural workforce living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), 52% of studies originate from high-income countries (HICs). Research focuses on NCDs (29%) and injuries (26%), with LMICs focusing on pesticide poisoning and HIC on accidents. Mental health emerges as a key topic in HICs, with the proportion of publications nearly doubling from 2021 to 2024 but remains underexplored in LMICs. Key gaps with high relevance to farming populations and climate change, such as heat-related illnesses, occupational injuries and musculoskeletal conditions, are not well represented in SDG 3 indicators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our findings highlight urgent needs for a more equitable and comprehensive global research agenda that integrates agricultural worker health into sustainability frameworks beyond the SDG era, ensuring the resilience and well-being of food producers worldwide.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ja&#x0308;ggi, L., Falgas Bague, I., Wey, H., Ru&#x0308;fli, D., Viglietti, P. G., Fuhrimann, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110537</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110537</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unequal harvests: AI-assisted evidence map of trends and gaps in global farmer health research along SDG 3 priorities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110537</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110537</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112284?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HOTFy: randomised clinical trial for hyperbaric oxygen therapy in fibromyalgia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112284?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Fibromyalgia is a polysymptomatic central sensitisation disorder characterised by widespread pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances and neuropsychiatric features. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy modulates neuroinflammation, mitochondrial function and neuroplasticity, thereby yielding analgesic and functional benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Evaluate the efficacy and optimal timing of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunct to standard care for fibromyalgia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>This single-centre, randomised, cross-over group, assessor-blinded clinical trial was conducted in the Department of Rheumatology at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil, and adhered to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Women (18&ndash;70 years) with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia for &ge;2 years were randomised 1:1 to early hyperbaric oxygen therapy plus standard care or standard care alone (delayed group). Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was conducted with all 56 participants (mean age: 51.0&plusmn;9.8 years; mean body mass index: 30.5&plusmn;5.1 kg/m&sup2;).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Standardised care (education, exercise and pharmacotherapy) plus hyperbaric oxygen therapy was delivered at 2.3 atmospheres absolute for 90 min, five times per week, over 8 weeks (total 32&ndash;40 sessions). The early group received hyperbaric oxygen therapy during weeks 0&ndash;8, while the delayed group received it during weeks 8&ndash;16, following the same protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Primary endpoints included the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Brazilian Portuguese (FIQR-Br), the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Symptoms Assessment Scale-40 (EAS-40) for psychopathology. Secondary endpoints included the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical and mental components and adverse effects. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks, and analysed using a mixed-design 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>3 analysis of variance (group: early vs delayed; time: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks) with Greenhouse-Geisser corrections as needed, followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests. Missing data were assessed using Little&rsquo;s missing completely at random (MCAR), and considering the ITT analysis, the means imputed for missing data were estimated through expectation maximisation. Effect sizes were reported as partial &sup2; and Cohen&rsquo;s d with &alpha;=0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>44 participants completed the study, and the overall withdrawal rate was 21.4% with no baseline between-group differences. Significant time effects were observed for all primary outcomes and the SF-12 outcome (p&lt;0.001; &sup2;=0.23&ndash;0.60). Group<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>time interactions were significant for FIQR-Br, VAS, EAS-40 and SF-12 physical and mental (p&le;0.02; interaction &sup2; up to 0.23), indicating improvements during active hyperbaric oxygen therapy exposure. Compared with standard care alone over 8 weeks, combined treatment achieved greater gains: FIQR-Br, &ndash;31.1% vs &ndash;14.4%; VAS, &ndash;54.0% vs &ndash;33.5%; EAS-40, &ndash;28.4% vs &ndash;3.7%; SF-12 physical, +39.1% vs +14.8%; SF-12 mental, +57.4% vs +31.9%. Large within-group effect sizes were observed (eg, VAS d=2.5&ndash;2.7; FIQR-Br d=1.4&ndash;1.7). Efficacy was equivalent regardless of time started, and the benefits converged by the end of each hyperbaric oxygen therapy phase. After stopping hyperbaric oxygen therapy, the FIQR-Br and SF-12 mental component scores regressed towards standard care levels, whereas residual improvements persisted for up to 8 weeks in VAS, EAS-40 and SF-12 physical component scores. Adverse events were infrequent; one case of otalgia required extended management. Withdrawals were primarily due to non-compliance or intolerance to chamber confinement. No serious or unexpected safety concerns were reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, delivered under a standardised protocol, is an effective and well-tolerated adjunct to multimodal fibromyalgia care. Timing can be individualised: early initiation for rapid relief or stepped introduction after optimised usual care, with comparable overall efficacy. The durability of the benefit appears to be exposure dependent, and maintenance or booster schedules merit further evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>RBR-6prps8g.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[da Mota Neto, J., Mendes, A. F., Magalhaes Martins, A. F., Teixeira De Landa, A., de Oliveira Fraga, R., de Souza, V. A., Raposo, N. R. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112284</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112284</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HOTFy: randomised clinical trial for hyperbaric oxygen therapy in fibromyalgia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112284</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112464?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How and why digital information interventions support patients and carers during hospital-to-home transitions: a protocol for a realist systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112464?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable stage in the patient pathway. Patients and carers often report unmet information needs regarding diagnoses, medication changes, follow-up arrangements and escalation pathways during the post-hospital discharge period. Digital information interventions&mdash;such as electronic health records, patient portals or remote communication systems&mdash;have been proposed to improve discharge pathways. However, evidence on their impact is unproven. The aim of this review is to understand what works for whom, how, why and in what circumstances in relation to digital information interventions during the hospital-to-home journey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Pawson&rsquo;s realist review approach will be used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and reporting standards will also be followed. The review will follow five steps: (1) Development of the initial programme theory; (2) evidence search; (3) selection and appraisal of data; (4) extraction and organisation of data and (5) data synthesis and analysis. The search will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid); Embase; PsycINFO; Web of Science and Cochrane Library and supplemented with citation tracking, grey literature, relevant organisational websites, programme evaluation reports and through consultation with stakeholders. The realist review will be an iterative process, and the initial realist programme theory will be tested (confirmed, refuted or refined) in response to the data searches and stakeholder discussions. Patient and public involvement and engagement will be embedded throughout the review. Patients, carers and health and care stakeholders will contribute to refining the initial programme theory, interpreting emerging programme theory and co-developing dissemination outputs to ensure findings remain grounded in lived realities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this review as it involves secondary analysis of published literature. The review will be conducted in accordance with principles of research integrity, transparency and responsible stakeholder involvement. Findings will inform the co-design of future digital discharge interventions and contribute to national priorities around digital transformation, safety and equity in transitional care. Dissemination will include conference presentations, a peer-reviewed journal article and accessible summaries co-developed with stakeholders to support equitable implementation and impact.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stepanova, E., Cooper, M., Lawson, L., Harris, V., Rance, A., Husband, A., Lorencatto, F., Tovey, W., Crayton, E., Tolley, C. L., Wong, G., Nazar, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112464</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112464</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How and why digital information interventions support patients and carers during hospital-to-home transitions: a protocol for a realist systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112464</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112464</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High-flow nasal oxygen versus nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation during upper aerodigestive tract endoscopy: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (OPTIGO)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e112540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Upper aerodigestive tract endoscopy is routinely performed for the diagnosis and staging of head and neck cancers. These procedures are commonly conducted under general anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation to optimise surgical exposure and avoid tracheal intubation. However, maintaining adequate oxygenation remains challenging, particularly in patients with altered airway anatomy due to prior surgery or radiotherapy.</p>
<p>Standard practice often involves a preliminary laryngoscopy to insert a nasopharyngeal oxygen catheter, which may increase procedural complexity and interfere with surgical conditions. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has emerged as a promising alternative for maintaining oxygenation in various perioperative settings.</p>
<p>The OPTIGO trial aims to determine whether HFNO is non-inferior to nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation in preventing intraoperative oxygen desaturation during upper aerodigestive tract endoscopy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The OPTIGO study is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial conducted in three French centres. A total of 610 adult patients scheduled for endoscopic procedures of the pharynx, larynx and oesophagus will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HFNO or standard oxygenation via a nasopharyngeal oxygen catheter.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is the occurrence of intraoperative oxygen desaturation, defined as a peripheral oxygen saturation &le;85% at any time from induction to the end of the procedure.</p>
<p>Secondary outcomes include intraoperative complications, postoperative laryngeal pain, surgeon comfort, duration of the procedure, anaesthetic drug consumption, and perioperative gas exchange.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the independent ethics committee CPP Est 1 (10 April 2025; EudraCT 2025-A00278-41). The trial will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines.</p>
<p>Results will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CPP Est 1 EudraCT 2025-A00278-41 (Clinical trial <A HREF="NCT07004699">NCT07004699</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alleyrat, C., Drilleau, R., Brasseur, J.-M., Karayan, J., Saenz-Molina, C., Frasca, D., Boisson, M., Beaumatin, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112540</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112540</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High-flow nasal oxygen versus nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation during upper aerodigestive tract endoscopy: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (OPTIGO)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112540</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113154?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[WeCare intervention to improve breast cancer screening and research preparedness in rural and low-socioeconomic women: study protocol for a community-engaged feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e113154?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Women residing in rural areas or belonging to lower socioeconomic status (SES) strata experience disproportionately low rates of breast cancer screening, contributing to delayed diagnoses and poorer prognoses. In addition, their participation in clinical trials remains markedly limited, reducing opportunities to access preventive and screening interventions. Promoting research preparedness among women before disease onset may empower them to make informed decisions regarding their health and willingness to participate in clinical research with fewer emotional and logistical barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This project applies a community-based participatory research approach to develop and refine the WeCARE (Women&rsquo;s Engagement for Cancer Awareness, Resources and Education) intervention for women aged 50&ndash;74 years who have either never undergone breast cancer screening or have not received screening in the past 5 years and who reside in rural areas or belong to low SES groups. The intervention consists of two components. Component 1 is a single-day, in-person community forum that includes (a) an educational seminar led by an oncologist to address breast cancer risk and screening guidelines, (b) survivor storytelling to enhance emotional engagement and cultural resonance and (c) facilitated navigation to breast cancer screening and future research participation. Component 2 involves structured post-forum follow-up through multiple touchpoints (phone calls and mailed boosters) to reinforce knowledge, address barriers and support screening completion and research enrolment. Quantitative data (eg, screening completion, satisfaction and follow-up engagement) will be summarised using descriptive statistics to assess feasibility and reach on 50 participants. Qualitative feedback from participants will undergo thematic analysis to identify barriers, facilitators and perceived cultural relevance. Integrated mixed-method interpretation will inform iterative refinement of the WeCARE intervention and guide design of subsequent larger trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB #25&ndash;008934). All participants will provide informed consent. Procedures ensure confidentiality, cultural sensitivity and participant safety. Data will be stored in REDCap and disseminated through publications, conferences, local town halls and community reports.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharma, P., Imsande, K. G., Vitriago, A., Seibel, M., Pritchett, J. C., Rudder, B., Watson, D., Beenken, M. J., Tran, L. T., Larson, S. L., Flock, C., Murphy, C. M., Puljas, T. L., Patten, C. A., Asiedu, G. B., Odedina, F. T., Lynch, B. A., Haddad, T. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113154</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113154</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[WeCare intervention to improve breast cancer screening and research preparedness in rural and low-socioeconomic women: study protocol for a community-engaged feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113154</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on obesity: a prospective cohort study of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e116378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on body mass index (BMI) and obesity status among Canadian residents and explore how this association varied by sociodemographic and health status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>41 302 adults, aged 45&ndash;85 at baseline, participating in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcomes</st>
<p>BMI and BMI-defined obesity were measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2 (FUP2), with 33% of FUP2 data (n=13 444) gathered after 16 March 2020, when COVID-19 restrictions began. Correction factors were applied for self-reported BMI and weighted generalised estimating equations assessed BMI changes before and during the pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We found a significant interaction between follow-up time and timing of FUP2 data collection (before or during the pandemic). Participants measured during the pandemic had an excess BMI increase of 0.21 kg/m&sup2; (95% CI 0.15 to 0.28) and 1.06 times higher odds of obesity (95% CI 1.03 to 1.09) compared with prepandemic trends. Increases were more pronounced among females, middle-aged adults and those without diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a modest increase in BMI and obesity among Canadian adults. Ongoing research is needed to assess long-term trends.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sakib, M. N., Griffith, L. E., Erbas Oz, U., Basta, N. E., Gerstein, H. C., Morgenstern, J. D., Kirkland, S., Thabane, L., Smith, B. T., Balion, C., McMillan, J. M., Raina, P., Anderson, L. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116378</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116378</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on obesity: a prospective cohort study of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116378</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117420?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impacts of epic MyChart and healthy planet on clinical care measures: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117420?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Epic MyChart, used as a patient portal or within Epic Healthy Planet programmes, is integrated with the Epic electronic health record system, enabling secure access to health information, communication with clinicians and self-management tools. Despite increasing portal adoption in the UK and internationally, there is fragmented and unclear evidence demonstrating impact on clinical outcomes, engagement, safety, experience, efficiency and equity. This scoping review will map existing research on Epic MyChart, identify barriers and facilitators to uptake, and explore technical and operational determinants influencing implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a scoping review guided by Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley&rsquo;s framework, refined by Levac <I>et al</I>, and report according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and PRISMA-Equity guidelines. Eligible studies will include original research evaluating Epic MyChart or Epic Healthy Planet programmes, reporting outcomes related to patient-reported measures, clinical effectiveness, engagement, safety, efficiency or equity. Searches will cover MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, trial registries and grey literature. Two reviewers will independently screen records and extract data on study characteristics, outcomes, equity factors and implementation determinants. Quantitative findings will be synthesised narratively using synthesis without meta-analysis guidance; qualitative data will undergo thematic synthesis. Stakeholder consultations with health informatics experts, clinicians, data scientists and health system managers, alongside a patient and public involvement workshop, will support interpretation of findings. A logic model will illustrate relationships between portal features, implementation factors and outcomes. Although focused on Epic MyChart, the review will offer insights relevant to other patient portals, as many implementation and equity considerations are shared across digital health systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as the review uses published data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conferences and stakeholder engagement to inform implementation of patient portals internationally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://osf.io/5azdh/overview">https://osf.io/5azdh/overview</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plackett, R., Moro, A., Zhao, R., Ettefaghian, A., Lafitte, D., Reed, C., Hertelendy, A. J., Wong, T. Y., Sitapati, A. M., Longhurst, C., Car, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117420</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117420</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impacts of epic MyChart and healthy planet on clinical care measures: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117420</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117420</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117555?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The benefits and costs of domiciliary care: a study protocol for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of domiciliary care in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e117555?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Care provided in people&rsquo;s own homes (domiciliary care) is an increasingly important part of long-term care. There are various services, including home visits, live-in care and housing with care. Some people directly employ care staff, called personal assistants. Services vary in quality, price and availability, and there is currently little evidence of the value these services provide to the public purse and individuals. This study protocol presents planned research to fill this important gap.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This will be a cross-sectional study based on surveys of care recipients, their unpaid carers as well as formal care providers. In the first half of 2026, we will survey 1850 people accessing domiciliary care either through a homecare agency, a housing with care scheme or by directly employing personal assistants and 400 unpaid carers, all based in England. We will conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis taking a &lsquo;production function&rsquo; approach and use quality of life as measured by the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit as the main outcome of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study received ethical approval from the School of Social Sciences Staff Review Committee at the University of Kent on 20 May 2025 (reference 1195) and the Health Research Authority, London&mdash;Camberwell St Giles Research Ethics Committee on 28 October 2025 (reference 25/LO/0652). Implications around consent, data protection and confidentiality, risk and participant payment are discussed. In addition to academic outputs (eg, academic articles, conference presentations), we aim to coproduce news items and blogs with people with lived experience of accessing long-term care and jointly present findings at events aimed at the care sector. Moreover, we will offer participating care providers benchmarking briefs based on our findings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vadean, F., Mamolis, G., Rand, S., Gousia, K., Teo, H., Birch, S., Alvarez Nishio, A., Towers, A.-M., Allan, S., Darton, R., Gregory, F., Lambert, C., Fenton, W., Davison, S., Roberts, A., Nizalova, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117555</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117555</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The benefits and costs of domiciliary care: a study protocol for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of domiciliary care in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117555</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117555</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118544?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Community-based social connection intervention programme to improve cardiovascular and brain health in older adults in rural Ecuador: study protocol for a quasi-experimental trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e118544?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Loneliness and social isolation are increasingly recognised as determinants of cardiovascular and brain health, particularly among older adults. Evidence from high-income settings links social disconnection to higher risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, cognitive decline and mortality, yet few interventions have been adapted for rural, resource-limited environments. In rural coastal Ecuador, demographic stability, low migration and strong community engagement provide a unique context to evaluate a culturally grounded intervention. This study aims to determine whether a multi-component social connection intervention programme (SCIP), informed by the Social Cognitive Theory, can reduce loneliness and social isolation and improve cardiovascular, cognitive and psychosocial outcomes among older adults living in three rural villages participating in a population-based cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This quasi-experimental matched-control study will be conducted in Atahualpa (intervention site) and the neighbouring villages of El Tambo and Prosperidad (control sites). Eligible participants are adults aged &ge;60 years without disability, dementia or major psychiatric illness. Intervention participants will be matched to controls using variable-ratio propensity score methods. The 12-month SCIP includes monthly community educational activities, peer-support group sessions and individualised coaching (two times per month) focused on skill-building, goal-setting and cognitive-behavioural strategies. Participants in the control villages will receive usual community and primary care services without exposure to SCIP activities. Baseline and 12-month assessments will measure social isolation, loneliness, cardiovascular health, sleep quality, cognitive performance, depressive symptoms and quality of life. Incident stroke, cardiovascular disease and mortality will be monitored quarterly. Analyses will use mixed-effects models for continuous and categorical outcomes and Cox proportional hazards models for incident events, adjusting for relevant confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital-Clinica Kennedy, Guayaquil. All participants will provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and community reports. Results may inform scalable strategies to enhance psychosocial well-being and reduce cardiovascular and cognitive risk in underserved rural populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07319663">NCT07319663</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Del Brutto, V. J., Leal, G., Mera, R. M., Rumbea, D. A., Abad, M. J., Del Brutto, O. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118544</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118544</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Community-based social connection intervention programme to improve cardiovascular and brain health in older adults in rural Ecuador: study protocol for a quasi-experimental trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118544</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118544</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e100756?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Status of womens empowerment and its associated factors using multidimensional empowerment index in Tigray, Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e100756?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the status of women&rsquo;s empowerment and its associated factors using multidimensional empowerment index in Tigray, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Community-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Tigray regional state, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A sample of married pregnant women (n=1477) whose gestational age was at least 8 weeks were the study participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome of the study was women&rsquo;s empowerment status, assessed using 24 indicators across five key domains: decision-making power, social independence, attitudes towards violence against women, social networking and household asset ownership. Equal weight was assigned to all domains and the weight assigned to each domain was distributed equally to the indicators within the corresponding domain. Women who scored at least 80% (ie, met 4 out of 5 domains) were considered as empowered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, only 8.2% (95% CI 6.9 to 9.78) of women were empowered. Intrafamilial factors: husband&rsquo;s education with primary (adjusted OR (AOR): 2.66 (1.30 to 5.43), secondary AOR: 4.69 (2.23 to 9.84) and tertiary AOR: 3.60 (1.20 to 10.83)) levels, being from model households (AOR: 4.38 (1.33 to 14.47)), households with middle (AOR: 3.50 (1.13 to 8.37)) or high (AOR: 3.10 (1.25 to 7.67)) wealth index, enrolment in productive safety net programmes (AOR: 2.37 (1.25 to 4.50)) and age at first pregnancy (AOR: 1.16 (1.08 to 1.24)) were positively associated with women&rsquo;s empowerment. From the community-level characteristics, dowry (AOR: 1.82 (1.10 to 5.30)) and perceived good availability of justice for women and girls (AOR: 3.00 (1.05 to 8.60)) were positively associated with women&rsquo;s empowerment. Conversely, the history of an adverse pregnancy outcome was negatively associated with women&rsquo;s empowerment (AOR: 0.51 (0.26 to 0.99)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The overall status of women&rsquo;s empowerment in Tigray was very low. Husband&rsquo;s education, being model household, wealth index, enrolment in productive safety net programmes, dowry practice, perceived good availability of justice for women and girls and age at first pregnancy were found to be significant factors associated with women&rsquo;s empowerment. In view of these empirical insights, several policy recommendations are proposed. First, interventions should focus on the identified associated factors, particularly in areas with lower empowerment scores such as partner&rsquo;s education, improving access to justice for women, addressing harmful community practices such as dowry and strengthening household economic status through social protection and livelihood programmes. Second, the promotion of gender-balanced household dynamics through awareness campaigns and policy incentives could make a substantial contribution to women&rsquo;s empowerment in the study area.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abebe, G. G., Kahsay, A. B., Medhanyie, A. A., Gebregziabher, M., George, M., Gebrehiwot, T. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100756</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100756</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Status of womens empowerment and its associated factors using multidimensional empowerment index in Tigray, Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100756</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100756</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102957?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hypertension and altitude in community-dwelling older adults: an epidemiological study in northwest China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/6/e102957?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and a relationship between altitude and hypertension has been demonstrated. To better characterise this relationship, this study investigated the prevalence of hypertension and its association with altitude in community-dwelling older adults living at different altitudes in Xinjiang, northwest China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Xinjiang, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>50 778 community-dwelling older adults residing at varying altitudes across Xinjiang.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measures</st>
<p>A multistage stratified sampling method was used to conduct an epidemiological survey from January 2019 to December 2019 among 50 778 community-dwelling older adults aged &ge;60 years who were long-term residents of Kashgar (1289 m), Hami (738 m) and Turpan (35 m), Xinjiang. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between altitude and hypertension risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) showed significant variations (both p&lt;0.001) across Kashgar, Hami and Turpan at different altitudes: Kashgar (SBP: 133.15&plusmn;19.644 mm Hg, DBP: 76.6&plusmn;11.363 mm Hg), Hami (SBP: 136.68&plusmn;19.617 mm Hg, DBP: 77.25&plusmn;11.808 mm Hg) and Turpan (SBP: 135.44&plusmn;21.101 mm Hg, DBP: 74.87&plusmn;12.785 mm Hg). Statistically significant differences in the distributions of both SBP and DBP were observed across different altitudes for both males and females (all p&lt;0.001). The differences in the distributions of SBP and DBP at different altitudes were statistically significant in all age groups, except for &ge;90 years (all p&lt;0.001). Moreover, the differences in SBP and DBP in older individuals living at the three altitudes were statistically significant (all p&lt;0.001) regardless of smoking status, alcohol consumption, diabetes, education level or body mass index. The hypertension prevalence rates were 40.5%, 49.5% and 54.5% in Kashgar, Hami and Turpan, respectively (p&lt;0.001). After adjustment for sex, age group, education level, smoking, alcohol consumption, BMI, diabetes, HR, SCr, blood urea nitrogen and dyslipidaemia, the risk of hypertension was increased in Hami (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.66, p&lt;0.001) and Turpan (OR=1.80, 95% CI 1.71 to 1.88, p&lt;0.001) compared with that in Kashgar.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In community-dwelling older adults residing in lowland to mid-elevation zones (35&ndash;1289 m) of Xinjiang, the prevalence and risk of hypertension were found to be inversely associated with residential altitude. These findings may reflect an environmental gradient effect specific to mid-to-low altitude settings, and their generalisability may be limited to populations at higher altitudes (&gt;1500 m) or regions with distinct ethnic, genetic or healthcare backgrounds. Furthermore, it should be emphasised that this association likely reflects altitude-related environmental factors rather than direct physiological effects of hypoxia. Additional studies are warranted to further elucidate these complex relationships.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maimaitiwusiman, Z., Xuekelati, S., Wumaier, A., Bai, X., Ma, L., Li, Y., Aerken, A., Yang, Y., Wang, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T04:47:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102957</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102957</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hypertension and altitude in community-dwelling older adults: an epidemiological study in northwest China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102957</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102957</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099542?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a screening scale to predict postdischarge depression in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099542?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop a simple screening scale to predict depression after discharge in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention (ACS-PCI) and to verify its reliability, validity and cutoff value.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective longitudinal study was conducted 1 week and 3 months after discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two hospitals where PCI is performed in Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 183 patients were potential candidates for the survey, of whom 42 provided valid responses (response rate: 23.0%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The number of items was reduced from 14 to 12 with item-total correlations and principal component analysis. Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha coefficient was 0.832 and the intraclass correlation coefficient (1, 2) was 0.811 (95% CI 0.650 to 0.898). Significant correlations were observed for concurrent validity (r=0.699, p&lt;0.01) and predictive validity (=0.538, p&lt;0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.799 (CI 0.629 to 0.970). A cut-off value of 28 points was obtained from the Youden index and demonstrated a sensitivity of 1.000, specificity of 0.553, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.190 and negative predictive value of 0.000.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study developed a simple screening scale for predicting postdischarge depression in patients with ACS-PCI (SDACS-12) and demonstrated its reliability, validity and predictive ability with 12 items. Nevertheless, its results should be interpreted cautiously given the moderate variance explained by PCA and the low specificity and PPV.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doi, M., Sakamoto, Y., Tanaka, A., Tsunashima, R., Miyabe, A., Minamizaki-Kanno, M., Hibi, K., Kanoya, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099542</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099542</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a screening scale to predict postdischarge depression in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099542</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099542</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106566?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Birth outcomes for women with pre-existing mental health problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106566?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To synthesise evidence on the association between any diagnosed or self-reported mental health problems prior to pregnancy (pre-existing mental health problems) and birth outcomes including preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal unit (NNU) admission and mode of birth (instrumental birth, planned or unplanned caesarean section).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO in December 2024 for studies examining the association between any pre-existing mental health problems and PTB, LBW, SGA, NNU admission and mode of birth. Only articles published in English were included with no restriction on year of publication. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool crude and adjusted ORs (aORs) and risk ratios (aRR) with 95% CIs. ORs and RRs were analysed separately. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 15 467 records screened, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Women with any pre-existing mental health problems had higher odds and risks of adverse birth outcomes, including PTB (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.56) (aRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.51), LBW (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.33) (aRR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.68), SGA (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.51) (aRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.51) and NNU admission (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.74). Adjusted estimates were based on multivariable models that commonly controlled for maternal age, parity and socio-demographic factors. No consistent associations were observed between pre-existing mental health problems and mode of birth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Pre-existing mental health problems were associated with increased risks and odds of several adverse birth outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of early identification and targeted support for women with mental health problems before pregnancy to strengthen preconception and maternity care planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023485834.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gong, J., Henderson, I., Lynch, R., Daskalopoulou, Z., Roberts, N., Fellmeth, G., Harrison, S., Quigley, M. A., Alderdice, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106566</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106566</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Birth outcomes for women with pre-existing mental health problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106566</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106566</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106948?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinician experiences of organisational compassion in healthcare: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106948?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>While compassion is widely recognised as an essential component of high-quality patient care, the compassion needs of clinicians often go unrecognised and unmet. Clinicians face multifaceted sources of workplace suffering, both sources inherent to working with the sick and avoidable sources due to healthcare systems and leadership challenges. Organisational compassion, defined as the continuous and systematic identification, prevention and alleviation of sources of suffering for healthcare workers, offers a paradigm shift in mitigating and preventing clinician suffering and burnout. Yet little is known about how clinicians experience suffering and compassion from their organisations, teams and leaders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Our overarching goal is to develop a clinician-reported experience measure of organisational compassion. The purpose of this study was to explore how clinicians experience suffering and compassion in healthcare organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and participants</st>
<p>This qualitative study used semistructured interviews of interdisciplinary paediatric hospice and palliative care clinicians from across the USA. A moderator&rsquo;s guide was developed based on the literature of organisational compassion in management and healthcare and validated through practice interviews with clinicians. 22 participants were recruited via national paediatric hospice and palliative care email list serves. Video interviews were conducted via Zoom. Transcripts were analysed using a hybrid grounded theory-thematic analysis methodology to identify themes and to construct a theoretical framework of compassion experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five major themes of experiencing compassion emerged: (1) Feeling cared about, characterised by authentic, empathetic responses to clinician distress; (2) Dignity, encompassing being valued, respected and recognised as a whole person and professional; (3) Proximal (team) compassion, including camaraderie, shared workload and mutual support within teams; (4) Structural (organisational) compassion, reflecting policies, practices and benefits that alleviate or exacerbate suffering and (5) Compassionate leadership behaviours, such as presence, empathy and connection to frontline staff needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Healthcare work includes sources of both inherent and avoidable suffering for clinicians. In this study, we sought to understand how clinicians experience compassion from their organisations, leaders and team members during times of distress. We found five themes of experiencing compassion in healthcare organisations: feeling cared about; dignity; proximal (team) compassion; structural (organisational) compassion and compassionate leadership behaviours. These qualitative data and results will provide an empiric foundation for the development of a clinician-reported experience measure of compassion for use in healthcare settings. Such a measure will enable future research examining how compassion experiences in healthcare may predict workforce outcomes such as burnout, satisfaction, engagement and thriving. Ultimately, this work may support the design of interventions aimed at strengthening compassionate organisational cultures and improving conditions for the healthcare workforce and both experiences and outcomes of the patients they serve.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pestian, T., Ellakula, J. C., Awtrey, E., Carle, A. C., Winick, N., Kanov, J., Thienprayoon, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106948</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106948</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinician experiences of organisational compassion in healthcare: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106948</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106948</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109860?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impacts of human and digital scribes on improving physician wellness and reducing administrative burden: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109860?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The rise in administrative burden on physicians is becoming increasingly recognised as a significant contributor to burnout and job dissatisfaction among primary care practitioners. Human scribes (HS) and digital/artificial intelligence scribes (DS) have emerged as potential tools to reduce clerical workload and improve physician well-being. There has been extensive research conducted on HS, and DS show promise but require validation across diverse healthcare settings. This scoping review aims to assess the effects of HS and DS in primary care settings to evaluate their impact on administrative work, job satisfaction, burnout and clinical operational efficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework with enhancements from Levac <I>et al,</I> along with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was developed, including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and Scopus databases in June 2025 with an academic health sciences librarian. Database searches will be conducted between March and June 2026. The inclusion criteria consist of empirical research on licensed physicians in primary care settings that implement HS or DS systems and measure physician-related outcomes. Two researchers will review and extract data independently using Covidence. The results will be analysed through thematic methods followed by descriptive summarisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review conducts an analysis of existing publications without needing ethical clearance. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presented at academic conferences where possible. The research team will make supporting materials accessible via the Open Science Framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/T5BHY">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/T5BHY</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Filbert, B., Sareen, J., Logsetty, S., Linton, J., Dyck, J., Jhanji, G., Paletta, A., Classen, C., Spiwak, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109860</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109860</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impacts of human and digital scribes on improving physician wellness and reducing administrative burden: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109860</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109860</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110702?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can digital self-screening improve identification of chronic dyspnoea in Australian general practice? A proof-of-concept protocol for the BREATHE SMART trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110702?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic dyspnoea is a prevalent and clinically significant symptom, often indicative of underlying cardiorespiratory disease. It is frequently under-reported by patients and under-recognised in primary care, with these challenges exacerbated in rural and remote communities where disease burden is greater and patients experience barriers to timely diagnosis and management. The BREATHE SMART trial aims to implement and evaluate an innovative, fully digital self-screening system for chronic dyspnoea, integrated into general practice workflows and information technology infrastructure. This approach seeks to enhance early detection and management of chronic cardiorespiratory conditions across diverse practice settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multisite proof-of-concept study will test a software platform delivering a preconsultation self-screening questionnaire across 40 general practices in urban, rural and remote Australia. The system identifies eligible patients (&ge;18 years, consenting to SMS communication with their practice), issues an automated SMS that administers a validated dyspnoea screening questionnaire, and summarises responses for integration into the electronic medical record. Process evaluation will assess acceptability and utility using deidentified audit data, software metrics and qualitative feedback from patients, staff and general practitioners (GPs) via surveys, interviews and focus groups. Approximately 12 000 patients will be screened over 12 months. Primary outcomes will include the proportion completing self-screening and prevalence of chronic dyspnoea and secondary outcomes will include the rate of newly diagnosed chronic dyspnoea-related conditions (ie, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure) in the preceding 12 months and during the intervention period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was granted by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (iRECS6645) and the University of Notre Dame Australia HREC (2024-155). Participating practices and each GP will provide written, informed consent. All patients being screened will provide electronic informed consent. Results of the study will be disseminated through various forums, including peer-reviewed publications and presentation at national and international conferences. Following the study, participating practices will be provided with a summary of the findings of the study, together with a full copy of any publications and a plain language statement for participants, which will be made available in the practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12624001451594.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jang, K., Giskes, K., Martin, A., Sunjaya, A. P., Khin, P., Jenkins, C., Hespe, C. M., on behalf of the BREATHE SMART Steering Committee, Hespe, Jenkins, Martin (Humphries), Giskes, Lowres, Woods, Chua, Pearce, Ben Freedman, Sunjaya, Fardy, Tam]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110702</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110702</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can digital self-screening improve identification of chronic dyspnoea in Australian general practice? A proof-of-concept protocol for the BREATHE SMART trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110702</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110702</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Establishing population-specific gestational weight gain ranges for twin pregnancies and comparing their performance with IOM recommendations: a retrospective cohort study from central China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To establish optimal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI)-specific gestational weight gain (GWG) ranges for twin pregnancies and compare their association with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes against Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study. Retrospective cohort study. Adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CI were used to quantify associations; average marginal effects (AME) with 95% CI (in percentage points) were used to compare absolute risk differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Perinatal data from &gt;70 obstetric institutions in Wuhan, China, collected via the Wuhan Maternal and Child Health Service Management Information System.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>10 636 women with twin deliveries at &ge;28 weeks (2011&ndash;2023). Pre-pregnancy BMI categorised using Chinese cut-offs: underweight &lt;18.5, normal 18.5&ndash;23.9, overweight 24.0&ndash;27.9, obesity &ge;28.0 kg/m&sup2;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), premature rupture of membranes (PROM), small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Optimal GWG ranges were: underweight 18.0&ndash;25.0 kg, normal 14.0&ndash;24.0 kg, overweight 12.2&ndash;24.0 kg, obesity 13.3&ndash;20.0 kg. Compared with IOM guidelines, study-derived ranges showed more favourable risk identification. In normal weight women, excessive GWG increased HDP risk (aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.14); 13.57% versus 8.79%, AME 5.90 pp (95% CI 3.88 to 7.91 pp). In underweight women, inadequate GWG increased PROM (aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.57); 14.48% versus 7.51%, AME 4.18 pp (95% CI 0.31 to 8.06 pp) and SGA (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.31); 45.58% versus 41.40%, AME 11.74 pp (95% CI 5.55 to 17.94 pp). In overweight women, excessive GWG increased HDP (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.70); 24.39% versus 16.32%, AME 9.68 pp (95% CI 2.49 to 16.88 pp) and inadequate GWG increased SGA (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.14); 35.15% versus 27.82%, AME 9.85 pp (95% CI CI 3.72 to 15.97 pp), which IOM failed to detect. In obese women, inadequate GWG increased SGA (aOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.53); 27.18% versus 17.16%, AME 17.95 pp (95% CI 5.74 to 30.17 pp), which was missed by IOM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings support adopting region-specific GWG standards for twin pregnancies in Asian populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, R., Wang, Y., Fu, Q., Zhang, Y., Qiu, L., Peng, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112189</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112189</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Establishing population-specific gestational weight gain ranges for twin pregnancies and comparing their performance with IOM recommendations: a retrospective cohort study from central China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112189</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of IgE autoantibodies in newborns with atopic dermatitis (DIANA): protocol of a prospective, non-interventional, observational birth cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic inflammatory skin disorder that typically begins in early childhood and affects up to 20% of children. Infants with a family history of allergic diseases or with elevated total IgE levels are at increased risk of developing AD. Emerging evidence shows that a subgroup of AD patients produce IgE autoantibodies against skin self-peptides, which are suggested to play a role in disease pathophysiology and predict the development of allergic diseases later in life. Notably, such autoantibodies have been detected in up to 15% of infants with AD under 1 year of age, indicating that IgE autoantibodies can arise early in life. The &lsquo;Development of IgE Autoantibodies in Newborns with (high risk to develop) Atopic dermatitis&rsquo; (DIANA) study is a prospective birth cohort designed to address these knowledge gaps by following a target of 500 newborns during their first 24 months of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and dissemination</st>
<p>It aims to investigate the presence of IgE autoantibodies at birth (cord blood) and during early life (6, 12 and 24 months) using an immunoassay and their association with the development of AD in children from high-risk (n=400) and low-risk (n=100) families. Genetic and environmental influences are evaluated through questionnaires. Additional assessments will include skin and gut microbiome profiling using 16S rRNA sequencing (swabs), non-invasive evaluation of skin barrier function using electrical impedance spectrometry and analysis of the natural moisturising factor. We aim to decipher the underlying cause of IgE autoantibody development and allow preventive measures to counteract this.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This prospective, non-interventional observational study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel/VUB (07/06/2023; EC-2023-074) and will follow Good Clinical Practice, applicable regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians. Participation is voluntary, and consent can be withdrawn at any time. All procedures comply with GDPR to ensure data confidentiality. Participant data will be pseudonymised, with the coding key accessible only to designated study members and securely stored on a restricted-access VUB server. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Pseudonymised data will be made available upon reasonable request in accordance with institutional policies and data protection regulations</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07316465">NCT07316465</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belasri, H., De Leye, H., Saerens, J., Vandermeersch, L., Badloe, F. M., Vandeneynde, A., Lenie, S., De Vriese, S., Gies, I., Cools, F., Gucciardo, L., Kortekaas Krohn, I., Gutermuth, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114509</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114509</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of IgE autoantibodies in newborns with atopic dermatitis (DIANA): protocol of a prospective, non-interventional, observational birth cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114509</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116412?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping common job demands and job resources for large-scale community health worker programmes in Southern Africa: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116412?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>High burdens of infectious and non-communicable diseases and human resource shortages strain primary healthcare systems in Southern Africa. Despite the widespread use of community health workers (CHWs) across the region, the existing literature offers no holistic exploration of the characteristics of CHWs&rsquo; work. The Job Demands-Resources model provides a framework to enable such a review, positing that two aspects of working conditions&mdash;job demands and job resources&mdash;are unique to each workplace but have universal impacts on workers&rsquo; health, motivation and the achievement of organisational aims.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The population, concept and context framework will guide the development of a comprehensive search strategy to source reports on CHWs working in large-scale programmes that explore job demands and job resources within at least one Southern African Development Community country. Searches to identify peer-reviewed articles and grey literature will be done in CHW Central, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and the WHO Library with citations purposively mined. Eligibility will be limited to reports published in English after the Declaration of Ouagadougou on Primary Health Care in 2008, as this ushered in the modern era of large-scale CHW programmes in Africa. Following publication of this protocol, two reviewers will independently complete screening and full-text review, with the lead author driving data extraction and coding. The results will include organising job demands and job resources into themes, documenting the types of research that articulate these themes and identifying potential knowledge gaps. The review&rsquo;s methodology and the inclusion of various types of literature will support replicability and comprehensiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Formal ethical approval is not required. Results will take the form of a summative article, and additional publications may be considered if the results warrant more in-depth reporting. The evidence from this review may also inform the creation or improvement of programmes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>INPLASY202580052.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coley, R. S., Shuro, L., Coetzee, R., Tabana, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116412</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116412</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping common job demands and job resources for large-scale community health worker programmes in Southern Africa: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116412</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116412</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116764?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of different telehabilitation methods on postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116764?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative pulmonary complications affect approximately 40% of individuals undergoing lung cancer surgery. A number of clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown that postoperative telehabilitation may reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events while reducing transport time and outpatient costs and improving patient motivation. However, optimal telehabilitation strategies remain undetermined. The primary objective of this protocol is thus to compare the effects of different telehabilitation methods used after pulmonary surgery in patients with lung cancer by conducting a network meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Two researchers will independently search six databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Medline and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)) and two clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP). The time range will be from database inception to March 2026. EndNote X V.21 will be used for screening based on predetermined inclusion criteria. All Chinese and English randomised controlled trials examining the effects of telehabilitation on lung function after lung cancer surgery will be included. The primary outcome measures will be forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume over 1 s (FEV<SUB>1</SUB>), FEV<SUB>1</SUB>/FVC and 6 min walking test. The secondary outcome measures will be the incidence of adverse events, intervention completion rate, incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) score. Risk of bias assessment will be performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias V.2 (RoB V.2.0) tool, while certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment and Evaluation (GRADE). Stata V.18.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas) and R (V.4.1.2) will be used to conduct traditional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this study. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal or conference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251275899.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, J., Niu, H., Li, J., Chen, Q., Bi, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116764</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116764</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of different telehabilitation methods on postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation Medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116764</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116764</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116972?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are there gender differences in academic medical career aspirations related to research, mentoring and discrimination? A national cross-sectional study of French medical residents]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116972?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Academic medical careers remain marked by persistent gender inequalities, despite the growing feminisation of the medical workforce. The objective of this study was to examine whether gender differences exist in key individual and institutional determinants of academic medical career aspirations among medical residents, including research motivation, mentoring, work centrality, self-efficacy, perceived discrimination and stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a national cross-sectional online survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Multicentre study conducted across 36 medical schools in France.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1570 medical residents (997 women and 573 men) voluntarily participated between November 2022 and February 2023. All participants completed validated self-report questionnaires. There were no exclusion criteria beyond being enrolled in a French residency programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Attitudes towards research (interest, motivation, significance) were measured using the Scale of Attitudes towards Research. Mentoring was assessed with the Mentor&ndash;Mentee Perception Questionnaire, work centrality with Hirschfeld and Feild&rsquo;s scale, self-efficacy with the General Self-Efficacy Scale, perceived discrimination with the Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Experiences of Academic Medical Faculty instrument and stress with the Perceived Stress Scale. Gender differences were analysed using t-tests or &sup2; tests with Holm-Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with men, women reported lower research motivation (mean (SD) 21.0 (5.5) vs 22.8 (5.5); p<SUB>adj</SUB>=0.011), lower research interest (27.1 (5.5) vs 28.1 (5.7); p<SUB>adj</SUB>=0.011), lower work centrality (26.7 (7.0) vs 28.2 (8.1); p<SUB>adj</SUB>=0.011) and lower self-efficacy (28.3 (5.2) vs 29.9 (5.0); p<SUB>adj</SUB>=0.011). Women were less likely to report having a mentor (38.5% vs 44.5%; p<SUB>adj</SUB>=0.02). They also reported substantially higher levels of experienced gender discrimination (22.8% vs 3.8%; p<SUB>adj</SUB>=0.005), sexual harassment (57.7% vs 18.2%; p<SUB>adj</SUB>=0.005) and perceived stress (8.48 (3.29) vs 7.27 (3.43); p<SUB>adj</SUB>=0.011)</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Gender differences were observed across several individual and institutional factors associated with academic medical career aspirations. Reduced access to mentoring and greater exposure to discrimination and stress among women may contribute to lower research motivation and self-efficacy. These findings highlight the need for institutional strategies addressing mentoring, workplace culture and equity to support gender parity in academic medicine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>OSF preregistration for this study is available at <A HREF="https://osf.io/9yseq/?view_only=1c72743f542b402ba67beed6908e597d">https://osf.io/9yseq/?view_only=1c72743f542b402ba67beed6908e597d</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deledalle, A., Congard, A., Bour, V., Sarda, E., Cohen, F., Gourraud, P.-A., Lemarchand, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116972</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116972</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are there gender differences in academic medical career aspirations related to research, mentoring and discrimination? A national cross-sectional study of French medical residents]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116972</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116972</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117537?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between preoperative metformin exposure and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a protocol for a prospective observational cohort study in a Chinese tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117537?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common and distressing complication following surgery, persisting despite advances in prophylactic regimens. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) has been identified as a biomarker inversely associated with PONV risk and severity. As metformin is known to elevate circulating GDF-15 levels, we hypothesise that preoperative metformin use may be associated with a lower incidence of PONV. This study aims to evaluate the association between a history of preoperative metformin administration and the occurrence of PONV in adults undergoing general anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study. We plan to enrol 909 adult patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation from December 2025 to December 2028. Participants will be divided into two groups based on their preoperative metformin exposure: an exposed group (n=303) with a documented history of metformin use and a non-exposed group (n=606) without such history, using a 1:2 ratio. The metformin regimen (choice of agent and daily dosage) will be determined by the attending physician as part of routine clinical care, independent of this study. The primary outcome is the incidence of PONV, defined as the occurrence of any nausea, retching or vomiting, within 120 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of PONV in the early (0&ndash;24 hours) and late (24&ndash;120 hours) postoperative phases; the severity of PONV symptoms and the requirement for rescue antiemetic medication during these intervals; the quality of recovery (assessed at 0&ndash;24, 24&ndash;48, 48&ndash;72, 72&ndash;96 and 96&ndash;120 hours); potential PONV risk factors in blood or urine and long-term survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol (version 04, dated 23 November 2025) was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Approval No. 2025ZSLYEC-689) prior to the initiation of participant recruitment. The first participant was enrolled under protocol version 04. A subsequent protocol amendment (version 05, dated 25 December 2025) was approved by the same Ethics Committee. This amendment added a quality of recovery assessment using the 15-item quality of recovery scoring system questionnaire at 30 days postoperatively. This amendment did not alter the primary or secondary outcomes, the sample size calculation, or any other key elements of the study design. The results of this study will be disseminated at scientific conferences and published in international peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07244575">NCT07244575</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shi, J., Zheng, J., Zhang, X., Liang, C., Zhang, S., Song, C., Sun, N., Deng, Z., Zheng, Z., Yang, X., Huang, Q., Zhao, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117537</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117537</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between preoperative metformin exposure and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a protocol for a prospective observational cohort study in a Chinese tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117537</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117537</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119958?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medication concentrations in human milk and potential adverse effects in breastfed infants (MedMilk): a protocol for an observational clinical study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119958?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Data on medication concentrations in human milk and their potential effects on the breastfed infant remain limited, leaving clinicians with insufficient evidence to guide women who require medication while breastfeeding. The MedMilk study aims to systematically measure medication concentrations in human milk, calculate the relative infant dose (RID) and evaluate infant outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This observational clinical study will recruit breastfeeding women using prescription and over-the-counter medications. Women will provide milk and urine samples along with self-reported maternal and infant health data. The primary outcome is quantification of medication concentrations in human milk. Secondary outcomes include estimation of the RID based on measured milk concentrations, maternally reported infant symptoms and adverse events potentially related to medication exposure, and pharmacokinetically simulated infant plasma exposure. Analytical methods include solid-phase extraction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for quantification combined with descriptive statistics and pharmacokinetic modelling. The study aims to recruit approximately 250 women across medication groups. For the most frequently used medications, we aim to include 20 participants per medication, with each participant contributing four milk samples and a urine sample. Biological samples will be stored in a biobank, and data in a secure database.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Regional Research Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (Journal no. H-23062687) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (Ref. P-2023-14627). All participants will provide written informed consent before enrolment. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and presentations at relevant national and international scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07346716">NCT07346716</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Resendal Gotfredsen, D., Heerfordt, I. M., Ka&#x0308;hler Byskov, P., Horwitz, H., Gade, C., Loekkegaard, E., Friis-Hansen, L., Bach Nielsen Fruekilde, P., Cvetanovska, E., Joergensen, N. R., Pedersen, L. H., Andersen, J. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119958</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119958</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medication concentrations in human milk and potential adverse effects in breastfed infants (MedMilk): a protocol for an observational clinical study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119958</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119958</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120861?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global gaps in how we assess undergraduate medical students mental health: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120861?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Mental health problems among undergraduate medical students are a major global public health concern that emerge early during training and are shaped by demanding educational environments, emotional stressors and organisational pressures. Although research has expanded rapidly, the literature remains fragmented across themes, regions and methods. This scoping review aims to map the global quantitative literature on medical students&rsquo; mental health and identify gaps in scope, geography, methodology and equity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We will include quantitative studies assessing mental health among undergraduate medical students. MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science (Clarivate), the Cochrane Library (Wiley) and PsycINFO (Ovid) will be searched without date or language restrictions using a keyword-based search strategy. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts and extract data using a standardised form. Data will include publication year, country, study design, sample size, mental health measures, thematic domains and patterns of collaboration. Mental health domains will be classified using an a priori thematic framework encompassing psychological symptoms and distress, psychological resources, academic environment, social support and physical health and lifestyle factors. Equity-related variables (sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status) will be operationalised based on analytical use. Results will be synthesised descriptively using tables and visualisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through publication and presentations. The dataset and code will be openly available on publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration details</st>
<p>Protocol registration will be made available online via the Open Science Framework (doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/2EHNU).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michaloud, F., Olie, E., Deruelle, P., De Jong, A., Visier, L., Costa, D., Lognos, B., Celi, L. A., Teisserenc, B., Schaefer, M. S., Jaber, S., Pensier, J., Chanques, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-29T07:37:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-120861</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-120861</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global gaps in how we assess undergraduate medical students mental health: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e120861</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e120861</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104953?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The association of the Healthy Lifestyle Index (HLI) and HLI trajectories with risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a GRADE-assessed dose-response systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104953?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The Healthy Lifestyle Index (HLI) integrates key behaviours to assess their cumulative impact on health. While higher HLI adherence is linked to lower disease and mortality risk, its long-term trajectory association remains understudied. This study aims to examine the dose-response relationship and long-term association of HLI on mortality risks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched until June 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We included observational cohort studies that assessed the relationship of HLI or its trajectories with all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD)-cause or cancer-cause of mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>Analysis of 13.7 million participants demonstrated that higher adherence to the HLI is linked to lower risk of all-cause (HR: 0.48; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.53; GRADE: moderate), CVD-cause (HR: 0.49; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.51; GRADE: moderate) and cancer-cause mortality (HR: 0.55; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.61; GRADE: low). These associations were further confirmed in a dose-response manner. Moreover, compared with maintaining an unhealthy lifestyle, a decline in HLI adherence was associated with a 14% higher risk of all-cause and a 19% higher risk of cancer-related mortality. In contrast, an improvement in HLI adherence was linked to a 20% lower risk of all-cause and a 13% lower risk of cancer-related mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Adherence to HLI and its long-term patterns are associated with lower mortality risk. These findings emphasise the importance of lifestyle-based prevention and intervention strategies in reducing mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024500538.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[HasanRashedi, M., Norouzzadeh, M., Gohari Dezfuli, Z., Jamshidi, S., Mehdipoor, F., Ghoreishy, S. M., Teymoori, F., Shidfar, F., Eskandari, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104953</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104953</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The association of the Healthy Lifestyle Index (HLI) and HLI trajectories with risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a GRADE-assessed dose-response systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104953</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104953</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107854?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[TACKLE concussion study: an observational study of post-concussion biomarker and neuroimaging progression in adolescent male school sports-related concussion]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107854?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sports-related concussion (SRC) is an established research topic in the context of sport professionals suffering from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), but there is scant investigation of SRC arising in school-aged athletes. Effective management of SRC in adolescents is especially dependent on obtaining an understanding of its pathophysiology and the multifaceted nature of recovery. In this planned observational study, we shall investigate the associations among multimodal data comprising blood-based and saliva-based biomarkers, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), quantified susceptibility imaging (QSM), resting state functional connectivity MRI (rsfMRI) and cognitive testing in school rugby players with a conventional diagnosis of concussion. Our objective is to map out a natural history of the post-concussion injury and recovery process as measured by diverse biomarkers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective cohort study will enrol 450 male adolescents who participate in sports (including rugby, basketball and swimming). We shall quantify blood biomarker levels (total tau, neurofilament light, glial fibrillar acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1), white matter integrity on DTI, cerebral venous oxygen saturation on QSM, connectivity metrics on rsfMRI and cognitive performance after SRC. We conduct measurements at pre-injury baseline measure and post-SRC at four to five pivotal times: day 1 (day of injury), 3, 6, 13 and 21 (if symptoms persist) post-concussion. Using mixed-effects and trajectory modelling, we shall assess biomarker trajectories.</p>
<p>We have secured ethical approval for this study from The University of Queensland&rsquo;s Human Research Ethics Committee, Queensland. We shall inform participants and/or their guardians verbally and in writing of the study&rsquo;s scope and procedures as a condition for informed consent. The dissemination of findings shall entail peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences and via research and clinical networks. Completion of this study should provide a clearer understanding of anatomic and functional outcomes in adolescents with sports-related concussion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Benefits of the study</st>
<p>The multimodal investigation of a cohort of adolescents suffering from concussion in the context of community sports should offer broad insight into the effects of mTBI on the developing brain.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[To, X. V., Robinson, B., Mitchell, G., McDonald, W., Cumming, P., Wood, J., Mammone, T., Evans, T., Ross, J., Nasrallah, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107854</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107854</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[TACKLE concussion study: an observational study of post-concussion biomarker and neuroimaging progression in adolescent male school sports-related concussion]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107854</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107854</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108351?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Caregivers confidence in and preferences for reporting rehabilitation service use following paediatric traumatic brain injury: a qualitative study for measure development]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108351?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate caregivers&rsquo; confidence in accurately reporting rehabilitation service use for paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to determine their preferences for measure scope, granularity and administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This qualitative descriptive study conducted remote, semistructured individual interviews with caregivers to examine their confidence in and preferences for reporting rehabilitation service use to inform measure development. The interview guide was refined through pilot interviews (n=2) excluded from analysis. Subsequent interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis with hybrid deductive-inductive coding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant videoconference platform.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were recruited using maximum variation sampling to promote diversity across factors associated with rehabilitation service use. 14 caregivers met the following inclusion criteria and consented to participate: primary caregiver of a child aged 0&ndash;18 years who sustained a TBI requiring hospitalisation within the past 3 years; caregiver communicates in English. Sampling continued until data saturation was reached.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three themes pertaining to the study objectives were identified: (1) Caregivers are confident in their ability to accurately report their child&rsquo;s rehabilitation service use and satisfaction by setting with approximate dosage; (2) Caregivers&rsquo; confidence in their ability to accurately report service use varies by setting and (3) Caregivers endorsed completing a comprehensive measure of rehabilitation service use with embedded definitions and structured prompts and preferred electronic administration for remote completion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Findings support the acceptability and potential feasibility of a caregiver-report measure of rehabilitation service use across the care continuum following their child&rsquo;s TBI. Next steps will include prototyping the Rehabilitation Use Measure and iteratively refining it through expert feedback and cognitive interviews with caregivers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarvis, J. M., Kaseman, L., Terhorst, L., Bendixen, R., Treble-Barna, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108351</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108351</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Caregivers confidence in and preferences for reporting rehabilitation service use following paediatric traumatic brain injury: a qualitative study for measure development]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108351</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108351</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109056?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Workplace incivility and bullying across healthcare professionals: patterns and correlates - a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109056?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the prevalence and frequency of workplace incivility and bullying across multiple healthcare roles; compare experiences among occupational groups; examine associations with psychological symptoms (stress, anxiety and depression); assess interrelations among mistreatment dimensions (experienced workplace incivility (EWI), witnessed workplace incivility (WWI), instigated workplace incivility (IWI and experienced workplace bullying (EWB)); and evaluate associations with demographic and contextual variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three teaching hospitals in Arak, Iran, between March and December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A stratified random sample of 550 healthcare workers was invited; 392 responded (response rate 71.3%) and 359 with complete data were included, comprising nurses, interns, residents, general practitioners and administrative staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Workplace incivility (Workplace Incivility Scale), workplace bullying (Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised) and psychological symptoms (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The sample (N=359) was 64% female with a mean age of 32 years. Significant differences were observed across occupational groups for WWI, IWI and EWB (all p&lt;0.001). However, post hoc analyses indicated that most differences involved administrative staff, while clinical roles showed broadly comparable levels of exposure. Interns showed the highest prevalence of both EWI and EWB (38% and 69%, respectively). All mistreatment dimensions were positively correlated with each other (=0.23&ndash;0.86) and with stress, anxiety and depression, particularly for EWI and EWB (=0.39&ndash;0.62, p&lt;0.03). In adjusted analyses, EWI and EWB remained associated with higher stress, anxiety and depression after adjustment (all p&le;0.014), whereas WWI was associated only with stress (p=0.001) and IWI showed no independent associations. Demographic and contextual variables showed weak and inconsistent associations, except smoking, which was associated with higher mistreatment scores across all dimensions (p&le;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Workplace incivility and bullying are widespread across healthcare roles, with broadly comparable exposure across clinical staff. Direct experiences of mistreatment showed the most consistent associations with psychological distress, and mistreatment dimensions appeared to operate within interconnected patterns. Addressing these issues requires system-level interventions targeting structural and cultural drivers to promote psychologically safe clinical environments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yousefian, S., Shayganfard, M., Safari, M., Javaheri, J., Sadeghi, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109056</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109056</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Workplace incivility and bullying across healthcare professionals: patterns and correlates - a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109056</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109056</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109083?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicentre randomised controlled trial of the Norwegian health in work service for patients with common mental disorders or musculoskeletal disorders: the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic (NSAC) Efficacy Study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109083?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In many countries, a high or increasing rate of sickness absence is challenging the sustainability of present sickness absence benefit schemes. Most sickness absence is certified on the grounds of common mental disorders or musculoskeletal disorders, and substantial effort has been invested in developing interventions promoting return to work for these patients. In Norway, the Health in Work ((HelseIArbeid), HIA) clinics were established as outpatients&rsquo; services within the specialised healthcare system, with the aim of improving health and supporting return to work. The HIA service admits patients with low-to-moderate anxiety/depression and/or musculoskeletal disorders. In this protocol, we describe the naturalistic multicentre randomised controlled trial Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic Efficacy study, which aims to determine the effect of HIA on work participation and health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analyses</st>
<p>The HIA outpatient service is staffed by clinical psychologists, physiotherapists, medical specialists in physical medicine and rehabilitation and employment support supervisors from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Patients admitted to HIA have access to multidisciplinary assessment and treatment. The trial recruits&rsquo; patients from five HIA outpatient clinics in Northern Norway. Patients are randomised in equal proportions to either (1) rapid HIA (assessment within 4 weeks), (2) delayed HIA (assessment within 10&ndash;14 weeks) or (3) active control, which consists of a monodisciplinary examination at HIA close to diagnosis-specific deadline for examination as suggested by guidelines (8&ndash;26 weeks). The trial commenced recruitment on 16 January 2023 and will recruit 2500 patients. The aim is to assess the effect of the HIA service, with the hypothesis that the HIA concept is superior to what resembles treatment as usual, in improving employment and preventing long-term welfare dependency. Secondary outcomes include self-reported symptoms of health problems. We also examine the effect the service has on other healthcare utilisation. To date, no research has been conducted to assess the efficacy of the HIA service. If proven efficacious, and if there is an economic case for this investment in tailored healthcare delivery, the policy implication may be implementation of the service at scale. If not, adaptations or investments into other viable paths of treatment may be considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics (REC North, #122770). Results from the study will be disseminated at national and international scientific conferences, to funders and participating outpatient clinics in seminars and in peer-reviewed scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05310695">NCT05310695</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aars, N. A. P., Bardal, I., Terjesen, C., Hansen, B. O., Jerven, A., Kaspersen, K. I., Lyngedal, O., Hu&#x0308;ttepohl, F., Johnsen, I., Uglebakken, T. O., Brinchmann, B., Mykletun, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109083</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109083</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicentre randomised controlled trial of the Norwegian health in work service for patients with common mental disorders or musculoskeletal disorders: the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic (NSAC) Efficacy Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109083</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109083</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111118?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: BioCaPPE (Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer/Prevention and Environment) - a Canadian multicentre prospective study of lifestyle and candidate biomarkers in relation to prostate cancer risk]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111118?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The BioCaPPE (Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer/Prevention and Environment) study is a multicentre prospective observational cohort designed to identify biomarkers associated with prostate cancer (PCa) risk that may be modifiable through lifestyle factors. This paper describes the cohort, along with the data and bio-samples available for future studies in PCa risk assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Canadian men at risk of PCa were enrolled based on one of two criteria (1) negative first prostate biopsy within 6 months from enrolment (Group 1); or (2) a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood level between 2.5 and 10 ng/mL without prior prostate biopsy (Group 2). At baseline, blood samples and comprehensive data were collected. PCa incidence and lifestyle factors were updated for all participants over 2 years, with extended follow-up for those who provided additional consent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>Recruitment was conducted across four health centres in Quebec, Canada. A total of 2053 men were enrolled&mdash;1499 in Group 1 and 554 in Group 2. All participants completed the initial visit, which included collection of medical and family history, anthropometric measurements, demographic information, dietary and alcohol intake, physical activity, tobacco use, medication use, and quality of life assessments, and candidate biomarker measurements. At the 2-year mark, 7.2% of participants had developed PCa; this figure has since increased to 15.3% (median follow-up: 6.1 years). Additionally, 84% (n=1718) consented to ongoing annual follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>This large, prospective cohort of men at risk of PCa offers valuable resources for risk stratification and primary prevention. The BioCaPPE biosamples and data are available to support the identification of lifestyle-related biomarkers associated with PCa risk in this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <A HREF="NCT03383016">NCT03383016</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moussa, H., Tourigny, R., Robitaille, K., Bussieres, V., Fadel, J., Ben Souilah, F., Diabate, L., Hovington, H., Bettan, L., Lacombe, L., Dujardin, T., Lodde, M., Toren, P., Aprikian, A., Saad, F., Carmel, M., Jeldres, C., Lamarche, B., Bergeron, A., Fradet, Y., Fradet, V., Network BIOCaPPE]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111118</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111118</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: BioCaPPE (Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer/Prevention and Environment) - a Canadian multicentre prospective study of lifestyle and candidate biomarkers in relation to prostate cancer risk]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111118</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111118</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112414?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigating differences in the implementation and experience of the Enhanced Health in Care Homes Framework in England: a qualitative protocol for the Understanding Variation in Admissions from Care Homes (UVAC) study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112414?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Older people living in care homes are at increased risk of harm during acute hospital admissions. In England, care home residents have more than twice as many emergency department (ED) attendances as people of the same age living at home. Up to 40% of emergency hospital admissions of older care home residents may be avoidable with different models of care within their homes.</p>
<p>In 2023, National Health Service England introduced the updated Enhanced Health in Care Homes (EHCH) framework, a set of recommendations to support &lsquo;joined up&rsquo; and enhanced care for people living in care homes. A stated aim of the framework is to reduce ED attendances and inpatient admissions of residents. There is limited available evidence regarding how implementation of the EHCH framework differs regionally and whether variation in implementation may impact on hospitalisations of care home residents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>We aim to explore regional differences in care elements developed from the EHCH framework and assess how these differences may contribute to variation in hospitalisations of care home residents over the age of 65.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a comparative qualitative case study of six care home-containing postcode districts in England embedded within three Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). ICBs are regional organisations responsible for commissioning healthcare services in England. Case study districts and ICBs were selected due to contrasting case-mix adjusted admission rates and other characteristics (eg, deprivation). Data will be collected through semistructured interviews. We will interview health and social care professionals who are responsible for commissioning, overseeing and delivering enhanced care in care homes, care home professionals, residents over the age of 65 and their family and friends. Interview data will be analysed through a framework approach, with comparisons drawn within cases, across cases and across ICBs. Through our analysis, we will characterise the EHCH framework care elements and identify differences in implementation that may cause variation in hospital admissions. We will also identify perceived appropriate, effective and replicable enhanced care models.</p>
<p>Patients and the public have informed the design of this study, and will advise the research practice, support the analysis of data and guide dissemination plans.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received Social Care Research Ethics and Health Research Authority Approval (25/IEC08/0014). All participants will be required to provide informed consent. The findings will inform a national survey of ICBs to map appropriate and effective enhanced care in England. Findings will be shared with key stakeholders and academic audiences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marincowitz, C., Zwerger, K. E., Harrad-Hyde, F., Garrett, H., Lam, E., Burton, J., Reeve, J., Mason, S. M., Spilsbury, K., Price, D. B., Jacques, R. M., Martin, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112414</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112414</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigating differences in the implementation and experience of the Enhanced Health in Care Homes Framework in England: a qualitative protocol for the Understanding Variation in Admissions from Care Homes (UVAC) study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112414</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112414</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112787?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Culturally tailored mHealth interventions for chronic low back pain in rural sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112787?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading global cause of disability and imposes significant social and economic burdens in rural sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Mobile health (mHealth) technologies offer opportunities to improve CLBP management in areas with limited physiotherapy services. However, the effectiveness and cultural appropriateness of mHealth interventions for CLBP in SSA remain insufficiently evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This systematic review will evaluate the effectiveness of culturally tailored mHealth interventions for adults with CLBP in rural SSA. The review will also identify barriers to implementing these interventions in rural SSA settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol outlines a mixed-methods systematic review that will evaluate the effectiveness of culturally tailored mHealth interventions for CLBP and identify barriers to their implementation in rural SSA. A comprehensive search will be conducted across multiple databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and African Journals Online. Eligible studies will include randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies. Risk of bias (RoB) will be assessed using design-specific tools, including the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. Quantitative and qualitative findings will be synthesised using a convergent integrated approach. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted; otherwise, a structured narrative synthesis will be undertaken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this study involves analysis of published data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and engagement with relevant stakeholders to inform policy and practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bello, B., Adejare, A., Useh, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112787</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112787</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Culturally tailored mHealth interventions for chronic low back pain in rural sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112787</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112787</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113766?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strong Families Study: protocol for a co-designed birth cohort study with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families in Queensland, Australia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113766?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Australian studies investigating parental factors often lack meaningful inclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families, limiting our understanding of current influences on positive developmental trajectories within communities. There is growing recognition of the need for culturally safe and responsive longitudinal research that is co-designed and co-led by the community for the community. An Indigenous-led birth cohort study of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families in Queensland, Australia, has therefore been developed to better understand health across generations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Strong Families Study is a co-designed prospective longitudinal birth cohort study that will follow 400 Indigenous families in Queensland from pregnancy until the child reaches 5 years of age. Eligible participants include pregnant individuals (&lt;28 weeks&rsquo; gestation) whose children may identify as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, along with their partners (if applicable). Data will be collected at multiple timepoints: during gestation, at delivery, postpartum, every 6 months until the child is 36 months (corrected age, CA) and annually until age 5 years. These will be collected by Aboriginal health workers using validated and culturally appropriate tools across different health themes. The study will incorporate health literacy throughout, as well as referrals to two nested family support programmes to support families and assist with the developmental outcomes of their children when and if required. Effects across health themes will be analysed with a focus on strengths, positive trajectories and holistic well-being of Indigenous families, moving beyond deficit-based narratives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Mater Misericordiae Ltd Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/MML/105191) and ratified by the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (2025/HE001924). Endorsement letters were secured from partner services at each study site. Findings will be shared with partnering hospitals and funding bodies at conferences and through reports and peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed, S. M., Dorey, E. S., Smith, D., Weatherall, L., Friday, R., Massi, L. F., Rooney, R., Hermith-Ramirez, D., Kendall, E., Wheeler, K., Eades, A.-M., Toombs, M., Boyd, R. N., Marriott, R., Eades, S. J., Benfer, K., Reid, N., Whittingham, K., Ware, R. S., Martin, E., Robinson, P. D., Clifton, V., Callaway, L. K., Kumar, S., Rae, K. M., The Strong Families Indigenous Steering Committee, Eades, Eades, Toombs, Smith, Weatherall, Friday, Wheeler, Marriot, Miller, Atu, Cole, Denaro, Powe, Smith, Fifita, Munns, Ham, Hill, Stokes, Jones, Lee, Nedwich, Oui, Yow-Yeh, Parnham, Taylor, Yeomans, Jesser]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113766</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113766</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strong Families Study: protocol for a co-designed birth cohort study with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families in Queensland, Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113766</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113766</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113887?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contribution of point of care ultrasound for ruling out small bowel obstruction in emergency departments: study protocol of the diagnostic, observational, prospective and multicentre OCCLUS-POCUS study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113887?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Abdominal pain is a common presentation in emergency departments. Among these cases, small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common diagnosis. Diagnostic procedure is currently based on CT, an imaging modality associated with radiation exposure. Studies suggest good accuracy of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for SBO. Through the OCCLUS-POCUS study, we aim to evaluate the POCUS ability to rule out SBO in patients with low to moderate clinical suspicion, thereby avoiding unnecessary CT scans.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, observational and multicentre study will involve 15 French emergency departments. Eligible patients will be adults presenting with low or moderate suspicion of SBO (based on Gestalt clinical probability). Exclusion criteria will include prior imaging confirmed SBO, pregnancy or breastfeeding. POCUS will be performed by emergency physicians prior to CT scans, which serve as the diagnostic gold standard. The primary endpoint will be the negative predictive value (NPV) of POCUS for SBO. Secondary endpoints will include POCUS diagnostic accuracy, time intervals between POCUS and CT and factors associated with false-positive or false-negative results. Statistical analyses will estimate the NPV and other diagnostic parameters with 95% CIs. While CT remains the gold standard for diagnosing SBO, this study seeks to validate POCUS as a reliable method for ruling out SBO in low-risk cases, potentially reducing radiation exposure, costs and emergency department length of stay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the relevant committee (V1.1 approved on 6 February 2025 by "Comit&eacute; de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest 2" &ndash; SI24.05744.000388 &ndash; 2024-A01942-45). Findings will be disseminated via an international Emergency Medicine journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT06803628">NCT06803628</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Papin, M., Le Bastard, Q., Saignes, M., Le Thuaut, A., Le Conte, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113887</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113887</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contribution of point of care ultrasound for ruling out small bowel obstruction in emergency departments: study protocol of the diagnostic, observational, prospective and multicentre OCCLUS-POCUS study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113887</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113887</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transforming health systems in Tanzania towards universal health coverage: a scoping review of policy evolution, 1961-2025]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Tanzania carries a dual burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases while remaining vulnerable to emerging pandemics of public health concern. Since its independence in 1961, Tanzania has implemented successive health reforms aimed at expanding access and moving towards universal health coverage (UHC). Despite notable progress, inequities in access, quality and financial protection persist. This review examined how policy evolution (1961&ndash;2025) addressed or reinforced inequities and the lessons for building resilience and equity in UHC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a scoping review of national health policies, strategies, legislation and the related literature (1961&ndash;2025), following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Eligible sources included government reports, strategic plans, evaluation reports and peer-reviewed or grey literature. Data were analysed using the Walt and Gilson Policy Triangle and mapped against the WHO Health Systems Building Blocks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of 10 435 records identified, 60 documents met the inclusion criteria. Policy evolution reflected five broad reform episodes, ranging from postindependence centralisation to primary healthcare, structural adjustment and cost-sharing, sector-wide reforms and recent UHC-focused financing strategies. Reforms shifted from politically driven, top-down policies to participatory and evidence-informed approaches. Mapping showed progressive but uneven gains across service delivery, workforce, financing, governance, medicines and information systems. Six thematic shifts towards UHC were identified: fragmented to pooled financing, routine delivery to resilient systems, paper to digital systems, workforce numbers to distribution and skills-mix, state-only to mixed providers and expansion to effective coverage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Tanzania&rsquo;s reform trajectory illustrates adaptive progress, but persistent inequities in financing, workforce distribution and service access remain. Achieving equitable and resilient UHC will require stronger domestic financing, governance and primary care, with transferable lessons for other low- and middle-income countries.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiremeji, M., Kibusi, S. M., Eliakimu, E., Mpagama, S. G., Julius, M., Ngowi, R., Armour, A., Masuma, J., Msemwa, F., Nzeyimana, E., Medarakani, H., Kilindimo, S., Katalambula, L., Sawe, H., Magembe, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115186</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115186</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transforming health systems in Tanzania towards universal health coverage: a scoping review of policy evolution, 1961-2025]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115186</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115212?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patterns and determinants of primary care virtual health service use among rural Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115212?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine virtual health service (VHS) device usage patterns and identify factors associated with VHS engagement among Indigenous Australian adults with chronic conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>An Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation providing primary healthcare services across rural and remote Queensland, Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>74 consenting Indigenous Australian adults with at least one chronic condition who were registered VHS users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Participants completed surveys assessing their use of four Bluetooth-enabled monitoring devices (pulse oximeter, blood glucose monitor, blood pressure monitor, weight scale) over a 2-week recall period. The primary outcome was VHS device usage status, categorised as active versus inactive users. Active users were defined as participants who reported any frequency of device use, while those reporting no use were classified as inactive users. All participants had access to Indigenous health coach support as part of the VHS model. Binary logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic and geographical factors associated with VHS engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sixty-four per cent (n=47) were active users, with 73% of these using all four devices concurrently. Among active users, blood pressure monitors showed the highest utilisation (98%), followed by weight scales (91%), blood glucose monitors (89%) and pulse oximeters (86%). Three factors were significantly associated with VHS usage using binary logistic regression: residing in medium rural towns (adjusted OR 4.71, 95% CI 1.23 to 17.94, p=0.02), age 18&ndash;65 years (adjusted OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.05 to 12.22, p=0.04) and having multiple chronic conditions (adjusted OR 10.95, 95% CI 1.25 to 95.87, p=0.03) compared with those in more remote areas, aged &ge;66 years and with single condition, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Indigenous-led VHS achieve substantial engagement through culturally grounded health coach support. However, addressing digital connectivity in remote areas, age-appropriate support for older adults and Indigenous workforce development is essential to ensure equitable access and sustained engagement</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haque, R., Luebbe, A., McGrail, M. R., Nasir, B. F., Alam, K., Wallis, K., Leedie, F., Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115212</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115212</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patterns and determinants of primary care virtual health service use among rural Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115223?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Non-clinical indicators of infertility and fertility care: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115223?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Infertility affects millions of people globally. The presence of key indicators of infertility and fertility care is critical to monitoring access and utilisation of services as part of universal health coverage. In the area of infertility, it is important to track both clinical and non-clinical outcomes of care. Previous reviews have examined clinical indicators for infertility and fertility care; however, non-clinical indicators have received limited attention. This systematic scoping review aims to map the literature related to the non-clinical indicators of fertility care and their types and dimensions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will adhere to the established reporting guidelines for systematic scoping reviews and has been registered in the PROSPERO database to avoid duplication. A systematic literature search strategy will be developed and adapted to four electronic bibliographic databases (Medline [PubMed], EMBASE [Embase.com], CINAHL [EBSCOhost] and Web of Science [Clarivate]). Supplemental searches will be performed to obtain relevant grey literature from major health research institutes and international organisations. The search will be limited to literature published from 1990 to date. This review will cover all non-clinical interventions relevant to human infertility and fertility care. Two reviewers will independently screen papers and identify relevant studies for inclusion using predetermined criteria and extract data based on a predefined template. Types and dimensions of non-clinical indicators will be identified and a descriptive narrative synthesis will be used to describe the overall landscape. This review is expected to start on 1 June 2026 and conclude by 15 December 2026. A preliminary search strategy has been developed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this study is based on a review of publicly available literature, ethical approval is not required. This scoping review will provide a comprehensive overview of the existing non-clinical indicators used to measure, report and monitor infertility and fertility care services. The findings will provide a comprehensive evidence base for developing a set of core indicators to monitor infertility and fertility care that can be adopted globally. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and webinars.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251177901.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mburu, G., Zhao, L., Mei, M., Men, P., Boivin, J., Kiarie, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115223</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115223</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Non-clinical indicators of infertility and fertility care: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115223</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115859?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Three delays of malaria care-seeking in Malawi: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115859?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify psychosocial and structural barriers to prompt malaria care-seeking in Malawi by applying the Three Delays Model (delay 1: deciding to seek care; delay 2: reaching a facility; delay 3: receiving quality care).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Nationally representative data collected from Malawi communities between 25 May 2021 and 1 July 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>913 female caregivers who reported a child with fever in the past 2 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Prompt care-seeking for fever (same or next day) from a qualified health provider.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Prompt care-seeking was primarily associated with delay 1 (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.78) and psychosocial (aOR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.79) factors. Significant factors included incorrect knowledge of malaria symptoms, cause and diagnosis (aOR 0.71: 95% CI 0.53 to 0.97), negative attitudes towards care-seeking (aOR 0.58; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.82), incorrect knowledge of when and where to seek care (aOR 0.19: 95% CI 0.07 to 0.50) and far distance from a health facility (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.93).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Despite the availability of free malaria services, significant bottlenecks remain in the initial decision-making phase. To reduce malaria mortality, national programmes should prioritise social and behaviour change interventions that move beyond general awareness to target specific care-seeking attitudes and intra-household decision-making dynamics.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olapeju, B., Bride, M., Volkmann, T., Cash, S., Dembo, E., Kayange, M., Gumbo, A., Mafuleka, T., Boyle, J., Mangando, A., Mbeye, N. M., Mukwakwa, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115859</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115859</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Three delays of malaria care-seeking in Malawi: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115859</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115859</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116170?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring utilisation of knee and hip osteoarthritis healthcare services and its predictors: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116170?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Despite growing evidence and specific guidelines, people with knee and hip osteoarthritis often do not receive appropriate care. This review aims to identify healthcare utilisation and its predictors to optimise existing services and identify unmet needs across different healthcare systems using Andersen&rsquo;s Healthcare Utilisation Model as a reference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a scoping review and included studies published between 2010 and 2023 that assessed the healthcare utilisation in people with osteoarthritis. We examined general practitioner and orthopaedist consultations, physiotherapy, medication, hospitalisation and emergency department visits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Livivo, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Complete and Web of Science were searched from January 2010 until November 2023. An updated literature search was conducted in December 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>We analysed the included studies by means of thematic analysis and descriptive representation of quantitative data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The literature search identified 4228 articles, of which 2380 articles were included in the title/abstract screening after excluding duplicates. After the full-text screening of 97 articles, we included 39 (n=4 233 566) publications for data extraction and data synthesis. Most studies were conducted in the USA, Australia, Germany and the UK&mdash;few from Asia, Middle and South America and other European countries. Utilised healthcare services are general practitioner consultations (mean use: 43% of participants, n=6), opioid (36%, n=8) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (42%, n=7), emergency department visits (27%, n=3), orthopaedic surgeon consultations (26%, n=4), total joint replacement surgery (26%, n=3), physiotherapy (14%, n=8), hospitalisation (11%, n=7) and psychotherapy (6%, n=2). Among predisposing characteristics, older age, female gender, ethnicity, high socioeconomic status, social support and fear of certain treatment options were related to higher healthcare utilisation. In those, gender (n=8 studies) and age (n=6 studies) were primarily discussed. Regarding enabling and need factors, increased healthcare utilisation is associated with urban residence and being insured as well as having pain and comorbidities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Results vary between countries. Against the background of existing guidelines, there is a need for promoting the utilisation of non-surgical and non-pharmacological treatments, such as physiotherapy, which have proven to be effective. Special attention should be given to predictors when promoting appropriate healthcare utilisation. Addressing the identified predictors associated with healthcare utilisation may lead to more appropriate osteoarthritis care. Further research is needed to address healthcare stakeholders&rsquo; (physiotherapists, insurers, patients and practitioners) needs and roles in the process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Protocol registration on PROSPERO (CRD42023475803).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neumann, S., Weber, F., Gru&#x0308;neberg, C., Schenk, L., Thiel, C., Gellert, P., Peschke, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116170</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116170</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring utilisation of knee and hip osteoarthritis healthcare services and its predictors: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116170</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116526?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perioperative sleep optimisation and brain health in older adults (SLEEP-BOOST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116526?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative neurocognitive disorders, including delirium and longer-term cognitive decline, are among the most common and costly complications of surgery in older adults, yet effective preventive strategies remain limited. Insomnia and sleep&ndash;circadian disruption are highly prevalent in this population, affecting up to one-third of older adults undergoing elective surgery and represent potentially modifiable risk factors that are rarely addressed in perioperative care. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is the first-line, evidence-based treatment for insomnia; however, its feasibility and efficacy have not been systematically evaluated for perioperative implementation. This protocol describes a pilot randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a condensed CBT-I intervention in the perioperative setting. The study will also explore its potential effects on insomnia and postoperative outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The SLEEP-BOOST study is a single-site, randomised controlled pilot trial conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital. The study will enrol 50 older adults (&ge;65 years) undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery with insomnia symptoms (Insomnia Severity Index&ge;10). Participants will be randomised 1:1 to either a condensed CBT-I intervention or a patient contact-matched Sleep Hygiene Education control group. All participants will complete 3 weeks of preoperative actigraphy and daily sleep diaries, with follow-up assessments at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The primary outcome is feasibility, assessed through adherence metrics, protocol engagement and acceptability. Secondary outcomes will be treated as exploratory including insomnia severity, sleep quality, actigraphy-derived sleep and circadian metrics, cognitive trajectories, postoperative pain, mood, functional status and incidence of postoperative neurocognitive disorders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol has received ethics approval from Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Review Board (Protocol #2024P000780). Dissemination is expected to include peer-reviewed journal articles, reports, conference presentations as well as websites or social media platforms of relevant sleep treatment organisations. Participants will receive a summary of the study results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06375265">NCT06375265</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles, A. E., Castillo Suarez, A. A., Chhajed, M., Jimenez Gallardo, M., Sanchez Valdes, K., Li, P., Hu, K., Wong, P. M., Winkelman, J., Gao, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116526</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116526</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perioperative sleep optimisation and brain health in older adults (SLEEP-BOOST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116526</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116526</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117737?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and implementation of Self-Help Plus (SH+) and Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWMS): protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117737?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Global increases in armed conflict, forced displacement, pandemics and economic instability have contributed to rising levels of psychological distress worldwide, placing relevant segments of the population at increased risk of developing mental health conditions. This burden is particularly pronounced in humanitarian and low-resource settings where access to specialist mental health services is limited. Scalable, low-intensity, evidence-based psychological interventions are therefore urgently needed. In response, the WHO has developed transdiagnostic programmes, including <I>Self-Help Plus</I> (SH+) and <I>Doing What Matters in Times of Stress</I> (DWMS). Although these interventions are increasingly implemented across humanitarian and public health contexts, evidence for their effectiveness and implementation has not yet been systematically synthesised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration standards and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We will include randomised controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of SH+ or DWMS, alongside qualitative and mixed-methods studies examining their implementation among stressor-exposed individuals of any age. Outcomes will include symptoms of depression and anxiety, general distress and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Moreover, we will examine effects on well-being, psychosocial functioning, adverse events and implementation outcomes (eg, acceptability, feasibility, fidelity). We will search Cochrane CENTRAL, APA PsycNet, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase and Scopus for records published from 2016 onwards. Searches will be supplemented by hand-searching preprint repositories and citation tracking. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and a customised appraisal tool for studies on implementation. Quantitative data will be synthesised using random-effects multilevel meta-analyses, with meta-regression models applied to examine moderators. Bayesian meta-analyses will be conducted where appropriate as sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the findings. Certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through an open-access peer-reviewed publication, a plain-language summary, and the Open Science Framework, where all materials will be made publicly available.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251168521.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thakur, H. K., Scha&#x0308;fer, C. G., Kunzler, A. M., Burmeister, C. F., Michael, T., Equit, M., Mo&#x0308;hler, E., Lieb, K., Scha&#x0308;fer, S. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117737</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117737</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and implementation of Self-Help Plus (SH+) and Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWMS): protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117737</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117737</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118394?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving healthcare professionals usage of artificial intelligence-powered risk recommenders through enhancement of trust and acceptance: a rapid realist review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118394?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Healthcare professionals working in busy hospital environments are expected to make multiple back-to-back critical decisions related to patient assessment and treatment. Fatigue from a combination of complex decision-making over multiple patients can lead to less efficient care and an increased risk of error and harm. Artificial intelligence (AI) risk recommendation systems, hereafter referred to as AI risk recommenders, have the potential to reduce the impact of decision fatigue by prompting healthcare professionals with appropriate recommendations for patient care and management. A key barrier to the effective usage of such systems is the establishment of trust and subsequent acceptance among healthcare professionals. However, little is currently known about how trust and acceptance can be engendered. The aim of this review is to develop a theory explaining what influences healthcare professionals&rsquo; usage of AI risk recommenders and how trust and acceptance, facilitate their usage of such systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a rapid realist review to develop a programme theory exploring how trust and acceptance of AI risk recommenders are established among healthcare professionals and how these mechanisms influence system usage. We will use the following databases&mdash;MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Elsevier), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL (EBSCOhost)), PubMed, The Cochrane Library, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, The Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library, Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate) and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses. The review will focus on identifying the resources and processes that stimulate trust and acceptance, leading to the actual use of the system in clinical practice. The review will be guided by the four steps of realist review described by Rycroft-Malone. Article searching and retrieval was conducted on 15 November 2025; full-text screening is ongoing and the review is expected to be completed by May 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study does not require formal ethics approval, as it does not involve primary research. Findings will be shared in peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and engagement with relevant policy-makers involved in the development and integration of AI risk recommenders within hospital settings. Through these efforts, we aim to support the effective utilisation of such systems, leading to improved decision-making and patient care outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251155251</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glass, G. F., Ang, C.-S., Weiss, M. E., Fan, X., Cleland, J. A., Manski-Nankervis, J.-A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118394</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118394</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving healthcare professionals usage of artificial intelligence-powered risk recommenders through enhancement of trust and acceptance: a rapid realist review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118394</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118394</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118728?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[US multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol: Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after surgery trial for Kids (CARES for Kids)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118728?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Acute pain is an expected symptom for adolescents after outpatient surgery. In the USA, postoperative analgesic regimens frequently include prescription opioids. Increasing attention from clinicians, patients and other healthcare leaders has been directed toward non-opioid strategies, such as combining non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) plus acetaminophen, as potential first-line options for managing postoperative pain. However, the effectiveness and safety of home regimens that include versus exclude opioids for adolescents are unclear. The Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after surgery for Kids study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of NSAIDs plus acetaminophen alone (NSAID regimen) versus NSAIDs and acetaminophen plus a low-dose opioid regimen (opioid regimen).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial recruiting 900 patients aged 12&ndash;20 years undergoing three common outpatient surgeries (tonsillectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, knee arthroscopy) across four health systems. We will recruit patients prior to surgery and individuals will be randomised 1:1 with stratification to receive prescriptions for either the NSAID regimen or the opioid regimen. The primary effectiveness outcome is patient-reported pain intensity, while the primary safety outcome is adverse medication-related symptoms both assessed over the first 2 weeks after surgery. Secondary outcomes include quality of recovery, healthcare-related quality of life and rates of problematic substance use and chronic prescription opioid use, assessed up to 1 year after surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study incorporates stakeholder collaboration, including patient partners, surgeons, professional organisations., and health insurance payors, to ensure ethical conduct and relevance. This study is overseen by a single institutional review board with certificate of confidentiality. Findings will be disseminated through academic publications, conferences and community outreach to inform patients, parents, surgical teams and policymakers about optimal pain management strategies for adolescents after surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06671002">NCT06671002</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, J. S., Bicket, M. C., Mansfield, S. A., Rabbitts, J. A., Van Horn, A., Perrone, E. E., Chua, K.-P., Voepel-Lewis, T., Waljee, J., Brummett, C., Hutmacher, C., Li, Y., Kelley-Quon, L. I., CARES for Kids Investigators, Bicket, Kelley-Quon, Brummett, Chua, Li, Mansfield, Perrone, Rabbitts, Voepel-Lewis, Horn, Waljee, Clark, Dubois, Sulich, Gunaseelan, Chiao-Li Chan, Kreider, Horvath, Arnold, Bedi, Bohn, Church, Crawford, Devare, Fayson, Finks, Gadepalli, Grant, Green, Greenburg, Kirkham, Manaligod, Pleasant, Thorne, Walick, Anselmo, Don, Gayer, Hochstim, Lucas, Kim, Mann, Koempel, Nguyen, Shin, Spurrier, Stein, Timbang, Zobel, Abrams, Balakrishnan, Chan, Chao, Cheng, Dunn, Fell, Fuchs, Hyun, Khan, Meister, Safran, Sherman, Schwab, Sidell, Sylvester, Tirrell, Truong, Aldrink, Criss, Jensen, Kenney, Michalsky, Olutoye, Smith, Thakkar, Hutmacher, Forest, Gordon, Winter, McKenzie, Kattail, Russell, Smith-Ponce, Walco, Walther, Derrington, Weisman, Thurn, Thorson, Yoseph]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-28T06:56:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118728</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118728</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[US multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol: Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after surgery trial for Kids (CARES for Kids)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118728</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118728</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099617?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The changing impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission across different pandemic stages in 12 Asian countries: an ecological study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099617?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) on COVID-19 transmission in different pandemic stages across 12 Asian countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was an ecological study of publicly available data. This study used the Stringency Index from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) as a composite measure of implementation strictness of non-pharmaceutical interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data were obtained from Our World in Data and OxCGRT (January 2021 to September 2022).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 countries were included in the study: Azerbaijan, Turkey, Bahrain, Israel, Lebanon, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, and Indonesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measure</st>
<p>The instantaneous reproduction number (Rt). Rt is defined as the expected number of secondary infections occurring at time t, divided by the number of infected individuals, each scaled by their relative infectiousness at time t (an individual&rsquo;s relative infectiousness is based on the generation interval and time).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three different pandemic development patterns were identified: Cluster 1 countries (marked by distinct fluctuation), Cluster 2 countries (characterised by smaller fluctuation) and Cluster 3 countries (featuring a peak between July and September). An increase in the Stringency Index was associated with a significant decrease in Rt during warmer seasons in both Cluster 1 and 2 (both p values &lt; 0.05). For Cluster 1, the accumulated local effects (ALEs) of the Stringency Index reached a maximum magnitude of approximately 1.80 during April&ndash;June, declining from 1.55 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.75) to &ndash;0.25 (95% CI &ndash;0.33 to &ndash;0.17). This was followed by a secondary ALE magnitude of about 0.47 during July&ndash;September, decreasing from 0.15 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.18) to &ndash;0.32 (95% CI &ndash;0.39 to &ndash;0.25). Similarly, in Cluster 2, the ALE of the Stringency Index peaked at a magnitude of about 1.25 during July&ndash;September, dropping from 0.65 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.76) to &ndash;0.60 (95% CI &ndash;0.70 to &ndash;0.51). In Cluster 3, during July&ndash;September, once the Stringency Index reached a certain threshold, the Rt value initially declined but subsequently increased again.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study demonstrates that the effectiveness of NPIs varies with seasonal changes and pandemic patterns. Therefore, to improve the efficiency of public health responses, policymakers should tailor NPI strategies based on seasonal variations and local socio-structural factors. The findings provide new insights for future research on the impact of NPI implementation during pandemics, which plays a critical role in pandemic management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[He, X., Liu, H., Zeng, F., Gao, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T21:58:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099617</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099617</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The changing impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission across different pandemic stages in 12 Asian countries: an ecological study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099617</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099617</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114391?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk-based selection for carotid revascularisation using the IMPROVE score versus standard care in symptomatic carotid artery disease: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis using pooled-data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114391?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A clinical prediction model (IMPROVE) for ipsilateral ischaemic stroke risk in symptomatic patients with carotid disease was recently developed with good performance. We aim to evaluate the model-based cost-effectiveness of IMPROVE-based triage versus triage in care-as-usual (CAU) for optimal medical treatment (OMT) alone or carotid endarterectomy plus OMT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A dataset of 678 patients with carotid disease and a recent ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack or amaurosis fugax from four cohort studies informed a decision-analytic model. Stratification of patients for carotid endarterectomy was based on &ge;50% carotid stenosis (CAU arm) or a range of 3-year ipsilateral ischaemic stroke risk thresholds (IMPROVE arm). The threshold resulting in the lowest number of ipsilateral strokes and perioperative strokes and deaths was selected as the optimal threshold. Patients with &lt;50% stenosis (CAU) or an IMPROVE risk score below the threshold (IMPROVE) were modelled to receive OMT only. Parameter uncertainty was incorporated in probabilistic analyses using Monte Carlo simulations for a 3-year and lifetime horizon. Subgroup analyses for &lt;50%, 50&ndash;69% and 70&ndash;99% carotid stenosis were performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>IMPROVE-based triage reduced ipsilateral ischaemic strokes and perioperative strokes and deaths by 34.5% (CAU: 4.3%, IMPROVE: 2.8%) over 3 years. Revascularisations decreased by 20% with IMPROVE, while Quality-Adjusted Life Years slightly increased. Procedural stroke occurred in 1.8% of patients in CAU versus 1.4% of patients for IMPROVE. Societal costs decreased on average by 1441/patient for IMPROVE versus CAU for a 3-year time horizon (lifetime cost reduction: 6101/patient). Subgroup analyses identified IMPROVE as the superior strategy for 50&ndash;69% and 70&ndash;99% stenosis (3-year and lifetime horizon) and &lt;50% stenosis (lifetime horizon).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this modelling analysis, triage of symptomatic patients with carotid disease with the IMPROVE model can lead to the prevention of one-third of ipsilateral ischaemic strokes and perioperative strokes and deaths, while also reducing societal costs. These findings should be validated in a clinical trial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nies, K. P. H., Ramaekers, B., Bierens, J., Auer, D. P., Schindler, A., Saam, T., Bos, D., de Jong, P. A., Nederkoorn, P. J., de Borst, G. J., van Oostenbrugge, R. J., Joore, M. A., Kooi, M. E., Smits, L. J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T21:58:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114391</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114391</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk-based selection for carotid revascularisation using the IMPROVE score versus standard care in symptomatic carotid artery disease: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis using pooled-data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114391</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Test-retest reliability and validity of movement-evoked pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a methodological study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pain experienced during functional activities, referred to as movement-evoked pain (MEP), is a common and disabling symptom in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Unlike pain at rest, MEP may better reflect the real-life burden of KOA and is increasingly recognised as a core outcome in musculoskeletal pain trials. However, its clinical utility remains limited by a lack of evidence on its measurement properties. This study aims to evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of MEP assessments during functional tasks in individuals with KOA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study includes two components: (1) a test-retest reliability assessment conducted over two sessions separated by approximately 7 days and (2) a cross-sectional analysis of convergent validity. We will recruit 62 participants with symptomatic KOA from the local communities. MEP will be assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale during five standardised functional tasks: 30-Second Chair Stand Test, One-Step Stair Climb Test, 40m Fast-Paced Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test and Six-Minute Walk Test. Test-retest reliability will be evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC<SUB>3,1</SUB>). Convergent validity will be assessed separately for each functional task by calculating correlation coefficients between MEP ratings and the pain subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee from Shanghai University of Sport (Ref: 102772025RT193). The study protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/B9N7G). The findings will be disseminated through presentations at national and international scientific conferences and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiang, L., Liu, D., Mani, R., Cheung, R. T. H., Cao, Y., Wang, R., Lu, Z., Wang, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116380</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116380</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Test-retest reliability and validity of movement-evoked pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a methodological study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116380</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116516?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Building capacity for patient advocacy in liver health: a cross-country qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116516?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore how patient advocates active in liver health understand and enact meaningful advocacy across diverse cultural and health-system contexts and to identify empirically grounded competencies that can inform evidence-based training and capacity building for patient advocacy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-country qualitative study using a focused ethnographic approach, based on in-depth semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Patient advocacy organisations active in liver health at local, national and international levels across Europe and selected non-European contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>23 experienced patient advocates affiliated with liver disease patient organisations in 17 countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted via videoconferencing. Data were analysed following a reflexive thematic analysis approach, with maximum-variation purposive sampling to capture diversity in advocacy roles, experience and health-system contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five interrelated themes were identified, conceptualising patient advocacy as a relational and value-driven practice enacted across multiple levels of action. Findings highlighted a set of communicative, ethical, strategic, emotional and contextual competencies that advocates progressively develop to translate lived experience into system-relevant action. Advocacy was described as shaped by structural constraints, cultural norms and emotional burden, requiring adaptive strategies and sustained reflexive learning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patient advocacy in liver health relies on a constellation of competencies that extend beyond lived experience alone and can be explicitly supported through structured training. By articulating these competencies, this study provides an empirical foundation for developing evidence-based educational tools for patient advocates and for strengthening mechanisms that integrate experiential knowledge into health policy and governance, including "Listening-Informed" Policy approaches.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barello, S., Monaci, M., Credi, B., Korenjak, M., Bigi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116516</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116516</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Building capacity for patient advocacy in liver health: a cross-country qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116516</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116516</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116644?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Follow-up monitoring, rehabilitation status and hand function recovery in patients who had a stroke at 1 year after discharge (FOLLOW-STROKE-HAND): protocol for a longitudinal observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116644?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Stroke is the leading cause of death and disability among adults in China, with a growing disease burden. Data from the <I>China Stroke Prevention and Treatment Report 2023</I> show that the incidence rate of stroke in China is approximately 246.8 per 100 000 population, with over 2 million new cases annually. Among surviving patients, 60%&ndash;70% experience varying degrees of hand dysfunction after discharge, and only 10%&ndash;20% can recover to near-normal levels. As the most refined and core motor function of the human body, hand function recovery essentially reflects motor cortical neuroplasticity (synaptic remodelling and cortical reorganisation). Its recovery directly affects the independence of activities of daily living (ADLs) such as eating, dressing and personal hygiene, markedly reducing quality of life and increasing family care burden and social medical costs.</p>
<p>Currently, clinical rehabilitation interventions for patients who had a stroke are mostly concentrated during hospitalisation, focusing on acute-phase stability and basic function recovery. However, postdischarge rehabilitation follow-up coverage is fewer than 40%, and community rehabilitation resources are disparately distributed, leaving most patients facing the dilemma of &lsquo;interrupted rehabilitation after discharge&rsquo;. Additionally, existing studies mostly focus on short-term follow-up (3&ndash;6 months) and lack systematic investigation of the long-term trajectory of hand function recovery (6 months to 1 year), key turning points and influencing factors&mdash;especially the regulatory role of multidisciplinary intervention on neuroplasticity. The integrated &lsquo;hospital-community-family&rsquo; multidisciplinary collaborative management model remains underdeveloped.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to describe the dynamic trajectory of hand function and overall rehabilitation outcomes in patients who had a stroke at 6 months and 1 year postdischarge, analyse the key influencing factors of hand function recovery (with a focus on the regulatory role of multidisciplinary collaborative intervention on motor cortical neuroplasticity), verify the effectiveness of the multidisciplinary collaborative management model on complications and rehabilitation satisfaction, and ultimately construct a continuous rehabilitation management model adapted to the current status of primary medical care in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A single-centre, prospective cohort study design will be used. A total of 120 patients who had a stroke with hand dysfunction discharged from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Second People&rsquo;s Hospital of Hefei Guangde Road Campus between February 2026 and February 2027 will be enrolled. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) consisting of rehabilitation physicians, rehabilitation therapists, community doctors/nurses and family caregivers will be established to implement a three-stage intervention: discharge connection, community intervention and online support (incorporating neuroplasticity initiation, enhancement and maintenance strategies).</p>
<p>Hand function (primary outcome) will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Hand (FMA-Hand) at baseline (1&ndash;3 days predischarge, T0), 3 months postdischarge (T1), 6 months postdischarge (T2) and 12 months postdischarge (T3). Secondary outcomes include overall motor function (FMA Total Score, FMA-Total) and ADL (Modified Barthel Index). Influencing factor data will be collected using structured questionnaires, and neuroplasticity will be indirectly evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation-derived motor evoked potentials.</p>
<p>SPSS V.26.0 software will be used for statistical analyses. Quantitative data will be expressed as (x&plusmn;s) or (M (IQR)) depending on normality; categorical data will be presented as (n (%)). Repeated measures analysis of variance will compare functional changes across time points, and multiple linear regression will identify independent influencing factors of hand function recovery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Expected results</st>
<p>Patients will show progressive hand function recovery within 1 year after discharge, with the fastest recovery at 3&ndash;6 months and stabilisation from 6 to 12 months. Younger age, higher baseline function, better rehabilitation adherence and active multidisciplinary intervention are associated with greater neuroplasticity and better hand function recovery. The MDT model may reduce complications and improve rehabilitation satisfaction and ADL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results of this study will fill the data gap in long-term postdischarge rehabilitation trajectories of patients who had a stroke, clarify the regulatory role of multidisciplinary collaborative intervention on motor cortical neuroplasticity and provide scientific evidence and practical references for optimising postdischarge rehabilitation follow-up programmes and improving the primary rehabilitation service system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of The Second People&rsquo;s Hospital of Hefei (No. 2024-KY-089). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to participants and community health institutions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2600119007.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, F., Wu, S., Mao, L., Pan, S., Zhou, K., Liu, Y., Cao, X., Wang, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116644</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116644</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Follow-up monitoring, rehabilitation status and hand function recovery in patients who had a stroke at 1 year after discharge (FOLLOW-STROKE-HAND): protocol for a longitudinal observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116644</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116644</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116731?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for evaluating the effects of the intelligent multimodal symptom assessment and response system in patients with pemphigus vulgaris: a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116731?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pemphigus vulgaris is a rare autoimmune blistering disease characterised by recurrent mucocutaneous erosions, high symptom burden and unpredictable relapse. Current management relies mainly on pharmacological therapy and hospital-based follow-up, with limited real-time monitoring and individualised support in home-based disease management. To address these challenges, this trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an Intelligent Multimodal Symptom Assessment and Response System, integrating patient-reported outcomes, wearable physiological data and image-based lesion assessments, to improve symptom management and quality of life in pemphigus vulgaris patients. Primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Intelligent Multimodal Symptom Assessment and Response System in improving symptom alerting and symptom management outcomes in patients with pemphigus vulgaris. Secondary objectives are to enhance patients&rsquo; self-management ability in symptom monitoring and control, to improve treatment adherence throughout the follow-up period, to promote health-related quality of life among pemphigus vulgaris patients, to assess the usability and acceptability of the system from the patients&rsquo; perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. 160 participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving the Intelligent Multimodal Symptom Assessment and Response System) or the control group (receiving standard care). Eligible participants will be adults aged 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris and active skin or mucosal lesions, who are able to use digital devices and provide written informed consent. Individuals with severe comorbidities, concurrent participation in other clinical trials or cognitive impairments that may interfere with study adherence will be excluded. The intervention will be delivered via a digital platform, integrating electronic patient-reported outcomes, wearable physiological data and lesion images over a 12-week follow-up period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the School of Nursing, Fudan University (IRB 2025-07-13), the Medical Ethics Committee of the Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2025-KY-034) and the Ethics Committee of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (2025-452). Approvals were granted on 10 September, 18 July and 23 July 2025, respectively. This protocol is based on V1.0, 13 July 2025 of the protocol. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500109711.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Y., Wang, L., Gao, J., Xiao, R., Yan, S., Pan, X., Yu, Y., Yuan, C., Yuan, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116731</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116731</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for evaluating the effects of the intelligent multimodal symptom assessment and response system in patients with pemphigus vulgaris: a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116731</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116731</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116839?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing middle-range theories for the implementation of clinical practice guideline recommendations for pre-eclampsia prevention and management in eastern, central and southern Africa: a realist synthesis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116839?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, such as pre-eclampsia (PE), are one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for PE prevention and management are available, there is limited information on their implementation in LMIC contexts. This realist synthesis therefore aims to uncover the causal explanations underpinning the implementation of CPG recommendations for PE prevention and management in Eastern, Central and Southern African contexts. By developing and refining initial programme theories (IPTs), we will generate a pragmatic evidence base explaining how contextual factors trigger mechanisms that lead to intended and unintended outcomes and why implementation varies across the different settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We conceptualise the implementation of CPGs for PE prevention and management as complex social interventions operating within complex adaptive systems. The realist synthesis method will be employed to systematically review the literature for evidence synthesis. The review process will be conducted in five phases, each iteratively building on the previous phase to uncover generative causation and refine the IPTs. We will identify articles through iterative purposive searching in six electronic databases and search engines (Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE Global Health) and through screening WHO sources. Advisory group consultations will be held to formulate, prioritise and refine IPTs. To conceptualise our realist theories through generative causation, we will analyse the data using a retroductive approach, an integration of inductive, deductive and abductive reasoning. We will inductively examine theoretical insights related to five established care moments and explore how CPGs operate during these moments, including where and how they fail to work as intended. The five care moments are: (1) Risk assessment/prevention, (2) Diagnosing disease, (3) Management of PE without severe features, (4) With severe features and (5) Decision making around birth. Deductive reasoning will support sense-making of evidence-based theories through the lens of theories that have been used to explain the adoption of guidelines in healthcare settings. Lastly, abductive reasoning, centring researcher hunches, will help to unearth mechanisms that have been insufficiently detailed in the literature. The intervention-context-actor-mechanism-outcome heuristic will be used to configure programme theories and articulate the theories using the if-then statements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This project is part of the larger PREvention of Severe Hypertensive Adverse events (PRESHA) project, which aims to improve the detection, prevention and management of PE in Tanzania. PRESHA has ethical clearance from the Regional Ethics Board in Norway and the National Health Research Ethics Committee in Tanzania. Findings of the review will support the contextual development of CPGs for the prevention and management of PE, which will be implemented within the context of the PRESHA trial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solnes Miltenburg, A., Uwamahoro, N. S., Mwanga, J. R., Lindskog, B. V., Misje, R., Kihunrwa, A., Pembe, A. B., Gilmore, B., Mukumbang, F. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116839</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116839</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing middle-range theories for the implementation of clinical practice guideline recommendations for pre-eclampsia prevention and management in eastern, central and southern Africa: a realist synthesis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116839</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116839</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117024?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility and acceptability of therapist-guided, asynchronous, internet-delivered trauma-focused CBT for adolescents with PTSD: a single-group feasibility trial in Sweden]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117024?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT) is the established first-line treatment for paediatric post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but access to evidence-based care remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a therapist-guided, 12 week, internet-delivered TF-CBT (iTF-CBT) programme for adolescents with PTSD and to explore preliminary changes in PTSD symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Single-group feasibility trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Save the Children, Sweden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Twenty-two adolescents (13&ndash;17 years, 82% female) with primary PTSD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>A 12 week, therapist-guided, asynchronous, internet-delivered TF-CBT comprising eight modules and parallel caregiver modules with joint adolescent&ndash;caregiver activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Feasibility measures included recruitment pace, participant retention, treatment adherence (module completion) and therapist time. Acceptability was evaluated through satisfaction, credibility, negative effects and reported adverse events. Within-group changes in PTSD severity using independent evaluator-rated Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-CA-5) and the self-reported Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) were used as indicators of potential clinical change. Assessments occurred at baseline, during treatment, post-treatment and at 1 month follow-up (primary endpoint).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Recruitment was completed after 7 months of active enrolment. Retention and adherence were high, satisfaction and credibility ratings were favourable, and no intervention-related serious adverse events occurred. Within-group improvements were observed at the primary endpoint, with large reductions on CAPS-CA-5 (Cohen&rsquo;s d=1.27) and CATS-2 (Cohen&rsquo;s d=1.51). At follow-up, 47.6% of participants no longer met criteria for PTSD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Therapist-guided iTF-CBT for adolescents with PTSD was safe, feasible, acceptable and associated with potentially meaningful symptom improvements. These findings support further evaluation in larger, controlled trials to determine efficacy, cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06185244">NCT06185244</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mattelin, E., Weyler, H., Andersson, R., Paulsen, J., Tielman, S., Vikgren, A., Bondjers, K., Serlachius, E., Mataix-Cols, D., Bragesjo&#x0308;, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117024</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117024</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility and acceptability of therapist-guided, asynchronous, internet-delivered trauma-focused CBT for adolescents with PTSD: a single-group feasibility trial in Sweden]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117024</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117024</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117256?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Community awareness of climate change and its public health impacts in the North Bank Region, The Gambia: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117256?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Climate change poses significant public health challenges globally, particularly in vulnerable regions such as The Gambia. Despite growing recognition of environmental impacts, limited research has examined community-level awareness of climate change health effects in West African settings. This study aimed to assess household awareness and perceptions of climate change impacts on public health among vulnerable communities in the North Bank Region, The Gambia and identify socio-demographic determinants of climate change awareness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>In this study, we conducted a community-based cross-sectional study. Using multistage sampling, we selected 35 communities across seven districts. Data were collected via structured questionnaires administered in local languages (Mandinka, Wolof, Fula) using KoboToolbox.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study was conducted among 868 residents aged &ge;18 years in the North Bank Region between January and February 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 85.7% (n=744) of respondents had heard about climate change, with radio (53.6%) being the primary information source. Participants demonstrated high awareness of certain climate hazards, such as excessive heat (76.4%) and altered rainfall patterns (55.2%), but less so for other hazards, such as flooding (30.3%). Respondents correctly identified multiple health impacts to health and livelihoods, including heat stress (65.8%), dehydration (57.3%), respiratory diseases (73.6%), waterborne diseases (59.0%) and crop failure (86.4%). Multivariable analysis revealed that older age (&gt;39 years: adjusted OR (aOR)=2.50, 95% CI 1.49 to 4.21) and tertiary education (aOR=3.93, 95% CI 1.50 to 10.30) were independent predictors of climate change awareness. Approximately 77% of participants reported experiencing climate change effects in their communities within the past 5 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This first comprehensive assessment of climate-health awareness in the North Bank Region of The Gambia reveals substantial community recognition of climate change and its health consequences. Significant disparities in awareness by age and educational attainment indicate that targeted educational interventions focused on younger populations and those with limited formal education are warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinteh, B., Darboe, L., Badjie, M., Gaye, M. S., Ceesay, S., Kongira, A., Sillah, S. O., Barrow, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117256</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117256</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Community awareness of climate change and its public health impacts in the North Bank Region, The Gambia: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117256</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proactive graded follow-up strategy for reducing recurrence in acute pancreatitis (PROGRESS): protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Recurrence of acute pancreatitis (AP) is common, leading to cumulative pancreatic injury and reduced quality of life. While aetiology-based treatments and lifestyle interventions are effective, long-term adherence is often poor due to insufficient health awareness and a lack of continuous reminders. We designed the PROGRESS (<I>PRO</I>active <I>GR</I>ad<I>E</I>d follow-up <I>S</I>trategy for reducing recurrence in acute pancreatiti<I>S</I>) trial to evaluate whether a physician-initiated, proactive and graded follow-up strategy can reduce AP recurrence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The PROGRESS trial is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. A total of 194 patients with AP will be randomised 1:1 to either a proactive follow-up group or a standard follow-up group. In the proactive follow-up group, patients are stratified into high-risk or low-risk categories based on reported risk factors. Follow-up is conducted via WeChat with varying frequencies: every 3 months for the high-risk group and every 6 months for the low-risk group. The standard follow-up group receives routine discharge education and a 1-month outpatient visit. The primary endpoint is the number of AP recurrence episodes within 24 months post-discharge. Secondary endpoints include AP recurrence rate, progression to chronic pancreatitis, quality of life (Short Form 12 Health Survey), anxiety/depression scores (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7/Patient Health Questionnaire-9), readmission rates and mortality. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (No. I-25PJ2556, I-26PJ0895). Ethics approval of each participating centre is required before initiation of patient enrolment. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500113459 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Chen, Y., Min, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, S., Li, J., Wu, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117540</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117540</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proactive graded follow-up strategy for reducing recurrence in acute pancreatitis (PROGRESS): protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117540</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117592?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of the OdonAssist device for assisted vaginal birth in a low-resource setting: ASSIST Ethiopia study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117592?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In sub-Saharan African countries, the population-based assisted vaginal birth (AVB) rate is approximately 1% as compared with 16% in Western Europe. Consequently, women experiencing prolonged labour often face limited access to prompt intervention, leading to maternal and perinatal complications or unnecessary caesarean sections (CS). The OdonAssist device has been developed to be safe, user-friendly and more acceptable than currently used AVB devices. We propose to conduct a study in Ethiopia to evaluate if the implementation of this innovation is feasible and may contribute to improving the access to AVB while reducing unnecessary CSs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We designed a single-centre feasibility study at Saint Luke Catholic Hospital (Wolisso, Ethiopia), a secondary facility where AVB is routinely performed by midwives and health officers under gynaecologist supervision, reflecting the local health system. Following a quasi-experimental design, we will include three groups of 20 women: an intervention group (OdonAssist), a vacuum extraction cohort and a control group of second-stage CS (performed without a prior trial of instrumental birth). The primary objective is to assess the clinical and methodological feasibility of the OdonAssist by collecting preliminary data on safety, acceptability and quantifying potential efficacy relative to the current standard of care. An exploratory economic evaluation of direct healthcare costs will be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by the Oromia Regional Health Bureau. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals to inform future impact evaluations of the OdonAssist device in global maternal and perinatal health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06918509">NCT06918509</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orsi, M., Sall, F. S., Fieni, S., Lihoreau, T., Nerich, V., Manenti, F., Bobbio, F. A., Taye, A., Merga, D., Cot, S., Mauny, F., Mottet, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117592</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117592</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of the OdonAssist device for assisted vaginal birth in a low-resource setting: ASSIST Ethiopia study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117592</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117592</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117783?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Testing and evaluating updated variants of the rurality index for Japan: a nationwide methodological study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117783?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To update the rurality index for Japan (RIJ) using the most recent national data and to test and evaluate the updated RIJ variants that incorporate alternative distance metrics and a modified classification of remote islands, thereby providing methodological guidance for their use in research and health policy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nationwide methodological study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All postal code areas in Japan; analyses were aggregated into municipalities and secondary medical care areas for evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Exposure</st>
<p>Six RIJ variants (&lsquo;RIJ family&rsquo;) constructed by combining three distance metrics (direct distance, road-based distance and travel time by car) and two island classifications (original RIJ and modified RIJ), standardised to a continuous 0&ndash;100 scale using percentile ranks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Concordance among RIJ variants was assessed using Spearman&rsquo;s rank correlation coefficients, quintile reclassification matrices and rank-difference analyses; convergent validity was evaluated using the national physician distribution index. Criterion-related validity was assessed using municipal-level life expectancy for men and women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>All RIJ variants had extremely high concordance (Spearman&rsquo;s &ge;0.99 across all pairwise comparisons). Compared with the previous RIJ classification, &gt;98% of the geographic units remained in the same rurality quintile and &lt;0.3% shifted by two or more quintiles across variants. Rank-difference analyses demonstrated that large changes were geographically limited and primarily concentrated in island areas. Convergent validity with physician distribution was moderate and consistent across variants (Spearman&rsquo;s  approximately &ndash;0.52). Criterion-related validity showed weak but significant negative correlations with life expectancy, which were stronger for males (  &ndash;0.27 to &ndash;0.29) than for females (  &ndash;0.17 to &ndash;0.19). These patterns were consistent with findings from the original RIJ study. We found no descriptive evidence that the associations with external indicators differed meaningfully across RIJ variants. The 95% CIs of the correlation coefficients largely overlapped across RIJ variants, suggesting no meaningful differences in their associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite differences in distance metrics and island classification, all RIJ variants captured highly similar underlying dimensions of rurality and demonstrated comparable validity. These findings indicate that rurality measurement in Japan is stable regardless of methodological refinements, allowing RIJ variants to be flexibly selected according to specific research or policy purposes without materially affecting conclusions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaneko, M., Ikeda, T., Shimizu, S., Sato, T., Nomura, O., Soma, Y., Inoue, M., Ishikawa, K. B., Matsuda, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117783</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117783</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Testing and evaluating updated variants of the rurality index for Japan: a nationwide methodological study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117783</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117783</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117998?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of 'spin on medical decision-making among healthcare professionals and other health-related decision makers: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117998?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>&lsquo;Spin&rsquo; refers to reporting practices that distort the interpretation of results and mislead readers&rsquo; impression of the research findings so that the results are viewed in a more favourable light. This systematic review aims to assess the impact of spin on the impressions and/or interpretation of research findings among healthcare professionals and decision makers involved in health-related decision-making and to evaluate interventions/strategies designed to reduce the influence of spin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) and the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) will be searched from their inceptions to 27 January 2026. Randomised controlled trials evaluating the impact of spin on participants&rsquo; impressions and/or interpretation of research findings, as well as trials assessing the effect of interventions/strategies on the recognition and interpretation of spin, will be considered. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment with the Cochrane RoB2 tool will be performed independently by multiple reviewers. Where sufficient data are available, meta-analyses will be conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this study is based on a review of publicly available literature, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at international conferences and press releases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>INPLASY202620006.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bae, I., Choi, S., Ryu, S., Park, H., Kim, M., Lee, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117998</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117998</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of 'spin on medical decision-making among healthcare professionals and other health-related decision makers: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117998</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117998</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118024?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What should be discussed when considering an induction of labour? A UK-wide, multi-centre Delphi study to develop a core information set for induction of labour]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118024?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop a core information set for induction of labour. Rates of induction of labour for childbirth are rising in many high-income countries. In England, a third of women have their labours induced. National guidelines recommend women receive information to make informed decisions about induction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Two-stage consensus study using modified Delphi.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Pregnant people, parents and professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Stage 1: A long list of information points was identified through a systematic review of reviews, reviewing patient leaflets, qualitative interviews and a stakeholder survey, with ongoing patient, public and professional involvement. Stage 2: Think-aloud interviews were undertaken to refine the Delphi survey before a two-round modified Delphi process where participants voted on the importance of the information items. Pre-specified criteria were used to select items taken forward to a consensus meeting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>199 information points were identified through systematic review (110), patient information leaflets (162), qualitative interviews (58) and a survey (93). 46 unique information items entered the first Delphi round after four think-aloud interviews, 2 items were added following round 2. 368 people (310 parents/58 professionals) participated in round 1 and 177 people (154 parents/23 professionals) in round 2. 44 items met inclusion criteria; one item excluded, and three items were carried forward for consensus meeting discussion where 12 overarching information points were agreed on.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study has established a consensus-based core information set for induction of labour from a sample of the birthing population and staff providing their care. The resultant set has been populated with evidence in line with national guidelines. It can be used by women and clinicians as a standardised starting point from which to personalise discussions about birth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>COMET Initiative registration 2600: Developing a core information set for induction of labour.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bunni, E., Kingdon, C., Bradley, V., Hunt, A., Mahdi, A., Axcell, T., Jagadish, R., Fox, S., ODair, M., Simms, C., Munn, Y. T., Bonnett, L., Greenfield, B., Cunningham, C., Holt, S., Burden, C., Ficquet, J., Otero-Romero, E., Parry-Smith, W., Black, M., Merriel, A., On behalf of the Options Collaborative Group, Lawlor, Smith, Norman, Heron, Kenny, Lawton, McGuinness, Davies, Lavender, Ives, Grant, Abdel-Fattah, Bakhbakhi, Wilson, Freeman, Birchenall, Johnson, Maden, Marshall, Sharp, Weeks, Johnstone, Taufik, Anand, White, Rosca, Kenyon, Dewhurst]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118024</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118024</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What should be discussed when considering an induction of labour? A UK-wide, multi-centre Delphi study to develop a core information set for induction of labour]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118024</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118024</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118130?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Policy monitoring indexes targeting non-communicable diseases: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118130?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cost-effective and feasible policy actions to prevent non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are identified, for example, WHO&rsquo;s Best buys. Monitoring implementation of policy action can be a key indicator of progress in NCD prevention. Several policy monitoring indices have been developed to assess policies targeting NCDs. The objective of this scoping review is to map and synthesise scientific publications and relevant grey literature reporting on the design, characteristics and use of such indexes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The scoping review will follow Johanna Briggs Institute guidance and reporting will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews. We will search eight databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Global Health, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus and FRANCIS) from 1 January 2013 onwards for eligible observational, quasi-experimental and mixed-methods studies in any language and reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews. Criteria for studies to be included are as follows: Population&mdash;any composite index designed to monitor the implementation of NCD relevant policies; Concept&mdash;monitoring, that is, the systematic collection, analysis and use of data targeting the implementation of policies aimed at reducing the prevalence of major NCDs and/or related behavioural risk factors; Context&mdash;national and/or supranational government-initiated policies implemented within the WHO European region. Conceptual-only papers, commentaries, conference abstracts, editorials and letters will be excluded. Screening and data extraction will be done in duplicate. Results will be synthesised narratively using descriptive statistics and visuals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required because the review does not involve primary data collection or direct interaction with human participants. The review is part of the Joint Action PreventNCD project, co-funded by the European Commission and involving 25 European countries. It will contribute to the project&rsquo;s objectives of advancing monitoring systems for NCDs and behavioural risk factors. We plan to disseminate findings at international conferences and to publish the full review in an international peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bjornara, H. B., Flodgren, G. M., Helleve, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118130</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118130</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Policy monitoring indexes targeting non-communicable diseases: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118130</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118130</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118633?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gambling trajectories among sexual and gender minority individuals in Canada: protocol for a 5-year mixed-methods longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118633?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Gambling encompasses all activities that involve betting or wagering money. It is highly prevalent both in Canada and worldwide. While most individuals gamble without experiencing harm, some develop problem gambling, which is associated with serious psychological, relational and financial outcomes. Sexual and gender diversity (SGD) populations experience disproportionately high rates of mental health disorders, although little is known about their gambling trajectories. Knowledge in this regard is mainly based on cross-sectional studies, with no longitudinal evidence being available internationally. This gap in the literature restricts understanding of how problematic gambling emerges and evolves among SGD populations. It also limits the development of prevention and harm reduction strategies tailored to their realities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This five-year longitudinal study will use a mixed-methods explanatory and sequential design in two phases. The first phase is a prospective cohort study. A self-report questionnaire will be administered online via a web panel to Canadian residents who are 18 years of age or older, self-identify as SGD and have gambled at least once in the previous 12 months (n=2500). This survey will be repeated annually over the course of three years to describe respondents&rsquo; gambling habits, model their trajectories and identify factors associated with problematic gambling. The second phase is a descriptive qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with respondents from phase 1 who present problematic gambling (n=40) to explore their experiences and lived realities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This research project has been ethically and scientifically approved by the Research Ethics Committee and by the CIUSSS de l&rsquo;Estrie&mdash;CHUS scientific evaluation committee on November 3, 2025 (reference number: 2026-6060 Trajectoires-JHA-LGBTQ). For all phases of the study, written or verbal consent will be obtained from each participant. A copy of the consent form and contact information will be sent to each participant.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brodeur, M., Legare, A.-A., Morvannou, A., Roberge, P., Loignon, C., Jutras-Aswad, D., Lacasse, A., Dufour, I., Fleury, M.-J., Simon, O., Hudon, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118633</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118633</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gambling trajectories among sexual and gender minority individuals in Canada: protocol for a 5-year mixed-methods longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118633</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118633</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118710?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk factors for recurrent falls in midlife: a prospective cohort study using data from the Health and Employment After Fifty (HEAF) study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118710?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Falls, especially recurrent, cause significant morbidity. Research on falls generally focuses on older adults but patterns of falling may start earlier in life. This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of falls and recurrent falls among late middle-aged community-dwelling adults and identify the socio-demographic, lifestyle and health-related factors associated with recurrent falls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Health and Employment After Fifty (HEAF) study is a longitudinal cohort of men and women aged 50&ndash;64 years recruited in 2013&ndash;14 from across England. At baseline and each of five approximately annual follow-ups, participants reported falls in the preceding year. Participants were categorised as recurrent fallers if they experienced more than one fall on at least two occasions, non-fallers if they never reported a fall, or intermediate fallers otherwise. Multinomial logistic regression explored associations between fall category and potential risk factors, presented as relative risk ratios with 95%CI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 8134 participants, 7051 were eligible for this analysis. The prevalence of any falls ranged from 14&ndash;18% across follow-ups. Overall, 437 (6%) were recurrent fallers, 2738 (39%) intermediate and 3876 (55%) non-fallers. Independent predictors of recurrent falls included female gender, unpartnered, unemployed or retired and lack of home ownership. Health-related factors included obesity, fair/poor self-rated health, depression, poor sleep, slow walking speed and memory problems. The final model correctly classified 60% of participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Recurrent falls in mid-life were relatively common. Both socio-economic and health-related characteristics, alongside female gender, were identified as predictors, suggesting potential targets for early identification and risk mitigation in this age group.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DAngelo, S., Westbury, L., Laskou, F., Walker-Bone, K., Dennison, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118710</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118710</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk factors for recurrent falls in midlife: a prospective cohort study using data from the Health and Employment After Fifty (HEAF) study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118710</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118710</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118725?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of iron dose in maternal multiple micronutrient supplement on perceived side effects, adherence, acceptability and preferences: protocol for a randomised crossover trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118725?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation in pregnancy is recommended by the WHO, with a dose of 60 mg of iron in contexts where anaemia remains a severe public health problem. Iron-containing supplements may cause side effects that affect acceptability and adherence in a dose-response manner. Maternal multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS), which include iron and folic acid plus additional micronutrients, are also recommended in the context of rigorous research, and programmes are considering transitioning from IFA to MMS containing 30 mg of iron. We will evaluate the effect of iron dose in MMS on maternal acceptability, side effects, adherence and preferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) Iron Dose Acceptability Crossover Trial is an individually randomised, quadruple-blind, non-inferiority crossover trial of daily antenatal MMS supplementation formulations that contain 60 mg, 45 mg and 30 mg elemental iron among pregnant women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. A total of 156 pregnant participants will be randomised to a sequence in which they receive each of the three MMS formulations for 1 month. Participants, investigators, outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment sequence. The primary trial outcome is participant-reported acceptability of each MMS formulation, measured on a Likert scale. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include preferred and least preferred formulation, identification of MMS formulation, reported side effects and adherence assessed by pill count. Regression analyses will be used to assess differences between formulations and will account for sequence and period effects of the crossover trial design. Qualitative in-depth interviews from a subsample of participants will be conducted to understand women&rsquo;s perceptions and experiences taking the different MMS formulations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial protocol was approved by Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Ifakara Health Institute IRB, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences IRB, the National Health Research Ethics Sub-Committee and the Tanzania Medicine and Medical Device Authority. Results will be shared through publications and presentations at the local, regional and international levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <A HREF="NCT06069869">NCT06069869</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sudfeld, C. R., Muhihi, A., Sylvetsky, A. C., Metta, E., Brownlee, V. S., Oakley, E. M., Bakari, M., Fawzi, W. W., Kinyogoli, S., Kuiper, J. R., Mugusi, S., Pan, Q., Sando, M. M., Wylie, B. J., Masanja, H., Smith, E. R., Pembe, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118725</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118725</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of iron dose in maternal multiple micronutrient supplement on perceived side effects, adherence, acceptability and preferences: protocol for a randomised crossover trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118725</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118725</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119154?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Short-term intravenous fluids for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (the STRIPE study): protocol for a five-arm randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119154?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is a significant procedural adverse event (AE), occurring in 5&ndash;15% of cases and leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. Aggressive prolonged intravenous (IV) fluid regimens have demonstrated efficacy in reducing PEP in clinical trials. However, these regimens typically involve continuous infusion of IV fluids over 8&ndash;24 hours following ERCP, making them impractical for outpatient settings. Data on shorter hydration protocols are lacking. The STRIPE study aims to address this gap by evaluating short-term peri-procedural IV fluid regimens as a practical alternative for mitigating PEP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This proof-of-concept, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial will evaluate the impact of various short-term IV fluid regimens on post-ERCP serum amylase levels, a surrogate marker for PEP. Participants undergoing ERCP will be randomised into five groups, receiving 500 mL, 1000 mL, 1500 mL, 2000 mL or 2500 mL of IV Ringer&rsquo;s lactate during the peri-procedural period. Patients, endoscopists and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation during the peri-procedural period. The primary outcome is the serum amylase level 24 hours post-ERCP. Secondary outcomes include PEP, 30-day AEs and unplanned healthcare encounters including those related to volume overload or cardiovascular AEs, duration of hospitalisation (for inpatients), death within 30 days and other relevant laboratory markers at 24 hours. A total of 505 participants (101 in each arm) will be enrolled to ensure adequate power after accounting for attrition and/or sample loss.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 7 February 2024. The study was approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (REB23-0625). On study completion, data will be made available on reasonable request to the corresponding author after completion of the study. Study dissemination and knowledge translation is planned via presentations at scholarly meetings, publications in peer-reviewed journals and, ideally, via adoption of results into clinical practice guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06260878">NCT06260878</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forbes, N., Guo, H., Kruk, A., Ficaccio, S., Cartwright, S., Howarth, M., Malik, G., Nietert, P. J., Smith, Z. L., Li, S., Chen, Y.-I., Causada Calo, N., Tse, F., Telford, J. J., Cook, D. J., Hill, M. D., Elmunzer, B. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119154</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119154</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Short-term intravenous fluids for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (the STRIPE study): protocol for a five-arm randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119154</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating stroke recognition and prehospital quality metrics in emergency dispatch: a retrospective cohort study comparing mimics and confirmed strokes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Accurate identification of acute stroke by the Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC) is essential for timely treatment and efficient resource use. However, stroke mimics&mdash;conditions resembling stroke can often lead to overtriage, complicating emergency care. We aimed to quantify EMDC stroke overtriage and compare characteristics of stroke mimics with confirmed stroke cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Patients with suspected stroke identified by the EMDC in Western Norway between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 8,261 patients with EMDC suspected stroke were included. Stroke suspicion was determined using the Norwegian Medical Priority Dispatch System, which includes 11 stroke-related criteria. The study population was stratified into stroke mimics (non-stroke diagnosis) and confirmed strokes (transient ischaemic attack, acute ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage discharge diagnosis) at hospital discharge. Data collected included dispatch codes, prehospital time metrics and hospital discharge diagnoses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Outcomes of interest were the positive predictive value (PPV) of stroke identification based on EMDC dispatch criteria, the association between specific dispatch criteria and confirmed stroke and differences in prehospital time metrics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 8,261 patients with an ambulance dispatch due to EMDC suspicion of stroke, only 1181 (14.3%) were confirmed strokes, resulting in a PPV of 14.3% (95% CI 13.6% to 15.1%). Five dispatch criteria&mdash;breathing problems, acute vertigo, hemianopsia, ataxia/confusion and headache&mdash;had stroke mimic rates exceeding 90%. The FAST (Face-Arm-Speech-Time) criteria were significantly associated with confirmed stroke after adjusting for age and sex (OR 3.55, 95% CI 1.55 to 8.07). EMS response times were similar between groups (median 10 min (IQR 7&ndash;14) vs 9 min (IQR 6&ndash;14); p=0.47), whereas stroke mimics had significantly longer on-scene times (median 16 min (IQR 9&ndash;24) vs 10 min (IQR 7&ndash;16); p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>EMDC stroke dispatch criteria demonstrated low PPV, reflecting substantial overtriage due to stroke mimics at the earliest stage of emergency assessment. FAST-based criteria were associated with improved discrimination for confirmed stroke. Confirmed stroke cases had shorter EMS on-scene times, suggesting more streamlined prehospital management. These findings highlight the operational impact of stroke mimics on emergency services and the need to refine dispatch strategies. Because sensitivity could not be assessed, overall diagnostic performance remains uncertain, and future studies should include all stroke presentations to evaluate system-level accuracy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leto, N., Farbu, E., Barach, P., Bjorshol, C. A., Kurz, M., Ajmi, S., Fromm, A., Kalhagen Bjerkvig, C., Lindner, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119267</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119267</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating stroke recognition and prehospital quality metrics in emergency dispatch: a retrospective cohort study comparing mimics and confirmed strokes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119267</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119795?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Moving from mechanisms to clinical practice: non-invasive spinal cord stimulation for recovery of autonomic functions after spinal cord injury - a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119795?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs autonomic functions, which are ranked among the highest priorities for recovery. The loss of autonomic control, including bowel, bladder, sexual and cardiovascular functions, interferes with rehabilitation and decreases health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Preliminary evidence indicates that non-invasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TCSCS) has the potential to improve autonomic stability in people with SCI. However, the optimal stimulation site for improving autonomic responses remains to be determined. This pilot randomised clinical trial aims to explore the efficacy of non-invasive mid-thoracic and lumbosacral TCSCS (proof-of-concept) for blood pressure stability (orthostatic hypotension and autonomic dysreflexia burden) alongside end-organ autonomic functions (lower urinary tract, bowel and sexual function) and HRQoL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>30 participants with chronic (&gt;1 year) motor-complete SCI (American Spinal Injuries Association Impairment Scale A and B) at or above T6 will be enrolled in this open-label, two-arm randomised pilot clinical trial. Participants will be block randomised into either the mid-thoracic or lumbosacral TCSCS group. Participants will then undergo 8 weeks of TCSCS (3 times per week for 60 min; 24 sessions total) while in a seated position. Post-treatment effects will be recorded following the 8-week intervention and follow-up effects will be recorded 8 weeks after the end of the intervention. Primary and secondary outcomes will assess resting blood pressure, autonomic dysreflexia, orthostatic hypotension and lower urinary tract, bowel and sexual functions as well as HRQoL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study is approved by The University of British Columbia&rsquo;s Clinical Research Ethics Board (UBC CREB H22-00365), and by Health Canada for Investigational Testing Authorisations (ITA) for Class II medical devices used in this trial (ITA#346875 TESCoN; ITA#381 154 SCONE). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, seminars and SCI community outreach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05369520">NCT05369520</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malik, R. N., Sobeeh, M. G., Maharaj, A. L., Shackleton, C., Hosseinzadeh, A., Saloojee, M., Khavandegar, A., Kontaxakis, A., Thordarson, T., Chang, C., Balthazaar, S. J. T., Williams, A. M. M., Lam, T., Ghuman, A., Anderson, K., Elliott, S. L., Berger, M. J., Samejima, S., Sachdeva, R., Krassioukov, A. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119795</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119795</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Moving from mechanisms to clinical practice: non-invasive spinal cord stimulation for recovery of autonomic functions after spinal cord injury - a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119795</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119795</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120048?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pragmatic trial assessing polygenic risk driven statin therapy for cardiovascular disease prevention: study protocol for the EE-PRS trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120048?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) continues to be a leading cause of preventable death globally. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer a way to detect individuals at higher relative risk of developing ASCVD, but they have not yet been incorporated into routine clinical practice. Pragmatic trials offer a way to evaluate the integration of PRS into cardiovascular disease prevention in primary care, allowing for a more accurate assessment of their effectiveness in everyday clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This trial evaluates the effectiveness of preventive statin treatment on reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events and death over 5 years in women (aged 55&ndash;80) and men (aged 45&ndash;80) with a high coronary artery disease PRS. This is a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, randomised clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio to intervention (n=1350), receiving preventive rosuvastatin 20 mg treatment or control (n=1350), receiving current standard of care. Following the intention-to-treat principle, all randomised participants are analysed according to their allocated group, with the primary outcome defined as time to first major adverse cardiovascular event, comprising ischaemic heart disease, stroke or transient ischaemia, peripheral vascular occlusion and stenosis, revascularisation or cardiovascular death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial has received ethical approval from the Estonian Committee on Bioethics and Human Research (13.06.2024 nr 1.1-12/1531) and the Estonian Ethics Committee for Medicinal Products (19.12.2024 nr RKU-4/92).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06820086">NCT06820086</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Voit, A., Elken, A., Viigimaa, M., Kalda, R., Fischer, K., Toompere, K., Irs, A., Milani, L., Alavere, H., Pajusalu, S., Org, E., Alloja, J., Kaarna, K., Ju&#x0308;risson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-120048</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-120048</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pragmatic trial assessing polygenic risk driven statin therapy for cardiovascular disease prevention: study protocol for the EE-PRS trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e120048</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e120048</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102059?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Voice-assisted artificial intelligence in cardiovascular disease management: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102059?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, with self-management playing a pivotal role in improving outcomes. Voice-assisted artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as virtual assistants and voice-controlled applications have emerged as innovative tools for healthcare delivery. While the technologies show promise in areas like primary prevention and chronic disease management, their effectiveness in supporting self-management for patients with CVD remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the impact of voice-assisted AI technologies on CVD self-management, specifically focusing on cardiovascular-related mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adherence to lifestyle modifications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. A comprehensive search will be performed across databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), from 2010 to 2025. The review will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and observational studies that evaluate voice-assisted AI interventions (eg, voice-controlled fitness apps, smart health assistants) aimed at CVD self-management. The primary outcome will be cardiovascular-related mortality. Secondary outcomes will include HRQoL, clinical outcomes (eg, high blood pressure), lipid profiles (eg, cholesterol and glucose levels) and lifestyle modifications (eg, dietary habits and levels of physical activity). Data management and analysis will be conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software V.2.0. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. The meta-analysis will use random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using <I>Q</I> and <I>I</I>&sup2; statistics. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression will be conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No formal ethical assessment is required, as this study involves analysis of publicly available secondary data. Findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and media coverage to inform healthcare providers, policymakers and patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024568702.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Issaka, A., Maddison, R., Lamaro Haintz, G., Shariful Islam, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102059</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102059</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Voice-assisted artificial intelligence in cardiovascular disease management: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102059</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102059</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104566?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unravelling the diversity of pacing behaviours in adults with chronic conditions: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104566?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to (1) examine if activity fluctuations over 1 week differ between two groups: individuals who have received fatigue management advice versus those who have not, (2) examine the associations between activity fluctuations and fatigue, engagement in pacing, perceived risk of overactivity, quality of life, self-regulation and physical activity (PA) and if they differ for the two groups and (3) explore whether there are distinct pacing patterns across the week in adults with chronic conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Exploratory cross-sectional observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Participants were recruited from a fatigue management clinic in the UK and through university networks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>29 adults with chronic conditions who experience fatigue (18 received fatigue management advice; 11 did not).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was activity fluctuations (SD of accelerometer-derived vector magnitude counts per minute), measured using the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT over 7 consecutive days. Secondary outcomes included fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale), engagement in activity pacing, perceived risk of overactivity, quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Instrument), self-regulation of PA (Physical Activity Self-Regulation scale) and self-reported PA (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short form).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No difference in activity fluctuations during the day was found between groups. Associations between self-regulation of PA and device-based PA with activity fluctuations significantly differed between groups (respectively, standardised regression (&beta;)=1686.14; p=0.006 and &beta;=288.83; p=0.042). Five distinct activity pacing patterns were identified through visual inspection of individual activity profiles: (1) high fluctuations in the morning, (2) high fluctuations in the afternoon, (3) high fluctuations at two time points, (4) consistent pacing pattern and (5) varied pacing patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Individuals who received fatigue management advice demonstrated significant associations between activity fluctuations and self-regulation, suggesting a goal-directed approach, which could indicate that tailored support and goal setting could help in balancing rest and activity. This study also identified five distinct activity pacing patterns in individuals with chronic conditions, emphasising the need for tailored fatigue management instead of a &lsquo;one-size-fits-all&rsquo; approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06001970">NCT06001970</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barakou, I., Seves, B. L., Abonie, U., Finch, T., Hackett, K., Hettinga, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104566</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104566</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unravelling the diversity of pacing behaviours in adults with chronic conditions: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104566</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104566</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105800?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-management experiences and needs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105800?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To systematically review qualitative studies on the self-management experiences and needs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to provide evidence for developing needs-based self-management intervention strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-aggregation of qualitative studies conducted in accordance with the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research statement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Database and CBM were searched from database inception to March 2025 for qualitative studies on COPD self-management experiences and needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Qualitative studies involving adults (&ge;18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD that reported patients&rsquo; real feelings, experiences and needs during the self-management process in any setting (hospital, community or home). Studies were excluded if the full text could not be obtained or data were incomplete, if they were duplicate publications or if they were not published in Chinese or English.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, extracted data using a standardised form and assessed methodological quality using the 2016 Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Findings (participants&rsquo; quotations and authors&rsquo; interpretive statements) were synthesised using a JBI meta-aggregation approach to develop categories and overarching synthesised findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>15 qualitative studies were included, comprising 251 patients with COPD. A total of 52 findings were identified, grouped into 13 categories and synthesised into 4 overarching findings: (1) physical symptom burden strongly shapes psychological well-being during COPD self-management; (2) patients face multiple and interrelated barriers to effective self-management; (3) some patients develop active coping strategies and self-management resources; and (4) patients express multidimensional and continuing support needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients with COPD experience substantial physical and psychological distress and face multiple challenges in the self-management process. Healthcare professionals should prioritise patients&rsquo; lived experiences, establish comprehensive and coordinated support systems and develop diversified, needs-based intervention strategies to address patients&rsquo; multidimensional needs, thereby enhancing self-management capacity and improving quality of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024607051.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Y., Zeng, H., Hongmin, R., Yang, N. N., Cheng, C. L., Liu, R., Luo, L. W., Jimei, L., Lina, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105800</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105800</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-management experiences and needs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105800</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105800</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107759?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family caregivers experience in the provision of palliative care for adult cancer patients in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107759?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In many low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), palliative care services are limited and much of the care for adults with advanced cancer is provided by family caregivers. This review aims to explore the family caregiver experience in providing palliative care to adult patients with cancer in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This qualitative systematic review will be conducted using a comprehensive search strategy on PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO without language or date restrictions. The COnnecting REpositories (CORE) database of the Open University will be searched for grey literature. Review questions will follow the PICo framework (Population, Phenomena of Interest and Context). Qualitative or mixed-method studies on the experience of family caregivers of adult patients with cancer (above 18 years) receiving palliative care in LMICs will be included. Study quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. Findings will be synthesised using meta-aggregation or with a narrative synthesis if pooling is not feasible. The review process will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence and will be reported according to the ENhancing Transparency in REporting the synthesis of Qualitative research (ENTREQ) framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is required as the study involves secondary data analysis of published literature. Ethical principles of accurate reporting and transparency will be upheld. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed open-access journals and presented at academic conferences. Recommendations will be shared with policymakers and healthcare organisations responsible for the provision of palliative care for patients with cancer in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251010556.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karunarathna, K., Uduwela, V. R., Godage, G., Isuruni, Y., Seneviwickrama, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107759</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107759</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family caregivers experience in the provision of palliative care for adult cancer patients in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107759</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107759</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108154?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge about the health impact of indoor air pollution and associated factors among mothers in northeastern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108154?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study was designed to determine the level of knowledge about the health impact of indoor air pollution (IAP) and associated factors among mothers in northeastern Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out from May to June 2024. A systematic sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Using a pretested and structured questionnaire, data were gathered through interviews. The collected data were entered into EpiData V.4.6 and SPSS V.25 was used for the analysis. The adjusted OR with a 95% CI and the significance of associations at p<I>&lt;</I>0.05 were determined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in northeastern Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 401 mothers participated in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome is the prevalence of good knowledge about the health impact of IAP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>With a response rate of 95%, 401 mothers in all completed the survey. Of the participants, 205 (51.1%) were aged &le;31 years. In this study, 46.4% (95% CI 41.6 to 51.4) of the 401 participants had good knowledge about the health impact of IAP. Higher educational level (adjusted OR (AOR): 4.4, 95% CI 2.38 to 8.14), higher income (AOR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.06) and receiving training (AOR: 2.72, 95% CI 1.14 to 6.46) were factors associated with having good knowledge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study concluded that less than half of the mothers had good knowledge about the health impact of IAP. The findings of this study highlight the critical need for policymakers to address the inadequate understanding among mothers of the health impact of IAP. Thus, the health education programme on IAP should be strengthened through effective community engagement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natnael, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108154</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108154</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge about the health impact of indoor air pollution and associated factors among mothers in northeastern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108154</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108626?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Differential treatment effects across subgroups in immunomodulatory drugs for sepsis: protocol for a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108626?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, may benefit from immunomodulatory drugs. Nevertheless, numerous clinical trials of these drugs have failed to demonstrate efficacy, partly due to substantial heterogeneous treatment responses. Subgroup analyses from these trials are frequently employed to investigate different treatment effects across subgroups. However, which drugs might have different effects across subgroups and how credible these findings are have not been well summarised and evaluated. Additionally, the differences in the characteristics and results of subgroup analyses based on whether the primary trial&rsquo;s main effect is statistically significant remain unclear. We will conduct a systematic review to comprehensively address these questions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating immunomodulatory drugs for adult sepsis and exclude quasi-randomised trials, single-arm studies, animal research, conference abstracts, study protocols and non-English publications. To comprehensively search for subgroup analyses, we will search both RCTs and their published secondary analyses across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library from their inception. Four reviewers will independently screen eligible studies and only one subgroup analysis will be selected for data extraction using standardised forms. The credibility of subgroup effects will be assessed using the Instrument for assessing the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses. We will analyse the proportion and characteristics of subgroup analyses reported in trials. We will qualitatively summarise the results of subgroup analyses, focusing on findings with a subgroup-specific p value&lt;0.05 or an interaction p value&lt;0.05. If two or more studies examined the same drug within a subgroup, we will perform data synthesis using a random-effects model to estimate pooled subgroup effects. We will compare the differences based on whether the primary trial&rsquo;s main effect was statistically significant using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, <sup>2</sup> test or Fisher&rsquo;s exact test, as appropriate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is required because the data we will use do not include individual patient data. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251089737.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ding, L., Bai, C., Jian, L., Hu, D., Xiong, J., Zhang, Z., He, Q., Wang, Y., Xu, J., Ge, L., Wang, W., Sun, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108626</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108626</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Differential treatment effects across subgroups in immunomodulatory drugs for sepsis: protocol for a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108626</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108626</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110635?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Individual and spousal weight trajectories and their associations with health-related quality of life: a longitudinal population-based cohort from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (2001-2018)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110635?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Although the association between obesity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is well-documented, studies on the association between weight trajectories and HRQoL among spouses are limited. This longitudinal study aimed to characterise distinct body mass index (BMI) trajectories and their association with HRQoL at individual and spousal levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The total sample of 773 couples was followed for an average of 15 years. Univariate group&ndash;based trajectory models and multi-trajectory group&ndash;based models were used to identify latent classes of individual and couple BMI trajectories, respectively. Linear regression analyses were applied to investigate the associations between identified BMI trajectories and HRQoL at the individual level and at the spousal level, where spousal HRQoL refers to the association between both partners&rsquo; BMI trajectories and each individual&rsquo;s HRQoL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Based on BMI changes over the life course, four trajectories were identified in wives and husbands at both individual and couple levels, ranging from stable healthy weight to progressively increasing overweight and obesity, with all trajectories showing an overall rise in BMI with age. In the fully adjusted model, compared with wives in the mild progressive overweight group, the mean score of physical HRQoL in women in the progressive obesity group (&beta;=&ndash;2.14, p=0.02) and severe progressive obesity group (&beta;=&ndash;2.55, p=0.03) was significantly lower. Moreover, compared with husbands with stable healthy weight status, those in the progressive obesity group had lower physical HRQoL (&beta;=&ndash;2.67, p=0.02). At the spousal level, lower physical HRQoL was observed in individuals whose BMI trajectories, together with their partner&rsquo;s trajectory, indicated higher risk (eg, wives with severe progressive obesity and husbands with stable overweight) compared with couples with both partners in lower-risk BMI trajectories (&beta;=&ndash;3.61, p=0.01). A similar effect was observed only in severe progressive obese women whose husbands were of stable healthy weight during their lifespan. None of the BMI trajectories at either individual or spousal levels affected mental HRQoL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our findings indicate a significant effect of individuals&rsquo; BMI patterns on the physical domain of HRQoL. Spousal HRQoL associations reflect how both partners&rsquo; BMI trajectories are jointly associated with individual HRQoL. Clinically, these results highlight the potential importance of early weight management, particularly in women, in relation to long-term physical HRQoL and possible benefits for both partners. Further investigation is required to assess the role of potential confounders in BMI&ndash;HRQoL associations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naseri, P., Amiri, P., Cheraghi, L., Zareie Shab Khaneh, A., Azizi, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110635</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110635</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Individual and spousal weight trajectories and their associations with health-related quality of life: a longitudinal population-based cohort from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (2001-2018)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110635</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110635</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110800?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How continuing professional education interventions enhance the uptake of evidence-based practices among oncology nurses: a realist review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110800?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Oncology nurses are pivotal to delivering high-quality cancer care; yet, the uptake of evidence-based practices (EBPs) remains inconsistent. Though continuing professional education is widely used to support EBP uptake, persistent gaps remain, likely driven by the intricate and interrelated mechanisms that unfold differently across individual, organisational and system contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To understand how, why, for whom and under what conditions continuing professional education interventions enhance (or fail to enhance) the uptake of EBPs among oncology nurses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This realist review will adhere to the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards methodological standards. The Theoretical Domains Framework will guide the exploration of potential mechanisms. 33 initial programme theories, developed from the Theoretical Domains Framework, prior reviews, expert input and consultations with interested parties working in oncology (eg, oncology nurses, managers), will be refined through systematic searches (CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Google Scholar). These initial programme theories represent hypothesised Context-Mechanism-Outcomes Configurations that may influence the uptake of EBPs among oncology nurses. Eligible peer-reviewed and grey literature from high-income countries in English or French will be screened in duplicate. Data will be coded deductively and inductively in MaxQDA and synthesised into Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations. These configurations will be reviewed in collaboration with interested parties.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Findings will be disseminated through open-access, peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Key stakeholders, including various professional associations (eg, the Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology and the International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care), will be actively engaged to ensure the clinical relevance of the findings and to maximise their translation into nursing practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251133710.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vinette, B., Fontaine, G., Auger, L.-P., Quaiattini, A., Thomas, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110800</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110800</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How continuing professional education interventions enhance the uptake of evidence-based practices among oncology nurses: a realist review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110800</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110800</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111299?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and associations with psychological distress and quality of life among medical students in Egypt: a multicentre cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111299?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterised by obsessive thoughts and compulsive actions. These obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) are subclinical manifestations that do not meet the full diagnostic criteria for OCD and are associated with anxiety, depression and lower quality of life (QoL). Medical students are vulnerable to developing OCS due to stress in medical school. This study assessed OCS prevalence and its association with the mental well-being and QoL of medical students in Egypt.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method(s)</st>
<p>A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted across 15 Egyptian medical schools. Using convenience sampling, 1850 students participated by completing a self-administered questionnaire that used validated scales. We assessed OCS with the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) using a screening cut-off of &ge;21, QoL with the Quality-of-Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-QSF), and anxiety and depression with the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were employed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Clinically significant OCS prevalence among medical students was 51.1%. Significant predictors for OCS included being female (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.25), attending a private university (AOR=1.64), and having personal (AOR=2.05) or combined personal and family history of mental illness (AOR=2.69). OCS presence was associated with a lower QoL score (Q-LES-QSF: 41.00 vs 43.97) and higher psychological distress score (PHQ-4: 5.93 vs 3.57) compared with students without OCS (p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>OCS are prevalent among Egyptian medical students, especially females, private university attendees and those with a personal or family history of mental illness. These symptoms are associated with higher psychological distress and a lower QoL. As OCS were identified using a screening cut-off, and given the cross-sectional design, findings should be interpreted cautiously, warranting further longitudinal investigation. Universities should consider implementing mental health support, screening and awareness programmes to address these issues.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaheen, M., Amasha, F. A., Riad, N., Ail, O. M., Morshed, M. I., Ahmed, M., Yasin, A. M., Al-sarhi, Y., Salem, A. S., Sheta, H., OCS team of collaborators, Elsaadany, Bastawi, Abdelwahab, Zaki, Abbas, Ayoub, Hassan, Khedr, Hekal, Sherif, Abo El Seoud, Elba, Mohamed, Abo Al Ezz, Ashosh, Abdo, Samy, Saeed, Gergis, Seddik, Monsef, Elfagal, Elnagdy, Gaber, Osama, Shoaib, ElShabrawy, Abdelkader Mohammed, Massoud]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111299</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111299</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and associations with psychological distress and quality of life among medical students in Egypt: a multicentre cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111299</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111299</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111494?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What is the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enema for Hirschsprung disease during COVID-19 service disruption in Vietnam? A retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111494?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enema for Hirschsprung disease in children when preoperative rectal suction biopsy was unavailable and to examine age-related diagnostic performance and the utility of individual radiographic signs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A high-volume tertiary paediatric surgical centre in Hanoi, Vietnam, during a period of COVID-19 related service disruption from May 2020 to October 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>354 consecutive children aged 0 to under 16 years who underwent contrast enema for suspected Hirschsprung disease. Final diagnosis was established by intraoperative frozen section and postoperative histopathology for operated patients and by clinical follow-up for non-operated patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of contrast enema versus the reference standard, expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with 95% CIs. Secondary outcomes were age-stratified accuracy and the performance of individual radiographic signs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 354 children, contrast enema yielded 131 true positives, 19 false positives, 20 false negatives and 184 true negatives. Overall sensitivity was 86.75% (95% CI 80.43 to 91.26), specificity 90.64% (95% CI 85.85 to 93.93), positive predictive value 87.33% (95% CI 81.06 to 91.74) and negative predictive value 90.20% (95% CI 85.34 to 93.56). Sensitivity was higher in children aged 1 month or less than in those older than 1 month, 96.00% vs 75.71%, whereas specificity was lower, 80.00% vs 97.67%. Of the individual radiographic signs, the inverted rectosigmoid index was the most sensitive, while the irregular mucosal pattern was the most specific.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Contrast enema showed moderate to high diagnostic accuracy for Hirschsprung disease in this biopsy-constrained setting and may be useful as a triage tool within a limited diagnostic pathway. However, its false negative rate indicates that it should not be used as a standalone rule-out test when histological confirmation is available.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tran, Q. A., Pham, H. D., Dang, T. T., Nguyen, L. V. T., Ly, D. B., Nguyen, N. T., Nguyen, H. V., Nguyen, Q. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111494</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111494</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What is the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enema for Hirschsprung disease during COVID-19 service disruption in Vietnam? A retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111494</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111494</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111772?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health system responsiveness and associated factors among outpatients in primary healthcare units in Southern Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111772?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the level of health system responsiveness (HSR) and its associated factors among outpatients attending primary healthcare units (PHCU) in Arba Minch, South Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Facility-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three PHCUs (one primary hospital and two health centres) in Arba Minch town, Southern Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 379 outpatients aged 18 years and above were selected using a systematic random sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>  <I>Primary outcome</I>: level of HSR, measured across seven domains (communication, confidentiality, basic amenities, dignity, choice, prompt attention and autonomy) using a 28-item tool adapted from the WHO HSR framework. <I>Secondary outcome</I>: factors associated with HSR, identified via bivariate and multivariable linear regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall HSR was 59.4%. The highest-performing domains were confidentiality (73.9%) and dignity (70.7%), while the choice of healthcare provider was rated lowest (34.6%). In multivariable linear regression analysis, factors significantly associated with HSR score were travel time to reach the health facility on foot (&beta; = &ndash;0.26, 95% CI &ndash;0.37 to &ndash;0.14); out-of-pocket payment for transport (&beta; = &ndash;6.51, 95% CI &ndash;8.33 to &ndash;4.70); patient satisfaction score (&beta;=1.57, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.88) and perceived quality of healthcare score (&beta;=0.32, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.49).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>HSR among outpatients in PHCU was moderate, with several individual and service-related factors associated with patient experiences. These findings suggest the need for focused interventions to improve responsiveness domains, although more research is required to demonstrate causal relationships.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bezie, H. E., Hailemariam, Z., Glagn, M., Andarge, B. D., Meshesha, T. A., Atlaw, E. W., Worsa, K. T., Degualem, S. M., Atlaw, H. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111772</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111772</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health system responsiveness and associated factors among outpatients in primary healthcare units in Southern Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111772</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111772</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112843?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Decolonising global health through implementation science: defining the path to equity and structural transformation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112843?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Decolonising global health requires rethinking how evidence is generated, valued and applied to address colonial legacies and power imbalances in systems, practices and research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This analysis draws on findings from a scoping review and synthesises existing literature to examine how decolonisation principles can be integrated into implementation science.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We propose three conceptual shifts: (1) Embedding contextually and locally driven intervention approaches, (2) Centring participatory, equity-focused methodologies that redistribute authority and (3) Expanding metrics to capture power, authorship equity, adaptability and legitimacy. These shifts reposition implementation science as a transformative practice supporting structural change.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Operationalising these shifts through policy-aligned, locally led research, equitable mentorship and technologies co-designed with communities provides a practical framework for researchers, funders and policymakers to embed decolonisation into implementation science, ensuring interventions are contextually relevant, equitable and socially just.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehjabeen, D., Patel, K., Jindal, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112843</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112843</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Decolonising global health through implementation science: defining the path to equity and structural transformation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112843</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112843</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113009?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Young adult perspectives on media content related to suicide in South India: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113009?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The important role of responsible media reporting as a low-cost, effective population-level suicide prevention strategy is well documented. However, research into its potential to generate protective effects and how this is perceived by audiences is underexplored in the Indian context. This qualitative study aimed to explore young adults&rsquo; experiences of exposure to current suicide-related and purpose-designed content in the media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This qualitative study was nested within a larger randomised controlled trial. A semi-structured interview guide was designed to explore participant perspectives and experiences regarding exposure to media content.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted with media professionals in Chennai, India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A purposive sample of 20 young adults (10 males, 10 females) participated in the study. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and an inductive-deductive approach to thematic analysis was followed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants shared a range of contrasting experiences related to suicide content in the media and their responses to purpose-designed media content. They reported typical characteristics of current media reporting of suicides involving sensationalism, exaggeration and simplistic assumptions and underscored its impact on mental health. The purpose-designed content elicited a sense of surprise among participants. It stimulated curiosity, improved understanding, challenged misconceptions and instilled hope. In contrast to existing media coverage, they viewed protective content as a valuable means of educating people about recovery and encouraging help-seeking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study uncovers unique insights into how young adults in the Indian context perceive and experience suicide reporting in the media. Our audience research indicates that current reporting styles may have harmful effects, while a more hopeful, recovery-oriented approach could offer significant benefits. These insights can be used to support meaningful collaborations between stakeholders in our efforts to encourage safe and respectful reporting that meets audiences&rsquo; needs to be kept informed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>CTRI/2022/09/045439.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armstrong, G., Kumar, S., Mohanraj, R., Krishnamoorthy, S., Vijayakumar, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113009</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113009</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Young adult perspectives on media content related to suicide in South India: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113009</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113009</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113302?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chronic stroke rehabilitation interventions in primary healthcare settings: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113302?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This scoping review intended to map the existing literature on chronic stroke rehabilitation interventions in primary healthcare (PHC) settings, with a particular focus on intervention dosage&mdash;frequency, intensity, type and duration&mdash;as well as the mode of delivery, which encompasses intervention location, format and provider.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A scoping review was conducted following the guidelines outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A comprehensive search of 16 databases was conducted on the EBSCOhost platform on 10 February 2022. A supplementary Google search was conducted to identify grey literature up to 19 November 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Sources published in English between 2010 and 2022 with full-text availability, addressing interventions for chronic stroke survivors delivered by various stakeholders in PHC, community or home-based settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened the identified sources to determine eligibility for inclusion. Data were extracted independently, compared between reviewers, analysed and synthesised narratively with descriptive statistics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total 34 sources are included in the review, with most (n=28) originating from high-income countries. Interventions predominantly targeted the body function and structure component of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (n=29) through physical exercise (n=21). However, few interventions addressed the activity (n=17) and participation (n=11) components. Contextual factors (n=9) were seldom considered in intervention design. Intervention dosage varied widely. Most interventions were delivered by the multidisciplinary team (n=9) and were provided either at home (n=16) or in the community (n=13). Individual sessions (n=18) were more commonly offered than group sessions (n=8).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The optimal dosage for chronic stroke interventions remains uncertain, and current interventions, along with their modes of delivery, are often misaligned with PHC settings. Further research is essential to establish best practices in both well-resourced and under-resourced environments to address the current evidence gap and to enable the development of effective rehabilitation protocols that meet the needs of chronic stroke survivors and their families in PHC settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naude, C. E., Janse Van Vuuren, C., Smith, R., Jansen, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113302</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113302</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chronic stroke rehabilitation interventions in primary healthcare settings: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113302</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113302</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114273?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Value-based pricing of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Markov modelling study from the US payer perspective]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114273?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to determine the value-based price range at which tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy becomes cost-effective compared with chemotherapy alone for treating advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We constructed a three-state Markov model over a lifetime horizon, following the same protocols in the RATIONALE-306 trial. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>US healthcare system, payer perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome of the model included value-based per-cycle price of tislelizumab at willingness-to-pay thresholds from US$50 000 to US$200 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Secondary outcomes were life years and QALY over life-time horizon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Tislelizumab+chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone followed by second-line paclitaxel in both arms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Tislelizumab resulted in a gain of 0.543 QALYs (95% CI 0.432 to 0.610) and 0.837 life-years (95% CI 0.780 to 0.915) compared with chemotherapy alone. The value-based price of tislelizumab was determined to be US$1575 to US$7160 per cycle when the willingness to pay threshold was set at US$50 000&ndash;US$200 000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the model&rsquo;s robustness at these price points across various model parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study established a value-based price range for tislelizumab in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma treatment using robust economic modelling. These findings can be used to guide payers in coverage decisions and inform pricing negotiations for emerging immunotherapies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdeen, A. A., Ayer, T., Lim, F., Shue, S., Hur, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114273</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114273</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Value-based pricing of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Markov modelling study from the US payer perspective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114273</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114399?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unveiling the burden of long covid in hospital and community settings: findings from the Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Network (PASCNET) cohort study in Italys pandemic epicentre]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114399?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) has emerged as a major public health concern. We aimed to estimate the 1-year incidence of PCC in adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in Lombardy, Italy, comparing community-managed and hospitalised patients and to assess the prognostic value of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) score to support estimation of long-term PCC prevalence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective-prospective observational cohort study enrolling patients infected between 1 March 2020 and 31 December 2022. The study visit was conducted between 16 January and 23 December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Multicentre study involving seven public hospitals and general practitioners across Lombardy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Randomly sampled adults aged 18&ndash;70 years with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hospitalised patients (HP) were admitted for COVID-19; general practitioner patients (GPP) were managed in the community. The total sample comprised: 1162 (546 HP, 616 GPP).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>This is an observational study with no active intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome: 1-year incidence of PCC retrospectively assessed at the study visit.</p>
<p>Secondary outcomes: symptom profiles, long-term PCC prevalence at the study visit and predictive value of the NIH RECOVER score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Median age was 57.1 years in HP and 42.9 years in GPP; 66.1% of HP and 47.7% of GPP were male. PCC developed in 280 patients (223 HP, 57 GPP). The 1-year cumulative incidence was 39.9% in HP (95% CI 35.9% to 44.1%) and 9.1% in GPP (95% CI 7.1% to 11.7%). The NIH RECOVER score was associated with PCC at 1 year (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.21). Model-based long-term PCC prevalence was 31.8% in HP and 6.3% in GPP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PCC remained frequent and heterogeneous, particularly among previously HP. In this cohort, the NIH RECOVER score showed prognostic value for estimating longer-term PCC burden. These findings underscore the need for structured long-term follow-up across both hospital and primary care settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antolini, L., Valsecchi, M. G., Bussi, A., La Piana, G., Pagani, E., Pascarella, M. G., Patroni, A., Pellegrino, I., Pozzi, A., Sorlini, M., Ticozzelli, M., Villa, M., Zappa, M., Russo, A. G., Lucifora, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114399</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114399</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unveiling the burden of long covid in hospital and community settings: findings from the Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Network (PASCNET) cohort study in Italys pandemic epicentre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114399</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114399</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115440?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fun Exercise for Older Adults (FEXO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial on intrinsic capacity, adherence and motivation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115440?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Ageing is associated with declines in physical and cognitive function that increase the risk of disability and dependence. Intrinsic capacity (IC), proposed by the WHO, provides a multidimensional framework to assess health in older adults. This study aims to evaluate whether a multicomponent recreational exercise programme (Fun Exercise for Older Adults (FEXO)) improves IC, motivation and adherence compared with a conventional programme (OTAGO).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A randomised controlled trial with two groups (2:1 ratio) will be conducted among 120 community-dwelling older adults (&ge;60 years). Participants will be randomly assigned to FEXO (intervention) or OTAGO (control). Both programmes will consist of 3 weekly sessions for 14 weeks. Primary outcomes: IC, assessed through validated measures (Short Physical Performance Battery, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Mini-Mental State Examination, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia and sensory evaluation), motivation (BREQ-3) and adherence rate. Secondary outcomes include body composition, cardiovascular parameters, frailty, cognition and resilience (PRIFOR). Data will be analysed using two-way ANOVA (group<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>time) under an intention-to-treat approach. Effect sizes (p&sup2;) and 95% CIs will be reported. Additional analyses (correlation, regression, mediation and moderation) will explore associations and intervention effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera (Ref. CEEI23/487 and CEEI25/639). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. The findings of this study will contribute to improving evidence-based strategies for promoting healthy ageing and will support the development of more engaging and effective exercise interventions for older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This study has been prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: <A HREF="NCT07133568">NCT07133568</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azanon-Nogueira, P., Garcia-Lucas, C., Salvador-Huerta, C., Amer-Cuenca, J. J., Picher Martinez, M., Garcia-Zamora, M., Lison, J. F., Benavent-Caballer, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115440</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115440</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fun Exercise for Older Adults (FEXO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial on intrinsic capacity, adherence and motivation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115440</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115440</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115526?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of community pharmacy in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in minority ethnic groups in the UK including barriers and facilitators: a mixed-methods systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115526?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the role of community pharmacy in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among minority ethnic groups and to identify key barriers and facilitators influencing engagement with pharmacy-based CVD prevention services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review using thematic synthesis to analyse both qualitative data and narratively synthesised quantitative data taking a convergent data synthesis approach. Searches were conducted from inception to 16 October 2024 across CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCOhost), EMBASE (Ovid), PubMed (NLM), Scopus (Elsevier) and Web of Science (Clarivate), supplemented by Google Scholar for grey literature and backward and forward citation tracking to identify additional studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community pharmacy settings across multiple countries, including the UK and international contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Minority ethnic groups accessing community pharmacy services and community pharmacy professionals involved in delivering CVD prevention interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Community pharmacy-based CVD prevention interventions, specifically services addressing CVD risk factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Outcomes comprised qualitative insights, including barriers and facilitators to engagement with community pharmacy-led CVD prevention services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Twenty-three studies met the eligibility criteria. Five overarching themes were identified: trust, systemic barriers, culturally tailored language, cultural and religious influences and family and social networks. Community pharmacies undertook varied CVD-related roles, most commonly CVD screening and diabetes management with additional contributions to smoking cessation, weight and lipid management, health promotion and medication adherence. Community pharmacies showed potential to support CVD prevention among minority ethnic groups. However, engagement was limited by language barriers, cultural beliefs, lack of trust in healthcare providers and organisational constraints such as time pressures and limited training. Facilitators included culturally tailored interventions, language concordance and strong pharmacist-patient relationships.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Evidence from the UK remains limited, highlighting a need for further research into the role of community pharmacy in reducing CVD disparities among minority ethnic groups. International evidence suggests significant potential for pharmacy-based interventions, but improved cultural competence, targeted service design and greater awareness of determinants of equitable healthcare are essential. Future research should focus on optimising culturally responsive pharmacy-led CVD prevention strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024579766.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duley, R. S., Birdi, G. K., Bush, J., Shoaib, A., Taylor, C. J., Connolly, D., Maidment, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115526</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115526</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of community pharmacy in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in minority ethnic groups in the UK including barriers and facilitators: a mixed-methods systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115526</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115526</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115657?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seasonal migration and healthy ageing in China: protocol for the Frigid-Tropical Migratory Population Health (ftMPH) cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115657?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>As populations age and climate variability intensifies, seasonal migration has emerged as a strategy among older adults to reduce exposure to climatic extremes and optimise living conditions. In China, millions of older adults migrate annually between cold northern and tropical southern regions, providing a natural setting to examine the health effects of seasonal migration. The Frigid-Tropical Migratory Population Health (ftMPH) cohort was established to assess the short- and long-term health effects of this migration and the underlying biological, behavioural and social pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The ftMPH cohort is a prospective, dynamic cohort jointly conducted in Heilongjiang (a cold region) and Hainan (a tropical region) in China, with a planned sample size of approximately 26 000 participants. Adults aged &ge;60 years are recruited and classified into four subcohorts: cold-origin seasonal migrants, cold-region residents, tropical-origin seasonal migrants and tropical-region residents. Baseline assessments include questionnaires, clinical examinations, biospecimen collection and environmental exposure measurements. Each migration cycle is assessed at predefined time points spanning the departure and return phases. Migration exposure will be updated longitudinally at each follow-up interval.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is the incidence of major cardiovascular disease events, including non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, stroke and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes include non-cardiovascular mortality, chronic disease events, healthcare utilisation and ageing-related measures. Time-to-event analyses will be performed using Cox proportional hazards models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) will be used to control for baseline confounding, with stabilised weights and covariate balance assessed using standardised mean differences. Longitudinal changes in repeated measures will be analysed using mixed-effects models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of Harbin Medical University (approval No HMUIRB2024029PRE) and the Ethics Review Committee of Hainan Medical University (approval No HYMLL-2025-102). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and policy or technical reports.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The ftMPH cohort is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500102337; registered on 13 May 2025).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guo, J., Tian, J., Han, Y., Yan, S., Jin, C., Chang, X., Wu, X., Song, W., Wang, F., Zhang, B., Ji, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115657</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115657</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seasonal migration and healthy ageing in China: protocol for the Frigid-Tropical Migratory Population Health (ftMPH) cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115657</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115657</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099203corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: Use of ambulatory pathways in emergency general surgery: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099203corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Fox B, Walters M, Pathak S <I>et al.</I> Use of ambulatory pathways in emergency general surgery: a systematic review. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2025;15:e099203. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099203</p>
<p>This article was previously published with an error.</p>
<p>The funding statement missed the MRC funder (grant number: MR/S001751/1).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T03:30:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099203corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099203corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: Use of ambulatory pathways in emergency general surgery: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099203corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099203corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101827?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of teenage pregnancy and associated factors in Uganda: a meta-analysis and systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101827?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Teenage pregnancy is a major public health problem with huge consequences for maternal health and pregnancy outcomes. This calls for a concerted effort from different stakeholders involved in issues of teenagers&rsquo; sexual reproductive health to achieve the SDG target of 2030 on the reduction of maternal mortality. The objective of this systematic review was to estimate the prevalence of teenage pregnancy and its associated factors in Uganda.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Designs</st>
<p>We conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis standards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>After prospective registration (PROSPERO CRD42023486460), a literature search was conducted in PubMed, African Journals Online and Google Scholar in December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>Observational studies that reported the prevalence of teenage pregnancy among teenagers were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Articles were screened for relevance at the title, abstract and full-text levels by multiple reviewers. The quality of studies was independently appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Any discrepancies were resolved by reaching a consensus. The process of extracting data included study information, geographical categorisation, type of studies, population, sample size, results/outcomes and prevalence of teenage pregnancy. The risk of bias was determined by Egger&rsquo;s test. The results were pooled using random-effects models to calculate the prevalence of teenage pregnancy with a CI of 95% and <I>I&sup2;</I> statistic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 918 records screened, 10 studies (4143 participants) were included. The pooled prevalence of teenage pregnancy was 25.5% (95% CI 13.7% to 39.5%; <I>I&sup2;</I>=98.9%), with individual study estimates ranging widely from 3.0% to 56.4%, reflecting substantial heterogeneity across study settings, populations and periods of data collection. Higher estimates were observed in the Central&ndash;Eastern region (31.7%, 95% CI 19.5% to 45.1%). The overall certainty of evidence was rated as very low using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, primarily due to very serious inconsistency across included studies (<I>I&sup2;</I>=98.9%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Pooling studies of mixed quality revealed a slightly higher prevalence of teenage pregnancy in Uganda. This review provides valuable insight for policymakers and healthcare providers in developing interventions and policies to reduce the burden of teenage pregnancy from disadvantaged backgrounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023486460.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aremu, B. A., Afolabi, I. B., Simeon, A. N., Mujeeb, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101827</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101827</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of teenage pregnancy and associated factors in Uganda: a meta-analysis and systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101827</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101827</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107310?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of co-created mental health and life-skill workshops with 12-to-16-year-olds from black and mixed ethnic groups during COVID-19 in the UK: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107310?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted the mental health of young people from minority ethnic communities, yet effective interventions such as mental health psychoeducational workshops, shown to work for other populations, have rarely been offered or investigated among this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This qualitative study examines the impact, challenges and benefits of mental health psychoeducational workshops co-created with and for 12-to-16-year-olds from black and mixed ethnic minority groups in London, UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>12 (8 female: 3 male) black and mixed ethnic minority 12-to-16-year-olds (<I>M</I>=16, SD=1.55 years) currently attending a West London community centre co-created, participated in, and fed back on the impact of five mental health and life-skill workshops through one-on-one semi-structured interviews (<I>M</I>=10 min 8 s, range=3&ndash;16 min), which were transcribed verbatim.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the interviews revealed three superordinate themes, with a total of eight codes clustered: (1) workshop features promoting positive mental health, (2) positive mental health outcomes and (3) workshop features impeding positive mental health outcomes. Overall, young people perceived workshops to have a positive impact on their mental health and helped provide support in coping with the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Study findings highlight the potential benefits and barriers to entry of mental health and life-skill workshops for young people from minority ethnic communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Clinical applications</st>
<p>Community-based and co-produced workshops were perceived as beneficial to mental health by Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic young people, warranting greater consideration and implementation in practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pomfret, I., Wong, K. K.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107310</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107310</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of co-created mental health and life-skill workshops with 12-to-16-year-olds from black and mixed ethnic groups during COVID-19 in the UK: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107310</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107310</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108215?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the association between medication, patient-specific factors and delirium in hospitalised patients: a 10-year retrospective, population-based cohort study in Iceland]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108215?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to identify potential significant statistical associations between the development of delirium, medication and several other patient-specific factors across a 10-year retrospective longitudinal real-world dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective, population-based cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The National University Hospital of Iceland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients&ge;18 years hospitalised between 2010 and 2020.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was a diagnosis of delirium within 2 years of a patient filling a prescription for a specific medication. The exposure was pre-admission medication use or a pre-existing condition. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of hospital stay, readmission rate and frequency of additional delirium diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 85 942 admissions and readmissions were included in the dataset, which comprised 1066 variables. The cohort comprised 55 495 patients (51.5% male) with a median [IQR] age of 71 years [58, 82]. Throughout the study, 3533 patients were diagnosed with delirium at least once over the 10-year study period. A statistically significant association (<sup>2</sup> test, <I>p</I>&lt;0.001) between the delirium (n=3533) and the non-delirium group (n=51 926) was identified for hyperpolypharmacy (&ge;10 medications), prescribed proton pump inhibitors, opioids, beta-lactam antibiotics, anticoagulants, statins and selective beta-blockers. Delirium was associated with an extended hospital stay, an increased readmission rate and increased mortality. No significant statistical association was found between delirium and the use of tricyclic antidepressants (p=0.121), nor with the presence of type I diabetes (p=0.216). On an annual average, the prevalence of patients who had obtained a delirium diagnosis within the previous year and were subsequently diagnosed again with delirium during their admission was 25.7%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Numerous medications and other patient-specific risk factors have been identified, which underlines the complexity of delirium development. To strengthen patient safety and hinder the development of delirium, an increased emphasis is needed to review medication use and improve our understanding of medication risk associated with delirium cause, treatment and prevention. Specific prescribing/deprescribing advice should be developed to inform prescribing practice and patient safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weidmann, A. E., Schintler, J. A., Stauffer, R., Sigurthsson, M. I., Jonsdottir, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108215</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108215</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the association between medication, patient-specific factors and delirium in hospitalised patients: a 10-year retrospective, population-based cohort study in Iceland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108215</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110023?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does a protocolised oxygenation target impact clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit across the 10 academic and community hospitals in the UCHealth system? Protocol and statistical analysis plan for an EHR-embedded pragmatic stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110023?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>We designed the Optimising Care in Critically Ill at the UCHealth by Liberalising the Target O<SUB>2</SUB> in Mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) Patients to determine the effectiveness of a multimodal educational and electronic health record order panel intervention in limiting occult hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation by targeting a prespecified oxygen saturation (S<SUB>p</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB> 90%&ndash;96%) range.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This trial is a pragmatic electronic health record-embedded, multisite, cluster-randomised, stepped-wedge implementation of a multimodal educational and electronic health record order panel intervention aimed at achieving a standardised intermediate target range of S<SUB>p</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB> (90%&ndash;96%) or partial pressure of oxygen (P<SUB>a</SUB>O<SUB>2</SUB> 60&ndash;100 mm Hg) in mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to the ICU across a 10 hospital health system that includes a large academic centre and smaller community hospitals.</p>
<p>The primary endpoint is ventilator-free days to day 30, defined as the number of days alive and not receiving support through invasive mechanical ventilation following the first initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation in a participating ICU during the hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes include a variety of clinical endpoints: hospital-free days to day 30, all-cause mortality to day 90, need for supplemental oxygen at discharge and incidence of occult hypoxaemia and hypoxaemia. We will analyse primary and secondary endpoints using a mixed effects modelling framework, with specific distributions chosen depending on the type of outcome (eg, binary, count, ordinal, time-to-event).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Research is performed under a waiver of informed consent for minimal-risk research, as approved by Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (24-0065). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06501118">NCT06501118</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sottile, P. D., Mikkelsen, M. E., Peterson, R. A., Mcgrath, M., Carlson, N., Higgins, C., Clinton, M. I., Barbour, A., Kautz, S. V., Kwan, B. M., West, S., Ginde, A. A., Aggarwal, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110023</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110023</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does a protocolised oxygenation target impact clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit across the 10 academic and community hospitals in the UCHealth system? Protocol and statistical analysis plan for an EHR-embedded pragmatic stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110023</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110023</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between difficulties navigating the French healthcare system and healthcare utilisation: results from the National Health Literacy Survey (HLS19)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the association between navigational health literacy (HL), defined as the skills required to effectively navigate healthcare systems, access services and make informed decisions and healthcare utilisation among French adults with and without chronic health conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional online survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>National survey conducted in metropolitan France as part of the Health Literacy Survey (HLS<SUB>19</SUB>) in 2020 and 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 2 003 individuals were included: 1103 without chronic condition and 900 with at least one chronic condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes measures</st>
<p>Number of general practitioner (GP) and specialist visits in the previous 12 months</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The chronic condition group reported more frequent GP (4.3 vs 2.1/year) and specialist (2.8 vs 1.1/year) visits than the no chronic condition group. A high navigational HL was significantly associated with fewer GP (p=0.016) and specialist visits (p&lt;0.001) only in the latter group. Other significant variables were age, gender, financial difficulties, self-reported health status and activity limitations. Younger persons and men reported fewer visits while those with poorer health and activity limitations reported more visits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>High navigational HL was associated with less healthcare utilisation in individuals with no chronic condition. Among the chronic condition group, this aspect seemed less influential, likely due to greater healthcare system familiarity and structured care. Our findings highlight the importance of strengthening HL navigation skills early to improve healthcare use.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Touzani, R., Rouquette, A., Allaire, C., Hardouin, J.-B., Mancini, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between difficulties navigating the French healthcare system and healthcare utilisation: results from the National Health Literacy Survey (HLS19)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110648?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicentre prospective cohort study to develop and validate a machine learning-based model for predicting 6-month all-cause mortality in elderly patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110648?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has an unpredictable clinical course, causing difficulties in short-term mortality prediction, overtreatment and delayed palliative care. Existing prediction models are limited and lack applicability to Chinese elderly patients with advanced COPD. Given the heavy disease burden and limited palliative care in China, we designed this multicentre cohort study to develop a 6-month mortality prediction model for elderly patients with advanced COPD to aid risk stratification, timely palliative care and efficient healthcare resource allocation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Patient recruitment has been ongoing since May 2024 and will be completed by December 2026, with a 12-month follow-up to be completed by December 2027. Eligible patients are being enrolled, and multidimensional baseline data including demographic characteristics, clinical indicators, laboratory results, comprehensive geriatric assessment and COPD-specific prognostic factors are being systematically collected. All participants will receive 12 months of standardised follow-up (monthly for the first 6 months and quarterly thereafter) to monitor 6-month all-cause mortality (primary outcome), as well as survival duration, end-of-life healthcare utilisation and do-not-resuscitate status (secondary outcomes). After completion of data collection, we will employ multiple machine learning algorithms to develop and internally validate a 6-month mortality prediction model with pre-specified centres reserved for external validation. Model performance will be evaluated by discrimination and calibration and head-to-head comparisons with the Body Mass Index, Airflow Obstruction, Dyspnoea and Exercise Capacity (BODE) and Age, Dyspnoea and Airflow Obstruction (ADO) indices will be conducted to verify its clinical value. The findings will provide a China-specific prediction tool for elderly patients with advanced COPD to guide clinical intervention, palliative care referral and healthcare resource allocation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (No. 2024-2662) and registered at ChiCTR2500100351. Informed consent is being obtained from all participants. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500100351.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pu, H., Liu, L., Chang, Y., Su, L., Zeng, X., Cheng, W., Jiang, Y., He, J., Mo, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110648</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110648</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicentre prospective cohort study to develop and validate a machine learning-based model for predicting 6-month all-cause mortality in elderly patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110648</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110648</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Zoi cohort, a prospective cohort with comprehensive phenotyping for preventive medicine in France, first 1000 participants: cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Zo&#x012B; cohort is a prospective longitudinal cohort study, designed to advance personalised prevention by systematically screening for undiagnosed or asymptomatic conditions, identifying early risk markers and predicting future disease risks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Recruitment takes place in a dedicated prevention-focused health centre. Adults aged 18 years and older are enrolled either as paying customers or through company-sponsored programmes. This manuscript presents the design of the cohort and the characteristics of the first 1000 participants (67.5% male, mean age 51.1 years, high education levels). The cohort exhibits a healthy volunteer bias, with lower smoking and obesity rates and higher educational attainment than the general French population, which limits generalisability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>Data collection is conducted in a standardised environment and combines over 500 self-reported items, clinical examinations, extensive biomarker profiling (196 biomarkers) and multimodal imaging (vascular, breast, abdominal and pelvic ultrasound, full-body composition, retinal scan). For several major diseases, risk is further estimated through established clinical prediction models. Despite lower obesity and smoking rates than the general population, almost half (45.6%) of those who reported no ongoing diseases had at least one undiagnosed chronic condition, most frequently hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Male sex and older age were significantly associated with disease unawareness (p&lt;0.05). These findings highlight a discrepancy between self-reported and objectively measured health status, even in a health-conscious population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>Longitudinal follow-up is collected via yearly re-evaluations and through a dedicated application. The cohort is designed as a deeply phenotyped, longitudinal resource to support interdisciplinary research collaborations, the development and validation of early risk stratification models and the evaluation of preventive interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bauvin, P., Benani, A., Lepoittevin, M., Sentilhes, M., Bringer, M., Lecheheb, D. A., De Luca, N., Ohayon, S., Dalle, C., Tannier, X., Steg, P. G., Bodard, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111119</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Zoi cohort, a prospective cohort with comprehensive phenotyping for preventive medicine in France, first 1000 participants: cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111119</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence and risk factors of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae and syphilis among a cohort of urban Canadian gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, 2017-2023: informing the potential impact of doxycycline prophylaxis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Doxycycline as post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) has emerged as an efficacious strategy to reduce <I>Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis)</I>, <I>Neisseria gonorrhoeae (N. gonorrhoeae)</I> and syphilis (sexually transmitted infections (STIs)) among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM). There is a need to identify prescribing criteria that maximise the number of STIs averted while minimising excessive use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>In this prospective longitudinal cohort study with repeated measures and biobehavioural data collection, participants completed a questionnaire and tested for STIs at each visit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-based, population-level study conducted in three large Canadian cities between February 2017 and July 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>2449 GBM were recruited through respondent-driven sampling (RDS); 1998 had &ge;1 follow-up visit, contributing 7551 person-years of observation. Eligible participants were aged &ge;16 years, cis- or transgender men, reported sex with another man in the past 6 months and resided in Montreal, Toronto or Vancouver.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Adjusted rate ratios (aRR) of STIs, accounting for RDS recruitment, loss to follow-up and confounding were estimated using generalised estimating equations (GEE) Poisson regression. For identified STI risk factors, the proportions of STIs averted through doxy-PEP prescription (based on the efficacy of doxy-PEP for each bacterial STI) and the number needed to treat (NNT) for 1 year to avert one STI, assuming 100% adherence, were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 1998 participants, the combined incidence rate of any <I>C. trachomatis</I>, <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> and syphilis infection was 29.5 (95%CI 27.3 to 31.9) per 100 person-years. STI risk factors that had the most impact as doxy-PEP criteria were history of any of the three STIs in the past 12 months (P12M) (aRR=2.0, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.2, 36% STI averted, NNT=2.1); &ge;10 male sexual partners in the past 6 months (P6M) (aRR=3.8, 95% CI 3.0 to 4.9, 41% STI averted, NNT=2.4); HIV-pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use P6M (aRR=1.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.0, 29% STI averted, NNT=2.5); use of any chemsex-related substance P6M (aRR=1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4, 28% STI averted, NNT=2.6); and group sex event attendance P6M (aRR=1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.3, 27% STI averted, NNT=2.3). Reporting&ge;10 male sex partners P6M represented the most useful criterion for syphilis prevention (52% syphilis infections averted, NNT=20). Prescribing doxy-PEP to GBM having any of the following STI risk factors, namely, &ge;1 bacterial STI P12M, &ge;10 male sex partners P6M, or HIV-PrEP use P6M, would substantially increase the proportion of all STI diagnoses potentially averted (60%) with minimal increase of the NNT (2.7).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This work informs on the impact of various doxy-PEP clinical prescribing criteria and demonstrates the benefit of focusing on any of the following three criteria: &ge;1 bacterial STI P12M, &ge;10 male sex partners P6M or HIV-PrEP use P6M.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lambert, G., Fourmigue, A., Dvorakova, M., Moodie, E. E. M., Moore, D., Lachowsky, N. J., Grace, D., Hart, T. A., Tan, D. H. S., Jollimore, J., Labbe, A.-C., Fortin, C., Maheu-Giroux, M., Hull, M., Grennan, T., Brunelle-Newman, S., Zhang, T., Lal, A., Gormezano, A., Cox, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111357</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111357</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sexual health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence and risk factors of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae and syphilis among a cohort of urban Canadian gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, 2017-2023: informing the potential impact of doxycycline prophylaxis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sexual health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111357</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111726?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Capturing heat illness in vulnerable populations through the lens of older adults: a scoping review protocol of health administrative data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111726?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Heatwaves are among the fastest-growing climate-related threats to human health, increasing in frequency, intensity and duration with climate change. Older adults are disproportionately affected, reflecting intersecting physiological, social and economic vulnerabilities. Beyond mortality, heatwaves drive substantial but often under-recognised morbidity, including emergency visits and hospitalisations for cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and metabolic conditions. Health administrative data provide valuable opportunities to improve understanding of these phenomena and for the quantification of their impacts. However, comparability is limited by heterogeneity in case definitions, that is, the criteria used to determine which health events are counted as cases: some studies only clinically diagnosed heat illness, while others also capture outcomes plausibly triggered or exacerbated by heat. It is further constrained by differences in International Classification of Diseases (ICD) versions, national adaptations, coding practices and adoption timelines across countries. No synthesis has yet mapped these heterogeneous approaches for older adults, despite their over-representation among those most affected by heat-health risks. This heterogeneity limits the ability to capture the true burden of disease and to inform adaptation planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a scoping review to map how heat-related diagnoses among older adults are identified and measured in health administrative data. The review will follow the initial methodological framework of Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley refined by Levac <I>et al</I> and adhere to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The search strategy will be developed with a public health librarian and applied to MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase and Web of Science. We will include peer-reviewed and grey literature published in English or French from 2010 onward. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts in Covidence, with disagreements resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a standardised form to capture study characteristics, ICD codes, definitions of heat exposure and approaches to measurement. A descriptive and thematic analysis will be conducted, and findings will be presented narratively and in tables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this review as it involves secondary analysis of published and publicly available data; for more information, contact University of Montreal&rsquo;s Research Integrity department at <I>plaintes-crr@umontreal.ca</I>. Results will be published through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and knowledge transfer activities with public health stakeholders in Qu&eacute;bec. This review contributes to the MEDICCS (<I>Mod&eacute;lisation &eacute;conomique des impacts des changements climatiques sur la sant&eacute;</I>) project and will support recommendations for improving the capture of heat-related morbidity in health administrative data.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[St-Arnaud, J.-G., Raymond, C., Boukari Abdou, S., Roussafi, F., Dufour, I., Castonguay, F. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111726</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111726</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Capturing heat illness in vulnerable populations through the lens of older adults: a scoping review protocol of health administrative data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111726</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111726</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111844?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Non-inferiority of saline versus corticosteroid injections for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a protocol for a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111844?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMO) is among the most prevalent forms of upper extremity osteoarthritis. It is frequently associated with significant levels of pain and disability, particularly among ageing women. The typical care pathway for TMO relies on non-surgical approaches for up to 2 years, before surgery is considered. One of the most common non-surgical approaches is an intra-articular cortisone injection. However, these are not universally recommended due to their safety profile and unclear efficacy compared with saline injections. Recent evidence suggests that saline might be non-inferior to cortisone, but this remains to be clarified. This pilot trial aims to assess the feasibility of a trial examining the non-inferiority of saline compared with cortisone injections for TMO.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This trial will recruit 40 adults with a diagnosis of TMO and a prescription for a cortisone injection from the Centre hospitalier de l&rsquo;Universit&eacute; de Montr&eacute;al (CHUM), Canada. Participants will be randomised to receive either an intra-articular injection of 0.9% sodium chloride (experimental arm, n=20) or triamcinolone acetonide (standard of care, n=20) under fluoroscopic guidance at the Radiology Department or under ultrasound guidance at the Physiatry Clinic. Opaque syringes will be used to blind participants and physicians. Feasibility outcomes, collected at all time points, will include recruitment rates, follow-up completion rates and blinding indices. Preliminary efficacy outcomes, collected at baseline and at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-injection, will include pain intensity (0&ndash;10 scales), hand function (QuickDASH 11-items), cumulative analgesic consumption scores, concurrent interventions, adverse events and number of participants receiving a second injection or an arthroplasty. Descriptive statistics will be used to present feasibility outcomes. Preliminary data on the effectiveness of saline and cortisone injections will inform the design of a large-scale study for formal hypothesis testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial was approved by the CHUM Human Research Ethics Board (2025-11815). The research output will be presented at conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06401317">NCT06401317</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gevers-Montoro, C., Freire, V., Harris, P. G., Ruel, M., Luong, D. H., Bureau, N. J., Bois, M.-C., Aribert, M., Efanov, J. I., Filali-Mouhim, A., Piche, M., Hamasaki, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111844</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111844</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Non-inferiority of saline versus corticosteroid injections for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a protocol for a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111844</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111844</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112126?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ADNOLA trial: a study-protocol - a randomised controlled trial study comparing adnexal surgery by vNOTES or laparoscopy]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112126?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adnexal surgery is one of the most common surgeries performed in women. Minimally invasive methods are on the rise globally as they have been shown to decrease surgical morbidity compared with abdominal surgery. Adnexal surgery by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is the latest innovation. It combines the vaginal approach and endoscopy via the vagina. Large pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking comparing outcomes after vNOTES and conventional laparoscopy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A multicentre pragmatic RCT aiming to recruit 200 women aged 18 years and above undergoing adnexal surgery for benign disease or prophylactic reasons. Patients will be randomised to vNOTES or laparoscopy. Recruitment will start Q4 2025, and the study is estimated to end 2028.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes are units of postoperative opioid and non-opioid analgesics used, perioperative complications, operation time, postoperative complications, readmission, conversion rate and the surgeon&rsquo;s experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The national Swedish ethical board at the main centre, Helsingborg Hospital, Sweden, has given ethical agreement (dated 20 March 2025). Before including patients, all centres will require local or national ethical approval. The results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06964594">NCT06964594</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olsson, K. S., Baekelandt, J. F., Ka&#x0308;llen, K., Matak, L., Caretto, M., Wassen, M. M. L. H., Simoncini, T., Stuart, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112126</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112126</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ADNOLA trial: a study-protocol - a randomised controlled trial study comparing adnexal surgery by vNOTES or laparoscopy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112126</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113520?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating time-varying cholera transmission and oral cholera vaccine effectiveness in Haiti and Cameroon, 2021-2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113520?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In 2023, cholera caused over 95 000 deaths globally, predominantly in low-income and conflict settings, and contributed to the wasting, stunting and malnutrition of millions in countries where the disease is endemic. Moreover, the frequency and magnitude of cholera outbreaks are rising. As a result, the demand for outbreak control interventions is quickly outpacing existing resources. Oral cholera vaccination (OCV) is one intervention among many used to limit further transmission. Since 2022, one-dose OCV (OCV1) has replaced the standard two-dose OCV due to limited global supply. However, only a handful of on-the-ground surveys of OCV1 effectiveness presently exist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to assess the transmission of cholera in outbreak settings using digital public health approaches and quantify OCV1 effectiveness in complement to on-the-ground surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using Haiti and Cameroon as natural case studies representing two disparate geographical and sociodemographic contexts, we employed computational digitisation techniques to extract weekly case counts from non&ndash;machine-readable images of outbreak epidemic curves. We then leveraged the R package <I>EpiEstim</I> to derive estimates of the effective reproduction number (<I>R</I><SUB>t</SUB>). To assess OCV1 effectiveness in the two considered countries, we applied <I>VaxEstim</I>, an extension of <I>EpiEstim</I> requiring three inputs: the basic reproduction number (<I>R</I><SUB>0</SUB>), <I>R</I><SUB>t,</SUB> and vaccine coverage. Notably, our work provides the first known real-world application of <I>VaxEstim</I> in low-resource settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Early in either outbreak, weekly estimates of <I>R</I><SUB>t</SUB> were elevated (Haiti, 2.60 (95% credible interval (CrI) 2.42 to 2.79); Cameroon, 1.90 (95% CrI 1.14 to 2.95)). Thereafter, <I>R</I><SUB>t</SUB> estimates oscillated around the critical threshold of 1 in both settings. Haiti exhibited marginally higher OCV1 effectiveness than Cameroon (75.3% (95% CrI 54.0 to 86.4%) versus 54.9% (95% CrI 18.9 to 84.9%)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study underscores the value of combining digitised case data with computational techniques and the utility of <I>VaxEstim</I> for rapid, inexpensive estimation of vaccine effectiveness in data-poor outbreak settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hulland, E. N., Charpignon, M.-L., Hayek, G. Y., Zhao, L., Martoma, R., Desai, A. N., Majumder, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113520</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113520</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimating time-varying cholera transmission and oral cholera vaccine effectiveness in Haiti and Cameroon, 2021-2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113520</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113520</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113559?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dual versus single implant fixation for geriatric distal femur fractures: protocol for a randomised, controlled pilot study at five US level 1 trauma centres]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113559?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Geriatric distal femur fractures are associated with mortality rates exceeding 20%, comparable to hip fractures. Traditional single implant fixation often requires weight-bearing restrictions that delay recovery. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing dual vs single implant fixation for geriatric distal femur fractures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled pilot trial will enrol 80 participants aged 60 years or older with displaced distal femur fractures at five US level 1 trauma centres. Patients will be randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either single implant (lateral plate or retrograde nail) or dual implant (nail-plate or dual plate) fixation. All patients will be permitted immediate weight-bearing. The primary outcome is feasibility assessed through enrolment rate (80 patients in 12 months), protocol adherence (&ge;90%) and follow-up retention (&ge;85% at 12 months). Secondary outcomes include post-surgical mobility (AM-PAC, TUG), patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-29), mortality (90-day and 1 year) and complication rates. Analyses will be on an intention-to-treat basis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (IRB_00149119) and IRBs at all participating centres. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or legally authorised representatives. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05292313">NCT05292313</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haller, J., Achebe, C. C., Oman, G., Konda, S., Garner, M., Yuan, B., Marchand, L. S., DeKeyser, G. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113559</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113559</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dual versus single implant fixation for geriatric distal femur fractures: protocol for a randomised, controlled pilot study at five US level 1 trauma centres]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113559</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113559</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113618?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sino-Canadian Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative in China: an economic evaluation protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113618?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Childhood overweight and obesity (OWO) in China, especially in urban areas, has become a significant public health challenge. Recent studies indicate a high prevalence of OWO in both children and adults, exacerbated by urbanisation and economic development. This trend poses a threat to health outcomes, including neurocognitive functioning, socio-emotional development and risk of chronic conditions. Recognising the limitations of high-income country prevention models, the Sino-Canadian Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (SCHeLTI) was established to evaluate a multifaceted intervention aimed at mitigating childhood OWO and related non-communicable disease risks. This protocol outlines the economic evaluation component of the SCHeLTI trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A within-trial economic evaluation and long-term model from both a healthcare/personal social services perspective and a broader societal perspective will be undertaken alongside the SCHeLTI study, comparing the multifaceted intervention to usual care. Costs will include intervention provision, implementation and household expenditures. Outcome measures span child and maternal health-related quality of life, growth indicators, cognitive and behavioural development, nutritional status and metabolic dysfunction indicators. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will be performed, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios calculated for primary outcomes and quality-adjusted life years. A decision-analytical model will also project long-term economic and health impacts. Equity impact analysis will assess the intervention&rsquo;s effects across socioeconomic strata. Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and probabilistic approaches, will be conducted to ensure robust results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committees of the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital in Shanghai, China (GKLW2017-01) and the CIUSSS de l&rsquo;Estrie-CHUS in Sherbrooke, Canada (MP-31-2019&ndash;2967). Results will be disseminated through academic publications, policy briefs, stakeholder meetings and community engagement to inform early childhood development policy in China and similar settings globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR1800017773.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, Y., Zhou, H., Huang, H.-F., Fraser, W. D., Fan, J., Baillargeon, J.-P., Poder, T. G., Wu, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113618</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113618</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sino-Canadian Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative in China: an economic evaluation protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113618</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113618</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114411?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measurement innovation for sensitive behaviours: applying direct and social network-based estimation approaches to intimate partner violence in Burkina Faso and the Democratic Republic of the Congo using cross-sectional data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114411?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore the feasibility of the confidante methodology to measure past-year intimate partner violence (IPV) experiences in Burkina Faso and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) through (1) comparison of direct assessment with indirect estimation via the confidante method and (2) assessment of the performance of each confidante method assumption.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study with nationally and subnationally representative data collected from December 2020 to March 2021 in Burkina Faso (national) and from December 2021 to April 2022 in Kinshasa and Kongo Central, DRC (subnational).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Burkina Faso; Kinshasa, DRC; Kongo Central, DRC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Partnered women (married or cohabiting) aged 15&ndash;49 in Burkina Faso (N=3047), Kinshasa, DRC (N=702) and Kongo Central, DRC (N=688) and their partnered confidantes aged 15&ndash;49 (N=2064 in Burkina Faso, N=304 in Kinshasa, DRC, N=393 women in Kongo Central, DRC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Past-year IPV (emotional, physical, sexual, any) comparing differences in prevalence between the direct respondent sample and the indirect confidante sample, adjusting for confidante method assumptions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The confidante method produced comparable IPV estimates to respondents&rsquo; direct reports across sites (35.3% respondent vs 36.1% confidante in Kinshasa, DRC; 29.7% respondent vs 39.0% confidante in Kongo Central, DRC; 25.7% respondent vs 26.0% confidante in Burkina Faso, differences not statistically significant). Of note, there were differences in IPV estimates between respondents and confidantes by IPV subtype, with physical IPV consistently lower among respondents across sites and sexual IPV lower among confidantes in Kinshasa, DRC and Burkina Faso, though generally not statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The confidante methodology did not afford advantages over standard, direct assessment for IPV. Overall, findings indicate the reliability of population-based surveys with direct IPV questions when implemented under recommended ethical guidelines, though direct reports are likely undercounts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, H. L., Bell, S. O., Bazie, F., Guiella, G., Kayembe, D. M., Akilimali, P. Z., Decker, M. R., Wood, S. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114411</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114411</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measurement innovation for sensitive behaviours: applying direct and social network-based estimation approaches to intimate partner violence in Burkina Faso and the Democratic Republic of the Congo using cross-sectional data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114411</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114411</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115137?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of patient preferences in digital health trials: procedure development and implementation in a preference-based trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115137?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop and evaluate a standardised, fully automated assessment procedure for patient treatment preferences suitable for use in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with remote or digital health interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multiphase developmental study followed by implementation in a fully randomised preference trial (FRPT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>University and outpatient cancer care settings in Switzerland; implementation in RCTs with a remote digital health intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>50 medical students for pilot testing; 11 patients with cancer for qualitative testing; 124 adult patients with cancer experiencing fatigue or sleep problems in an FRPT with a remote digital health intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome: feasibility and applicability of a standardised digital preference assessment procedure. Secondary outcomes: distribution and strength of treatment preferences, reasons for preference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A procedure with three items for assessing treatment preferences was developed and refined based on pilot testing, stakeholder meetings and patient interviews. The stepwise procedure ensured that study participants with an initially unclear preference were finally able to report their preference. The majority of students (91.7%) indicated their preference already in the first assessment step. Similar in the RCT phase, 110 of 124 participants (88.7%) indicated their preference in the first step. Preference drivers included interest, perceived ease and conceptual appeal in addition to expected treatment benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our fully automated standardised preference assessment with three items appears feasible in trials with digital health interventions. Future trials with two active treatment conditions should consider implementation of such a preference assessment to evaluate non-specific treatment effects driven by the match of patients&rsquo; preferences with the respective treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p>DRKS00035596; DRKS00035541; SNCTP000006209.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barth, J., Thomae, A. V., Tietjen, A. K., Witt, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115137</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115137</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of patient preferences in digital health trials: procedure development and implementation in a preference-based trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115137</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115709?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modulate Obesity and relateD metabolic complIcations For Yielding improvements in IBD outcomes (MODIFY-IBD): consensus on obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities in inflammatory bowel disease using systematic reviews and the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115709?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Obesity and related cardiometabolic comorbidities, including hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, are increasingly prevalent among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These conditions influence disease activity, therapeutic response, surgical outcomes and overall quality of life, yet evidence remains fragmented. The <I>M</I>odulate <I>O</I>besity and relate<I>D</I> metabolic compl<I>I</I>cations <I>F</I>or <I>Y</I>ielding improvements in <I>IBD</I> outcomes (MODIFY-IBD) initiative aims to synthesise evidence and generate consensus recommendations to guide practice and future research in this area. This study describes a protocol for a structured evidence synthesis and Research ANd Development/University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Appropriateness Method (RUAM) consensus process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct three systematic reviews and a structured evidence synthesis organised into three domains: (1) the impact of obesity on IBD outcomes, (2) the burden of cardiometabolic complications in IBD and (3) the management of overweight, obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities in IBD. A multidisciplinary international panel of gastroenterologists, surgeons, endocrinologists, hepatologists, cardiologists and dietitians will assess each statement using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Panellists will rate the appropriateness of each statement (only those that fall within their area of expertise) on a 1&ndash;9 scale (1&ndash;3=inappropriate, 4&ndash;6=uncertain and 7&ndash;9=appropriate), with medians rounded up (eg, 6.5=appropriate). Agreement will be assessed using the RAND Disagreement Index (DI&lt;1.0=agreement).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will not involve direct patient participation, as it is based on evidence synthesis and expert consensus; therefore, formal research ethics committee approval will not be required. Patient representatives will contribute to the consensus process to provide contextual perspectives but no identifiable data will be collected.</p>
<p>Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentation at major gastroenterology and IBD conferences and communication with professional societies. A lay summary and patient-friendly infographic will also be developed to facilitate translation of recommendations into clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration numbers</st>
<p>CRD420251178843: a systematic review of the impact of obesity on inflammatory bowel disease outcomes.</p>
<p>CRD420251178799: a systematic review of cardiometabolic complications in inflammatory bowel disease.</p>
<p>CRD420251174653: management of overweight, obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devi, J., Samaan, S., Sehgal, P., Mohamed, M., Vincent, M., Coombs, S., Doering, M., Barnes, E. L., Johnson, A. M., Yarur, A. J., Deepak, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115709</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115709</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modulate Obesity and relateD metabolic complIcations For Yielding improvements in IBD outcomes (MODIFY-IBD): consensus on obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities in inflammatory bowel disease using systematic reviews and the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115709</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115709</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116542?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experience, barriers and facilitators of discharge readiness in patients with acute pancreatitis: a descriptive qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116542?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore patients&rsquo; experiences of discharge readiness following acute pancreatitis (AP) and to identify perceived barriers and facilitators influencing readiness for discharge during the transition from hospital to home.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive qualitative study guided by Meleis&rsquo; Transitions Theory.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Emergency and gastroenterology wards of Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>16 patients with AP were recruited; all 16 eligible patients approached agreed to participate (100% response rate).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were collected between December 2024 and January 2025 through semistructured in-depth interviews. Data were analysed using Elo and Kynga&#x0308;s&rsquo;s three-step qualitative content analysis framework, integrating conventional and directed content analysis. The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patterns of response reflected variability in patients&rsquo; psychological adaptation during the transition process, including cognitive-emotional responses and relational interactions. Factors influencing discharge readiness were identified across three theoretical domains. Nature of Transitions captured the dynamics of self-management, including awareness, engagement and behavioural evolution. Transition Conditions reflected the complexity of socioecological determinants, including age and life stage, health literacy, financial resources and occupational and cultural influences. Nursing Therapeutics highlighted the discordance between professional support and patient needs, particularly in relation to information provision, dietary management and care continuity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Building on Meleis&rsquo; Transitions Theory, this study provides an empirically grounded understanding of discharge readiness among patients with AP as a dynamic, multifactorial process. Our findings extend the theory by demonstrating that discharge readiness is shaped by the interaction between individual self-management, socioecological determinants, psychological adaptations and professional support. Addressing gaps in professional health information, personalised and structured dietary management and continuity of care is essential to enhance discharge readiness and support safe, sustainable recovery.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, S., Xu, M., Hua, W., Zhu, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116542</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116542</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experience, barriers and facilitators of discharge readiness in patients with acute pancreatitis: a descriptive qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116542</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116542</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116962?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Weight-Neutral Health Intervention (WIN) for adults with BMI >=30 kg/m2: protocol for a single-arm feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116962?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Weight stigma and internalised weight bias are associated with poor mental, social and physical health. Weight-neutral approaches prioritise well-being and sustainable health behaviours. However, the feasibility and acceptability of weight-neutral interventions remain uncertain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Weight-Neutral Health Intervention (WIN) is an investigator-initiated single-arm feasibility study enrolling 56 adults with body mass index &ge;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in the Capital Region of Denmark. The study investigates a codesigned weight-neutral health intervention. The 6-month intervention comprises 1 preparatory session and 11 group sessions led by trained practitioners, focusing on intuitive eating, body acceptance and self-compassion; optional components include support-network events, up to three individual online sessions and access to &lsquo;size-inclusive yoga&rsquo; and &lsquo;body competence&rsquo; courses. The primary feasibility outcome is follow-up completion. Recruitment proportion and adherence are secondary feasibility outcomes. These will be assessed using a set of predefined &lsquo;traffic-light&rsquo; stop/go progression criteria. Exploratory feasibility outcomes include data completeness for other outcomes and participant engagement with the intervention. Exploratory clinical outcomes include questionnaire data (quality of life, depression, weight bias internalisation, eating behaviours, self-esteem, body image, stress and life satisfaction), clinical measures (weight, heart rate and blood pressure), biomarkers (blood samples and hair cortisol), 7-day actigraphy (physical activity and sleep) and serious adverse events. Qualitative interviews, focus groups and fieldnotes will be used to explore acceptability and contextual factors. If progression criteria are met, the study will inform the design of a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised trial. The exploratory outcomes will inform outcome selection, setting, sample size and procedures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-25013213). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and public platforms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06922630">NCT06922630</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sigurdardottir, G. A., Koster-Rasmussen, R., Meyer, L. B., Sandholdt, C. T., Christiansen, A.-K. L., Specht, I. O., Lindschou, J., Engstrom, J., Heitmann, B. L., Bojsen-Moller, K. N., Overbeck, G., Kousgaard, M. B., Reventlow, S., Jebb, S., Dirksen, C., Aveyard, P., Waldorff, F. B., on behalf of the LightCOM team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116962</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116962</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Weight-Neutral Health Intervention (WIN) for adults with BMI >=30 kg/m2: protocol for a single-arm feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116962</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116962</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116964?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of an anti-inflammatory diet intervention and cognitive behavioural therapy in endometriosis: protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116964?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Treatment for women with endometriosis is only partially or temporarily effective. Moreover, medical hormonal treatment is associated with debilitating side effects and interferes with fertility, while surgery has a relatively high risk of complications. Meanwhile, women with endometriosis show increasing interest in implementing lifestyle interventions to alleviate symptoms and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Integrating these lifestyle interventions can provide a holistic approach to the treatment of this debilitating disease. However, scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of these interventions is limited. This study is designed to investigate the effectiveness of two lifestyle interventions and the combination of both: an anti-inflammatory diet intervention (AIDI) could improve immune cell function and reduce inflammation, resulting in improved HRQoL and alleviating pain. In addition, the integration of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) aims to provide insight into pain mechanisms and coping with pain, and to assist in sustaining dietary adjustments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Pain in Endometriosis And the Relation to Lifestyle (PEARL) study is a five-arm randomised controlled trial with a pre-post factorial design with two factors: an AIDI and CBT. The study population will consist of 250 premenopausal women, of whom 200 are diagnosed with endometriosis and experience pain symptoms and 50 are healthy controls (HC). Women with endometriosis will be recruited from one academic tertiary and five secondary hospitals in the Netherlands. They will be randomised (1:1:1:1) among four intervention groups: standard care (SC) (SC group), SC and an AIDI (SC + AIDI group), SC and CBT (SC + CBT group), and SC, AIDI and CBT (SC + AIDI + CBT group). Women with endometriosis will visit the hospital twice during the intervention period, at the start (T0) and end (T2) of the 13-week intervention period. HC will not undergo any of the interventions and will have one hospital visit (T0). Participants will complete questionnaires regarding pain symptoms, HRQoL, physical activity level, sleep, diet quality, pain cognitions, and stress at T0 and T2. Furthermore, they are instructed to collect menstrual effluent, a vaginal swab and a faecal sample. During the study visits, peripheral blood will be drawn and scalp hair samples will be taken. The primary outcome is average pain, measured using a numerical rating scale. Secondary outcomes focus on HRQoL, inflammation, immune system characteristics, vaginal- and gut microbiome, and hair cortisol levels. These are considered to reflect potentially underlying mechanisms of the effect of both interventions on the primary outcome. Biological samples and questionnaires of women with endometriosis and HC will be compared to establish the differences in secondary outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol has been approved (approval number: NL86247.091.24) by the METC Oost-Nederland from Radboud University Medical Centre on July 11, 2024. Prior to participation, participants are required to provide informed consent. The results will be widely disseminated through scientific peer-reviewed journals, and presentation to a broad audience in scientific meetings, congresses, patient meetings, as well as in policy-relevant forums.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06332560">NCT06332560</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huijs, E., van der Sman, L., Wirken, L., Delcliseur, H. S., Winter, E. G., de Roos, N. M., van der Molen, R. G., Oosterman, J. M., Vigano, P., Horne, A. W., Dolmans, M.-M., Hoogstad-van Evert, J. S., Nap, A. W., EUmetriosis Working Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116964</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116964</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of an anti-inflammatory diet intervention and cognitive behavioural therapy in endometriosis: protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116964</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116964</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116985?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising parental self-efficacy in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and its implications on child care and parenting quality: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116985?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Parenting an infant in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can be highly stressful, undermine parental confidence and minimise involvement in infant care. Enhancing parental self-efficacy is therefore crucial to promoting active engagement and supporting positive child outcomes. This study aims to identify the psychosocial needs (emotion regulation and stress management) of NICU parents and examine the factors that influence their engagement in infant care. It also seeks to determine whether higher levels of parental self-efficacy are associated with greater engagement and collaboration with healthcare providers (HCPs) and a shorter NICU stay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A mixed-methods study will be conducted at the Montreal Children&rsquo;s Hospital&rsquo;s Level III NICU located in Quebec, Canada. Parents (ie, mothers and, when available, their partners) will be recruited during their infant&rsquo;s hospitalisation. Participants will complete a set of self-report questionnaires measuring parental engagement, self-efficacy, parent-infant attachment, mental health, perceived stress and social support. Additionally, one parent per family will be invited to participate in a qualitative interview to discuss their experience in the NICU. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically using NVivo 12 to identify key themes, and statistical analyses will be conducted using RStudio to determine which factors are most strongly associated with parental engagement and their interactions with the clinical team. Finally, HCPs will be invited to assist and participate in a qualitative interview regarding their perspectives on the NICU environment and the study&rsquo;s impact on the unit (ie, reduction in HCP burden due to increased parental engagement). Findings from this study will offer valuable insights to inform future clinical strategies aimed at enhancing parental engagement and self-efficacy in the NICU. These outcomes may contribute to improved neonatal outcomes, parental mental health and the advancement of evidence-based, family-centred care policies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by the Montreal University Health Centre&rsquo;s (MUHC) Research Ethics Board (2025-9392). Findings derived from this study have the potential to optimise parental engagement in the NICU to promote family resilience and child well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Implications of findings</st>
<p>Our study protocol aims to underscore the critical role of self-efficacy and other key psychosocial factors, such as lower parental stress and higher emotion regulation, in promoting parental engagement and collaboration within the NICU. We anticipate that higher levels of self-efficacy will correlate with parental well-being, increased caregiving engagement (ie, basic baby care, improved communication with NICU staff) and enhanced parent-infant bonding. These findings may support the development of structured interventions that empower parents and streamline provider-parent collaboration. In clinical practice, these insights can guide the integration of tailored parental support programmes to optimise discharge preparation and reduce provider burden by promoting shared caregiving responsibilities. Future initiatives could build further on this model to guide institutional policies that aim to prioritise parental empowerment (ie, greater self-efficacy and engagement) as a fundamental pillar of neonatal care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montreuil, T. C., Gratton, C., Mir-Shokraei, K., Biran, V., Beltempo, M., Brossard-Racine, M., Lecorguille, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116985</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116985</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising parental self-efficacy in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and its implications on child care and parenting quality: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116985</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116985</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117862?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of Doxycycline versus Macrolides for Mycoplasma pneumoniae INfectiOn in Children (DOMINO): a protocol for a multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117862?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p><I>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</I> (MP) is a major cause of community-acquired pneumonia in children. In East Asia, the prevalence of macrolide-resistant MP (MRMP) has surged, leading to treatment failures and prolonged illness. While doxycycline is an effective alternative, its use in young children has historically been limited due to concerns about tooth discolouration. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxycycline compared with azithromycin as a first-line treatment for children with pneumonia suspected of MRMP infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group superiority trial conducted at 14 tertiary hospitals in South Korea. A total of 208 children (aged 3&ndash;17 years) with pneumonia and confirmed or suspected MP infection will be randomised 1:1 to receive either doxycycline (4 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 7&ndash;14 days) or azithromycin (10 mg/kg on day 1, then 5 mg/kg on days 2&ndash;5) (). Randomisation will be stratified by age (3&ndash;7 years vs 8&ndash;17 years). A standardised &lsquo;rescue therapy&rsquo; protocol ensures patient safety by allowing control group patients to switch to doxycycline if no clinical improvement is observed within 48&ndash;72 hours. The primary outcome is the defervescence rate within 72 hours after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include treatment failure rate, length of hospital stay, symptom duration and adverse events. Safety assessment will specifically include tooth discolouration evaluation at Day 28, focused on children aged &lt;8 years. Efficacy will be analysed using the intention-to-treat principle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of all participating centres. Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians, and assent will be obtained from children aged 7 years and older. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07306234">NCT07306234</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, Y. Y., Kang, C., Choe, Y. J., Yoo, Y., Shin, A., Kim, D. R., Ahn, B., Eun, B. W., Kim, G., Kang, H.-M., Kim, Y. J., Cho, Y. K., Lee, H., Kim, Y. K., Choi, J. H., Yun, K. W., Jo, K. J., Kim, K.-R., Lee, T. J., Choi, U. Y., Yoon, Y. S., Kim, J., Kang, M. S., Park, S. K., Yang, W. M., Lee, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-26T00:41:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117862</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117862</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of Doxycycline versus Macrolides for Mycoplasma pneumoniae INfectiOn in Children (DOMINO): a protocol for a multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117862</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117862</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e095421?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intimate partner violence: protocol of a quasi-experimental study to increase primary care professionals ability to identify exposed individuals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e095421?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The overall aim of the present project is to increase healthcare professionals&rsquo; ability to ask about exposure and to identify individuals exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV). The project will evaluate the effects of three different interventions that can be assumed to increase healthcare professionals&rsquo; ability to ask and identify individuals who have been or are exposed to IPV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This project has a quasi-experimental design. After a 2-month baseline period, participating care units (primary health centres, maternal health clinics and youth guidance clinics) will be assigned to one of three interventions to potentially increase the ability to enquire and identify patient exposure to IPV: (1) healthcare professionals&rsquo; use of a standardised questionnaire about exposure to IPV in patient meetings, (2) training through the use of a virtual patient case tailored to health professionals and (3) a combination of (1) and (2) earlier. Preintervention (baseline) and postintervention measurements of the health professionals&rsquo; enquiry and identification of patients exposed to IPV will be used to explore the effect of the interventions. Focus group interviews with the participating health professionals will be used as a qualitative method, applying thematic analysis, to explore which intervention they perceive as most effective in increasing their ability to identify victims of IPV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>Data analysis will focus on a comparison of pre- and post-measurements regarding the number of patients asked about and identified patients in each intervention arm that have been or are exposed to IPV. Measurements will be carried out per care unit at the group level. Qualitative data from focus group interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>All participants will sign a written consent form and the study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr 2023-03399-01). The study will be conducted according to good clinical practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The results of this study will increase knowledge about how identification of violence in close relationships can be improved in the clinical setting through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study status</st>
<p>Recruiting since May 2024. Expected trial termination December 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06322251">NCT06322251</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonas, W., Dahlstro&#x0308;m, K., Eikemo, R., Elvin Nowak, Y., Fors, U., Hurtig, C., Lindberg, L., Rhen, M., Stenfors, T., So&#x0308;rman, K., Zamora Hernandez, M., Barimani, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095421</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095421</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intimate partner violence: protocol of a quasi-experimental study to increase primary care professionals ability to identify exposed individuals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095421</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095421</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e098210?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of three risk prediction models for clinical deterioration of patients after craniotomy: a retrospective cohort study in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e098210?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to identify a deterioration prediction tool for patients after craniotomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three large tertiary hospitals in Hunan Province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Between January 2018 and March 2020, 1576 patients who underwent craniotomy at three tertiary hospitals in Hunan Province were selected and randomly allocated to either the training or validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. Comprehensive demographic and disease-specific data were collected. Logistic regression, Bayes classification and back propagation neural network were used to construct the models. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution method was used to evaluate the efficiency of the models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The performance of all three models was commendable. In both the training and validation datasets, the back propagation neural network model demonstrated the highest efficiency, achieving a sensitivity of 77.1%, specificity of 91.7%, correctness of 86.8%, positive predictive value of 82.3% and negative predictive value of 88.9%. Conversely, the Bayes classifier exhibited the lowest predictive efficiency among the models evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We developed three models to predict clinical deterioration in patients following craniotomy. Among these, the back propagation neural network model demonstrated superior predictive performance. This model serves as a valuable reference for clinical nurses, aiding them in identifying high-risk patients who may deteriorate post-craniotomy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, L., Luo, Z., Xu, H., Tang, Y., Wang, L., Peng, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098210</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098210</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of three risk prediction models for clinical deterioration of patients after craniotomy: a retrospective cohort study in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical management</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098210</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101177?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of clobetasol propionate ophthalmic nanoemulsion for treating intraocular inflammation and pain associated with cataract surgery: two phase 3 multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical studies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101177?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the effect of clobetasol propionate ophthalmic nanoemulsion, 0.05% (clobetasol) on ocular inflammation and eye pain associated with cataract surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Two independent twin phase 3 multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The CLOSE-1 and the CLOSE-2 trials, respectively, involved 19 and 17 sites in the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients who presented inflammation of at least five cells in the anterior chamber on the first day after routine unilateral cataract surgery</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants were randomised to either clobetasol or placebo four times a day for 14 days. Follow-up visits occurred on days 3, 8, 15 and 29.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with anterior chamber cell (ACC) grade 0 on day 8. A key secondary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score of 0 on day 8. Safety was also assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>426 patients were randomised: 281 to the clobetasol arm and 145 to the placebo arm. The proportion of patients with ACC of 0 at day 8 was significantly superior with clobetasol (37.8% vs 18.1%; odds ratio [OR] 2.8; p&lt;0.0001). The percentage of patients with a VAS pain score of 0 on day 8 was greater with clobetasol (54.7% vs 36.5%; OR 2.1; p=0.0005). Related treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 3.9% of patients on clobetasol and 5.5% on placebo.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Clobetasol propionate ophthalmic nanoemulsion 0.05% is an effective and safe therapeutic option for treating inflammation and pain associated with cataract surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p>CLOSE-1 (<A HREF="NCT04246801">NCT04246801</inter-ref>) and CLOSE-2 (<inter-ref locator="NCT04249076" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT04249076</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schwartz, A., Wellish, K., Zaman, F., Jong, K., Sadri, E., Martel, J., Peace, J., Korenfeld, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101177</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101177</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of clobetasol propionate ophthalmic nanoemulsion for treating intraocular inflammation and pain associated with cataract surgery: two phase 3 multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101177</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101177</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106522?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Subgroup disparities in the mediating roles of income and social support between education level and depressive symptoms among Chinese middle-aged and older adults: an analysis based on the China health and retirement longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106522?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to identify potential subgroups and explore how the mediating effects of income and social support in the relationship between education level and depressive symptoms vary across these groups among middle-aged and older Chinese adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study used statistical learning techniques to analyse data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), adopting a cross-sectional approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study analysed data from the 2011 baseline survey of CHARLS. Depressive symptoms were evaluated based on the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale form. Education, social support (informal social support, community support and public support), lifestyle choices (smoke, alcohol and social activity), health conditions (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, lung disease, heart problem, kidney disease, digestive disease, arthritis, disability, pain and activity limitation), demographic background (urban residence, sex, age, marital status, body mass index and retirement status) were included in the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>8161 adults over the age of 45 were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome measure was the association between educational level and depressive symptoms mediated by income and social support. These associations may vary across subgroups and were measured using a heterogeneous structural equation modelling method with automatic subgroup detection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three subgroups were identified and their distinct mediation pathways were revealed. Subgroup 1 had lower depressive symptoms, higher income, better community support and more urban residents. In this subgroup, education was positively associated with income and community support. Higher income and higher community support were associated with fewer depressive symptoms. Subgroup 2 had more severe depressive symptoms, more rural residents and higher rates of chronic conditions and body pain. In this subgroup, neither the direct nor the indirect effects of education were statistically significant. Subgroup 3 had the lowest depressive symptom severity, more rural residents and lower income. In this subgroup, education had a direct protective effect and the indirect pathway through community support was also significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Income and community support mediate education-depression associations with subgroup heterogeneity. Policies enhancing education, income and community resources could mitigate depressive symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Not applicable (secondary analysis); CHARLS ethical approval: IRB00001052-11015 (Peking University Biomedical Ethics Committee).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, W., Fan, Y., Ma, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106522</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106522</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Subgroup disparities in the mediating roles of income and social support between education level and depressive symptoms among Chinese middle-aged and older adults: an analysis based on the China health and retirement longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106522</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106522</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of COVID-19 public health measures with cardiac non-invasive testing utilisation in Ontario, Canada: a population-based, retrospective time series analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery worldwide, beginning in early 2020. While cardiac non-invasive testing (NIT) plays a critical role in the evaluation and management of cardiovascular disease, the population-level association of pandemic-related public health measures on cardiac diagnostics remains unclear.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To compare the rates and patterns of cardiac NIT before and after the implementation of the first and subsequent provincial COVID-19 lockdown measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>A population-based and registry-based retrospective time series analysis conducted in Ontario, Canada, a single-payer healthcare system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All individuals receiving transthoracic echocardiography, stress echocardiography, nuclear imaging, cardiac CT or cardiac MRI between 17 March 2018 and 16 March 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Standardised weekly testing rates compared across pre-pandemic and pandemic intervals using ARIMA (autoregressive integrative moving average) modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 5 269 897 cardiac tests performed, the cumulative rates decreased from 228.8 (95% CI 228.5 to 229.0) tests per 100 000 person-weeks in the pre-pandemic period to 204.3 (95% CI 204.0 to 204.5) tests per 100 000 person-weeks in the pandemic period (p&lt;0.0001). The first lockdown led to the most significant decrease in cumulative testing rate (105.9 per 100 000 person-weeks, 95% CI 105.4 to 106.4, p&lt;0.0001), with an incomplete recovery over time that varied based partially on NIT modality. Outpatient testing decreased more compared with inpatient testing. The rates of transthoracic echocardiography and nuclear imaging decreased, whereas cardiac MRI remained stable and cardiac CT increased.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>During the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, cumulative cardiac NIT rates declined significantly and did not fully recover by early 2022. The magnitude and patterns of these declines raise concerns about delayed cardiovascular diagnoses while also signalling a possible shift in diagnostic strategies. Efforts should prioritise preserving access to essential diagnostic testing during future health crises.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, E., Mendis, B., Odugbemi, T., Sivaswamy, A., Fang, J., Roifman, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108186</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108186</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of COVID-19 public health measures with cardiac non-invasive testing utilisation in Ontario, Canada: a population-based, retrospective time series analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108186</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109989?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What influences the decision by primary care doctors to recommend cancer screening? A qualitative evidence synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109989?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This review synthesised evidence from studies about the perceptions and experiences of primary care doctors (PCDs) regarding the factors that influenced or inhibited their decision to recommend cancer screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) following the ENTREQ (Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research) guideline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies that were published between 1 January 2000 and 22 January 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included peer-reviewed studies which involved PCDs (in private or public settings in any country), covered cancer screening guideline recommendations and written in English.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers conducted article screening, data extraction, quality assessment and coding. The review team discussed, reviewed, and refined the descriptive themes and analytical themes to reach higher-level interpretation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Nine studies were included in this QES. The synthesis of evidence identified three main analytical themes. First, PCDs demonstrated positive attitudes towards cancer screening guidelines even though there were some concerns regarding false-negative results and colonoscopy-related complications as well as a perceived lack of rewards/compensation for adhering to screening guidelines. Second, implementation challenges were noted including patient factors, PCD-related inhibitors, health system-related barriers and challenges related to cancer awareness and beliefs. Thirdly, the factors that were perceived by PCDs to facilitate guideline adherence included integration of digital record systems, reminders and raising community awareness about screening. Only one study was conducted in a low-middle-income country, and it indicated that resource limitations, including the unavailability of FOBT tests, were reported to reduce PCDs&rsquo; motivation to implement cancer screening recommendations. In addition, cancer-related stigma, cultural beliefs and misconceptions about cancer&mdash;such as preferring home or religious remedies&mdash;were perceived as barriers to screening uptake, highlighting the need for stronger public health education and awareness initiatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There tends to be good adherence to screening guidelines among PCDs across various countries and healthcare systems at least relating to colorectal cancer and, to a lesser extent, cervical cancer. Studies about adherence to BC screening in primary care are required. The incorporation of an array of interrelated factors appears to facilitate adherence. We know less about cancer guideline adherence in resource-constrained settings, and there is a need for studies in primary care in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Htay, M. N. N., Oo, M. M. T., Su, T. T., Donnelly, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109989</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109989</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What influences the decision by primary care doctors to recommend cancer screening? A qualitative evidence synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109989</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109989</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110628?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for the recovery stage of septic shock: an interventional study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110628?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In the de-resuscitation phase of septic shock, resolving vasoplegia and fluid mobilisation can increase venous congestion in patients with sepsis-related myocardial dysfunction. This study will characterise the haemodynamic effects and safety of recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide (rh-BNP) in this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, prospective, single-arm study will enrol 30 adults recovering from septic shock with improving infection/vasopressor trends, sinus rhythm, ongoing pulse-index continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring and measurable arm-equilibrium pressure (Parm). Eligibility will require cardiac dysfunction (left-ventricular ejection fraction &le;50% and/or &ge;10% absolute decline when available) and volume overload (global end-diastolic volume index &gt;800 mL/m&sup2; and extravascular lung water index &gt;10 mL/kg). Participants will receive rh-BNP (2 &micro;g/kg intravenous bolus over 15 min, then a 0.01 &micro;g/kg/min infusion for up to 72 hours). Measurements will be obtained at baseline, acute response (30&ndash;60 min), 24, 48 and 72 hours. The primary outcome will be within-patient change in venous return pressure gradient (PVR, Parm&ndash;central venous pressure) from baseline to acute response. Secondary outcomes will include indices of preload, cardiac function, tissue perfusion and venous congestion. Haemodynamic instability will be the safety endpoint. Paired tests and repeated-measures analyses will estimate within-patient changes over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Sichuan Provincial People&rsquo;s Hospital, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences (No. 2024-653-1). Written informed consent will be obtained. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06745206">NCT06745206</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luo, J.-C., Mou, T., Li, M., Feng, W.-T., Yue, R.-M., Pan, C., Huang, X.-b., Kattan, E., Zhang, Y., Pan, L.-A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110628</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110628</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for the recovery stage of septic shock: an interventional study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110628</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110628</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112065?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sticky black stain that steals everything from you: the lived experiences of women living with human papillomavirus in Tehran, Iran]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112065?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to explore lived experiences of women with human papillomavirus (HPV) in the Iranian socio-cultural context, focusing on their understanding of the disease, associated challenges and the impact of these challenges on health-seeking behaviours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This qualitative study was conducted using Smith&rsquo;s Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) method, employing in-depth semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-based recruitment in Tehran, Iran, with data collection conducted in 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>10 women aged 24&ndash;44 years, diagnosed with HPV, were recruited in Tehran through purposive and convenience sampling. Purposive sampling ensured rich experiential data relevant to the research question, while convenience sampling facilitated access to participants willing to discuss a sensitive topic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>None. This was an exploratory qualitative study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four main themes emerged from this IPA study: (1) the heavy burden of social stigma (unequal moral landscapes, forced loneliness, body shame and loss of femininity); (2) a challenging therapeutic journey (unknown territory, verbal violence and a ray of hope); (3) persistent worries (living with uncertain tomorrow, fear of cancer and broken trust); and (4) from wound to wisdom (becoming an agent again and not being alone in the experience).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This qualitative exploration indicates that for women in the Iranian sociocultural context, the impact of HPV may extend into psychosocial domains, involving gendered stigma and identity concerns that can influence health-seeking behaviours. These experiences appear to be shaped by local perceptions of femininity and social norms. While many participants faced significant difficulties, some also reported instances of personal growth and strengthened social support. These insights point to the potential benefit of integrating psychological support into HPV care and enhancing healthcare provider training to address the psychosocial needs of patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Not applicable (qualitative study).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammadi, A., Mokhtary, F., Sanagoo, A., Vedadhir, A., Jouybari, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112065</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112065</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sticky black stain that steals everything from you: the lived experiences of women living with human papillomavirus in Tehran, Iran]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112065</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112065</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How can a remotely delivered, personalised physical activity intervention for people with high risk of breast, lung and bowel cancer recurrence be implemented in England? Protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation embedded in a feasibility basket trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are essential to determine intervention effectiveness yet they often fail to capture how and why interventions succeed or fail in different contexts. Embedding a process evaluation alongside a clinical trial allows exploration of implementation processes, intervention fidelity and contextual influences. The CANFit trial is a basket-design RCT evaluating a personalised, remotely delivered exercise intervention for people diagnosed with breast, lung and bowel cancer with increased risk of recurrence. This embedded process evaluation aims to understand how individual, team and organisational factors influence intervention delivery and uptake.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A concurrent, mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted using a hybrid type 1 design. Data will be collected from multiple sources, including participant and trainer questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, intervention adherence logs, trainer diaries and observations. Five core implementation outcomes, guided by Proctor&rsquo;s framework&mdash;acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity, penetration and sustainability&mdash;will structure the evaluation. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively and qualitative data will undergo framework analysis using both deductive and inductive coding. Data integration will occur through a convergent mixed-methods approach, using context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations to refine programme theory.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approvals were obtained through Hull York Medical School (ID: 23/SS/0060) and the UK NHS Health Research Authority (ID: 327663). All participants will provide informed consent before taking part. Data will be handled according to General Data Protection Regulation and University of Hull data management policies. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder reports and lay summaries for participants and the public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN97662203">ISRCTN97662203</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson, G., Pearson, M., Bullock, A. F., Cohen, J., Huang, C., Lind, M., Saxton, J., Wilson, C., Twiddy, M., Forbes, C. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112103</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112103</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How can a remotely delivered, personalised physical activity intervention for people with high risk of breast, lung and bowel cancer recurrence be implemented in England? Protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation embedded in a feasibility basket trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112103</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112550?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maternal health, service utilisation and its determinants among women who gave birth in the last 12 months across Afar, Benishangul-Gumuz, Gambella and Somali region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study in four developing regional states of Ethiopia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112550?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to assess maternal health and service utilisation and identify the key determinants across Afar, Benishangul-Gumuz, Gambella and Somali, the four developing regional states (DRS) of Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2020 to February 2021 using stratified multistage cluster sampling for permanent residents and a random route approach for refugee populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at the community level across the DRS of Ethiopia, including Afar, Benishangul-Gumuz, Gambella and Somali regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1226 women who gave birth within the last 12 months participated, including 1028 non-refugees and 198 refugees living in temporary settlements. The mean age of participants was 26.4 years (SD&plusmn;5.7).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was maternal health service utilisation, defined as receiving at least one of the two services, antenatal care (8+ contacts) or postnatal care (staying in a health facility after delivery or visiting a health facility within the first 45 days postpartum and being checked for early postpartum danger signs and taking treatments accordingly).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>Overall, across the four regions, only 33% of women who had given birth within the last 12 months utilised maternal health services. Regional variation (Benishangul-Gumuz region (AOR=3.269, 95% CI 2.128 to 5.021; p value&lt;0.001), refugee status (AOR=4.022, 95% CI 2.753 to 5.876; p value&lt;0.001) compared with non-refugees, type of residence (urban residents (AOR=1.608, 95% CI 1.129 to 2.291; p value=0.008)), educational status of secondary school or higher (AOR=3.441, 95% CI 1.882 to 6.29; p value&lt;0.001) and women who made decisions by herself or jointly with her husband (AOR=1.872, 95% CI 1.255 to 2.792; p value=0.002) compared with those who do not have decision-making power regarding maternal and child health were significantly associated with maternal health service utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Maternal health service utilisation remains critically low in Ethiopia&rsquo;s DRS. Efforts to improve maternal health outcomes should focus on expanding educational opportunities, disseminating trusted information and empowering women in household decision-making.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yadate, T., Abute, L., Alemu, S., Dida, N., Geleta, T., Sharma, R., Mon, H. S., Abebe, F., Addisu, H., Abebe, Y., Dejene, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112550</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112550</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maternal health, service utilisation and its determinants among women who gave birth in the last 12 months across Afar, Benishangul-Gumuz, Gambella and Somali region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study in four developing regional states of Ethiopia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112550</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112550</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113841?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards the development of a framework for monitoring and evaluating the multidimensional sustainability of healthcare organisations: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113841?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The literature on sustainability performance frameworks for healthcare organisations varies in its applicability to different types of organisations and settings, functions and activities, and definitions and dimensions of sustainability. This fragmentation creates implementation barriers which may be overcome by consolidating existing evidence in a format that can be linked directly to organisations&rsquo; business models. This protocol proposes a scoping review to assess the extent of the literature on frameworks for monitoring and evaluating the multidimensional sustainability performance of healthcare organisations and to assemble a consolidated framework in an operationally relevant format to support progress towards sustainable healthcare organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The search strategy will be applied across Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL and Business Source Premier databases. Search results from 2009, coinciding with the publication of the WHO&rsquo;s &lsquo;Healthy Hospitals, Healthy Planet, Healthy People&rsquo; report, will be considered. The scoping review will include studies reporting on multidimensional sustainability monitoring or evaluation frameworks applied or developed for use at the level of healthcare delivery organisations. Studies relating to operational units within organisations or to healthcare systems will be excluded. The review&rsquo;s context will be restricted to operational sustainability and will not consider the literature on sustainable design planning and construction of new facilities. No specific exclusion criteria will be applied to the types of healthcare delivery organisations nor participants implicated in the frameworks. Title and abstract screening against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by full-text assessment of remaining articles, will be performed by two reviewers. Data from included studies will be extracted using a custom-designed extraction tool, analysed using topic or thematic analysis to consolidate themes and presented within the triple-layered business model canvas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Only publicly available sources will be used; research ethics approval is not required. Findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific meetings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pain, G. C. F., Chaves, R. L. P., Zhao, W., Haren, M. T., Gartner, J.-B., Bergeron, F., Cote, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113841</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113841</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards the development of a framework for monitoring and evaluating the multidimensional sustainability of healthcare organisations: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113841</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113841</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115518?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality and patient safety surveillance systems in healthcare settings: a rapid realist review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115518?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Despite extensive efforts in data collection, quality and safety measurement remains a significant global challenge, with limited understanding of how and under what conditions quality and patient safety surveillance systems function effectively. With the aim of informing the development and effective functioning of quality and patient safety surveillance systems, a rapid realist review was conducted to develop a set of theories that address how, why, for whom and in what context quality and patient safety surveillance systems work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Rapid realist review to inform recommendations and intervention design for the monitoring and evaluation phase of the QS Signals Project, reported according to Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Initial programme theories were constructed based on data collected from key articles on quality and patient safety surveillance systems, consultation with an expert panel, informal meetings with a project team charged with developing a quality and patient safety surveillance system for maternal and infant health and a review of the project&rsquo;s planning documents. A three-phase iterative search of PubMed, PsycInfo, CENTRAL, CINAHL and grey literature was conducted, including studies in healthcare settings across all patient groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Documents were assessed for relevance (alignment with the theory under test), richness (depth of insight) and rigour (trustworthiness and coherence of data).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Context&ndash;mechanism&ndash;outcome configurations were generated, iteratively refined and grouped under relevant programme theories to contribute to theory refinement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The review process resulted in the development of 11 final programme theories, identifying mechanisms operating at organisational and national levels. Effective systems were enabled by leadership commitment, organisational readiness for change and a supportive safety culture. Clear governance structures, including defined local and national roles, strengthened accountability and coordination. The establishment of multidisciplinary clinical advisory groups facilitated the selection of meaningful safety indicators. Sustainable financial investment and adequate human and technical resources were critical for implementation. Robust data governance frameworks enhanced trust, transparency and appropriate data use. User-centred system design improved data accessibility and usability, while feedback loops supported learning and continuous improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Quality and patient safety surveillance systems function most effectively when supported by strong leadership, clear governance structures, adequate resources and a learning-oriented culture that enables the meaningful use of safety data. The findings emerging from this review provide comprehensive, practical and testable systems-level programme theories to inform future research on the development of quality and patient safety surveillance systems across diverse healthcare settings and international contexts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ertugrul, B., Kaur Dullat, J., McDonnell, T., ODowd, M., McAuliffe, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115518</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115518</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality and patient safety surveillance systems in healthcare settings: a rapid realist review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115518</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115518</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115635?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among children aged 6-59 months in rural model households in the Central Zone of Sidama regional state, Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study using robust Poisson regression analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115635?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Undernutrition remains a public health challenge in Ethiopia, despite several nutrition programmes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of undernutrition and its associated factors among children aged 6&ndash;59 months in rural model households in the Central Zone of the Sidama regional state.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study employed a community-based cross-sectional design between 4 July and 4 August 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in selected woredas of the Central Zone of the Sidama regional state.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 627 children aged 6&ndash;59 months in the model households. Model households, defined as those that attended at least 75% of the 96-hour training sessions and successfully implemented 75% of the Health Extension Program (HEP) packages, were awarded certificates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome</st>
<p>The primary outcomes of this study were undernutrition, specifically stunting, underweight and wasting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Secondary outcome</st>
<p>The secondary outcome focused on factors associated with stunting, underweight and wasting. Bivariable and multivariable robust Poisson regression analyses were used to identify the associations between outcome and risk factors. The strength and significance of associations were assessed using adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) with 95% CIs and p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Although multilevel analysis was performed to account for woreda and kebele clustering, no significant effects were found. Simple robust Poisson regression findings are therefore presented. Stunting prevalence was 37.6%, underweight 13.9% and wasting 9.4%. Being male is linked to a higher prevalence of stunting (APR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.69), underweight (APR 1.72, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.65) and wasting (APR 1.73, 95% CI 1.003 to 2.98). Conversely, spoon-feeding (APR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.95), mothers as housewives (APR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.76) versus farmers and maternal household decision-making (APR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.70) were associated with lower prevalence of stunting. Additionally, larger households (&ge;5 members) were also associated with higher prevalence of underweight (APR 1.61, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.52) and wasting (APR 1.88, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.24).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings indicate a higher prevalence of stunting, accompanied by moderate rates of wasting, among children residing in rural model households in the Sidama region. Notably, practices such as spoon-feeding and maternal involvement in decision-making were associated with a lower prevalence of stunting. Conversely, larger family size was linked with a higher prevalence of underweight and wasting among children. To address these challenges, it is essential to promote hygienic feeding practices via the HEP, empower women in their communities, advocate for family planning to manage family size and strengthen community-based nutrition programmes. These measures could help combat undernutrition in rural areas.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gujo, A. A., Amare, H. H., Estifanos, M. B., Aregu, M. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115635</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115635</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among children aged 6-59 months in rural model households in the Central Zone of Sidama regional state, Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study using robust Poisson regression analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115635</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115635</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115691?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health-related quality of life and associated factors among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115691?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and identify associated factors among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) attending selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>A hospital-based multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted among 205 patients with COPD attending the chest clinics of selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from June 2023 to December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 205 patients with COPD who had follow-up at outpatient departments of the chest clinic of the selected hospitals were included in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The main outcome of this study was HRQoL, which was assessed using the validated COPD Assessment Test-Amharic version (CAT-Am). Data analysis was performed using Stata version.17, and multivariable linear regression was employed to examine the relationship between HRQoL and independent variables. Variables with p-values &lt;0.05 at a 95% CI were considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean score of the overall CAT-Am was 20.24&plusmn;8.13. Older age (&beta;=0.11, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.17), poor social support (&beta;=2.49, 95% CI: 0.74 to 4.24), biomass fuel exposure (&beta;=4.57, 95% CI:3.17 to 5.97), Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages 2, 3 and 4 (&beta;=2.12, 95% CI: 0.23 to 4.01; &beta;=3.38, 95% CI: 1.11 to 5.66; &beta;=5.20, 95% CI: 2.37 to 8.05, respectively), presence of comorbidity (&beta;=4.03, 95% CI: 2.48 to 5.59), increased number of hospitalisations in the past year (&beta;=2.78, 95% CI: 1.68 to 3.88), increased number of prescribed medications (&beta;=0.40, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.70), low medication adherence (&beta;=2.79, 95% CI: 1.13 to 4.46), and moderate medication adherence (&beta;=3.38, 95% CI: 1.65 to 5.11) were negatively associated with HRQoL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion and recommendations</st>
<p>In this study, patients with COPD had poor HRQoL, which indicates that patients need multidisciplinary interventions. Older age, poor social support, an increased number of prescribed medications, an increased number of hospitalisations in the past year, biomass fuel exposure, low and moderate medication adherence, GOLD severity stages 2, 3 and 4, and the presence of comorbidities require close follow-up to improve HRQoL. Further research should evaluate targeted strategies to address these determinants.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tesema, S. E., Muhammed, O. S., Gebremariam, G. T., Melaku, S. F., Fetene, A., Tamene, F. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115691</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115691</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health-related quality of life and associated factors among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115691</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115691</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115968?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How can work motivation among primary care physicians be assessed? Development and psychometric validation of the M-PCP scale: a cross-sectional study in the Girona Health Region, Spain]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115968?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Work motivation is essential for well-being, performance and retention in general practice. Despite its relevance, no validated instrument is available to assess motivation specifically among primary care physicians (PCPs) or to inform targeted managerial action.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To develop and validate the Motivation Scale for PCP (M-PCP), a theory-driven instrument designed to capture motivational processes relevant to general practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The scale was developed using a structured, theory-based process grounded in Ford&rsquo;s Motivational Systems Theory. Items were generated from existing models, reviewed by experts and tested in a cross-sectional survey of PCPs in the Girona Health Region (Catalonia, Spain). Psychometric analyses included item discrimination, exploratory factor analysis and partial least squares structural equation modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After removing items with low discrimination or weak loadings, the final 37-item scale showed a clear two-factor structure: goals (continuous improvement, self-care and agency) and perceptions (emotions and contextual agency beliefs). Both constructs showed strong reliability and validity. The model fit was acceptable, and perceptions explained a moderate proportion of variance in goals. These findings indicate that the scale captures key motivational processes linked to daily clinical work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The M-PCP is a valid tool for assessing work motivation in general practice. By identifying goal-related, emotional and contextual motivational processes, it supports targeted strategies that may enhance clinical performance, continuity of care and physician well-being. Further research should examine its predictive value and applicability across health systems.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115968</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115968</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How can work motivation among primary care physicians be assessed? Development and psychometric validation of the M-PCP scale: a cross-sectional study in the Girona Health Region, Spain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical management</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115968</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115968</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116566?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility and acceptability of ENhanced Reviews of PsychologIcal Changes (ENRICH) after stroke: protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116566?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Managing mood, cognition and fatigue are top unmet needs reported by stroke survivors, which impact quality of life. There is currently no standardised UK care pathway to support post-stroke psychological outcomes. The ENhanced Reviews of PsychologIcal Changes (ENRICH) programme, an intervention co-designed with stroke survivors, carers and healthcare professionals, aims to fill this gap. Here, we describe the protocol for evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of ENRICH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>ENRICH reviews comprise cognition, mood and fatigue assessment, personalised psychoeducation and tools to communicate results and discuss self-management strategies, delivered at 1, 3 and 6 months post-stroke. N=140 participants (N=80 patients who had a stroke, N=45 carers, N=15 healthcare professionals) will be recruited to a single-arm multicentre feasibility study.</p>
<p>Patients who had a stroke and carers will complete demographics at baseline (T1) questionnaires of quality of life, mood and healthcare resource use at 6 months post-stroke (T2) and an optional interview on experiences of ENRICH. Process evaluation will include fidelity assessment via audio recordings. Descriptive statistics will be calculated for study outcomes.</p>
<p>Key qualitative acceptability outcomes are sought on intervention delivery by clinicians, patients and carers.</p>
<p>Key intervention delivery feasibility outcomes relate to training clinicians (including competency and fidelity delivering ENRICH), and review completion rates. Study feasibility outcomes will include site and participant recruitment and retention rates and completion of candidate primary outcome measures on quality of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The ENRICH study was approved by a UK Research Ethics Committee (reference: 24/LO/0341). Consent procedures include a waiver of consent to the intervention itself due ENRICH&rsquo;s service-level design and written informed consent/consultee advice for participants providing research data. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and lay summaries for study participants and healthcare professionals. Results will inform whether ENRICH is acceptable to delivering clinicians and receiving patients who had a stroke and carers, and provide key insights to inform a future randomised trial to determine effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN16018388">ISRCTN16018388</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kusec, A., Hobden, G., Wright-Hughes, A., Demeyere, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116566</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116566</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility and acceptability of ENhanced Reviews of PsychologIcal Changes (ENRICH) after stroke: protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116566</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116566</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116834?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of artificial intelligence-based digital therapeutics versus traditional Schroth exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116834?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) requires long-term conservative management to prevent curve progression. While physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises, specifically the Schroth method, are considered the gold standard for conservative treatment, their clinical efficacy is often limited by accessibility barriers, high costs and suboptimal treatment adherence. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital therapeutic system, which uses computer vision for remote, personalised posture analysis and adaptive exercise prescription compared with traditional outpatient Schroth therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This parallel-group randomised controlled trial will be conducted at Guangzhou Women and Children&rsquo;s Medical Center (Guangzhou, China). 300 adolescents aged 10&ndash;18 years with AIS who present with a Cobb angle between 10&deg; and 30&deg; and a Risser sign of 0&ndash;2 will be recruited and randomised in a 1:1 ratio into an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group will use a smartphone application to capture standardised bi-weekly images. These images will be processed by an AI algorithm to classify curve patterns and assign personalised exercise modules with adaptive dosing ranging from maintenance to high-intensity levels. The control group will receive standard outpatient Schroth care. The primary outcome is the absolute change in the major curve Cobb angle from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes include the angle of trunk rotation, trunk appearance perception, Scoliosis Research Society-22 Revised (SRS-22r) quality-of-life scores and adherence rates. Statistical analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle using linear mixed models to account for repeated measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of Guangzhou Women and Children&rsquo;s Medical Center (Guangzhou, China) (approval no. [2025]497A01). Written informed assent and consent will be obtained from participants and their legal guardians respectively. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov, <A HREF="NCT07341633">NCT07341633</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, R., Huang, Z., Zhu, X., Ma, X., Cheng, W., Tang, D., Liu, J., Shu, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116834</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116834</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of artificial intelligence-based digital therapeutics versus traditional Schroth exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116834</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116834</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117387?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Illness perception and self-management behaviours in adults with multimorbidity: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117387?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Multimorbidity, characterised by the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions, represents a growing challenge for health systems, adversely affecting quality of life, self-care, treatment adherence and service utilisation. Within the context of self-regulation in health, the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation of Health and Illness (CSM) proposes that illness perceptions&mdash;such as beliefs about causes, control, consequences, timeline and illness identity&mdash;influence health behaviours. Despite consolidated evidence in single-disease contexts, little is known about how these perceptions operate when multiple conditions coexist, particularly due to the need to integrate potentially conflicting representations. To date, no systematic reviews have synthesised these relationships specifically in populations with multimorbidity. This protocol describes the methods for a systematic review aimed at examining how illness perceptions are associated with treatment adherence, self-care and indicators of chronic condition management in adults with multimorbidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Observational studies involving adults (&ge;18 years) with multimorbidity, which assess illness perceptions using validated instruments and report outcomes related to treatment adherence, self-care or self-management behaviours, will be included. The search will be conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and LILACS databases, using combinations of descriptors related to illness perception, multimorbidity and health behaviours. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection, data extraction and methodological quality assessment. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the overall quality of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted using measures of association (eg, ORs, relative risk or HRs); otherwise, a structured narrative synthesis will be performed. Subgroup analyses will be conducted when data are available.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As it uses exclusively secondary and published data, this review does not require approval by a research ethics committee. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at relevant scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO number</st>
<p>CRD420251266292.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Junger, A. L., Fonseca, E. S., Sousa, A. L. L., Batista, S. R. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117387</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117387</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Illness perception and self-management behaviours in adults with multimorbidity: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117387</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117387</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117840?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding how post-intensive care follow-up is delivered within the role of critical care outreach teams: a qualitative study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117840?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Each year over 130 000 patients in the UK are discharged from an intensive care unit (ICU), with many experiencing poor outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, emergency ICU readmission and/or significant morbidity. Despite current national guidance and the availability of follow-up services, post-ICU care remains variable. Critical Care Outreach Teams (CCOTs) are key in supporting this patient group, yet practice differs considerably. Recovery pathways have been successfully employed in other patient populations and are a potential option to standardise post-ICU care. Understanding how care is currently delivered by CCOT throughout the UK is essential to inform future development of an evidence-based recovery pathway for this patient group. Our primary aim is to understand how post-ICU follow-up care is delivered within the wider remit of CCOT workloads.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a pragmatic multicentre qualitative study of post-ICU follow-up care. The study will be split into two sub-studies: semi-structured interviews and ethnographic observations. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with three groups of individuals: multi-professional staff members involved in the care of patients discharged from ICU to the wards, patients discharged from ICU to the wards and their family members. Direct participant observations alongside ad hoc informal discussions will be undertaken with members of the CCOT at participating sites focusing on their workflow to generate an understanding of the CCOT role and how post-ICU support fits within this. An overarching thematic analysis approach will be taken to analyse data from both sub-studies to clearly identify the barriers and facilitators to providing post-ICU support within the CCOT role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained through the London&mdash;Chelsea Research Ethics Committee (25/PR/0773). We aim to disseminate the findings to local teams, at regional and international conferences, in peer-reviewed journals and through social media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN14138257">ISRCTN14138257</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonner, A., Gustafson, O., Betteridge, S., Pattison, N., Watkinson, P. J., Vollam, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117840</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117840</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding how post-intensive care follow-up is delivered within the role of critical care outreach teams: a qualitative study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117840</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117840</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118679?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Scoping review of e-cigarette use in the perioperative setting: a protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118679?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>E-cigarette use (often referred to as &lsquo;vaping&rsquo;) has increased rapidly over the past decade. Tobacco smoking is a well-established risk factor for adverse perioperative outcomes. While UK guidance supports e-cigarette use as a harm reduction and smoking cessation strategy, the perioperative implications of e-cigarette use are unclear. This scoping review aims to map the breadth and nature of the available evidence on e-cigarette use in the perioperative setting. It will describe how perioperative e-cigarette use is defined and measured, identify the perioperative populations and settings which have been studied, summarise reported perioperative outcomes and identify key knowledge gaps that should be addressed in future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will be conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and grey literature sources will be systematically searched from 2003, when the first commercially available e-cigarette was introduced, to February 2026. Studies will be screened, and data extracted by two independent reviewers. Studies of any design examining perioperative e-cigarette use in the perioperative period, across all surgical specialities, will be included. Data will be synthesised narratively and presented using tabular and visual summaries. The study will be undertaken between 9 February and 1 August 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for scoping reviews. Findings will be disseminated by conference presentation and publication in a peer-reviewed open-access journal and communication with stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrogate, S. R., Livingstone-Banks, J., Hinchliffe, R., Pope, I., Mouton, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118679</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118679</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Scoping review of e-cigarette use in the perioperative setting: a protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118679</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118679</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118771?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing the impact of diabetic foot ulcers (REDUCE): study protocol for an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118771?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Diabetic foot ulceration represents a prevalent, persistent and resource-intensive complication of diabetes. These ulcers are slow to heal, prone to recurrence and impose a substantial burden on both patients and healthcare providers. The reducing the impact of diabetic foot ulcers (REDUCE) intervention has been designed as a multifaceted approach targeting psychological and behavioural determinants linked to diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) outcomes. Following a successful pilot trial, the REDUCE trial has been designed as a pragmatic, multicentre randomised trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the REDUCE intervention plus usual care versus usual care alone in reducing recurrence in people with healed DFUs. Additionally, there is an embedded process evaluation and two sub-studies which will be carried out alongside the main trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Adults over 18 years of age, with a recently healed DFU and two lower limbs, will be identified from around 30 specialist multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinics at participating National Health Service Trusts in the UK. Patients with active Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy, active DFU or ulcers healed for more than 12 weeks will be excluded. We will aim to recruit 544 participants (1:1 randomisation). The primary outcome for this trial will be total ulcer-free days with limbs intact (ie, without amputation) between randomisation and the end of follow-up (18 months post-randomisation). Secondary outcomes include time to re-ulceration, total number of ulcers, amputation, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare, ICEpop capability measure for adults and resource use. As part of the process evaluation, up to 20 REDUCE intervention patient-participants will be interviewed, and the healthcare professionals delivering the intervention will also be interviewed. An assessment of intervention fidelity will also be carried out.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was granted by Wales 3 Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 22/WA/0053) on 16 March 2022. The findings will be presented at relevant conferences and disseminated via peer-reviewed research publications and to relevant stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN15570706">ISRCTN15570706</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell, N., Vedhara, K., Ayling, K., Mitchell, A., Sheehan, C., Cullen, K., Hart, R., Okanlawon, A. A., Arundel, C., Bradbury, K., Brewin, D., Chalder, T., Cullum, N., Dayan, C., Figueredo, G., Fitzsimmons, D., Hewitt, C., Howard, G., Lawton, J., Metcalfe, C., Torgerson, D., Watson, J., Winkley, K., Yardley, L., Game, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118771</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118771</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing the impact of diabetic foot ulcers (REDUCE): study protocol for an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118771</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118771</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118867?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of bacterial dysbiosis in infertility: the BIOME study protocol for a Danish multicentre prospective observational cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118867?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Microbiome composition across multiple body sites, including the vagina, gut, urinary tract and semen, has been implicated in reproductive health and infertility. Vaginal dysbiosis and reduced <I>Lactobacillus</I> abundance have previously been associated with poorer outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies, yet few studies have simultaneously characterised microbiomes of both partners or compared infertile couples with healthy population controls. The BIOME study, a prospective cohort study, aims to characterise multisite microbiomes in infertile and healthy Danish couples and examine their association with long-term fertility outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The BIOME study is a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study including 100 couples undergoing fertility treatment following &ge;12 months of unsuccessful pregnancy attempts and 100 healthy control couples. Participants provide biological samples from multiple body sites (vaginal swab or semen, faeces, urine and blood) prior to initiation of fertility treatment. Samples will undergo microbial sequencing, quantitative PCR, culture-based analyses, proteomics, metabolomics and microRNA profiling. Questionnaire data, clinical information and electronic medical record data will be collected. Participants will be followed for 5 years after sample collection to assess fertility outcomes. No intervention, randomisation or blinding is performed. Recruitment is planned over 24 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Danish Ethics Committee (#SJ-1033), and all participants provide written informed consent. Data are processed according to the General Data Protection Regulation and the Danish Data Protection Act, with pseudonymisation and restricted-access procedures. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences. Sequencing data will be deposited in a public repository (eg, European Nucleotide Archive) with personal identifiers removed, and curated metadata will be available on reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Storck-Thy, C., Dessing, L. B., Jensen, B. H., Oxlund-Mariegaard, B., Krogfelt, K. A., Jonsson, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118867</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118867</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of bacterial dysbiosis in infertility: the BIOME study protocol for a Danish multicentre prospective observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118867</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118867</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119219?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective longitudinal observational study at an academic medical centre of lifestyle and cognition in older adults with a cochlear implant or hearing aid: study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119219?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Dementia is a major global health problem with increasing prevalence. Hearing loss has been identified as the most modifiable risk factor for dementia. The Age-Related Cognition and Hearing (ARCH) study is a 3-year prospective, controlled, observational comparative cohort study comparing cochlear implants (Implants) and hearing aids (HAs) for reducing cognitive decline associated with age-related hearing loss (ARHL), based on patient-reported real-world outcomes of auditory function, cognitive performance, listening environment, social interaction and psychosocial well-being. Upon its completion in 2029, the ARCH study is expected to yield significant evidence regarding the comparative effects of two primary hearing interventions&mdash;Implants and HAs, to delay and ameliorate cognitive decline associated with ARHL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>210 older adults are divided into six study subgroups (N=35) with: (1) moderate to profound hearing loss or age-typical normal hearing, (2) use of Implants or HAs and (3) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or normal cognition. Listeners in the HA groups have hearing loss that is consistent with Implant candidacy and qualification through Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services in the USA. The primary study outcome is a 3-year change in real-time patient-reported outcomes collected while participants are in their natural listening environments using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodologies. Secondary outcomes include lab-based audiometric and neuropsychological testing, and patient-reported outcomes of social isolation, loneliness, depression, anxiety and quality of life.</p>
<p>Cross-sectional analyses will use factor analysis to reduce EMA items into domains, followed by regression and mixed-effects models to test group differences and identify specific EMA items driving those effects. Machine-learning approaches will complement these models by predicting outcomes, identifying key variables and uncovering data-driven patterns. Longitudinal mixed-effects models will assess how EMA factor scores and cognition change over time and whether real-world EMA experiences mediate cognitive trajectories. Additional analyses will compare real-time EMA responses with retrospective patient-reported outcome measures and laboratory-based cognitive and auditory assessments, with sample size adjusted for up to 10% attrition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>All study procedures follow institutional review board requirements and the Declaration of Helsinki at the University of Iowa (IRB# 202403385), with informed consent processes tailored to ensure understanding among participants with MCI. Study findings will be disseminated through a multi-tiered strategy aimed at maximising scientific, clinical and public health impact. Peer-reviewed manuscripts will be submitted to leading journals in audiology, geriatrics, cognitive ageing and public health, with interim and final results presented at national and international conferences and professional society meetings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shulman, L. M., Caraher, K., Cummings, M. P., Mahurkar, A., Huffman, M., Vinyard, A., Hoth, K. F., Wu, Y.-H., Oleson, J., Dunn, C. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119219</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119219</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective longitudinal observational study at an academic medical centre of lifestyle and cognition in older adults with a cochlear implant or hearing aid: study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119219</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study protocol for the effect of intraoperative subanaesthetic dose esketamine on the incidence of postoperative depressive symptoms in patients with breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative depressive symptoms are common after breast cancer surgery and can adversely affect recovery and quality of life. This multicentre trial aims to determine whether a single intraoperative subanaesthetic dose of esketamine, as an adjunct to antidepressant therapy, improves postoperative depressive outcomes at postoperative day (POD) 30.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, prospective, randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial will enrol 824 women aged 18&ndash;80 years with stage I&ndash;III breast cancer (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I&ndash;III) who are scheduled to undergo surgery. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive 0.2 mg/kg esketamine or an equivalent volume of normal saline after anaesthesia induction and before surgical incision. The primary outcome is the incidence of depressive symptoms at POD 30, assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression (score &ge;8). Secondary outcomes include acute and chronic pain, and anxious symptoms, etc. Primary analysis will use a generalised linear mixed model with a logit link on an intention-to-treat basis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been formally approved by the institutional ethics committee of the National Cancer Center (Approval No.25/483-5429). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and international scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2600117573.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, Z.-Y., Wang, J., Yang, J.-S., Xu, X., Wang, F., Li, H.-X., Zheng, H., Fang, Y., Ma, S., Yan, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119291</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119291</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study protocol for the effect of intraoperative subanaesthetic dose esketamine on the incidence of postoperative depressive symptoms in patients with breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119291</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119354?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SAGE (safer analgesia): a protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to reduce the use of high-risk medicines in people with chronic back and/or neck pain]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119354?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic back and neck pain are commonly treated with opioid analgesics, gabapentinoids and benzodiazepines, despite their high-risk profile and potential limited efficacy. Deprescribing interventions (aimed at medicine reduction or cessation) have shown some effectiveness in reducing the use of these medications, but similar approaches tailored to individuals with complex chronic back and/or neck pain are lacking and urgently needed. This trial will evaluate the effect of the safer analgesia (SAGE) intervention (training of general practitioners (GPs) in deprescribing and support to deprescribe) on cessation and/or reduction of the target high-risk medicine (a benzodiazepine, gabapentinoid or opioid) for people with chronic back and/or neck pain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>SAGE is a pragmatic cluster randomised trial that will be conducted with at least 30 general practices in Australia randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the SAGE intervention or no intervention (usual care control group). The SAGE intervention is a GP-facing intervention comprising (i) training for GPs in deprescribing and access to deprescribing resources and (ii) deprescribing support&mdash;to assist the deprescribing process for their patients, GPs can conduct a long GP consultation (20&ndash;40-min duration), refer to trained physiotherapists for the provision of psychologically informed physiotherapy sessions and provide alternate pain management options including heat wrap and diclofenac gel. A total of 320 adult patient-participants experiencing chronic back and/or neck pain (&ge; 3 months duration) prescribed a target high-risk medicine (benzodiazepine, gabapentinoid or opioid) persistently for this pain will be recruited via participating general practices. The primary outcome is cessation of dispensation of the trial participant&rsquo;s high-risk medicine (a benzodiazepine, gabapentinoid or opioid) prescribed by their trial GP. The primary time-point for the primary outcome will be 1-year post-enrolment with an observation window of the preceding 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include self-reported outcomes such as pain, quality of life and adverse events. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat approach with a nested economic evaluation and per-protocol analysis planned separately.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study received approval from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2024/HE001706). The results will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, presentation at conferences and media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ANZCTR: ACTRN12625000953437.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdel Shaheed, C., McLachlan, A. J., Mathieson, S., Ivers, R., Clare, P. J., Blyth, F., Stanaway, F., Degenhardt, L., Gnjidic, D., French, S., Thompson, R., Hilmer, S., Pinheiro, M., Machado, G. C., Austin, T., Gardner, T., Sharma, S., Bennett, A., Boogs, M., McMaugh, J., Vizza, L., Downie, A., Tracy, M., Hopkins, R., Osman, R., Lindley, R. I., Hayes, C., McCaffery, K., Maher, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-24T21:16:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119354</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119354</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SAGE (safer analgesia): a protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to reduce the use of high-risk medicines in people with chronic back and/or neck pain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119354</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119354</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103318?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of COVID-19-related data drift on machine-learning prognostic models predicting 30-day opioid-related emergency department visits, hospitalisation or mortality: a population-level administrative data study in Alberta, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103318?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop machine-learning (ML) models during the COVID-19 pandemic and adjacent time periods to evaluate the impact of data drift on model performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This prognostic study used population-level administrative health data to develop ML prediction models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Alberta, Canada during 2019&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients over 18 who received at least one opioid dispensation from a community pharmacy within the province of Alberta between 2019&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Exposure</st>
<p>Each opioid dispensation served as the unit-of-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcomes/measures</st>
<p>Opioid-related outcomes were identified from linked health administrative datasets. Light Gradient Boosting-machine models were developed on pre-pandemic, pandemic and endemic data and temporally validated on 2023 data (pre-pandemic model was also validated on 2020&ndash;2021 data) to predict the risk of emergency department visit, hospitalisation or mortality within 30-days of an opioid dispensation. We described key feature distributions across the study time period and changes in model prediction performance on the validation sets using relevant metrics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 1.2 million study participants representing over 13 million opioid dispensations, there were 59 809 (2.1%), 134 402 (2.4%) and 62 143 (2.3%) events reported in the pre-pandemic (2019), pandemic (2020 and 2021) and endemic (2022) time periods, respectively (estimated 2023 validation set pre-test probability of 2.8%). Notable differences in key features were observed in the 2020&ndash;2021 model relative to other years. In the 2023 validation set, discrimination performance was highest for the pre-pandemic and endemic models compared with the pandemic model (0.81, 0.83, 0.74, respectively). A similar trend regarding changes from pre-test to post-test probabilities in higher categories of predicted risk (23%, 40%, 16%) was observed. 2020&ndash;2021 had the lowest discrimination performance (0.71) and uninformative post-test probabilities (&lt;10%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>COVID-19 pandemic health data contributed to significant ML drift. Although ML approaches allow for quick re-training to mitigate drift, health regulators should approach ML prediction with caution when using pandemic-times data.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharma, V., Li, W., Joon, T., Dubois, C., Lau, D., Jess, E., Lindeman, C., Kain, N. A., Ye, M., Semenchuk, M., Eurich, D. T., Samanani, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103318</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103318</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of COVID-19-related data drift on machine-learning prognostic models predicting 30-day opioid-related emergency department visits, hospitalisation or mortality: a population-level administrative data study in Alberta, Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103318</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105381?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trends, utilisation and appropriateness of proton pump inhibitor prescriptions among recent initiators: a decade-long analysis of patients with a 1-year washout period (2013-2021)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105381?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe temporal trends in initiation, dose intensity, utilisation and potentially inappropriate prescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) among recent initiators in an urban Chinese outpatient setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective, annual identification of recent PPI initiators using a 1-year washout definition (repeated cross-sectional approach).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Outpatient prescriptions recorded in the hospital information system of Jinshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 2013&ndash;2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults aged &ge;18 years who initiated PPI and had no PPI prescription in the preceding year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary and secondary outcome measures annual initiation rates (overall and stratified by sex, age group, dose intensity and indication), utilisation metrics (defined daily dose/1000 inhabitants/day, defined daily cost, drug utilisation index) and components of potentially inappropriate prescribing (indication-related, prophylaxis-related and incomplete diagnosis).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 114 241 recent initiators (mean age 48.47 years; 51.43% female), initiation rates increased from 1.79% (95% CI 1.76% to 1.83%) in 2013 to 2.79% (2.74% to 2.83%) in 2021 (p&lt;0.001), with the steepest rise in adults aged 18&ndash;34 years. High-dose initiation peaked in 2019 and then declined, while standard-dose initiation increased after 2019. Across 2013&ndash;2021, potentially inappropriate indication-related prescribing decreased (30.94% in 2013 to 10.36% in 2021), whereas prophylaxis-related prescribing remained common.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PPI initiation increased substantially over the past decade, particularly among younger adults. These patterns raise concerns about potential overuse and suboptimal prescribing. The results underscore the need for targeted prescription review and deprescribing-oriented stewardship, with particular attention to young adults, prophylactic indications and dose optimisation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Ren, W., Wang, S., Xiang, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105381</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105381</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trends, utilisation and appropriateness of proton pump inhibitor prescriptions among recent initiators: a decade-long analysis of patients with a 1-year washout period (2013-2021)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical management</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105381</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105381</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106285?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of human papillomavirus vaccine non-uptake among adolescent girls in Ethiopia: evidence from National Immunization Survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106285?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess determinants of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine non-uptake among adolescent girls in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Community-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A weighted sample of 5341 adolescent girls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A secondary analysis was conducted using the 2024 Ethiopian National Immunization Evaluation Survey dataset. A two-stage stratified sampling technique was used to select 467 enumeration areas (EAs). Within each EA, 30 households with adolescent girls aged 15&ndash;18 were systematically selected. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to identify individual-level and/or household-level, and community-level determinants. Associations were presented using adjusted ORs with 95% CIs and statistical significance was set at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Individual and household-level determinants of HPV vaccine non-uptake include age 17&ndash;18 years (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.41; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.72), illiteracy (AOR=3.03; 95% CI 2.14 to 4.28), not currently attending school (AOR=2.84; 95% CI 2.24 to 3.60), poor knowledge (AOR=8.91; 95% CI 6.63 to 11.99), unfavourable attitude (AOR=4.24; 95% CI 3.34 to 5.37) and living in the poorest households (AOR=1.48; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.10). Community-level determinants were urban residence (AOR=1.40; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.95); and living in Addis Ababa (AOR=2.73; 95% CI 1.29 to 5.74), Afar (AOR=4.73; 95% CI 2.08 to 10.77), Dire Dawa (AOR=2.69; 95% CI 1.21 to 5.98), Harari (AOR=2.09; 95% CI 1.05 to 4.14) and Somali (AOR=3.68; 95% CI 1.61 to 8.38).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The determinants of HPV vaccine non-uptake were older age (17&ndash;18), illiteracy, school non-attendance, poor knowledge, unfavourable attitude, living in the poorest households, urban residence and living in Addis Ababa, Afar, Dire Dawa, Harari and Somali. The findings call for improved health literacy, knowledge and attitude through health extension programmes and targeted outreach in underserved urban and pastoralist settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Assefa, K. T., Worku, A. G., Muche, A. A., Geremew, B. M., Woldetsadik, M. A., Alemu, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106285</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106285</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of human papillomavirus vaccine non-uptake among adolescent girls in Ethiopia: evidence from National Immunization Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106285</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106382?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is publicly funded health insurance associated with healthcare utilisation and financial protection in India? Evidence from a cross-sectional household survey (CAMS 2022-2023)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106382?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the association of India&rsquo;s publicly funded health insurance (PFHI), mainly Ayushman Bharat&ndash;Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana, with healthcare utilisation, out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) and catastrophic health expenditure (CHE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the Comprehensive Annual Modular Survey 2022&ndash;2023. Multivariable logistic regression and Heckman two-stage models were applied, adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic covariates and survey design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All states and union territories of India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>302 086 households (173 096 rural; 128 990 urban) surveyed between July 2022 and June 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PFHI coverage was associated with higher outpatient (adjusted OR 1.404, 95% CI 1.328 to 1.484, p&lt;0.01) and inpatient care use (adjusted OR 1.168, 95% CI 1.128 to 1.210, p&lt;0.01). At the 20% threshold, PFHI coverage significantly reduced the likelihood of CHE for both outpatient (adjusted OR 0.869, 95% CI 0.810 to 0.932, p&lt;0.01) and inpatient care (adjusted OR 0.790, 95% CI 0.737 to 0.846, p&lt;0.01). Heckman model estimates showed a significant reduction in inpatient OOPE (coefficient &ndash;0.205, 95% CI &ndash;0.258 to &ndash;0.153, p&lt;0.01), while outpatient OOPE reductions were modest (&ndash;0.047, 95% CI &ndash;0.087 to &ndash;0.006, p&lt;0.05). However, outpatient care remained inadequately covered, with high OOPE and CHE persisting even among insured households. Financial vulnerability was higher among the uninsured, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups and rural residents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PFHI was associated with improved access to inpatient services and partial financial protection, but association with outpatient care indicates a major source of financial burden. Policy reforms should expand PFHI benefits to outpatient services, strengthen primary care through Ayushman Arogya Mandirs and tailor implementation to state contexts and vulnerable populations to achieve equitable and comprehensive financial protection.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonu, S., Bhushan, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106382</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106382</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is publicly funded health insurance associated with healthcare utilisation and financial protection in India? Evidence from a cross-sectional household survey (CAMS 2022-2023)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106382</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106382</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106835?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of community sociodemographic and tuberculosis-related factors with variability in community-level tuberculosis stigma in South Africa: an ecological analysis from the MISSED TB Outcomes study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106835?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Tuberculosis (TB) stigma is a critical barrier to timely diagnosis and treatment, yet few studies have quantified community-level TB stigma or its variability across geographic contexts. This study describes methods for capturing community-level TB stigma and examines stigma variability and correlations with community-level sociodemographic and TB-related factors across urban, periurban and rural communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Ecological study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>93 demarcated study communities in Buffalo City Metropolitan Health District, Eastern Cape, South Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>3869 heads of household, age &ge;18 years, were surveyed in a geographically clustered random sample of households across the 93 study communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Validated scales were used to measure perceived TB stigma. Community levels of TB stigma were generated by aggregating individual responses within each study community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Median community TB stigma scores varied significantly by community location: compared with urban communities, rural communities had lower TB stigma scores (beta=&ndash;0.235; 95% CI &ndash;0.362 to &ndash;0.108) while periurban communities had higher scores (beta=0.136; 95% CI 0.017 to 0.254). Community TB stigma was positively associated with community HIV stigma, with the strongest associations in urban (beta=0.977 (95% CI 0.634 to 1.321) and rural (beta=0.816 (95% CI 0.186 to 1.446) communities. No associations were observed between TB stigma and TB prevalence, TB knowledge or household demographics after adjusting for community location.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>TB stigma varied meaningfully across communities and was associated with urbanicity and HIV stigma. Stigma is a complex social process and there may be many other factors shaping TB stigma at the community level. Future research and stigma-reduction interventions should consider local contexts and community-level determinants beyond individual demographics, TB knowledge or community TB burden.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kipp, A. M., Olivier, D., Skonje, N., Majiza, L., Free, E., Preacher, K. J., Ngcelwane, N., Daftary, A., Medina-Marino, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106835</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106835</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of community sociodemographic and tuberculosis-related factors with variability in community-level tuberculosis stigma in South Africa: an ecological analysis from the MISSED TB Outcomes study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106835</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106835</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108683?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a phase I single-centre dose escalation trial of autologous thymus derived regulatory T cells in paediatric heart transplant recipients to prevent cardiac allograft vasculopathy (ATT-Heart)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108683?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a critical predictor of the long-term success of heart transplantation and once it is established, progression to graft dysfunction and loss is inevitable, despite adherence to immunosuppression and medications that ameliorate cardiac risk factors. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are key for maintaining immune balance in the periphery. Studies investigating adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded Tregs isolated from blood have been shown to be feasible and safe with good evidence for Tregs reducing CAV lesions in animal models of transplantation. Here, we describe the protocol for the ATT-Heart Study which is a phase I clinical trial investigating autologous thymus-derived Treg cell therapy in nine paediatric heart transplant recipients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Patients will be recruited from the heart transplant waiting list at Great Ormond Street Hospital. Individualised autologous thymus-derived and expanded Tregs (TR006) will be injected into patients 3&ndash;6 months after transplant and follow-up will be conducted as per the post-transplant standard of care protocol with no wean of standard of care immunosuppression. Primary endpoint includes occurrence of Dose-limiting Toxicities in patients receiving TR006. Further data from blood tests, endomyocardial biopsy tissue, coronary imaging and clinical follow-up will be collected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This article is based on the ATT-Heart study Protocol (V.1.1; dated 19 December 2024). The ATT-Heart trial has received a favourable ethical opinion from the Health Research Authority and South-Central Oxford A Research Ethics Committee (IRAS Number: 1008875/REC reference: 24/SC/0333). Clinical trials authorisation approval from UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has also been received. The clinical trial will be conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice and following the guidelines set as part of the Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care and all applicable necessary local policies. It is intended that the findings of the clinical trial will be presented at national/international conferences and using social media and through patient groups for dissemination among their members. The results will also be published in international peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN15374803">ISRCTN15374803</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aiyengar, A., Fanelli, G., Romano, M., Patel, P., Issa, F., Panesar, D., Muthialu, N., Douiri, A., Lombardi, G., Burch, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108683</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108683</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a phase I single-centre dose escalation trial of autologous thymus derived regulatory T cells in paediatric heart transplant recipients to prevent cardiac allograft vasculopathy (ATT-Heart)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108683</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109264?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychological self-care, burnout and quality of life among university students in health-related fields across three regions of Thailand]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109264?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Public health students face academic and training pressures as well as challenges arising from patient and community expectations, which may adversely affect their quality of life (QoL) and contribute to burnout and student dropout. This study aimed to examine psychological self-care, burnout and QoL as well as the factors associated with these outcomes among university students.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study conducted between January and March 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Universities in northern, southern and northeastern Thailand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1426 health-related students aged 18&ndash;25 years were recruited using non-probability sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, which included the Thai version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF instrument (WHOQOL-BREF-THAI), the Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess emotional exhaustion (EE) and cynicism (CY) and a psychological self-care assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most participants (79.9%) reported a moderate level of QoL. The prevalence of burnout was 18.9%. Pearson&rsquo;s correlation analysis indicated statistically significant relationships between psychological self-care, EE, CY and QoL (all p values&lt;0.001). Multilevel linear regression further highlighted that psychological self-care was significantly associated with sex, academic performance, presence of chronic conditions, smoking and sleep duration. In terms of burnout, EE was significantly linked to chronic conditions, alcohol consumption and cannabis use. CY showed significant associations with academic performance, chronic conditions, alcohol consumption and cannabis use. Additionally, QoL was significantly associated with sex, academic performance, income adequacy, chronic conditions, smoking and cannabis use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Good mental healthcare behaviours and lower levels of burnout are associated with higher QoL among public health students. Universities and programme administrators should implement mental health support strategies, including routine screening, counselling services and self-care promotion, to reduce burnout and improve students&rsquo; overall well-being.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seangpraw, K., Kantow, S., Sakulwattana, W., Auttama, N., Sukhabot, K., Bootsikeaw, S., Khaonuan, B., Ong-Artborirak, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109264</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109264</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychological self-care, burnout and quality of life among university students in health-related fields across three regions of Thailand]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109264</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111387?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying future research priorities for diversity-sensitive psychosocial interventions to manage dementia-related symptoms (GenderDem): protocol for a priority setting partnership study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111387?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Gender, sex and ethnicity-sensitive approaches to psychosocial interventions for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia have been under-represented in the literature. Although the initial findings have revealed relevant differences with regard to sex, gender and ethnicity-sensitive approaches to those interventions. The GenderDem study aims to identify the top-10 research priorities in this context for future dementia care research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The methodological approach in GenderDem is based on the James Lind Alliance Guidebook and the concept of priority setting partnerships. In this participatory research approach, people living with dementia, their caregivers (and/or their loved ones) and healthcare professionals will be actively involved in the study. As members of a steering group, they act as coresearchers in the GenderDem study. We aim to recruit a diverse group of people for the steering group by considering different factors, eg, gender identity, sex, ethnicity and age. Future research priorities will be identified through two rounds of online surveys to collect and rank research topics from additional participants (eg, people with dementia, caregivers and/or loved ones and healthcare professionals). Additionally, a literature review and a workshop will be carried out in parallel to consider the current state of the research and to finalise the top-10 research priorities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>An ethics application for conducting the two surveys and the workshop for this study has been approved by the German Society of Nursing Science (No. 25-029). Study participants will be informed in detail about the voluntary nature of their participation. Together with the coresearchers from the steering group, we will develop a dissemination plan that considers the different media consumption forms of the various groups. Additionally, we will disseminate our project results on an ongoing basis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michel, E., Yigit, G., Rommerskirch-Manietta, M., Altinok, K., Felding, S. A., Manietta, C., Roes, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111387</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111387</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying future research priorities for diversity-sensitive psychosocial interventions to manage dementia-related symptoms (GenderDem): protocol for a priority setting partnership study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111387</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111387</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113943?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of allied health professions in falls prevention for community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113943?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Falls among community-dwelling older adults are prevalent and have serious individual, societal and economic consequences. Allied health professionals provide key falls prevention interventions yet their representation in current clinical practice guidelines is inconsistent. Increased recognition of allied health roles and delivering context-specific guidelines for falls care could help to address workforce gaps and optimise care approaches. This scoping review explored the roles of the allied health professions in falls prevention screening, assessment and intervention for community-dwelling older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review, using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database databases. The initial search was completed in November 2023, with a secondary search performed in July 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Sources were eligible if they identified or described a specific role of at least one allied health professional in falls prevention care for older adults. No restrictions were placed on publication type or date. Study protocols and conference abstracts were excluded, and only English-language sources were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>ChatGPT-4o was used for initial data extraction. Authors then cross-checked and updated inaccuracies as required. A numerical descriptive analysis, and a qualitative content analysis were performed to answer the research questions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The search identified 442 relevant sources from 34 countries. The roles of 17 allied health professions in falls prevention for community-dwelling older adults were discussed. Screening, assessment and intervention roles were identified spanning medical, physical capacity, environmental, education and behavioural&ndash;psychological domains. Profession-specific interventions closely aligned with their primary scope of practice, and notable areas of overlap between professions were highlighted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This review highlights the diverse and overlapping contributions of allied health professionals to falls prevention in community-dwelling older adults. Varying levels of evidence are available across the professions and evidence gaps were highlighted for smaller allied health professions, indicating a need for foundational research to substantiate their roles and facilitate their inclusion in future practice guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration details</st>
<p><A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7SV3F">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7SV3F</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawton, A., Tripodi, N., Wospil, R., Wright, B. M., Menz, H. B., Martin, S., Bonanno, D. R., Linton, C., Bastani, A., Ross, A., Thomas, R., Corcoran, D., McNamara, T., Baxter, D., Vaughan, B., Lane, R., Feehan, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113943</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113943</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of allied health professions in falls prevention for community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113943</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113943</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113984?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Offloading orthotic insoles on healing of diabetic foot ulcers: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113984?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a complication of uncontrolled and long-standing diabetes, often associated with peripheral neuropathy, and can result in amputation, prolonged hospitalisation and reduced quality of life. Orthotic insoles are commonly used to redistribute plantar pressure, offload the ulcer site and potentially accelerate wound healing. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of offloading insoles in the healing of DFUs, with a focus on ulcer size reduction, recovery time, pain management, pressure redistribution and limb function, such as balance. A secondary objective is to compare the effects of different insole materials on healing outcomes, including satisfaction level towards the insole and overall quality of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) will be prioritised, while non-randomised studies that meet the eligibility criteria will also be considered. Studies published in English between 2000 and 2026 will be included. Eligible studies must assess the impact of orthotic insoles on DFUs, with outcome measures including pain intensity, pressure redistribution, wound healing and recovery time. Methodological quality will be assessed using the PEDro scale, while the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) will be applied as appropriate. Data will be extracted using a standardised form.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review does not require ethical approval. The results will be shared through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251145215.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamil, A., Javaid, H. b.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113984</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113984</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Offloading orthotic insoles on healing of diabetic foot ulcers: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113984</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113984</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115283?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Burden of diabetes and prediabetes among teaching and non-teaching staff in educational institutions of Bahawalpur, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study (BDEB study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115283?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the burden of diabetes and prediabetes in the educational sector in Bahawalpur City, Pakistan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Teaching institutes of Bahawalpur, Pakistan, during January 2024 to December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 955 participants from 15 universities, colleges and schools were included. Eligible participants were aged 18&ndash;75 years and employed as teachers or academic staff and enrolled using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Primary anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, smoking status and HbA1c levels were recorded. Prediabetes was defined as HbA1c 5.7&ndash;6.4% and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as HbA1c &ge;6.5%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 955 participants, 622 (65.1%) were male and 713 (74.7%) were teaching staff. The median age was 42 years, and median BMI was 27.3 kg/m&sup2;. The prevalence of prediabetes and T2DM was 31.7% and 15.4%, respectively, with 8.5% newly diagnosed cases of T2DM. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis found that age (p=0.006), BMI (p=0.008) and family history of diabetes (p&lt;0.001) were independent predictors of prediabetes/T2DM. Males had a higher median HbA1c (5.60%, IQR: 5.20&ndash;6.30) than females (5.40%, IQR: 5.20&ndash;5.80). HbA1c levels rose with age: 6.10% (IQR: 5.75&ndash;8.95) in ages 61&ndash;75, 5.80% (IQR: 5.40&ndash;6.80) in 46&ndash;60 and 5.35% (IQR: 5.00&ndash;5.70) in 18&ndash;45. Higher education was associated with lower HbA1c (above master&rsquo;s: 5.40%, IQR: 5.10&ndash;5.80). No significant HbA1c differences were found by occupation (p=0.711) or income (p=0.655). Hypertensive individuals had a higher HbA1c (5.90%, IQR: 5.40&ndash;6.85) versus non-hypertensives (5.50%, IQR: 5.10&ndash;5.90), and those with a family history also had elevated HbA1c (5.70%, IQR: 5.30&ndash;6.50) versus those without (5.40%, IQR: 5.10&ndash;5.90). HbA1c correlated moderately with age (r=0.388) and weakly with BMI (r=0.228) and waist circumference (r=0.254) (all p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study highlights a significant prevalence of T2DM and prediabetes in the educational sector of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Increasing age, BMI and positive family history of diabetes were independent predictors of prediabetes/T2DM.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali, Q. M., Khan, R., Shafique, S., Imran, A., Gardezi, S. S., Masroor, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115283</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115283</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Burden of diabetes and prediabetes among teaching and non-teaching staff in educational institutions of Bahawalpur, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study (BDEB study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115283</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115283</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116404?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of psychosocial factors in muscle performance and response to outpatient supervised exercise-based physical therapy in individuals with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116404?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between psychosocial factors, muscle performance and treatment response in individuals undergoing an exercise-based physical therapy (EBPT) programme for chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A secondary analysis of a prospectively collected clinical registry involving participants with CLBP enrolled in an 8&ndash;10-week EBPT programme. Participants completed psychosocial questionnaires before starting EBPT for CLBP. Lumbar extensor muscle performance was assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer, which recorded absolute and age and sex adjusted torque. Differences in muscle performance (absolute and adjusted) were calculated and regressed against psychosocial factors and clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Absolute and adjusted torque increased with treatment (33.33% and 82.84% respectively, p&lt;0.01). On average, pain, disability and patient goal achievement improved with treatment (p&lt;0.10). Improvements in muscle performance were associated with lower fear avoidance (&szlig;=&ndash;0.29 to &ndash;0.31, p&lt;0.04), whereas higher absolute baseline and final torque correlated positively with pain self-efficacy (&szlig;=0.20, p=0.04; &szlig;=0.27, p=0.02). No significant correlations were observed between changes in muscle performance and improvements in clinical outcomes, including pain, disability or functional status (all p&gt;0.20).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Individuals with CLBP demonstrated improved muscle performance and clinical outcomes after EBPT, though these improvements were independent of each other. Better absolute lumbar extensor muscle performance correlated with higher pain self-efficacy, and greater treatment response corresponded with lower fear-avoidance. These data suggest that pain coping strategies and addressing fear avoidance through educational and exposure-based interventions may be a target for modifying muscle performance in CLBP.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lebens, R., Havandjian, L., Zavareh, A., Taitano, L., Richards, C., Raiszadeh, K., Shahidi, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116404</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116404</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of psychosocial factors in muscle performance and response to outpatient supervised exercise-based physical therapy in individuals with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116404</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116404</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116443?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Positive experiences of medication self-management among older adults with chronic multimorbidities in Chinese city communities: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116443?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study utilises the Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, Accomplishment (PERMA) framework to explore positive experiences in medication self-management among older adults with chronic multimorbidities from a positive psychology perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive phenomenological qualitative research method was adopted. Data were analysed using Colaizzi&rsquo;s seven-step method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two community health service centres in Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 24 older adults with chronic multimorbidities were recruited and interviewed face-to-face between January and June 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Analysis of the collected data yielded five overarching themes: (1) positive emotional experiences in medication self-management; (2) proactive engagement in medication management; (3) perceived social support from multiple sources; (4) profound understanding of the intrinsic value of medication management; (5) personal growth and realisation of life value through medication self-management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Older adults with chronic multimorbidities demonstrate a wide range of positive experiences during medication self-management. This finding suggests that healthcare professionals may consider integrating positive psychology principles into clinical practice and consistently provide positive reinforcement for patients. This approach may help foster and sustain comprehensive and long-term medication management behaviours, thereby exerting a positive impact on their quality of life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, X., Wang, X. F., Su, L. L., Lv, X. C., Zhang, C. H., Zhang, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116443</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116443</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Positive experiences of medication self-management among older adults with chronic multimorbidities in Chinese city communities: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116443</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116443</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116702?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Toolkit to prompt and support stopping antidepressants in general practice: an interview study exploring patient participants experiences in the RELEASE trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116702?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore patient experiences with the RELEASE (Redressing long-term antidepressant use) toolkit resources, including antidepressant hyperbolic tapering plans designed to minimise withdrawal symptoms as part of the RELEASE trial&rsquo;s implementation evaluation to understand what aspects of the toolkit work well and identify areas where refinement could enhance future implementation. The RELEASE intervention, a multistrategy intervention codesigned with general practitioners (GPs) and patients to prompt and support stopping long-term (&gt;12 months) antidepressants, is being evaluated in an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-1 cluster randomised controlled trial in general practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>One-to-one semistructured qualitative interviews using reflexive thematic analysis to identify patterns of shared meaning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>General practice, south-east Queensland, Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult participants (aged 18 years or older) taking an antidepressant long-term allocated to the intervention arm of the RELEASE trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>31 participants with an average duration of antidepressant use of 16.5 years (range 1&ndash;30 years) were interviewed. Seven themes were identified. Across seven themes, participants described how the RELEASE toolkit resources prompted reflection on their antidepressant use, supported informed conversations with GPs, and offered tapering plans that were both structured enough to instil confidence and flexible enough to help participants feel in control of their tapering journey. They also identified barriers, including beliefs that very small tapering doses were unnecessary, difficulty accessing the mini-doses required for hyperbolic tapering and the challenge of managing withdrawal symptoms. For those who successfully stopped, the transition was associated with a renewed sense of autonomy. Participants also offered practical suggestions to strengthen the toolkit and its broader implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The RELEASE toolkit resources played a meaningful role in prompting and supporting informed shared decision-making and guiding attempts to stop antidepressants. Clearer messaging about the potential for withdrawal symptoms and access to mini-doses for tapering are needed to support patients to safely stop antidepressants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12622001379707p; Pre-results.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moura Ferreira, P., McDonald, S., Wallis, K. A., Donald, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116702</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116702</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Toolkit to prompt and support stopping antidepressants in general practice: an interview study exploring patient participants experiences in the RELEASE trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116702</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116702</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117329?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a living systematic review of randomised controlled trials on the clinical efficacy of transcranial pulse stimulation in neurological and psychiatric conditions]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117329?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) is a novel technology with therapeutic promise for Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease. Given its novelty and the rapidly evolving research in neurology and mental health using this technology, large randomised controlled trials are expected. Therefore, an independent and up-to-date synthesis of the available evidence is needed. In our effort to create a living systematic review of the clinical efficacy of TPS across various conditions, we aim to describe its methodology to ensure its transparency and scientific rigour. This protocol details the predefined methods related to search frequencies, updates to the review and quantitative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will only include randomised controlled trials involving clinically diagnosed populations and comparing active TPS to sham TPS. We will search MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science, as well as trial registries and grey literature. The principal searches in databases and trial registries will be rerun monthly, and new evidence will be integrated. Study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments will be performed independently and in duplicate. All relevant clinical outcomes measured with validated psychometric scales and tests will be collected. The relevance of a quantitative synthesis, the studies to be included in pairwise meta-analysis, appropriate scales, questionnaires and time points will be discussed by the research team annually. If a meta-analysis is conducted, we will use the standardised mean difference as the measure of effect size. We will assess our confidence in the cumulative evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we will collect existing data without generating new datasets. Therefore, ethics approval or consent to participate is not required.</p>
<p>We will publish our initial systematic review when a total of four randomised controlled trials across different health conditions using active TPS compared with sham TPS are available. At this stage of our project, we anticipate updating the living systematic review annually following the publication of the baseline review. We will conclude the living phase of the review when high certainty of evidence is achieved or if the topic loses its relevance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Systematic review registration</st>
<p>CRD42024595947.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demina, A., Casey, D., Amaral, S., Fabus, M. S., Bejot, Y., Trojak, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117329</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117329</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a living systematic review of randomised controlled trials on the clinical efficacy of transcranial pulse stimulation in neurological and psychiatric conditions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117329</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117329</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118744?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Necessity and safety of primary closure of the patent processus vaginalis in laparoscopic orchiopexy: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118744?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A patent processus vaginalis (PPV) is frequently observed during laparoscopic orchiopexy in infants with cryptorchidism. Nevertheless, the decision to primarily close the PPV following laparoscopic orchiopexy remains a subject of debate. This protocol therefore outlines the scope and methodology for a systematic review and meta-analysis that will synthesise the available evidence to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with primary closure of the PPV after laparoscopic orchiopexy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic electronic literature search will be conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify eligible studies published before 31 May 2026. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias V.2 tool for randomised trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool for non-randomised studies. The primary outcomes will include postoperative inguinal hernia, testicular atrophy and testicular ascent. Secondary outcomes will comprise operative time, estimated blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay and overall 30-day postoperative complications. The robustness of the findings will be evaluated through subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. All statistical analyses will be performed using Stata19.0 and RevMan Web, with statistical significance defined as a two-sided p&lt;0.05. The certainty of the evidence will be evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this study based solely on aggregated and anonymised data is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and interactive dialogues in this research area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420261289759.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuan, T., Dai, W., Han, Y., Cai, Z., Ma, Q., Sun, J., Yang, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118744</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118744</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Necessity and safety of primary closure of the patent processus vaginalis in laparoscopic orchiopexy: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118744</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118744</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118766?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the feasibility of a scalable, digitally supported model for global collaborative surgical research: protocol for a prospective, international, multicentre observational study in cryptoglandular anal fistula treatment (CRAFT)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118766?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Management of cryptoglandular anal fistula is characterised by wide variation in diagnostic strategies, surgical techniques and outcome reporting, limiting comparison between studies and hindering evidence-based guideline development. This study aims to implement a standardised core outcome measurement set within a large international observational framework and to evaluate the feasibility of a scalable digitally supported model for global collaborative surgical research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Cryptoglandular anal fistula treatment is a prospective, international, multicentre observational study comprising two components: a short-term audit capturing clinician-reported outcomes at 3 months and a long-term cohort capturing clinician- and patient-reported outcomes over twelve months. Adults undergoing surgery for primary or recurrent cryptoglandular anal fistula are eligible, excluding non-cryptoglandular aetiologies. Data are collected using secure electronic case report forms and digitally administered patient-reported outcome measures, with paper alternatives available where required. Outcomes are defined according to the Anal Fistula Core Outcome Measurement Set and include clinical and radiological healing, recurrence, complications, reintervention, development of additional fistulas, symptoms, psychological impact of treatment, continence, quality of life and additionally work productivity. The study was designed around a predefined nine-step framework, including multidisciplinary coordination, central ethical approval to support local submissions, artificial intelligence-assisted translation of study materials with native review and implementation of secure digital data capture systems. Based on previous European Society of Coloproctology studies and expected centre volumes, the audit arm aims to include approximately 1000 patients and the cohort arm 500 to 750 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Central ethical approval has been obtained from the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Maastricht University Medical Centre+ under METC 2024-0374 (audit arm) and METC 2024-0361 (cohort arm) with local approvals or waivers secured in participating countries according to national regulations. Written informed consent is obtained for cohort participation. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and international conferences, with the aim of informing future guideline development and supporting patient-centred care in cryptoglandular anal fistula management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tabakovic, N., Kimman, M., Keatley, J., El-Hussuna, A., Tozer, P., Zimmerman, D. D. E., Magill, L., Mitalas, L., van Kuijk, S., Pinkney, T., Breukink, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T10:11:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118766</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118766</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the feasibility of a scalable, digitally supported model for global collaborative surgical research: protocol for a prospective, international, multicentre observational study in cryptoglandular anal fistula treatment (CRAFT)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118766</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118766</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111954?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of early-life human rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus infections with childhood asthma: a cohort study in Suzhou, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111954?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the impact of early-life human rhinovirus (HRV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections on subsequent asthma development among children with acute respiratory infections (ARI), with a focus on the timing of infection during critical developmental windows.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Tertiary paediatric hospital&mdash;Children&rsquo;s Hospital of Soochow University in eastern China&mdash;with data linked to a regional health information system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 2628 children who were hospitalised with acute respiratory infections (ARI) and received respiratory virus testing between September 2017 and December 2024 were included in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was incident asthma. Associations between early-life HRV or RSV infection and asthma risk were evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Causal mediation analysis was applied to examine potential mediation by wheezing and bronchiolitis. Secondary outcomes were the frequency of asthma-related medical visits and number of exacerbations, analysed using multivariable negative binomial regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 616 (20.2%) children developed asthma. Cox regression showed that HRV-RSV (aHR=2.40, 95% CI 1.02 to 6.69) and s-HRV (aHR=1.56, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.22) were associated with asthma risk compared with negative controls, whereas s-RSV was not (aHR=1.31, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.89). Wheezing mediated 53.5% of the effect of HRV on asthma risk. Among asthma cases, both HRV and RSV were associated with increased asthma-related visits and exacerbations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Early-life hospitalisation for HRV or RSV, particularly at 13&ndash;24 months of age, may be associated with increased risk of asthma and greater asthma morbidity. These findings suggest a potential role of infection timing in shaping long-term respiratory outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, L., Shen, K., Chen, Q., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Peng, R., Tian, J., Zhao, G., Zhang, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111954</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111954</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of early-life human rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus infections with childhood asthma: a cohort study in Suzhou, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111954</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111954</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112342?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lived experiences of primary caregivers supporting adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury: a qualitative systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112342?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a growing mental health concern among adolescents. While not intended as a suicidal act, it has significant implications for individuals and families. Primary caregivers, often the frontline support, face emotional distress, psychological strain and disrupted family dynamics. However, most research has centred on adolescents leaving a critical gap in understanding caregivers&rsquo; perspectives. Addressing this gap is essential for developing effective, family-centred interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will include original qualitative studies examining the lived experiences of primary caregivers supporting adolescents who engage in NSSI. Studies must address caregivers&rsquo; emotional responses, psychological impacts, changes in family relationships and their perspectives on mental health service needs. There will be no restrictions on settings, geographic locations or sample sizes. Research published in both English and Chinese will be included with no restrictions on the starting year up to 31 December 2025. Systematic searches will be conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data and CBM and reference lists and grey literature will also be reviewed. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, assess their methodological quality, and extract relevant data. The data will be synthesised using meta-aggregation, and the ConQual approach will be used to evaluate the confidence in the synthesised findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review will not require ethical approval, as it will only include secondary data from previously published studies. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant academic conferences to inform both research and clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251113508.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[He, X., Yu, Q., Peng, J., Yang, P., Yang, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112342</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112342</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lived experiences of primary caregivers supporting adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury: a qualitative systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112342</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112342</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112617?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intranasal sufentanil versus ketamine for acute severe traumatic pain in children: protocol for a phase II randomised controlled trial (SUF-KET-PED)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112617?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Effective management of severe pain in children presenting to emergency departments remains challenging. Intravenous analgesia is often delayed due to technical and emotional difficulties related to vascular access. Intranasal administration offers a rapid, needle-free route. Although ketamine is widely used intranasally for paediatric analgesia, sufentanil may represent a potent alternative with favourable pharmacological properties. However, comparative paediatric data are lacking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>SUF-KET-PED is a single-centre, randomised controlled superiority trial conducted in the paediatric emergency department of Lenval Children&rsquo;s Hospital, Nice, France. A total of 116 children aged 6 to 17 years presenting with severe traumatic limb pain (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) &gt;6/10) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intranasal sufentanil at 0.5 &micro;g/kg or ketamine at 1 mg/kg in addition to standard care including inhaled nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture. Pain will be assessed using the VAS at baseline and at predefined intervals up to 30 min. Sedation will be monitored using the Ramsay Sedation Scale and adverse events will be recorded throughout a 60-minute follow-up period.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is the mean change in VAS score between baseline and 30 min. Secondary outcomes include time to effective analgesia, excessive sedation, adverse events, use of rescue analgesia and patient and parent satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the French Ethics Committee CPP Sud M&eacute;diterran&eacute;e V and authorised by the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, IDRCB no 2025-521075-31-00. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>EU Clinical Trials Information System: 2025-521075-31-00. ClinicalTrials.gov: <A HREF="NCT06968546">NCT06968546</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mendes Dos Reis, C., Olla, M., Freyssinet, E., Baranton, E., Joulie, A., Fontas, E., Tran, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112617</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112617</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intranasal sufentanil versus ketamine for acute severe traumatic pain in children: protocol for a phase II randomised controlled trial (SUF-KET-PED)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112617</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112617</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112794?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring self-care experiences, challenges and preferences among patients with heart failure in Jordan: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112794?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the self-care experiences, challenges and preferences of Jordanian patients with heart failure (HF) to inform culturally tailored strategies for improved disease management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews among 25 purposively sampled patients with HF. Data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke&rsquo;s six-phase framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>The study was carried out in four hospitals in Jordan, covering educational, public and military health sectors. Hospitals were selected based on their cardiology services and regional location to ensure a varied sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A central theme, <I>Empowering Patients through Knowledge, Support and Culturally Sensitive Care</I>, was produced alongside four key themes: (1) Strengthening Health Literacy, (2) Enhancing Psychosocial Support through Family and Peer Engagement, (3) Navigating Sociocultural and Religious Influences and (4) Leveraging Digital Tools for Access and Engagement. Barriers to self-care included limited information, weak provider communication and cultural norms. Enablers included family involvement, religious practices and openness to digital health solutions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>HF self-care in Jordan is shaped by a complex interplay of informational, emotional and cultural factors. Interventions should incorporate culturally tailored education, family-inclusive models and digital platforms to enhance adherence and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saifan, A. R., Qarqodah, W. H., Al-Yateem, N., AbuRuz, M. E., Bani Amer, D., Tamimi, A., Saleh, Z. T., Khalaf, A., Rawas, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112794</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112794</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring self-care experiences, challenges and preferences among patients with heart failure in Jordan: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112794</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112794</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112922?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exposure to pesticides in drinking water during pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112922?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Congenital malformations (CMs) are the leading cause of infant mortality. Still, the aetiology remains unknown in 70% of cases. The most accepted hypothesis is that hereditary and environmental elements concur in altering embryo-fetal development. Recently, the role of the environment has been emphasised.</p>
<p>Women are exposed to several xenobiotics during pregnancy. This review aims to study the available literature on the exposure of pregnant women to pesticides through drinking water to see if there is any evidence of correlation to the onset of any kind of congenital anomalies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a systematic literature review in The Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed for studies published between 1 January 2005 and 31 January 2026. Articles will be included if they examine pregnant women as the study population, exposure to pesticide active ingredients and metabolites present in drinking water, and any type of CM in their children as the main outcome. The screening of title, abstract and full text as well as the data extraction will be conducted independently through two investigators. A third investigator will resolve any eventual conflicts. Each included study will be evaluated according to the NIH&rsquo;s quality assessment tools. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used for summarising and assessing certainty in the bodies of evidence produced by the review. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD420251063011.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The completed work will be published in a scientific journal for dissemination. Due to the nature of the study, an ethical approval is not necessary since no patient data or other information will be directly collected.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riboni, C., Paganetti, C., Holland-Cunz, S. G., Gros, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112922</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112922</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exposure to pesticides in drinking water during pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112922</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112922</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112999?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial (RECONNECT-PLUS)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112999?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative syndrome associated with Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease and frontotemporal degeneration. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a promising treatment, especially associated with language therapy, but comparative efficacy and long-term effects between the different techniques (transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)) remain unknown. The present study aims to investigate the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation, alone or associated (tDCS/TMS/tDCS plus TMS) combined with language therapy delivered during a period of 6 months, in the progression of language impairment in PPA, compared with sham stimulation combined with language therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study is a randomised, double-blinded, parallel, sham-controlled clinical trial. Patients with PPA in early stages (global Clinical Dementia Rating equal to or less than 1) are eligible. They are to be randomised to one of the four treatment arms of the study (active tDCS-active TMS, active tDCS-sham TMS, sham tDCS-active TMS, sham tDCS-sham TMS). All patients will receive language therapy immediately after each session of NIBS, for 6 months. The primary outcome is the Mini-Linguistic State Examination. The secondary outcomes are naming of trained items, Addenbrooke&rsquo;s Cognitive Examination, Interview for Deterioration in Daily Living Activities, Clinical Dementia Rating including behaviour and language domains, Neuropsychiatric Inventory and regional brain metabolism. Exploratory substudies will be conducted including blood biomarkers, quantitative electroencephalography and spontaneous speech assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is registered (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07158216) and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clinico San Carlos (code 25/309-IC_P_CE). Patients will be enrolled after signing an informed consent form. Study outcomes will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals and other academic forums.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07158216">NCT07158216</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez-Romero, L., Diez-Cirarda, M., Delgado-Alonso, C., Cabrera-Martin, M. N., Gonzalez-Rosa, J. J., Sanz-Nieto, C., Perez-Macias, N., Balugo, P., Gomez-Ruiz, N., Matias-Guiu, J., Portoles-Perez, A., Matias-Guiu, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112999</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112999</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial (RECONNECT-PLUS)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112999</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112999</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115062?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Detection of age-related vision reduction in general practice in Denmark (DETECT): a study protocol for a feasibility and cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115062?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Vision reduction is linked to reduced quality of life, self-care capacity, increased fall risk, cognitive decline and depression. Prevalence increases with age. In response, WHO recommends regular vision assessment at primary care level, such as general practice (GP), for adults +50 years. However, research on detection of age-related vision reduction in GP is limited. The objective is to assess the feasibility and clinical utility of implementing vision screening in Danish general practice following an annual control consultation for patients aged &ge;70 years with minimum one chronic condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Complex health intervention in a Danish general practice setting. Testing a patient baseline questionnaire with 18 items on self-reported vision and quality of life in combination with three vision tests: Colenbrander Mixed Contrast Card Test for near vision, Amsler Grid test and Confrontational Visual Field Test. 18&ndash;20 GP clinics and 450 patients are planned to be included. After GP consultation, all patients visit a collaborating optometrist for a comprehensive vision assessment including refraction, intraocular pressure measurement, fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Data and pictures from the optometrist are evaluated by an ophthalmologist, who refers to further follow-up and/or treatment if deemed necessary.</p>
<p>Feasibility outcomes: patient recruitment rate, patient adherence, as well as patients&rsquo; and health providers&rsquo; experiences with the intervention. Clinical outcomes: GP staff assessment of patient vision and patient-reported assessment compared with ophthalmologic assessment. This includes identifying the need for new glasses and detecting eye diseases that require further evaluation, monitoring or treatment. This study will provide evidence on the feasibility of integrating vision screening into routine general practice, potentially helping expedient referrals and improving detection and access to primary eye-health care for older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is registered and approved by Danish Research Ethics and Data Protection, VEK F-23070033 and in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07015034. Findings will be disseminated in peer-review journals, academic conferences and with the public through patient organisations and public health events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: <A HREF="NCT07015034">NCT07015034</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brost, A. G., Petersen, M. L., Steinbo, E. K. F., Siersma, V., Bach-Holm, D., Line, K., Kristensen, M., Waldorff, F. B., Sandholdt, C. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115062</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115062</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Detection of age-related vision reduction in general practice in Denmark (DETECT): a study protocol for a feasibility and cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115062</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115062</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115675?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Repurposing semaglutide as an adjunctive treatment for cocaine use disorder: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115675?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a significant public health concern in the USA, with considerable prevalence and mortality and no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved pharmacotherapies. Recent advances in addiction science emphasise the need for novel, mechanism-based treatments. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, such as semaglutide, have shown promise in modulating reward-related behaviours and may offer therapeutic benefits for CUD. We present a study protocol evaluating semaglutide, as an adjunct to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), as a novel approach for treating CUD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 75 treatment-seeking adults with CUD. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either once-weekly semaglutide (0.25&ndash;1.0 mg) or placebo injections over 14 weeks, alongside weekly individual CBT. Primary outcomes include changes in neurophysiological reactivity to drug-related and non-drug-related motivationally relevant cues (late positive potential), behavioural economics (cocaine demand), craving (Cocaine Craving Questionnaire) and cocaine use (self-report, urine drug screens). Exploratory aims assess associations between mechanistic changes and cocaine use, consumption of other substances (ie, tobacco, alcohol and cannabis) and dose&ndash;response relationships. Data will be analysed using Bayesian statistical methods using an intention-to-treat approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the UTHealth Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (HSC-MS-25-0412) and is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. All participants will provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07227948">NCT07227948</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yammine, L., Versace, F., Green, C. E., Webber, H. E., Yoon, J. H., Gutierrez, A. D., Leonard, S. J., Weaver, M. F., Schmitz, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115675</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115675</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Repurposing semaglutide as an adjunctive treatment for cocaine use disorder: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115675</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115675</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115755?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for AI-enabled blended type 2 diabetes care by digital experience and socioeconomic status: a discrete-choice experiment in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115755?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To elicit stated preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled blended care in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to examine preference heterogeneity by digital experience and socioeconomic status (SES).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>12 community health centres in Jiaozuo and Puyang, Henan Province, China. Data were collected between June and August 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>423 adults diagnosed with T2DM for at least 6 months, recruited using consecutive convenience sampling from routine follow-up appointments. Of 769 participants who completed the survey, 346 were excluded following prespecified data quality criteria (retention rate: 55.0%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Outcome measures included preference weights and WTP (in Chinese Yuan, &yen;) for five DCE attributes: monthly subscription fee, recommendation source, feedback modality, in-person follow-up frequency and expert oversight, estimated using mixed logit models. Simulated uptake probabilities for tailored service packages across four user profiles were computed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 423 participants, 80.6% had never used AI tools. Price was the dominant driver of choice (62.7% relative attribute importance). Profound preference heterogeneity emerged across subgroups: rural residents (n=78) were highly price-sensitive but preferred physician endorsement (WTP &yen;17.58 (US$2.55), 95% CI &yen;5.98 to &yen;29.17); female participants (n=224) valued guideline recommendations (WTP &yen;18.45 (US$2.67), 95% CI &yen;7.81 to &yen;29.40); and diabetes app users (n=34) were the least price-sensitive but showed a negative preference for AI instant feedback, instead preferring human dietitian feedback. Expert oversight carried a consistent negative WTP across all profiles. Targeting tailored service bundles to intended subgroups increased uptake by 8&ndash;16 percentage points compared with non-targeted bundles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A &lsquo;digital experience paradox&rsquo; exists whereby digitally experienced users view human interaction as a premium service, while underserved groups rely on specific trust markers such as physician endorsement. To avoid widening the digital divide, AI-enabled blended diabetes care must move beyond standardised models towards configurable, equity-driven service pathways.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sun, H., Shi, Z., Xia, Y., Bai, Y., Yu, M., Liu, R., He, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115755</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115755</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for AI-enabled blended type 2 diabetes care by digital experience and socioeconomic status: a discrete-choice experiment in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115755</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115755</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116172?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adaptive balancing of effort, accuracy and response speed in anomia treatment for post-stroke aphasia in community-based settings in the USA: a within-subjects randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116172?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Anomia is a primary feature of aphasia that negatively impacts quality of life. Although current anomia treatments improve word retrieval, long-term retention and generalisation of trained words to discourse-level communication are rarely measured. Treatment that produces lasting naming gains and generalises to real-world use is one of the top priorities of people living with aphasia. Here, we report the protocol for a randomised clinical trial that investigates individualised anomia treatment through adaptive naming deadlines to achieve &lsquo;desirable difficulty&rsquo; to promote learning retention and generalisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We implement a within-subject sequential, crossover design in which 30 participants with chronic post-stroke aphasia will complete three anomia treatment conditions in randomised order: (1) an adaptive condition where the naming deadline (ie, amount of time the participant is given to name the item) dynamically adjusts between 1.5 and 10 s based on ongoing participant performance and (2) a static Effort-Maximised condition where there is a fixed 10-second naming deadline for all treatment sessions and (3) a static Accuracy-Maximised condition where items are presented immediately in auditory and orthographic form and are repeated by the participant. In each condition, participants are treated on 40 unique non-overlapping words across eight treatment sessions. Before and after each condition, participants complete naming probes and discourse probes. Treatment outcomes from the adaptive treatment will be tested against the two static conditions using linear mixed-effects modelling. Our primary outcome is performance on noun picture naming at 3 months post-treatment. We evaluate production of treated words in discourse probes as a secondary analysis. We predict that our novel, adaptive naming treatment will produce more successful outcomes compared with the static treatment conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh approved the trial protocol (Study 21120130). Following study completion, results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals. If hypothesised results are observed, the adaptive treatment will be a novel, empirically based intervention for long-term retention of anomia treatment gains, positively impacting the lives and recovery of individuals living with aphasia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05653440">NCT05653440</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Stelt, C. M., Cavanaugh, R., Hula, W. D., Starns, J., Kelly, A., Goodman, M. L., Terhorst, L., Hassany, M., Brusilovsky, P., Evans, W. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116172</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116172</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adaptive balancing of effort, accuracy and response speed in anomia treatment for post-stroke aphasia in community-based settings in the USA: a within-subjects randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116172</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116172</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116230?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spatial population study on the association among socio-economic indicators and oral health in preschool children in Buenos Aires]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116230?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Dental caries is the most prevalent chronic condition among Argentine children, with distribution and severity strongly shaped by social and territorial inequalities. This study evaluated caries treatment needs and their spatial and socio-economic associations among preschool children in Buenos Aires.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting, participants</st>
<p>An ecological population study was conducted among 54 337 6-year-old children attending public schools in Buenos Aires. Caries severity was measured using the Caries Treatment Needs Index (CTNI) by calibrated examiners.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Socio-economic indicators included individual health coverage, neighbourhood housing prices, distance to the nearest primary health centre, population density and the proportion of households with unsatisfied basic needs. Analyses comprised descriptive statistics, multivariate regression, ORs and spatial autoregressive models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 67.9% of children had treatment needs (CTNI &gt;2) and 17.5% had high needs (CTNI &gt;10), with significant heterogeneity across municipalities (p&lt;0.01). Public health coverage showed a strong gradient with increasing caries severity (OR: 1.77&ndash;3.68; p&lt;0.01). Lower housing prices, greater distance to health centres, higher population density and higher unmet basic needs were independently associated with worse CTNI outcomes (p&lt;0.01). Spatial analyses confirmed significant territorial clustering of treatment needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Caries treatment needs in Buenos Aires follow a clear socio-economic and spatial gradient, with both individual and neighbourhood disadvantage independently associated with increased needs and highlighting the need for targeted, territorially focused public health strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Squassi, A., Belen Gonzalez, E., Ventura, F., Lazzati, R., Rossi, G., Salgado, P., Cappai, A., Dettori, M., Campus, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116230</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116230</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spatial population study on the association among socio-economic indicators and oral health in preschool children in Buenos Aires]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116230</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117615?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Weaning from invasive ventilation with levosimendan (WEANLESS): study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117615?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Prolonged weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation is a major challenge in critically ill patients failing a spontaneous breathing trial. Levosimendan, a calcium sensitiser, has been shown to improve respiratory muscle function. However, its effect on clinically relevant endpoints in difficult to wean patients has not yet been investigated. We aim to assess whether levosimendan shortens the weaning process in invasively ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients who fail a separation attempt. The objective is to assess the effect of levosimendan on the number of ventilator-free days and alive at day 28.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The WEANing with LEvoSimendan Study (WEANLESS) is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised clinical superiority trial. Adult invasively ventilated patients who failed a separation attempt are randomly assigned to receive either intravenous levosimendan (intervention) or placebo (control). The primary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days and alive at day 28 from randomisation. WEANLESS also evaluates the effects of levosimendan on patient-reported outcomes, measured through daily dyspnoea scores and uses an EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Additionally, we will evaluate healthcare resource utilisation and intensive care capacity, assessed through reintubation rates, ICU readmissions within 90 days, the need for non-invasive respiratory support and ICU length of stay. WEANLESS includes a pharmacokinetic analysis of levosimendan and its metabolites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>WEANLESS is the first clinical study that is sufficiently powered to determine the effect of intravenous levosimendan in difficult to wean patients on the duration of weaning from invasive ventilation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>WEANLESS is registered before the inclusion of the first patient at clinicaltrials.gov; the study protocol has been approved by the relevant ethics committee. Its findings will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences and publications in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07105202">NCT07105202</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Leijer, E., Hofma, C., Serpa Neto, A., Hunfeld, N. G. M., Schultz, M. J., Doorduin, J., Heunks, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117615</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117615</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Weaning from invasive ventilation with levosimendan (WEANLESS): study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117615</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117615</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118910?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of school feeding programmes integrating food systems components on health, nutrition, education and food systems outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118910?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>School feeding programmes reach over 466 million children globally, making them one of the largest social safety nets worldwide. Beyond providing immediate nutritional benefits, school feeding programmes increasingly aim to strengthen local food systems through procurement from smallholder farmers, support for sustainable agriculture, community kitchen involvement and broader development outcomes. However, evidence on how school feeding programmes can simultaneously improve nutrition and educational outcomes while transforming food systems in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains fragmented. This systematic review will synthesise evidence on the effects of school feeding interventions with explicit food system components on health, nutrition, education and food system outcomes among school-age children and adolescents in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We conducted comprehensive searches in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), Web of Science, Google Scholar, completed on 18 February 2026, with grey literature searches ongoing and to be completed subsequently. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and quasi-experimental studies with comparison groups examining school feeding interventions with food system components among school-age children and adolescents (5&ndash;19 years) in LMICs. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, review full texts, extract data and assess study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools (RoB 2 for RCTs and Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomised studies). Certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. We will conduct narrative synthesis using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines and meta-analysis where appropriate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review as no primary data will be collected. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and policy briefs targeting international organisations, governments and development partners working on school feeding and food systems in LMICs.</p>
<p><b>Registration:</b> Open Science Framework <A HREF="https://osf.io/p83tb/">https://osf.io/p83tb/</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinde, S., Rehman, A. A., Sari, C. N., Fawzi, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118910</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118910</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of school feeding programmes integrating food systems components on health, nutrition, education and food systems outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118910</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118910</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118914?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medical nutrition therapy strategies for type 2 diabetes in Western and African contexts: a comparative scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118914?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a growing global public health challenge, with a rapidly increasing burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) is a cornerstone of T2D management; however, its design, delivery and implementation vary across health systems, cultural contexts and resource environments. Most synthesised evidence and guideline development originate from Western settings, while MNT approaches in African contexts remain heterogeneous and less systematically characterised. This scoping review aims to map and compare MNT strategies for T2D across Western and African contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework and its enhancements, aligned with Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Reporting will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, CABI Global Health and African Journals Online, supplemented by grey literature and citation searching. Eligible sources will include studies and programme reports describing MNT interventions for adults with T2D published between 2000 and 2025 in Western or African settings. Eligibility will be defined using the Population&ndash;Concept&ndash;Context framework. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data using a standardised, framework-informed charting form based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Data will be synthesised using descriptive numerical summaries, framework-informed thematic synthesis (deductive coding with inductive refinement), and comparative evidence matrices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review will use publicly available data and does not require ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and stakeholder-oriented knowledge translation activities to inform culturally relevant, context-appropriate and implementation-ready MNT strategies across diverse health system settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kusumawati, N., Bada, M., McClelland, D. J., Hounkpatin, W. A., Alaofe, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118914</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118914</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medical nutrition therapy strategies for type 2 diabetes in Western and African contexts: a comparative scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118914</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118914</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119037?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect and neurophysiological mechanisms of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for misophonia (taVNS-MISO): a study protocol for a single-centre double-blind randomised sham-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119037?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Misophonia is a newly recognised sound sensitivity disorder with clinically significant symptoms affecting up to 18% of the population. It is characterised by extreme negative reactions to specific sounds which are often repetitive and generated by the human oral-nasal tract (eg, sniffing and eating sounds). Although misophonia currently has no standard treatment, research suggests that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) holds promise therapeutically. This study aims to investigate both the effects of 4 weeks taVNS (compared with sham) on misophonia and related symptoms as well as its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. To our knowledge, this is the first trial on taVNS in misophonia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre double-blind sham-controlled trial in which 60 participants with clinically significant misophonia are randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive taVNS or sham stimulation. The intervention will be self-administered over 4 weeks (two times per day for 30 mins each). The primary efficacy outcome is self-reported misophonia severity with secondary outcomes, including mental health and audiological symptoms. In addition, all participants will undergo preintervention and postintervention testing, including MRI and physiology to investigate neurophysiological mechanisms underlying taVNS effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Brighton and Sussex Medical School ethics board (ER/GLP28/4). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Data will be anonymised and made available for sharing after completion of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This trial is registered in ISRCTN; <A HREF="ISRCTN79500062">ISRCTN79500062</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rinaldi, L. J., Karapanagiotidis, T., Koch, E. M. W., Sanderson, A., Strawson, W. H., Simner, J., Eccles, J., Critchley, H., Aazh, H., Poerio, G. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119037</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119037</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect and neurophysiological mechanisms of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for misophonia (taVNS-MISO): a study protocol for a single-centre double-blind randomised sham-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119037</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119037</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119136?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence on digital interventions to improve postpartum contraceptive uptake among adolescent mothers: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119136?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adolescent mothers are at increased risk of rapid repeat pregnancy during the postpartum period, particularly in low-and middle-income countries where unmet need for contraception remains high. Stigma, limited autonomy and inadequate youth-friendly services contribute to low uptake of postpartum contraception. Digital health interventions have been proposed as scalable approaches to improve access to contraceptive information and support. However, evidence specifically focusing on digital interventions to enhance postpartum contraception among adolescent mothers has not yet been comprehensively mapped. This scoping review aims to identify and describe the available evidence in this area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This review will follow the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework, with refinements by Levac <I>et al</I> and guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Reporting will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science along with relevant grey literature sources will be searched. Studies involving adolescent mothers (10&ndash;19 years) within 12 months after childbirth and evaluating digital interventions for postpartum contraception will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract data using a standardised charting form. Findings will be synthesised descriptively to map intervention types, outcomes and research gaps. No formal quality appraisal will be undertaken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and engagement with relevant stakeholders to inform research, policy and programme development.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Purwatiningsih, Y., Nugraheny, E., Suparmi,  , Paramashanti, B. A., Masitoh, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119136</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119136</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence on digital interventions to improve postpartum contraceptive uptake among adolescent mothers: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119136</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119136</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106685?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Designing interventions guided by digital phenotype and pharmacogenetics in Spain for suicidal behaviour based on retrospective data: the multicentre SMARTomicS study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106685?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Each year, suicide claims approximately 700 000 lives worldwide and generates a significant financial burden. Integrating genomic data, exposomic factors and digital phenotypes can enhance the development of short-term predictive models. Current knowledge and available tools provide the basis for designing personalised treatment strategies that incorporate real-time interventions to prevent suicide attempt recurrence cost-effectively. This study aims to develop a predictive algorithm for suicidal behaviour integrating psychiatric assessments, genetic risk markers, digital phenotypes and exposomic data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol describes a retrospective multicentre study that will recruit participants with a clinical history of suicide across 25 hospitals across Spain with a catchment area of 8.6 million people (17.8% of Spain&rsquo;s population). Our sample target is over 5000 participants, aged over 12 years old, ensuring 93.5% statistical power for genetic analysis. Eligible participants must be over 12 years old. Data collection will include psychiatric assessments, biospecimen collections (DNA, RNA, plasma and serum), Google Takeout data for digital phenotyping, and a standardised set of administrative and clinical data registered for each patient. Genotyping will be performed with the Axiom Spanish array (&gt;750 000 markers), and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) will be performed after genetic imputation in a whole sample of &gt;10 000 individuals (5000 suicide attempters; 5000 controls). Prescription and clinical history will also be retrospectively integrated, and codified data statistics forms will periodically be sent to the Government. Statistical analyses will combine traditional regression models and AI-based algorithms to identify predictive behavioural, genomic profiles, and digital markers of suicidal behaviour. Cost-effectiveness analyses of pharmacogenomic markers for antidepressant response will also be conducted.</p>
<p>By successfully implementing this project, we aim to help reduce suicide reattempts and lessen the emotional and economic burden on families and the healthcare system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fundaci&oacute;n Jim&eacute;nez D&iacute;az (PIC301-24_FJD) and complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. It adheres to the GDPR (EU Regulation 2016/679), Spain&rsquo;s Organic Law 3/2018 on Personal Data Protection and Digital Rights, and Law 41/2002 on patient autonomy. All required data protection measures will be implemented, including those under Real Decreto 1718/2010 on prescriptions and treatment adherence. Underaged participants will require parental consent for participation. The results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations at psychiatric conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07422090">NCT07422090</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artes, C., Porras-Segovia, A., Ruiz-Veguilla, M., Giner, L., Garcia-Campayo, J., Lopez del Hoyo, Y., Alejandra-Saiz, P., Garcia-Fernandez, A., Martinez-Jambrina, J. J., Villa-Diez, R., Gili, M., Roca, M., de Andres, F., Perez Sola, V., Elices, M. E., Grande, I., Cebria, A. I., Irigoyen-Otinano, M., Galvan-Santiago, L., Garcia-Iturrospe, E. J. A., Mesones-Peral, J., Mora-Marin, R., Sierra, P., Penas-Lledo, E., LLerena, A., Lopez-Castroman, J., Cruz, R., Arrojo, M., Ovejero, S., de la Torre-Luque, A., Palao-Tarrero, A., Vaquero-Lorenzo, C., Toma, C., Barrigon, M. L., Artes, A., Diaz-Marsa, M., Ayad-Ahmed, W., Ibanez, A., Diaz-Sastre, C., Salvador-Robert, M., Alvarez-Garcia, R., Mata-Iturralde, L., Benavente-Lopez, S., Munoz-Lorenzo, L., Di Stasio, E. F., Carmona-Camacho, R., Penuelas-Calvo, I., Valencia, M., Lopez Pena, P., Albarracin-Garcia, L., Baca-Garcia, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106685</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106685</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Designing interventions guided by digital phenotype and pharmacogenetics in Spain for suicidal behaviour based on retrospective data: the multicentre SMARTomicS study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106685</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106685</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107240?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intensive weight loss intervention versus usual care for adults with severe and complex obesity: the LightWAY randomised trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107240?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Effective treatment for clinical obesity is available but is rarely offered by healthcare systems, which often treat complications without treating the underlying cause. The LightWAY trial will investigate the clinical benefits and harms as well as cost-effectiveness of an intensive weight loss intervention compared with existing weight management programmes for people with clinical obesity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>LightWAY is an investigator-initiated, international, randomised, parallel-group clinical superiority trial with blinded outcome assessment. Six hundred people seeking treatment for clinical obesity (body mass index &ge;35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with comorbidities) will be recruited in centres in the UK and Denmark and randomised 1:1 to one of two groups. The experimental group will be offered a 2-year intensive weight loss programme providing support and advice to follow a total diet replacement programme, followed by gradual transition to an energy-reduced diet in combination with increased physical activity and if needed, prescription of weight loss medication. The control group will receive usual care, typically comprising brief behavioural support for weight loss and treatment of the complications of obesity or occasionally referral to specialist weight management services. The two co-primary outcomes are cardiometabolic risk, assessed with metabolic syndrome severity Z-score, and body weight assessed at 2 years. The secondary outcomes include the Short Form-36 mental component scale, 4-metre gait speed and proportion of participants achieving &ge;20% weight loss. The key adverse effects will be the proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event, incidence of eating disorders and disproportional loss of bone mass. Incremental cost-effectiveness will be assessed over the trial period and over the lifetime through modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was granted in the UK (August 2024, 24/SC/0211) and Denmark (December 2023, H-23065222). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences and to participants in the trial and clinicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06321458">NCT06321458</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wane, S., Aveyard, P., Wielsoe, S., Larsen, S. C., Scragg, J., Lindschou, J., Jakobsen, J. C., Engstrom, J., Specht, I. O., Christiansen, A.-K. L., Jensen, A. K. G., Bandholm, T., Albury, C., Overbeck, G., Reventlow, S., Olsen, K. R., Farr, P., Bojsen-Moller, K. N., Heitmann, B. L., Waldorff, F. B., Madsbad, S., Dirksen, C., Jebb, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107240</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107240</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intensive weight loss intervention versus usual care for adults with severe and complex obesity: the LightWAY randomised trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107240</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107462?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Virtual reality effects on dynamic stability of gait in stroke survivors: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess the role of user experience]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107462?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In recent years, virtual reality (VR) training has gained momentum in stroke rehabilitation for reducing falls by enhancing balance and stability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>VR interventions offer superior immersion, interactivity and creative engagement compared with conventional therapies. However, the precise mechanisms by which VR influences dynamic stability remain unclear. Moreover, there is currently limited information regarding user experience (UX) in this context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study protocol outlines a randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of an immersive VR intervention on the dynamic stability of gait parameters in stroke survivors, incorporating an assessment of UX. Two groups of subjects will be enrolled in this study, including patients with a stroke within the previous 6&ndash;12 months who will receive (1) 3 weeks of immersive VR training (intervention) or (2) conventional rehabilitation (control).</p>
<p>The primary outcome of the study will be dynamic stability measures and the UX. The secondary outcomes include anxiety and depression, fatigue, functional mobility, functional walking ability, static balance, fear of falling and adverse effects. All participants will be assessed at baseline, after 3 weeks and after 2 months of the initiation of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study ethics were approved by the ethical committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (registration No IR.TUMS.NI.REC.1401.091, registered on 8 January 2023). Written consent is going to be taken from all of the participants. The study adheres to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Dissemination of study findings will occur through peer-reviewed publications and knowledge translation activities targeting clinicians, researchers and rehabilitation professionals. Data generated from this study will be anonymised and curated in accordance with institutional and national data protection standards</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>IRCT20231031059916N1.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahmoodi, T., Memari, A., Seyedmirzaei, H., Sajadi, S., Keihani, A., Hojjatipour, F., Shahbazzadeh, M., Moradi, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107462</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107462</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Virtual reality effects on dynamic stability of gait in stroke survivors: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess the role of user experience]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107462</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107462</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108251?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Performance of active drug safety monitoring and management for pharmacovigilance strengthening in Ethiopia, experience from a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis management program: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108251?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The study aimed to assess the performance of active drug safety monitoring and management (aDSM) in the context of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) treatment programmes to generate insights that could support potential scale-up efforts to strengthen the pharmacovigilance (PV) system in Ethiopia and beyond.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study design was employed. The records of patients with MDR/RR-TB enrolled and treated at selected hospitals during April 2018 through February 2023 were reviewed. Data were collected using a structured data extraction form, and Research electronic Data Capture (REDCap) was used for data entry and management. The data were analysed using SPSS version 25, employing descriptive statistics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was carried out at ten (10) public hospitals in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1377 patients with MDR/RR-TB were included from 10 hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of the 1377 patients, the majority (59.3%) were males, and 39.9% were new to anti-TB treatment. Deviations from the schedule or missed safety monitoring and other investigations were observed. No records were available for monitoring adverse events (AEs) in 94 (6.8%) of the patients during their treatment follow-up. Overall, 455 (33.0%) patients experienced at least one AE during the treatment period. A total of 774 AE records were identified, of which 134 (17.3%) and 225 (29.1%) were serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI), respectively. Only 135 (17.4%) of all identified AEs were reported to the PV Centre, of which 70 (51.9%) and 48 (35.6%) were AESI and SAE, respectively. However, the trend of AE detection and reporting showed improvement over the surveyed aDSM implementation period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Despite the implementation of aDSM, AE detection and reporting remained suboptimal in the MDR/RR-TB treatment cohort. Therefore, routine aDSM needs to be strengthened and consistently implemented to improve the national pharmacovigilance system and enhance patient safety monitoring and management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Achalu, D. L., Meshesha, S. G., Kiltu, A. B., Wendimu, D. E., Tegegne, N. A., Alemu, A., Tiemersma, E. W., Cobelens, F., Teferi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108251</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108251</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Performance of active drug safety monitoring and management for pharmacovigilance strengthening in Ethiopia, experience from a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis management program: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108251</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108893?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In their own words: experiences surrounding masculinising chest surgery among transgender and gender-diverse adolescents - a secondary analysis of GENDER-Q data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108893?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Masculinising chest surgery, also known as top surgery, is the most requested gender-affirming procedure among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adolescents, yet research on patient experiences remains limited. This study explored the experiences of TGD adolescents who were seeking or had undergone masculinising chest surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative secondary analysis using existing themes framework and data from the GENDER-Q (GQ) and GENDER-Q Youth (GQY) research programmes, which aim to develop comprehensive patient-reported outcome measures for gender-affirming care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Participants were sampled from five high-volume gender-affirming care clinics, three in Canada and two in the United States. Interviews were conducted online.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>35 GQ and GQY participants aged 13&ndash;18 years who were assigned female at birth, identified as trans men or non-binary, and were pursuing (n=19) or had undergone (n=16) masculinising chest surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three major themes emerged: chest appearance, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and gender practices. Most participants expected a flatter chest that aesthetically aligned with their gender identity. Presurgery participants anticipated that surgery would allow them to engage in previously avoided physical activities and would enhance their relationships. Postoperative participants reported increased physical activity, mental resilience, bodily connection and social comfort. Most reported binder use and related reliance or discomfort as motivators for pursuing surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study highlights the multidimensional experiences surrounding masculinising chest surgery on TGD adolescents with impacts on chest appearance, HRQL and gender practices. Centering adolescents&rsquo; perspectives, these findings underscore the importance of accessible, affirming surgical care and provide valuable insights for clinicians, policymakers and future research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armstrong, K., Quan, I., Kennedy, S. L., Kaur, M. N., Cornacchi, S. D., Rae, C., Johnson, N., Khatchadourian, K., Marinkovic, M., Sequeira, G. M., Bradley, B., Cheung, K., Morrison, S. D., Klassen, A. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108893</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108893</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In their own words: experiences surrounding masculinising chest surgery among transgender and gender-diverse adolescents - a secondary analysis of GENDER-Q data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108893</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108893</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109404?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Australian key stakeholder views regarding implementation of atrial fibrillation screening: a qualitative evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109404?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To understand the issues impacting atrial fibrillation (AF) screening and what needs to be considered for a successful national screening programme in Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative design using semistructured interviews and thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Australian Health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Six broad stakeholder groups were identified: charities/patient support, healthcare providers, professional bodies, government, research (including Indigenous health) and industry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews were conducted with 25 representative participants. Iterative thematic analysis was used. Coding was driven by the research questions (the current context; is a national screening programme warranted and approaches to a national screening programme) and an inductive approach where novel groupings of information were identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The key findings are grouped into four areas. (1) Current opportunistic general practitioner-led screening is ad hoc and fragmented. Issues: poor remuneration; lack of health sector collaboration and prioritisation; consumers lack awareness. (2) Systematic screening of all in-scope patients not considered feasible and concerns over lack of evidence. (3) Alternative approaches to increase screening include innovative approaches inside and outside general practice and use of smart technology. (4) Recommendations: (a) Support general practices and address remuneration and workflows; (b) Ensure a clear pathway to treatment; (c) Address data security, management and integration and sensitivity issues with wearable devices; (d) Promote collaboration between key organisations; (e) Address research gaps and (f) Generate culturally appropriate consumer education to promote consumer demand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Most stakeholders were broadly supportive of AF screening but agreed that current approaches were fragmented and not sufficient. If the forthcoming research evidence supports screening effectiveness on major outcomes, stakeholders envisaged a semi-systematic approach tailored to specific health settings, rather than a formalised systematic national screening programme.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mckenzie, K., Freedman, B., Jacob, A., Modi, R. N., Lowres, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109404</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109404</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Australian key stakeholder views regarding implementation of atrial fibrillation screening: a qualitative evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109404</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109404</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111370?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preferences of frail elderly patients with cardiovascular disease for web-based exercise telerehabilitation interventions in China: protocol for a discrete choice experiment study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111370?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Individuals with cardiovascular disease are prone to frailty, while frailty accelerates disease progression and worsens outcomes. Exercise interventions are essential non-pharmacological treatments for frail elderly patients with cardiovascular disease; however adherence remains low and strategies are inconsistent. Telerehabilitation improves accessibility, allows continuous monitoring with timely clinical responses and helps overcome mobility and geographical barriers for frail older adults. Guided by the patient-centred approach, exercise telerehabilitation should consider both clinical effectiveness and patient preferences to enhance acceptance and adherence. However, patient preferences for web-based exercise telerehabilitation remain poorly understood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is designed as a discrete choice experiment to elicit and quantify preferences for key features of web-based exercise telerehabilitation among frail older adults with cardiovascular disease. Candidate attributes and levels were developed through a systematic literature review, patient focus groups and expert consultation. An orthogonal fractional-factorial design will generate the choice sets. A questionnaire survey will recruit older adults with cardiovascular disease who are identified as frail based on validated frailty assessment scales. Participants will be recruited from a cardiovascular specialty hospital in Xiamen, China, with a planned sample size of 157. Final data will be analysed using mixed logit models to estimate attribute importance, quantify preference weights and identify preference heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethical approval from the relevant institutional ethics committee (2025&ndash;46). All participants will provide informed consent. Findings will be disseminated to patient groups, clinicians and policymakers and published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zou, H., Wu, L., Zheng, X., Dong, P., Yuan, W., Li, J., Zhang, S., Chen, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111370</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111370</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preferences of frail elderly patients with cardiovascular disease for web-based exercise telerehabilitation interventions in China: protocol for a discrete choice experiment study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111370</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111370</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103938corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction in: Association between decentralised clinical trial adoption and trial duration: a retrospective cross-sectional study of metabolic disease trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103938corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Lee SW, Cho KH. Association between decentralised clinical trial adoption and trial duration: a retrospective cross-sectional study of metabolic disease trials. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2026;16:e103938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103938</p>
<p>This article has been updated since it was published. The author order has been changed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-20T05:46:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103938corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103938corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction in: Association between decentralised clinical trial adoption and trial duration: a retrospective cross-sectional study of metabolic disease trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103938corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103938corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost of emergency hospital admissions to acute general wards for mental health problems among children and young people in England, 2012-2022: a retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine trends in the frequency and costs of emergency hospital admissions in acute wards for mental health conditions among children and young people in England between 2012 and 2022 and to assess socioeconomic and geographic disparities in these costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective observational cohort study using routinely collected administrative data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary care acute wards; analysis includes all National Health Service (NHS) hospital admissions in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All emergency hospital admissions in acute wards for individuals aged 5&ndash;18 years with a primary or secondary mental health diagnosis recorded between 2012 and 2022. Exclusion criteria included admissions without a mental health diagnosis or outside the defined age range.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were the annual number and total cost of mental health-related emergency admissions. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, diagnostic categories contributing to cost, and variation by socioeconomic deprivation and geographic location.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Between 2012 and 2022, the total cost of emergency admissions for mental health among children and young people rose markedly, driven by increases in both admission rates and length of stay. Children from the most socioeconomically deprived areas experienced higher admission rates and greater associated costs. Substantial regional variation in the financial burden was also observed. Eating disorders and self-harm were the main diagnostic categories contributing to the rise in costs. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, total admission numbers declined, but overall costs remained high due to a shift in diagnostic mix towards conditions associated with longer hospital stays and higher per-admission costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The increasing financial burden of paediatric mental health crises highlights the urgency of addressing upstream drivers of poor mental health. Policies should prioritise early intervention, reduce regional and socioeconomic disparities, and ensure equitable allocation of mental health resources. Further research should explore the effectiveness of community-based alternatives to hospital care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pilvar, H., Cornaglia, F., Ward, J. L., Vazquez-Vazquez, A., Phillips, K., Settle, K., Gibson, F., Nicholls, D., Roland, D., Roberts, H., Viner, R. M., Hudson, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T13:31:55-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107143</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107143</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Press releases, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost of emergency hospital admissions to acute general wards for mental health problems among children and young people in England, 2012-2022: a retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107143</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106055?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between same-sex partnership certificate schemes and mental health in sexual and gender minority adults: nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106055?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Same-sex marriage legalisation improves mental health among sexual and gender minority (SGM) people. In Japan, where same-sex marriage is not legalised, some municipalities have introduced &lsquo;partnership certificate&rsquo; schemes (PCSs) to offer same-sex couples social recognition without legal recognition. We examined whether mental health status in SGM adults differed between municipalities with and without PCSs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>We used cross-sectional data on adults aged &ge;18 years from a nationwide internet survey conducted in September and October 2022. We estimated the relative difference by comparing the differences in mental distress and suicidal thoughts reported by SGM adults residing in municipalities with and without PCSs to the corresponding differences among cisgender heterosexual adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Mental distress (Kessler 6 Scale score &ge;5) and self-reported suicidal thoughts, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, health status and municipal characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We analysed 28 106 participants (mean (SD) age, 48.2 (17.3) years), including 3169 (11.3%) SGM individuals. Despite no significant difference in mental distress, we found a statistically significant difference in rates of self-reported suicidal thoughts between municipalities with and without the scheme for the SGM group (average marginal effects (AME), +5.1 percentage points (pp); 95% CI +0.4 to +9.8 pp) and the cisgender heterosexual group (AME, &ndash;1.6 pp; 95% CI &ndash;3.0 to &ndash;0.1 pp; relative difference, +6.7 pp; 95% CI +1.8 to +11.5 pp).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Residing in a municipality with PCSs was not associated with better mental health among SGM people in Japan. This may reflect limited scheme uptake or perceptions of inequality with legal marriage. These schemes without national legislation may not adequately address internalised stigma or promote acceptance, and they may have lowered the self-esteem of SGM people, leading to worse mental health. Further research is needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms of this association.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tatsuno, Y., Minami, T., Tomio, J., Tabuchi, T., Miyawaki, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T05:02:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106055</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106055</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between same-sex partnership certificate schemes and mental health in sexual and gender minority adults: nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106055</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106055</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e095242?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of care modality and chronic disease needs among older adults with chronic disease and disability in rural China: a cross-sectional study in Qinghe County, Hebei Province]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e095242?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with care modality among older adults with chronic disease and disability in rural China. We hypothesised that marital status, family structure, duration of disability and the number of chronic diseases would be significantly associated with care modality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional observational study using survey data to identify demographic and health-related factors associated with care modality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in a rural mid-sized county in China and focused on older adults with chronic disease and disability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 608 older adults aged &ge;60 years with chronic disease and disability residing in Qinghe County, Hebei Province, China, completed the survey. Eligible participants had at least one chronic disease and partial or complete loss of self-care ability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was care modality (home-based care vs institutional care). Secondary outcomes included specific chronic disease care needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the participants, 18.59% received institutional care. Divorced, widowed or unmarried participants had higher odds of institutional care use (OR=3.113, 95% CI 2.01 to 4.82, p&lt;0.0001), as did those with one child (OR=5.55, 95% CI 1.647 to 18.696, p=0.0057). Participants with a disability lasting 3 or more years had significantly lower odds of institutional care use (OR=0.353, 95% CI 0.186 to 0.667, p=0.0014). Individuals with three chronic diseases (OR=0.486, 95% CI 0.242 to 0.977, p=0.0429) or four or more (OR=0.412, 95% CI 0.183 to 0.928, p=0.0324) also had lower odds of institutional care use. The highest-priority chronic disease care needs were regular physical examinations, rehabilitation guidance, medication guidance, chronic disease management guidance and nutritional guidance. Participants receiving institutional care reported higher needs for digitally supported services such as online referral, medical record information sharing and remote data transmission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Marital status, number of children, duration of disability and number of chronic diseases were significantly associated with care modality in this population. These findings highlight the need to improve institutional care quality and availability and to better address the chronic disease management needs of this population. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to explore the evolving care needs of this growing demographic.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geng, J., Kang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Sun, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095242</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095242</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of care modality and chronic disease needs among older adults with chronic disease and disability in rural China: a cross-sectional study in Qinghe County, Hebei Province]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095242</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108694?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a deep learning model applied to chest X-rays of patients with suspected pneumonia presenting to the emergency department designed to predict admission risk: a retrospective training and prospective non-intervention validation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108694?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop, train and test a deep learning model Image-based PROgnostication applied to Chest X Rays (IPRO-X) tool that predicts the inpatient (IP) admission risk in patients with suspected pneumonia presenting to the emergency department (ED).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The study consists of a retrospective (training) and prospective non-interventional shadow deployment (validation) of a deep learning model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three-hospital tertiary care system with two EDs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Consecutive adult patients (18 years old or older) who presented to the ED from December 2022 to February 2023 with a chief clinical complaint potentially related to pneumonia were reviewed for eligibility (n=5567), with a final number of 3677 included in the validation study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>IPRO-X was developed using standard two-dimensional convolutional neural network InceptionNet architecture and processes chest radiographs (CXRs) acquired at admission generating a continuous value from 0 (IP-negative) to 1 (IP-positive). We examined IPRO-X&rsquo;s ability to predict IP admission using accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. IPRO-X scores were compared against observed outcomes (admission and discharge) to determine clinical utility in an ED setting. Four thresholds were defined from the retrospective phase: Youden optimal, highest specificity and thresholds equivalent to 30-day mortality rates of Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) Risk class IV and Confusion, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressure and Age 65 or older Score (CRB-65) scores 1 and 2. Performance was also analysed per group of chief complaints.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the validation set, 3677 patients (1777 (48%) female, median age 56 years (min 18, max 99)) were included. IPRO-X predicted IP admissions with an AUC of 0.795, and in the pneumonia-specific chief complaints, AUC increased to 0.828, whereas in non-related pneumonia chief complaints, the AUC decreased to 0.755. IPRO-X score was significantly higher in admitted patients compared with discharged patients (p&lt;0.001). The accuracy of IPRO-X when using the PSI-anchored threshold was 0.751 and with the CRB-anchored threshold was 0.729, with a specificity of 0.803 and 0.968, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>IPRO-X applied to CXR of patients with signs and symptoms commonly related to pneumonia in the ED can accurately predict IP admission.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pimenta Ribeiro Pontes Almeida, E., Masood, S., Baldauf-Lenschen, F., Hennessy, T. J., Akbar, S., Deng, Y., Soares Torres, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108694</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108694</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a deep learning model applied to chest X-rays of patients with suspected pneumonia presenting to the emergency department designed to predict admission risk: a retrospective training and prospective non-intervention validation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108694</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108694</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109040?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of esketamine versus remifentanil as adjuncts to propofol sedation in children undergoing haematologic-oncologic procedures in China: a single-centre, randomised, controlled, crossover trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109040?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adequate sedation is essential for paediatric patients undergoing invasive haematologic-oncologic procedures. The combination of propofol and remifentanil is commonly used yet is associated with respiratory depression. Esketamine has anaesthetic, analgesic and sympathomimetic properties and is known to cause less respiratory depression than other sedatives. This study aims to assess esketamine versus remifentanil in combination with propofol for invasive haematological-oncological procedures for paediatric patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, randomised, double-blind, two-period crossover trial will include 80 paediatric patients aged 6&ndash;12 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status II to III, who are scheduled to undergo repeated invasive procedures including bone marrow aspirates and lumbar punctures under sedation. Participants will be randomised to two sequences: AB or BA. In sequence AB, children will receive propofol (3 mg/kg) and esketamine (0.5 mg/kg) in period 1 and propofol (3 mg/kg) and remifentanil (1 &micro;g/kg) in period 2. In sequence BA, the order is reversed. The primary endpoint of this trial is the incidence of desaturation events, defined as SpO<SUB>2</SUB>&lt;90% during the sedation and recovery. The secondary endpoints include: (1) the interruption rate of the procedure; (2) total dose of propofol; (3) the number of times esketamine or remifentanil is added; (4) recovery time; (5) distress behaviour; (6) a composite of sedation-related adverse events, including psychotomimetic effects (hallucinations, nightmares, fatigue, dizziness and headache), nausea, vomiting, bradycardia and hypotension; (7) operator satisfaction; (8) patient satisfaction and (9) anaesthetist satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Children&rsquo;s Hospital of Soochow University (Approval No. 2025008). The results of this trial will be submitted for peer review and publication in a scientific journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500098533.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, S., Yang, Y.-F., Gao, J.-M., Chen, X., Tang, Z., Ji, F.-H., Peng, K., Wang, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109040</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109040</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of esketamine versus remifentanil as adjuncts to propofol sedation in children undergoing haematologic-oncologic procedures in China: a single-centre, randomised, controlled, crossover trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109040</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109040</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109839?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family-supported hearing aid use behaviour intervention to improve outcomes in older adults at high risk for dementia (SOUND): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109839?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Hearing loss (HL) imposes a substantial burden on families and society and is the largest modifiable risk factor for dementia. As a practical and non-invasive approach to managing HL, hearing aid use has been associated with a reduced risk of incident dementia and global cognitive decline. However, high-level evidence on the cognitive benefits of hearing aids among those at high dementia risk is scarce and adherence to hearing aid use remains challenging. Our study aims to explore whether a family-supported hearing aid use behaviour intervention, guided by the integrated framework of self-determination theory, technology acceptance model and family social support theory, can improve cognitive function in Chinese older adults with both HL and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a two-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. A total of 150 participants with HL and MCI will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention group (hearing aid use and family intervention) or a control group (hearing aid use and regular health education). All interventions will last for 4 months. Hearing aid use will be delivered by professional audiologists, while family caregivers will deliver the behavioural intervention at home after receiving standardised training from researchers and guidance through structured manuals. Furthermore, family caregivers will be guided through a WeChat group to address unresolved issues related to hearing aid maintenance and intervention skills. The primary outcome is cognitive function measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment&ndash;Hearing Impairment at baseline and follow-up. Secondary outcomes include adherence score to hearing aid use measured by daily duration and weekly frequency, hearing aid use skills, motivation, activities of daily life, quality of life, depressive symptoms, subjective cognitive decline, social support, self-efficacy, healthcare utilisation, autonomy support and caregiver burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University. Research findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400091791.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, G., Zhong, Z., Yang, Y., Huang, Y., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Luo, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109839</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109839</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family-supported hearing aid use behaviour intervention to improve outcomes in older adults at high risk for dementia (SOUND): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109839</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109839</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110242?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes among Aboriginal women in remote communities of the Northern Territory, Australia: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110242?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Aboriginal women in the remote Northern Territory (NT) experience high rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes related to hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) screening was recommended in early pregnancy but barriers to uptake exist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine uptake of screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy among Aboriginal women in remote NT communities and explore adverse pregnancy outcome rates among women who did not have early OGTT screening compared with women who did undergo screening in early pregnancy and those with pre-existing diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective observational cohort study of pregnancies among Aboriginal women in remote NT clinics from January 2017 to December 2019. Screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy included having an early OGTT (&lt;20 weeks of gestation) or a routine OGTT (&ge;20 weeks). Logistic regression was used to assess adverse pregnancy outcomes between those who did and did not have early OGTT screening and those with pre-existing diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 1191 pregnancies in 52 remote communities, pre-existing type 2 diabetes (T2D) was diagnosed in 6.4% (n=76) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was diagnosed in 13% (154/1191). Excluding women with pre-existing diabetes, 226 (20%) had an early OGTT. Guideline-directed screening (with either (a) an early OGTT diagnosing GDM or (b) a negative early OGTT followed by a routine OGTT) occurred in 14% of pregnancies (n=158). Compared with women who had an early pregnancy OGTT, the combined adverse pregnancy outcome was more common among women with pre-existing T2D (89% vs 54%, adjusted OR 6.06 (95% CI 2.75 to 13.35)) and similar among women who did not undergo early OGTT (50%, adjusted OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.32)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Uptake of guideline-directed screening in Aboriginal women in remote NT was low, although there was no difference in pregnancy outcomes for women who were and were not screened with an early OGTT. Rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes were concerningly high in women with pre-existing T2D, highlighting a need to strengthen diabetes care for these women.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wood, A. J., OHara, C., Joyce-Tubb, A., Webster, V., Wicks, M., Van Dokkum, P., Maple-Brown, L. J., Hare, M. J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110242</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110242</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes among Aboriginal women in remote communities of the Northern Territory, Australia: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110242</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112643?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Womens preference for HPV self-sampling devices: a programme-embedded, large-scale paired comparative study within the cervical cancer screening programme in the Capital Region of Denmark]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112643?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To demonstrate women&rsquo;s preferences for three human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling devices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional, programme-embedded paired comparative study with randomised sampling order within device pairs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Organised cervical cancer screening programme in the Capital Region of Denmark.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1760 women eligible for cervical cancer screening (April 2024 to May 2025), assigned to one of three groups: (1) Evalyn versus FLOQSwab (n=518), (2) Evalyn versus SensiGrip (n=657) and (3) FLOQSwab versus SensiGrip (n=585).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary: device preference. Secondary: sampling-experience (self-reported). Data were assessed with &sup2; tests for preference, logistic regression for predictor analysis and Wilcoxon signed-rank equivalence test with two one-sided test procedures to assess sampling experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 95.7% rated HPV self-sampling a positive experience and 87.3% preferred HPV self-sampling in future screening. SensiGrip was preferred significantly over FLOQSwab (p&lt;0.001), with participants rating ease of use and sampling certainty higher for SensiGrip. No significant differences in preference were observed between Evalyn and either alternative device in the primary analysis (p&gt;0.05) although Evalyn scored higher in sampling certainty. Sampling order influenced preference in Evalyn comparisons. Prior experience with self-sampling, screening history and subcohort membership did not significantly influence device preference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Overall, participants rated self-sampling a positive experience. SensiGrip was preferred over FLOQSwab, while Evalyn demonstrated comparable overall acceptability to both alternative devices in the primary implementation-focused analysis. These findings suggest that device replacement would be acceptable from a screening participation perspective, particularly a shift from FLOQSwab to SensiGrip.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreasen, E. K., Arum, A., Pedersen, H., Dahl Nielsen, T., Frandsen, P., Pedersen, B. T., Serizawa, R., Bonde, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112643</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112643</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Womens preference for HPV self-sampling devices: a programme-embedded, large-scale paired comparative study within the cervical cancer screening programme in the Capital Region of Denmark]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112643</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112643</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112788?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Objective data-driven personalised approach to diagnosis of chronic tinnitus: the Tinnitus Detection (TIDE) project - protocol for the identification and validation of a biomarker for tinnitus]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112788?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Tinnitus is the perception of sound without an external source, often considered a phantom percept similar to phantom limb sensations, resulting from maladaptive plasticity in the brain. The condition lacks an established biomarker for diagnosis but recent studies have linked it to neural changes. The Tinnitus Detection consortium aims to identify and validate potential biomarkers for tinnitus presence and intensity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods/design</st>
<p>This multicentre prospective case&ndash;control study will recruit 560 adults (280 chronic tinnitus; 280 controls). Participants will complete standardised audiological and questionnaire assessments and then undergo 64-channel electroencephalography (and magnetoencephalography at one site) to record event-related potentials during (1) a cortical gap prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (GPIAS) paradigm assessing gap-related inhibition of the N1 response and (2) an omission auditory oddball paradigm quantifying mismatch negativity and P300 as candidate biomarkers of tinnitus presence and loudness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The identification of a biomarker for tinnitus is crucial for developing personalised diagnosis and treatment: There is a need for updated guidelines and more effective tinnitus treatments, as existing interventions often rely on subjective measures. The success of biomarkers like GPIAS and oddball paradigms could significantly improve the reliability of tinnitus diagnosis and treatment, marking a transformative step in the field.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06520865">NCT06520865</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanneste, S., Yasoda-Mohan, A., Chen, F., Arulchelvan, E., Shields, N., Braun, C., Campbell, J., De Ridder, D., Engelke, M., Fink, S., Husain, F. T., Jain, N., Kleinjung, T., Kim, G., Knipper, M., Langguth, B., Lu, H., Neff, P., Ralston, L., Riegger, E., Ru&#x0308;ttiger, L., Schlee, W., To&#x0308;dtli, B., Shabestari, P. S., Ajmera, S., Staudinger, S., Wolpert, S., Cederoth, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112788</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112788</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Objective data-driven personalised approach to diagnosis of chronic tinnitus: the Tinnitus Detection (TIDE) project - protocol for the identification and validation of a biomarker for tinnitus]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112788</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112788</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112790?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient and family experiences of sedation in an urban academic tertiary-level intensive care unit in Canada: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112790?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Sedation is commonly used in critically ill patients to facilitate procedures and care as well as provide comfort but can carry risks such as delirium and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Although current guidelines advocate for light sedation, sedation practices are influenced by clinicians&rsquo; subjective interpretations. Patients and families may experience distress and unmet needs, and little is known about their perspectives and experiences in the context of contemporary light sedation practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to understand the perceptions and experiences of both patient and family members in the intensive care unit (ICU) of current sedation practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>Canadian, closed, mixed ICU setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Critically ill adult patients and adult family members.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients and family members were interviewed, using a semi-structured interview questionnaire, and Braun and Clarke inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes in the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 family members and 10 patients. Family members and patients reported that sedation was needed for patient comfort. Family members also described the need for sedation for patient and staff safety, as well as their own comfort. While both groups described sedation as necessary for enduring the medical procedures in the ICU, both groups reported concerns of sedation use, including negative physiological and cognitive patient outcomes. Patients and family members also recommended strategies for improving how sedation use is communicated in the ICU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Perceptions and experiences of patient and families with sedation care practices in the ICU were multifaceted with both positive and negative outcomes reported including psychological and emotional concerns with sedation use. Key recommendations were provided for improving sedation practices with families emphasising the need for family-centred care and patients highlighting the need for self-determination.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petkovic-Wintemute, A., Eystathioy, T., Okuori, A., Oxland, P., Kupsch, S., Fiest, K., Niven, D., Parsons Leigh, J., Burry, L., Jenkins, J., Jaworska, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112790</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112790</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient and family experiences of sedation in an urban academic tertiary-level intensive care unit in Canada: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112790</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112790</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112891?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global Healthcare Study on Psoriasis (GHSP): cohort profile and first findings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112891?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Despite the intention of international psoriasis treatment guidelines to cover all patients globally, disparities persist in the availability and accessibility of adequate therapy in many countries. The Global Healthcare Study on Psoriasis (GHSP) aims to study patient characteristics, disease impact, treatment accessibility and healthcare systems worldwide. This study provides a description and data analysis of 22 countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The GHSP cohort was initiated in 2020, and the number of recruiting centres has gradually grown. Participants are recruited by dermatologists at reference centres worldwide. Data are collected using a standardised assessment questionnaire comprising 88 items, administered by trained experts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>By 26 October 2024, cross-sectional data had been collected from 3950 psoriasis patients at 130 reference centres in 22 countries on six continents. The majority (55.7%) of patients were male, and the median (IQR) body mass index was 26.5 (23.7&ndash;30.1) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The median (IQR) Psoriasis Area and Severity Index was 5.0 (2.0&ndash;11.4), and median (IQR) Dermatology Life Quality Index was 7.0 (2.0&ndash;14.0). Psoriatic arthritis was present in 20.2% of the patients and nail psoriasis in 36.7%. Additionally, 16.5% of patients were current smokers, and 26.4% reported regular alcohol consumption.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>By identifying inequalities, special patient populations and country-specific differences, the GHSP will guide the development of strategies to enhance psoriasis care on a global level. Future directions include expanding the study to additional countries and sites worldwide, while transitioning into a long-term global registry of skin diseases, including atopic dermatitis and hidradenitis suppurativa, termed &lsquo;Global Healthcare Registry on Skin Diseases&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maul, J.-T., Fro&#x0308;hlich, F., Nielsen, M.-L., Maul, L. V., Torres, T., Thyssen, J. P., Armstrong, A., Oon, H. H., Ji, M., Kang, X., Valenzuela, F., Romiti, R., Carvalho, A. V. E. d., Novoa, F., Sousa, M., Luz, M., Guevara, B. E. K., doss, N., Gisondi, P., Chularojanamontri, L., Ku&#x0308;ndig, T. M., Egeberg, A., Thomsen, S. F., Didaskalu, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112891</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112891</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global Healthcare Study on Psoriasis (GHSP): cohort profile and first findings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112891</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112891</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114881?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measurement of quality of stroke care with national electronic health records: a prospective cohort study during and after the COVID-19 pandemic]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114881?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the value of linked electronic health records (EHRs) for measuring stroke care quality in England before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on metrics not routinely captured: stroke incidence, dispensing of secondary prevention medications and a proxy of disability&mdash;time spent at home after stroke (&lsquo;home-time&rsquo;).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study using national linked datasets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>England-wide health data linkage including the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP), primary and secondary care, dispensed medications and mortality records, accessed via National Health Service (NHS) England&rsquo;s Secure Data Environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>425 675 adults with a first stroke between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2023; data were available for 304 210 in primary care, 279 825 in hospital admissions, 220 470 in SSNAP and 59 465 in death records.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Annual stroke incidence; first-year medication dispensing rates for antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antihypertensives and lipid-lowering agents (with a 1-month washout period) and home-time at 180 days post stroke.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Stroke ascertainment was highest when combining all sources, with 10.8% of non-fatal ischaemic strokes recorded exclusively in primary care and 19.4% of fatal strokes identified solely through death records. Standardised annual stroke incidence rose from 227.6 (95% CI 226.1 to 229.0) to 244.8 (95% CI 243.4 to 246.3) per 100 000 over the study period including the COVID-19 pandemic. During the COVID-19 lockdown, non-fatal stroke recordings decreased while stroke-related deaths rose, indicating that recording quality was sensitive to shifts in healthcare-seeking behaviour during the pandemic. Among people with ischaemic stroke, 89.1% received an antiplatelet or anticoagulant, 44.5% an antihypertensive and 80.5% a lipid-lowering therapy. For haemorrhagic stroke, these proportions were: for anticoagulants 13.5%, antiplatelets 13.2%, antihypertensives 46.6% and lipid lowering 41.1%. Medication dispensing for stroke prevention declined with increasing age and comorbidity, but varied little by ethnicity, region or pandemic period. Mean home-time within 180 days of stroke was 166.6 (95% CI 166.4 to 166) days, decreasing with greater age (141.4 days for 90 years or older (95% CI 140.7 to 142.1)), deprivation (166.4 days (95% CI 166.1 to 166.6) for most deprived quintile) and stroke severity (137.4 days for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on arrival over 22 (95% CI 135.8 to 139.1)) and increasing with years from the COVID-19 pandemic 2023 (169.3 days (95% CI 169.0 to 169.5) vs 2020 164.4 days (95% CI 164.1 to 164.7)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Standardised stroke incidence increased significantly over the study period, highlighting a growing public health burden that persisted despite disruptions due to the pandemic although variation in case ascertainment and stroke coding practices was observed. While secondary prevention coverage for antiplatelets and lipids was high, lower rates of dispensing of antihypertensives, particularly in older and comorbid populations, potentially signal a target for improvement. Home-time represents a sensitive, person-centred outcome that exposes disparities linked to socioeconomic deprivation and clinical severity that can be used to enhance routine stroke audits. These findings justify the expansion of linked EHR infrastructure and the modernisation of governance frameworks to enable the longitudinal evaluation of care quality beyond the COVID-19 era.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farrell, J., Nolan, J., Lambert, R., Torralbo, A., Petersen, S. E., Hocaoglu, M., Tomlinson, C., Sofat, R., Huang, Q., Kontopantelis, E., James, M., Lessels, S., MacArthur, J. A. L., Wood, A. M., Whiteley, W. N., Denaxas, S., on behalf of the CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114881</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114881</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measurement of quality of stroke care with national electronic health records: a prospective cohort study during and after the COVID-19 pandemic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114881</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114881</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115464?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the efficacy, safety and utility of fully closed-loop insulin delivery compared to standard insulin therapy with a continuous glucose monitor in adults with type 2 diabetes (COYOTE study): a randomised parallel study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115464?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) presents a global healthcare burden. Despite widespread use of non-insulin glucose lowering therapies, many individuals still require insulin to achieve recommended target glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Insulin injections improve HbA1c but can lead to problematic hypoglycaemia. The objective of this study is to determine whether fully closed-loop insulin delivery improves HbA1c at 26 weeks compared with standard insulin therapy with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with T2D.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study adopts an open-label, multinational, randomised, single-period parallel design and aims to randomise 224 adults with T2D to either standard insulin therapy with CGM (control group) or fully closed-loop insulin delivery (intervention group) for a period of 26 weeks. Participants will complete a run-in period of 2&ndash;3 weeks wearing a masked CGM followed by randomisation to either the control or intervention group. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in HbA1c at 26 weeks. Key endpoints include time in target glucose range (3.9&ndash;10.0 mmol/L), mean sensor glucose, time above range (&gt;10.0 mmol/L) and non-inferiority for time below target (&lt;3.9 mmol/L) over the 26-week study period. Secondary outcomes include standard CGM metrics, binary metrics for HbA1c, total daily insulin dose, body mass index, blood pressure, fasted lipid profile, renal function and liver function. Safety will be assessed by the frequency of severe hypoglycaemic episodes and other adverse events. Utility will be assessed by CGM and closed-loop system use. The impact of fully closed-loop will be assessed using validated questionnaires and interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received ethical approval from the East of England Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire Research Ethics Committee (24/EE/0149) in the UK. Ethical approval for non-UK site has been obtained by local Research Ethics Committees.</p>
<p>Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, and findings will be shared with people living with diabetes, healthcare providers and relevant stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06579404">NCT06579404</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seese, R., Boughton, C., Tseung, F., Uy, R., Wilinska, M., Thabit, H., Cheah, Y., Neupane, S., Hussain, S., Choudhary, P., Wilmot, E., Bally, L., Hanaire, H., Mader, J., Haluzik, M., ONeal, D., Lawton, J., Rankin, D., Kollman, C., Dunseath, G., Hovorka, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115464</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115464</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the efficacy, safety and utility of fully closed-loop insulin delivery compared to standard insulin therapy with a continuous glucose monitor in adults with type 2 diabetes (COYOTE study): a randomised parallel study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115464</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115464</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118949?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Economic evidence on provider-level implications of direct posterior amalgam alternatives following the EU phase-out: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118949?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To map and characterise economic evaluations (EEs) and provider-level cost/resource reporting related to direct posterior restorative alternatives following the European Union (EU) dental amalgam phase-out.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and LIVIVO (ZB MED search portal for life sciences (Germany)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Peer-reviewed studies (English/German; 1 January 2021&ndash;22 February 2026) reporting EEs or cost/resource-use components for direct posterior restorations in permanent teeth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data were charted using a predefined extraction framework focusing on analytic perspective, time horizon, modelling approach and granularity of provider-level resource components. Two reviewers independently screened records and charted data; disagreements were resolved by discussion and, if needed, by consultation with a third reviewer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six studies met the inclusion criteria (four model-based or trial-based EEs; two cross-sectional surveys). Most analyses adopted payer, societal or mixed perspectives and used decision-analytic models with medium- to long-term horizons. Outcomes included cost per complication-free month, cost per tooth-year retained and lifetime cost projections. Detailed provider-level reporting (eg, chair time, personnel allocation, overheads or warranty-related retreatment burden) was limited, and survey evidence relied on self-reported estimates. Heterogeneity in methods and metrics precluded quantitative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Economic evidence regarding direct posterior restorative alternatives after the EU amalgam phase-out is sparse and primarily based on modelled or reimbursement-derived inputs from payer, societal or mixed perspectives, rather than explicitly measured provider-level microcosting. Greater transparency in analytic perspective and microcosting components may support evidence-informed adaptation to restorative material substitution policies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oesterreicher, J., Herz, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T04:38:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118949</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118949</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Economic evidence on provider-level implications of direct posterior amalgam alternatives following the EU phase-out: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118949</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118949</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108442?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preparation for online psychological therapy for depression in people living with and beyond cancer in East Midlands NHS primary and secondary care services in England: protocol for the PROSPER randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108442?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Depression is up to four times more common among individuals with cancer compared with the general population. Psychological therapies are effective in treating depression among patients in cancer care, but access is often delayed, which can exacerbate symptoms, increase dropout and reduce therapeutic effectiveness. This study evaluates the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a therapy preparation intervention (TPI) designed to enhance engagement and outcomes among patients awaiting psychological therapy in cancer care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a parallel-group, two-arm, multicentre, single-blind randomised controlled trial. A total of 150 adults (&ge;18 years) living with or beyond cancer and experiencing moderate-to-severe depression will be recruited from health services in the East Midlands region of England. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either TPI plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is depression severity measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-items (PHQ-9) over a 24-week follow-up. Secondary outcomes include anxiety, functioning, mental well-being, patient activation, readiness for change, health-related quality of life and health economics, and therapy engagement including attendance and dropout. Hope and in-session patient activation, assessed using recorded treatment preparation sessions, will be explored as additional mechanistic variables. Health economic outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 24 weeks. Data will be collected via online or telephone surveys at baseline, and at 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks post randomisation. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants will explore intervention experiences, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Health Research Authority and National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (Bromley) (REC reference: 24/LO/0610). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and clinical and patient networks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ISRCTN registry: <A HREF="ISRCTN13692666">ISRCTN13692666</A>, registered on 18 October 2024.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boutry, C., Hagyari-Donaldson, P., Hill, A., Mauger, F., Mays, C., Macauley, C., Covington, M., Wynn, R., Simpson, K., Cordrey, M., Higton, F., Hall, C. L., Moghaddam, N., Morriss, R., Rathbone, J., Guo, B., Patel, S., Malins, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T08:54:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108442</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108442</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preparation for online psychological therapy for depression in people living with and beyond cancer in East Midlands NHS primary and secondary care services in England: protocol for the PROSPER randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108442</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108442</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114628?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Blended adapted sailing therapy with telerehabilitation for rare skeletal disorders: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled feasibility trial in Italy (PaS2-EXTEND)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114628?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Rare skeletal disorders (RSDs) cause lifelong functional impairment, chronic pain and reduced quality of life. Evidence-based rehabilitation strategies remain underdeveloped, particularly for adolescents and young adults. We previously demonstrated preliminary feasibility of a 5-day adapted sailing intervention but observed benefit attenuation at 3-month follow-up. This pilot trial evaluates feasibility, acceptability and safety of intensive adapted sailing therapy followed by home-based telerehabilitation maintenance versus telerehabilitation alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, randomised, assessor-blinded, parallel two-arm pilot feasibility trial. 24 participants aged 12&ndash;30 years with confirmed RSDs will randomise with a 1:1 allocation ratio to: (1) 5-day adapted sailing therapy followed by 3-month telerehabilitation (n=12) or (2) 3-month telerehabilitation alone (n=12). Primary outcomes assess feasibility through recruitment efficiency (&ge;80% eligible patients enrolled), intervention adherence (&ge;75% sessions completed), participant retention (&ge;80% at 6-month follow-up), and safety (zero serious adverse events attributable to interventions). Secondary outcomes include sensor-based motor function (balance, gait, upper extremity mobility via inertial measurement units) and patient-reported outcomes (health-related quality of life, functional capacity, kinesiophobia, pain), measured at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Exploratory analyses will estimate preliminary between-group effect sizes. Statistical analysis uses intention-to-treat principles with linear mixed-effects models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study received approval from the Area Vasta Emilia Centro Ethics Committee (363/2025/Sper/IOR) on 7 July 2025. The study is ongoing, and data collection is expected to be completed by March 2026. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open-access publications, conference presentations, patient organisation partnerships and plain-language summaries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07102875">NCT07102875</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boarini, M., Banchelli, F., Scognamiglio, D., Farella, G. M., Platano, D., Rizzo, S., Cavina, U., Rogati, G., Ramaglia Amadasi, R., Villa, G., Leardini, A., Berti, L., Sartini, S., Magnanelli, L., Locatelli, A., Scopinaro, A. M., Sangiorgi, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114628</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114628</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Blended adapted sailing therapy with telerehabilitation for rare skeletal disorders: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled feasibility trial in Italy (PaS2-EXTEND)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114628</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114628</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115254?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Generating practice-based evidence for common mental health problems using routine outcome monitoring: a protocol for a longitudinal naturalistic study in Ecuadorian mental health services]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115254?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Practice-oriented research uses scientific methods to generate practice-based evidence on psychotherapy processes and outcomes. The Consorcio Latinoamericano de Investigaci&oacute;n en Psicoterapia (CLIP) unifies data collection across multiple sites to enhance the value of routine outcome monitoring. This project aims to generate practice-based evidence on the implementation, progress and predictors of change in psychological interventions within Ecuador&rsquo;s routine mental health settings, using CLIP&rsquo;s unified data forms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analyses</st>
<p>This is a protocol for an observational, naturalistic, longitudinal study. From February 2025 to February 2028, we will describe implementation processes and examine intervention progress and outcomes across 11 Ecuadorian mental health services. Participants will include adolescents (11&ndash;17 years) and adults (&ge;18 years) seeking psychological intervention along with their therapists and trainees. Clients&rsquo; change will be monitored through psychological distress measures. Socio-demographic and intervention satisfaction data will be collected alongside information on therapists and services. Analyses will include initial contact characterisation, reliable change, outcome predictors and the examination of how time, therapist and service characteristics each contribute to clients&rsquo; change.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Universidad de Las Am&eacute;ricas, Ecuador (ID: 2024-OBS-033). The results will be disseminated within the services for service improvement, in peer-reviewed scientific articles and at conferences and workshops.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07257848">NCT07257848</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paz, C., Benalcazar-Betancourt, I., Valdiviezo-Ona, J., Evans, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115254</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115254</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Generating practice-based evidence for common mental health problems using routine outcome monitoring: a protocol for a longitudinal naturalistic study in Ecuadorian mental health services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115254</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115860?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing central nervous system contributions to accelerate musculoskeletal pain diagnosis and treatment (AsCent): protocol for a mixed-method, prospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115860?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic musculoskeletal pain often extends beyond pathology alone. Augmented central pain processing is linked to pain severity, persistence and treatment outcomes. A practical clinical tool is needed to identify individuals likely to have persistent or worsening pain, likely due to augmented central pain mechanisms. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) offers mechanistic insight, while the Central Aspects of Pain (CAP) Questionnaire captures symptom profiles that potentially reflect central mechanisms. Combining a brief clinical QST protocol with CAP may support early risk stratification and guide personalised pain management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective observational study will recruit 250 individuals with inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthritis, chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia from existing cohorts, primary or secondary care. Participants will complete validated patient-reported outcomes at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks, with no additional intervention. The risk stratification tool completed at baseline will include clinical QST (Pressure Pain Threshold, Temporal Summation of Pain, Conditioned Pain Modulation), tender point count and the CAP questionnaire. Baseline laboratory versions of the clinical QST, plus Heat Pain Threshold, Offset Analgesia and the Central Sensitisation Inventory short form-9 questionnaire, will provide pain profiling to evaluate the predictive validity and psychometric properties of the tool. Data collection will include demographics, medical history, cognitive and neurological assessments and sleep quality via actigraphy (Actigraph wGT3X-BT). Interviews with patients and healthcare professionals will inform refinement, feasibility and acceptability of the tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Yorkshire &amp; The Humber&mdash;South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee (reference number: 24/YH/1062). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and patient-facing summaries and podcasts. The study aims to develop a clinically feasible tool to identify individuals at risk of persistent or worsening pain due to augmented central pain processing, enabling targeted treatment strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06518278">NCT06518278</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clay, G., Vanhegan, S., Abbott, C., Pearce, F. A., Moffatt, F., Bannister, K., Graven-Nielsen, T., Walsh, D. A., Smith, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115860</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115860</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing central nervous system contributions to accelerate musculoskeletal pain diagnosis and treatment (AsCent): protocol for a mixed-method, prospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115860</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115860</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116013?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accuracy of nanopore sequencing technology for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116013?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Accessing samples from mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes is considerably more difficult, rendering the diagnosis of tuberculous mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy particularly challenging. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive interventional technique used for sampling mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Nanopore sequencing technology (NST) permits the rapid identification of <I>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</I> genes directly from clinical samples. NST has significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for both pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis; its accuracy in diagnosing tuberculous mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy using EBUS-TBNA specimens has not yet been systematically evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and PRISMA-Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (DTA) guidelines, this protocol (PROSPERO: CRD420251274529) will synthesise evidence from five international databases (PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) and two Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Database). The literature search is planned to be conducted between 1 December 2026 and 31 December 2026 (start and end dates of the search). The publication dates of the included literature ranged from the inception of the relevant databases to 31 December 2026. Data extraction from the included studies is anticipated to be completed by 31 May 2027, and the final reporting of findings is expected by 31 December 2027. Study selection followed the PICT framework: participants (P): patients with suspected tuberculous mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy; index test (I): the index test was defined as NST; comparator (C): the reference standard for tuberculous lymphadenopathy; target condition (T): the target condition was confirmed tuberculous mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. Two independent investigators will perform a three-step screening process, extract data and assess methodological quality using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Bivariate random-effects models implemented in STATA V.15.0 will be used to pool sensitivity, specificity and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves when four or more studies are available; for fewer studies, Meta-DiSc V.1.4 will be employed. If substantial heterogeneity is detected (I&sup2; statistic &gt;50%), meta-regression and subgroup analysis will be performed across prespecified covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study is based on publicly available data and therefore does not require ethics committee approval. Upon completion, the findings will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal. The review is conducted in accordance with established guidelines for systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251274529.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yu, G., Du, K., Shen, Y., Ling, Y., Zhong, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116013</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116013</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accuracy of nanopore sequencing technology for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116013</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116013</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bailout valve-in-valve therapy during transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis: an observational single-centre study in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Bailout valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a critical rescue strategy for procedural failure, yet evidence regarding its outcomes in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) anatomy remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This retrospective, single-centre study analysed 1597 patients (48.3% BAV) undergoing TAVR. Patients were stratified by the requirement for bailout ViV, which was conducted for significant residual aortic regurgitation (AR) or valve embolisation. Predictors were identified via multivariate logistic regression. Early- and mid-term survival outcomes were compared using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) via entropy balancing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Bailout ViV was required in 6.20% of patients (BAV: 6.87%; tricuspid aortic valve (TAV): 5.57%). Larger annulus perimeter and significant residual AR after initial deployment were identified as consistent independent predictors of bailout ViV across all cohorts. Additionally, lower annulus calcification volume, non-repositionable self-expanding valves and the learning phase were predictors in the overall cohort. Significant mitral regurgitation and lower calcification volume in BAV and male sex in TAV cohorts were independent risk factors. IPTW-adjusted analysis revealed significantly higher 30-day all-cause (HR 3.09, p=0.019) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.49, p=0.021) in the bailout ViV group. However, no significant differences were observed in mid-term all-cause or cardiovascular mortality between groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Bailout ViV was associated with elevated early mortality but offered satisfactory mid-term survival. Key predictors include anatomical challenges (large annulus and insufficient calcification) and procedural factors (non-repositionable self-expanding valve, learning phase TAVR and significant residual AR after the first prosthesis).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Xiong, T., Li, Y., Feng, Y., Chen, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116125</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116125</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bailout valve-in-valve therapy during transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis: an observational single-centre study in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116125</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116945?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chiglitazar in combination with anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective therapy for the treatment of MASH associated with T2DM: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116945?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), formerly known as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), is the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome. When it co-occurs with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), it presents a significant therapeutic challenge due to a higher risk of fibrosis progression and adverse outcomes. While new treatments for MASH are emerging, their efficacy in the T2DM subpopulation remains an unmet need. Chiglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor pan-agonist that regulates key pathways in lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis and inflammation. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chiglitazar as a combination therapy for patients with MASH and T2DM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. This trial will enrol 300 adult patients aged 18&ndash;75 years with biopsy-confirmed MASH and fibrosis stage F1 or higher. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either chiglitazar 48 mg daily or a matching placebo. All participants will also receive background therapy consisting of vitamin E (100 mg three times a day) and polyene phosphatidyl choline (456 mg three times a day). The treatment duration is 78 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint is resolution of steatohepatitis with no worsening of liver fibrosis. Key secondary endpoints include improvement in liver fibrosis by at least one stage and changes in metabolic and liver safety biomarkers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Shanghai Punan Hospital of Pudong New District Ethics Committee (Punan Branch of Renji Hospital Ethics Committee, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine). KY2025-066. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07303803">NCT07303803</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[He, K., Chen, F., Shao, R., Jiang, W., Gu, W., Huang, Z., Gan, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, H., Zhao, Y., Zhang, B., Gao, L., Yan, X., Yao, C., Shen, C., Ji, P., Wei, J., Bian, Y., Lu, Y., Abuduaini, A., Liu, L., Li, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116945</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116945</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chiglitazar in combination with anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective therapy for the treatment of MASH associated with T2DM: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116945</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116945</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117077?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Finnish physicians attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a nationwide cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117077?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To study Finnish physicians&rsquo; attitudes and opinions toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A nationwide cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>An online survey was conducted via the Finnish Medical Association in the autumn of 2023 covering all Finnish physicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>8857 Finnish physicians answered the survey, yielding a response rate of 31%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Finnish physicians&rsquo; attitudes towards euthanasia and PAS and background factors influencing these attitudes and opinions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the responders, 29% fully agreed and 29% fully disagreed with the statement &lsquo;Euthanasia should be legalised in Finland&rsquo;, respectively. Fewer responders (18%) fully agreed that physicians should be able to assist a patient in suicide. Factors such as being female and having experience in end-of-life care were associated with disagreement about legalising euthanasia and assistance in suicide. Conversely, having faced a request for euthanasia or PAS was associated with agreeing on legalising euthanasia and assistance in suicide. One out of seven respondents fully agreed that they could practise euthanasia, and one out of six fully agreed that they could assist a patient in suicide if these practices were legal in Finland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Finnish physicians&rsquo; attitudes and opinions towards assistance in dying are highly divided, emphasising the controversy of this challenging subject.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piili, R. P., Tolvanen, E., Ho&#x0308;kka&#x0308;, M., Va&#x0308;nska&#x0308;, J., Louhiala, P., Lehto, J. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117077</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117077</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Finnish physicians attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a nationwide cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117077</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117077</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117575?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study implementing and evaluating the Comprehensive High-dose Aphasia Treatment (CHAT) programme in Australian rehabilitation services: a protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117575?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Comprehensive High-dose Aphasia Treatment (CHAT) programme is an intensive comprehensive aphasia programme, which aims to address evidence-practice gaps in aphasia rehabilitation where there are known barriers to service delivery requiring implementation strategies. The aims of this study are to (1) evaluate the clinical implementation of the CHAT programme, (2) assess the clinical effectiveness of CHAT compared with usual care in rehabilitation services and (3) determine whether the real-world implementation of CHAT compared with usual care is cost-effective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Four participant groups will be recruited across six hospital and health services Australia-wide to participate in a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study: (1) people with aphasia, (2) support persons, (3) treating clinicians and students and (4) clinical stakeholders (eg, managers). This before-and-after study will include three time periods: (1) &lsquo;usual care&rsquo; where people with aphasia will receive their usual care aphasia therapy, (2) &lsquo;implementation transition&rsquo; where clinicians will be trained to deliver CHAT and (3) &lsquo;intervention implementation&rsquo; where people with aphasia will receive the CHAT programme (ie, 50 hours of evidence-based aphasia therapy over 8 weeks). Evidence-based implementation strategies will be used to facilitate implementation within participating rehabilitation services. The primary outcome is delivery of evidence-based aphasia treatment (ie, CHAT) as measured by a composite score of quality indicators. Clinical effectiveness outcomes, measuring change in language impairment, communication effectiveness, confidence and quality of life, and implementation outcomes will also be examined. We will also conduct an embedded mixed-methods process evaluation and economic evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Royal Brisbane and Women&rsquo;s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2021/QRBW/72154). Outputs will include conference presentations, publications and a training package to optimise implementation of aphasia treatment in rehabilitation service contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration details</st>
<p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) prospective registration ACTRN12621001765819. Trial registered 23 December 2021. <A HREF="https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=381365&amp;isReview=true">https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=381365&amp;isReview=true</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McSween, M.-P., Dignam, J. K., Shrubsole, K., Levine, R., Power, E., Lannin, N. A., Wallace, S. J., Cadilhac, D. A., Kilkenny, M. F., Hill, A. J., Ryan, B. J., Copland, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:40-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117575</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117575</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study implementing and evaluating the Comprehensive High-dose Aphasia Treatment (CHAT) programme in Australian rehabilitation services: a protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117575</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117575</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101376?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence and factors associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia in Chinese newborns delivered via caesarean section: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101376?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Neonatal hypoglycaemia is a common metabolic disorder in newborns and may be more frequent in infants delivered by caesarean section because of altered metabolic adaptation after birth. Evidence specific to Chinese caesarean-delivered newborns remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia and identify factors associated with its occurrence in Chinese newborns delivered via caesarean section.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three regional obstetric care centres in East China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1232 mother-newborn pairs, including both term and preterm singleton infants delivered via caesarean section.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were extracted from hospital electronic medical records. Neonatal hypoglycaemia was defined as a blood glucose level below 2.6 mmol/L within 24 hours after birth. Maternal, obstetric and neonatal characteristics were analysed. Bivariable analyses were performed to assess associations between neonatal hypoglycaemia and candidate variables, followed by multivariable logistic regression to identify independent factors. Predictive performance of the final model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Neonatal hypoglycaemia occurred in 800 of 1232 newborns, giving an incidence of 64.9% (95% CI 62.3% to 67.6%). In multivariable logistic regression, higher gestational age was independently associated with lower odds of neonatal hypoglycaemia (OR 0.781, 95% CI 0.684 to 0.891; p&lt;0.001). Compared with appropriate-for-gestational-age newborns, large-for-gestational-age newborns had higher odds of hypoglycaemia (OR 2.200, 95% CI 1.477 to 3.276; p&lt;0.001), whereas small-for-gestational-age newborns had lower odds (OR 0.394, 95% CI 0.188 to 0.824; p=0.013). Elective caesarean delivery was also associated with higher odds of hypoglycaemia (OR 1.638, 95% CI 1.248 to 2.150; p&lt;0.001). Compared with parity 1, parity 3 was associated with higher odds of hypoglycaemia (OR 2.274, 95% CI 1.151 to 4.496; p=0.018), whereas parity 2 was not significant (OR 1.224, 95% CI 0.936 to 1.601; p=0.140). For amniotic fluid characteristics, category 1 was not significantly associated with hypoglycaemia (OR 0.624, 95% CI 0.287 to 1.359; p=0.235), whereas categories 2 and 3 were associated with lower odds (OR 0.478, 95% CI 0.291 to 0.786; p=0.004, and OR 0.518, 95% CI 0.296 to 0.909; p=0.022, respectively). The final model showed modest discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.667 (95% CI 0.633 to 0.697).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Neonatal hypoglycaemia was common among Chinese newborns delivered via caesarean section, but most episodes were asymptomatic and resolved with routine feeding within 24 hours. Gestational age, fetal growth classification, elective caesarean delivery, parity and amniotic fluid characteristics were associated with hypoglycaemia in the current model. Early glucose monitoring and targeted nutritional support may be particularly important for newborns at increased risk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pu, L., Yang, Y., Shi, J., Zhang, Y., He, L., Shen, A., Wang, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101376</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101376</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence and factors associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia in Chinese newborns delivered via caesarean section: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101376</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101376</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing community resilience during the first COVID-19 wave peak in a megacity in eastern China: a cross-sectional study using social media data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>In the face of pandemics resulting from infectious disease, improving community resilience has become increasingly vital. China&rsquo;s sudden exit from Zero-COVID policy in December 2022 triggered a surge in COVID-19 cases, compounded by medication shortages due to earlier restrictions, creating a public health crisis. This study assesses community resilience during the first post-Zero-COVID infection wave (8 December 2022 to 7 January 2023), focusing on adaptation mechanisms, resource mobilisation, protective behaviours and medicine access, using real-time social media data to capture these dynamics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study analysed all geotagged COVID-19-related posts on Sina Weibo&mdash;China&rsquo;s largest public microblogging platform&mdash;collected from a megacity in eastern China with over 10 million residents, covering 8 December 2022 to 7 January 2023. Posts were obtained through a data purchase agreement with Sina Weibo and comprised publicly available content. Machine learning and natural language processing were applied to classify posts across four dimensions: content, responder, response type and time. Community resilience was assessed using the community-level response ratio, response speed and sentiment expressed in interactions related to medicine-seeking posts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>26 973 posts were analysed, of which 12 152 (45.05%) were help-seeking. Among these help-seeking posts, 11 236 (92.46%) specifically sought COVID-19 medicine, of which 8495 (75.61%) of these medicine-seeking posts received community support. Over 4 weeks, community responses comprised &gt;70% of all replies (the rest were from market-based responders, government and NGOs). More than half of the community responses occurred within an hour, and the emotional state at the community level was the most stable and consistently positive, indicating a high level of prompt community engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Communities in the sample area consistently exhibited prompt and proactive responses during the health crisis, with community responses accounting for the majority of interactions on medicine-seeking posts. The power of community mutual aid can significantly enhance responsiveness to public health emergencies. Such insights suggest that strengthening community resilience is crucial in designing more effective disaster response strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, L., Zhang, S., Wei, Y., Gasevic, D., Talic, S., Weng, J., Zhang, J., Liu, L. Z., Jian, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104115</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104115</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing community resilience during the first COVID-19 wave peak in a megacity in eastern China: a cross-sectional study using social media data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104115</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What are the views of cancer care administrators and clinicians in England on the use of a machine learning clinical decision support system (ML-CDSS) to predict patients risk of hepatic and renal deterioration during chemotherapy? A qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore administrators&rsquo; and clinicians&rsquo; views on the factors that influence their use and adoption of a machine learning clinical decision support system (ML-CDSS) to predict patients&rsquo; risk of hepatic and renal deterioration during chemotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This was a qualitative study that used purposive sampling. 18 participants with administration and clinical backgrounds working in cancer care in England were recruited. Qualitative data were collected by conducting semi-structured interviews and a focus group. Data were analysed thematically using the framework method to identify key themes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants acknowledged that monitoring blood chemistry is a core component of chemotherapy as it helps clinicians assess patient fitness and treatment response. The ML-CDSS was perceived as a potentially valuable tool for identifying patients at increased risk of hepatic and renal deterioration, supporting clinical decision-making and enhancing care efficiency. However, several concerns were raised regarding its potential implementation in practice. Participants questioned clinicians&rsquo; willingness and capacity to integrate the tool into their existing workflows. Participants also believed it was important to demonstrate the ML-CDSS&rsquo;s sensitivity, specificity and validity in accurately predicting patients&rsquo; risk to build clinicians&rsquo; trust in the tool, demonstrating evidence of its efficacy and effectiveness in practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Administrators and clinicians recognised the potential benefits of the ML-CDSS to enhance the delivery of chemotherapy by identifying patients at risk for hepatic and renal deterioration. Successful adoption in practice depends on building trust with the tool by being transparent in its development, its effectiveness and impact. Future work should demonstrate the ML-CDSS being used in practice to generate real-world evidence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ercia, A., Yip, M., Reed, C., Steventon, L., Geoghegan, C., Watson, M., Kennelly, C., Chambers, P., Al Moubayed, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107197</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107197</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What are the views of cancer care administrators and clinicians in England on the use of a machine learning clinical decision support system (ML-CDSS) to predict patients risk of hepatic and renal deterioration during chemotherapy? A qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107197</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110475?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of iloprost therapy versus non-iloprost therapy for severe frostbite: a retrospective cohort study of two Canadian cities]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110475?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Frostbite is a common reason for emergency department (ED) presentations in Canada. Iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, has been investigated to reduce the risk of amputation with its use expanding. Two Canadian cities implemented iloprost over different times leading to a practice variation that allowed for treatment comparison. Our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of iloprost compared with non-iloprost treatment. Secondary objectives include assessing the impact of iloprost dosage and homelessness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult severe frostbite cases presenting to EDs in Calgary and Edmonton between November 2021 and April 2024. Data were abstracted from clinical databases and analysed for demographic and injury characteristics, treatment and amputation outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 1812 total ED encounters for frostbite, 257 patients with grades 2&ndash;4 extremity frostbite were included for analysis. Logistic regression found that overall patients receiving iloprost were associated with reduced likelihood of any amputation (OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.96) and fewer digit amputations (p&lt;0.001). In particular, iloprost use was associated with reduced amputation rates in grade 3 injuries compared with non-iloprost care (30% vs 52%, p=0.042). Although over 80% of patients with grade 4 frostbite required amputations regardless of iloprost treatment, its use was associated with improved digit salvage, with 10% fewer digit segments requiring amputation in treated patients in both hands (p=0.049) and feet (p=0.003). When assessing 65 patients who received iloprost for limb frostbite, higher iloprost doses were associated with a lower likelihood of amputation (OR=0.35; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.91; p=0.03). In the patient subgroup who underwent at least one amputation, total iloprost dosage was inversely related to outcome (p=0.033, &beta;ST=&ndash;0.26). Adverse events were reported in 61% of iloprost-treated patients, with headache being the most common. Homelessness was found to be a significant predictor of delays in arrival to the ED after injury (p&lt;0.001); OR=2.90 (95% CI 1.73 to 4.91).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Iloprost infusion was associated with a reduction in amputation rates in grade 3 and 4 frostbite with the greatest association seen in grade 3 cases. Greater iloprost dosage was associated with improved digit salvage. Homelessness was associated with delayed ED presentation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ODochartaigh, D., Douma, M. J., Picard, C., Violato, E., Poole, A., Gauthier, J., Armour, A., Tiwana, D., Harrigan, T., Gabriel, V., Brown, J., Ghosh, S. M., MacNairn, I., Khangura, J., Boucher, H., Robinson, L., Watt, L., Van Nest, J., Bown, J. l., Mageau, A., Crooks, S., Efegoma, Y., Byrnes, K., Middleton, S., Hayward, J., Whiteside, B., Dong, K., Hyshka, E., Zakhary, M., Maclean, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110475</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110475</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of iloprost therapy versus non-iloprost therapy for severe frostbite: a retrospective cohort study of two Canadian cities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110475</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110475</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112564?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of traditional Chinese exercises for upper-limb dysfunction following breast cancer surgery: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112564?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Upper-limb dysfunction commonly occurs after breast cancer surgery and can impair the quality of life. Traditional Chinese exercises are a category of mind-body practices derived from traditional Chinese culture and exercise traditions. They involve physical postures, breathing techniques and mental focus and have the potential to improve postoperative upper limb function. This protocol outlines the methods used for a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating traditional Chinese exercises for upper limb dysfunction following breast cancer surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Randomised controlled trials evaluating traditional Chinese exercises for upper-limb dysfunction among individuals following breast cancer surgery will be searched in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database (Wanfangdata), VIP Database (cqvip), and China Biology Medicine Database (Sinomed) from inception to April 2026. The search strategy combined terms for participants (eg, breast neoplasms), interventions (eg, Tai Chi, Baduanjin and Qigong) and study design (randomised controlled trials). The primary outcome is upper limb function, assessed using validated scales (eg, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and its quick version and the Upper Extremity Functional Index). Secondary outcomes include shoulder range of motion (goniometry), pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale), upper limb circumference (cm), upper limb strength (dynamometers) and adverse events (haematoma, infection and lymphoedema). After study selection and data extraction, the risk of bias assessment will be performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. Standard pairwise meta-analysis will be conducted using Stata V.16.0 software. Next, sensitivity and subgroup analysis will be performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system will assess evidence quality for the primary outcome. This review may inform clinical decision-making on the rehabilitation of individuals following breast cancer surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as study data will be drawn from published randomised controlled trials. The systematic review results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251143499.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wan, Y., Fu, Y., Bian, Z., Wang, C., Sun, R., Lu, Y., Lv, H., Xuan, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112564</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112564</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Complementary medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of traditional Chinese exercises for upper-limb dysfunction following breast cancer surgery: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Complementary medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112564</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112564</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112693?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112693?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The mode of delivery is one of the most critical decisions in maternal care, influenced by psychological, social, cultural and medical factors. Despite the known benefits of vaginal delivery, the caesarean section rate (40%&ndash;55%) in Iran remains significantly higher than the WHO&rsquo;s recommended level (10%&ndash;15%). Fear of childbirth, anxiety, social norms and misinformation are among the key determinants shaping women&rsquo;s delivery preferences. Understanding these factors is essential for developing effective interventions to promote informed decision-making and reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. Thus, the study aims to assess the determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will employ a convergent parallel mixed-methods design to comprehensively investigate the determinants of delivery mode choice among pregnant women. In the quantitative phase, a cross-sectional study will be conducted among 768 primigravid women attending health centres in Tabriz, Iran. Data will be collected using standardised instruments such as the Childbirth Fear Questionnaire, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and researcher-developed questionnaires addressing sociocultural, environmental and educational factors. Statistical analyses will include descriptive and inferential tests such as <sup>2</sup> and multivariate logistic regression. In the qualitative phase, semistructured interviews will be conducted with purposively selected participants to explore their experiences, beliefs and perceptions related to childbirth and delivery mode choice. Data will be analysed using conventional content analysis. The findings from both phases will be integrated during the interpretation stage to provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (IR.TBZMED.REC.). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. The study started in August 2025 and will continue until 2027. A similar study design will be implemented in a national, multicentre setting during this period.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Osouli-Tabrizi, S., Abdolalipour, S., Ahadi Yulgunloo, F., Maghalian, M., Mirghafourvand, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112693</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112693</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112693</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112693</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113503?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical efficacy, safety and applicability of home-based bright light therapy in outpatient adolescents with major depressive disorder in China: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113503?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability among adolescents, yet available treatments remain limited. Bright light therapy (BLT) is a non-pharmacological intervention with demonstrated efficacy in adults. However, its clinical utility and underlying neural mechanisms in adolescents remain unclear. This trial aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy, time to onset, safety and applicability of home-based BLT in outpatient adolescents with MDD, and to explore its underlying neural mechanisms using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a randomised, placebo-controlled, three-arm multicentre clinical trial. A total of 126 outpatient adolescents aged 13&ndash;17 years with MDD will be randomly assigned to receive high-intensity BLT, medium-intensity BLT or placebo dim red light using a portable light box in a home-based setting for 40 min each morning over 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week follow-up. 42 age-matched and gender-matched healthy controls will also be enrolled for baseline assessments only, serving as normative references for comparison. The primary outcome will be the change in total scores on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression from baseline to week 4. All analyses will follow an intention-to-treat framework to ensure methodological rigour. The primary outcome will be analysed using analysis of covariance and linear mixed-effects models. Secondary outcomes will include response and remission rates, time to onset, maintenance of efficacy, self-reported depressive symptoms, sleep quality, cognitive function, anxiety, irritability, suicidal ideation, non-suicidal self-injury, self-efficacy and the overall safety profile of BLT. Prefrontal cortical activity will be measured using fNIRS at baseline and week 4 to explore potential neural mechanisms. Approximately 15% of participants will additionally take part in a qualitative substudy exploring experiences and acceptability of BLT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Sixth Hospital (approval number: 2025&ndash;24). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants and their legal guardians prior to enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06913309">NCT06913309</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, Z., Zhou, T., Liu, M., Wang, N., Li, Y., Yang, C., Qiu, Y., Wang, J., Wu, W., Bai, Y., Su, Y., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Shi, Z., Xie, T., Wang, J., Yuan, J., Dang, W., Dong, W., Chen, Z., Yu, X., Lv, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113503</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113503</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical efficacy, safety and applicability of home-based bright light therapy in outpatient adolescents with major depressive disorder in China: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113503</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113503</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113565?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adaptations to the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program for diverse clinical and cultural populations: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113565?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) is a widely used peer-led patient education intervention that imparts disease knowledge and self-management skills to people with chronic diseases. While the CDSMP was developed to be accessible to people with diverse chronic diseases, chronic disease self-management needs and beliefs can vary by clinical or cultural populations. Questions remain regarding the range of populations it has been adapted for and the methods that have been used to make these modifications. This scoping review explores the following research questions: For which clinical and cultural populations has the CDSMP been adapted? Which methods, frameworks and/or processes have been used to inform CDSMP adaptations?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We are conducting a scoping review with guidance from the <I>JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis</I> and Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley&rsquo;s framework. Search results were retrieved on 30 October 30 and 4 November 2025 from the following databases: Medline (Ovid) 1946&ndash;2025, Embase (Elsevier) 1974&ndash;2025, CINAHL Complete (Ebscohost) 1937&ndash;2025, Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley) 1898&ndash;2025, Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate) 1900&ndash;2025, Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest) 1952&ndash;2025, Dissertations and Theses Global (ProQuest) 1861&ndash;2025 and Dimensions (Digital Science) coverage varies. Conference abstracts were excluded from Embase, Web of Science, Sociological Abstracts and Dimensions. Additionally, chapter, edited book, monograph, reference work and research chapters were excluded in Dimensions.</p>
<p>Inclusion criteria encompass any study type reporting on adaptations to the CDSMP and include people of any age diagnosed with any chronic disease, and specifically asthma, arthritis, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension or stroke, who are attending the CDSMP in any type of health setting. Data will be extracted and organised into categories and subthemes in tabular form. To extract information on adaptations, we will use an adapted version of the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study does not involve the participation of human subjects. Thus, we do not have approval from an Institutional Review Board. Review findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and at conferences. This protocol is registered with Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/27KTF">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/27KTF</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siantz, E., Casucci, T., McFarland, M. M., Incze, M. A., Cabassa, L. J., Gordon, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113565</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113565</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adaptations to the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program for diverse clinical and cultural populations: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113565</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113565</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113681?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neighbourhood migrant density and outcomes in hospitalised patients with cancer before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden: a register-based retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113681?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Neighbourhood migrant density is increasingly recognised as a social determinant of health. However, its association with hospitalised patients with cancer outcomes, such as mortality and readmission rates, remains understudied. This study examined whether neighbourhood migrant density influenced these outcomes and whether these associations varied before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Swedish national registers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Hospitalised patients with cancer (ICD code C00&ndash;C97) from 2014 to 2019 (before the pandemic) and 2020&ndash;2021 (during the pandemic).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>90-day mortality and readmission rates. Independent variables were neighbourhood migrant density&mdash;categorised as total, Western and non-Western migrants (as a proportion of the total area population).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 243 357 hospitalised patients with cancer before the pandemic and 112 935 during the pandemic. Swedish-born individuals and Western migrants residing in high migrant density neighbourhoods had higher rates of 90-day mortality (incidence rate ratio, IRR: 1.15, 95% CI 95% CI 1.12 to 1.19 and IRR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.18) and readmission (IRR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.19 and IRR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.22). During the pandemic, 90-day mortality rates significantly increased among Western migrants and 90-day readmission rates increased for all patients from high migrant density neighbourhoods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>High neighbourhoods migrant density was associated with increased 90-day mortality and readmission among Swedish-born individuals and Western migrants before the pandemic. These outcomes were exacerbated during the pandemic, particularly among migrants. Cancer care for residents in neighbourhoods with high migrant density needs to be improved, especially during public health crises.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khin, Y. P., Fujiwara, T., Rostila, M., Tollosa, D. N., Miething, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113681</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113681</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neighbourhood migrant density and outcomes in hospitalised patients with cancer before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden: a register-based retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113681</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113681</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114078?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of Nutritional Status among Children under 5 years in India: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the National Family Health Survey 2019-2021]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114078?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims at understanding the important correlates of child undernutrition in India using a quantile regression approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data Source</st>
<p>The study utilizes the secondary data from the latest round of the National Family Health Survey (2019&ndash;2021) to assess the individual, maternal and household-level determinants of under-nutrition among Indian children aged 0&ndash;5 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The unit of analysis is children under the age of 5 years and the sample size is 224, 218.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome Variable</st>
<p>The outcome measures of this study are stunting, wasting and underweight.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Results from our study show that birth order and size of the child at birth have a statistically significant association with stunting, wasting and underweight. While currently breastfeeding is negatively associated with HAZ scores (below 50th quantile), maternal height is positively associated with HAZ, WAZ and WHZ scores in all quantiles. Mother&rsquo;s age, body mass index and education level have significantly stronger association with HAZ and WHZ scores. Furthermore, children from richer and richest households are likely to have higher HAZ, WAZ, and WHZ scores compared to the children from poorest households. For instance, the WHZ scores increased from 0.15 in the 10th quantile among the poorest to 0.43 among the richest at the same quantile. Moreover, at the 90th percentile, this coefficient increased from 0.11 among the poorest to 0.46 among the richest.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>It is crucial to acknowledge that to have healthy babies, we must have healthy mothers. Thus, interventions to address child nutrition in India should also focus on maternal health, education, increasing the women&rsquo;s agency and women empowerment. The findings of the study suggest that concerted efforts addressing the manifold determinants of children&rsquo;s nutritional status from the government, non-governmental organisations and civil societies will ensure bolstered nutritional outcomes for children in India.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, A., Shri, N., Singh, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114078</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114078</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of Nutritional Status among Children under 5 years in India: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the National Family Health Survey 2019-2021]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114078</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114078</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114571?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of a clinical decision support tool for postpartum depression: protocol for a prospective randomised clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114571?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders affect more than one in five pregnant individuals. Despite the large percentage of individuals impacted by mood disorders, they continue to remain underdiagnosed and undertreated. Recent interventions such as risk prediction modelling offer opportunities to predict patients at risk prior to symptom onset. Leveraging technology platforms such as electronic health records allow for timely diagnosis and intervention. To date, there are no established clinical decision support (CDS) tools. We hypothesise that subjects who use a CDS aid will find them acceptable, appropriate and feasible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a pilot randomised clinical trial at three Weill Cornell Medicine clinics with randomisation at the clinician level. Patients in the control arm will receive usual care, while those in the intervention arm will receive CDS. The primary implementation outcomes are the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. The effectiveness outcomes are mental health service utilisation, EuroQol 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and social support measured by the perceived support scale. We hypothesise that stakeholders will find the CDS acceptable, and the intervention arm will have lower mental health service needs compared with control.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine Internal Review Board. IRB Protocol# 23-07026254.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06818734ClinicalTrial.gov">NCT06818734</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joly, R., Gossey, T. J., Daoud, A. K., Zhang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T06:23:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114571</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114571</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of a clinical decision support tool for postpartum depression: protocol for a prospective randomised clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114571</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114571</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e096075?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family caregiver education programmes for safe home care: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e096075?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Population ageing and the rise in chronic diseases are driving a shift from residential models to home care where family carers play a key role. Although education programmes have shown benefits, limited attention has been paid to how family caregivers can be effectively trained to prevent unintentional mistakes in home care and to how they should be prepared to respond to them related to the care they provide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This scoping review aims to examine education programmes that enhance family caregivers&rsquo; knowledge and skills to promote safe home care, prevent unintentional mistakes and mitigate their impact on both care recipients and family caregivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodology for scoping reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Embase in April 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>The review included studies on family caregivers in home-based care, focusing on education programmes promoting safe practices; quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods designs were eligible while studies on professional care or unrelated to home safety were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Extracted data included study characteristics, education type, target population and safety-related outcomes, which were summarised descriptively to map the available evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>31 studies on home safety education programmes for family caregivers across oncological, neurological, chronic and paediatric conditions were identified, mostly from the USA and conducted in hospital, home and other health and care facilities. Randomised controlled trials predominated and were generally high quality. Education programmes targeting technical, daily living and self-care skills improved caregiver burden, knowledge, preparedness and quality of life although physical health outcomes showed limited change.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Evidence indicates that structured education programmes enhance family caregivers&rsquo; knowledge, preparedness, competence and psychological well-being, supporting safer home care. While current education programmes are mostly short-term and caregiver-centred, this review identifies core technical, daily life and self-care competencies to guide future education programmes, highlighting the need for co-designed, rigorously evaluated education programmes that include patient safety outcomes and caregiver emotional support.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matarredona Perez, V., Guilabert, M., Navarro Macia, C., Abed, N., Strametz, R., Tella, S., Srulovici, E., Mira, J. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096075</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096075</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family caregiver education programmes for safe home care: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096075</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096075</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e097976?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Midwives/nurse midwives autonomy experience in caring for labouring women in health facilities: a systematic review protocol with meta-synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e097976?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Midwives/nurse midwives are the healthcare professionals most often present on the birth scene. However, they have been the professionals who are most justified to defend their legally established position by arguing their competence and autonomy. Thus, it is important to show their reality through experiences, particularly when autonomy does not</p>
<p>align with regulations. This meta-synthesis aims to bring together scientific evidence regarding midwife/nurse midwife&rsquo;s autonomy experience in caring for labouring women in health facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The meta-aggregation will be used to conduct a systematic review of qualitative studies. In January 2025, a search was carried out in scientific databases: EBSCOhost (CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE Ultimate and Academic Search Complete), LILACS, PubMed, Wiley Online Library, Scopus and Web of Science. The articles will be independently reviewed by two authors who will assess data quality, extraction and synthesis. Studies will be assessed for rigour using critical appraisal tools provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data extraction and synthesis will be carried out using software, and results will be presented in tables. The results of the qualitative research will, where possible, be grouped according to the meta-aggregation approach proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval to analyse secondary data is not required. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international and national conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024572542</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salgueiro, E., Afonso, C., Sim-Sim, M., Janeiro, C., Zangao, M. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097976</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097976</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Midwives/nurse midwives autonomy experience in caring for labouring women in health facilities: a systematic review protocol with meta-synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097976</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097976</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103822?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between physical fitness and anthropometric indicators according to area of residence in Chilean adolescents: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103822?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Research has yielded contradictory results regarding differences in physical fitness and cardiometabolic risk between children and adolescents living in rural and urban areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The present study aimed to analyse the moderating role of area of residence on the association of physical fitness and anthropometric parameters in Chilean adolescents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative school-based sample from Chile.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and measures</st>
<p>A total of 7,833 adolescents with an average age of 15.8&plusmn;0.7 years participated in both rural (n=759) and urban (n=7,074) settings. Physical fitness tests were evaluated using the Assessing Levels of Physical Activity and Fitness (ALPHA-Fitness) battery and anthropometric variables such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Generalised linear models with Gaussian distributions were constructed to estimate moderation models, with anthropometric-related variables as dependent variables, physical fitness variables as independent variables and area of residence as a moderator. Moderation analyses were conducted to examine whether the area of residence influences the association between physical fitness and anthropometric indicators (WC, WHtR and BMI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In all models, place of residence did not moderate the potential associations between physical fitness and anthropometric indicators; for example, cardiorespiratory fitness with WC (B=0.13, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.31; 0=0.160), WHtR (B=0.08, 95% CI &ndash;0.03 to 0.20; p=0.143) or BMI (B=0.08, 95% CI &ndash;0.03 to 0.20; p=0.207).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings suggest the associations between physical fitness and anthropometric outcomes do not differ significantly between rural and urban adolescents.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yanez-Sepulveda, R., Clemente-Suarez, V. J., Mahecha-Matsudo, S., Cortes-Roco, G., de Souza-Lima, J., Zavala-Crichton, J. P., Hinojosa-Torres, C., Paez-Herrera, J., Hurtado-Almonacid, J., Reyes-Amigo, T., Olivares-Arancibia, J., Molina-Pedernera, C., Aguilera-Martinez, N., Tuesta, M., Lopez-Gil, J. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103822</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103822</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between physical fitness and anthropometric indicators according to area of residence in Chilean adolescents: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103822</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103822</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103892?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trend and pattern of antenatal care utilisation and neonatal mortality in Ghana: analyses 2003-2022 demographic and health survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103892?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Neonatal mortality remains a significant public health issue in most of the developing countries including Ghana. This study examines the trends and patterns of antenatal care (ANC) utilisation and neonatal mortality in Ghana using the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey (GDHS) from 2003 to 2022. It also appraises the association between ANC visits and neonatal mortality while acknowledging key elements impelling the mortality rates over time</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) employed a cross-sectional study using nationally representative survey data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Women in Ghana aged 15&ndash;49 years who had a live birth within 5 years preceding the 2003, 2008, 2014 and 2022 GDHS. The pooled weighted sample included 14 436 most recent live births.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measure of response variable</st>
<p>Neonatal mortality, defined as death within the first 28 days of life. The primary exposure was ANC utilisation, measured by the number of visits and the timing of the first visit. Survey-weighted logistic regression and Joinpoint regression were used to assess trends and associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Neonatal mortality declined significantly over the study period. Compared with 2003, the odds of neonatal death were significantly lower in 2014 (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.81) and 2022 (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.67). Joinpoint regression showed a significant average annual percentage decline of 3.7% (p&lt;0.05). ANC utilisation improved substantially, with the proportion of women attending eight or more visits increasing from 22.8% in 2003 to 38.8% in 2022, and first-trimester initiation rising from 46.3% to 63.7% over the same period. Neonatal mortality was generally lower among women with higher numbers of ANC visits, although patterns were not strictly linear across all survey years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Neonatal mortality in Ghana declined significantly between 2003 and 2022, coinciding with improvements in ANC utilisation. However, fluctuations in mortality across ANC categories suggest that increased coverage alone may not be sufficient; quality and timeliness of care remain critical. Strengthening comprehensive ANC services and ensuring equitable access may further accelerate progress towards Sustainable Development Goal target 3.2.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam, J., Dickson, K. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103892</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103892</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trend and pattern of antenatal care utilisation and neonatal mortality in Ghana: analyses 2003-2022 demographic and health survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103892</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103892</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109740?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing a job retention vocational rehabilitation intervention for people with long covid: a person-based approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109740?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Long covid affects a significant proportion of people following SARS-CoV-2 infection and is associated with persistent symptoms such as fatigue, cognitive dysfunction and breathlessness which can negatively impact a person&rsquo;s ability to return to and remain in work. Although tiered vocational rehabilitation (VR) models have been proposed, these are often generic, lack empirical validation and may not address the complex, fluctuating needs of this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To co-design a VR intervention (the COVID-19-VR intervention) to support return to work (RTW) for people with long covid (pwLC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary and secondary care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Mixed-methods target population-centred, person-based approach in three stages: Stage 1: interviews (n=21) with pwLC to identify issues and challenges faced in working with long covid. Stage 2: three co-design workshops with pwLC and service providers to (a) generate guiding principles, (b) identify key intervention features to address work needs, (c) create a logic model to illustrate how the intervention could work and (d) develop a treatment plan and resources. Stage 3: feasibility and acceptability testing in six cases (three critical care admissions, three primary care referrals).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PwLC described work-related problems relating to: fluctuating symptoms (cognition, fatigue and breathlessness), employer, coworker and family&rsquo;s understanding of long covid and workplace adjustments. We developed a 6-session, 12-week individually tailored, remotely delivered intervention that included vocational goal setting, RTW planning, fatigue/symptom management, financial advice, and where permitted, education for family/employers, employer engagement and negotiation of a phased RTW. Following feasibility testing, changes included accommodating the long-term nature of long covid, addressing unmet psychological needs, and adding content on adjustment, processing traumatic experience and performance/symptom anxiety, with extended delivery including monitoring, review and case coordination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PwLC may need specialist help to RTW. Our COVID-19-VR appears feasible and acceptable and warrants further evaluation using a staged approach, prior to any definitive effectiveness trial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boutry, C., Phillips, J., Knight, C., Holmes, J., Patel, P., Morriss, R., das Nair, R., Douglas, E., Bolton, C. E., Guo, B., Radford, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109740</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109740</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing a job retention vocational rehabilitation intervention for people with long covid: a person-based approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109740</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109740</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110192?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seroprevalence of COVID-19 among healthcare workers in Hong Kong during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021): a longitudinal cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110192?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, Hong Kong adopted strict public health and social measures to stop community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. These include border screening and control, isolation of cases and quarantine of their contacts and universal masking. During this period, attack rates in Hong Kong were among the lowest globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the seroprevalence of COVID-19 among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Hong Kong in 2020 and 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We reviewed contact tracing data from the Hong Kong Department of Health to identify COVID-19 cases reported among HCWs. Between June 2020 and December 2021, we conducted a longitudinal cohort study to estimate the seroprevalence of COVID-19 among HCWs working in hospitals and clinics in Hong Kong during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall seropositivity of COVID-19 by plaque reduction neutralisation test during the first (May&ndash;October 2020) and second round (November 2020&ndash;April 2021) of the study was 0% (95% CI 0.00% to 0.49%) and 0.52% (95% CI 0.14% to 1.33%). After COVID-19 vaccines were offered to HCWs in February 2021, seroprevalence by surrogate virus neutralisation assay among cohort participants who provided biannual blood samples rose to 68.7% (95% CI 65.9%, 71.3%) and 80.2% (95% CI 76.8%, 83.2%) in round 3 (May&ndash;October 2021) and the first 2 months of round 4 (November&ndash;December 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Seroprevalence in Hong Kong HCWs in our study was low despite considerable exposure to confirmed COVID-19 cases in some study participants. However, the low rate of community transmission may have also contributed to the observed low seroprevalence among HCWs in our cohort.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lim, W. W., Mak, L., Ho, F., Ng, T. W. Y., Yau, E. M., Ko, R. L. W., Chen, D., Xiao, J., Seto, W. H., Cheng, S. M. S., Perera, R. A. P. M., Ip, D. K. M., Peiris, M., Cowling, B. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110192</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110192</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seroprevalence of COVID-19 among healthcare workers in Hong Kong during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021): a longitudinal cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110192</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110192</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112047?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional study on community pharmacists behaviours in providing travel health services in Tu&#x0308;rkiye: a structural equation modelling approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112047?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to evaluate the behaviours of community pharmacists in Tu&#x0308;rkiye regarding the provision of travel health services (THS) and to identify the determinants of these behaviours using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional descriptive study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Online nationwide survey conducted in Tu&#x0308;rkiye.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included 145 Turkish community pharmacists with at least 5 years of professional experience who had provided THS to at least one patient in the previous year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>A theory-based measurement tool was developed and validated according to the TPB framework. Data were collected via self-administered online questionnaires between May 2024 and July 2024. Structural equation modelling was employed to analyse the factors influencing pharmacists&rsquo; behaviours and intentions towards THS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The structural equation model demonstrated an acceptable fit with the empirical data. Pharmacists&rsquo; intentions to provide THS were significantly influenced by subjective norms (&beta;=0.19, p&lt;0.05) and perceived behavioural control (PBC) (&beta;=0.49, p&lt;0.001). PBC was identified as the strongest predictor of intention. Furthermore, pharmacists&rsquo; intentions significantly and positively influenced their actual behaviour in providing THS (&beta;=0.49, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings confirm that providing THS is a suitable and essential role for community pharmacists in Tu&#x0308;rkiye. Since PBC is the primary driver of intention, policy interventions should focus on empowering pharmacists through specialised training and expanding their professional autonomy to better integrate travel health into community pharmacy practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arslan, M., Sehitoglu, A. C., O&#x0308;zcelikay, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112047</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112047</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional study on community pharmacists behaviours in providing travel health services in Tu&#x0308;rkiye: a structural equation modelling approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112047</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112047</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113145?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between self-reported poor sleep status and ovulation rate in Chinese women with fertility intentions: a multicentre prospective cohort study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113145?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In China, women of childbearing age, who constitute a major demographic of online consumers and professionals in emerging industries are increasingly experiencing significant sleep disturbances. Existing studies have predominantly focused on the association between sleep disorders and polycystic ovary syndrome, often overlooking the independent impact of sleep patterns on ovulatory function in the general population of women attempting conception. Specifically, the synergistic effect of blue light exposure from electronic devices and delayed sleep onset remains underexplored, and evidence regarding the relationship between sleep duration, sleep quality and ovulation rates is insufficient. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the association between sleep habits and ovulation rates among Chinese women with fertility intentions. Second, it aims to determine the correlation between these sleep habits and factors such as screen time, night shift work and regional differences. Third, using a user-friendly sleep monitoring wristband, the study seeks to clarify the quantitative relationship between objective sleep parameters (eg, sleep onset time, sleep efficiency) and ovulation rates in this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a 1.5-year multicentre prospective cohort study. Participants will be recruited from at least five reproductive medicine centres in mainland China between May 2025 and December 2026. The study will enrol women aged 20&ndash;50 years with fertility intentions. Baseline demographic information and habitual sleep patterns will be assessed through standardised questionnaires, with participants self-reporting their sleep conditions. Prepregnancy biochemical indicators and anthropometric data will be recorded. The primary outcome will be the ovulation rate, with secondary outcomes including pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This research project has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Approval No.20250072), and has also received approval from the Primary and Specialty Nursing Committee for implementation and development. All participants will be informed verbally and in writing about the study procedures and objectives prior to signing the consent form. Data confidentiality will be ensured, and participants may withdraw their consent at any stage of the research. The findings will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Su, N.-j., Huang, J., Li, H., Chen, H., Wang, L., Wang, S., Huang, K., Wang, J., Huang, J., Liao, Y., Li, L., Xiong, Z., Ren, H., Liu, B., Chen, D., Ma, N., Yin, L., Huang, C., Zhang, X., Liu, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113145</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113145</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between self-reported poor sleep status and ovulation rate in Chinese women with fertility intentions: a multicentre prospective cohort study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113145</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113749?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a nurse-led palliative care health coaching intervention (Educate, Nurture, Advise before Life Ends) for patients with heart failure and their caregivers in Singapore: a randomised wait-list controlled pilot study of health coaching in Asian heart failure]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113749?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of the culturally adapted Educate, Nurture, Advise Before Life Ends (ENABLE) programme in Singapore for patients with heart failure (HF) and their family caregivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Non-blinded randomised wait-list controlled pilot study, using Simon&rsquo;s randomised phase II trial design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Specialist outpatient clinics in a tertiary cardiac centre in Singapore.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients had a diagnosis of American Heart Association Stage C or D HF, were symptomatic with New York Heart Association functional class 2 and above symptoms, had a prognosis of 6 months, a hospitalisation in prior 6 months and were on disease-directed HF management. Patients already known to palliative care (PC) were excluded. Recruited caregivers were family caregivers of patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>ENABLE integrates PC early into HF care. It starts with a comprehensive PC assessment with a PC physician and nurse. This is followed by a series of nurse coach-led health coaching sessions for both patients and caregivers. After the completion of health coaching, participants would receive follow-up phone calls to review their coping up to 6 months post-enrolment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p><I>Feasibility</I> was defined by the proportion of approached patient-caregiver dyads who consented to participate and the proportion of participants who completed health coaching. <I>Acceptability</I> was defined by a score of at least 12 out of a maximum of 16 for the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 4-Item Survey. Primary <I>efficacy</I> outcome measure was the change in patient quality of life (QOL) at 6 months as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) total score, with the target effect size (Cohen&rsquo;s d) being at least 0.25 SD in favour of ENABLE. Other secondary outcomes included patient/caregiver anxiety and depression scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, spirituality scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Wellbeing Scale and caregiver QOL on the Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><I>Feasibility</I>: recruitment was carried out from February 2022 to October 2023. We approached 164 patient-caregiver dyads and 60 patient-caregiver dyads (36.6%) consented. A total of 48 patients and 44 caregivers started on health coaching, of which 44 patients (91.7%) and 43 caregivers (97.7%) completed health coaching.</p>
<p><I>Acceptability</I>: patients&rsquo; satisfaction was high, at 85.7% and 87.5% in the intervention and wait-list arm, respectively. Caregivers were similarly satisfied, at 100% and 87.5% in the two arms, respectively.</p>
<p><I>Efficacy</I>: intervention-arm patients had a higher mean total KCCQ score at 6 months than wait-list-arm patients (difference in means=12.4; 95% CI 0.9 to 24.0; Cohen&rsquo;s d=0.43). There was no difference in caregiver QOL changes between trial arms at 3 months and 6 months. Both patients and caregivers had improvements in anxiety at 3 months and sustained improvements in depression and spirituality at 6 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Proportion of participants who completed health coaching was high, though proportion of approached participants who consented was lower than expected. Our acceptability and efficacy targets were met. Further phase III testing is planned.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05211882">NCT05211882</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neo, S. H.-S., Ong, W. S., Liao, K., Sim, D. K.-L., Ng, E. S. L., Foo, C. C.-z., Yang Meijuan, G., Odom, J. N., Bakitas, M., Cheung, Y. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113749</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113749</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a nurse-led palliative care health coaching intervention (Educate, Nurture, Advise before Life Ends) for patients with heart failure and their caregivers in Singapore: a randomised wait-list controlled pilot study of health coaching in Asian heart failure]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113749</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113749</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113839?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do publicly supported generic pharmacies improve financial risk protection? Findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113839?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The Government of India launched the <I>Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Pariyojana</I> (PMBJP) to expand access to affordable generics through private retail outlets named as <I>Jan Aushadhi Kendras</I> (JAKs). This study examines the association of PMBJP with out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishment rate (IR) attributable to medicines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted across nine Indian states in 2022&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Outpatient (OPD) and inpatient (IPD) departments of secondary and tertiary government hospitals, private pharmacies and JAKs in 18 districts of India</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 10 336 patients were recruited from OPD (n=2881) and IPD (n=1009) departments of government hospitals as well as pharmacy settings (n=6446). Data on sociodemographics, disease severity, number of generic prescriptions, source of acquiring medicines and medicine-related OOPE were collected through semistructured interviews and periodic follow-ups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcomes</st>
<p>Primary outcomes included mean OOPE on medicines, incidence of CHE (&ge;40% of non-food consumption expenditure on medicines), IR among JAK and non-JAK users were the primary outcomes of the study. Secondary outcomes comprised awareness of JAKs, generic prescribing rates in hospitals and the factors associated with OOPE, CHE and IR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients procuring medicines exclusively from JAKs reported the lower mean OOPE (OPD: 172; IPD: 275; pharmacy: 307), compared with significantly higher spending at private pharmacies (OPD: 1085; IPD: 3165; pharmacy: 1031). After adjusting for covariates, OOPE among exclusive JAK users was significantly lower relative to private pharmacy users by 60.6%&ndash;89.3%. Furthermore, matched analysis confirmed 42% lower expenses, compared with private pharmacies. The likelihood of CHE was also significantly greater among private pharmacy users. However, utilisation of JAKs remained limited, mainly due to low awareness, perceived stock shortages and low rates of generic prescribing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>PMBJP is associated with significant reduction in OOPE and financial hardship, positioning it as an effective cost-containment intervention within India&rsquo;s universal health coverage framework. Strengthening supply chains, promoting generic prescribing and integrating JAKs with public facilities would further maximise its impact.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Purohit, N., Goyal, A., Jyani, G., Soman, B., Kar, S. S., Verma, R., Singh, K., Albert, S., Patel, P., Rana, S. K., Kumar, S., Biswal, S. B., Prinja, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113839</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113839</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do publicly supported generic pharmacies improve financial risk protection? Findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113839</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113839</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114005?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validation of treatment decision algorithms for childhood tuberculosis at district healthcare levels in Mozambique and Zambia: the Decide TB cluster-randomised pragmatic trial - a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114005?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Of 1.2 million children and young adolescents (&lt;15 years) developing tuberculosis (TB) yearly, more than 50% are undiagnosed and unreported to national TB programmes (NTPs) and the World Health Organization (WHO). This is mainly due to poor performance of microbiological tests, limited clinical skills and structural barriers for childhood TB diagnosis at decentralised levels of care. Treatment decision algorithms (TDAs) could improve child TB outcomes but require external validation. We aim to evaluate a comprehensive TDA-based approach for childhood TB screening, diagnosis and treatment decision-making at district hospital (DH) and primary health centre (PHC) levels in Mozambique and Zambia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Decide TB is a pragmatic, hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 2 cluster-randomised trial with a stepped wedge design. The comprehensive TDA-based approach (intervention) will be implemented under programmatic conditions in four districts in each country (each comprising one DH and six PHCs), randomly selected to switch sequentially from the standard of care to the intervention. Evaluations will assess epidemiological, clinical, economic, social sciences, implementation and health policy endpoints. Aggregated and individual data from children with presumptive TB will be extracted from facility registers and individual data will be collected using an electronic medical record (EMR), both data sources will be entered in national Demographic Health Information System 2 databases. Questionnaires and individual/group interviews (among healthcare workers (HCWs), parents/caregivers and key informants), supervision and mentoring reports and quantitative cost tools will be used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from national ethics committees in Mozambique (Instituto Nacional de Sa&uacute;de review board and National Committee for Bioethics in Health) and Zambia (University of Zambia ethical review board and National Health Research Authority); this includes a waiver for analysing data collected by NTPs (no identifiable information reported, intervention with minimal risk) without individual consent from children&rsquo;s parents/caregivers. Informed consent will be obtained from HCWs, parents/caregivers and key informants. Results will be openly shared with the scientific community, WHO and national and international stakeholders for translation into policy and practice. Procedures for requesting further use of Decide TB data will be publicly available.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06593080">NCT06593080</A>; PACTR202407866544155.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orne-Gliemann, J., Roucher, C., Khosa, C., Hoddinott, G., dElbee, M., Huyen Ton Nu Nguyet, M., Banze, D., Bonnet, M., Cossa, K., Desselas, E., Dodd, P. J., Etoa, C., Kachuka, A., Lebrun, N., Lungu, P., Jose, B., Manguele, S., Monin, C., Mubanga, A., Mutemba, C., Namuziya, N., Olbrich, L., Palmer, M., van der Zalm, M. M., Seddon, J. A., Chabala, C., Marcy, O., on behalf of Decide TB study group, Chabala, Kapasa, Kasungu, Katsokore, Lesa, Mbalazi, Mulenga, Namuziya, Malambo, Mutale, Mwanabet, Mwiinga, Shankalala, Chimzizi, Kabaso, Kasapo, Kachuka, Khunga, Mubanga, Simwanza, Lungu, Cossa, Jordao, Khosa, Manganhe, Mussa, Ribeiro, Banze, Nhassengo, Chibale, Fole, Fulai, Viera, Bembele, Francisco, Jose, Machava, Manguele, Mutemba, Romao, Conrado, Mandlate, D'Elbee, Eliot, Etoa, Bonnet, Desselas, Hoddinott, Ilhan, Palmer, Zalm, Wademan, Dodd, Mafirakureva, Seddon, Gupta, Larsson, Olbrich, Razid]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114005</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114005</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation of treatment decision algorithms for childhood tuberculosis at district healthcare levels in Mozambique and Zambia: the Decide TB cluster-randomised pragmatic trial - a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114005</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114005</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114268?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experiences and preferences of Hispanic men in the National Diabetes Prevention Program: a qualitative study guided by the COM-B framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114268?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This qualitative study aims to explore the experiences and preferences of Hispanic men participating in the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP), an intensive lifestyle change intervention that effectively reduces diabetes risk, considering Hispanic men experience diabetes disproportionately yet remain underrepresented in the NDPP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted over the phone in English or Spanish between June 2023 and February 2024. Transcripts were analysed using a framework analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>17 Hispanic men engaged in the NDPP for &ge;4 sessions. The majority were foreign-born (n=11) and self-identified as English proficient (n=11).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Through three major themes, Hispanic men reflected on their experiences: (1) Going into the NDPP: despite not knowing what to expect from the NDPP, their fear of diabetes motivated them to enrol in the programme; (2) During the NDPP: they felt relief from gaining critical knowledge about diet, exercise and diabetes prevention; and finally (3) Impressions of the NDPP: they appreciated the NDPP&rsquo;s informational resources, personalised coaching, group format and acknowledgement of traditional cultural diets and found men-only groups often offered additional emotional safety but had mixed feelings about the programme&rsquo;s virtual format.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Findings suggest that Hispanic men appreciate the knowledge and skills attained from the NDPP and value its resources, group format, culturally-tailored content and gender-tailored structure. Recruitment efforts may benefit from emphasising how the programme reduces uncertainty about prediabetes and from more clearly conveying the structure of the programme. Strategies to improve sustained engagement should consider how to feasibly offer delivery formats that accommodate diverse preferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez, C. J., Hernandez, N. G., Perez-Mejia, C. N., Flaxman, H., Stephenson-Hunter, C., Gil, E., Formagini, T., Shapiro, M. F., Gonzalez, J. S., Chambers, E. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114268</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114268</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experiences and preferences of Hispanic men in the National Diabetes Prevention Program: a qualitative study guided by the COM-B framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114268</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114382?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validation of the kidney failure risk equation and its impact on referral strategies for chronic kidney disease: protocol for a retrospective cohort study using national claims and laboratory data in Thailand]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114382?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in Thailand and imposes a growing burden on the health system, driven by limited nephrology capacity and high rates of unplanned dialysis. The kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) estimates the risk of progression to kidney failure (KF) on age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. This study aims to validate and, if required, recalibrate the four-variable KFRE for the Thai population and to assess the potential impact of KFRE-guided referral strategies on clinical care and health system performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a retrospective cohort study using linked, de-identified national health databases covering approximately 70% of the Thai population. Adult patients with CKD stages 3&ndash;5 will be included. KFRE performance will be evaluated at 2 and 5 years for discrimination and calibration. If miscalibration is identified, the model will be recalibrated using Cox-based methods. Simulations (1000 iterations) indicated that approximately 920 KF events by 5 years would be required to achieve the target standard errors for the calibration slope. A subsequent impact analysis will compare KFRE-guided referral with current Thai CKD guideline criteria and real-world practice using a decision-tree and Markov modelling framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Institute for the Development of Human Research Protections, Thailand (COA No. IHRP2025110), Imperial College London and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the use of anonymised secondary data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and policy briefs to supplement evidence-based referral strategies and health system planning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phannajit, J., Narkpaichit, C., Angkurawaranon, C., Aramrat, C., Cleary, F., Major, R. W., Pichaiwong, W., Anutrakulchai, S., Praditpornsilpa, K., Turner, H. C., Nitsch, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114382</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114382</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation of the kidney failure risk equation and its impact on referral strategies for chronic kidney disease: protocol for a retrospective cohort study using national claims and laboratory data in Thailand]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114382</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114382</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114825?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Better outcomes for the older surgical patient trial (BOOST): protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial of an embedded geriatric perioperative service within emergency and elective surgery in an Australian tertiary referral hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114825?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Older patients admitted under surgical care have longer length of stay (LOS) and are at risk of functional decline, hospital-acquired complications and geriatric syndromes. Embedded specialist geriatrician models within surgical care teams can reduce length of stay and perioperative complications. Evidence gaps remain regarding the implementation of these models of care and their impact on patient outcomes. This study aims to measure hospital, patient and implementation outcomes of an embedded perioperative geriatric service in a large Australian tertiary referral hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial involves four services (emergency general, elective general, urology and vascular surgery), with a predicted reach of &gt;2000 patients over 24 months. The intervention consists of a proactive geriatrician-led service providing a comprehensive geriatric assessment and ongoing review during the acute admission. Service evaluation will be via (1) traditional hospital outcomes (primary outcome LOS); (2) implementation outcomes; and (3) patient reported outcomes across three 6 month phases: (1) prior to service implementation; (2) during service implementation and (3) continued service but without active implementation. Data analysis will include descriptive statistics of patient demographics, clinical characteristics and implementation outcomes; cost-effectiveness; univariate and multivariate analysis of outcomes against demographic and clinical characteristics and thematic analysis of qualitative data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial has been approved by the Hunter New England Research Ethics Committee (2024_ETH023259). The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The research team will facilitate adoption more broadly within the health service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12625000404426)</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sagi, C., Logan, H., Epstein, E., Holliday, E., Smith, S. R., Mackney, J., Paul, C. L., Clark-Pitrolo, S., Gillies, D., ONeill, C. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114825</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114825</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Better outcomes for the older surgical patient trial (BOOST): protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial of an embedded geriatric perioperative service within emergency and elective surgery in an Australian tertiary referral hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114825</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114825</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114928?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of long COVID on diverse Australian populations: a multi-site, longitudinal prospective cohort study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114928?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Long COVID is a complex, multisystem chronic condition that may persist or fluctuate for months to years after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite emerging international research, significant gaps remain in understanding the full breadth of long COVID&rsquo;s impacts in Australia. No study has yet prospectively examined these multidimensional impacts using a culturally appropriate, user-validated toolkit. Our study aims to characterise symptom profiles, functional outcomes and psychological, social, financial and behavioural impacts of long COVID in Australian adults; identify factors associated with recovery trajectories; and validate a set of measures to support research and clinical care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This national, multi-site, longitudinal prospective cohort study comprises three phases: (1) survey selection and user-testing; (2) psychometric validation; and (3) a longitudinal cohort study. Survey selection was informed by literature review, Australian parliament inquiry reports and international recommendations, and refined through iterative user-testing and expert review. A total of 1000 participants aged &ge;18 years from diverse cultural backgrounds with ongoing symptoms following COVID-19 infection will be divided into three cohorts based on time since infection. Surveys will be administered at seven time points over 24 months, with optional follow-up to 36 months. Data linkage to state and national health datasets will enable an objective assessment of healthcare utilisation and associated costs. Psychometric properties of the tools will be evaluated using baseline responses from the initial 300 participants, including assessments of structural/construct validity, convergent validity, known-groups validity, cross-validity, internal reliability, responsiveness and test&ndash;retest reliability. Other data analyses will include descriptive statistics, repeated-measures analysis of variance, linear mixed-effects modelling and multivariable regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from The St Vincent&rsquo;s Hospital Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (112108/2024/PID00364) and RMIT University HREC (28124). Research findings will be disseminated at conferences and in peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12625001415493).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luo, S., Zheng, Z., Karimi, L., Plebanski, M., Anderson, K. L. M., Jovanovski, N., Lankatillake, C., Cockshaw, W., Wollersheim, D., Sheahan, J., Seal, E.-L., Butler-Henderson, K., Campbell, D., Clarke, A., Cleary, S., Danaher, J., El-Ansary, D., Figueiredo, B., Flanagan, K. L., Hines, C., Jessup, R. L., Mehmet, H., Miller, S. M., Seeley, M.-C., Sivan, M., Smarrelli, F., Smith, A. B., Vesty, G., Vindigni, D., Xenos, S., Stocco, L., Hartman, S., Ivory, I., Itsiopoulos, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114928</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114928</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of long COVID on diverse Australian populations: a multi-site, longitudinal prospective cohort study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114928</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114928</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115210?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Couples problem-solving therapy for perinatal women living with HIV and male partners in Malawi: a study protocol for a pilot trial of Mphatso]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115210?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Perinatal depression is a common, yet understudied, mental health disorder among women and contributes to poor engagement in prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. Male partners are positioned to provide critical forms of social and economic support during pregnancy and postpartum, and also may contribute to women&rsquo;s stress, depression and anxiety through intimate partner violence and withholding of social support. Despite the critical role of men in pregnancy outcomes and HIV prevention, few interventions have engaged men around women&rsquo;s depressive symptoms, nutrition and health, and engagement in PMTCT. We will conduct a pilot trial of <I>Mphatso,</I> a couple-based intervention based on problem-solving therapy with couple relationship skills to reduce depressive symptoms in perinatal women, improve food insecurity and prevent HIV transmission to the infant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will employ a two-arm pilot randomised controlled trial in the Zomba district of Malawi to assess the feasibility and acceptability of <I>Mphatso</I> (meaning &lsquo;gift&rsquo; or the child) and explore health impacts on depressive symptoms, PMTCT engagement and food insecurity. We will enrol 60 pregnant women in the second or third trimester who are living with HIV and meet criteria for probable depression based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and their male partners. Couples will be randomised to receive either five sessions of <I>Mphatso</I> (problem-management skills plus health education and relationship skills) or enhanced usual care. Feasibility and acceptability outcomes will include session attendance rates, satisfaction levels and retention at 3 months and 6 months postpartum. Exploratory analyses using regression models including time and treatment arm will be conducted to explore effects on the mothers&rsquo; and fathers&rsquo; depressive symptoms, adherence to PMTCT (antiretroviral therapy, nevirapine use, HIV testing and exclusive breastfeeding) and food insecurity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The pilot trial has been approved by the University of California, San Francisco (Human Research Protection Program (HRPP); Protocol Number 23-40685), and the study has also been approved by the National Health Sciences Research Committee in Malawi (NHSRC; Protocol Number 24/05/4431). Results will be disseminated to study participants, health officials, policymakers, community leaders and care providers, as well as through presentations at conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06659315">NCT06659315</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conroy, A. A., Butterfield, R. M., Mkandawire, J., Mulauzi, N., Bengtson, A. M., Neilands, T. B., Weiser, S. D., Johnson, M. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115210</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115210</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Couples problem-solving therapy for perinatal women living with HIV and male partners in Malawi: a study protocol for a pilot trial of Mphatso]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115210</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Video-supported telephone triage in emergency primary healthcare: an observational study from Norway]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe how video support is used in telephone triage at Norwegian Local Emergency Medical Communication Centres (LEMCs), including frequency, call duration, patterns of video use and associations with urgency and response assessments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An observational study using national-level operational data and prospectively collected triage data from the Watchtower Project.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Norwegian LEMCs, which provide 24/7 nurse-managed telephone triage within the municipal emergency primary healthcare system, handling a broad range of medical inquiries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>79 LEMCs using the Norwegian Air Ambulance video solution in 2024 and six LEMCs participating in the Watchtower Project in 2022&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Frequency of video use and call duration with and without video support. Video use across caller and patient characteristics and reasons for contact. Changes in urgency level and intended response following video use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The national-level dataset included 2 242 522 calls and the Watchtower dataset included 109 281 calls. Nationally, video was used in 4.9% of answered calls. Median call duration was 7:13 min (IQR: 5:09&ndash;10:02) with video and 3:58 min (IQR: 2:18&ndash;6:16) without video (p&lt;0.001). Video was most frequently used in the evening, for children (47% aged 0&ndash;15 years), and in calls initiated by next of kin (58%). Skin-related issues accounted for 65% of all video-supported calls. Following video use, urgency changed in 36% of contacts (22% downgraded, 14% upgraded), and the intended response changed in 31%. Changes occurred in both directions, including shifts between nurse-managed and physician-managed responses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Video-supported calls were longer than non-video calls. Video is used selectively and is associated with bidirectional adjustments in urgency and response assessments in a substantial share of calls.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandal, N., Johansen, I. H., Hjortdahl, M., Baste, V., Ness, S., Zakariassen, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115378</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115378</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Video-supported telephone triage in emergency primary healthcare: an observational study from Norway]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115378</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115638?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Work-life integration in interprofessional general practice collaboration: a qualitative exploration of different trends among Bavarian general practitioners]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115638?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Problems with healthcare provision in general practice are already present and expected to worsen in the future. Therefore, retaining medical professionals in the long-term. An important factor in deciding on a profession is its compatibility with one&rsquo;s own life. This study aimed to examine general practitioners&rsquo; working environment, social environment, their current work-life integration and potential changes enabled by interprofessional working concepts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative approach was used, with guided focus group interviews with 37 general practitioners followed by individual interviews with 10 general practitioners. The interviews were verbatim transcribed and analysed using the framework method. The primary analyses were conducted, overall and separately for each gender. A professional group also carried out analyses. The subgroup analyses are based purely on qualitative trends.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Both genders and all professional groups perceived work-life integration as necessary. Men tended to report a better work-life integration than women. Women were more likely to work part-time and emphasised difficulties with childcare. When establishing interprofessional concepts, participants hope for more opportunities for delegation and co-determination, which can go hand in hand with reduced workload.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this current study, women tended to perceive a greater degree of double burden both in their job and leisure time than men did. Beyond these gender and professional group differences, there were also tendencies towards differences between women with and without children. The findings indicate that work-life integration is an important factor in the professional setting of general practice. Particularly given the increasing number of female general practitioners, the establishment of part-time and childcare options is necessary.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trompke, M., Zeiser, K., Schumacher, L., Weissenburger, D., Roos, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115638</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115638</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Work-life integration in interprofessional general practice collaboration: a qualitative exploration of different trends among Bavarian general practitioners]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115638</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115638</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117522?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring psychological experiences of fear of complications among hospitalised people with type 2 diabetes in China: a qualitative phenomenological study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117522?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of fear of complications (FoC) among hospitalised people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in China and to provide insights for targeted nursing interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A phenomenological research approach was employed to conduct semistructured interviews and the Colaizzi&rsquo;s seven-step analysis method was used for data analysis. This study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and setting</st>
<p>15 people with T2D were purposively recruited between March and July 2025 from the endocrinology departments of two tertiary hospitals in Daqing City, Heilongjiang Province.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three themes and 11 subthemes were identified: (1) experiencing multiple negative psychological responses (distress from negative emotions, contradictory and painful psychological states, social alienation); (2) the triggers of fear are complex (adverse outcomes of similar patients, illness uncertainty, symptom burden, self-perceived burden, economic burden) and (3) employing diverse coping strategies (negative avoidance, positive self-adjustment, seeking social support).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Healthcare professionals should pay greater attention to FoC among people with T2D. Early psychological assessment, identification of fear triggers, strengthening social support and promoting adaptive coping strategies may help reduce fear and improve quality of life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, Y.-q., Qiu, J., Li, S.-b., He, W.-w., Lu, Y.-p., Cai, Y.-j., Ni, M.-d., Liu, F.-r., Jia, H.-h.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T23:35:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117522</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117522</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring psychological experiences of fear of complications among hospitalised people with type 2 diabetes in China: a qualitative phenomenological study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117522</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117522</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e100186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e100186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and other sources from inception to 30 January 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study selection</st>
<p>Randomised clinical trials comparing regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues (insulin aspart, lispro, glulisine) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analyses</st>
<p>Data were analysed using meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, V.2, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcomes</st>
<p>Severe hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis and serious adverse events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>10 trials randomising 1107 participants were included. The certainty of evidence was very low mainly due to high risk of bias and small sample sizes. Meta-analysis showed no evidence of a difference between regular human insulins and rapid-acting insulin analogues on severe hypoglycaemia (risk ratio (RR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.03; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%; p=0.2851; nine trials), ketoacidosis (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.93; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%; p=0.8593; two trials) and serious adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.25; I<sup>2</sup>=0.0%; p=0.9958; two trials). Trial sequential analysis showed that all meta-analyses of primary outcomes were underpowered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Current research shows no differential effects between regular human insulins and rapid-acting insulin analogues for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, but the evidence is very uncertain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024508625.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petersen, J. J., Faltermeier, P., Juul, S., Kamp, C. B., Sillassen, C. D. B., Dos Santos, T. J., Jakobsen, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100186</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100186</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100186</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107980?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring barriers to and experiences of palliative and end-of-life care for people living with HIV: a cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107980?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore priorities, barriers to and experiences of palliative and end-of-life care from the perspectives of people living with HIV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional online survey conducted in the UK between September 2024 and November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Online survey of people living with HIV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The sample (N=90) was adults living with HIV in the UK. The majority of participants were male (82.4%), gay men (77.8%) and white (88.1%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The majority of participants (58.9%) reported knowing what palliative care was and that they could explain it to someone else; however, a misconception about palliative care being only for the end of life was evident. Over a quarter of respondents (27.8%) reported that their HIV status &lsquo;Sometimes&rsquo; negatively affected their experiences of care in general practitioner, hospital and dental settings. The top three priorities for end of life were (1) being in a calm atmosphere, (2) being free of pain and (3) support with psychological well-being. Not being judged was also identified as a priority.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>To promote integration of palliative and end-of-life care into care pathways for people living with HIV, partnerships with HIV services and charities may be needed as well as tailored messaging and training for staff in generalist services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crooks, J., Simpson-Greene, C., Hughes, L., Dreja, L., Tweed, M., Holt, T., Brimacombe, M., Jeneway, R., Macrowan, R., Hudson, B. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107980</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107980</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring barriers to and experiences of palliative and end-of-life care for people living with HIV: a cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107980</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107980</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Who gets to deliver in a health facility? An investigation of wealth-based inequities in institutional delivery in Ghana]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Institutional delivery under skilled care is essential for reducing maternal mortality. Ghana has expanded maternal health services through policies such as the National Health Insurance Scheme and the free maternal healthcare policy. Inequalities in access to facility-based delivery, however, remain across socioeconomic groups. This study examined wealth-based inequities in institutional delivery and identified maternal and socioeconomic factors associated with facility delivery in Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative survey data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Data were drawn from the 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. The analysis included 5855 women aged 15&ndash;49 years who had at least one live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Descriptive statistics were used to summarise participant characteristics, and weighted logistic regression models were applied to identify factors associated with institutional delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>84.3% of women delivered in a health facility. Wealth showed a strong gradient effect. Women in the richest wealth quintile had significantly higher odds of institutional delivery compared with those in the poorest quintile (odds ratio (OR) 2.71, p&lt;0.001). Higher education, increased antenatal care visits and health insurance coverage were also associated with higher odds of facility delivery. Rural residence was associated with lower odds of institutional delivery (OR 0.52, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Socioeconomic and geographic disparities in institutional delivery remain evident in Ghana. Wealth, education, antenatal care attendance and health insurance coverage influence access to facility-based childbirth. Targeted interventions are needed to improve equitable access to skilled delivery services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atta-Doku, J. F., Achiam, W. K. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109187</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109187</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Who gets to deliver in a health facility? An investigation of wealth-based inequities in institutional delivery in Ghana]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109187</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110998?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of COVID-19 on the implementation of mental health interventions for adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110998?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are a vulnerable population disproportionately affected by mental health disorders due to the combined burden of chronic illness, stigma and socioeconomic challenges. In response, numerous mental health interventions have been implemented to support ALHIV. However, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted health systems, particularly in-person services, potentially undermining the delivery and efficacy of these interventions. This protocol describes the methodology for a systematic review that will assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the implementation of mental health interventions for ALHIV in SSA and to explore the emergence or adaptation of interventions during this period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Data will be collected, analysed and reported per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We will search PubMed, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO and Scopus for literature published from 2020 to 2025. Eligible studies will include both qualitative and quantitative designs that assess mental health interventions for ALHIV in SSA or explore pandemic-related implementation impacts. Both peer-reviewed and grey literature will be included. The primary outcomes of interest are implementation-related outcomes, including service disruptions, adaptations, feasibility, acceptability and barriers or facilitators influencing intervention delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data, including study design, methodology and results, will be extracted and synthesised using an Excel spreadsheet. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used during literature screening and will include study type, location and language.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review uses only publicly accessible data from previously published studies and does not involve the collection of primary data or identifiable human subjects. Therefore, ethical approval is not required. The results of the review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and shared with stakeholders working in adolescent HIV and mental health services in SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251147822.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chiromo, M., Shumba, C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110998</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110998</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of COVID-19 on the implementation of mental health interventions for adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110998</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110998</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112056?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intensive Dietary and Activity Counselling (IDAC) study: a randomised trial following infants genetically susceptible to type 1 diabetes to prevent {beta}-cell dysfunction and islet autoimmunity - a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112056?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease, preceded by the presence of islet autoantibodies, a preclinical state defined as islet autoimmunity. Several environmental exposures have been associated with the initiation of islet autoimmunity but the triggers remain largely unknown. Rapid growth and weight gain during childhood are some of the exposures that have been proposed to promote islet autoimmunity. A high intake of protein and animal milks in early childhood is consistently associated with increased later obesity. Growth during early childhood is directly related to dietary intake and especially protein intake and this association has been linked to increased risk of islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes. The Intensive Dietary and Activity Counselling (IDAC) study aims to determine whether a healthy lifestyle counselling from age 3 months to age 2 years improves &beta;-cell health in children with increased risk for islet autoimmunity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The IDAC study is a randomised trial (1:1 allocation) with two parallel groups, aiming to enrol 1244 children at increased genetic risk of type 1 diabetes before the age of 4 months. Participants will be randomised to either the control or intervention group based on the child&rsquo;s current breastfeeding status (currently breastfeeding or no longer breastfeeding). The intervention group will receive regular dietary and physical activity counselling. The primary outcome is &beta;-cell health at 36 months, assessed by fasting and stimulated proinsulin-to-C-peptide ratio. Secondary outcomes include accelerated growth during infancy, overweight at 36 months, and time to development of persistent confirmed islet autoantibodies or type 1 diabetes. Growth measures, blood samples for serological markers, stool samples, dietary intake (nutrients and food group data) and questionnaire data will be collected regularly throughout the study period. Regression models will be used to estimate the effects of the intervention on the primary outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The research protocol was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (dnr 2024-05217-01, 2024-08622-02, 2025-01759-02). Study findings will be presented at national and international conferences, submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, shared on social media and disseminated through patient-education materials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06670625">NCT06670625</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aronsson, C. A., Hummel, S., Eriksson Hallstro&#x0308;m, E., Gudmundsson, T., Maziarz, M., Elding Larsson, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112056</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112056</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intensive Dietary and Activity Counselling (IDAC) study: a randomised trial following infants genetically susceptible to type 1 diabetes to prevent {beta}-cell dysfunction and islet autoimmunity - a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112056</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112056</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112830?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of paternity leave on the health of fathers and their families: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112830?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>As of 2024, paid paternity leave was available in 102 countries worldwide. However, the accessibility and methods of taking paternity leave are influenced by cultural background and individual values, leading to variations in uptake rate. Both positive and negative effects of paternity leave have been reported on the health of fathers, partners and children. A comprehensive understanding of this topic is essential for medical professionals supporting fathers undertaking childcare. The aim of this review is to identify and provide an overview of research related to the impact of paternity leave on the health of fathers, their partners and their children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Ichushi-Web (Japan&rsquo;s medical literature database) will be searched for published studies, and Google Scholar, ProQuest and CiNii Research (a database used to search for academic information in Japan) will be searched for grey literature. Screening will be performed by two independent reviewers. In this scoping review, we will include studies that focus on fathers taking paternity leave, their partners and their children, regardless of ethnicity or geographic location. This review will focus only on studies related to effects within 3 years after childbirth. We will not restrict study inclusion by whether paternity leave is paid or unpaid, the length of the leave or whether it was taken solely by the father. Furthermore, we will include both English and Japanese literature. The findings of this scoping review will be presented in tabular form and summarised in a way that aligns with the review questions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This paper does not involve human participants, so approval by an ethics committee is not required. The results of this scoping review will be presented in academic conferences and disseminated in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p><A HREF="https://osf.io/jsc89">https://osf.io/jsc89</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yamashita, M., Shimazaki, A., Maehara, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112830</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112830</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of paternity leave on the health of fathers and their families: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112830</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112830</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113426?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research priorities in the field of interprofessional healthcare education: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113426?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Interprofessional education (IPE) is a key factor, preparing students for collaboration to improve quality in healthcare. Current literature implies that IPE research needs to be relevant for students, teachers and stakeholders ensuring that research answers the most important research issues. Therefore, the objective of this study was to establish outcomes of a partnership between students, teachers and clinicians to rank the top 10 research priorities for IPE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (JLA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Higher health education in Sweden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Students, teachers and healthcare professionals (clinicians).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>According to the JLA process, a steering committee was established. A pilot survey to gather research uncertainties highly relevant for participants was performed and tested by the content validity index. The pilot survey was followed by a main survey with 53 participants and a final workshop to determine the top 10 research priorities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The content validity index was satisfactory for 23 out of 27 research uncertainties, followed by minor changes and removal of three uncertainties. After processing the 24 uncertainties from the main survey, 21 remained in the workshop. The final top 10 research priorities included measurements to evaluate IPE, promoting and hindering factors for IPE, educational models for IPE, longitudinal studies on effects from IPE and implementation of IPE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The priorities represent consensus areas from students, teachers and clinicians to guide future research and justify and inform strategic allocation of research funding.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumlien, C., Ask, E., Axelsson, M., Gudmundsson, P., Hugosson, O., Jakobsson, J., Stollenwerk, M. M., Carlson, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113426</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113426</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research priorities in the field of interprofessional healthcare education: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113426</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113426</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113674?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenges in patient-physician communication: the results of an Angolan cross-sectional study on communicative health literacy and its determinants]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113674?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Assessing and understanding communicative health literacy (COM-HL) in healthcare settings is essential, as it constitutes a fundamental tool of public health and health promotion. Despite its importance, COM-HL remains an underinvestigated topic in Africa. Consequently, the development and validation of a Portuguese COM-HL scale could be regarded as a significant contribution to the assessment of the COM-HL in Portuguese-speaking African countries. Therefore, the aims of this study were to assess the psychometric properties of the Portuguese COM-HL instruments, to describe the COM-HL of Angolan adults and investigate its determinants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Purposively selected recruitment sites within the municipality/district in seven provinces of Angola across the North, South and East regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1839 Angolan adults from 3041 invited persons, predominantly females (53.6%). Quota sampling was used to ensure representation across key sociodemographic strata. Within each quota, recruitment sites, data collection time points and participants were randomly selected. The inclusion criteria were age 18 years or above, Angolan nationality, permanent residence in Angola, the ability to speak the language of the questionnaire and the absence of mental disabilities or any other incapacity to perform the interview.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Measurement properties of the six-item and 11-item versions of the COM-HL instrument assessed through Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient, construct validity of the questionnaire investigated by principal component analysis (PCA), the relationship between COM-HL and independent variables measured with linear regression analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha of the 11-item COM-HL scale was 0.92, and the Spearman-Brown correlation was 0.89. The items belonged to one factor, and 56.7% of the total variance was explained by this factor based on the PCA. The mean score was 52.4 (95% CI 51.42 to 53.45). For the six-item version, the Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha was 0.86, and the Spearman-Brown correlation was 0.83. The items belonged to one factor, and 58.1% of the total variance was explained by this factor based on the PCA. The mean score was 49.9 (95% CI 48.83 to 50.97). In both versions of the scale, getting enough time in the consultation with your doctor was rated as the most difficult task. The absence of financial deprivation (p&lt;0.001), the location of residence within an urban area (p&lt;0.001) and the possession of at least a fair health status (p&lt;0.02) were identified as positive determinants of COM-HL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The questionnaires can be characterised by good internal consistency and seem to be an appropriate tool to assess COM-HL in Portuguese-speaking countries. Angolan adults scored relatively low for COM-HL. People found it difficult to get enough time during consultations. Therefore, it is recommended to improve the communication skills of physicians and facilitate communication among healthcare users.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Israel, F. E. A., Vincze, F., Adany, R., Biro, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113674</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113674</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenges in patient-physician communication: the results of an Angolan cross-sectional study on communicative health literacy and its determinants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113674</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113674</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113859?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge and attitudes towards perioperative pulmonary embolism in major orthopaedic surgery patients: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113859?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study investigated the knowledge and attitudes (KA) towards perioperative pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, a population at particular risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A single-centre, cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary care hospital in Shanghai, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>454 patients scheduled for major orthopaedic surgery (Grade III or above) were enrolled between February and September 2024. Selection criteria included adult patients undergoing eligible procedures, while exclusion criteria encompassed cognitive impairment or refusal to participate. All enrolled participants completed the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were the total scores on validated knowledge and attitude questionnaires. Secondary outcomes included the identification of demographic factors associated with these scores and the analysis of the direct relationship between knowledge and attitude using structural equation modelling (SEM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The average knowledge score was 52.9% (23.82/45), indicating poor understanding. The average attitude score was 66.4% (29.88/45), indicating a moderate attitude. The multivariable analysis showed that a college diploma (OR=4.824, 95% CI 2.399 to 9.703, p&lt;0.001) and a bachelor&rsquo;s degree or above (OR=19.754, 95% CI 6.906 to 56.503, p&lt;0.001) were independently associated with both adequate knowledge and a positive attitude. Higher knowledge scores were also directly associated with a positive attitude (OR=1.041, 95% CI 1.004 to 1.079, p=0.028). However, SEM analysis revealed that greater knowledge had a paradoxical negative direct impact on attitude (&beta;=&ndash;0.484, 95% CI &ndash;0.565 to &ndash;0.402, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery possess poor knowledge but moderately positive attitudes toward PE. Educational level is a key factor influencing KA. Improving patient knowledge and attitudes is crucial for supporting informed surgical decision-making and enhancing perioperative self-management, though the complex relationship between knowledge and attitude warrants further investigation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ye, P., Chen, H., Yu, X., Xu, C., Qian, X., Xue, M., He, K., Ding, Z., Cai, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113859</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113859</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge and attitudes towards perioperative pulmonary embolism in major orthopaedic surgery patients: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113859</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113859</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114901?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transitioning from paper-based to electronic health management information systems in Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114901?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The rising shift from paper-based to electronic health management information systems (EHMIS) among global health systems has shown promising strides over the past decade. Yet, most African health systems have continued to use paper records with attendant gaps and challenges. Most African governments have now started transitioning from paper to EHMIS but lack adequate guidance to support this shift. There is therefore a need for harmonised regional guidance to ensure that such transitions are carried out systematically and take into account country-specific contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The objective of this study protocol is to conduct a scoping review to generate evidence that will inform the development of a comprehensive guide to support countries in the WHO African Region in transitioning from paper-based to EHMIS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow established methodological guidance for scoping reviews as outlined by Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley and further refined by Levac <I>et al</I> and the Joanna Briggs Institute, with reporting guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. A search strategy will be developed to systematically identify relevant studies from both published and grey literature sources including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and African Index Medicus. Other sources will include Google Scholar, Emerald Journal, the WHO Regional Office for Africa Library and websites of WHO, ITU and Ministries of Health. Reference lists of the retrieved published articles will be manually searched to identify additional relevant studies. Descriptive qualitative content analysis will be undertaken using the policy analysis framework and key findings will be summarised and presented using tables, charts and maps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study does not involve the collection of primary data; therefore, ethical approval will not be required. On completion of the study, findings will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and will also be presented at national, regional and international conferences to support knowledge sharing and policy engagement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Droti, B., Ibeneme, S., Traore, M., Kawila, C., Kipruto, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114901</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114901</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transitioning from paper-based to electronic health management information systems in Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114901</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114901</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115084?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Peer-led versus instructor-led debriefing in simulation-based interprofessional education (Sim-IPE) at a simulation centre in Qatar: protocol for a single-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115084?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Simulation-based interprofessional education (Sim-IPE) enables health professions students to collaborate in a realistic, safe, simulated clinical environment. Debriefing is a critical component of simulation, facilitating reflective learning and improvement in team performance. Instructor-led (IL) debriefing is considered the gold standard but is resource-intensive and may not be feasible in settings with limited faculty availability. Peer-led (PL) debriefing offers a potentially cost-effective alternative; however, its impact on debriefing quality, interprofessional competencies and professional identity in Sim-IPE remains underexplored. This study aims to compare PL and IL debriefing in terms of perceived quality and impact on interprofessional outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This manuscript reports a prospectively registered protocol for a single-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial to be conducted at Qatar University Simulation Centre (Tamayuz). The trial consists of two arms: an IL debriefing arm (control) and a PL debriefing arm (intervention). A total of 120 students will undergo a comprehensive simulation experience, including pre-briefing and simulation, followed by random assignment to one of the debriefing arms. Outcome measures will include the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare Scale, Satisfaction with Simulation Experience tool, Modified McMaster Ottawa Scale for Teams and Extended Professional Identity Scale. At the time of the original submission, participant recruitment had not yet commenced.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Qatar University (QU-IRB 237/2025-EA). All participants in this study will provide informed consent prior to participation in the study. Findings of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and may be presented at conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>This study is prospectively registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, a recognised clinical trial registry, prior to participant enrolment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN52780669">ISRCTN52780669</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El-Awaisi, A., Mustafa, D. N., El Hajj, M. S., Major, S., Brown, M., Mahfoud, Z. R., OHara, L., Elhage, A., Al Hariri, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115084</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115084</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Peer-led versus instructor-led debriefing in simulation-based interprofessional education (Sim-IPE) at a simulation centre in Qatar: protocol for a single-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115084</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115084</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116613?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a scoping review of interventional trials in complex regional pain syndrome: evaluation of adherence to the core outcome set, SPIRIT-PRO and CONSORT-PRO guidelines]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116613?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating chronic pain condition that severely reduces quality of life. Physiotherapy is a key component of management; however, high-quality evidence to inform optimal practice is limited. Variability in outcome measurement and poor reporting quality may hinder the ability to synthesise findings and inform best practice.</p>
<p>Although international guidelines for reporting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been developed to address these issues and a CRPS Core Outcome Set (COS) has been published, the extent to which they have been adopted in CRPS research remains unclear. This protocol describes a scoping review, which aims to explore whether randomised controlled trials evaluating physiotherapy interventions for adults with CRPS adhere to COS recommendations and comply with PRO reporting guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The design of the scoping review will align with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews will be used to guide reporting. Electronic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, CENTRAL and PsycINFO will be searched in addition to the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP). Titles, abstracts and full texts will be screened by two independent reviewers. Data extraction and synthesis will follow, with discrepancies resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Adherence to the CRPS COS will be assessed by mapping trial outcomes to COS domains, and compliance with Standard Protocol Items Recommendations for Interventional Trials: Patient-Reported Outcome Extension (SPIRIT-PRO) and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials: PRO Extension (CONSORT-PRO) guidelines will be evaluated against checklist items. Data will be summarised descriptively, with subgroup analysis comparing trials initiated before and after COS publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as the study involves no collection of primary data. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and concise reports prepared for key stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>This protocol is registered on Open Science Framework and is available at <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BFH82">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BFH82</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cork, H., Deutsch, A., Kyte, R., Turner, D., Kyte, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116613</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116613</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a scoping review of interventional trials in complex regional pain syndrome: evaluation of adherence to the core outcome set, SPIRIT-PRO and CONSORT-PRO guidelines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116613</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116613</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118313?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of multimodal exercise programme combined with high-protein diet on glycaemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118313?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Effective management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in older adults requires interventions that address both metabolic control and functional capacity. Exercise improves insulin sensitivity, glucose uptake and cardiometabolic health, while high-protein diets support muscle mass preservation, satiety and glycaemic regulation. Evidence suggests that integrating structured exercise with a high-protein diet may provide additive benefits; however, research evaluating this combined approach in older adults with T2DM, particularly in low-resource settings, is limited. This study aims to determine whether a 12-week multimodal exercise programme combined with a high-protein diet improves glycaemic control and broader health outcomes compared with exercise alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this randomised controlled trial (RCT), 140 adults aged &ge;60 years with T2DM will be allocated 1:1 to an experimental group (multimodal exercise with high-protein diet, n=70) or a control group (multimodal exercise alone, n=70). All participants will engage in three supervised exercise sessions per week for 12 weeks. Additionally, the experimental group will follow a high-protein diet that provides approximately 30% of total energy from protein, with a 500-kcal daily energy deficit. The primary outcome is glycaemic control, measured by Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary outcomes include anthropometric measures, fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, functional capacity (6-minute walk test) and health-related quality of life Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, postintervention (week 12) and follow-up (week 24). Participants, outcome assessors and statisticians will remain blinded. Intervention fidelity, adherence and safety will be systematically monitored, and final results will be analysed using SPSS (v.26.0). The study will follow ethical standards and comply with Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology (Approval No.: PTR-JUST/IRB/2025/09/192404) and registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and structured knowledge-sharing sessions to inform clinical practice in diabetes management.</p>
<p>Trial registration number: <A HREF="CTRI/2025/08/092509">CTRI/2025/08/092509</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharna, S. Y., Hossain, K. M. A., Hero, M. H., Rahman, M. A., Rikti, J. F., Mim, P. B., Amin, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118313</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118313</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of multimodal exercise programme combined with high-protein diet on glycaemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118313</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118313</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119075?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Therapeutic empathy in remote consultations in general practice: a realist review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119075?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Remote consultations (video, telephone, text) have become integral to the delivery of primary care and are promoted by government initiatives. While many find these more convenient, they may also discriminate against those with lower digital literacy and present a barrier to empathy by removing some non-verbal communication. The aim of this realist review is to understand how therapeutic empathy can be effectively expressed during remote consultations in general practice across different situations and for different people.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This realist review will follow the methodological framework proposed by Pawson and colleagues, which includes the following five steps: (1) identify existing theories to develop an initial programme theory; (2) systematically search bibliographic databases to identify relevant literature; (3) select, extract and organise data; (4) synthesise evidence to develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations; (5) refine and finalise programme theory. This iterative process will be guided by a Content Expert Group consisting of patients, carers, clinical staff working in general practice and representatives from national stakeholder groups. The final programme theory will inform the development of evidence-based recommendations to help clinical staff working in general practice express empathy during remote consultations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review does not require ethics approval. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, national and international conferences and through relevant professional associations and primary care networks in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420261306014.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howick, J., Ma, K., Bennett-Weston, A., Ward, A., Roberts, N., Bostock, J., Broad, J., Wong, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T04:54:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119075</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119075</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Therapeutic empathy in remote consultations in general practice: a realist review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119075</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119075</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e058801ret?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Retraction: Friendship during patients stable and unstable phases of incurable cancer: a qualitative interview study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e058801ret?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>This article<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> is retracted by the journal.</p> <sec id="s1"><st>What happened after publication</st> <p>Gabe Sonke told the journal that he was not an author, and had been included in the author list for the article by co-author Hilde Buiting. An expression of concern<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> was published for this article. The journal investigated and corrected the author list to remove Gabe Sonke and Michelle van Eijk, and corrected the affiliations of Hilde Buiting.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref></p> <p>The misrepresentation of the authorship to include Sonke as an author without his knowledge raised concerns about the overall integrity of the study. The journal asked the institutions connected to the work (the Netherlands Cancer Institute and University of Amsterdam) to review the good standing of the research, given the misrepresentation of authorship.</p> <p>The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NCI) would not investigate the work. They confirmed that their institution provided ethical approval for the...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T22:16:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058801ret</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2021-058801ret</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Retraction: Friendship during patients stable and unstable phases of incurable cancer: a qualitative interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Retraction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e058801ret</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e058801ret</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e058801corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: Friendship during patients stable and unstable phases of incurable cancer: a qualitative interview study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e058801corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The authorship of this article<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> has been corrected to remove Gabe Sonke and Michelle van Eijk. Hilde Buiting&rsquo;s affiliation has also been corrected.</p> <sec id="s1"><st>What happened after publication</st> <p>Gabe Sonke told the journal that he was not an author as he did not contribute to the work in any way, and was unaware of its submission and publication. On that basis, an expression of concern<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> was published. The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NCI) told the journal that Hilde Buiting&rsquo;s use of their affiliation was inaccurate. The journal investigated Hilde Buiting&rsquo;s affiliations and the contribution of each of the four individuals originally listed as authors of the work: Michelle van Eijk, Daniel H de Vries, Gabe S Sonke and Hilde M Buiting.</p> <p>Michelle van Eijk and Daniel de Vries agree with Gabe Sonke that he did not contribute to any aspect of the work. Sonke&rsquo;s institution, the...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T22:01:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058801corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2021-058801corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: Friendship during patients stable and unstable phases of incurable cancer: a qualitative interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e058801corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e058801corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e098088?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised, multicentre phase II study of bevacizumab and paclitaxel induction followed by atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: protocol for the INDUCE trial (JBCRG-M10)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e098088?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Addition of bevacizumab and paclitaxel as induction therapy prior to standard atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) may help to overcome vascular endothelial growth factor-associated resistance mechanisms that limit the immune-mediated antitumour efficacy of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Induction Therapy of PTX+BV Followed by Atezolizumab+Nab-PTX for PD-L1+TNBC (INDUCE) study is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two cycles of induction therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel followed by atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel compared with standard atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1-positive mTNBC. The primary outcome of the study is progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours, V.1.1. We have estimated that 89 PFS events are needed to allow a power of 80% to detect a difference between treatment groups at a one-sided significance level of 10% in this study. The target sample size is set to 106 patients to account for dropouts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol and informed consent form have been approved by the Certified Research Review Board at the Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. Study results will be presented at international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>jRCTs041240039 <A HREF="NCT06793553">NCT06793553</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ozaki, Y., Koyama, S., Morita, S., Miyashita, M., Tokuda, E., Shimoi, T., Fukuoka, M., Masuda, H., Takano, Y., Shibata, N., Yoshinami, T., Murakami, A., Tamaki, K., Ishiguro, H., Saji, S., Miwa, A., Matsunaga, J., Zheng, Y., Nishikawa, H., Masuda, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098088</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098088</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised, multicentre phase II study of bevacizumab and paclitaxel induction followed by atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: protocol for the INDUCE trial (JBCRG-M10)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098088</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098088</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099033?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of anxiety and depression in adults who are high users of healthcare services and magnitude of associated costs: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099033?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Anxiety and depression are common and associated with higher use of general healthcare services. The aims of this systematic review were to (1) estimate the prevalence of anxiety and depression in adults who are high or costly users of general healthcare services in comparison to routine users and (2) estimate the magnitude of healthcare costs associated with the presence of anxiety and depression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review of the available literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, PROSPERO and Cochrane Library were systematically searched without language restriction from inception to 1 April 2019 and updated on 25 October 2022, 16 October 2024 and 18 February 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Eligible studies described adults aged &ge;18 years who were defined as high or costly general healthcare users and where the prevalence and/or associated costs of anxiety and/or depression were quantified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Three reviewers independently extracted information on study characteristics, exposure and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From the 38 412 identified articles, 27 studies from 10 countries (in Europe, North America and Asia) involving 6 145 907 participants met eligibility criteria and were included. There were wide variations in the estimated prevalence of anxiety (3.8&ndash;67.2%) and depression (4.7&ndash;77.9%) among high healthcare users. The prevalence of both disorders was higher among high healthcare users than routine users in all studies with non-high user comparator groups. Only four studies investigated healthcare costs associated with depression. These uniformly reported that general healthcare costs are higher for those with depression than those without. No studies investigated costs associated with anxiety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Anxiety and depression are over-represented among high or costly healthcare users, although accurate quantification of the magnitude of difference is precluded by significant methodological heterogeneity and variability in definitions used. Improved identification of covert mental health problems is essential for the provision of effective interventions for patients and healthcare expenditure reduction. Future research should prioritise a standardised approach, with agreed definitions for high and/or costly healthcare use in different contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42018102628.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Romeu, D., Jadhakhan, F., Taylor, A. K., Lindner, O. C., Blakemore, A., Guthrie, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099033</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099033</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of anxiety and depression in adults who are high users of healthcare services and magnitude of associated costs: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099033</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099033</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099575?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Responsible preoperative opioid use for hip or knee arthroplasty (OpioidHALT): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial of pharmacist-partnered opioid tapering prior to hip or knee arthroplasty]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099575?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite limited evidence of efficacy, opioid analgesics are frequently used by patients for chronic pain while awaiting total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). Preoperative use of opioids is problematic as it increases the likelihood of postoperative opioid-related adverse drug events and postoperative complications and is the strongest predictor of persistent opioid use post surgery. Opioid tapering prior to elective surgery has been proposed as a strategy for mitigating harms and improving postoperative outcomes. This protocol describes a randomised clinical trial, which aims to determine the effectiveness of a preoperative pharmacist-partnered opioid tapering programme compared with standard care for patients awaiting elective THA or TKA on postoperative outcomes including persistent opioid use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>Eligible participants must be aged &ge;18 years; awaiting elective unilateral or bilateral THA or TKA; speak and read English; use prescription opioid analgesics at least 4 days a week and have access to internet or telephone. The participants will be excluded if they are undergoing a repeat surgery (same procedure within 6 months), are using opioids for cancer, palliative care or substance use disorder; have previously or are currently undergoing an opioid tapering programme or active medication review or have cognitive impairment. Enrolled participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio in permuted blocks of two and four to: (1) intervention or (2) standard care. A total of 314 participants will be recruited into the study. The intervention will include a pharmacist-partnered opioid tapering programme in which a pharmacist will work with participants to reduce their opioid dose over a 3-month period before surgery. Standard care will involve review by the hospital preadmission clinic multidisciplinary team to assess medical, physical and psychological health prior to surgery and education sessions for preoperative and postoperative care. The primary outcome assessed is persistent opioid use 3 months post surgery. The key secondary outcome is total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score. Data analysis will be performed using an estimand framework, with a generalised estimating equation model for the primary outcome from 1 day to 3 days presurgery to 3 months post surgery and a multilevel model for the main secondary outcome from baseline to 3 months after surgery. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will be conducted to determine whether the intervention is cost-effective from the healthcare system perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval for this study was granted by a Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 2023/ETH01042). Results will be disseminated in peer reviewed journals, at international scientific meetings as well as meetings with key stakeholders and via the media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12623000685617.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penm, J., Liu, S., Adie, S., Ashton-James, C. E., Bailey, K. A., Brady, B., Chaar, B., Chen, J., Descallar, J., Englezos, K., Genel, F., Gillespie, D., Gnjidic, D., Hoang, T., Jansson, A., Jauregui, K. J., Keehan, M., Lin, C.-W. C., Lintzeris, N., Luckie, K., Mathieson, S., Moles, R. J., Mulford, J., Nealon, L., OReilly, C. L., Page, F., Patanwala, A. E., Penm, M., Quirk, R., Ratnanayagam, G., Schaper, F., Schneider, C. R., Sefton, A., Si, L., Stevens, J., Sylvester, K., Tan, S., Tran, C., Naylor, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099575</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099575</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Responsible preoperative opioid use for hip or knee arthroplasty (OpioidHALT): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial of pharmacist-partnered opioid tapering prior to hip or knee arthroplasty]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099575</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099575</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e100150?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Individual patient data meta-analysis: a cost-effective and efficient tool to advance paediatric research in low- and middle-income countries]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e100150?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>There is a deficit between existing levels of paediatric clinical research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and what is warranted based on the disease burden in children in these countries. Lack of market protections, low ability to pay and cost-based pricing are key commercial barriers to industry-funded paediatric research and access to paediatric formulations of therapeutics in LMICs. Individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) taking advantage of existing clinical trials, enabled by data sharing, is one potential tool to bridge the research gap in a cost-effective and efficient way. Recent IPD-MAs of paediatric antimalarial drug safety and efficacy enabled by the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), part of the Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), demonstrate the feasibility of this approach.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McElwee, F., Farlow, A., Guerin, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100150</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100150</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Individual patient data meta-analysis: a cost-effective and efficient tool to advance paediatric research in low- and middle-income countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100150</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100150</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103029?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of structural factors with provision of non-English language services in substance use disorder treatment facilities in the USA: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103029?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The substance use disorder (SUD) crisis continues to be a public health challenge in the USA, disproportionately affecting culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations. Understanding how structural factors contribute to providing linguistically competent SUD treatment can guide efforts to incorporate treatment provisions tailored to the specific needs of diverse CALD communities. This study examines the association of structural factors, namely ownership type and receipt of government funding, with facility-level provision of SUD treatment in non-English languages in the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study using deidentified facility-level data from the 2019 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS) dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>SUD treatment facilities from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Of 15 961 facilities in the 2019 N-SSATS dataset, 14 993 were selected for inclusion in our study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcomes and measures</st>
<p>The main outcome was a binary indicator of the provision of SUD treatment services in languages other than English. To assess the association between structural factors and the provision of SUD treatment services in non-English languages, we ran generalised linear mixed models, controlling for state- and facility-level variables, to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 14 993 SUD treatment facilities nationally, 7864 (52.45%) offered non-English language SUD treatment services. Private for-profit facilities had significantly lower odds of offering non-English language services than private non-profit facilities (aOR=0.59; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.65). Facilities that received government funding had significantly higher adjusted odds of providing non-English language services compared to those that did not (aOR=1.45; 95% CI 1.32 to 1.59).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions and relevance</st>
<p>Structural factors, including ownership type and government funding, were associated with the provision of SUD treatment services in non-English languages. Our findings highlight the potential role of these structural factors in shaping the capacity to provide services in non-English languages in SUD care settings. Future research is needed to better understand how changes in funding mechanisms or ownership type may facilitate the provision of non-English-language treatment services across SUD facilities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pathan, U., Saini, J., Rizk, J. G., Qato, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103029</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of structural factors with provision of non-English language services in substance use disorder treatment facilities in the USA: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103029</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103029</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104741?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tenting screw technique for guided bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104741?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Inadequate alveolar bone is a critical challenge for the placement of implants. The tenting screw technique has been demonstrated to be effective for bone augmentation. However, no previous systematic reviews have addressed the clinical outcomes of the tenting screw technique for guided bone regeneration (TS-GBR). Thus, we aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to systematically assess the clinical outcomes of TS-GBR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will search eight databases to identify relevant studies. Clinical trials that report the outcomes of bone augmentation with the application of the tenting screw technique and that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Two authors will independently conduct the literature search and data extraction. The risk of bias of the included studies will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist on the basis of the study design. Weighted means will be calculated. R software will be used to perform the data analysis. A funnel plot will be generated to assess publication bias. The quality of evidence for each outcome will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not applicable since this is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis that does not include actual patients or require data privacy. We will summarise the currently available data related to TS-GBR. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSRERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251043324.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, J., Ren, X., Lu, H., Wang, X., Wang, J., Dong, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104741</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104741</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tenting screw technique for guided bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104741</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104741</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105765?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Designing and delivering youth mental health services for young people, with young people: what works? A protocol for a realist eDelphi study on effective co-production]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105765?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Research and mental health services agree that more youth co-production in service design and delivery is needed, but there is little consensus on how to do it well. This study is trying to find agreement about the best ways to do this.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A realist eDelphi study will be conducted. People with experience of co-production and engagement in youth mental health services will be invited to participate. This will include young people with relevant lived experience, family members/carers of young people with mental ill health, youth mental health researchers and other professionals with experience of youth engagement work (eg, mental healthcare staff, mental health service managers and participation/engagement professionals in the sector). The target is to recruit 10&ndash;20 participants from each of these four groups (40&ndash;80 participants total).</p>
<p>The following steps will be taken: (1) an advisory group of young people will use results from a realist literature review completed prior to this study, to generate the first list of items for the survey; (2) using the online survey tool Qualtrics, participants will be invited to rate these items in an online survey. A prompt question formatted using a realist framework will allow participants to comment on their rating and how this survey item works (or does not work) in this context, for young people or other stakeholders. Participants will be able to add further suggestions at this stage; (3) using Qualtrics, a second survey round will be completed which will include the new suggestions from participants, and original items with their average participant ratings and comments displayed. Participants will be asked to rerate items in this round; (4) a list of items will be generated that comprises survey items believed to be &lsquo;essential&rsquo; or &lsquo;important&rsquo; by 80% or more of the participants; (5) this list will be discussed with the Youth Advisory Group to generate a final recommendations document and consider creative outputs and dissemination methods. Data analysis will include raw numbers, means and frequencies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been granted by the University of Birmingham Research Ethics Committee (Ref: ERN_1550-Apr2024). Both traditional and non-traditional outputs will be created (eg, conference presentations, publications, a plain English summary and social media infographics).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, V. R., Rathore, I., Waring, J., Wright, N., Fenton, S.-J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105765</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105765</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Designing and delivering youth mental health services for young people, with young people: what works? A protocol for a realist eDelphi study on effective co-production]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105765</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105765</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106371?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and psychometric validation of the 8-item Student Quality of Life Index (IQoL) using item response theory (IRT): a cross-sectional study among Brazilian higher education students]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106371?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop and validate the 8-item Student Quality of Life Index (IQoL), a concise, multidimensional instrument for assessing quality of life (QoL) among higher education students in Brazil, encompassing psychological well-being, vitality and perceived functional capacity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional psychometric validation study using a split-sample approach for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), followed by bifactor item response theory (IRT) modelling and measurement invariance testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A large-scale survey conducted across 32 private higher education institutions in 14 Brazilian states, covering diverse academic fields. To ensure representativeness, the medical student subgroup was calibrated using post-stratification weights to align sex and age distributions with national medical education demographics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 10 844 undergraduate students completed the survey. Psychometric model development used 10 793 respondents with complete data for the candidate item pool included in the EFA/CFA/IRT pipeline. Score distributions and subgroup comparisons used 10 838 respondents with complete information for sex, age group and course (3656 medical; 7182 other). The sample was predominantly female (69.0%) and white (47.3%) or mixed-race (41.2%), with an age range predominantly between 18 and 29 years. For medical-student comparisons, a stratified, calibrated analytic subset was created to match national sex and age margins, which led to a small reduction in the medical subgroup denominator in those analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Psychometric properties of the 8-item IQoL scale. Structural validity was assessed via CFA (weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted estimator) and internal consistency via Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha and Omega coefficients. Item-level performance was evaluated using Samejima&rsquo;s Graded Response Model. Scalar measurement invariance was tested across sex, age and course.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The parsimonious 8-item, three-factor model demonstrated superior fit indices (comparative fit index=0.996; Tucker-Lewis index=0.993; root mean square error of approximation=0.058 (90% CI 0.052 to 0.064); standardised root mean square residual=0.031). Internal consistency was high (&alpha;=0.88; <f></f>). Bifactor IRT analysis supported a dominant general QoL factor, with item discrimination parameters (<f></f>) ranging from 1.37 to 3.48. Scalar measurement invariance was established for sex, age and academic field, supporting valid group comparisons. Medical students reported slightly higher psychological well-being than non-medical peers, though effect sizes were trivial (Hedges&rsquo; g=0.074). Within the medical subgroup, females scored higher in vitality and psychological well-being (g up to 0.225). Lower income and self-reported depression were significantly associated with lower global IQoL scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The Student Quality of Life Index (IQoL) is a psychometrically robust, invariant and efficient tool for large-scale monitoring of student well-being. The establishment of scalar invariance ensures that the observed differences across demographic and academic subgroups reflect true differences in the latent construct, reinforcing the instrument&rsquo;s utility for institutional assessment and mental health policy-making in higher education.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gobbo, M., Silveira de Resende, M., Santos, I. M., Moura, E. C. d., Pedro, R. d. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106371</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106371</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and psychometric validation of the 8-item Student Quality of Life Index (IQoL) using item response theory (IRT): a cross-sectional study among Brazilian higher education students]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106371</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106371</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108598?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-national validation of the MHQoL: psychometric evaluation and open-source tools for assessing mental health quality of life]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108598?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To validate the cross-national psychometric properties of the Mental Health Quality of Life questionnaire (MHQoL) and to develop an open-source toolbox for its scoring, transformation and presentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Secondary analysis of data from a multicentre international randomised controlled trial (EMPOWER).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Workplace settings in small-sized and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and public sector organisations in Finland, Spain and the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The sample included 564 employees: 122 from Finland, 114 from Spain and 328 from the UK. Most were white-collar workers in SMEs or public organisations, mainly in public administration, manufacturing, health/life sciences or higher education. Women were the majority (56%&ndash;91% across countries), and mean age ranged from 43 to 48 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>No intervention was delivered for this analysis; data were drawn from baseline assessments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were internal consistency and construct validity of the MHQoL, evaluated using Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha, measurement invariance testing and multilevel analyses of associations between MHQoL dimensions and its visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were convergent validity, assessed through correlations between MHQoL scores and other mental health and quality of life measures (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5- level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Insomnia Severity Index, Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4), Psychosocial Risk Scale, and World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The MHQoL showed good internal consistency across countries, with Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha ranging from 0.741 in Finland to 0.806 in Spain (overall &alpha;=0.787). Measurement invariance across Finland, Spain and the UK supported construct validity. Multilevel regression analyses showed associations between MHQoL dimensions and the MHQoL-VAS, with strongest contributions from Self-Image, Daily Activities, Mood and Future. Convergent validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations between MHQoL, EQ-5D-5L and related mental health measures. An open-source R package and Shiny web application (&lsquo;MHQoL Toolbox&rsquo;) were developed for scoring, transformation and visualisation</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The MHQoL is a reliable and valid measure of mental health-related quality of life across countries. The MHQoL toolbox supports consistent, transparent implementation, facilitating use in research, clinical practice and economic evaluations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04907604">NCT04907604</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peeters, S. B., Thielen, F. W., De Mul, M., Sinokki, M., Olaya, B., Van Der Feltz-Cornelis, C. M., Hakkaart-Van Roijen, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108598</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108598</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-national validation of the MHQoL: psychometric evaluation and open-source tools for assessing mental health quality of life]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108598</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108598</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108775?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Performance of large language models (GPT-5.2, Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.1) on the Fellowship of The Royal College of Surgeons Urology Part A examination]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108775?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess and compare the performance of four contemporary frontier large language models (LLMs)&mdash;GPT-5.2 (OpenAI), Gemini 3 Pro (Google DeepMind), Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.1 (xAI)&mdash;on a simulated Fellowship of The Royal College of Surgeons Urology (FRCS(Urol)) Part A examination, evaluating overall accuracy, subspecialty-level performance, output consistency and response time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Controlled comparative evaluation study using a standardised simulation framework with repeated independent testing runs per model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All models were accessed via their respective consumer-facing interfaces. No clinical setting or patient data were involved. Testing was conducted under uniform conditions with conversational memory disabled across all sessions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Four large language models were evaluated. No human participants were involved. Models were selected to represent the current frontier of publicly accessible LLMs from four distinct commercial developers. No models were excluded following selection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Each model was presented with 240 FRCS (Urol) Part A single best answer questions, mapped to the Joint Committee on Intercollegiate Examinations' Urology Syllabus Blueprint (2023). A standardised prompt was delivered at the start of each session. Each model completed five independent examination runs. No fine-tuning or system-level modification was applied to any model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was overall examination accuracy for each model, benchmarked against an indicative pass threshold for the FRCS (Urol) Part A examination. Secondary outcomes were performance across 18 individual urology subspecialty topics; response time reported as mean total and per-question elapsed time; and consistency of performance quantified by SD and 95% CIs derived from a sequential Monte Carlo sampling procedure. All outcomes were prospectively planned and fully measured as specified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three of four models exceeded the indicative 74% pass threshold: Gemini 3 Pro (82.4%&plusmn;0.9%; 95% CI 81.3 to 83.6%), Claude Sonnet 4.6 (79.3%&plusmn;1.1%; 95% CI 77.9 to 80.6%) and GPT-5.2 (76.1%&plusmn;2.4%; 95% CI 73.1 to 79.1%). Grok 4.1 failed (70.4%&plusmn;0.6%; 95% CI 69.6 to 71.2%), with its entire CI below 74%. All models completed the assessment in under 3 min. Strong performance was observed in research methodology (90&ndash;98%) and andrology (92&ndash;98%), with the weakest results in paediatric urology (38.7&ndash;54.7%) and testicular cancer (48.2&ndash;67.3%). Substantial within-model output instability was identified across several domains, most notably GPT-5.2 in female urology (SD&plusmn;22.8%) and anatomy (SD&plusmn;14.2%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Three of four frontier LLMs achieved scores consistent with passing the FRCS (Urol) Part A examination, representing a substantial advance since ChatGPT-3.5. Aggregate accuracy alone, however, obscures important subspecialty weaknesses and output instability. LLMs should be regarded as adjunctive revision aids rather than authoritative knowledge sources and always used alongside expert-led teaching. Future work should evaluate performance on Part B and viva-style assessments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kafagi, A. R., Atassi, N., Kafagi, A.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108775</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108775</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Performance of large language models (GPT-5.2, Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.1) on the Fellowship of The Royal College of Surgeons Urology Part A examination]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108775</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108775</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108947?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index and Numeric Rating Scale scores after lumbar spine surgery: machine learning model development and fairness assessment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108947?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>One-third of patients operated for degenerative conditions in the lumbar spine do not report substantial improvement after 12 months. Most previous outcome prediction models are classifiers. This constrains nuances in prediction and use for decision support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop and test models for the prediction of continuous outcome scores and retrieval of similar patients&rsquo; outcomes, and to evaluate the models&rsquo; fairness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Norwegian public and private specialist healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and data source</st>
<p>All cases recorded with an elective operation for lumbar disc herniation (LDH, n=18 377) or lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS, n=24 540) in the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery from 1 January 2007 to 23 May 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>All outcomes were patient-reported 12 months after the operation. The primary outcome was the Oswestry disability index (ODI), modelled on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Numeric Rating Scale scores (range 0&ndash;10) for back and leg pain were secondary outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Model building and performance</st>
<p>We selected 22 predictors recorded preoperatively by patients and clinicians based on Shapley Additive Explanations values. Data were split into 80%/20% training/test samples for LDH and LSS. Six machine learning methods for regression, that is, with a continuous outcome (extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Gaussian process regression, gradient boosting regression, artificial neural networks and linear regression), were trained for both conditions using fivefold cross-validation. We report the magnitude and distribution of errors as mean absolute error (MAE) with 95% CIs, and explanatory power as the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>). Fairness and calibration were assessed with violin and calibration plots of error. We developed a patient-similarity function that uses a K-nearest neighbour model to retrieve the individual outcomes of the 50 most similar patients and evaluated it by calculating L1 distances (Manhattan distances) across subgroups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>XGBoost regression performed best for both conditions. The models showed good calibration and predicted ODI with MAE 11.32 (95% CI 11.00 to 11.63) and R<sup>2</sup> 0.27 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.29) for LDH and MAE 12.05 (95% CI 11.76 to 12.32) and R<sup>2</sup> 0.31 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.34) for LSS. The MAEs for back and leg pain were 2.09 (95% CI 2.04 to 2.15) and 1.95 (95% CI 1.90 to 2.00) for LDH and 2.33 (95% CI 2.28 to 2.38) and 2.13 (95% CI 2.08 to 2.16) for LSS. All models were fair with differences in error between subgroups for sex, age, education level and native language. In the patient-similarity function, distances at baseline were evenly distributed across subgroups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our machine learning models predicted continuous outcomes with MAEs close to the SEs of measurements. The models were fair across sociodemographic subgroups. We succeeded in developing a patient-similarity function which supplements the predictions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joakimsen, H. L., Lund, J. A., Burman, J., Woldaregay, A. Z., Berg, B., Solberg, T. K., Ingebrigtsen, T., Mikalsen, K. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108947</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108947</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index and Numeric Rating Scale scores after lumbar spine surgery: machine learning model development and fairness assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108947</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108947</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112204?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HealthyPregnancy: development and feasibility of a digital care guide to promote recommended gestational weight gain in pregnant women living with overweight in Denmark]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112204?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Excessive gestational weight gain increases the risk of complications in pregnancy, childbirth and later in life among pregnant women living with overweight and their offspring. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and examine the feasibility of a digital intervention supporting recommended gestational weight gain and the recommended level of physical activity, targeting pregnant women with a body mass index (BMI) of 27 or above.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Intervention development was guided by the Medical Research Council guideline on the development and evaluation of complex interventions, and subsequent feasibility testing was conducted in a non-randomised design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The obstetric department at Copenhagen University Hospital&mdash;North Zealand, Denmark.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>98 pregnant women living with overweight participated in feasibility testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>The intervention developed in this study was a mobile phone application with a digital care guide containing text and video information supporting recommended gestational weight gain and physical activity levels. The video material featured multiple healthcare professionals and a pregnant woman from the target group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The main feasibility measures were participant recruitment and engagement with the digital care guide throughout pregnancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Recruitment rates were satisfactory, with 69% of eligible pregnant women consenting to participation. The participants used the application and engaged with the digital care guide; however, use of the care guide diminished as pregnancy progressed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We developed a digital care guide supporting recommended gestational weight gain and physical activity levels for pregnant women with a BMI of 27 or higher. Feasibility testing indicated that there is sufficient interest in participating in a study promoting recommended weight gain and physical activity to warrant a larger effectiveness trial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hansen, M. K., Bendix, J. M., Lokkegaard, E. C. L., Schiotz, M. L., Broberg, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112204</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112204</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HealthyPregnancy: development and feasibility of a digital care guide to promote recommended gestational weight gain in pregnant women living with overweight in Denmark]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112204</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112680?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strategies to increase HPV vaccination among unvaccinated college students in the USA: a concept mapping study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112680?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The goal of this study was to identify strategies and assess priorities to increase human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among unvaccinated young adults using a concept mapping approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The concept mapping process was conducted in two phases. In phase 1, eligible participants generated qualitative statements in response to a topic prompt. In phase 2, participants organised and grouped the statements by perceived similarity, and then rated each statement on a scale of perceived effectiveness. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were conducted to develop a conceptual map of the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted at a university in the southwestern USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Eligibility criteria for participation included individuals (1) aged 18&ndash;26, (2) who had not received any dose of the HPV vaccine or were unsure if they had received the vaccine and (3) who were enrolled students at the study site institution. 24 participants engaged in the concept mapping process; five participated in phase 1 only, five participated in phase 2 only and 14 participated in both phases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The 41 statements generated were organised into five cluster concepts: media and messaging, information and education, promotion, legal and accessibility. Accessibility was the highest-rated cluster for effectiveness followed by information and education. Exploratory trends across participant demographics were also identified. Differences in perceived effectiveness of the cluster concepts were observed by gender, race, political affiliation and vaccination status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study provides valuable preliminary insights into strategies and factors perceived influential in enhancing HPV vaccination from the perspective of unvaccinated young adults. Using concept mapping, multiple factors were identified that varied in their degree of perceived effectiveness across different groups. Future HPV vaccination interventions should consider multi-component elements to ensure their success and reduce the burden of HPV-related disease.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mantina, N. M., Palmer, K. N. B., Yusoof, K. A., Rajkumar, T., Magrath, P. A., Barraza, L., Madhivanan, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112680</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112680</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strategies to increase HPV vaccination among unvaccinated college students in the USA: a concept mapping study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112680</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112680</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112961?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of treatment outcomes among hospitalised patients with skin and soft tissue infections: a prospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112961?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The study aimed to determine treatment outcome and factors affecting treatment outcomes among hospitalised patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialised Hospital (UOGCSH) in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An institution-based prospective observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>UOGCSH, Northwest Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>423 patients from all age groups with clinically diagnosed SSTIs from 25 June to 25 December 2023 at the UOGCSH were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary treatment outcomes were early apparent clinical response within 48&ndash;72 hours and treatment failure after 72 hours of optimal antibiotic therapy. Secondary treatment outcomes included hospital length of stay (HLOS) and in-hospital mortality. Multiple linear regression assessed factors influencing the HLOS, and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of treatment failure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The average HLOS was 13.46&plusmn;3.01 days. Of the patients, 39.3% had an early clinical response within 48&ndash;72 hours, whereas 34.4% had treatment failure. At 0.7%, the in-hospital death rate was modest. Living in a rural area (adjusted OR (AOR) 5.54, 95% CI 2.67 to 11.37), having concurrent illnesses (AOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.07) and starting antibiotics later than 12 hours (AOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.17) were significantly associated with treatment failure. Concomitant disorders and complex comorbidities were also associated with longer HLOS, whereas higher socioeconomic level, oral step-down therapy, early antibiotic initiation and early clinical response were linked to better results and shorter hospital stays.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Timely antibiotic initiation, efficient source control, patient comorbidities and socio-economic considerations affect the treatment course for SSTIs. Prolonged treatment and the frequent use of &lsquo;watch&rsquo; and &lsquo;reserve&rsquo; antibiotics underscore the need for improved antimicrobial stewardship. In this situation, optimising clinical results and minimising HLOS requires prompt clinical evaluation and customised antibiotic therapy. However, the single-centre design and potential residual confounding may introduce bias.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biyazin, A. A., Mekonnen, G. B., Anberbr, S. S., Tarekegn, G. Y., Zerihun, T. E., Getahun, A. D., Abebe, R. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112961</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112961</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of treatment outcomes among hospitalised patients with skin and soft tissue infections: a prospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112961</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112961</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115169?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impacts of high-fidelity and virtual reality simulation on the development of non-technical skills in healthcare students and professionals: protocol for a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115169?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Deficiencies in non-technical skills&mdash;including communication and leadership&mdash;are well-established causes of clinical errors in healthcare. Healthcare students and professionals increasingly use high-fidelity and virtual reality (VR) simulation to replicate clinical practice, through immersive and realistic scenarios in a risk-free teaching setting. However, there is no up-to-date, high-quality synthesis of the effects of high-fidelity and VR simulation on non-technical skills for healthcare students and professionals. A systematic review and meta-analysis of this literature is required to enhance the current knowledge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This protocol has been reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. We will include randomised trials and other controlled studies that report differences in non-technical skills between high-fidelity and VR simulation. We will search MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, ERIC and CINAHL, from database inception. We will also search reference lists and contact experts to identify additional studies. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, review full texts, and extract data. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion, with a third reviewer if necessary. For randomised trials, we will use the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2.0 (RoB2) tool to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. For non-randomised studies, we will use the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies (ROBINS-1) assessment tool. If appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. We will analyse continuous outcomes using weighted mean differences (with 95% CIs) or standardised mean differences (with 95% CIs) if different measurement scales are used. We will use subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity. The overall certainty of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not applicable for this study because no primary data have been collected. This review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presented at conferences to inform ongoing educational practises.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251136479.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hunt, W., Lock, S., Bonfield, A., Howick, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115169</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115169</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impacts of high-fidelity and virtual reality simulation on the development of non-technical skills in healthcare students and professionals: protocol for a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115169</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115169</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115344?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[KInetics of Procalcitonin to Reduce Unnecessary aNtibiotic use (KIPRUN): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial to compare the efficacy and safety of procalcitonin kinetics-guided and absolute procalcitonin value-guided antibiotic initiation in critically ill patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115344?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Appropriate antibiotic (AB) therapy remains a challenge in intensive care units (ICUs). Guidelines recommend against using procalcitonin (PCT) to guide the initiation of AB therapy, although with low certainty and a very low level of evidence. Recent studies suggest that changes in PCT levels may be more accurate than a single measurement; however, this has never been tested in a randomised trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT), we aim to compare the efficacy and safety of two different PCT protocols for initiating AB therapy. Hemodynamically stable, critically ill adult patients with suspected new-onset infection at admission or during ICU stay will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. In the treatment arm (Kinetics Group, KG), initiation of AB treatment is strongly recommended if PCT &ge;0.5 ng/mL and increases by more than 100% compared with the previous day. In the control arm (Absolute Group, AG), the initiation of AB treatment is strongly recommended if PCT &ge;0.5 ng/mL. The primary outcome will be the rate of unnecessary AB therapy: 72 hours after recruitment, an independent intensivist, microbiologist and infectologist will determine whether the therapy was necessary, using all relevant clinical, microbiological and radiographic results. If no consensus is reached, a decision will be made by secret vote. We plan to enrol 250 participants in the study, with 80% statistical power and a 5% alpha level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the National Centre for Public Health and Pharmacy (BM/20019/2025). We plan to present our results at relevant national and international conferences and meetings and to submit them for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Moreover, we plan to disseminate the results to important stakeholders in the Hungarian healthcare system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This is the first version of the trial protocol, prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT 2025 guideline (version 1.0, dated 30 September 2025). The trial has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT07211620">NCT07211620</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Papp, M., Turan, C., Kiss, N., Zubek, L., Karim, D. M., Hegyi, P., Molnar, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115344</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115344</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[KInetics of Procalcitonin to Reduce Unnecessary aNtibiotic use (KIPRUN): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial to compare the efficacy and safety of procalcitonin kinetics-guided and absolute procalcitonin value-guided antibiotic initiation in critically ill patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115344</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115344</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116086?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing and validating an electronic health record-embedded AI model for managing multimorbid hospitalisation risk in patients with chronic RESpiratory disease (AiRES): a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116086?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are heterogeneous conditions with a high multimorbidity burden. However, existing risk assessment instruments prioritise physiological measures while overlooking systemic comorbidities. We aim to develop and validate an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded artificial intelligence (AI) model&mdash;AiRES (AI in patients with RESpiratory disease)&mdash;to predict the 30-day, 90-day and 180-day risks of all-cause and index-disease hospitalisations. This model represents a first step towards a clinical decision support tool for personalised multimorbidity management in patients with CRD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>Patients aged &ge;18 years with a validated case definition of asthma and COPD will be identified from Singapore health administrative data (2012&ndash;2020). Candidate predictors will include age, sex, ethnicity, housing type, and comorbidities, measured across multiple care settings as visit frequency, grouped at quarterly intervals in Year 1 and annually for Years 2 and 3 over a 3-year lookback window. We will predict 30-day, 90-day, and 180-day risks of (1) all-cause and (2) asthma/COPD-specific hospital admissions using up to five randomly selected index dates per individual. Three machine learning algorithms&mdash;logistic regression (LR) with Lasso regularisation, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Categorical Boosting&mdash;will be trained using 10-fold cross-validation (CV) with an ensemble feature selection strategy. The optimal model, selected based on performance and feature importance, will be benchmarked against two reference models: a full LR and a Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial regression with hospitalisation history as the sole predictor. Discrimination and calibration will be assessed using internal-external cluster-based and temporal CV. Clinical utility will be evaluated using decision curve analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study obtained ethics approval from the National University of Singapore (NUS-IRB-2024-849). Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, W. Y., Lee, T. Y., Tan, K. B., Koh, M. S., Abisheganaden, J. A., Lam, S. S. W., Chotirmall, S. H., Yadav, C. P., Yii, A. C. A., Tiew, P. Y., Liew, M. F., Sun, Q., Chen, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116086</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116086</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing and validating an electronic health record-embedded AI model for managing multimorbid hospitalisation risk in patients with chronic RESpiratory disease (AiRES): a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116086</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116086</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116226?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants and strategies for implementing guideline-adherent physiotherapy: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116226?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Clinical practice guidelines support evidence-based care and aim to reduce unwarranted variation in healthcare. Despite evidence that guideline-adherent physiotherapy is associated with reduced healthcare utilisation, adherence among physiotherapists remains inconsistent. This scoping review aimed to synthesise evidence on determinants of guideline adherence and implementation strategies in physiotherapy and to identify research gaps relevant to guideline implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PEDro and CINAHL were searched from database inception to July 2023 and updated in July 2025. Grey literature sources, including Grey Literature Report, OpenGrey and Web of Science Conference Proceedings, were also searched. Reference lists of included studies were screened.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies were eligible if they examined determinants of guideline adherence and/or implementation strategies in physiotherapy. Studies involving physiotherapists across all clinical fields and settings were included. Only studies published in English or German were considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Determinants were analysed using qualitative content analysis and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implementation strategies were summarised using Proctor&rsquo;s reporting recommendations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Fifty-eight studies were included: 29 examined determinants, 25 implementation strategies and four both. Determinants were identified across all CFIR domains, with most relating to the Inner Setting and Characteristics of Individuals. Implementation strategies primarily targeted individual-level change, such as education, reminders and feedback, whereas few addressed system-level factors, including organisational leadership or reimbursement structures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Guideline implementation in physiotherapy is shaped by determinants across individual, organisational and system levels, yet current strategies predominantly focus on individual clinicians. This individual-level focus may contribute to the responsibilisation of clinicians for care quality, while organisational and system-level strategies that have shown promise in other fields remain underutilised in physiotherapy. Future implementation initiatives should adopt broader, system-oriented approaches to enhance long-term implementation success.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study registration</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://osf.io/g5cpt/">https://osf.io/g5cpt/</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reiter, N. L., Rosen, D., Erhart, M., Vogel, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116226</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116226</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants and strategies for implementing guideline-adherent physiotherapy: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116226</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116226</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116993?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fatigue after COVID-19 in occupationally exposed workers: prevalence, severity and associated risk factors in a cross-sectional analysis of a multicentre registry study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116993?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>As fatigue is among the most frequent manifestations of post-COVID syndrome (PCS), this study aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of cognitive and physical fatigue after occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection and to identify sociodemographic, clinical and occupational predictors of fatigue severity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis of a multicentre prospective registry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Six German Social Accident Insurance hospitals distributed across Germany, providing standardised post-COVID assessments for individuals with persistent symptoms following occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Workers with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection recognised as an occupational disease or work-related accident who presented with persistent symptoms and were enrolled in a multicentre post-COVID registry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Cognitive and physical fatigue severity assessed using validated self-administered questionnaires (Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale and Wu&#x0308;rzburg Fatigue Inventory for Multiple Sclerosis). Clinical relevance was determined based on established cut-offs reported in the literature. Fatigue severity was operationalised using median splits of the respective subscales to identify factors associated with higher fatigue levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 1511 registry cases, 628 participants had complete fatigue data. Median age was 54 years, 77% were female and most worked in nursing (43%) or educational/care professions (19%). Clinically relevant fatigue was highly prevalent: cognitive fatigue affected 78%&ndash;93% and physical fatigue 87%&ndash;98%. Both fatigue dimensions were positively correlated with older age, work incapacity and persistent symptom burden. In multivariate analyses, a higher number of acute symptoms was associated with lower odds of cognitive fatigue (adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.81), while physical fatigue remained associated with profession (adjusted OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.59). Sex, pre-existing conditions, hospitalisation and variant wave were not significant predictors in either model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Fatigue is a prevalent and disabling PCS-symptom among occupationally exposed workers. Distinct determinants of cognitive and physical fatigue emphasise the need for early recognition, targeted management and rehabilitation strategies to support recovery and work reintegration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kobes, K., Rademacher, C., Kozak, A., Gonschorek, A., Schmehl, I., Seddigh, S., Fu&#x0308;rst, A., Wohlfarth, K., Engel, L., Wefers, J., Wischnat, J., Kleinmu&#x0308;ller, O., Nienhaus, A., Tegenthoff, M., Schwenkreis, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116993</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116993</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fatigue after COVID-19 in occupationally exposed workers: prevalence, severity and associated risk factors in a cross-sectional analysis of a multicentre registry study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116993</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116993</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117937?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer loyalty card study-2 (CLOCS-2): protocol for an observational case-control study focusing on the patient interval in cancer diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117937?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Some cancers are diagnosed late, making them harder to treat. People with an undiagnosed cancer may use over-the-counter medications to manage non-specific cancer-related symptoms that often mimic other more common, easily treatable conditions. Results from the original Cancer Loyalty Card Study (CLOCS) suggest there may be an increase in purchases of pain and indigestion medication 8&ndash;9 months before an ovarian cancer diagnosis. We aim to validate the CLOCS findings by exploring whether a significant change in medication purchases could be an indication for early signs of the following cancer types: oesophageal, stomach (gastric), colorectal (bowel), pancreatic, liver, bladder, endometrial, uterine sarcoma, ovarian and vulval, using data collected through store loyalty cards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Using a retrospective case-control design, we aim to recruit 1450 participants with one of the cancers of interest (cases) and 1450 participants without cancer (controls) in the UK who (or whose household members) hold a loyalty card with at least one participating high street retailer. We will use pre-existing loyalty card data to compare past purchase patterns of cases with those of controls. To assess cancer risk in participants and their purchasing patterns, we will collect information on demographic characteristics, health risk factors, lifestyle habits and behaviours, family history of cancer and any symptoms experienced prior to diagnosis (cases) and in the last year prior to study recruitment (controls). In addition, cases will be asked about their cancer diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>CLOCS-2 was reviewed and approved by the East Midlands-Leicester South Research Ethics Committee (23/EM/0224). Study outcomes will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, presentations to the research communities as well as patients and the public, the study website and other social media outlets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06447064">NCT06447064</A>, CPMS58679; pre-results.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toopchiani, S., Codling, S., Pondeca, Y., Kaur, S., Horeau, K., Brewer, H., Cross, A., Delaney, B., Faisal, A. A., Peters, C., Goulding, J., Hirst, Y., Sundar, S., Flanagan, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117937</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117937</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer loyalty card study-2 (CLOCS-2): protocol for an observational case-control study focusing on the patient interval in cancer diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117937</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117937</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating postoperative pneumatic lymphatic drainage following lymphaticovenous anastomosis for secondary lower extremity lymphoedema in Japan (LVA-PLD trial): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Secondary lower extremity lymphoedema is a chronic progressive condition that frequently develops after cancer treatment and results in persistent swelling, recurrent cellulitis and impaired quality of life. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is an established physiological microsurgical treatment; however, postoperative outcomes vary and evidence-based adjunctive postoperative management remains limited. A novel pneumatic lymphatic drainage (PLD) system has been developed to deliver anatomically directed, pathway-aligned mechanical stimulation that mimics manual lymphatic drainage. Its clinical efficacy following LVA has not yet been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial will enrol adults (&ge;18 years) with unilateral secondary lower extremity lymphoedema (International Society of Lymphology stage I&ndash;II) undergoing LVA. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive PLD plus standard postoperative care or standard postoperative care alone. PLD will be initiated on the day of surgery and continue for 6 months (Day 183). The primary outcome is the rate of improvement in excess limb volume (EV) at Day 183 relative to baseline, calculated from circumferential measurements taken at 4 cm intervals using the truncated cone method, with the contralateral limb serving as an internal control. Secondary outcomes include longitudinal trajectories of EV, improvement in excess limb fluid volume assessed by bioimpedance, the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire, cellulitis incidence and safety outcomes. A total of 64 participants (32 per group) will provide 80% power (two-sided &alpha;=0.05) to detect a 15-percentage-point between-group difference in the rate of improvement in EV at 6 months, assuming a common SD of 20 percentage points and allowing for attrition. Primary analyses will follow the ITT principle using mixed-effects models for repeated measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the Chiba University Certified Review Board (approval number: CRB0119-25; approval date: 15 December 2025) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Japanese Clinical Trials Act. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international scientific conferences, irrespective of study outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>jRCTs032250600.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akita, S., Nishioka, R., Tokunaga, H., Ando, N., Yamada, K., Yamaji, Y., Saito, G., Takahashi, K., Hattori, Y., Hayashi, A., Ando, Y., Nuri, T., Onishi, F., Kadota, H., Shinaoka, A., Takanari, K., Suzuki, Y., Yasunaga, Y., Hanaoka, H., Mitsukawa, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T06:00:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating postoperative pneumatic lymphatic drainage following lymphaticovenous anastomosis for secondary lower extremity lymphoedema in Japan (LVA-PLD trial): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110916?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introduction to secret sharing based secure multiparty computation in health data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110916?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Joint analyses across multiple health datasets can increase statistical power and improve the generalisability of research findings. However, limitations on data sharing often prevent researchers from fully realising these benefits. Existing approaches such as federated analytics involve sharing information, which poses challenges due to data governance and security restrictions.</p>
<p>Secure multiparty computation (SMPC) is a set of cryptographic techniques that allows joint analyses across multiple private datasets with zero information sharing except for the agreed outputs. Despite its transformative potential in health research, SMPC has received relatively little attention within the health data landscape.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This article gives an introduction to secret sharing based SMPC that is accessible with no prior knowledge assumed. We explain how secret sharing techniques work, and the security guarantees they offer. We also discuss SMPC software, and offer our view on the most promising approaches to implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>SMPC has significant potential for enabling privacy-preserving analyses, and could become a standard tool in the future for collaborative health data research. As efforts to improve data access and integration continue, it will be increasingly important for health data researchers to have an understanding of SMPC so they can use it effectively.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerr, S., Escudero, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110916</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110916</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introduction to secret sharing based secure multiparty computation in health data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110916</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110916</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111512?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Moderating role of supervisor support in the association between job demands and distress: a mixed-effects analysis in a population-based cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111512?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To study the association between job demands and distress among working adults and to test whether perceived supervisor support moderates this relationship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Mixed-effects analysis of repeated measures from a population-based cohort study, estimating overall (combined within-person and between-person) associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing (NL-SH), an ongoing Dutch cohort with nationwide recruitment and follow-up including four measurement waves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 989 employed individuals (&ge;12 hours/week) with 1858 observations had complete data on distress, job demands, supervisor support and covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The dependent variable was distress, measured using the 16-item distress subscale (range 0&ndash;32) of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire. Job demands and supervisor support were assessed with subscales from the Job Content Questionnaire. Multilevel linear models were used to estimate main and interaction effects, adjusted for age, sex, educational level, hearing impairment, contract type and chronic diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Higher job demands were associated with greater distress (B=0.22, 95% CI (0.17 to 0.27)). Higher supervisor support was associated with lower distress (B=&ndash;0.26, 95% CI (&ndash;0.38 to &ndash;0.15)). The interaction between job demands and supervisor support was statistically significant (B=-0.02, 95% CI (-0.04 to 0.001), p=0.042). Stratified analyses showed that the association between job demands and distress was stronger among employees with low supervisor support (B=0.27, p&lt;0.001) than among those with high support (B=0.13, p=0.008).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Job demands and supervisor support were independently associated with distress. Supervisor support appeared to buffer the impact of job demands, as the association between job demands and distress was stronger among employees reporting low levels of supervisor support. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening supportive supervisor practices, alongside addressing excessive job demands, as integral components of workplace mental health strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lettinga, H. A. M., Proper, K. I., van Wier, M. F., Kramer, S. E., van Oostrom, S. H., Anema, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111512</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111512</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Moderating role of supervisor support in the association between job demands and distress: a mixed-effects analysis in a population-based cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111512</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111512</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111614?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mistreatment of women during childbirth and its determinants: a cross-sectional study in Mazandaran/Iran]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111614?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study was designed to investigate the mistreatment of women during childbirth and its determining factors in a selected maternity hospital in Mazandaran/Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study was designed in 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Maternal and child clinics in the cities of Amol and Babol in Mazandaran/Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Precipitants</st>
<p>The study population consisted of 215 women who were selected via convenience sampling and were at least 8 weeks postpartum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>All participants in the study reported experiencing at least one form of mistreatment. 42% of cases experienced three types of mistreatment. The highest reported level of mistreatment was related to the poor relationship between women and service providers (88.1%) and physical abuse (80.9%), respectively. The overall satisfaction score for care was 33.96&plusmn;9.17. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that higher maternal age was significantly associated with lower odds of physical mistreatment (OR=0.923, 95% CI 0.865 to 0.985, p=0.016). Women without doula accompaniment during childbirth had higher odds of experiencing a lack of privacy compared with those who had a doula (OR=2.77, 95% CI 1.41 to 5.42, p=0.003), and failure to meet needs (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.13 to 4.28; p=0.020), but significantly lower odds of experiencing poor communication (OR=0.128; 95% CI 0.043 to 0.337; p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results of this study indicated that the prevalence of mistreatment in participants in the selected hospitals was notable. The most reported mistreatment was the lack of effective communication between staff and the patient, followed by physical mistreatment and the lack of respect for privacy. Factors related to mistreatment included the mother&rsquo;s age and the presence of a companion (doula) during delivery.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Firouzbakht, M., Nikpour, M., Sharif-Nia, H., Alijanpour, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111614</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111614</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mistreatment of women during childbirth and its determinants: a cross-sectional study in Mazandaran/Iran]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111614</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111614</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111661?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a single-blind, single-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial: comparison of oxygenation stability between different ventilators in mechanically ventilated patients during intrahospital and interhospital transport]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111661?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Mechanical ventilation during patient transport is a high-risk clinical practice. While the novel Mindray TV80, a high-performance emergency transport ventilator, offers potential advantages for use across complex transport settings, rigorous clinical data comparing its oxygenation performance in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients during transport are lacking. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating the non-inferiority of TV80 to Hamilton T1 in maintaining oxygenation stability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, single-blind, single-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Mechanically ventilated patients (18&ndash;80 years) requiring intrahospital or interhospital transport will be recruited. Eligible patients will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio to the TV80 group (intervention) or Hamilton T1 group (control) using a permuted block design stratified by transport type (intrahospital vs interhospital) via the electronic data capture system. The intervention involves using the assigned ventilator during transport, with parameters replicated from the patient&rsquo;s pre-transport ventilator. The primary outcome is the difference in oxygenation index (P/F) before (within 1 hour) and after (within 1 hour) transport as measured by blood gas analyser. Continuous SpO<SUB>2</SUB> monitoring will be performed throughout the transport period to capture real-time oxygenation changes. Secondary outcomes include transport preparation time, changes in PaCO<SUB>2</SUB> and pH, variability of ventilator parameters (tidal volume, FiO<SUB>2</SUB>) and vital signs (heart rate, SpO<SUB>2</SUB>, mean arterial pressure) and incidence of adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs. Sample size is 98 (49 per group) to achieve 80% power with a non-inferiority margin of &ndash;30 mm Hg. Pre-specified subgroup analyses by transport type will be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine (approval number: LSY-2025-0903). Written informed consent will be obtained from participants&rsquo; legal representatives. All results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07198269">NCT07198269</A> (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiang, S., Yang, M., Wang, H., Guo, X., Wei, J., Qi, W., Li, K., Xu, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111661</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111661</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a single-blind, single-centre, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial: comparison of oxygenation stability between different ventilators in mechanically ventilated patients during intrahospital and interhospital transport]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111661</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111661</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111701?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a community-reported outcome measure of the value of school-based screening programmes for Indigenous populations: a mixed-methods study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111701?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>For priority populations, such as Indigenous children, school-based screening programmes can increase equitable access to care. However, current traditional economic measures evaluating the effectiveness of many screening programmes in Australia do not capture the value perceived by those at the intersection of the benefits, including children and families, communities, health workers and teachers or the differences between Western-Anglo and Indigenous conceptualisations of health. This mixed-methods study aims to develop and validate a Community Reported Outcome Measure (CROM) of school health screening programmes based on concepts of value of health and healthcare and school screening programmes from the perspective of Indigenous peoples. The purpose of the tool is to provide a robustly developed and validated tool to assess the experiences of school health screening programmes from the perspective of Indigenous stakeholders including families, communities, health workers and teachers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This mixed-methods study will be conducted in three stages in accordance with regulatory and international consensus guidance: (1) concept elicitation to construct a conceptual framework of value in school screening; (2) item generation and mapping to the conceptual framework and (3) a psychometric evaluation of the CROM. Phase 1 concept elicitation: this involves an umbrella review (phase 1.1); yarning circles with communities in New South Wales (phase 1.2); concept integration of the umbrella review and yarning circles data (phase 1.3) and an online e-Delphi study to ensure the framework of value is nationally representative (phase 1.4). Phase 2 item generation and mapping: this involves item generation (phase 2.1) and cognitive testing of the item pool (phase 2.2). Phase 3 psychometric evaluation: this involves field testing (phase 3.1) and assessing the structural validity of the CROM via Rasch analysis (phase 3.2).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was reviewed and approved by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (Ref: REC-0397) and State Education Research and Partnerships (Ref: SERAP 6500). The results of this study will be presented at relevant academic and non-scientific conferences and meetings and published in high-impact peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mealings, K., Hughes, S. E., Halvorsen, L., Nash, K., Coe, L.-J., MacQueen, D., Ward, K., McMahon, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111701</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111701</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a community-reported outcome measure of the value of school-based screening programmes for Indigenous populations: a mixed-methods study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111701</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111701</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112032?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gender-related facilitators and barriers in implementing combined lifestyle interventions for individuals with knee osteoarthritis and overweight or obesity: perspectives of healthcare professionals and patients in a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112032?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Weight loss through combined lifestyle interventions (CLIs) can slow down knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression. However, gender-related factors may influence both the implementation of and participation in CLIs. Therefore, the aims were to identify gender-related facilitators and barriers to CLI implementation among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and uptake and adherence among individuals with early-stage knee OA and overweight or obesity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted in this qualitative study. Thematic analysis, combining inductive and deductive approaches, was performed according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>HCPs and individuals with knee OA and overweight or obesity were interviewed in Dutch between December 2023 and May 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>16 HCPs who referred or delivered a CLI and 23 individuals with knee OA and overweight or obesity who participated in a CLI were purposively recruited. 16 participants identified themselves as women and 7 as men; no other gender identities were reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>HCPs experienced resistance to CLIs of both men and women. Additionally, HCPs perceived that women were more open and available to participate in CLIs, tended to prioritise others over themselves and often lacked familial support compared with men. Women valued trust, preferred female HCPs and struggled with self-prioritisation. Men were motivated by female HCPs and participants due to their empathy and interaction. Across men and women, barriers included conflicting HCP advice, work stress, caregiving tasks and lack of discipline, while social environment support was a key facilitator.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Addressing gender-related facilitators and barriers in the design and implementation of the CLI may improve long-term engagement and efficacy in individuals with knee OA and overweight or obesity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON), managed by the CCMO: NL75367.078.20</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hulshof, C. M., Jansen, N. E., Gharbaran, P., Schiphof, D., Berkers, P. P., van Middelkoop, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112032</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112032</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gender-related facilitators and barriers in implementing combined lifestyle interventions for individuals with knee osteoarthritis and overweight or obesity: perspectives of healthcare professionals and patients in a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112032</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112032</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breaking barriers: mental health literacy and stigma in Addis Ababas schools - a qualitative study in Ethiopia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore the mental health literacy of school communities and stigma against students with mental disorders in Ethiopia&rsquo;s specific context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using in-depth and key informant interview guides.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Nine teaching and psychosocial support staff participants (five men and four women; years of experience ranging between 2 and 35; three school counsellors, two clinical nurses, two special needs teachers, one counselling psychologist and one class principal teacher) were purposefully recruited on the basis of their proximity to the students&rsquo; academic Journeys and health-related issues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Key Informant Interviews were conducted with nine participants working at four high schools (two private schools, one affiliated with a church and two public schools, one with a programme for special needs students) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study revealed that there is a significant lack of awareness and misconceptions about mental health issues within the school community, and that students suffering from mental disorders often face discrimination and stigma. These factors contribute to delays in seeking care, which may result in poor coping strategies. School-based programmes aimed at promoting mental well-being and reducing the stigma observed at the study sites are inadequate for addressing these challenges effectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this study, we identified key challenges among school communities, as perceived and reported by school-based professionals, including a lack of awareness, misconceptions and notable stigma against schoolchildren with mental disorders. To establish a well-coordinated school mental health system, governance should focus on (1) establishing comprehensive mental health literacy and promotion, (2) reducing stigma and (3) implementing service delivery and/or referral programmes within schools in Addis Ababa. To ensure a holistic and inclusive mental health support in Ethiopian schools, future studies should engage students and their parents directly triangulating these professional observations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Megersa, S. W., Ware, F. A., Dehning, S., Jobst, A., Girma, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112423</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112423</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breaking barriers: mental health literacy and stigma in Addis Ababas schools - a qualitative study in Ethiopia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112423</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112630?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Primary caregivers practices and perceptions on antibiotic use and resistance: a one health qualitative study in rural South India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112630?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global public health threat driven by interactions between human, animal and environmental factors. Rural settings in low- and middle-income countries may face increased risk due to unregulated antibiotic use, close human&ndash;animal interactions, and environmental contamination. This study explored community-level knowledge, attitudes and practices related to antibiotic use and resistance among caregivers of children in rural South India using a One Health perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using focus group discussions and thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Four rural villages in Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Seventy-seven primary caregivers of children aged 2&ndash;12 years from households with backyard animals, purposively selected from a rural cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three themes emerged. First, human health practices included reliance on home remedies, reuse of prescriptions, self-medication and incomplete antibiotic courses alongside misconceptions about antibiotics. Second, environmental factors such as untreated water consumption, open defecation, poor drainage and improper waste disposal were perceived to increase infection risks. Third, animal-related pathways included close child&ndash;animal contact, antibiotic use in livestock and unsafe disposal of animal waste. Limited healthcare access and transport costs influenced treatment-seeking behaviour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Interconnected caregiver practices, environmental conditions and animal husbandry behaviours create multiple pathways for antimicrobial resistance transmission. Integrated, community-based interventions addressing behaviour change, healthcare access and environmental management are essential to support antibiotic stewardship within a One Health framework.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charan, K., Lakshmi Kandhan, V., Rishika, R. S., Kalimuthu, P., Pon Ruban, A. C., Karthikeyan, M. B., Sahoo, K. C., Ponnaiah, M., Chethrapilly Purushothaman, G. K., Diwan, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112630</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112630</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Primary caregivers practices and perceptions on antibiotic use and resistance: a one health qualitative study in rural South India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112630</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112630</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112817?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Capturing risk awareness and disease burden in cardiovascular (risk) management: development and content validation of a new module for the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112817?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and is associated with a broad range of physical, emotional and social burdens. Existing tools such as Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation and WHO CVD risk charts identify clinical risk factors but fail to capture patient-perceived burden and the risk of burden awareness. The Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool, a validated, person-centred instrument, offers a more holistic approach. The aim of the current study is to develop and validate a new module within the ABCC-tool for patients with an elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk or CVD (cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) module).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>A mixed-methods design was used across four phases and expert meetings to identify the items for the module. All phases took place in the Netherlands. Phase 1 (literature search) was performed in 2021, phase 2 (semistructured interviews) was completed between January and October 2021, phase 3 (survey) was completed in November 2023 and December 2024, and phase 4 (semistructured interviews) was completed in January 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Phase 2 involved 14 experts by experience (patients with CVD or people at elevated risk) and 10 healthcare professionals in the field of CVD. Phase 3 included 86 healthcare professionals. Phase 4 included 12 experts by experience. In total, four expert meetings took place, attended by three experts by experience, nine healthcare professionals and seven researchers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The module was refined iteratively, using qualitative and quantitative insights at each phase of development. The model was only finalised after thorough content validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No suitable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) focusing specifically on CVRM were identified in the literature. Interviews revealed significant burdens in terms of physical, emotional and social burdens. Feedback from expert meetings and validation rounds led to substantive refinement. The final module contains 10 items and was deemed valid by both experts by experience and healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The CVRM module of the ABCC-tool has been systematically developed and validated in terms of content. The final module focuses on the multidimensional burden of CVD and dealing with its risk factors and aims to support self-management. The module complements existing risk assessment tools by focusing on the burden experienced by the patient and the burden resulting from risk awareness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Debie, V. H., Ottenheijm, R. P., Gruiskens, J., Mikulic, S., van Schayck, O. C., Muris, J. W., Willemsen, R. T. A., Kroon, A., Gidding-Slok, A. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112817</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112817</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Capturing risk awareness and disease burden in cardiovascular (risk) management: development and content validation of a new module for the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112817</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112817</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112893?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How does prior infection and vaccination relate to the risk of incident SARS-CoV-2 infection/reinfection? A prospective cohort study among nine clinical sites in the USA, February 2021 to January 2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112893?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To estimate the relative effectiveness of vaccination (0, 1, 2, &ge;3 doses) and prior infection, in combination, on risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection/reinfection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We recruited participants for the Aegis Study from nine clinics across five US states. Participants must have been 18 years or older, had a history of a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 antigen or antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 with documentation or had no suspected or documented prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, intended to remain in study area for the next 12 months, and had elevated risk of future SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Exclusion criteria included acute illness, contraindication to phlebotomy, use of immunosuppressants or receipt of systemic immunoglobulins.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used extended Cox regression with robust standard errors to estimate the association between time-varying number of vaccine doses and baseline prior infection on risk of infection/reinfection among a prospective cohort of US adults between February 2021 and January 2023, accounting for censoring using inverse probability of censoring weights. Additionally, to quantify possible exposure misclassification of prior infection by comparing prior infection operationalised as (1) documented/self-reported prior infection and (2) documented/self-reported prior infection plus nucleocapsid antibody indication of prior infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of n=2178 who completed enrolment, n=1887 adults (63% female; 65% non-Latino White) contributed 366 905 days of observation. Participants contributed an average of 7.2 months of follow-up between February 2021 and January 2023. 28% (n=533) of individuals were infected or reinfected during the study period. Similar relative effectiveness was observed between the two different operationalisations of prior infection. After correction for prior infection status in the nearly 16% of those without study documentation of prior infection who had nucleocapsid antibody levels comparable to documented cases, relative to the unvaccinated with no prior infection, estimated effectiveness generally increased with increasing vaccine doses and prior infection (without prior infection: one (17%, 95% CI &ndash;31% to 47%), two (49%, 95% CI 31% to 63%), &ge;three (71%, 95% CI 58% to 80%) vaccine doses; with prior infection: none (56%, 95% CI 30% to 72%), one (71%, 95% CI 42% to 86%), two (65%, 95% CI 49% to 76%), &ge;three (80%, 95% CI 68% to 88%) vaccine doses). Pairwise comparisons at each vaccine dose (ref: no prior infection) revealed that prior infection provided additional protection, with stronger relationships for no and one dose (none: 56% (95% CI 30% to 72%), one: 66% (95% CI 28% to 84%), two: 31% (95% CI 7% to 49%), &ge;three 31% (95% CI 0% to 53%)). There was a marked decrease in the protection offered by vaccination, prior infection, or both in the Omicron period versus pre-Omicron period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In our real-world observational sample, vaccination (with two and &ge;three vaccine doses of any Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization approved vaccine) and prior infection conferred benefits for protection against infection/reinfection. Re-classification of prior infection status based on antibody levels had little effect on results.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judge, A., Beidelman, E. T., Allison, D. B., Dickinson, S., Gadde, K. M., Golzarri Arroyo, L., Ioannidis, J. P., Macagno, A. L., Macy, J. T., Maki, K. C., Perlman, S., Ricciardi, M. J., Rosenberg, M., Ludema, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112893</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112893</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How does prior infection and vaccination relate to the risk of incident SARS-CoV-2 infection/reinfection? A prospective cohort study among nine clinical sites in the USA, February 2021 to January 2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112893</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112893</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113384?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prediction of inpatient falls and key predictors using machine learning applied to electronic health records: a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital in Tu&#x0308;rkiye]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113384?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Traditional fall risk tools are often inaccurate and burdensome. This study aims to develop a predictive model for inpatient falls and identify the most influential variables using machine learning applied to electronic health record data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A large tertiary university hospital in Tu&#x0308;rkiye.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult patients (&ge;18 years) hospitalised in a university hospital between January 2017 and June 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Occurrence of inpatient falls recorded in incident reporting systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 518 fallers were identified and compared with 3121 non-fallers. Fallers were significantly older (median 68.5 vs 64 years, p&lt;0.001), had longer hospital stays (16 vs 12 days, p&lt;0.001) and higher comorbidity burden (p&lt;0.001). They were also more likely to receive high fall-risk medications (86% vs 76%, p&lt;0.001) and had a higher prevalence of mental disorders (26.3% vs 17.2%, p&lt;0.001). The random forest quantile classifier demonstrated the highest discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) 0.821, 95% CI 0.781 to 0.861), with balanced sensitivity (0.799, 95% CI 0.734 to 0.867) and specificity (0.722, 95% CI 0.691 to 0.755). Pairwise comparisons using DeLong&rsquo;s test showed significantly higher AUC compared with several models (adjusted p=0.001), while differences with eXtreme Gradient Boosting were not significant (p=0.240). Key predictors included comorbidity burden, age, number of fall-risk-increasing medications and laboratory variables such as eosinophil and basophil counts, blood urea nitrogen, sodium and red blood cell count.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Machine learning models using electronic health data can predict inpatient falls and reveal key risk factors. The random forest quantile classifier offers a promising approach for improving fall risk prediction in imbalanced clinical datasets.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baris, V. K., Hudaverdi, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113384</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113384</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prediction of inpatient falls and key predictors using machine learning applied to electronic health records: a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital in Tu&#x0308;rkiye]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113384</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113384</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113491?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analytical performance of four HbA1c point-of-care devices: a cross-sectional evaluation in low- and middle-income countries]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113491?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement is essential for managing diabetes, yet limited data exist on the performance of point-of-care (POC) HbA1c devices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study evaluated the analytical performance and usability of HbA1c devices in different LMIC settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>This prospective, cross-sectional multicentre study evaluated the accuracy and usability of four POC devices (i-SENS A1Care, HemoCue HbA1c 501 System, Abbott Afinion 2 and Siemens DCA Vantage) against a laboratory-based HbA1c method at two hospitals in Nigeria and Cambodia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults with or without diabetes and haemoglobin &ge;8 g/dL were enrolled.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary objective was to evaluate HbA1c POC device accuracy versus laboratory reference testing; secondary objectives evaluated device usability and technical characteristics when used by trained professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Capillary and venous blood samples were tested on all devices using two cartridge lots followed by reference testing. Usability was assessed via operator questionnaires. Accuracy was evaluated using regression slopes, intercept, absolute bias at 30, 48 and 75 mmol/mol, and Bland-Altman analysis, including capillary-venous concordance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 248 participants completed all study procedures (n=125 in Cambodia, n=123 in Nigeria). Siemens DCA Vantage and Abbott Afinion 2 showed strong agreement with the reference method, with no clinically significant differences and narrow limits of agreement. In contrast, i-SENS A1Care and HemoCue HbA1c 501 System displayed greater bias, especially at elevated HbA1c levels. Most results fell within limits of agreement, though high-HbA1c outliers were more common with the A1Care and HbA1c 501 System devices. Usability feedback was positive overall, when devices were rated across various dimensions, such as clarity of instructions, safety and labelling, although limited user sample size constrains the generalisability of these findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Siemens DCA Vantage and Abbott Afinion 2 demonstrated reliable accuracy and usability. In contrast, i-SENS A1Care and HemoCue HbA1c 501 System require cautious interpretation at high HbA1c levels. Ongoing evaluation is critical to ensure the appropriate use of POC devices in diverse clinical settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06170515">NCT06170515</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, P., Lenters-Westra, E., Choun, K., Fasanmade, O., Erkosar, B., Watson, M., Haldane, C., Vetter, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113491</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113491</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analytical performance of four HbA1c point-of-care devices: a cross-sectional evaluation in low- and middle-income countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113491</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113491</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114703?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study of remimazolam besylate for general anaesthesia and population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics in elderly, hepatic or renal-insufficient patients: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114703?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, is characterised by rapid onset and recovery, metabolism independent of hepatic or renal function and haemostability. Despite the above pharmacokinetic (PK) advantages and potential benefits for renal- or hepatic-insufficient patients and the elderly patients, the effects and population pharmacokinetics&ndash;pharmacodynamics (popPK/PD) of remimazolam for general anaesthesia in elderly, hepatic or renal insufficient patients from large, randomised controlled trials remain unknown.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a randomised controlled single-blind multicentre study. Patients undergoing selective surgeries (eg, abdominal, orthopaedic or urologic procedures) will be screened and randomised into the elderly (age &ge;65 years), hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh class B or C) or renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m&sup2;) groups, with a target of 752 subjects per group. Patients in each group will randomly receive remimazolam or propofol for general anaesthesia induction and maintenance. The primary outcome is the quality of induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia (the time of maintaining bispectral index (BIS) 35&ndash;65 divided by the time for test-drug administration). Secondary outcomes are PK and PD characteristics of remimazolam in the target populations, which include: the incidence of hypotension; incidence and amount of vasoconstrictor agents; area under the curves of blood pressure over time; pain on injection; eye opening time; extubation time; time to reach modified Aldrete scores 9; nursing delirium screening scores and incidence of intraoperative awareness. Exploring outcomes are remimazolam besylate plasma concentrations; the ideal target remimazolam besylate plasma concentrations (plasma concentrations corresponding to a BIS value between 35 and 65) and the optimal dosage regimen based on the popPK/PD model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, on 30 August 2024, and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The findings of this study will be disseminated through presentations at relevant conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400089033.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tang, M., Zhu, M., Chen, G., Zhu, T., Yin, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114703</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114703</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study of remimazolam besylate for general anaesthesia and population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics in elderly, hepatic or renal-insufficient patients: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114703</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114703</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114763?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring transitions in care for individuals living with and beyond cancer: A qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114763?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Cancer care involves multiple healthcare providers across various settings. Each time the responsibility of care is transferred from one healthcare provider or setting, referred to as transitions in care (TiC), there is an increased risk of medical error, patient dissatisfaction with care and poor outcomes. The objective of this study is to explore patient perspectives and experiences with TiC during cancer care, and to identify perceived gaps in care during TiC among individuals living with and beyond cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study using the interpretive descriptive approach was used to generate clinically relevant insights. Participants were recruited between 1 September 2022 and 9 September 2023, using purposive sampling to obtain a diverse sample. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed with thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted in Alberta, Canada. Cancer care in Alberta is provided through a publicly funded, single-payer healthcare system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>31 interviews were conducted, with three themes emerging: (1) Communication as a key driver of continuity and quality during TiC, (2) Complexity and fragmentation create variation and confusion in care and (3) From system to person: how system failure and strengths shape individual experiences of TiC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study highlights the multifaceted nature of TiC among individuals living with and beyond cancer and emphasizes the need for patient-centred, coordinated approaches to improve the quality of care for individuals living with and beyond cancer. The findings highlight the emotional strain during TiC, which can be eased when patients feel informed, supported and involved in decision-making. Survivors can apply this by preparing questions in advance and engaging with support networks. Whereas providers can offer check-ins and clear next steps during TiC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rana, B., Kersen, J., Smith, C., Hezam, A., Sauro, K. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114763</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114763</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring transitions in care for individuals living with and beyond cancer: A qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114763</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114763</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115088?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the interplay of family dynamics and pregnancy supplement adherence among married women of reproductive age: a qualitative study from rural Bangladesh]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115088?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine how household members, community health research workers (CHRWs) and broader social networks influenced pregnant women&rsquo;s capabilities, opportunities and motivations to consume a daily balanced-energy protein (BEP) supplement or a multiple micronutrient supplement (MMS) in the context of an effectiveness trial in rural Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>In-depth interviews, group interviews, focus group discussions, thematic analysis using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Gaibandha, Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Women (n=32) who had completed participation in the TARGET-BEP randomised trial, their husbands (n=13) and mothers-in-law (n=13), who participated in 13 group interviews, and CHRWs (n=39) who participated in six focus group discussions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p><I>Capability</I> to adhere to BEP and MMS was strengthened when family members understood the value of supplements and actively supported supplementation. Children emerged as unexpected facilitators, reminding mothers to consume supplements and tracking intake. <I>Opportunity</I> to use supplements consistently was enhanced by women&rsquo;s educational attainment and the availability of household resources. Finally, <I>motivation</I> to take the supplements was influenced by many actors including neighbours, who could offer support but also often transmitted rumours and taboos, and CHRWs, who adeptly adapted adherence messages to the local context and to women&rsquo;s specific concerns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>To improve antenatal supplement adherence and maternal&ndash;infant health in Bangladesh and similar contexts, pregnancy nutrition programmes should move beyond the woman-as-sole-agent paradigm by: (1) co-designing messages for husbands, mothers-in-law, children and neighbours in conversation with effective community health workers, such as those working in the TARGET-BEP trial; (2) equipping community health workers with flexible, family-engaging counselling strategies; and (3) complementing women&rsquo;s education gains with gender-transformative and family-inclusive interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov <A HREF="NCT05576207">NCT05576207</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mondal, P. P., de Boer, M., Rahman, A., Khaled, N., Zavala, E., Haque, R., Ali, H., Siddiqua, T. J., Afsana, K., Christian, P., Thorne-Lyman, A. L., Kalbarczyk, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115088</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115088</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the interplay of family dynamics and pregnancy supplement adherence among married women of reproductive age: a qualitative study from rural Bangladesh]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115088</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115088</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115297?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of parathyroidectomy versus non-surgical management on renal outcomes in primary hyperparathyroidism: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115297?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) increases the risk of renal stones and progressive renal dysfunction. Parathyroidectomy is recommended for patients with renal involvement, yet whether surgery improves renal outcomes compared with non-surgical management remains unclear. Prior reviews have focused mainly on biochemical or skeletal outcomes, included few renal events and largely predate recent large cohort studies using contemporary methods to evaluate renal stones, chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and long-term estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline. A contemporary renal-focused synthesis is needed to clarify the true renal benefits of parathyroidectomy. We aim to evaluate the effect of parathyroidectomy versus non-surgical management on renal stones and broader renal outcomes in adults with PHPT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P)-aligned protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing parathyroidectomy with non-surgical management in adults (&ge;18 years) with PHPT. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched from inception to 5 November 2025. Eligible studies include randomised trials, non-randomised interventional studies and observational comparative designs. Studies without a comparator, those focused exclusively on secondary or normocalcaemic hyperparathyroidism and case reports or series will be excluded. Primary outcomes are renal stones and renal functional outcomes (eg, CKD progression, &ge;30% decline in eGFR, dialysis initiation). Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life and adverse events. Two reviewers will independently screen records, extract data and assess risk of bias (Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions). Random-effects models will be used where appropriate, and heterogeneity assessed using I&sup2;. Publication bias will be assessed using appropriate quantitative or qualitative methods based on the available evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required as only published data will be used. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251240480.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay, M., Straus, S. E., Lodhi, S., Khan, A., Bapat, P., Lipscombe, L. L., Eskander, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115297</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115297</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of parathyroidectomy versus non-surgical management on renal outcomes in primary hyperparathyroidism: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115297</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115297</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Digital cognitive behavioural therapy for quality of life and psychological outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently accompanied by anxiety, depression and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Psychological comorbidities worsen symptom burden, daily functioning and self-management and are associated with more frequent exacerbations and higher mortality. Digital cognitive behavioural therapy (dCBT), in which core cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) content is delivered predominantly via web-based or app-based platforms, offers a potentially scalable approach to addressing these needs. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has yet synthesised randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence on the effects of dCBT on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adults with COPD. This protocol describes the planned methods for such a review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will include RCTs enrolling adults (&ge;18 years) with COPD that compare dCBT with usual care, wait-list, attention control, non-CBT psychological or educational interventions, or other non-CBT digital interventions. For this review, dCBT will be defined as an intervention that explicitly states a CBT framework or CBT techniques, delivers most therapeutic content through digital platforms and uses digital CBT as the principal active component. Blended or multicomponent programmes will be eligible only when the dCBT component is clearly identifiable and central to the intervention. The primary outcomes will be PROs assessed by validated PRO measures, including disease-specific or generic HRQoL and psychological symptoms (anxiety and depression). Secondary outcomes will include other PROs such as disease-specific symptom burden, psychological distress or well-being, and self-efficacy where reported. We will search PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CNKI, Wanfang Data and SinoMed from inception to 30 November 2025, without language restrictions. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool. Where appropriate, we will conduct random-effects meta-analyses, with subgroup, sensitivity and (if feasible) meta-regression analyses to explore heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence for key outcomes will be graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review and meta-analysis will use data extracted exclusively from published randomised controlled trials and other publicly available sources. No new data will be collected directly from individual participants, and no identifiable personal information will be obtained; therefore, formal approval from a research ethics committee and informed consent are not required. The review will be carried out in accordance with established methodological guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations, and review-related data will be curated and made available as appropriate in the final report.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251246582.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fang, L., Su, Y., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115423</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115423</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Digital cognitive behavioural therapy for quality of life and psychological outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115423</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115546?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ankle Fracture FIXation surgery with or without Tourniquet (AFFIXT): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115546?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Ankle fracture fixation surgery may be performed with or without the use of a tourniquet. Surgeons who use a tourniquet report reduced intraoperative bleeding, which improves the visualisation of anatomical structures. This may facilitate more accurate fracture fixation and restoration of the anatomical configuration of the ankle joint, potentially leading to improved functional outcomes. An additional proposed benefit of tourniquet use is reduced operative time. In contrast, surgeons who choose not to use a tourniquet report concerns that it may exacerbate postoperative pain and increase the risk of venous thromboembolism, surgical site infection and other complications. However, existing clinical trials are limited by small sample sizes and high risk of bias, preventing the ability to draw robust conclusions. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the potential benefits and risks of tourniquet use in ankle fracture fixation surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study comprises a two-centre, participant-blinded and surgeon-blinded parallel-arm RCT and an integrated qualitative interview study. A computer-generated randomisation service will allocate up to 50 patients to undergo ankle fracture fixation surgery either with or without the use of a tourniquet. Participants will be followed up for 3 months postoperatively. Primary outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, data completeness, success of blinding and adherence to allocated intervention. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, quality of the surgical field, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusions, procedure duration, skin assessment, awareness of tourniquet use, health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L), Olerud-Molander Ankle Score and intraoperative and postoperative complications. The integrated qualitative study will consist of semistructured interviews with up to 12 patients and 12 trauma and orthopaedic surgeons (~24 interviews). Interviews will explore perspectives on the feasibility trial, identify factors associated with unblinding and examine barriers and potential solutions to the design and delivery of a future definitive trial. Interviews will be analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>National Research Ethics Committee (East of England-Essex) approved this study on the 8 May 2025 (REC 25/EE/0051). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN91783787">ISRCTN91783787</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farhan-Alanie, M. M., Huhulea, C., Williams, M., Arif, A., Kumar, P. R., Skipper, O. J. S., McArthur, J., Parsons, J., Seers, K., Griffin, X. L., Bruce, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115546</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115546</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ankle Fracture FIXation surgery with or without Tourniquet (AFFIXT): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115546</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115546</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115825?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Human-animal cross-host infection and environmental contamination of Soil-transmitted helminths in the Philippines: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115825?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections remain a significant cause of morbidity worldwide. Due to the growing complexity of its transmission dynamics, which involve cross-host infections and persisting environmental contamination, the control strategies against STH continue to face drawbacks. In the Philippines, literature exploring the tripartite arm of the One Health approach remains scant; thus, to strengthen the integration of the One Health framework in the current Philippine One Health agenda, a comprehensive mapping of the local literature supporting this concept is necessary. This scoping review aims to map existing evidence on human&ndash;animal cross-host infection of STH and the extent of environmental contamination with STH in the Philippines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the procedures established by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Eligible literature for review from 2006 to 2026 will be retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest and Health Research and Development Information Network. Studies must contain cases of cross-host infection STH (ie, human STH infecting animals or animal STH infecting humans) or the prevalence of STH in environmental samples in the Philippines. The final selection of sources for review will begin after two independent reviewers achieve &ge;75% agreement and a Cohen&rsquo;s Kappa score between 0.61 and 1.00 on source selection in a pilot test. Data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers using a modified data extraction tool adapted from JBI. Extracted data will be summarised descriptively and visually using tables and layered geographic information system maps along with a narrative summary. The search strategy was developed between October and November 2025. Data extraction is scheduled from May to June 2026, with the study anticipated to be completed by August 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>An ethical approval is not required for this scoping review protocol. As a comprehensive summary of cases of STH at human&ndash;animal&ndash;environment interfaces, the results of this scoping review will be presented at local and international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed, open-access journal for maximum reach and knowledge translation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Review registration</st>
<p>OSF <A HREF="https://osf.io/e9qdk">https://osf.io/e9qdk</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deocades, E. C., Gomez, I. N. B., Martin I, G. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115825</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115825</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Human-animal cross-host infection and environmental contamination of Soil-transmitted helminths in the Philippines: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115825</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115825</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116163?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experiences, perceptions and preferences regarding medical decision-making in South Korea: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of the general public]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116163?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Active patient involvement is a core principle of patient-centred care, yet public experiences of medical decision-making in non-Western settings remain underexamined. In South Korea, nationwide evidence on how adults experience, perceive and prefer medical decision-making is limited. This study, therefore, examined Korean adults&rsquo; experiences, perceptions and preferences regarding medical decision-making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was conducted between March and April 2025 using online data collection for adults aged 19&ndash;59 years and face-to-face interviews for those aged 60 years or older.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This nationwide survey was conducted in South Korea.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1081 Korean adults were recruited using proportional quotas for sex, age group and region. After excluding withdrawals and invalid responses, 1000 were included (response rate 92.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 70.4% of respondents reported at least one significant health-related decision in the past 2 years. Although 34.1% reported making their most recent decision independently, a larger proportion preferred collaborative decision-making involving clinicians and/or family members. The clinician&rsquo;s explanation was the most influential factor (77.4%). Preferences for primary decision-maker varied by clinical context: patient-led decisions were favoured for low-risk interventions such as vaccination (78.5%), whereas physician involvement was preferred for life-threatening illness (86.2%). Communication ratings were highest for presentation of treatment options (mean score 3.56&plusmn;0.79 on a 5-point scale) and lowest for explanation of potential treatment risks (mean score 3.20&plusmn;0.89). Participants satisfied with decision outcomes reported higher communication quality (p&lt;0.001), while those reporting neutral satisfaction (37.1%) resembled dissatisfied participants (4.1%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Medical decision-making was common, but respondents&rsquo; experiences did not always match their preference for collaborative involvement. The findings suggest that strengthening patient-centred care in South Korea will require not only improvements in patient&ndash;clinician communication, but also attention to family involvement and structural conditions such as limited consultation time and current reimbursement arrangements.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, M. J., Yoo, S. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116163</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116163</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experiences, perceptions and preferences regarding medical decision-making in South Korea: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of the general public]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116163</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116408?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of serum sodium and geriatric nutritional risk index with fragility fractures in type 2 diabetes: a 10-year retrospective cohort study in Western China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116408?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate the associations among serum sodium, Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) and the risks of fragility fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The restricted cubic spline model was used to analyse the relationships between exposures (serum sodium and GNRI) and the risks of fragility fractures. The independent and combined effects between exposures and fragility fractures were examined using the Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to further examine the relationships between exposures and fragility fractures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>6221 participants diagnosed with T2D between January 2009 and March 2020 who were older than 45 years were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Assessing the risks of fragility fractures in patients with T2D based on discharge diagnoses in the hospital discharge records.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Serum sodium and fragility fractures had a U-shaped relationship, while GNRI and fragility fractures had a reverse S-shaped relationship. In the fully adjusted model 3, low sodium was significantly linked to around double the elevated risks of fragility fractures (HR, 1.87; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.83). Moderate (HR, 1.60; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.12) and low (HR, 2.28; 95% CI 1.40 to 3.71) GNRI levels were associated with increased risks of fragility fractures in the model 1. In the joint model 4, low sodium in conjunction with moderate (HR, 2.35; 95% CI 1.29 to 4.28) and low (HR, 3.62; 95% CI 1.50 to 8.71) GNRI levels significantly elevated the risks of fragility fractures. The associations between exposures and fragility fractures were more likely in individuals older than 60 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Low sodium and low GNRI levels were associated with increased risks of fragility fractures in patients with T2D. Clinicians should carefully monitor serum sodium levels and nutritional status, and consider early intervention to lower the incidence of fragility fractures in older patients with T2D.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeng, Y., Ye, D., Yu, T., Zhang, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116408</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116408</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of serum sodium and geriatric nutritional risk index with fragility fractures in type 2 diabetes: a 10-year retrospective cohort study in Western China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116408</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116408</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117799?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sociodemographic factors associated with the utilisation of specialist palliative care in individuals with end-stage kidney disease: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117799?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), whether receiving dialysis or conservative care, experience high symptom burden and limited life expectancy, indicating substantial palliative care needs. Integrating palliative care into kidney care is vital for comprehensive ESKD management, but access remains uneven across sociodemographic groups. Identifying and addressing these disparities is key to ensuring equitable care and improving patient outcomes. This study aims to explore sociodemographic factors associated with specialist palliative care utilisation among people with ESKD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study protocol outlines a scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature using an established methodological framework by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), and reporting will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Relevant literature will be identified through a multi-database (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO) and grey literature search strategy designed alongside a health sciences librarian. To be included, articles must involve individuals with ESKD and report on how sociodemographic factors influence access to and utilisation of specialist palliative care services. Results of the search will be screened independently by two reviewers and data from included studies will be extracted independently and in duplicate. A narrative and thematic analysis will be conducted to identify key themes related to sociodemographic influences on specialist palliative care access and utilisation among individuals with ESKD, with particular attention to differences between kidney care modalities (dialysis vs conservative care) and the extent to which intersectionality of sociodemographic factors has been examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Findings will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Results will identify patient-related factors influencing access to specialist palliative care in ESKD and remaining gaps in the literature, informing future research and policy to support equitable care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jameson, E., Brown, P. P., Bruni, A., Wassef, M., Chang, R., Milne, K., Berry, J., Bonares, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117799</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117799</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sociodemographic factors associated with the utilisation of specialist palliative care in individuals with end-stage kidney disease: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117799</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117799</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118656?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Technology-enabled sexual health promotion for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118656?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Technology-enabled approaches are increasingly used to support health education, yet the extent and characteristics of digital interventions addressing sexual health promotion for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) remain unclear. Individuals with IDD often experience limited access to developmentally appropriate sexuality education, highlighting the need to understand how technology is being used to support learning, safety and autonomy. This scoping review aims to map peer-reviewed evidence on technology-enabled sexual health promotion for individuals with IDD, including intervention characteristics, target populations, sexual health content and reported outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol follows the Population&ndash;Concept&ndash;Context framework and is developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidance; the scoping review will be reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Electronic database searches will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase for studies published in English between 2010 and 2025. The preliminary search strings were developed in consultation with a health sciences librarian and will be refined iteratively, if required, during the review process. Eligible studies will include peer-reviewed empirical research examining technology-enabled sexual health promotion for individuals with IDD. Two reviewers will independently conduct screening and data charting using Rayyan, with disagreements resolved through discussion and adjudication by a third reviewer. Data will be synthesised through descriptive mapping and thematic organisation. Given anticipated heterogeneity in technologies, settings and outcome measures, findings will be synthesised narratively rather than pooled quantitatively. Expert consultation will support interpretation without influencing study selection decisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as the review uses published literature only. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences to inform clinicians, educators, researchers and policymakers working in disability and sexual health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Open Science Framework, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X7HQW.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[P James, C., Das, A., Sreelatha Biju, A., Abhi, N., Tijo, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118656</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118656</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sexual health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Technology-enabled sexual health promotion for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sexual health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118656</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118656</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102637?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[AI chatbots for health information seeking among Chinese patients with precancerous ENT lesions: a descriptive qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102637?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore how Chinese patients with precancerous ear, nose and throat (ENT) lesions experience using artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots for health-related information seeking, with particular attention to perceived benefits, challenges and influences on information-seeking practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Descriptive qualitative study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Department of Otolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 adult patients with clinically diagnosed precancerous ENT lesions who had used AI-driven chatbots at least three times in the previous 30 days to seek health-related information about their condition were purposively recruited. Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted between 11 October 2024 and 10 November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Interviews were analysed using Colaizzi&rsquo;s method. Four themes were identified. First, participants described AI chatbots as an immediate and accessible source of health information, particularly when questions arose outside clinical encounters or during periods of uncertainty. Second, many reported moving away from conventional search engines towards conversational information seeking, valuing direct and synthesised responses over link-based retrieval. Third, participants emphasised that obtaining useful answers depended on learning to ask clear and specific questions, suggesting that effective prompting was an important user skill. Fourth, some participants perceived chatbot interaction as emotionally safer than asking healthcare professionals certain questions, particularly when they felt embarrassed, worried about asking repetitive questions or feared being judged.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Among this sample of Chinese patients with precancerous ENT lesions, AI-driven chatbots were perceived as a convenient and conversational supplementary source of health information. Participants valued their accessibility and interactional ease, but also indicated that their usefulness depended partly on users&rsquo; ability to formulate effective prompts. Some participants additionally perceived chatbots as a more comfortable channel for asking sensitive or basic questions. The findings suggest that AI chatbots may have a complementary role in patient information support, but further research is needed to evaluate response accuracy, safety and appropriate integration into clinician-led care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huang, Y., Liang, Q., Lin, Z., Zhang, M., Liu, X., Ding, L., Peng, R., Yu, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102637</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102637</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[AI chatbots for health information seeking among Chinese patients with precancerous ENT lesions: a descriptive qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102637</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102637</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106406?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Basic management of life-threatening emergencies in primary healthcare centres: a systematic review protocol on obstacles and facilitators]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106406?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Primary healthcare (PHC) emergency services are critical as the first line of defence against life-threatening conditions, significantly reducing mortality and morbidity. Globally, life-threatening emergencies (LTEs) such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, severe trauma and respiratory failure frequently present first at PHC centres, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. However, inadequate emergency preparedness at the primary care level contributes to substantial avoidable mortality and long-term disability. Many PHC centres, especially in underserved and rural areas, face substantial challenges including inadequate equipment, insufficient training and poor referral systems which compromise emergency care quality and outcomes. Despite the recognised importance of PHC in emergency care, there is currently no synthesised evidence comprehensively mapping the barriers and facilitators that influence LTE management at this level. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on barriers and facilitators in managing LTEs at PHC centres to inform effective interventions and policy development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will comprehensively search PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science for relevant literature published up to 31 May 2026. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, two independent researchers will conduct a three-stage screening process: initial title/abstract evaluation, full-text assessment and manual review of reference lists. Any disagreements between reviewers will be adjudicated by the lead investigator. The eligibility criteria and research question will be established using the SPIDER framework, which examines Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation and Research Type components. Methodological quality will be appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (2018). Extracted data will be systematically collected using a standardised form. A &lsquo;best fit&rsquo; framework synthesis approach, complemented by thematic analysis, will be employed to integrate qualitative evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol for this systematic review has received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (approval number: IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1404.061). The committee confirmed that the study objectives do not involve direct patient contact or clinical interventions, and therefore, the review meets ethical standards for research based exclusively on published literature. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and policy briefs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Systematic review registration</st>
<p>Registration number PROSPERO CRD420251071584.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amir-Behghadami, M., Gholipour, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106406</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106406</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Basic management of life-threatening emergencies in primary healthcare centres: a systematic review protocol on obstacles and facilitators]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106406</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106406</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107772?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of safety management systems (SMS) in healthcare: a systematic review and international comparison]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107772?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Many industries where safety is a priority (eg, aviation) use safety management systems (SMSs), but evidence on their use in healthcare is needed to determine whether they could support patient safety improvement. We investigated the application of national-level SMSs to patient safety in terms of effectiveness, implementation and experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review using a case study approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>We identified patient safety organisations in each country and searched their websites. We also searched MEDLINE (in December 2023) and Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Web of Science (in February 2024).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Any evidence from five high-income countries that have publicly funded healthcare systems with universal coverage: Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the Netherlands. We included publications on the effectiveness, implementation or experience of the patient safety approach in each country.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Included evidence was summarised and mapped onto an initial analytical framework based on analysis of SMSs in high-risk industries, enabling cross-country comparisons. Drafts were shared with experts from patient safety organisations in each country for comment. Formal quality appraisal was not possible as most evidence was non-evaluative.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>53 publications were included, from Australia (5), Canada (7), Ireland (8), New Zealand (9) and the Netherlands (24). Only the Netherlands implemented a patient safety programme explicitly based on an SMS approach. Some aspects of patient safety in hospitals improved as a result, but there was significant variation in both the implementation of the programme and attributed outcomes.</p>
<p>In the other four countries, the main components of an SMS were identified to some extent, along with evidence that their patient safety approaches had been influenced by concepts from high-risk industries and &lsquo;safety science&rsquo; more widely.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Emerging ideas from high-risk industries (beyond SMSs) and broader safety science have influenced all countries, reflecting increasing awareness of the need for initiatives to be context-specific to be successful. However, their implementation and impact need further evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023487512.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Bell, S., Zhelev, Z., Bethel, A., Clarke, M., Anderson, R., Thompson Coon, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107772</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107772</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of safety management systems (SMS) in healthcare: a systematic review and international comparison]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107772</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107772</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109139?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contextual factors that affect diabetic retinopathy screening uptake at township health units in southern China: a qualitative study with service providers and users]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109139?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to identify the factors that influence access to diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a qualitative case study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Township health units in Shaoguan City, Guangdong Province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study included two representative patient groups (n=15) and five health-staff groups (n=42).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Focus group discussions were guided by a female ophthalmologist and other ophthalmology staff to determine the contextual factors influencing DRS uptake in people with diabetes mellitus in Qujiang District, Shaoguan City, southern China. Directly observed treatment and short-course (DOTS) components for the assessment of tuberculosis services were referred to for health structure when themes were extracted using deductive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>By referring to DOTS components related to the government, case detection, treatment, drug supply and recording system, we identified 31 factors associated with DRS uptake. Among these, six were from the perspective of service users whereas the remaining 25 were related to providers. From these factors, 10 modifiable themes pertained to policy, financing, interdepartmental coordination, hospital preparedness, primary healthcare staff training and public awareness through health education and quality enhancement of public health services. Two unmodifiable factors were also extracted: discomfort from pupil dilation during the examination and long travel distance to the facility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This analysis identified contextual factors influencing DRS uptake, including policy, financing and public awareness, which, if addressed, could significantly enhance future screening uptake and disease management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xiao, B., Chan, V. F., Price-Sanchez, C., Piyasena, M. P., Wang, Y., Wan, Q., Congdon, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109139</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109139</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contextual factors that affect diabetic retinopathy screening uptake at township health units in southern China: a qualitative study with service providers and users]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109139</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109856?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Calm after the storm; transition from crisis: Iranian nurses experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic - a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109856?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic had significant physical and psychosocial impacts on nurses. While the initial phases of the pandemic presented considerable challenges, these appear to have diminished over time. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of Iranian nurses working in clinical settings during the post-pandemic period of COVID-19.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a qualitative study conducted using the conventional content analysis approach proposed by Granheim and Lundman (2004).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted at secondary care hospitals in northwest Iran that served as referral centres for multiple provinces during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 18 nurses with at least 1 year of clinical experience in COVID-19 wards were recruited using purposive sampling. Participants were diverse in terms of gender, age and educational background. Nurses temporarily transferred from other wards were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>&lsquo;Return to Normalcy&rsquo; emerged as the overarching theme, encompassing five main categories: <I>Expansion of Knowledge</I>, <I>Changing Attitudes Toward the Disease</I>, <I>Improved Disease Management</I>, <I>Changing Nature of the Disease</I> and <I>Expansion of Facilities</I>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings suggest that, like other crises, the COVID-19 pandemic represents a temporary disruption. However, certain factors can expedite the transition back to normalcy. These include enhanced awareness of the disease, effective crisis management and improved access to diagnostic, therapeutic and protective resources.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zirak, M., Sadeghian, A., Aliafsari Mamaghani, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109856</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109856</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Calm after the storm; transition from crisis: Iranian nurses experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic - a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109856</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109856</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110503?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rezvilutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel in the neoadjuvant treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer (REDOOM): study protocol for an open-label, parallel-cohort, multicentre clinical study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110503?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This trial investigates the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy using rezvilutamide combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), with or without docetaxel, in treating oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (omHSPC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, open-label, multicentre trial aims to enrol 100 patients newly diagnosed with omHSPC (defined as &le;5 bone or lymph node metastases confirmed by conventional imaging, without visceral metastasis) who must express a desire to undergo surgery. All patients undergo a prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/CT (PSMA-PET/CT) scan at enrolment or within 4 weeks before enrolment to assess and confirm the number of metastases at baseline. Scans should be performed before initiating ADT to avoid compromising test sensitivity. Then patients will be allocated into groups in parallel according to their own preferences: one group will receive an LHRH agonist or antagonist for 24 weeks to maintain continuous ADT or have undergone bilateral orchiectomy. Treatment with rezvilutamide will be maintained daily. The other group will be scheduled to complete up to six cycles of docetaxel within 24 weeks, with maintenance of continuous ADT and rezvilutamide for 24 weeks. Both groups will receive a conventional imaging evaluation at the 12th week. After neoadjuvant therapy, patients will undergo conventional imaging and a second PSMA-PET/CT assessment, followed by cytoreductive radical prostatectomy within the subsequent 6 weeks. After surgery, patients may choose to continue with ADT or rezvilutamide at their own discretion, until disease progression. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response, defined as the absence of residual viable tumour cells in the tumour bed on pathological evaluation of the postoperative specimen. Secondary endpoints include 1 year biochemical progression-free survival, overall survival, radiographic progression-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, quality of life scores (total and subscale) assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate questionnaire, time to symptomatic progression, time to deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, the interval from enrolment to an increase in score from baseline, the proportion of patients with a &ge;30% reduction in prostate volume on imaging before cytoreductive surgery compared with pre-neoadjuvant therapy, minimal residual disease and major pathological response. The study plans to enrol a total of 100 patients. Patient recruitment for this study is scheduled to begin in May 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This has been approved by the Ethics Committee in Clinical Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (number KY2024-231). Results will be published in peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This study is expected to provide prospective evidence on the feasibility and potential clinical value of rezvilutamide combined with ADT, with or without docetaxel, as neoadjuvant treatment for newly diagnosed omHSPC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400093262).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Z.-J., Zhu, X.-X., Huang, H., Ding, Y.-Z., Zhuang, Y.-D., Wang, L., Li, P., Yu, K.-Y., Chen, H.-D., Wang, H.-L., Li, H.-Y., Cai, B., Deng, Z.-X., Pan, Y., Yang, Y., Li, P., Huang, K.-T., Ji, X.-W., Lin, Q., Chen, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110503</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110503</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rezvilutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel in the neoadjuvant treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer (REDOOM): study protocol for an open-label, parallel-cohort, multicentre clinical study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110503</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110503</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110564?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Age, patient experience and satisfaction with breast cancer care: a cohort study using linked national cancer patient experience survey and cancer registry data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110564?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine whether satisfaction with information provision and involvement in decision-making among people with breast cancer (BC) treated in English hospitals was associated with age and other patient characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective population-based cohort study, conducted as part of the National Audit of Primary Breast Cancer and the National Audit of Metastatic Breast Cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) responses linked to National Cancer Registration data for BC patients (stage 0&ndash;4) diagnosed between 2017 and 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>40 018 patients diagnosed with BC who responded to CPES between 2017 and 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Responses to questions about overall experience of care, satisfaction with information provision, involvement in decision-making and clinical nurse specialist (CNS) contact were examined. The relationships between responses, personal, disease and clinical characteristics were analysed using multivariable Poisson regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>90% of patients rated their overall care as &ge;8 out of 10 (0=very poor; 10=very good), decreasing to 82% for those aged &lt;40 years (p&lt;0.001). Adjusted analysis showed that stage 4 disease (incidence risk ratio (IRR) 1.19; CI 1.02 to 1.40; p&lt;0.001), the highest deprivation (IRR 1.18; CI 1.07 to 1.30; p&lt;0.001) and Asian (IRR 1.60; CI 1.42 to 1.82; p&lt;0.001) or Black (IRR 1.53; CI 1.30 to 1.80; p&lt;0.001) ethnicity were associated with a negative overall care experience. Satisfaction was high for information provision (85%) and involvement in decisions (81%), but lower among younger patients and those with advanced stage disease (both p&lt;0.001). Fewer than 70% of patients aged &lt;40 years felt sufficiently involved in decisions, compared with 81% &gt;40 years (p&lt;0.001). Patients with stage 4 disease were more likely to report dissatisfaction with involvement in decision-making (IRR 1.50: CI 1.36 to 2.67; p&lt;0.001). Most patients (95%) had a named CNS, with 85% reporting ease of contact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Most patients reported high satisfaction with their BC care. Satisfaction was consistently lower among younger people and those with advanced disease; this finding might partly reflect more complex pathways but requires further exploration, ideally in partnership with patients to codesign solutions. Actionable remedial strategies are proposed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blacker, S., Withrow, D. R., Boyle, J. M., Wang, L., Delon, C., Medina, J., Horgan, K., Dodwell, D., Verrill, M., Lemanska, A., Frampton, A. E., Cromwell, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T07:02:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110564</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110564</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Age, patient experience and satisfaction with breast cancer care: a cohort study using linked national cancer patient experience survey and cancer registry data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110564</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110564</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101258?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting depressive and anxiety symptoms among Lebanese and Syrian adults in a suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, during concurrent crises: nested cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101258?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to develop prediction models for symptoms of poor mental health among Lebanese adults and adult Syrian refugees or migrants residing in a suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, separately.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nested cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Sin-El-Fil, a suburb east of Beirut, Lebanon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Lebanese and Syrian adults residing in low socio-economic status areas of Sin-El-Fil.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome was having depressive symptoms, ascertained through the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 where a total summative score of 10 or more indicated having depressive symptoms. Secondary outcome was having anxiety symptoms, ascertained through the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 where a total summative score of 10 or more indicated having anxiety symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 1986 participants, 1322 (66.5%) were Lebanese adults, 664 (33.5%) were Syrian refugees or migrants. Among Lebanese adults and adult Syrian refugees or migrants, 324 (25.3%) and 289 (43.9%) had depressive symptoms, respectively. Having pain that impacts usual activity, having debt, not feeling safe at home and having none or one person to count on in difficult times were common predictors of depressive and anxiety symptoms among Lebanese adults and Syrian refugees or migrants. Not having a legal residency permit was also a predictor of depressive symptoms for Syrian refugees or migrants. Prediction models developed for depressive and anxiety symptoms among both nationalities had good performance measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The predictors of poor mental health included financial, health and social indicators for both Lebanese adults and Syrian refugees or migrants during the concurrent crisis in Lebanon. These models are most applicable in similar urban, crisis-affected and low-resource settings. Findings emphasise the need for social protection and financial support among populations with vulnerabilities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shamas, H., Ragi, M.-E., Abi Zeid, B., DeJong, J., McCall, S. J., CAEP Study Group, Germani, El-Jardali, Ghattas, M Melhem, DeJong, McCall]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101258</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101258</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting depressive and anxiety symptoms among Lebanese and Syrian adults in a suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, during concurrent crises: nested cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101258</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101258</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104560?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing adiposity-related predictors of cardiometabolic disease in two Indigenous Guatemalan municipalities: a cross-sectional receiver operating characteristic analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104560?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>(1) To compare the ability of body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio and visceral fat, as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), to predict hypertension and diabetes in men and women and (2) to determine whether the correlation between BMI and visceral fat varies by height quantile.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a representative survey that included data on anthropometrics, body composition, glycosylated haemoglobin and blood pressure. We used receiver operating characteristic analysis and DeLong CIs to compare the ability of each adiposity measure to predict diabetes and hypertension in each gender.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Tecp&aacute;n and San Antonio Suchitep&eacute;quez, Guatemala.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>806 non-pregnant adults from 347 households, primarily of Indigenous ethnicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Diabetes, defined as a haemoglobin A1c of greater than 6.5% or self-reported history and hypertension, defined as a systolic blood pressure over 140 or a diastolic blood pressure over 90.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the three adiposity measures, visceral fat was the best predictor of diabetes (area under the curve; AUC 0.73 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81) (men); AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.7 to 0.8) (women)) and hypertension (AUC 0.7 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.79) (men); AUC 0.76 (95% CI 0.7 to 0.82) (women)), followed by waist-to-height ratio followed by BMI. All three measures better predicted hypertension in women than in men. In sensitivity analysis, visceral fat and waist-to-height ratio better predicted hypertension and diabetes when BMI was below 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The correlation between BMI and visceral fat did not vary appreciably by height.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Of the three adiposity measures studied, BIA-derived visceral fat best predicted cardiometabolic disease in the population. In clinical practice, alternative techniques beyond BMI need to be considered when assessing adiposity, screening for cardiometabolic disease and diagnosing clinical obesity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alajajian, S., Rohloff, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104560</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104560</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing adiposity-related predictors of cardiometabolic disease in two Indigenous Guatemalan municipalities: a cross-sectional receiver operating characteristic analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104560</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104560</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105630?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of the MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy Side Effects Tool (M-SET): a Delphi study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105630?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Despite growing interest in the therapeutic potential of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), no targeted measure to systematically assess side effects of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AP) exists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Our aim was to develop an MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy Side Effects Tool (M-SET) to capture side effects over the course of MDMA-AP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Informed by a systematic review and a review of other relevant questionnaires, we drafted a list of potential side effects. Face and content validation were obtained via a modified two-round online Delphi process involving experts in MDMA-AP and the neuropsychopharmacology of MDMA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Twelve experts consented to participate over two rounds of Delphi panel deliberations (response rate: Round 1 = 83&ndash;92%, Round 2 = 75%). The Delphi panellists were asked to keep, discard, modify or suggest additional items. The final version of the M-SET consists of 165 items across four questionnaires that collect information at screening, baseline, the day of medication sessions and longer term follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The use of a modified Delphi technique proved a successful method to generate content for the first structured tool designed to evaluate side effects specifically associated with MDMA-AP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Clinical implications</st>
<p>The M-SET is recommended for use in both research and clinical settings. Its implementation has the potential to improve the safety of delivering MDMA-AP as well as support the development of a more systematic and robust evidence base on its safety and tolerability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colcott, J., Guerin, A. A., Carter, O., Baggott, M. J., Bershad, A., Danforth, A., de Wit, H., Feduccia, A. A., Kirkpatrick, M. G., Liechti, M. E., Oehen, P., Schmid, Y., Bedi, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105630</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105630</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of the MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy Side Effects Tool (M-SET): a Delphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105630</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105630</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106634?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dilemmas in the development of the general practitioner workforce in primary care: a qualitative study in Beijing, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106634?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The general practitioner workforce (GPWF) is an important factor influencing primary care capacity. Many countries face GP shortages and substantial challenges in workforce development. However, the factors and mechanisms shaping GPWF development remain insufficiently understood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To explore key challenges affecting GPWF development and their interrelationships in the primary care system of Beijing, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Between October and December 2024, directors and GPs from 18 community health centres were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected through a focus group discussion and in-depth interviews; thematic analysis was conducted in line with Merriam and Tisdell&rsquo;s approach. A causal loop diagram (CLD) was then developed to identify and visualise dynamic relationships among factors influencing the GPWF development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The participants comprised 10 directors and 8 GPs from urban and suburban areas, with a predominance of women and those holding senior professional titles. Participants had diverse educational and professional backgrounds. Three major themes were identified: (1) rising demand for GP services, (2) supply challenges in the GPWF, and (3) challenges to GPs&rsquo; professional sustainability. Across these themes, 12 subthemes and 10 key variables were identified. The CLD reflected participants&rsquo; perceptions of how these variables interacted and illustrated potential reinforcing interactions among them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The development of the GPWF in Beijing is constrained by multiple interrelated challenges. Addressing these challenges entails coordinated policy actions to strengthen workforce planning and training, enhance job attractiveness, improve the alignment between training and practice, and reinforce professional support and continuing professional development, thereby promoting the sustainability of the GPWF.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cui, Y., Sun, T., Tian, M., Jia, N., Wang, W., Lu, X., Zhang, W., Lan, L., Jin, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106634</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106634</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dilemmas in the development of the general practitioner workforce in primary care: a qualitative study in Beijing, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106634</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106634</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109727?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clustering socio-demographic of Indonesian adolescents and their associations with depression: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109727?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify socio-demographic subgroups of adolescents through cluster analysis and examine the extent to which these clusters are associated with depression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study used cluster analysis and logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The Indonesian Health Survey 2023 is a nationally representative survey of Indonesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 89,866 adolescents aged 15&ndash;24 years were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Depression was assessed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Logistic regression models were applied to estimate the association between cluster membership and depression risk, adjusting for behavioural factors (smoking and alcohol use), and geographical distribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five discrete socio-demographic clusters were identified in this study. Two clusters showed a significantly elevated risk of depression compared with the socioeconomically disadvantaged rural male cluster (Cluster 1). Cluster 2 (older, poor, rural females) had an OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.12), while Cluster 3 (younger, urban, affluent females) had an OR 2.60 (95% CI 1.92 to 3.52).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Adolescent depression risk factors are shaped by intersecting socio-demographic vulnerabilities, particularly among females in disadvantaged rural and socioeconomically privileged urban settings. Gender-responsive and context-specific mental health interventions are required.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murti, F. A. K., Nursalam, N., Kustanti, C. Y., McKenna, L., Sutrisno, S., Pradipta, R. O., Saleh, A., Efendi, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109727</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109727</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clustering socio-demographic of Indonesian adolescents and their associations with depression: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109727</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109727</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110724?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cluster-randomised-controlled trial evaluating the impact of implementing the Canadian C-Spine Rule in prehospital cervical spine trauma care by the French Emergency Medical Call Center: IPSTRAUC study - a protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110724?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In France, cervical spine trauma frequently results in systematic prehospital immobilisation with a cervical collar, despite a low incidence of clinically significant injuries. This practice may lead to unnecessary discomfort, delayed care and emergency department (ED) overcrowding. The Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) is a validated tool for identifying patients at low risk of cervical injury but its use is currently limited to ED settings. An adapted version (CCRa) has been validated in Canada for prehospital use, demonstrating safe reduction in immobilisation rates. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and clinical impact of CCRa implementation in the French prehospital emergency setting. The objectives are to assess whether the implementation of the CCRa by French prehospital emergency teams can safely reduce unnecessary cervical spine immobilisation in stable trauma patient, optimise imaging use and decrease ED overcrowding while maintaining patient safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is multicentre, cluster-randomised-controlled trial involving 16 Emergency Medical Call Center and their affiliated prehospital emergency services in France. Each centre will be randomised to either implement the CCRa or usual care with standard immobilisation practices. Alert adult patients (18&ndash;65 years) with suspected closed cervical spine trauma and Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 will be included. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with suspected cervical spine trauma who are transported to the ED. Secondary outcomes include the appropriateness of cervical spine immobilisation, use of cervical imaging, ED visits for neck pain, immobilisation-related complications, healthcare costs at 30 days, and feasibility and acceptability of CCRa implementation among prehospital professionals (effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 design). Quantitative data will be collected during prehospital care, ED admission and follow-up at days 14 and 30, while implementation outcomes will be assessed at the end of the intervention period using questionnaires and qualitative interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by a national ethics committee (CPP), the French competent authority and registered to the French National Authorities (ID-RCB 2024-A00636-41). It is funded by the French Ministry of Health via the 2023 PREPS programme (DGOS). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant scientific meeting. The sponsor of the study is Rennes University Hospital. The findings may support broader CCRa implementation in European EMS systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06983873">NCT06983873</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saget, F., Levrel, V., Reuter, P.-G., Soulat, L., Peschanski, N., Bajeux, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110724</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110724</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cluster-randomised-controlled trial evaluating the impact of implementing the Canadian C-Spine Rule in prehospital cervical spine trauma care by the French Emergency Medical Call Center: IPSTRAUC study - a protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110724</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110724</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110895?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence on stillbirth prevention across the reproductive continuum: an umbrella review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110895?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To collate and appraise evidence from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses on interventions to prevent stillbirth and reduce perinatal mortality across the reproductive continuum, including preconception, antenatal, intrapartum and immediate newborn periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Umbrella review synthesising evidence from systematic reviews, including meta-analyses where available.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A comprehensive search was conducted in CENTRAL (via Cochrane Register of Studies Online), PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, along with trial registries (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN Registry), from inception to 12 January 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesising randomised controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies that reported stillbirth, perinatal mortality, fetal loss or fetal death were included. Reviews focused exclusively on predefined high-risk populations were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) certainty ratings were extracted as reported by the original review authors. Evidence synthesis followed a structured framework adapted from Ota <I>et al</I>, integrating direction of effect and certainty of evidence based on pooled estimates and GRADE assessments. Publication overlap was assessed using the Corrected Covered Area index where relevant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 116 systematic reviews were included, synthesising evidence from randomised controlled and quasi-experimental studies across preconception, antenatal, intrapartum and immediate newborn periods. Evidence from individual reviews showed clear benefit for several interventions, including balanced energy-protein supplementation, home visits by community health workers, birth preparedness interventions, labour induction at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation and skilled or community-based intrapartum care, primarily for reducing perinatal mortality. Reduced antenatal visit schedules compared with standard care were associated with a possible increase in stillbirth or perinatal mortality, indicating potential harm. Many interventions&mdash;such as group antenatal care (ANC), nutritional education, case-note provision, routine ultrasound or Doppler monitoring, antibiotic treatment for bacterial vaginosis, antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy and several pharmacological or hormonal interventions&mdash;demonstrated unknown or inconclusive effects on stillbirth or perinatal mortality, largely due to imprecision and heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This umbrella review identifies a range of interventions with evidence of effectiveness across the reproductive continuum, particularly those addressing maternal nutrition, continuity of ANC and quality intrapartum and newborn care. However, substantial evidence gaps remain, especially for interventions widely implemented without strong supporting evidence. These findings highlight the need for context-specific implementation research and prioritisation of proven strategies in low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of stillbirth remains highest.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024531100.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gadapani Pathak, B., Vats, P., Manna, S., Yadav, S., Bhatt, A., Mukherjee, R., Patil, R., Dayma, G., Mazumder, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110895</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110895</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence on stillbirth prevention across the reproductive continuum: an umbrella review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110895</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110895</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111625?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and risk factors of cognitive impairment among stroke survivors in India: an analysis of cross-sectional data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111625?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study examines the prevalence of and risk factors associated with cognitive impairment among Indian stroke survivors aged &ge;60 using data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional comparative analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary analysis of Wave 1 (2017&ndash;2019) data from the nationally representative LASI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 844 individuals aged &ge;60 years with a self-reported history of stroke and 2532 age-matched and gender-matched non-stroke controls selected at a 3:1 ratio from the LASI dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The outcome measure was the prevalence of cognitive impairment among older adults with a history of stroke, assessed using a composite cognitive index (score &le;14) derived from five cognitive domains. We also aimed to identify socio-demographic, socioeconomic, behavioural and health-related factors associated with post-stroke cognitive impairment using multivariable logistic regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Stroke survivors had a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment (15.3%) compared with non-stroke individuals (11.6%) and significantly lower cognitive function (composite score: 22.23 vs 23.78, p&lt;0.001). Stroke significantly increased the risk of cognitive impairment (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.79, p=0.021), even after adjusting for demographic and health-related factors. Higher expenditure status, higher education and urban residence were strong protective factors, while being single and experiencing depressive symptoms were associated with an increased likelihood of cognitive impairment. Based on a multivariate-adjusted model, risk factors for cognitive impairment among stroke survivors included advanced age (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.35 to 9.27, p=0.010 (80+ vs 60&ndash;64 years)), female gender (2.53, 95% CI 1.32 to 4.86, p=0.005), physical inactivity (1.93, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.61, p=0.039), not in a current relationship (2.08, 95% CI 1.10 - 3.93, p= 0.024) and being underweight (2.97, 95% CI 1.47 to 6.00, p=0.002).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Stroke survivors in India face increased risk of cognitive impairment, with associated risk factors including age, female gender, inactivity, depression and low body mass index, while higher education and expenditure status were associated with a reduced risk. Early detection and targeted interventions, including screening, lifestyle changes and personalised rehabilitation, are vital for preserving cognitive health after stroke.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sooriyaarachchi, P., Waller, M., Nambiar, V., Mohan, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111625</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111625</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and risk factors of cognitive impairment among stroke survivors in India: an analysis of cross-sectional data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111625</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111625</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112441?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pilates during pregnancy for maternal musculoskeletal pain and discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112441?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The predominant concern during pregnancy is musculoskeletal pain, often accompanied by additional discomforts such as anxiety and insomnia. Pilates, as a low-impact mind-body exercise, may be beneficial in managing musculoskeletal pain and associated symptoms in adults. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness of Pilates for alleviating musculoskeletal pain and other discomforts during pregnancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Scopus, TRIP Medical Database, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to 14 January 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Randomised controlled trials and prospective non-randomised controlled studies that compared Pilates with other prenatal care modalities for improving musculoskeletal pain and discomfort were eligible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two researchers independently extracted data using standardised forms with subsequent cross-verification. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias V.2.0 tool. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>13 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 10 contributed data to the meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability level. Pain intensity was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (range 0&ndash;10). Moderate-certainty evidence demonstrated that Pilates significantly reduced musculoskeletal pain during pregnancy (mean differences (MD)=&ndash;2.59, 95% CI &ndash;4.19 to &ndash;1.00; I<sup>&sup2;</sup>=91%, p=0.001). Low-certainty evidence suggested that Pilates reduced pregnancy-related disability (standardised mean differences (SMD)=&ndash;1.82, 95% CI &ndash;2.99 to &ndash;0.66; I<sup>&sup2;</sup> = 93%, p=0.002). Secondary outcomes comprised sleep quality and psychological status. Multivariate meta-analysis showed significant improvements in psychological status (SMD=&ndash;0.86, 95% CI &ndash;1.31 to &ndash;0.42; &sup2;=0.4, I<sup>&sup2;</sup>=86%, p=0.0005) but did not yield statistically significant improvements in sleep quality (MD=&ndash;1.93, 95% CI &ndash;4.70 to 0.84; I<sup>&sup2;</sup>=93%, p=0.17). Both secondary outcomes were supported by very low-certainty evidence. Risk of bias assessment rated three studies as high risk, three as unclear risk and seven as low risk. Formal assessment of publication bias was not feasible owing to the limited number of studies (fewer than 10 per outcome).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This meta-analysis demonstrates that, compared with standard care, structured prenatal Pilates significantly alleviates musculoskeletal pain and disability while also enhancing psychological status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024628027.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Song, C., Shen, Y., Tang, X., Li, Z., Li, X., Zhang, X., Xiang, Y., Ma, J., Tian, X., Li, H., Li, F., Li, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112441</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112441</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pilates during pregnancy for maternal musculoskeletal pain and discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112441</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112441</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113991?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment adherence, survival outcomes and barriers to care of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Northwest Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113991?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate treatment adherence, survival and systemic patient and provider level factors associated with non-Hodgkin&rsquo;s lymphoma (NHL) management as reported by healthcare providers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Explanatory sequential mixed-methods study comprising a retrospective hospital-based cohort and a qualitative descriptive study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, and the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Gondar, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults (&ge;18 years) with histologically confirmed NHL who initiated systemic chemotherapy were eligible. We randomly selected 182 patients with NHL treated and diagnosed between 1 August 2019 and 31 July 2024, for retrospective chart review out of a total of 283 patients during the study period. 14 healthcare professionals with at least 1 year of oncology experience participated in in-depth interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome</st>
<p>The primary outcome was overall survival, defined as the time from histological diagnosis to death from any cause. The secondary outcome was treatment adherence, defined as interruption between cycles or abandonment of prescribed chemotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At a median follow-up of 18 months, the estimated 3-year overall survival rate was 48.5% (95% CI 37.8% to 58.4%). Lower survival rate was independently associated with B-symptoms (adjusted HR (AHR) 2.7, 95% CI 1.6 to 4.4), high intermediate International Prognostic Index (IPI) (AHR 3.7, 95% CI 1.8 to 6.9) and high IPI (AHR 5.5, 95% CI 2.7 to 11.3). Treatment abandonment and interruption occurred in 22.5% and 20.5% of patients, respectively. Exposure to rituximab was more likely to abandon therapy (&sup2;=4.8, p=0.03). Patient residence in rural areas was associated with higher rates oftreatment interruption (&sup2; = 6.0, p = 0.01), whereas absence of healthinsurance was associated with treatment abandonment (&sup2; = 8.0, p =0.005).</p>
<p>In the qualitative analysis, healthcare providers identified multilevel barriers to NHL care, including low patient awareness and late presentation, frequent misdiagnosis at the primary care level, weak referral systems, financial constraints, inconsistent drug availability and limited diagnostic capacity. These systemic and patient-level challenges are often associated with delayed diagnosis, treatment interruption and suboptimal survival outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>3-year survival among adults with NHL in Northwest Ethiopia was substantially lower than reported in high-income settings. Mortality was higher among patients with B-symptoms and elevated IPI scores. High rates of treatment interruption and abandonment were observed. Patient-level and system-level factors are associated with reduced survival and treatment continuity. Strengthening early diagnosis, risk stratification and financial protection may support improved treatment adherence and survival outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kassaw, A. T., Teferi, E. T., Zerihun, T. E., Mussie, D. A., Melese, T. B., Admasu, M. T., Wallie, B. Y., Birarra, M. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113991</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113991</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment adherence, survival outcomes and barriers to care of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Northwest Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113991</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113991</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114262?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Broadening the understanding of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study protocol of the EMA-FAMS project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114262?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common central nervous system disease among young adults worldwide and Finland is one of the high-risk MS regions in Europe. Fatigue affects around 80% of individuals with MS, with prevalence rising to 95% as the disease progresses. Fatigue significantly limits daily activities and is associated with poorer employment outcomes and reduced quality of life. The objective of this qualitative study is to explore the lived experiences of individuals with MS and conceptions of MS-related fatigue among physiotherapists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This qualitative study is part of a larger research project entitled &lsquo;<I>Building conceptualisation and understanding of momentary fatigue and activity-related fatigability in daily life for people with multiple sclerosis</I>&rsquo; (EMA-FAMS), consisting of several studies conducted from 2024 to 2028. For this qualitative study, 10 individuals with relapsing-remitting MS will be interviewed using a phenomenological approach to collect their lived experiences of fatigue. Additionally, 15 physiotherapists with experience in MS rehabilitation will be interviewed using a phenomenographic approach to explore their conceptions of MS-related fatigue. All interviews will be conducted remotely during 2025&ndash;2026. Interview data will be analysed in two phases using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) and phenomenographic analysis methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The EMA-FAMS study project has obtained ethical approval from the Regional Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Helsinki University Hospital District (HUS/10011/2024), and all the participants will provide written consent. Findings of this study will be shared through peer-reviewed articles, at academic conferences and with public healthcare and healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lukkaroinen, A.-M., Suikkanen, S., Vuoskoski, P., Miettinen, O., Romberg, A., Ha&#x0308;ma&#x0308;la&#x0308;inen, P., Rintala, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114262</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114262</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Broadening the understanding of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study protocol of the EMA-FAMS project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114262</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116199?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Electronic symptom monitoring of patient-reported outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma during immunotherapy (PRIME-HCC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116199?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePROs)-based symptom monitoring benefits health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in various cancers. However, despite the high disease and economic burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the complex symptom profile during immunotherapy, the effectiveness and implementation of ePROs-based interventions in this population remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and implementation outcomes of ePROs-based symptom monitoring among patients with HCC receiving immunotherapy in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The trial is a two-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT). Approximately 238 patients with HCC undergoing immunotherapy in China will be recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to an intervention or control group. The intervention group will receive an 18 week, weekly ePROs symptom monitoring survey via a WeChat-based platform, featuring reactive alerts that provide patients with automated, evidence-based self-management advice when predefined thresholds are exceeded. The control group will receive usual care. Guided by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) Framework and normalisation process theory (NPT), the study employs a mixed-methods approach. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in HRQoL at 18 weeks. Secondary effectiveness outcomes include physical function, symptom burden, overall survival, mental health and healthcare utilisation. Key implementation outcomes, assessed quantitatively and qualitatively, include acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, cost-effectiveness and the contextual mechanisms influencing sustainability and scalability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University (IRB No. 00001052-24066). This protocol is based on V2.0, 6 July 2024 of the protocol. Electronic informed consent is obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences, providing evidence to inform scalable integration of digital symptom monitoring into oncology care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06938945">NCT06938945</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xia, Y., Wei, X., Wang, Y., Shi, Z., He, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116199</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116199</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Electronic symptom monitoring of patient-reported outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma during immunotherapy (PRIME-HCC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116199</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117016?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seasonality of scabies and its association with climatic factors in Rohingya refugee camps, Coxs Bazar: a retrospective observational study, 2021-2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117016?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Scabies is a common skin condition and poses a substantial disease burden in resource-poor tropical settings. The Rohingya refugee camps in Cox&rsquo;s Bazar, Bangladesh represent one of the world&rsquo;s largest and most protracted humanitarian crises. Using 3 years of data from 2021 to 2023, this study analysed the seasonality of scabies and examined its association with climatic factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This is a retrospective observational study conducted in the Rohingya refugee camps and adjacent host communities in Ukhiya and Teknaf, Cox&rsquo;s Bazar. All patients clinically diagnosed with scabies and who received treatment at 35 International Organization for Migration (IOM)-supported health facilities between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2023 were included. Climate data, including daily mean, minimum and maximum temperature and total and maximum rainfall, were obtained from the Bangladesh Meteorological Department. Seasonal&ndash;Trend decomposition using LOESS (locally estimated scatterplot smoothing) (STL) was applied. Associations between climatic variables and the decomposed seasonal component of scabies cases and corresponding attack rate, as well as overall scabies case counts and overall attack rate, were assessed using Pearson&rsquo;s correlation tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 323 106 new scabies cases were reported from IOM-supported health facilities between January 2021 and December 2023. Children aged under 5 years and 6&ndash;18 years accounted for the highest proportion of cases (32.08% and 38.95%, respectively). The average monthly number of scabies cases was highest in November (12 625) and lowest in May (5862). Case numbers increased from November to February (high season), with a peak between October and November, and declined between April and June (low season). An inverse relationship was observed between temperature and scabies incidence, with higher case numbers during cooler months and lower numbers during warmer months. Pearson&rsquo;s correlation analysis demonstrated a strong and significant negative correlation between the seasonal components of both scabies cases and attack rate and temperature variables, including maximum (cases: r=&ndash;0.492, p=0.002; attack rate: r=&ndash;0.484, p=0.003), minimum (cases: r=&ndash;0.506, p=0.002; attack rate: r=&ndash;0.489, p=0.002) and mean temperature (cases: r=&ndash;0.525, p=0.001; attack rate: r=&ndash;0.511, p=0.001). No significant association was observed between the seasonal component of scabies cases or attack rate and humidity or rainfall.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study identified a distinct seasonal pattern of scabies, with higher caseloads and attack rate during late autumn and winter (October to February) and lower caseloads and attack rate during summer months (April to June). Temperature showed a strong negative association with the seasonal component of scabies burden. These findings may inform the timing of public health strategies, including mass drug administration, intensified case management and social and behavioural change communication, in humanitarian settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halder, C. E., Hasan, M. A., Okello, J. C., Khan, M. F., Soma, E. R., Poly, J. T., Tassdik, H., Hosen, M. S., Prue, U. M., Hannan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117016</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117016</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seasonality of scabies and its association with climatic factors in Rohingya refugee camps, Coxs Bazar: a retrospective observational study, 2021-2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117016</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117016</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117488?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adipose-derived stem cell uses in orthopaedic surgeries: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117488?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Musculoskeletal disorders represent a significant global health burden, frequently leading to chronic pain, functional impairment and disability. Conventional treatment modalities, including rehabilitation, pharmacotherapy and surgical intervention, are often associated with suboptimal outcomes and prolonged recovery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have gained considerable attention due to their regenerative capacity, accessibility and immunomodulatory properties. Preclinical studies of ADSCs have demonstrated promising effects in skeletal muscle regeneration. However, the evidence from human orthopaedic shoulder surgery remains inconclusive. This scoping review aims to map the process of adipose tissue-derived treatments in orthopaedic surgery, especially shoulder surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A scoping review will be conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology to systematically map existing evidence on the clinical use of ADSCs in orthopaedic shoulder surgery. The search strategy will use the Population&ndash;Concept&ndash;Context framework and will be applied across four bibliographic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Scopus) and ClinicalTrials.gov, with additional grey literature searches. Studies will be limited to adults (&ge;18 years) undergoing shoulder surgery. Both clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be extracted. Article screening and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers using Covidence software, with discrepancies resolved through consensus or third-party arbitration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The extensive mapping will provide a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence on the application of ADSCs in orthopaedic surgery, including preparation methods, intraoperative techniques, postoperative follow-up and outcome measures. Special attention will be paid to heterogeneity in clinical practice, methodological limitations and reported patient-centred outcomes. This review will also identify gaps in the literature and inform future research priorities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This scoping review does not require ethics approval, as we will only include information from previously conducted studies and will not involve human participants.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cartuliares, M. B., Andkjaer, S. W., Kildall Hejbol, E., Moos, C., Henrik Frich, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117488</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117488</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adipose-derived stem cell uses in orthopaedic surgeries: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117488</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117488</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of sound therapy on tinnitus in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Tinnitus is a highly prevalent and distressing symptom in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). While international clinical guidelines primarily focus on hearing recovery through pharmacological interventions, effective treatment for tinnitus remains limited. Sound therapy, such as masking and retraining therapy, has emerged as a promising treatment. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sound therapy for the alleviation of tinnitus in adult patients with ISSNHL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Researchers will independently conduct searches for randomised controlled trials in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), CNKI and Wanfang Data. The literature search is scheduled for March 2026 without language restrictions. The review will include studies involving adult patients (18 years or older) diagnosed with ISSNHL with tinnitus symptoms who underwent sound therapy (including Tinnitus Masking Therapy, Tinnitus Retraining Therapy or music therapy) with standard drug therapy, placebo or any other non-acoustic interventions compared with the same treatment alone. Researchers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Data analyses will be performed using RevMan V.10.0.2 and Stata V.18.0 software. The certainty of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study relies on the analysis of secondary data from previously published trials; therefore, ethical approval from a research ethics committee is not required. The results of this systematic review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.</p>
<p><b>PROSPERO registration number</b></p>
<p><A HREF="CRD420261294173">CRD420261294173</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ren, Q., Luo, H., Li, J., Yuan, H., Hu, Y., Tang, H., Tian, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117521</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117521</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of sound therapy on tinnitus in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117521</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117775?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation and outcomes of structured clinical guidance frameworks for people with chronic illnesses in out-of-hospital respite care settings: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117775?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic and life-limiting illnesses require coordinated care beyond hospital settings, with increasing emphasis on continuity of care in community and out-of-hospital environments. Respite care plays an important role in supporting both patients and caregivers; however, its delivery is often variable and lacks structured clinical guidance. While several frameworks exist to support chronic and palliative care, these have been primarily studied in broader care settings and have not been systematically examined within out-of-hospital respite care. This scoping review aims to map clinical guidance frameworks used in respite care, describe their components and implementation and identify reported patient-level, caregiver-level and system-level outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive search will be undertaken across the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Global Health, along with grey literature sources (ProQuest). Studies of any design including quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, implementation studies and service evaluations, published in English from database inception to 31 December 2025 will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data using a structured data-charting form and resolve discrepancies through discussion. Extracted data will be synthesised using descriptive mapping and thematic analysis. Findings will be integrated to identify gaps and implications for low and middle-income country settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this review, as it will use publicly available data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and integration into the ongoing mixed-methods doctoral project.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study registration</st>
<p>Open Science Framework, osf.io/avyzp.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damani, A., Ghoshal, A., S, G., Clark, J., V, C. V., Rao, S., Majumdar, P., Salins, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117775</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117775</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation and outcomes of structured clinical guidance frameworks for people with chronic illnesses in out-of-hospital respite care settings: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117775</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117775</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117974?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacist prescribing in hospital inpatient settings: what works, for whom, why and in what circumstances--a realist review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117974?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pharmacist prescribing has been introduced to alleviate pressures on hospital services and improve timely access to treatment. However, implementation in inpatient settings remains highly variable, with pockets of excellent practice alongside areas where prescribing roles are limited or absent. Traditional effectiveness reviews have demonstrated positive impacts of pharmacist prescribing on clinical and service outcomes yet offer limited insight into how contextual conditions and underlying mechanisms interact to produce results in complex hospital inpatient environments. This realist review aims to develop and refine programme theory (PT) explaining how pharmacist prescribing in hospital inpatient settings works, for whom, why and in what circumstances, with particular attention to the factors that support or constrain successful implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow Pawson&rsquo;s six-stage realist synthesis process andRealist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards guidance, moving iteratively between theory development, searching, selection, data extraction and synthesis. A multidisciplinary stakeholder advisory group and patient and public involvement group will work alongside the review team to feedback on the scope, refinement of context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) and implementation recommendations. Initial programme theories will be developed and then refined using evidence from formal searches of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus alongside grey literature. Data will be extracted into a descriptive spreadsheet and coded in NVivo using deductive, inductive and retroductive approaches to identify, test and refine CMOCs. The final output will be a refined PT and practical recommendations to inform design, implementation and scaling of pharmacist prescribing roles in hospital inpatient care with attention to equity and acceptability for patients and multidisciplinary teams.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this realist review as it involves secondary analysis of published articles and grey literature. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, presentations to pharmacy departments and professional bodies, as well as co-produced accessible materials with patient and public groups to support knowledge mobilisation. The review protocol has been registered on PROSPERO.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420261283633.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Nsouli, D., Timmons, S., Anderson, C., Gordon, A., Arakawa, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117974</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117974</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacist prescribing in hospital inpatient settings: what works, for whom, why and in what circumstances--a realist review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117974</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117974</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118612?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical practice experiences of nursing students in Tu&#x0308;rkiye: a qualitative study using reflexive thematic analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118612?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This study aimed to explore, in depth, the challenges nursing students encounter during clinical practice, the emotions they experience and coping strategies they use to manage these challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Clinical practice is a critical component of nursing education, enabling students to integrate theoretical knowledge into practice. However, factors such as limited instructor support, inadequate laboratory preparation and the demands of clinical environments may negatively affect students&rsquo; learning experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study was conducted at A&#x011F;r&#x0131; Ibrahim Cecen University between April and July 2025. 18 nursing students with clinical practice experience participated in semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke&rsquo;s reflexive thematic analysis, supported by MAXQDA qualitative data analysis software. Data collection and analysis proceeded iteratively until sufficient depth and richness of data were achieved. Reflexive discussions were conducted throughout the analysis process to enhance analytical rigour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Two main themes and five subthemes were identified, including challenges and emotional experiences, causes of difficulties, coping strategies and recommendations. Students reported issues such as insufficient instructor support, large clinical groups, limited psychomotor skills and perceived &lsquo;intern bias&rsquo;. Emotional responses included feelings of inadequacy, low motivation and fear of making mistakes. Coping strategies involved peer support, self-affirmation and seeking guidance from clinical nurses. Participants recommended increasing instructor availability, expanding simulation-based training and strengthening mentoring systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings suggest that strengthening supportive instructional approaches, structured clinical environments and enhanced simulation opportunities may be important in nursing education. These findings may inform educators and clinical mentors in developing more supportive and effective clinical learning environments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atay, M. E., Deniz, R., Ciftci, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118612</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118612</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical practice experiences of nursing students in Tu&#x0308;rkiye: a qualitative study using reflexive thematic analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118612</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118612</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120232?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Positive psychological intervention to reduce HIV acquisition risk with men who use stimulants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120232?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A resurgent methamphetamine epidemic is a major driver of HIV incidence in the USA. Although daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective for preventing HIV acquisition, its effectiveness depends on achieving and maintaining prevention-effective adherence (ie, four or more doses per week). Digital health interventions offer a scalable method to extend the reach of behavioural approaches to HIV prevention, but evidence of their efficacy in improving objectively measured adherence remains limited. Addressing this gap is critical to maximising the clinical and public health benefits of PrEP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>From 26 January 2022 through 17 January 2025, this single-blind, parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 239 men taking PrEP who reported problematic stimulant use and who resided in California or Florida. Participants were randomised to receive five individually delivered telehealth sessions of a positive psychological intervention (n=119) or an attention-control condition (n=120), both delivered alongside remote contingency management for directly observed PrEP doses using the Spotlight mobile health application. Participants received US$20 per session and up to US$360 for uploading videos of at least four PrEP doses per week over 3 months. Follow-up assessments at 3, 6 and 12 months included surveys and dried blood spot specimens to quantify tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP). The primary outcome is biobehavioural HIV acquisition risk, defined as any recent condomless anal sex in the absence of TFV-DP concentrations consistent with prevention-effective adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This RCT was approved by the University of Miami Institutional Review Board and registered prior to initiation of enrolment. Analyses of primary and secondary outcomes using intent-to-treat principles will be conducted after the completion of TFV-DP assays in June 2026, with results disseminated shortly thereafter through peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>This RCT was registered on <A HREF="www.clinicaltrials.gov">www.clinicaltrials.gov</inter-ref> (<inter-ref locator="NCT04899024" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT04899024</A>) prior to launching enrolment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valentin, O. R., Henderson, C., Coffin, L. S., Paredes-Gotamco, J., Olem, D., Farrales, W., Neilands, T. B., Dilworth, S. E., Doblecki-Lewis, S., Page, K., Moskowitz, J. T., Anderson, P. L., Johnson, M. O., Carrico, A. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-120232</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-120232</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Positive psychological intervention to reduce HIV acquisition risk with men who use stimulants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e120232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e120232</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120416?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Blood Cancer Clinical Trials Long-term Follow-up Using Integrated Healthcare Systems Data (BLISS): protocol for a data-linkage study integrating randomised clinical trials with national healthcare systems data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e120416?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are gold standard in evidence-based medicine, but follow-up typically relies on clinic visits and trial-specific data collection. Much of this information overlaps with routinely collected healthcare systems data (HSD), such as electronic health records and national registries. Leveraging HSD for trial follow-up has the potential to reduce cost, time and resource burden. However, concerns remain about data quality and evidence is needed to show that HSD-based outcomes are reported to an equivalent standard to trial-specific data.</p>
<p>The Blood Cancer Clinical Trials Long-term Follow-up Using Integrated Healthcare Systems platform will link data collected from multiple myeloma clinical trials with HSD to create a research database supporting extended follow-up and further methodological and clinical research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This data-linkage study includes participants from multiple myeloma RCTs conducted by the University of Leeds between 2008 and 2021. NHS (National Health Service) England will link these participants to HSD, including deaths and cancer registrations, systemic anticancer therapy, radiotherapy and Hospital Episode Statistics.</p>
<p>We will compare trial-collected outcomes with those derived from HSD, including mortality, treatment, second cancer incidence and major adverse events. Long-term overall survival will be estimated using national mortality data. HSD-derived demographic and clinical variables will be used to assess population representativeness relative to the wider myeloma population. Time to next treatment will be derived and evaluated as a surrogate for progression-free survival. HSD-derived frailty measures will be examined for prognostic utility, and radiotherapy and hospital records will be analysed to characterise bone-related treatments and skeletal complications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the East of England&ndash;Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee, with Section251 support from the Health Research Authority on advice from the Confidentiality Advisory Group. Findings will be disseminated through publications, conference presentations and engagement with stakeholders and patient groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN60123120">ISRCTN60123120</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="ISRCTN49407852" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN49407852</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="ISRCTN90889843" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN90889843</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="ISRCTN24989786" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN24989786</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="ISRCTN08577602" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN08577602</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="ISRCTN17354232" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN17354232</inter-ref>,<inter-ref locator="ISRCTN59395590" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN59395590</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="ISRCTN24593488" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN24593488</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="ISRCTN58227268" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN58227268</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="ISRCTN15028850" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN15028850</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, L., Hoang, J., Gillson, S., Richards, J., Cook, G., Brown, S., Royle, K.-L., Roberts, S., Olivier, C., Parish, C., Spencer, K., Thompson, S., Cairns, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-11T04:14:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-120416</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-120416</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Blood Cancer Clinical Trials Long-term Follow-up Using Integrated Healthcare Systems Data (BLISS): protocol for a data-linkage study integrating randomised clinical trials with national healthcare systems data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e120416</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e120416</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114084?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ODIN Biobank: a Danish cohort for dementia research- cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114084?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Biomarkers related to the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of dementia will play a key role in future clinical practice. The overarching aim of the ODIN (blood and cerebrospinal fluid) Biobank is to study biomarkers for dementia and contribute to the transition from cerebrospinal fluid to blood-based biomarkers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>ODIN recruited 451 patients (median age 74 years, 53% females) referred to the Department of Neurology at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, for diagnostic assessment of dementia. Enrolment started in March 2020 and ended in July 2025. Patients referred for a lumbar puncture were eligible for inclusion. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood samples (plasma, serum and buffy coat) were stored at &ndash;80&deg;C. Information about sociodemographic, educational level, dementia subtype, cognitive test scores, neuroimaging results, hypertension, diabetes, height, weight, alcohol consumption and smoking was collected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>The most frequent diagnoses were Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease (n=268, 59%), frontotemporal dementia (n=26, 5.8%) and mixed Alzheimer&rsquo;s and vascular disease (n=23, 5.1%). N=82 (18%) were cognitively unimpaired or had mild cognitive impairment but not dementia. The median Mini&ndash;Mental State Examination score was 23 (IQR: 20&ndash;26) and the median Addenbrooke&rsquo;s Cognitive Examination score was 68 (IQR: 58&ndash;77).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>ODIN will contribute to the development, validation and implementation of new biomarkers related to diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of dementia. Furthermore, the cohort will assist the transition from cerebrospinal fluid to blood-based biomarkers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laugesen, K., Skjaerbaek, C., Okkels, N., Moller, H. J., Borghammer, P., Gottrup, H., Parkner, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114084</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114084</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ODIN Biobank: a Danish cohort for dementia research- cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114084</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114084</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114260?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing maternal autonomy in choosing birthing positions: an exploratory pre-post intervention study protocol (MAM-Care)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114260?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Although evidence on whether particular birthing positions offer advantages over others remains inconclusive, the majority of women give birth in the supine position. Earlier research associates maternal satisfaction with autonomy and active participation in choosing positions, irrespective of the clinical outcome. In practice, however, autonomy may be limited by the dynamics of labour, insufficient information and sociocultural norms. Against this background, the intervention aims to enhance maternal autonomy in childbirth through the provision of activating information materials and psychological nudges. Women shall be encouraged to explore various positions enabling them to autonomously choose positions that best align with their individual needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Using an exploratory pre-post design, this controlled intervention is carried out as a multicentre study in six German obstetrics departments. The intervention will include various ways to inform and nudge women to move and try out various positions autonomously during childbirth. Due to its minimally invasive character, it should easily integrate into organisational processes and everyday care. The primary endpoint of the study is the proportion of mothers who indicate that their final birthing position felt appropriate. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of upright positions as final birthing positions and maternal and neonatal health outcomes among others. Data sources include maternal longitudinal data, birth companions&rsquo; and midwives&rsquo;/physicians&rsquo; perspectives as well as clinical sheets and aggregated comparisons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study obtained ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn and the Medical Chamber of Nordrhein (2025&ndash;325 BO). All study procedures will adhere to relevant data protection regulations. Dissemination of project information, materials and results will take place through the project homepage, social media and peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00036899; (<A HREF="https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00036899/entails">https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00036899/entails</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Okumu, M.-R., Haid-Schmallenberg, L., Sand, N., Sto&#x0308;cker, A., Volkert, A., Scholten, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114260</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114260</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing maternal autonomy in choosing birthing positions: an exploratory pre-post intervention study protocol (MAM-Care)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114260</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114260</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115068?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of access to anticancer medicines in South Asia: a multimethod study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115068?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>South Asia bears a high cancer burden, low universal health coverage and high out-of-pocket expenditure. Access to anticancer medicines is challenging and is influenced by determinants&mdash;National Essential Medicines List (NEML), registration and local production&mdash;yet these are rarely evaluated. This study evaluates these determinants in eight South Asian countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multimethod study using a document analysis phase and semistructured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Eight South Asian countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka) for document analysis, with stakeholder interviews conducted in six countries, excluding Bhutan and Maldives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Data were collected from eight regulatory authorities and 30 interviews with drug supply chain stakeholders across six South Asian countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The inclusion of 67 anticancer medicines from the 2023 WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) into NEML, their registration and local production, along with macrolevel indicators and stakeholders&rsquo; perspectives regarding them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The median number of medicines included in NEMLs, registered and locally produced was 23.5, 45 and 6.5, respectively. Local production correlated positively with NEML inclusion (=0.884, p=0.004) and negatively with healthcare expenditure (r = &ndash;0.732, p=0.039). Three countries listed &gt;50% of the WHO EML medicines on their NEMLs; six had &gt;50% registered. Local production remained limited, with imports dominating supply. Qualitative analysis identified three key barriers to improving availability: financial constraints, a weak regulatory system and insufficient strategic planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Access to anticancer medicines is constrained by systemic misalignment between NEML inclusion, registration and local production, undermined by weak regulatory coordination, limited strategic planning and financial constraints. Strengthening regulatory coordination, improving registration efficiency and supporting regional production strategies aligned with guided WHO guidance may help improve equitable access to cancer medicines in the region.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shukar, S., Hussain, I., Iqbal, A., Rahimi, A., Shirol, G. M., Shirzad, I., Tenzin, J., Dewan, S. M. R., Kumari Mishra, S., Saeed, A., Babar, Z.-U.-D., Yang, C., Fang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115068</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115068</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of access to anticancer medicines in South Asia: a multimethod study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115068</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115068</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116084?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-developing a vocational rehabilitation intervention for individuals with chronic low back pain across a regional spine centre and three municipalities in Denmark: a three-stage intervention development study guided by the Medical Research Council framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116084?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To co-develop the Stay-At-Work (SAW) intervention, a person-centred, interdisciplinary, cross-sectoral vocational rehabilitation (VR) programme for individuals on, or at risk of, sick leave due to chronic low back pain (CLBP) and to advance methodological understanding of how evidence, qualitative insights, stakeholder input and programme theory can be systematically integrated and operationalised into concrete intervention components.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A three-stage intervention development study, guided by the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions, involving evidence review and stakeholder consultation (previously reported); multistakeholder co-design; and prototyping in clinical settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The intervention was developed within a Danish public healthcare and welfare context, involving a secondary care spinal service, municipal employment services (n=3), municipal rehabilitation services (n=3) and general practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Stage 1: 17 individuals on long-term sick leave due to CLBP participated in interviews and focus groups. Stages 2 and 3: The co-design group included individuals living with CLBP (n=2); clinicians from a secondary care spine service (n=2) and municipal rehabilitation services (n=6); general practitioners (n=2); municipal employment service professionals (n=3) and local managers (n=3); and employer and employee representatives (n=2). Participants were purposively recruited based on their roles and experience in VR and return-to-work processes and contributed across different stages of intervention development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The SAW intervention consists of eight structured activities, developed through multistakeholder co-design and underpinned by a programme theory with four core mechanisms: (1) strengthened interprofessional and cross-sectoral understanding and collaboration; (2) stronger alignment around functional capacity and work ability; (3) addressing psychological vulnerability through systematic screening and support; and (4) enhanced coordination of care and rehabilitation efforts across services.</p>
<p>Stakeholder input from the co-design group informed the intervention&rsquo;s content and procedures, thereby improving alignment with local contexts and strengthening cross-sector collaboration. Some proposals were excluded due to inconsistency with clinical guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study demonstrates how a structured, theory-informed co-development process can be used to integrate evidence, stakeholder input and programme theory into a coherent, cross-sectoral VR intervention. The approach enhanced transparency, supported alignment with real-world practice, and provides methodological insight to strengthen the reproducibility and transferability of complex interventions.</p>
<p><b>Registration number</b>: The Region of Southern Denmark&rsquo;s Research Registry (journal no. 23/44927).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frydenlund, G., Mortensen, O. S., ONeill, S., Sondergaard, J., Hansen, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116084</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116084</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-developing a vocational rehabilitation intervention for individuals with chronic low back pain across a regional spine centre and three municipalities in Denmark: a three-stage intervention development study guided by the Medical Research Council framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116084</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116084</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lithium versus lamotrigine in bipolar disorder type II: protocol for a single-blinded, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (the LiLa-Bipolar RCT)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Bipolar II disorder (BDII) accounts for the majority of patients with bipolar disorder (BD), yet evidence supporting first-line mood stabilising treatment with lithium and lamotrigine is scarce, and the certainty of the evidence is very low. This highlights a critical evidence gap within psychiatric care. The lithium versus lamotrigine-bipolar randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare lithium and lamotrigine on self-rated day-to-day mood instability (MI) and other patient-centred outcomes in BDII, hypothesising the superiority of lithium.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A two-arm, single-blind, parallel-group, superiority RCT with a target sample size of 200 patients (accounting for attrition), recruiting patients with newly diagnosed BDII from specialised outpatient mood disorder clinics in the capital region of Copenhagen, Denmark. Participants are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lithium or lamotrigine for 6 months. The primary outcome is MI, assessed via daily smartphone-based mood ratings. MI is chosen as the primary outcome measure due to its internal validity as a real-life measure for patients and external validity as it reflects both illness severity and functional impairment. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of participants showing a non-response to treatment and observer-rated changes in depressive symptoms over 6 months, measured using the six-item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Primary analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle using linear mixed models. The trial is monitored by the good clinical practice.</p>
<p>Recruitment commenced on 8 May 2024, and the final participant follow-up (last patient last visit) is expected on 1 December 2027.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial has received approvals from the Danish Research Ethics Committee, the Danish Medicines Agency (EU CT No. 2023&ndash;5 09 607-32-00) and the Capital Region Data Agency (P-2023-307). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Clinicaltrials.gov/<A HREF="NCT06184581">NCT06184581</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fredskild, M. U., Fussing Bruun, C. F., Miskowiak, K. W., Budtz-Jorgensen, E., Vinberg, M., Faurholt-Jepsen, M., Kessing, L. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116196</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116196</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lithium versus lamotrigine in bipolar disorder type II: protocol for a single-blinded, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (the LiLa-Bipolar RCT)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116196</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117630?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy with generalised exercise for chronic spinal pain in surgeons: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117630?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic musculoskeletal pain is an occupational health concern among surgeons, with spinal pain being commonly reported. Exercise-based physiotherapy is recommended for reducing chronic spinal pain; however, the treatment effects are modest and may vary across clinical subgroups. Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) is a classification-based approach that uses a standardised clinical examination to guide exercise-based interventions and self-management strategies, and may offer advantages over non-direction-specific generalised exercise in selected patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled superiority trial will compare MDT with generalised exercise in surgeons with chronic spinal pain and a confirmed directional preference, with a planned recruitment of 62 participants (31 per group). Participants will be randomised 1:1 using a computer-generated allocation sequence in Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), with stratification by sex and permuted blocks of undisclosed size. Interventions will be delivered in routine physiotherapy practice with flexible scheduling within predefined boundaries (maximum six supervised sessions; most expected within the first 12 weeks), with a follow-up period of 26 weeks.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is the between-group difference in average pain intensity over the preceding 7 days at 12 weeks, measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and adjusted for baseline pain intensity.</p>
<p>The secondary and exploratory outcomes include functional limitations, health-related quality of life, fear of movement, pain catastrophising, pain self-efficacy, therapeutic alliance, exercise adherence and patient global impression of change, assessed at baseline and at 4, 12 and 26 weeks (where applicable). Treatment effects will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models under the intention-to-treat principle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (N-20240046). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07293130">NCT07293130</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kjaergaard, C., Madeleine, P., Dalboge, A., Steinhilber, B., Olesen, A. V., Nielsen, T. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117630</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117630</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy with generalised exercise for chronic spinal pain in surgeons: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117630</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117630</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118438?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emotional intelligence intervention to improve mental well-being of adolescents with emotional distress (BEAM): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118438?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adolescents experiencing emotional distress are at increased risk of developing mental health problems, which can negatively impact their academic performance, social relationships and long-term well-being. Schools provide a key setting for implementing preventive interventions that promote emotional and psychological resilience. This study presents the protocol for a randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multicomponent, school-based intervention grounded in emotional intelligence (EI) in improving mental well-being, EI levels and resilience among adolescents aged 14&ndash;16 years experiencing emotional distress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The trial will be conducted in public and publicly funded secondary schools in Terrassa, Spain, during the 2025&ndash;2026 academic year. Eligible participants will be identified using the short version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). The intervention consists of nine 55-minute group sessions delivered during school hours by a nurse and a physiotherapist, supported by the school&rsquo;s psychopedagogue. Sessions focus on emotional regulation, self-esteem, mindfulness, assertiveness and other socio-emotional skills. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, postintervention and 24-week follow-up. The primary outcome is mental well-being (WEMWBS); secondary outcomes include EI (Trait Meta-Mood Scale-24 items) and resilience (Child and Youth Resilience Measure-32 items). It is anticipated that adolescents in the intervention group will show significantly greater improvements in mental well-being, emotional intelligence and resilience compared with the control group, with effects sustained at follow-up. This study will provide evidence on the effectiveness of a scalable, school-based intervention led by community health professionals. The programme could be integrated into educational and public health strategies to promote adolescent mental health and reduce emotional distress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by CEIm Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa (01-24-1CR-102). Low-risk study; predefined procedures are in place for participants at risk (eg, suicidal ideation, abuse) with referral pathways to health/social services. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and a plain-language summary to schools/stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06713460">NCT06713460</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pedrosa-Vazquez, C., Ayuso-Marganon, R., Lidon-Moyano, C., Morales, P., Canas, L., Garriga-Salvo, C., Farfan-Dominguez, B., Rey-Vito, S., Llistosella, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118438</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118438</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emotional intelligence intervention to improve mental well-being of adolescents with emotional distress (BEAM): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118438</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118438</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119450?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of pain, anxiety and patient satisfaction during intravenous injection: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119450?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Intravenous injection is one of the most frequently performed invasive nursing procedures in hospitals. However, patients may experience pain and anxiety during this procedure, which can affect patient satisfaction.</p>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to determine the levels of pain, anxiety and satisfaction in patients undergoing intravenous injection and to examine the sociodemographic, clinical and procedural factors affecting these levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between August and November 2025 in the emergency departments of Atatu&#x0308;rk University Research Hospital, a large tertiary care university hospital. This single-centre study was carried out in a high-volume emergency department that provides 24-hour services to a diverse patient population. A total of 405 patients who received intravenous injections and agreed to participate in the study were included. Data were collected using an Information Form, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, VAS for anxiety and Post-Injection Satisfaction Scale. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, analysis of variance, correlation analyses and multiple regression analyses were used to analyse the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean pain VAS score for patients was 4.39&plusmn;2.33, the mean anxiety VAS score was 4.42&plusmn;2.14 and the mean Post-Injection Satisfaction Scale score was 3.51&plusmn;0.77, indicating moderate levels of pain and anxiety on a 0&ndash;10 VAS. Women were found to have significantly higher levels of pain and anxiety than men (p&lt;0.05). Low educational level, chronic disease, poorer perceived general health, negative intravenous experience, frequent injections, low pain tolerance and prolonged pain were associated with higher pain and anxiety levels and lower satisfaction levels (p&lt;0.05). A strong positive correlation was found between pain and anxiety (r=0.656, p&lt;0.05), while a negative correlation was found between pain, anxiety and satisfaction (p&lt;0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that lower pain tolerance and longer pain duration were among the most clinically relevant variables associated with higher pain and anxiety levels, particularly pain tolerance and pain duration, together with perceived general health status and procedure-related variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>It was found that patients experienced moderate pain and anxiety during intravenous injection and that this situation negatively affected patient satisfaction. The results indicate that individualised nursing approaches in intravenous injection practices and the implementation of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing pain and anxiety may increase patient satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
</sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Y&#x0131;ld&#x0131;z, G. N., Yu&#x0308;ce Basaran, H. D., Yavuz, B., Kocyigit, D., Koc, G., Ciftci, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:45-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119450</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119450</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of pain, anxiety and patient satisfaction during intravenous injection: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119450</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119450</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104128?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Open Pharma Vision for company-sponsored biomedical research publications]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104128?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Open Science aims to fight misinformation and improve trust in scientific research; it encourages the reliability and accessibility of evidence, reduces inequalities through the democratisation of scientific knowledge and focuses scientific endeavours on issues of societal significance. As a multisponsor collaboration committed to driving positive change, Open Pharma has a multifaceted vision for scientific research publications funded by pharmaceutical companies (&lsquo;company research publications&rsquo;) that aligns strongly with Open Science tenets. This new vision statement outlines our forward-looking principles for company research publications, both for short-term attainment (&lsquo;immediate&rsquo;) and long-term commitment (&lsquo;ultimate&rsquo;). Together, the principles provide a framework for positive collective action by all stakeholders involved in the development and dissemination of peer-reviewed company research publications. Underpinned by our central commitment to transparency for company research publications, we outline goals for: universal access to these publications; provision of peer-reviewed plain language summaries of the publications to aid comprehension among non-specialist readers; leveraging author and institutional metadata to advance transparency, discoverability and research impact; working towards FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse) data principles through cross-sector consensus and action, and disclosure of patient involvement in research and its reporting to support transparency and encourage a research ecosystem attuned to patient centricity. We call on all stakeholders to realise the Open Pharma Vision and achieve an open and trusted future for company research publications that will ultimately advance patient care and improve global health.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Osorio, J., Baronikova, S., Dews, S.-A., Mysore, S., Patrikis, K., Philippon, V., Rains, C. P., Schmidt, A., Skobe, C., Winchester, C. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104128</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104128</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Open Pharma Vision for company-sponsored biomedical research publications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical publishing and peer review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104128</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104128</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107259?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can social prescribing intervention reduce unplanned hospital usage in an ethnically diverse and deprived population: a quasi-experimental study using a dynamic staggered difference-in-differences approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107259?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a social prescribing intervention (the Central Locality Integrated Care Service (CLICS)) on unplanned hospital usage in the city of Bradford.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A quasi-experimental study applying a dynamic staggered difference-in-differences (DID) analysis on a propensity matched cohort between 2019 and 2023, using data from the Connected Bradford dataset, a pseudonymised linked health dataset on the whole Bradford population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>CLICS was delivered within general practices in deprived and ethnically diverse inner-city areas of Bradford, Yorkshire, UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>In total, 1304 CLICS patients were matched to 5216 control patients on key characteristics including ethnicity, deprivation, age, gender and health conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>A proactive social prescribing intervention that integrates clinical and non-clinical services, including an individualised approach to tailor support based on the patient&rsquo;s needs, both within primary care services and by linking them to appropriate community-based assets/services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the rate of unplanned hospital admissions and the secondary outcome was unplanned accident and emergency (A&amp;E) attendances.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>CLICS patients were 2.1% (95% CI &ndash;3.8% to &ndash;0.4%, p=0.013) less likely to have an unplanned hospital admission and 2.4% (95% CI &ndash;4.6% to &ndash;0.2%, p=0.03) less likely to have an unplanned A&amp;E attendance compared with the matched control. The DID analysis demonstrated a gradual increase in the association over time. Subanalyses revealed heterogeneity by ethnicity, the reduction in unplanned hospital admissions was observed only in patients of the Pakistani group, whereas the reduction in A&amp;E attendances was statistically significant only in the white British group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The CLICS intervention was associated with a reduction in unplanned hospital usage. Social prescribing may be a valuable component of strategies to reduce health inequalities in unplanned hospital usage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hou, B., Moss, R. H., Hammad, M., Abbas, S., McCooe, M., Wright, J., Wildman, J., Sheldon, T., Dickerson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107259</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107259</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can social prescribing intervention reduce unplanned hospital usage in an ethnically diverse and deprived population: a quasi-experimental study using a dynamic staggered difference-in-differences approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107259</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107681?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multimodal personalised executive function intervention (E-Fit) for school-aged children with complex congenital heart disease in Switzerland: a randomised controlled feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107681?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the feasibility of a novel multimodal executive function intervention in school-aged children with complex congenital heart disease (cCHD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Single-centre, single-blinded, randomised-controlled 8-week multimodal personalised executive function intervention (E-Fit) study. Outcomes were measured throughout the intervention, post-intervention (T1) and at 4-month follow-up (T2).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Tertiary care centre between May 2022 and May 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Children 10 to 12 years (M=11.0, SD=0.9) with cCHD without a genetic diagnosis with infant open-heart surgery and reported difficulties (T-scores &ge;60) on any of the summary scales of the parent- or teacher-reported Behavior Rating Inventory for Executive Function (BRIEF).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Children with cCHD were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the intervention or the control group. The 8-week intervention was multimodal including three modalities: (1) computerised executive function (EF) training 3<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>20 min/week with CogniFit; (2) a weekly, remote standardised 1:1 individual EF strategy coaching; (3) analogue games played at convenience. The control group completed activity logs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Feasibility measures</st>
<p>Acceptability: Acceptance and Feasibility Scale (AFS) and coach-rated engagement during coaching sessions. Demand: Number of completed computerised training, strategy coaching and analogue game sessions. Implementation: E-Fit Fidelity Measurement System, assessing adherence to core components. Practicality: Retention rate. Integration: AFS integration items. Exploratory efficacy: BRIEF, neuropsychological EF testing and psychosocial variables at baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks) and at 4-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We recruited 42 participants (N<SUB>female</SUB>=20). Acceptability: The intervention was acceptable, with moderate observed engagement. Demand: median number of computerised training sessions completed was 16 of 24 sessions (67%, (IQR; 6 to 19)), all children attended all scheduled coaching sessions, analogue games were played in total a median of 9 times (IQR 4 to 14). Implementation: Coaching sessions could be implemented by the coaches as intended. Practicality: Overall retention rate was 90%. Integration: E-Fit was well integrable into the home setting. Exploratory efficacy favoured the intervention group with improvements in the parent-rated Behavioral Regulation Index of the BRIEF (adjusted Hedge&rsquo;s (g<SUB>A1</SUB>) = &ndash;0.408 to &ndash;0.903) and in social responsiveness (g<SUB>A1</SUB> = &ndash;0.427 to &ndash;0.521) at T1 and at T2.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>E-Fit is a feasible intervention suggesting EF and social responsiveness improvements in children with cCHD. Motivational strategies to improve adherence to computerised training should be refined before a full-scale efficacy trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05198583">NCT05198583</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schmid, A. S., Ehrler, M., Bunge, S. A., Kretschmar, O., Landolt, M. A., Rousson, V., Tuura, R. O., Wehrle, F. M., Latal, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107681</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107681</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multimodal personalised executive function intervention (E-Fit) for school-aged children with complex congenital heart disease in Switzerland: a randomised controlled feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107681</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107681</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109911?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Model of care to promote recovery in older people with long COVID: findings from interviews and a co-design workshop]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109911?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to co-design a tailored model of care for older people with long COVID.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Using a human-centred design approach, semistructured interviews were conducted with patients and health professionals from a long COVID service to explore their experiences. Insights were further developed during a co-design workshop involving patients, health professionals and community members who identified as older people and who had experience with chronic illness. Key themes were identified and used to map an ideal patient journey and inform the final model of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Long COVID outpatient service in a tertiary hospital in Adelaide, South Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Four patients and four health professionals participated in the interviews. The workshop included four patients, five health professionals and seven community members.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The co-design process identified challenges experienced by people with long COVID, including lack of validation, delayed multidisciplinary care, mental health deterioration and difficulties navigating the healthcare system. These challenges were described as having particular relevance for older adults. In response, a model of care was developed focused on comprehensive assessment, coordinated multidisciplinary care, education for self-management, mental health support and opportunities for research participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A comprehensive and adaptable model of care is needed to address the complex and multifaceted nature of long COVID. This human-centred design approach ensured the model was grounded in lived experience, clinically informed and aligned with patient priorities. While not unique to older adults, the findings highlight areas that may require particular attention in this population, including care coordination, validation and support for comorbidities and social vulnerabilities. While developed in a single tertiary service, these principles may inform the design of services for similar populations in other healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuel, K., Davis, A., Little, K., Peng, F., Gwilt, I., Laver, K., Adey-Wakeling, Z., Seaforth, C., Crotty, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109911</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109911</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Model of care to promote recovery in older people with long COVID: findings from interviews and a co-design workshop]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109911</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109911</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110096?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Healthcare utilisation patterns among frail individuals aged 50+ years: results from the Lolland-Falster Population Study (LOFUS)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110096?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterised by impaired homeostatic mechanisms and reduced physiological reserve. Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are commonly used as indicators of quality in primary healthcare. We aimed to examine the association between frailty and the use of healthcare resources, including unplanned hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs and visits to general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists (MSs) in primary care. We hypothesised that frail individuals would have similar odds of hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Registry-based epidemiological study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data from the Danish Lolland-Falster Health Study and national health registers. Data were collected in a rural region of Denmark between February 2016 and February 2020.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>10 154 randomly selected individuals aged &ge;50 years participating in the Lolland-Falster Health Study with valid frailty measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Hospital visits due to any diagnosis, hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs, and visits to GPs and MSs in the primary care sector.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidity and socioeconomic factors, frail participants had higher odds of hospital visits due to any diagnosis (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.57; p=0.03). The odds of hospital visits due to ACSCs (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.08; p=0.07) and non-ACSCs (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.47; p=0.22) were not significantly different. Frail individuals had higher odds of visiting their GP (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.46; p=0.047) but not a medical specialist (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07; p=0.15).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Among frail individuals, the distinction between unplanned hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs is not meaningful. This finding is consistent with the understanding of frailty as a state of reduced physiological reserve, in which minor stressors may lead to hospital care regardless of diagnostic category.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacobsen, K. K., Christensen, M. G., Nilsson, C., Jepsen, R., Thygesen, L., Suetta, C., Holm, E. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110096</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110096</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Healthcare utilisation patterns among frail individuals aged 50+ years: results from the Lolland-Falster Population Study (LOFUS)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110096</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110096</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk factors and population attributable fraction for large-for-gestational-age and macrosomic births in low- and middle-income countries between 2000 and 2025: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Large-for-gestational-age (LGA) and macrosomic births pose significant maternal and neonatal health risks, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where access to care are often limited. Despite well-established associations between LGA, macrosomia, and various risk factors, the relative contributions of these factors remain underexplored in LMICs. This study aims to identify risks factors for LGA and macrosomia in LMICs, with an emphasis on modifiable ones, and quantify their population attributable fractions (PAFs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic review will be conducted across the following databases: MEDLINE, Scopus and ProQuest Central and regional databases (Africa Index Medicus, Index Medicus for South Asia and Latin America and Caribbean literature of health sciences). Eligible studies will include observational studies, reviews and interventional research conducted between 2000 and 2025 that report on prevalence or association of risk factors for large-for-gestational-age (LGA) and/or macrosomia births in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Data extraction will encompass study characteristics, prevalence/incidence estimates, risk factor distributions and measures of association. Quality assessment will be performed by two independent reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational cohort, case&ndash;control and cross-sectional studies. While Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool will be used for randomised controlled trials and a Measurement Tool to Assess Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model, which accounts for population heterogeneity, will synthesise risk estimates for factors examined in three or more studies from LMICs, up-to-date meta-analysis including all relevant studies identified through our search. Population attributable fractions for individual and combined risk factors will be calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review will use only previously published information. Ethical approval is therefore not required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and the findings will be presented at international conferences to engage relevant stakeholders including policymakers and public health organisations in LMICs with the aim of informing the development of targeted interventions to reduce the burden of LGA and macrosomia births in the region.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirakoya-Samadoulougou, F., Blencowe, H., Ilboudo, D., Ukwishaka, J., Suarez Idueta, L., Hazel, E. A., Ohuma, E., Erchick, D. J., Katz, J., Lee, A. C., Black, R. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110407</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110407</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk factors and population attributable fraction for large-for-gestational-age and macrosomic births in low- and middle-income countries between 2000 and 2025: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110407</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110631?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding patient preferences, experiences and engagement with ambulatory heart rhythm monitoring: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110631?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To review the literature reporting patient preferences for ambulatory heart rhythm monitoring (AHRM) and what factors affect experience and engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The prevalence of arrhythmia continues to rise and contributes significantly to outpatient care burden. There is limited understanding of patient experience and compliance with monitoring. As innovative technologies are developed and healthcare strategies move towards surveillance and prevention, understanding this is key.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A scoping review was conducted using guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. The review included studies of adults under investigation or surveillance for arrhythmia with a range of devices (Holter monitor, patch device, event recorder, mobile cardiac telemetry, external and implantable loop recorders, wearables and other implantable cardiac devices) in ambulatory care settings worldwide. The final search was conducted on 3 January 2026 across Medline (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid) and Google Scholar. Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, multiple methods and any type of review articles were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>54 studies were eligible for inclusion from the initial search that identified 1320 articles. Two overarching themes emerged from the quantitative and qualitative data: patient factors and device factors affecting experience and engagement. Patient factors included clinical and demographic factors, education and expectations, experience and preferences and impact on daily life and healthcare. Device factors could be common to several devices, for example, skin irritation or device specific, for example, the nature of activation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patient and device factors influence preferences for and experience and engagement with AHRM. While existing literature is incomplete and heterogeneous, it identifies key considerations that should be integrated into the development and testing of novel approaches for arrhythmia surveillance in healthcare contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p><A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6K3W8">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6K3W8</A> (Open Science Framework).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bennett, M. R. J., Chaudhry, B., Norman, G., Robinson, T., Ternent, L., Coats, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110631</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110631</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding patient preferences, experiences and engagement with ambulatory heart rhythm monitoring: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110631</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110631</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111403?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping same day, urgent and emergency care services across the UK: a mixed methods study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111403?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In the UK, a range of services provide same day, urgent and emergency care (UEC). Urgent medical needs can be addressed through pharmacy services, same day general practice (GP) appointments, phone or online triage services, out-of-hours GP appointments and urgent treatment centres (or equivalents). For emergency medical needs, patients can access emergency departments (EDs) and ambulance services. These services are highly vulnerable to excessive strain due to rising, unpredictable demand and limitations in patient flow across the system. The workforce operates in time-critical situations, often with limited resources, which can lead to staff burnout, low job satisfaction and retention and poor health. The organisation of services and their workforce continues to evolve in response to local and national pressures and varies considerably across the UK, where there are four distinct, publicly funded healthcare systems managed separately in each country. This makes it difficult to describe and compare services within and across regions and understand the impact of workforce organisation on service delivery, staff well-being and patient care. This study aims to develop a comprehensive understanding of the range and types of UK UEC services, the relative experiences of the workforce and the available workforce data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This mixed-methods study includes two components, integrated through an explanatory sequential design. Study 1 will use data on NHS service availability and direct enquiry to map UEC services and populate a structured database, which will facilitate the generation of a UEC typology of the range and types of services and regional variation across the UK. Multiple case studies will be conducted in a subset of services using qualitative interviews (n=136&ndash;220) with service leaders (n=3&ndash;5), workforce (n=10&ndash;12), and patients or carers (n=4&ndash;5), as well as document analysis where relevant, in each service of interest (n=8&ndash;10). Study 2 will create a metadata catalogue of workforce data and produce descriptive summaries of key metrics (eg, staffing levels and skill mix). The study will be supported by our Community Inclusion and Engagement (CIE) panel and Patient and Public Advisory Group (PPAG) to ensure relevance, inclusivity and impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study received ethical approval from Yorkshire and The Humber - Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (04/08/2025, IRAS ID: 357276, REC Reference: 25/YH/0125) and HRA and Health and Care Research Wales approval (12/08/2025). Data collection poses minimal risk, informed consent will be obtained, and participants may withdraw at any time. Dissemination will follow knowledge mobilisation principles to maximise impact. We will build on our existing networks and work with our CIE panel and PPAG to tailor study outputs to different audiences. The outputs will improve understanding of the variation in how UEC services and workforces are organised across the UK, as well as the type and format of available workforce data, and provide benchmarks for future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>Research Registry (REF: researchregistry11555; <A HREF="https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now/%23home/registrationdetails/68d402672341e502cd0ce888/">https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now/%23home/registrationdetails/68d402672341e502cd0ce888/</A>)</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Same day and urgent care (SURGE) Workforce Research Partnership, Blackwell, Watkins, Jones, Phillpotts, Tate, Benger, Booker, Manley, Siriwardena, Asghar, Vasilakis, Drennan, Black, Gage, Halter, Archibong, Arnold, Clark, Cooper, Edwards, Gibson, Jagosh, Moore, West, Walsh, Voss]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111403</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111403</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping same day, urgent and emergency care services across the UK: a mixed methods study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111403</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111403</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112451?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic disparities and mortality among acute patients with sepsis: a retrospective Danish cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112451?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Socioeconomic inequalities exist in infectious diseases and sepsis in high-income countries. We investigated the association between income and mortality among patients with sepsis, overall and among those treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) versus general wards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective register-based cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The Region of Southern Denmark (RSD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All adult patients with an unplanned contact with a hospital in the RSD from 1 January 2016 to 20 March 2018. Patients with sepsis were identified based on the following criteria: (1) blood culture(s) performed within 48 hours of arrival, (2) antibiotic(s) administered within 48 hours of arrival, (3) a discharge diagnosis of infection and (4) a SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score of &ge;2. The cohort was divided into quartiles according to household income.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between income groups and mortality. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality with 7-day and 365-day mortality as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were calculated overall and stratified by general ward treatment only and ICU admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 7813 first-time visits with community-acquired sepsis, including 886 ICU admissions (11.3%). Among patients in the lowest income group, sepsis was associated with a HR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.34) for 90-day mortality compared with the highest income group. This association was particularly pronounced at 365-day follow-up: HR=1.24 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.39). No difference was observed in 7-day all-cause mortality, HR=1.13 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.45). The association was not observed among patients admitted to the ICU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Low income was associated with increased mortality in patients with sepsis, particularly during long-term follow-up. The impact of income disparities was not observed among patient admitted to the ICU.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schade Skov, C., Brabrand, M., de Groot, B., Rosenvinge, F. S., Skjot-Arkil, H., Mogensen, C. B., Johansen, I. S., Lassen, A. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112451</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112451</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic disparities and mortality among acute patients with sepsis: a retrospective Danish cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112451</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112451</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113682?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and types of anxiety disorders among patients with cardiac conditions and elevated HADS-A scores: findings from the initial screening phase of the Heart and Mind trial in Denmark]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113682?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify whether patients with arrhythmia, heart failure or ischaemic heart disease presenting with anxiety symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) have identifiable anxiety according to the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID) and, if so, which type of anxiety disorder based on the SCID.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Initial screening data from the Heart and Mind randomised clinical trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Patients with arrhythmia, heart failure or ischaemic heart disease were screened using HADS, and patients with a HADS-anxiety (HADS-A) score&ge;8 were invited to participate. Participants were interviewed by trained cardiac nurses using the SCID to determine whether they met the criteria for anxiety and, if so, the type of anxiety disorder.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 7816 patients who completed the HADS questionnaire, 1803 (23%) had a HADS-A score&ge;8. Among these, 398 (22%) agreed to the SCID interview, and 336 (84%) met the diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder. The mean age was 61 years, with 40% being female. The mean HADS-A score was 11.3 (SD=2.7). The most common types of anxiety were generalised anxiety disorder (61%), panic disorder (23%) and specific phobia (8%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The majority of individuals identified by the instrument also met the diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder. Generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder were the most prevalent subtypes. Anxiety was common across the cardiac population, underscoring the need for routine assessment and targeted intervention in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04582734">NCT04582734</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berg, S. K., Rasmussen, L. R., Thorup, C. B., Rasmussen, T. B., Christensen, A. V., Hammer, C. B., Jorgensen, M. B., Svendsen, J. H., Risom, S. S., Juul, C., Schjodt, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T05:41:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113682</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113682</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and types of anxiety disorders among patients with cardiac conditions and elevated HADS-A scores: findings from the initial screening phase of the Heart and Mind trial in Denmark]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113682</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113682</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099036?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenges and enablers in accessing paediatric inguinal hernia surgical care in Sierra Leone: a qualitative exploratory study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e099036?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess challenges and enablers in accessing paediatric inguinal hernia surgical care at governmental hospitals in Sierra Leone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>A qualitative exploratory interview study was conducted using semistructured interviews with 16 healthcare providers and 19 guardians of 17 children at four governmental secondary-level and tertiary-level hospitals in Sierra Leone. All interviews were analysed using thematic analysis within a constructivist paradigm, with subsequent framework-based interpretation using the WHO health system building blocks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study identified five interrelated themes describing barriers to accessing surgical care across household and health system levels: (1) access to equipment, consumables and medicines; (2) health-seeking behaviour; (3) financial considerations; (4) workforce; and (5) management and hospital structure. These themes illustrate how health system constraints and household-level barriers interact to delay or impede access to surgery. Key enablers included task-sharing within the surgical workforce, community trust and financial protection through the Free Healthcare Initiative or non-governmental organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Access to paediatric inguinal hernia surgery in Sierra Leone is hindered by economic barriers, limited awareness and shortages of staff, equipment and medicines. Targeted community outreach, expansion of the Free Healthcare Initiative beyond age 5 and securing dedicated paediatric surgical instrument sets emerged as feasible strategies to reduce delays and improve equity of care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mona, J., Ahlba&#x0308;ck, J. G., Lebbie, A., Ashley, T., Bolkan, H. A., van Duinen, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099036</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099036</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenges and enablers in accessing paediatric inguinal hernia surgical care in Sierra Leone: a qualitative exploratory study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099036</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099036</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104029?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medication errors in practice: A mixed-methods study from Diwan Polyclinic-Muscat]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104029?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore healthcare professionals&rsquo; experiences with medication errors (MEs) in terms of types and factors that contribute to them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A mixed-methods study was conducted to explore the MEs experiences of healthcare professionals. Quantitative data were collected through a cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire, whereas qualitative data were collected via face-to-face semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at Diwan Polyclinic in Muscat, a primary and secondary healthcare institute.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study population included healthcare workers who were practising (not retired) and actively involved in patient care and the medication-use cycle, either by prescribing, dispensing or administering medication. The total number of participants was 83 (55 females and 28 males) healthcare professionals, comprising doctors (38), nurses (32), pharmacists and assistant pharmacists (13). Omani participants accounted for 72%, whereas non-Omani participants accounted for 28%. Six of 83 healthcare professionals were purposefully selected to provide additional qualitative insights into their experiences with MEs and the measures they use to reduce them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes focused on identifying types, causes and effects of MEs, and the secondary outcomes aimed to explore the emotional and professional implications on healthcare workers as well as suggested strategies to minimise MEs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 83 participants (55 females and 28 males) were included, with 72% Omani and 28% non-Omani. Of these, 44 participants (53%) encountered MEs during their practice at Diwan Polyclinic. The most common type of MEs was prescribing errors (51%), followed by dispensing errors (39%) and administering errors (10%). Incorrect dosing was the most typical cause of prescribing errors.</p>
<p>In the qualitative part of the study, the interviewed participants implemented these measures to reduce MEs: 1) double-checking the prescribed medicines, patients &lsquo;names and identity before dispensing and administering drugs, 2) patient education on polypharmacy and 3) alerting prescribing doctors to errors in their prescriptions or orders. Several measures have been suggested to mitigate MEs, including better communication among health professionals and between them and patients, focusing on staff well-being and development and innovative built-in modules and programmes in electronic medical records for drug verification.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The most common type of MEs was prescribing errors. Focusing on better communication and staff well-being, as well as the innovative development of electronic medical records, will help minimise MEs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Mukhaini, Z. A. M., Passarin, I., Palomares, E. M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104029</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medication errors in practice: A mixed-methods study from Diwan Polyclinic-Muscat]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104029</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104029</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What is the adherence to an exercise intervention during (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy among Swedish patients with breast cancer? Data from the Phys-Can randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>While exercise adherence is known to vary during cancer treatment, little is known about what predicts these changes during chemotherapy or within individual treatment cycles for breast cancer. We examined changes in adherence and its predictors (1) across chemotherapy treatment and (2) within treatment cycles in women undergoing (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study is based on data from the Phys-Can multicentre parallel randomised trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The exercise intervention was conducted at public gyms in three Swedish university cities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>178 women undergoing (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy without any chemotherapy treatment delays and had any adherence data were included in the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants in the Phys-Can trial were randomised to either high or low-to-moderate intensity combined endurance and resistance training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome</st>
<p>The primary outcome variable for this secondary analysis of Phys-Can trial data was adherence to endurance and resistance training. Bayesian multilevel growth curve models were used to examine adherence to resistance and endurance training throughout the chemotherapy treatment period and within chemotherapy cycles. Potential predictors of adherence included exercise intensity, chemotherapy dose, muscle strength, body mass index, cardiorespiratory fitness, fatigue and age. Results are reported with 95% credibility intervals (CrIs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Adherence to endurance and resistance training declined on average across the chemotherapy treatment by 1% (95% CrI &ndash;1.5, &ndash;0.5) and 5.2% (95% CrI &ndash;6.8, &ndash;3.6), respectively, per week. Adherence decreased within the chemotherapy treatment cycle by 2.4% for endurance (95% CrI &ndash;4.2, &ndash;0.7) and 6.1% (95% CrI &ndash;8.2, &ndash;4.1) for resistance training, respectively. Higher baseline fitness predicted better adherence to endurance exercise (<I>&beta;</I>=1.2, 95% CrI 0.1, 2.3), while high-intensity training predicted a steeper decline (<I>&beta;</I>=&ndash;1.2, 95% CrI &ndash;2.2, 0.2). No significant predictors were found for adherence to resistance training over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Women with breast cancer may require additional support to maintain exercise adherence during the later stages of chemotherapy and during the second and third weeks of their chemotherapy cycles. Those with lower pretreatment fitness levels may benefit from more intensive support to sustain engagement in exercise.</p>
<p>The Phys-Can trial was registered in Clinical trials: ClinicalTrials.gov <A HREF="NCT02473003">NCT02473003</A>,</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henriksson, A., Stenling, A., Mazzoni, A.-S., Sjo&#x0308;vall, K., Bo&#x0308;rjeson, S., Berntsen, S., Bean, C. G., Buffart, L. M., Nordin, K., Demmelmaier, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105540</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105540</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What is the adherence to an exercise intervention during (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy among Swedish patients with breast cancer? Data from the Phys-Can randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105540</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Variations in symptoms, endoscopy use and emergency diagnosis of colorectal cancer by body mass index: a retrospective cohort study using linked electronic health records in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Body mass index (BMI) confers a higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and may influence cancer diagnostic pathways. We investigated variations in diagnostic pathways by BMI category among patients with symptomatic CRC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study using linked cancer registry, primary, and secondary care data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>England</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>5571 patients with symptomatic CRC diagnosed in England between 2011 and 2015.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Route to CRC diagnosis (emergency presentation and fast-track referrals among patients with new-onset red flag symptoms), presenting symptoms and pre-diagnostic endoscopy use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Red-flag symptoms (change in bowel habit, rectal bleeding) were more frequently recorded among patients with rectal cancer with obesity and overweight versus normal weight (65.2% and 65.5% vs 56.8%, respectively). Among colon cancer patients endoscopy during the year pre-diagnosis was used in a greater proportion of patients with obesity versus normal weight (72.8% vs 64.4%, p&lt;0.001). Among patients with colon cancer with red-flag symptoms, being overweight versus normal weight was associated with higher odds of fast-track referral compared with diagnosis through other routes (OR: 1.48, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.88). Obesity was associated with lower odds of emergency presentation, compared with normal weight (colon 23.6% vs 32.1%; adjusted OR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90; rectum 8.3% vs 14.8%; OR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.92).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients with CRC with higher BMI are more likely to be referred urgently and less likely to experience emergency cancer diagnosis than normal weight patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurland, J. S., Kaushal, A., Benitez Majano, S., Lyratzopoulos, G., Renzi, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107468</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107468</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Variations in symptoms, endoscopy use and emergency diagnosis of colorectal cancer by body mass index: a retrospective cohort study using linked electronic health records in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107468</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term health outcomes of migration experiences during different life stages among middle-aged and older adults in China: a retrospective study using CHARLS data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the associations between migration experiences during different life stages and long-term health outcomes among middle-aged and older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective study based on data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A nationally representative survey conducted in 150 county-level and 450 village-level administrative units across China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 14 753 Chinese adults aged 45 years or older who completed both the 2014 and 2020 waves of the CHARLS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome measures included self-rated health, depression, cognitive function and physical disability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants were categorised into four groups based on migration timing: never experienced childhood and adulthood migration (NCMAM); childhood migration only, no adulthood migration; adulthood migration only, no childhood migration (PAMNCM) and both childhood and adulthood migration experiences (PCMAM). Compared with the NCMAM group, the PAMNCM group reported poorer self-rated health (OR=1.12, 95% CI (1.02 to 1.23), p&lt;0.05) but demonstrated better cognitive function (B=0.34, 95% CI (0.14 to 0.55), p&lt;0.01). In contrast, the PCMAM group exhibited a lower prevalence of depression (OR=0.80, 95% CI (0.65 to 0.99), p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Migration experiences showed complex associations with health outcomes among middle-aged and older adults. Migration during both childhood and adulthood was linked to better mental health, whereas migration limited to adulthood was associated with slightly better cognitive function despite poorer self-rated health. Policies should account for the diversity of migration backgrounds and equitably address the distinct needs of all migration status groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, X., Zheng, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, S., Wang, X., Chen, F., Wang, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107521</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107521</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term health outcomes of migration experiences during different life stages among middle-aged and older adults in China: a retrospective study using CHARLS data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107521</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107582?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of general practice education on medical students attitude towards this discipline: a mixed studies scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107582?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The shortage of general practitioners in many countries remains a persistent issue and is likely to become more severe in the future. Multiple factors influencing the attitude of medical students towards general practice have been identified. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the scope of the evidence on the influence of teaching general practice in medical school (eg, lectures, seminars, internships) on medical students&rsquo; attitude towards this discipline and to identify knowledge gaps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will apply a mixed studies scoping review design. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring the influence of general practice education in medical school (exposure) on the attitudes (outcome) of medical students (population) will be included. The outcome will be any measured or reported change in medical students&rsquo; attitude towards general practice as a discipline. A systematic search in MEDLINE through PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, the Education Resources Information Centre and PsycInfo, as well as forward and backward citation tracking, will be conducted starting from 2015, published in English or German. Titles, abstracts and full texts will be screened and data will be extracted independently by two reviewers. Results will be tabulated and summarised narratively and interpreted according to the framework of the affective domain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion and conclusion</st>
<p>By identifying and linking educational formats with levels of the affective domain, this approach may help educators understand how medical training can influence the attitude towards and interest in primary care and improve the development of professional identity formation and general practice focused curricula.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This scoping review does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The protocol of this scoping review has been registered on OSF (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UFJCR).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schu&#x0308;rmann, L., Ho&#x0308;ft, L.-M., Karpfinger, J., Gerbaulet, S., Sternal, J., Muth, C., Puzhko, S., Leeuw, B., Peters, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107582</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107582</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influence of general practice education on medical students attitude towards this discipline: a mixed studies scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107582</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107582</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109563?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Environmental impact of total hip replacements: a life cycle assessment study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109563?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Healthcare contributes considerably to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly from operating theatres. The global demand for total hip replacements (THR) is rising, highlighting the need to understand its impact on the environment. The study aims to assess the environmental impact of THRs using life cycle assessment (LCA) and to identify key contributors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A process-based LCA focusing on the surgical procedure was conducted in accordance with global standards (ISO 14040:2006 and ISO 14044:2006). Eleven sensitivity scenarios were performed to assess the robustness of the results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A Danish University Hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The empirical data involved the quantity and type of surgical equipment, material composition, energy usage and clinical infrastructure. There were no study participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>No study interventions were performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>18 environmental impact scores, such as global warming, human toxicity and water consumption, were assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The carbon footprint of a THR was 62.0 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e, with major contributors being single-use disposable utensils (54 %), implants (22 %), and sterilisation of non-disposable utensils (18 %). Operating theatre energy usage, non-disposable utensils and clinical infrastructure contributed less, at 3 %, 2 % and 1 % each. Although the results of the other 17 environmental impact scores varied, they were predominantly influenced by the same factors as the carbon footprint. The sensitivity analysis showed that the overall carbon footprint varied by no more than 6 % unless the energy system shifted to less renewable energy, potentially increasing the footprint by 47 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>THRs impose a substantial environmental burden, and sustainable solutions should focus on the primary drivers of this impact: disposable utensils, implants and the sterilisation process. In contrast, clinical infrastructure and non-disposable utensils appear to have a relatively minimal environmental impact.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roe Rasmussen, A., Brorson, S., Dudka, K., Hauschild, M. Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109563</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109563</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Environmental impact of total hip replacements: a life cycle assessment study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109563</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109563</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110060?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying success factors and impacts of social and emotional well-being programmes for First Nations youth in Australia: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110060?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth hold central roles in the preservation and transmission of cultural knowledge, community leadership and Australia&rsquo;s social and political future. Fostering youth well-being is essential in the context of historical, social and political impacts of colonisation. Social and emotional well-being (SEWB) is a holistic concept grounded in First Nations worldviews, encompassing connections to country, culture, spirituality, family, community, body and mind. Many programmes aim to support SEWB among First Nations youth; however, evidence describing programme success factors outcomes remains fragmented and is often shaped by Western-centric methodologies. This protocol outlines a culturally responsive scoping review that will map success factors and SEWB impacts of programmes delivered in Australia for First Nations youth aged 10&ndash;18 years that is designed to be undertaken collaboratively with First Nations people and non-Indigenous allies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Identity</st>
<p>In recognition of the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and their right to self-identify using preferred terminologies, in this protocol, we respectfully use &lsquo;First Nations peoples&rsquo; to refer to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia and &lsquo;First Nations youth&rsquo; to refer to those aged 10&ndash;18 years. We further acknowledge that this use of this terminology may not capture the many and varied First Nations identities within Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review protocol outlines a revised, culturally responsive version of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and will be conducted using an Indigenous-informed, decolonising approach. Peer-reviewed and grey literature reporting on Australian SEWB programmes delivered to First Nations youth between 2000 and 2025 will be included. Databases to be searched include MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, ProQuest and EBSCOhost. Targeted Indigenous sources will be searched, including Informit Indigenous Collection, Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet, National Aboriginal Controlled Community Health Organisation and Lowitja Institute repositories, along with relevant organisational and government websites. Three reviewers will independently screen records and extract data. Articles requiring cultural responsivity assessment will be reviewed by First Nations researchers. Data will be analysed using inductive content analysis to identify programme success factors and reported SEWB outcomes, with interpretation guided by First Nations members of the research team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol is guided by Australian Indigenous research ethics frameworks including the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research and the Lowitja Institute&rsquo;s guidance for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. Findings will be disseminated through culturally appropriate channels to communities and stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>Protocol registration will be made available online via the Open Science Framework (osf.io/yq6sv).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kealey, J., Ward, R., Pocock, C., Schaffer, K., Scott, R., Burton, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110060</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110060</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying success factors and impacts of social and emotional well-being programmes for First Nations youth in Australia: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110060</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110060</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110420?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Navigating a vulnerable transition: a qualitative study of the role of companions and providers in pregnancy and childbirth in Burkina Faso]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110420?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore women&rsquo;s expectations and experiences of care and support from pregnancy to childbirth in Burkina Faso, with a focus on the role and impact of companions and providers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An exploratory qualitative study based on in-depth interviews with purposively sampled participants and employing reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two public hospitals in urban Burkina Faso having implemented the &lsquo;QUALIty DECision-making by women and providers for appropriate use of caesarean section&rsquo; intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>24 purposively selected postpartum women with variation in terms of parity, mode of birth, labour companionship experiences, education level and occupation were interviewed before discharge from the hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The two themes generated from the analysis elucidate how women rely on providers and companions to navigate uncertainty and vulnerability experienced during pregnancy and childbirth. Women viewed providers as essential for managing the biomedical risks of childbirth and voiced their need for care at critical moments. They expected companions to enhance the non-clinical aspects of their experiences by providing spiritual support and alleviating feelings of loneliness. However, participants also expressed ambivalence about companions witnessing intimate aspects of their birth experience and valued the ability to choose a companion as means to preserve personal integrity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Both providers and labour companions play an essential role in enhancing women&rsquo;s experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in Burkina Faso. Additional research and programmatic efforts are needed to support women&rsquo;s equitable participation in patient&ndash;provider interactions and operationalise the notion of choice of a labour companion in a contextually appropriate manner.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wallengren, E., Ouedraogo, K., Hanson, C., Mo&#x0308;lsted Alvesson, H., Bocoum, F. Y., Kabore, C. P., Dumont, A., Betran, A. P., Cleeve, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110420</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110420</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Navigating a vulnerable transition: a qualitative study of the role of companions and providers in pregnancy and childbirth in Burkina Faso]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110420</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110420</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111194?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Longitudinal real-world surveillance of infection outcomes in CAR-T and bispecific therapy recipients: the CLARITY study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111194?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Infections are a leading cause of non-relapse mortality following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) and bispecific antibody (BsAb) therapies. However, infection data from clinical trials are often incomplete, lack pathogen-level detail and rarely capture late infectious complications. This <b>C</b>AR-T treatment in <b>L</b>ymphoma: <b>A</b>nalysis of <b>R</b>isk of <b>I</b>nfection following <b>T</b>herap<b>y</b> (CLARITY) study aims to generate real-world, longitudinal infection data with extended follow-up to characterise infection timing, including late events and inform risk prediction in patients with lymphoma and myeloma receiving novel immunotherapies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>CLARITY is a multicentre observational cohort study across six Australian centres enrolling adults treated with CAR-T or BsAb therapies. A co-designed REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) instrument captures infections classified as microbiologically defined, clinically defined or fever of unknown origin, using internationally standardised definitions. Patients were enrolled between 2019 and 2023, with at least 2 years follow-up per patient, allowing time-updated data on immunosuppressive exposures, haematological recovery and prophylaxis. Multivariable regression and landmark analyses will estimate infection incidence and identify dynamic risk factors over time. Incidence rate ratios will assess prophylaxis effectiveness. Data integrity is supported by central adjudication and site-level audits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received a waiver of consent (HREC/PMCC/89002) and was co-designed by haematology and infectious diseases investigators. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings and national guideline committees to inform infection prevention and late effects surveillance in immunotherapy-treated populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reynolds, G. K., Anderson, M. A., Thursky, K., Teh, B. W., Slavin, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111194</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111194</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Longitudinal real-world surveillance of infection outcomes in CAR-T and bispecific therapy recipients: the CLARITY study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111194</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111194</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111213?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prototype of an organising framework for healthcare decarbonisation research: an exploratory classification study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111213?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop an organising framework for healthcare decarbonisation research which goes beyond classification schemes based on scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions or lists of loosely connected themes and which is intended to support the coordination, funding and application of research into policy and practice. The organising framework was developed with a focus on the National Health Service (NHS) in England but enables application to healthcare systems more broadly.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An exploratory classification study of over 160 research questions derived from a review and data extraction of nine systematic reviews, 13 stakeholder documents, two research priority exercises and four research funder sources. A further eight systematic reviews and 14 stakeholder documents, which were not used for direct data extraction, were used to test the emerging framework and specify thematic gaps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primarily high-income healthcare systems, with a focus on the NHS in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome</st>
<p>A multilevel thematic framework representing current and missing areas of research in healthcare decarbonisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The framework comprises six top-level themes: <b>N</b>atural resource use and sources of carbon; <b>H</b>ealthcare settings and workflows; <b>S</b>olutions; <b>S</b>takeholders; <b>O</b>rganisational levers for change; and <b>S</b>cientific measurement and theory (the &lsquo;NHS-SOS framework&rsquo;). At levels two and three, there were 39 and 86 subthemes, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This framework offers a structured, empirically derived representation of the emerging field of healthcare decarbonisation research. It is intended as a living tool to support shared understanding, prioritisation and action and to foster coherence in a currently fragmented research landscape.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petrova, M., Burrows, F., van der Scheer, J. W., Kipouros, T., Smith, J. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111213</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111213</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prototype of an organising framework for healthcare decarbonisation research: an exploratory classification study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111213</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111213</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111791?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dose dE-eScalaTion IN prostATe radIOtherapy usiNg an MR-Linac in 2 Fractions (DESTINATION 2): protocol for a randomised, phase II/R-IDEAL2b trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111791?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered on an MRI-guided linear accelerator (MR-linac) enables highly conformal prostate cancer irradiation. The DESTINATION 2 trial is a federated, randomised phase II/R-IDEAL 2b study evaluating whether de-escalating the dose to prostate tissue, while maintaining a high dose to MRI-visible tumour(s) in two fractions, reduces genitourinary (GU) treatment-related adverse events (AE) without compromising disease control in men with localised prostate cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>200 men worldwide with localised, MRI-visible prostate cancer will be randomised 1:1 to receive either (1) prescribed uniform dose MR-linac SBRT (27 Gy in two fractions to the whole prostate and seminal vesicles with 0 mm CTV-PTV margin) or (2) de-escalated SBRT (20 Gy in two fractions to whole prostate with 0 mm CTV-PTV margin and 27 Gy in two fractions to MRI-visible tumour(s) with a 4 mm intraprostatic margin applied to the GTV. All treatments are delivered using MRI-guided adaptive Radiotherapy (MRIgRT). The primary endpoint is the absolute and relative risk reduction in acute grade 2+GU AE (CTCAE v5) within 12 weeks of completing radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include late GU AE, acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) AE, sexual AE, patient-reported outcomes, dosimetry, technical feasibility and 2-year biochemical relapse-free survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This is a federated trial design in which each centre operates independently with its own sponsor, ethics committee approval and regulatory oversight. Each centre is responsible for obtaining and maintaining local ethics approval in accordance with their national and institutional requirements. The UK centre (The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust) has received ethical approval from the East of England&ndash;Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 24/EE/0163; IRAS: 338368). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06638541">NCT06638541</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooper, S., Alexander, S., Breitkreutz, D., Casey, F., Christodouleas, J., Dassen, M. G., Dellacqua, V., Dunlop, A., Herbert, T., Kolias, P., Mitchell, A., Pos, F. J., Westley, R., Tree, A. C., Van Der Heide, U. A., Vesprini, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111791</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111791</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dose dE-eScalaTion IN prostATe radIOtherapy usiNg an MR-Linac in 2 Fractions (DESTINATION 2): protocol for a randomised, phase II/R-IDEAL2b trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111791</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111791</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111898?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111898?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Polygenic risk scores are increasingly available to consumers to provide an estimate of the genetic contribution to health conditions. However, healthcare providers report limited knowledge and confidence using polygenic risk scores. Clinical implementation necessitates educational programmes to support clinicians to integrate this new test into practice. This study aimed to identify healthcare providers&rsquo; learning needs and preferences for polygenic risk education to inform the design of tailored education initiatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>This pragmatic qualitative study used focus groups to capture healthcare providers&rsquo; perspectives. To ensure informed responses, genetic healthcare providers with prior experience using polygenic risk scores, and/or who had completed polygenic risk education were recruited to participate in focus groups or interviews (n=30). There were no exclusions based on country of practice. Recordings were transcribed and content analysis conducted to identify learning needs. Themes related to education engagement were mapped to the capability, opportunity and motivation model for behaviour change.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among this cohort of experienced providers, residual gaps existed in polygenic risk-related knowledge, skills and local guidelines to inform practice. Learning needs encompassed: (i) polygenic risk-specific knowledge, and (ii) communication skills needed to discuss results and facilitate risk management. Themes related to engaging with polygenic risk education mapped to capability included awareness of, and access to educational resources and initiatives, including practice resources and position statements from professional bodies. Time-poorness was a primary barrier to accessing education. Opportunities comprised of building on existing workplace training and activities such as multidisciplinary team meetings and journal clubs. All participants noted that motivation for completing polygenic risk training was primarily driven by a desire to improve patient-centred care and clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlights priority learning areas to inform the development of tailored polygenic risk education initiatives, and resources and delivery strategies that meet the identified needs. Participants&rsquo; expert insights reveal potential barriers as well as solutions to engaging healthcare providers with polygenic risk score education to ultimately facilitate implementation into clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark, A., Wallingford, C. K., Berkman, J., McInerney-Leo, A., Nisselle, A., Terrill, B., Palpant, N., Young, M.-A., James, P. A., Yanes, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111898</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111898</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Genetics and genomics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genetics and genomics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111898</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111898</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111913?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How do global policy frameworks address the ethics of pain management? A qualitative content analysis of WHO and WMA documents]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111913?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine how the WHO and the World Medical Association (WMA) frame bioethical principles and address implementation barriers in their pain management policies, providing insights for global health policy and ethical analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative content analysis of international policy documents using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research to ensure methodological transparency and analytical rigour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Analysis of publicly available policy documents produced by the WHO and WMA between January 2000 and December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Documents addressing pain management with ethical content, current and not superseded (n=18 from 314 screened).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>18 policy documents were retrieved through relevance screening and analysed with reference to ethical values and systemic constraints using MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022. Thematic coding identified ethical principles, structural barriers and strategic policy directions shaping global pain management frameworks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Nine ethical principles underpin global pain management policies, including human rights-based access, professional duty to relieve suffering and equitable care. Seven major barriers, such as regulatory restrictions, educational deficiencies and systemic inequities, hinder implementation. Five policy directions were identified to bridge principles and practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>WHO and WMA frameworks articulate a shared normative commitment to equitable, safe and person-centred pain management but differ in emphasis between public health and clinical ethics perspectives. Addressing identified structural barriers, integrating biopsychosocial approaches, and promoting culturally sensitive ethical guidance are critical for improving global pain management policies. While international guidelines provide the ethical foundations, achieving equitable global pain care requires coordinated transformation across regulatory, educational and health system domains. The persistent gap between ethical commitments and real-world implementation underscores the urgent need for binding accountability mechanisms, stronger international coordination and systematic approaches to address structural determinants of inequity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coskun, S., Bu&#x0308;ken, N. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111913</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111913</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How do global policy frameworks address the ethics of pain management? A qualitative content analysis of WHO and WMA documents]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111913</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111913</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112219?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112219?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study is to evaluate existing evidence on the effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate for community-acquired pneumonia in children and adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Ovid-MEDLINER were searched with no language restrictions through 16 July 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included studies comparing the effectiveness of amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate versus other antibiotics or placebo.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Only randomised controlled trials comparing amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate with another antibiotic or placebo with a primary outcome of clinical resolution or clinical failure were eligible for our review. We used random-effects and fixed-effects logistic regression models to estimate the pooled treatment effect size. Heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the  statistic. We performed an unplanned frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis for the indirect comparison between amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials was used to assess and categorise studies into low risk of bias, some concerns or high risk of bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We extracted data from 44 studies including 45 400 patients. We found no evidence of a differential effect on clinical resolution when comparing amoxicillin with other antibiotics (n=15 trials; pooled OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.38, where &gt;1 favours amoxicillin) or amoxicillin-clavulanate with other antibiotics (n=17; OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.04). Similarly, evidence of difference in clinical failure between amoxicillin and other antibiotics was unclear and unable to rule out clinically important benefits or harms (n=8; OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.06, where &lt;1 favours amoxicillin). We found no evidence of a differential effect on clinical resolution between adults treated with amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate (n=28; OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.70, where &gt;1 favours amoxicillin-clavulanate). Sixty-three per cent and 29% of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate studies, respectively, had low risk of bias according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Current evidence is unclear as to whether amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate differs from other antibiotics, or from each other, in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, owing to the small number of trials and substantial heterogeneity in comparators used across study settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024568554.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Potter-Schwartz, L., Swe, M. M., Sharland, M., Bielicki, J. A., Cooper, B. S., Lim, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112219</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112219</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112219</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112219</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115383?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advancing sustainable medication use in healthcare: a Delphi study on (de)prescribing interventions]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115383?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify and prioritise the most appropriate (de)prescribing interventions in inpatient and outpatient hospital care to advance environmentally sustainable healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A modified RAND Delphi study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Inpatient and outpatient hospital care in the Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The Delphi panel consisted of 63 participants, comprising 36 physicians and 27 pharmacists working in Dutch hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Consensus on the appropriateness of (de)prescribing interventions for frequently used medications in inpatient and outpatient hospital care to advance environmentally sustainable healthcare and the prioritisation of interventions per care setting (inpatient/outpatient) and intervention type (deprescribing/sustainable dosage form), culminating in a top 20.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>51 (de)prescribing interventions were identified for 18 medication classes, for which consensus on appropriateness was reached for 42 (82%). The top 20 highest ranked interventions were identified, starting with switching from intravenous to oral administration of paracetamol, stopping chronically used proton pump inhibitors without indication and initiating antibiotics orally in case of good bioavailability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Most (de)prescribing interventions were considered appropriate for advancing sustainable medication use, highlighting support for their potential implementation to reduce the environmental burden of healthcare.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smale, E. M., van der Giessen, J. L., Appels, C. W. Y., Leegwater, E., Dietz, M., van den Bemt, P. M. L. A., Coenradie, S., Kool, R. B., Kwint, H.-F., Ista, E., Hunfeld, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115383</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115383</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advancing sustainable medication use in healthcare: a Delphi study on (de)prescribing interventions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115383</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115383</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115990?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Economic evaluations of digital health interventions on maternal, newborn and child health in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115990?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Digital health interventions have emerged as promising solutions to strengthen maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) systems in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although evidence on their effectiveness is growing, corresponding economic evaluations remain limited, heterogeneous and fragmented. Understanding the value for money of digital health interventions is essential for supporting scale-up decisions and efficient resource allocation. This protocol outlines the methods for a systematic review synthesising economic evaluations of digital health interventions across the MNCH continuum in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will systematically search PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO and Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) Pro for peer-reviewed studies published from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2025. Backward citation searching (reference lists of included articles) and forward citation tracking will be performed to ensure comprehensive study identification, and study authors will be contacted when necessary to obtain missing or unclear data. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based Deep Research tools will be used as a supplementary approach to identify additional keywords and assess the completeness of the search strategy. Eligible studies will include full and partial economic evaluations embedded within randomised controlled trials, quasi-experiments, controlled before&ndash;and&ndash;after studies, time-series analyses, cohort or case&ndash;control designs, implementation studies and economic modelling studies. Three reviewers will independently conduct study selection and data extraction using a predefined form adapted from the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 guidelines. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Drummond checklist. Due to heterogeneity in study designs and economic methods, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Costs will be standardised to the US dollar (USD) in 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review will synthesise evidence from already published studies and does not involve the collection of primary data; therefore, ethical approval is not required. All data extracted will be derived from publicly available peer-reviewed literature, and no identifiable personal information will be used. The findings of this systematic review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at academic conferences focused on global health, digital health and MNCH. In addition, the results will be shared with relevant stakeholders, including policymakers, programme implementers and organisations involved in digital health and MNCH in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251125682.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wu, F., Soun, B., Zhan, B., Morton, A., Yi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115990</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115990</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Economic evaluations of digital health interventions on maternal, newborn and child health in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115990</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115990</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116684?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accuracy of epilepsy screening tools in community and primary care settings across countries in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116684?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Circumstantial evidence suggests that a high proportion of cases of epilepsy in countries across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remain undiagnosed. The magnitude of the burden is unknown. Screening tools offer promise for early detection and prevalence estimation that will enable evidence-informed management of epilepsy in SSA. This review will systematically assess the accuracy and reliability of screening tools for detecting epilepsy in communities and primary care settings in SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Relevant databases, non-database sources and grey literature will be searched for studies on epilepsy screening tools. PubMed, LILACS, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar, from inception to 31 May 2026, will be searched for studies on screening tools (questionnaires) administered by non-expert physicians to populations or hospital/clinic-based cohorts with no language restrictions. The following search terms will be used: screening tool, screening questionnaire, screening test, screening instrument, diagnostic tool, diagnostic accuracy, epilepsy, sensitivity, specificity, true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative and SSA. All countries in SSA will be included as search terms. Cochrane databases, African Journals Online, African Index Medicus, HINARI and Preprint and Thesis repositories will also be searched. Reference lists of potentially relevant studies will be reviewed, and experts will be contacted to identify additional studies missed in our searches. Study selection (using a pretested study selection flow chart), data extraction (using a validated data extraction form) and risk-of-bias assessment (using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) will be performed independently by at least two reviewers, and any discrepancies will be resolved through discussion. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) will be estimated from 2-by-2 tables of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives. Possible causes of heterogeneity between studies will be assessed through pre-specified subgroup analyses. A meta-analysis will be conducted using a bivariate random-effects model to summarise sensitivity, specificity and DOR per patient. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve will be plotted to determine the overall diagnostic performance of the index tests. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to test the robustness of pooled estimates of screening accuracy, and all estimates will be presented with their 95% CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will synthesise empirical evidence from publicly available published and unpublished studies, and hence no ethical approval is required. An eligible study with serious ethical issues will be excluded from the analysis and the reasons for exclusion will be documented. The review findings will be shared with all relevant stakeholders, including healthcare providers, patient advocate groups, agencies involved in implementing epilepsy care and policies, civil society, social services providers and researchers. The review findings will be shared widely at scientific symposia and conferences, and the final report will be published in a high-impact-factor peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024566976.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkwa, E. K., Cross, J. H., Adjei, P., Newton, C. R., Sen, A., Akpalu, A., Sander, J. W., Danso-Appiah, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116684</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116684</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accuracy of epilepsy screening tools in community and primary care settings across countries in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116684</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116684</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117391?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective multi-phase observational study evaluating local field potentials to guide deep brain stimulation programming in dystonia at a UK Tertiary Neurosciences Centre (LFP-DYT): a protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117391?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for dystonia is effective but programming optimisation can take months. Local field potentials (LFPs) recorded by the Medtronic Percept device may provide biomarkers to guide stimulation. This study will prospectively evaluate whether chronic LFP profiles correlate with clinical outcomes and can inform DBS programming strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>LFP-DYT is a single-centre, multi-phase observational study at Newcastle upon Tyne National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust. An internal pilot (Cohort 1) will refine recording workflows, followed by Cohort 2 (traditional programming with LFP recordings) and Cohort 3 (LFP-informed programming). 20&ndash;25 adults with primary dystonia undergoing globus pallidus internus DBS will be recruited. The study combines chronic LFP sensing with neurophysiology (electromyography, electroencephalography), motor inhibition testing (stop-signal reaction time), patient-reported outcomes and wearable sensor monitoring (STAT-ON) to provide a comprehensive multi-modal assessment framework. Primary outcome: reproducibility of alpha&ndash;theta frequency LFP peaks and concordance with optimal stimulation site. Secondary outcomes include stimulation and medication effects on LFP profiles, clinical improvement (Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale-2 (TWSTRS-2), Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS)) and beta-band activity as a marker of stimulation-related bradykinesia. Analyses will be descriptive and exploratory. Feasibility outcomes, including recruitment rates, retention and data completeness, will inform design and power calculations for future multi-centre trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has NHS Research Ethics Committee approval from the East Midlands&mdash;Derby Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 24/EM/0246; IRAS ID: 337426). All participants will provide informed consent. Data will be pseudonymised and stored on secure NHS servers. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and participant summaries. De-identified data and analysis code will be available on reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07309133">NCT07309133</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ledingham, D., Mills, R., Gibbs, M., Maynes, M., Pal, A., Iredale, R., Foster, V., Ong, S., Sathyanarayana, S., Jenkins, A., Nicholson, C., Hussain, M., Baker, M. R., Pavese, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117391</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117391</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective multi-phase observational study evaluating local field potentials to guide deep brain stimulation programming in dystonia at a UK Tertiary Neurosciences Centre (LFP-DYT): a protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117391</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117431?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of the disease of obesity in patients with type 1 diabetes with tirzepatide: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial in a single-centre setting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117431?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Medication for the disease of obesity has improved, and clinical trials based on natural gut hormones such as tirzepatide, showed only mild side effects and ~22% weight loss maintenance. However, patients with type 2 diabetes only lose 15% bodyweight with tirzepatide while tolerating the medications very well, but little is known in patients with the disease of obesity who also have type 1 diabetes, especially regarding safety of the medications. Tirzepatide&rsquo;s licence in the Gulf countries and Europe for obesity does not exclude patients with obesity and type 1 diabetes, unlike the USA. In Kuwait, more than a quarter of patients with type 1 diabetes also have the disease of obesity. Tirzepatide is not approved for glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes, because it is unlikely to make a difference. Because tirzepatide is approved for the treatment of obesity in patients who also have type 1 diabetes we can now test how effective treatments for obesity such as tirzepatide are for patients with obesity and type 1 diabetes. Concerns regarding the safety of the medication in type 1 diabetes can also be addressed thus addressing an important knowledge gap.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This will be a randomised double blind controlled trial of 60 patients with obesity and type 1 diabetes to test usual care with or without maximum tolerable dose of tirzepatide to achieve weight loss. We will investigate the safety of the medications in patients with obesity and type 1 diabetes to address important knowledge gap which can change clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received ethical approval from the Dasman Diabetes Institute Ethical Review Committee (HR-RA-2025-03) and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07096908). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants, with no financial compensation provided. Data will be reported in accordance with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines, ensuring participant anonymity. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07096908">NCT07096908</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Ozairi, E., Al Awadhi, A., Taghadom, E., Al Kandari, J., Alsaeed, D., Alghanim, S., Mashankar, A., Le Roux, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117431</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117431</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment of the disease of obesity in patients with type 1 diabetes with tirzepatide: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial in a single-centre setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117431</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117431</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117588?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Applying intersectionality theory to health outcomes and healthcare utilisation of ethnic minority populations: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e117588?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intersectionality, as applied to health, provides a framework for understanding how overlapping social identities, such as ethnicity, gender and socioeconomic status, shape differential health outcomes and healthcare experiences. Individuals who occupy multiple marginalised identities often experience compounded disadvantages. Ethnic minority (EM) populations, defined here as social groups who are numerically smaller and/or socially marginalised within a given national or regional context based on ethnicity, race, culture, language, ancestry, or related heritage (often overlapping with racialised identities), frequently experience systemic exclusion, racism and structural barriers that also contribute to persistent disparities in morbidity, mortality and healthcare access. However, much health research relies on single-axis analyses, which can obscure within-group variation and may inadvertently reinforce inequities. Despite growing recognition of intersectionality, its empirical application to EM health remains limited. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on how intersectionality theory has been conceptualised and applied to understand health outcomes and healthcare utilisation among EM populations globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the PRISMA-Equity Extension. Comprehensive searches of peer-reviewed databases and grey literature, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, Web of Science and ProQuest will identify quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method empirical studies published from 2000 to 2026. Eligible studies must implement intersectionality theory to EM health or healthcare utilisation outcomes. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Data extraction will also be conducted independently and discrepancies will be discussed with input from a third reviewer. Guided by the PROGRESS-Plus equity framework, findings will be synthesised thematically, implementing a mixed-method convergent integrated synthesis design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review only analyses previously published data, thus it does not require ethical approval. Findings will be presented at relevant academic or professional conferences and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251248887.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bilney, E. V. M., Tse, E. T. Y., Chan, M. M. L., Shi, Q., Ma, J., Parry, J. E., Wong, D. K. K., Bernal Pulido, L. G., Wong, W. C. W., Chan, L., Tanuseputro, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T06:45:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117588</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117588</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Applying intersectionality theory to health outcomes and healthcare utilisation of ethnic minority populations: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117588</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117588</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102899?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the impact of Namaste Care for individuals with advanced dementia: a systematic review of costs, effects and benefits]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102899?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Namaste Care, a non-pharmaceutical daily multicomponent palliative care intervention, offers care for people with dementia, aiming to improve quality of life of those living with dementia as well as their family and caregivers. This systematic review explores the Namaste Care intervention and its clinical and economic effects in multiple care settings. The aim of this review is to consolidate existing evidence on Namaste Care&rsquo;s clinical and economic outcomes and examine the tools used for data collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic literature search was conducted (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) to identify peer-reviewed studies on Namaste Care&rsquo;s impact on quality of life, costs, health, economic outcomes and benefits up to 22 February 2026. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, while the completeness of reporting of economic evaluation studies was evaluated according to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>31 studies reported the clinical and/or economic outcomes of Namaste Care. The results for quality of life and quality of dying were mixed, while 5 of 11 studies evaluating quality of life reported significant improvements. The various quality-of-life instruments used include the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia (QUALID), EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L instruments, ICEpop CAPability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O), ICECAP Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM), Quality of Life for People with Dementia (QUALIDEM) and Carers-DEMentia Quality of Life (C-DEMQOL). The clinical outcomes considered included pain, behavioural symptoms and quality of end-of-life care. The Medication Quantification Scale and Minimum Data Set indicated reductions in antidepressant and antianxiety medication use. Seven studies reported significant improvements in well-being, and two studies reported reduced stress among family members following Namaste Care sessions. A subset of five studies reported a range of economic outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings suggest that Namaste Care improves well-being, reduces caregiver stress and lowers the use of antidepressant and antianxiety medications at a moderate cost. The current literature is characterised by small, non-random, heterogeneous studies. Randomised controlled trials, which include economic evaluations, help to improve evidence-based research to support funding and implementation decisions on Namaste Care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024560056.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parks, T., Soukopova, J., Tothova, D., Smaling, H. J. A., Murphy, A., Vidovicova, L., Hlavka, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102899</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102899</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the impact of Namaste Care for individuals with advanced dementia: a systematic review of costs, effects and benefits]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102899</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102899</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104877?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study protocol for a hybrid I randomised clinical trial to evaluate an audit and feedback and a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medications in older adults: the AIM study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e104877?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) in older adults, such as long-term use of benzodiazepines, proton pump inhibitors without indication or antipsychotics in dementia, are associated with adverse events and increased healthcare utilisation. Despite clinical guidelines discouraging their use, PIPs remain frequent in primary care. An audit and feedback (A&amp;F) intervention of PIPs to general practitioners (GPs), led by pharmacists, may reduce the prescription of PIPs in primary care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A two-arm, pragmatic, controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an A&amp;F-based intervention and a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce the proportion of patients aged &ge;65 years receiving inappropriate prescriptions. A total of 170 participating GPs, 85 per group, are required. GPs will be randomised into intervention or control groups (1:1). The intervention includes feedback reports, pharmacist-led academic detailing and access to online training modules. The primary outcome is the proportion of older adults receiving at least one PIP at 12 months as well as the total number of PIPs. A random effects Tobit regression model, censored at 0 and 100, will be used to estimate between-group differences adjusted for baseline prescribing. Subgroup analyses will explore heterogeneity of effect by baseline prescribing level and healthcare region. Implementation outcomes, including reach, fidelity, engagement and maintenance, will be evaluated using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, combining quantitative and qualitative data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained by the Balearic Island Committee Ethics (IB5219/23PI). Study findings, including primary and secondary outcomes and qualitative implementation results, will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and stakeholder reports.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN14449434">ISRCTN14449434</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leiva, A., Gallardo Alfaro, L., Bejarano, F., Sempere, E., Soler, A., Huguet, A., Llarena, M., Lekue, I., Campabadal Prats, C., Salom, C., Solaz, R. B., Socias Canellas, C., Gonzalez, A., Campins, G. M., Vanrell, A., Rovira, M., Ponsa Mir, G., Vicens-Caldentey, C., The AIM Group, Ugarriza, Nunez, Parera Pascual, Melantuche, Perez, Guerrero, Palomares, Guerrero]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104877</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104877</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study protocol for a hybrid I randomised clinical trial to evaluate an audit and feedback and a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medications in older adults: the AIM study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104877</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104877</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106846?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of wipes with emollient and barrier properties for the prevention of pressure injuries: a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106846?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the effectiveness of a twice-daily application of a wipe impregnated with emollient and barrier ingredients in reducing incidence of pressure injury (PI) in aged care consumers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A single-blinded, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Randomisation was stratified by facility, using simple 1:1 randomisation within each stratum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>20 residential aged care facilities in Rural and Metropolitan New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory, Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>858 aged care consumers aged &ge;65 years at risk of developing a PI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive either standard hygiene practices, repositioning and use of pressure redistribution surfaces (standard care) or twice-daily applications of a pre-packaged wipe impregnated with emollient and barrier ingredients (Contiplan) to the sacrum, buttocks and heels in addition to standard care for the study duration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome and analysis</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the incidence of PIs per 1000 consumer days. Treatment effects were estimated using an intention-to-treat approach, with the absolute difference and 95% CI estimated using the Wald method. The relative difference in the incidence of PIs was estimated using a negative binomial regression model (with log link).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>858 participants were included in the study. There was a 50% relative reduction in the incidence of PI in the intervention compared with the control (95% CI 0.31 to 0.81, p=0.005), with an absolute rate difference of 0.31 fewer PIs per 1000 consumer days (95% CI 0.11 to 0.51).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The use of wipes with emollient and barrier properties significantly reduced the incidence of PIs and prolonged the time to first PI, demonstrating efficacy as a PI preventive strategy in aged care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12622001360707.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan, H., Tehan, P. E., Gumuskaya, O., Hutton, A., Mitchell, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106846</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106846</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of wipes with emollient and barrier properties for the prevention of pressure injuries: a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106846</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106846</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108768?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematic review of economic evaluations in thalassaemia screening programmes globally: developing guidance for low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108768?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Thalassaemia, a genetic blood disorder, is a major public health burden. Most affected individuals reside in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). Screening programmes can reduce incidence, but in resource-constrained settings cost-effectiveness is important. This work aimed to investigate how economic evaluations of thalassaemia screening programmes have been conducted globally, to identify best practices for future evaluation suited to a LMIC context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic literature review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>The original review was undertaken between May and July 2023; an update was completed between November and December 2025. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment Database, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), economic databases (Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry) and grey literature (including conference proceedings) were searched. Additional validation searches were conducted in Google Scholar to identify relevant studies not indexed in the electronic databases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies were screened against pre-specified criteria by two independent reviewers. Eligible articles reported an economic evaluation of a thalassaemia screening programme for pregnant women or children aged 2 years or younger in any geographic setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data extraction for each included article was performed by one author and verified by a second. Findings were interpreted within the context of LMICs, given the high prevalence and resource limitations in these settings. The quality of each article was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Economic Evaluation Checklist; quality assessment for each article was performed by one author and verified by a second.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 2112 publications identified from database searches, ten were ultimately included: three cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs), six cost-benefit analyses (CBAs) and one cost-utility analysis. Study quality varied widely, with most not reporting methodological details such as discounting rates and time horizon. Additionally, no studies employed standard cost-effectiveness metrics, such as quality-adjusted life-years. Seven studies adopted simplified approaches to evaluating thalassaemia screening programmes, relying on basic cost comparisons without formal modelling. Three studies used a decision tree model structure based on the chronological sequence of steps during the screening process. Of these, two Thailand-based studies were notable, given their robust decision tree model, explicit adoption of a lifetime time horizon, application of a discounting rate in line with Thai Health Technology Assessment Guidelines, and performance of sensitivity analyses using recognised methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The frequent use of simple cost comparisons likely reflects the complexities surrounding modelling of thalassaemia screening programmes. While traditional CEAs are predominantly used in cost-effectiveness research, practical and ethical challenges associated with calculating health utility differences in this context may limit their use. However, the absence of standard metrics does not preclude a robust economic evaluation, as evidenced by the two high-quality Thailand-based studies. The methods outlined in these papers can be used as a starting point for future economic evaluations, provided the evaluation is further tailored to the local setting. If development of a model is not possible, a simpler CBA with a robust, comprehensive approach could be used. In any case, it is vital to capture the societal benefits of screening programmes; any future evaluation within this context should therefore include a broad societal perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023445001.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massey, K., Phommasone, K., Mehta, A., Lee, V. Q. Y., Ashley, E. A., Mayxay, M., Painter, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108768</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108768</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematic review of economic evaluations in thalassaemia screening programmes globally: developing guidance for low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108768</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108768</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109693?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Kings Stool Chart in patients receiving enteral nutrition]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109693?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Chinese version of the King&rsquo;s Stool Chart among patients receiving enteral nutrition for use in nursing practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital in Henan Province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 144 patients receiving enteral nutrition were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study was conducted in two phases. Phase I involved the translation and cultural adaptation of the King&rsquo;s Stool Chart using established methodologies, including forward translation, synthesis, back-translation and expert review. Phase II comprised psychometric evaluation with 144 patients receiving enteral nutrition. The Chinese version of the King&rsquo;s Stool Chart was used to assess stool frequency, consistency, weight and the daily total score. Validity was tested through content, construct and concurrent validity, while inter-rater reliability was assessed using the kappa coefficient.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Chinese version of the King&rsquo;s Stool Chart demonstrated excellent content validity, with item-level indices ranging from 0.95 to 1.00. Construct validity was supported by the ability of the Chinese version of the King&rsquo;s Stool Chart to differentiate between clinical subgroups with varying stool characteristics. Sensitivity rates for stool weight categorisation were above 89%, and substantial inter-rater reliability (kappa=0.735) was observed. The daily total score was effective in identifying patients at risk for diarrhoea, with significant differences observed among clinical subgroups. Diarrhoea classification, using a threshold of &ge;15 points, showed strong construct validity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Within the scope of this single-centre sample, the Chinese version of the King&rsquo;s Stool Chart demonstrates acceptable validity and substantial to excellent inter-rater reliability for assessing stool frequency, consistency, weight and diarrhoea classification in enterally fed ICU patients in China. These psychometric properties provide preliminary support for its use in routine nursing practice for gastrointestinal function monitoring in ICU settings. Further multicentre and large-sample studies are required to verify its external validity and generalisability to broader Chinese-speaking populations and non-ICU clinical settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, G., Dou, H., Wang, H., Hu, J., Wang, L., Li, W., Wang, X., Zhang, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109693</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109693</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Kings Stool Chart in patients receiving enteral nutrition]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109693</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109693</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111714?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and independent predictors of refractive error among adults with diabetes in Addis Ababa: a multicentre hospital-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111714?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to assess the prevalence and independent predictors of refractive error among adults with diabetes in Addis Ababa, Central Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A multicentre hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted using a systematic random sampling method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted at public referral hospitals&rsquo; diabetic care clinics of Addis Ababa, Central Ethiopia from 13 May to 17 August 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included 391 adult patients with diabetes who met the inclusion criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Data were collected using face-to-face interviews completed by an interviewer, ophthalmic examinations and reviewed medical records.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In this study, 391 participants (a response rate of 92.4%) participated. The median age of the participants was 54 years IQR (46&ndash;62). The prevalence of refractive error was 55.7% (95% CI 50.7 to 60.7). Older age, female sex, longer diabetes duration, poor glycaemic control, hypertension, diabetic retinopathy and cataract were positively associated with refractive error.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study found a high prevalence of refractive error among patients with diabetes in Central Ethiopia. Older age, female sex, longer diabetes duration, poor glycaemic control (assessed by both fasting blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c), hypertension, diabetic retinopathy and cataract were significantly associated with refractive error.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tizazu, K. T., Bogale, Z. M., Assefa, A. L., Liyih, S. Z., Bekele, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111714</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111714</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and independent predictors of refractive error among adults with diabetes in Addis Ababa: a multicentre hospital-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111714</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111714</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112179?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of the POPulation Medicine Multimorbidity Intervention in Xishui County (POPMIX) on people at high risk for COPD who smoke: protocol for the POPMIX-Smoking cluster randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112179?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Tobacco use is a major contributor to the burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other non-communicable diseases in China. People at high risk for COPD who smoke, particularly those with pre-existing chronic conditions, often remain underserved by conventional smoking cessation programmes. Population medicine offers a promising framework for proactively identifying high-burden diseases, managing multimorbidity and prioritising interventions for vulnerable populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol describes a stratified, two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (Population Medicine Multimorbidity Intervention in Xishui County-Smoking) being conducted in Xishui County, a rural area of Guizhou Province, China. A total of 26 townships were stratified by population size and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a multicomponent intervention or usual care. Eligible participants were individuals aged 35 years or older who smoked and were at high risk for COPD as identified by the COPD Screening Questionnaire. The intervention package integrates multiple components, including a digital smoking cessation programme, digital mental health support, community-based spirometry, tailored chronic disease management, health education and a performance-linked &lsquo;pay-for-population&rsquo; scheme that aligns healthcare worker reimbursement with population health outcomes. Primary outcomes are smoking amount and nicotine dependence and secondary outcomes include COPD-related health outcomes, hypertension, diabetes, health risk behaviours, quality of life, healthcare utilisation and productivity loss. Follow-up occurs at 3, 6 and 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been granted by the Peking Union Medical College Ethics Committee (CAMS&amp;PUMC-IEC-2024-042). Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed publication and (inter)national conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06458205">NCT06458205</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, S., Huang, K., Zheng, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Chen, W., Tang, X., Cao, Z., Tang, L., Tong, X., Zhao, J., He, L., Jiao, L., Wang, Y., Zhao, T., Luo, Y., Lai, Q., Lyu, X., Dou, R., Chen, Q., Bunker, A., Vollmer, S., Geldsetzer, P., Jamison, D., Ba&#x0308;rnighausen, T., Yang, T., Wang, C., on behalf of the POPMIX study investigators, Zhang, Ye, Hou, Liao, Zhou, Liu, Zhong, Zhao, Mu, Liu, Lyu, Zhang, Li, Wang, Lan, Liu, Zhou, Yu, Wang, Luo, Jiang, Zhang, Wu, Luo, Rao, Yang, Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Li, Chen, Huang, Jian, Li Wang, Linghu, Li Zhong, Gui, Cheng, Yang, Yan, Liao, Xu, Zhao, Han, Wu, Tang, Wang, Li Feng, Si, Zeng, Tian, Fan, Luo, Feng, Ding, Yi, Lyu, Yuan, Liu, Wang, Duan, Zhao, Luo, Li, Liang, Li, Tang, Liu, Wang, Zhong, Zheng, Zhao, Zhang, Tu, Lu, Zhao, Chen, Yuan, Mu, Zhao, Zhang, Li, Wang, Mu, Hu, Chen, Lei, Hu, Tang, Luo, Zhou, Pan, Zhou, Ren, Zhou, Zeng, Hu, Liu, Yang, Wan, Zhang, He, Wang, Wang, Wang, Lei, Yuan, Luo, Zhu, Luo, Hu, Zhang, Yuan, Luo, Ma, Cao, Cao, Chen, Chen, Chen, Chen, Cheng, Feng, Gao, Jian, Jiang, Kang, Lei, Liu, Lu, Luo, Lyu, Meng, Mu, Mu, Qian, Ren, Wang, Li Wang, Wang, Wang, Wang, Wang, Wu, Xu, Yang, Yu, Yuan, Yuan, Yuan, Yue, Yue, Li Zhang, Zhao, Zhao, Zhong, Zhou, Yang, Chen, Ren, Gong, Shi, Tan, Yu, Mu, Chen, Yu, Li, Mu, Wu, Zhao, Chen, Huang, Li, Yang, Yang, Yuan, Zhou, Ye, Zhang, Luo, Wang, Hu, Yuan, Mu, Yuan, He, Li, Liu, Cheng, Liu, Yang, Zhang, Chen, Ying, Zhao, He, Feng, Guo, Yuan, Yuan, Wang, Chen, Zhao, Ning, Feng, Chen, Chen, Qi, Li, Zhao, Wang, Wang, Zhong, Wang, Chen, Mu, Gong, Lu, Chen, Chen, Chen, Mu, Deng, Duan, Dong, Yan, Rao, Wang, Chen, Wang, Zhang, Luo, Huang, Chen, Li, Li Huang, Huang, Long, Chen, Jiang, Ding, Yu, Wei, Liu, Si, Mu, Huang, Yang, Xu, Yuan, Zhao, Chen, Luo, Chen, Zhang, Yuan, Shui, Wu, Huang, Wu, Zhang, Wu, Chen, Xu, He, Zhang, Chen, Yuan, Li, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Liao, Feng, Wang, Deng, Yang, You, Deng, Huang, Zhang, Zhu, Liao, Song, Yuan, Cai, Lu Liu, Luo, Huang, Hu, Yuan, Zhao, Zeng, Huang, Luo, Luo, Wu, Liu, Zhang, Ren, Yang, Wang, Yuan, Yuan, Yuan, Chen, Liu, He, Zhang, Xu, Hu, Qian, Zhang, Lei, Wang, Yuan, Yang, Xiang, Zhao, Ren, Li, Ren, Teng, Chen, Yuan, Mu, Zhang, Li, Sun, Wang, He, Wang, Cai, Tian, Cai, Chen, Mu, Mu, Cheng, Pan, Wang, Zhao, Liu, Yang, Yu, Min, Wang, Li, Zhang, Wang, Zhao, Luo, Yuan, Ruan, Wu, Wang, Zhang, Zhang, Ao, Zhao, Liang, Zhao, Mu, Luo, Zhang, Huang, Cao, Li, Liu, Yuan, Zhao, Wang, Duan, Chen, Zhao, Wu, Deng, Wang, Yan, Wang, Liu, Cao, Ma, Lu, Zhang, Xiang, Wang, Zhu, Wang, Hu, Li, Chen, Chao Tian, Wang, Xiao, Yu, Wei, Yang, Zhang, Zhao, Zhong, Xiao, Luo, Chen, Dai, Liu, Luo, Ma, Mu, Rao, Wen, Wu, Hu, Shi, Huang, Chen, Zhang, Chen, Luo, Ruan, Liu, Fan, Zou, He, Yang, Wang, Wang, Li, Wu, Yang, Si, Wang, Linghu, Yuan, Yuan, Qian, Wang, Ren, Dai, Deng, Xu, Zhang, Bai, Zhang, Wang, Liu, Feng, Wang, Wang, Liu, Liu, Wang, Wang, Cao, Yuan, Cao, Luo, Hou, Lu Kong, Zhou, Yuan, Liu, Gong, Zhao, Wang, Chen, Bai, Zhou, Chen, Sun, Xu, Zheng, Wang, Chen, Zhong, Ren, Zhu, Yang, Chen, Huang, Zhang, Yu, Yu, Wang, Yu, Zhou, Lu, Wang, Huang, Wu, Yuan, Xiong, Zhang, Zhou, Liu, Chen, Ye, Luo, Dai, Feng, Huang, Xia, Zhao, Wang, Yang, Hu, Yuan, Zhou, Yuan, Yuan, Wen, Zhao, Zhao, Zhao, Yuan, Xiong, Yuan, Yuan, Zhao, Luo, Luo, Yuan, Huang, Luo, Wang, Zhang, Chen, Wang, Yuan, Luo, Li, Wang, Chen, Teng, Wang, He, Wu, Xia, Mao, Luo, Yi, Li, Yang, Ao, Zhong, Liu, Chen, Luo, Wang, Chen, Wu, Wu, Feng, Lei, Li, Chen, Zhao, Ren, Yang, Luo, Zhang, Yuan, Li Chen, Ren, Jiang, Yuan, Ren, Mu, Yang, He, Hu, Huang, Li, Li, Li, Lu, Lu, Luo, Luo, Mu, Qin, Quan, Tang, Wang, Wang, Xu, Yang, Yang, Yang, Zhang, Zhao, Zhao, Zhou, Zuo, Xia, Xie, Chen, Li Yang, Li, Pan, Yang, Zhao, Zhou, Hu, Huang, Long, Luo, Pan, Ying, Zhang, Zhang, Zhao, Zhou, Zhu, Chen, Ding, Dong, Fu, Li, Liu, Huang, Ou, Tan, Tang, Wu, Xu, Xu, Zhang, Zhou, Zhu, Zuo, Chen, Luo, Duan, Gu, Ou, Zhao, He, Liao, Shi, Wang, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Zhou, Luo, Jin, Shi, Yang, An, Jin, Huang, Mu, Wang, Zhang, Zhou, Ao, Bao, Jiang, Liu, Nie, Rao, Wan, Wang, Wei, Xie, Xu, Zhang, Deng, Fu, Guo, He, Liu, Liu, Qin, Tian, Wang, Wu, Ye, Zhang, Zhou, Zhou, Liu, Yin, Luo, Bai, Li, Zhang, Zhu, Chen, Jiang, Yang, Zhao, Geng, Li, Wang, Hu, Li, Lu, Long, Qian, Shi, Wang, Wu, Zhang, Zhou, Hu, Ren, Shi, Zeng, Li, Qin, Zhou, Liu, He, Li, Mao, Wang, Ma, Li]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112179</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112179</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of the POPulation Medicine Multimorbidity Intervention in Xishui County (POPMIX) on people at high risk for COPD who smoke: protocol for the POPMIX-Smoking cluster randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112179</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112719?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Which 'health check programmes for the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and disease could be used to prevent illness and improve health in countries with universal healthcare? A systematic umbrella review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112719?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify and synthesise evidence pertaining to &lsquo;health check&rsquo; programmes for the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and disease delivered to adult populations in countries with universal healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic umbrella review was undertaken. The protocol for this systematic umbrella review was registered on the PROSPERO registry and was undertaken based on Cochrane guidance and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Google Scholar and Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC) were searched. These searches identified records published between January 2009 and February 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>The inclusion criteria for the review were as follows: population&mdash;adults aged &ge;18years; intervention&mdash;health checks including the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and disease; comparators&mdash;non-recipients, variations of health checks and within-person pre/post assessments; outcomes&mdash;uptake and diagnosis rates, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related clinical and behavioural risk factors, referral changes, and barriers and facilitators to uptake. Studies published prior to 2009 (when NHS Health Checks were introduced) and those from countries without universal healthcare provision were excluded. Screening was performed independently by two reviewers and conflicts were resolved via discussion or adjudication by a third reviewer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data extraction and quality appraisal were performed independently by a single reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. The quality of included reviews was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) (for quantitative evidence) and the Swedish Agency for Medical and Social Evaluation tool (for qualitative evidence). The results of this systematic umbrella review were synthesised narratively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Results from meta-analyses reported by the included systematic reviews showed that the effects of health checks on cardiovascular and total mortality, stroke and coronary heart disease were mixed and generally non-significant. Conversely, health checks generally showed significant, positive effects (reductions) in CVD risk factors including blood pressure, body mass index and cholesterol levels. Non-significant reductions in smoking were found in two meta-analyses. Health checks were generally cost-effective; however, it was found that the cost-effectiveness of health checks could be improved through targeting towards &lsquo;high risk&rsquo; populations defined based on socioeconomic factors, obesity and family history of CVD. Health check attendance versus non-attendance was related to demographic, attitudinal, socioeconomic and practical factors. The effectiveness of health checks was influenced by factors including social support to make changes to health behaviours and the availability and accessibility of referral options.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Overall, health checks had a positive impact on the detection of and improvement in the levels of cardiovascular risk factors. There was limited evidence of impact on the occurrence of longer term CVD events, which could reflect the limitations of onward treatment for CVD. Cardiovascular health checks could be more effective and cost-effective if targeted towards high-risk groups. The ability to access appointments at convenient times and venues and increased opportunities for social support may increase health check uptake, and increased availability and accessibility of referral options may improve their effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024487529.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanner, L., Kenny, R. P. W., Inskip, A., Potter, R., Lewis, R., Gregory, N., Jesurasa, A., Pearson, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112719</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112719</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Which 'health check programmes for the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and disease could be used to prevent illness and improve health in countries with universal healthcare? A systematic umbrella review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112719</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112719</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113402?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rationale and design of the SMILe (Spinal Morphine or Intravenous Lidocaine) study: protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial in southern Sweden on whether spinal morphine improves postoperative recovery compared to intravenous lidocaine in patients undergoing robot-assisted upper urinary tract surgery]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113402?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical procedures are commonly perceived to result in fast recovery; however, the postoperative course can be challenging for many patients. We have previously found severe pain and a significant decrease in the patient-reported outcome measure Quality-of-Recovery 15 (QoR-15) in a cohort of patients undergoing robot-assisted upper urinary tract surgery. In similar settings, intrathecal analgesia is sometimes used to improve recovery; however, its benefits have not been established. Therefore, this study aims to examine the effects of intrathecal analgesia in this setting compared with an active comparator intravenous lidocaine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this randomised, assessor-blinded multicentre trial, 220 patients scheduled for robot-assisted upper urinary tract surgery under general anaesthesia are recruited after obtaining informed consent. They are randomised to receive either intrathecal analgesia or an intraoperative infusion with lidocaine. The primary study outcome is the decrease in QoR-15 from baseline to postoperative day 1. Other outcomes of interest include postoperative pain, length of stay and postoperative complications. Differences in intraoperative haemodynamics and postoperative inflammatory parameters will also be analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Swedish Medical Products Agency (5.1.1-2023-69740 and 5.1.2-2025-030145). The results of this study will be presented at national and international meetings and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed international medical journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06349668">NCT06349668</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holmberg, M., Chew, M., Nilsson, L., Skoglund, P., Bahlmann, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113402</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113402</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rationale and design of the SMILe (Spinal Morphine or Intravenous Lidocaine) study: protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial in southern Sweden on whether spinal morphine improves postoperative recovery compared to intravenous lidocaine in patients undergoing robot-assisted upper urinary tract surgery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113402</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113402</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113927?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising the utility of patient-reported outcome measurements during recovery after orthopaedic extremity fractures: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113927?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Recovery after extremity fracture is influenced by injury-related impairments, functional capacity, symptom severity and psychosocial well-being, emphasising the need for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Despite increasing adoption of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and legacy PROMs in orthopaedic research, substantial knowledge gaps remain regarding their measurement properties, comparability and clinical utility, particularly in fracture populations. Our aim is to develop meaningful guidance to clinicians regarding the use of PROMs in treating orthopaedic fracture patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A prospective cohort of 1500 patients across 14 centres presenting with isolated extremity fractures being treated operatively or non-operatively will be recruited prospectively. We will aim to recruit 300 patients for each of five fracture types: isolated hip, tibial shaft, ankle/pilon, proximal humerus and distal radius fracture. All procedures and management will be performed according to the site&rsquo;s standard of care and treatment protocol. For patients treated non-operatively, the index visit (first study assessment) will be performed at the first orthopaedic treatment encounter (eg, emergency department visit or outpatient fracture clinic). Surgically treated patients will have PROMs collected anytime from the day of the surgery up to discharge from hospital for the index visit. Follow-up visits will be performed at 2&ndash;3 weeks, 6&ndash;8 weeks, 10&ndash;13 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after the index visit. At baseline, we will document injury data, demographic and sociodemographic data, and radiographic classification using the AO classification system. Patient-perceived functioning will be assessed with PROMIS Physical Function (PF), PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Global Health, Knee and Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand. The following domains and PROMs will also be captured: symptoms of anxiety and depression (PROMIS Anxiety; PROMIS Depression), patient activation (Patient Activation Measures (PAM)-10) and a patient&rsquo;s ability to fulfil social roles (PROMIS Social Roles).</p>
<p>The range and normative limits of the PROMs collected will be defined using standard descriptive statistics. We will crosswalk or validate PROMIS measures with legacy instruments for PF using an Item Response Theory (IRT)-based linking model and compare it to non-IRT models (such as equipercentile linking). Lastly, we will assess the PROM-based recovery trajectory after fracture, overall and after adjusting for relevant demographic, clinical or biopsychosocial factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval for this study was granted from the local Ethics Committees or Institutional Review Board at each of the participating sites prior to patient enrolment. Austin: Institutional Review Board University of Texas at Austin, STUDY00000262; Boston: Mass General Brigham, 2019P000397; Los Angeles: Cedars-Sinai, Office of Research Compliance and Quality Improvement, STUDY00000081; Miami: University of Miami Human Subject Research Office, 20221353; Bogot&aacute;: Comit&eacute; Corporativo de &Eacute;tica en Investigaci&oacute;n, CCEI-15607-2023; Berlin: GoFitFast: under Homburg approval; Recovery/Linking: Ethikkommission Charit&eacute; Universita&#x0308;tsmedizin Berlin, EA2/026/21; Homburg: GoFitFast: Ethikkommission der A&#x0308;rztekammer des Saarlandes, 232/19; Recovery/Linking: under Charit&eacute; approval; Murnau: under umbrella from Homburg and Charit&eacute;, GoFitFast: under Homburg approval, Recovery/Linking: under Charit&eacute; approval; Tu&#x0308;bingen: GoFitFast: Ethik-Kommission, Universita&#x0308;tsklinikum Tu&#x0308;bingen, 393/2022BO2; Freiburg: Ethik-Kommission Albert-Ludwigs-Universita&#x0308;t Freiburg, 21&ndash;1401; Rostock: Ethikkommission an der Universita&#x0308;tsmedizin Rostock, A 2024&ndash;0113; Innsbruck: Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Universita&#x0308;t Innsbruck, 1258/2021; Oxford: HRA and Health and Care Research Wales, 20/EE/0051; London: HRA and Health and Care Research Wales, 20/EE/0051; Groningen: Medical Ethics Review Board University Medical Center Groningen, METc 2023/187 16882; Non-WMO waiver; Zwolle: Medical Ethics Review Board University Medical Center Groningen, METc 2023/187 16882; Non-WMO waiver. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at different conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04113044">NCT04113044</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AOBERT Consortium, Heng, Arora, Augat, Braun, Chen, DiMascio, Doornberg, Fischer, Gwilym, Hernandez, Hodor, Jaecker, Ja&#x0308;eger, Jayakumar, Joeris, Kaat, Ma&#x0308;rdian, Orth, Pesantez, Pohlemann, Rose, Rothrock, Schalet, Vrahas, Zuurmond]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113927</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113927</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising the utility of patient-reported outcome measurements during recovery after orthopaedic extremity fractures: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113927</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113927</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114122?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective longitudinal study of respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory viruses in children <5 years in community settings in metropolitan western Australia: the PATROL study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114122?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a significant cause of respiratory infections in young children. Since 2021, RSV has been a notifiable disease in Australia. However, current surveillance systems focus on hospitalised RSV, with limited surveillance at a community level through primary care clinics. This approach only captures RSV requiring hospitalisation. Less severe illnesses, while not captured, may have significant social and economic impacts including the associated cost of care and absenteeism. The aim of this study is to establish an understanding of the broader burden of RSV in young children in a community setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The PATROL (Parents Actively Tracking RSV in Little Ones) project is a prospective longitudinal observational study of RSV and other respiratory viruses in children &lt;5 years in community settings in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. Over a 12-month surveillance period, parent/guardians will collect a mid-nasal swab from their child any time they meet the case definition or during one of the four screening points aligned with key points in the RSV season. Swabs will be tested for RSV and other respiratory viruses by PCR, with results returned to the parent/guardian. Rapid antigen tests for RSV, SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B are provided for at-home testing in addition to PCR. Symptoms are reported by parents/guardians using MyCap, a phone-based application for REDCap.</p>
<p>Incidence rates of RSV illness and asymptomatic carriage will be calculated and compared with the incidence rate ratios of other respiratory viruses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Government of Western Australia Child and Adolescent Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee approved all study materials. Results and findings will be disseminated through manuscripts, conference abstracts and presentations, participant newsletters and appropriate general news media items.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, A., Harvey, J., Bastian, E., Foley, D. A., Levy, A., France, M., Moore, H. C., Blyth, C. C., on behalf of the STAMP RSV Study Group, Moore, Blyth, Cameron, Carlson, Clarke, Conway, Finucane, Foley, Giannini, Harvey, Hughes, Lamichhane, Levy, Pienaar, Puca, Richmond, Sarna, Wadia, Williams]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114122</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114122</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective longitudinal study of respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory viruses in children <5 years in community settings in metropolitan western Australia: the PATROL study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114122</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of collaborative reasoning in physician-to-physician teleconsultations: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Teleconsultation has become a vital component of modern healthcare delivery, within which clinical reasoning is a critical determinant of care quality, directly impacting patient outcomes. This qualitative study aimed to explore and validate the key components that constitute effective (accurate, timely and safe) physician-physician clinical reasoning in teleconsultations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>We employed a qualitative design using directed content analysis. The study was conducted within Iran&rsquo;s national &lsquo;Moein Program&rsquo;, a structured teleconsultation service providing specialist support for obstetrics and gynaecology. Data collection was conducted between 2023 and 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews were conducted with 16 purposively sampled obstetrician-gynaecologists (both specialists and residents) who had direct teleconsultation experience. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>The data analysis process was guided by an initial conceptual framework derived from a literature review, and the study&rsquo;s rigour was ensured through Lincoln and Guba&rsquo;s trustworthiness criteria, including triangulation and member checking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analysis validated and refined the initial framework, culminating in five key components influencing clinical reasoning in teleconsultations: (1) Data collection and sharing, (2) Situation analysis, (3) Ethical and emotional factors, (4) Collaborative decision-making and (5) Resource-related factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study concludes that successful teleconsultation relies not merely on technological infrastructure but critically on a complex interplay of human, cognitive and ethical factors. These findings underscore the necessity for developing integrated teleconsultation systems that are explicitly designed to support both the technical and the collaborative cognitive dimensions of clinical reasoning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghasemi, S., Changiz, T., Omid, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114267</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114267</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of collaborative reasoning in physician-to-physician teleconsultations: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114267</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114436?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CARE study: prospective cohort study on supportive care among paediatric oncology patients in western Kenya--a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114436?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Childhood cancer presents significant challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), as survival rates remain substantially low. Supportive care, including nutritional support and infection prevention plus management, is crucial in improving outcomes of childhood cancer patients. To develop evidence-based interventions improving supportive care and survival, insight is needed into local prevalences of malnutrition, colonisation and infections, their association with clinical outcomes and the attitude of parents or legal guardians towards nutritional care and infection prevention. The overall aim of this prospective cohort study is to identify modifiable nutritional and infection-related determinants of clinical outcomes at 6 months in children with cancer (1&ndash;15 years of age) treated with curative intent at the Paediatric Oncology ward of the Shoe4Africa Children&rsquo;s Hospital at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital in Eldoret, Kenya.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a prospective cohort study on 150 children aged 1&ndash;15 years who are newly diagnosed with cancer and treated with curative intent. During 6 months of follow-up, we will collect clinical data, perform nutritional assessments and monitor pathogen exposure, colonisation and infections. Parents or legal guardians will receive one questionnaire to assess attitudes towards supportive care. Six-month mortality is the primary outcome. Other outcomes include the prevalence and characteristics of malnutrition, rectal colonisation with bacterial and fungal pathogens, infections and neutropenic fever episodes. Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, logistic regression and thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Institutional Research and Ethics Committee has approved the study protocol (FAN: 0004674, protocol version 1.0). Informed consent from parents or legal guardians and assent from children &ge;12 years will be obtained. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at academic conferences and engagement with local and national policymakers and stakeholders. Data from this study could guide the development of locally informed, evidence-based supportive care interventions, with the ultimate goal to improve overall survival for children with cancer in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gichemi, A., Wijnen, N. E., Kormelink, E., Osore, I., Odero, L., Olbara, G., Voskuijl, W., Nessle, C. N., van der Bruggen, J.-T. T., Sieswerda, E., Serem, E., Kaspers, G., Njuguna, F., Huibers, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114436</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114436</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CARE study: prospective cohort study on supportive care among paediatric oncology patients in western Kenya--a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114436</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114436</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[My Story and Me: protocol for a feasibility study of a personalised public mental health intervention for young women aged 14-18 years]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Rates of mental health difficulties among girls and young women in the UK have risen sharply, and disproportionately so for those from marginalised groups. My Story and Me is a new digital public mental health intervention that uses storytelling to reduce stigma, increase awareness and support early help-seeking among girls and young women aged 14&ndash;18. The feasibility study aims to determine the acceptability of the intervention and future full trial, including assessing optimal settings and meaningful changes in the primary outcome measure (anxiety and depression).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is an 18-month mixed-methods, uncontrolled feasibility study conducted in secondary schools, further education colleges and community organisations across the UK. We will recruit 120&ndash;180 participants. Quantitative data will be collected at baseline and 7-month follow-up. The primary outcomes are anxiety and depression, and secondary outcomes are social support, mentalising, stigma, quality of life, loneliness, empowerment, intervention acceptability, resource use and randomisation acceptability. Platform-level engagement data will assess adherence and fidelity. Qualitative interviews with young women and staff will explore acceptability, feasibility, mechanisms of change and views on trial procedures, including randomisation in a future full trial. Analysis will be descriptive and exploratory, including comparisons across settings and priority groups (LGBTQIA+, neurodivergent and those experiencing digital poverty). A framework and reflexive thematic analysis approach will be used for qualitative data. Prespecified progression criteria will inform decisions about advancing to a full cluster randomised trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The University College London Research Ethics Committee (0692) has approved the My Story and Me protocol. Interested participants will be required to complete an expression of interest and consent form to take part in the study, and young people under 16 years old will be required to obtain parent/carer informed consent. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, lived experience summaries, a policy briefing and academic conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN12191423">ISRCTN12191423</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labno, A., Abel, K. M., Aked, H., Bhui, K., Brooks, H., Crease, M., Deighton, J., Edridge, C., Fonagy, P., Grace, E., Heslin, M., Leyera, S. T., Nisbet, K., Obateru, A., Norton, S., Ravaccia, G., Stapley, E., Edbrooke-Childs, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115245</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115245</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[My Story and Me: protocol for a feasibility study of a personalised public mental health intervention for young women aged 14-18 years]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115245</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115323?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sexual violence disclosure in Canadian postsecondary educational institutions: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115323?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Across Canadian postsecondary educational institutions, sexual violence persists as a serious yet largely undisclosed harm with profound impacts on students&rsquo; mental, physical and academic well-being. Canadian scholarship has not been systemically synthesised to clarify how sexual violence disclosure processes are framed or experienced within postsecondary contexts despite disclosure often being the primary way students seek support. The aim of this scoping review was to: (1) characterise existing perceptions of disclosure within Canadian postsecondary sexual violence evidence; (2) identify key sources and perspectives informing the Canadian postsecondary sexual violence evidence; (3) synthesise reported impacts of disclosure for students pertaining to Canadian postsecondary sexual violence and (4) highlight gaps and research priorities for Canadian postsecondary sexual violence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A scoping review conducted using Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework, with incorporated enhancements from Levac and colleagues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Documents published between 1 January 2014 and 7 March 2025 were reviewed. These were located through searches in PsycINFO, ERIC, Sociological Abstracts, Criminal Justice Abstracts and SCOPUS, along with targeted searches of organisational and government websites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Peer-reviewed and grey evidence in English, published from 2014 onward that addressed sexual violence in Canadian postsecondary settings were included. Eligible evidence included empirical studies, theoretical papers, reviews, dissertations, commentaries, books, book chapters and organisational reports. Letters to the editor, book reviews and conference abstracts were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Extraction and synthesis examined how disclosure is defined, its purpose, associated barriers and outcomes; the role of intersectionality and power relations; and recommendations to improve sexual violence responses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 224 documents (164 peer-reviewed articles and 60 grey literature documents) were included in the review. Results indicate disclosure is a complex, iterative process, shaped by systems of power that differentially affect students across intersecting identities. Barriers to disclosure were most often linked to both institutional and structural inequities that influence students&rsquo; experiences and outcomes. Findings clarify that advancing the safety of sexual violence response and research depends on centring student perspectives and expertise.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This scoping review provides an overview of the power dynamics and risk involved in sexual violence disclosures among students in Canadian postsecondary institutions. Meaningful and transparent application of intersectional and trauma-informed approaches is critical to supporting epistemic safety and cultivating institutional cultures of care rather than perpetuating further harm for Canadian students.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, J., Ashcroft, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115323</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115323</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sexual violence disclosure in Canadian postsecondary educational institutions: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115323</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115323</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116442?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a core screening, assessment and outcome set for cancer prehabilitation: an international Delphi consensus study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116442?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A core screening, assessment and outcome set is needed in cancer prehabilitation to standardise what is measured in both research and services. Currently, there is significant variation in measures used, which limits comparability between studies and evidence synthesis. Standardising measures will improve the quality, comparability and impact of research by reducing heterogeneity between studies, minimising reporting bias, improving trial efficiency, enabling data synthesis into large datasets, supporting international collaboration and data sharing, and accelerating the implementation of best practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>An international Delphi consensus process will be conducted involving patients, healthcare professionals and researchers to identify screening, assessment and outcomes and their corresponding measurement instruments, to be included in a core set. The study consists of three phases: (1) A scoping review to identify screening, assessment and outcomes and associated measurement instruments currently used in cancer prehabilitation. (2) At least two rounds of a modified Delphi survey to prioritise the identified screening, assessment and outcomes using a 1&ndash;9 Likert scale. Consensus will be defined across stakeholder groups using prespecified thresholds. A consensus meeting will be held if agreement is not reached. (3) Measurement instruments corresponding to each retained screening, assessment and outcome will be assessed for quality for measurement properties and feasibility. Further Delphi rounds will be conducted to reach consensus on the most appropriate measurement instrument for each core screening, assessment and outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has ethical approval (Ref: 25/NW/0159). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder networks and made publicly available via the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials database.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parkington, T., Humphreys, L. J., West, M., Myers, A., Keen, C., Denehy, L., Gillis, C., Edbrooke, L., Moore, J., Steffens, D., Bongers, B. C., Slooter, G. D., Nile, K., Garner, N., Copeland, R., The National Cancer Prehabilitation Coll The Royal Marsden Cancer Charity, Jhanji, Levett, Grocott, Kitchen, Shaw, Jack, Malhotra, Cowan-Dickie, Eldridge, Costelloe, Patterson, Don Milliken, Morris, Collyer, Collinson, Timney, Khan, Hewitt]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116442</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116442</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a core screening, assessment and outcome set for cancer prehabilitation: an international Delphi consensus study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116442</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116442</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116758?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating modern US social contact patterns, the ENGAGED study: a study protocol for a staggered longitudinal cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116758?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Accurately capturing social contact data is essential for developing effective mathematical models to forecast disease trends and evaluate interventions. There are limited population-based data of social contacts in the USA which limits our ability to accurately model infectious disease transmission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>To fill in this gap, we conducted a staggered longitudinal cohort study in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, USA. We aimed to characterise contact patterns and examine how they varied by (1) participant demographics, (2) seasonality and (3) self-managed and medically-attended symptoms. Once per month for 6 months, participants reported individual contacts they can name, individual contacts they cannot name and contacts that occurred in group settings. We defined individual contacts as a two-way conversation with five or more words in the physical presence of another person or physical skin-to-skin contact and group contacts as contacts with a group of people with whom participants talked, interacted or shared space. Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis, and data is collected from November 2024 through April 2026. Data analysis will generate age-specific contact matrices using individual contacts and compare contact rates by symptoms. We will also analyse the number and characteristics (eg, indoor/outdoor) of each type of contact. The contact matrices and results will be publicly available for the wider modelling community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Kaiser Permanente Interregional Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviewed and approved all submitted study documents. An IRB Authorization Agreement was established with the Emory University IRB documenting the roles and responsibilities of each study site. On study completion, de-identified individual level contact data as well as contact matrices and analytical code will be made publicly available on GitHub/Zenodo platform. Study findings will be published in scientific journals and presented at conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shiiba, M., Bruck, M., Sesay, M. M., Hudgins, A. F., Segall, M. F., Prasad, P., Doran, C. R., Siegler, A. J., Lobelo, F., Ryerson, A. B., Lopman, B., Nelson, K. N., Ahmed, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116758</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116758</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimating modern US social contact patterns, the ENGAGED study: a study protocol for a staggered longitudinal cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116758</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116758</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118137?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safety and immunogenicity of live attenuated vaccines during corticosteroid therapy in children with nephrotic syndrome: protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (VACCINES trial: VAccines in Children on CorticosteroIds for NEphrotic Syndrome)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118137?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Live attenuated vaccines (LAVs) are recommended during moderate corticosteroid therapy (&lt;2 mg/kg per day) for nephrotic syndrome (NS) largely based on observational/case&ndash;control study data. We aim to conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the safety and immunogenicity of LAVs in children with NS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>To test the safety and immunogenicity of LAVs in NS in children on moderate dose corticosteroid therapy (1.5 mg/kg alternate day dose with maximum 40 mg alternate day dose; early arm) vs those off corticosteroid therapy for 4 weeks (standard arm), we are conducting a single-centre, open-label, non-inferiority RCT at a tertiary care centre in South India (VACCINES trial: Vaccines in Children on Corticosteroids for NEphrotic Syndrome). Eligible children (after inclusion and exclusion criteria) will be enrolled after obtaining written informed consent (from a legally accepted representative/parents) as well as assent for children aged &gt;12 years. Two doses of measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and/or varicella vaccines will be administered 12 weeks apart, after the initial assessment of seroprotection. Immunological assessment of humoral and cellular immunity will be evaluated in eligible participants. Randomisation into the standard and early arms will be performed during the last 2 weeks of alternate-day therapy (stratified into first episode and relapse patients). Seroconversion assessments will be made at 4, 12, 16 and 52 weeks into the study. The primary objective is to compare the proportion of participants who demonstrate seroconversion after 4 weeks of the first intervention. The secondary outcomes are the antibody geometric mean titres and adverse event profiles including serious events. With a non-inferiority margin of 15% (assuming 86% seroconversion in healthy controls), power of 85% and an alpha error of 5%, 100 patients (including 10% attrition) will be randomised (1:1). Comparisons with 50 healthy children will also be made. The occurrence of three serious adverse events directly attributable to the intervention constitutes a stopping rule. An interim analysis after recruitment of 50% is planned to be presented to an institutional Data Safety Monitoring Board. The first patient was enrolled on 30 June 2025, and enrolment is expected to be completed by February 2028.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Christian Medical College, Vellore (IRB min 2411130, dated 20 November 2024). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and may be presented at medical conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Clinical Trials Registry &ndash; India, CTRI/2025/01/078854 (Jan 16, 2025).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew, G., Madhavan, R., Kompithra, R. Z., Loganathan, S. K., Abraham, A. M., Moorthy, M., Mammen, S., Kannangai, R., Samuel, P., Verghese, V. P., Raranveettil, D., Agarwal, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118137</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118137</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety and immunogenicity of live attenuated vaccines during corticosteroid therapy in children with nephrotic syndrome: protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (VACCINES trial: VAccines in Children on CorticosteroIds for NEphrotic Syndrome)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118137</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103857corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction for 'Theory-based chatbot for promoting colorectal cancer screening in a community setting in Hong Kong: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103857corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Hu Y, Lau WM, Wang ZJ, <I>et al</I>. Theory-based chatbot for promoting colorectal cancer screening in a community setting in Hong Kong: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2025;15:e103857. doi:10.1136/bmjopen2025-103857</p>
<p>This article has been corrected since it was published online. The Primary outcome section has been updated from "The primary outcome is the CRC screening uptake rate, defined as participation in and completion of the government-subsidised CRC screening programme by returning valid FIT kits at 3 months and 6 months after intervention" to "The primary outcome is the CRC screening uptake rate, defined as participation in and completion of the government-subsidised CRC screening programme by returning valid FIT kits at 3 months after intervention".</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T07:07:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103857corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103857corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction for 'Theory-based chatbot for promoting colorectal cancer screening in a community setting in Hong Kong: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103857corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103857corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116832?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Community insights into type 1 diabetes care in Armenia: a qualitative study informing health policy reform]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116832?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore the lived experiences of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their caregivers in Armenia, a post-Soviet country, and to identify system-level barriers to care from the community perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using a phenomenological design with inductive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Muratsan Hospital Complex, the primary national referral centre for paediatric endocrinology, Yerevan, Armenia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 children aged 13&ndash;17 years with T1D and their caregivers, recruited through purposive sampling across 7 of Armenia&rsquo;s 10 administrative regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five themes emerged from the data: (1) barriers to care, (2) quality of care, (3) perceived control of T1D, (4) knowledge of T1D and (5) government and non-governmental organisation (NGO) support. Participants described unreliable government-supplied glucose strips, geographical barriers rooted in the centralisation of specialist care in the capital, abrupt withdrawal of state support at age 18, reliance on the KATIL NGO to fill gaps in both clinical and psychosocial support and pervasive stigma encountered across family, school and clinical settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Children with T1D in Armenia navigate a post-Soviet health system where provisions exist but remain fragmented, limited by centralised care, geographical barriers and variable support. This unique context shapes the relationship and expectations patients have of the healthcare system. Community perspectives are indispensable in these settings, surfacing system-level gaps that conventional data cannot capture. These findings have relevance for other health systems navigating similar structural transitions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ohanian, A., Ghazarian, V., Mkhitaryan, K., Aghajanova, E., Libaridian, L., Selimyan, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:54-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116832</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116832</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Community insights into type 1 diabetes care in Armenia: a qualitative study informing health policy reform]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116832</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116832</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e096492?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between comorbidities and differences in treatment decisions and outcomes in patients with colon or rectal cancer: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e096492?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To systematically evaluate associations between comorbidities and differences in treatment decisions, outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healthcare resource utilisation and costs, in patients with colon or rectal cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed (Medline) and Embase databases were searched for studies published from January 2000 until January 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We included articles that compared the presence and absence of comorbidities, evaluated multiple comorbid conditions or used the Charlson Comorbidity Index, or variations such as the Charlson-Deyo Index. Primary and secondary outcome measures included cancer treatments, outcomes (including complications from treatments, survival and mortality rates), HRQoL, healthcare resource use and costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists to ensure the quality of data. Findings were summarised narratively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After duplicates were removed, 15 394 hits were screened and 31 studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. Comorbidities were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving treatment and lower survival rates and HRQoL, alongside a higher likelihood of complications following treatment, higher mortality rates and higher healthcare resource use. There were very limited studies that reported on HRQoL and resource use, and none reporting data directly relating to the impact of comorbidities on costs. These results were consistent across North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>For patients with colon and rectal cancer, comorbidities are associated with a lower likelihood of receiving treatments and poorer health outcomes. With global populations ageing, there is likely to be an increase in patients with colon and rectal cancer with comorbidities. Therefore, further research is necessary, especially to inform decisions regarding patient management and treatment, and to understand the implications on healthcare resource allocation, costs and HRQoL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lloyd, A. K., Medina-Lara, A., Birch, S., Wallis, K. A., Spencer, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096492</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096492</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between comorbidities and differences in treatment decisions and outcomes in patients with colon or rectal cancer: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096492</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096492</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101202?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Compliance with current VTE prophylaxis guidelines and associated factors among admitted medical inpatients in Mehal Meda General Hospital, North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e101202?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains highly prevalent among medically ill patients and often leads to increased mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to assess compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines and associated factors among admitted medical inpatients at Mehal Meda General Hospital, North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia, in 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected via medical chart review and interview-administered questionnaires, entered into EPI Data V.4.6, and exported to SPSS V.26 for analysis. Data were presented using frequency tables and graphs. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with compliance with VTE prophylaxis. Variables from the bivariable logistic regression analysis with a value of p&lt;0.3 were included in the multivariable logistic regression model. A value of p&lt;0.05 and an adjusted OR (AOR) with a 95% CI were used to identify factors associated with compliance with VTE prophylaxis. Model fitness was assessed using the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at Mehal Meda General Hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study was conducted among 365 admitted medical inpatients. The study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall proportion of compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines among admitted medical inpatients was 24.2% (95% CI 19.9% to 28.8%). In this study, being a patient with heart failure (AOR = 6.8, 95% CI 3.7 to 12.54) and being a patient with diabetes (AOR = 3.98, 95% CI 2.2 to 7.2) were positively associated with compliance with VTE prophylaxis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The overall proportion of compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines among admitted medical inpatients was low compared with previous studies. Heart failure and diabetes were positively associated with compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines. Therefore, greater attention should be given to both, patients with diabetes and patients with heart failure.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yitbarek, T., Tadesse, N., Andarge, E. M., Adem, Y. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101202</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101202</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Compliance with current VTE prophylaxis guidelines and associated factors among admitted medical inpatients in Mehal Meda General Hospital, North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical management</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101202</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102941?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening and adjusted Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening scores for risk stratification of advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic Vietnamese: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e102941?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score is a validated tool for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in the Asia-Pacific region. An adjusted APCS (A-APCS) score was recently developed by incorporating body mass index into the original score and was reported to outperform the original score but lacked external validation. This study aimed to compare the A-APCS score with the original APCS score in asymptomatic Vietnamese individuals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Dai Phuoc Polyclinic, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Asymptomatic individuals underwent colonoscopy screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Participants were categorised into three risk groups based on the sum of the APCS and A-APCS scores: average risk (AR), moderate risk (MR) and high risk (HR). The performance of the two scores was compared via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 714 participants (median age 51 years, range: 18&ndash;79; female-to-male ratio: 1:1.46) were included, with an ACN prevalence of 9.0%. Both scores indicated effective predictive ability for ACN in the HR group compared with the AR group, with OR=3.878 (95% CI 1.777 to 8.068) and 3.266 (95% CI 1.617 to 6.595), respectively. The A-APCS score was more effective than the APCS score in predicting ACN in the MR group than in the AR group. However, no significant differences in area under the ROC curve were observed between the two scores for ACN prediction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Compared with the APCS score, the A-APCS score may not provide improved ACN risk stratification in asymptomatic Vietnamese individuals. Both scores are suboptimal and should be used to prioritise, rather than exclude, candidates for colonoscopy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quach, D. T., Vu, N. T. H., To, H. T. T., Tong, H. N. D., Nguyen, D. T. A., Phan, T. D. A., Ngo, D. Q., Hiyama, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102941</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102941</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening and adjusted Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening scores for risk stratification of advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic Vietnamese: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102941</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102941</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107097?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transfer of faeces in ulcerative colitis 2: improving efficacy - study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TURN2 study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107097?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The interaction between the gut microbiota and the host immune system is implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis (UC). Targeting the gut microbiota with faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from a healthy donor has shown promise in inducing remission in patients with active UC. However, mixed results and protocol heterogeneity have limited its practical application. Our previous Transfer of Faeces in Ulcerative Colitis; Restoring Homeostasis (TURN) trial found a correlation of clinical response with specific strains and butyrate production. Since most gut microbes, including many butyrate producers, are anaerobes, anoxic processing of donor stool may be essential to increase efficacy of FMT in UC. This trial aims to enhance FMT efficacy by applying strict anoxic processing, selecting donors based on microbial composition and using repetitive dual-route administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study evaluates the efficacy of strictly anoxic prepared donor FMT compared with anoxic prepared autologous FMT in patients with mild to moderate active UC. An open-label extension option is available for non-responders in the autologous arm. Included patients will receive 4 weekly FMTs, comprising two double-route administrations (nasoduodenal administration combined with enema) and two single enemas. Donors are selected based on their microbiota profile, informed by our previous TURN trial and literature. A total of 76 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint will be included. The primary endpoint is steroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8, assessed by the adapted Mayo score. An interim analysis will be conducted midway through the study by a Data Safety Monitoring Board to monitor efficacy and safety. Other outcomes of this study include the evaluation of clinical, endoscopic and histological response. In addition to clinical results, this study aims to provide valuable insights into specific microbial strains, metabolites and mechanisms correlated with response, aiding in the development of future microbial therapies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre in the Netherlands (reference number 2018_057). All participants will provide written informed consent. The results of the trial will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at (inter)national conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Prospectively registered in May 2018 in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR/LTR) as NL7770. Assigned NL-OMON52507 following the transition of the Dutch Trial Register to the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands. Also registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT05998213">NCT05998213</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benard, M. V., Van Der Spek, M. J., Davids, M., Visser, C. E., Zoetendal, E. G., Rethans, B., Zwezerijnen-Jiwa, F. H., Visschedijk, M. C., Oldenburg, B., Weersma, R. K., Ponsioen, C. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107097</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107097</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transfer of faeces in ulcerative colitis 2: improving efficacy - study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (TURN2 study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107097</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107097</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108091?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of wounds and patient characteristics in an Australian community setting: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108091?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the community prevalence of acute and chronic wounds in a defined Australian population, and to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of affected individuals and their wounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective, population-based cohort study using electronic health records for all patients with wounds seen by a community nursing service during 2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community nursing service in the Central Coast region of New South Wales, Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 3632 individuals (1652 females and 1980 males) from a population of 327 736 were treated for 8470 unique wounds. Over 65% of patients resided in areas classified as most socioeconomically disadvantaged.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were the prevalence of acute and chronic wounds and the distribution of wound types. Secondary outcomes included patient demographics and socioeconomic status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We estimated an annual age-sex-standardised prevalence of any wound of 8.34 per 1000 (95% CI 7.56 to 9.13); 3.27 per 1000 (95% CI 3.05 to 3.48) for acute wounds and 4.64 per 1000 (95% CI 4.38 to 4.90) for chronic wounds. The average point prevalence over the year for chronic wounds was 3.81 per 1000 (95% CI 3.57 to 4.04) which is higher than many previous estimates elsewhere. Prevalence of any wound type increased with age and area-level deprivation and was much higher for males than females. There was no observable seasonal variation in wound prevalence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We have derived robust estimates of the prevalence and characteristics of people receiving community-based wound care in one district of Australia. We found important differences in the frequency and patterns of wounds compared with previous studies elsewhere in the world (notably the UK and Europe). More research is needed to better understand the epidemiology of acute and chronic wounds in Australia to enable more targeted prevention and effective treatment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Purcell, A., Brinton, J., King, J., Munford, L. A., Hibbard, K., Cullum, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108091</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108091</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of wounds and patient characteristics in an Australian community setting: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108091</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108091</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109029?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experiences of families participating in a 10-week family-focused e-Health healthy lifestyle programme for school-aged children with overweight or obesity: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109029?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore families&rsquo; experiences participating in a 10-week web-based lifestyle programme for school-aged children with overweight or obesity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study using inductive analysis of semi-structured interview data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Victoria, Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Families (children aged 7&ndash;13 years with overweight or obesity&mdash;body mass index &ge;85th percentile&mdash;and accompanying parent) recruited for a randomised controlled trial that evaluated the effectiveness of the web-based programme and who received the programme (n=102 children/85 families) were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview at 3 months post-programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Families received a 10-week family-focused electronic health (e-Health; web-based) lifestyle programme with health coaching sessions&mdash;an evidence-based programme adapted from its in-person, group-based counterpart.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 28 families, including 34 children (eight siblings) and mostly mothers, shared their experiences. 10 themes were identified on family members&rsquo; experiences and aligned with the socioecological model: intrapersonal&mdash;knowledge development on healthy living; experiences and stigma related to overweight, obesity or weight; engaging with structural features of the web-based programme, interpersonal&mdash;family dynamic; connections with others (non-healthcare professionals) outside of home; relationship with healthcare professionals, environmental/institutional&mdash;impact of COVID-19 lockdowns; health-promoting environments; promotion of and access to overweight or obesity management programmes; web-based programme as part of a larger or established system. Each theme highlighted factors that influenced programme uptake and engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Valuable insights were gained on ways to better adapt e-Health (web-based) lifestyle programmes for children with overweight or obesity. Families perceived advantages in a web-based lifestyle programme and highly regarded humanised features and elements comparable to conventional in-person programmes. Further research is needed to explore the perspectives of families from diverse populations, fathers and families who decline participation in the follow-up period. Web-based lifestyle programmes that incorporate contemporary e-Health technologies, including responsive AI, also warrant further investigation to maximise programme benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12621001762842.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhu, D., Dordevic, A. L., Davidson, Z. E., Gibson, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109029</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experiences of families participating in a 10-week family-focused e-Health healthy lifestyle programme for school-aged children with overweight or obesity: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109029</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109029</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109305?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coping strategies and associated factors in a sample of Iranian nurses: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109305?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate coping strategies and associated factors among clinical nurses in Iran in 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Hospitals in Kashan, Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 400 nurses were selected through stratified random sampling from different hospital departments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Coping strategies were measured via the Potential Factors Related to Coping Strategies Questionnaire, the Work-Family Conflict Scale and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Coping strategies were quantified with scores ranging from 0 to 198. Associations with potential influencing factors were assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The coping strategies score was 94.22&plusmn;25.49 (95% CLM 91.72 to 96.72). Notably, 83.5% of the variation in coping strategy scores could be attributed to emotion-focused coping. The simultaneous inclusion of work-family conflict and spouse participation in household affairs was found to be significant (F=9.85, p&lt;0.0001). Work&ndash;family conflict was positively associated (B=0.82, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.26), whereas spouse participation was negatively associated (B=&ndash;8.43, 95% CI &ndash;16.22 to &ndash;0.64). Together, these variables accounted for 6.4% of the variance in coping strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Nurses in Kashan hospitals used moderate levels of coping strategies, which were mainly emotion-focused. It is recommended that hospitals provide guidance on these strategies, especially during pandemic crises.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarvarian, A., Tagharrobi, Z., Sharifi, K., Sooki, Z., Zare, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109305</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109305</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coping strategies and associated factors in a sample of Iranian nurses: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109305</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109305</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for EACH-ADHF trial: efficacy and safety of early comprehensive rehabilitation in patients with acute decompensated heart failure - a multicentre, randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is associated with high mortality rates and significant decline in physical function following hospitalisation. Although exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is recognised as a key component of comprehensive heart failure management, clinical evidence supporting its application in patients with ADHF remains limited. The trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an early initiated comprehensive rehabilitation in patients with ADHF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 140 patients hospitalised with ADHF will be enrolled and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either comprehensive rehabilitation intervention or attention control. The intervention group will receive a supervised, 6-week structured comprehensive rehabilitation programme consisting of progressive balance, endurance, strength and inspiratory muscle training. Rehabilitation therapy commences after admission and continues into the outpatient period with a total of 18 sessions. The control group will receive standard usual care supplemented by fortnightly non-rehabilitation-related contact from study personnel to control for attention. Coprimary outcomes are changes in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score and in maximum inspiratory pressure expressed as a percentage of predicted value (PImax%pred) at 6 weeks postrandomisation. Secondary outcomes include changes in the Short Physical Performance Battery score, frailty phenotype, pulmonary function tests and 6-month all-cause rehospitalisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Early Comprehensive Rehabilitation in patients with ADHF (EACH-ADHF) trial was granted by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial People&rsquo;s Hospital (KY-Q-2022-487). Findings will be disseminated to patients, clinicians and commissioning groups through peer-reviewed publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06161987">NCT06161987</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, M., Chang, J., Guo, L., Bai, B., Wang, R., Liu, X., Du, Q., Mao, Y., Xue, A., Su, M., Wang, Y., Lin, K., Ma, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110196</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110196</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for EACH-ADHF trial: efficacy and safety of early comprehensive rehabilitation in patients with acute decompensated heart failure - a multicentre, randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110196</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110727?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of interventions involving parents on childrens eating behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110727?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Parents play a pivotal role in shaping their children&rsquo;s food environment and eating behaviours. Involving parents in interventions designed to promote nutritional outcomes such as dietary intake in children has been shown to improve parental feeding practices. However, it remains unclear how such interventions influence children&rsquo;s eating behaviour outcomes. This protocol describes the methods of a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions involving parents in improving the eating behaviours of healthy children aged 0&ndash;12 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched from inception to September 2025. A search strategy is developed to identify randomised controlled trials directly involving parents and reporting eating behaviours in children as either primary or secondary outcomes. Two independent reviewers will screen identified records and extract data on study, participant and intervention characteristics. Study results relevant to our primary and secondary outcomes will also be extracted using a prepiloted standardised data extraction form. We will use the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB2) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess risk of bias and certainty of evidence, respectively. Where possible, meta-analysis using random-effects models will be performed; otherwise a qualitative summary will be provided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this study as no primary data will be collected. The findings will provide valuable insights for stakeholders to inform and optimise public health policies and practices aimed at empowering families to promote healthy eating behaviours early in childhood. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251076540.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khorramrouz, F., Rae, S., Kucab, M., Uleryk, E. M., Maguire, J. L., Pechlivanoglou, P., Thorpe, K. E., Comelli, E. M., Birken, C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110727</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110727</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of interventions involving parents on childrens eating behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110727</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110727</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111477?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of evening dexmedetomidine nasal spray on postoperative sleep disturbance in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111477?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Postoperative sleep disturbance (PSD) is a common complication following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). It is associated with delirium, cognitive decline and delayed recovery. Effective preventive strategies are currently lacking. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective &alpha;<SUB>2</SUB>-adrenergic receptor agonist, offered in a nasal spray formulation with high bioavailability and convenient administration, may present a novel approach for PSD prevention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of evening dexmedetomidine nasal spray on the incidence of PSD on the first postoperative day in LC patients. Secondary objectives include assessing its impact on the quality of recovery, anxiety and depression and pain scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. At least 260 patients will be enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either dexmedetomidine (50 &micro;g nasal spray) or saline placebo the night before and the night of surgery (between 20:00 and 22:00). The primary outcome is the incidence of PSD on postoperative day 1 defined as an Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) &gt;6 or Athens Insomnia Scale &gt;6 score, which will be compared between groups using the <sup>2</sup> or Fisher&rsquo;s exact test on the full analysis set. Secondary outcomes include quality of recovery (Quality of Recovery-15 scale, QoR-15), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), pain (NRS), postoperative nausea and vomiting and adverse events, analysed using t-tests, rank-sum tests or repeated-measures mixed-effects models as appropriate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School (Approval No.: 2025&ndash;0064-02) and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The findings of this study will be disseminated through various channels. Academic dissemination will include publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500101205.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shi, W., Zhu, S., Xia, T., Cui, Y., Bo, J., Gu, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111477</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111477</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of evening dexmedetomidine nasal spray on postoperative sleep disturbance in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111477</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111477</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113057?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient engagement, shared decision-making and equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in research ethics board application forms and templates in Canada: a mixed methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113057?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI), patient engagement and shared decision-making are important considerations throughout clinical trials, including the research ethics review stage. Meaningfully integrating these considerations can enhance the relevance and generalisability of trial results and reduce participation barriers among equity-deserving populations. Presently, it is unclear to what extent such guidance is provided at the ethics application stage for clinical trials. This study aimed to report the degree of guidance on EDI, patient engagement and shared decision-making in clinical trial research ethics documents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was an embedded mixed methods study conducted in collaboration with Clinical Trials Ontario.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study analysed research ethics board (REB) forms and templates from 17 institutions across seven provinces in Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and methods</st>
<p>15 REB application forms, 9 protocol templates and 17 informed consent document (ICD) templates were assessed for guidance related to EDI, patient engagement and shared decision-making. The Place of residence, Race, ethnicity, culture and language, Occupation, Gender and sex, Religion, Education, Socio-economic status, Social capital (PROGRESS)-Plus framework, International Association for Public Participation Spectrum of Public Participation, Patient-Oriented Research Level of Engagement Tool, Indigenous Research Level of Engagement Tool and shared decision-making standards guided our coding. We engaged with patients and persons with lived experience to inform interpretation, reporting and dissemination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>EDI guidance from 15 ethics application forms and 9 protocol templates predominantly covered the &lsquo;Race, ethnicity, culture, language&rsquo; (n=14; 93.3%), &lsquo;Age&rsquo; (n=13; 86.7%) and &lsquo;Gender and sex&rsquo; (n=12; 80%) categories of PROGRESS-Plus but lacked nuance on diverse gender identities (n=1; 6.7%). Patient engagement guidance mostly covered the &lsquo;inform&rsquo; level (n=7; 46.7%) and applying &lsquo;knowledge in practice&rsquo; with non-Indigenous (n=7; 46.7%) or Indigenous communities (n=13; 86.7%). All 17 (100%) ICD templates included guidance on information about options, disclosures, key elements, ethical issues and study design. No guidance was available on time-dependent relationships, empowering patients and communities in co-leading trials or providing structured guidance in making trial participation decisions (all n=0; 0%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We provided a comprehensive view of EDI, patient engagement and shared decision-making guidance in trial ethics applications in Canada. REB guidance may be strengthened in several areas to support the inclusion of equity-deserving populations in trials, meaningful engagement with patients and Indigenous communities and evidence-informed, values-aligned decisions about trial participation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan, T. L., Carroll, K., Mosa, M., Hudek, N., Richards, D. P., Marlin, S., Meeking, K., Etherington, C., Presseau, J., Brehaut, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113057</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113057</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient engagement, shared decision-making and equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in research ethics board application forms and templates in Canada: a mixed methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113057</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113057</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114075?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Couple-based intervention for HIV prevention, care and treatment in South Africa: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of Simunye]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114075?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>While improvements have been made across the HIV care continuum in South Africa, gaps remain. Relationship-focused couples-based approaches may be one avenue to improve HIV-related outcomes for men and women. Prior couples-based studies have been found to improve several HIV care and treatment outcomes in this context, but few have considered viral suppression as the primary outcome. We aimed to compare a couples-based motivational-interviewing intervention delivered to couples to similar content delivered to men and women in couples separately. We will test the efficacy of this approach in a randomised controlled trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Our goal is to enrol 270 heterosexual couples for this trial, with at least one partner living with HIV. Couples will be randomised into one of two arms, stratified by couples&rsquo; HIV status. The intervention arm, Simunye (&lsquo;We are one&rsquo; in isiZulu), will provide two sessions of motivational information and skills regarding HIV-related behaviours to couples together, along with relationship-focused content and skills. The content is based on Partner Steps (P-steps), a couples-focused adaptation of Life Steps, an evidence-based programme shown to improve adherence and viral suppression. The control group will receive two sessions as individuals, with similar HIV-related information but without relationship-focused content. Participants will be followed up at 6, 12 and 18 months postrandomisation. The baseline questionnaire will include measures of relationship domains such as satisfaction and communication, and measures pertaining to HIV and reproductive health (eg, fertility intentions, HIV knowledge and risk perception, and sexual behaviour), and mental health (eg, depression symptoms). The primary outcome is viral suppression, based on dried blood spots. Secondary outcomes will include other aspects of treatment engagement. We will also examine hypothesised mediators of intervention participation, for example, relationship dynamics. Primary analyses will use a multilevel modelling approach, which will feature planned time-averaged comparisons of postbaseline measurements across the intervention and control groups to test the primary hypothesis. The analysis will account for the dyadic nature of the data, for example, participants nested within couples.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Human Sciences Research Council in South Africa, protocol number 2/27/01/21, and the IRB at the University of Michigan (HUM 00203672). Human subjects&rsquo; concerns or adverse events will be reported to both IRBs and the Data Safety and Monitoring Board. We will disseminate findings to community members and stakeholders via community meetings, as well as by conference presentations and publications in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Clinicaltrials.gov Protocol Registration <A HREF="NCT05231707">NCT05231707</A> registered on 8 February 2022. Protocol version 2.0, 31 October 2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darbes, L. A., Chibi, B., Tesfay, N., Dilworth, S. E., Humphries, H., Merrill, L., Conroy, A. A., Johnson, M. O., Neilands, T. B., Gutin, S. A., van Heerden, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114075</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114075</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Couple-based intervention for HIV prevention, care and treatment in South Africa: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of Simunye]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114075</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114075</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114426?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abdominopelvic computed tomography during pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations: protocol for a nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114426?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The use of CT has increased markedly over recent decades, and this trend is also observed among pregnant women. According to current clinical guidelines, fetal radiation exposure below a threshold of 100 to 200 mGy does not appear to increase the risk of congenital malformations. Although the estimated fetal dose from a maternal abdominopelvic CT examination is generally lower than this range, evidence regarding the risks associated with such relatively low-dose diagnostic exposures during pregnancy remains scarce. This study aims to evaluate the association between abdominopelvic CT exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations in infants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a nationwide population-based cohort study using the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database of South Korea. All live births from 2011 through 2023 will be identified and linked to their mothers. Exposure will be defined as maternal abdominopelvic CT during the first trimester of pregnancy. The primary outcome is major congenital malformations in infants, defined according to the standardised classification system of the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies. Secondary outcomes include organ-specific malformations and congenital malformations requiring neonatal intensive care unit admission or corrective surgery. A propensity score-based fine stratification weighting approach will be used to adjust for covariates as potential confounders, and relative risks will be estimated. Prespecified sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess robustness of the findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Institutional Review Board No. X-2508-993-902). Informed consent was waived because only anonymised administrative claims data will be used. All analyses will be conducted within the secure NHIS research environment, and no individually identifiable data will be released. The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conference presentations and communication with regulatory authorities, clinicians and policymakers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hwang, J., Cho, J., Kim, H. Y., Lee, S., Jung, Y. M., Lee, K. H., Park, J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114426</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114426</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abdominopelvic computed tomography during pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations: protocol for a nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114426</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114426</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of a multidisciplinary transitional care programme on self-management and quality of life in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score-matched analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Adequate self-management support following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a recognised challenge. This study evaluated the Integrated Psychocardiology Transitional Care (IPTC) programme&rsquo;s effect on self-management and quality of life, and the mechanism of their interaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Outcomes were analysed for 697 patients after propensity score matching from an initial PCI registry cohort of 1148.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was change in Coronary Artery Disease Self-Management Scale Score over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 scores. Mixed-effects models and time-lagged mediation analysis were used to examine longitudinal changes and the mediating role of self-management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No between-group difference in self-management was observed at 1 month. Significant differences in self-management emerged at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months (all p&lt;0.001). The mixed-effects model for repeated measures analysis revealed significant group <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> time interaction effects (F=183.1, p&lt;0.001), indicating differential improvement trajectories favouring the IPTC group. The IPTC group showed significantly better SF-36 physical (45.6&plusmn;9.6 vs 39.8&plusmn;8.4, 95% CI 4.5 to 7.2, p&lt;0.001) and mental (44.9&plusmn;8.3 vs 41.7&plusmn;8.1, 95% CI 2.0 to 4.4, p&lt;0.001) scores at 12 months. Time-lagged mediation analysis confirmed self-management improvement mediated quality of life effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The IPTC programme is associated with improved quality of life in PCI patients, and this association appears to be partly explained by enhanced self-management. These findings suggest that integrating psychology-informed transitional care into post-PCI care may be beneficial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tao, L., Luo, D., Tan, L., Zhang, C., Li, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116363</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116363</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of a multidisciplinary transitional care programme on self-management and quality of life in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score-matched analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116363</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116392?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systemic inflammation and malaria co-infection in irritable bowel syndrome: a cross-sectional study of 142 Yemeni patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116392?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence of malaria co-infection among patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in Yemen and to evaluate the association of systemic inflammatory biomarkers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)) with this co-infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multicentre, cross-sectional observational study conducted between April and December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary and secondary healthcare facilities across 21 governorates in Yemen.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>142 consecutive adult patients (aged 18&ndash;70 years) diagnosed with IBS according to the Rome IV criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the prevalence of malaria infection, confirmed by a rapid diagnostic test . Secondary outcomes included differences in NLR, MPV and PLR between groups, assessed using independent t-tests, and the diagnostic performance of these biomarkers evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with AUC calculation. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of malaria co-infection, adjusting for potential confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean age was 42.3 years (SD 11.7) with an equal gender distribution. The prevalence of malaria co-infection was 45.1% (64/142). Patients with malaria positivity had significantly higher NLR (mean difference 0.56, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.72; p&lt;0.001) and PLR (mean difference 22.6, 95% CI 17.8 to 27.4; p&lt;0.001) and lower MPV (mean difference &ndash;0.60 fL, 95% CI &ndash;0.77 to &ndash;0.43; p&lt;0.001) compared with malaria-negative patients. In adjusted logistic regression, higher NLR (adjusted OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.89 to 5.45) and PLR (adjusted OR per 10-unit increase 4.02, 95% CI 2.24 to 7.18) were independently associated with malaria positivity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Nearly half of the Yemeni patients with IBS in this study had malaria co-infection, with the highest burden in diarrhoea-predominant and mixed subtypes. Elevated NLR and PLR were strongly associated with co-infection, suggesting these readily available biomarkers could aid targeted screening in resource-limited, endemic settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali, N. T., Mehdi, M. A. H., Abdullah, R. S., Gubran, A. N. M., Al-Abd, N. M., Ali, G. S., Mohsen Ali, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116392</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116392</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systemic inflammation and malaria co-infection in irritable bowel syndrome: a cross-sectional study of 142 Yemeni patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116392</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116392</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116776?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing adherence to intravesical instillation therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116776?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is often treated with repeated weekly intravesical instillations of chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The number of instillations received influences the risk of recurrence and progression; thus, treatment completion is crucial. However, previous research indicates that nearly half of patients do not adhere to treatment for various reasons. This scoping review aims to define the concept of treatment adherence to intravesical instillation therapies and identify and map the factors that influence treatment adherence in intravesical instillation therapies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute&rsquo;s Manual for Evidence Synthesis and will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search strategy will be employed to guide the literature search across databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.</p>
<p>We will include studies on intravesical instillation therapies with BCG or Mitomycin C for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, as well as studies that describe factors influencing patients&rsquo; adherence to treatment. Screening of abstracts and full texts, as well as data charting, will be performed independently by two researchers using the Covidence software. We will collect and chart data concerning characteristics of the source and setting, treatment specifics, reasons for non-adherence and any factors that affect adherence.</p>
<p>We will summarise each included source and present the identified factors in a narrative synthesis. Furthermore, we will describe how the results inform the review objective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review, as all data have been published. The findings of the scoping review will be disseminated in a scientific publication and widely presented to researchers, healthcare professionals and patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leinum, L. R., Jensen, B. T., Lauridsen, S. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T05:05:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116776</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116776</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing adherence to intravesical instillation therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116776</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116776</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115484?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Ive got a pupil who vapes every 20 minutes: exploration of the wider impact on schools of young peoples use of new nicotine products in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115484?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and objectives</st>
<p>The use of new nicotine products (NNPs), particularly vapes, by pupils has been increasingly reported in schools. This paper reports the findings of a qualitative exploration of the impact of NNPs on schools by eliciting the views of 14&ndash;16-year-old pupils and school staff, as part of a wider study investigating the marketing and use of NNPs in Scotland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using 16 focus groups with pupils conducted February&ndash;March 2025, and in-person and telephone interviews (nine individual and two paired) with school staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Four schools in Scotland based in areas of differing socioeconomic status and two levels of urbanity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>77 S3 (14&ndash;15 years) and S4 (15&ndash;16 years) pupils who vaped or were at risk of vaping. School staff (n=13) with a senior teaching or pastoral care/guidance role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measurements</st>
<p>Focus groups with pupils and interviews with staff exploring perceptions of NNPs, particularly vapes, on schools, and what mitigating actions might be needed. The qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Pupils reported widespread use of vapes and to a lesser extent nicotine pouches, and described practices and behaviours, including truancy and missing classes as pupils sought other environments for their vaping, that were impacting on the life of the classroom and the wider school environment. The school staff outlined a number of approaches they had adopted to counteract disciplinary and other issues arising from vape use within schools, including instigating regular patrols, monitoring of toilet facilities and visiting neighbourhood shops, but acknowledged that they had little knowledge of nicotine pouches. They also perceived that they were not as knowledgeable as to the risks of NNPs and did not feel as comfortable addressing this issue within the classroom as they did compared with tobacco-related teaching.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Young people reported behaviours related to NNP use that were having a detrimental impact on the schools. Staff had developed various approaches to address these issues and were having to allocate significant time and resource, especially to vaping-related issues. Staff require knowledge and awareness training in relation to other NNPs, as well as specific guidance on the risks of vaping and nicotine use.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacGregor, A., Hamid, A., Shields, J., Minty, S., Morgan, A.-J., Zheng, C., Shortt, N., Pearce, J., Ford, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T00:00:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115484</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115484</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Ive got a pupil who vapes every 20 minutes: exploration of the wider impact on schools of young peoples use of new nicotine products in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115484</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115484</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118087?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hypothermia risk factors in patients with burns during emergency presentations: protocol for a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118087?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Burn injuries constitute a significant health concern, requiring immediate first aid to mitigate further tissue damage and complications. Most countries worldwide recommend application of 20 min of cool running water (20CRW) within 3 hours of the burn as the cornerstone in burn first aid management. Despite its widespread acceptance and proven benefits in reducing the severity of burns and subsequent interventions, concerns regarding the risk of hypothermia following this intervention persist, representing at least a perceived barrier to the delivery of 20CRW. When it does occur, hypothermia in patients with burns has been associated with higher mortality rates, even after controlling for burn injury severity. Developing an understanding of the incidence of post-burn hypothermia following 20CRW, with a specific focus on potential predictive and/or causative factors, is quintessential.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study of all adult and paediatric patients with thermal burn injuries presenting to one of 11 participating Australian or New Zealand hospitals between 1 January 2024 and 31 December 2024 will be conducted. The primary outcome is the incidence of hypothermia in patients with burns following their arrival at the emergency department (ED). Secondary outcomes include influence of burn first aid cooling, risk factors influencing hypothermia, impact of hypothermia on clinical patient outcomes and incidence of hypothermia in patients with burns in non-ED settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was granted by the Children&rsquo;s Health Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (CHQHREC; HREC Ref No: HREC/25/QCHQ/114285) as well as Health and Disability Ethics Committees, New Zealand (HDEC; Ref No: 2026 EXP 23892). The study findings will be formally disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vayada, D. D., Holbert, M. D., Meikle, B., Dyer, B. P., Lisec, C., Schnekenburger, M., Baker, P., Bertinetti, M., Holland, A. J. A., Kimble, R., Darton, A., Isacson, D., Harish, V., Adanichkin, N., Schrale, R., Quinn, L., Carney, B., Griffin, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118087</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118087</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hypothermia risk factors in patients with burns during emergency presentations: protocol for a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118087</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118087</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118277?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of tegileridine combined with intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia following thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e118277?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection are prone to moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain, which not only increases the risk of pulmonary complications but may also lead to chronic postsurgical pain. While traditional opioids provide effective analgesia, they are associated with significant adverse effects. Intercostal nerve block (ICNB) can precisely relieve incisional pain but has a limited duration of action. Tegileridine is a novel biased &mu;-opioid receptor agonist, offering favourable analgesic efficacy with fewer adverse reactions. Currently, there is a lack of research on the combination of tegileridine and ICNB for analgesia following thoracoscopic pulmonary resection, warranting further clinical exploration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial is designed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of tegileridine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) combined with ICNB versus sufentanil-based PCIA combined with ICNB in patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. A total of 118 participants are enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the tegileridine group or the sufentanil group. The primary outcome is the pain Visual Analogue Scale score during movement within 48 hours postoperatively, with non-inferiority determined using a margin of &ndash;1 point and 95% CIs. Secondary outcomes include the number of rescue analgesic interventions, PCIA-related parameters (total analgesic consumption, number of effective presses and total number of presses), incidence of opioid-related adverse events (respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting) and overall patient satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology on 14 February 2026 (Approval No. 2026-S010). The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and on relevant institutional websites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07386626">NCT07386626</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zheng, H., Pan, R., Yuan, F., Li, J., Xu, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118277</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118277</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of tegileridine combined with intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia following thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118277</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can the GAD-7 be used to create valid, reliable, feasible and actionable outcome-focused paediatric anxiety quality measures for use across specialty and paediatric treatment settings?]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e119157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Paediatric anxiety disorders are among the most common psychiatric disorders of childhood and adolescence, affecting between 15% and 30% of youth. Rates rose sharply during the COVID-19 pandemic, and untreated anxiety is associated with impaired functioning and increased risk of depression, suicidality and substance use in adulthood. Evidence-based treatments such as cognitive-behavioural therapy and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are highly effective yet remain underused, while non-recommended treatments, including benzodiazepines, are often prescribed. Despite the public health burden, there are currently no endorsed outcome-focused quality measures for paediatric anxiety. Developing such measures would allow health systems and providers to track outcomes, reduce disparities and drive quality improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will develop and test two complementary outcome-focused paediatric anxiety quality measures based on the seven-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale: (1) remission (clinically significant reduction in anxiety symptoms to below threshold) and (2) response (clinically significant improvement, even if remission is not achieved). Using electronic health record and claims data from Kaiser Permanente Northwest and Kaiser Permanente Southern California from 2017 to 2024, we will establish measure inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluate the application of symptom weighting, test measure reliability and validity and implement casemix adjustment models. Analyses will examine disparities by race, ethnicity and social risk factors through linkage indices capturing local social determinants of health. Qualitative interviews with providers and electronic medical record vendors will be conducted to assess feasibility and usability. Measures will be prepared and submitted for endorsement by a national quality measurement body.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards at RTI International and Kaiser Permanente. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences, stakeholder workshops and submissions to a national quality endorsement body.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark, T. L., Saavedra, L. M., Kirsch, S., Pogue, Y. Z., Lynch, F. L., Koebnick, C., Morgan Lopez, A. A., Yaros, A. C., Juel, E. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:42-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119157</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119157</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can the GAD-7 be used to create valid, reliable, feasible and actionable outcome-focused paediatric anxiety quality measures for use across specialty and paediatric treatment settings?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119157</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e088521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e088521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Early open fracture management aims to minimise the risk of complications. For the most severe open fracture wounds, multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries are required to overcome severe wound contamination, to reassess the evolving tissue injury or to temporise and plan further surgery. When multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries are needed, uncertainty remains about how the open fracture wound should be managed to best minimise complications. The primary aim of this trial is to compare the antibiotic cement bead pouch vs negative pressure wound therapy in the management of patients with severe open tibia fracture wounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>BvV is a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel arm randomised controlled trial that aims to enrol 312 adult patients admitted to a participating centre with a severe open tibia fracture requiring multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries. Participants will be randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either antibiotic cement bead pouch or negative pressure wound therapy. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome to evaluate clinical status 6 months after randomisation. Using the win ratio approach, we will hierarchically assess the composite outcome in the following order: (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) injury-related amputation of the lower extremity, (iii) unplanned reoperation to manage wound complications, an infection or promote fracture healing and (iv) clinical fracture healing assessed using the Functional IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) instrument.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The BvV trial has been approved by a central institutional review board (IRB) (Advarra) for clinical sites in the USA, the ethics board at the coordinating centre at McMaster University (Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board), and participating sites not using the central institutional IRB (Fraser Health Research Ethics Board, The University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board, Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Board, University of Manitoba Biomedical Research Ethics Board). Additional clinical sites who are in the start-up phase, as well as any new selected clinical sites, will obtain local approvals prior to initiating trial activities. This will include a clinical site in the UK who is in the process of obtaining the necessary approvals. Recruitment began in November 2023. Both interventions are frequently used to manage severe open fracture wounds, ensuring that the trial results can be easily transitioned into clinical practice. The results of this trial will be disseminated to national and international partners through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences and stakeholder engagement activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="NCT05615844">NCT05615844</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marchand, L. S., Slobogean, G., OHara, N. N., Harris, A. D., Grainger, D. W., Thabane, L., Bhandari, M., Della Rocca, G. J., Kellam, P. J., Zura, R. D., Marvel, D., Wells, J. L., Gitajn, I. L., Jeray, K. J., OToole, R. V., Working, Z. M., Natoli, R. M., Bergin, P. F., Hagen, J. E., Levack, A. E., Guerra-Farfan, E., Schrank, G. M., Hebden, J. N., Mossuto, F., Tsoutsounakis, C., Pogorzelski, D., Pineda, H., Bzovsky, S., Sprague, S., BvV Investigators, Marchand, Sprague, Slobogean, OHara, Bhandari, Grainger, Harris, Thabane, Della Rocca, Kellam, Zura, Kleweno, Wagstrom, Ouyang, Marvel, Wells, Bergin, Gitajn, Guerra-Farfan, Hagen, Jeray, Levack, Natoli, OToole, Working, Mossuto, Tsoutsounakis, Hebden, Schrank, Pogorzelski, Pineda, Kay, Bzovsky, Li, Pannozzo, Virgilio, Johnston, McKay, Gage, Howe, Phipps, Stokes, Selby, Hempen, Nascone, Sciadini, Bonyun, Pensy, Renninger, Loudermilk, Degani, Adler, Bennett, Kommu, Wilhelm, Jang, Mullis, ONiell, Szatkowski, Arnold, Lopas, McKinley, Virkus, Robinson, Hill, Bahdanovich, Skinner, Benbow, Mizimakoski, Graves, Morellato, Barr, Ibe, Montgomery, Mittwede, Alshibli, Clark, Melancon, Riley, Nehete, Hernandez, Srinath, Kalandiak, Vilella-Hernandez, Boomsma, Fuster, Steinlauf, Drandarov, Gaski, Goch, Schulman, Fausey, Wills, Moss, Holzman, Hymes, Malekzadeh, Quigley, Phillips, Rashid, Beltran, Sagi, Archdeacon, Laughlin, Le, Keller, Hasselfeld, Hale, Hall, Lake, McMillan, Mahatme, Moore, Jaeblon, Hahn, Bauer, Kolakowski, Bonyun, Shah, Meredith, Talwar, Pencle, Biedron, Horodyski, Patrick, Talerico, Vlasak, Krupko, Pazik, Rijo, Dykes, Patterson, Gary, Blumenthal, Zalavras, Ahlmann, Fleming, Yan, Walsh, Ruacho, Brodke, Friess, DeKeyser, Deutsche, Smith, Trapalis, Shatzer, Stockton, Sepehri, Broekhuyse, Potter, Lefaivre, Hache, Chong, Phi, Zhu, Smailes, Al-Asiri, Ristevski, Petrisor, Williams, Rajaratnam, Denkers, Klas, Gallant, Pusztai, MacRae, Bridger, Lourenco, Saiyed, Rothberg, Haller, Higgins, Achebe, Oman, Funk, Fu, Johnson, Scott, Clinch, Hashem, Forro, Williams, Retzlaff, Viskontas, Perey, Cinats, Boyer, Moola, Apostle, Stone, Butterfield, Yogalingam, Windbiel, Lukas, Gentile, Hoffman, Schrickel, Hileman, Chance, Burnikel, Conover, Layton, Molnar, Krohn, Lewis, Marston, Moorefield, Eskew, Threeths, Harris, Adams, Read, Flores, Worhacz, Tully, Patterson, Sridhar, Kitziger, Gurich, Adams, Rice, Brignull, Williams, Drosback, Salley, Schaller, Pirkle, Mellor, Reynolds, Miller, Roward, Papp, Liew, Meulenkamp, Gammon, Wilkin, Lalonde, Gofton, Mistry, Ghaziasgar, Chang, Wolinsky, Mullin, Symonds, Recendez, Anderson, Parr, Woods, Domes, Doro, Goodspeed, Lang, Dunahoe, Whiting, Lee, Wilkinson, van der Horst, Fitzpatrick, Sheerin, Spitzley, DeLoretto, College, Kirkpatrick, Naylor, Karim, Jones, Motzkin, Dean, Taylor, Tanner, Hummel, Lin, Moon, Marecek, Garlich, Vrahas, Michalski, Jordan, Dubuclet, Fernandez, OHara, Riedel, Leslie, Salameh, Benitez, Boerger, Cormier, Cortezzo, Kubiak, Roehr, Pietryga, Nelson, Robinson, Panganiban, Bimbi, Lundy, Kanakamedala, Nwachuku, Ramski, Greenhill, Rahmi, Lachman, Sacco, Valdes, Matullo, Grimm, Brogle, Polanksy, McFadden, Hosler, Van Demark III, Horrigan, Kim, Pemberton, Lovro, Wixted, Rodriguez, Ibrahim, Appleton, Agarwal-Harding, McTague, Aguiar, Wagner, Saiz, Bromfield, Fitzpatrick, Soles, Lee, Campbell, Porter, Schemitsch, Lawendy, Del Balso, Sanders, Alqahwaji, Ansari, White, McEvoy, Zillmer, Brown, Fisher, Sauer, Scholl, Gauthier, Collins, Floyd, Slette, Shearer, Bruenjes, Dahl, Feltz, Muckenhirn, Hardie, Hurley, Pigliacampi, LaRoque, Montgomery, Vyas, Bueide, Patel, Seaver, Flick, Richardson, Cunningham, Murr, Jones, Davis, Tufescu, Sultana, Greene, Smith, Furey, Anthony, Salman, Scolaro, Learned, Lim, Demas, Lehman, Borsada, McKee, Adamczyk, Walker, Dehghan, Jimenez, Calderon, Vasireddy, Gokturk, Mendoza, Reichert, Tatman, Trochez, Moreno-Diaz, Velasco-Castro, Kumar]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088521</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-088521</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e088521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e088521</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103314?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Engagement with behaviour change in people with mild cognitive impairment and mild frailty: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e103314?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Many older people experience Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), which may compromise the effectiveness of health promotion programmes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We explored engagement with behaviour change among participants scoring 18-25 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment receiving HomeHealth, a health promotion intervention supporting older adults with mild frailty to maintain independence in England ().</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Of the 46 semistructured process evaluation interviews, 29 participants scored in the MCI range, purposively selected for demographic characteristics and degrees of cognitive impairment and the seven support workers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thematic analysis resulted in three themes: Navigating the impact of MCI; Addressing memory as a goal in the intervention; and Adapting Behaviour Change Interventions for MCI. Participants had varied opinions about whether their memory was problematic and whether anything could be done to help. Many reported not discussing memory concerns with support workers. Barriers to engagement in behaviour change included limited social support and not acknowledging memory problems. Facilitators included setting goals which increased or were linked to existing health behaviours, using reminders/prompts and actively involving family members.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Implementing these facilitators into existing and new health promotion interventions delivered to older adults, with suspected but unacknowledged MCI, could overcome the current barriers people with MCI face when trying to engage and benefit from interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN54268283">ISRCTN54268283</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rookes, T. A., Frost, R., Barrado-Martin, Y., Catchpole, J., Armstrong, M., Gardner, B., Gould, R. L., Cooper, C., Hammond, C., Marston, L., Walters, K. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103314</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103314</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Engagement with behaviour change in people with mild cognitive impairment and mild frailty: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103314</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105129?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e105129?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To synthesise existing qualitative and conceptual literature on the implementation, ethical considerations and policy implications of Medical Assistance in Dying for Mental Disorder as a Sole Underlying Medical Condition (MAiD MD-SUMC) in Canada and internationally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative evidence synthesis using a thematic analysis approach. Empirical, conceptual and policy papers addressing MAiD for mental disorders were identified through major databases and grey literature. Studies were thematically analysed to identify recurring ethical, clinical and policy themes related to eligibility, assessment and implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Data was extracted from a systematic search of Medline and Embase for peer-reviewed studies published from 1974 onwards, supplemented by relevant policy documents and legal cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies were included if they examined MAiD MD-SUMC and explored ethical, legal or clinical considerations or provided stakeholder perspectives. Exclusion criteria included studies focusing solely on non-psychiatric conditions or not published in English.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers screened, extracted and analysed data using an iterative thematic synthesis approach. Key themes were identified through consensus discussions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The synthesis identified four major themes: (1) Irremediability and treatment resistance&mdash;persistent uncertainty regarding when mental disorders can be considered irremediable. (2) Capacity and vulnerability&mdash;ongoing debate about assessing capacity amid fluctuating symptoms and social influences. (3) Ethical and policy considerations&mdash;divergent interpretations of autonomy, justice and safeguards highlighting the need for standardised criteria. (4) Public and professional perspectives&mdash;public and family support for inclusion, although clinician hesitancy exists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The evidence supports a thoughtful, structured approach to potential implementation of MAiD MD-SUMC in Canada. Future priorities include refining criteria for irremediability, standardising capacity assessments, addressing disorder-specific complexities and strengthening mental health infrastructure. Continued research, engagement and transparent policy dialogue will be essential to ensure that any expansion of MAiD upholds ethical integrity, protects vulnerable persons and maintains public trust.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pawluk, A., Arksey, E., Jansens, H., Qiao, S., McFarlane, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105129</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105129</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105129</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105129</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does previous pregnancy experience improve folic acid supplementation uptake? A systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine whether multiparous women have more or less folic acid uptake than primiparous women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Preconceptional, periconceptional and postconceptional folic acid use among all pregnant women and high risk pregnant women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE-Ovid, CINAHL Ultimate, Scopus and ProQuest Medical.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Observational epidemiological studies comparing folic acid use between primiparous and multiparous women, published in English from January 1994 to June 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers screened all papers meeting the eligibility criteria. One reviewer completed data extraction and assessed study quality using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Three other reviewers independently assessed 10% of the studies as a quality check. Random-effects (DerSimonian and Laird) meta-analyses combined results for each outcome. Heterogeneity, risk of publication bias and certainty of evidence were assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 10 982 records identified, 81 studies involving 826 855 women were included in the review. 27 studies were conducted in Europe, 22 in Asia, 11 in North America, 7 in Africa, 7 in Australia, 5 in the Middle East and 2 in South America. Multiparous women were consistently less likely to take folic acid before and during pregnancy than primiparous women. For preconceptional use, the odds were 29% lower among multiparous women (adjusted OR (aOR): 0.71; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.78; n=25 studies; I<sup>2</sup>=88.67%), and 58% lower in multiparous high-risk women (aOR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.64; n=3 studies; I<sup>2</sup>=27.28%). For periconceptional use, the odds were 32% lower among multiparous women (aOR: 0.68; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.74; n=28 studies; I<sup>2</sup>=85.46%). Postconception, the odds were 21% lower among multiparous women (aOR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.85; n=33 studies; I<sup>2</sup>=85.91%). By the second trimester, there was no significant difference between the two parity groups (aOR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.05; n=4 studies; I<sup>2</sup>=0.00%). The certainty of evidence was low for preconceptional, periconceptional and postconceptional uptake due to heterogeneity, and moderate for preconceptional uptake among high-risk women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Multiparous women were less likely to take folic acid preconceptional, periconceptional and postconceptionally, despite their previous pregnancy experience. Barriers to folic acid supplement uptake among multiparous women need to be identified, and strategies to address them in preconception, antenatal and interconception care should be investigated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024553241.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ebong, U., Wilson, J. J., Given, J., Casey, F., Loane, M., Dolk, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106205</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106205</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does previous pregnancy experience improve folic acid supplementation uptake? A systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106205</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106519?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Healthcare experiences of transgender and gender-diverse people in the UK: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e106519?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To map the existing literature on transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people&rsquo;s experiences of healthcare in the UK, summarising key findings and characteristics of current research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This scoping review was guided by the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched on 29 October 2024. Reference lists of included studies were searched to identify further relevant literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>Primary research of any design reporting the healthcare experiences of TGD people in the UK from 2019 onwards was included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Relevant data were extracted using a data charting form guided by the research questions and the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework. Results were narratively synthesised to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>52 studies were included, comprising qualitative (n=38), mixed-methods (n=12) and quantitative (n=2) designs. TGD people reported varying experiences across general and transition-related healthcare settings. Positive experiences were often attributed to individual clinicians. Negative experiences were common, including transphobic discrimination, insufficient clinician knowledge and barriers to effective transition-related care. Strategies for navigating healthcare, such as information sharing within the TGD community and educating clinicians about trans health needs, reflected adaptive responses to systemic barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings highlight a need for greater recognition of diverse gender identities, more inclusive approaches in healthcare education and practice and further targeted research. This is especially urgent in light of the recent UK Supreme Court judgement regarding definitions of &lsquo;sex&rsquo; under the Equality Act 2010, the emerging implications of which risk compounding existing barriers by reinforcing exclusionary practices within healthcare settings and further limiting recognition and protections for TGD people in the UK.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davidson, L., Moore, A., Grove, A., Gauly, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106519</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106519</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Healthcare experiences of transgender and gender-diverse people in the UK: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106519</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106519</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107888?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contribution of Nova-classified ultraprocessed foods to energy and nutrient intakes in very old people: the Newcastle 85+ Study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e107888?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the contribution of ultraprocessed foods (UPF) to total energy intake and to macronutrient and micronutrient intakes among very old people aged 85 years in the Newcastle 85+ Study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional observational analysis of baseline dietary and demographic data from the Newcastle 85+ cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-dwelling and institutionalised adults in Newcastle on Tyne and North Tyneside, UK, recruited through general practice registered between June 2006 and October 2007.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Eight hundred participants (62% female) aged 85 years at baseline, with two complete non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the contribution of UPF (Nova group 4) to total energy intake, macronutrient intakes, expressed as percentage of total energy for carbohydrate, protein, total fat, saturated fat and added sugars, as grams per day for fibre and to micronutrient intakes (vitamins A, B, B&#x2081;<SUB>2</SUB>, C, D, E and folate) and minerals (calcium, potassium, magnesium, zinc, selenium, phosphorus, iron and sodium). All evaluated across sex, education and socioeconomic status, adjusted tertiles of UPF intake.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the 800 participants included in the analysis, UPF contributed 56% of total energy intake, surpassing that from unprocessed foods (27%). Total energy intake did not differ across tertiles of UPF consumption (lowest vs highest tertile: 1759.5 kcal/day (95% CI 1684.6 to 1834.4) vs 1740.0 kcal/day (1667.3 to 1812.7)). Higher UPF intake was associated with a higher proportion of energy from carbohydrates and added sugars, and a lower proportion from protein and saturated fat. Intakes of several micronutrients were lower in the highest versus the lowest UPF tertile, including vitamin C (59.9 mg/day (49.8 to 70.0) vs 94.0 mg/day (83.7 to 104.4)) and potassium (2455.9 mg/day (2334.1 to 2577.6) vs 2786.3 mg/day (2660.8 to 2911.8)). By contrast, calcium from fortified foods increased across tertiles (6.3 mg/day (3.7 to 8.9) to 15.4 mg/day (12.9 to 17.9)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study highlights the potential role of UPF in the diets of very old people: higher UPF intake was not associated with higher energy intakes often observed in younger populations. Some UPF, particularly fortified products, may contribute to meeting micronutrient requirements in very old people where dietary inadequacies are common. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to inform dietary guidance for very old people.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shahatah, F., Hill, T. R., Fairley, A. M., Adamson, A., Robinson, L., Granic, A., Watson, A. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107888</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107888</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contribution of Nova-classified ultraprocessed foods to energy and nutrient intakes in very old people: the Newcastle 85+ Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107888</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107888</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond protocols: what are nurses lived experiences and perceived systemic barriers in central venous catheter management in a resource-limited tertiary hospital in Ghana? A qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore nurses&rsquo; experiences of central venous catheter (CVC) management in a resource-limited tertiary hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative exploratory-descriptive study using in-depth, semistructured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A low-resource tertiary care facility in Ghana, West Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>13 registered nurses working in intensive and critical care units.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Individual semistructured interviews were conducted and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four (4) main themes and 14 related subthemes were identified. The main themes included (1) system constraints shaping CVC care (supplies, infrastructure and workload); (2) practice and protocol feasibility (infection prevention and workarounds); (3) capability building and support (knowledge/skills, practical training, supervision and mentoring and nurses&rsquo; voice) and (4) psychosocial impact (burnout, fear of complications and limited emotional support). Nurses described confidence in routine tasks but reported limited support for managing complications and sustaining protocol adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In resource-limited settings, effective CVC management extends beyond individual clinical competence and requires robust institutional support, adequate staffing, ongoing professional development and responsive organisational systems. Addressing these structural and psychosocial factors is essential to improving nursing practice, enhancing patient safety and supporting global infection prevention priorities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajah, M. R., Yakubu, Y. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108279</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108279</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond protocols: what are nurses lived experiences and perceived systemic barriers in central venous catheter management in a resource-limited tertiary hospital in Ghana? A qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108279</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108667?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adding reciprocal inhibition to conventional physiotherapy for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder in Bangladesh: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating pain, function and range of motion]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108667?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) is a common condition characterised by pain, stiffness and reduced function. While conventional physiotherapy (typically comprising joint mobilisation, stretching, strengthening and electrotherapy) is widely used, there is limited evidence for the effectiveness of advanced neuromuscular techniques such as the reciprocal inhibition technique (RIT). This study aims to evaluate the impact of incorporating RIT into standard physiotherapy compared with standard physiotherapy alone in individuals with adhesive capsulitis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. 30 adults aged 30&ndash;70 years with clinically confirmed adhesive capsulitis will be recruited from a tertiary rehabilitation centre in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either RIT combined with conventional physiotherapy or conventional physiotherapy alone, with both groups undergoing 12 treatment sessions over 4 weeks. The primary outcome is pain intensity at 4 weeks post-randomisation, measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes include shoulder range of motion (abduction, internal and external rotation, assessed with a universal goniometer), functional ability (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) and muscle strength (abduction, internal and external rotation, measured by hand-held dynamometry). Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline and after the intervention. Data will be analysed using intention-to-treat principles. Between-group comparisons will be made using linear mixed models with fixed effects for group, time and group-by-time interaction, and a random intercept for participants to account for repeated measurements. Within-group changes will be estimated from the models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial has received ethical clearance from the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation &amp; Research (approval number BPA-IPRR/IRB/18/02/2025/32). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and international conferences in accordance with Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines. By addressing a significant evidence gap, this study may establish RIT as an effective and affordable adjunct to standard physiotherapy for managing adhesive capsulitis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CTRI/2025/06/089288 [Registered on: 23/06/2025]</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahman, M. R., Halder, P., Hossain, M. E., Ashfaquzzaman, M., Mahmud, M. N., Paul, R. C., Sheikh, M. S., Utshab, K. Z., Hasan, M. M., Hossain, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108667</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108667</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adding reciprocal inhibition to conventional physiotherapy for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder in Bangladesh: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating pain, function and range of motion]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108667</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108667</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108998?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Potential harms of social prescribing: a global umbrella review and dark logic model]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e108998?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Social prescribing has provided a lifeline to people, capturing the importance of quality support offered via community connections. It has not been exempt from difficulties, resulting in low-quality evidence on effectiveness in part due to high drop-out rates and lack of controls. While these have been the focus of recent research, less attention has been paid to the safety implications of social prescribing. This review aims to understand safety implications of social prescribing interventions and to build a dark logic model of how harms are produced.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Using review of review (umbrella) methodology, we searched nine databases to June 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Medline/Ovid, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library/Wiley, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched from 1 January 2010 to 3 June 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Included reviews were systematic/scoping/narrative reviews or meta-analyses, which synthesised primary data collected from any person in receipt, involved in delivery or the commissioning of social prescribing interventions. The context of the review was social prescribing interventions/services based in primary healthcare (statutory) or third sector (non-statutory) in any country. Only reviews that were published in English and in peer-reviewed journals were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers extracted data from included reviews using the Typology of Harms Framework (which includes five categories of harms associated with interventions: physical, psychological, group/social, equity and opportunity harms) and to build a dark logic model to understand what contributes to these harms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sixteen reviews were included, reporting on social prescribing research including a link worker. Of the identified harms, we found that opportunity harms (harm related to the cost, inappropriate or ineffective interventions) were most reported. There was also evidence extracted to suggest plausible psychological, equity (impact caused by inequity in provision, delivery or access) and group/social harms (impact that overly or inadvertently excludes a person). No physical harms were identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Social prescribing, as with any delivery of care, has the potential to cause harm. We identified a range of potential harms (psychological, group/social, equity or opportunity harm) from social prescribing; however, it is unlikely to be an exhaustive list. We provide two clear outcomes: (1) the need for robust design of social prescribing research, including collection of data on the incidence and prevalence of harms, (2) recognition of the potential for harm from social prescribing and to address these where practicable.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooper, M., Okeowo, D., Bennett, L., Aslam, E., Yahya, F., Lawson, L., Robinson-Barella, A., Nazar, H., Scott, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108998</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108998</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Potential harms of social prescribing: a global umbrella review and dark logic model]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108998</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108998</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109258?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Syndemic effects of social isolation on mental health, health behaviours and diabetes management in older adults with diabetes: a gender-based cross-sectional study in South Korea]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109258?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the associations between social isolation (SI) and mental health, health behaviours and diabetes management among older adults with diabetes in South Korea, focusing on gender-specific syndemic patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional secondary analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>2023 Korea Community Health Survey, a nationwide community-based survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>18 924 adults aged &ge;65 years with physician-diagnosed diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Mental health (depressive symptoms, perceived stress), health behaviours (smoking, high-risk drinking, physical activity) and diabetes management (medication use, complication screening, diabetes education) were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted associations between SI and study outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>SI was more prevalent among women (33.6%) than among men (14.1%). In men, SI was associated with depressive symptoms (aOR=1.60, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.18, p=0.003), smoking (aOR=1.51, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.82, p&lt;0.001), high-risk drinking (aOR=1.76, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.28, p&lt;0.001) and lower diabetes education participation (aOR=0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.99, p=0.031). Among women, SI was associated with depressive symptoms (aOR=1.35, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.69, p=0.010), smoking (aOR=2.53, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.78, p&lt;0.001), lower physical activity (aOR=0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.71, p&lt;0.001), lower medication use (aOR=0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.69, p&lt;0.001), reduced complication screening (aOR=0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.97, p=0.016) and lower diabetes education participation (aOR=0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.95, p=0.010). SI was not significantly associated with perceived stress in either gender.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>SI was associated with poorer mental health and unhealthy behaviours among older adults with diabetes, with distinct gender-specific patterns. The SI also showed non-uniform associations with diabetes management, indicating that its impact may differ across management domains. Addressing SI may support improvements in selected aspects of diabetes care. Further research should clarify the mechanisms linking SI and disease management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, J.-S., Kim, K., Shin, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109258</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109258</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Syndemic effects of social isolation on mental health, health behaviours and diabetes management in older adults with diabetes: a gender-based cross-sectional study in South Korea]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109258</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109258</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109940?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oxytocin substitution therapy in patients with AVP deficiency (central diabetes insipidus): study protocol of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e109940?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Arginine vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OXT) are both hormones released from the posterior pituitary. While AVP primarily regulates water reabsorption in the kidneys, OXT plays a key role in socioemotional functioning. Due to the anatomical proximity, disruptions of the AVP system leading to AVP deficiency (AVP-D) may also affect the OXT system, possibly resulting in an additional OXT deficiency. This hypothesis was recently proven by using the 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine stimulation tests and identifying OXT deficiency in patients with AVP-D, linked to increased anxiety and impaired emotion recognition. Despite these findings, OXT replacement therapy is not currently established as a treatment for AVP-D and long-term replacement therapy remains unexplored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial enrolling adults with AVP-D. Participants are randomised 1:1 to receive intranasal OXT (Syntocinon, 24 IU twice daily) or placebo for 28 days. The primary endpoint is a composite binary outcome defined as a clinically meaningful improvement in either trait anxiety (&ge;5-point reduction in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait Score) or emotion recognition (&ge;4-point increase in EmBody/EmFace task performance). Secondary outcomes include empathy, stress reactivity, neuroimaging markers of amygdala activity, additional psychological measures, metabolic parameters and safety outcomes, including hyponatraemia. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle, with Fisher&rsquo;s exact test used for the primary outcome and mixed-effects models for secondary endpoints.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the competent ethics committees and regulatory authorities in Switzerland and the European Union. The following institutions granted ethical approval: Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz (EKNZ), project number EKNZ 2023&ndash;01010 and the Erasmus MC MERC, EU-CT number 2024&ndash;5 16 813-19-00. Results will be published in open-access, peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via scientific meetings, media communication and lay summaries provided to participants. De-identified individual participant data will be made available on reasonable request following publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06036004">NCT06036004</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atila, C., Leibnitz, S., Nikaj, A., Liechti, M. E., De Quervain, D., Christ-Crain, M., the OxyTUTION Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109940</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109940</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oxytocin substitution therapy in patients with AVP deficiency (central diabetes insipidus): study protocol of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109940</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109940</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between discharge planning department staffing levels and the average length of stay in acute care wards: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the association between staffing levels, particularly the number and combination of nurses and medical social workers (MSWs) in the discharge planning department, and the average length of stay (LOS) at the ward level in acute care hospitals in Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used nationwide administrative hospital-level and ward-level data from fiscal year 2021, encompassing 4989 acute care wards in 923 hospitals across 216 secondary medical areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1036 wards in designated special function hospitals, 3398 general acute care wards with a 7:1 patient-to-nurse ratio (7:1 acute care wards) and 555 general acute care wards with a 10:1 patient-to-nurse ratio (10:1 acute care wards) were included in the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Average LOS per ward.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Two-level multilevel linear regression models with random intercepts were stratified by ward type. The analysis was adjusted for ward-level, hospital-level and region-level covariates. We examined both the total staffing level (the total number of nurses and MSWs per 100 hospital beds) and the staffing combinations (high/low numbers of nurses and MSWs) in the discharge planning department.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In multilevel models, no statistically significant associations were observed between discharge planning department staffing and ward-level average LOS across any ward type. In special function wards, wards with high nurse/low MSW staffing (coefficient: &ndash;1.07; 95% CI &ndash;2.39 to 0.25; p=0.11) and high nurse/high MSW staffing (coefficient: &ndash;1.16; 95% CI &ndash;2.45 to 0.13; p=0.08) tended to have shorter LOS than did those with low nurse/low MSW staffing. In 7:1 acute care wards, higher total staffing was not significantly associated with LOS (coefficient: &ndash;0.14; 95% CI &ndash;0.30 to 0.03; p=0.10). No clear associations were observed for 10:1 acute care wards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This nationwide cross-sectional study found no statistically significant association between discharge planning department staffing levels and ward-level LOS in Japanese acute care hospitals. While LOS alone may not adequately capture the discharge planning relationship, the findings may inform staffing policies in healthcare systems facing population ageing.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Machida, A., Kashiwagi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110125</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110125</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between discharge planning department staffing levels and the average length of stay in acute care wards: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110125</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110326?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Longitudinal changes in motor skills and parental responses following early motor screening in preschool children: a 6-month observational follow-up study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110326?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This follow-up study examined changes in motor performance over 6 months among preschool children in Tyrol, Austria, initially screened for motor difficulties suggestive of developmental coordination disorder. It also investigated parental actions initiated after early testing that may be relevant for subsequent motor skill development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study is a longitudinal observational follow-up study based on a previously assessed cohort. Children&rsquo;s motor development was reassessed 6 months after baseline using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (M-ABC-2). Information on any interventions initiated in the interim was collected via parent report.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Follow-up assessments were conducted 6 months after the initial testing under standardised conditions in physiotherapy practices by the same trained and experienced examiners.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>36 children (aged 4&ndash;6 years) from the original cohort who previously completed the M-ABC-2 were re-assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was change in domain-specific motor performance over 6 months. The secondary outcome was parental actions initiated following early testing which may influence subsequent motor development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Children with initial motor difficulties showed significant improvements in manual dexterity and aiming and catching (p=0.016 and p=0.039, respectively), while balance improvements were not statistically significant. Conversely, children with previously age-appropriate scores showed no significant gains and a notable decline in balance (p=0.012). Most parents of children with initial difficulties reported initiating supportive actions, including home-based activities and formal therapy. However, 41.6% of children still scored below the 15th percentile at the M-ABC-2 at follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Children with initial domain-specific motor difficulties showed improvements over 6 months, particularly in manual dexterity and aiming and catching, whereas balance deficits appeared more persistent. Causal effects of home-based activities and formal therapeutic interventions cannot be inferred.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scheiber, B., Mildner, S., Plattner, J., Spiegl, C., Federolf, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110326</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110326</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Longitudinal changes in motor skills and parental responses following early motor screening in preschool children: a 6-month observational follow-up study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110326</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110326</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110803?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multimodal approach to exploring neighbourhood and transportation dynamics in HIV care in Kenya: protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e110803?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>HIV is a major health challenge in Kenya, where prevalence exceeds global averages. Achieving viral suppression depends on consistent adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART), but individuals in neighbourhoods perceived as disorderly often show low self-efficacy for ART adherence. Despite the importance of neighbourhood dynamics in shaping health behaviours, this area is under-explored in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially regarding transportation barriers. Grounded in Social-Ecological Theory (SET) and the &lsquo;Broken Windows&rsquo; Theory (BWT), SET suggests that health outcomes are influenced by environmental factors, while BWT posits visible signs of neighbourhood disorder, such as neglect and decay, can lead to a decline in healthy behaviours, creating an environment conducive to negative health outcomes. This protocol describes a multimodal qualitative study designed to examine how transportation challenges and perceived neighbourhood dynamics influence HIV care among people living with HIV (PLWH). This intersection of structural barriers, neighbourhood dynamics and HIV outcomes in LMIC settings remains under-researched.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This theory-informed multimodal qualitative study, grounded in a Community-Based Participatory Research framework, integrates individual in-depth interviews (IDIs) and community-based photovoice focus group discussions (FGDs). 20 PLWH participated in IDIs accompanied by a survey with validated scales (~ 10 min) assessing perceived neighbourhood disorder, defined as visible physical and social signs of neglect such as crime, vandalism and deteriorated infrastructure, ART adherence self-efficacy, transportation, access to HIV care and fear of crime. An additional 20 PLWH took part in four photovoice FGD sessions. Photovoice FGD sessions were guided by the SHOWeD questioning technique, a structured reflection method that prompts participants to discuss what they see, what is happening, how it relates to their lives, why it exists and what can be done. In each component, participants were purposively sampled and stratified to ensure approximately equal representation by viral suppression status (10 suppressed, 10 unsuppressed), gender (10 women, 10 men) and age group (10 aged 18&ndash;24, 10 older than 24). Interviews and photovoice discussions were transcribed and are being analysed thematically using MAXQDA qualitative analysis software. Participant-generated photographs will be analysed alongside accompanying narratives using an integrated visual and textual coding approach combining inductive and theory-informed deductive analysis. Triangulation across interviews and validated survey measures will be conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethical approval from the KNH-UoN Ethics and Research Committee (P635/08/2024) and the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (eProtocol #: 77260). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and a photo exhibition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This study will contribute to an understudied body of research on how socio-environmental conditions influence HIV care engagement in LMICs. Through the integration of individual-focused in-depth interviews and community-centred photovoice FGD sessions, the study captures both personal perceptions and shared neighbourhood realities. Findings will inform interventions and policy adjustments to improve support for PLHIV in disordered environments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimaru, L. J., Ngaruiya, C., Mugo, C., Madhivanan, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110803</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110803</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multimodal approach to exploring neighbourhood and transportation dynamics in HIV care in Kenya: protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110803</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110803</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111667?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trends in type 2 diabetes incidence in a disadvantaged neighbourhood before and during implementation of complex community-based health interventions]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e111667?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims at exploring longitudinal trends in the onset of type 2 diabetes in the disadvantaged urban neighbourhood of Tingbjerg before and during implementation of interventions within the Danish health promotion initiative Tingbjerg Changing Diabetes. The findings are compared with trends in the national population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Using Poisson regression, trends in age-specific incidence rates were estimated in both populations during the full timespan with adjustments for gender and educational attainment. We used anonymised national registers to obtain sociodemographic and health information about all residents in Tingbjerg. Likewise, information from the remaining national population was analysed for comparison.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Tingbjerg is a disadvantaged neighbourhood with approximately 7000 residents located in the outskirts of Copenhagen.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The full national adult population in Denmark, from 2003 to the end of 2022, was included in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Tingbjerg Changing Diabetes is a long-term complex community-based health promotion initiative that started in 2015 and aims at enhancing well-being, promoting healthy living and preventing type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases among residents of the local community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>The outcome measure was onset of type 2 diabetes assessed by clinical register data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Estimated trends show relatively higher age-adjusted incidence rates of type 2 diabetes in Tingbjerg compared with the national population with an almost two-fold higher rate in Tingbjerg in 2015. From 2015, a decline in the incidence rate was observed in Tingbjerg whereas an increase was observed in the national population, resulting in almost similar rates in 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Exploration of type 2 diabetes incidence rates from 2003 to 2022 shows relative improvements in Tingbjerg after 2015. It is unknown to what extent the interventions have impacted the observed trends.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olesen, K., Stougard, M., Ronn, P. F., Bloch, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111667</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111667</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trends in type 2 diabetes incidence in a disadvantaged neighbourhood before and during implementation of complex community-based health interventions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111667</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111667</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112006?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of latent tuberculosis infection screening using interferon-gamma release assays among migrants to Japan: a Markov modelling study incorporating social vulnerability and access barriers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e112006?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening strategies using interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) among migrants, integrating social vulnerability and access barriers into the modelling framework to support more inclusive public health policy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A Markov state-transition model was constructed from a public healthcare payer perspective over a lifetime horizon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Population</st>
<p>A hypothetical cohort of asymptomatic 30-year-old immigrants originating from six high-incidence countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Screening strategies included IGRA-based LTBI testing paired with various preventive treatment regimens: 3-month once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine (3HP) under directly observed therapy (DOT), 3HP under self-administered therapy, 1-month daily isoniazid plus rifapentine (1HP) under DOT, 4-month daily self-administered rifampin (4R), 3-month daily self-administered isoniazid plus rifampin, 6-month daily self-administered isoniazid, 9-month daily self-administered isoniazid, pre-entry chest X-ray, postentry chest X-ray, postentry artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted chest X-ray and no screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), TB cases and TB-related deaths.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among all evaluated strategies, IGRA with 3HP under DOT was the most cost-effective strategy (US$200.1; 25.1042 QALYs; ICER vs 4R: US$29 182 per QALY gained). The current pre-entry chest X-ray remained the least costly option as screening expenses are borne by applicants. Cost-effectiveness was strongly influenced by screening access and the risk of TB reactivation. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$50 000 per QALY gained, IGRA with 3HP under DOT, AI-assisted chest X-ray and IGRA with 4R showed probabilities of cost-effectiveness of 40.0%, 27.4% and 22.9%, respectively. For 122 454 immigrants entering Japan in 2023, IGRA with 3HP under DOT was projected to prevent 1403 TB cases and 479 TB-related deaths.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>IGRA with 3HP under DOT provides strong cost-effectiveness and preventive impact. IGRA with 1HP under DOT also shows promising potential, contingent on rifapentine pricing and strengthened public health support. Integrating LTBI screening with improved access to screening and healthier living environments may reduce TB reactivation among migrants and promote more equitable health outcomes, particularly for socially vulnerable groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kowada, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112006</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112006</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of latent tuberculosis infection screening using interferon-gamma release assays among migrants to Japan: a Markov modelling study incorporating social vulnerability and access barriers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112006</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112006</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113868?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact and cost-benefit of CAMFEDs livelihoods support on young womens economic activity, health and well-being in Tanzania and Zimbabwe: protocol for a multi-method, longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113868?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In sub-Saharan Africa, young women face disproportionate challenges transitioning from school to employment, with high rates of those not in education, employment or training (NEET). Structural barriers&mdash;including unequal gender norms, early marriage and unpaid labour&mdash;limit their economic participation. The Campaign for Female Education (CAMFED) Livelihoods programme supports young women&rsquo;s transition from school to independent adulthood through mentoring, life skills, business and agricultural training and access to financial resources.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>This study will evaluate the impact, process and mechanisms of change, and cost-benefit of CAMFED Livelihoods programme in Tanzania and Zimbabwe (2024&ndash;2027), focusing on outcomes related to economic activity, empowerment, leadership, mental health, subjective well-being and sexual and reproductive health among adolescent and young women (aged 15&ndash;24 years).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a mixed-method, longitudinal evaluation across five districts in Tanzania and three districts in Zimbabwe. The quantitative component includes a pre-post cohort with a comparison group in Tanzania (n=1520) and a single-cohort design in Zimbabwe (n=500), with data collected at baseline, midline and endline. Primary outcomes are NEET status and leadership, complemented by measures of well-being, empowerment and health. The qualitative component will explore mechanisms of change and programme delivery. A cost-benefit analysis will estimate social and economic returns using a provider perspective. Youth researchers will be engaged to enhance participatory learning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>We have received ethics approvals from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (31266), the National Health Research Ethics Committee (6732) in Tanzania and the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (MRCZ/A/3239) in Zimbabwe. Results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and shared with policymakers, study participants and the other stakeholders in Tanzania and Zimbabwe.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranganathan, M., Neuman, M., Shah, V., Abramsky, T., Montero, A. M., Greco, G., Shimmin, C., Boero, L., Mackworth-Young, C. R. S., Bandason, T., Buwu, N., Chidawanyika, S., Minja, P., Mitti, R. D., Alex, S., Kajula, L., Ngadaya, F., Binyaruka, P., Mboya, F., Fute, N., Daudi, D., Malunde, P., Moshi, E., Nyandoro, J., Murandu, M., Boyce, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113868</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113868</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact and cost-benefit of CAMFEDs livelihoods support on young womens economic activity, health and well-being in Tanzania and Zimbabwe: protocol for a multi-method, longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113868</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113868</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113896?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimal dose and type of exercise across cardiometabolic outcomes in adults with overweight or obesity: protocol for a Bayesian model-based dose-response network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e113896?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Overweight and obesity are major global public health challenges and increase the risk of type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Exercise is a safe and cost-effective non-pharmacological strategy to improve cardiometabolic health, yet the optimal combinations of exercise modality and dose for key cardiometabolic outcomes remain uncertain. This protocol aims to synthesise evidence on the joint effects of exercise modality and dose in adults with overweight or obesity and to identify modality&ndash;dose combinations associated with the most favourable cardiometabolic profiles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from inception to June 2026 for randomised controlled trials of exercise interventions in adults (&ge;18 years) with overweight or obesity. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. We will conduct a Bayesian model-based dose&ndash;response network meta-analysis to estimate modality-specific dose&ndash;response relationships across cardiometabolic outcomes, with exercise dose standardised as metabolic equivalent of task minutes per week. Non-linear dose&ndash;response curves will be fitted to estimate minimum effective doses and optimal dose ranges. Meta-classification and regression tree analyses will be used to explore potential effect modifiers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required because no primary data will be collected. Findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251229131.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zang, W., Wu, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113896</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113896</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimal dose and type of exercise across cardiometabolic outcomes in adults with overweight or obesity: protocol for a Bayesian model-based dose-response network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113896</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113896</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114162?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex-, gender- and ethnically-sensitive aspects of psychosocial interventions for people living with dementia and BPSD: A protocol for a participatory umbrella review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114162?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) affect up to 80% of people with dementia and pose significant challenges in the context of care. Psychosocial interventions have been recommended as first-line strategies, but the roles of aspects of sex, gender and ethnicity in this context remain underexplored. This umbrella review, which will be conducted as part of the GenderDem project, aims to synthesise existing reviews on psychosocial interventions for BPSD and to investigate the potential sex-, gender- and ethnicity-sensitive differences among them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Our GenderDem project follows the methodology of the James Lind Alliance for Priority Setting Partnerships. As part of this approach, this participatory umbrella review actively involves people living with dementia, their caregivers and/or loved ones and healthcare professionals in examining the existing review literature.</p>
<p>Different types of reviews on this topic will be identified by reference to the databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO) and PsycInfo (via Ovid) databases. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts using Rayyan. Data will be extracted in line with the Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in healthcare: revised reporting guidelines, supplemented with items pertaining to gender, sex and ethnicity. The results will be summarised descriptively, and relevant intervention types (including whether sex/gender/ethnicity has been taken into consideration), the characteristics of the study populations, outcomes and research gaps will be highlighted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required, as this umbrella review will include only data from published studies. The findings of this review will be disseminated through a publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yigit, G., Michel, E., Rommerskirch-Manietta, M., Altinok, K., Felding, S. A., Manietta, C., Roes, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114162</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114162</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex-, gender- and ethnically-sensitive aspects of psychosocial interventions for people living with dementia and BPSD: A protocol for a participatory umbrella review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114162</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114422?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pre-diagnostic route reported by patients with sarcoma from the Netherlands, the UK, Australia and New Zealand: early detection challenges for general practitioners - an international observational cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114422?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate how patients with sarcoma present prior to diagnosis&mdash;through a general practitioner (GP) or another healthcare professional (HCP)&mdash;and describe presenting symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>International observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data were obtained from the longitudinal &lsquo;QUality of life and Experiences of Sarcoma Trajectories&rsquo; (QUEST) cohort study, conducted across the Netherlands, the United Kingdom (UK), Australia and New Zealand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 572 patients, 487 (85.1%) started their diagnostic trajectory at the GP (subcohort 1) and 85 (14.9%) with another HCP (subcohort 2)&mdash;mainly medical specialists treating unrelated conditions (36/85; 42.4%). Soft tissue sarcoma patients most often reported swelling, whereas bone sarcoma patients reported unexplained pain. Notably, 31/85 (36.5%) of subcohort 2 were asymptomatic. Reasons for delaying GP visits included assuming symptoms were minor and expecting them to resolve. Patients sought care when, among others, symptoms persisted and worsened.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Most patients first consulted a GP, underlining the role of primary care in sarcoma diagnosis internationally. Due to rarity and nonspecific symptoms, faster diagnosis remains challenging, requiring improvements in both primary and specialist care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT03441906">NCT03441906;</A> Results.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holthuis, E. I., Soomers, V. L. M. N., Rafiq, M., Jones, R. L., Hayes, A., Van De Wal, D., Drabbe, C., Been, L. B., Bonenkamp, H., van der Hage, J. H., Lee, A. T. J., Verhoef, C., van Houdt, W. J., Young, R. J., Bae, S., Andelkovic, V., Hong, A. M., Connor, J., Koops, C., van der Graaf, W. T. A., Husson, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114422</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114422</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pre-diagnostic route reported by patients with sarcoma from the Netherlands, the UK, Australia and New Zealand: early detection challenges for general practitioners - an international observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114422</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114422</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114537?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the efficacy of empagliflozin in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis: protocol for a randomised, open-label, controlled study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e114537?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Heart failure occasionally develops after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis (AS), despite procedural success. Most cases present with mildly reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), underscoring the role of diastolic dysfunction. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have shown benefits across the heart failure spectrum, independent of LVEF. The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to determine whether adding a SGLT2 inhibitor to conventional medications improves LV diastolic function in patients with preserved LVEF after TAVI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a prospective, single-centre, open-label, randomised, parallel-group, two-arm trial enrolling patients with mildly reduced or preserved LVEF (&ge;40%) undergoing TAVI for severe AS. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either conventional medications plus empagliflozin or conventional medications alone. In the empagliflozin group, participants will receive conventional medical therapy plus empagliflozin 10 mg orally once daily, initiated 4 weeks after TAVI. Empagliflozin treatment will continue throughout the study period. Participants in the control group will receive conventional medications without empagliflozin. The primary endpoint is the change in E/e&rsquo;, assessed by echocardiography from treatment initiation at 4 weeks post TAVI (day 1) to day 168 (week 24). Each group will include 50 patients, totalling 100 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the Chiba University Hospital Certified Clinical Research Review Board (CRB0111-25).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>jRCT1031250190.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Okita, S., Kitahara, H., Shoji, M., Sugawara, T., Miyakoda, K., Yaginuma, H., Yamamoto, H., Kanda, T., Kinoshita, M., Sasaki, H., Suzuki-Eguchi, N., Takaoka, H., Matsuura, K., Ozawa, Y., Hanaoka, H., Matsumiya, G., Kobayashi, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114537</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114537</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the efficacy of empagliflozin in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis: protocol for a randomised, open-label, controlled study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114537</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114537</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115391?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence of diabetes mellitus following hospitalisation with influenza: a population-based cohort study in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115391?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To establish the incidence of developing diabetes mellitus (DM) post hospitalisation with influenza.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Electronic healthcare records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) linked to Hospital Episode Statistics in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>13 710 adults with a first episode of hospitalised influenza as the primary cause for admission between 1 July 2004 and 1 March 2021 based on ICD-10 codes without pre-existing DM were included. A randomly selected group (a) from CPRD records matched for age, sex and General Practitioner (GP) practice and (b) an unmatched group of hospitalised sepsis patients were used as comparator groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Patients were followed from 1 day after discharge till either DM diagnosis, death or end of GP record. HRs for incidence of DM were calculated using adjusted Cox regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Incidence of DM was 12.5 per 1000 person years. Adjusted HRs (aHR) for developing DM after hospitalised influenza compared with matched controls was 1.54 (95% CI 1.39 to 1.70, p&lt;0.001) and to hospitalised sepsis comparators 1.14 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.26, p=0.013). The greatest risk for developing DM in hospitalised influenza patients was within 90 days of discharge (aHR 2.71 (95% CI 1.94 to 3.77, p&lt;0.001)) compared with matched controls. Risk factors for DM after influenza hospitalisation included being male, pre-existing DM risk, obesity and critical care admission during acute illness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patients&rsquo; post hospitalisation with influenza had a greater incidence of DM when compared with both matched controls and patients following hospitalisation with sepsis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Middleton, S., McKeever, T. M., Grudzinska, F. S., Huang, Y., Bolton, C. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115391</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115391</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence of diabetes mellitus following hospitalisation with influenza: a population-based cohort study in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115391</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115851?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interaction as care in advanced dementia: protocol for a qualitative video-based study of routine care practices]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e115851?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Interaction plays a central role in the delivery of care and in supporting participation and well-being in healthcare. For people living with advanced dementia, cognitive and communicative impairments can restrict participation in everyday care activities while increasing reliance on interaction to obtain support. Although participation is widely promoted in dementia care, empirical evidence on how it is enacted in routine care interactions, particularly in advanced stages of dementia, remains limited. This study aims to examine how healthcare professionals create opportunities for participation for people with advanced dementia during everyday care activities and how these opportunities are taken up, negotiated or resisted in interaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a qualitative multimethod study conducted across six long-term care nursing homes in French-speaking Switzerland. Data collection comprises three phases: (1) ethnographic observations to contextualise care practices and identify target activities; (2) audio-video recordings of naturally occurring interactions between healthcare professionals and people with advanced dementia during routine care activities and (3) collection of complementary sociodemographic, medical and professional data. Approximately 80 residents with advanced dementia and 60 professionals will be involved, yielding an estimated 160&ndash;300 recorded interactional sequences. Data will be analysed using conversation analysis, focusing on the sequential and multimodal organisation of interaction. Analysis will examine interactional practices through which professionals create opportunities for participation, residents&rsquo; responses to these opportunities and variations across activities, professional roles and care contexts. Findings will inform the identification of interactional competencies relevant for communication skills training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been granted by the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Vaud (205-01373). Informed consent will be obtained from legal representatives of residents and from participating professionals, and assent will be sought from people with advanced dementia. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences and feedback to participating institutions and will contribute to the development of communication skills training for healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sterie, A.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115851</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115851</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Communication]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interaction as care in advanced dementia: protocol for a qualitative video-based study of routine care practices]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Communication</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115851</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115851</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116383?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adult persons with type 2 diabetes and family engagement in diabetes self-management education and support: what works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? - a realist review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116383?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S) programmes must demonstrate effective engagement of family members to achieve diabetes self-management outcomes and well-being of the whole family. These are complex interventions and their effectiveness is context dependent. We present initial programme theories of DSME/S and aim to answer: In what contexts and through which mechanisms do DSME/S interventions involving family caregivers impact diabetes self-management outcomes?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards and Pawson&rsquo;s five steps: define the scope, develop initial programme theories, search for evidence, appraise studies and extract and synthesise data. Literature searching will be combined with feedback from patient and public involvement stakeholders. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO will be searched to February 2026, with citation tracking and grey literature included. Data will be synthesised inductively to develop programme theories and context&ndash;mechanism&ndash;outcome configurations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study is a realist synthesis protocol and does not require ethics approval. The study will use published evidence and grey literature with contributions from patient and public involvement stakeholders. The study will produce transferrable programme theories that explain the contexts and mechanisms that influence DSME/S intervention impact and the considerations required to maximise family involvement in diabetes care. These programme theories will provide conceptual frameworks for consideration when designing DSME/S interventions for various contexts in order to maximise self-management capabilities of the persons with diabetes while promoting the health of the family as a whole. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration ID</st>
<p>CRD420251179485.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suglo, J. N., OConnor, S., Hargrave, E., Nkhoma, K. B., Sturt, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116383</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116383</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adult persons with type 2 diabetes and family engagement in diabetes self-management education and support: what works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? - a realist review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116383</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116383</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding LUng Cancer risk factors and their Impact Assessment (LUCIA): protocol for multicentre observational cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, primarily due to diagnosis at advanced stages. Although low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduces lung cancer mortality in high-risk populations, current screening programmes are largely restricted to individuals defined by age and smoking history. This approach excludes never-smokers and individuals with non-smoking-related risk factors, limiting the equity, efficiency and scalability of lung cancer screening. The LUng Cancer risk factors and their Impact Assessment (LUCIA) project aims to overcome these limitations by developing personalised lung cancer risk prediction models and evaluating novel non-invasive technologies for early detection within a risk-adapted screening strategy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>LUCIA is a multicentre, observational, longitudinal cohort study that will recruit approximately 4000 participants across four European regions: Andalusia and the Basque Country (Spain), Li&egrave;ge (Belgium) and Riga (Latvia). The study population includes smokers, never-smokers and reduced smokers with low-to-moderate lung cancer risk. All participants will initially enter phase 1 (wide population screening) and may transition to phase 2 (precision screening) or phase 3 (diagnosis) based on LDCT findings, results from non-invasive screening devices and artificial intelligence-based risk prediction models. Participants will be followed up for 24 months, with assessments at baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 months. Data collection includes sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, environmental and occupational exposures, lifestyle factors, spirometry, multi-omics profiles and outputs from novel non-invasive devices, including a breath analyser, spectrometry-on-card and a skin-applied volatile organic compound sensing patch. The study will develop and validate integrated lung cancer risk prediction models and evaluate the diagnostic performance of these technologies to support population stratification and personalised screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines and applicable national and European regulations. Ethical approval has been obtained from the relevant ethics committees in all participating countries. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open-access publications, scientific conferences and communication with public health stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov, <A HREF="NCT06473870">NCT06473870</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Idoyaga-Uribarrena, J. E., Garcia-Echeberria, L., Lecumberri, I., Azkona, E., Jimenez, U., Sainz-Camin, M., Nunez-Benjumea, F. J., Luque-Romero, L. G., Ernst, B., Guiot, J., Stonans, I., Krams, A., Macia, I., Garin-Muga, A., Gut, I. G., Gut, M., Orcajo-Lago, J., Arana-Arri, E., LUCIA Study Group members. TECHNION - Israel Institute of Technology (TECH-Israel), Haick, Broza, Zuri, Shaked, Raviv, Polis, Brenner, Ben Scho&#x0308;ttker, Bhardwaj, Supek, Marin, Alvarez, Desai, Gut, Rodriguez, Vila, Gut, Lopez, Chaquet, Molina, Colomer, Laspiur, Fernandez, Lopez-Linares, Calle, Bobeda, Alonso, Herrera, Uguducu, Ag&#x0131;m, Sensoy, Rankin, Black, Wallace, Gogulancea, Lonie, Moore, Menasalvas, Tejera, Ledesma-Carbayo, Honrubia, Gonzalez, Ugarriza, Munoz, Guijarro, Yanowsky, Real, Paulus, Gester, Denis, Guglielmi, Horst, Flasse, Parisi, Moreno, Baz, Gonzalez, Ortega, Giraldez, Simarro, Lanzano, Blasco, Yaghmaei, Jakab, Larsen, Dumortier, Sachdev, Garel, Nabbe, Bisconti, Rizzo, Albeck, Marom, Feinberg, Meroz, Sella-Tavor, Aharon, Yehuda, Lifshitz, Brodskaia, Fishbein, Rosenstein, Ogus, Ereno, Burgo, Barasoain, Gomez-Sanchez, Martin-Rodriguez, Iturbe, Fernandez-Nebreda, Cortes, Sala, Egurrola, Moreno, Montejo, Armendariz, Hernandez, Arrieta, Cuello, Elizundia, Guzman, Camino, Iriberri, Casas, Cacicedo, Lazaro, Mandiola, Benito, Exposito, Campayo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116423</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116423</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding LUng Cancer risk factors and their Impact Assessment (LUCIA): protocol for multicentre observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116423</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116611?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer survival and its social determinants among children with a migrant background: systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116611?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Childhood cancer survival rates are not equal for all, with disparities existing both between and within low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries, particularly among ethnic minorities and children with migrant backgrounds. Factors such as cultural misunderstandings, language barriers and limited support networks can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment challenges, which can result in poor health outcomes. Social determinants of health (SDoH), such as housing insecurity and poverty, may worsen these disparities. This protocol outlines a systematic review to examine childhood cancer survival in children with migrant backgrounds compared with non-migrants and to explore the SDoH associated with these survival outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will search MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant studies, with secondary searches of grey literature. Two reviewers will screen for observational studies, including longitudinal cohort, case&ndash;control, cross-sectional and registry-based studies, that report childhood cancer survival outcomes (eg, survival rates, HRs) for both migrant and non-migrant populations. A narrative synthesis will explore SDoH and their association with survival outcomes. If data allow, we will perform random-effects meta-analyses to estimate pooled survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses will examine factors such as geographic region, migration status and type of cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Understanding factors contributing to childhood cancer survival disparities in migrant populations is critical for informing the development of targeted strategies to address them, ensuring all children, regardless of their migration status, have an equitable opportunity for effective care and improved outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this study as it is based on previously published data and does not involve primary data collection. We will publish the results in peer-reviewed journals and present at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024547239.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajabzadeh, V., Sami, A., Harila, A. H., Richards, D. A., Woodford, J., von Essen, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116611</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116611</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer survival and its social determinants among children with a migrant background: systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116611</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116611</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116795?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Post-stroke depression management in the Israeli primary care setting: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/5/e116795?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To characterise post-stroke depression (PSD) diagnostic and treatment patterns in an outpatient primary care setting, including timing, screening methods, therapeutic interventions and associations with mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Maccabi Healthcare Services, the second largest Healthcare Maintenance Organisation in Israel, covering more than 2.7 million citizens between 2016 and 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were adult patients with a new stroke diagnosis between 2016 and 2022 and a subsequent diagnosis of depression according to International Classification of Diseases clinical criteria or antidepressant medication initiation. Patients with a diagnosis of depression or antidepressant treatment prior to stroke were excluded from the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcomes</st>
<p>Primary outcomes included PSD diagnosis rates, time to diagnosis and treatment, use of screening questionnaires, specialty of the physician making the diagnosis and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included referral rates to mental health services, rehabilitation participation and its impact on mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 11 499 patients, PSD occurred in 4620 (40.2%) patients. Primary care physicians diagnosed 53.1% of cases based on clinical assessment; only 4.5% of patients underwent Patient Health Questionnaire-2 screening. Most diagnoses occurred in the first year (53.4%). Antidepressants, predominantly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (58.3%), were initiated within 30 days in 65.1% of diagnosed patients. Patients with PSD demonstrated higher rehabilitation participation (69.5% vs 48.5%, p&lt;0.001) and paradoxically lower mortality rates (22.1% vs 27.9%, p&lt;0.001). Patients without PSD were older with a greater comorbidity burden. Cox regression identified physiotherapy visits (HR=0.625, p&lt;0.001) and mental health consultations (HR=0.642, p&lt;0.001) as protective factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this cohort, in an outpatient primary care setting, primary care physicians diagnosed the majority of PSD cases, predominantly relying on clinical criteria, without using screening tools. The majority of PSD diagnoses occurred during the first year after stroke (53.1%), suggesting that repeated evaluation might be appropriate during this follow-up period. Early antidepressant treatment and enhanced rehabilitation engagement may positively influence mortality outcomes in patients with PSD. Low utilisation of standard screening tools and mental health referrals represents an area for potential improvement in PSD management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spivak, O., Lev-Shalem, L., Yaari, S., Adler, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T07:38:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116795</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116795</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Post-stroke depression management in the Israeli primary care setting: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116795</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116795</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e097959?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Longitudinal assessment and clinical implications of treatment expectations in an outpatient pain centre: evaluation of the GEEE in patients with chronic pain]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e097959?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>There is evidence that treatment expectations predict treatment outcomes in pain management and other clinical conditions. However, translating these insights into clinical practice remains challenging: it is difficult to measure the multifaceted construct of expectations across diverse medical and psychological treatment modalities. Furthermore, little is known about how prior treatment experiences shape different expectation domains. A unified assessment approach is lacking, limiting comparability across studies and clinical contexts. The Generic Rating Scale for Previous Treatment Experiences, Treatment Expectations, and Treatment Effects (GEEE) seeks to overcome these limitations. The present study aims to explore the GEEE in a naturalistic clinical sample of people seeking treatment for chronic pain, which may provide preliminary evidence for its validity and applicability. An additional exploratory aim is to examine whether the GEEE is suitable for predicting treatment outcomes longitudinally in this clinical setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective longitudinal observational study with three measurement time points (baseline, 3 weeks and 16 weeks).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Specialised outpatient pain treatment centre in Germany.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The baseline sample comprised 219 patients with chronic pain, follow-up data were available from 140 participants at 3 weeks and 108 participants at 16 weeks, constituting the longitudinal subsamples.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were prior treatment experiences, current treatment expectations and treatment effects, which were assessed using the GEEE, as well as clinical outcomes of pain intensity and pain-related disability. Secondary measures included desire for pain relief, depression and anxiety symptoms, which were analysed in correlational tests to assess construct validity. Trajectories of treatment expectations and clinical outcomes were examined longitudinally, and it was assessed if baseline expectations predicted clinical outcomes over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Regarding validation, at baseline, improvement expectations correlated weakly with expectations of worsening and side effects (Rho&ndash;0.14 to &ndash;0.15, <I>p</I>=0.028&ndash;0.034). Negative previous treatment experiences were associated with current expectations of worsening and side effects (Rho0.35&ndash;0.41, <I>p</I>&le;0.002). The GEEE items on current treatment effects correlated with changes in clinical outcomes (pain intensity and pain-related disability; |r|0.17&ndash;0.56, all <I>p</I>&le;0.043). Regarding prediction, treatment expectations remained stable, while pain intensity (&sup2;G=0.076, <I>p</I>&lt;0.001) and pain-related disability (&sup2;G=0.037, <I>p</I>&lt;0.001) decreased over time. Regression models predicting subjective improvement were significant at 3 weeks (<I>R&sup2;</I>=0.18) and 16 weeks (<I>R&sup2;</I>=0.29), with baseline improvement expectations emerging as a significant predictor. Models predicting pain intensity and disability at 16 weeks were also significant (<I>R&sup2;</I>0.50&ndash;0.59), and higher baseline improvement expectations were independently associated with better outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We found supporting evidence for the validity of the GEEE and its applicability in longitudinal clinical research. Improvement expectations as measured with the GEEE at baseline predicted better treatment outcomes, while previous negative treatment experiences correlated with current treatment expectations. The findings underscore the value of assessing and addressing expectations and prior treatment experiences to optimise treatment outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henrich, L., Basedow, L. A., Maser, D., Schmidt, K., Bingel, U., Rief, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097959</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097959</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Longitudinal assessment and clinical implications of treatment expectations in an outpatient pain centre: evaluation of the GEEE in patients with chronic pain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097959</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097959</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103777?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Household determinants of observed handwashing among primary schoolchildren in Hebron, Palestine: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103777?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess observed handwashing before eating among primary schoolchildren in a fragile setting in Palestine and examine how this behaviour is associated with household-level and guardian-related determinants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional baseline study embedded within a school-based cluster randomised controlled trial of a hand hygiene intervention. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05964478), and this manuscript reports pre-results baseline findings alongside additional cross-sectional household survey data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Public primary schools in rural and semiurban areas of the Hebron governorate, Palestine, February&ndash;March 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Fifth and sixth grade schoolchildren enrolled in the trial and their co-resident guardians. Children were observed at school and guardians completed a questionnaire at home.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was observed handwashing of both hands with water before eating at school, recorded by trained enumerators during a standardised snack break. Household-level and guardian-level determinants were derived from a structured questionnaire covering five domains: sociodemographic characteristics of guardian and child; household access to handwashing; guardian&rsquo;s health and handwashing knowledge; guardian&rsquo;s self-reported handwashing behaviour; and guardian-reported child handwashing at home. Associations between determinants and observed handwashing were estimated using generalised linear mixed-effects models with school as a random effect; effect modification by whether the responding guardian was the mother was explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Observation and survey data were available for 931 child&ndash;guardian pairs across 26 schools. Overall, 37% of the fifth and sixth grade children were observed washing their hands before eating at school, while 44% of guardians expressed high confidence that their child would do so and 84% exhibited good handwashing knowledge themselves. Poor guardian&rsquo;s self-reported handwashing behaviour was associated with a lower likelihood of children&rsquo;s observed handwashing at school (adjusted OR (OR<SUB>adj</SUB>): 0.68; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.99), particularly when the guardian was the mother (OR<SUB>adj</SUB>: 0.55; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.90). Household water quality was perceived as poor by 95% of guardians. Poor perception was associated with lower likelihood of children washing hands at school (OR<SUB>adj</SUB>: 0.41; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.90).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this fragile, water-insecure setting, low levels of observed handwashing before eating and the associations with guardian behaviours and household-level factors suggest that school-based handwashing promotion may be strengthened by complementary strategies that also engage households.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maani-Abuzahra, Y., Hattendorf, J., Owen, B. N., Sao, O., Younan, I., Sultan, S., Peter, M., Winkler, M. S., Probst-Hensch, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103777</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103777</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Household determinants of observed handwashing among primary schoolchildren in Hebron, Palestine: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103777</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103777</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105949?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens of public health interest in Vietnam from a One Health perspective: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105949?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing public health threat, and the prevalence of AMR is particularly high in Vietnam. A comprehensive review of AMR in humans, animals and/or the environment in Vietnam has however not been conducted to date. This systematic review aims to address this evidence gap and will collect and aggregate findings from literature on AMR in Vietnam among bacterial pathogens of public health interest from a One Health perspective. The results from this countrywide literature review may serve as a guiding tool for policymakers, medical practitioners, veterinarians and other relevant stakeholders in Vietnam and outside the country. This review will also identify specific areas where critical information is lacking, which will be of value for future surveillance programmes and epidemiological research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Studies reporting primary data on antimicrobial susceptibility testing from human (both community and hospital settings), animal and environmental samples in Vietnam will be included. The search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus. In addition, Google Scholar will be used to retrieve literature published in Vietnamese and Open Access Theses and Dissertations will be used to seek relevant PhD dissertations. More than 18 different pathogens will be included in this review, mainly based on the 2017 and 2024 WHO bacterial priority pathogens list and the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System. Risk of bias (quality) assessment of included studies will be conducted using (1) The thirteen mandatory elements of the Microbiology Investigation Criteria for Reporting Objectively checklist and (2) The bias appraisal framework of Hoy <I>et al</I>. The outcome of this literature review will be the prevalence of resistance among selected bacteria, stratified by setting (human (hospital or community), animal and the environment). Pooled prevalence estimates will be calculated for each of the selected antimicrobial-bacterial pathogen combinations. This literature review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as no primary data are to be collected. The results from this review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>PROSPERO CRD420251047399.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Wijk, M., Naing, S. Y., Vu, T. T., Ngo, H. H. T., Le, H. T., Nguyen, T. P., Vu, B. N. T., Kesteman, T., van Doorn, H. R., Wagenaar, J. A., Lewycka, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105949</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105949</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens of public health interest in Vietnam from a One Health perspective: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105949</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105949</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108126?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[General practitioners and general practitioner registrars experiences and learning from caring for dying patients: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108126?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The general practitioners&rsquo; (GP) workforce is in crisis, with 22% of GPs feeling so stressed by the pressures of general practice they cannot cope. Patient death is the greatest stressor in medical practice and has an impact on the personal stress and well-being of doctors. Providing good holistic care for dying patients in the community keeps patients in their preferred place of care and reduces unnecessary costly interventions and hospital admissions. It is crucial to explore the experiences and learning of GP and general practitioner registrars&rsquo; (GPR)&mdash;who represent the future primary care workforce&mdash;in caring for dying patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We aimed to understand what is known about GPs and GPR experiences of, and learning from, caring for dying patients to outline current knowledge and identify future research options.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included all studies that explored GP and GPR experiences and learning related to adult dying, palliative, terminal care and death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources of evidence</st>
<p>Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane) as well as reference lists and hand-searching key journals were searched from January 2003 until February 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Charting methods</st>
<p>Data were extracted and charted by all authors and then a qualitative content approach was used to analyse and interpret the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The database search yielded 3378 publications; 17 studies have been included in the scoping review. This includes over 4412 participants, mostly GPs/GPRs. GPs/GPRs gain knowledge, skills and confidence when they have exposure and hands-on experience with dying patients. Uncertainty, intolerance of ambiguity, fear of initiating conversations around dying and perceived lack of knowledge were barriers for caring for dying patients. Facilitators such as safe learning environments with ongoing support from supervisors and protected time to discuss, debrief and reflect were valuable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Timely understanding of the current structural, practice level factors such as learning and emotional issues and challenges is required to upskill and support doctors, which can lead to improved emotional well-being and workforce retention&mdash;all of which will directly benefit dying patients and relatives at this significant part of their lives.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holdsworth, R., Alberti, H., Burford, B., Vance, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108126</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108126</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[General practitioners and general practitioner registrars experiences and learning from caring for dying patients: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108126</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109554?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maraviroc for Stroke Recovery (MASTER): protocol for a phase 2 double-blind placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109554?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite advances in acute treatment, stroke remains the first cause of acquired disability. Today, there is no effective pharmacological therapy to improve recovery beyond the acute phase. Preclinical studies suggest that inhibition of the C-C chemokine Receptor 5 (CCR5) may promote recovery by enhancing plasticity in the peri-infarct cortex. However, the role of CCR5 to improve outcome after ischaemic stroke in humans is unknown.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>MAraviroc for STrokE Recovery is a phase II, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The aim is to assess the efficacy and safety of the CCR5 antagonist Maraviroc for improving motor recovery of the upper limb after ischaemic stroke. 80 ischaemic stroke patients with moderate but incomplete upper extremity motor impairment will be enrolled within 7 days of onset. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either oral maraviroc (300 mg two times per day) or placebo for 90 days in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. The primary outcome is upper limb motor function assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity at day 90. Secondary outcomes include motor learning skills and plasticity in the peri-infarct region assessed using MRI connectivity and spectroscopy at 90 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Geneva Competent Ethics Committee (Commission Cantonale d&rsquo;&Eacute;thique, CEC; Reference Number: CCER 2024-02359) and Swissmedic (Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>2024-02359; <A HREF="NCT07080567">NCT07080567</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broc, N., Byczynski, G., Dirren, E., Carrera, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109554</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109554</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maraviroc for Stroke Recovery (MASTER): protocol for a phase 2 double-blind placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109554</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109554</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111212?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers to and facilitators of paediatric early hearing detection and intervention: protocol for a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111212?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) is a crucial public health initiative focused on the prompt identification and management of hearing impairments in children, significantly impacting their communication abilities, cognitive development and overall well-being. Although the global acceptance of EHDI programmes is gradually expanding, delay in diagnosis and enrolment in early intervention continues to challenge optimal outcomes. Qualitative studies examining the barriers and facilitators within EHDI remain limited, particularly regarding the experiences of caregivers, healthcare providers and policymakers across various contexts. This systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence aims to comprehensively identify and synthesise these barriers and facilitators from multiple stakeholder perspectives aiming to inform policies and strategies that improve EHDI programme effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Scientific Information Database and MagIran, from database inception to December 2025, with no language restrictions. The SPIDER framework will guide the inclusion of qualitative studies on barriers to and facilitators of EHDI (sample: children, parents and providers; phenomenon of interest: EHDI barriers/facilitators; design: qualitative; evaluation: experiences/perspectives; research type: qualitative). Quantitative-only studies, non&ndash;peer-reviewed sources and studies without accessible full texts will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts/full texts, resolving disagreements via discussion or a third reviewer. Quality appraisal will be done using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data synthesis will employ thematic content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review and meta-synthesis was approved by the Resarch Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (approval number: IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1404.331). The committee determind that the study adheres to established etical standards, as it involes only the synthesis and analysis of previously published literature, with no direct interaction with human participants, n collection of primary data, and no involvement in clinical interventions. Therefore, the review dose not require informed of consent or ethical clearance beyond the institutional approval obtainad. Findings will be shared via peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and targeted summaries for policymakers and clinicians.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amir-Behghadami, M., Maleki, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111212</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111212</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers to and facilitators of paediatric early hearing detection and intervention: protocol for a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112993?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['It helps my anxiety because Im managing my breathlessness: a qualitative exploration of anxiety and breathlessness in patients with advanced chronic respiratory disease receiving specialist palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112993?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore the lived experiences of anxiety related to breathlessness in patients who are receiving specialist palliative care for advanced chronic respiratory disease (CRD), such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This qualitative exploration formed part of a mixed-methods feasibility study of a novel intervention. Participants receiving specialist palliative care for CRD engaged in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two hospice sites in a single UK region.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>11 participants were included in the analysis (7 male participants and 4 female participants with an age range of 49&ndash;75 years). Ethnicities were self-reported as white British (n=8) and Asian/British Asian (n=3).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three key organising themes emerged: (1) Understanding my breathlessness&mdash;participants described their breathlessness as progressive, frightening and restrictive. (2) Understanding my anxiety&mdash;described as emotional distress with a profound physical component, often compounded by external life stressors. (3) Vicious circle interlinks breathlessness and anxiety&mdash;a circular bi-directional relationship where anxiety could not be separated from breathlessness. Participants often employed non-pharmacological strategies to manage both their anxiety and breathlessness interdependently.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings provide insight into the intricate relationship between anxiety and breathlessness in patients with a range of CRD. There is an ongoing need for holistic support for patients with anxiety related to breathlessness in non-malignant conditions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bleazard, L., Walker, K., Ashton, S., Faull, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112993</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112993</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['It helps my anxiety because Im managing my breathlessness: a qualitative exploration of anxiety and breathlessness in patients with advanced chronic respiratory disease receiving specialist palliative care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112993</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112993</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dietary diversity and child malnutrition in Ghana: a nationally representative analysis of socioeconomic gradients and effect modification]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Inadequate dietary diversity during complementary feeding contributes to high childhood malnutrition rates in sub-Saharan Africa. Understanding relationships between dietary quality and nutritional outcomes across socioeconomic subgroups is essential for designing effective, equitable interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We examined associations between dietary diversity and nutritional status among children aged 0&ndash;23 months in Ghana, with attention to effect modification by socioeconomic factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We analysed data from 2031 children Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2022 Dietary diversity was assessed using the WHO minimum dietary diversity indicator (&ge;5 of 7 food groups consumed in 24 hours). Nutritional status was evaluated through WHO z-scores; stunting, wasting and underweight were defined as z-scores below &ndash;2 SD. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression examined associations adjusting for child, maternal, household and geographic factors. Sensitivity analyses included prevalence ratios from modified Poisson regression, an 8-food-group minimum dietary diversity definition and models with region and additional covariates. Stratified analyses tested effect modification.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Only 28.3% of children aged 6&ndash;23 months achieved minimum dietary diversity, with disparities by wealth (20.8% poorest vs 47.6% richest) and maternal education (16.6% no education vs 57.1% higher education). Stunting affected 14.8% of children overall, increasing with age. In fully adjusted models, minimum dietary diversity was associated with a 42% reduction in underweight odds (OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.91, p=0.018). Wasting showed a consistent protective direction (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.11, p=0.110), reaching significance with the 8-food-group definition (OR=0.51, p=0.012) and in dose&ndash;response analysis (OR=0.86 per food group, p=0.018). No association was observed for stunting (OR=1.09, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63, p=0.678). Dose&ndash;response patterns were evident for underweight (OR=0.88 per food group, p=0.021) and wasting (OR=0.86, p=0.018). Exploratory stratified analyses suggested stronger protective associations among children of mothers with lower education, though formal interaction tests were non-significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Dietary diversity is associated with reduced acute malnutrition among Ghanaian children, particularly underweight, with suggestive evidence for wasting. The null finding for stunting is consistent with the multifactorial, cumulative aetiology of chronic malnutrition. Findings support incorporating dietary diversity improvement into equity-focused nutrition strategies while recognising that addressing stunting requires broader multi-sectoral approaches.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azumah, G. E., Saani, A. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114468</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114468</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dietary diversity and child malnutrition in Ghana: a nationally representative analysis of socioeconomic gradients and effect modification]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114468</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114523?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrating users perspectives during the development of the Chronic Pain Recommendation Map: protocol for a qualitative descriptive study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114523?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>One in five people experience chronic pain globally, yet management remains suboptimal and discrepant guideline recommendations are common. To increase pain literacy and improve concordance between evidence and practice, we are developing a freely accessible digital Chronic Pain Recommendation Map (e-Chronic Pain RecMap) focusing on three priority areas: opioids, cannabis and spine-related interventional procedures. The aim of this study is to gather participants&rsquo; perspectives on the mockups of the RecMap interfaces throughout its development, in terms of design, usability, content relevance and clarity. Feedback will guide iterative refinements of the platform and align the RecMap with user expectations and needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We will use a qualitative descriptive approach to explore participants&rsquo; perspectives through online semi-structured interviews. Participants will be purposively sampled to include health researchers, healthcare providers, individuals with living or lived experience of chronic pain and policymakers. Based on information power, we aim to recruit approximately 20 participants, at least 5 participants per target user group, with assessment of sample size adequacy throughout data collection. We will analyse interview transcripts using inductive content analysis and findings will inform iterative refinements to the RecMap&rsquo;s content and design. To increase methodological rigour, we will apply established qualitative descriptive techniques including detailed description of data analysis, triangulation of investigators, thick data description, dependability, confirmability and reflexivity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board approved this study. We will conduct online interviews and record audio only. After transcription, we will de-identify all collected data and ensure that participants&rsquo; names are not linked to any transcripts or study materials. We will share a summary of our final findings with participants and interest-holders via email, and we plan to publish the final manuscript in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cordovani, L., Torabiardakani, K., Cooper, L., Ritz, S. A., Swidrovich, J., Khalid, A. F., Welch, V., Guyatt, G., Schu&#x0308;nemann, H., Busse, J. W., Darzi, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114523</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114523</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrating users perspectives during the development of the Chronic Pain Recommendation Map: protocol for a qualitative descriptive study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114523</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114523</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115300?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychosocial factors associated with non-suicidal self-injury in Iranian adolescents and young adults: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115300?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is defined as the deliberate harm to one&rsquo;s body without suicidal intent. Although individuals engaging in NSSI do not intend to die, repetitive self-injury may increase the risk of future suicidal behaviour through reduced fear of death and increased pain tolerance. Global lifetime prevalence estimates of NSSI range from 4.2% in adults to 15.4% in adolescents, with an observed increase during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Iran, the reported prevalence of NSSI among adolescents and young adults is approximately 22%; however, comprehensive and culturally contextualised evidence remains limited. Psychosocial, interpersonal and ecological factors contribute to NSSI, yet no prior study has systematically mapped these determinants within an integrated, multilevel framework in the Iranian context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This scoping review aims to identify and map intrapersonal, interpersonal and ecological psychosocial factors associated with NSSI among Iranian adolescents and young adults, summarising quantitative and qualitative evidence and highlighting gaps for future research and intervention planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Following Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley&rsquo;s six-stage framework, with enhancements from the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across international (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase) and national (SID, Magiran, Noormags) databases. Two reviewers will independently conduct screening, data extraction and thematic coding. A third reviewer will resolve any discrepancies. Findings will be synthesised using a directed narrative synthesis combined with integrative thematic analysis. Psychosocial factors will be mapped to an integrated framework combining Nock&rsquo;s functional model and Bronfenbrenner&rsquo;s ecological systems theory. Methodological quality will be appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted based on published and publicly available literature; therefore, no individual informed consent is required. Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Approval code: IR.UM.REC.1404.282). The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentations and academic workshops to inform researchers, clinicians and policymakers about the factors associated with NSSI among Iranian adolescents and young adults.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinparvar, R., Ghanbari Hashemabadi, B.-A., Taghipour, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115300</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115300</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychosocial factors associated with non-suicidal self-injury in Iranian adolescents and young adults: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115300</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115300</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115741?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients before paperwork: a feasibility study evaluating digital and human scribes in psychiatric clinical settings - a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115741?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>There are national calls for reducing physician administrative burden. While interest in digital scribes (DS) is growing, there is limited evidence evaluating their safety and effectiveness. In contrast, human scribes (HS) have demonstrated significant benefits in multiple controlled studies. To our knowledge, no prior study has compared the utility of HS versus DS in improving clinical efficiency in psychiatric clinical settings. We hypothesise that HS and DS will reduce administrative burden for psychiatrists compared with no scribes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Following institutional ethics board approvals, we will conduct a randomised controlled crossover study with 10 Manitoba psychiatrists. Study phases will include 1 month periods for baseline, HS and DS for a total of 3 months. Measures will include physician characteristics, practice patterns, administrative hours and patient satisfaction. Depending on distributional characteristics, data will be analysed using parametric or non-parametric tests to compare scribed and non-scribed periods as well as HS versus DS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval has been obtained from the Committee for Harmonized Health Impact, Privacy, and Ethics Review (CHIPER) Health Research Ethics Board, which is the ethics board for medical research at the University of Manitoba (HS26944 (H2025:154)). The results of this trial will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and provincial and national conference presentations. Integrated knowledge translation will be conducted throughout the duration of the research process with key stakeholders including medical organisations, such as the provincial health organisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Protocol version</st>
<p>1.2, 9 April 2026</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dyck, J., Perera, E., Filbert, B., Paletta, A., Logsetty, S., Spiwak, R., Classen, C., Joaquin, C., Sareen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115741</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115741</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients before paperwork: a feasibility study evaluating digital and human scribes in psychiatric clinical settings - a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115741</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115741</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117280?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intraoperative endoscopic pylorus dilatation during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy to prevent delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE): protocol for the WIDE randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117280?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Oesophageal cancer has a poor prognosis and oesophagectomy has increasingly adopted minimally invasive techniques, but delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) still occurs in ~10&ndash;50% of patients, depending on the used diagnostic criteria and definitions. DGCE can cause serious complications, such as aspiration pneumonia, and it prolongs hospital stay and the overall morbidity of patients. Surgical pyloric drainage procedures (pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy) have not clearly improved outcomes. Endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation (EPBD) effectively treats established DGCE, and emerging evidence suggests that prophylactic EPBD may reduce its incidence. However, no randomised trial has evaluated intraoperative EPBD during minimally invasive oesophagectomy until now. The WIDE trial will test whether adding an EPBD during oesophagectomy can prevent early postoperative DGCE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>WIDE is a single-centre, double-blind randomised controlled trial, in which 116 adult patients undergoing minimally invasive <I>Ivor Lewis</I> oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer are randomly assigned to intraoperative endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation (30 mm EPBD) versus no pyloric intervention. Patients with prior gastric surgery, non-curative disease or American Society of Anesthesiologists class V are excluded. The EPBD is following induction of general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation, and immediately prior to or concomitant with the start of the surgical procedure in the operating room. Control patients will receive standard surgery without any pyloric procedure. Patients and outcome assessors are blinded to the groups. The primary outcome is early DGCE after 5 and 10 days post-op, defined as nasogastric tube output &ge;500 mL on postoperative day 5 or later and/or &gt;100% increase in gastric conduit width on imaging (vs immediate post-op baseline). Key secondary outcomes include DGCE at 3 months, postoperative complication rates (eg, anastomotic leak, pneumonia, aspiration), recovery metrics (time to first bowel movement, time to resume solid food, vomiting episodes), length of hospital and ICU stay, and 3-month quality of life. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. A sample size of 104 patients (52 per arm) provides 80% power to detect a meaningful reduction in DGCE incidence (&alpha;=0.05). The target enrolment is 116 to allow for ~10% attrition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol (V.1.3) has been approved by the Northwestern and Central Switzerland Ethics Committee (EKNZ; BASEC 2025-01877). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The trial is classified as a Category A (minimal-risk) study under the Swiss Human Research Act and Clinical Trials Ordinance (ClinO). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations, as well as in our in-hospital journal in a lay version for patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07355374">NCT07355374</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cron, L., Klasen, J. M., Neuschu&#x0308;tz, K., Dirnberger, A., Maaser, A., Baur, J., Heinrich, H., Gockel, I., Bolli, M., Mu&#x0308;ller, B. P., Kraljevic, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117280</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117280</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intraoperative endoscopic pylorus dilatation during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy to prevent delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE): protocol for the WIDE randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117280</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of diabetes and associated risk factors in Ga Mashie, Accra, Ghana: a cross-sectional CARE Diabetes community-based survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to assess the prevalence of diabetes and associated risk factors and to deepen understanding of the diabetes burden in Ga Mashie, an urban-poor area in Accra, Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional epidemiological cluster survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>We surveyed adults aged over 25 years in 80 enumeration areas within Ga Mashie, targeting 959 randomly selected households based on the 2021 census.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Household-level data included household membership and structure, water and sanitation, cooking infrastructure and asset ownership. Individual-level data encompassed demographics, lifestyle behaviours and biometric measurements. Diabetes was identified through random blood glucose levels &ge;11.1 mmol/L or a prior diagnosis, with obesity defined as a body mass index &gt;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and central obesity as a waist circumference-to-height ratio &gt;0.5. We derived weighted prevalence estimates and compared these estimates by age, sex and wealth using unadjusted ORs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The survey, achieving a 67% response rate, covered 854 individuals from 644 households. It unveiled a notable prevalence of risk factors known to be associated with diabetes: 47.2% for alcohol consumption (95% CI 43.7% to 50.8%), 50.7% for insufficient physical activity (95% CI 46.0% to 55.3%), 28.9% for unhealthy snack consumption (95% CI 24.5% to 33.7%), 35.1% for obesity (95% CI 31.3% to 39.1%) and 74.5% for central obesity (95% CI 70.8% to 77.9%). Diabetes affected 8.2% of the population aged &ge;25 (95% CI 6.4% to 10.5%), with disparities evident across age, wealth and sex (2.66 greater odds in females for diabetes (95% CI 1.38 to 5.12)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Diabetes and its risk factors are highly prevalent in Ga Mashie, with significant demographic disparities underscoring the need for targeted interventions. The study highlights the critical challenge diabetes poses in urban-poor contexts, emphasising the necessity for tailored health initiatives to mitigate this burden.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grijalva-Eternod, C. S., Sedzro, K. M., Adjaye-Gbewonyo, K., Kushitor, S. B., Lule, S. A., Kushitor, M. K., Marphatia, A. A., Gray, E., Amon, S., Sanuade, O. A., Awuah, R. B., Baatiema, L., Kretchy, I. A., Arhinful, D., Koram, K. A., Fottrell, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119125</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119125</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of diabetes and associated risk factors in Ga Mashie, Accra, Ghana: a cross-sectional CARE Diabetes community-based survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119125</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119278?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between peripheral serotonin levels and postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing gastrointestinal surgery: a single-centre, prospective cohort study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119278?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious postoperative complication, with an incidence of approximately 30% among older adults undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Serotonin has been implicated in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. Gastrointestinal surgery has been shown to increase serotonin synthesis and release from enterochromaffin cells; however, the causal relationship between serotonin and POD remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the causal relationship between peripheral serotonin levels and POD in older adults undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre prospective cohort study will enrol 314 patients aged &ge;60 years who are undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between December 2025 and December 2026. Peripheral serotonin levels will be measured prior to anaesthesia induction and prior to discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit. The primary outcome will be the incidence of POD within 3 days. Secondary outcomes will include emergence agitation, number of POD episodes, POD onset time and duration, POD severity and subtype, pain scores, quality of recovery, gastrointestinal function and postoperative complications. A predefined directed acyclic graph will be used to guide covariate adjustment. Statistical analyses will include multivariate logistic regression, linear trend analysis, restricted cubic spline modelling, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and Bayesian mediation analysis. Delirium assessors will undergo standardised training conducted by psychiatrists to ensure diagnostic reliability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (Approval No. QYFYEC2025-199) and was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration ChiCTR2500112152). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. Data will be anonymised, securely stored on encrypted servers for a minimum of 10 years, and shared only with approval from the ethics committee. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500112152.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, S., Han, Y., Fan, K., Guo, C., Lin, Y., Wang, J., Shi, Y., Tian, S., Zhu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-03T21:24:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119278</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119278</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between peripheral serotonin levels and postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing gastrointestinal surgery: a single-centre, prospective cohort study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119278</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e100157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of an education intervention to support genomics research participation: a community-based pre-post study among participants under-represented in diabetes genomics research]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e100157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Develop and study a culturally tailored genomics education tool to better inform future consent processes for genomics research participation among a medically underserved population with diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A single-arm, cohort pre/postsurvey study to assess an educational intervention developed using a community engaged approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Federally Qualified Health Centers in San Diego.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults (18 years or older) self-identifying as Latino or Hispanic with type 2 diabetes or a history of gestational diabetes were invited to participate. A total of 111 enrolled and completed the preintervention survey; 60 completed the education session and postsurvey. Lay healthcare <I>promotoras</I> previously trained to offer bilingual diabetes education and support were also invited; 34 enrolled and completed the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Using community-engaged research approaches, we developed a genomics education programme to include required elements of informed consent for future diabetes genomics research. The 1-hour, face-to-face genomics education programme was delivered 14 times with a variety of day versus evening and weekday versus weekend options, across a 9-month period. Participants completed a 21-item survey, which included 12 items measuring genomics knowledge and 9 items assessing attitudes towards genomics in healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome was the difference between pre and posteducation mean total genomics knowledge scores among the patients who completed the education session and postsurvey. Secondary outcomes included comparison of baseline survey scores between patient and <I>promotora</I> subgroups, difference between patient pre and posteducation mean total attitude scores, and prescore to postscore changes within each knowledge and attitude survey item. An exploratory analysis of associations between preintervention scores and sociodemographic characteristics was also completed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 60 patients, mean genomics knowledge scores significantly increased from 7.3 (SD=1.9) preintervention to 9.4 (SD=1.5) postintervention (p&lt;0.0001). Preintervention, <I>promotoras</I> (mean 8.1, SD=2.0) had significantly higher knowledge scores than patients (mean 6.9, SD 2.3) (p=0.01). Similarly, <I>promotoras</I> (mean 6.8, SD1.3) demonstrated a more positive attitude than patients (mean 6.0, SD=1.4) (p=0.0008). Patient attitudes towards genomic testing did not change significantly from preintervention to postintervention (6.2 (SD=1.4) vs 6.3 (SD=1.4), p=0.51).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A community-informed education intervention improved genomics knowledge in an under-represented population, providing a model to foster more adequately informed consent for advanced technology research participation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rivera-Raices, A. A., Uribe-Bruce, L., San Diego, E. R. N., Philis-Tsimikas, A., Waalen, J., Orendain, N., Garcia, M. I., Ruiz, M., Fortmann, A. L., Gallo, L. C., Nicholson, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100157</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100157</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Genetics and genomics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of an education intervention to support genomics research participation: a community-based pre-post study among participants under-represented in diabetes genomics research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genetics and genomics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100157</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101558?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anatomy of a failure: a retrospective evaluation of a cognitive bias modification intervention to promote physical activity in cardiac rehabilitation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101558?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Promoting regular physical activity (PA) is essential in cardiac rehabilitation; yet many patients exhibit low levels of PA. In January 2022, the Improving Physical Activity (IMPACT) trial, a randomised controlled trial at the University Hospital of Geneva, was launched to promote PA in cardiac patients by targeting automatic approach tendencies towards exercise-related stimuli through a cognitive bias modification (CBM) intervention. This article examines the limited acceptance of this intervention, identifies potential barriers and proposes strategies to improve future implementations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective evaluation of a preregistered clinical trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The intervention was conducted in a cardiac rehabilitation centre in Switzerland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>68 cardiac rehabilitation patients (M<SUB>age</SUB>= 57.76, SD = 10.76 years, 87% male).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Patients received 12 CBM sessions over six weeks, designed to target approach-avoidance tendencies to exercise-related stimuli and improve PA levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Acceptance was assessed using behavioural (e.g., enrolment and engagement rates), cognitive (e.g., perceived effectiveness) and emotional (e.g., affective evaluation) indicators. The cognitive and emotional indicators were derived from verbal feedback documented by the research assistants based on patients&rsquo; reactions during the intervention period. These observations do not constitute qualitative research as defined by methodological standards; they were informal notes provided by research assistants during intervention delivery and were not collected or analysed using qualitative research methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 352 patients initially required, only 68 (19%) were enrolled. Among these 68, 63% completed the minimum number of CBM sessions and 25% completed accelerometer-based PA measures during the week following discharge. These behavioural indicators of low acceptance were associated with cognitive (e.g., scepticism about the task relevance and perceived effectiveness of the intervention) and emotional (e.g., feelings of boredom and disinterest) barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The low engagement and acceptance observed in the IMPACT trial highlight several key barriers, such as perceived task irrelevance, task monotony and task boredom that undermine the acceptance and feasibility of this digital CBM intervention in cardiac rehabilitation. These findings emphasise the importance of designing patient-centred interventions, ensuring their seamless integration into clinical contexts and conducting qualitative research prior to implementation to anticipate potential barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registeration number</st>
<p>German clinical trials register (reference number: DRKS00023617).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fessler, L., Maltagliati, S., Meyer, P., Finckh, A., Cullati, S., Sander, D., Friese, M., Wiers, R. W., Farajzadeh, A., Luthy, C., Sarrazin, P., Cheval, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101558</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101558</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anatomy of a failure: a retrospective evaluation of a cognitive bias modification intervention to promote physical activity in cardiac rehabilitation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101558</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101558</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the impact, reach and implementation of a health systems intervention to improve diabetes and hypertension care in pluralistic urban public primary care in Bangladesh: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In Bangladesh, government provision of primary care in rural areas has seen the development of services for non-communicable diseases, particularly hypertension and diabetes (given their substantial rise in recent decades). However, in the context of cities, which are characterised by a plurality of providers that have sprung up to meet the demands of a rapidly growing urban population, such provision is very limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a mixed-methods study, based on the RE-AIM framework, to understand the (1) reach, (2) effectiveness, (3) adoption, (4) implementation and (5) maintenance (the five RE-AIM domains) of a health systems intervention to strengthen management processes for hypertension and diabetes within government and non-governmental organisation (NGO-run) primary care facilities. To evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, we will use a quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences design. We will recruit 20 purposively selected urban government-run and NGO-run primary care facilities across Dhaka North and South City Corporation areas. Ten facilities will be purposively allocated to an intervention group and receive training and guidance materials on diabetes and hypertension care, based on the WHO Package of Essential Non-communicable (PEN) Disease Intervention for Primary Care, and the use of an e-health application for patient records. The remaining facilities will be allocated to the existing care group and receive no intervention inputs, with identical data collection processes carried out in both groups. We aim to collect data on 50 patients visiting each facility during a baseline period and at 6 and 12 months after implementing the intervention. We will estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) for the intervention at 6 and 12 months after implementing the intervention on a primary outcome that measures how many of eight key management processes are appropriately carried out for each patient visit at a study facility (with the appropriateness of each management process determined by assessing criteria based on how patients should be managed according to the intervention guidelines). We will also estimate the ATT for the intervention at 6 and 12 months after implementing the intervention on each of the appropriate management processes making up the primary outcome as separate secondary outcomes. Alongside this design, we will collect a range of additional quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate the other RE-AIM domains, using sequential mixed methods approaches, focusing on understanding potential facilitators and barriers in relation to these domains.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval has been received from the Research Governance Committee at the University of Leeds, UK (MREC 21-008) and from the Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRCAIREC/20 I 9-2022/485). We will use a variety of channels to share our findings with policy makers, service providers, academicians and relevant stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barua, D., Hicks, J. P., Elsey, H., Das, M., Anee, U. S., Jahan, N. B., Islam, K., Chowdhury, R., Ali, M., Ebenso, B., Ensor, T., Huque, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104331</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104331</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the impact, reach and implementation of a health systems intervention to improve diabetes and hypertension care in pluralistic urban public primary care in Bangladesh: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104331</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108031?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors associated with high-cost patients with first-episode psychosis: a retrospective study of direct healthcare costs using US private-payer claims data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108031?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Understanding drivers of high healthcare utilisation costs among individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) is essential for improving care in those with psychotic disorders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To characterise and compare patient-level factors and longitudinal healthcare utilisation costs across 3 years in FEP high-cost (HC) versus non-high-cost (NHC) patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Commercial US insurance claims data from 2013 to 2019 were used to identify HC and NHC patients with FEP. HC were patients accounting for &ge;50% of total direct healthcare expenditures within the FEP cohort. Binomial logistic regression was used to identify patient-level factors associated with the HC group. Total healthcare costs and service modalities, including inpatient, outpatient, emergency and prescription drugs, were compared between HC and NHC across time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 27 587 patients with FEP, 12% were HC with higher rates of multiple psychotic disorder diagnoses (p&lt;0.001), chronic medical conditions (p&lt;0.001) and exposure to adverse social determinants of health (p&lt;0.01), particularly for economic category (p&lt;0.001), with vitamin deficiency listed as the highest frequency. Cost analysis revealed a positive relationship between psychosis- and non-psychosis-related conditions, with HC having increased inpatient use for both.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Factors associated with being HC in this nationally representative private-payer FEP population were behavioural diagnostic instability, comorbid mental and physical health conditions, and exposure to adverse social factors, including nutritional deficiency. Additionally, psychosis and non-psychosis-related costs stabilise within 2 years. These findings may be important in identifying individuals who may benefit from additional, more intensive services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sridhar, S., Hasenstab, K. A., Lochotzki, H., Montesano, V. L., Ramos, J., Hogan, T., Hefner, J. L., Breitborde, N. J., Seiber, E. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108031</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108031</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors associated with high-cost patients with first-episode psychosis: a retrospective study of direct healthcare costs using US private-payer claims data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108031</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108031</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109077?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109077?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns are critical indicators of potential adverse outcomes for the fetus during pregnancy. Early detection and identification of predictors are essential for reducing preventable neonatal mortality. Despite being one of the leading causes of neonatal death, there is limited evidence regarding the prevalence and predictors of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to assess the prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and the associated factors among labouring mothers in public hospitals within the Wolaita Zone of Southern Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 334 labouring mothers in public hospitals within the Wolaita Zone from 1 to 30 July 2024. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. Data were collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires and chart reviews. The collected data were entered into EpiData version 4.6 and subsequently exported to SPSS V.26 for analysis. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with the outcome variable. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted ORs (AORs) with 95% CIs were reported, and a p-value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns was 19.2% (95% CI 15.0 to 23.9). Labour augmentation (AOR 3.28, 95% CI 1.72 to 6.27), referred from other healthcare facilities (AOR 3.39, 95% CI 1.70 to 6.76), primigravida (AOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.74) and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (AOR 4.52, 95% CI 2.10 to 9.75) were significantly associated with non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns was found to be high. Consequently, it is essential to enhance intrapartum monitoring and prompt management of these risk factors, particularly among primigravida women and mothers transferred from other healthcare institutions to reduce the risk of adverse fetal outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fiseha, F., Assefa, G., Tekalign, T., Nima, L., Kidane, H., Alemu, B. M., Dadi, H. H., Ali, Y. Y., Tessema, Y. N., Gebeyehu, N. A., Assfaw, B. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109077</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109077</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109077</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109077</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evolution and forecasting of antiretroviral therapy utilisation in British Columbia: a population-level analysis of provincial drug treatment programme data, 2014-2024]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110123?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To characterise temporal trends in antiretroviral therapy (ART) utilisation and forecast short-term changes in regimen distribution within a provincial HIV treatment programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-level longitudinal analysis of administrative drug dispensation data combined with time-series forecasting using recurrent neural network (RNN) models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The British Columbia (BC) Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Program (DTP), which centrally coordinates and records all publicly funded ART dispensations in BC, Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All ART dispensations recorded in the DTP between fiscal years 2014/2015 and 2023/2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Temporal changes in ART dispensation volume and regimen market share. Forecasts of regimen utilisation were generated using drug-specific RNN models, and predictive performance was evaluated using different measures, including mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean absolute error. Forecast uncertainty was presented using 95% prediction intervals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>ART utilisation patterns changed substantially over the study period. Dispensation of second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens, particularly dolutegravir- and bictegravir-containing combinations, increased steadily, while utilisation of several older regimens, including generic formulations, declined in relative market share. RNN models demonstrated strong predictive performance during temporal validation, with validation MAPE ranging from 0.27% to 2.26% across regimens. For example, the model forecasting bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide utilisation showed a validation MAPE of 0.27%, indicating very small prediction error during temporal validation. Forecasts suggest that second-generation INSTI-based regimens will continue to account for the majority of ART dispensation volume within the provincial programme in the near term.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Over the past decade, ART utilisation in BC has shifted from older and generic regimens towards newer second-generation INSTI-based combinations. These changes illustrate evolving treatment patterns within a publicly funded HIV programme and may have implications for long-term programme planning as newer therapies replace existing treatment options. In addition, this study demonstrated the potential application of machine learning-based forecasting approaches for analysing pharmaceutical utilisation patterns using administrative health data. Such approaches may complement traditional pharmacoepidemiological methods and provide additional tools for monitoring treatment trends and informing health system planning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lima, V. D., Mokhtari Jazi, A., Montaner, J. S. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evolution and forecasting of antiretroviral therapy utilisation in British Columbia: a population-level analysis of provincial drug treatment programme data, 2014-2024]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110123</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110338?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Utilization of palliative care services among adult patients with cancer at Jimma University Medical Center, Jimma, southwestern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110338?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to assess palliative care service utilization among adult patients with cancer and examine how sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and patients&rsquo; perceptions of palliative care influence this behaviour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A facility-based cross-sectional study design using the multivariate logistic regression model was employed to identify sociodemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics and perceptions of patients determining palliative care service utilization among adult patients with cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>Jimma University Medical Center, Jimma, Southwestern, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 409 participants were able to complete the interviewer-administered questionnaires from 20 February to 25 December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome of the study was utilisation of palliative care services, defined by the proportion of patients who actually used the service. The independent variables included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and patients&rsquo; perceptions of palliative care utilisation, measured by Perception of Palliative Care Instrument constructs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>39.4% of the participants used palliative care services. Female gender (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.8), diploma and above educational level (AOR=1.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.6), employed occupational status (AOR=2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.3), having five or more family members (AOR=3.4, 95% CI 2.0 to 5.7), being diagnosed at Stage IV (AOR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.8) and having a good perception of palliative care needs (AOR=1.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.5) were identified as being significantly associated with the utilization of palliative care services at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The utilization of palliative care services was suboptimal among our participants. Being female and receiving a cancer diagnosis at an advanced stage contributed to the underutilisation of palliative care services. Conversely, higher educational level, being employed, increased family size and positive perception increased utilisation. Therefore, a family-centred approach to palliative care services, early integration into the care process and addressing gender inequities are highly recommended.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biratu, A., Gela, D., Tilahun, S. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110338</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110338</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Utilization of palliative care services among adult patients with cancer at Jimma University Medical Center, Jimma, southwestern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110338</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110338</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110474?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and potential risk factors of short birth interval among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh: a population-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110474?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Short birth interval is an important reproductive health concern in low- and middle-income countries, including Bangladesh, as it may have adverse consequences for both perinatal and maternal health. According to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes O09.891, O09.892 and O09.893, pregnancies occurring after a short interpregnancy interval are classified as high-risk pregnancies that require appropriate medical supervision. Understanding the risk factors associated with short birth intervals is crucial for designing effective interventions and achieving the maternal and child health targets outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence and identify the potential risk factors of short birth interval using a two-level logistic regression (LR) model and the Boruta machine learning (ML) based feature selection method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study used secondary data from the nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included 11 872 married women of reproductive age (15&ndash;49 years) in Bangladesh who reported at least one previous live birth. The demographic, socioeconomic, reproductive and media exposure-related characteristics of the study participants were obtained from the BDHS 2022 dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A two-level LR model was used to identify the risk factors associated with short birth interval, and the results were presented as adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs and p values &lt;0.05. Additionally, the Boruta ML method was applied to determine the important predictors of short birth intervals. The overlapping risk factors identified by both the LR model and the Boruta method were considered potential risk factors of short birth intervals among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh. Subsequently, three widely used ML models were implemented in the study. The performance of each model was evaluated on the test dataset using five evaluation metrics, namely accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In Bangladesh, the prevalence of short birth intervals was 34%. Both the two-level LR model and the Boruta method identified women aged &le;19 years (aOR=6.496, 95% CI 2.900 to 14.551; p&lt;0.001); residence in Sylhet (aOR=2.457, 95% CI 1.956 to 3.086; p&lt;0.001), Chattogram (aOR=1.554, 95% CI 1.279 to 1.887; p&lt;0.001), Dhaka (aOR=1.287, 95% CI 1.059 to 1.565; p=0.011), Mymensingh (aOR=1.394, 95% CI 1.118 to 1.738; p=0.003) and Rangpur (aOR=1.248, 95% CI 1.009 to 1.543; p=0.041) divisions; no education (aOR=1.399, 95% CI 1.078 to 1.816; p=0.011); poorest (aOR=1.364, 95% CI 1.146 to 1.624; p&lt;0.001), poorer (aOR=1.230, 95% CI 1.042 to 1.452; p=0.014) and middle wealth quintile (aOR=1.196, 95% CI 1.022 to 1.399; p=0.025); use of traditional contraceptive methods (aOR=1.615, 95% CI 1.305 to 1.998; p&lt;0.001) and no intention to use contraception (aOR=1.506, 95% CI 1.237 to 1.833; p&lt;0.001); birth order &ge;4 (aOR=1.467, 95% CI 1.243 to 1.730; p&lt;0.001); and having more than two children ever born (aOR=2.777, 95% CI 2.455 to 3.141; p&lt;0.001) as potential risk factors for short birth interval among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh. Among the ML-based models, the extreme gradient boosting model achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 66.356% in predicting short birth intervals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings highlight that women aged &le;19 years, those residing in the Eastern and Central divisions, women with no formal education, lower household wealth quintile, traditional or no intention to use contraceptive methods, higher birth order and having more than two children were potential risk factors for short birth interval. The extreme gradient boosting classifier showed the best performance in predicting short birth intervals among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akter, S., Islam, M. M., Tawabunnahar, M., Chowdhury, S., Takyeatun Nesa, J., Hossain, M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110474</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110474</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and potential risk factors of short birth interval among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh: a population-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110474</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110474</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110642?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The GRACE video-telehealth project protocol: a mixed-methods study to improve quality, safety and acceptability of video-telehealth in Australian general practice and residential aged care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110642?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Access to safe, high quality, acceptable and sustainable general practice (GP) and primary care services is essential to improved health outcomes and quality of life for people living in residential aged care homes (RACH). There are, however, critically low levels of service availability and a decline in GPs providing RACH services globally, suggesting there is an urgent need for safe and effective models of care. Telehealth, delivered as part of a holistic model of care, offers a solution to address this gap but comprehensive, person-centred research is needed to directly assess its effect on safety and quality of care in RACH settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This collaborative 4-year project (General practice and Residential Aged CarE: GRACE video-telehealth) will (1) scope current telehealth models of care and their acceptability and person-centredness, including identifying the barriers and enablers experienced by RACH residents, carers, staff, GPs and practice managers; (2) co-design a best-practice model of care with an accompanying suite of digital resources and education materials to improve the uptake of video-telehealth; and (3) implement and evaluate this best-practice model of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a mixed-methods study of residents, carers, RACH staff, GPs and their practice teams that will be conducted across New South Wales, Australia. This protocol describes a staged approach across three phases. In Phase 1, we will collect baseline measures of the frequency of telehealth use in GP practices and RACHs, clinical outcomes (eg, hospitalisations), questionnaires to measure person-centred care, satisfaction and usability of telehealth and qualitative observations and semi-structured interviews. In Phase 2, we will conduct workshops to co-design an intervention that will include developing a model of care to support person-centred video-telehealth, with an accompanying online hub of resources and educational materials to facilitate and support its utilisation. In Phase 3, we will implement and evaluate the intervention. Data will be analysed statistically and thematically and synthesised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval has been obtained from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2025/000340) (human.ethics@sydney.edu.au). Prior informed written consent will be obtained from all research participants. Findings from each phase of the study will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication. Project outputs will be disseminated for implementation more widely across New South Wales and Australia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carrigan, A., Baysari, M. T., Luscombe, G., McCormack, B., Von Huben, A., Tyagi, V., Taggart, R., Nash, J., Willcock, S., Wilkinson, D., Barnett, S., Bonney, A., Rhee, J. J., Pearce, C., Robinson, F., Chen, T. F., Vagholkar, S., Russell, H., Chua, A.-V., Shaban, R., Soumya, S., Sengupta, A., Makeham, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110642</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110642</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The GRACE video-telehealth project protocol: a mixed-methods study to improve quality, safety and acceptability of video-telehealth in Australian general practice and residential aged care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110642</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110642</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112452?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing the Hungarian version of the MATCH test from the original German language: an evidence-based protocol for the translation, cultural adaptation and validation of paediatric speech audiometry tests from one language into another]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112452?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Speech audiometry is widely used in routine clinical settings to assess auditory function in children. Appropriate test materials are available in languages such as English or German; however, formally validated translations do not exist in less widely spoken languages such as Hungarian. This protocol aims to describe an evidence-based process of translation, cultural adaptation and validation of a paediatric speech audiometry test from its original language into another.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Mainzer Audiometric Test for Children (MATCH) is a picture-pointing speech audiometry test for children aged 3&ndash;6 years. It will be translated from the original German into Hungarian in six phases: (1) identification of MATCH test items and validation of MATCH picture recognisability among children; (2) confirmation of linguistic conformity by comparing phoneme distribution of Hungarian test vocabulary to spontaneous Hungarian speech reference data; (3) recording of Hungarian speech material in a sound-treated environment complying with ISO 8253-3:2022 standards; (4) evaluation of the homogeneity of the intelligibility of the recorded Hungarian test items through speech recognition testing in adults; (5) standardisation of the Hungarian MATCH test on a cohort of normal-hearing children aged 3&ndash;6 years whose dominant language is Hungarian and (6) assessment of the diagnostic validity of the Hungarian version of the MATCH by comparing MATCH speech recognition thresholds to pure-tone audiometry results. To determine sensitivity, specificity and optimal cut-off points for the Hungarian test in detecting hearing loss among children aged 3&ndash;6 years, receiver operating characteristic analysis will be used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07156825), complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, and has been approved by the medical ethics committee at Semmelweis University Budapest (Ref. nr.: SE RKEB 312/2021). The study using the speech test is currently in progress. The results and conclusions will be shared with the scientific community through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07156825">NCT07156825</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vasvari, G. P., Hacki, T., Vicsi, K., Schirkonyer, V., Tamas, L., Gaborjan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112452</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112452</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing the Hungarian version of the MATCH test from the original German language: an evidence-based protocol for the translation, cultural adaptation and validation of paediatric speech audiometry tests from one language into another]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112452</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112452</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113204?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevent 6:1 trial: pI rotocol for a feasibility trial of a 6:1 intermittent diet for weight gain prevention in women at increased risk of breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113204?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Weight gain in adulthood is a common potentially modifiable breast cancer risk factor. Intermittent 5:2 diets (two low-calorie days/week) have proven efficacy for weight loss among people with overweight or obesity and can promote sustained awareness and mindfulness of diet choice and help appetite control.</p>
<p>This trial aims to test whether a less intensive 6:1 intermittent diet programme (one low-calorie day/week) is a feasible intervention to promote healthy eating and prevent weight gain in women at increased risk of breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Single arm prospective feasibility trial in 30 healthy weight women aged 18&ndash;40 years, at moderate or high risk of breast cancer (&ge;17% lifetime risk and/or &ge;3% 10 year risk at 40 years), body mass index 20&ndash;25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Participants will be entered to a 16-week 6:1 diet programme involving 1 day consuming 1000 kcal and healthy eating for 6 days a week. Participants will also be advised to meet physical activity recommendations for health (&ge;150 min of moderate intensity physical activity/week and resistance exercise two times per week). The programme will be supported remotely by dietitian calls at baseline, week 1, 4, 8, 12 and 16. Participants will also be provided access to a trial-specific private monitored Facebook group which includes information and the opportunity for peer support.</p>
<p>Co-primary outcomes are: (a) uptake to the trial, (b) retention rate, (c) adherence to the 6:1 diet and (d) participant feedback on acceptability of the programme. Secondary outcomes include characteristics of those recruited and completing the programme and a preliminary evaluation of benefits and harms. This includes changes in body weight and body composition (bioelectrical impedance), diet quality, physical activity, binge eating, sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), menstrual cycle length and potentially diet-related adverse events, that is, fatigue, constipation, dizziness, headache, indigestion. Exploratory outcomes include the impact of low-calorie days on dietary intake and physical activity across the week and any differences in adherence to the low calorie days across the menstrual cycle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial has been approved by South Central&mdash;Berkshire B Research Ethics committee (rec reference 24/SC/0321). Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, national and international cancer prevention and obesity conferences and cancer prevention charitable bodies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN14330469">ISRCTN14330469</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinsey, L., French, D., Howell, S., Gill, J., Lombardelli, C., Haiba, M., Barrett, E., Jones, N., Wisely, J., Harvie, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113204</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113204</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevent 6:1 trial: pI rotocol for a feasibility trial of a 6:1 intermittent diet for weight gain prevention in women at increased risk of breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113204</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113799?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Asymptomatic malaria parasite carriage and anaemia among senior high school students in Tempane District of the Upper East Region of Ghana: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113799?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence of malaria parasite carriage and anaemia among senior high school students and to identify the demographic, behavioural and residential factors associated with these outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Participants were enrolled from Tempane Senior High School students in the Tempane District of the Upper East Region of Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>290 senior high school students aged 15&ndash;22 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Demographic characteristics, residential status and insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) use were collected using a structured questionnaire. Venous blood samples were obtained for malaria parasite detection by microscopy and haemoglobin measurement. Association analysis was performed using logistic regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of malaria parasite carriage was 23.1%, while 49.0% of participants were anaemic. Day students had a significantly higher prevalence of malaria (59.2%) than boarding students (15.8%) (p&lt;0.001). Malaria parasite infection was also more common among students who did not use ITNs (39.7%) compared with users (5.0%) (p&lt;0.001). In multivariate analysis, not using ITN (adjusted OR (aOR)=15.97; 95% CI 6.33 to 40.32; p&lt;0.001) and being a day student (aOR=5.65; 95% CI 2.58 to 12.36; p&lt;0.001) were significant predictors of malaria parasite infection. Students infected with malaria parasites had significantly lower mean haemoglobin (11.50&plusmn;1.43 g/dL) than uninfected students (12.56&plusmn;1.35 g/dL) (p&lt;0.001). Malaria parasite infection (aOR=9.36; 95% CI 3.91 to 22.42; p&lt;0.001) and male students (aOR=2.26; 95% CI 1.09 to 4.65; p=0.028) were associated with higher odds of anaemia. Whereas age groups 18&ndash;20 years (aOR=0.41; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.97; p=0.043) and those above 20 years (aOR=0.07; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.27; p&lt;0.001) were associated with lower odds of anaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Malaria and anaemia remain prevalent among senior high school students in the Upper East Region of Ghana, with asymptomatic malaria strongly linked to anaemia. Not using ITN and being a day student significantly increased the odds of malaria parasite infection. These findings underscore the need to extend malaria prevention interventions to adolescents through school-based programmes, including routine screening, treatment and promotion of consistent ITN use, especially among day students.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Awindago, J. A., Captain-Esoah, M., Motey, G. A., Angyiereyiri, E. D., Azameti, M. K., Adjei, M. R., Donkor, M. N., Frempong, K. K., Dassah, S. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113799</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113799</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Asymptomatic malaria parasite carriage and anaemia among senior high school students in Tempane District of the Upper East Region of Ghana: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113799</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113799</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrating orthotic and prosthetic solutions into disaster risk management: a multimethod study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Disasters often cause large numbers of injuries, including fractures, lacerations and amputations, which overwhelm emergency services. Orthotic and prosthetic solutions can provide timely primary care, reduce the need for surgery and prevent complications. A structured framework for preparedness and response is required to integrate these solutions into disaster risk management. This study aims to develop such a framework to enhance rehabilitation and reduce secondary injuries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multimethod protocol comprises three phases. First, a systematic scoping review will be conducted following Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley&rsquo;s framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-Systematic Scoping review (ScR) guidelines to identify evidence on orthotic and prosthetic integration across disaster management stages. Second, qualitative content analysis will be performed through semistructured interviews with healthcare providers, policy makers and service organisations to capture perspectives on practical application. The interview data will be analysed using conventional content analysis. The rigour and trustworthiness of the findings will be evaluated using the criteria proposed by Lincoln and Guba and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Third, the Delphi method will be used to refine and consolidate recommendations for strategic integration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (ethics code: IR.USWR.REC.1404.154). Informed consent, written or verbal as appropriate, will be obtained from all interview and Delphi participants. No patients or members of the public were involved in the design or planning of this protocol. However, in future research phases, we plan to present the findings to individuals with disabilities who require orthotic/prosthetic devices. Their feedback on the proposed service delivery methods will be sought, and they may also be invited to contribute to the development of plain-language summaries of the results. Findings will also be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at relevant conferences and policy briefs for disaster management and rehabilitation authorities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saeid Ershadi, F., Khankeh, H., Hosseinzadeh Khankahi, F., Motie, M., Shirozhan, S., Saatchi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114176</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114176</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrating orthotic and prosthetic solutions into disaster risk management: a multimethod study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114176</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115453?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MAiDHouse: a qualitative study on structured community-based support for grief and bereavement in Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115453?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to understand how MAiDHouse&rsquo;s services shape the experiences of grief and bereavement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were coded in duplicate and then analysed with a content-analysis approach through MaxQDA. We developed themes deductively based on a previously published framework and inductively from the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>MAiDHouse is a community-based, national, non-profit organisation and registered charity that provides those eligible to receive medical assistance in dying (MAiD) with a supportive and comfortable setting. MAiDHouse does not provide any MAiD assessments or MAiD provisions. Instead, MAiDHouse&rsquo;s supports may affect grief and bereavement for family and friends. The goal of this qualitative study was to understand how MAiDHouse&rsquo;s services shape the experiences of grief and bereavement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We invited primary contacts of individuals who received MAiD at MAiDHouse between April and December 2022. 13 participants completed semi-structured interviews over Zoom.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants&rsquo; perceptions of MAiDHouse&rsquo;s grief and bereavement supports ranged from net neutral to positive. The location&rsquo;s accessibility, staff&rsquo;s longitudinal follow-ups and the facilitation of logistics during an emotional time are valued. During the MAiD process, there are multiple sources of confusion with regard to MAiD access, provider responsibilities and organisational roles, all of which can affect future bereavement. Participants&rsquo; appreciation for MAiDHouse is due to the responsiveness of staff, personalised and attentive communication and facilitation of logistics which in turn shaped the grief experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our study explored the lived experiences of family and friends of individuals who received MAiD at MAiDHouse. Participants generally acknowledged that MAiDHouse&lsquo;s role in their bereavement journey exceeded beyond providing a physical location. Future implications for practice include strengthening expectation-setting before provision and building interdisciplinary grief supports. MAiDHouse was perceived to be an easily accessible community resource to address multiple factors surrounding grief and bereavement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yan, H., Chhina, J., Kaplan, A., Kornberg, M., Hashemi, N., Isenberg, S., Buchman, S., Hendrickson, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115453</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115453</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MAiDHouse: a qualitative study on structured community-based support for grief and bereavement in Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115453</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115453</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115625?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the development of implementation science competency frameworks and capacity-building programmes: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115625?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The rapid global expansion of implementation science (IS) capacity-building programmes has been accompanied by the development of IS-specific competency frameworks to guide curriculum design and programme delivery. Although prior reviews have examined the outcomes of these programmes, less attention has been paid to how IS competency frameworks and capacity-building programmes are developed. Further, a recent review noted substantial heterogeneity and inconsistent definition of competencies identified across IS capacity-building programmes. As such, greater clarity is needed regarding the methodological approaches underpinning the design of IS competency frameworks and capacity-building programmes and the degree to which IS competency frameworks, capacity-building programmes and trainees&rsquo; needs are aligned.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We plan to conduct a scoping review, following the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Web of Science will be searched for articles published in English from January 2010. Peer-reviewed articles that describe the development methodology of a specific IS competency framework or capacity-building programme will be included. The review will map and synthesise the methodological approaches used to develop IS competency frameworks and capacity-building programmes, with particular attention to (a) the use of participatory methods in development processes and (b) the use of competency frameworks in the development of capacity-building programmes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and presentations at relevant conferences and workshops.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Pre-registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="https://osf.io/utyje/">osf.io/utyje/</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sivaramakrishnan, H., Moullin, J. C., Baumann, A. A., Stadnick, N. A., Myers, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115625</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115625</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the development of implementation science competency frameworks and capacity-building programmes: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115625</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115625</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119604?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Molecular characterisation of progressive pulmonary sarcoidosis: protocol for a longitudinal multi-centre study to develop peripheral blood circulating biomarkers for predicting pulmonary sarcoidosis progression]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119604?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sarcoidosis is a heterogeneous granulomatous disease with highly variable clinical trajectories, yet no validated biomarkers exist to distinguish progressive sarcoidosis (P-sarcoidosis) from non-progressive disease (NP-sarcoidosis). This lack of tractable biomarkers limits early risk stratification and impedes therapeutic decision-making. Preliminary data from our group suggest that P-sarcoidosis and NP-sarcoidosis may be differentiated by blood-derived and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-derived molecular signatures, as well as ex vivo granuloma biogenesis in response to putative disease-causing antigens. This protocol describes a multi-omic study aimed at identifying mechanistically grounded, clinically translatable biomarkers that distinguish P-sarcoidosis from NP-sarcoidosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will perform an integrative proteomic and transcriptomic analysis across three biological compartments: ex vivo granuloma model, PBMCs and plasma. Participants with clinically adjudicated P-sarcoidosis or NP-sarcoidosis will provide blood samples for multi-omic profiling. P-sarcoidosis versus NP-sarcoidosis phenotype will be assessed based on changes in spirometry, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, chest radiography and need for treatment for pulmonary symptoms. Patient-reported outcomes will also be recorded. Data-driven computational approaches will be used to identify molecular pathways associated with granuloma formation and disease persistence and to develop a classifier that distinguishes P-sarcoidosis from NP-sarcoidosis. Rigorous internal validation, feature-selection procedures and statistical controls for high-dimensional data will be applied. Candidate biomarkers emerging from multi-compartment integration will be prioritised based on biological coherence, reproducibility and clinical feasibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the Biomedical Research Alliance of New York, serving as a single Institutional Review Board (IRB) for the project (IRB # 23&ndash;02-503), as well as at National Jewish Health (IRB# HS-4091), University of Minnesota (STUDY00020121/SITE00002051) and The Ohio State University (IRB# 2023X0140). All participants will provide informed consent prior to enrolment. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and presentations to patients and advocacy groups. De-identified datasets and analytic workflows will be shared in accordance with institutional policies and data-sharing agreements.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhargava, M., Crouser, E. D., Barkes, B. Q., Weise, D. O., Perlman, D. M., Epperson, L. E., Griffin, T. J., Jagtap, P. D., Mehta, S., Li, L., Leach, S. M., Maier, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T08:03:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119604</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119604</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Molecular characterisation of progressive pulmonary sarcoidosis: protocol for a longitudinal multi-centre study to develop peripheral blood circulating biomarkers for predicting pulmonary sarcoidosis progression]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119604</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119604</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103051?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103051?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify self-report self-care scales for patients with cancer and critically evaluate their measurement properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic literature review based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A comprehensive search was conducted from database inception to March 2025 through PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and APA PsycINFO. Potentially eligible articles were also identified by consulting the reference lists of the included studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies were eligible if they reported on the development or validation of self-report instruments measuring self-care in adult patients with cancer and provided data on at least one measurement property as defined by the COSMIN framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed according to COSMIN criteria. A modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was applied to determine the level of evidence for each psychometric property and to formulate recommendations for instrument use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>30 studies involving 26 instruments were included. Three instruments, the self-management instrument for patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant therapy, the Self-Care of Oral Anticancer Agents Index and the Leuven questionnaire for Patient Self-care during Chemotherapy, were strongly recommended (Grade A) based on adequate content validity and internal consistency. In contrast, the Self-Care Agency Scale and the Breast Cancer-Related Lymphoedema Self-Care Scale were not recommended (Grade C) due to high-quality evidence for insufficient structural validity and internal consistency, respectively. Most instruments received a Grade B, indicating potential for use but requiring further validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This review highlights several gaps in psychometric evaluations, emphasising the need for future research to conduct more rigorous assessments of the measurement properties of current instruments and to develop tools that measure self-care in a broader population of oncology patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration number</st>
<p>PROSPERO (CRD42024519219; 16 March 2024).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amato, C., Iovino, P., Magi, C. E., Vellone, E., Uchmanowicz, I., Longobucco, Y., El Aoufy, K., Bambi, S., Rasero, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103051</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103051</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103051</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103051</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105173?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105173?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify cross-registrations (ie, registrations of the same trial in different registries) among clinical trials affiliated with German University Medical Centres (UMCs) and to describe how these cross-registrations are linked. To determine the consistency of key information across registrations of the same trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Registry-based study of clinical trials affiliated with German UMCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>2895 interventional trials affiliated with German UMCs, registered on ClinicalTrials.gov or the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) and completed between 2009 and 2017.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Number of potential cross-registrations involving the EU Clinical Trials Register (EUCTR) and the type of linkage between these cross-registrations. In a manually validated subset, consistency across registry entries of the same trial was assessed for prospective registration, recruitment status, completion date and availability of summary results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 625 potential EUCTR cross-registrations. The majority of potential cross-registrations (n=470; 75%) were linked through a trial registration number (TRN) in at least one of the registries. Only 109 (17%) were linked through a TRN in both registries. Title matching and TRNs in trial results publications led to an additional 155 (25%) potential cross-registrations. In a sample of 228 manually confirmed EUCTR cross-registrations, 85% (95% CI 80% to 89%; n=189) had the same overall recruitment status while 50% (95% CI 43% to 57%; n=92) had the same completion date across registrations of the same trial. EUCTR was the dominant route for summary results availability and included structured tabular results as well as other formats.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Among trials affiliated with German UMCs, cross-registrations are common, yet often inadequately linked and present discrepant information. In Germany, where registration in multiple registries is common, cross-registrations can meaningfully influence assessments of trial registration and results reporting and therefore warrant explicit consideration in transparency monitoring.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez, L., Bascunan Atria, E., Yerunkar, S. S., Salholz-Hillel, M., Nachev, V., Schorr, S. G., Strech, D., Franzen, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105173</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105173</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105173</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105173</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105217?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Online cultural experiences for mental health in people aged 16-24: a qualitative analysis of multisource data from a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105217?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To further understand young people&rsquo;s perceptions of using online arts and culture and how it impacts on mental health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This qualitative study was embedded in a proof-of-principle randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of two different online arts and culture experiences on mental health in young people (aged 16&ndash;24 years). The RCT compared the Ashmolean website (Ash) a generic museum website and Ways of Being (WoB), a codesigned stories based web experience. Three sources of data were analysed; focus group transcripts, free text responses and viewpoints. We adopted an interpretive phenomenological approach allowing deductive and inductive hybrid thematic analysis to gain critical insight into how young people make sense of phenomena relating to mental health in a complex context within a critical realist paradigm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 117 free text responses relevant to the interventions were received. The first focus group was attended by seven Ash participants and the second by six WoB participants. A total of 108 separate viewpoints were entered. The main themes identified across sources were of human connection, the content and journey of the online experience, the features, setting and when it was used, positive mental health impacts and neutral/negative effects. Positive mental health impacts were often described in association with human connection in WoB participants. Neutral and negative effects were more commonly described in participants allocated to Ash.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Continued development of online arts and culture for diverse populations using participatory and mixed methods to identify potential mechanisms are promising future areas of mental health research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04663594">NCT04663594</A>; Results</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Syed Sheriff, R., Riga, E., ODell, B., Chandler, L., Public contributor, University of Birmingham, Adams, H., Glogowska, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105217</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105217</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Online cultural experiences for mental health in people aged 16-24: a qualitative analysis of multisource data from a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105217</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105628?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A comparative evaluation of the prognostic performance of MGAP and GAP trauma scores in predicting clinical outcomes in multiple trauma patients: protocol for a prospective cohort study from Baghdad, Iraq]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105628?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Trauma remains a significant contributor to global morbidity and mortality, with low- and middle-income countries being particularly affected due to limited resources and delayed medical care. Although trauma scoring systems such as MGAP (Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, Arterial Pressure) and GAP (Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, Systolic Blood Pressure) can be used for rapid risk assessment, they have never been validated for use in conflict-affected regions like Iraq. This study assesses the prognostic accuracy of MGAP and GAP in predicting in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit admission and surgical intervention in multiple trauma cases from Iraq.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A prospective observational cohort study is set to take place at Al-Kadhimiya Teaching Hospital in Baghdad, running from April 2025 to March 2027. This study will include patients aged 16 and older who experience multiple trauma within 6 hours of the event. Estimated sample size of 522 participants. Demographic information, mechanism of injury, vital signs and clinical outcomes as a result of accidents will be collected. The MGAP and GAP scoring systems will be used and their results will subsequently be compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. This will involve assessing the area under the curve to evaluate the predictive performance of the scores. The significant threshold will be set at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the College of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University (Approval No. UNCOMIRB20250383), with approval valid from 7 March 2025 to 7 March 2027. Written and verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrolment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06732791">NCT06732791</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khamees, A. R., Gomaa, A. A., Mahgoub, A. M. A., Abotaleb, S. J., Hilali, A. E., Hajwal, S. K., Kareem, H. N., Hamdawi, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105628</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105628</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A comparative evaluation of the prognostic performance of MGAP and GAP trauma scores in predicting clinical outcomes in multiple trauma patients: protocol for a prospective cohort study from Baghdad, Iraq]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105628</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105628</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105946?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and correlates of anxiety and depression among LGBT individuals in Nepal: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105946?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) individuals have faced marginalisation and discrimination despite legal advancements, such as those in Nepal. While Nepal has constitutional protections for LGBT rights, the community still deals with social stigma, harassment and mental health challenges. Limited research exists on LGBT mental health in Nepal, with studies mostly focusing on sexual health. This study aims to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety among LGBT individuals of Kathmandu Valley, focusing on the factors associated with anxiety and depression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A community-based cross-sectional descriptive quantitative study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Conducted in urban areas of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, from January to May 2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Data were collected from 197 LGBT individuals aged 18 and above using snowball sampling, whereas individuals unable to complete the questionnaire due to language barriers were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were depression and anxiety, assessed using the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale and Beck Anxiety Inventory respectively. Secondary measures included sociodemographic and behavioural factors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study found 18.27% LGBT individuals were depressed and 25.38% of LGBT individuals had anxiety. Individuals from minority ethnic groups had higher odds of depression compared with Brahmin/Chhetri (aOR=4.31, 95% CI (1.02 to 18.20)). A history of suicide attempts was strongly associated with both depression (aOR=11.20, 95% CI (3.94 to 32)) and anxiety (aOR=3.27, 95% CI 1.46 to 7.33; p&lt;0.01). Above-average self-rated health was associated with lower odds of depression (aOR=0.34, 95% CI (0.14 to 0.87)) and anxiety (aOR=0.333, 95% CI (0.149 to 0.743)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A substantial proportion of LGBT individuals in Nepal experience depression and anxiety, with disparities linked to ethnicity, self-rated health and history of suicide attempts. These findings highlight the need for inclusive and culturally sensitive mental health interventions and targeted support strategies for this population. Further research using representative sampling and longitudinal designs is recommended.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thapa, K., Bhusal, R., Mishra, D. K. K., Shakya, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105946</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105946</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and correlates of anxiety and depression among LGBT individuals in Nepal: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105946</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105946</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107534?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a tic service model for children and young people in England: a Delphi study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107534?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop an evidence-based, consensus-driven service model for the identification, assessment and treatment of tic disorders in children and young people (CYP) in England, addressing the absence of dedicated pathways and national clinical guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Two-stage consensus study comprising a Delphi survey, expert/patient and public involvement (PPI) review and regional stakeholder workshops.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>UK healthcare and community settings relevant to tic disorder assessment and management (primary care, neurodevelopmental services, child and adolescent mental health services).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Stage 1: UK-based clinicians, researchers and practitioners with expertise in tic disorders (Delphi panel; n=49; 98% retention across rounds). Stage 2: regional stakeholders including clinicians, commissioners, service managers, third-sector representatives and parents/carers (n=36). Eligibility required relevant professional or lived experience; no exclusions applied beyond this criterion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome</st>
<p>Identification of a consensus-based component of a best-practice service model for tic disorders and barriers and facilitators to implementation across regional pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Delphi process generated consensus on 40 core components, refined to 43 following expert and PPI review. Agreed features included referral criteria, comprehensive assessment, psychoeducation, behavioural interventions, pharmacological options and integrated cross-service working. Stakeholder workshops highlighted key implementation challenges, including workforce training, funding constraints and coordination across neurodevelopmental and mental health services, informing practical adaptations to the model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This consensus-informed service model provides structured, UK-specific guidance to support earlier identification, appropriate intervention and improved care coordination for CYP with tic disorders. Future research should assess real-world implementation and impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Clinical implications</st>
<p>The model offers actionable recommendations for referral pathways, intervention provision and service configuration. Adoption may reduce diagnostic delays, minimise misdiagnosis and strengthen collaboration between primary, neurodevelopmental and mental health services, leading to improved outcomes for CYP with tic disorders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, S. S., Rattu, N. R., Hall, C. L., Kilgariff, J., Murphy, T., James, N., McNally, E., Rimmer, S., Thomson, L., Groom, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107534</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107534</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a tic service model for children and young people in England: a Delphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107534</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107534</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108400?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exposure to electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products preventive and promotional messages among schoolchildren aged 13-15 in Vietnam: a national cross-sectional study using GYTS 2022 data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108400?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The increasing use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and heated tobacco products (HTPs) among adolescents globally poses significant health risks fuelled by promotional and limited regulations. This cross-sectional study examines the prevalence of e-cigarette and HTP promotions and preventive messages and identifies factors linked to exposure and e-cigarette/HTP use among Vietnamese schoolchildren aged 13&ndash;15.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Using data from the 2022 Global Youth Tobacco Survey in Vietnam, 3873 secondary and high school students were analysed. Logistic regression was applied to assess the relationships among demographic factors, exposure to promotional, harm-preventive messages and e-cigarette/HTP use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Results revealed that only 18.3% of the students reported exposure to e-cigarette and HTP promotion messages. However, among those exposed, the majority (10.9% of the total sample) encountered these promotions primarily on social media. In comparison, 66.9% of students encountered preventive messages, mostly via television or radio (28.8% of the total sample). Higher pocket money (&ge;US$0.9 per week, OR=1.37, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.75; &ge;US$2.2 per week, OR=1.51, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.95), parental smoking (OR=2.50, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.78) and current e-cigarette/HTPs user (OR=2.58, 95% CI 1.56 to 4.30) were associated with increased exposure to promotions. Seeing promotions (social media platform: OR=2.9, 95% CI 1.7 to 5; websites: OR=3.4, 95% CI 1.4 to 8.3) significantly heightened the likelihood of using e-cigarettes and HTPs. In contrast, exposure to preventive messages does not have significant protective effects on e-cigarette/HTP use (social media platform: OR=0.8, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.5).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study highlights a critical gap in tobacco control. While digital promotional communication significantly drives the current use of e-cigarettes/HTPs among students, current preventive communication does not show a significant protective effect. Public health strategies must urgently prioritise targeting social media and internet platforms to counteract the pervasive influence of the tobacco industry on school-aged children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pham, B. D., Do, D. M., Luu, M. N., Nguyen, T. D. H., Phan, T. H., Duong, T. A., Kim, G. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108400</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108400</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Smoking and tobacco]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exposure to electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products preventive and promotional messages among schoolchildren aged 13-15 in Vietnam: a national cross-sectional study using GYTS 2022 data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Smoking and tobacco</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108400</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108400</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108477?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Controlled, before-and-after analysis and pre-post surveys to assess the effects of a community-wide sanitation system on environmental contamination, infection risk and well-being in Alabamas Black Belt: study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108477?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Rural sanitation deficits in the USA represent an important source of non-point source pollution and may present risks to public health. We propose a controlled, before-and-after (CBA) study using a difference-in-differences analysis to measure the effect of a town-wide sanitation expansion programme on the release of pathogens to the environment. This work is expected to yield valuable insight into the potential for rural sanitation improvements to reduce pathogen releases and support public health and well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We will conduct a CBA study including quantitative measurement of key enteric pathogens and faecal indicator bacteria adjacent to 30 households lacking adequate sanitation. As households connect to a new sewerage system serving the entire community, longitudinal household sampling will continue until crossover is complete. We will include 10 concurrent control sites with existing appropriate sanitation as well as 10 control sites never receiving the intervention to monitor secular trends in pathogen releases during the study period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>We will compare the concentration of culturable <I>Escherichia coli</I> in the environment preintervention and postintervention between intervention and control groups. We will use the preintervention values of culturable <I>E. coli</I> in the environment to adjust the effect size for differences between the groups at baseline. We will couple pathogen measurements with quantitative microbial risk assessment to estimate the potential effect of the intervention on infection risks via key exposure pathways. A linked pre&ndash;post survey will focus on self-reported quality of life measures among households connecting to the system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Informed consent will be obtained prior to data collection, with participants informed of study details and risks. Participation is completely voluntary, and identifiable data will be securely and separately stored from all other data. Each household will be offered a summary of their site-specific data. Deidentified results will be shared with the community in a public forum and published in peer-reviewed journals. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research (IRB) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (IRB #24-0665).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harmon, O. A., Lott, M. E. J., Holcomb, D. A., McGlohn, E., Elliott, M., White, K., Brown, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108477</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108477</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Controlled, before-and-after analysis and pre-post surveys to assess the effects of a community-wide sanitation system on environmental contamination, infection risk and well-being in Alabamas Black Belt: study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108477</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108477</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108674?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study protocol of the e-Intervention Enhancing Mental Health in Adolescents (IMPROVA) project: a randomised controlled trial to promote adolescents mental health and well-being in four European countries]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108674?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This trial aims to evaluate the impact of the IMPROVA intervention programme in improving mental health, quality of life, and well-being in adolescents enrolled in secondary schools in four European countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The IMPROVA intervention will be evaluated using a two-arm parallel group pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with an intervention and a wait-list control group. Secondary schools in France, Germany, Romania, and Spain were recruited. Originally, we estimated to enrol a total of 6000 students within 64 schools; that is, 16 schools per country. The IMPROVA programme is a multi-level intervention that provides tailored content for adolescents, families, and school staff. This content creates a unified and supportive framework that promotes mental health and social-emotional development among adolescents. A series of implementation strategies was planned to support the uptake of the programme into the education setting and among participants. Study outcomes were assessed at baseline, mid-term (during the intervention), postintervention (primary end point), and will be assessed at postintervention (secondary end-point; 6 months after postintervention). Overall mental health (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) is the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include: health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety, social isolation, and self-esteem. The trial will be evaluated regarding its effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, implementation, and social return on investment analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received the approval of human research ethics committees in France (Comit&eacute; de Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France VIII", No. 2024-A00201-46), Germany (Ulm University Ethics Committee, No. 186-24), Romania (The Research Ethics Subcommittee of the Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, No. 14.146/23.09.2024), and Spain (CEIm Fundaci&oacute; Sant Joan de D&eacute;u, No. PIC-61-24). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open-access publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Non-technical summaries will be shared with public health authorities, participants, and stakeholder organisations. All findings will be reported in aggregate form, ensuring no individual participant can be identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="NCT06556576">NCT06556576</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lima, R. A., Baumeister, H., Pryss, R., Ku&#x0308;chler, A.-M., Kraft, R., Berghoff, N., Nagel, L., Reichert, M., Idrees, A. R., Stach, M., Melchior, M., Davisse-Paturet, C., Falkiner, E., van der Waerden, J., Baban, A., Taut, D., Danila, I., Perez-Anton, M., Porricelli, D., Sanguesa, J., Moneta, M. V., Garcia-Carrion, R., Finkenauer, C., Stevens, G. W., Krabbendam, L., Bolinski, F., Maresova, P., Nilsen, P., Karlsson, N., Moreno, N., Le Corvec, A., Haro, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108674</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108674</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study protocol of the e-Intervention Enhancing Mental Health in Adolescents (IMPROVA) project: a randomised controlled trial to promote adolescents mental health and well-being in four European countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108674</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108674</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111472?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111472?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Multidrug-resistant organisms, including carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB), have a heavy health and economic burden in healthcare settings. Assessing the costs and clinical impact of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures targeted at CRGNB is essential to determine their cost-effectiveness and guide the allocation of limited resources. Systematic reviews of clinically effective IPC measures for carbapenem-resistant bacteria exist; however, similar reviews of economic analyses of IPC measures are lacking. Hence, the goal of this paper is to produce a protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations of IPC measures targeting CRGNB in healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will query CINAHL, Medline and Embase (via Ebsco), Web of Science, Cochrane, and the grey literature for studies published between 1 January 2009 and 1 January 2026. We will include quantitative studies that describe any of the IPC strategies recommended by the WHO including hand hygiene, surveillance, contact precautions, patient isolation (single room isolation or cohorting), and environmental cleaning and that apply at least one type of economic analysis, such as cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost-minimisation, cost&ndash;utility or cost&ndash;consequence. Outcomes will include net cost savings, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year, and incremental cost per disability-adjusted life-year. Each article will be screened by three coauthors independently. One coauthor and the generative artificial intelligence chatbot Elicit will independently perform data extraction using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. The extractions will then be reviewed by another co-author and compiled into a single document. Two coauthors will assess the quality of the studies using three quality assessment tools: the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklist for economic evaluations, the Drummond critical assessment for economic evaluations, and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We will calculate and report inter-rater agreement as a percentage. We will use The Dominance Ranking Matrix by the Joanna Briggs Institute to assess whether an intervention should be favoured or rejected, or if the results are unclear. Extracted data will be synthesised, and values will be adjusted to 2026 Canadian dollars using the discount rates of 3%, 5% and 8%. Sensitivity analyses will then be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>reviewregistry1948.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tchouaket, E., El-Mousawi, F., Robins, S., Leroux, S., Aw, I., Jubinville, M., Kilpatrick, K., Dery, J., Beogo, I., Villeneuve, J., Sia, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111472</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111472</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111472</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111472</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111993?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How the risk of suicide and non-suicidal self-injury is assessed, monitored and managed in randomised controlled trials of interventions for youth depression: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111993?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This scoping review examines randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for young people with depression to explore three key questions: (1) Do RCTs for young people with depression exclude participants based on risk of suicide or self-harm? (2) How is this risk monitored throughout the course of the trial? and (3) When risk is identified, how is this risk managed throughout the RCT?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This project used a scoping review methodology and was conducted in accordance with guidance in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Four electronic databases (PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE, PsychARTICLES and Embase) were searched with sets of search terms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility</st>
<p>Included studies were RCTs evaluating interventions for depressive symptoms in young people (age 18 or under). Studies published between 1988 and 2025, and in English, were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction</st>
<p>Papers retrieved were independently screened by two reviewers, first by title and abstract and then full text, in accordance with eligibility criteria. Relevant data were then extracted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>89 studies were included. Of these, 55.06% (n=49) excluded young people at screening or baseline stages for risk of suicide or self-harm, with four studies excluding over 10% of participants. Overall, 40.45% (n=36) of studies reported monitoring risk during the trial, with the majority (n=24; 66.67%) using psychometric assessment. Most studies that monitored risk took an active approach to managing it, for example, through referral to external clinical services (n=12; 33.33%) or further clinical involvement from the trial team (n=9; 25%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>To ensure that RCTs for young people with depression are reliable, safe and can be replicated in clinical settings, there needs to be greater clarity on risk procedures in trials and on the expectations of reporting and monitoring the risk of suicide or self-harm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework prior to the implementation of the search strategy (<A HREF="https://osf.io/6dz5a">https://osf.io/6dz5a</A>; registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6DZ5A).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hudson, F., Read-Williams, C., Williamson, G., Lobo, S., Hardman, A., Patel, H., Pile, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111993</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111993</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How the risk of suicide and non-suicidal self-injury is assessed, monitored and managed in randomised controlled trials of interventions for youth depression: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111993</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111993</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ATOPE study protocol: a randomised controlled trial comparing cystectomy and plasma vapourisation in endometriomas under 6 cm, with an observational arm for sclerotherapy in larger cysts]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Ablative Technique Options for Preserving fertility in Endometrioma study is a prospective, monocentric clinical study that combines a randomised controlled trial comparing cystectomy and plasma vapourisation for endometriomas measuring between 2 cm and 6 cm with a parallel observational cohort evaluating sclerotherapy for endometriomas larger than 6 cm. The primary outcome is the cumulative pregnancy rate at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include ovarian reserve, recurrence, complications and pain scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A total of 332 women with unilateral or bilateral ovarian endometriomas will be enrolled at Institut Franco-Europ&eacute;en de prise en charge multidisciplinaire de l&rsquo;endom&eacute;triose. Women with an indication for deep endometriosis surgery and endometriomas &lt;6 cm will be randomised to receive either laparoscopic cystectomy or plasma vapourisation. Women with endometriomas &gt;6 cm will be allocated to a prospective observational cohort undergoing laparoscopic sclerotherapy. The primary endpoint will be the cumulative pregnancy rate (spontaneous or assisted) at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include live birth rates, spontaneous and assisted reproductive technology pregnancy rates, rate of ongoing pregnancies beyond 12 weeks&rsquo; gestational age, recurrence rates and postoperative complications. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses will be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by the Comit&eacute; de protection des personnes &Icirc;le-de-France II, the study adheres to Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. Outcomes will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and international congresses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07119060">NCT07119060</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crestani, A., Merlot, B., Chanavaz Lacheray, I., Dennis, T., Goualard, P.-H., Roman, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112291</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112291</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ATOPE study protocol: a randomised controlled trial comparing cystectomy and plasma vapourisation in endometriomas under 6 cm, with an observational arm for sclerotherapy in larger cysts]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112291</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112882?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Senior managements understanding of and response to climate goals in healthcare: a qualitative study in a Swedish hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112882?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Healthcare is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, and sector-specific policies and goals are recommended as governance tools. Despite leadership playing a critical role in reducing emissions, there is limited empirical research on how healthcare managers perceive and navigate climate goals and actions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore how members of a hospital&rsquo;s senior management team understand and respond to climate goals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study design, semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analysed thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A hospital in Sweden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Members (n=15) of the hospital&rsquo;s senior management team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five themes were identified. Senior managers recognised the importance of climate goals (theme 1), but their understanding of these varied&mdash;from perceiving them as concrete and actionable to abstract and irrelevant at the departmental level (theme 2). Climate goals were described as both visible and invisible (theme 3), and as both in alignment and in competition with other organisational goals (eg, patient safety, budget constraints) (theme 4). There was a common understanding that they, and the hospital, could do more to reduce emissions but knowledge gaps, limited resources, monitoring challenges, as well as systemic constraints, challenged advancement (theme 5). These dynamics led to two co-existing patterns of responses: a <I>virtuous cycle</I> of climate action and a <I>vicious cycle</I> of climate inaction in which uncertainty prevailed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Climate goals can act as both catalysts and inhibitors to climate actions in hospitals, depending on how they are understood and operationalised by senior managers. Policymakers and healthcare system leaders must address the uncertainty surrounding climate goals to advance climate action.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mazzocato, P., Hasson, H., Kulstadvik, S., Taxen, M., Sa&#x0308;vblom, C., Sturesson Stabel, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112882</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112882</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Senior managements understanding of and response to climate goals in healthcare: a qualitative study in a Swedish hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112882</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112882</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113711?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of symptoms associated with occupational exposure to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene among gas station workers: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113711?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Gas station workers are at increased risk of inhaling volatile chemical compound vapours that may cause headaches, dizziness, fatigue, eye and nasal irritation, as well as haematological and neurological changes. This systematic review aims to estimate the prevalence of symptoms associated with occupational exposure to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene vapours among fuel station workers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will be conducted between February and July 2026. Literature searches will be carried out between February and March 2026 across the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (PubMed/MEDLINE), Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases. Grey literature will be searched using OpenGrey. Eligible studies will include cross-sectional and case-control designs. No language or publication date restrictions will be applied. The systematic review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two reviewers will independently select the studies, assess their eligibility using predefined criteria and standardised forms, and extract data. Combined prevalence estimates will be calculated in the meta-analysis using a random effects model with 95% CIs. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RevMan (version 5.3.5) will be used for qualitative and quantitative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this protocol, as the review and meta-analysis will be based exclusively on secondary data and will not involve the collection of primary data. Findings will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences, publication in peer-reviewed journals, and communication with workers, employers and policy-makers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251159127.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mendes, T. d. M. C., Medeiros, K. S., Oliveira, R. F. S. d., Carlan Padilha, L., Castro, J. L. d.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113711</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113711</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of symptoms associated with occupational exposure to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene among gas station workers: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113711</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113711</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hand hygiene awareness and handwashing effectiveness in caregivers of surgical patients: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate surgical patients&rsquo; caregivers&rsquo; hand hygiene knowledge and to examine the discrepancy between reported knowledge and actual hand cleanliness following caregiving activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>General surgery inpatient clinics of a tertiary university-affiliated hospital in Turkey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Caregivers of patients hospitalised in general surgery inpatient clinics; a total of 128 caregivers participated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was caregivers&rsquo; hand hygiene knowledge score. The secondary outcome was observed hand cleanliness, assessed using fluorescent simulation gel and ultraviolet light across different hand regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the 128 caregivers (65.6% women; mean age 45.7&plusmn;14.8 years), hand hygiene knowledge was high (mean score: 98.9&plusmn;3.9). However, observations under ultraviolet light revealed residual contamination, particularly at the wrist. Caregivers with clean wrists had significantly higher knowledge scores than those with contamination (p&lt;0.05). Although caregivers reported frequent handwashing, only 43% reported receiving encouragement from healthcare staff. Inter-observer reliability was excellent, with Cohen&rsquo;s kappa values ranging from 0.864 to 0.913.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Although caregivers of surgical patients demonstrated high hand hygiene knowledge, a gap between knowledge and observed practice was identified, particularly in less visible areas such as the wrists. These findings suggest that strategies beyond knowledge transfer, including visual training tools and increased engagement of healthcare professionals, may help improve practical hand hygiene behaviours and infection prevention.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O&#x0308;zer O&#x0308;zlu&#x0308;, N. G., Mutlu, I., Ko&#x0308;ken, S., K&#x0131;l&#x0131;carslan, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114196</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114196</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hand hygiene awareness and handwashing effectiveness in caregivers of surgical patients: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114196</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114320?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients with non-acute fragile brain function (NFBF): a study protocol of bi-center, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114320?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common acute central nervous system syndrome in elderly patients following surgery. Due to pre-existing brain tissue damage, elderly patients with non-acute fragile brain function (NFBF) are at higher risk of developing POD, which can lead to long-term cognitive impairment, postoperative complications increasing and prolong hospitalisation. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been demonstrated to play a significant role in treating various neurological disorders, including epilepsy, depression and consciousness impairment. However, its efficacy in preventing POD in elderly NFBF patients remains unknown. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of perioperative taVNS on the incidence of POD in elderly NFBF patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A bi-centre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial will be conducted at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences, China, from December 2025 to December 2026. A total of 148 elderly NFBF patients (&ge;60 years old) undergoing abdominal surgery will be enrolled and randomly allocated to two groups: the taVNS group (receiving transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation) and the tnVNS group (receiving transcutaneous non-vagus nerve stimulation). The primary outcome will be the incidence of POD within 5 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include delirium severity, changes in biomarkers, postoperative delayed cognitive dysfunction, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores, recovery of gastrointestinal function, anaesthesia-associated parameters, economic indicators, and the incidence of perioperative complications or other serious adverse events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and adheres to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was written in accordance with the 2013 Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials guidelines. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national or international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ITMCTR2025002263.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hao, S., Zhang, F., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., An, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114320</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114320</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients with non-acute fragile brain function (NFBF): a study protocol of bi-center, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114320</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114352?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of home-based digital-assisted dyadic Tai Chi training in Chinese chronic heart failure patients and family caregivers: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114352?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Lack of exercise or sustained low engagement in exercise represents a significant risk factor for adverse health outcomes among chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. Concurrently, family caregivers of patients with CHF often endure considerable caring burdens, leading to low quality of life (QoL) and diminished health status. Substantial evidence supports that Tai Chi has beneficial effects on cardiac function and heart failure prognosis. However, conventional Tai Chi interventions are often constrained by limitations such as site dependency and overlook the roles and needs of caregivers. Therefore, we developed a home-based, digital-assisted dyadic Tai Chi training programme aimed at improving health outcomes for both patients with CHF and their family caregivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a two-arm parallel, single-blinded randomised controlled trial. Patients with CHF and their family caregivers will be randomly assigned to (1) intervention group, participate in usual care plus a 12-week home-based digital-assisted dyadic Tai Chi training programme, comprising a 30-min online educational seminar, 1-hour online nurse-led dyadic coaching session, 1-hour preliminary Tai Chi training session and subsequent 12-week supervised dyadic Tai Chi practice; or (2) control group, only receive usual care. Outcome assessments encompass three perspectives: patients with CHF, caregivers and dyads. The primary outcome is functional capacity and cardiac function in patients with CHF. Secondary outcomes include: exercise self-efficacy of patients with CHF, sedentary behaviour, fear of activity, hospital admission and health-related QoL; care burden and QoL of caregivers; and mutuality, depression, anxiety and stress for both patients with CHF and their caregivers. Process evaluation will be implemented by assessing participation adherence and attrition. Adverse events will be recorded for safety assessment. Data will be collected at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1) and 12 weeks (T2) after initiation of the intervention. Intention-to-treat and sensitivity analysis (including per-protocol and subgroup analysis) will be performed using generalised estimating equations models. The minimal clinically important difference for primary outcomes will also be explored using the <sup>2</sup> test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HSEARS20240904005) and the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through conference presentation to provide a novel paradigm for optimising dyadic well-being in patients with CHF and their caregivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06876441">NCT06876441</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Y., Ngai, F. W., Wei, L., Lu, X., Liang, J., Xie, Y. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114352</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114352</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of home-based digital-assisted dyadic Tai Chi training in Chinese chronic heart failure patients and family caregivers: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114352</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114352</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114465?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-designed web platform (TeenFit) to identify physical activity mobile apps for Spanish adolescents: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114465?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adolescence is a critical period marked by physiological and psychological changes that influence long-term health. Establishing healthy behaviours, particularly regular physical activity, is essential during this stage; however, around 80% of young people do not meet the WHO&rsquo;s physical activity recommendations. Digital technologies offer promising opportunities to promote health among youth, yet most physical activity mobile applications (apps) lack scientific validation and usability. Unlike psychology, which has validated repositories to guide users in selecting mental health apps, physical activity lacks validated repository platforms, especially for adolescents. The project has a twofold aim: (1) to co-design a website, named the TeenFit website, that facilitates the selection of physical activity apps tailored to each adolescent&rsquo;s individual needs and preferences and (2) to investigate the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the TeenFit website in real-world settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Adolescents and other stakeholders (ie, caregivers, educators, and health professionals) will be engaged in the development of the TeenFit website app finder through a participatory design approach that involves three workshops, encompassing both a development phase and an implementation phase. Approximately 10&ndash;12 participants per group will take part in smaller working groups to collaboratively contribute to the co-design of the TeenFit website. TeenFit will include physical activity apps available in the Spanish market, developed in both English and Spanish. These applications are currently being identified through two ongoing systematic reviews. In addition to qualitative data gathered during the audio- and video-recorded workshops, quantitative data will be collected on participants&rsquo; co-design experiences and the acceptability of the TeenFit website. Data analysis will involve descriptive statistics, qualitative content analysis for describing participants&rsquo; perspectives on what aspects (ie, content, features and layout) are important for the design of the website and reflexive thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee in the province of M&aacute;laga (Spain) (REC ref: SICEIA-2024-003172). Research findings will be disseminated primarily via national and international conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Patient and public involvement will inform further dissemination activities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seitero&#x0308;, A., Ruiz-Moreno, A., Alcarazo, A., Garrido-Gonzalez, C., Ballesta-Rodriguez, M. I., Henriksson, P., Lima, R. A., Alvarez-Perez, Y., Reigal, R. E., Campos Paino, H., Bellon, J. A., Motrico, E., Flores-Lopez, M., Rodriguez-Ayllon, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114465</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114465</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-designed web platform (TeenFit) to identify physical activity mobile apps for Spanish adolescents: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114465</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114465</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114884?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[TIPS (Trans-Tasman Internet-delivered Prevention of (youth) Suicide) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of mobile health interventions (four apps) to help young people reduce suicidal ideation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114884?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Suicidal ideation is common in young people and increases the risk of suicide. Effective interventions that are relevant and accessible to young people, so-called digital natives, are urgently required. There are key questions regarding the cross-cultural efficacy of suicide prevention applications (apps) for scalability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This online four-arm parallel randomised controlled superiority trial will enrol 1480 young people aged 16&ndash;24 years with current suicidal ideation in New Zealand and Australia. Participants will be randomised to one of three therapeutic apps developed in different countries, Tune In, Bro and LifeBuoy, or to My Mood (attention control). The primary outcome is suicidal ideation severity at 30-day and 90-day post-baseline; secondary outcomes include mental well-being, engagement and acceptability. Emotional regulation will be examined as a mediator of change in suicidal ideation. All outcomes are measured by self-reported scales incorporated in an online questionnaire. Acceptability of the apps for rangatahi M&#x0101;ori (Indigenous youth, New Zealand) will be explored via semi-structured interviews. Linear mixed models with repeated measures analyses, using maximum likelihood estimation, an appropriate covariance structure and consideration of site effects, will be undertaken. Examination of an individual app intervention effects in New Zealand and Australia will highlight the effects of apps developed for a different country.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approval was obtained (26 February 2025) from the Health and Disability Ethics Committees (Ministry of Health ref 2025 EXP 21500). Participants provide informed consent online. Trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, shared on relevant websites and via presentation at international scientific conferences; Individial Patient Data will only be shared if requested and subsequent to review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12625000349448.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ludin, N., Torok, M., McGillivray, L., Wong, Q., Fortune, S., Meinhardt, I., Thabrew, H., Cargo, T., Hetrick, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114884</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114884</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[TIPS (Trans-Tasman Internet-delivered Prevention of (youth) Suicide) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of mobile health interventions (four apps) to help young people reduce suicidal ideation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114884</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114884</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115018?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tabriz model: a qualitative study protocol exploring a decade of implementing a comprehensive child development centre]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115018?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Rapid and sensitive early childhood development is vital for lifelong health, cognition and socio-emotional well-being. Suboptimal care during these formative years increases the risk of developmental delays affecting motor, cognitive, speech, hearing and visual domains. Early identification and intervention can mitigate these risks but structured, integrated service delivery remains limited in many low- and middle-income countries. Since 2014, comprehensive child development centres (CCDCs) have been established under Iran&rsquo;s Ministry of Health to address these gaps, with Tabriz hosting one of the pioneering centres. This qualitative study protocol aims to systematically document the implementation of the Tabriz CCDC over a decade, identifying key facilitators and barriers essential for shaping a scalable, evidence-based model of comprehensive child development services adaptable to Iran&rsquo;s health system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A qualitative, exploratory study design grounded in phenomenology will be employed to explore the lived experiences of key stakeholders involved in implementing the CCDC in Tabriz over 10 years. Purposeful and snowball sampling will recruit diverse participants, including policymakers, healthcare providers and parents of children under five. Data collection will include semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions conducted until thematic saturation is reached. Audio-recorded data will be transcribed verbatim and analysed using framework-guided content analysis. A triangulated approach will integrate document reviews and stakeholder questionnaires to enrich findings. Methodological rigour will be ensured through member checking, peer debriefing and double coding. Ethical considerations such as informed consent and confidentiality will be strictly maintained. The study&rsquo;s reporting will adhere to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) 32-item checklist, guaranteeing transparency, completeness and methodological rigour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Two separate ethical approval codes were issued for the qualitative protocol of this study IR.TBZMED.REC.1404.025 and IR.TBZMED.REC.1404.139. Separate informed consent forms have been developed for all stakeholder groups. Participants will provide oral and written consent before interviews or focus group discussions, and audio recordings will be conducted only with their permission; for those who do not consent to recording, detailed notes will be taken. Participants will be informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without consequence. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and policy meetings to inform future strategies for comprehensive child development services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amir-Behghadami, M., Tabrizi, J.-S., Heidarabady, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115018</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115018</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tabriz model: a qualitative study protocol exploring a decade of implementing a comprehensive child development centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115018</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115018</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115296?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of the serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis vaccine (4CMenB) in preventing experimental Neisseria gonorrhoeae urethral infection: a double-blind randomised controlled human challenge study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115296?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Rates of sexually transmitted infections are on the rise globally, including those caused by <I>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</I>. Retrospective analyses across clinical settings around the world have indicated that rates of gonorrhoea declined following mass campaigns with vaccines made with outer membrane vesicles (OMV) from <I>N. meningitidis</I> serogroup B, a pathogen closely related to <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I>. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved <I>N. meningitidis</I> serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) contains <I>N. meningitidis</I> OMV and five recombinant protein components: factor H-binding protein (fHbp), Neisserial heparin-binding antigen (NHBA), Neisseria adhesin A (NadA) and the fusion partners genome-derived Neisseria antigen (GNA) 2091 and GNA1030 (used to stabilise fHbp and NHBA, respectively); <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> encodes homologues of fHbp, NHBA, GNA2091 and GNA1030, but not NadA. Humans and mice immunised with 4CMenB have been shown to develop antibodies directed against <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> antigens, and 4CMenB immunised mice exhibit enhanced <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> clearance in a vaginal-infection model versus mock immunised mice. Collectively, these data led to the hypothesis that immunisation with 4CMenB may provide cross-protection against <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I>. There is a unique and time-sensitive opportunity to test the effectiveness of this vaccine in preventing <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> using the human male urethral challenge model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a double-blind randomised controlled trial testing the efficacy of the FDA-approved 4CMenB vaccine in preventing experimental <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> infection. Our research team is currently the only in the world to use the established controlled human infection model to study <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> in its natural human host. Males aged &gt;18 years and &lt;36 years with no medical contraindication to 4CMenB administration, no contraindication to intraurethral challenge with <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> and who are willing and able to consent and participate in the study will be enrolled in this study. Participants who complete both immunisation and <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> challenge phases will be included in the primary endpoint analyses of <I>N. gonorrhoeae</I> infection in each study group to determine the efficacy of standard immunisation with 4CMenB in preventing experimental gonococcal infection. The secondary objective is to determine whether 4CMenB vaccinations change or delay the onset of urethritis symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>All participants enrolled in the study provided informed consent twice. This study has been reviewed and approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board (#21-0498). Data collection for this study is ongoing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05294588">NCT05294588</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Waltmann, A., Kronk, C., Lapple, D., Motley, M. P., Lin, F.-C., Sena, A. C., Hobbs, M. M., Duncan, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115296</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115296</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of the serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis vaccine (4CMenB) in preventing experimental Neisseria gonorrhoeae urethral infection: a double-blind randomised controlled human challenge study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115296</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115296</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115669?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrated acoustic and respiratory biomarkers of dysarthria in acquired brain injury: protocol for a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115669?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Dysarthria secondary to acquired brain injury (ABI) is a motor speech disorder characterised by impaired coordination of the respiratory, phonatory and articulatory subsystems, with a negative impact on communication and quality of life. Previous studies have largely examined these components separately, which limits understanding of their functional interactions. An integrated approach combining respiratory and acoustic&ndash;articulatory measures may improve the characterisation of dysarthria and support the identification of objective markers of severity. The aim of this study is to jointly analyse respiratory function and speech acoustic parameters in adults with ABI and to examine their association with the presence and severity of dysarthria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A cross-sectional observational study will be conducted in adults with a confirmed diagnosis of ABI, both with and without dysarthria, with an estimated sample size of 97&ndash;101 participants. The protocol will include collection of sociodemographic and clinical data, cognitive assessment using the Mini-Mental State Examination, swallowing assessment using the Eating Assessment Tool-10, acoustic and aerodynamic analyses following standardised procedures, respiratory function assessment using spirometry and perceptual evaluation of dysarthria using the Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment-2. Between-group comparisons and multivariate analyses will be performed to examine associations between respiratory, acoustic, aerodynamic and dysarthria severity measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee for Research with Medicines of the Salamanca Health Area (CEIm PI 2025 04 1897-TD) and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent must be provided by all participants prior to inclusion. Findings will be disseminated at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. Anonymised data will be made available following publication of the main results, in compliance with data protection regulations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07435155">NCT07435155</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Argoubi, A., Diez Garcia, R., Hernandez Moreda, B., Martin-Nogueras, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115669</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115669</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrated acoustic and respiratory biomarkers of dysarthria in acquired brain injury: protocol for a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115669</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115669</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116035?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pilot multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial assessing prevention of recurrent DIverticulitis through the use of pelvic floor PHYSIOtherapy: DIPHYSIO study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116035?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite the ubiquity of diverticular disease, the options for reducing the risk of recurrent diverticulitis remain limited and the pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. While high intraluminal pressures within the distal colon and rectum have been proposed as a possible association with diverticular disease, studies on this relationship have been few, inconsistent and not generalisable. The investigators of this pilot study propose that the repeated transient high intraluminal pressures generated within the distal colon and rectum due to ineffective defecatory technique may predispose some patients to an increased risk of diverticulosis and diverticulitis. Therefore, by correcting defecatory technique through the implementation of pelvic floor physiotherapy (PFPT), the investigators hypothesise that there would be a reduction in the risk of recurrent diverticulitis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This pilot multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial will be conducted at Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital and Logan Hospital in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Eligible adult patients admitted with acute diverticulitis will be considered for enrolment and randomised into two groups in a 1:1 allocation ratio. The aim is to recruit 40 patients with 20 patients per group. The control group will receive standard of care dietary advice. The intervention group will receive PFPT as an outpatient within 4 weeks of discharge. The primary endpoint will be the risk of readmission with recurrent diverticulitis within a 12-month follow-up period. Secondary endpoints will be the risk of surgical intervention and/or interventional radiology procedure in the subgroup of patients readmitted with recurrent diverticulitis. Feasibility outcomes will review patient compliance and completeness of data collection. Results of this trial will inform study design and sample size required in a larger prospective study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at the participating centre. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12625000927426.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aumeerally, M. I., Gillespie, C., Warwick, A., Bryant, A., Hooper, K., Ong, F., Burstow, M., Walkenhorst, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116035</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116035</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pilot multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial assessing prevention of recurrent DIverticulitis through the use of pelvic floor PHYSIOtherapy: DIPHYSIO study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116035</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116035</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116538?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[E-Patient Quality Improvement and Standardisation (EQIS) platform for improving maternal and paediatric clinical care in Bangladesh: study protocol for a prospective open cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116538?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Inappropriate healthcare practices are major contributors to poor outcomes of maternal and paediatric patients. Where resources are scarce, provider-level targeted interventions, such as implementation of standardised, evidence-based protocols and quality improvement initiatives, are particularly needed to address these gaps in care. Simulation-based tools have been shown to have a promising effect on improving clinical care management. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a simulation-based platform called E-Patient Quality improvement and Standardisation (EQIS) in improving maternal and paediatric healthcare in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study employs a prospective, open-cohort design and will be conducted across five tertiary-level hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. All physicians engaged in providing maternal or paediatric care will be recruited. The EQIS platform will facilitate the development of online simulated cases, aiming to enhance physician practice and patient outcomes through involvement and immediate personalised feedback. The development of cases will consist of several stages of review by expert clinicians, ensuring that the cases align with national and local practice guidelines. Each participant physician will work on three cases per round, completing one of six rounds every 4 months for 2 years. The primary outcome will be the change in mean EQIS clinical performance score among participating physicians across evaluation rounds. Descriptive and inferential analysis will be done to assess trends in clinical performance and pinpoint areas for improvement. In addition, patient-level pre-impact and post-impact data will be collected. These data will evaluate the impact of the EQIS platform on physician performance, as measured by changes in patient satisfaction, treatment costs, referrals and facility utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol was approved by the National Research Ethics Committee of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council (registration number: 59524062024). Dissemination of the study findings will be through meetings with stakeholders, conference presentations and publications in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed, S., Khan, A. M., Ibrahim, S. B., Ahmad, F., Hossain, M. M., Tabassum, A., Khan, S. A., Ahmed, S., Chowdhury, N. H., Islam, M. S., Kawser, C. A., Shahidullah, M., Begum, F., Begum, F., Dewan, F., Johnson, S., Ouenes, O., Elias, M., Baqui, A. H., Peabody, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116538</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116538</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[E-Patient Quality Improvement and Standardisation (EQIS) platform for improving maternal and paediatric clinical care in Bangladesh: study protocol for a prospective open cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116538</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116538</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118207?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comprehensive proteomic classifier for molecular characterisation of pulmonary sarcoidosis: protocol for a longitudinal multi-centre study to evaluate bronchoalveolar fluid and cell diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of pulmonary sarcoidosis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118207?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder with variable presentation and disease course. Diagnosis requires the exclusion of other causes of granulomatous inflammation. Current clinical management is often fraught with diagnostic uncertainy and the lack of tools to predict pulmonary disease progression. To address these challenges, we designed a study using data from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and cells to develop diagnostic and prognostic tools in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and Analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre study will include discovery and validation cohorts of healthy controls, interstitial lung disease controls and pulmonary sarcoidosis cases from three study sites. Sarcoidosis participants will be grouped into progressive and non-progressive pulmonary disease based on changes in pulmonary function testing, chest radiographs or treatment requirements. The discovery cohort consists of participants with existing BAL fluid, BAL cells, and clinical datasets; the validation cohort will be prospectively enrolled and participants will consent for BAL collection from either a clinical or research bronchoscopy. Untargeted proteomic profiling of BALF along with statistical modelling with variable selection techniques will generate a classifier for diagnosis and prognosis. Targeted proteomics using parallel reaction monitoring&ndash;mass spectrometry will be used for internal and external validation. Additionally, BAL cell single-cell gene-expression analysis using Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-seq) will be integrated with proteome-wide data to elucidate cell-specific pathways implicated in the development and progression of sarcoidosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and Dissemination</st>
<p>The study will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol has been approved by the Biomedical Research Alliance of New York Institutional Review Board (IRB), which serves as the single IRB across all study sites. The findings of this study will be presented as abstracts at scientific meetings and summarised in peer-reviewed journal manuscripts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhargava, M., Weise, D. O., Barkes, B. Q., Jagtap, P. D., Mehta, S., Lock, E. F., Kakoty, B., Perlman, D. M., Dincer, E. H., Restrepo, C. I., Griffin, T. J., Fingerlin, T. E., Li, L., King-Biggs, M., Maier, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T06:07:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118207</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118207</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comprehensive proteomic classifier for molecular characterisation of pulmonary sarcoidosis: protocol for a longitudinal multi-centre study to evaluate bronchoalveolar fluid and cell diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of pulmonary sarcoidosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118207</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e092678?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a community home-based dual-supplier cooperation care model for people with dementia based on an intelligent decision-assistance system: protocol of a 1-year randomised controlled trial in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e092678?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Dementia imposes significant care and financial burdens on families and countries globally. While high-quality home-based care is crucial, the current supply chain of care&mdash;relying on family caregivers and community healthcare workers&mdash;remains fragmented and lacks effective integration. Furthermore, although artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise, existing applications predominantly focus on diagnosis or monitoring rather than holistic care delivery and quality of life (QoL). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the community home-based dual-supplier cooperation (CHDSC) care model in older people with dementia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A 1-year, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, superiority randomised controlled trial with 1:1 allocation will be conducted. A total of 200 pairs (community-dwelling people with dementia aged &ge;65 years and their primary family caregivers) will be recruited from four community health centres in Guangzhou, China, and randomly assigned to either the CHDSC care model intervention or usual care. The intervention comprises monthly home visits following a structured six-step cycle (problem assessment, personalised recommendation generation, case seminar, training, task execution with progressive handover and reassessment), delivered collaboratively by community healthcare workers and family caregivers and guided by an intelligent decision-assistance system. The primary outcome is the QoL of patients assessed using the Quality of Life in Alzheimer&rsquo;s Disease scale. Secondary outcomes include caregiver burden, quality of home-based care, behavioural and psychological symptoms, cognitive function, ability to perform activities of daily living, adverse event rate and unplanned readmission rate. A comprehensive process evaluation embedded in the randomised controlled trial will be taken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Jinan University. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2300075393: Implementation and effectiveness evaluation of a home-based dual-supplier cooperation care model for community-dwelling patients with dementia based on intelligent decision assistance system</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhuang, Z., Li, C.-y., Li, W.-h., Wang, Y.-q., Wang, Y., Hou, Y.-s., Wang, Z.-w., Xu, M.-m., Lyu, Q.-y., Xie, J.-y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092678</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-092678</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a community home-based dual-supplier cooperation care model for people with dementia based on an intelligent decision-assistance system: protocol of a 1-year randomised controlled trial in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e092678</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e092678</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103766?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of an insertable cardiac monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in large- or small-vessel disease ischaemic stroke in the USA]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103766?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) compared to standard of care (SoC) to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with stroke of presumed known cause of large-artery atherosclerotic disease (LAD) or small-vessel occlusive disease (SVD) from a US payer perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A lifetime Markov model assessed cost-effectiveness of ICM versus SoC from a US payer perspective. Patient characteristics and AF detection rates were based on the STROKE AF trial (NCT02700945): 3-year diagnostic yield was 21.7% (95% CI 16.7% to 27.9%) for ICM and 2.4% (1.0%&ndash;5.7%) for SoC. AF detection resulted in a switch from aspirin to direct oral anticoagulant unless precluded by prior bleeding. Subsequent risks of ischaemic strokes (ISs) and bleeding events were modelled based on published literature. Costs and effects were discounted at 3% annually. Specific SoC short-term monitoring strategies (STMs) were explored as scenarios.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>US healthcare system perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Hypothetical cohort of patients with IS believed to be due to LAD or SVD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Patients received an ICM within ten days of the index stroke or SoC involving conventional follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Stroke and bleeding risk, mortality, health-related quality of life and healthcare cost and utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>ICM was associated with a gain of 0.176 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with SoC per patient, representing a reduction of 53 strokes per 1000 patients. The lifetime incremental cost of ICM was $6736 per patient. This resulted in an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $38 346 per QALY gained, making ICM a cost-effective intervention at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50 000&ndash;$150 000 per QALY in the USA. ICMs were also cost-effective compared with various individual STMs, with ICERs ranging from $29 814 to $38 941 per QALY gained. The mean probabilistic ICER across 5000 samples was $46 910 per QALY (97.5% CI$45 421 to $53 523). Results were sensitive to anticoagulant uptake on AF detection and underlying stroke risk. Model findings were robust to both probabilistic sensitivity analysis and sensitivity analyses where inputs tested were considered within plausible ranges, as ICM was found cost-effective in these analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ICMs are highly likely to be a cost-effective diagnostic tool for secondary prevention of stroke related to AF in US patients with prior stroke attributed to LAD or SVD. However, further research is needed to understand the efficacy of secondary stroke prevention treatments in patients with stroke attributed to LAD or SVD and subclinical AF.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reynolds, M. R., Pollit, V., Schwamm, L., Witte, K. K., Yaghi, S., Rose, D. Z., Cudworth, S., Carpenter, J., Rosemas, S. C., Ziegler, P. D., Neisen, K., Franco, N. C., Bernstein, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103766</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103766</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of an insertable cardiac monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in large- or small-vessel disease ischaemic stroke in the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103766</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103766</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104683?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy in reducing infertility distress in women: a community-based randomised crossover trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104683?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Infertility is a global health concern affecting 10%&ndash;15% of couples, often accompanied by profound psychological distress for women. Various psychological interventions being trialled in this population, outcomes have been mixed, underscoring the need for innovative therapeutic approaches. Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy, originally developed for trauma-related conditions, is a promising alternative. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of EMDR therapy in reducing infertility-related distress and improving psychological well-being among women undergoing fertility treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a randomised crossover trial with two groups: an immediate EMDR therapy treatment group and a waitlist control group. 64 women who meet eligibility criteria for infertility-related psychological distress will be randomly assigned (1:1) using block randomisation. The intervention consists of 6 weekly EMDR sessions delivered by an accredited EMDR practitioner. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, post-treatment and 3-month follow-up. Outcomes include infertility-related distress measured by the Infertility Distress Scale (IDS) and Fertility Quality of Life scale (FertiQoL), Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), trauma symptoms measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and the Impact of Event Scale &ndash; Revised (IES-R), psychological well-being measured by Ryff&rsquo;s Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS), self-esteem measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), general health measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and coping strategies measured by the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief-COPE). A qualitative component using reflexive thematic analysis will explore participants&rsquo; subjective experiences of EMDR and infertility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial has received ethical approval from the RMIT University Human Research Ethics Committee (2025-28286-27180). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and participant summaries. All participants will provide written informed consent, and those in the waitlist group will receive the intervention following the initial study period, aligning with ethical principles of beneficence and justice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12624001289505p.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson, P. L., Saunders, P., Mizzi, S., Hallam, K. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104683</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104683</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy in reducing infertility distress in women: a community-based randomised crossover trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104683</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105347?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk and protective factors associated with psychological distress and the mediating role of resilience among physician educators in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105347?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Academic and clinical medicine place different, but equivalently exacting demands on their practitioners. Physician educators in Hong Kong (HK) must straddle both of these environments simultaneously, and also negotiate unspoken culturally nuanced workplace expectations, contributing to the high stress and turnover rate within this population. Limited literature exists regarding psychological distress among physician educators in an Asian context more broadly, and HK more specifically, making it difficult to design culturally appropriate interventions to mitigate their distress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the risk and protective factors associated with psychological distress among physician educators affiliated with one of two medical schools in HK, and to investigate the mediating role of resilience in relation to these factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional survey study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>One medical school in HK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>333 physician educators who were full-time, part-time or honorary clinical academic staff at one HK medical school and who were involved in teaching medical learners, trainees and/or physicians. Most participants were male (71.5%), married (76.3%), Chinese (94.6%) and aged 40&ndash;49 (34.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Well-being, resilience and psychological distress were measured using three validated instruments: the 5-item WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5), the 2-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC2) and the 9-item Physician Well-Being Index-Expanded (ePWBI-9), respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A path analysis for physician educators&rsquo; psychological distress (Tucker-Lewis Index=0.99; Normed-Fit Index=0.99; Comparative Fit Index=1.00; root mean square error of approximation=0.03; standardised root mean-square residual=0.02) indicated that resilience partially mediated the relationship of well-being with psychological distress (<f></f>=&ndash;0.50, 95% CI &ndash;0.57 to &ndash;0.41, p=0.002). Average working hours had a positive direct effect on distress (<f></f>=0.29, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.37, p=0.001). However, age, relationship status and years as an educator were not significantly associated with either resilience or psychological distress among HK physician educators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The risk and protective factors identified in this study, including the partial mediating role of resilience, provide preliminary insights into factors associated with psychological distress among clinical physician educators in this HK setting. The findings suggest the importance of well-being interventions, coupled with strategies to address prolonged working hours, as potential mechanisms to mitigate psychological distress in similar contexts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chan, L., Chan, P. P. L., Bilney, E. V. M., Chen, J. Y., Lam, T. P., Tipoe, G. L., Ganotice, F. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105347</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105347</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk and protective factors associated with psychological distress and the mediating role of resilience among physician educators in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105347</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105347</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106457?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physical and mental health of ethnic minority service personnel in the UK Armed Forces: a retrospective pooled cross-sectional analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106457?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess physical and mental symptoms by ethnicity of a UK Armed Forces cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective, pooled cross-sectional analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Self-report questionnaire collected between 2004&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Three samples of UK Armed Forces, including a Gurkha (n=254), Fijian (n=112) and a heterogeneous sample of British ethnic minority personnel (n=178) were compared with a sample of white British participants (n=254).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main exposure measure</st>
<p>Physical and mental health symptoms were measured using individual items from the Patient Health Questionnaire, Post-traumatic Stress Checklist (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist&mdash;Civilian Version) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) drawn from four phases of cohort data. Ethnic samples were matched by military role and veteran or active service status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Based on their first assessment, 60 white British participants (24.2%) met GHQ criteria for common mental disorder, significantly higher than found for the other three groups (<sup>2</sup> (3, n<I>=</I>782)<I>=</I>25.03, p&lt;0.001). Across all measures, Gurkha participants were the least symptomatic, though Gurkha and Fijian participants reported more symptoms of post-traumatic stress. British samples reported more somatic reports. Different patterns of post-traumatic and somatic symptoms may be explained by differential levels of traumatic exposures, recruitment profiles and culturally nuanced expressions of distress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patterns of mental and physical symptoms warrant further investigation to inform prevention, more precise diagnosis and tailored care and treatment for specific ethnic groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palmer, L., Bhui, K., Chalder, T., Fear, N. T., Jones, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106457</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106457</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physical and mental health of ethnic minority service personnel in the UK Armed Forces: a retrospective pooled cross-sectional analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106457</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106457</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109391?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of intraoperative use of 20% albumin in combination with Ringers lactate versus Ringers lactate during cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: protocol for a randomised controlled, open-label clinical trial (ALBUCHIP trial)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109391?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is considered the standard of care for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal and gynaecological cancers. Characterised by substantial intraoperative fluid shifts and increased endothelial permeability, this procedure is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes. Human albumin has been extensively studied in critically ill patients as an intravenous fluid, but its efficacy during major non-cardiac surgery involving substantial fluid requirements remains insufficiently evaluated. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of 20% albumin in combination with Ringer&rsquo;s lactate versus Ringer&rsquo;s lactate alone for fluid therapy during CRS with HIPEC in relation to postoperative outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study protocol was designed and written in accordance with the Prospective Randomised Open, Blinded Endpoint design and followed the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) recommendations. This is a randomised controlled, open-label parallel-group multicentre clinical trial. Participants will be patients admitted for CRS with HIPEC. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either the control group (Ringer&rsquo;s lactate) or the intervention group (20% albumin+Ringer&rsquo;s lactate) in a 1:1 ratio, with stratification by centre. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score at day 28 following CRS with HIPEC. Secondary endpoints include mortality at day 28, CCI score at day 7, volume of intraoperative and postoperative (48 hours) fluid therapy, cumulative incidence of surgical and medical postoperative complications, and number of days alive and out of the hospital by day 28. To ensure 90% power, a total of 140 patients (70 per group) are required to detect a 13.6-point reduction in the CCI score on day 28 in the intervention group, assuming a SD of 24.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been authorised by the Clinical Trials Information System and approved by the European Ethical Committee (EU CT number 2024-5 10 943-76-00). Clinicians will explain the details of the study to all eligible participants. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to randomisation. The results of the study will be communicated to healthcare professionals and the public through presentations at international scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed medical journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The trial has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT06351475">NCT06351475</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deniau, B., Moreau, A., Monsel, A., Faitot, V., Pottecher, J., Zoric, L., Suria, S., Bankole, E., Michelet, D., Poirier, N., Plaud, B., Chaix, C., Biard, L., Depret, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109391</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109391</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of intraoperative use of 20% albumin in combination with Ringers lactate versus Ringers lactate during cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: protocol for a randomised controlled, open-label clinical trial (ALBUCHIP trial)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109391</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110692?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Womens preferences and concerns on HPV screening sampling methods for cervical cancer in Ibadan, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110692?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study assessed women&rsquo;s preferences and concerns on human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sample and healthcare provider (HCP) sample collections for cervical cancer screening in Ibadan, Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>Study was conducted in primary healthcare centres in selected peri-urban and urban communities in Ibadan, Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 620 sexually active women aged 25&ndash;65 years were recruited for the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the preferred method of collecting cervico-vaginal sample (self-sampling or provider sampling) by women. Secondary outcomes were observed differences in preferences between women in urban and peri-urban communities, reasons for these preferences, concerns on each method of sample collection and preferred locations for self-sample collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, more women preferred HCP sample collection (51.6%) than self-sampling collection (48.4%) (p=0.422). Self-sampling was more preferred among urban participants (53.7%), while HCP sample collection was more preferred among peri-urban participants (56.6%) (p=0.011). Peri-urban women preferred HCP sample collection due to clinician&rsquo;s expertise (90.2%) and result reliability (57.8%), while urban women preferred self-sample collection because of privacy (74.2%), comfort (62.1%) and confidentiality (55%). Most women (63.7%) preferred to self-sample in a private place in the hospital while others preferred to self-sample at home (36.3%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Preferences for HPV sample collection methods were similar, with a slightly higher proportion of women favouring HCP collection compared with self-sampling. Self-sampling was an acceptable complementary option to HCP-based sampling. Factors such as age, media access, and awareness of HPV were associated with women&rsquo;s preferences for sample collection methods. Integrating flexible, facility-based self-sampling within existing health services may help address contextual barriers and could potentially improve participation in cervical cancer screening programmes in Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew-Bassey, U. I., Bello, Y. O., Okunlola, M. A., Morhason-Bello, I. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110692</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110692</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Womens preferences and concerns on HPV screening sampling methods for cervical cancer in Ibadan, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110692</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110692</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112098?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Concept of premature mortality: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112098?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Premature mortality (PM) is a concept applied in public health, epidemiology, medicine, demography and economics. Its conceptualisations vary across disciplines and often rely on implicit normative assumptions. A scoping review is needed to build a typology to systematise PM conceptualisations and make their assumptions explicit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and report using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (to July 2025) identified 53 470 records, of which 20 612 duplicates were removed. Titles and abstracts of 32 858 unique records were screened in Rayyan using filters, machine learning and manual review. To the large volume of the remaining articles, we applied purposeful sampling supported by the BERT language model, grouping articles based on titles and abstracts into 436 subtopics. We selected one representative and one randomly sampled article from each group. 84 articles identified during manual screening as conceptually distinct were added to the review data. In total, 954 articles will be screened in detail and reviewed in full text. Review questions were developed based on six predefined dimensions of PM conceptualisations: inclusiveness, study objective, reference point, conceptual centrality, discipline and ethical framing. Review data will be extracted across these dimensions. We will develop a typology of PM conceptualisations to support more transparent and consistent use of the concept across disciplines, including normative assumptions of its conceptualisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this review uses secondary literature, ethical approval is not required. Results will be published in an open access, peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muszynska-Spielauer, M., Paulik, P. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112098</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112098</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Concept of premature mortality: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112098</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112098</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Safer Spaces Project: a whole of community systems approach to co-designing and implementing a 'Safer Spaces model of primary healthcare for LGBTQ+ young people in Western Victoria - a protocol for a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>LGBTQ+ young people in rural Australia face significant health challenges due to stigma, discrimination and structural barriers that hinder effective access to care. The inaccessibility or altogether absence of tailored primary healthcare services exacerbates poor health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Safer Spaces will use a mixed-methods approach combining participatory systems science with health economics methods to co-design and implement a &lsquo;&lsquo;Safer Spaces&rsquo; Model of Primary Healthcare (SSMPH) targeting LGBTQ+ young people aged 12&ndash;25 years in rural Western Victoria. Phase 1 co-design of the SSMPH will be achieved through the establishment of a Queer Health Alliance, engagement in Group Model Building workshops via Deakin&rsquo;s STICKE platform and the administration of a Discrete Choice Experiment to ascertain LGBTQ+ young people&rsquo;s primary health service preferences. Phase 2 will implement strategies co-designed in phase 1 supporting primary healthcare for LGBTQ+ young people that are equitable, accessible and responsive to local needs. Implementation efficacy will be evaluated using participatory qualitative methods, systems-based monitoring (including causal loop diagrams and social network analysis) and stakeholder-led evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this research project has been granted by Deakin University&rsquo;s Human Research Ethics Committee. Safer Spaces will be developed in collaboration with lived experience researchers and the community. The knowledge translation plan will be integrated and revised throughout the project as partnerships and engagement with LGBTQ+ young people and their allies continue. All findings will be shared with rural health research bodies, policy makers, rural health providers and LGBTQ+ young people in ways that are meaningful to them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This protocol addresses critical gaps in rural health equity for LGBTQ+ young people by generating insights to guide community-informed service reform and building systemic capacity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucas, J., OShea, A., Brumby, S., Dixon, M., Wake, M., Robinson, S., Rogers, G., Giddy, A., Macdonald, J., Brown, A., Dunk-West, P., Hutchinson, A. M., Reed, K., Lombardo, T., Zanker, J., Spence, S., Lawson, W., Kennedy, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112176</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112176</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Safer Spaces Project: a whole of community systems approach to co-designing and implementing a 'Safer Spaces model of primary healthcare for LGBTQ+ young people in Western Victoria - a protocol for a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112176</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112558?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of South Koreas national gastrointestinal cancer screening programme on incidence and mortality: a population-based difference-in-differences study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112558?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The objectives of this study were threefold. First, to examine the long-term association between implementation of South Korea&rsquo;s National Cancer Screening Programme and trends in incidence and mortality for major gastrointestinal cancers at the population level. Second, to assess whether programme-associated effects differed across implementation phases and population subgroups defined by age, sex and region. Third, to evaluate the specificity of observed trends by comparing screened cancers with pancreatic cancer, which is not included in the national screening programme, using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-based quasi-experimental study using a difference-in-differences approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Nationwide analysis using publicly available national cancer registry, screening and mortality data obtained from Statistics Korea (Korean Statistical Information Service) and related national databases. We applied a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design comparing pre-intervention (1999&ndash;2002), early implementation (2003&ndash;2011) and long-term effect (2012&ndash;2021) periods, reflecting the expected latency between screening implementation and population-level outcome changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Individuals eligible for NCSP screening based on age and programme criteria between 1999 and 2021, compared with contemporaneous populations not eligible for screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Age-standardised and sex-standardised incidence and mortality rates for colorectal, gastric, liver and pancreatic cancers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After the implementation of the National Cancer Screening Programme, age-standardised and sex-standardised incidence and mortality declined substantially for screened cancers. Between 2012 and 2021, gastric cancer incidence and mortality decreased by 28.1% and 24.1%, respectively, while colorectal cancer incidence declined by 22.4% and mortality by 28.6%. Liver cancer mortality decreased by 38.2% over the same period. In contrast, no significant decline was observed for pancreatic cancer. Difference-in-differences and joinpoint analyses confirmed statistically significant trend changes for screened cancers (p&lt;0.05), whereas no beneficial trend was detected for pancreatic cancer. Subgroup analyses indicated persistently lower screening participation and follow-up among rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>South Korea&rsquo;s National Cancer Screening Programme was associated with long-term declines in incidence and mortality for gastrointestinal cancers targeted by organised screening. These findings suggest that sustained, population-based screening programmes may contribute to reductions in cancer burden, while underscoring the importance of improving equitable participation and follow-up care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cha, J., Kang, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112558</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112558</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of South Koreas national gastrointestinal cancer screening programme on incidence and mortality: a population-based difference-in-differences study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112558</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112558</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112848?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of photobiomodulation with red and infrared low-level laser diodes in individuals undergoing rhinoplasty at a single centre in Sao Paulo, Brazil: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112848?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Oedema and ecchymosis are common after rhinoplasty and may delay recovery. Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been shown to have analgesic, anti-inflammatory and regenerative effects; however, its role in rhinoplasty remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PBM in reducing periorbital oedema in patients undergoing rhinoplasty.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, randomised, controlled, double-blind clinical trial that will include 60 participants allocated into two groups: a control group (n=30), receiving sham PBM before surgery, and an intervention group (n=30), receiving preoperative PBM followed by rhinoplasty. PBM will be delivered using a cluster device containing three red low-level laser diodes (660 nm, 150 mW each) and three infrared low-level laser diodes (808 nm, 150 mW each), applying 12 J per point for 80 s at three standardised facial sites. The intervention (PBM or sham) will be applied 1 hour before the surgical procedure. The primary outcome will be periorbital oedema on postoperative day 3, assessed using the Hoffmann clinical scale. Standardised photographic analysis using ImageJ software will be employed as a complementary measure. Secondary outcomes will include oedema at additional follow-up time points, ecchymosis, postoperative pain assessed using the visual analogue scale, nasal tip skin thickness, analgesic consumption and patient-reported aesthetic and functional outcomes assessed using the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) questionnaire. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 3, 7, 30, 60 and 90 days, as well as at 6 and 12 months. Data will be analysed using parametric or non-parametric tests according to data distribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Irmandade da Santa Casa de S&atilde;o Paulo (protocol number: 7503097), will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and current Brazilian regulations for research involving human participants and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07033039). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific publications, presentations at national and international scientific conferences, and communication of findings to interested participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07033039">NCT07033039</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azevedo, M. A., Dolci, E. L. L., Maciel, M. L. F. L., Coelho, M. S., Kitamura, R. H., Quedas, A., Bussadori, S. K., Mesquita-Ferrari, R. A., Fernandes, K. P. S., Horliana, A. C. R. T., Duran, C. C. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112848</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112848</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of photobiomodulation with red and infrared low-level laser diodes in individuals undergoing rhinoplasty at a single centre in Sao Paulo, Brazil: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112848</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112848</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113184?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Redispensing oral anticancer drugs in Denmark (DANROAD): a national, multicentre, prospective implementation study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113184?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Unused oral anticancer drugs (OADs) represent substantial financial and environmental waste. In Denmark, medicines worth ~55 million are destroyed annually, many unopened and unexpired. Redispensing unused OADs has proven feasible and cost-saving in the Netherlands, but has not been tested in a Danish context. The Redispensing of Oral Anti-cancer Drugs in Denmark (DANROAD) study aims to evaluate the economic, environmental and implementation feasibility of a national redispensing programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>DANROAD is a national, multicentre, prospective observational study with two phases: a single-site pilot at Odense University Hospital, followed by a national rollout. Eligible patients (&ge;18 years, prescribed an OAD with expected treatment &ge;3 months) will be enrolled after providing informed consent. OADs will be dispensed in sealed bags with temperature loggers; unused OADs returned at routine visits will undergo quality control and, if eligible, be redispensed. The primary outcome is the net economic balance (value of redispensed OADs minus operational costs). Secondary outcomes include avoided greenhouse gas emissions (life cycle assessment), patient and professional acceptance (qualitative analyses) and medication waste metrics (return rates, eligibility, disqualification reasons). Quantitative and qualitative data will be analysed separately and integrated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Danish Medicines Agency has approved the regulatory framework for redispensing. The Regional Ethics Committee confirmed that formal approval was not required. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study is preregistered in the Open Science Framework (no. 7nh65). Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, conferences, stakeholder reports and lay summaries.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petersen, A. S. T., Moriat, K. B., Bekker, C., Carlsen, H. H., Christensen, M. M. H., Dunvald, A.-C. D., Ennis, Z. N., Gram, E. B., Henriksen, D. P., Johansen, K. B., Lund, M. L., Nielsen, M. L., Obling, M. L., Overgaard, L. K., Strudwick, C., Vestergaard, H., Pedersen, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113184</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113184</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Redispensing oral anticancer drugs in Denmark (DANROAD): a national, multicentre, prospective implementation study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113184</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113946?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Delphi approach to prioritising research in cardiovascular and kidney disease using routinely collected data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113946?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are leading global causes of morbidity and mortality, often coexisting and sharing common risk factors. Despite their interconnection, clinical care and research for affected individuals remain siloed and fragmented. Recognising the need for integrated approaches, this study aimed to identify and prioritise key research questions at the intersection of CKD and CVD that can be addressed using real-world healthcare data to inform more cohesive and data-driven strategies for improving outcomes across both disease areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>A three-round modified Delphi process was conducted: Round 1 online survey collected open-ended research questions about CKD-CVD priorities via BHF Data Science Centre, Kidney Research UK, UK Renal Health Data Network and HDR UK public involvement channels; Round 2 in-person workshop refined and consolidated items; Round 3 online survey prioritised items across urgency, feasibility and impact using 5-point scales.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Survey mean scores for each research question were calculated across the three prioritisation domains, each scored out of 5. The top-ranked questions were identified based on overall scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six thematic domains emerged: risk prediction and early detection, treatment optimisation, health inequities, multimorbidity, disease mechanisms and data infrastructure. The highest-rated research priority was "What are the most effective strategies for prevention, early diagnosis and intervention in CKD?" with a mean score of 12.6 (SD 1.1). Other top priorities included evaluating the cost-effectiveness of early treatment, identifying predictors of kidney failure and assessing the benefits of treating cardiovascular and renal conditions independently.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Across domains, prevention/early detection and early treatment in CKD consistently ranked highest, indicating near-term opportunities for data-enabled cardio-renal research and service improvement; these priorities can inform funder calls, data linkage work and evaluation studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forsyth, R. A., Coombe, A., Brunskill, N., Chico, T., Dhaun, N., Dreyer, G., Fotheringham, J., Hodgkinson, A., MacArthur, J. A. L., Mcmahon, A., Miller-Hodges, E., Molete, M., Petersen, S. E., Scanlon, M., Stevenson, A., Wheeler, D. C., Bell, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113946</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113946</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Delphi approach to prioritising research in cardiovascular and kidney disease using routinely collected data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113946</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113946</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114530?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Respiratory Outcomes from Tracking and Evaluating Community-based TeSting (Project PROTECTS): a community-based, prospective study of acute respiratory infections among adults across the USA - cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114530?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Prospective Respiratory Outcomes from Tracking and Evaluating Community-based TeSting study is a 2-year community-based, prospective cohort launched in 2024. The overall aim of the study is to better understand the burden and impact of acute and postacute COVID-19, influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections across the USA. Our key objectives are to measure the incidence and symptom burden of major respiratory viruses using home testing, measure incidence and risk factors for postacute symptoms of major respiratory viruses and investigate the impact of antivirals and vaccinations on acute and postacute symptoms of respiratory viruses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Enrolment began in June 2024 using internet-based strategies. Eligible participants were adults aged &ge;18 years who were US residents, English language proficient and had no known SARS-CoV-2, RSV or influenza infections in the 3 months before screening. We prioritised enrolment of individuals who were at high risk for severe SARS-CoV-2 outcomes. After enrolment, participants were prompted to report the presence or absence of respiratory symptoms weekly. When respiratory symptoms occurred, participants completed serial at-home multipathogen rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2, RSV, influenza A and influenza B viruses, and daily symptom reporting, including timing and severity. A subset of participants provided self-collected nasopharyngeal and saliva samples for PCR testing. Following a positive test and acute symptom reporting for up to 29 days, participants were followed monthly for 6 months to capture postacute symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>As of March 2025, 6206 people were enrolled in the cohort. The majority of the participants were over 50 years of age (61.4%), women (66.8%) and non-Hispanic white (75.2%), with a notable proportion having a college or postgraduate degree (68.4%) and an annual household income of &gt;US$100 000 (40.7%). All 50 US states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico were represented in the cohort. Half of participants (51.8%) had received a COVID-19 vaccine in the year prior to enrolment, and 19.5% who had reported at least one SARS-CoV-2 infection had a history of antiviral use. A majority of the cohort (95.6%) had at least one underlying medical condition or risk factor for severe COVID-19. Nine-month retention (93.7%) and adherence to the study protocol among participants was high. As of 18 April 2025, 4537/6206 (73.1%) participants had reported respiratory symptoms within 10 days of onset, with a median time to report of 2 days after onset, and 3814/4537 (84.1%) conducting at least one valid rapid test. Of these 3814 participants, 489 (12.8%) had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 324 (8.5%) for influenza A, 22 (0.6%) for influenza B and 113 (2.9%) for RSV by study rapid or PCR tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>We enrolled a large, diverse cohort with a high proportion at risk for severe COVID-19. We have collected over 3000 person-years of data on symptoms, outcomes and risk factors for three major respiratory infections, with high participant retention and engagement through 9 months of data collection. Research priorities include characterising acute and postacute symptoms of major respiratory illnesses and assessing the impact of antivirals and vaccination on the development of severe symptoms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rane, M. S., Penrose, K., Robertson, M. M., Balasubramanian, S., Berry, A., Kulkarni, S. G., Allen, K. E., Puzniak, L., Ernst, F. R., Zamparo, J., Srivastava, A., Ganzhorn, S., Shen, Y., Castillo, P. W., Berger, E., Chan, B. X. J., Sanborn, J., Nash, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114530</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114530</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Respiratory Outcomes from Tracking and Evaluating Community-based TeSting (Project PROTECTS): a community-based, prospective study of acute respiratory infections among adults across the USA - cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114530</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114530</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114633?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The LDR BURST trial: a randomised controlled trial comparing the side effects of low-dose-rate brachytherapy against ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy using spacer gel treatment in men with Cambridge Prognostic Groups 1-3 prostate cancer]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114633?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Long-term follow-up after low-dose rate brachytherapy and ultra-fractionated radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer has demonstrated impressive survival statistics with low toxicity profiles. Superiority between the two treatments has not been shown, with a lack of randomised data comparing the two. Emerging studies have shown a benefit of adding a rectal spacer gel to sit between the prostate and anterior rectal wall to further reduce toxicity following radiotherapeutic treatments. Further randomised studies are, however, recommended to support this data. To the best of our knowledge, the LDR BURST Trial is the first randomised controlled study to compare the toxicity and survival outcomes of low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy against ultra-hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy with a spacer gel in situ.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This parallel group interventional study sets out to randomise 220 participants with Cambridge Prognostic Groups 1&ndash;3 prostate cancer to either LDR brachytherapy with a rectal spacer gel versus external five fraction ultra-fractionated radiotherapy (total dose 36.25 Gy) on a 1:1 basis. The primary outcome is detection of a minimally important difference using the validated Expanded Prostate Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include further validated patient-reported questionnaires, physician-reported adverse events and survival outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The LDR BURST study has received Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) approval (reference 25/LO/047). All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation. Findings from this study will be disseminated through presentations at national and international conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07210502">NCT07210502</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayhurst, W., Uribe-Lewis, S., Uribe, J., Mikropoulos, C., Otter, S., Goh, C., Mehta, S., Wood, K., Deering, C., Higgins, D., Langley, S., Long, M., Michael, A., Langley, S., Perna, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114633</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114633</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The LDR BURST trial: a randomised controlled trial comparing the side effects of low-dose-rate brachytherapy against ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy using spacer gel treatment in men with Cambridge Prognostic Groups 1-3 prostate cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114633</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114633</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114897?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients unfit for cholecystectomy after an acute biliary pancreatitis episode (PROSECCO): study protocol for an open-label, two-armed, randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114897?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Acute pancreatitis is a major cause of gastrointestinal admissions, with an overall mortality of approximately 3%, and 30&ndash;55% of cases are biliary in origin. After acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), elderly or frail patients who are unfit for cholecystectomy remain at high risk of recurrent biliary events and related complications. However, the efficacy of prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in this patient population remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate whether performing prophylactic ES after ABP can reduce mortality and readmissions for biliary events in patients unfit for cholecystectomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial will be conducted in Hungary, with planned international expansion, to assess the efficacy of prophylactic ES in patients with ABP unfit for cholecystectomy. 92 patients will be randomised 1:1 to prophylactic ES or conservative treatment. An interim analysis will be conducted after 65% of the planned enrolment or once 60 patients have completed 12 month follow-up or have experienced a primary outcome event, whichever occurs first. ES will be performed in accordance with current guidelines. Eligible participants are adults with a high probability of biliary aetiology but without a current indication for urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The primary endpoint is time from randomisation to first recurrent pancreatobiliary event within 12 months, including recurrent ABP, cholangitis, choledocholithiasis requiring ERCP or pyogenic liver abscess. Secondary endpoints are pancreatobiliary-related and all-cause mortality, as well as events requiring intensive care. Follow-up visits will take place at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol was approved by the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Medical Council (NNGYK/34436-6/2025). The findings will be disseminated through presentation at scientific meetings and publication in a highly recognised, peer-reviewed international journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07238296">NCT07238296</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tari, E., Vincze, A., Czako, L., Sandru, V., Laursen, S. B., Cadoni, S., Brunacci, M., Kiss, M., Hegyi, P., Eross, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114897</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114897</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients unfit for cholecystectomy after an acute biliary pancreatitis episode (PROSECCO): study protocol for an open-label, two-armed, randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114897</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114897</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115403?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Innovative models of care for LGBTQ+ older adults: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115403?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to identify and map innovative care models for LGBTQ+ older adults and characterise the supporting evidence base.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Older LGBTQ+ adults face persistent inequalities in health and social care, including discrimination, invisibility and barriers to appropriate support. As the population of openly LGBTQ+ older people grows, ensuring equitable and affirming provision has become increasingly urgent in the UK and beyond. In response, care models that may be considered innovative (whether newly developed, adapted for LGBTQ+ communities or applied in novel ways) have begun to emerge. However, no review has yet systematically mapped what is currently known about innovations in LGBTQ+ care and the evidence supporting them. This scoping review therefore aims to identify and map innovative care models for LGBTQ+ older adults and to characterise the supporting evidence base.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley&rsquo;s framework and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Evidence will be included where a care model or initiative is described or evaluated along with its implications for LGBTQ+ older people. For this review, care models are defined as organised approaches to care&mdash;that is, services, policies, practices (including training), initiatives or interventions&mdash;implemented in formal or informal care settings&mdash;such as residential care homes, housing with care schemes (eg, supported accommodation, retirement communities), domiciliary care, communities or informal long-term care arrangements. Use of the term &lsquo;innovation&rsquo; will not be required for inclusion and will instead be coded by reviewers during charting. English-language sources of any design published between 2015 and 2025 will be included; sources without LGBTQ+ relevance, purely theoretical pieces, protocol papers and conference abstracts without full reports will be excluded. Searches will be conducted in Scopus, Social Science Premium Collection, CINAHL and PsycINFO, with grey literature identified through Overton. Additional searching of SCIE, Google Scholar, relevant third-sector resources and reference lists will be undertaken following source selection. After de-duplication, two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts, with disagreements resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. Data will be charted on author and year, country, source type, participants or source focus, intended beneficiary population, intervention/model/practice described, study design or document design, context/setting, methods, type of evidence, innovation basis, innovation level/domain, reviewer rationale for innovation coding, outcome or implementation indicators reported, main findings relevant to the review question and limitations of the study or evidence. Findings will be presented in tables and through narrative synthesis to map the models of care, their innovative features and the nature of the evidence base, and to identify implications for UK policy, practice and research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this review will use data from publicly available sources, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, presentations and accessible outputs for relevant stakeholders, including community-facing materials where appropriate.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pattinson, C., Annand, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115403</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115403</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Innovative models of care for LGBTQ+ older adults: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115403</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115403</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115982?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Attitudes, opinions and practice patterns regarding anaesthesia providers use of vasopressors: protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115982?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The deleterious effect of intraoperative hypotension has been emphasised by many observational studies. However, vasopressor therapies to treat intraoperative hypotension, specifically the choice between phenylephrine and norepinephrine, have been debated. There is a crucial need for additional studies to determine the most appropriate choice for vasopressor therapy in the context of this variable use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design is proposed to expand the knowledge base relating to vasopressor selection during non-cardiac surgery and inform the education surrounding and extrapolation of the results of a pragmatic clinical trial. The three phases will consist of an observational study using rigorously validated multicentre electronic health record data, a web-based survey targeting clinicians and a semistructured interview targeting a subsample of survey respondents. These research aims will address areas with insufficient data: (1) the quantification of practice patterns and variation of vasopressor selection within non-cardiac operating rooms and (2) the reasoning behind these clinical decisions. This study will serve as primary steps to develop and provide context for the future results of a multicentre pragmatic clinical trial comparing the impact of phenylephrine and norepinephrine on postoperative patient outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received Institutional Review Board (IRB) exemption from the University of Michigan. We plan to disseminate results through peer-reviewed journal articles, conference proceedings and presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janda, A. M., Mirizzi, K., Athavale, T., Mathis, M. R., Dubovoy, T., Cocroft, S., Chen, T., Alrubaie, N., Kheterpal, S., Guetterman, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T05:41:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115982</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115982</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Attitudes, opinions and practice patterns regarding anaesthesia providers use of vasopressors: protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115982</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115982</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099997?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of an online interval group therapy for children with developmental language disorders: protocol for a randomised controlled intervention study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099997?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>With a prevalence of around 7.6%, developmental language disorders (DLDs) without comorbidities are among the most common and most frequently treated childhood disorders. Standard DLD therapy in Germany consists of individual therapy sessions once per week within speech&ndash;language therapy practices. In reality, these sessions only take place every 10&ndash;14 days on average. Online therapy may be beneficial but is not yet standard practice in Germany. Although DLD group therapy has been proven to be effective, it is rarely undertaken in Germany. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of online DLD therapy for small groups of children with standard one-to-one therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The effectiveness of two treatment settings is evaluated in 212 children with moderate-to-severe DLD (ages 3 years to 6 years 11 months) in the multicentre, block randomised controlled trial (RCT) THErapy ONline. Five centres in Germany participate. Children are randomly assigned to the intervention group (online interval-intensive therapy, IG1, n=106) or the control group (extensive standard in-person therapy, IG2, n=106). A speech and language assessment is conducted at baseline (study entry, T0), 12 months (T1) and 18 months (T2) after therapy start. The co-primary outcome parameters are the speech and language test scores of phonological speech sound production, expressive vocabulary, grammar production and language comprehension at T1. The secondary outcome parameters comprise two composite speech and language test scores at T1 and T2, including phonological working memory scores and the individual scores of the aforementioned tests at T2, as well as process evaluation parameters (time expenditure, resource utilisation, such as salary costs of speech&ndash;language therapists, additional costs of the online therapy, adherence to appointments and therapy acceptance).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of Westphalia-Lippe (2022-282 f-S). Parents provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through presentations, peer-reviewed journals and conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00030068</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heiland, A., Siemons-Lu&#x0308;hring, D., Speckemeier, C., Klaar, L., Treger, P., Sonntag, K., Scharpenberg, M., Tu&#x0308;cke, J., Neusser, S., Brannath, W., Mathmann, P., Voss, T., Neumann, A., Rieger, T., Heiming-Al Yosef, J., Hesping, A., Kanaan, O., Weber, M., Alfakiani, S., Parfitt, R., Ho&#x0308;rner, L., Shahpasand, S., Gietmann, C., Neumann, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099997</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099997</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of an online interval group therapy for children with developmental language disorders: protocol for a randomised controlled intervention study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099997</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099997</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e100026?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adherence to retinal screening recommendations and its associated factors among patients with diabetes in Ethiopian public hospitals: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e100026?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess adherence to retinal screening recommendations and its associated factors among patients with diabetes receiving follow-up care at public hospitals in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional, institution-based study was conducted at public hospitals in Addis Ababa from 27 February to 27 March 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Five of the fourteen public hospitals in Addis Ababa were selected for this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A systematic random sample of 405 adult patients with diabetes mellitus (receiving follow-up care at public hospitals in Addis Ababa was selected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess statistical associations. Statistical significance between the outcome variable and independent variables was determined at a p value of less than 0.05 and a 95% CI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>223 participants (55.1%) adhered to the recommended retinal screening guidelines. Factors significantly associated with adherence to retinal screening recommendations included being an urban resident (adjusted OR (AOR)=2.783; 95% CI 1.022 to 7.583), lack of formal education (AOR=0.242; 95% CI 0.100 to 0.589) and poor knowledge regarding diabetic retinopathy (AOR=0.281; 95% CI 0.171 to 0.462).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion and recommendation</st>
<p>Slightly more than half (55%) of the participants in this study adhered to the recommended retinal screening guidelines. Urban residence, higher educational attainment and good knowledge of diabetic retinopathy were significant predictors of adherence to retinal screening recommendations. Healthcare professionals should take a more proactive role in educating patients with diabetes about diabetic retinopathy and the importance of retinal screening, with particular emphasis on rural residents and individuals without formal education.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinsa, F., Aga, F., Gela, D., Wldesilase, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100026</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100026</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adherence to retinal screening recommendations and its associated factors among patients with diabetes in Ethiopian public hospitals: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100026</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100026</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102846?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Model-based economic evaluation of non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in patients with long-term medical conditions in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102846?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Persistent fatigue is a frequent symptom in chronic medical conditions. Systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue have identified interventions that are effective at reducing fatigue, but there is limited published evidence on the cost-effectiveness of these interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify non-pharmacological fatigue interventions that have the potential to be cost-effective in patients with long-term medical conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Decision analytic modelling with intervention costs estimated from staff time and quality-of-life outcomes mapped from a systematic review and network meta-analysis of fatigue outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>UK National Health Service (NHS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>People with persistent fatigue associated with a chronic medical condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Non-pharmacological fatigue interventions versus usual care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Net monetary benefit from a UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective; quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained; intervention costs valued at 2022/23 prices; costs and benefits discounted at 3.5% per annum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the base-case analysis, expected costs from the probabilistic analysis for individual and group interventions were: &pound;267 and &pound;157 for physical activity promotion, &pound;810 and &pound;485 for cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-Fatigue and &pound;462 and &pound;214 for mindfulness. The expected QALYs gained were similar for mindfulness and physical activity promotion (0.061 and 0.060, respectively), but lower for CBT-Fatigue (0.045). All interventions provided positive incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) versus usual care when valuing a QALY at &pound;20 000. However, since group interventions are less costly than individual ones, and we assumed equivalent clinical benefit, they are expected to provide greater INMB. These findings remained robust across different scenarios, except for CBT-Fatigue (individual), which had negative INMB in some scenarios.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There remains uncertainty regarding which intervention is most cost-effective due to limitations in the underlying evidence base. Future research is recommended to compare the cost-effectiveness of these interventions across a broad population with different chronic conditions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mon-Yee, M., Burton, C., Leaviss, J., Forsyth, J. E., Daly, G., Davis, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102846</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102846</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Model-based economic evaluation of non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in patients with long-term medical conditions in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102846</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102846</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Individuals with the metabolic syndrome without diabetes and/or hypertension: which risk factors should healthcare workers pay extra attention to? A longitudinal, cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components as risk factors for a cardiovascular (CV) event, in individuals without diabetes and/or hypertension, and to explore which of the risk factors are the most predictive for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and whether the assessment of risk could be simplified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A longitudinal, cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A randomly selected population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>In 2002&ndash;2005, 2816 randomly selected residents of Skaraborg, Sweden, underwent physical examinations and blood tests as part of the Skaraborg Project. Exclusion of individuals with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension at baseline left 2328 persons for analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>CV events were assessed in 2011 using national Swedish registers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 293 (13%) were defined as having the MetS according to the National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) and 292 according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definition, whereof 27 had a CV event after a mean follow-up time of 9.7 years. The MetS according to NCEP was significantly predictive of a CVD with an HR 2.4 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.9) but not according to the IDF definition. Blood pressure was significantly predictive according to both definitions (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.97). Also, triglycerides (Tg) were significantly predictive for a CV event (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.59). Neither waist circumference, high-density lipoprotein nor fasting plasma glucose was predictive for a CV event. Combining a blood pressure &ge;125/&ge;80 mm Hg with Tg &ge;1.5 mmol/L was predictive for CVD (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.6) with a sensitivity of 32.5% and numbers needed to examine (NNE) 7.1. Lowering the cut-off for Tg to &ge;1.2 mmol/L (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.4) increased sensitivity to 44.9% and NNE became 8.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Using blood pressure combined with Tg was shown to be an equally good predictor for CVD as the complete MetS in individuals without diagnosed diabetes or hypertension. Therefore, healthcare personnel should pay attention to individuals with a borderline blood pressure, and if equivalent to or equal to 125/85, continue with measuring Tg for a discussion concerning lifestyle.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nordin, P., Lindblad, U., Ottarsdottir, K., Daka, B., Hellgren, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105379</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105379</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Individuals with the metabolic syndrome without diabetes and/or hypertension: which risk factors should healthcare workers pay extra attention to? A longitudinal, cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105379</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of indispensable amino acid supplementation on gut function in children at high risk of environmental enteropathy: protocol for an international coordinated group of randomised controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Environmental enteropathy (EE) is a syndrome affecting the gut characterised by villus blunting, reduced nutrient absorption and microbial translocation in children and adults experiencing a high burden of enteric infection due to inadequate access to clean water and sanitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct coordinated randomised controlled trials in six countries to determine if supplementation with indispensable amino acids (IAAs) can improve intestinal barrier dysfunction in six geographically diverse populations of 18&ndash;36 months old children with stunting or severe stunting. All trials will measure the same primary outcomes while secondary outcomes will be measured on a per-trial basis using standardised protocols across the project. The primary endpoint will be change in gut permeability as assessed by the lactulose/rhamnose ratio. Secondary endpoints include changes in amino acid and carbohydrate absorption using novel, isotope tracer tests. Other prespecified outcome measures include changes in EE biomarkers and child weight. IAA supplementation will be given daily for 28 days and evaluation of the major endpoints will be at baseline and after 28 days of supplementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval will be obtained from the Research Ethics Committee at each participating site. Caregivers will provide written informed consent for each participant. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and face-to-face meetings with participant caregivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CTRI: CTRI/2024/06/069187 (India); ClinicalTrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT06617130">NCT06617130</inter-ref>, Malawi; <inter-ref locator="NCT06676215" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT06676215</inter-ref>, Philippines and <inter-ref locator="NCT07256028" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT07256028</A>, Morocco); Ongoing (Zambia); Ongoing (Morocco); PACTR: (PACTR202311714091884, Ghana).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, G. O., Owino, V., Baquiran, A. F. P., Pasanna, R. M., Achoribo, S. E., Meskini, T., Amadi, B., Maleta, K. M., Gaudichon, C., Serafico, M. E., Hegde, S., Cabanilla, C. V. D., Devi, S., El Mzibri, M., Brouwer, A. F., Kurpad, A. V., Kelly, P., Morrison, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105456</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105456</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of indispensable amino acid supplementation on gut function in children at high risk of environmental enteropathy: protocol for an international coordinated group of randomised controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105456</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107274?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breastfeeding initiation and continuation among women on medicines: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107274?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Breastfeeding provides essential health benefits for infants and mothers, yet initiation and continuation can be influenced by maternal medication use. Uncertainty regarding medication safety may lead to early discontinuation or avoidance of necessary treatment. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of breastfeeding initiation and continuation at 6 months post partum among women using medications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier (EBSCO) and Google Scholar were searched up to 30 November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>For selecting studies: We included cohort, cross-sectional and observational studies reporting breastfeeding initiation at birth and continuation at 6 months post partum among women aged &ge;18 years using medications during pregnancy or post partum. Studies reporting medication type and duration of breastfeeding were prioritised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers screened, extracted and coded data using standardised methods. Risk of bias was assessed using validated tools. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression was performed to explore factors associated with breastfeeding outcomes. Findings were summarised in GRADE evidence profiles and synthesised qualitatively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 286 retrieved articles, 29 met the inclusion criteria and 28 were included in the meta-analysis. 14 (48%) were cohort studies reporting breastfeeding prevalence while using medications. The pooled prevalence of breastfeeding initiation among women on medication during pregnancy or post partum was 75.2% (95% CI 69.8% to 80.7%; range 14&ndash;98%), with high heterogeneity (<I>I</I>&sup2;=99.2%, p&lt;0.001). Overall prevalence of breastfeeding at 6 months post partum was 53.2% (95% CI 43% to 63%). Meta-regression showed that women in high-income countries were less likely to initiate (&beta;=&ndash;0.27, 95% CI &ndash;0.54 to &ndash;0.00, p=0.04) or continue breastfeeding at 6 months (&beta;=&ndash;0.27, 95% CI &ndash;0.54 to &ndash;0.01, p=0.04). Women using antidepressants (&beta;=&ndash;0.45, 95% CI &ndash;0.87 to &ndash;0.02, p=0.04) and opioids (&beta;=&ndash;0.50, 95% CI &ndash;0.93 to &ndash;0.08, p=0.02) were less likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months. Women living with HIV on ART in low- and middle-income countries had higher continuation rates, likely due to supportive public health programmes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Breastfeeding initiation among women using medications is generally high, but continuation declines substantially, particularly among women on psychotropic, opioid or antiepileptic drugs. HIV status, medication type, healthcare support and national guidelines influence breastfeeding outcomes. Targeted interventions, including provider education, medication-specific lactation guidance and supportive workplace policies, are essential to promote sustained breastfeeding among women using medications.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nakijoba, R., Musaazi, J., Kyohaire, I., Atuyambe, L., Waitt, C., Kiguba, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107274</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107274</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breastfeeding initiation and continuation among women on medicines: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107274</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107274</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stakeholder perspectives on transferability of a 12-week physical activity and sedentary behaviour intervention for ethnically diverse community dwelling older adults: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Numbers of ethnically diverse older adults are increasing in the UK. These individuals often have complex health problems that are exacerbated by language barriers (ie, limited English proficiency), acculturation experiences and socio-economic level. Further, this diverse group is also the most sedentary and least active subgroup in the wider population which raises major health issues. A number of interventions have been implemented to improve older adults&rsquo; physical activity and decrease their sedentary behaviour. Nevertheless, there is a lack of research examining how stakeholders&rsquo; perspectives can inform the transferability of interventions into the real-world particularly for ethnically diverse older adults. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to explore the perspectives of stakeholders regarding the transferability of a 12-week intervention that aims to increase activity and decrease sedentary behaviour among ethnically diverse sedentary older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A qualitative exploratory study employing reflexive thematic analysis was conducted using purposive sampling and in-depth interviews to recruit a diverse group of stakeholders representing varied professional roles, service delivery and organisational sectors related to older adults&rsquo; physical activity and well-being. The Population&ndash;Intervention&ndash;Environment&ndash;Transfer Model of Transferability (PIET-T) model served as a theoretical and conceptual framework for assessing the transferability of health interventions. Prior to the interview, the researcher explained the intervention study that was assessed in a prior feasibility study. This helped us identify stakeholder perspectives about potential challenges and practical considerations for transferring the intervention within existing policy and service frameworks. The primary researcher (NAAM) transcribed data from recorded interviews. Using reflexive thematic analysis, themes were generated from the data set and were interpreted using the PIET-T model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The findings showed that different concepts of the PIET-T model influenced intervention transferability. The findings generated the following key themes: (1) User-centred and organisation supported programmes (Population), (2) intervention appropriateness and adaptations (Intervention), (3) organisational and system context (Environment) and (4) transferability and implementation factors (Transferability). Overall, the PIET-T model addresses key factors within each domain to facilitate the transferability of intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Exploring diverse stakeholder perspectives was crucial for facilitating transferability and ensuring readiness for real-world implementation. Stakeholders suggested key modifications, including translated materials, adjusted duration, flexible digital delivery options and stronger collaboration with local organisations and healthcare systems to improve transferability among ethnically diverse older adults.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meghani, N. A. A., Hudson, J., Stratton, G., Mullin, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107380</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107380</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stakeholder perspectives on transferability of a 12-week physical activity and sedentary behaviour intervention for ethnically diverse community dwelling older adults: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107380</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107976?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The world according to girls: a qualitative study of school, work and identity among adolescent girls and young women living with HIV in Ghana]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107976?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) living with HIV in Ghana face multiple intersecting forms of marginalisation. Beyond the clinical management of HIV, little is known about how they construct meaning, navigate identity and imagine their futures within structural contexts shaped by stigma, gender inequity, economic precarity and colonial legacies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore how AGYW living with HIV in Ghana understand and negotiate their social identities in work and school. We then aimed to understand how their lived experiences at school and work are shaped by broader systems of power.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This qualitative study drew on semi-structured interviews with AGYW (ages 11&ndash;24, n=24) receiving HIV care in Kumasi, Ghana. Data were coded both inductively and deductively. Themes were interpreted through the Ghanaian context using intersectionality, Critical Disability Studies, spoiled identity theory and African feminist decolonial theory. The analysis was conducted iteratively and reflexively, with attention to positionality, gender and structural power dynamics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Seven major themes were identified: (1) social support; (2) concrete plans for the future; (3) unattainability of the future; (4) coping via detachment; (5) need for privacy and confidentiality; (6) role as an arbiter of HIV information; and (7) financial stress. Across these themes, AGYW described dynamic processes of identity negotiation, moral and emotional labour and structural constraint. HIV was rarely the sole barrier. Rather, it intersected with gender norms, family dynamics, age hierarchies, economic marginalisation and misinformation to shape participants&rsquo; social worlds. Some participants coped through detachment or concealment, while others reclaimed agency through caregiving roles, education or aspirational goals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>AGYW living with HIV in Ghana are not only navigating a chronic illness but also resisting a layered matrix of social and structural injustice. Their stories reveal both vulnerability and strategic agency. Interventions and policy must go beyond biomedical care to address stigma, provide confidential and affirming school and work environments, and offer structural supports for emotional, educational and economic well-being.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhagavathi, V., Martyn-Dickens, C., Owusu, S. A., Nettey, G. K., Bedele, J., Sarfo, A. D., Munyikwa, M., Moyer, C. A., Enimil, A. K., Ratner, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107976</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107976</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The world according to girls: a qualitative study of school, work and identity among adolescent girls and young women living with HIV in Ghana]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107976</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107976</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108268?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do studies of interventions to improve laypeoples critical thinking about health choices assess potential harms? A systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108268?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To make informed health choices, and avoid waste and unnecessary suffering, people need critical thinking skills. However, like health interventions, educational interventions can have adverse effects. In this systematic review, the objective was to assess the extent to which researchers have included potential adverse effects in studies of interventions intended to improve the critical thinking of laypeople about health choices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study was a systematic review, in which we updated the search for an earlier systematic review of intended effects of relevant interventions. The earlier review did not address potential adverse effects. We did not update the analysis of intended effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Epistemonikos, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Web of Science up to March 2025. In addition to studies from the original review and updated search, we included any additional studies included in a similar, even earlier review. Our unit of analysis was study report (eg, journal article).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included all studies from the original review. We applied the same inclusion criteria to the results of the updated search: the study included a comparison, the population was laypeople and the intervention was intended to improve understanding of &ge;1 key concept for informed health choices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>We extracted data about study design (randomised trial or other), participants (children, adolescents or adults), study setting (countries), main intervention (resources delivered to participants) and comparator (usual/no intervention or other). For the analysis, we extracted verbatim text describing any assessment of a potential adverse effect of the intervention. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the extracted data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 35 reports of quantitative studies (including multi-method and mixed-methods studies). Most often, the study was a randomised trial, the setting was a high-income country, the population included adults (including university students) and the intervention was school-based (including university). In one of the 35 reports, authors described assessing a potential adverse effect.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review assessing the extent to which researchers have assessed adverse effects of any category of educational interventions. Our review shows that researchers generally have not assessed potential adverse effects of interventions to improve critical thinking about health choices. Researchers should pay more attention to such effects, while policymakers and educators making decisions about implementing relevant interventions should consider the lack of evidence. The findings of this study suggest a need for research that facilitates assessing potential adverse effects of interventions to improve critical thinking about health choices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oxman, M., Cusack, L., Verdugo-Paiva, F., Avila, C., Pena, J., Novillo, F., Oxman, A. D., Fretheim, A., Melby-Lervag, M., Nordheim, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108268</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108268</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do studies of interventions to improve laypeoples critical thinking about health choices assess potential harms? A systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108268</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110013?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence and associated factors of inadequate emergence in elderly patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study in Northwest Ethiopia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110013?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Inadequate emergence is a common postoperative complication in elderly patients following major abdominal surgery. This study was designed to determine its incidence, identify associated risk factors and characterise its clinical subtypes within this high-risk cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>This prospective single-centre cohort study was conducted at a comprehensive specialised tertiary care hospital in Northwest Ethiopia. Consecutive patients aged 65 years and older scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing inadequate emergence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 388 patients were analysed. Inadequate emergence occurred in 21.9% of participants (95% CI 14.3% to 31.6%), with hypoactive emergence observed in 10.7% and emergence delirium in 11.2%. Multivariable logistic regression identified several independent predictors, including advanced age (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.9; 95% CI 1.5 to 8.2), preoperative anxiety (AOR=2.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 7.2), prolonged preoperative fasting (AOR=2.1; 95% CI 1.8 to 9.1), non-ketofol-based induction (AOR=3.4; 95% CI 1.6 to 6.3), absence of abdominal field block (AOR=4.2; 95% CI 4.0 to 9.6), substantial intraoperative blood loss (&gt;1000 mL; AOR=1.9; 95% CI 1.2 to 7.6), postoperative nausea and vomiting requiring antiemetics (AOR=2.2; 95% CI 2.1 to 7.1) and presence of an indwelling urinary catheter (AOR=2.4; 95% CI 1.8 to 7.9).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Inadequate emergence occurred in approximately one in five elderly patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. Independent predictors included advanced age, major intraoperative blood loss, postoperative nausea/vomiting requiring antiemetics, non-ketofol-based induction, preoperative anxiety, absence of abdominal field block, presence of an indwelling urinary catheter and prolonged preoperative fasting.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bayable, S. D., Debas, S. A., Aligaz, E. M., Endeshaw, A. S., Ale, Y. F., Amberbir, W. D., Fetene, M. B., Yetneberk, T., Zegeye, S. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110013</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110013</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence and associated factors of inadequate emergence in elderly patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study in Northwest Ethiopia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110013</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110013</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110976?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing Quality of Life for Individuals with Stroke (EQL): a study protocol for co-creating a social support and context-informed intervention to improve self-management, health and well-being in older adults recovering at home]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110976?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Enhancing Quality of Life for Individuals with Stroke (EQL-stroke) is an international, collaborative multiphase project aiming to strengthen supported self-management for older adults recovering from stroke at home in Sweden, Latvia and the Netherlands. Existing poststroke pathways may provide insufficient support for self-management during the transition from hospital to home, and there is limited evidence on interventions that integrate social networks and everyday environmental context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>EQL-stroke uses a participatory, multimethod design across three phases. Phase I generates knowledge through policy review, qualitative interviews and people&ndash;place mapping (~25 participants per country) and includes cross-cultural adaptation of the Collective Efficacy of Networks Scale. Phase II co-designs and specifies a tailored social network-informed supported self-management intervention (the Network-Based Intervention), including core components and principles for local adaptation (~15 participants per country). Phase III will recruit approximately 20&ndash;40 stroke survivors for a single-arm pilot feasibility study with an 8-week follow-up and embedded process evaluation to assess feasibility, acceptability and fidelity in routine practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (reg. no. 2025-00083-01), the R&#x012B;gas Stradina Universit&#x0101;te Research Ethical Committee (reg. no. R&#x012B;gas Stradina Universit&#x0101;te Research Ethical Committee) and the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen (reg. no. 2025-07). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, stakeholder engagement activities and patient/public channels.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kylen, M., Falk Johansson, M., McCarthy, L., Meijering, L., Tomsone, S., Tistad, M., Elf, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110976</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110976</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing Quality of Life for Individuals with Stroke (EQL): a study protocol for co-creating a social support and context-informed intervention to improve self-management, health and well-being in older adults recovering at home]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110976</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110976</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111868?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors affecting implementation of hospital inpatient-level care at home: a qualitative study of virtual wards in North West England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111868?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify key factors influencing the implementation of technology-enabled virtual wards (VWs), also known as hospital at home, drawing on the qualitative accounts of stakeholders involved in implementation, using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a guiding analytical framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative semi-structured interviews with implementation leads. All interviews were conducted online, using MS Teams or Zoom, between January&ndash;June 2024, and audio-recorded with consent. Audio-recordings were transcribed, anonymised and exported to NVivo V.12 Pro software for data management. The updated CFIR was used to guide thematic analysis of interview data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Adult VW services in one regional health and social care system in North West England, UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Service implementation leads from 11 hospital sites providing adult VW services. Job titles and roles varied across sites and included both operational and clinical service leads.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>20 interviews were conducted with 22 participants. Four implementation themes were identified: (1) complexity and adaptability: the ability to adapt the service to local conditions was valued by leads, but also contributed to wide variation in operational, clinical, workforce and digital components of VW models; (2) resource and infrastructure: workforce capacity was identified as a key implementation challenge along with information technology system capability and interoperability; (3) performance demands: leads were concerned that an excessive focus on bed numbers and occupancy levels, without accounting for patient acuity, could negatively affect implementation, straining the service and staff capacity; and (4) readiness for change: organisational and professional readiness for change was considered crucial for increasing referrals and enabling successful implementation, yet leads reported that the level of behavioural and cultural change required had been underestimated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Implementation of a national VWs programme has resulted in wide service variation in one UK region, which raises questions about service equity and poses challenges for wider programme evaluation. Despite this variation, common factors found to help or hinder implementation have been identified. This study provides greater understanding of the factors that influence the implementation of VW services and outlines actionable insights to help refine VW strategies. These insights can support future planning and sustainability of technology-enabled inpatient-level care at home more widely.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bradley, F., Howells, K., Gasteiger, N., Sanders, C., Blakeman, T., Dowding, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111868</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111868</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors affecting implementation of hospital inpatient-level care at home: a qualitative study of virtual wards in North West England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111868</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111868</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111920?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards an integrated model for dengue management: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111920?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To systematically identify and synthesise dengue management strategies, levels of implementation, management dimensions, key challenges and proposed solutions across health systems worldwide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A scoping review following the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2003 and December 2024. Reference lists of included studies were also manually screened.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>English-language, peer-reviewed articles and reviews focusing on dengue management strategies, challenges and solutions at any health system level were included. Studies without full-text access or outside the scope of dengue management were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data using a structured form. Extracted data were charted and synthesised using an inductive thematic approach to identify core strategy domains, implementation levels, challenges and solutions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 4822 records identified, 34 studies met the eligibility criteria. Dengue management strategies were categorised into six domains: vector and environmental control; surveillance and early warning systems; vaccination; enhancement of diagnostic and treatment services; community participation and education; and governance with intersectoral coordination. Implementation occurred at community, municipal, national, regional and international levels. Key challenges were grouped into five domains: structural and resource-related; sociocultural; governance and policy; scientific and technological; and climate- and urbanisation-related factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Global dengue management is increasingly adopting integrated, multi-sectoral approaches. Effective dengue control requires strengthening health system infrastructure, institutionalising community engagement and leveraging scientific and technological innovations. Sustained political commitment, stable financing mechanisms and coordinated governance across sectors are essential for resilient and sustainable dengue control.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salehi, M., Mousa Farkhani, E., Moghri, J., Ghasemian, A., Tabatabaee, S. S., Hooshmand, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111920</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111920</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards an integrated model for dengue management: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111920</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111920</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112217?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epidemiological, entomological and community determinants of the 2021 yellow fever outbreak in Wa East District, Ghana: cross-sectional descriptive outbreak investigation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112217?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe the epidemiology, ecological determinants and public-health response to a yellow-fever (YF) outbreak in Wa East District (WED), Ghana, and to identify operational gaps to strengthen surveillance and immunisation in high-risk rural settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional descriptive outbreak investigation integrating epidemiological, entomological, vaccination-coverage and community knowledge assessments, conducted under Ghana&rsquo;s Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>WED, located in the Upper West Region of Ghana, is an agrarian, forest-fringe area bordering the Mole National Park, characterised by limited access to health services and seasonal nomadic movements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All suspected YF cases (N=57) reported between epidemiological weeks 41&ndash;46 of 2021; 50 community respondents interviewed for knowledge and awareness and 52 households inspected for entomological indices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Demographic and clinical characteristics of cases, spatial&ndash;temporal distribution, vaccination coverage, <I>Aedes</I> vector indices, community knowledge and awareness levels and response interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 57 suspected cases (33 males 24 females) were identified, of which 12 (21.1%) were laboratory-confirmed. The case-fatality ratio among confirmed cases was 33.3% (95% CI 9.7% to 65.1%). Most cases occurred in individuals aged 6&ndash;30 years and were clustered in the Ducie community. The epidemic curve, based on confirmed cases, showed a single focal wave between epidemiological weeks 41 and 46 of 2021, peaking in week 45 and declining thereafter following intensified outbreak response activities, particularly surveillance and risk communication. Routine YF vaccination coverage was 25% before the outbreak, increasing to 95% after the mass campaign. The district&rsquo;s composite risk score was 83%, indicating very high transmission risk. Entomological indices (House Index=48.5%, CI=36.1%, Breteau Index=159.6) exceeded WHO thresholds, confirming intense <I>Aedes</I> proliferation. Community awareness was low, with only 22% recognising the viral cause, 16% identifying mosquitoes as vectors and 10% knowing that vaccination prevents YF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The outbreak reflected the convergence of ecological vulnerability, low baseline immunity and poor community awareness. Sustained high routine immunisation, structured <I>Aedes</I> surveillance and continuous risk communication are essential to prevent recurrence and advance Ghana&rsquo;s commitment to the WHO Eliminate Yellow Fever Epidemics strategy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bessing, B., Aabalekuu, S., Bangniyel, J., Alhassan, I. K., Danquah, C. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112217</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112217</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epidemiological, entomological and community determinants of the 2021 yellow fever outbreak in Wa East District, Ghana: cross-sectional descriptive outbreak investigation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112217</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112623?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant/adjuvant relugolix and enzalutamide for the treatment of high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer: study protocol of the RENAPCA phase Ib trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112623?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Treatment for high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer typically includes radiation or radical prostatectomy plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but the optimal use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant ADT in practice remains unclear. Relugolix and enzalutamide have demonstrated strong efficacy independently in the setting of advanced disease, but their combined use in neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy has not been studied. This trial investigates their safety and efficacy as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing definitive local treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Relugolix and Enzalutamide as Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant to Local-regional treatment in Patients with High-risk, Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer (RENAPCA) is a prospective, single-arm, open-label phase Ib trial with blinded outcome assessment. The study is conducted across four tertiary oncology centres within the United States. Eligible participants are adult men with pathologically confirmed locally advanced high-risk prostate cancer who are candidates for definitive local therapy. Patients with significant comorbidities or a life expectancy of less than 6 months are excluded. The trial includes a 3+3 dose-escalation safety lead-in cohort (up to 12 patients) to determine dose-limiting toxicities and recommended phase 2 dose, followed by a dose expansion cohort (up to 46 patients). Interventions consist of 6 months of neoadjuvant therapy with relugolix plus enzalutamide, definitive local therapy (radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy), and 18 months of adjuvant therapy with relugolix plus enzalutamide. Primary outcomes include pathologic CR rate and minimal residual disease rate. Secondary outcomes include prostate-specific antigen response, progression-free survival, objective response rate, frequency and severity of adverse events, and positive margin/pathologic downgrade rate. Exploratory objectives include patient-reported outcomes and quality of life measures. RENAPCA will assess the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant/adjuvant relugolix+enzalutamide in high-risk, locally advanced prostate cancer to support future larger-scale studies and potentially improve treatment outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This research protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (7 March 2024). The study is based on voluntary participation with informed written consent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06130995">NCT06130995</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loper, M., Qadar, A., Vesely, S. K., Gunter, T., Ayanambakkam, A., Wen, Y., Cookson, M., Stratton, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112623</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112623</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant/adjuvant relugolix and enzalutamide for the treatment of high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer: study protocol of the RENAPCA phase Ib trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112623</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112623</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113198?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness modelling of early lead extraction for cardiac implantable electronic device infections in the United Kingdom]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113198?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early lead extraction (&le;7 days post-admission) compared with delayed (&gt;7 days) or no extraction for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections in the UK using a decision-analytic model from the NHS perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A decision-tree model was constructed to simulate clinical and economic outcomes in adult patients with systemic or pocket CIED infections.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary care hospital setting within the UK NHS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A simulated cohort of adult patients with systemic or pocket CIED infections. Model inputs were sourced from published literature and NHS cost data (2023 &pound;).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Early lead extraction (&le;7 days after diagnosis/admission) compared with delayed extraction (&gt;7 days) or no extraction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Adverse events avoided and total healthcare costs over a 1-year time horizon; deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model robustness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Early extraction was both clinically and economically superior to delayed or no extraction. For systemic infections, early extraction reduced costs by &pound;123 056 and avoided 9.0 adverse events per 100 patients, with mortality falling from 20.0 to 7.5 per 100 patients. In pocket infections, early extraction lowered costs by &pound;104 904 and avoided 8.4 adverse events per 100 patients, with mortality decreasing from 12.4 to 0.9 per 100 patients. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, with antibiotic failure rates being the most influential parameter.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Early lead extraction for CIED infections is a cost-effective, dominant strategy in the UK, reducing mortality, adverse events and overall costs. These results strongly support guideline recommendations for prompt extraction and highlight the need for improved adherence to evidence-based management of CIED infections.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rinaldi, A., Howell, S., Verma, S., Youn, J.-H., Uehlin, A., Vanden Baviere, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113198</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113198</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness modelling of early lead extraction for cardiac implantable electronic device infections in the United Kingdom]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113198</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113826?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence on anaemia across trimesters of pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113826?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pregnancy-related anaemia significantly affects human development across life stages. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), country-specific epidemiological variations primarily driven by nutritional practices, socioeconomic factors and health-system disparities contribute to heterogeneity in prevalence, severity and adverse birth outcomes (ABOs). While anaemia and micronutrient deficiencies in pregnancy are well studied globally, comprehensive trimester-specific evidence and their associations with ABOs in SSA remain scarce. This review, therefore, examines the breadth and nature of existing evidence on these associations within SSA, thereby updating current knowledge and informing regionally tailored interventions and future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A scoping review methodology will be employed due to the limited volume of literature addressing the specific research questions and population. The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework, applying the population-concept-context approach. Comprehensive searches will be conducted across CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholar, EBSCO Open Dissertations and relevant organisational websites. The planned search period will span from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract data using JBI-adapted protocols within the Rayyan review platform. Any discrepancies will be resolved via discussion with the research team. Findings will be synthesised narratively through descriptive content analysis and visual mapping.</p>
<p>This review will include peer-reviewed studies and grey literature that investigate the associations between anaemia or deficiencies in iron, folate and vitamin B<SUB>12</SUB> during pregnancy trimesters and ABOs in SSA. All relevant sources of evidence will be considered, regardless of study design or methodology, provided they report on women of reproductive age who experienced anaemia in any trimester and were subsequently identified with ABOs. Birth outcomes of interest include low birth weight, macrosomia, small or large for gestational age, preterm birth, post-term birth and stillbirth. Only sources published in English from 2016 onward will be included. The studies&rsquo; quality will be evaluated using Cochrane&rsquo;s risk of bias assessment and mixed methods appraisal tools and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This scoping review will not require ethical approval as it will synthesise published data and reports. It has been registered with the Open Science Framework. This review does not involve human participants. The final report will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The findings will be used to shape subsequent research, serving as a fundamental element of the evidence and knowledge mapping framework. As this study protocol was not reviewed by an ethics committee, the appropriate contact for research integrity matters is the Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adjei-Gyamfi, S., Zeng, I., Aryee, P. A., Mearns, G. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113826</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113826</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence on anaemia across trimesters of pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113826</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113826</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113949?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Teaching Fellow programmes as a strategy to support the delivery of NHS workforce priorities: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113949?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The National Health Service (NHS) faces mounting pressure from an ageing population and the backlog of care following the COVID-19 pandemic. The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan sets out a strategic framework to address these pressures through three priorities: train, retain and reform. The plan outlines a range of measures, including the doubling of medical school places over the next decade. Realisation of these ambitions is constrained by limited training capacity, as existing educators face significant pressures due to clinical demands. Clinical Teaching Fellow (CTF) programmes provide resident doctors with protected time for education and may help expand capacity and alleviate workforce pressures on established educators. Despite their rapid growth, CTF programmes remain under-described, and their contribution to NHS workforce priorities has not been systematically examined. To address this gap, this scoping review will map published and unpublished evidence on UK-based CTF programmes, engaging knowledge users to ensure findings are relevant to practice and workforce priorities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews. Evidence will be identified from academic databases (British Education Index, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science) and grey literature sources (Google Scholar, NHS and medical school websites, deanery pages and job-advertising platforms). Two reviewers will independently screen and extract data using a piloted form, with discrepancies resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Extracted data will undergo descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis, guided by a Theory of Change framework to identify how CTF programme inputs, activities and outcomes relate to NHS workforce priorities. Knowledge users will be engaged throughout the review to refine research questions, inform source selection, interpret findings, and shape dissemination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been granted. All participants will provide informed consent. Participant contributions will be pseudonymised, and data will be managed in accordance with UK data protection legislation. Dissemination will be informed by knowledge users to ensure that findings on CTF programmes, including reported outcomes and identified gaps, are shared with those involved in delivering or supporting CTF programmes and with NHS stakeholders responsible for workforce priorities in training, retention and reform.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, N., Khan, Z., Hofmann, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113949</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113949</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Teaching Fellow programmes as a strategy to support the delivery of NHS workforce priorities: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113949</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113949</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114031?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Real-world changes in lipid-lowering therapy use and LDL-C goal attainment in high and very high cardiovascular risk patients in the UK: a secondary analysis of the European SANTORINI study 1-year follow-up]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114031?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This real-world study investigated the changes of lipid lowering therapy (LLT) usage in patients with high or very high cardiovascular (CV) risk in the UK and the group of all other European countries in the SANTORINI study up to 1 year from baseline and the impact this treatment had on the attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) risk-adjusted goals set by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and those in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) dyslipidaemia guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Secondary analysis of the SANTORINI dataset (an international, prospective, observational, non-interventional study (NCT04271280)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary and secondary care centres in the UK and the group of other European countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>663 UK patients with high and very high CV risk were included in this analysis and 8502 from the group of other European countries. Of these, 380 UK patients and 6830 from the group of other European countries had LDL-C information available at baseline and 1-year follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary objectives were to describe patients&rsquo; lipid management, LDL-C levels at 1-year follow-up and their attainment of 2023 NICE (&le;2.0 mmol/L) and 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C 2019 guideline-recommended LDL-C goals (&lt;1.4 mmol/L for very high-risk patients and &lt;1.8 mmol/L for high-risk patients) within this time frame.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over the course of 1-year follow-up, the overall proportion of UK patients on no LLT reduced from 20.4% at baseline to 7.1%, similar to that observed in the group of other European countries (baseline&ndash;20.9%, 1 year&ndash;3.0%). The proportion of UK patients receiving LLT monotherapy increased from 74.8% at baseline to 84.9%, higher at both time points than that observed for the group of other European countries (baseline: 52.0%, 1 year: 55.0%). The use of any combination therapy increased slightly from baseline to 1 year in the UK overall cohort (4.9% vs 7.1%) and overall in the group of all other European countries, the cohort increased from baseline (27.1%) to 1 year (40.2%). Overall, mean (SD) LDL-C levels in the UK were 2.5 (1.2) mmol/L at baseline and 2.1 (1.0) mmol/L at 1 year and for the group of other European countries were 2.4 (1.2) mmol/L at baseline and 2.0 (0.9) mmol/L at 1 year. The overall proportions of UK patients achieving the UK NICE treatment goal and ESC/EAS 2019 guidelines at baseline versus 1-year follow-up were 40.3% vs 52.6% and 22.9% vs 32.9%, respectively; 21.1% and 30.9% of patients in the group of other European countries achieved the ESC/EAS 2019 guidelines at baseline and 1-year follow-up, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this UK-focused analysis of the SANTORINI study, use of LLT increased modestly over 1 year, accompanied by a reduction in average LDL-C levels. However, mean LDL-C remained above the NICE goal, and attainment of both NICE and ESC/EAS LDL-C thresholds remained suboptimal. The findings highlight continued opportunities to optimise lipid management in UK clinical practice, including the potential for broader use of combination therapies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connolly, D., Fuat, A., McCormack, T., Mcnally, D., Garstang, J., Ryan, J., Reed, A., Robinson, D., Catapano, A. L., Ray, K. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114031</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114031</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Real-world changes in lipid-lowering therapy use and LDL-C goal attainment in high and very high cardiovascular risk patients in the UK: a secondary analysis of the European SANTORINI study 1-year follow-up]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114031</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114031</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114584?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Methodologies and methods for the development, evaluation and implementation of psychosocial interventions for dementia: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114584?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Research on psychosocial interventions for dementia demonstrates increased rigour and robustness. However, if we are to influence practice, beyond results from randomised controlled trials, a variety of types and sources of evidence is needed. The Medical Research Council (MRC) framework offers a valuable guide for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions, to facilitate integration of research into practice. There is limited knowledge of how researchers design, evaluate and implement psychosocial intervention studies in dementia, using the MRC framework. This scoping review aims to: (1) identify the methodological and methods trends, use and gaps in the development, evaluation and implementation of psychosocial interventions for dementia, and (2) determine if and how the MRC six core elements were considered and applied in studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Six databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) will be searched for studies published from 2015 (when MRC process guidance was published) to 2025. Identified deduplicated citations will be imported into Covidence software, where up to 40% of title/abstracts will be double screened by independent reviewers. ASReview will be used to rank articles by relevance, with a stopping criterion of 250 consecutive irrelevant articles. Full texts will be reviewed by a single reviewer and those excluded will be checked by a second reviewer. Data extraction will include study aim/objective (ie, to develop/adapt; test feasibility/pilot; evaluate; implement); methodology and methods applied; information on which MRC six core elements were considered (yes/no), and if so, how they were addressed (ie, qualitative details). A narrative synthesis, alongside graphical representations (eg, table/bar charts/histograms), will be used to synthesise findings on methodologies and methods mapped onto the MRC framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This secondary analysis scoping review does not require ethics approval. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication(s), seminars, webinars, conferences, postgraduate dementia programmes, blogs, commissioner briefings and social media. The findings will provide a state-of-the-art overview of current practices; advance methods/methodology such as informing a Delphi consensus study on appropriate research approaches; and guide researchers in application of the MRC framework to widen the scope of dementia care evidence for practice improvements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>Submitted to Open Science Framework <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S56NQ">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S56NQ</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DAndrea, F., Bartels, S. L., Markaryan, M., Masterson-Algar, P., Bernal, A. N., De Bruin, S. R., Chirico, I., Flynn, A., Garcia, L., Gebhard, D., Handley, M., Janssen, N., Roes, M., Stephens, N., Teesing, G., Van den Block, L., Windle, K., Moniz-Cook, E., Graff, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114584</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114584</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Methodologies and methods for the development, evaluation and implementation of psychosocial interventions for dementia: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114584</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114584</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114769?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of the self-care in partners of cancer patients (SC-PC) questionnaire: a mixed methods study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114769?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Partners of cancer patients often show similar levels of distress like the oncological patients themselves, and they are a primary resource for the patient&rsquo;s physical and emotional support. Integrating self-care in daily routines is applied as a treatment approach in cognitive behavioural therapy. Carrying out self-care in caring relatives prevents anxiety and depression, enhances health-related quality of life and reduces caregiver burden. So far, there is no instrument which assesses self-care specifically in partners of cancer patients. The aim of this prospective mixed-methods validation study is to develop and psychometrically evaluate a psychological self-reported questionnaire assessing self-care in partners of cancer patients (SC-PC questionnaire).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Recruitment of participants will take place online and offline across Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The data collection will be carried out via personal cognitive qualitative interviews and a web-based data assessment tool within four phases: (1) personal qualitative semi-structured interviews with n15 partners of cancer patients on self-care in different areas of life; (2) pretest of derived self-care items concerning feasibility, comprehensibility and completeness with n=3&ndash;5 (psycho-)oncological experts and n=20&ndash;30 partners of cancer patients; (3) pilot study with an exploratory factor analysis with n=300 partners of cancer patients, based on an expected initial item pool of approximately 30 items and a 10:1 item-participant ratio; and (4) main validation study with confirmatory factor analysis with n=400 partners of cancer patients, based on an expected final item pool of approximately 20 items and a 20:1 item-participant ratio. Subgroup analyses will be calculated with demographic and medical variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>A project-specific concept for data protection was established. All legal and professional regulations will be complied with. In order to meet ethical standards and protect participants from potential emotional burdens during this mainly decentralised study, ethical guidelines for online studies were implemented in the study design. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Ulm (number/ID of the approval: 230/25). Results will be presented at conferences and published in scientific peer-reviewed journals for broad reach. The resulting self-care questionnaire may be implemented as a new measurement instrument in research projects investigating psycho-oncological interventions for partners of cancer patients and the practical field of cancer counselling for progress assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00038519.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[von Dungen, K., Herschbach, P., Gu&#x0308;ndel, H., Ho&#x0308;nig, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114769</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114769</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of the self-care in partners of cancer patients (SC-PC) questionnaire: a mixed methods study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114769</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114769</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114864?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Missed opportunities in methanol poisoning: a qualitative exploration of the socio-material practices of health professionals responding to acute methanol poisoning in Bangladesh]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114864?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study applied a socio-material practice lens to examine health professionals&rsquo; responses to methanol poisoning in Bangladesh and to compare these practices with established guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study employed a rapid ethnographic design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data were generated in primary-level, secondary-level and tertiary-level health facilities in six districts of western Bangladesh between September 2024 and May 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We carried out semi-structured interviews with 50 health professionals with responsibilities for managing patients experiencing alcohol-related or poisoning-related conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among health professionals, the meanings of methanol poisoning as a diagnostic category, its symptoms and treatments are obscured by moral concerns about alcohol. Materials, including antidotes, for managing methanol poisoning were scarce, and health professionals reported using readily available medical supplies for supportive treatment, though not specifically adapted for methanol poisoning. Health professionals&rsquo; care practices for responding to methanol poisoning were often structured by these meanings and materials, with guidelines remaining largely invisible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Socio-material practices of health professionals in response to methanol poisoning in Bangladesh are characterised by missed opportunities. Improving responses requires shifting the meanings of methanol poisoning as a diagnostic category, ensuring that materials such as treatment guidelines and appropriate antidotes, such as ethanol and fomepizole, are available and supporting providers to enact care practices that reflect these guidelines.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perkins, J. E., Sorensen, J. B., Islam, M. S., Hovda, K. E., Chowdhury, F. R., Ghose, A., Rahman, A. S. M. M., Eddleston, M., Street, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114864</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114864</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Missed opportunities in methanol poisoning: a qualitative exploration of the socio-material practices of health professionals responding to acute methanol poisoning in Bangladesh]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114864</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114864</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115007?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sensitivity of immunohistochemistry in the laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115007?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Leprosy is a chronic disease caused by the bacillus <I>Mycobacterium leprae</I> and remains a public health concern in endemic countries. Early diagnosis is fundamental to prevent transmission and irreversible disabilities. Histopathological identification of acid-fast bacilli in tissue specimens is traditionally considered the laboratory reference standard; however, its sensitivity is limited, particularly in paucibacillary forms. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been proposed as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for detecting <I>M. leprae</I> antigens in tissue samples, but its diagnostic accuracy has not been systematically synthesised. This protocol outlines a systematic review aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of IHC in the laboratory diagnosis of leprosy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies will include analytical observational studies and clinical trials evaluating IHC in human subjects with suspected leprosy. The reference standard will be defined as the identification of acid-fast bacilli in skin biopsy specimens from patients with compatible clinical presentation using conventional staining methods (eg, Fite-Faraco), with the exclusion of alternative mycobacterial infections when applicable. Searches will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and BVS/LILACS (Biblioteca Virtual em Sa&uacute;de/Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), as well as grey literature sources, at 31 May 2026. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction using a standardised Microsoft Excel form and risk of bias assessment using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Sensitivity and specificity estimates will be calculated. If appropriate, a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted using RevMan (Review Manager) and Stata.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required because this study will use publicly available data. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pereira Leite Neto, M., de Lima, M. A. P., da Silva, C. G. L., Kerr, L. R. F. S., Queiroz Gurgel, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115007</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115007</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sensitivity of immunohistochemistry in the laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115007</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115007</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115259?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of immunity-boosting regimens for COVID-19 upon initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (CIRCUIT): study protocol for a randomised, controlled clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115259?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk of delayed SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance, severe COVID-19 and related death. This heterogeneous group of affected patients includes but is not limited to those with a haematological malignancy, people on immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of autoimmune/inflammatory diseases and those following bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Immunosuppression is associated with decreased rates of anti-spike IgG seroconversion following COVID-19 vaccination. While clinical guidelines have been established to guide vaccination pre-splenectomy and post-BMT, there are limited data to guide timing of COVID-19 or other booster vaccines in adults commencing new or intensified moderate to severe immunosuppression. The comparison of immunity-boosting regimens for COVID-19 upon initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (CIRCUIT) study was designed to address this knowledge gap. CIRCUIT investigates whether administration of a third (or subsequent) COVID-19 booster vaccine &le;2 weeks prior to immunosuppression provides greater anti-spike IgG-mediated immunity than a booster given 24 weeks after new or intensified immunosuppression, that is, week 24 timepoint (Group 1; n=280). Additionally, the research will investigate whether giving a fourth post-BMT COVID-19 booster vaccine at 9 months post-transplant provides greater anti-spike IgG-mediated immunity than a booster given 15 months post-transplant (Group 2; n=40).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The CIRCUIT study is an open-label, multicentre randomised clinical trial. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either an additional COVID-19 booster &le;2 weeks pre-immunosuppression and a diphtheria/tetanus toxoids (DT) booster at 24 weeks following new or intensified immunosuppression (week 24 timepoint) or receive a DT booster &le;2 weeks pre-immunosuppression and an additional COVID-19 booster at week 24 (Group 1). Group 2 participants who underwent autologous or allogenic BMT in the last 9 months will be randomised 1:1 to either receive a fourth post-BMT COVID-19 booster at 9 or 15 months post-transplant. The primary outcome will be the integrated time-weighted area under the curve anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody (NAb) response over 12 months from a SARS-CoV-2 booster as assessed by a high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 NAb platform assay. Key secondary outcomes of the CIRCUIT randomised control trial will include safety and generation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen specific T and B cell responses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The research protocol was approved by the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee on 25 August 2022 (Ref no. 2022/PID00782 &ndash; 20022/ETH0069). Study results will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals and presented at local and international conferences. All findings regardless of the outcome will be reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05415267">NCT05415267</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carey, D. L., Ahlenstiel, G., Brilot, F., Brown, D. A., Bull, R., Crowther, H., Cunningham, A., Davenport, M. P., Diamond, P., Hamad, N., Johnston, A., Kelleher, A. D., Lee, F. J., Matthews, G. V., Petoumenos, K., Quichua, G. C., Swaminathan, S., Trotman, J., Turville, S., Vukic, S., Wong, P., Sasson, S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115259</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115259</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Immunology (including allergy)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of immunity-boosting regimens for COVID-19 upon initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (CIRCUIT): study protocol for a randomised, controlled clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Immunology (including allergy)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115259</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115855?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Facilitators and barriers to the practice of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in UK maternity services: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115855?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore barriers and facilitators to midwifery practice of intermittent auscultation according to national guidance in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multisite ethnographic study using observations of practice, semistructured interviews and informal conversations. Framework analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>11 maternity units across seven NHS maternity services in England and Wales in 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Midwives and other maternity care professionals involved in fetal monitoring during labour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>&lsquo;Intermittent auscultation&rsquo; (IA), or listening to the fetal heart rate at regular intervals, to monitor fetal well-being during active labour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>IA monitoring was frequently observed to be marginalised due to national and local pressures. IA is a complex skill that requires expertise and practice to develop and maintain. However, lack of a robust evidence base for IA methods is a further barrier to implementation. The study uncovered examples of facilitators that include: leadership engagement, access to knowledge and information supported in mentorship programmes and peer support models. These features created micro-environments where IA was valued, supported and integrated into care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our study highlights the significant impact of multilevel factors on the implementation of IA within UK maternity care. However, when organisational readiness, strong leadership engagement and supportive conditions are present, IA can be delivered in accordance with guidance. These findings underscore the need to align policy, infrastructure and organisational culture to sustain evidence-based, woman-centred practices such as IA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacLellan, J., Ade, M., Douthwaite, M., Fitzsimons, B., Joash, K., Mulla, S., Sanders, J., Kenyon, S., Pope, C. J., Rowe, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115855</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115855</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Facilitators and barriers to the practice of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in UK maternity services: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115855</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115855</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116003?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Refining Trichomonas vaginalis treatment in women and men: protocol for an open-label randomised comparison of multi-dose oral metronidazole versus single-dose oral secnidazole]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116003?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p><I>Trichomonas vaginalis</I> is estimated to be the most common non-viral sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide with 156 million new cases each year. In 2021, the United States Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated their STI Treatment Guidelines to recommend multi-dose oral metronidazole (MTZ) for all <I>T. vaginalis</I>-infected women. Although multi-dose oral MTZ 500 mg twice daily was found to be superior to single-dose 2 g oral MTZ in multiple trials in women, multi-dose oral MTZ still had unacceptably high rates of breakthrough infection (9%&ndash;11%) at test-of-cure. With approximately 156 million cases of <I>T. vaginalis</I> worldwide per year, over 17 million persons per year are estimated to be insufficiently treated with multi-dose oral MTZ. Moreover, past trials only included women, and single-dose 2 g oral MTZ remains the recommended treatment for men. Thus, there is a critical need to further refine <I>T. vaginalis</I> treatment in women and men. A single dose of 2 g of oral secnidazole (SEC), a next generation 5-nitroimidazole with a longer half-life than oral MTZ and improved tolerability, may be a good option. This study will examine the effectiveness of multi-dose oral MTZ versus single-dose oral SEC in both men and women infected with <I>T. vaginalis</I>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multi-centred open-label effectiveness trial comparing oral multi-dose MTZ (500 mg twice daily for 7 days) to 2 g of single-dose oral SEC. This trial aims to enrol 1200 <I>T</I>. <I>vaginalis</I>-infected women and men aged 18 years and older at four clinical sites: the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Sexual Health Clinic and the UAB Gynaecology Clinics in Birmingham, AL, LSU-CrescentCare Sexual Health Centre (LSUHSC-NO) in New Orleans, LA, and HealthCare Clinical Data, Inc. in Miami, FL. Those who are pregnant/lactating, have been treated with a 5-nitroimidazole within the last 28 days, used intra-vaginal boric acid or any other intra-vaginal treatment for <I>T. vaginalis</I> within the last 14 days, have a history of a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction to 5-nitroimidazoles, are taking phenytoin and/or warfarin, use any medications which may alter the metabolism of oral MTZ, or have previously been enrolled will be excluded from the study. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to either multi-dose oral MTZ or single-dose oral SEC. A test-of-cure (TOC) visit will be performed 4 weeks after completion of treatment (window 1 week before and 2 weeks after scheduled TOC visit).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol is approved through a single Institutional Review Board (IRB) mechanism by the Tulane Human Research Protection Programme (Protocol # 2024&ndash;101 SPHTM). External relying sites are the UAB IRB (including both the UAB Sexual Health Research Clinic and Gynaecology Clinics; Protocol ID IRB-300012617), the LSUHSC-NO IRB (LSU-CrescentCare Sexual Health Centre; Protocol ID 6979) and the Advarra IRB (Healthcare Clinical Data Inc; Protocol ID Pro00085531). This study is also approved for referral purposes only by the Research Review Committee at the Jefferson County Department of Health (JCDH) Sexual Health Clinic in Birmingham, AL (JCDH Research Number 2024&ndash;03). Study findings will be presented in scientific conferences and peer-reviewed journals, shared with treatment advisory boards, as well as disseminated to providers and patients in communities of interest. The study Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will meet twice a year to review patient safety data and study progress and provide recommendations on the study&rsquo;s continuation or modification.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06261840">NCT06261840</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muzny, C. A., Lillis, R. A., Chavoustie, S. E., Arbuckle, J. L., Van Gerwen, O. T., Sagoe, M., Kandregula, A. R., Srivastav, S., Kissinger, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116003</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116003</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Refining Trichomonas vaginalis treatment in women and men: protocol for an open-label randomised comparison of multi-dose oral metronidazole versus single-dose oral secnidazole]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116003</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116003</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116809?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicentre prospective trial of abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid versus CT for detection of late recurrent HCC (AMRICT): study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116809?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurs in most patients after curative treatment. Late recurrence (&gt;2 years after curative treatment) typically indicates de novo tumours in the residual liver. Although contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and MRI are widely used for post-treatment follow-up, they each have limitations including radiation exposure, high cost and limited access. The abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid versus multiphasic CECT for detection of late recurrent HCC after curative treatment (AMRICT) trial aims to compare gadoxetic acid-enhanced abbreviated MRI using hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBP-AMRI) and multiphasic CECT for detecting late recurrent HCC after curative treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective multicentre intra-individual comparison trial will enrol 455 participants who have undergone surgical resection or local ablation for HCC and remained recurrence-free for over 2 years. Each participant will undergo two imaging sessions at 6&plusmn;2 month intervals, using both HBP-AMRI and multiphasic CECT. The primary endpoint is the detection rate of all-stage HCC. The secondary endpoints include the false referral rate of all-stage HCC and detection and false referral rates of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0&ndash;A HCC and of stage 0 HCC. Structured imaging protocols and quality assessments will be implemented for both modalities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the three participating institutions (approval number: 2023&ndash;1630 (Asan Medical Center), H-2407-146-1556 (Seoul National University Hospital) and B-2410-929-401 (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06537193). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific meetings, public forums and guideline updates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov: <A HREF="NCT06537193">NCT06537193</A>. Participant enrolment began on 12 December 2024, and is ongoing.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Park, H. J., Lee, D. H., Chang, W., Kim, H. Y., Kim, D. H., Choi, W.-M., Chung, S. W., Choi, J., Lee, D., Shim, J. H., Lee, H. C., Lim, Y.-S., Kim, S.-O., Singal, A. G., Kim, S. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116809</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116809</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicentre prospective trial of abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid versus CT for detection of late recurrent HCC (AMRICT): study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116809</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116809</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116936?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Glycemia Range and Offspring Weight and adiposity in response To Human milk (GROWTH) study: protocol for an observational cohort designed to study lactational programming]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116936?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Maternal human milk feedings continue an offspring&rsquo;s exposure to the programming stimuli of maternal metabolism during the postnatal period. While considerable research focuses on associations between in utero environments and offspring metabolic disease, few studies have been able to specifically measure how human milk composition modifies programming of children&rsquo;s growth in conjunction with comprehensive measures of maternal glycaemia during pregnancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Glycemia Range and Offspring Weight and adiposity in response To Human milk (GROWTH) Study is a longitudinal cohort enrolling women with a singleton pregnancy who (1) undergo serial testing of glycaemia during pregnancy and (2) are intending to provide their breast milk through direct breastfeeding or pumped milk as the primary nutrition for their infant. Enrolment started in October 2023 and is expected to be completed in December 2026. Key procedures include virtual lactation support visits, serial human milk sampling at three time points, maternal and infant blood sampling, serial maternal and child anthropometric measurements and diet assessment. After delivery, mother&ndash;child dyads are followed until children turn 2 years of age. The primary exposure variable is maternal glycaemia obtained from a fasting, 3 hour 100 g oral glucose tolerance test performed at 24&ndash;28 weeks of gestation, and the primary outcome measure is the composite of human milk linoleic and docosahexaenoic acid concentrations in milk samples collected at 1 month postpartum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Lurie Children&rsquo;s Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) provides central oversight of the GROWTH Study in conjunction with each participating centre&rsquo;s IRB. The GROWTH Study data has the potential to inform perinatal health and future research in lactation and human milk science by providing comprehensive measures of human milk composition and early childhood growth and body composition parameters impacted by maternal metabolism in pregnancy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josefson, J. L., Gregg, B., Sen, S., Rajakumar, K., McGowan, E. C., Andrei, A.-C., Arend, A. B., Rick, A.-M., Marshall, E., Caal, K., Robinson, D. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T08:42:34-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116936</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116936</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Glycemia Range and Offspring Weight and adiposity in response To Human milk (GROWTH) study: protocol for an observational cohort designed to study lactational programming]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116936</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116936</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102316?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rehabilitation intervention to improve Recovery after an Episode of Delirium in adults over 65 years (RecoverED): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study in NHS acute hospitals in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102316?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To test a theory-informed, person-centred rehabilitation intervention for older adults following a hospital admission complicated by delirium, developed in line with the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions, to determine whether: (a) the intervention is acceptable to individuals with delirium and (b) a definitive trial and parallel economic evaluation of the intervention are feasible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multicentre, single-arm feasibility study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>19 patient (aged &gt;65 years old) and carer pairs were recruited from six National Health Service acute hospitals across the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Home-based rehabilitation programme designed to support recovery after hospital discharge, addressing cognitive, physical, physiological and psychosocial needs. Delivered by a trained team of occupational therapists, physiotherapists and rehabilitation support workers, the intervention included a comprehensive home assessment, collaborative goal setting, up to 10 personalised sessions over 12 weeks and the use of a recovery record to guide progress, education and psychosocial support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Examined aspects of feasibility including eligibility, recruitment, data collection, attrition, acceptability of the rehabilitation intervention and potential to calculate cost-effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 419 patients were identified as having delirium and 36 met the full eligibility. 19 patient and carer pairs agreed to participate in the study (consent rate 53%; 95% CI 35% to 70%) with 13 participants going on to start the intervention (68%; 95% CI 43% to 87%) and 10 participants completing final follow-up (53%; 95% CI 29% to 76%). Baseline assessments were conducted either during hospitalisation or postdischarge, with initial assessments occurring a mean of 18 days (SD=13.0) postdischarge, and 77% completed within 14 days. Participants completed a mean of eight sessions (SD=2.9). 19 participants completed the primary outcome at baseline, while 10 participants completed it at 6-month follow-up. The economic evaluation indicated a total cost of &pound;1249.29 per participant, covering assessments, intervention sessions and training costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The intervention showed feasibility among older adults recovering from delirium, as evidenced by the trial processes for participants who entered the study. However, recruitment challenges indicate a need for better strategies and further research through a definitive randomised controlled trial to demonstrate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN15676570">ISRCTN15676570</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan, L., Um, J., OConnell, A., Raghuraman, S., Bingham, A., Laverick, A., Chandler, K., Connors, J., Mahmoud, A., Hawton, A., Goodwin, E., Morgan-Trimmer, S., Goodwin, V. A., Ukoumunne, O. C., Jackson, T. A., Richardson, S. J., Collier, L., Glasby, J., Whale, B., Dawe, P., Burnett-Fry, N., Clare, L., on behalf of the RecoverED team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T07:48:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102316</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102316</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rehabilitation intervention to improve Recovery after an Episode of Delirium in adults over 65 years (RecoverED): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study in NHS acute hospitals in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102316</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108568?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving menstrual and vaginal health for all (IMVAHA): protocol for a randomised cross-over trial assessing the impact of menstrual products on the vaginal microbiome of women aged 18-35 years in Cameroon, Peru and Switzerland]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108568?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Menstrual health is critical to achieving gender equity and reaching the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, yet evidence on the health impacts of menstrual products&mdash;particularly on the vaginal microbiota&mdash;is limited. The <I>Improving Menstrual and Vaginal Health for All</I> (IMVAHA) project aims to address this knowledge gap through qualitative exploration, a health survey and clinical trial embedded in three sister projects: <I>Laura</I> (Peru), <I>Leke</I> (Cameroon) and <I>Marie</I> (Switzerland). This paper outlines the protocol for the IMVAHA health survey and clinical trial studies, which aim to (1) assess menstrual hygiene practices, product preferences and vaginal health; and (2) evaluate longitudinal changes in vaginal microbiota associated with the use of pads, tampons and menstrual cups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The IMVAHA project will take place in urban Cameroon, urban Peru, and in Switzerland. The baseline survey will explore vaginal and menstrual health behaviours and preferences, including vaginal complaints, menstrual products and menstrual stigma. Descriptive statistics will be calculated for a cross-sectional profile of vaginal and menstrual health within and between contexts, and mixed effects linear regression models will be run to identify associations between contextual factors and key vaginal and menstrual outcomes. From survey participants, 300 eligible, consenting women (100 per country) will be enrolled in a 7-month crossover clinical trial. As a self-controlled trial, a dedicated control group is not necessary. Each participant will use pads, tampons and menstrual cups for two menstrual cycles per product, providing vaginal swabs at baseline and post-menstruation. Swabs will undergo 16S rRNA sequencing, pH testing and screening for toxic shock syndrome-related bacteria. A short survey on health behaviours and symptoms, menstrual hygiene practices and participant experiences with different menstrual products will be administered during each menstrual period. The primary outcome of the clinical trial is the log ratio of <I>Dialister</I> to <I>Lactobacillus crispatus</I> abundance measured after the use of different menstrual products. Mixed-effects linear regression will assess differences in the primary outcome across product types. Secondary analyses will include per-protocol comparisons and ORs with 95% CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, Council for the International Organizations of Medical Sciences guidelines and local regulations. Ethical approval has been obtained in all three countries (National Ethics Committee for Human Health Research in Cameroon (CE N&deg; 2024/03/1649/CE/CNERSH/SP); the Institutional Review Board of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia and Universidad Nacional de la Amazon&iacute;a Peruana in Peru (217572) and the Ethics Commission of Northwest and Central Switzerland (2024-02135)). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants after detailed explanation of study procedures and risks. Data will be securely stored, with participant anonymity maintained. A political economy analysis will explore regulatory environments for menstrual products, and findings will be disseminated through policy briefs, stakeholder networks, academic publications and conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06646185">NCT06646185</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ticlla, M. R., Dumbaugh, M., Condori-Catachura, S., Kenfack, J., Hattendorf, J., Van Der Donck, L., Arista, K. M., Arora, N., Gebert, S., Ackermann, L., Ahannach, S., Riveros, M., Blas, M. M., Kenmoe, S., Barriere, F. Y., Shea, A. A., Pinedo-Cancino, V., Rivas-Ruiz, R., Di Cecco, V., Esemu, L., Ochoa, T. J., Lebeer, S., Martin Hilber, A., Merten, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108568</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108568</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving menstrual and vaginal health for all (IMVAHA): protocol for a randomised cross-over trial assessing the impact of menstrual products on the vaginal microbiome of women aged 18-35 years in Cameroon, Peru and Switzerland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108568</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108568</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110930?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EMPOWHPVR: exploring the factors that impact HPV self-sampling uptake amongst Black women and people with a cervix in Peel region, Ontario - a qualitative study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110930?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Every 2 minutes, a woman dies from cervical cancer, resulting in over 300 000 preventable deaths globally. Nearly all cervical cancers are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) and are preventable with HPV vaccination and screening through Papanicolaou (Pap) and HPV tests. In Canada, cervical cancer mortality rates have declined in recent decades with more accessible cervical cancer screening programmes. However, screening rates remain low, particularly among Black women and people with a cervix (WPC).</p>
<p>Cervical cancer screening studies of Black WPC in Ontario&mdash;Canada&rsquo;s most populous province&mdash;are limited. These studies indicate Black WPCs are at elevated risk for under-screening, with many overdue for screening.</p>
<p>An innovative approach to begin addressing delays is HPV self-sampling (HPVSS). Self-sampling is a cost-effective and more accurate test for detecting high-risk HPV infections associated with precancerous changes versus the Pap test. Self-sampling supports Canada&rsquo;s action plan&mdash;a response to WHO&rsquo;s global strategy&mdash;to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040.</p>
<p>Despite Canada&rsquo;s plan, research on the state of Black WPCs&rsquo; HPV knowledge and self-sampling interventions tailored to them is scant. These scarcities are concerning as Ontario plans to implement HPV primary screening and offer HPVSS soon.</p>
<p>The study objective is to codevelop an HPVSS intervention tailored for and made by Black WPC in Peel region, Ontario. This protocol focuses on phase one of a two-phased study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In phase one, a qualitative, community-informed approach, co-led by community research assistants, will be used to purposively recruit 10 service providers (eg, clinicians, social workers, community care workers) and 40 Black WPC who will undergo one-on-one semistructured interviews and sociodemographic surveys to explore the state of: (1) Black WPC&rsquo;s level of HPV, cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening knowledge; (2) Black WPC&rsquo;s motivators, beliefs, attitudes and misconceptions towards HPVSS; (3) Black WPC&rsquo;s perceived barriers and facilitators to HPVSS and (4) service providers&rsquo; perspectives on Black WPC&rsquo;s barriers and facilitators to HPVSS. Charmaz&rsquo;s grounded theory approach and intersectionality will guide data collection and analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Trillium Health Partners Research Ethics Board (ID#1207). Study findings will be disseminated through community healthcare events, conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications and virtual and physical pamphlets. Additionally, summaries of the findings will be shared and tailored to collaborators, healthcare leadership and researchers and community health centres. Wide dissemination will help enhance understanding of the state of cervical cancer screening, HPV and HPVSS among Black WPC. Given Canada&rsquo;s commitment to eliminating cervical cancer, study findings will be used to begin developing an HPVSS intervention for Black communities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee-Foon, N. K., Lofters, A., Dias, K., Ogilvie, G. S., Massaquoi, N., Kuluski, K., Reid, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110930</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110930</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EMPOWHPVR: exploring the factors that impact HPV self-sampling uptake amongst Black women and people with a cervix in Peel region, Ontario - a qualitative study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110930</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110930</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110984?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenges in translating GINA asthma recommendations into practice: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals in Jordan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110984?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore barriers and enablers to the implementation of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommendations in Jordan, building on prior quantitative survey findings. We aimed to examine healthcare professionals&rsquo; experiences, perceptions and contextual challenges in translating guideline awareness into practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews. Analysis was inductive thematic, guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Healthcare services in Jordan, including public hospitals, private hospitals, outpatient clinics and community pharmacies, spanning both urban and semi-urban areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>28 healthcare professionals were purposively sampled to capture diverse roles, sectors and levels of experience. The sample included physicians (general practitioners and pulmonologists), pharmacists (community and hospital), nurses and Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) graduates. Eligibility required direct involvement in the management and counselling of adult patients with asthma within the preceding 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Perceptions of and experiences with implementing GINA recommendations in clinical practice, focusing on provider-level, system-level and patient-level barriers and enablers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eight interrelated themes were identified. A consistent &lsquo;know&ndash;do gap&rsquo; emerged, whereby clinicians were aware of guidelines but reverted to habitual practice due to insufficient training, scepticism or lack of support systems. Limited diagnostic capacity, particularly the absence of spirometry in public settings, led to symptom-based management. Pharmacotherapy decisions were shaped by patient demand, entrenched short-acting &beta;<SUB>2</SUB>-agonist use and affordability concerns. Inhaler technique counselling and written action plans were infrequently provided, largely due to workload and unclear interprofessional roles. Patients&rsquo; beliefs (eg, steroid fears, avoidance of inhalers during Ramadan, low health literacy) further impeded adherence. Despite these barriers, participants proposed pragmatic solutions, including concise locally adapted tools, structured Continuing Medical Education (CME), digital decision support, pharmacy-based inhaler technique clinics and public awareness campaigns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Asthma care in Jordan reflects a gap between GINA awareness and consistent application, driven by resource, organisational and cultural barriers. Improving outcomes will require system-level investment in diagnostic infrastructure, sustainable access to controller medications, interprofessional care models and culturally tailored patient education. These findings highlight the need for a coordinated national strategy to strengthen guideline implementation and provide a basis for developing policy and practice interventions across similar middle-income settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abed, A., Al Khatib, A. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110984</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110984</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenges in translating GINA asthma recommendations into practice: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals in Jordan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110984</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110984</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111168?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding tonic and phasic irritability in developmental psychopathology among help-seeking children and adolescents in Switzerland: Protocol for the longitudinal multimodal UTOPICA study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111168?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Irritability represents one of the most common causes of referral to child and adolescent mental health services. Conceptually, tonic irritability (i.e., persistent grumpy mood) can be distinguished from phasic irritability (i.e., temper outbursts). The objective of this research project is to develop a fine-grained, ecologically valid and multimodal characterisation of tonic and phasic irritability to better understand the differential role of the two components in developmental psychopathology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study has a longitudinal observational and experimental design and involves two sites: (a) the Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at the University Hospital of Lausanne and (b) the Division of Youth Mental Health at the Faculty of Psychology at the University of Basel. 220 help-seeking and healthy youths aged 8&ndash;14 years and their families will participate in the study consisting of a baseline assessment (i.e., self-report, interviews, cognitive assessments, autonomic measures, as well as in-situ experiments), an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) phase (over 2 weeks, including experience sampling method, cognitive assessment and passive monitoring) and a 1-year follow-up. Statistical analyses will include multilevel regression (e.g., linear mixed modelling).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination.</st>
<p>We obtained ethical approval from the local ethics committees (Cantonal Research Ethics Commission on Human Beings, CER-VD, #2023-01846) and data collection began in January 2025. The results of the present study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and will be presented at key conferences in the field of child and adolescent mental health, as well as at conferences focusing on EMA. Additionally, findings will be disseminated to practitioners, the educational sector and associations working with youths. We further intend to make the findings accessible to the general public through social media, for instance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Urben, S., Giovannini, J., Dietsche, A., Abi-Kheir, M., Schmidt, L., Koenig, J., Stringaris, A., Plessen, K. J., Kaess, M., Mu&#x0308;rner-Lavanchy, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111168</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111168</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding tonic and phasic irritability in developmental psychopathology among help-seeking children and adolescents in Switzerland: Protocol for the longitudinal multimodal UTOPICA study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111168</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111810?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Participatory priority setting of research questions for improving hospital care of adults with childhood-onset intellectual disabilities (PRISMA): a study protocol for a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111810?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Persons with childhood-onset intellectual or complex disabilities have an elevated probability of encountering delayed or erroneous diagnoses during hospital treatment. It is imperative to consider the possibility that mistreatment may worsen their health. Persons with intellectual disabilities face numerous challenges in accessing and using healthcare. These challenges include structural and communication barriers, as well as a dearth of competencies among health professionals in interacting with persons with intellectual disabilities. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of studies that analyse the challenges faced by persons with intellectual disabilities in hospital and even fewer that involve persons with intellectual disabilities in the research process. Therefore, the objective of the study described in this protocol is to identify the salient research questions for improving hospital care of adults with childhood-onset intellectual disabilities by collecting and prioritising the different perspectives of patients, caregivers and clinicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study design is based on the Priority Setting Partnership procedure of the James Lind Alliance, encompassing four steps to identify and prioritise issues with patients, caregivers and clinicians. Initially, problems and issues pertinent to those affected are collated using an open online questionnaire and subsequently clustered into topics. In the second step, the topics are transformed into potential research questions and reviewed by available scientific literature. Subsequently, research questions that cannot yet be answered by current literature are prioritised by participants in a second online questionnaire. Finally, the 25 questions rated most relevant are to be discussed in a one-day workshop with participants reflective of all target groups. The salient 10 research questions are to be determined using nominal group technique.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received a positive ethics vote from the Ethics Committee at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki on 21 March 2025 (reference 25-0106). This study&rsquo;s findings will be shared in academic conferences and published in scientific peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00037347.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scheffel, A., Fritsch, T., Arnold, S., Asam, T., Bettenhausen, B., Dengler, B., einsmehr, V., Spielmann, J., Weidmann, A., Winterholler, M., Prodinger, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111810</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111810</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Participatory priority setting of research questions for improving hospital care of adults with childhood-onset intellectual disabilities (PRISMA): a study protocol for a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111810</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111810</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychological predictors of adherence to antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV in high-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>People living with HIV (PLHIV) frequently face psychological challenges, including stigma, stress and social isolation, which can negatively affect adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Even in high-income countries where treatment is accessible, poor adherence can lead to drug resistance, reduced immune function and early morbidity. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on the relationship between psychological and mental health factors and ART adherence among PLHIV in high-income settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will include studies published in any language between January 2015 and the date of the last searches. Reports of studies published in languages other than English, and which appear to be eligible for inclusion after the first level of screening, will be translated using Google Translate.</p>
<p>Studies will be included if they continue to meet the inclusion criteria and the quality of the translation is sufficient to extract the relevant data. PLHIV aged &ge;15 years receiving ART in high-income countries. The studies to be included must assess psychological or mental health variables and ART adherence. Peer-reviewed journal articles will be the primary source of evidence. Grey literature identified from reference lists of key articles or using Google Advanced search techniques will be included. Searches for published studies will be done in OVID Medline, PsycINFO and Embase. Cochrane CENTRAL will be used to identify clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.</p>
<p>Two independent reviewers will assess study quality and risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool and Jadad Scale. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer. Synthesis of quantitative data will be primarily descriptive. Predictors that have been examined in three or more studies will be reported in detail while those assessed in fewer studies will be presented concisely.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will be a review of the literature and will not involve primary collection of patients&rsquo; data. We will include amendments to the protocol in the final review. The final study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. The results of this systematic review will inform clinical practice, guide future research and support policy development that minimise mental health barriers to ART adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251102248.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ezenwoko, A. Z., Pimentel, J., Gaborieau, M., Keynan, A., Robinson, C., Correia de Damasco Rodrigues, G., Bernardin, S., Linton, J., Fredborg, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112100</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112100</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychological predictors of adherence to antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV in high-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112100</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113486?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113486?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the effects of nurse-led shared decision-making (SDM) on lung cancer screening outcomes, including low-dose CT (LDCT) uptake, benign findings, early cancer detection and willingness to participate among high-risk populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Medline via OvidSP, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE via OvidSP, Web of Science, Scopus, grey literature databases and clinical trial registries were searched from inception to March 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies evaluating nurse-led SDM interventions in high-risk lung cancer populations, reporting outcomes including LDCT uptake rates, screening results (Lung-RADS (Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System) classifications), early-stage cancer detection or willingness to participate. Randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and observational studies were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (for non-randomised studies) and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (for randomised controlled trials). Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>13 studies (n=13 608 participants) were included, comprising 10 single-arm studies and three comparative studies. In single-arm studies without control groups, nurse-led SDM programmes achieved a pooled LDCT uptake rate of 98% (95% CI 28% to 100%; I&sup2;=99%), and willingness to participate was 68% (95% CI 24% to 93%; I&sup2;=98%). In comparative studies, nurse-led SDM showed no significant difference in LDCT uptake compared with usual care (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.02; I&sup2;=0%), suggesting non-inferiority rather than superiority. Among individuals who completed screening, 81% (95% CI 77% to 85%) had benign or low-risk findings (Lung-RADS <b>[Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System]</b> I/II), and 2% (95% CI 1% to 3%) were diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer, rates consistent with benchmark screening trials. Meta-regression identified female sex as positively associated with uptake (&beta;=0.54, p&lt;0.001), while current tobacco use was negatively associated (&beta;=&ndash;0.37, p=0.033). The risk of bias was moderate to serious across studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Comparative evidence suggests that nurse-led SDM achieves equivalent LDCT uptake to standard care approaches, indicating feasibility as an alternative service delivery model. However, the predominance of single-arm studies, high heterogeneity and moderate-to-serious risk of bias limit causal inference. High uptake rates in single-arm studies likely reflect selection bias rather than intervention effectiveness. Current evidence supports the feasibility but not the superiority of nurse-led SDM. Well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to establish comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness before recommending widespread integration of nurse-led SDM into lung cancer screening programmes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>PROSPERO CRD420251033595. <A HREF="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=1033595">https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=1033595</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tang, X., Cao, T., He, W., Ma, L., Li, W., Tao, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113486</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113486</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113486</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113486</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114587?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Parental-based prevention interventions to reduce suicidal-related behaviours in adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114587?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Effectiveness of prevention programmes to reduce suicidal-related behaviours among adolescents could improve when systematically involve interventions for parents/caregivers to enhance family functioning and parental skills. We aim to systematically review parental or family-based family prevention interventions and meta-analyse its effectiveness, as evidence on this topic has not been recently and systematically synthesised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of parent-based prevention interventions to reduce suicidal-related behaviours in adolescents aged 10&ndash;19 years. Studies involving a comparison group, postintervention and/or follow-up assessments of suicidal ideation, self-harm, suicidal attempts, psychopathology, emotional regulation and behavioural and functional outcomes will be reviewed. The CINAHL, CENTRAL, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) databases were searched, without time limits, for eligible studies in English or Spanish, and with results available. Databases were searched from November 2025 to March 2026. The study selection process, the data extraction and the critical evaluation&mdash;with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool&mdash;of included studies will be conducted independently and in duplicate by teams of reviewers, with the assistance of a third party, until reaching a high degree of agreement. If substantial heterogeneity is observed (I<sup>2</sup>&gt;75%), we will use a narrative synthesis of the study results. If feasible, we will conduct a quality effects model for the statistical synthesis of results. If sufficient data are available, we will assess potential sources of heterogeneity. Doi plots, the Rosenthal&rsquo;s N test and Egger&rsquo;s Z test will be used to assess publication bias. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the confidence in the evidence reviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Results are expected to be published in a peer-reviewed journal in the field of adolescent and/or youth mental health. This study will be conducted using published data and does not involve human participants directly. Therefore, it is exempt from ethical review. Therefore, it is exempt from ethical review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251183954.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nunez, D., Salas, F., Gaete, J., Meza, D., Andaur, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114587</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114587</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Parental-based prevention interventions to reduce suicidal-related behaviours in adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114587</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114587</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115162?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcome 50 years after surgical repair of pulmonary valve stenosis: a longitudinal cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115162?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Data on long-term outcomes after surgical repair of pulmonary valve stenosis are limited. This study evaluated survival, clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after surgery during childhood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Single centre, longitudinal cohort study evaluating consecutive patients with pulmonary valve stenosis who underwent surgical repair between 1968&ndash;1980 and were evaluated every decade since 1990.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the original cohort of 89 operated patients, 11 died (12%), including 2 who died within 30 days postsurgery (2%), and 7 (8%) were lost to follow-up. Survival at 50 years follow-up was 87%, which was not significantly different from the GDP. Of the remaining 71 survivors, 32 refrained earlier from participating in this cohort study, leaving 39 eligible, of whom 34 (87%) participated again (50% male, median age 48 years) with a median follow-up of 45 (range 40&ndash;52) years. Event-free survival was 50%, with supraventricular tachycardia (14%) and reintervention (13%) being the most frequent events, although less frequently in the last 10 years. At last follow-up, biventricular function was preserved in most patients. Reduced right and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was found in 33% and 13%, respectively. Exercise capacity and maximum rate of oxygen consumption were mildly impaired in 14% and 32% of patients. Patients who underwent an infundibulectomy during initial surgery were significantly more likely to undergo reintervention (HR=8.32, p=0.003). Patient-reported QoL scores remained stable over time and consistently exceeded those of the age-matched GDP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Fifty-year survival after surgery for pulmonary valve stenosis was excellent and comparable to the GDP. Most patients maintained preserved ventricular function, functional capacity and excellent QoL. Routine lifelong follow-up may not be necessary for all patients, but should be considered for those who underwent an infundibulectomy or have residual lesions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[U&#x0308;nlu&#x0308;tu&#x0308;rk, S., Kauling, R. M., Cuypers, J. A. A. E., van den Bosch, A. E., Hirsch, A., Pelosi, C., Bowen, D. J., Bogers, A. J. J. C., Helbing, W. A., Kardys, I., Roos-Hesselink, J. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115162</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115162</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcome 50 years after surgical repair of pulmonary valve stenosis: a longitudinal cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115162</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115439?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Facilitators and barriers to malaria surveillance in community pharmacies and over-the-counter medicine sellers in sub-Saharan Africas health sector: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115439?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Malaria remains a serious public health issue, and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is still disproportionately burdened with the disease. Efficient disease tracking in both public and private healthcare points is required to consolidate elimination efforts. Considerable amounts of malaria cases in the private sector, especially community pharmacies, are not captured into routine surveillance systems. This scoping review aims to systematically collate the existing evidence on the facilitators and barriers to malaria surveillance in community pharmacies (CPs) and over-the-counter medicine sellers (OTCMS) in SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will retrieve all relevant studies (published and completed but unpublished) through searches in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and Hinari from inception to 15 June 2026. Searches will be conducted without language restrictions; however, full-text inclusion will be limited to English-language publications due to resource constraints. Titles and abstracts of non-English articles will be thoroughly screened using online-assisted translation tools such as Google Translate to assess their potential eligibility. Potentially relevant non-English studies will be documented and reported in the appendices to allow for an evaluation of possible language bias, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. All the articles retrieved from the searches will be collated and deduplicated using EndNote. The deduplicated studies will then be screened and selected. Two reviewers will independently screen studies using a study selection flow chart developed from the pre-specified eligibility criteria. The data synthesis for this scoping review will be conducted using a narrative synthesis approach. The extracted data will be organised into a structured format, categorising information based on study characteristics, malaria surveillance activities, facilitators and barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Formal ethical approval is not required as the review uses publicly available data. Findings will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal, presented at relevant conferences and disseminated through policy briefs and infographics to the WHO, national malaria programmes and pharmacy councils.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial Registration number</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (registration link: <A HREF="https://osf.io/udwpn/overview?view_only=6e42bea8abb94f9cbc535b161ea329a6">https://osf.io/udwpn/overview?view_only=6e42bea8abb94f9cbc535b161ea329a6</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonful, H. A., Owiredu, D., Annor, R. B., Opoku-Mireku, M., Abokyi, L. N., Vroom, B. D., Kenu, E., Kretchy, I. A., Koduah, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115439</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115439</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Facilitators and barriers to malaria surveillance in community pharmacies and over-the-counter medicine sellers in sub-Saharan Africas health sector: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115439</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115439</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115612?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the impact, uptake and use of reporting guidelines for patient and public involvement in research: GRIPP2 - study protocol for a meta-research project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115612?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research is increasingly recognised for its potential to enhance feasibility, improve relevance and foster collaboration at different stages of a study. Reporting guidelines such as GRIPP2 (Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public) have been developed to help improve completeness and transparency in PPI reporting. This meta-research project aims to assess the impact of the GRIPP2 reporting guidelines through citation and alternative metrics, analysing its uptake or adoption across authors, institutions, journals and countries, as well as its practical application in reporting PPI within diverse research designs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol for a meta-research project consists of two studies. In Study 1, we will conduct a search across Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar to identify all publications citing the GRIPP2 guidelines (planned for July 2026 using forward citation analysis). Retrieved records will undergo standardised processing and structured de-duplication to ensure each citing article is represented once. Following de-duplication, data from unique citations&mdash;including title, publication year, journal, subject category, keywords, document type, citations, authors&rsquo; names, institutional affiliations, country and funding sources&mdash;will be collected. Citation counts, alternative metrics (eg, mentions in policy documents, news media) and knowledge production patterns across authors, institutions, journals and countries will be analysed to assess GRIPP2&rsquo;s impact and uptake of the guidelines. Descriptive analyses will be conducted (including the number of papers, citations, authors, countries, journals, keywords, funding, field distribution and main collaboration metrics). Network analyses will be carried out to study the structure of collaborations. In Study 2, we will evaluate a random sample of 300 research articles citing GRIPP2, including randomised trials (n=100), systematic reviews with meta-analyses (n=100) and health economic evaluations (n=100). If an insufficient number of citing studies are available within these categories, we will include additional study types identified in Study 1 (eg, study protocols, observational studies, mixed-methods or qualitative research studies and other types of reviews). Reporting and PPI practices in each article will be extracted by at least two researchers using a standardised data extraction form. Information on general, methodological and PPI items will be analysed and reported, stratified by study design (eg, randomised trials vs systematic reviews vs health economic evaluations).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Due to the nature of the proposed study, no ethical approval will be required. All data will be deposited in a cross-disciplinary public repository. It is anticipated the study findings could be relevant to a variety of audiences. Study findings will be disseminated at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Open Science Framework: <A HREF="https://osf.io/et85d">https://osf.io/et85d</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catala-Lopez, F., Ganuza, E., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Perna, R., Tricco, A. C., Hutton, B., Colin, C., Tejedor-Romero, L., Ridao, M., Bautista-Puig, N., Tabares-Seisdedos, R., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Nafria-Escalera, B., Staniszewska, S., Moher, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115612</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115612</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the impact, uptake and use of reporting guidelines for patient and public involvement in research: GRIPP2 - study protocol for a meta-research project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115612</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115612</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116911?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[LEAN mass Preservation with Resistance Exercise and Protein during semaglutide and tirzepatide therapy (LEAN-PREP study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116911?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Obesity is a global public health issue, with its effects a particular issue in Kuwait. Advances in pharmaceutical treatment (eg, glucagon-like peptide-1s) offer an effective solution, with the magnitude of weight lost something to celebrate. However, this level of weight loss also results in dramatic reductions in lean mass, reflecting loss of muscle mass and muscle strength which can predispose people to sarcopenia. This is a particular issue in people with type 2 diabetes in Kuwait, where the prevalence of muscle weakness is extremely high. Solutions to mitigate this loss of muscle mass and strength are needed, with a pragmatic resistance exercise intervention and increasing dietary protein intake having potential. This trial aims to determine whether resistance exercise and/or protein intake can preserve muscle mass and improve physical function in people with obesity initiating semaglutide/tirzepatide therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, 6-month, randomised controlled trial at Dasman Diabetes Institute will enrol 232 adults with obesity, randomised (1:1:1:1) to control, resistance exercise, protein supplementation or combined resistance exercise and protein in conjunction with semaglutide or tirzepatide therapy. Resistance exercise will be home-based and involve three sessions per week, progressing from one to three sets targeting major muscle groups. Protein supplementation will target 1.6 g/kg/day via dietary adjustment and protein products. Assessments at baseline and 6 months will include MRI measured quadriceps cross-sectional area (primary outcome), plus measures of secondary outcomes of MRI measured liver fat content and stiffness and intramuscular fat, body composition (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), strength, physical function, dietary assessment, physical activity levels, sleep patterns, quality of life, glycaemic control and metabolic biomarkers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received ethical approval from the Dasman Diabetes Institute Ethical Review Committee (HR-RA-2025-01, 19 February 2025) and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06885736, 26 June 2025). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants, with no financial compensation provided. Data will be reported in accordance with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines, ensuring participant anonymity. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06885736">NCT06885736</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alawadhi, A. A., Alroudhan, D., Alsaeed, D. J., Almarshad, B. W., Alshehabi, D. H., Allahou, B. A., Mashankar, A., Al Ozairi, E., Gray, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116911</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116911</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[LEAN mass Preservation with Resistance Exercise and Protein during semaglutide and tirzepatide therapy (LEAN-PREP study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116911</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116911</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117846?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Midodrine for Sepsis Treatment and Early Vasopressor Weaning (MID-STEP): protocol for a pragmatic randomised clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117846?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sepsis is a global health priority with nearly 50 million cases annually. Cardiovascular dysfunction is common, frequently manifesting as hypotension that persists despite fluid resuscitation. Most affected patients require the use of intravenous (IV) vasoactive agents, typically necessitating intensive care unit (ICU)-level monitoring, invasive interventions and contributing substantially to healthcare costs. Midodrine, an oral alpha-1 agonist approved for orthostatic hypotension, has increasingly been used off-label as a vasopressor-sparing (reducing IV vasopressor use) strategy in sepsis, despite limited and inconsistent evidence. This pragmatic, randomised, open-label trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of midodrine in patients with sepsis-associated hypotension. We hypothesise that, compared with standard care, midodrine administration will reduce the duration of IV vasopressor use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A total of 308 adult patients with sepsis-associated hypotension will be enrolled (154 per arm). The intervention group will, in addition to standard of care, receive enteral midodrine 10 mg three times daily. Outcomes will be ascertained pragmatically via electronic health record-based data retrieval and adjudicated by research coordinators blinded to treatment assignment. The primary outcome is time alive and off IV vasopressors in the first 28 days (in hours) after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include cumulative vasopressor exposure; use and duration of central venous access; cumulative fluid balance over the first 48 hours and up to 7 days of ICU stay; ICU and hospital length of stay; and ICU-, hospital-, and organ support-free days through day 28. Safety outcomes include adverse events potentially attributable to midodrine during hospitalisation including acute kidney injury. Primary analyses will follow an intention-to-treat framework, including all randomised participants according to their assigned treatment groups. Primary and secondary outcomes will be compared using a van Elteren test stratified by randomisation factors. A predefined secondary Bayesian analysis of the primary outcome will provide complementary estimates of treatment effect. Safety outcomes will be summarised descriptively without formal between-arm hypothesis testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this protocol and required written informed consent from all participants (IRB# 24&ndash;0 00 121). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and international conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06319248">NCT06319248</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tekin, A., Halpern, G., Gowda, D., Bansal, V., Schuchard, A., Joguncic, A., Schulte, P., Odeyemi, Y. E., Ahmad, S., Madsen, B., Rizwan, Z., Barreto, E. F., Reddy, S., Bhavsar, V., Sanghavi, D., Domecq Garces, J. P., Khan, S. A., Shiari, A., Cartin-Ceba, R., Gajic, O., Lal, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T05:09:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117846</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117846</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Midodrine for Sepsis Treatment and Early Vasopressor Weaning (MID-STEP): protocol for a pragmatic randomised clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117846</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117846</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From legalisation to practice: implementation of newly legalised health interventions in healthcare settings - a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Over the last decade, a growing number of health interventions (eg, medical assistance in dying and mitochondrial donation) have become legalised or decriminalised globally. Newly legalised health interventions share characteristics that are distinct from other health interventions, making their implementation more challenging. They are often highly emotive, controversial and associated with strong opinions and ethical dilemmas, with some of them being high-stake and irreversible. This study aimed to identify, systematise and map the factors that affect the implementation of health interventions that have recently been legalised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematically conducted review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched to identify studies published between 2014 and 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We included studies if they evaluated the implementation of health interventions that were newly legalised or newly decriminalised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data were extracted and synthesised through descriptive analysis. Both deductive and inductive thematic analyses were applied to map the barriers, facilitators and implementing strategies that influence the implementation of newly legalised health interventions in healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The search strategy yielded 1510 publications, of which 78 were included in this review. Findings showed that several newly legalised health interventions, including medical assistance in dying (n=56 studies); medical abortion (n=13); assisted human reproduction (n=3); psychedelic-assisted therapies (n=3); use of medical cannabis (n=2) and use of biosimilars (n=1) were addressed. The analysis identified a total of 880 diverse barriers, facilitators and strategies in five domains across system, organisational and individual levels: (1) patients/service users/consumers; (2) healthcare providers; (3) healthcare organisation; (4) legal processes and (5) system. These were further divided into 27 themes of barriers, 18 themes of facilitators and 17 themes of strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Implementing newly legalised health interventions is complex. Our findings can support the development of an implementation plan for the spread and scaling of future health interventions, maximising the impact of interventions and making them accessible to more people and health organisations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vizheh, M., Lamprell, K., Sheriff, S., Cormack, M., Braithwaite, J., Ludlow, K., Mills, C., Long, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101271</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101271</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From legalisation to practice: implementation of newly legalised health interventions in healthcare settings - a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101271</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107555?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HIV care attrition among pregnant and postpartum adolescent girls and young women living with HIV in Tanzania: findings from a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107555?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine HIV care attrition patterns and risk factors among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) enrolled in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) services in Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in three regions of Tanzania: Kagera, Tabora and Dar es Salaam across 543 public and private health facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 10 147 pregnant and postpartum AGYW living with HIV attending PMTCT services between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020 were included in this study and followed prospectively until they were censored at the last appointment date or 31 December 2023, whichever was earlier.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was time to HIV care attrition, defined as death, discontinuation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) or loss to follow-up (LTFU). LTFU was defined as failure to attend a scheduled clinic appointment and being absent from care for &ge;90 consecutive days following a missed appointment among non-transfers. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate time to first attrition. The Anderson-Gill proportional hazard model estimated the risk factors for repeated care interruptions, adjusted for baseline characteristics and stratified by ART status at PMTCT enrolment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 3259 attrition events were observed, of which 79% occurred within the first year, with the median time to first attrition of 4 months (IQR: 1&ndash;8), 96.3% were due to LTFU. Over two-thirds of first-year attrition occurred among AGYW newly started on ART at PMTCT enrolment, who had more than twice the attrition rate of those already on ART (28.6 vs 11.2 per 100-person-years). Of AGYW lost to follow-up, 44.8% returned to care and 20.9% experienced subsequent attrition. Among AGYW new on ART, attrition was higher in those enrolled late in their third trimester (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.20; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42) versus those in the first trimester and lower during the postpartum period (aHR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.79). In AGYW already on ART, attrition rate was higher among adolescents 18&ndash;19 years (aHR 1.37; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.66) and those enrolled late; during the second (aHR 1.41; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.72) and third trimesters (aHR 1.57; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.00) or post partum (aHR 1.36; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.70) compared with the first trimester. AGYW with early-stage HIV, on second-line regimens and attending facilities with fewer AGYW, had a lower attrition rate in contrast to comparison groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>AGYW newly started on ART at PMTCT enrolment are more likely to have early and recurring dropout. Given the cyclical nature of HIV care engagement, tailored and repeated interventions are needed to support continuous retention and re-engagement for pregnant and postpartum AGYW with HIV.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Urrio, R. F., Machumi, L., Naburi, H., Mahande, M. J., Festo, C., Mganga, A., Machangu, D., Simba, B., Siril, H., Mbunda, T., Mauka, W., Kibao, A., Msangi, M., Larsson, E. C., Biberfeld, G., Kilewo, C., Kagesten, A. E., Ekstro&#x0308;m, A. M., Lyatuu, G. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107555</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107555</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HIV care attrition among pregnant and postpartum adolescent girls and young women living with HIV in Tanzania: findings from a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107555</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107555</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Course of psychological symptoms and the initial management strategies in general practice using electronic health records in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patients who consult their GP about psychological complaints, such as feeling anxious or depressed, are often initially given a psychological symptom diagnosis. However, it remains unclear whether these symptoms will develop into psychiatric conditions, which is crucial for informing patients about their prognosis and guiding GPs in their management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To explore the course of psychological symptom diagnoses and compare GPs&rsquo; management strategies for (a) psychological symptom diagnoses that persisted for more than a year and (b) those that changed into psychiatric conditions during the first year of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Family-Medicine Network database. We included all episodes of care (EoC) that started with a psychological symptom diagnosis between 2008 and 2021. We performed negative binomial analyses and logistic regression analyses to compare management strategies and number of contacts between EoC that changed into psychiatric conditions and persistent psychological symptoms (&gt;1 year) during the first year of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of the 14 633 EoC that started with a psychological symptom diagnosis, 79.4% resolved within 1 year, 12.8% persisted as psychological symptoms and 7.8% changed into psychiatric conditions. In EoC that changed into psychiatric conditions, as compared with EoC that persisted as psychological symptoms, we observed a significantly higher number of contacts with the GP (RR=1.76, 95% CI 1.63 to 1.91) as well as an increased total number of interventions (RR=1.71, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.84).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Most psychological symptoms remain for only a short period of time and only a few persist or change into psychiatric conditions. Future research should investigate the factors that influence patients&rsquo; decisions to seek further help from their GPs as well as those that contribute to the transition from psychological symptom diagnoses to a psychiatric condition.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaabouni, A., Schouten, B., Houwen, J., Lucassen, P., Akkermans, R., Walraven, I., van Boven, K., Schers, H., Olde Hartman, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108541</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108541</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Course of psychological symptoms and the initial management strategies in general practice using electronic health records in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108541</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109286?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations between achieving treatment targets and functional and economic outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: retrospective cohort analyses of BRASS registry data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109286?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study evaluated the associations between achieving treatment goals and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on advanced treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort analyses of deidentified data from an established registry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>US-based single-centre registry between 2003 and 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Data from patients with RA in the Brigham and Women&rsquo;s Hospital Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study registry were analysed using multivariable regression analyses. Patients were classified into four groups based on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores at baseline and 1 year (consistently at/not at target, gain or lose target). Patients who were consistently at target were further classified into remission, very low disease activity (LDA) and LDA subgroups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>PROs (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) overall, pain, fatigue scores) and HCRU (surgery rates, durable medical equipment (DME) use) were assessed over 2 years.</p>
<p>The primary endpoint compared MDHAQ PROs and surgery and DME HCRU among the four primary groups. The secondary endpoint assessed the association between maintaining LDA and achieving remission at follow-up with PROs and HCRU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 637 patients with CDAI data, 257 (40%) had LDA at baseline; 57 (22%) lost target at 1 year. Of 380 (60%) patients with CDAI &gt;10 at baseline, 115 (30%) attained LDA. Patients not attaining LDA had higher surgery risk, DME use and MDHAQ scores. Of 200 (31%) patients with LDA at baseline and 1 year, 89 (45%) achieved remission, 79 (40%) very LDA and 32 (16%) LDA. Remission was associated with reduced DME use (adjusted OR (AOR) 5.4 (95% CI 1.9 to 15.4) at year 1 and AOR 4.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 11.1) at year 2) and improved MDHAQ scores compared with LDA (overall unadjusted mean 0.07 vs 0.5 at year 1 and 0.09 vs 0.4 at year 2; p&lt;0.001), with no differences in surgery rates (AOR 1.9 (95% CI 0.7 to 5.6) at year 1 and AOR 1.9 (95% CI 0.8 to 4.4) at year 2).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Achieving and maintaining LDA is challenging for patients with RA but leads to better functional outcomes and reduced DME use. Patients who achieve remission have further improvements.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, J., Sbarigia, U., Kwong, J., Naik, C., Zazzetti, F., Shadick, N. A., Weinblatt, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109286</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109286</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations between achieving treatment targets and functional and economic outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: retrospective cohort analyses of BRASS registry data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109286</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109286</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110057?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intranasal dexmedetomidine in reducing postoperative delirium among cardiac surgery patients by improving sleep quality in China (DREAMS): study protocol for a single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110057?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication following cardiac surgery and is closely associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The effect of perioperative dexmedetomidine on reducing POD remains controversial in the existing literature. In our previous meta-analysis, we obtained preliminary evidence suggesting that dexmedetomidine may reduce the incidence of POD by improving sleep quality, which may partly explain the heterogeneity reported in previous studies. Based on these findings, the present randomised controlled trial aims to test the hypothesis that preoperative intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine reduces the incidence of POD in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass assisted cardiac surgery by enhancing preoperative sleep quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This trial is a single-centre, investigator-initiated, parallel, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Individuals aged 18 years or older who are scheduled for elective cardiopulmonary bypass&mdash;assisted cardiac surgery will be enrolled in the study. The planned sample size is 686. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the dexmedetomidine group receiving two doses of dexmedetomidine (1.5 &micro;g/kg according to ideal body weight) administered between 21:00 and 21:30 on the night before surgery and 15 min before anaesthesia induction, or the placebo group, receiving an equivalent volume of normal saline at the same time points. The primary outcome is the incidence of delirium within 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the severity, subtypes and duration of delirium, length of postoperative hospital stay, in-hospital all-cause mortality, postoperative sleep assessed by the Numerical Rating Scale score, pain intensity, postoperative anxiety and depression scores. Mediation analyses will be conducted using the preoperative Sleep Quality Index to assess whether dexmedetomidine reduces POD by improving preoperative sleep quality. The Baron and Kenny causal steps framework in conjunction with bootstrap resampling will be employed to estimate the direct, indirect and total effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of Xijing Hospital (KY20242259). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06619912">NCT06619912</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Z., Yang, X., Qin, Y., Gao, B., Wang, Y., Ji, J., Gao, J., Huang, M., Wang, L., Zheng, Z., Lei, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110057</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110057</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intranasal dexmedetomidine in reducing postoperative delirium among cardiac surgery patients by improving sleep quality in China (DREAMS): study protocol for a single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110057</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110057</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Arts-based empathy education in healthcare: a critical systematic review of pedagogical mechanisms and evidence gaps]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To systematically identify and synthesise the pedagogical mechanisms through which arts-based interventions (theatre, poetry, narrative medicine) may support empathy development in healthcare learners, while critically appraising the contextual implementation factors and methodological limitations of the existing evidence base.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review with narrative synthesis, conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Collection and CINAHL Plus, from inception to 31 August 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>Peer-reviewed empirical studies involving undergraduate or postgraduate healthcare students or professionals. Eligible studies reported on arts-based educational interventions designed to enhance empathy (including theatre, poetry or narrative medicine) and included quantitative or qualitative outcome measures of empathy or related constructs. No restrictions were placed on study design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data on intervention characteristics and outcomes, and assessed methodological quality using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools. A narrative synthesis was conducted to examine patterns across intervention modalities. Effect sizes (Cohen&rsquo;s <I>d</I>) were calculated for quantitative pre-post or controlled designs; meta-analysis was precluded due to high heterogeneity in study designs, populations and outcome measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From 1094 records screened, 17 studies involving 835 participants (median sample size=28) met inclusion criteria. There were eight theatre-based, five poetry-based and four narrative medicine interventions. Theatre interventions, which emphasised embodied learning, showed patterns of large empathy effects (mean d=0.83). Poetry interventions, focusing on reflective practice, showed patterns of moderate effects (mean d=0.49). One study of narrative medicine demonstrated a pattern of sustained gains at 2-year follow-up (d=0.82). Key limitations of the evidence base include small sample sizes, substantial measurement heterogeneity (12 different empathy instruments), geographical bias (88% of studies from high-income, Western countries), and a predominance of pre&ndash;post study designs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Arts-based interventions show mechanism-specific patterns of potential benefit for empathy in healthcare learners. However, significant methodological limitations in the current evidence constrain definitive practice recommendations. Educators may consider piloting brief, facilitator-led interventions based on local resources, while acknowledging the need for more robust evidence. Future research must prioritise standardised outcome measures, rigorous controlled and longitudinal trial designs, and studies in diverse cultural contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42025116174.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mojarrad, S., Khojasteh, L., Soori, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110509</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110509</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Arts-based empathy education in healthcare: a critical systematic review of pedagogical mechanisms and evidence gaps]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110509</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111116?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Echocardiographic grading for long-term mortality risk stratification after first-time ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicentre cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111116?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess whether a simple echocardiographic grading system reflecting the severity and stage of myocardial injury can stratify long-term mortality risk among patients with first-time ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multicentre prospective registry-based cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Eight hospitals in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Consecutive patients with first-time STEMI between June 2016 and June 2024 who survived to hospital discharge and underwent echocardiography were included. A total of 2708 patients were enrolled and followed up for a median of 5.5 years (IQR: 5.3&ndash;6.4).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients were stratified into four grades: 1392 (51.4%) were classified as Grade 1; 905 (33.4%) as Grade 2; 350 (12.9%) as Grade 3; and 61 (2.3%) as Grade 4. During follow-up, long-term all-cause mortality increased stepwise across increasing echocardiographic grades. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the baseline grading remained an independent predictor of long-term mortality after adjustment (adjusted HR for Grade 4 vs Grade 1: 3.35, 95% CI 1.34 to 8.38, p&lt;0.01). In a subset of patients with available 90-day echocardiographic data, the stratification yielded comparable group distributions and mortality trends to those observed with baseline data (adjusted HR for Grade 4 vs Grade 1: 6.22, 95% CI 1.69 to 22.82, p&lt;0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patient grade from the echocardiographic grading system was associated with long-term mortality after first-time STEMI, with the highest risk observed in patients classified as Grade 4. As a simple and objective classification, this grading system may provide a practical way to describe and communicate infarct severity among clinicians and others involved in patient care, as the term &lsquo;myocardial infarction&rsquo; alone may inadequately reflect disease severity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miao, Y., Shen, L., Wang, L., Xiong, J.-F., Lu, Y., Ge, H., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Xu, X.-D., Guo, W., Chen, Z., Su, F., Li, Y.-s., Zhou, N., Zhang, X., Shen, L.-H., Pan, C.-q., Smith, S., He, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111116</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111116</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Echocardiographic grading for long-term mortality risk stratification after first-time ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicentre cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111116</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111780?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy versus placebo for central serous chorioretinopathy (REPLAY trial): rationale and study protocol of a pivotal double-blind randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111780?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) can cause progressive and permanent vision loss. Although photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a primary treatment option globally, it is not approved for CSC worldwide, limiting therapeutic access. The REPLAY trial is a phase III, investigator-initiated trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reduced-fluence PDT (rf-PDT) for chronic CSC to seek the first regulatory approval globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study comprises two cohorts. The &lsquo;untreated cohort&rsquo; is a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial involving 60 patients with untreated, fovea-involving chronic CSC, randomised 2:1 to receive a single rf-PDT or placebo treatment. The &lsquo;previously treated cohort&rsquo; is a single-arm, open-label trial for up to 10 patients with recurrent CSC after PDT. The primary endpoint for both cohorts is the proportion of eyes with a complete resolution of subfoveal fluid at 12 weeks post-treatment, assessed by optical coherence tomography. Secondary endpoints include changes in best-corrected visual acuity, central choroidal thickness, recurrence rates and incidence of adverse events over a 48 week follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol was approved by the Kyoto University Hospital Institutional Review Board, IRB of Chiba University Hospital, Tokyo Women&rsquo;s Medical University Institutional Review Board and Institutional Review Board of Kansai Medical University Hospital. Written informed consent is obtained from all participants. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>jRCT2051230156 (URL: <A HREF="https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2051230156">https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2051230156</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miyake, M., Takahashi, A., Baba, T., Maruko, I., Ohnaka, M., Kuroda, A., Tada, H., Hidaka, Y., Ibi, Y., Muraoka, Y., Ito, T., Morita, S., Sakamoto, T., Imai, H., Yamamoto, S., Iida, T., Tsujikawa, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111780</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111780</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy versus placebo for central serous chorioretinopathy (REPLAY trial): rationale and study protocol of a pivotal double-blind randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111780</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111780</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112527?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Participatory development and feasibility study of a digital intervention for detecting and treating bio-psycho-social needs of long-term cancer survivors: study protocol of the DELPHIN study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112527?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Long-term cancer survivors may suffer from significant bio-psycho-social burden even years after treatment. Yet, a structured approach to detect and address bio-psycho-social burden of long-term cancer survivors in primary care is missing in Germany, although family physicians are the primary medical contact for most patients. In this paper, we describe the DELPHIN study aiming to develop and test a structured care model for long-term cancer survivors. The DELPHIN study and intervention will facilitate networking of regional medical and non-medical services. This protocol describes the intervention as well as the pilot study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The DELPHIN study comprises a developmental and a feasibility phase. In the developmental phase, we will assess (1) the current care needs of long-term cancer survivors (n=1000) using a cross-sectional questionnaire survey; (2) in an additional cross-sectional questionnaire survey, we will address medical and non-medical care providers to assess current care practice for this patient group (n&ge;250); (3) a qualitative interview study with both long-term cancer survivors (n=12) and family physicians (n=10) will assess patients&rsquo; needs and barriers for effective care. Results will then be triangulated to inform development of the DELPHIN intervention. The intervention shall include the following elements: the DELPHIN mobile app for patients with a digital screening tool, a digital treatment plan, a survivorship passport and information on regional medical and non-medical providers. Additionally, a DELPHIN website and a DELPHIN eLearning tool for family physicians will be developed. The subsequent feasibility study will follow 100 long-term cancer survivors using the DELPHIN app for 4 months, with two assessments (t<sup>0</sup>=baseline; t<sup>1</sup>=4 months follow-up) regarding the usability of the app and their health-related quality of life. The eLearning tool will be tested by 50 family physicians using three measurement points to evaluate learning success (t<sup>a</sup>=before; t<sup>b</sup>=directly after eLearning; t<sup>c</sup>=after 4 weeks).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The DELPHIN study seeks to address cancer survivors&rsquo; unmet bio-psycho-social needs through implementing a digital mobile application. Positive results in the feasibility study will provide the basis for a future effectiveness study and integration into routine care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the University of Bonn, Germany (No: 2024-409 BO) which did not object to the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00035726.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[von der Warth, R., Gminder, A., Karimzadeh, A., Averdunk, K., Do&#x0308;ppenschmitt, C., Pfeifer, R., Schmid, M., Schmidt-Wolf, I. G. H., Weigl, M., Aretz, B., Geiser, F., Weltermann, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112527</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112527</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Participatory development and feasibility study of a digital intervention for detecting and treating bio-psycho-social needs of long-term cancer survivors: study protocol of the DELPHIN study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112527</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112527</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113405?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a multicentre survey of sexual and reproductive health and fertility among unmarried women living in Chinas megacities]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113405?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite the rapid increase in the proportion of unmarried women in the Chinese population, little is known about their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and well-being. The aim of this survey is to collect data on SRH knowledge and needs, past care-seeking experiences, fertility goals and attitudes towards fertility technology among unmarried women in four megacities in China where singlehood is prominent among women of reproductive age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multi-centre cross-sectional survey, Survey of Unmarried women on Reproductive health and Fertility (SURF), aims to recruit 6000 eligible women, with 1500 from each study site. Eligibility criteria include: (1) women; (2) aged 25&ndash;40 years; (3) currently unmarried (never married, divorced or widowed); and (4) reside in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen or Guangzhou metropolitan areas. Quota sampling is used to ensure the age strata in the final sample correspond to the age distribution from the latest Chinese census. Data are currently being collected through referral recruitment and a self-administered questionnaire available on the mobile devices and computers of participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>SURF has been approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Peking University (institutional review board (IRB) number: IRB00001052-24040). Each participant receives comprehensive information about the objectives, procedure and data handling of the survey before proceeding to the questionnaire. Participants are also provided with the contact information of the principal investigator in case they have questions regarding the survey. Written informed consent is obtained before data collection starts. Participation is anonymous and no personal identifiers are collected. Findings from this survey will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, F., Hu, J., Liu, H., Liu, T., Wu, D., Stewart, T., Chen, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113405</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113405</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a multicentre survey of sexual and reproductive health and fertility among unmarried women living in Chinas megacities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113405</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113405</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised, sham-controlled, double-blinded, multicentre international trial to evaluate the efficacy of the Ventfree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator to assist ventilator weaning in critically ill patients: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Nearly half of patients who receive invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure require over 4 days of ventilator support, each day of which is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and cost. Many of these patients develop expiratory muscle atrophy and weakness, which are linked to failed extubation and weaning. We seek to test the hypothesis that exhalation synchronised abdominal functional electrical stimulation reduces mechanical ventilation duration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This pivotal superiority trial will be performed in up to 30 intensive care units (ICUs) in the USA, France, the Netherlands and Australia. Adults (&ge;22 years old) who have been mechanically ventilated for 24&ndash;96 hours and are expected to remain ventilated for another 24+ hours are potentially eligible. We will recruit participants until 150 successful liberations from mechanical ventilation occur. To achieve this, we estimate that a maximum of 272 participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive 30 min of active exhalation synchronised abdominal functional electrical stimulation (vs sham). The intervention will be applied using the VentFree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator two times per day, a minimum of 5 days per week, for a maximum of 28 days or until ICU discharge. The primary outcome is time from first intervention to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes include cough peak flow (CPF) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) at 24 hours post-extubation, hospital and ICU length of stay, reintubations, complications, ICU readmissions, 90-day mortality and quality of life. The participant, clinical team and outcome assessor are blinded to group allocation. A positive outcome has the potential to improve patient-centred outcomes in ICUs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by local ethics institutions in the USA, Australia, France and the Netherlands. We describe the methods herein using the Standard Protocol Items for Randomised Trials framework and discuss key design decisions. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and clinicaltrials.gov updates. Individual country-level approvals are as follows:</p>
<p>France:</p>
<p><l type="unord"><li><p>Ethics committee: Comit&eacute; de Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France X.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Reference numbers: CPP 27-2024; RCB 2024-A00559-38.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Initial approval date: 14 May 2024.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Australia:</p>
<p><l type="unord"><li><p>Ethics committee: South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Reference number: 2022/ETH02724.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Initial approval date: 21 March 2023.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Netherlands:</p>
<p><l type="unord"><li><p>Ethics committee: Medisch Ethische Toetsings Commissie Erasmus MC.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Reference numbers: MEC-2023-0364; NL84195.000.23.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Initial approval date: 30 April 2024.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>USA:</p>
<p><l type="unord"><li><p>Ethics committee: WCG IRB.</p>
</li><li>
<p>IRB tracking number: 20214073.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Initial approval date: 13 March 2023.</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>All participating sites are currently approved and operating under protocol version 09 or later.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05759013">NCT05759013</A>. Registered 8 March 2023.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCaughey, E. J., McLachlan, A. J., Cai, J., Cohen Freue, G., Demoule, A., Gotur, D. B., Hill, N. S., Dimatteo, C., Oliva, S. P., Patel, M. B., Girard, T. D., Heunks, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113540</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113540</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised, sham-controlled, double-blinded, multicentre international trial to evaluate the efficacy of the Ventfree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator to assist ventilator weaning in critically ill patients: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113540</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113901?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of early antiplatelet therapy on 30-day mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective target trial emulation using the MIMIC-IV database]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113901?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The effect of early antiplatelet therapy on 30-day mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association between early antiplatelet therapy initiation and clinical outcomes in post-CABG patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective target trial emulation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Single academic medical centre in Boston, Massachusetts, USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We included adult patients who underwent CABG and were admitted to the intensive care unit at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2008 and 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients were classified into the treatment group if they initiated antiplatelet therapy within 24 hours postoperatively; otherwise, they were assigned to the control group. To address immortal-time bias for the primary outcome of 30-day mortality, we used clone-censor-weighting. For the exploratory outcome of 30-day acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence, we employed inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analysis for 30-day mortality included 6887 patients. The mortality was 2.35% in the control group versus 1.44% in the treatment group, yielding an absolute risk difference of 0.90% (control group minus treatment group, 95% CI 0.09% to 1.72%). The difference in restricted mean time lost was 0.19 days (control group minus treatment group, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.36). For AKI incidence, 5543 patients were analysed. The incidence was 78.61% in the control group and 69.13% in the treatment group, with an absolute difference of 9.48% (control group minus treatment group, 95% CI 6.40% to 12.50%; p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this target trial emulation, early antiplatelet therapy initiated within 24 hours after CABG was associated with lower 30-day mortality and a reduced incidence of postoperative AKI. These findings warrant confirmation in prospective randomised controlled trials.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiang, Y., Ding, H., Su, J., Li, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113901</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113901</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of early antiplatelet therapy on 30-day mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective target trial emulation using the MIMIC-IV database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113901</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113901</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113950?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ProHealth: a co-designed online home-based healthy eating and exercise programme for men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy - a study protocol for a feasibility and preliminary efficacy randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113950?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves survival in advanced prostate cancer but may lead to debilitating side effects, including sarcopenic obesity and a 10&ndash;45% increased risk of other comorbidities. Guidelines recommend exercise and nutrition interventions during ADT, but access to these services is often limited, and referral pathways are unclear. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an online, home-based, multi-faceted, exercise, nutrition and education programme (ProHealth) for men with prostate cancer treated with ADT. ProHealth was co-designed with consumers and healthcare professionals to include (i) education on prostate cancer and treatment-related side effects and (ii) multimedia behaviour change resources to support individualised nutrition and exercise behaviour change.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This 12-week randomised controlled trial (target n=50) will include men treated with ADT for &gt;3 months or who have completed ADT in the last 24 months, are overweight or obese and are not under the care of a dietitian or exercise professional. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to the ProHealth intervention or usual care. The intervention group will receive four consultations with an Accredited Practising Dietitian to promote a high protein and energy reduced diet, and five consultations with an Accredited Exercise Physiologist to follow a home-based progressive resistance training and aerobic exercise programme. The primary outcomes are feasibility (recruitment rate, retention, data completeness, reach, safety, consultation attendance and adherence, and usage of the ProHealth web platform), acceptability and satisfaction of the ProHealth intervention. Exploratory secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks and include changes in body weight and composition (total and appendicular fat-free mass, fat mass), quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)&mdash;General, FACT-Prostate, FACT-Fatigue), physical function (30-second sit-to-stand), dietary intake (3-day food diary) and physical activity (7-day accelerometer). Linear regression models will estimate differences between the intervention and usual care group. Qualitative interviews on participant satisfaction will be transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study is approved by Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (DUHREC2024-038) and registered on Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000874516). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific meetings and other public forums.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12624000874516.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baguley, B. J., Daly, R. M., Livingston, P. M., Rawstorn, J. C., White, V. M., Koorts, H., Fraser, S. F., Gardner, J., Atkins, L., Steer, B., O, E., Heneka, N., Abbott, G., Russell, G., McNamara, G., Kiss, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113950</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113950</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ProHealth: a co-designed online home-based healthy eating and exercise programme for men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy - a study protocol for a feasibility and preliminary efficacy randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113950</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113950</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114908?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker breast cancer educational programme in rural South Africa: a modelling study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114908?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death among women. Women with lower income, those living in rural areas and women of Black ethnicity are more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages and have poorer survival outcomes. Reducing these inequities is an important public health priority. This study aimed to identify a cost-effective strategy for reducing breast cancer-related inequities and to evaluate the equity impact of the intervention across population subgroups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We developed a novel individual-level microsimulation model to assess both the equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker-led education intervention in rural areas. The model, with annual cycles, simulated rural and urban breast cancer populations in South Africa using data from national and regional cancer datasets and followed individuals over a lifetime horizon. Costs were estimated from the provider perspective and outcomes included life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) compared with three willingness-to-pay thresholds (ZAR 58 018/ZAR 109 468/ZAR 328 408). Parameter uncertainty was explored using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Equity impact was evaluated by estimating changes in age-standardised all-cause mortality across subgroups defined by place of residence (rural vs urban) and ethnicity (Black vs non-Black), using both absolute (rate differences) and relative (rate ratios) measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The intervention generated average gains of 0.35 life-years and 0.31 QALYs per patient across the breast cancer population. Inequities by residence decreased, with an absolute reduction of 229.65 per 1000 patients with breast cancer in the age-standardised mortality rate difference, and a relative reduction in the rate ratio of 0.80. By ethnicity, absolute and relative reductions of 110.26 per 1000 patients and 0.27, respectively, were observed between Black and non-Black populations. The intervention was cost-effective, with an ICER of ZAR 44 124 (I$6036) per QALY gained, which is below all three willingness-to-pay thresholds considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Community health worker programmes represent a cost-effective strategy to reduce breast cancer-related inequities. Their integration into national cancer control plans in low-income and middle-income countries should be prioritised and supported.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chanakira, E. Z., Thomas, C., Miot, J., Mandrik, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114908</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114908</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker breast cancer educational programme in rural South Africa: a modelling study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114908</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114908</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115230?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB Host-Response assay for tuberculosis disease in adolescents and adults: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115230?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health challenge, with an estimated 10.8 million new cases and 1.25 million deaths in 2023. Despite advances in molecular detection of Mycobacterium TB (MTB), significant diagnostic gaps remain: in 2023, only 48% of newly diagnosed TB cases received rapid diagnostic testing, far below the 100% target. These challenges are intensified in high-burden settings, where sputum collection and distinguishing TB from other illnesses are difficult. The Xpert MTB Host Response (Xpert-HR) assay measures host immune gene expression from blood, shows promise but variable accuracy across studies. Hence, this study will perform an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis (IPDMA) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, subgroup performance, predictive values and clinical benefit of Xpert-HR compared with conventional sputum-based testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review and IPDMA will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Diagnostic Test Accuracy guidelines. Prospective studies including adolescents (&gt;12 years) or adults with presumed TB tested using the Xpert MTB Host-Response assay will be identified through PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Study quality will be assessed using an adapted diagnostic accuracy tool. Diagnostic accuracy will be pooled using random-effects models, with subgroup analyses where applicable. Decision curve analysis will evaluate clinical utility. Predictive values will be estimated across TB prevalences of 1-10%. Both one-stage and two-stage IPDMA approaches will be explored, and the proportion of unevaluable samples will be reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The review will be based on deidentified individual patient data to be obtained upon request from the corresponding authors of studies fulfilling all the data sharing agreement. Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethical Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University (Approval No. S-043/2026). The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and through presentations at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251071857.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muchie, K. F., Tobian, F., Gaeddert, M., Denkinger, C. M., Wright, J. K., Gupta-Wright, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115230</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115230</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB Host-Response assay for tuberculosis disease in adolescents and adults: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115230</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115236?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hongkou Advanced Research on Metabolism and Obesity iNtervention studY (HARMONY): a protocol for a longitudinal cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115236?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Obesity is a global chronic metabolic disorder associated with significant comorbidities and healthcare burdens. Nutrient-stimulated hormone (NuSH)-based therapies have markedly advanced the pharmacological treatment for obesity. However, heterogeneity in treatment responses, high discontinuation rates, post-cessation weight regain and concerns regarding long-term safety still remain unresolved. To address these challenges, we initiated the Hongkou Advanced Research on Metabolism and Obesity iNtervention studY (HARMONY), a real-world, prospective observational cohort designed to comprehensively monitor the metabolic responses and clinical outcomes of adults with overweight or obesity undergoing various weight management interventions, with particular attention to the application of NuSH therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The HARMONY study is a prospective, observational cohort study to be conducted at Shanghai Fourth People&rsquo;s Hospital, Hongkou district, Shanghai, China. The study will enrol approximately 1500 overweight and obese participants over a 5-year period. Data collection will occur at baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24 and annually thereafter, including anthropometric measures, clinical evaluations, metabolic assessments and treatment outcomes. The primary endpoint is the percentage change in body weight at week 12 and week 24, while secondary endpoints include glucose metabolism, lipid profiles, liver and intrapancreatic fat deposition and safety outcomes such as adverse events. The cohort will be followed longitudinally to assess the long-term impact of weight management interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for the study has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Fourth People&rsquo;s Hospital (No. 2025036&ndash;001). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences, with reporting in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500113384.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, C., Chen, W., Liu, S., Cao, B., Ge, Y., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Guo, T., Xu, J., Wang, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T03:58:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115236</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115236</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hongkou Advanced Research on Metabolism and Obesity iNtervention studY (HARMONY): a protocol for a longitudinal cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115236</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102926?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of risk factors for primary non-central malposition of peripherally inserted central catheter tip in neonates with different diseases admitted to neonatal surgical department: a case-control study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102926?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the risk factors for primary non-central malposition of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) tip in neonates admitted to the neonatal surgical department, compare the malposition rates across different insertion sites in disease types, and explore whether different diseases affect PICC tip malposition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective case&ndash;control study conducted in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A 3A women&rsquo;s and children&rsquo;s hospital in South China (Guangdong Province).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 558 neonates aged &le;28 days who underwent PICC insertion between January 2019 and November 2024 were enrolled. Neonates with congenital circulatory system malformations, incomplete clinical data and death or treatment withdrawal before tip positioning were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the incidence of primary non-central PICC tip malposition confirmed by X-ray or ultrasound within 24 h after insertion. Secondary outcomes included comparison of primary non-central PICC tip malposition rates across different insertion sites and comparison of primary PICC tip malposition rates by insertion sites across different disease groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>558 neonates were included in this study, including 460 cases with PICC tip in place and 98 with PICC tip malposition. In binary logistic regression analysis, the PICC insertion site was considered an independent risk factor (OR 2.908, 95% CI 1.748, 4.840, p&lt;0.001) for PICC tip malposition. Statistically significant differences were observed in the PICC tip malposition rates between the head and neck vein insertion and the limb vein insertion in neonates from different disease groups (p&lt;0.0167).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Medical staff can choose appropriate upper or lower limb veins for PICC insertion without worrying about the impact of abdominal diseases or thoracic diseases on non-central PICC tip malposition. PICC insertion via the head and neck veins should be performed with caution in neonates, as these sites carry a high risk of primary non-central tip malposition compared with other insertion sites.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mai, J., Ruan, J., Zhang, Y., Xiao, Z., Zhong, X., Dai, K., Jiang, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102926</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102926</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of risk factors for primary non-central malposition of peripherally inserted central catheter tip in neonates with different diseases admitted to neonatal surgical department: a case-control study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102926</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102926</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104083?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Core outcome set for Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment of adult allergic rhinitis: study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104083?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a highly prevalent condition worldwide and imposes a substantial public health burden on adults. Although Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) therapies have shown potential therapeutic benefits in AR management, the lack of a standardised outcome evaluation framework limits evidence comparability and synthesis. Current studies commonly exhibit inconsistent outcome selection, heterogeneous measurement instruments and unclear assessment time points, reducing the applicability of findings to evidence-based practice and guideline development. Moreover, existing AR-related core outcome set (COS) studies generally target a broad population, with limited focus on adults (aged 18&ndash;75 years) and insufficient involvement of patients and other stakeholders. Therefore, this study aims to establish a standardised COS for clinical research in adult allergic rhinitis (COS-AR), with clearly defined outcomes, measurement instruments and recommended assessment time points. This COS-AR will provide a framework for outcome selection and measurement in clinical studies of TCM for adult AR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The development of COS-AR will be conducted in four sequential phases: (1) A comprehensive review of randomised controlled trials and clinical trial registry entries related to adult AR from major domestic and international databases published between 1 January 2019 and 31 August 2025 will be performed. This phase will involve the systematic categorisation of all reported outcomes, including their definitions, measurement instruments and assessment time points. (2) An online survey will be administered to both clinicians and patients involved in AR management to identify outcomes considered most important by these stakeholders. (3) A modified Delphi process, consisting of two to three rounds of online surveys, will be conducted with over 100 key stakeholders to establish a COS. (4) One or two online consensus meetings will be convened with a representative group of 20&ndash;30 key stakeholders to reach final consensus on the outcomes, their definitions, measurement instruments and recommended assessment time points to be included in the COS-AR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>All activities conducted in this study have received ethical approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Hospital (Ethics Approval Number: 2023 (9K)-X4). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to participation. The research findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and relevant academic and professional conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>China Clinical Trial Core Outcome Sets Research Centre (ChiCOS). Available at: <A HREF="https://www.chicos.org.cn/cos/1788748723768049665">https://www.chicos.org.cn/cos/1788748723768049665</A> (accessed 29 December 2025)</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, Y., Jiang, J., Zhu, H., Sun, Y., Jin, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104083</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104083</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Immunology (including allergy)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Core outcome set for Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment of adult allergic rhinitis: study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Immunology (including allergy)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104083</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104083</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104121?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heart rate trends in healthy newborns >=35+0 weeks gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104121?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe the normal heart rate (HR) of healthy newborns &ge;35+0 weeks&rsquo; gestation in the first 10 min after caesarean delivery (CD) with extrauterine placental transfusion, using dry-electrode ECG (NeoBeat).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Single-centre, prospective observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Norwegian County Hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients</st>
<p>Newborns &ge;35+0 weeks&rsquo; gestation delivered by CD under regional anaesthesia were eligible for inclusion. Newborns delivered by CD under general anaesthesia, or who needed medical intervention, were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>NeoBeat was attached to the newborn&rsquo;s chest immediately following delivery. The placenta was delivered without cord clamping after 60&ndash;90 s and transferred with the newborn to a resuscitation table. Modified physiology-based cord clamping (PBCC) was performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>HR was recorded every second for 10 min. HR quartiles were calculated. Events possibly influencing HR were annotated using Liveborn Observation App.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>89 newborns with a mean (SD) gestational age of 39+3 weeks (10 days) and birth weight of 3649 (536) g were included. Median (IQR) HR was 164 (117&ndash;176) and 169 (145&ndash;186) beats per minute at 20 s and 30 s, respectively, peaking at 169 (152&ndash;183) beats per minute at 4 min and then slowly decreasing to 157 (146&ndash;167) beats per minute at 10 min. HR was not significantly affected by intact-cord blood sampling (mean difference=5.4 (95% CI &ndash;1.4 to 12.1)), placental delivery (mean difference=0.7 (95% CI &ndash;3.5 to 4.9)) or cord clamping (mean difference =&ndash;0.6 (95% CI &ndash;2.1 to 0.9)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This report describes, for the first time, HR quartiles for healthy newborns &ge;35<sup>0</sup> weeks&rsquo; gestation from 15 s to 20 s and up to 10 min after CD with extrauterine placental transfusion and PBCC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saether, E., Andersson, O., Myklebust, T. A., Bernitz, S., Bjellmo, S., Stridsklev, S., Eriksen, B. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104121</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104121</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heart rate trends in healthy newborns >=35+0 weeks gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104121</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107572?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mortality differences between ICUs that are regarded as 'in control: a longitudinal register-based study in the Netherlands, 2013-2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107572?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Funnel plots are used to identify intensive care units (ICUs) with a higher than expected risk-adjusted mortality. ICUs with a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) within pre-defined control limits (often the 99.8% CL) are regarded as &lsquo;in control&rsquo; and not labelled as a potential outlier for a particular calendar year. However, increased mortality rates not due to random fluctuations within and across the calendar years may be overlooked. We examined whether statistically significant and relevant differences in mortality over time between ICUs regarded as &lsquo;in control&rsquo; are present.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A longitudinal register-based study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>88 ICUs in the Netherlands registering the admissions of all critically ill patients in the National Intensive Care Evaluation registry in the Netherlands from 2013 to 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Hospital death analysed in a multivariable logistic regression analysis with a random intercept for ICU. The random intercept variance was translated to the median OR (MOR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>877 ICU-calendar year combinations were included, covering 759 498 unique admissions. The MOR increased from 1.12 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.15) for ICU-calendar year combinations with an SMR within the narrowest 95% CL (N=677) to 1.20 (1.17 to 1.24) for combinations with an SMR within the expanded 99.8% CL (including adjustment for overdispersion) (N=194) and to 1.21 (1.17 to 1.25) when including all ICU-calendar year combinations. Similar results were found for separate calendar years and separate diagnostic groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These results show differences in mortality between ICUs that were not labelled as outliers. Assessment of mortality performance should integrate cross-sectional funnel plots, the MOR and longitudinal trends in the SMR to better capture persistent patterns of excess risk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Termorshuizen, F., Brinkman, S., Arbous, S. M., Dongelmans, D. A., de Keizer, N. F., Bakhshi-Raiez, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107572</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107572</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mortality differences between ICUs that are regarded as 'in control: a longitudinal register-based study in the Netherlands, 2013-2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107572</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107572</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of fecal microbiota transplantation for adolescent anorexia nervosa]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite its serious impact, anorexia nervosa (AN) remains one of the least understood mental illnesses, with significant gaps in effective treatment options. No medications have been deemed effective and only 50% of individuals respond to conventional psychotherapies. Gastrointestinal (GI) bacteria have been found to be altered in individuals with AN. While, Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has shown potential for alleviating anxiety and depression, its effects remain understudied for individuals with AN. This study aims to determine whether oral capsular FMT is acceptable to adolescents with AN and results in clinical improvement in weight and/or psychological symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study will randomise 20 adolescents with AN, ages 12&ndash;17 years, to receive either FMT or placebo capsules. These 20 youth, as well as an additional 10 youth who decline trial enrolment, will participate in qualitative interviews. We will track recruitment rates and collect psychological and biological measures (blood, stool, urine and saliva) at multiple timepoints to assess how gut microbiota and their metabolites may influence the symptoms of AN. Interviews with participants and caregivers will explore their experiences and views on FMT as a treatment approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethics approval by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (#17493) and investigational drug approval by Health Canada (Dossier ID: c292423). Informed consent will be obtained by research staff from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through academic conferences, clinical forums and partnerships with advocacy organisations to reach clinicians, researchers and individuals with lived experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06593366">NCT06593366</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Couturier, J., Kenner, E., Nicula, M., Chowdhury, F., Surette, M., Pai, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109115</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109115</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of fecal microbiota transplantation for adolescent anorexia nervosa]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109115</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109712?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk of severe cardiovascular events and incidence rate of cardiopulmonary events among patients with COPD in China: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109712?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the risk of severe cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) across different time periods following COPD exacerbations and the incidence rate of cardiopulmonary events in a real-world setting in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Regional electronic health records database from Yinzhou District of Ningbo City, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 14 713 patients aged &ge;40 years with a first COPD diagnosis between 1 January 2014 and 1 March 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The risk of severe CV events (ie, hospitalisation and a primary or secondary discharge code for acute coronary syndrome, heart failure decompensation, cerebral ischaemia, arrhythmia and CV-related death) during different exposed time periods following a COPD exacerbation, the incidence rate of overall cardiopulmonary events (ie, severe exacerbation of COPD, all-cause mortality, inpatient CV events, inpatient ischaemic stroke and inpatient tachyarrhythmia/atrial fibrillation) and the incidence rate stratified by COPD exacerbation history.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included a total of 14 713 patients. During a median (IQR) follow-up of 2.8 (4.0) years, 20.1% experienced severe CV events. Compared with the unexposed period, the risk of severe CV events was the highest in the first 10 days following a COPD exacerbation (adjusted HR 10.00, 95% CI 8.16 to 12.25). The risk of severe CV events decreased over time but remained significantly elevated up to 90 days post exacerbation. We found that 32.7% of COPD patients experienced cardiopulmonary events, with a crude incidence rate of 9.38 (95% CI 9.09 to 9.69) per 100 person-years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study is the largest retrospective cohort study investigating CV and cardiopulmonary events among patients with COPD in China. Our findings highlight an elevated risk of CV events closer to the time of COPD exacerbations and show that nearly one-third of COPD patients experience cardiopulmonary events.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, Z., Cheang, I., Chen, Y., Zhang, M., Shen, P., Li, W., Hou, D., Lin, H., Zhan, S., Sun, F., Song, Y., Li, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109712</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109712</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk of severe cardiovascular events and incidence rate of cardiopulmonary events among patients with COPD in China: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109712</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109712</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110222?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Electrical Stimulation of the Nucleus Accumbens for Severe, Refractory Self-Injurious Behaviour in Children (EASE-SIB): protocol for a randomised double-blinded crossover trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110222?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Self-injurious behaviour (SIB) consists of persistent, repetitive movements that can result in serious injury without suicidal intent. These behaviours are prevalent among children with neurodevelopmental disorders, including profound autism. Although many individuals benefit from currently available therapies, some exhibit treatment-refractory SIB that necessitates ongoing use of personal protective equipment and restraint, presumably due to stronger neurobiological drivers. We recently completed a phase I, open-label clinical trial demonstrating the safety, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of bilateral deep brain stimulation targeting the nucleus accumbens (NAc-DBS) in children with profound autism and severe, refractory SIB. The objective of the proposed study is to characterise the effectiveness of NAc-DBS in treating severe, refractory SIB in this unique and vulnerable population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A single-centre, randomised double-blinded, crossover trial is proposed. Informed by the results of our pilot study, 25 subjects with autism spectrum disorder and severe, refractory SIB will undergo bilateral NAc-DBS. Following a 4-week recovery period, participants will be randomised to either group A (stimulation ON then OFF) or group B (stimulation OFF then ON). Each block will last 12 weeks, separated by a 2-week washout period. Following completion of the second block, all participants will enter a 6-month open-label phase with stimulation ON. The primary outcome is the difference in the Repetitive Behaviour Scale&ndash;Revised total score, between DBS-ON and DBS-OFF conditions. Secondary outcomes include measures of quality of life, caregiver burden, daily logs of SIB events and direct observation of SIB under structured analogues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The proposed trial has been approved by the institutional Research Ethics Board (1000081171). Trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06529380">NCT06529380</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mithani, K., Sauter, S., Hagopian, L. P., Breitbart, S., Sriharan, S., Kisteroff, F., Huynh, M., Malik, S., Thorpe, K. E., Huber, J., Gorodetsky, C., Ibrahim, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110222</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110222</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Electrical Stimulation of the Nucleus Accumbens for Severe, Refractory Self-Injurious Behaviour in Children (EASE-SIB): protocol for a randomised double-blinded crossover trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110222</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111824?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Retention in trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies reporting participant reasons for trial non-completion]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111824?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Poor participant retention in randomised clinical trials, resulting in missing outcome data, can impact the validity, reliability and generalisability of results. While participants&rsquo; views on general non-retention issues have been reported elsewhere, a qualitative evidence synthesis specifically focusing on trial processes (ie, outcome data collection) impacting retention has not been undertaken to date. This is an important research question to inform targeted interventions to support retention. This review aims to address this by systematically searching and synthesising the evidence on participant reasons for trial non-completion, linked to outcome data collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis of qualitative studies and mixed methods studies with a qualitative component, in Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Social Science Citation Index, Cumulative Index of Nursing &amp; Allied Health Literature and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, up to February 2025. We used Thomas and Harden&rsquo;s thematic synthesis approach. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative framework was used to assess confidence in the review findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We identified 11 studies reporting qualitative data from 14 separate trials, with findings from 105 trial non-retainers. The studies were undertaken between 2007 and 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were three types of participant non-retention behaviours reported across the studies, where participants either: (1) missed at least one clinic visit; (2) did not complete a postal questionnaire or (3) did not complete online data collection. We developed four analytical themes outlining participant-reported influences on trial non-retention, specifically related to trial processes (ie, data collection for outcome measures): fluctuating health, balancing trial burdens, navigating life as a trial participant and managing expectations of participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This review generates important insights into participants&rsquo; reasons for trial non-completion linked to outcome data collection. The review highlights the need for further research into supporting trial recruitment discussions that provide clear, realistic expectations for potential trial participants, as well as strategies that recognise, and where possible, address some of the influences on participants to improve outcome data completeness and ultimately improve trial retention.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murphy, E., Gillies, K., Skea, Z., Biesty, L., Hunter, A., Noor, N. M., McCann, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111824</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111824</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Retention in trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies reporting participant reasons for trial non-completion]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111824</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111824</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Healthcare professionals barriers and enablers concerning deprescribing in type 2 diabetes patients with polypharmacy: a focus group study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Deprescribing is important because inappropriate polypharmacy increases the risk of adverse drug events, treatment burden, reduced adherence and healthcare costs, while potentially compromising patient safety and quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the perceived barriers and enablers experienced by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Indonesia regarding deprescribing in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and polypharmacy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGDs) and thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>Four FGDs were conducted with general practitioners, specialists (internists) and pharmacists from healthcare facilities in West Java Province, Indonesia. Each group included 3&ndash;4 participants from the same discipline, with one mixed group that included one participant of each profession. In total, 13 participants were included in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>HCPs across disciplines recognised the goals of deprescribing as optimising treatment, reducing polypharmacy risks and preserving treatment outcomes. However, implementation was hindered by the lack of clear guidelines, hierarchical dynamics, limited training and resource constraints, particularly in rural and high-volume settings. Enablers included clinical competence, effective communication, access to comprehensive clinical data and interprofessional collaboration. Patient education level, family support and community engagement were also key, underscoring the need for system-level support and shared decision-making to achieve effective deprescribing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Deprescribing in T2D with polypharmacy is shaped by clinical competence, interprofessional collaboration, patient engagement and system-level resources. Improving practice in Indonesia requires clear guidelines, targeted HCP training, stronger interprofessional communication, better access to patient data and active involvement of patients and families. These strategies could provide context-specific insights to guide practice and policy on deprescribing initiatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>766/UN6.KEP/EC/2024</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oktora, M. P., Yuniar, C. T., Hak, E., Alfian, S. D., Abdulah, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112378</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112378</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Healthcare professionals barriers and enablers concerning deprescribing in type 2 diabetes patients with polypharmacy: a focus group study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112378</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113738?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing Hospital at Home tariffs in Denmark: a time-driven activity-based microcosting approach within a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113738?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop an empirically grounded, activity-based tariff framework for Hospital at Home (HaH) services using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) and micro-costing to support transparent and equitable reimbursement for acute elderly care delivered at home.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Microcosting study embedded within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing HaH with conventional hospital admission in Denmark.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three municipalities in the Central Denmark Region in collaboration with emergency department physicians at a regional hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A consecutive subsample of 107 elderly acute patients enrolled in the RCT between June 2022 and February 2024. Resource use for HaH activities was measured prospectively using microcosting logs, time-motion observations and administrative records.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Empirically derived tariffs per HaH visit (first and subsequent) calculated using an eight-step TDABC framework incorporating process mapping, resource identification, capacity cost rates and time equations. Sensitivity analyses tested robustness to variation in key cost drivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean total tariff was 338.89 (95% CI 310.94 to 351.49) for first visits and 207.81 (95% CI 200.70 to 215.69) for subsequent visits, including treatment and transport components. Staff time was the principal cost driver, while equipment, overhead and travel reimbursement had smaller effects. The framework accommodates variation in staffing, geography and visit intensity and can be used to estimate total costs across diverse HaH pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A transparent and reproducible tariff-development framework for HaH services was established using TDABC and microcosting. The model aligns reimbursement with actual resource use and care complexity and provides a transferable template for economic evaluation and operational planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05360914">NCT05360914</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Risor, B. W., Duvald, I., Nielsen, C. P., Tayyari, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113738</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113738</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing Hospital at Home tariffs in Denmark: a time-driven activity-based microcosting approach within a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113738</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113738</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113829?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vitamin B12 deficiency in long-term metformin use and clinician awareness: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113829?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Metformin is the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Long-term use of metformin has been associated with vitamin B<SUB>12</SUB> deficiency, which may lead to serious complications such as anaemia and neuropathy. Although international bodies have recommended screening for vitamin B<SUB>12</SUB> deficiency in patients on long-term metformin, it is unclear how aware clinicians are of this adverse effect and to what extent such guidance is being followed in practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A scoping review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Databases searched included MEDLINE, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (PubMed), British Nursing Index (BNI), Google Scholar, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCO) alongside searching for grey literature such as EThOS (Electronic Theses Online Service), DART (Digital Access to Research Theses) European and Kings College London Research Portal. Studies published in English from 1990 onwards were included if they addressed clinician awareness or screening practices. Data were extracted and summarised using a structured tool, with themes mapped visually. The literature search was conducted between 1 August 2025 and 1 November 2025 and included studies published from January 1990 onwards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>23 sources were included in the review. 7 studies directly assessed clinician awareness of metformin-associated vitamin B<SUB>12</SUB> deficiency, all conducted outside the UK. Across 15 studies reporting screening practices, routine vitamin B<SUB>12</SUB> monitoring was uncommon, with annual testing rates in general below 20% of eligible patients (range 2.6%&ndash;19.8%). In a large retrospective cohort study of patients on long-term metformin, 44.9% underwent vitamin B<SUB>12</SUB> testing, with a mean delay of 990 days from treatment initiation. Screening was predominantly symptom-triggered rather than preventive, and older adults and other high-risk groups were consistently less likely to be tested. Reported barriers included lack of clinical prompts, competing priorities and testing costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Clinician awareness of the link between long-term metformin use and vitamin B<SUB>12</SUB> deficiency is present but inconsistently translated into practice. Screening practices remain suboptimal despite recent guideline updates. Interventions, such as checklists, prompts and updated training, may support improved adherence. However, no UK-based studies were identified, highlighting a gap in national evidence. Routine, risk-based screening in primary care could prevent significant morbidity associated with undiagnosed vitamin B<SUB>12</SUB> deficiency in this population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parsonage, I., Wainwright, D., Barratt, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113829</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113829</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vitamin B12 deficiency in long-term metformin use and clinician awareness: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113829</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113829</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113833?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How is interprofessional communication researched and defined in healthcare? A scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113833?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Poor communication between healthcare professionals is one of the main causes of medical errors. Many articles about interprofessional communication (IPC) do not define what communication is and often describe it only as a domain of competencies of interprofessional collaboration. Three communication paradigms coexist: the transmission model, the transactional model and the constitutive model. These models focus on different aspects of communication and are complementary. No review about IPC, including all healthcare professionals or all healthcare settings, has been found.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A scoping review protocol was developed to map the research on the topic of IPC, the paradigms of communication used by the researchers, as well as to clarify the definition of this concept. We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews. Eligibility criteria follow the Population, Concept, Context framework. Articles about health professionals, allied health professionals and social workers and students in these fields will be included. Articles evaluating IPC in healthcare, either quantitatively or qualitatively, will be included. Articles investigating IPC in any type of healthcare setting in any country will be considered. All types of published articles in scientific journals will be included. The databases that were searched are MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, EMBASE and Web of Science. In October 2025, 22 798 citations were retrieved, of which 9722 duplicates were deleted. Two researchers will then independently assess the remaining 13 078 citations against the eligibility criteria. This step is scheduled for completion in May 2026. They will then chart the data using a standardised data extraction tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. Findings of the scoping review will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration details</st>
<p>Because the study is a scoping and not a systematic review, registration was not possible on PROSPERO. The study was registered on Open Science Framework: <A HREF="https://osf.io/dyh2a">https://osf.io/dyh2a</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, H., Gignon, M., Boyer-Vidal, F., Hainselin, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113833</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113833</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How is interprofessional communication researched and defined in healthcare? A scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113833</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113833</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vision Intervention for Seeing Impaired Babies: Learning through Enrichment (VISIBLE) - protocol of a feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Visual impairment is reported to affect 40%&ndash;50% of children with cerebral palsy (CP). Vision difficulties in the context of rehabilitation are often under-recognised, under-treated and therefore under-studied, pointing to an urgent need for the development of evidence-based vision interventions for infants and toddlers with cerebral vision impairment (CVI). We present the protocol of a multisite pragmatic pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an early vision-awareness and parent-directed environmental enrichment programme for infants with or at risk of CP under 7 months corrected age (CA) with vision impairment.</p>
<p>The main objective is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Vision Intervention for Seeing Impaired Babies: Learning through Enrichment (VISIBLE) intervention. We will estimate the preliminary effects of the programme on infants&rsquo; visual functions and early development, as compared with standard community-based care (SCC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A two-group RCT will be conducted. Infants at 3&ndash;6 months at entry, with severe visual impairment and at high risk of CP, will be enrolled and randomised (n=16 per group) to receive the VISIBLE intervention compared to SCC. Randomisation will be completed through an independent automated process (Research Electronic Data Capture). VISIBLE intervention will be delivered by a therapist through home visits (90&ndash;120 min) once every 2 weeks. Completion of 10 visits (80% of the intervention target dose) within 6 months is required for adherence to the VISIBLE trial. Outcome will be assessed at 12 months CA. Visual function will be evaluated with the Infant Battery for Vision, motor outcomes with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition. Developmental quotients, infant quality of life, parent well-being and parent-infant relationship will be also monitored through standardised tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The enrolling sites have historically demonstrated rapid and effective translation of successful evidence-based interventions into routine clinical practice, as well as the dissemination of the findings through local, national and international scientific meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12618000932268.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guzzetta, A., Bancale, A., Bedoshvili, A., Bosanquet, M., Chorna, O., Corsi, G., Del Secco, S., Elliott, C., Fiori, S., Fripp, J., Gole, G. A., Gordon, A., Harpster, K., Hunt, R. W., Leishman, S., Mori, R., Morgan, C., Novak, I., Pagnozzi, A. M., Pannek, K., Philip, S. S., Rice, M., Salt, A., Shannon, B., Schwartz, T., Tatishvili, N. N., Tatishvili, S., Boyd, R. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114567</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114567</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vision Intervention for Seeing Impaired Babies: Learning through Enrichment (VISIBLE) - protocol of a feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114567</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115434?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evolving roles and impacts of digital health tools in HIV prevention efforts in Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115434?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>With the proliferation of digital technology, the health sector, like other sectors of society, has increasingly adopted digital technologies, resulting in a dynamic landscape where the roles and impacts of digital health tools in different contexts are constantly evolving. This integration of digital technology into the health space has extended into the field of HIV prevention, ushering in new possibilities and challenges. However, review studies documenting the evolving use of digital health tools in HIV prevention are scant, particularly in regions with many low- and middle-income countries, such as in Africa, which have some of the highest HIV prevalence and incidence rates in the world.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) 2020 guidelines for methodological rigour and will be reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). Relevant published literature will be searched using a combination of keywords, Boolean terms and Medical Subject Headings in the following databases: CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, WHO Digital Health ATLAS and Health Source with no date limits for the studies chosen. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) website and the reference lists of selected articles will also be used for backward searching, and Google Scholar will be used for forward citation tracking. The search strategy will be formulated following the guidelines provided by the Peer review of Electronic Search Strategies statement for peer assessment of electronic search strategies. Two reviewers will independently assess the references to ensure that they align with the predetermined eligibility criteria. Subsequently, the data from the included studies, published between January 2004 and January 2026, reflecting the period in which digital health innovations have rapidly expanded in Africa, will be extracted and any discrepancies resolved using a third reviewer. Thematic analysis will be used to analyse the data, and the findings will be reported using both tables and figures. The PRISMA-ScR will be followed to report this study&rsquo;s results. Quality appraisal of the included studies will be done using the mixed methods appraisal tool V.2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study does not involve human participants and only reviews existing literature in the public domain, and therefore ethical approval was not required. Our intention is to disseminate our research findings through a diverse range of channels, including peer-reviewed journals, conferences and webinars.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mpangase, S. H., Zondi, G. M., Haffejee, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115434</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115434</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evolving roles and impacts of digital health tools in HIV prevention efforts in Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115434</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115434</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115973?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dynamic trade-off evaluation framework for bariatric surgery outcomes: a qualitative Straussian Grounded Theory study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115973?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Guided by Straussian Grounded Theory, this study aimed to explore patients&rsquo; dynamic trade-off processes in evaluating bariatric surgery outcomes and to construct a patient-centred theoretical framework to inform clinical assessment and intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using Straussian Grounded Theory, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using open, axial and selective coding. Reporting followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in China between June 2023 and August 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 11 patients who had undergone bariatric surgery were enrolled, aged 21&ndash;54 years, with postoperative follow-up durations ranging from 1 to 10 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A core category&mdash;<I>Dynamic Trade-off Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Outcomes</I>&mdash;was identified, characterised by dynamism, trade-off and subjectivity. The framework comprises four inter-related components: trade-off basis, trade-off moderation, trade-off process and comprehensive evaluation. Outcome evaluation emerged as a non-linear process progressing through four stages: burden-dominant, contradiction-coexistence, contradiction-persistence and meaning-reconstruction stages. Individual goal orientation and psychological resilience served as key moderating factors shaping evaluative trajectories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study proposes a novel theoretical framework elucidating how patients dynamically evaluate bariatric surgery outcomes. By revealing stage-specific mechanisms and moderating factors, the framework provides a theoretical basis for improving preoperative expectation management and postoperative support.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wu, S., He, H., Han, J., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Wang, C., Zhang, J., Gao, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115973</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115973</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dynamic trade-off evaluation framework for bariatric surgery outcomes: a qualitative Straussian Grounded Theory study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115973</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115973</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116065?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Economic evidence of health technology innovations for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB in resource-limited settings: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116065?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) poses a significant diagnostic and economic challenge in HIV endemic, low-resource settings due to its complex presentation and current diagnostic tools limitations. While accurate and timely diagnosis is critical for reducing morbidity, mortality and health system costs, economic evaluations of EPTB diagnostics remain sparse and fragmented. This protocol aims to map existing evidence on the economic evaluation of diagnostic innovations for EPTB in low-resource settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological framework and registered on the Open Science Framework. Peer-reviewed articles, grey literature and official reports published between 2000 and 2025 will be searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Scopus and Science Direct. The search strategy is structured using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Time, Study design and Setting (PICOTSS) framework, and will be peer-reviewed using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) guideline. Study selection, data charting and extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Data will be charted iteratively, and the methodological quality of selected economic evaluations will be appraised using the Drummond checklist. Results will be synthesised in narrative summaries and tabular formats. Final reporting will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guideline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>For review of previously published data, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated in professional networks, stakeholder meetings and a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>OSF Registration DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BTCPG</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nyamasve, J. G., Katena, N. A., Shamu, S., Mutsvangwa, J., Esmail, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116065</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116065</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Economic evidence of health technology innovations for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB in resource-limited settings: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116065</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116065</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118259?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Providing care to domestically sex trafficked persons in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118259?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Domestic sex trafficking is a major health and human rights concern associated with profound social, physical and psychological harms, including complex trauma. People who are being/have been sex trafficked often present to emergency departments (EDs) with unmet health needs and in contexts shaped by coercion, control and fear of authority. ED encounters represent an important setting for identifying sex trafficking, building trust, making referrals to specialised resources and facilitating an exit out of sex trafficking. This scoping review will explore the care experiences and processes for sex trafficked persons in EDs by synthesising existing evidence on the barriers and facilitators to providing high quality, equitable and effective emergency care. This review represents the first phase of a multi-stage study to develop quality indicators (QIs) for ED clinicians providing care for people experiencing domestic sex trafficking in Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley&rsquo;s framework, as updated by Levac and colleagues, which consists of: (1) identifying a research question(s); (2) identifying relevant literature; (3) selecting studies; (4) charting/extracting data; (5) collating, summarising and reporting results; and (6) consulting with community partners. Five databases will be systematically searched to find scholarly, empirical studies describing emergency care experiences and processes for people being sex trafficked. Data will be extracted using a standardised charting tool developed by the lead author and research team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Research Ethics Board (REB) approval is not required for this study as it involves an analysis of published literature only. Findings will be synthesised into a set of candidate QIs to be disseminated.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, K. J., Kosa, S. D., Brown, H., Grewal, K., Du Mont, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118259</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118259</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Providing care to domestically sex trafficked persons in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118259</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Linezolid in addition to standard antibiotic treatment for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: study protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p><I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (<I>S. aureus</I>) bacteraemia is a common and severe infection. With mortality rates ranging from 20&ndash;30% and long-term impairments in over a third of survivors, better treatments are urgently needed. Linezolid, a well-established treatment for pneumonia and complicated skin infections, has been shown in preclinical studies to strongly suppress <I>S. aureus</I> virulence factors critical to bacterial persistence and tissue damage. Hence, we aim to investigate whether the addition of linezolid to standard therapy in patients with <I>S. aureus</I> bacteraemia leads to an overall improvement in patient-relevant outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a two-arm, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (Linezolid Plus Standard of Care) in 12 hospitals in Switzerland with blinded treating physicians, patients and outcome assessors. Hospitalised patients aged &ge;18 years with <I>S. aureus</I> bacteraemia will be eligible. Patients will receive standard antibiotic treatment as prescribed by the treating physician. Within 72 hours of collection of the blood sample yielding the first positive blood culture, patients will be enrolled and randomised 1:1 to receive either adjunctive linezolid (600 mg orally two times per day for 5 days) or placebo. To determine patient-relevant outcomes, we implemented a comprehensive patient-representative consultation process. Consequently, we will use the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) established for <I>S. aureus</I> bacteraemia as the primary outcome at 90 days. The hierarchical composite DOOR outcome includes the following four components, ranked from most to least important: (1) survival, (2) return to level of function before <I>S. aureus</I> infection, (3) complications leading to treatment changes and serious adverse reactions; and (4) hospital length of stay. This approach will allow us to analyse the win ratio, that is, whether patients receiving linezolid have a better DOOR rank compared to patients in the placebo group. We calculated a target sample size of 606 patients providing 90% power at a two-sided significance level of 0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was received from the Ethics committee for Northern and Central Switzerland (BASEC number 2025-00655). Eligible patients will be informed about the study by the local study team and asked for written consent if they wish to participate. For patients unable to provide informed consent, an appropriate substitute (ie, a close relative or a physician not involved in the research project) may make decisions based on the presumed wishes and the best interest of the patient. The patient&rsquo;s own consent will be obtained as soon as their condition permits. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and in laymen's terms through various channels (social media, Swiss national portal HumRes).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06958835">NCT06958835</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rose, N., Bernasconi, N. S., Schumacher, M., Werlen, L., Bu&#x0308;chel, D., Weisser, M., Vogt, S. B., Wehrle-Wieland, E., Conen, A., Thurnheer, M. C., Martin, Y., Birrer, M., Bongiovanni, M., Albrich, W. C., Karrer, U., Schibli, A., Harbarth, S., Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, M., Briel, M., Hasse, B., Khanna, N., Kuehl, R., Speich, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T06:20:59-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118509</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118509</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Linezolid in addition to standard antibiotic treatment for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: study protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118509</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Primary carE PPi dEprescRibing (PEPPER) trial: a protocol for determining the optimal strategy for stopping chronic proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Current Belgian guidelines state that chronic proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is indicated for oesophagitis grade C and D, Barrett&rsquo;s oesophagus, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, or to prevent bleeding ulcers with chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) intake in patients at risk. Guidelines justify empiric short-term PPI therapy in other cases to control symptoms. Yet, there is insufficient PPI down-titration and/or cessation. As such, concerns have risen related to the impact of PPIs on the healthcare budget and increasing number of risks and side effects. This study aims to provide evidence to determine which strategy provides the most effective approach for stopping chronic intake of PPIs in patients in whom there is no firm medical indication for their continued use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised clinical trial. General practitioners will randomise 609 to one of three PPI deprescription strategies. Patients on a high-dose PPI are allowed to participate after down-titrating their dose to a maintenance dose for 1 month before being randomised. Patients unable to decrease the high-dose PPI are not to be randomised. Following randomisation, patients will be requested to adapt their PPI intake for 1 month to the allocated deprescription scheme: (a) on-demand PPI intake, (b) replace PPI to alginate intake and (c) intermittent PPI intake with a fixed scheme. After successfully following the deprescription strategy, patients are requested to completely stop their use of PPI. Patients are followed up for 1 year. The primary endpoint of the study is the percentage of patients achieving a successful therapeutic outcome, defined as limited PPI intake and willingness to continue the therapy, at the end of the follow-up period. Data will be collected using a study-specific online platform and analysed using the intention-to-treat approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial was approved through the platform for Clinical Trials in the European Union by a Belgian ethics committee (CTIS reference: 2022-502375-37-00). Study results will be disseminated via open-access, peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Trial registration number NCT05629143.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05629143">NCT05629143</A>, clinicaltrial.gov.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carbone, F., Scheepers, J., Van den Houte, K., Laenen, A., Tack, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Primary carE PPi dEprescRibing (PEPPER) trial: a protocol for determining the optimal strategy for stopping chronic proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101266</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101718?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care (North America): an updated systematic review from Making Healthcare Safer IV]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101718?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>In the USA, an estimated 40&ndash;50 million operations are performed annually, with high rates of adverse events. Since the 1980s, report cards have been used for outcome measures and to improve safety of surgical care. As part of Making Healthcare Safer IV&mdash;an initiative aimed at publishing evidence-based reviews as they are completed to help healthcare leaders, researchers and policymakers act more quickly on evidence-supported practices&mdash;we performed an updated review on the certainty of evidence on patient safety practices related to the use of surgical report cards and outcome measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review using the Grade of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched from November 2011 to May 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We included primary research studies (randomised control trials or observational studies with a comparison group, including pre&ndash;post studies) or observational studies that investigated a surgical report card in adult or paediatric surgical patients at the hospital or surgeon level in inpatient or outpatient settings. Excluded studies included: narrative reviews, scoping reviews, editorials, commentaries, abstracts, studies that measured only patient knowledge or levels of engagement or studies using local surgical dashboard data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Screening and eligibility were done in duplicate, while data extraction was done by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Specific items in the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool and a modification of the National Institutes of Health Tool were used to assess for bias in studies. Two reviewers assessed each study for risk of bias. A modified version of the GRADE framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria: 13 primary research studies and 6 descriptive studies of surgical collaboratives. Of the primary studies, nine used a pre&ndash;post or longitudinal study design and four used a regression discontinuity or concurrent controlled design. Seven of the studies were about the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. Five studies were from single institutions and the remainder included nine to greater than 700 hospitals. Pre&ndash;post studies of report cards that prompted quality improvement (QI) programmes all reported improvements in outcomes, longitudinal studies reported benefits in some but not all outcomes and one in four controlled before-and-after studies reported a statistically significant mortality benefit. All studies, except for one, were at moderate or high risk of bias. Six collaboratives were identified with preliminary data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Based on the above evidence, the theoretical rationale and parallel evidence in other settings, we judged that it was moderate certainty that report cards and outcomes measurements can improve surgical outcomes. However, given the evidence from studies where report cards were actively linked to institutional QI initiatives, we recommend that outcome data must be paired with actionable QI efforts to meaningfully improve patient outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huy, T., Blegen, M. B., Tupper, H., Premji, A., Motala, A., Lawson, E., Shekelle, P. G., Girgis, M., Maggard-Gibbons, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101718</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101718</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care (North America): an updated systematic review from Making Healthcare Safer IV]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101718</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101718</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preschool care early in life and mental health in adolescence in Sweden: a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Despite the high rates of early enrolment in preschool and of poor mental health in adolescence in Sweden, knowledge regarding their association in Sweden is lacking. We investigated whether age at starting preschool and weekly hours spent at preschool in different ages are associated with mental ill-health in Swedish adolescents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cohort study based on data from KUPOL (Swedish acronym for &lsquo;Knowledge about Adolescents Mental Health and Learning&rsquo;).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>We used data from KUPOL, a longitudinal study conducted during 2013&ndash;2018, involving Swedish adolescents born 2000&ndash;2001. We included in the current analyses adolescents with available information on the exposures and the outcomes of interest (n=2261).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Study participants and their parents completed questionnaires concerning the child&rsquo;s age (in months) at start of preschool, the average weekly hours in preschool in different ages, the adolescent&rsquo;s mental health, lifestyle, school-related, psychosocial and parental sociodemographic factors. We analysed the association between preschool-related factors and mental health using logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Children enrolled in preschool at the age of 12&ndash;15 months had increased odds of high overall and externalising problems score on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire relative to those enrolled at 20 months or later. The corresponding ORs (95% CIs) were 1.39 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.90) and 1.52 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.16), while the corresponding population attributable fractions were 8% and 9%, respectively. There were no associations between age at start of preschool and internalising problems, nor between the average weekly hours at preschool and mental health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We found weak and inconsistent evidence for a link between early preschool attendance and mental health in adolescence; population attributable fractions suggest limited public health implications for the studied associations. The results should be interpreted in light of the methodological constraints of observational studies, the multitude of our comparisons and the sample selection.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laszlo, K. D., Chen, H., Andersson, F., Galanti, M. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preschool care early in life and mental health in adolescence in Sweden: a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Its not just diabetes: implementation enablers and barriers of an indigenous-focused virtual diabetes care clinic using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) - a qualitative assessment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Indigenous peoples living with diabetes face unique challenges accessing comprehensive specialty diabetes care. A small diabetes virtual care clinic oriented towards Indigenous individuals, and those in rural and remote communities, has provided care to over 400 individuals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We characterised the distinguishing features of care provided at this clinic and used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0 (CFIR) to explore the enablers and barriers to implementing this model of care, from the perspective of the clinic&rsquo;s staff and providers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Research methods and design</st>
<p>Guided by CFIR, we conducted eight semi-structured interviews with six clinic staff members. Deductive thematic analysis was used to identify relevant enablers and barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The aspirational features of care were cultural safety, comprehensiveness and virtual delivery. The implementation of this model of care was enabled by an internal culture of relational care; a nimble, resourceful, pragmatic and client-centred approach to virtual delivery; wayfinding and resources from key external organisations; community engagement and a small team of motivated and independent providers. Key barriers included the lack of physical interactions and uncertain or limited resources and funding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The identified enablers and barriers to implementing an Indigenous-focused virtual diabetes care clinic have implications for future interventions to improve rural Indigenous chronic disease care, and for governments and adjacent organisations tasked with meeting Canada&rsquo;s Truth and Reconciliation Commission&rsquo;s calls to action in healthcare. Further research examining the effectiveness of virtual diabetes care at this clinic is ongoing.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swampy, K., Eurich, D. T., Meneen, K., Samanani, S., Singh, P., Wozniak, L. A., Padwal, R. S., Lau, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Its not just diabetes: implementation enablers and barriers of an indigenous-focused virtual diabetes care clinic using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) - a qualitative assessment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107266</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107760?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding chemsex prevention among community pharmacy professionals in France: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107760?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe the Knowledge&ndash;Attitude&ndash;Practices (KAP) of community pharmacy professionals regarding chemsex prevention in the Auvergne-Rh&ocirc;ne-Alpes region of France, and to identify associated determinants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Regional, cross-sectional, web-based, self-administered KAP survey collecting quantitative and qualitative data, analysed using multivariable linear regression and inductive content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care, community pharmacies in the Auvergne-Rh&ocirc;ne-Alpes region of France, February&ndash;March 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Of the 276 respondents entering the survey, 261 community pharmacy professionals fully completed it. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age &ge;18 years; (2) pharmacists, pharmacy technicians or students in training and (3) employment in a community pharmacy in the Auvergne-Rh&ocirc;ne-Alpes region. Exclusion criterion was non-consent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>KAP domain scores derived from survey items; thematic categories identified through qualitative content analysis of open-ended responses; and factors associated with KAP scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants were predominantly female (69.6%), pharmacists (64.5%), aged 18&ndash;29 (41.7%) and working in urban areas (61.6%). Overall, 67.4% were able to define chemsex. Mean (SD) KAP domain scores were 13.8 (4.4) (range 3&ndash;27) for knowledge, 9.6 (2.9) (2&ndash;16) for attitudes and 9.6 (2.9) (5&ndash;16) for perceived resource adequacy/need. Qualitative analysis identified insufficient knowledge or training (28.7%) and the taboo and intimate nature of the topic (21.1%) as the main barriers to discussing chemsex. The most frequently suggested levers for improving care were professional training (57.1%) and broader prevention efforts (36.4%).</p>
<p>Higher knowledge scores were associated with more positive attitudes (p=0.015), male gender (p=0.004) and prior chemsex-related advice requests (p=0.027), while increasing age was negatively associated with knowledge (p=0.029). Positive attitudes were associated with urban practice settings (p&lt;0.001 for city-centre; p=0.002 for near urban centre) and higher knowledge scores (p&lt;0.001). Perceived resource adequacy/need was lower among participants who had previously provided chemsex-related advice (p=0.047).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lebrat, M., Bouasla, H. E., Logerot, S., Carrouel, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107760</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107760</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding chemsex prevention among community pharmacy professionals in France: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107760</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107760</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107830?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early mobilisation after abdominal surgery: a concept analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107830?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To clarify and define the clinical practice concept of early mobilisation after abdominal surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A concept analysis guided by Walker and Avant&rsquo;s method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE (Ovid), AMED-(Ovid), Embase (Elsevier) and CINAHL (EBSCO) were searched through 5 December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Relevant studies that included combinations of the terms &lsquo;early mobilisation&rsquo;, &lsquo;early ambulation&rsquo;, &lsquo;early acceleration&rsquo;, &lsquo;abdominal surgery&rsquo; and &lsquo;surgical procedures&rsquo; were selected. We restricted the search to English full-text publications involving adult patients, limited to the year 2000 and onward. Inclusion criteria were original research articles describing the timing and/or type of mobilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>The study derives its defining attributes, antecedents and consequences through data analysis. To enhance understanding of the model, we constructed related and contrary cases of the concept and outlined relevant empirical referents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 140 studies were included in the analysis. Early mobilisation is characterised by the key defining attributes of initiating active physical movement, including standing, sitting in a chair or walking, within the first 24 hours of surgery. Antecedents include haemodynamic and respiratory stability, adequate pain management, and the patient&rsquo;s cognitive and physical readiness. Contextual antecedents include competent and adequately staffed healthcare teams. Consequences include improved physiological recovery and enhanced postoperative outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This analysis provides a clarified, practice-focused definition of early mobilisation after abdominal surgery. By delineating its key attributes and contextual prerequisites, the study offers a conceptual foundation that can support clinical guidelines, promote consistent implementation and inform future research aimed at optimising postoperative recovery.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schandl, A., Siesage, K., Kroksmark, A.-K., Gruber-De Sousa, E., Lilliecrona, J., Olsen, M. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107830</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107830</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early mobilisation after abdominal surgery: a concept analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107830</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107830</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108073?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[N-terminal proBNP adds prognostic value to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in elective thoracic surgery: an observational cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108073?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) is a common complication following non-cardiac, particularly thoracic, surgery and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Although guidelines recommend cardiac biomarker monitoring to detect PMI, its implementation in routine clinical practice remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the combined use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following elective thoracic surgery, and to determine whether NT-proBNP provides incremental prognostic value beyond hs-cTnI alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multicentre observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Conducted between February 2021 and November 2023 in three Spanish tertiary hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients aged &ge;45 years scheduled for elective thoracic surgery involving lung resection (pneumonectomy, lobectomy, bilobectomy or segmentectomy) under general anaesthesia. Exclusion criteria included urgent or non-thoracic surgery, active infection or sepsis and a history of severe heart failure (ejection fraction &lt;30%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Combined measurement of hs-cTnI and NT-proBNP at baseline (preoperatively) and at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.</p>
<p>PMI was defined as hs-cTnI &ge;45 ng/L at 24 and/or 48 hours or a &ge;20% increase from baseline in patients with elevated preoperative concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 475 patients, PMI occurred in 11.8%. PMI had higher rates of prior stroke (12.5% vs 2.9%; p=0.004), smoking history (85.7% vs 64.0%; p=0.001) and severe renal dysfunction (7.1% vs 0.7%; p=0.001), with similar Revised Cardiac Risk Index distribution. Patients with PMI also had greater postoperative elevations of hs-cTnI and NT-proBNP (p&lt;0.001), longer surgeries (3.5 hours vs 2.7 hours; p&lt;0.001) and more frequent lobectomy/bilobectomy (64.3% vs 50.4%; p&lt;0.001). Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) was associated with increased PMI risk (OR 2.29; p=0.019). Among 49 patients (10.3%) with dual postoperative elevation of hs-cTnI and NT-proBNP, cardiovascular comorbidities were common (hypertension 81.6%, smoking history 85.7%, stroke 14.3%), and most procedures were minimally invasive (video-assisted thoracic surgery 61.2%, RATS 24.5%), with a median duration of 3 hours 42 min. MACE occurred in 18.4% of this group, indicating a substantially elevated risk than isolated or no biomarker elevations. At 30 days, patients with PMI had higher MACE (14.3% vs 3.3%; p&lt;0.001), mortality (3.6% vs 0.7%; p=0.049) and new-onset arrhythmias (5.3% vs 0.2%; p&lt;0.001), particularly atrial fibrillation (7.1% vs 1.7%; p=0.011). Dual biomarker elevation was associated with the highest MACE risk (15.2%), representing a twofold to threefold increase over single biomarkers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Combined hs-cTnI and NT-proBNP assessment improves perioperative cardiovascular risk stratification beyond ischaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04749212">NCT04749212</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alonso, M., Popova, E., De Miguel, M., Garcia-Osuna, A., Gonzalez-Tallada, A., Ordonez-Llanos, J., Jauregui, A., Trujillo, J. C., Martin Grande, A., Martinez-Tellez, E., Parera, A., Planas, G., Trujillo, L., Butron, D., Sola-Roca, J., De Nadal, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108073</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108073</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[N-terminal proBNP adds prognostic value to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in elective thoracic surgery: an observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108073</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108073</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110008?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of osteoporotic fracture risk assessment in people with intellectual disabilities: a UK NHS modelling study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110008?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We compared the cost-effectiveness of alternative fracture risk assessment strategies for people with intellectual disabilities (ID) aged &ge;40 years from a UK National Health Services perspective over a lifetime horizon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cost-effectiveness analysis using a lifetime decision-analytical model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>UK primary care, with data from literature and national databases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>People with ID.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Three strategies were assessed: (S1) Risk assessment using the UK QFracture score; (S2) use of IDFracture (a fracture risk prediction tool specifically developed for adults with ID); and (S3) conducting a one-time dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan in all. S1 and S2 were followed by DXA scan for those at risk. At-risk individuals received treatment according to UK practice (bisphosphonates plus vitamin D and calcium for osteoporosis, and vitamin D and calcium alone for osteopenia).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Direct healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the base case, S2 (ICER: &ndash;&pound;2568/QALY) was dominant (ie, less costly and more effective) and S3 (ICER: &pound;1678/QALY) was cost-effective relative to S1 for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). For hip fracture, S2 (ICER: &pound;32 116/QALY) and S3 (ICER: &pound;49 536/QALY) were not cost-effective relative to S1 under the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-recommended cost-effectiveness thresholds. Findings from the sensitivity analyses were predominantly consistent with the base-case results. Subgroup analyses showed that age-specific and gender-specific strategies could be used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>For people with ID aged &ge;40 years, a proactive approach to risk assessment for MOF is not only clinically beneficial, but also cost-effective.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Png, M. E., Frighi, V., Holt, T. A., Achana, F., Smith, M. C., Collins, G. S., Roast, J., Petrou, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110008</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110008</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of osteoporotic fracture risk assessment in people with intellectual disabilities: a UK NHS modelling study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110008</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110008</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112976?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of a digital tool for monitoring and managing the emotional and cognitive sequelae of post-intensive care syndrome: ICURA study protocol for a randomised clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112976?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intensive care units (ICUs) can be a particularly challenging environment for patients who are mentally vulnerable. In addition to the physical stress associated with critical illness and its management, there are physiological and psychosocial factors that can negatively impact a patient&rsquo;s mental health. Approximately half of ICU survivors will experience post-intensive care syndrome, a set of emotional, neuropsychological and physical sequelae that can significantly affect patients&rsquo; functionality and quality of life, both in the short and long term. The main objective of this study is to investigate whether the ICU Recovery Answers (ICURA) digital follow-up platform can effectively detect emotional and cognitive problems in critically ill patients and its impact on functionality and health-related quality of life during the first year after ICU discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Multicentre longitudinal prospective study involving ICU adult patients, with randomised follow-up comparing a telemedicine monitoring programme versus usual medical care during 1 year after discharge. A total of 360 participants will be recruited during their ICU admission in two hospitals in Spain. Efficacy outcomes will focus on participants&rsquo; level of functioning, assessed with the WHO Short Disability Assessment Schedule, and quality of life, measured with the 12-Item Short Form Survey at 1, 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge. Emotional state and cognitive impairment will be evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and Treatment-Outcome Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment by telephone at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after ICU discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The implementation of this project is expected to have a direct impact on the satisfaction of ICU survivors, improving their well-being, personalised follow-up and quality of life. Results from this study will be disseminated at various scientific conferences, national and international meetings, and will be shared with the general public and other relevant parties. The dissemination of these results will occur through scientific publications, allowing the medical and scientific community to benefit from the study&rsquo;s findings. Ethics approval from the Ethics Board of Parc Taul&iacute; Foundation and Balearic Islands with reference numbers 2022/3031 and IB 5072/22 PI: Protocol version 1 of 18 November 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06504979">NCT06504979</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Llabres-Alvarez, E., Riera-Sagrera, M., Llompart-Casasnovas, A., Salva, P., Castro, A., Godoy-Gonzalez, M., Dona-Lopez, E., Lopez-Aguilar, J., Jodar, M., Navarra-Ventura, G., Gili, M., Roca, M., Fernandez-Gonzalo, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112976</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112976</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of a digital tool for monitoring and managing the emotional and cognitive sequelae of post-intensive care syndrome: ICURA study protocol for a randomised clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112976</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112976</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115342?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115342?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore existing qualitative research on patients&rsquo; experiences from the onset of symptoms to the diagnosis of sarcoma, with the purpose of identifying patient-perceived barriers at both patient and healthcare system levels and to highlight opportunities for improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review of qualitative studies using thematic synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We systematically searched Medline [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], PsycINFO [EBSCOhost] and CINAHL [EBSCOhost] from database inception to 11 April 2025 for qualitative studies reporting sarcoma patients&rsquo; experiences during their diagnostic trajectory. The final search was conducted on 11 April 2025. All articles were screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist. Six studies conducted in Australia, the Netherlands and the UK were included. Data were analysed using a thematic synthesis approach guided by Thomas and Harden (2008). Confidence in the synthesised findings was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERqual) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four overarching themes emerged: patients&rsquo; experience and interpretation of symptoms, diagnostic pathways, healthcare system factors, and reflections and recommendations. Key contributors to delayed diagnosis were symptom normalisation, misattribution by both patients and healthcare professionals, limited continuity of care and communication challenges. These findings were consistent across multiple countries, indicating relevance and validity in many settings. Patients emphasised the importance of disease awareness, persistence of patients and coordinated care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Diagnostic delays in sarcoma are influenced by both patient and healthcare systemic factors. Addressing these factors requires increased disease awareness among healthcare professionals and the public, improved coordination within the healthcare system, and targeted research to guide future interventions. This review provides cross-country insights into barriers to early sarcoma diagnosis, informing future priorities in clinical practice and research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251030726.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schambye, M. E. R., Kotter, M. F., Rosing, J. A. M., Dybdal, D., Mathiasen, R., Hjalgrim, L. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115342</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115342</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115342</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115342</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117087?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biopsychosocial trajectories in older adults with planned intensive care: a protocol for a prospective observational study (GeriICU)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117087?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Older adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) following elective surgery face heterogeneous trajectories of recovery spanning the physical, cognitive and social domains. Biological ageing processes, including cellular senescence, may modulate these outcomes. Here, we present the protocol for an analytic prospective observational cohort study integrating biopsychosocial assessments and senescence-associated biomarkers to identify predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and post-ICU recovery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Single-centre, prospective cohort study at the University Hospital Halle (Saale), Germany. Adults aged 60 years or older scheduled to undergo elective surgery and who have a planned postoperative stay in the ICU of at least 24 hours and who are able to provide consent will be enrolled. Baseline pre-ICU data will include the following: medical history, comorbidity, medications, routine laboratory values and a comprehensive geriatric assessment (eg, frailty, mobility, handgrip strength, Timed Up &amp; Go, cognition, mood, loneliness, social status and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, EQ-5D-5L). A 5 mL serum sample will be collected for a senescence-associated secretory phenotype panel and additional ageing biomarkers. Skin autofluorescence will be used to estimate advanced glycation end-products. Telephone follow-ups at 3 and 6 months ascertain HRQoL, functional outcomes, psychosocial outcomes, rehospitalisations and institutionalisation. The primary endpoint is defined as a stable or improved HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L) at 3/6 months vs baseline. We intend to use multivariable predictive modelling with elastic-net regularisation and conduct internal validation using bootstrap resampling and cross-validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg (No. 2025-112). Written informed consent is obtained from all participants. The results of this study will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00037969.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schumann, J., Ko&#x0308;hring, W., Simm, A., Grosskopf, A., Szabo, G., Schneider, T., Prell, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T06:04:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117087</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117087</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biopsychosocial trajectories in older adults with planned intensive care: a protocol for a prospective observational study (GeriICU)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117087</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117087</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103702?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in the epidemiology of heart failure in the decade 2014-2023: insights from the AQUORE retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103702?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue due to its high morbidity, mortality and healthcare burden. This study aimed to provide estimates of HF incidence, survival rates, outcome changes and their predictive factors in a central Italian population over the decade 2014&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-based retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Hospital discharge records from all hospitals in L'Aquila Province of Italy were analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All residents who experienced a HF index hospitalisation between 2014 and 2023 were included. HF index hospitalisation was defined as the first hospitalisation for HF in patients with no prior hospitalisation from the same diagnosis for at least 4 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were age-standardised and sex-standardised incidence rates of HF index hospitalisations and all-cause mortality following index hospitalisation. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs), survival and their associated factors were analysed with negative binomial regression models, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 6965 incident cases from 17 588 HF hospitalisations in the decade under study were analysed. The overall standardised incidence rate was 1.73 per 1000 person-years, with significant differences by age and sex. Incidence rates decreased by 17% from 2014&ndash;2018 to 2019&ndash;2023 (IRR: 0.834; 95% CI 0.743 to 0.936). Cumulative 1-year and 5-year survival were 70.05% and 36.38%, respectively, with a progressively higher mortality risk in older people. Compared with the 2014&ndash;2018 cohort, the 2019&ndash;2022 cohort showed improved survival at 30 and 90 days and at 1 year overall and by age groups, with &lt;50 exception.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>HF incidence declined, particularly in older populations, and remained higher in men, while survival rates improved. Despite these trends, HF continues to represent a substantial clinical and public health burden.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lancia, L., Dante, A., Caponnetto, V., Petrucci, C., Masotta, V., Mammarella, L., Romano, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103702</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103702</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in the epidemiology of heart failure in the decade 2014-2023: insights from the AQUORE retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103702</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103702</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104751?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of paediatric vertebral body and canal dimension in the cervical spine considering the influence of ethnicity in a New Zealand cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104751?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To define subaxial cervical spine vertebral body and canal dimensions in a paediatric cohort and to assess the influence of age and ethnicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective radiological observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Single-centre tertiary level trauma care setting in New Zealand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>CT scans of children under 18 years of age were reviewed. A total of 111 participants were included (63 New Zealand European (NZE) and 48 M&#x0101;ori). Patients with cervical spine pathology or deformity were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were anteroposterior and transverse vertebral body and spinal canal dimensions measured at the mid-pedicle level from C3 to C7. Secondary outcomes included canal-to-vertebral body (canal:VB) ratios. Associations with age and ethnicity were assessed using correlation analysis and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Absolute vertebral body and canal dimensions were larger in NZE children compared with M&#x0101;ori. Canal:VB ratios were smaller in NZE children, reaching statistical significance at C7 (p=0.011). Age demonstrated a strong positive correlation with mean vertebral body anteroposterior diameter and a moderate correlation with canal:VB ratio. ANCOVA showed ethnicity (NZE) to be a significant predictor of vertebral body dimensions, particularly transverse diameter at C4&ndash;C6, while age had a lesser effect. Canal:VB ratios decreased with increasing age from C3 to C7, with low coefficients of determination indicating additional influencing factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In this paediatric cohort, vertebral body dimensions were more strongly associated with age than spinal canal dimensions. Ethnicity was associated with modest differences in cervical spine morphology, particularly transverse vertebral body diameter. These findings suggest cervical spine development is multifactorial and may have implications for trauma assessment and spinal cord injury risk evaluation in adolescents. Further studies incorporating anthropometric and sex-specific variables are warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathews, A., Zhu, M., Lee, J., Baker, J. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104751</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104751</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of paediatric vertebral body and canal dimension in the cervical spine considering the influence of ethnicity in a New Zealand cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104751</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104751</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106362?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Negative effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy for patients with 'difficult to treat depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106362?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Mindfulness-based interventions are widely used, yet concerns about potential negative effects&mdash;particularly those related to mindfulness meditation practice&mdash;have gained increasing attention. Individuals with difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) represent a population of particular relevance due to heightened vulnerability, but comparative evidence on clinically relevant negative outcomes of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) versus established alternative psychotherapies in this group is lacking. This protocol describes a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis to assess and compare the incidence of clinically relevant negative outcomes associated with MBCT and the cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP), an established individual psychotherapy for DTD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Randomised controlled trials of MBCT and CBASP for adults with DTD were identified through systematic searches of major databases. Eligible studies must compare MBCT or CBASP (alone or with treatment as usual) to each other or to control groups. The primary outcome is clinically significant deterioration, defined as a &ge;6-point increase on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or equivalent. Secondary outcomes are suicidality and treatment dropout. IPD will be requested from trial investigators; aggregate data will be used when IPD is unavailable. One-stage random-effects IPD network meta-analyses will be conducted to integrate direct and indirect evidence and to examine participant-level moderators of deterioration. Adverse events reported in the included trials will be summarised descriptively at the study level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No local ethical review was required following consultation with the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Primary trial investigators obtained local ethical approval and will share pseudonymised IPD. Findings will inform clinical decision-making and guideline development by strengthening the evidence base on potential negative effects of MBCT and CBASP in adults with DTD, including identification of subgroups at increased risk. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and accessible summaries for relevant stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42022332039</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niemi, M., Michalak, J., Velana, M., Barnhofer, T., Harrer, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106362</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106362</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Negative effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy for patients with 'difficult to treat depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106362</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106362</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106815?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of the effects of eHealth-delivered sedentary breaks versus physical activity promotion interventions on sedentary time: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106815?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Prolonged sedentary behaviour (SB) is an independent risk factor for adverse health outcomes, with current WHO guidelines emphasising both increased physical activity (PA) and reduced sitting time. While electronic health (eHealth) interventions offer scalable solutions, the comparative effectiveness of two dominant strategies: sedentary break interventions (frequent interruptions of sitting) versus PA promotion (structured activity sessions) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol aims to compare the effectiveness of interventions targeting breaks in SB versus increased PA in reducing sedentary time through meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing either intervention to a control condition, while exploring key moderating factors including participant characteristics, intervention type, duration, eHealth delivery mode, theoretical basis, use of behaviour change techniques (BCTs), PA intensity and SB frequency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to 31 July 2025, with language restrictions limited to English and Chinese publications. RCTs comparing eHealth-delivered interventions promoting sedentary breaks with those increasing PA in adults will be included. The primary outcome is sedentary time (objectively measured or self-reported), and secondary outcomes include health outcomes such as cardiometabolic markers, fatigue and well-being. Two reviewers (SC and XN) will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using validated tools. Meta-analyses will be performed if sufficient homogeneous data are available, comparing changes in sedentary time. Subgroup analyses will explore effects by participant characteristics including gender (male vs female), age groups (&lt;60 vs &ge;60 years), intervention type (sedentary breaks vs PA), duration (short-term &le;3 months vs medium-term &gt;3 to &lt;6 months vs long-term &ge;6 months), eHealth platform/delivery mode (eg, smartphone apps vs websites vs wearable device prompts vs text messages), theoretical basis (eg, theory-driven interventions vs non-theoretical interventions), use of BCTs (eg, interventions incorporating BCTs vs interventions without BCTs), SB break frequency (eg, every 30 min vs every 60 min) and PA promotion intensity (eg, light vs moderate vs vigorous). A narrative synthesis will be conducted for studies unsuitable for quantitative analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this study involves secondary analysis of published data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251042994.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, S., Nie, X., Giovannucci, E., Yang, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106815</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106815</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of the effects of eHealth-delivered sedentary breaks versus physical activity promotion interventions on sedentary time: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106815</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106815</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dapagliflozin for cardiorenal protection after intensive care unit discharge: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating dapagliflozin at ICU discharge for cardiorenal protection (DAPA-ICU)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patients discharged from intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of adverse long-term outcomes including cardiovascular and/or renal events and a 1-year mortality of approximately 22%. Plasma biomarkers measured at ICU discharge have demonstrated strong prognostic value, with elevated cardiac or renal biomarkers identifying patients at particularly high risk of poor outcomes. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are now widely recognised for their cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects in chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes, heart failure or chronic kidney disease. These agents improve both morbidity and mortality across a range of high-risk populations. We hypothesise that a therapeutic strategy aimed at preventing the progression of cardiovascular and/or renal injury following ICU discharge may improve long-term outcomes in ICU survivors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted across 16 teaching and non-teaching ICUs in France. We will enrol 600 adult patients (18 years of age or older) who have received mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressors for at least 24 hours during their ICU stay, and who meet at least one of the following criteria at ICU discharge: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) &gt;800 pg/mL or BNP &gt;90 ng/L, an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 25 and 90 mL/min/m&sup2;. Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either dapagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or a matching placebo for a duration of 1 year. The primary outcome is a composite endpoint assessed at 1 year after randomisation, comprising: all-cause mortality, unscheduled hospitalisation for acute heart failure and decrease in renal function. Feasibility will be assessed based on patient and clinical acceptability and recruitment performance, including enrolment rates across participating centres.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (CPP Ile-de-France 5). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment and the initiation of any study-related procedures. Dapagliflozin is a widely available medication with an established safety profile. If proven effective, it would represent a readily deployable strategy to improve long-term outcomes in ICU survivors. The study is described in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials framework, and key design features and methodological decisions are outlined accordingly. DAPA-ICU aims to evaluate the efficacy of dapagliflozin in cardiorenal protection among critically ill patients following ICU discharge. The main trial results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal as soon as they become available after final analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07025629">NCT07025629</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Depret, F., Chousterman, B., Roger, C., Garnier, M., Lalande, R., Kerforne, T., Rouve, E., Lukaszewicz, A.-C., Ouattara, A., Merdji, H., Turbil, E., Bouhemad, B., Quenot, J.-P., Delbove, A., Levrat, Q., Jully, M., Legriel, S., Bougouin, W., Klouche, K., Kimmoun, A., Asfar, P., Vicaut, E., Mebazaa, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108119</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dapagliflozin for cardiorenal protection after intensive care unit discharge: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating dapagliflozin at ICU discharge for cardiorenal protection (DAPA-ICU)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108119</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108573?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adapting and implementing the Serious Illness Care Programme for outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108573?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a coordinator-facilitated Serious Illness Care Programme (SICP) in outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Single-arm, mixed-methods, prospective feasibility study conducted over three sequential phases across 9 months, guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics in two tertiary medical centres in Singapore.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Eleven clinicians (eight doctors and three nurses) participated. Clinicians had prior serious illness conversation (SIC) training and were purposively sampled for diversity in specialty, seniority and mode of care delivery. One participant disengaged midway due to concerns about intervention fit but completed endline measures. A total of 101 patients participated in an SIC during the intervention period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Implementation supports were developed with reference to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation&ndash;Behaviour model of behaviour change, and adapted to the workflows and needs of participating clinicians. These included email reminders, in-person prompting by a coordinator, access to a locally adapted SIC guide, a structured documentation template and optional patient preparation materials. Supports were introduced in full during phase 2, with in-person prompting and support withdrawn in phase 3.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Feasibility was the primary outcome, operationalised through clinician perceptions of implementation support (acceptability) and the proportionality of implementation effort to observed benefits (practicality). Secondary outcomes included SIC engagement rates (reach), clinician retention (adoption) and continuity intentions among clinicians (maintenance).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Clinician retention was 91% (n=10/11) with the only dropout being in the cardiology setting. Most clinicians felt support was acceptable and adequate (n=9/11). While 101 patients had SICs, engagement activity in oncology and cardiology declined following the withdrawal of in-person prompting, while engagement among palliative medicine clinicians remained stable or increased. Coordinator time commitment decreased by 75.8% between phases 2 and 3. Key barriers faced by clinicians included the documentation burden. Additionally, there was a perceived lack of fit in outpatient cardiology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A coordinator-facilitated SICP is feasible and acceptable in outpatient oncology and palliative care settings. Active coordination reduces clinician burden. As in-person prompting may be necessary to sustain engagement in non-palliative specialties, further research should focus on institutionalising supports in these settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ng, A., Yeo, S.-M., Neo, S. H.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108573</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108573</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adapting and implementing the Serious Illness Care Programme for outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108573</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108573</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110668?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of the PREDICT-Kidney online tool to promote informed decision-making about kidney cancer follow-up care: a qualitative co-design study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110668?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Co-design of the PREDICT-Kidney online tool by patients, members of the public and healthcare professionals (HCPs), to support the communication of the risk of recurrence following surgical treatment for kidney cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative co-design study. Using an iterative process, feedback was collected (via workshops), prioritised and implemented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Online workshops with participants from across the UK were conducted between December 2023 and November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>18 adult participants, including patients surgically treated for kidney cancer, members of the public without a history of kidney cancer and HCPs involved in kidney cancer care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcomes</st>
<p>To produce an online tool to support the communication of risk of kidney cancer recurrence that is easy to use, easy to understand and acceptable to stakeholders. Secondary outcomes are the properties of the feedback collected, including volume and type.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Across nine workshops, 99 discrete feedback items were collected, resulting in 71 actionable changes to the initial prototype tool. Differences in priorities were observed between participant groups, especially around the inclusion of information about competing risks of death. Participants valued the tool for improving consistency of follow-up information, supporting shared decision-making and providing multiple visual formats to communicate risk. Iterative feedback led to refinements in terminology, design, content and delivery, including adjustments to the presentation of recurrence and mortality risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A co-design approach was used to improve the PREDICT-Kidney online tool to align with the needs of patients and HCPs. A feasibility study is required to evaluate its use and impact in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Re, C., Stimpson, G., Stewart, G. D., Bromley, J., Archer, S., Batley, C., Godoy, A., Usher-Smith, J., Harrison, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110668</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110668</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of the PREDICT-Kidney online tool to promote informed decision-making about kidney cancer follow-up care: a qualitative co-design study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110668</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110668</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112010?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preventive interventions for preschool children at risk for emotional and behavioural problems: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112010?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Emotional and behavioural problems (EBPs) are receiving increasing attention at the global level, and preschool children are no exception. These issues have a significant impact on future development. Preventive interventions in preschool age are effective in preventing more serious disorders by improving social skills, emotional regulation and resilience in children. Although various preventive interventions have been developed and their effectiveness demonstrated, the evidence remains fragmented. At present, there has been no comprehensive study mapping EBPs prevention interventions at the preschool age level using the Neuman Systems Model approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews.The completed scoping review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A systematic search will be conducted in four major databases, namely Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and online searches using Google Scholar, without language and publication year restrictions. Two reviewers will independently screen the literature according to the inclusion criteria and then extract the data. Any differences between the two reviewers will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. We will compile, summarise and analyse the extracted data and present the results in figures, tables and descriptive narratives to ensure clarity and facilitate comparison across studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required, as the review will use only published literature. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed international journal and may inform policy and practice in early childhood preventive interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://osf.io/zg6ty">https://osf.io/zg6ty</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anggeriyane, E., Fitri, S. Y. R., Dhamayanti, M., Rakhmawati, W., Mardya, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112010</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112010</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preventive interventions for preschool children at risk for emotional and behavioural problems: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112010</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112010</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114414?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adjuvant short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and a PD-1 inhibitor for resected mucosal melanoma: study protocol for a single-arm, prospective, phase II trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114414?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Mucosal melanoma (MM) carries a high risk of postoperative relapse and poorer survival than cutaneous disease. Prospective data from China support adjuvant temozolomide&ndash;cisplatin (TMZ/DDP) in resected MM, while radiotherapy (RT) may augment antitumour immunity and synergise with programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor. We therefore designed an adjuvant regimen combining short-course RT (SCRT) with chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor after curative-intent resection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective, phase II study at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre enrols adults (&ge;18 years) with histologically confirmed MM after R0/R1 resection, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0&ndash;1 and M0 disease. Patients receive six 3-week cycles of systemic therapy: pucotenlimab 200 mg IV on day 1; TMZ 200 mg/m&sup2; orally on days 1&ndash;5 and DDP 25 mg/m&sup2; IV on days 1&ndash;3. (SCRT; 25 Gy in five fractions) is delivered after the first two cycles of systemic therapy, followed by four additional cycles of systemic therapy without RT. The primary endpoint is 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints include locoregional RFS, distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival and safety (CTCAE V.5.0). The planned sample size is 47 (44 evaluable), providing 80% power (one-sided &alpha; of 0.10) to detect an improvement in 1-year RFS from 55% to 70%. Time-to-event endpoints will be estimated using Kaplan&ndash;Meier methods with 95% CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre (approval number: 2407300-5), and all participants will provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400093001.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lv, J., Shen, L., Jiang, X., Wu, R., Zhou, S., Zhang, Z., Wan, J., Xia, L., Liu, F., Liu, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Xu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114414</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114414</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adjuvant short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and a PD-1 inhibitor for resected mucosal melanoma: study protocol for a single-arm, prospective, phase II trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114414</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114414</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115587?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metformin use and the risk of incident osteoarthritis among individuals with diabetes: a register-based nested case-control study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115587?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the association between metformin use and incident osteoarthritis (OA) in people with diabetes and the impact of dosing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nested case-control study within a cohort of &gt;1.4 million individuals from Sweden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were aged 35&ndash;80 years in 2005, without diabetes or OA. We identified persons with incident diabetes between 2006 and 2016 and excluded those with OA before the diabetes diagnosis and those with an incident OA diagnosis within 3 years of the diabetes diagnosis. Cases were defined as individuals with incident OA before 2020 and were matched with up to four controls without OA in the same period, by sex, diabetes duration, birth year (&plusmn;1 year) and date of diabetes diagnosis (&plusmn;180 days) using incidence density sampling. Metformin use before the index date (OA diagnosis) was the main exposure. Secondary exposures were quartiles of total metformin use (defined daily doses (DDD)) and duration-adjusted use (DDD/day), reflecting average daily use. We estimated risk ratios with 95% CIs using conditional logistic regressions, adjusted for age at diabetes diagnosis, education, immigration status and comorbidities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome</st>
<p>Incident OA diagnosis in primary or specialist care (International Classification of Diseases codes M15&ndash;M19).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 4007 cases and 14 111 controls. Any metformin use was not associated with OA risk (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.12). Results for higher total use (0.98 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.11)) and duration-adjusted use (0.92 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.07)) showed no or inconclusive associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In individuals with incident diabetes and no prior OA, metformin was not linked to a lower risk of developing OA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DellIsola, A., Magnusson, K., Turkiewicz, A., Recenti, F., Lohmander, S., Englund, M., Kiadaliri, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115587</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115587</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metformin use and the risk of incident osteoarthritis among individuals with diabetes: a register-based nested case-control study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115587</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115587</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115862?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prefilled versus infused regional citrate anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy on circuit lifespan: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115862?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>For critically ill patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, regional citrate anticoagulation is the preferred strategy to maintain extracorporeal circuit patency. Current clinical practice relies on two citrate-based protocols, with the widely used but complex 4% trisodium citrate solution posing a hypernatraemia risk and haemofiltration replacement fluid of sodium citrate offering procedural simplification and a more physiological electrolyte profile. Direct prospective comparison of their circuit lifespan efficacy is currently unavailable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, prospective, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial will be conducted in China. 90 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive anticoagulation with either citrate-based haemofiltration replacement fluid or 4% trisodium citrate solution, with all patients undergoing a standardised continuous venovenous haemofiltration protocol. The primary outcome is circuit lifespan, with a non-inferiority margin set at 2.43 hours. Secondary outcomes include the 72-hour circuit survival probability, duration of hospitalisation, and all-cause mortality rates at 28 and 90 days. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Approval No. (2025)1157). Any subsequent amendments must be submitted to the same ethics committee for further review and approval prior to implementation. Furthermore, the findings of this trial will be disseminated through presentations at relevant national and international conferences and via publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2500106991.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zou, H., Wang, F., Mali, N., Yang, Y., Zhang, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115862</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115862</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prefilled versus infused regional citrate anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy on circuit lifespan: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115862</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115862</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117565?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and real-world cohort validation of a meta-analysis-derived simplified scoring model for cardiac resynchronisation therapy response: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117565?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone device-based treatment for patients with heart failure with ventricular dyssynchrony. However, approximately 30&ndash;40% of recipients fail to achieve clinical response. Despite extensive research, validated prediction tools grounded in high-level evidence and readily applicable in clinical practice remain lacking. This study protocol describes the development and real-world validation of a simplified clinical scoring model for CRT response derived from systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will develop a CRT response prediction model via meta-analysis and preliminarily validates it in a single-centre retrospective cohort. Initially, systematic searches of multiple databases up to 31 January 2026 and meta-analysis will synthesise effect estimates for candidate predictors, creating an evidence-based foundation that conceptually functions as a &lsquo;training dataset&rsquo;. Predictor selection and prioritisation will be guided by study frequency, effect magnitude and clinical accessibility, with factor weights derived directly from pooled random-effects meta-analytic estimates. Log relative risks will be converted to integer scores to establish a series of nested prediction models. Model performance will then be comprehensively assessed in an independent &lsquo;validation dataset&rsquo; comprising a single-centre cohort from Xinjiang Medical University, evaluating discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), calibration (calibration plots and Hosmer-Lemeshow test) and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). The final scoring system will be identified through comparative model evaluation guided by parsimony principles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This meta-analysis exclusively uses published, de-identified data and therefore does not require ethical approval. The validation cohort employs retrospectively anonymised patient data in strict adherence to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Approval No.: K202403-48-2503A-Y1). As this constitutes a retrospective analysis of existing data, individual informed consent will be waived. Comprehensive measures to protect participant privacy and ensure data integrity will be implemented throughout all research procedures. The findings will be presented at academic gatherings or published in scholarly, peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024572313</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, X., Wang, Y., Wei, M., Tuerhong, Z., Lu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117565</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117565</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and real-world cohort validation of a meta-analysis-derived simplified scoring model for cardiac resynchronisation therapy response: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117565</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117565</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117726?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) used in ambulatory palliative care for adult patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117726?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The global burden of cancer is increasingly concentrated in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health systems face significant challenges such as late-stage diagnosis, limited resources and restricted access to specialised care. Palliative care plays a vital role in improving symptom control and quality of life for patients with cancer, particularly as care delivery shifts toward ambulatory and community-based settings. In this context, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are crucial for capturing patients&rsquo; perspectives on the quality of care. However, the use and characteristics of these instruments in ambulatory palliative care settings within LMICs remain poorly understood. This systematic review aims to identify and map PROMs and PREMs used among adult patients with cancer receiving ambulatory palliative care in LMICs, and to examine their content, psychometric properties and alignment with key domains of quality palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA) guidelines. The search will be conducted across seven databases from the database inception to December 2025. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles using Rayyan software to identify studies involving adults (&ge;18 years) with cancer in ambulatory palliative care settings. Data extraction will capture study characteristics, instrument content and psychometric properties. The final review will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA-COSMIN for Outcome Measurement Instruments. A narrative synthesis will be conducted, mapping the identified instruments against the eight domains of the National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care to identify measurement gaps and inform future instrument development. A meta-analysis will be conducted if sufficient homogeneity exists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review will include only published data; therefore, no approval is required. The findings of this review will be presented at conferences and published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251273579.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew, M., Ghoshal, A., Kabukye, J. K., Shetty, N., Dhyani, V. S., Chakraborty, S., Shetty, D. K., B, B., Salins, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117726</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117726</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) used in ambulatory palliative care for adult patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117726</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117726</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117963?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising sleep and managing stress by integrating a behavioural intervention during cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and design of the OPTICARE-RESST multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117963?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Over 50% of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) experience poor sleep and/or, closely related, psychological stress. Although stress management interventions are generally available, they are typically underutilised in CR, and sleep remains an underaddressed component within CR. This is concerning, as poor sleep and stress not only reinforce each other but are also associated with poorer cardiovascular health and lower quality of life. Therefore, the primary aim of the OPtimising CArdiac REhabilitation by REfining Sleep and STress (RESST) study is to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of adding a behavioural intervention targeted at improving sleep and managing stress during CR (RESST intervention) on sleep and psychological stress. Furthermore, the study aims to explore the (bidirectional) associations between sleep, stress and lifestyle behaviours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This parallel-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial will include 200 CR patients across 3 major CR centres in the Netherlands who experience poor sleep and/or stress. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to standard CR or standard CR with the RESST intervention. Standard CR is a structured programme combining exercise, lifestyle guidance and risk management. On top of standard CR, the RESST intervention consists of 5 in-person group sessions targeting sleep and stress and is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. Primary outcomes are accelerometer-assessed and self-reported sleep and perceived stress. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, psychosocial well-being, chronic stress biomarkers (hair cortisol and cortisone), momentary fatigue, momentary stress and physical activity. Linear mixed models will be used to assess changes in outcomes at 3-month (after intervention and/or CR completed) and 6-month follow-up. The momentary data collected with ecological momentary assessment and accelerometry will be analysed using multilevel linear mixed models to explore the (bidirectional) relationship between sleep, stress and other lifestyle components such as physical activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the ethics committee of Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (MEC-2024-0238). The findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at academic conferences and professional and patient publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06505109">NCT06505109</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Loon, I., Ooms, E., Luik, A., Sunamura, M., Wally, T., Boersma, E., Vromen, T., Tenbu&#x0308;lt-van Limpt, N., Bussmann, H., Boon, M., Louter, M., Redekop, K., Ista, E., van den Berg-Emons, R., ter Hoeve, N., on behalf of the other OPTICARE-RESST Consortium members, van 't Hof, Ebner-Priemer, Ribbers]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117963</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117963</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising sleep and managing stress by integrating a behavioural intervention during cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and design of the OPTICARE-RESST multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117963</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117963</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118090?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heart rate variability as a biomarker for autonomic recovery and maternal wellbeing following caesarean delivery: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118090?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Caesarean delivery accounts for more than 21% of all births worldwide, with rates exceeding 30% in several countries, yet objective physiological markers for monitoring postoperative maternal recovery remain scarce. Heart rate variability (HRV), a non-invasive index of autonomic nervous system integrity, has demonstrated prognostic value in general surgical populations. This scoping review will map the extent, range and nature of evidence on HRV monitoring in caesarean populations within a recovery-assessment framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review follows a Population&ndash;Concept&ndash;Context framework. The primary population comprises women undergoing elective caesarean delivery, with emergency procedures analysed as a distinct subgroup. The concept covers any validated measurement of HRV parameters (time-domain, frequency-domain and non-linear indices). The context spans the perioperative-to-postpartum continuum, from preoperative baseline through 6 weeks after delivery. Adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, we will employ a three-step search strategy across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers will screen records and extract data. Findings will be synthesised narratively and presented via temporal evidence mapping, an evidence gap map, and structured summary tables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Formal ethics approval is not required because this review exclusively analyses published data. We will disseminate our findings through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at relevant academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Y., Deng, L., Xiong, Y., Zeng, Q., Cui, H., Guo, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118090</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118090</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heart rate variability as a biomarker for autonomic recovery and maternal wellbeing following caesarean delivery: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118090</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118090</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118275?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Indocyanine green fluorescence for intraoperative detection of liver tumours in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for the LIVERGREEN phase IV multicentre clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e118275?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Liver tumours are a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Current diagnostic tools, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), have limitations in detecting liver neoplasms. Indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as a promising tool for improving liver tumour detection. This study aims to assess the impact of preoperative ICG on intraoperative tumour detection in minimally invasive surgery and develop a machine-learning algorithm to enhance tumour detection using ICG fluorescence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, multicentre, phase IV clinical trial adheres to Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines. Patients with liver tumours eligible for minimally invasive surgery and a preoperative imaging test will be included. ICG will be administered intravenously 24 hours before surgery. Intraoperative procedures will include IOUS, ICG mapping and photographic documentation. Patients will be followed for 90 days to assess tumour progression, morbidity and mortality. The photographic analysis will enable the development of an artificial intelligence algorithm using machine learning and neural networks to identify lesions based on ICG fluorescence. The estimated sample size is 173 patients and the trial is predicted to accrue in 3 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS) guidelines. Approved by the local institutional Ethics Committee and the AEMPS, the results will be shared with the scientific community through publications and conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>EudraCT number</st>
<p>2023&ndash;5 08 316-27-00.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06398028">NCT06398028</A>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Protocol version</st>
<p>V.12, 18 March 2025</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huerta, M., Lopez-Ben, S., Llado, L., Sanchez-Cabus, S., Mils, K., Molina, V., Dopazo, C., Vidal, L., Dalmau, M., Caralt, M., Roson, N., Merino, X., Armario, D., Salcedo, M. T., Pellino, G., Sapisochin, G., Gomez-Gavara, C., LIVERGREEN Collaborative Group, Perez, Roig, Sanjuan, Perez, Sanchez-Maroto, Delgado, Cabau, Villasante, Galiana, Herms, Valencia, Canete, Garcia, Barrios, Vila, Leiva, Layreda]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118275</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-118275</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Indocyanine green fluorescence for intraoperative detection of liver tumours in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for the LIVERGREEN phase IV multicentre clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e118275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e118275</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101629?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between older patients receiving geriatric co-management at the emergency department and acute hospital admissions compared to usual care: an observational, controlled study in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e101629?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study is to determine if a geriatric co-management model, referred to as &lsquo;The Geriatric Emergency Medicine (GEM)-team&rsquo; is associated with less admissions to hospital in older patients compared with the usual care without increasing the risk of mortality or 30-day emergency department (ED) readmissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This observational, controlled study used 18-month data prospectively collected from hospital records. Inverse probability weighting was used to account for baseline differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>An ED at a suburban Dutch general hospital, receiving approximately 10 000 patients aged 70 or older per year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients aged 70 or older were screened according to predefined criteria. When positively screened patients were presented at the ED on weekdays between 09:00&ndash;17:00, they received geriatric co-management. Outside these hours and when the capacity of the GEM team was reached, patients received care as usual.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Geriatric co-management at the ED involves a geriatric multidisciplinary team in collaboration with the primary ED physician who share management and responsibility for the provided medical treatment and nursing care starting directly at the primary assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was hospital admission and secondary outcomes were the composite outcome of 30-day ED readmissions and mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients receiving geriatric co-management (n=972) had lower odds for hospitalisation (OR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.91) compared with the control group (n=1355) while 30-day ED readmissions and mortality did not differ between groups (OR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.36).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Geriatric co-management at the ED is associated with decreased hospital admissions while 30-day ED readmissions or mortality was not impacted. These preliminary results contribute to the evidence that geriatric co-management may be an effective intervention for older patients with frailty at the ED.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hogervorst, V. M., Ribbink, M., van Eekelen, R., Buurman, B. M., De Jonghe, A., Macneil Vroomen, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101629</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101629</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between older patients receiving geriatric co-management at the emergency department and acute hospital admissions compared to usual care: an observational, controlled study in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101629</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101629</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103045?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of incidental findings requiring interventions in CT for trauma patients in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103045?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To systematically review and meta-analyse the prevalence of incidental findings (IFs) requiring interventions identified in CT performed for patients with traumatic injuries in the emergency department, including pathologically confirmed cancers and emergent non-traumatic vascular pathologies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from database inception to 22 November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>Prospective or retrospective studies involving traumatic injury patients presented at the emergency department reporting IFs of clinical significance detected through CT with any interventions proposed were included. Studies that exclusively included paediatric populations were excluded. The systematic review methods included double-screening, dual assessment of eligibility and study validity, dual data extraction, Bayesian multivariate random-effects meta-analysis of prevalence and employing the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations&rsquo; rating for the certainty of evidence. The primary outcomes were IFs requiring any interventions, and subset IFs requiring urgent interventions. Secondary outcomes were histologically confirmed cancers and emergent non-traumatic vascular pathologies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>22 studies (1 with a prospective and 21 with a retrospective design) mainly from high-income countries using limited-quality data based on clinical practice involving 18 538 patients were included. 9 studies evaluated the whole body, while 13 evaluated selective body regions. The grading criteria for IFs were non-uniform, and the image interpreters involved had diverse experience and expertise. The summary prevalence estimates for IFs requiring any interventions, urgent interventions, pathologically confirmed cancers and emergent non-traumatic vascular pathologies detected in the whole body were 29.8% (95% credible interval (CrI) 20.4% to 42.9%; very low certainty), 7.6% (95% CrI 4.5% to 14.8%; low certainty), 0.6% (95% CrI 0.3% to 1.6%; moderate certainty) and 0.3% (95% CrI 0.1% to 0.9%; moderate certainty), respectively. These findings were largely identified in the chest or abdomen and pelvis, with the overall detection frequency reduced with the scanned body regions narrowed (very low to moderate certainty). Sparse data on the head, neck and spine resulted in limited results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>IFs identified in trauma whole-body CT requiring intervention are prevalent and can lead to substantial medical costs. The widely reported prevalence range suggests variations in radiologist recommendations and reporting in clinical practice and calls for standardisations. IFs requiring urgent intervention are not rare, which leads to a diagnosis of significant diseases including cancers and urgent vascular pathologies. Future studies should report long-term, patient-relevant results based on standardised classification and reporting systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42020187852.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nagasawa, K., Nihashi, T., Iwata, M., Terasawa, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T07:54:50-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103045</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103045</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of incidental findings requiring interventions in CT for trauma patients in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103045</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103045</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e100200?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Detection of fetal malnutrition at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score and anthropometric indices and its associated risk factors among term newborns in southern Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e100200?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to determine the prevalence of fetal malnutrition (FM) among term singleton newborns at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score. The study also compared the CAN score with selected anthropometric indices to describe their ability to identify FM. Furthermore, it sought to identify maternal and neonatal factors linked with FM among term infants delivered in four public hospitals in South Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at four public hospitals in South Ethiopia Regional State.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>480 live-born full-term babies and their mothers delivered at four public hospitals between 6 June 2021 and 19 April 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>FM status at birth was the outcome variable. FM was assessed using both the CAN score and selected anthropometric indices. At birth, measurements of height, weight, head circumference (HC) and mid-arm circumference (MAC) were taken. The MAC/HC ratio, body mass index (BMI) and ponderal index (PI) were computed and contrasted with reference curves. By examining and calculating subcutaneous tissue and muscle loss, the CAN score was used to determine the newborn&rsquo;s CAN status. A CAN score of &lt;25 was considered FM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study of 480 newborns found varying rates of FM depending on the diagnostic criteria used. The prevalence of FM was highest when assessed by CAN score (26.04%), followed by PI (17.29%), BMI (16.25%), MAC/HC ratio (13.54%) and birth size-for-gestational-age (11.25%). Not attending formal education (AOR 3.31 95% CI 1.14 to 9.64), age between 25&ndash;29 years (AOR 2.66 95% CI 1.19 to 5.98), primi-parity (AOR 9.63 95% CI 1.42 to 65.46), having &lt;= two antenatal clinic (ANC) visits (AOR 2.34 95% CI 1.05 to 5.24) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) (AOR 16.99 95% CI 4.20 to 68.81) were maternal factors significantly associated with increased risk of FM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>FM was prevalent among term neonates, with the CAN score showing higher prevalence than anthropometric indices. Education level of the mother, primi-parity, fewer ANC visits, maternal age between 25&ndash;29 years and PIH were significant risk factors. FM might be most effectively recognised using the CAN score, which can be done without advanced tools.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Debere, M. K., Eromo, N. C., Hussen, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100200</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100200</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Detection of fetal malnutrition at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score and anthropometric indices and its associated risk factors among term newborns in southern Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100200</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100200</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102325?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation of a comprehensive template to support personalised care for people with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation in primary care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102325?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Healthcare services are mainly organised around single health conditions and need reconfiguration to meet the needs of people with multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity). Typically, people are offered annual reviews for each of their long-term conditions separately. In a randomised controlled trial, a comprehensive computerised template based on a personalised care model increased the person-centredness of multimorbidity reviews in primary care, but there were implementation challenges. We sought to understand and address the challenges of implementing a template to support personalised primary care for people with multimorbidity (PP4M).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore the extent of implementation and factors influencing uptake of the PP4M intervention. To understand factors influencing implementation and normalisation of the template.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Convergent parallel mixed methods within a non-randomised hybrid implementation-effectiveness study. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) informed design, data collection and analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care (general practices) in three English regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Quantitative: Patients aged 18 years or over and had at least three types of long-term conditions (routine data collection); staff involved in using the template in implementation practices (Normalisation MeAsure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire).</p>
<p>Qualitative: Staff at implementation practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>A multimorbidity computerised template to support personalised annual reviews. NPT-informed implementation package delivered to implementation practices included: process mapping, software support and training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data collection</st>
<p>Routine medical record data; NoMAD questionnaires and qualitative interviews in implementation practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary/secondary outcomes</st>
<p>Measures of reach, fidelity, acceptability and sustainability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>Quantitative data: descriptive statistics, logistic regression and difference-in-difference models. Qualitative data analysis conducted using NPT coding manual.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In practices that received an NPT-informed implementation package, use of the template increased more, across patients with a range of demographics and health conditions, than in those that did not receive the implementation package (OR 2.86 (95% CI 2.34 to 3.49)). The implementation package successfully triggered NPT processes of coherence and cognitive participation, and, to a lesser extent, collective action and reflexive monitoring. Contextual factors, including a lack of staff generalist skills and disease-specific incentives, impeded engagement and sustained implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Focusing on the processes of normalisation as mechanisms of implementation facilitated development of an implementation strategy with potential to trigger those mechanisms, but did not sufficiently address contextual factors. Implementation strategies to support personalised care must consider wider system and practice level contextual factors, such as incentives and staff training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trail registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN40295449">https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN40295449</A> (2022&ndash;08-03, retrospectively registered.)</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson, R., Turner, A., Jinks, C., Portillo, M. C., Coope, C. M., Moult, A. L., Lippiett, K. A., Baker, D. J., Mann, C., Scott, L. J., Dziedzic, K., Paskins, Z., Byng, R., Chilcott, S., Scrimgeour, G., Salisbury, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102325</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102325</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation of a comprehensive template to support personalised care for people with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation in primary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102325</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102325</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102410?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Active subperiosteal versus passive subdural 24-hour drainage following single burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (the SUPERDURA trial): protocol for a multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e102410?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The main treatment of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is neurosurgical evacuation with subsequent drainage. However, consensus on optimal drain modality and placement is lacking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aim</st>
<p>To examine whether 24-hour active subperiosteal drainage is non-inferior to 24-hour passive subdural drainage after a single burr hole evacuation of a symptomatic CSDH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>SUPERDURA is a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial encompassing all neurosurgical units in Denmark. Adult patients with symptomatic CSDH admitted to a Danish neurosurgical unit for single burr hole evacuation will be screened for inclusion. Patients who are not able to give informed consent, and patients with recurrent CSDH, known cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities and other known brain pathologies will be excluded. Patients with bilateral CSDH will be registered as one case and treated similarly on both sides. Before surgical haematoma evacuation, patients will be randomised to 24-hour passive subdural drainage or 24-hour active subperiosteal drainage. The patients included and the two study statisticians will be blinded. The primary outcome is a composite outcome of 90-day mortality and symptomatic CSDH recurrence. Secondary outcomes are 90-day simplified modified Rankin score, 90-day serious adverse events and complications related to surgery or occurring during admission, including intracerebral haemorrhage due to misplaced drains, acute subdural haematoma, tension pneumocephalus, wound infection, drain seepage, subperiosteal haematoma, thromboembolic events, infections and seizures.</p>
<p>A detailed statistical analysis plan is published separately. Sample size simulations of non-inferiority with a threshold of 7% increased relative risk show that a total of 354 participants will be required to demonstrate a relative risk reduction of recurrent CSDH and mortality of 30% for the cohort receiving active subperiosteal drainage given a stable power above 80% with an alpha of 5%. The study inclusion period is estimated to last 2 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval for the inclusion of competent patients has been obtained from the North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics. Results of the primary and secondary outcomes will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant neurosurgical meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number at ethics committee</st>
<p>N-20240009, accepted 13 May 2024 and 13 December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06621407">NCT06621407</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miscov, R., Gronhoj, M., Ronn Jensen, T. S., Schack, A. E., Korshoej, A. R., Haldrup, M., Olsen, M. H., Holmen Terkelsen, J., Poulsen, F. R., Fugleholm, K., Bjarkam, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102410</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102410</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Active subperiosteal versus passive subdural 24-hour drainage following single burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (the SUPERDURA trial): protocol for a multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102410</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102410</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103361?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Occupational exposure to cadmium: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103361?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cadmium is a metal that poses significant health risks, particularly in occupational environments where exposure can happen. The main objective of this scoping review is to review the cadmium exposure levels in the different occupational settings in the European Union (EU), considering the regulatory measures currently in place. The secondary objectives, depending on the availability of data, are (a) to identify the occupational settings where higher exposure levels occur, (b) to identify any geographical and temporal differences and trends within the EU and (c) to identify the most relevant co-exposures reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines. Studies reporting quantitative occupational data on cadmium exposure obtained through human biomonitoring and/or air monitoring will be included. A descriptive analysis of the findings will be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol for a scoping review does not require ethical approval as it is based on secondary data. The dissemination plan of the scoping review includes its publication in a scientific journal of reference, as it is expected that it will provide important knowledge to support ongoing and future occupational health interventions in the EU, at the technical and regulatory levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>This study is registered at the Open Science Framework (OSF), 7 April osf.f2w3h.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paulo, M. S., Martins, C., Riesenberger, B., Cordeiro, J., Cervantes, R., Palmont, P., Bhoonah, R., Ndaw, S., Viegas, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103361</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103361</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Occupational exposure to cadmium: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103361</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103361</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103743?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring collaboration preferences of health care professionals and patients regarding treatment decision making in severe asthma: a qualitative study in The Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103743?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Shared decision making (SDM) is advocated as an approach for patient-centred asthma care. However, this approach may not always be feasible or preferred by patients and/or healthcare professionals (HCPs). Knowledge and insights into whether and how the preferred collaboration style in medical decision making is discussed and managed during consultations for severe asthma are limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate how HCPs&rsquo; and patients&rsquo; preferred collaboration styles in treatment decision making are experienced, discussed and managed during consultations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews with HCPs specialised in severe asthma and a focus group with severe asthma patients in The Netherlands. Inductive thematic analysis was used, with results reported according to the COREQ checklist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four themes concerning HCPs&rsquo; and patients&rsquo; experiences were identified: (1) overall preference for SDM, yet (2) ambiguity of SDM&rsquo;s content, (3) variation in application of SDM and (4) friction between medical focus and patient autonomy in SDM. A fifth theme concerned the discussion and management of collaboration style preferences: limited metacommunication. HCPs and patients seem unable to identify each other&rsquo;s preferences in collaboration styles. Overall, a lack of communication regarding how to collaborate in making treatment decisions was found. Varying views on meaning and content of collaboration styles, especially SDM, and HCPs&rsquo; medical focus seemed to contribute to the lack of communication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>With the lack of communication regarding preferences in collaborating, HCPs and patients are likely to miss out on effective collaboration. Future studies should explore how views and preferences regarding HCP-patient collaboration can be bridged.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Achterbosch, M., van der Werf, H. M., Mortelmans, L., Dilles, T., Dierick, B. J. H., van Dijk, L., van Boven, J. F. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103743</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103743</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Communication]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring collaboration preferences of health care professionals and patients regarding treatment decision making in severe asthma: a qualitative study in The Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Communication</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103743</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103743</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103880?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of periodontal therapy in preventing tooth loss and improving masticatory function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103880?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Periodontitis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are inter-related conditions that can significantly impact patient health. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of active non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) combined with supportive periodontal care (SPC) in reducing tooth loss and improving masticatory function in patients with CKD and stage III periodontitis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This randomised controlled trial will recruit 86 patients diagnosed with both stage III periodontitis and CKD. Participants will be randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either an experimental group receiving active NSPT supplemented with SPC or a control group receiving oral hygiene instruction with scheduled periodontal monitoring. The intervention will last for 24 months, with assessments conducted at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The primary outcome is the incidence of tooth loss due to periodontitis over the 2-year follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include the number of lost teeth, masticatory function, clinical periodontal parameters and oral health-related quality of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol and informed consent form were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Ninth People&rsquo;s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SH9H-2022-T404-1). Findings will be disseminated to participants and published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2300068923.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., He, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, Y., Song, Z., Chen, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103880</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103880</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of periodontal therapy in preventing tooth loss and improving masticatory function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103880</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103880</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Real-world and Genomic data-based Asthma Insights through Network Analysis (REGAIN study): protocol for a novel retrospective and prospective longitudinal asthma cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Although important learnings come from traditionally designed large prospective asthma cohorts, highly restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria limit generalisability to clinical practice. Moreover, small sample sizes for important disease subtypes, narrow scope of clinical data collection and limited biomarker assessments reduce the power of some studies to detect important and diverse longitudinal disease courses. The Real-world and Genomic data-based Asthma Insights through Network Analysis (REGAIN) study takes a novel approach to asthma cohort development by employing a pragmatic definition of asthma and simplified study procedures for biospecimen and data collection. REGAIN will produce a large scale, real-world, longitudinal clinical and molecular description of asthma powered to characterise and compare clinically relevant asthma subtypes. This design will provide insights on distinct longitudinal trajectories of disease, predictors of response to therapies and likelihood of clinical remission, all of which should help guide asthma management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>REGAIN is a clinical observational retrospective and prospective cohort study designed to determine large scale, real-world longitudinal clinical and molecular descriptions of asthma according to types of treatment, level of asthma control and inflammatory biology based on clinical biomarkers. Key questions include predictors of change in asthma control as well as timing and durability of clinical remission on biological therapy. To complement these clinical insights, REGAIN will produce one of the largest multiscale data sets in asthma that will include demographic and clinical features, inflammatory biomarkers, responses to therapy with inhaled steroids and other inhaled controllers with or without asthma biologics, and serial airway epithelium and peripheral blood transcriptomics and proteomics. REGAIN targets enrolment of 780 participants with asthma fitting one of five prespecified asthma subtypes with the aim of better characterising under-studied groups and allowing comparative analyses to elucidate important differential therapeutic responses and clinical trajectories. We target enrolment of 400 healthy controls to provide a healthy state molecular description of the tissues sampled in REGAIN participants with asthma. Participants with asthma are followed prospectively for 18 months with assessment of longitudinal clinical status including prospective clinical data collection, integration of electronic medical record data and serial biospecimen collection at 6 and 18 months. Participants with asthma starting treatment with asthma biologics undergo additional clinical assessment and biospecimen sampling at 3 months to track early clinical and molecular response to therapy. Healthy participants without asthma are evaluated cross-sectionally on enrolment without longitudinal follow-up in order to compare molecular profiles for airway epithelium and blood. An optional study component for participants with asthma employs a mobile phone application, digital inhaler monitors and home digital peak flow measurements and contributes data on real-time medication use, serial lung function and geolocated environmental data relevant to asthma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The REGAIN protocol and all amendments were approved by The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Program for Protection of Human Subjects (PPHS19-0358), and all participants provided written informed consent. Enrolment began in November 2019 and was completed in February 2024. Results will be presented at local, national and international meetings, and results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for consideration for publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06623435">NCT06623435</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kasarskis, A., Wang, E., Bryce, P. J., Savic, R., Pan, Q., Weisman, R., Barnhart, E., Sifuentes, A., Mosso, E., Zhang, L., Lee, E., Zhang, Z., Hao, K., Schadt, E., Nestle, F., de Rinaldis, E., Rogers, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104380</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104380</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Real-world and Genomic data-based Asthma Insights through Network Analysis (REGAIN study): protocol for a novel retrospective and prospective longitudinal asthma cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104380</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106432?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Building a data-driven evaluation framework of physician wellness initiatives: a rapid review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106432?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>While there exist many individual and organisation-level initiatives aimed at reducing physician burnout and promoting wellness, there are no comprehensive frameworks or guidelines for evaluating initiatives targeted at physicians. To address this gap, we conducted a rapid review to understand the current state of initiative evaluation in this field and develop an evaluation framework for initiatives aimed at physician burnout and wellness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A rapid review based on the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, Embase and PsycInfo were searched from database inception to 2 May 2024 for concepts related to physicians, wellness initiatives and burnout, and organisational efforts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included studies with initiatives aimed at physician burnout, wellness or experience; targeted physicians, residents, fellows and/or physician faculty; were evaluated in some format; and took place within healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers extracted data according to a standard template. For each study, we noted information related to the type of wellness initiative, evaluation approach, components measured in evaluations (&lsquo;evaluation indicators&rsquo;) and gaps in evaluation. The same reviewers analysed the data quantitatively and thematically. Findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The database search yielded a total of 3786 references, of which 105 were included based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Various types of wellness initiatives (eg, mindfulness, peer support programmes, communities of practice) were delivered multimodally, or via curriculums and workshops, among other formats. Common evaluation approaches included surveys (95%, n=100/105) and interviews or focus groups (17%, n=18/105). Evaluation indicators spanned five categories: impacts (94.3%, n=99/105), participants&rsquo; reactions (65.7%, n=69/105), perspective and behaviour changes (46.7%, n=49/105), implementation (45.7%, n=48/105) and continuous improvement (6.7%, n=7/105). Evaluation gaps included limited responses from participants, failure to capture certain indicators (eg, physician turnover) and limited longitudinal measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Based on the findings and existing models, we developed a physician-focused evaluation framework, constituting two domains: implementation and impacts. This framework can enable organisations to better understand, assess and improve initiatives aimed at physician well-being, which can have positive impacts on patient care and the healthcare system.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khairi, I., Kundurthi, S., Lo, B., Tajirian, T., Rodak, T., Sockalingam, S., Wilkie, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106432</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106432</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Building a data-driven evaluation framework of physician wellness initiatives: a rapid review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106432</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106432</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108349?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between ambient air pollution exposure levels and the risk of developing pulmonary embolism in the Chinese population: findings from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association (CCA) Database-Chest Pain Centre]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108349?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To analyse the associations between exposure to different air pollutants and the morbidity of pulmonary embolism (PE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Time series study with a distribution lag non-linear model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>275 cities in China, 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>27 369 cases of PE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The associations between exposure to different air pollutants and the morbidity of PE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>During the study period, 27 369 cases of PE were recorded. PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>(Particulate Matter 2.5), PM<SUB>10</SUB>(Particulate Matter 10) and NO<SUB>2</SUB>(Nitrogen Dioxide) exposure levels were associated with an increased risk of developing PE in the single-pollutant model. PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> exposure caused the greatest risk of developing PE at lag 1 in the single-day lag model, with a relative risk (RR) value of 1.033 (95% CI 1.007 to 1.058). PM<SUB>10</SUB> and NO<SUB>2</SUB> exposure had the greatest effects at lag 0, with RR values of 1.038 (95% CI 1.016 to 1.059) and 1.039 (95% CI 1.009 to 1.068), respectively. No associations were found between CO(Carbon Monoxide), O<SUB>3</SUB>(Ozone) or SO<SUB>2</SUB>(Sulfur Dioxide) exposure levels and the risk of developing PE. PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>, PM<SUB>10</SUB> and NO<SUB>2</SUB> exposure levels were most strongly associated with the development of PE at lag 01 in the cumulative lag model, with RR values of 1.052 (95% CI 1.009 to 1.095), 1.053 (95% CI 1.020 to 1.086) and 1.058 (95% CI 1.005 to 1.111), respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Short-term exposure to PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>, PM<SUB>10</SUB> and NO<SUB>2</SUB> can increase the risk of developing PE, especially in females. The effects of PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> and PM<SUB>10</SUB> exposure were more significant in cold seasons and in North China.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bao, Y., Hu, Z., Wei, S., Huo, Y., Wang, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108349</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108349</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between ambient air pollution exposure levels and the risk of developing pulmonary embolism in the Chinese population: findings from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association (CCA) Database-Chest Pain Centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108349</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109980?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[mHealth-based Healthy Lifestyle Promotion (MYLIFE) for metabolic syndrome risk reduction in Chinese employed adults: protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109980?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Metabolic syndrome (MetS) poses a significant public health challenge among employed adults. Lifestyle modifications have been shown to be effective in preventing the onset and progression of MetS in employed adults, and the widespread adoption of mobile and wearable technologies introduces an appealing approach to mHealth lifestyle interventions. When widely implementing smartphone-based interventions for employed adults, enhancing equitable access and promoting wearable device use for those with MetS is a more cost-effective way to reduce health disparities, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, relevant evidence is currently lacking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to design an mHealth-based Healthy Lifestyle Promotion (MYLIFE) trial, a three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT), to evaluate the effectiveness of a smartphone-based lifestyle intervention and a combined smartphone-based lifestyle intervention with intensive intervention for MetS individuals using wearable devices, in reducing MetS risk among employed adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a three-arm, parallel, single-blind, cluster RCT with a 12-week intervention and a total follow-up of 1 year. The trial will recruit 120 workplaces from the Chinese Cohort of Working Adults in a 1:1:1 ratio to either a control group or one of two intervention groups. Within these workplaces, a total of at least 348 eligible participants will be enrolled. The regular mHealth group will receive smartphone-based intervention. The intensive mHealth group will receive smartphone-based intervention for all participants, and an additional wearable device-intensive intervention for those with MetS. The primary outcome is the Chinese MetS Z score at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include MetS Z score, prevalence of MetS, specific MetS components, questionnaire-based indicators, and clinical outcomes at 12 weeks and 1 years. The main analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, using mixed-effects models to assess between-group differences in outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the West China School of Public Health and the West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University (Gwll2025024). The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500101904.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yu, B., Tang, Q., Hu, Y., Zuo, H., Yang, B., Pan, J., Jia, P., Reinhardt, J., Yang, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109980</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109980</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[mHealth-based Healthy Lifestyle Promotion (MYLIFE) for metabolic syndrome risk reduction in Chinese employed adults: protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109980</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109980</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110419?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[VAPGAMO trial protocol: a cluster-randomised controlled evaluation of a digital game-based learning intervention to reduce adolescent vaping intention in Malaysian public secondary schools]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110419?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Youth vaping remains a global public health challenge. We will evaluate a pragmatic, theory-driven digital game-based learning intervention (VAPGAMO), delivered in public secondary schools to reduce adolescents&rsquo; intention to vape at 3-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Parallel cluster-randomised controlled trial with schools as clusters. Eight public secondary schools in an urban Southeast Asian district (Klang, Malaysia) will be randomised 1:1 to intervention or attention-matched online flash game. The intervention is a single 90 min, facilitator-led module grounded in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Surveys at baseline, immediately postintervention and 3 months. The primary outcome is intention to vape at 3 months. Secondary outcomes are knowledge, attitudes, injunctive norms and refusal self-efficacy (perceived behavioural control). Prespecified implementation outcomes include acceptability, fidelity, reach, time-on-task and cost per student. Primary analysis will use generalised estimating equations with cluster-robust SEs, adjusted for baseline covariates; the intra-cluster correlation coefficient and design effect will be reported; intention-to-treat will be applied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Universiti Putra Malaysia JKEUPM-2024-887; approvals from the Ministry of Education, Malaysia. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed outlets and shared with education and health authorities to inform school-health programming. De-identified data and code will be made available on publication, subject to approvals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Thai Clinical Trial Registry (TCTR20241222001).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saruddin, M. Z., Azman, A. Z. F., Abdul Manaf, R., Azman, F. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110419</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110419</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Smoking and tobacco]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[VAPGAMO trial protocol: a cluster-randomised controlled evaluation of a digital game-based learning intervention to reduce adolescent vaping intention in Malaysian public secondary schools]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Smoking and tobacco</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110419</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110419</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110853?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Childbirth experience among different Iranian ethnic groups: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110853?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Ethnic communities provide an appropriate setting for examining patterns of pregnancy and childbirth. Policy-making aimed at improving maternal health will be rendered ineffective in the absence of knowledge and comprehension of the traditions and beliefs associated with childbirth. The objective of this study was to cross-ethnically compare childbirth experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This research used a cross-sectional methodology and was conducted in 2023. The sampling in the cities of Tabriz (Azeri), Sanandaj (Kurdish), Babol (Mazani), Khorramabad (Lur), Ahvaz (Arab) and Tehran (Fars) was conducted using the cluster random approach. The data collection instruments included questionnaires of sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics and childbirth experience (Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0). In bivariate analysis, a one-way analysis of variance test was employed. In contrast, a general linear model (GLM) was used in multivariate analysis to adjust for the influence of sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics. The data were analysed using SPSS V.24 software. The p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Health centres in cities with different ethnic groups all over Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>For this purpose, 1331 women from six ethnic groups who were referred to health centres were selected 4 to 6 weeks after giving vaginal birth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The following are the mean (SD) scores (scoring range: 1&ndash;4) for the childbirth experiences of the participating women: Azeri 2.31 (0.32), Kurdish 2.14 (0.31), Fars 2.26 (0.42), Mazani 1.93 (0.38), Lur 2.14 (0.4) and Arab 2.06 (0.18). Results from GLM multivariate analysis showed that while Azeri (B: 0.25; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.35; p&lt;0.001), Kurdish (B: 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.18; p=0.007) and Fars (B: 0.18; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.27; p=0.014) women had significantly higher mean scores for childbirth experience than Arabs (the reference group), women of Mazani ethnicity had significantly lower scores (B: &ndash;0.10; 95% CI &ndash;0.18 to &ndash;0.04; p=0.002).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Women of different Iranian ethnicities have varying childbirth experiences. Women of Azeri and Fars ethnic groups report higher satisfaction with childbirth than those of others. Mazeni women had the lowest mean scores for having a positive birth experience. To offer compassionate and effective treatment for their patients, healthcare providers must have a deep understanding of cultural diversity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdolalipour, S., Tavananezhad, N., Iravani, M., Bakouei, F., Janani, F., Mohammadi, A., Ghanbari-Homaie, S., Mirghafourvand, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110853</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110853</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Childbirth experience among different Iranian ethnic groups: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110853</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110853</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110884?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Seasonal and temporal trends in leading causes of hospitalisation among older adults in Hong Kong: a retrospective study across community and institutional care settings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110884?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>With an ageing population, understanding leading causes of hospitalisation in older adults is critical for care strategies. These leading causes may vary across residential settings and by seasonal patterns. This study examines the temporal trends of leading causes of hospitalisation among older adults in community-dwelling and nursing home settings, specifically comparing patterns during winter and summer seasons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting, participants and main outcome measures</st>
<p>A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from Hong Kong public hospitals (2012&ndash;2018) was conducted for three million adults aged &ge;65. Age-standardised and sex-standardised monthly hospitalisation rates and average annual percentage change (AAPC, representing the average yearly percentage change in rates) were examined for leading causes during summer and winter across settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among community-dwelling individuals, the top five causes in 2018 were symptoms, signs and abnormalities not classified elsewhere (NEC), neoplasms, genitourinary, circulatory and respiratory diseases in winter, with digestive diseases replacing respiratory diseases in summer. Symptoms, signs and abnormalities NEC (AAPC: 2.7% (95% CI 1.8% to 3.6%) in winter; 3.4% (2.8% to 4.0%) in summer), neoplasms (2.4% (1.4% to 3.4%) in winter; 2.5% (1.6% to 3.4%) in summer), genitourinary (2.5% (2.1% to 2.9%) in winter; 2.4% (1.8% to 3.0%) in summer) and digestive diseases (2.5% (1.6% to 3.3%) in winter; 2.6% (1.7% to 3.5%) in summer) increased, while circulatory diseases decreased in winter. In nursing home residents, the top five causes in 2018 were respiratory diseases, symptoms, signs and abnormalities NEC, genitourinary, circulatory and digestive diseases in winter and summer. Symptoms, signs and abnormalities NEC increased (2.9% (0.9% to 5.0%) in winter; 2.9% (0.8% to 5.1%) in summer), while circulatory diseases declined across seasons. Genitourinary diseases remained stable across seasons, whereas digestive diseases declined in winter.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In Hong Kong&rsquo;s ageing population, seasonal and temporal shifts in hospitalisation causes were observed. Symptoms, signs and abnormalities NEC emerged as the top two causes across settings, highlighting challenges for primary care and hospital management and need for enhanced prevention and care strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qian, X. X., Chau, P. H., Lai, E. T. C., Wong, G. L.-H., Woo, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110884</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110884</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Seasonal and temporal trends in leading causes of hospitalisation among older adults in Hong Kong: a retrospective study across community and institutional care settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110884</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110884</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol of a randomised controlled trial: comparing the safety and efficacy of two methadone conversion strategies in Chinese patients with cancer pain receiving high-dose opioids]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>China has the highest global burden of new cancer diagnoses and cancer-related mortality, with approximately 60%&ndash;85% of patients with advanced malignancies experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. Although the WHO&rsquo;s analgesic ladder is widely implemented, approximately 20% of cancer-related pain remains refractory. This persistent pain is often further complicated by opioid-induced side effects and the risk of opioid use disorders. Methadone, a potent opioid with distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, has shown potential in managing refractory cancer pain; however, there is a lack of standardised and evidence-based protocols for methadone conversion, particularly in patients requiring high-dose opioids.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial will enrol 164 Chinese patients with cancer and oral morphine equivalent daily dose requirements of &ge;300 mg. Participants will be randomised to receive either the 3 day switch (3DS) strategy or the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended methadone conversion method. The primary endpoints include time to stable analgesia, methadone conversion efficiency and overall pain relief rate. Secondary endpoints will evaluate pain intensity, frequency of breakthrough pain, corrected QT interval changes, incidence of adverse events and health-related quality of life. This trial is designed to generate high-quality clinical evidence to inform methadone conversion strategies for patients with refractory cancer pain who are dependent on high-dose opioids. By addressing existing gaps in clinical practice and pharmacoeconomic decision-making, the study aims to support the development of standardised methadone protocols.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (approval number: IRB-2024-314(IIT)) on 3 April 2024 and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400085332) on 5 June 2024. The outcomes will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400085332.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, Q., Bao, G., Ding, H., Ding, Q., Liu, M., Gong, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111143</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111143</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol of a randomised controlled trial: comparing the safety and efficacy of two methadone conversion strategies in Chinese patients with cancer pain receiving high-dose opioids]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111143</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111900?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of modified site for radial artery cannulation on the stability of arterial blood pressure monitoring in patients undergoing elective surgery (MoSRAC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111900?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is critical for perioperative and critically ill patients, yet traditional radial artery cannulation near the wrist joint is prone to catheter dysfunction (eg, kinking, occlusion) due to positional changes, compromising accuracy and patient safety. This trial hypothesises that modifying the cannulation site to 1.5&ndash;2.5 cm proximal to the radial styloid process may enhance catheter stability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, analyst-blinded trial. A total of 486 participants (243 per group) will be enrolled at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Eligible patients (18&ndash;75 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I&ndash;III, requiring elective surgery with radial artery cannulation) will be randomised 1:1 to the modified group (1.5&ndash;2.5 cm proximal to the radial styloid process) or the conventional group (traditional site). The primary outcome is the incidence of arterial catheter dysfunction (defined by criteria such as blood sampling difficulty, position-dependent waveform or improved waveform post-square wave test). Secondary outcomes include frequency of catheter dysfunction, damping abnormality rate, first-puncture success rate, number of arterial punctures, arterial cannulation time, complication incidence and blood pressure measurement differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol (V.4.0) was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, China on 2 September 2025. The first participant was recruited on 15 September 2025, with an estimated completion date of 31 December 2025. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06566456">NCT06566456</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, X., Liang, H.-M., Huang, Y.-B., Li, S., Chen, Y., Luo, T.-F., Wang, W., Li, J., Zhao, Y.-Y., Jin, Y., Wang, F., Yao, Y.-C., Jin, S.-Q., Zheng, Z.-N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111900</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111900</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of modified site for radial artery cannulation on the stability of arterial blood pressure monitoring in patients undergoing elective surgery (MoSRAC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111900</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111900</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112223?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Age-related histopathological and immunophenotypic variations in early-stage mycosis fungoides: a multicentre retrospective study in Tu&#x0308;rkiye]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112223?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) is diagnostically challenging due to overlap with inflammatory dermatoses. Age-related immunological and cutaneous changes may modify histopathological presentation. We aimed to compare clinical, histopathological and immunophenotypic features of early-stage MF between geriatric and non-geriatric patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Dermatology departments of tertiary centres in Tu&#x0308;rkiye.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 541 patients diagnosed with early-stage MF were included and stratified into geriatric (&ge;65 years) and non-geriatric (18&ndash;64 years) groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were age-related differences in histopathological and immunohistochemical features. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics and quality of life measures. Primary endpoints were prespecified a priori (epidermotropism, basilar lymphocytes, epidermal atrophy, dermal lymphocytic infiltration, papillary dermal fibrosis and CD4-dominant versus CD8(+)/CD4(&ndash;) phenotypes); all other comparisons were considered exploratory.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The geriatric group had a higher proportion of males (59.5% vs 47.1%; p=0.004), while lesion type, duration, surface involvement and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores did not differ between groups. Histopathologically, epidermotropism (81.3% vs 63.3%), basilar lymphocytes (57.1% vs 45.7%), epidermal atrophy (26.6% vs 13.8%), dermal lymphocytic infiltration (75.8% vs 58.5%) and papillary dermal fibrosis (55.2% vs 38.4%) were more frequent in geriatric patients (all p&lt;0.05). Plasma cells (13.5% vs 6.2%) and eosinophils (21.8% vs 13.8%) were also increased. A CD4-dominant phenotype was more common in geriatric patients (70.2% vs 60.6%; p=0.043), whereas a CD8-positive/CD4-negative phenotype was more frequent in non-geriatric patients (8.5% vs 2.6%; p=0.012). However, histopathological and immunohistochemical variables were extracted from existing routine pathology reports without central slide re-review, harmonised scoring criteria or adjudication; therefore, the reported frequencies may partly reflect intercentre/interobserver reporting practices and temporal changes in diagnostic work-up (eg, immunohistochemistry panels and reporting terminology) in addition to biological differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Although clinical characteristics were comparable across age groups, geriatric patients showed differences in reported histopathological and immunophenotypic features; these observations may facilitate clinicopathological recognition of early-stage MF in older individuals. However, some features (particularly epidermal atrophy and superficial/papillary fibrosis) are not MF-specific and may partly reflect background age- and site-related changes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solak, B., Cak&#x0131;rsoy Cakar, G., Gu&#x0308;ngo&#x0308;r, Z., Gezmen, S., Karabulut, Y. Y., Demirseren, D. D., Orhun, H. S., Go&#x0308;nu&#x0308;lal Bak, R., Karstarli Bakay, O. S., Comut, E., Tas Aygar, G., Go&#x0308;kce, A., Canpolat, F., Kahraman, F. C., Cobanoglu, B., Akbulak, O., Aksu, A., Kaya, H. E., Alt&#x0131;nel, D., Zorlu, O., Karabag, S., Yazici, S., Adim, S. B., Demirbas, A., Bayramgurler, D., Yaprak Bayrak, B., Esen, M., Sula, B., Ibiloglu, I., Bastug, D., Kusku Cabuk, F., Caf, N., Temiz, S. A., Daye, M., K&#x0131;l&#x0131;nc, F., Celik, A., Tu&#x0308;rsen, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112223</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112223</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Age-related histopathological and immunophenotypic variations in early-stage mycosis fungoides: a multicentre retrospective study in Tu&#x0308;rkiye]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112223</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112305?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[General practitioner confidence and practices in oral anticoagulant use for atrial fibrillation in Australia: findings from a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112305?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine Australian General Practitioners&rsquo; (GPs) confidence in initiating oral anticoagulants (OACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and their practices for monitoring treatment adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional online survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>GPs practising in metropolitan, regional and rural/remote locations in Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1765 Australian GPs recruited through professional GP networks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>GPs&rsquo; self-reported confidence initiating OACs; practices monitoring patient adherence and persistence; and perceived barriers to adherence. Demographic data including clinical experience and geographic location were collected. <sup>2</sup> analyses were used to examine associations between the key outcome variables and GP location and clinical experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 1765 respondents, 83.1% had practised for &gt;10 years and 27.6% worked in regional or rural/remote areas. Overall, only 50.2% reported high confidence initiating OACs in patients with CHA<SUB>2</SUB>DS<SUB>2</SUB>-VA score &ge;2 (a cumulative stroke risk score with a score of 1 for: congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, vascular disease and age 65-74 years and 2 for: stroke/transient ischaemic attack, age &ge; 75 years). Unsurprisingly, confidence was higher among GPs with &gt;10 years experience (51.5%) compared with 5&ndash;10 years (44.9%) and &lt;5 years (43.2%) (p&lt;0.01). Confidence was highest in rural/remote areas (73.2%) compared with regional (56.4%) and metropolitan areas (46.0%) (p&lt;0.01). More GPs reported greater confidence initiating non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (49.5%) than warfarin (6.2%) (p&lt;0.01). Regional and rural/remote GPs, and those who had practised longer, were more likely to be confident with both NOACs and warfarin, while less experienced and metropolitan GPs showed stronger preference for NOACs. Only 76% reported monitoring adherence/persistence to OAC therapy. Reported barriers to patient adherence and persistence included low health literacy, medication concerns, cognitive impairment and lack of awareness of stroke risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Only half of GPs reported high confidence initiating OAC treatment, and approximately a quarter do not routinely monitor medication adherence or persistence. Targeted strategies to improve confidence and align practices with guideline recommendations are required. Appropriate education should be developed targeting the specific issues underlying lack of confidence in initiating OAC and the practice of referring newly diagnosed patients to cardiology. Further research into implementing systems for monitoring and improving adherence and persistence would be worthwhile in the context of these findings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamed, O., Wright, S., Giskes, K., Lowres, N., Orchard, J., Freedman, B., Hespe, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112305</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112305</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[General practitioner confidence and practices in oral anticoagulant use for atrial fibrillation in Australia: findings from a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112305</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112305</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113120?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Burnout, associated factors and coping strategies among nursing professionals in Kerala, India: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113120?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine burnout prevalence, associated factors and coping strategies used by nursing professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analytical study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Public and private healthcare institutions in Kerala, India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Nursing professionals in Kerala (n=349).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Burnout levels (assessed with the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)) and coping strategies. Log-binomial regression was performed to identify factors associated with burnout.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>High burnout was reported by 36.1% of participants (126/349; 95% CI 31.1 to 41.4). Burnout prevalence was higher among nurses with an MSc (Master of Science) or higher educational qualification (adjusted prevalence ratio (APR)=1.46; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.03); those working in urban settings (APR=1.41; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.90); those who were single, divorced or separated (APR=1.58; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.12); those with travel time &ge;30 min (APR=1.36; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.79); and those engaged in clinical/direct patient care duties (APR=1.75; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.59). Commonly reported coping strategies included active coping (59.6%), seeking instrumental social support (58.7%) and venting (54.4%), whereas negative strategies, such as substance use, were less frequent (22.9%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Over one-third of the nurses in our study reported high burnout. Efforts to reduce burnout should focus on nurses with higher qualifications, those working in urban settings, those with higher travel time, those who are single/divorced/separated and those involved in clinical duties to enhance healthcare quality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ambujam, J. K., Francis, P. T., Olickal, J. J., Sarma, P. S., Thankappan, K. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113120</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Burnout, associated factors and coping strategies among nursing professionals in Kerala, India: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113120</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113469?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing the effectiveness and safety of different surgical procedures for haemorrhoids: a protocol for systematic evaluation and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113469?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Haemorrhoidal disease affects 25&ndash;40% of adults worldwide and constitutes a primary reason for outpatient colorectal consultations. Surgical management is essential for grade III&ndash;IV or treatment-refractory cases. Numerous procedures have emerged, including Milligan-Morgan open haemorrhoidectomy, Ferguson closed haemorrhoidectomy, stapled haemorrhoidopexy, Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation, transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation and laser haemorrhoidoplasty. However, randomised controlled trials and conventional meta-analyses report conflicting results on efficacy, postoperative pain, recurrence rates and complications such as bleeding, stenosis and incontinence. Although network meta-analyses exist, an updated synthesis is needed because outcomes and follow-up vary across trials. This protocol aims to determine the most effective and safest haemorrhoid interventions (office-based and operative) through systematic review and network meta-analysis, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical practice and guideline development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, SinoMed and Wanfang databases will be searched from inception to January 2025, limited to English or Chinese publications. Randomised controlled trials evaluating haemorrhoid interventions/procedures for haemorrhoidal disease will be included, with outcomes encompassing cure rate, recurrence, complications, postoperative pain, wound-healing time, anal function and operative duration. Risk of bias will be assessed using RoB 2. Pairwise meta-analyses will be conducted in RevMan; network meta-analysis will employ Bayesian frameworks in GeMTC or R, incorporating consistency evaluation, node-splitting and surface under the cumulative ranking curve for treatment ranking. Subgroup analyses (haemorrhoid grade, follow-up duration), sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessments will be performed. Evidence certainty will be graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As only published data will be used, ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251053697.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, X., Cheng, Y., Zhi, C., Liu, N., Wang, X., Zheng, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113469</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113469</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing the effectiveness and safety of different surgical procedures for haemorrhoids: a protocol for systematic evaluation and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113469</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113469</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113798?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Access to child-appropriate medicines in community pharmacies in Albania: a cross-sectional survey using SDG indicator 3.b.3]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113798?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess access to child-appropriate medicines in Albanian community pharmacies by applying a child-adapted version of sustainable development goal (SDG) indicator 3.b.3.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community pharmacies providing primary care medicines in six urban areas in Albania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Thirty community pharmacies were surveyed. Two predefined baskets of child-appropriate essential medicines were assessed: 24 medicines for children aged 1&ndash;59 months and 25 medicines for children aged 5&ndash;12 years. Medicines were selected from these child-adapted SDG 3.b.3 medicine baskets proposed at an international level and then matched to paediatric formulations registered nationally for application to Albania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Individual facility scores by age group and medicine type (originator brands (OBs) vs lowest-priced generics (LPGs)), as well as sensitivity analyses using alternative affordability thresholds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The SDG 3.b.3 indicator score was 0%, as no surveyed facility reached the 80% access threshold. Mean facility scores were 42.6% for medicines intended for children aged 1&ndash;59 months and 29.6% for those aged 5&ndash;12 years, indicating poorer access for older children. Scores for OBs were particularly low (11.8% and 13.6%, respectively), reflecting reliance on LPGs. In younger children, ibuprofen and hydroxycobalamin showed 0% availability, while in school-aged children, paracetamol, propranolol and budesonide were absent across surveyed facilities; benzylpenicillin was absent in both age groups, whereas ceftriaxone was consistently available in both. Although all surveyed medicines were affordable, limited availability remained the primary barrier to access.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Application of the child-adapted SDG indicator 3.b.3 in Albania highlights substantial gaps in access to essential paediatric medicines in private community pharmacies, driven primarily by poor availability rather than affordability. The findings underscore the need for targeted supply-side policies. This study demonstrates the complementary value of composite SDG indicators and medicine-specific availability measures in monitoring progress toward universal health coverage for children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petro, E., Hart, R. P. M., Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K., van den Ham, H. A., Suleman, F., Joosse, I. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113798</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113798</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Access to child-appropriate medicines in community pharmacies in Albania: a cross-sectional survey using SDG indicator 3.b.3]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113798</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113798</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114026?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study protocol for testing pharmacological conditioning as a drug dose reduction strategy in patients with psoriasis in a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114026?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that significantly impacts patients&rsquo; quality of life. Although biological therapies are effective, they are associated with high costs and potential side effects, necessitating strategies for dose reduction. Pharmacological conditioning, using placebo mechanisms through associative learning, presents a promising approach to maintain therapeutic efficacy with lower doses of medication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The single-centre, randomised controlled trial aims to investigate pharmacological conditioning with secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (N=168). Participants will be randomly allocated to a treatment-as-usual group or one of two experimental groups receiving partial or continuous reinforcement schedules with reduced secukinumab doses combined with a distinctive gustatory stimulus. Primary outcomes include changes in itch intensity, skin-related quality of life and objective disease severity. Secondary outcomes encompass psychological variables, side effects and biological markers. Results may contribute to optimised long-term psoriasis management, reducing medication burden while maintaining treatment efficacy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital Essen (19&ndash;8636 BO) on 20 November 2023. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Participant confidentiality will be ensured through pseudonymised data handling and secure storage. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00034977.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savvidou, P., Ho&#x0308;lsken, S., Krefting, F., Benson, S., Sondermann, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114026</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114026</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study protocol for testing pharmacological conditioning as a drug dose reduction strategy in patients with psoriasis in a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114026</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114026</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114337?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trends and characteristics of syphilis incidence in Japan: a nationwide claims-based analysis of working-age populations and their dependents, 2016-2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114337?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine trends and demographic characteristics of syphilis incidence in Japan using a large nationwide claims database with family linkage, with particular focus on differences by sex, age, HIV status and family relationships.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>JMDC claims database (JMDC Inc, Tokyo, Japan), a nationwide administrative claims database in Japan, using data from 2016 to 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Individuals aged 16&ndash;59 years enrolled in the JMDC database, including employees of medium-to-large companies and their dependents (n=12.5 million).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Syphilis cases were defined by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes (A50&ndash;A53) with concurrent treatment with relevant antibiotics. We determined syphilis incidence rates per 100 000 person-years, stratified by sex, age, HIV status and family relationships. We also investigated within-couple concordance patterns and reinfection rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 16.4 million individuals, 9357 syphilis infections were identified among 8881 individuals. Incidence increased markedly during the pandemic, reaching 48.2 (men) and 12.9 (women) per 100 000 person-years in 2023. Men showed consistently high incidence in their 20s&ndash;50s, whereas female incidence peaked in the 10s&ndash;20s. Among 2 294 184 married couples, dependent women (ie, housewives) showed comparably high incidence to age-matched men (10&ndash;20 per 100 000 person-years). In 1286 couples with at least one syphilis case, 12.4% of wives in their 20s were also diagnosed, compared with 2%&ndash;3% in older groups. In 20s couples, the proportion of syphilis among wives only and husbands only was similar. Subgroup analysis revealed notably high incidence among unmarried female dependent youths (2022: 66.7 per 100 000 person-years). Individuals living with HIV had substantially elevated incidence (3000&ndash;15 000 per 100 000 person-years) and reinfection rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Using a large claims database with family linkage, we found that while male syphilis incidence remained dominant, high rates were also observed among dependent women and youths. These findings suggest that syphilis risk may extend beyond traditionally recognised high-risk populations and emphasise the need for targeted screening and preventive strategies in broader demographic groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ikeuchi, K., Okushin, K., Arisato, Y., Kishida, T., Matsumoto, S., Kado, A., Yotsuyanagi, H., Tsutsumi, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114337</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114337</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trends and characteristics of syphilis incidence in Japan: a nationwide claims-based analysis of working-age populations and their dependents, 2016-2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114337</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114337</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114974?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[LIFE-UP Day audit to monitor implementation of post-intensive care syndrome prevention practices: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Belgian intensive care units]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114974?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the feasibility and relevance of the LIFE-UP Day audit, a simple, 1-day benchmarking tool based on the multidisciplinary LIFE-UP bundle (Limit sedation, optimise nutritional Intakes, engage Families, promote Exercise and follow-UP the patients after discharge) and assessing the implementation of postintensive care syndrome (PICS) prevention strategies in daily practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Exploratory multicentre cross-sectional audit study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Eight Belgian adult intensive care units (ICUs), between April and July 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients present at 08:00 on the audit day and hospitalised for &ge;24 hours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>An independent nurse collected data on sedation, analgesia, nutrition, family empowerment, physical exercise and post-ICU follow-up. A multidimensional LIFE-UP composite score (raw 0&ndash;10 points), normalised to a 5-point scale, was created to quantify adherence to PICS prevention practices based on current recommendations. Feasibility was evaluated through data accessibility, resource needs, cooperation of ICU teams and the ability to complete the audit within 1 day. Relevance was evaluated through adherence to the bundle, assessed by comparing LIFE-UP scores between ICUs. Quantitative results were expressed as median and IQR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The audit was tested in 87 patients aged 68 (59&ndash;74) years, 9 (5&ndash;15.5) days after their admission. The audit was feasible across all ICUs: necessary data were available, resources required were minimal and cooperation was excellent. The LIFE-UP score highlighted significant variability between ICUs (2.5 (1.75&ndash;2.75), p&lt;0.001). The lowest-performing domains were nutritional adequacy, family engagement and structured post-ICU follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The LIFE-UP Day audit proved feasible and provides a first structured framework for benchmarking. Broader implementation will be essential to validate the LIFE-UP score, refine the model and ultimately determine whether it can translate into improved patient and family outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rousseau, A.-F., Khai, N., DOrio, V., Fraipont, V., Gurdebeke, C., Minguet, G., Pinck, E., Verscheure, S., Wertz, D., Lambermont, B., Berger-Estilita, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114974</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114974</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[LIFE-UP Day audit to monitor implementation of post-intensive care syndrome prevention practices: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Belgian intensive care units]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114974</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114974</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115020?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Surgical patients awareness about their diagnosis and management plans in Ethiopia: cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115020?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patient awareness of their diagnosis and management plan is crucial for improving compliance, empowering patients and enhancing outcomes. We aimed to assess surgical patients&rsquo; awareness of their diagnosis, management plans and associated factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2024 to March 2025 on 400 adult surgical inpatients who had undergone surgery in the general surgery, gynaecology and obstetrics, and orthopaedic wards at Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia. Data were collected using a structured written questionnaire and analysed using the SPSS V.25. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with patients&rsquo; awareness of their diagnosis and care plan, with significance determined using adjusted ORs and 95% CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>Overall, 52% of respondents had global awareness of their clinical conditions and management plans. Awareness was highest for clinical diagnosis (78.9%), necessity of admission (78.9%) and operations performed (72.0%). However, more than 50% of respondents did not seek information on the diagnosis, possible cause and investigation related to their condition. In multivariable analysis, patients with tertiary education were 7.12 times more likely to have global awareness than those without formal education (adjusted OR, AOR=7.12; 95% CI 1.95 to 25.95), and patients living in urban areas were 3.15 times more likely to have global awareness than those in rural areas (AOR=3.15; 95% CI 1.63 to 6.10; p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Awareness of various aspects of healthcare ranged from 35.5% to 78.9%, with about half of respondents demonstrating global awareness of their diagnosis and management plans. Implementing shared decision-making models may improve patients&rsquo; understanding of their care plans.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mossie, K. D., Zerihun, M. T., Wubet, H. B., Asmare, T. B., Belete, K. G., Gobezie, N. Z., Demissie, B., Deress, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115020</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115020</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Surgical patients awareness about their diagnosis and management plans in Ethiopia: cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115020</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115020</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115081?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of pronatal policies on sexual and reproductive health services: a protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115081?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In the context of declining total fertility rates, many governments are seeking the optimal blend of policy interventions to encourage childbirth. Scholars have mapped how pronatal policy agendas are shaping social policies, yet there has been less attention on how such agendas shape health policies. This review will map and synthesize the evidence on how pronatal policies affect sexual and reproductive healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A scoping review will be conducted using two searches. One search will identify relevant peer-reviewed papers in Medline, EMBASE, social policy and practice, global health and Web of Science databases. A second search will identify relevant grey literature from Overton and Policy Commons databases. Sources will be managed using Rayaan software and studies selected based on specified inclusion criteria. Data will be extracted using a customised extraction form, mapped and subsequently synthesised using narrative approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed manuscript and conference presentations. Ethics and patient engagement are not required for a scoping review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251156155.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mburu, G., Galati, A., Chou, D., Genatra, B., Kiarie, J., Boydell, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115081</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115081</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of pronatal policies on sexual and reproductive health services: a protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115081</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115081</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115147?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can a fluorescent imaging device (MolecuLight) function as an adjunct to surgical debridement during revision knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic infection in a tertiary centre: a feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115147?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Radical surgical debridement is central to the eradication of prosthetic joint infection. Surgeons are taught that the adequacy of debridement is critical to the success of revision procedures. We aimed to assess the feasibility of using a handheld fluorescent imaging device as an adjunct to tissue debridement in the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after standard radical debridement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective feasibility trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This was performed at a tertiary prosthetic joint infection unit (The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK), multidisciplinary team (MDT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>10 patients with established PJI managed through a tertiary prosthetic joint infection MDT were recruited between January 2023 and December 2023. All patients underwent standard management, including radical debridement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>After completion of standard radical debridement, the device was used to identify any remaining areas of fluorescence. These areas underwent excision for further intraoperative microbiological and histological sampling to analyse if the represented areas had residual bacterial load.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome</st>
<p>To assess whether the fluorescence imaging device is able to detect additional areas of fluorescence which led to positive tissue sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In all cases, the device was able to identify areas of fluorescence, indicating further debridement. In eight cases, an organism was isolated after additional microbiological sampling and culture. In all eight cases, the same isolate was identified with the standard sampling. Additional histological sampling was performed in eight cases and confirmed acute infection in three cases. The remaining five cases demonstrated histologically inflammatory tissue consistent with chronic infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study is encouraging for the feasibility of using this device as an adjunct for debridement in the surgical management of PJIs; further evaluation is underway.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Archer, J. E., Adlan, A., Sumathi, V., Stevenson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115147</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115147</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can a fluorescent imaging device (MolecuLight) function as an adjunct to surgical debridement during revision knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic infection in a tertiary centre: a feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115147</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115147</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Remote assessment and practice implementation for disorders in ears, nose and throat: a mixed-methodology observational study in the United Kingdom]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Ear, nose and throat (ENT) conditions are highly prevalent in primary and secondary care, yet patients frequently face prolonged waits for specialist review. In England, over half of ENT patients wait beyond the NHS 18-week referral-to-treatment target. Many of these cases can be effectively managed with advice and non-surgical interventions, presenting an opportunity for remote service innovation.</p>
<p>This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, acceptability and environmental sustainability of a digitally enabled remote ENT clinic model compared with traditional face-to-face pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, mixed-methods, prospective cohort study will be conducted at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. Remote clinics will use trained staff to collect diagnostic data (including endoscopic imaging and boothless hearing tests) for consultant review via secure cloud-based software. Quantitative analysis will assess patient outcomes, costs, waiting times, carbon footprint and satisfaction. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with patients, clinicians and managers will explore acceptability, scalability and barriers to implementation. The qualitative data will be analysed using the framework methodology, according to the non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread and sustainability framework, while the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology framework will be used to guide the reporting of quantitative data. Cost-effectiveness analyses will follow NICE guidelines, while environmental impact will be measurement will be informed by the sustainability in quality improvement framework. Recruitment will be aiming for 300 completed datasets and 30&ndash;35 interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been granted (IRAS 350908; REC 25/SW/0116). Findings will be disseminated via conferences, peer-reviewed journals and institutional communication channels.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spinos, D., Beech, T., Coulson, C., Greenfield, S., Litchfield, I., Nankivell, P., Allen, R., Muzaffar, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115521</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115521</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Remote assessment and practice implementation for disorders in ears, nose and throat: a mixed-methodology observational study in the United Kingdom]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115521</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115580?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Application of the WHO new vaccine introduction prioritisation and sequencing framework to guide evidence-based vaccine introduction decisions in Iran, 2025-2030]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115580?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To document the first application of the WHO New Vaccine Introduction Prioritization and Sequencing Toolkit (NVI-PST) in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region and to describe how Iran&rsquo;s National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) adapted and implemented the framework to develop a prioritised roadmap for vaccine introduction during 2025&ndash;2030.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Policy implementation case study applying a structured multicriteria decision analysis-informed prioritisation framework through a three-phase process including framework adaptation, evidence synthesis, ordinal ranking of candidate vaccines, weighted aggregation and development of sequencing scenarios.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>National immunisation governance process in Iran, coordinated by the Ministry of Health and Medical Education and Iran&rsquo;s NITAG, with technical support from the WHO Country Office.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Core and non-core members of Iran&rsquo;s NITAG and key immunisation stakeholders involved in the deliberative prioritisation process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine ranked highest in both importance and feasibility, followed by pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) for high-risk adults and seasonal influenza vaccine for high-risk groups. Two sequencing scenarios were proposed: both placed HPV first, with either PCV or influenza third after the already-approved hexavalent vaccine. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and varicella vaccines were classified as low priority for the 5-year horizon. The toolkit enabled structured multistakeholder deliberation, improved the transparency and reproducibility of prioritisation, and supported systematic integration of epidemiological, economic and programme evidence. The main implementation challenges arose from national evidence constraints, particularly gaps in adult RSV and pneumococcal disease burden, limited locally generated cost-effectiveness analyses and uncertainty in long-term budget impact estimation under macroeconomic instability, rather than from limitations of the toolkit itself.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The NVI-PST proved feasible under national leadership and generated credible, consensus-based recommendations aligned with Iran&rsquo;s public health priorities and programme constraints. Minor refinements (streamlined evidence compendium, simpler weighting, stronger secretariat support) would make the toolkit lighter and more sustainable, especially for resource-constrained settings. This Iranian experience provides a replicable model for structured multi-vaccine prioritisation in the Eastern Mediterranean Region and beyond.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fotouhi, A., Younesian, S., Mousavi, S. M., Zahraei, S. M., Mahmoudi, S., Fotouhi, F., Nojomi, M., Alavi, M., Zamani, O., Sedighi, I., Nateghian, A., Akbari Sari, A., Movahedi, M., Gharagozlou, M., Mamishi, S., Salehi, M., Biglari, A., Es-Haghi, A., Moradi, G., Gouya, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115580</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115580</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Application of the WHO new vaccine introduction prioritisation and sequencing framework to guide evidence-based vaccine introduction decisions in Iran, 2025-2030]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115580</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115580</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinician factors influencing decision-making in emergency general surgery (EGS): a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Emergency general surgery (EGS) decisions often occur under time pressure and with reduced patient involvement in comparison to the elective setting. Variation in decision-making in the field of EGS is partly attributable to patient and contextual factors, but clinician factors also likely shape decisions.</p>
<p>This scoping review aims to clarify which clinician factors have been investigated in relation to decision-making in adult EGS, which have been identified as influential, and the methods used to measure them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Any studies reporting on individual clinician factors and decision-making in EGS will be eligible. Studies must be only in adult populations (patients aged 18 and over). This review will consider quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods study designs.</p>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the methodology developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. This protocol was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework: <A HREF="https://osf.io/xcqp4">https://osf.io/xcqp4</A>. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CDSR and CENTRAL. The search strategy will be adapted for each database, and no time or language restrictions will be applied.</p>
<p>Two independent reviewers will screen studies for eligibility and extract data using a purpose-designed data extraction form, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Extracted data will be synthesised using a narrative approach to map key concepts, describe study characteristics and identify gaps in the literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this review will use publicly available data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Groundwater, E., Bisset, C. N., Bradley, R., John-Charles, R., Maeda, Y., McKee, T., Moug, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116205</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116205</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinician factors influencing decision-making in emergency general surgery (EGS): a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116205</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116435?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Balint group interventions for physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e116435?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Physician burnout is a global crisis compromising healthcare sustainability and patient safety. Balint groups, a structured case-based discussion intervention focusing on the doctor-patient relationship, are increasingly used to mitigate this distress. However, existing evidence regarding their efficacy remains fragmented. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Balint groups in reducing physician burnout and improving secondary psychological outcomes, while also assessing implementation characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will search MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO and major Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and SinoMed) from inception to 31 May 2026, supplemented by grey literature and trial registries. The formal search has not yet commenced and is planned to begin on protocol publication. We will include both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (non-randomised trials (NRTs), including non-controlled before-after studies) that evaluate Balint groups for practising physicians. The primary outcome is the change in burnout severity, with priority given to the emotional exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory; however, data from other validated tools, such as the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, will also be extracted and synthesised if reported. Secondary outcomes include stress and anxiety as psychological comorbidities closely associated with burnout, and job satisfaction, adherence and medical errors as its downstream occupational consequences. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool for NRTs. Data synthesis will be conducted separately for RCTs (between-group effects) and NRTs (within-group effects) using random-effects models. Heterogeneity will be explored via subgroup analyses (eg, career stage) and, where data permit, meta-regression. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this study synthesises primary data from published research. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal publication and conference presentations to inform interventions for physician well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251142526.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, J., Jiang, H., He, X., Xi, W., Zhu, R., Chen, S., Zhang, X., Nie, D., Zeng, X., Zou, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116435</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116435</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Balint group interventions for physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116435</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116435</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117478?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the landscape of concept analysis in nursing and auditing reporting completeness: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117478?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Concept analysis is widely used in nursing to clarify key concepts, support theory development and improve conceptual consistency in research and practice. Although concept analysis studies have increased substantially, concerns remain regarding methodological heterogeneity and incomplete reporting. Based on preliminary scoping of the literature, no dedicated scoping review has yet mapped the broad landscape of concept analysis studies in nursing while also examining reporting completeness. This protocol describes a scoping review that will characterise methodological trends, identify recurrent reporting omissions and generate an evidence map to support future methodological work in this field.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow established scoping review guidance and will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Guided by the Population-Concept-Context framework, we will search major English-language and Chinese-language databases for nursing-related concept analysis studies. All concept analysis approaches will be considered eligible, provided the study explicitly reports analysing a nursing-related phenomenon. Two reviewers will independently screen records, assess full texts and chart data using a standardised extraction form. In parallel, reporting completeness will be examined using an author-developed, evidence-informed audit checklist. Findings will be synthesised using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required because this review will synthesise data from publicly available sources. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation. The review is expected to provide a structured overview of current concept analysis practices in nursing and to identify priority areas for improving reporting transparency in future methodological work.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ge, J., Yang, J., Feng, Y., Fan, T., Ding, X., Zhou, H., Peng, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T08:17:47-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117478</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117478</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the landscape of concept analysis in nursing and auditing reporting completeness: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117478</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117478</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112695?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Generative artificial intelligence-driven chatbots and medical misinformation: an accuracy, referencing and readability audit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112695?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots have been rapidly adopted across research, education, business, marketing and medicine. Most interactions, however, come from non-experts using chatbots like search engines, including for everyday health and medical queries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted an original study to audit chatbot responses in health and medical fields prone to misinformation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Five popular chatbots were assessed: Gemini (Google), DeepSeek (High-Flyer), Meta AI (Meta), ChatGPT (OpenAI) and Grok (xAI). In February 2025, each chatbot was prompted with 10 questions from five categories: cancer, vaccines, stem cells, nutrition and athletic performance. We deployed an adversarial-like framework, using open- and closed-ended prompts designed to strain models toward misinformation or contraindicated advice. Two experts from each category rated responses as &lsquo;non-problematic&rsquo;, &lsquo;somewhat problematic&rsquo; or <I>&lsquo;</I>highly problematic&rsquo; using a coding matrix based on objective, predefined criteria. Citations were scored for accuracy and completeness, and each response was given a Flesch Reading Ease score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Nearly half (49.6%) of responses were problematic: 30% somewhat problematic and 19.6% highly problematic. Response quality did not differ significantly among chatbots (p=0.566) but Grok generated significantly more highly problematic responses than would be expected under a random distribution (z-score +2.07, p=0.038). Performance was strongest in vaccines (mean z-score &ndash;2.57) and cancer (&ndash;2.12), and weakest in stem cells (+1.25), athletic performance (+3.74) and nutrition (+4.35). Chatbot outputs were consistently expressed with confidence and certainty; from 250 total questions, there were only two refusals to answer (0.8%), both from Meta AI. Reference quality was poor, with a median completeness score of 40% (Q1&ndash;Q3: 20&ndash;67%). Chatbot hallucinations and fabricated citations precluded any chatbot from producing a fully accurate reference list. All readability scores were graded as &lsquo;Difficult&rsquo; (30&ndash;50), equivalent to college sophomore&ndash;senior level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The audited chatbots performed poorly when answering questions in misinformation-prone health and medical fields. Continued deployment without public education and oversight risks amplifying misinformation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiller, N. B., Marcon, A. R., Zenone, M., Kidd, K. E., Jeukendrup, A. E., Master, Z., Caulfield, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T15:31:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112695</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112695</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Press releases, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Generative artificial intelligence-driven chatbots and medical misinformation: an accuracy, referencing and readability audit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112695</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112695</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111345?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Individualised stimulation parameters in deep brain stimulation for Parkinsons disease based on disease phenotype and brain connectivity: protocol for a randomised feasibility study in a tertiary care centre (iDBS trial)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111345?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a well-accepted treatment for advanced Parkinson&rsquo;s disease (PD). Currently, programming of the DBS is done in a trial-and-error manner and it can take up to 12 months to reach optimal stimulation parameters. Technological advances in electrode design and implantable pulse generator capabilities lead to an almost infinite number of stimulation options. To explore the potential benefit of all these technological advances, a conventional trial-and-error approach is no longer sufficient. Consequently, there is a clear need for a more computational approach to programming DBS systems. This pilot study is a prospective trial to prove the feasibility of programming bilateral STN-DBS for PD in a computational fashion based on patient anatomy, electrode position and brain connectivity. In this study, we aim to assess the safety, practical feasibility and technical feasibility of a computational approach for programming newly implanted STN-DBS patients with PD. This computational approach will be based on a patient-specific DBS setting regarding sweet spots and structural connectivity of the STN. The results of this pilot study will be used to develop a computational approach for DBS programming to use in a future randomised clinical trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The iDBS trial will be a prospective randomised feasibility study carried out at the Radboud university medical center. A total of 24 patients with PD eligible for bilateral STN-DBS surgery implanted with Boston Scientific Cartesia leads will be included. Patients will be randomised to receive either (1) computational DBS programming (n=12) or (2) conventional DBS programming based on monopolar review (n=12). The primary endpoints are safety (occurrence of stimulation-induced side effects, duration of induced side effects (temporary or permanent), severity of the stimulation-induced side effects) and technical feasibility (time from surgery to DBS initiation, time from surgery to reaching optimal DBS stimulation settings) of the computational workflow.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the Medical Ethical Committee region Arnhem-Nijmegen, the Netherlands (2024&ndash;17453). This study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all applicable European and Dutch law. All participants will have to provide written informed consent. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The study is registered in the OMON-registry (NL87334.091.24, NL-OMON57446).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Ronde, E. M., Birnie, E., Rijpma, A., Arnts, H., Bartels, R. H. M. A., Esselink, R., Vinke, R. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111345</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111345</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Individualised stimulation parameters in deep brain stimulation for Parkinsons disease based on disease phenotype and brain connectivity: protocol for a randomised feasibility study in a tertiary care centre (iDBS trial)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111345</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111345</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111346?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[STRONGER 60+: study protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial assessing the clinical effectiveness and delivery of an adapted FINGER model for brain health in primary care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111346?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) was the first to show that multidomain lifestyle interventions can enhance brain health and reduce cognitive decline. However, the clinical effectiveness and delivery of the FINGER model within primary care settings remain unexplored. This paper presents the protocol for the STRONGER 60+trial, which aims to evaluate both the clinical effectiveness and real-world delivery of an adapted FINGER-based intervention in primary care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This 6-month randomised controlled clinical effectiveness trial will be conducted in primary care and will include adults aged 60 and older with vascular or lifestyle-related risk factors for dementia. A total of 80 participants will be randomised to either a structured, supervised multidomain lifestyle intervention or a self-guided version of the same programme. The intervention includes nutritional guidance, physical exercise, cognitive training, social engagement and management of vascular and metabolic risk factors. Data will be collected at baseline, 6 months (primary endpoint) and 12 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome is the change in a composite healthy lifestyle score at 6 months. In addition, the study will explore delivery processes and stakeholder (participant and healthcare professional) perspectives using both qualitative and quantitative methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (approval numbers: 2020&ndash;05785, 2021&ndash;06413-02, 2022&ndash;05454-02) and will follow the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical procedures for informed consent, confidentiality and data management will be strictly observed. Results will be disseminated through scientific publications, conferences and targeted outreach to healthcare professionals and the general public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07117916">NCT07117916</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Welmer, A.-K., Leavy, B., Thunborg, C., Holleman, J., Karlsson, P., Hallinder, H., Aspo&#x0308;, M., Bergstro&#x0308;m, C., Akesson, E., Kulmala, J., Kivipelto, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111346</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111346</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[STRONGER 60+: study protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial assessing the clinical effectiveness and delivery of an adapted FINGER model for brain health in primary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111346</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111346</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112201?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of anaemia interventions in indigenous populations across the globe: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112201?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Anaemia is highly prevalent among the indigenous population globally. Several interventions have been used to prevent and manage nutritional anaemia, including dietary measures, health education, oral iron supplements, food fortification and intravenous iron therapy. This protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and treatment of nutritional anaemia in indigenous populations worldwide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will include randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and observational studies evaluating interventions, including but not limited to iron and folic acid supplementation, dietary modifications, food fortification, deworming and health education. A robust search strategy will be developed, and six electronic bibliographic databases and Google Scholar will be searched from 2000 to 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen the identified studies, extract data, conduct a critical appraisal and evaluate quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Based on the level of heterogeneity, a meta-analysis will be conducted using either a fixed-effect or random-effects model, with pooled estimates, and 95% CIs. The I<sup>2</sup> statistic will be used to evaluate heterogeneity. When meta-analysis is not feasible, narrative synthesis will be conducted. The impact of the intervention type and delivery model will be investigated using subgroup analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review has been registered with PROSPERO. Ethical approval is not required as the study does not collect primary data from participants. The findings will be communicated via peer-reviewed journal articles and presentations at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251120554.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thatoju, P. K., Mallya, S. D., Dhyani, V. S., Shetty, R. S., Kotebagilu, N. P., Pattanshetty, S. M., Bhat, R. G., Kunder, M. A., Kumar, A., Kaur, H., Poobalan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112201</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112201</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of anaemia interventions in indigenous populations across the globe: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112201</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112201</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114095?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Days alive and out of hospital after burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural haematoma: a national cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114095?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The objective of this study was to investigate the utility of the days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) metric within a cohort of patients undergoing burr-hole drainage of a chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH). We evaluate the validity of the DAOH metric in a national CSDH cohort and examine how the DAOH metric compares to its constituent outcomes (mortality and hospital bed days) at an organisational level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics data linked to the national death registry to identify patients who underwent burr-hole drainage of CSDH in English National Health Service neurosurgical units between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2020. Construct validity was assessed by measuring the patterns of DAOH across categories of known perioperative risk factors. Variation between units in the risk-adjusted values for DAOH, postoperative mortality and days in hospital was explored using funnel plots. Linear regression and logistic regression were used to derive the risk-adjusted rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 16 450 patients who underwent at least one burr-hole drainage of CSDH were identified during the time period. The median 30-day DAOH was 16 (IQR, 0&ndash;24); the median for the 90-day DAOH was 74 (42&ndash;84), and was better at measuring the complete stay associated with the index admission. Worse 90-day DAOH values were associated with older age, increasing comorbidities and greater frailty. Risk-adjusted 90-day DAOH values for neurosurgical units varied more markedly than for its constituent outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The 90-day DAOH looks to be a valid outcome metric for patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for CSDH that is feasible to derive using national hospital data. Future work should explore how to estimate a minimally important clinical difference for DAOH and evaluate its utility as an outcome measure.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thompson, D., Wahba, A., Davies, B., Williams, A., Hutchinson, P. J., Stubbs, D., Helmy, A., Cromwell, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114095</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114095</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Days alive and out of hospital after burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural haematoma: a national cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114095</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114095</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115722?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Regional disparities in insurance-covered cognitive behavioural therapy in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study using National Database Open Data, 2015-2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115722?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is recommended as a first-line treatment for depression and anxiety disorders, but its utilisation under Japan&rsquo;s national health insurance remains poorly understood. This study aimed to describe CBT utilisation patterns, quantify regional disparities across prefectures and analyse temporal trends from fiscal year (FY)2015 to FY2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a nationwide repeated cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Japan&rsquo;s National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups Open Data (NDB Open Data), FY2015&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients who received insurance-covered CBT in FY2023, with a longitudinal comparison across FY2015&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were annual CBT claims and patient counts. The secondary outcomes included prefecture-level distribution, population-adjusted utilisation rates per 100 000 population, distribution by sex and age, monthly trends and temporal changes over 9 years. Regional variation in physician-delivered CBT was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) and extremal quotient (EQ).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In FY2023, the total CBT claims numbered 38 045 with 8299 patients, representing only 0.14% of an estimated 6.03 million psychiatric patients. Physician-delivered CBT accounted for 99.6% (37 886 claims), whereas nurse-delivered CBT introduced in 2016 remained at 0.4% (159 claims). 13 of the 47 prefectures (27.7%) had zero or fewer than 10 claims. The population-adjusted physician-delivered CBT claims ranged from 370.96 per 100 000 in Okayama to 0.99 per 100 000 in Kumamoto, yielding an EQ of 375-fold. The CV among the 34 prefectures with measurable physician-delivered CBT was 174.8%. Despite indication expansions in 2016 and 2018, claims decreased by 9.9% from 42 216 in FY2015 to 38 045 in FY2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Insurance-covered CBT in Japan remains severely underused, with significant regional disparities. Incremental policy measures, including indication expansions and nurse-delivered CBT, have failed to improve access. Fundamental system reforms, potentially including dedicated psychological therapy services, are needed to ensure equitable access to evidence-based psychological treatments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fujii, T., Nogami, Y., Seo, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115722</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115722</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Regional disparities in insurance-covered cognitive behavioural therapy in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study using National Database Open Data, 2015-2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115722</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115722</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115891?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenging history taking encounters: a systematic review, meta-analysis and phenomenological framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115891?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>All physicians will experience challenging history taking encounters, where communication is impaired and negatively impacts the diagnostic process. The aims of this systematic review were to (1) undertake a meta-analysis of the frequency of challenging encounters; (2) collate adverse outcomes of challenging encounters; (3) identify underlying causes of challenging encounters; (4) identify strategies to deal with different challenges; and (5) align these strategies with our published phenomenological framework of history taking challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence data adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A literature search in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed on 12 July 2020, and updated on 4 August 2025, focusing on challenging history taking encounters in any clinical setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Articles reporting on the frequency, adverse outcomes, causative factors or strategies used to address challenges in the history taking process in any clinical area of medicine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Factors associated with challenging history encounters (causative or consequential) were categorised using inductive coding and referenced to a phenomenological framework. Meta-analysis was used to estimate the prevalence of history taking encounters using a restricted maximum likelihood model with <I></I><sup>2</sup> and <I>I</I><sup>2</sup> as tests for heterogeneity and funnel plot with Egger&rsquo;s test for publication bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>73 articles were included in the analysis. The overall prevalence of challenging history taking encounters was 19.5% (95% CI 14.2% to 24.7%). Adverse outcomes of patient dissatisfaction (level 1 evidence) and diagnostic uncertainty (level 3 evidence) were identified. Factors associated with (n=22) and strategies to mitigate challenging encounters (n=13) were categorised. Correlation of factors and strategies with a phenomenological approach created a framework to assist novice history takers in approaching such circumstances.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Challenging history taking encounters are common. Little is known of the relative importance of factors associated with challenging history taking encounters or the impact of suggested strategies. Many of the suggested strategies to facilitate meaningful communication in these situations involve a departure from standard history taking. More research is required to better define the nature of challenges encountered in history taking with a view to develop better educational models for trainee physicians.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hossain, S., Murray, K., Zhang, L., Jassem, A. M., Clarke, J., Somers, J., Dias, R., Uridge, A., Sharma, S., Teodorczuk, A., Keijzers, G., McConnell, H., Sun, J., Amey, L., Broadley, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:10-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115891</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115891</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenging history taking encounters: a systematic review, meta-analysis and phenomenological framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115891</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115891</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e096038?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influencing factors and sex differences of life satisfaction in patients with chronic kidney disease: a national cross-sectional study in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e096038?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors influencing life satisfaction in patients with chronic kidney disease and to explore any sex differences. Thus, this provides a theoretical basis for improving the life satisfaction status of middle-aged and elderly patients with chronic kidney disease, as well as formulating prevention, treatment and intervention strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Based on the health ecology model, 22 potential influencing factors were identified at five levels. Subsequent analyses examined whether they impacted the life satisfaction of patients with chronic kidney disease and had varying effects on different sexes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1422 patients with chronic kidney disease were included from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The <sup>2</sup> test and multivariate logistic regression model were used to analyse the influencing factors of life satisfaction in patients with chronic kidney disease and their sex differences. Sensitivity analyses additionally supported the robustness of the results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Age, self-rated health, depressive symptoms, marital satisfaction, satisfaction with children, activities of daily living and pension were all significant influencing factors of life satisfaction in patients with chronic kidney disease (p&lt;0.05). The impact of drinking on life satisfaction in patients with chronic kidney disease showed significant sex differences. Interestingly, male patients who consumed alcohol were more likely to report high life satisfaction, while male patients who smoked cigarettes were more likely to show low life satisfaction; however, this association was not found in female patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study reveals that a combination of factors affects life satisfaction in patients with chronic kidney disease. Therefore, targeted prevention and intervention strategies should be carried out, with specific focus on females, individuals with poor self-rated health and those experiencing depressive symptoms from a multidimensional perspective.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shen, K., Ji, X., Zhang, Y., Cheng, Y., Xian, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096038</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096038</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influencing factors and sex differences of life satisfaction in patients with chronic kidney disease: a national cross-sectional study in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096038</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096038</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103072?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a CORe outcome set for clinical trials of RECTal cancer treatment: protocol for the CORRECT initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103072?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>With the rapidly changing landscape of rectal cancer treatment, it is becoming increasingly challenging for clinicians to interpret and synthesise the vast amount of high-quality evidence being generated. A core outcome set (COS) for clinical trials in rectal cancer would help address issues surrounding outcome selection and reporting. The purpose of this research project is to develop a COS to be used in research comparing different treatment paradigms in the management of rectal cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This will be a mixed-methods project, including a systematic review, semi-structured interviews and a Delphi consensus process. The project was designed in accordance with the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Handbook, which provides a framework for COS development based on existing evidence. A multidisciplinary Study Advisory Group, composed of rectal cancer providers, methodologists and patients, will oversee the project. A systematic review will be performed to identify an inclusive list of outcomes reported by researchers in previous rectal cancer trials. Outcomes will be collapsed into various core areas and domains according to the OMERACT Filter V.2.0. Semi-structured interviews with rectal cancer survivors and their partners/caregivers will help identify additional patient-centric outcomes not captured in the systematic review. Finally, after a final list of outcomes is generated, patients and healthcare professionals will be invited to participate in a Delphi process to develop the final COS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received full approval with the Research Ethics Committee at the Integrated Health and Social Services Network for West-Central Montreal (health network responsible for the Jewish General Hospital) (REC: 2025-4377) and the Institutional Review Board of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine (IRB: STUDY-25-00515). The results of this study will be presented at national and international meetings and a manuscript will be submitted for publication in a high-impact surgery and/or oncology peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The study was registered in the COMET database in December 2023 (<A HREF="https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2941">https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2941</A>). The full systematic review protocol, along with the search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria, was registered online in September 2023 (researchregistry.com; reviewregistry1705).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garfinkle, R., George, M., Jethwa, K., Johansen, P., Lakaszawski, M., Nagarajan, A., Smart, N., Sylla, P., Vuong, T., Boutros, M., Fergusson, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103072</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103072</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a CORe outcome set for clinical trials of RECTal cancer treatment: protocol for the CORRECT initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103072</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103072</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108120?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diabetes-related treatment costs and catastrophic health expenditure at a tertiary care hospital in Rajshahi, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108120?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Diabetes is a chronic disease characterised by elevated blood sugar levels, which can lead to damage across various body systems. Bangladesh has the second highest number of adults with diabetes in South Asia and faces a significant economic burden from this condition. The objective of this study was to investigate the economic burden of diabetes and its associated factors among patients with diabetes registered at a tertiary-level diabetes hospital in the Rajshahi region of Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional hospital-based study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary data were collected from patients with diabetes at a tertiary-level diabetes hospital in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study recruited 400 patientswith diabetes, who were randomly selected. The economic burden was assessed using the Catastrophic Health Expenditure (CHE) threshold of &ge;10% of household income. Descriptive statistics, 2 tests, t-tests, linear regression and binary logistic regression were employed for analysis, with statistical significance set at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The proportion of diabetes-related burden among patients with diabetes was 50.7%. 95.8% of patients had type 2 diabetes, and over half (52.5%) were overweight or obese. Treatment costs were significantly associated with diabetes duration, insulin use and age (35&ndash;55 vs &ge;56 years). The economic burden was strongly associated with lower income levels (poor income and middle income vs high income) and longer diabetes duration. Participants not adhering to a healthy diet had 43% lower odds of experiencing economic burden than those following a healthy diet.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Approximately half of the patients experienced catastrophic health expenditure due to diabetes, indicating a substantial economic burden in the Rajshahi region of Bangladesh. This burden was significantly higher among lower-income and middle-income groups and patients with longer disease duration, and treatment-related factors such as insulin use were associated with greater financial strain. These findings emphasise the need for targeted financial protection strategies, including subsidised care and preventive interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akter, F., Hossain, M. G., Mothashin, M., Hasan, F., Al Mamun, A. S. M., Alam, S. N., Aufi, S. S., Hasnin, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108120</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diabetes-related treatment costs and catastrophic health expenditure at a tertiary care hospital in Rajshahi, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108120</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110091?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Methods of cervical ripening in induction of labour: an individual participant data network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (CIRCLE-NMA) study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110091?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Induction of labour (IOL) is a commonly performed obstetric intervention, particularly when delivery is deemed more beneficial than continuing the pregnancy due to maternal or fetal indications. When the cervix is unfavourable for delivery, cervical ripening is performed prior to IOL. A wide variety of mechanical, pharmacological and combination methods are used, but the optimal approach balancing efficacy, safety and patient experience remains uncertain. Conventional aggregate data (AD) meta-analyses lack individual-level data, limiting exploration of patient-level factors for personalised medicine and do not address concerns about the trustworthiness of data presented in peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This protocol describes an individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) designed to evaluate and rank cervical ripening methods for IOL using only high quality, trustworthy data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will identify eligible parallel-group RCTs enrolling pregnant women with a singleton, cephalic fetus at &ge;34 weeks&rsquo; gestation requiring cervical ripening, through comprehensive searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Scopus, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Register, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, clinicaltrials.gov and reference lists of prior reviews. The interventions we consider will be selected via Delphi consensus with international clinical experts. Eligible trial investigators will be invited to contribute de-identified IPD; AD will be used if IPD is unavailable. Trials will be assessed for trustworthiness using the Trustworthiness in RAndomised Clinical Trials checklist and the IPD Integrity Tool, with only eligible studies included in the primary analysis. All statistical analyses will follow a pre-specified statistical analysis plan (SAP) finalised before any analyses are conducted. A two-stage, contrast-based, frequentist IPD-NMA will compare cervical ripening methods for three co-primary outcomes: vaginal birth, composite adverse perinatal outcomes and composite adverse maternal outcomes. Subgroup analyses will assess effect modifiers (eg, parity, age and previous caesarean), with treatment rankings presented using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and rank-heat plots. Sensitivity analyses will examine the impact of bias, missing data and population criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (No. 48189). IPD will be de-identified and securely transferred for storage on a Monash University-hosted shared network drive. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference abstracts and the Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labour Collaborative Evidence Network Meta-Analysis (CIRCLE-NMA) website (<A HREF="https://circlenma.com">https://circlenma.com</A>). Patient and public involvement will guide the communication and interpretation of results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251077464.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Au, N., Patabendige, M., Libesman, S., Wang, R., Gurrin, L. C., Mol, B. W., Li, W., the CIRCLE-NMA Collaborative, Haas, Galadanci, Zhang, Allotey, de Carvalho Pacagnella, Mundle, Grobman, Seidler, Karahalios, Hunter, Wang, Libesman, Chan, Jones, Tan, Li, Subramaniam, Tita, Osoti, Anand, Henry, Gouge, Saad, Manjunath, Haugland, Diguisto, Policiano, Vayssiere, Pennell, Young, Lokkegaard, Perrotin, Kruit, Hosier, Baidya, Mathews, Dodd, Thompson, Cecatti, Marions, Goonewardene, de Oliveira e Oliveira, Romero, Waterstone, Jozwiak, Beckmann, Wise, ten Eikelder, Aggarwal, Sass, Huang Grace, Gemund, Dallenbach, Rozenberug, Roux, Sheehan, Bagga, Edwards, Pasrija, Cheng, Mundle, Wallstrom, Deshmukh, Berghella, Liu, Al-Ibraheemi, Lelliott, Kongvongsa-Patel, Stannard]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110091</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110091</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Methods of cervical ripening in induction of labour: an individual participant data network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (CIRCLE-NMA) study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110091</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110091</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111121?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prescribing practices of healthcare professionals regarding multivitamins and mineral supplements in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111121?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Multivitamins and minerals (MVMs) are readily available dietary supplements that help prevent nutritional deficiencies and boost energy. This study examined the prescribing and consultation practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) related to MVM supplements in Pakistan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study used a web-based structured questionnaire to collect data from HCPs from February 2021 to January 2022. The study link, which included a consent form and questionnaire, was circulated on social media platforms, and all individuals who provided consent and completed the forms were included in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 524 HCPs participated in the study, with the majority being males, holding MBBS or Fellow of the College of Physicians and Surgeons qualifications, and working in urban settings. Findings revealed that HCPs prescribe MVMs for varied reasons. We assessed differences based on various factors like gender, education level, area of practice and specialty. Most of the differences observed were not statistically significant, except for a few related to area of practice and education level that were found significant. The primary conditions prompting MVM prescriptions included osteoporosis and bone pain (80% for vitamin D and calcium), fatigue and weakness (over 70% for iron) and numbness/tingling (more than half for folate and vitamin B<SUB>12</SUB>). Regarding biospecimen analysis before prescribing MVMs, 46% of HCPs required laboratory investigations before prescribing vitamin D and calcium and 60% for iron prescriptions. Common formulations prescribed include cholecalciferol for vitamin D deficiency (62%) and ferrous sulfate for iron deficiency (76%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our study findings highlight that the prescribing practices of MVMs by HCPs are primarily in line with the known physiological roles of these supplements. However, a few identified gaps in practices highlight the need for standardised guidelines to ensure patients&rsquo; health and well-being.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mubashir, M., Naz, S., Shabbir, M., Zehra, N., Majid, H., Jafri, L., Habib, A., Iqbal, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T08:30:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111121</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111121</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prescribing practices of healthcare professionals regarding multivitamins and mineral supplements in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111121</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers and enablers to scaling implementation of Trauma Recovery Center model of care: a protocol for scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Trauma Recovery Center (TRC) is an evidence-based model of care designed to meet the needs of underserved survivors of violent crime through the provision of comprehensive mental health and psychosocial services. Originally developed in the USA, the TRC model has been adopted by 53 hospitals and outpatient settings nationwide. Its demonstrated effectiveness supports its potential for international scale-up, particularly in countries seeking to improve their responses to interpersonal violence and trauma. While the core principles of the model remain universally consistent, there is a striking paucity of synthesised evidence on implementation barriers and enablers, necessary to guide effective scale-up and adaptation across diverse systems of care. The objective of this scoping review is to identify and map barriers and facilitators that influence implementation of the TRC model of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The scoping review was initiated in May 2025 and is expected to be completed in May 2026. The review will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Results will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The initial PubMed search was conducted in June 2025. The finalised search strategy will subsequently be applied to PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus databases. A two-stage screening process using Covidence software will be used to determine study eligibility. To be included, studies will be required to have examined implementation-related barriers or facilitators associated with at least one core element of the TRC model or analogous psychosocial support programmes within the context of comprehensive, trauma-informed care for survivors of violent crime. Studies conducted within the USA and published in English between 2001 and 2026 will be included.</p>
<p>All studies will be independently assessed for eligibility. Data will be extracted and mapped using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Extracted data will be analysed and synthesised narratively across the five CFIR domains, accompanied by summary tables that describe how the findings relate to the review objective. Existing knowledge gaps will be identified and discussed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Experts from the National Alliance of Trauma Recovery Centers (NATRC) will be engaged to provide feedback on the study findings and support the dissemination of results. Dissemination activities will include peer-reviewed publications and presentations at academic conferences and professional events, such as NATRC&rsquo;s technical assistance and learning community training sessions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varyvoda, Y., Yurika, R., Chukwuonye, G. N., Soto, S., Manygoats, T., Ehiri, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-10T09:14:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107117</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107117</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers and enablers to scaling implementation of Trauma Recovery Center model of care: a protocol for scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107117</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113446?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health outcomes and reinfection among COVID-19 survivors 4 years after hospital discharge in Wuhan, China: a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113446?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate health outcomes and identify risk factors for reinfection and persistent symptoms among COVID-19 survivors 4 years after hospital discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two hospitals in Wuhan, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1076 COVID-19 survivors discharged from hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Self-reported symptom questionnaire, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) fatigue subscale. Long covid was defined according to WHO criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Median age was 58 years and 50.2% were male. Reinfection during December 2022&ndash;April 2023 occurred in 36.1%; 21 developed pneumonia and 14 required hospitalisation. At least 12 months after reinfection, 12.1% reported sequelae compared with 46.9% after the initial infection. At 4 years, 16.7% reported long covid symptoms, commonly fatigue, chest tightness, cough and dyspnoea. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for abnormal fatigue (CIS &ge;27) included age (OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.007 to 1.034; p=0.003), reinfection (OR 2.393, 95% CI 1.708 to 3.352; p&lt;0.001), severe disease (OR 1.553, 95% CI 1.088 to 2.218; p=0.015) and tumour (OR 3.420, 95% CI 1.177 to 9.936; p=0.024).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>At 4 years post discharge, symptom burden was lower than at earlier follow-up time points for most survivors. Reinfection and older age were associated with persistent symptoms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dai, Y., Luo, H., Liu, X., Hu, B. M., Wang, M., Cheng, L. X., Luo, Y., Ma, X.-y., Cao, G., Mao, Q., Li, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-10T09:14:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113446</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113446</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health outcomes and reinfection among COVID-19 survivors 4 years after hospital discharge in Wuhan, China: a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113446</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113446</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113756?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trends in ethnic disparities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health interventions and the role of social investment and inclusive policies: a mixed-methods study in Ecuador, 2004-2018]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113756?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Ethnic disparities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health (RMNCH) persist in Latin America, rooted in structural racism and colonial legacies. Evidence on the temporal evolution of these disparities and the impact of policies targeting Indigenous populations remains limited. Following the 2000 economic crisis, Ecuador showed the region&rsquo;s largest ethnic gaps in intervention coverage and social determinants. Since 2008, inclusion policies have advanced. This study analysed trends in RMNCH coverage, social determinants and their potential association with policies and strategies over 14 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using a mixed-methods design, we analysed three nationally representative surveys (2004, 2012 and 2018) to assess changes in social determinants and the coverage of six RMNCH services; defined as the proportion of women and children receiving essential health services across the continuum of care, including family planning, antenatal care, skilled birth attendance and child immunisation, stratified by ethnicity (Indigenous women and children, Afro-Ecuadorian populations and Mestizo and White populations). We estimated absolute inequality measures and adjusted coverage ratios using Poisson regression models. Through a literature review and temporal graphs, we analysed plans, policies and strategies in health, education and ethnic inclusion during the same period to estimate potential impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>By 2018, Indigenous populations doubled their representation in the highest wealth quintiles (10% to 20%) and increased secondary education attainment (25% to 45%), with slower progress in rural areas. RMNCH coverage, including prenatal care, institutional deliveries and professional-assisted births, rose significantly (27% to 75%) among Indigenous populations. Afro-Ecuadorians also experienced improvements in RMNCH coverage and social determinants, though progress was less pronounced compared with Indigenous groups. Although ethnic gaps persisted, inequalities declined over the study period. These reductions coincided with increased social investment in rural health and education, constitutional recognition of plurinationality, and policies promoting intercultural health practices. However, gaps in monitoring and impact evaluation were evident.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Ecuador demonstrates that inclusive and integrated policies, leadership, social participation and sustained social investment can reduce ethnic inequalities, promote the integral development of society and strategies that should be maintained. Temporal studies based on routine surveys are crucial for monitoring the impact of such policies. These findings provide a pre-pandemic benchmark and serve as a reference for countries aiming to improve health outcomes among Indigenous and Afro-descendant populations and advance the Sustainable Development Goals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rios-Quituizaca, P., Endara-Mina, J., Ferreira, L. Z., Armenta-Paulino, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-10T09:14:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113756</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113756</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trends in ethnic disparities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health interventions and the role of social investment and inclusive policies: a mixed-methods study in Ecuador, 2004-2018]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113756</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113756</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114090?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy and Safety of preoperative Controlling Heart Rate in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ESCORT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114090?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency with a high mortality rate, and acute Stanford Type A AD is the most dangerous form, often requiring surgical intervention. Factors contributing to the progression of AD include increased heart rate, blood pressure and the rate of ventricular contraction (dP/dt). While heart rate control is a cornerstone of preoperative management for AD per existing guidelines, the recommended target (eg, &le;60 bpm in American Heart Association 2010) is consensus-driven (Level C) and thus not grounded in high-level evidence. The ESCORT (<unl>E</unl>fficacy and <unl>S</unl>afety of preoperative <unl>Co</unl>ntrolling heart <unl>R</unl>ate in patients with acute <unl>T</unl>ype A aortic dissection) trial is designed to address this critical gap by providing high-level evidence from a randomised controlled trial to define the optimal preoperative heart rate target.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study is a multicentre, single-blind, RCT involving adult patients diagnosed with acute (Stanford Type A) AD, scheduled for aortic arch prosthetic vascular replacement and elephant trunk stent implantation surgery. 680 patients will be randomised into two groups: low heart rate target group (55&ndash;65 beats per minute) and standard heart rate target group (75&ndash;85 beats per minute). The intervention involves protocol-directed medication to achieve the target heart rates, with esmolol as the primary recommended agent. The primary outcome measure is the rate of major adverse cardiovascular event within 30 days after surgery, and secondary outcomes include various clinical, economic and biochemical measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The ESCORT study is the large-scale RCT to investigate the optimal preoperative heart rate control in patients with acute type A AD. The results of this study have the potential to fill the evidence gap in current clinical guidelines and provide evidence-based support for clinical management. The findings may influence the standard of care by either endorsing lower heart rate targets or providing alternative guidance for managing heart rate in this high-risk patient population. The study&rsquo;s results will be disseminated through publications and presentations at both national and international conferences, ensuring that the results are accessible to the medical community and relevant patient organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study, including the study protocol (version 1.3, 3 December 2022), was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fuwai Hospital, CAMS and PUMC (approval number: 2022-1886). Additional approvals were obtained from the ethics committees of participating subcentres (approval numbers are listed in the main text). The findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2300067811.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, G., Wang, D., Yang, Y., Zhang, T., Xie, B., Hu, J., Wei, X., Chen, J., Yuan, S., Yu, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-10T09:14:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114090</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114090</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy and Safety of preoperative Controlling Heart Rate in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ESCORT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114090</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114090</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117813?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence landscape on lactation: a scoping review protocol applying a Bio-Psycho-Social-Ecological framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117813?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Breastfeeding provides well-documented benefits for both mothers and infants, yet global exclusive breastfeeding rates remain below target levels. Current research on lactation outcomes and challenges tends to focus on isolated factors, creating a fragmented evidence base. This scoping review aims to systematically map the existing literature on factors affecting lactation during the first 6 months post partum. We will develop and apply a Bio-Psycho-Social-Ecological (BPSE) integrative framework to organise the findings and identify gaps for future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct this scoping review following the updated Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and report findings according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Systematic searches will be performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases. We will include systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials published between January 2020 and October 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen articles and extract data. The extracted data will include study characteristics, trial registration status, examined factors or interventions and relevant lactation outcomes. Findings will be synthesised narratively and mapped within the BPSE framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this scoping review will synthesise data from publicly available publications. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at relevant academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Open Science Framework <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NXCRF">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NXCRF</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, L., Tian, Y., Guo, S., Lei, Y., Zhang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-10T09:14:03-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117813</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117813</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence landscape on lactation: a scoping review protocol applying a Bio-Psycho-Social-Ecological framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117813</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117813</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105730?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of HIV/AIDS awareness among women of reproductive age in underserved regions of Somaliland: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 demographic and health survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e105730?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Sanaag and Sool are two remote regions in Somaliland with limited access to health service and high burden of HIV/AIDS. The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of HIV/AIDS awareness among women of reproductive age in underserved regions of Somaliland using data from the 2020 Somaliland Demographic and Health Survey through a cross-sectional analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study using Somaliland Demographic and Health Survey data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>The study was conducted in the Sanaag and Sool regions of Somaliland. These areas are characterised by underserved communities and ongoing internal conflict, which has significantly undermined the delivery of health services. Consequently, there is a high HIV/AIDS burden in these regions. The study focused on women of reproductive age, using data from the 2020 Somaliland Demographic and Health Survey for the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Variables</st>
<p>The outcome variable of the study was awareness about HIV/AIDS and independent variables including education, media exposure, place of residence and wealth index were considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>The proportion of poor HIV/AIDS awareness is high in Sool and Sanaag, with 38.8% and 26.6% of women respectively having no awareness about HIV/AIDS. Findings indicate that women who had primary and above level of education (adjusted OR, AOR=2.25; 95% CI 1.99 to 2.53) and media exposure including radio (AOR=2.31; 95% CI 1.99 to 2.68) and television (AOR=3.94; 95% CI 3.45 to 4.5) are strong predictors of HIV/AIDS awareness. Women in urban areas (AOR=2.83; 95% CI 2.25 to 3.57) were more likely to have HIV/AIDS awareness compared with women in rural and nomadic settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Inadequate awareness about HIV/AIDS was associated with education, residence and mass media exposure. Targeted health education programmes, promoting women&rsquo;s education status and media campaigns could help improve HIV/AIDS awareness, which in turn enables reproductive age women to take protective measures against exposure.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdiwali, S. A., Geta, T. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-09T07:47:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105730</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105730</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of HIV/AIDS awareness among women of reproductive age in underserved regions of Somaliland: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 demographic and health survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105730</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105730</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108062?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Connection, confluence and convergence: a protocol for reviewing policies on antimicrobial resistance and plastic pollution]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108062?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and plastic pollution are converging global crises that threaten both human health and environmental sustainability. Despite the growing recognition of these challenges, few legislative and policy frameworks acknowledge the complex interplay between antibiotic misuse and environmental plastic contamination. This protocol seeks to bridge that gap by critically examining policies in Europe and the Philippines, focusing on those that target antibiotic misuse and plastic pollution in human and animal health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Document analysis will be employed to systematically review relevant legislative and policy frameworks. We will retrieve laws, regulations and policy documents from official databases, government websites and other sources using broad inclusion criteria. The extraction process and analysis will be guided by the READ (Ready, Extract, Analyse, Distill) approach which will ensure a thorough examination of how these documents address the dual challenges of AMR and plastic pollution. Particular attention will be paid to identifying policy gaps, overlaps and synergies that may affect the overall effectiveness and coherence of current governmental responses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This policy review has been granted exemption from ethical review by the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine (RITM-IRB No. 2024-35), Philippines. The results are expected to provide a robust evidence base to inform the development of integrated policies at the nexus of global public health and environmental sustainability. Findings will be disseminated at academic conferences and peer-reviewed publications and to key stakeholders within European, Philippine, and international organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The detailed protocol is pre-registered and openly available on the Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://osf.io/3tkn2/overview">https://osf.io/3tkn2/overview</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah-Rohlfs, R., Landicho, J., Endoma, V., Sornillo, B. J., Treskova, M., Rocklo&#x0308;v, J., McMahon, S. A., Renosa, M. D. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-09T07:47:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108062</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108062</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Connection, confluence and convergence: a protocol for reviewing policies on antimicrobial resistance and plastic pollution]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108062</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108062</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108460?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Foot self-care knowledge, practices and associated factors among individuals diagnosed with diabetes attending clinics at base hospitals in Colombo, Sri Lanka: an analytical cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108460?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Diabetic foot is an infection, ulceration or destruction of the tissue of the foot of a person diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM). Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major and preventable complication of DM. Adequate knowledge and foot self-care practices are crucial to reduce the risk of DFU complications, particularly in resource-limited healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the knowledge and practices related to foot self-care and associated factors among individuals diagnosed with diabetes attending diabetic clinics at all base hospitals in Colombo District, Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 423 individuals diagnosed with diabetes attending the diabetic clinic at all three base hospitals in Colombo district, from January 2023 to March 2024 (study period). Participants were selected by using a systematic random sampling. Data were collected using a validated and pre-tested interviewer-administered questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences V.26 software. Associations were examined using <sup>2</sup> tests, independent sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), with a p value&lt;0.05 considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The majority of the participants were females (71.2%). Among the participants, 33.8% of them had a poor level of knowledge regarding foot self-care. Knowledge level was significantly associated with the participants&rsquo; family history of diabetes and the hospital where they attended the clinic (p&lt;0.05). Females had a significantly higher mean knowledge score (60.5&plusmn;19.7) than males (55.4&plusmn;23.7) (p=0.03), and participants attending District General Hospital Avissawella had the highest mean knowledge score (67.9&plusmn;21.6) among other hospitals (p=0.01). Approximately 67.6% of them demonstrated satisfactory foot self-care practices. Practice level was significantly associated with the hospital where they attended the clinic and the type of medication used for DM (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Nearly one-third of participants demonstrated poor knowledge of foot self-care, despite over half exhibiting satisfactory foot-care practices. This gap highlights the need for targeted education to boost awareness and promote consistent foot care, which is a key step in preventing diabetic foot complications and improving long-term outcomes for individuals diagnosed with diabetes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayaweerage, B. N., Hettiarachchi, M., Kaveesha, A. D., Gamaralalalage, M. R., Sisudan, S., Mahanama, P., Malawi Arachchi, C. D., Kamshiga, T., Kaushalya, S., Shopijen, E., Kisokanth, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-09T07:47:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108460</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108460</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Foot self-care knowledge, practices and associated factors among individuals diagnosed with diabetes attending clinics at base hospitals in Colombo, Sri Lanka: an analytical cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108460</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108460</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Practical guide for determining whether healthcare providers are research participants in cluster randomised trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In cluster randomised trials (CRT), groups (rather than individuals) are randomised to intervention and control conditions. Since the publication of the <I>Ottawa Statement</I> on the Ethical Design and Conduct of CRTs, the accurate identification of research participants has continued to challenge researchers and research ethics committees.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>In this article, we focus on CRTs involving healthcare providers and provide a practical framework for applying <I>Ottawa Statement</I> criteria for identifying research participants. We illustrate key lessons with example CRTs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Framework</st>
<p>Study procedures should be analysed in relation to the study objective. A study intervention confers research participant status on healthcare providers if the study objective is to evaluate its effect and it is delivered to or targeted at healthcare providers. A data collection procedure confers research participant status on healthcare providers if it informs a study outcome used to achieve the study objective and it involves interactions between researchers and healthcare providers to collect their data, or the collection of healthcare providers&rsquo; identifiable private information.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Key lessons</st>
<p>In CRTs, healthcare providers may be research participants because of study interventions, data collection procedures, or both; conversely, they may simply be research collaborators. Some study interventions confer research participant status on both healthcare providers and patients. Collecting data on healthcare provider behaviour may confer research participant status on healthcare providers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Accurately identifying research participants in CRTs is essential to their ethical conduct. When healthcare providers are research participants, their rights and welfare should be protected in accordance with research ethics guidelines.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nix, H. P., Goldstein, C. E., Taljaard, M., Weijer, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-09T07:47:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109131</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109131</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Practical guide for determining whether healthcare providers are research participants in cluster randomised trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109131</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114696?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global prevalence and risk factors of probable sarcopenia in older adults: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114696?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>With the acceleration of the global ageing trend, sarcopenia has become a major public health problem. Probable sarcopenia, characterised primarily by decreased muscle strength, represents an early, potentially reversible stage. However, epidemiological evidence on the prevalence and risk factors of probable sarcopenia in older populations remains limited, scattered, and methodologically inconsistent. Therefore, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are needed to synthesise current data, quantify global and regional prevalence, identify associated risk factors, and explore sources of heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2020 and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodologies, this review will include observational studies that define probable sarcopenia according to recognised consensus criteria (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 and Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2). Comprehensive searches of eleven English and Chinese databases (Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, CINAHL, CBM, CNKI, WANFANG, and VIP) will be conducted from inception to January 2026. Two reviewers will independently screen, extract, and appraise studies using JBI tools. Random-effects meta-analyses will be used to estimate global and regional prevalence and to synthesise the available evidence on associated risk factors. Pre-specified subgroup and meta-regression analyses will be undertaken to explore potential sources of heterogeneity across diagnostic criteria, geographical regions, and population characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was not required for this protocol. The results of the final review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251153142.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ye, Y., Shi, Y., Deng, T., Gu, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-09T07:47:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114696</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114696</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global prevalence and risk factors of probable sarcopenia in older adults: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114696</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114696</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109623?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Life expectancy gains across US states between 1941 and 2000: a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109623?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We use new data and robust methods to estimate mortality levels and trends for US states and Washington DC and quantify cohort life expectancy for birth cohorts between 1941 and 2000.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data</st>
<p>Mortality data and population estimates for cohorts born between 1941 and 2000 at the state, regional and national levels were obtained from the US Mortality Database.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>We estimated cohort life expectancy at birth by sex and geographical level. We used the coefficient of variation to assess levels and trends in convergence in cohort life expectancy by geographical level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In contrast to recent findings, estimates suggest that all states and regions experienced cohort life expectancy gains between the birth cohorts of 1941 and 2000 for both sexes, typically more than 5 years; the range included gains of 7&ndash;8 years in Oklahoma and Arkansas to over 14 years in Arizona, New Mexico and South Carolina (men). States sharply converged in the 1940s due to the South making substantial gains in under-five mortality, and since the 1960s there has been overall stability in geographical variation that is a combination of continued convergence by the South and modest divergence in the Midwest.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Cohort life expectancy estimates across US states over the birth cohorts born between 1941 and 2000 have shown important gains in all states and regions. The lack of progress estimated in other work is not replicated; for example, recent work estimated that between 1950 and 2000, at least 15 states&rsquo; female populations experienced cohort life expectancy losses; however, the use of better data and robust methods show no losses by any state. Our results also point to early life public health and medical interventions as key explanations for regional convergence in cohort life expectancy around 1950, however, the results suggest only modest additional convergence since then.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pifarre i Arolas, H., Andrade, J., Fletcher, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T13:00:55-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109623</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109623</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Life expectancy gains across US states between 1941 and 2000: a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109623</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109623</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106169?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why do older people not adhere to a healthy lifestyle: a qualitative exploration of perceived barriers among older people living in a low-income and middle-income country setting]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106169?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore perceived barriers to adhering to a healthy lifestyle among older people living in a Sri Lankan setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative thematic analysis of in-depth interviews among older people.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in Kalutara district, Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>In total, 28 older people aged between 60 years and 74 years were interviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six major themes were identified following the analysis. They were named as lack of knowledge, financial difficulties, poor health status, domestic constraints, cultural norms and changing the living environment. Lack of knowledge emerged through two subthemes, namely lack of information and lack of services. Domestic constraints were derived from family commitments and domestic conflicts, while cultural norms came via beliefs and customs. Poor health status emerged through three subthemes, namely disabilities, diseases and polypharmacy, while changing the living environment emerged via adaptation and urbanisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study provides evidence of real-life perceptions on why older people do not adhere to a healthy lifestyle. Barriers are multifaceted and complex, yet those dimensions need to be considered heavily while developing lifestyle programmes to get maximum benefit for the older people.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayasinghe, V., Ferdinando, R., Abeysena, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T02:37:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106169</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106169</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why do older people not adhere to a healthy lifestyle: a qualitative exploration of perceived barriers among older people living in a low-income and middle-income country setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106169</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106169</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108799?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and cross-site validation of machine-learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of stable angina with and without obstructive coronary artery disease: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108799?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) affects millions and is frequently under-recognised because diagnostic pathways and risk tools predominantly target obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). This protocol describes shared methods for two machine-learning (ML) studies: (1) differentiating ANOCA from stable angina with obstructive CAD and (2) predicting long-term mortality among patients with ANOCA and obstructive CAD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will develop and cross-site validate ML classification models using a multicentre retrospective cohort drawn from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry and institutional datasets from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and the University Health Network. Eligible participants are adults (&ge;18 years) undergoing initial cardiac catheterisation for chest pain/anginal equivalents since 1995, excluding prior revascularisation, major structural heart disease and predefined non-anginal indications. Outcomes are (1) ANOCA (0% to &lt;50% stenosis) versus obstructive CAD (&ge;50% stenosis) and (2) 1, 3 and 5-year mortality, modelled separately for ANOCA and obstructive CAD.</p>
<p>Model development will use nested cross-validation with stratified k-fold inner-loop tuning and leave-one-site-out cross-validation for repeated external validation. Candidate predictors will be harmonised across sites, filtered for missingness and refined using expert/directed acyclic graph-guided selection plus Boruta and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator. Preprocessing includes appropriate encoding, missing-data imputation (multivariate imputation by chained equations) and feature scaling. Algorithms will include elastic-net logistic regression, random forest, LightGBM and multilayer perceptron models; hyperparameters will be optimised via Bayesian optimisation. Performance and threshold tuning will be reported. Explainability and subgroup fairness will be assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Final models will be deployed as a web-based clinical risk calculator.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval has been obtained from the University of Calgary and the University Health Network (#24-5916). Analyses will use deidentified data in secure environments; only aggregate results will be reported. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and a web-based calculator.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deng, J., Patel, S. K., Fung, M., Heybati, K., Layard, B., Wang, B., Rubin, B., Simard, T., Hibbert, B., Anderson, T., Subasri, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T02:37:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108799</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108799</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and cross-site validation of machine-learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of stable angina with and without obstructive coronary artery disease: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108799</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108799</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111933?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of pharmacological interventions for hepatic outcomes of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111933?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality due to chronic liver disease. There is an extensive body of evidence focusing on pharmacotherapy for MASLD. Reviews on the topic have been largely limited to the efficacy of select agents, subgroups or outcomes. The current is a protocol for a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluating the efficacy of examined pharmaceutical interventions in improving hepatic outcomes of MASLD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library database and multiple trial registries will be searched for clinical trials on MASLD pharmacotherapy. Histological, radiological and paraclinical outcomes will be considered along with safety and tolerability. Screening and data extraction will be conducted by pairs of independent reviewers. Risk of bias (RoB) will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses will be conducted followed by random-effects frequentist NMAs&mdash;according to the length of intervention&mdash;for each outcome in clinically distinct MASLD subgroups. Other effect moderators will be examined in subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was waived (Alborz University of Medical Sciences; approval ID: IR.ABZUMS.REC.1404.121) as no new data will be generated. Information from published records will be used in compliance with their Copyright agreements. Results will be submitted for peer review and publication in a scientific journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251125615.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semnani, K., Semnani, F., Aarabi, S. S., Esmaeili, S., Taheri, E., Mahdavi-Gorabi, A., Rajabnia, M., Djalalinia, S., Goodarzi, S., Kasaeian, A., Siddiqui, M. S., Qorbani, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T02:37:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111933</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111933</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of pharmacological interventions for hepatic outcomes of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111933</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111933</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112021?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-exploring how environments shape brain health through a planetary health lens: a photovoice study in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112021?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Dementia prevention and climate action share a common imperative: safeguarding future generations&rsquo; health. Despite evidence that nearly half of dementia cases could be prevented by addressing modifiable risk factors, current interventions focused mostly on individual behaviours have yielded mixed cognitive benefits. At the same time, climate change is introducing unprecedented environmental stressors, including air pollution, extreme heat exposure and degraded green spaces, that compound dementia risk. This study aimed to explore how midlife adults perceive the relationship between their daily environments, brain health-related behaviours and planetary health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using the photovoice method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community setting in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>14 community-dwelling adults aged 40&ndash;65 years residing in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Participants took photographs and shared narratives to document how their daily environments nurture or threaten lifestyle factors related to brain health. The project involved a five-session participatory process, and data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by a planetary health framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Reflexive thematic analysis, underpinned by a planetary health framework, revealed four inter-related themes: (1) nature as restorative and protective; (2) the mental burden of pollution, sensory overload and climate-driven landscape changes; (3) the protective role of social connection, community care and routines; (4) the co-benefits of education and mindful, eco-friendly behaviours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings underscore that midlife adults perceive their brain health as intertwined with ecological and social contexts. Dementia risk reduction strategies may therefore benefit from integrating planetary health perspectives that consider environmental conditions alongside social determinants of health. By centring lived experiences and diverse perspectives, photovoice generated context-rich insights that can guide research on more holistic approaches to dementia risk reduction.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ro&#x0308;hr, S., Alpass, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T02:37:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112021</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112021</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-exploring how environments shape brain health through a planetary health lens: a photovoice study in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112021</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112021</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112974?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Facilitators and challenges in the practice of skin-to-skin contact after birth: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112974?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Neonatal survival continues to pose a global health challenge. Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) has been shown to significantly reduce neonatal mortality and offer numerous benefits for both mothers and newborns. However, its implementation varies widely across healthcare settings and is often hindered by practical barriers. This scoping review aims to systematically explore the facilitators and challenges associated with implementing SSC after birth and to synthesise relevant evidence to guide clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping studies. A comprehensive search will be conducted across seven electronic databases and grey literature sources. Two review authors will independently perform the screening of studies and data extraction in parallel. Discrepancies will be resolved through consensus or consultation with a third author. A data extraction form will be developed based on key themes related to SSC implementations. The extracted data will be qualitatively analysed and presented in diagrammatic, tabular and narrative summary forms, in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>All data to be used in this study will be derived from previously published studies, thus rendering the need for ethical approval and informed consent superfluous</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>This protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CWPK4">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CWPK4</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wu, Y., Huang, Y., Xiao, X., Huang, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T02:37:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112974</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112974</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Facilitators and challenges in the practice of skin-to-skin contact after birth: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112974</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112974</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113686?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113686?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) is a consultation guide to identify, triage and reduce unmet patient needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We aimed to assess NAT-C fidelity, mechanisms of action and implementation issues in UK primary care as part of a clinical and cost-effectiveness cluster randomised controlled trial of the NAT-C for people with cancer compared with usual care (registration: ISRCTN15497400).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Design: a mixed-methods process evaluation informed by normalisation process theory (NPT). Setting: 21 participating general practices in England were randomised to be trained to conduct an NAT-C guided consultation with people with cancer (excluding those in remission). General practitioner fidelity of intervention and clinical action resulting from the NAT-C consultation was noted. Two Normalisation MeAsure Development Questionnaire surveys were distributed to trained clinicians before (Survey 1) and after delivery of &ge;2 NAT-C consultations (Survey 2). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians (post delivery &ge;2 NAT-C consultations) and key stakeholders in primary and cancer care. Fidelity, action and paired before/after survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Interview data were analysed using a deductive thematic framework approach (NPT-informed). Data were narratively synthesised with cross-tabulated key findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 360/376 (96%) NAT-C consultations delivered, 258/360 (72%) resulted in clinical action, including 50 (13%) external referrals. 14 paired before (Survey 1, n=53) and after (Survey 2, n=29) responses. Survey 1 showed positive responses across all NPT domains, but while continuing to see relevance, usefulness and legitimacy, Survey 2 highlighted concerns about insufficient resources and management support. 16 clinician participants (eight GPs, eight key stakeholders; 50% male) completed interviews. Following synthesis, we identified five themes: (1) the perceived value of the NAT-C; (2) &lsquo;champions&rsquo; are important at all levels (practice, regionally and nationally); (3) research evidence is seen as important, but influences implementation indirectly through policy, clinical guidelines and resourced initiatives; (4) adequate resources are fundamental for implementation beyond practice level and (5) NAT-C practicalities; training is adequate, but robust functional information technology systems are needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Implementation requires champions and clinicians &lsquo;buy-in&rsquo; to the patient value to legitimise use. In the context of current primary care pressures, resources were seen as essential to embed the NAT-C, but financial incentives were viewed with mixed feelings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN15497400">ISRCTN15497400</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swan, F., Clark, J., Blenkinsopp, J., Farrin, A. J., Wright-Hughes, A., McNaught, E., McCormack, T., Johnson, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T02:37:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113686</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113686</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113686</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113686</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113892?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Daytime circadian patterns of exhaled volatile organic compounds in adults without and with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: protocol for an exploratory observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113892?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Circadian regulation modulates metabolic and hormonal processes throughout the day, yet it remains unclear whether these diurnal fluctuations are reflected in exhaled volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles and whether such temporal patterns differ between individuals with and without diabetes. Previous breath analysis studies in diabetes have shown heterogeneous results, which may reflect differences in analytical approaches and the lack of standardised sampling times.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, single-centre observational study examines daytime VOC dynamics from 08:00 to 16:00 among adults without diabetes, and individuals with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes. 60 participants will complete one in-person visit with repeated breath measurements using a BreathSpec<sup>&reg;</sup> gas chromatography&ndash;ion mobility spectrometry system (GC-IMS) device, capillary glucose testing, body composition assessment, questionnaires, and oral and stool microbiota sampling. A standardised breakfast is provided; subsequent meals follow structured timing but are not standardised. The primary outcome is temporal variation in VOC intensities. Secondary outcomes include between-group differences and associations with glucose levels, body composition and microbiota composition. Analyses will use established GC&ndash;IMS tools and exploratory multivariate approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Bern (BASEC 2023-01143). Results will be shared via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and lay summaries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05984979">NCT05984979</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolier, C., Rothenbu&#x0308;hler, M., Balmer, M. L., Witthauer, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T02:37:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113892</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113892</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Daytime circadian patterns of exhaled volatile organic compounds in adults without and with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: protocol for an exploratory observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113892</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113892</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114812?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[89Zr]bevacizumab PET/CT imaging of vestibular schwannomas for the prediction of bevacizumab treatment effect in patients with symptomatic NF2-related schwannomatosis: a study protocol for a phase II single centre, prospective, feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114812?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Treatment with bevacizumab achieves both tumour stabilisation or regression and preservation or improvement of hearing. However, the efficacy of bevacizumab varies between patients and within patients. Side effects due to bevacizumab treatment are also common. It would be of value to predict therapeutic response prior to initiating therapy to prevent unnecessary exposure in patients unlikely to benefit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We aim to recruit 25 patients with <I>NF2</I>-related schwannomatosis (NF2) with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. Patients will receive an intravenous injection of 37 MBq [<sup>89</sup>Zr]bevacizumab followed by positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging 4 days later. After clinical evaluation at baseline, patients undergo bevacizumab treatment and are followed up at 3 and 6 months. The primary objective is to examine associations between pretreatment [<sup>89</sup>Zr]bevacizumab uptake on PET/CT and changes in multiple hearing outcomes and radiological characteristics of the target tumour following treatment. Secondary outcome measures include vestibular functioning, patient reported outcome measures, cranial nerve functionality, peripheral neurology, non-target schwannoma response and renal function. Given the explorative nature of the study, associations between PET-derived metrics and clinical and radiological outcomes will be examined without formal hypothesis testing, using generalised estimating equations to account for within-patient correlation. Pairwise associations will be summarised in an association matrix with multiplicity addressed using an all-resolutions inference approach, and findings will be considered hypothesis generating.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was submitted via the Clinical Trials Information System reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden&ndash;The Hague&ndash;Delft Delft. The study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and by presentation at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System under the registration ID: <A HREF="NCT05685836">NCT05685836</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douwes, J. P. J., Tops, A. L., Dibbets-Schneider, P., Verbist, B. M., Fuentealba Bassaletti, C. A., Jansen, J. C., Koetsier, K. S., van Dam, V. S., Koot, R. W., van Velden, F. H. P., Pool, M., Vugts, D., Schopman, J. E., Goeman, J. J., De Geus-Oei, L.-F., Hensen, E. F., Gelderblom, H. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T02:37:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114812</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114812</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[89Zr]bevacizumab PET/CT imaging of vestibular schwannomas for the prediction of bevacizumab treatment effect in patients with symptomatic NF2-related schwannomatosis: a study protocol for a phase II single centre, prospective, feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114812</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114812</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and investigation of the efficacy of an interactive, web-based game exercise system (ApnoeaTheraPlay) for individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: study protocol for a randomised, single-blind, controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is a prevalent sleep disorder caused by recurrent upper airway collapse during sleep. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the most commonly prescribed treatment; however, adherence remains suboptimal, with non-compliance rates reported between 46% and 83%. Exercise-based interventions have demonstrated beneficial effects on respiratory muscle strength, upper airway function and sleep quality. This study aims to develop an interactive, web-based, game exercise platform (ApneaTheraPlay (ATP)) integrating respiratory, aerobic, strengthening and oropharyngeal exercises as an adjunct to CPAP therapy for individuals with OSAS, and to evaluate its effectiveness compared with a structured presleep exercise programme and a control condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is designed as a single-blinded, three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Individuals diagnosed with OSAS who use CPAP will be randomly allocated to the ATP group, the structured presleep exercise group (SPEG) or the control group (CG). Participants in the ATP and SPEG groups will perform exercise sessions three times per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions in total). The ATP group will use a web-based, interactive, game-based exercise system, whereas the SPEG group will follow a conventional video-based exercise programme delivered in a non-interactive format. Participants in the CG will continue their usual activities and record daily physical activity using an activity diary. The primary outcome measures will be the Apnoea&ndash;Hypopnoea Index and nocturnal oxygen saturation parameters. Secondary outcomes will include sleep quality, daytime functioning, fatigue, muscle strength and function, CPAP adherence, psychological status and technology usability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Istanbul Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (E-10840098-202.3.02-6266; 17 September 2025). The study will comply with the guidelines established by the <I>International Committee of Medical Journal Editors</I> (<I>ICMJE</I>) for clinical trial registration and reporting. The results of this trial will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentation at national and international scientific meetings. No individual participant data will be shared publicly. This study is supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TU&#x0308;BITAK) under project number 225S257.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07214636">NCT07214636</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aras Bayram, G., Tarakci, D., Ergezen Sahin, G., Savas Cevlan, G., Ceylan, A., Atilgan, E., Ozkan, K., Kunter, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T02:37:24-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117541</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117541</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and investigation of the efficacy of an interactive, web-based game exercise system (ApnoeaTheraPlay) for individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: study protocol for a randomised, single-blind, controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117541</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e098166?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identification of immunomodulators associated with atrial fibrillation reporting to better understand AF immunologic mechanisms: a Vigibase retrospective disproportionality analysis and a literature review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e098166?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Growing evidence exists about the pivotal role of immune mechanisms in the physiopathology of atrial fibrillation (AF). Drugs that modulate the immune system (immunomodulators) may contribute to the development of AF. We aimed to identify immunomodulators that are associated with AF to better define their safety profile, and elucidating their mechanisms of action could yield novel insights into AF&rsquo;s immune physiopathology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive and disproportionality analysis of claims data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>World pharmacovigilance database VigiBase until 1 March 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary ouctomes</st>
<p>First, we ascertained the association of immunomodulators with AF over-reporting with a disproportionality analysis evaluating the multivariable-adjusted reporting odds ratio (aROR) for AF reporting performed for 141 immunomodulators in VigiBase. Then, a literature review was done to explore the underlying mechanisms of AF through immunomodulator mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 6 148 556 reports encompassing at least one of the 141 immunomodulators were identified in Vigibase. Our primary analysis revealed 20 immunomodulators associated with AF over-reporting. The three immunomodulators with the greatest signal were: recombinant interleukin-11 with an aROR=20.91 (99.96% CI 12.08 to 36.17), efgartigimod alfa with an aROR=6.75 (99.96% CI 3.96 to 11.52) and recombinant interleukin-2 with an aROR=6.15 (99.96% CI 3.62 to 10.45). A derivative literature review posited a hypothetical immune &lsquo;vicious circle&rsquo; promoting AF, involving T helper cells, macrophages and natural killer cells which could lead to electrophysiologic and histologic atrial remodelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Twenty Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-labelled immunomodulators are associated with AF overreporting in Vigibase with a substantial signal on recombinant IL-11. These data contribute substantively to the prevailing understanding of the safety profile of these immunomodulators. Moreover, these findings support a multidirectional interaction between the immune system and AF development and might lead to considering future therapeutic targets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06095791">NCT06095791</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Font, J., Dolladille, C., Divoux, J., Chretien, B., de Boysson, H., Legallois, D., Ollitrault, P., Champ-Rigot, L., Ferchaud, V., Pellissier, A., Milliez, P., Alexandre, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098166</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098166</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identification of immunomodulators associated with atrial fibrillation reporting to better understand AF immunologic mechanisms: a Vigibase retrospective disproportionality analysis and a literature review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098166</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e098386?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Facilitators of and barriers to teamwork between operating room nurses and other practitioners: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e098386?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Seamless collaboration in the operating room is the critical foundation for patient safety and successful outcomes. This synergy enhances efficiency, minimises errors and is a key determinant of the final surgical quality. The objective of this study is to synthesise qualitative studies on facilitators of and barriers to teamwork between operating room nurses (ORNs) and other practitioners.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A systematic search was conducted across nine electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science (Core Collection), CINAHL, PsycINFO, CNKI, WanFang and Vip. The search covered the period from 1 January 2014 to 30 September 2025. The search strategy used both medical subject headings and free-text terms, supplemented by the snowball method and grey literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>Qualitative studies exploring teamwork involving ORNs were included. Of 4839 initially retrieved records, 29 studies finally met the inclusion criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two researchers independently extracted data, including the author, year of publication, country, study design, study objective, interview location, number of participants, age, methods of data collection and analysis and duration of interviews. The key findings were synthesised into two overarching themes: facilitators (eg, professional skills, role awareness, team familiarity, patient-centred culture, effective leadership) of and barriers (eg, individualistic behaviour, hierarchical culture, insufficient resources, punitive management, environmental constraints) to teamwork between ORNs and other practitioners. A meta-synthesis was conducted to synthesise study results from different groups and countries. NVivo 15 was used for data management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 29 qualitative studies (published between 2014 and 2025) were included in this study. Key facilitators of teamwork included professional skills, role awareness, team familiarity, patient-centred culture and effective leadership. Major barriers encompassed individualistic behaviours, punitive management, hierarchical culture, environmental constraints and insufficient resources. These factors worked across individual, interpersonal and systemic levels to shape OR teamwork.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Optimising OR teamwork requires a multifaceted approach simultaneously addressing these facilitators and barriers. Interventions should simultaneously cultivate individual competencies (eg, skills, role awareness), foster positive team dynamics (eg, familiarity, psychological safety, inclusive leadership), and rectify systemic issues (eg, hierarchical culture, resource constraints, punitive management). In this way, teamwork between ORNs and other practitioners can be enhanced, thereby contributing to improved perioperative safety and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024506414.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Luo, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098386</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098386</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Facilitators of and barriers to teamwork between operating room nurses and other practitioners: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098386</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098386</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103070?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of equity in quality improvement for multiarterial grafting in females and patients with low socioeconomic status: retrospective analysis of a statewide collaborative database]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103070?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Quality collaboratives improve quality of care at the hospital and collaborative levels, but less is understood about how such efforts affect patient-level disparities. This study evaluated how a quality improvement (QI) effort (increasing multiarterial grafting during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)) translated into populations which historically receive lower-quality care (females and patients of low socioeconomic status).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All non-federal hospitals in the state of Michigan that perform cardiac surgery and participate in a statewide collaborative database (n=33).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients undergoing first-time, isolated CABG receiving at least two bypass grafts from 2011 to 2022 were identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary endpoints</st>
<p>Association of sex and socioeconomic status with multiarterial grafting was evaluated across the study period. The distressed community index (DCI), a socioeconomic ranking (0&mdash;not distressed, 100&mdash;severely distressed), was matched to the patient&rsquo;s zip code. Hierarchical regression modelling was performed to associate DCI and sex with multiarterial grafting, incorporating patient factors and hospital and surgeon effects. A sex-surgery year and DCI-surgery year interaction term was performed to assess the change in the rate of multiarterial grafting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 40 322 patients underwent CABG at 33 centres with a median age of 66 years and 24% were female. The rate of multiarterial grafting was 15%, although lower among females (10% vs 17%) and the highest (vs lowest) DCI quartile (14% vs 18%). After risk adjustment, females were less likely to receive multiarterial grafting (OR<SUB>adj</SUB> 0.51 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.58), p&lt;0.001). Patients living in zip codes with a higher DCI had lower adjusted odds of receiving multiarterial grafting (OR<SUB>adj</SUB> 0.35 per 10-point increase (95% CI 0.24 to 0.51), p&lt;0.001), a finding that was independent of study time (sex-year and DCI-year interaction terms p&gt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite a large overall increase in multiarterial grafting due to QI efforts, females and patients with low socioeconomic status had lower rates of multiarterial grafting. QI efforts should be evaluated both overall and among patients who historically receive lower quality care to improve quality and equity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wagner, C., Theurer, P. F., Clark, M., He, C., Braun, T., Azoury, F., Qandeel, H. G., Magouliotis, D. E., Martin, J., Pruitt, A., Topcu, A. C., Ailawadi, G., Likosky, D. S., Thompson, M. P., Pagani, F. D., Hawkins, R. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103070</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103070</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of equity in quality improvement for multiarterial grafting in females and patients with low socioeconomic status: retrospective analysis of a statewide collaborative database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103070</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103070</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk factors for skin rash among patients with cancer receiving epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Skin rash is the most common adverse effect in patients with cancer receiving epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs), which can impair quality of life and lead to treatment discontinuation. Numerous primary studies have explored factors that may predict the development of skin rash. However, the wide range of variables and substantial heterogeneity among these studies limit the availability of high-quality, synthesised evidence. A comprehensive scoping review is therefore warranted to systematically map and synthesise the risk factors for EGFRI-induced skin rash in patients with cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. An initial search strategy was developed and piloted in PubMed. The comprehensive search will include PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Ultimate, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), SinoMed, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and Wanfang Database. Grey literature sources, including ProQuest Dissertations &amp; Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, will also be searched. All searches were conducted from database inception to 30 January 2026, restricted to human studies published in English or Chinese. All original quantitative studies, including cohort, case&ndash;control and cross-sectional designs, will be eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for eligibility, extract relevant data and assess study quality. Any discrepancies will be resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. Results will be presented in tabular and/or graphical formats, accompanied by a descriptive summary of the risk factors for EGFRI-induced skin rash.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This scoping review will rely exclusively on the collection and analysis of published and/or publicly available sources; therefore, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentation at scientific conferences and via digital science communication platforms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, L., Zhai, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, T., Tan, J.-Y., Sun, D., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Zheng, W., Jiang, N., Zhou, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103333</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103333</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk factors for skin rash among patients with cancer receiving epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103333</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107282?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of a clinical pharmacist-led stewardship programme on antibiotic utilisation and clinical outcomes in thoracic surgery: a retrospective interrupted time-series study at a tertiary hospital in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107282?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to assess the impact of clinical pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship on antibiotic use and postoperative pulmonary infection in a surgical department.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective and cross-sectional.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary hospital in Wuhan, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 9157 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery (VATLS) were included (4949 and 4208 pre-implementation and post-implementation).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>An interrupted time-series design with segmented regression analysis was employed to evaluate changes in antibiotic use intensity (defined daily dose/100 bed-days), antibiotic spectrum coverage (scores/100 bed-days) and postoperative pulmonary infection rate before and after implementation of the stewardship programme. Between-group comparisons of antibiotic use rates and treatment duration were performed using <sup>2</sup> test, Fisher&rsquo;s exact test, t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Antibiotic use intensity (defined daily dose/100 bed-days), antibiotic spectrum coverage (scores/100 bed-days), postoperative pulmonary infection rates, the proportion and the duration of antibiotic use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Following implementation, antibiotic use intensity decreased immediately by 96.65 defined daily doses/100 bed-days (95% CI &ndash;122.56 to &ndash;70.74; p&lt;0.001). Antibiotic spectrum coverage (ASC) also showed an immediate reduction of 4.77 scores/100 bed-days (95% CI &ndash;6.12 to &ndash;3.42; p&lt;0.001), although a gradual upward trend in ASC was observed during the post-implementation period. No significant change was seen for postoperative pulmonary infection rates between the two periods. Prescribing patterns shifted towards narrower-spectrum agents: the proportion of first-generation cephalosporins increased from 17.6% to 45.5% (p&lt;0.001), while usage of fourth-generation cephalosporins (12.3% to 1.5%), &beta;-lactam/&beta;-lactamase inhibitors (63.9% to 12.6%), quinolones (57.4% to 27.4%), carbapenems (0.8% to 0.4%) and glycopeptides (8.2% to 3.1%) declined significantly (all p&lt;0.05). The median duration of antimicrobial therapy was shortened across most antibiotic classes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Clinical pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship can reduce the antibiotic use intensity among patients undergoing VATLS in thoracic surgery, decrease the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and shorten the duration of antibiotic therapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wu, G., Guo, F., He, Y., Lu, J., Liu, D., Yin, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107282</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107282</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of a clinical pharmacist-led stewardship programme on antibiotic utilisation and clinical outcomes in thoracic surgery: a retrospective interrupted time-series study at a tertiary hospital in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107282</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107282</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of presbyopia among social safety net beneficiaries with the cognitive, numeracy and dexterity skills required for smartphone use: a cross-sectional analysis of THRIFT RCT screening data from Kurigram, Bangladesh]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence of presbyopia and associated risk factors among Bangladeshi recipients of elderly social safety net payments who were not currently using mobile financial services (MFS) and demonstrated numeracy, dexterity and cognitive prerequisites for smartphone use during eligibility screening for the Transforming Households with Refraction and Innovative Financial Technology (THRIFT) trial. Accessing these payments requires use of online banking, as with a smartphone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis of trial eligibility screening data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-based screening conducted in two rural subdistricts in Kurigram District, Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Among 13 944 Old Age Allowance and Widows&rsquo; Allowance (WA) beneficiaries screened, 953 met trial eligibility criteria, including passing a smartphone readiness assessment and completing near vision examinations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Presbyopia, defined as binocular presenting near visual acuity of N6.3 or worse, correctable to at least N5 with near vision glasses and with distance vision of &ge;6/12 in both eyes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 953 participants (mean age 61.4&plusmn;7.2 years, 62.6% women), presbyopia prevalence was 62.6% (95% CI 59.5 to 65.7). Presbyopia was significantly positively associated with female gender (adjusted prevalence ratio (APR)=1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.41) and receiving WA (APR=1.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.38) in multivariable analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study highlights a substantial burden of uncorrected presbyopia among a prescreened, randomised control trial-eligible subgroup of social safety net beneficiaries in rural Bangladesh, who were not currently using MFS but demonstrated cognitive and functional capacity to use mobile phones, potentially hampering their ability to carry out online banking. Delivery of reading glasses may improve digital financial access and facilitate broader financial inclusion, a hypothesis currently being tested in the parent THRIFT trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05510687">NCT05510687</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aftab, I. B., Chakma, T., Pant, S., Sigwadhi, L. N., Shitol, S. A., Rahman, H. M. M., Alam, J., Haque, E., Chadalavada, H. P., Murtaza, F., Chan, V. F., Little, J.-A., Khanna, R. C., MacKenzie, G., Gudwin, E., Lohfeld, L., Clarke, M., Shonchoy, A., Congdon, N., Rabbani, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108327</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108327</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of presbyopia among social safety net beneficiaries with the cognitive, numeracy and dexterity skills required for smartphone use: a cross-sectional analysis of THRIFT RCT screening data from Kurigram, Bangladesh]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108327</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111113?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score for telephone triage of acute chest pain: a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study in out-of-hours primary care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111113?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess whether the Marburg Heart Score (MHS) and INTERCHEST score may improve telephone triage of chest pain by providing better diagnostic discrimination compared with the triage protocol from the Netherlands Triage Standard (NTS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective diagnostic accuracy study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Large regional out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) facility in Alkmaar, the Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1254 eligible patients contacted the OOH-PC facility (median age 56.0 years, 57.9% female) between December 2022 and May 2023. The study was completed and verbal informed consent obtained in 280 (22.3%) patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Triage assistants asked study questions in addition to the NTS protocol to complete the MHS and INTERCHEST score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Discrimination (C-statistics) and diagnostic test properties (eg, sensitivity/specificity) were used; the reference standard was the occurrence of a major event (ie, composite of all-cause mortality, and urgent cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within 6 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A major event occurred in 36 patients (12.9%), including 13 (4.6%) ACS cases. For predicting major events, the MHS and INTERCHEST scores showed C-statistics of 0.67 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.77) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.74), respectively, compared with 0.62 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.71) for the NTS protocol. For ACS, C-statistics were 0.62 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.79), 0.59 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.75), and 0.62 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.75) for MHS, INTERCHEST and NTS, respectively. Regarding test characteristics, the MHS and INTERCHEST score showed higher point estimates for specificity (27.9% and 26.6%) vs the NTS (19.7%), but at the expense of lower sensitivity (88.9% and 86.1% versus 97.2%) for major events. For ACS, a similar pattern was observed (specificity 26.2% and 25.5% vs 18.4; sensitivity 84.6% and 84.6% vs 100.0%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Simple clinical decision rules (MHS and INTERCHEST) have comparable, modest discriminative ability and diagnostic properties compared with the current protocol for telephone triage of acute chest pain in Dutch OOH-PC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Netherlands Trial Register (TRACE &ndash; NL-OMON20102).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manten, A., Melessen, I. M. B., Himmelreich, J. C. L., Moll van Charante, E. P., Harskamp, R. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111113</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111113</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score for telephone triage of acute chest pain: a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study in out-of-hours primary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111113</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113343?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Process evaluation of a basic life support educational intervention (FirstCPR cluster randomised study) delivered at community organisations in New South Wales, Australia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113343?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The FirstCPR cluster randomised trial delivered multimodal basic life support (BLS) learning opportunities to community organisations. An a priori process evaluation examined intervention implementation, including participation, reach, uptake and member engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study used a multimethod process evaluation. Data were collected via semistructured interviews, focus group discussions, participant surveys, study records, web analytics and in-field observations. These sources captured participation patterns and implementation measures (delivery, reach, uptake and engagement: opt-in to digital messages and attendance at training sessions), as well as reasons for refusals and withdrawals. Qualitative data were analysed thematically and organised using the <I>UK Medical Research Council process-evaluation framework</I>. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed separately and subsequently interpreted collectively to contextualise implementation patterns and identify barriers and enablers that influenced trial successes and failures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Intervention uptake and engagement varied significantly across organisations, with greater success observed in social and faith-based groups. Of the 82 intervention clusters, 78 (95%) received intervention materials; 74 (90%) engaged in at least one activity and 15 (18%) engaged in all activities. Participation was primarily driven by the organisation&rsquo;s leadership interest and support in providing BLS training to members, and by the time available to facilitate intervention activities. The presence of a dedicated liaison/champion emerged as the most critical enabler of member engagement and implementation. Feedback recommended concise, simple and culturally tailored modules, with practical components delivered in shorter, convenient sessions. Intervention delivery was affected by contextual challenges, including COVID-19 disruptions that limited in-field recruitment and group activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Process evaluation can strengthen community-based interventions by identifying mechanisms and contextual factors that shape implementation and engagement. Partnering with social and faith-based organisations may be an effective approach to disseminating educational programmes such as life-saving skills to lay communities. Minimising research burden and ensuring organisational leadership support may improve participation while brief, practical and culturally tailored training may enhance engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12621000367842.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munot, S., Bauman, A., Bray, J., Redfern, J., Angell, B., Kancijanic, D., Rock, Z., Semsarian, C., Jennings, G., Coggins, A., Denniss, A. R., Chow, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113343</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113343</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Process evaluation of a basic life support educational intervention (FirstCPR cluster randomised study) delivered at community organisations in New South Wales, Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113343</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113343</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114480?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of risk factors and development of a predictive nomogram for chronic postsurgical pain after hip arthroplasty: a study protocol in a Chinese tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114480?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after hip arthroplasty is a major complication that affects patients&rsquo; long-term quality of life. However, reliable tools for the individualised prediction of CPSP risk after hip arthroplasty are lacking. This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram model to predict CPSP risk in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective observational cohort study will consecutively recruit 300 patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty at the Department of Orthopaedics and Joints, Nanping First Hospital Affiliated with Fujian Medical University. The primary outcome is CPSP assessed at 3 months postoperatively (Visual Analogue Scale score &ge;4). Candidate predictor variables have been identified based on literature review and clinical expertise, and include demographics, comorbidities, preoperative pain, psychological status and surgical and perioperative management. The dataset will be randomly split into development and internal validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. We will employ Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression to select variables and will use multivariable logistic regression to build the final prediction model. Internal validation will be performed using bootstrap resampling (1000 repetitions). The model&rsquo;s discrimination, calibration and clinical utility will be assessed using the C-statistic (area under the curve), calibration plots and decision curve analysis, respectively. The final model will be presented as a nomogram.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanping First Hospital (Approval No: NPSY202412034). All participants will provide written informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed academic journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500107193; <A HREF="https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=282634">https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=282634</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ni, R., Gao, Z., Jiang, Z., Hao, X., Zhang, M., Lu, D., Wu, Z., Huang, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114480</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114480</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of risk factors and development of a predictive nomogram for chronic postsurgical pain after hip arthroplasty: a study protocol in a Chinese tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114480</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114480</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114632?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Post-progression treatment patterns in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated interstitial lung disease: insights from a US retrospective, observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114632?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) are at high risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD). We sought to gain insight into the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments being used by patients with SARD-associated ILD (SARD-ILD) following ILD progression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a retrospective, observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Optum Clinformatics Data Mart administrative medical and pharmacy claims database in the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients with SARD-ILD who had an incident ILD diagnosis and progression between January 2018 and March 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Treatment patterns and healthcare services utiliation were descriptively summarised for baseline and follow-up periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 6431 patients with SARD-ILD and evidence of ILD progression (mean age, 71.2 years; 75.3% female; 68.9% white). The mean (SD) time between the initial SARD-ILD diagnosis and the onset of ILD progression (index date) was 104 (201) days. On average, patients were followed for 936 (467) days.</p>
<p>Oral corticosteroids were the most common treatment post-progression (69.5%), followed by non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (non-biologic DMARDs) (41.6%), biologic DMARDs (15.5%) and immunomodulators (15.4%). Antifibrotics were received by 3.5% of patients. Supplemental oxygen was the most frequent non-pharmacological treatment (48.9%). For the baseline period, 53.0% and 42.1% of patients used inpatient and emergency department services, respectively. During the follow-up, 69.7% and 62.8%, respectively, used these services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The high use of corticosteroids and limited use of DMARDs and antifibrotics post-progression in this descriptive study implies a significant gap between current practice and optimal management of patients with SARD-ILD.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, J., Sadowski, K., Kharat, A., Chauffe, A., Kulkarni, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114632</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114632</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Post-progression treatment patterns in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated interstitial lung disease: insights from a US retrospective, observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114632</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114632</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115673?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A double-blind, crossover, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial where primary care providers and patients compare human-generated and AI-generated digital health messages: the AI-CARE study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115673?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Primary care is facing multiple crises, including an increase in health misinformation. Digital health messaging by primary care providers has been shown to reach a diverse patient population. With the uptake of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) usage in healthcare, there is an important opportunity to rapidly create messages that are tailored to different populations and conditions. However, thoroughly assessing artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content is essential, as GenAI raises concerns regarding its accuracy, understandability, actionability and bias perpetuation. We aim to investigate whether digital health messages created by GenAI are evaluated as non-inferior compared with those created by human experts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The AI-CARE (AI to Create Accessible and Reliable patient Education materials) study is a double-blind, crossover, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Data collection began on 30 May 2025, and is expected to be completed at the end of May 2026. Over 12 months, 192 messages on 48 topics will be written: half by primary care and public health experts and half by a GenAI tool (OpenAI&rsquo;s ChatGPT). Review Panels composed of 24 primary care providers and 24 patients will evaluate these messages using an Evaluation Grid developed to assess the messages&rsquo; quality of information, adaptation to the target audience, relevance and usefulness, and readiness to be shared with patients. Evaluations will be completed via online REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) surveys and the order in which the 192 messages appear will be randomised and will vary between individuals. Participants and analysts will be blinded to the generation source. The primary outcome will be the Clarity and Understandability score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Research Ethics Boards of the H&ocirc;pital Montfort (24-25-11-038) and the University of Ottawa (S-12-24-11153) formally approved this study in December 2024. Reported data will be grouped and anonymised for dissemination in peer-reviewed scientific journals and conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="NCT06997107">NCT06997107</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lemieux, A., Kutcher, S. A., Galani Tietcheu, B. R., Seitz, G., Trickovic, J., Archibald, D., Grosjean, S., Hogg, W., Johnston, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115673</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115673</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A double-blind, crossover, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial where primary care providers and patients compare human-generated and AI-generated digital health messages: the AI-CARE study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115673</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115673</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119342?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early-life infectious and nutritional exposures and cardiovascular risk in early adulthood in Uganda: protocol for a new round of data collection in the Entebbe Mother and Baby Study birth cohort at 21 years (EMaBS@21)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e119342?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-communicable diseases, particularly cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), have become major contributors to morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and are projected to surpass infectious diseases as the leading cause of death among adults by 2030. Although CVDs have traditionally been associated with older age and obesity, adverse cardiovascular phenotypes are increasingly being observed in younger and leaner individuals in SSA. This pattern suggests that pathways to CVD risk in SSA may differ from those described in high-income countries. Early-life infectious exposures, undernutrition and socio-demographic conditions common in many SSA settings have been proposed as potential risk factors. Still, empirical evidence linking these exposures to cardiovascular risk in early adulthood remains limited due to a scarcity of long-running birth cohorts in the region.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol describes a new round of data collection nested within the Entebbe Mother and Baby Study (EMaBS), a population-based Ugandan birth cohort established originally as a clinical trial (ISRCTN32849447) between 2003 and 2006 with prospective follow-up from pregnancy through adolescence. All participants currently under follow-up will be invited to participate at approximately 21 years of age. Primary outcomes are physiological determinants of CVD measured in early adulthood, including blood pressure, blood lipid levels, body mass index, body composition and markers of glucose metabolism. Secondary outcomes include behavioural CVD risk factors (diet, physical inactivity, alcohol use and tobacco use) and qualitative measures of CVD knowledge and risk perception. Key exposures of interest include prospectively collected early-life and childhood infectious exposures (malaria and helminth infections), markers of growth and undernutrition, micronutrient status, inflammatory markers, socio-demographic factors and selected genetic variants. Quantitative analyses will use multivariable regression and causal modelling approaches and will be complemented by qualitative interviews and focus group discussions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Uganda Virus Research Institute Research and Ethics Committee (UVRI REC Ref: GC/127/35), the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST Ref: MV625), and the London School of Hygiene &amp; Tropical Medicine Research Ethics Committee (LSHTM Ethics Ref: 8811). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before study activities. Study findings will be shared and discussed with participants and community stakeholders through established engagement platforms. Results will be disseminated to the scientific community through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, and data will be made available to other researchers via established data-sharing platforms. We will engage policymakers at the district, national and international levels to facilitate the translation of findings into policy-relevant outputs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sekitoleko, I., Komata, R., Ssali, I., Kyasanku, R., Nakyesige, R., Sewankambo, M., Akello, F., Twinamasiko, N., Namutebi, M., Tumusiime, J., Akantorana, C., Akurut, H., Balungi, P. A., Akello, M., Atkinson, S. H., Niwaha, A., Wajja, A., Kyegombe, N., Nyirenda, M., Elliott, A. M., Walusimbi, B., Webb, E. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T07:29:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119342</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-119342</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early-life infectious and nutritional exposures and cardiovascular risk in early adulthood in Uganda: protocol for a new round of data collection in the Entebbe Mother and Baby Study birth cohort at 21 years (EMaBS@21)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e119342</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e119342</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099888?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Daridorexant in children and adolescents with insomnia disorder: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099888?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Insomnia disorder imposes a significant burden on children and adolescents; however, treatment options are limited. This paper describes the first controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, in children and adolescents with or without comorbid neurodevelopmental disorders, allowing its evaluation in a broad paediatric population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding Phase 2 trial includes male and female participants aged &ge;10 to &lt;18 years meeting the diagnosis of insomnia disorder as per Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) or International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition (ICSD-3) criteria. The study population is stratified into three groups: those with a known diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); those without a diagnosis of ASD/ADHD but who meet the definition of &lsquo;subthreshold ASD&rsquo; or &lsquo;subthreshold ADHD&rsquo;; those with neither diagnosed ASD/ADHD nor &lsquo;subthreshold&rsquo; ASD/ADHD. Study participants are randomised 1:1:1:1 to daridorexant 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg or placebo for at least 14 days. The change from baseline to Day 1 in total sleep time, measured by polysomnography, is the primary endpoint used to characterise the dose-response relationship of daridorexant in paediatric subjects with insomnia disorder. The study also assesses the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, palatability and acceptability of daridorexant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the respective health authorities and institutional review boards/independent ethics committees for each participating site and country and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval has been obtained for each participating country/site. Regardless of the outcomes, the results will be published in an international peer-reviewed scientific journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05423717">NCT05423717</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coloma, P., Coury, D., Wernette, S., Beevers, V., Dubois, C., Di Marco, T., Dursun, O. T., Bruni, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099888</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099888</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Daridorexant in children and adolescents with insomnia disorder: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099888</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099888</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106039?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of maternal health-seeking behaviour on complete measles vaccination coverage in Bangladesh: evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106039?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to determine the prevalence and contributing factors of complete measles vaccination with key attention to maternal health-seeking behaviour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The study used secondary data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017&ndash;2018, which was a cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data extracted from the BDHS 2017&ndash;2018 dataset. It is the latest available nationally representative dataset containing measles vaccination data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The sample comprised 2651 children aged 15&ndash;59 months in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The study analysed participants&rsquo; sociodemographic characteristics, maternal health-seeking behaviour and measles vaccination coverage. Frequency distributions, <sup>2</sup> tests, and stepwise binary logistic regression analysis were performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of complete (first dose at 9 months and second dose at 15 months or later) measles vaccination coverage was 80% among Bangladeshi children. Complete measles vaccination coverage was significantly higher among babies of mothers who had completed at least an antenatal visit (AOR 1.71, p&lt;0.001), undergone an institutional delivery process (AOR 1.36, p=0.017), and completed at least one postnatal visit (AOR 1.27, p=0.050). In addition, maternal health-seeking factors, notably educated mothers (secondary educated: AOR 2.34, p&lt;0.001; higher secondary and above AOR 2.58, p&lt;0.001), had more vaccination coverage for their children. However, children living in urban areas had significantly lower vaccination coverage (AOR 0.68, p=0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study recommends strengthening the complete measles vaccination coverage in Bangladesh, which is still behind the target. Specific measures should be taken to increase antenatal care and postnatal care coverage and provide institutional delivery facilities. The study&rsquo;s findings would contribute to attaining the Sustainable Development Goals for children&rsquo;s health in Bangladesh by mitigating measles-related morbidity and mortality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haque, S. M. R., Islam, M. R., Tisha, S., Swarna, S. S., Baset, K. u., Bari, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106039</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106039</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of maternal health-seeking behaviour on complete measles vaccination coverage in Bangladesh: evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106039</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106039</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106230?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hypertension in women of reproductive age: a cross-sectional analysis of prevalence and risk factors across 21 low-income and middle-income countries using Demographic and Health Surveys (2013-2023)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106230?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Women of reproductive age (WRA) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionate burden of hypertension, with limited pooled analyses exploring its prevalence and associated risk factors. This study investigates hypertension prevalence and key determinants among WRA in 21 LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective, cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Nationally representative data were obtained from the Demographic and Health Survey conducted in 21 LMICs between 2013 and 2023. This research focused on female participants aged 15&ndash;49 who were selected for blood pressure monitoring, resulting in a weighted sample of 818 325 WRA (36 970 pregnant and 781 355 non-pregnant).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were the prevalence of hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure &ge;140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure &ge;90 mm Hg) and the identification of individual, household and community-level risk factors associated with the condition. Descriptive statistics of proportions between pregnant and non-pregnant women were assessed. Multilevel logistic regression identified individual, household and community factors affecting hypertension.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study found the prevalence of hypertension was 8.20% (95% CI 7.95% to 8.45%) among pregnant women and 10.52% (95% CI 10.42% to 10.62%) among non-pregnant women, with substantial regional disparities. C&ocirc;te d&rsquo;Ivoire and Haiti exhibited the highest prevalence (48.00% in pregnant women; 57.30% in non-pregnant women, respectively), while the Philippines reported the lowest (0.00% in pregnant women and 0.50% in non-pregnant women). Among pregnant versus non-pregnant women, risk factors included advanced age (35&ndash;49 years) (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.31, 95% CI 2.89 to 3.80 vs 3.69, 95% CI 3.60 to 3.77), low education levels (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.30 vs 1.33, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.35), not currently employed (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15 vs 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.09), higher body mass index (BMI) (aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.76 to 1.81; non-pregnant women), rural residence (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.24 vs 1.14, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.16) and limited healthcare access were linked to higher hypertension rates (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.13 vs 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The burden of hypertension among WRA is driven by advanced age, lower education, high BMI and rural residence. Policymakers should prioritise targeted interventions addressing key sociodemographic and geographic risk factors. Strengthening education, equitable healthcare access and community-based strategies is essential to reducing hypertension-related risks and associated maternal health complications among WRA in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andriani, H., Arsyi, M., Andhisa, C. S., Mohd Hairi, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106230</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106230</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hypertension in women of reproductive age: a cross-sectional analysis of prevalence and risk factors across 21 low-income and middle-income countries using Demographic and Health Surveys (2013-2023)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106230</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107604?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Occupational biomechanical risk factors for hip and knee arthroplasty incidence: a register-based cohort study in male construction workers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107604?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the association between exposure to occupational biomechanical factors and the incidence of surgically treated osteoarthritis (OA) treated with arthroplasty in the hip and knee among male construction workers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal register-based cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and setting</st>
<p>Male construction workers (n=291 062) who participated in a national Swedish occupational health examination programme between 1971 and 1993, delivered through multiple primary-level nationwide occupational health centres.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Hip and knee arthroplasties performed due to OA from 1987 to 2019 were identified through linkage with the Swedish National Patient Register. Data on age, smoking habits, body mass index, job title and self-reported biomechanical exposures were collected during the health examinations. Occupational biomechanical workload was assessed using eight factors from a job-exposure matrix. Poisson regression was applied to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) associated with each type of occupational biomechanical exposure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study included 10 336 cases of hip arthroplasties and 8926 cases of knee arthroplasties. All studied biomechanical risk factors were associated with an increased risk of knee OA requiring arthroplasty, especially for individuals exposed to static work in non-neutral lumbar postures (IRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.65) and those with a high frequency of kneeling (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.45). In contrast, only a few biomechanical factors were associated with an increased risk of hip OA requiring arthroplasty. Similar results were observed when alternative exposure measures, such as occupational group and self-reported exposure assessments, were employed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Occupational workload was associated with an increased risk of knee arthroplasty due to OA, whereas the association for hip arthroplasty remains unclear.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gustafsson, K., Wahlstro&#x0308;m, J., Stjernbrandt, A., Lewis, C., Mukka, S., Liv, P., Noor Baloch, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107604</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107604</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Occupational biomechanical risk factors for hip and knee arthroplasty incidence: a register-based cohort study in male construction workers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107604</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107604</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112648?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adverse childhood experiences and cognitive outcomes among older adults in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112648?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>While adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been consistently linked to poorer cognitive outcomes in later life, far less is known about ACEs&rsquo; contribution to dementia and cognitive ageing risk in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), despite their growing and disproportionate share of global Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease and related dementias (ADRD) burden. This study aimed to systematically review existing evidence on the association between individual ACEs and cognitive outcomes among adults aged 40 years and older in LMIC settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and narrative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data source</st>
<p>We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from the inception of each database to January 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Observational studies examining the association between individual ACEs and cognitive outcomes among adults aged 40 and older in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened each record, assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool and extracted data. Results were illustrated using descriptive forest plots and a narrative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our systematic review included 14 studies, primarily from upper-middle-income countries, that assessed the relationship between individual ACEs and cognitive impairment (n=4) and function (n=10). 10 studies reported significant associations between ACEs and poorer cognitive function and increased risk of cognitive impairment. No study assessed the association between ACEs and ADRD. Parental death, neglect and mental health issues in the family showed consistent associations with cognitive outcomes, whereas experiencing hunger and poor health in childhood showed inconsistent associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our review corroborated evidence from high-income countries that exposure to ACEs is associated with a long-term risk of poorer cognitive outcomes among older populations in LMICs. However, the available literature remains limited, with most studies originating from upper-middle-income countries, few examining cognitive impairment and none assessing ADRD. These findings underscore substantial gaps in knowledge and highlight the need for research across diverse LMIC settings to clarify the role of broader psychosocial and contextual childhood experiences in shaping cognitive ageing and dementia risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024501816.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ngwa, C. H., Abdulrahim, S., Nehme, R., Saad, M., Kabalan, M., Lteif, M. R., Yazbek, Y., Chaaya, M., Elbejjani, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112648</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112648</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adverse childhood experiences and cognitive outcomes among older adults in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112648</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112648</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113795?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a structured physical therapist-led intervention compared to usual care in people with longstanding hip and groin pain referred to orthopaedic care in Sweden: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the HIPSTER trial)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113795?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>People with longstanding hip and groin pain (LHGP) are often referred to orthopaedic care. Physical therapist-led interventions are recommended in consensus statements as the first line of treatment, but it is unknown if structured interventions are more effective than usual care. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured physical therapist-led treatment model (HIPSTER) compared with usual care on hip-related quality of life at 4 months for people with LHGP referred to orthopaedic care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a preregistered (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05853640) study protocol for a double-blinded two-armed pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Patients with LHGP (n=122), referred to the Department of Orthopaedics at a university hospital in Sweden, will be randomised into the HIPSTER model or usual care. The HIPSTER model is a 16-week structured, individualised progressive treatment using exercise therapy and patient education. Usual care consists of a recommendation to contact a physical therapist in primary care. Both groups will undergo standard examinations and a surgical consultation at the Department of Orthopaedics. The primary outcome will be the mean group change in the International Hip Outcome Tool from baseline to 4 months, according to intention-to-treat principles. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes (such as perceived improvement, psychological factors and physical activity), physical impairment tests and radiographic measures. Additional time points will be 1, 2 and 5 years after baseline. Subgroups of patients will complete semistructured interviews and report additional data on psychosocial variables to provide more information on patient experience as well as determinants of adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Swedish Ethical Review Authority approved this study (Dnr 202205023&ndash;01). The results of this study will be published, regardless of results, in scientific journals and as plain language summaries for participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05853640">NCT05853640</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Estberger, A., Kemp, J., Thorborg, K., Kostogiannis, I., Palsson, A., Ageberg, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113795</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113795</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a structured physical therapist-led intervention compared to usual care in people with longstanding hip and groin pain referred to orthopaedic care in Sweden: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the HIPSTER trial)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113795</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113795</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114240?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a study protocol for a double-blind, prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114240?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Perioperative anxiety, characterised by tension, worry or fear from preoperative to postoperative phases, is prevalent among patients with colorectal tumour. It exacerbates intraoperative haemodynamic instability, postoperative pain and delirium and prolongs hospital stay, underscoring the need for effective management. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (TaVNS) represents a promising non-invasive intervention for anxiety alleviation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of TaVNS in reducing perioperative anxiety in patients with colorectal tumour, thereby providing evidence for its clinical application.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This randomised, prospective, double-blind, single-centre controlled trial will enrol 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal tumours. These patients will be randomly assigned to either the TaVNS group (n=60) or the control group (n=60). Both groups will receive corresponding stimulation for half an hour on the day before surgery and after extubation postoperatively. For the primary outcome measure, differences in anxiety scores will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) on postoperative days 1&ndash;3 and 3 months postoperatively in patients with laparoscopic colorectal tumours. For the secondary outcome measures, the incidence of postoperative delirium, pain scores, Richards&ndash;Campbell sleep questionnaire scores and the occurrence of various postoperative adverse reactions will be compared.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received approval from the Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital on 28 September 2025 (Approval number KY-2025-149). The research findings will be published in international peer-reviewed academic journals and presented at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500112808.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, Y., Sang, S., Yuan, M., Zhu, X., Wu, M., Halisa, P., Gu, L., Zhang, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114240</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114240</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a study protocol for a double-blind, prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114240</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114924?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing self-management responses to educational interventions in at-risk diabetes population: a cluster-based longitudinal analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114924?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the effect of three educational interventions on self-management behaviours among individuals at risk of diabetes in Burkina Faso, Comoros and Mali, using cluster analysis to identify distinct respondent profiles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Single-arm before&ndash;after longitudinal study with 6-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community screening initiatives and antenatal clinics in Burkina Faso, Comoros and Mali.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>540 adults at risk of diabetes (body mass index &ge;25 kg/m&sup2; and/or family history of diabetes and/or impaired fasting glucose &ge;1.10 g/L; mean age 38.2 years, 69% female) recruited through community screening initiatives and antenatal clinics in Burkina Faso, Comoros and Mali.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Three educational interventions: (1) social media video broadcasting, (2) peer educator outreach and (3) gestational diabetes education at antenatal clinics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Changes in domain-specific Health Education Impact Questionnaire scores over 6 months assessed using Cohen&rsquo;s <I>d</I> effect sizes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 540 initial participants, 528 responded to the follow-up survey 6 months later. Cluster analysis revealed two distinct self-management profiles: cluster 1 showed significant improvement in only two domains, self-monitoring (d=0.35, p=0.006) and skill acquisition (d=0.30, p=0.020), indicating limited but focused gains. In contrast, cluster 2 suggested significant progress in seven out of eight domains, including large gains in positive engagement in life (d=0.74, p&lt;0.001) and health-directed activity (d=0.61, p&lt;0.001). Emotional distress decreased significantly in cluster 2 (d=-0.27, p=0.009), underscoring its greater responsiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Distinct self-management profiles among diabetes-risk populations revealed critical heterogeneity that demands tailored, context-specific public health strategies to effectively address diverse needs and optimise prevention efforts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Relwende, N., Nguemeni, M., Patricia, K., Ben Ali, R. A., Besancon, S., Moury, P. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114924</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114924</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing self-management responses to educational interventions in at-risk diabetes population: a cluster-based longitudinal analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114924</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114924</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115614?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PROCESS: a multimethods protocol to develop principles to operationalise community engagement, equity and sustainability in South Asian Health Research in Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115614?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>While health research about persons of South Asian ancestry has been conducted for decades in Canada, it often uses pathologising approaches that fail to consider historical, social and political factors shaping health disparities. Further, this research rarely engages South Asian communities in meaningful ways, reinforcing feelings of disconnect and longstanding mistrust. Greater collaboration and transparency are needed to build trust and generate credible findings. The aims of this research protocol are to (1) examine how community engagement has been implemented in health research involving South Asian populations, (2) explore the experiences of both South Asian community members and academics involved in community-engaged research and (3) develop a framework guiding health research with and for South Asian communities in Canada, titled PRinciples to Operationalize Community Engagement, Equity, and Sustainability in South Asian Health Research in Canada (PROCESS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This ongoing codesigned concurrent multimethods study is being conducted with community partners across Canadian provinces. First, the scoping review is examining how community engagement has been operationalised in health research involving South Asian populations in Canada. We are performing a search in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO databases for articles published between 2003 and 2024 referring to the concept of community engagement in South Asian health research. Two reviewers are independently completing abstract and full-text reviews based on preselected eligibility criteria. Data are being extracted from peer-reviewed studies using a data extraction framework. Findings will be aggregated and synthesised using descriptive content analyses. Second, a qualitative descriptive study is being conducted to explore the experiences of diverse stakeholders, including academics and community partners who are partaking in academic health research focused on South Asians. Semistructured interviews are being analysed using an inductive thematic content analysis. Results from the scoping review and qualitative interviews will be triangulated to detect emerging themes and patterns, which will enable the identification of principles to be incorporated within a draft of the PROCESS framework. In the final phase, we will use a modified Delphi process to iteratively codevelop the PROCESS framework with community partners and researchers across Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Institutional Review Board at McGill University approved the study&rsquo;s protocol (24-05-080). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented in academic and community forums. Results will also be shared with diverse audiences across Canada through multiple formats, including articles, conferences, infographics and social media, with the aim of raising awareness and promoting the adoption of research principles and practices for engaging South Asian communities in health research. This research received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant #507768).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Banerjee, A. T., Ismail, I., Sarwar, A., Parvez, M., Desai, P., Arora, M., Jayaprakash, T., Kalra, B., Dulai, J., Khan, B., Chiu, M., Rukh-E-Qamar, H., Sabharwal, S., Kaur, A., Lal, A., Khan, M., Hassen, N., Jassal, J., Dasgupta, K., Hafeez, H., Arneja, J., Li, P., Mukhopadhyay, B., Wanigaratne, S., Akter, N., Thandi, G., Ferry, R., Shah, N.-U.-H., Ganeshwaran, A., Shan, N., Shirazi, M., Anand, P., Sahota, K., Suleman, S., Wahi, G., Pinto, A. D., Hasan, S., Mucina, M., Krishnamoorthy, R., Quaiattini, A., Veenstra, G., Agarwal, G., Malhotra, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115614</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115614</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PROCESS: a multimethods protocol to develop principles to operationalise community engagement, equity and sustainability in South Asian Health Research in Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115614</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115614</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117063?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[LED red light for atrophy and microcirculation in pathologic myopia (RAMP): study design and protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e117063?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pathologic myopia (PM) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, yet effective therapeutic interventions remain limited. Although repeated low-level red light (RLRL) therapy has demonstrated significant efficacy in controlling myopia progression among children, its application in patients with PM remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the regulatory effects of RLRL on choroidal vascular density and thickness in patients with PM and verify its safety and efficacy in delaying the progression of fundus atrophic lesions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, randomised, controlled trial enrolling 158 patients with PM aged 18&ndash;55 years. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive light-emitting diode&ndash;based RLRL therapy (wavelength, 660 nm; power density, 65 mW/cm&sup2;) administered two times daily for 3 min per session, 5 days per week, over a 12-month period. The control group will receive a sham treatment (power density, 5 mW/cm&sup2;) following an identical schedule. The primary outcome measure is the change in choroidal vascular density and choroidal vessel volume index at 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Centre (EC-20250506-04). This study will be conducted in adherence to the approved protocol, Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The study results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at both local and international congresses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07312214">NCT07312214</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, J., Yu, J., Wang, X., Sun, T., Zou, Y.-l., Zou, H., Xu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T05:52:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117063</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117063</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[LED red light for atrophy and microcirculation in pathologic myopia (RAMP): study design and protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117063</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117063</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099965?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Going the distance: a cross-sectional geospatial analysis quantifying province-wide inequities in travel-based access, and fragility of access to French-language primary care provided by family physicians in Ontario, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099965?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Language-concordant care, or healthcare in one&rsquo;s preferred language, is important both for health equity and for improving health outcomes. Linguistic minorities, like Francophones in Ontario, Canada, are at risk of poorer clinical outcomes if they receive non-language-concordant primary care. However, common ratio-based access measures can provide misleading views of minorities&rsquo; actual access levels. This cross-sectional geospatial study demonstrates a new way to measure primary care access using average travel time to the nearest five English- and French-speaking family physicians. We also introduce the concept of primary care access fragility, where a region&rsquo;s primary care access may depend on one or a few local family physicians. Our research question is: are there differences in travel burden and access fragility for census subdivisions (CSDs) across language (English/French), rurality (urban/rural) and region (north/south) in the province of Ontario, Canada?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a cross-sectional geospatial analysis to estimate English-language and French-language primary care travel burdens and access fragility in Ontario, Canada. We used population and boundary data from Statistics Canada&rsquo;s 2021 census, road-network data from OpenStreetMaps, and family physician practice locations and language abilities from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. We measured travel burden using Valhalla, an open-source road-network analysis platform.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>We conducted our analysis for Ontario, Canada&rsquo;s 577 CSDs, which correspond roughly to municipalities and with populations ranging from 5 inhabitants in Rainy Lake 17B to a high of 2 794 356 in Toronto.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Using public data from January 2026, we identified 15 762 family physicians practising in Ontario, of whom 11.0% reported speaking French. Patient data were obtained from the most recent 2021 census.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Our first primary outcome measures were CSD-level mean travel time to the nearest five English-speaking family physicians, and CSD-level mean travel time to the nearest five French-speaking family physicians, which we compared to explore regional inequities in travel burden. Our secondary outcome measures were based on a novel notion of the travel burden component of &lsquo;primary care access fragility&rsquo;. This metric indicates how dependent a region&rsquo;s access is on a small number of local physicians and is defined as the difference between the CSD-level mean travel time to the nearest one physician and to the nearest five physicians. As the difference in travel times grows, so too does access fragility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Median differences in French-language and English-language travel burdens were strongly significant across rurality, regions and overall (median difference 13.4 min, p&lt;0.001, IQR 4.9&ndash;29.3 min), as was primary care access fragility (median difference 5.2 min, p&lt;0.001, IQR 0.8&ndash;18.4), with larger travel burdens and fragilities in northern and rural communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Compared with the general public, Ontario&rsquo;s French-speakers face higher travel burdens to language-concordant family physicians and higher access fragility, especially in rural and northern regions. Our results are of interest to policymakers and health-system planners, and our methods are applicable to other populations and regions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belanger, C., Timony, P. E., Belizaire, A., Desilets, A., Fitzsimon, J. P., Gauthier, A. P., Godfrey, L., Karunananthan, S., Kehoe MacLeod, K., Muray, M.-N., Peixoto, C., Bjerre, L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T06:57:55-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099965</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099965</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Going the distance: a cross-sectional geospatial analysis quantifying province-wide inequities in travel-based access, and fragility of access to French-language primary care provided by family physicians in Ontario, Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099965</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099965</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106337?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and acceptability of a patient decision aid for people with degenerative cervical myelopathy: an international mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106337?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop and user-test a patient decision aid for people diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy and who are considering surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Mixed-methods study describing the development of a patient decision aid.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A draft decision aid was developed by a multidisciplinary steering group (including study authors with degenerative cervical myelopathy, health professionals and researchers) informed by the best available evidence, authorship consensus and existing patient decision aids.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patient-participants and health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy were recruited through social media and the steering group&rsquo;s research and practice network. Quantitative questionnaires were used to gather baseline data, descriptive feedback, refine the decision aid and assess its acceptability. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted online to gather feedback on the decision aid and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We conducted 32 interviews: 19 patient-participants and 13 health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy (neurosurgeons, neurologists, physiotherapists, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, rehabilitation and pain specialists and consultant occupational physicians and chiropractors). Participants were from 10 countries (Australia, Canada, Cyprus, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and USA). Most participants rated the decision aid&rsquo;s acceptability as good-to-excellent and agreed with most aspects of the decision aid (eg, defining degenerative cervical myelopathy, management recommendations, potential benefits and harms, questions to consider asking a health professional).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our patient decision aid was rated as an acceptable tool by both health professional-participants who treat degenerative cervical myelopathy and patient-participants with lived experience of degenerative cervical myelopathy. This decision aid can be used by clinicians and people with degenerative cervical myelopathy to help with shared decision making following a diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy. A study testing the potential benefits of this decision aid in a clinical setting is recommended.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gamble, A. R., Anderson, D. B., McKay, M. J., Davies, B., Macpherson, S., Van Gelder, J., Hoffmann, T., McCaffery, K., Stevens, S. X., Ammendolia, C., Chauhan, R. V., Zipser, C. M., Boerger, T. F., Tetreault, L. A., Fehlings, M. G., Dustan, E., Nugent, C., Holmgren, H., Demetriades, A. K., Lantz, J. M., Dhillon, R., Maher, C. G., Zadro, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T06:57:55-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106337</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106337</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and acceptability of a patient decision aid for people with degenerative cervical myelopathy: an international mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106337</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106337</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108273?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Synthetic data-augmented machine learning for 30-day readmission prediction in patients with chronic conditions: a retrospective real-world study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108273?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop and evaluate an explainable machine learning framework enhanced with synthetic data generation to predict unplanned 30-day hospital readmissions among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to identify key clinical and social predictors of readmission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data incorporating both structured variables and information extracted from unstructured clinical notes. Synthetic data were generated using advanced resampling and deep learning-based techniques to address outcome imbalance and improve model training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Intensive care unit and general ward admissions at a single tertiary academic medical centre included in the MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV) database.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult patients (&ge;18 years) were admitted with a primary diagnosis of COPD (n=14 050), HF (n=7097) or T2DM (n=12 735) between 2008 and 2019, with complete 30-day follow-up and no in-hospital mortality during the index admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was unplanned all-cause hospital readmission within 30-days of discharge. Predictors were drawn from six domains, including demographics, comorbidities, clinical acuity, therapies, behavioural factors and care continuity. Predictive performance was evaluated using multiple machine learning methods and fivefold cross-validation, with model interpretability assessed using established goal and local explanation approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Ensemble-based machine learning models demonstrated the strongest predictive performance across all three disease cohorts. Key predictors of readmission included higher illness severity, greater comorbidity burden, medication non-adherence, gaps in preventive care and limited social support. Models incorporating synthetic data augmentation showed improved discrimination compared with models trained on original data alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>An explainable synthetic-data driven framework incorporating clinical, behavioural and social data can support prediction of 30-day readmissions among patients with common chronic conditions using routinely available electronic health record data.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brothers, T., Adhikari, K., Ramazani, M., Imtiaz, A., Al-Mamun, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T06:57:55-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108273</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108273</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Synthetic data-augmented machine learning for 30-day readmission prediction in patients with chronic conditions: a retrospective real-world study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108273</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108362?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multidimensional effects of virtual reality on motor dysfunction in patients who had a stroke: study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e108362?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Poststroke motor dysfunction places a heavy burden on individuals and society. Virtual reality (VR) offers enhanced motor skill transfer and active rehabilitation by overcoming the scenario-specific constraints of conventional therapies. Validating the efficacy of VR rehabilitation could lead to scalable and cost-effective solutions, potentially enabling home-based rehabilitation. However, the widespread clinical application remains constrained by the lack of rehabilitation-specific VR and multidimensional quantitative assessments. The aim of this study was to investigate the multidimensional effects and neural mechanisms of VR rehabilitation in poststroke motor recovery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial protocol designed to evaluate the effects of multisensory VR training on motor dysfunction in patients who had a stroke using multidimensional assessments. The trial consists of a baseline assessment, a 4-week intervention period and an endpoint assessment. A total of 40 patients who had a stroke will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either a VR combined with treadmill group or a treadmill-only group. The primary outcome measure is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity score, while secondary outcomes include three-dimensional gait analysis, the Berg Balance Scale score, the activities of daily living score and functional near-infrared spectroscopy results. Safety will be evaluated by monitoring the incidence of adverse events. This study aims to determine whether VR rehabilitation offers superior efficacy in improving motor function in patients who had a stroke by using a multidimensional assessment approach, including neural coupling function, muscle movement mechanics and clinical performance. The findings will provide robust, high-quality evidence to support the broader application of VR in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics, registration and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (2022&ndash;155). This study protocol was registered with the clinicaltrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT06275516">NCT06275516</A>). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal or presented at a conference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06275516">NCT06275516</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, Z., Lu, Q., Chen, D., Tang, L., Ran, T., Yang, L., Bai, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T06:57:55-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108362</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108362</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multidimensional effects of virtual reality on motor dysfunction in patients who had a stroke: study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108362</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108362</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111001?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Megestrol acetate versus dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111001?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Oxaliplatin is widely used in the treatment of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. However, oxaliplatin-induced nausea and vomiting often complicate treatment and negatively affect patients&rsquo; quality of life. The current standard antiemetic regimen&mdash;dexamethasone (DEX) plus palonosetron&mdash;offers only limited efficacy, benefiting approximately 70% of patients, and is associated with steroid-related adverse effects, including insomnia and gastrointestinal bleeding. Consequently, there is a clear clinical need for effective DEX-free antiemetic regimens. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of megestrol acetate versus DEX in preventing oxaliplatin-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>This is an investigator-led, multicentre, randomised-controlled, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority trial. Chemotherapy-nai&#x0308;ve patients scheduled to receive oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy are randomly (1:1) assigned to receive either megestrol acetate (megestrol acetate group) or DEX (DEX group) in combination with palonosetron. The primary endpoint is the complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue therapy) rate during the first 120 hours following the initiation of chemotherapy (0&ndash;120 hours). Secondary endpoints include the following indicators: CR rate in acute period (0&ndash;24 hours), CR rate in delayed period (24&ndash;120 hours), time to treatment failure, frequency of salvage medication use, nausea, anorexia, adverse events and quality of life.</p>
<p>The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of megestrol acetate compared with DEX for prevention of oxaliplatin-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. If proven effective, the results might inform future antiemetic strategies in the long term to (1) provide a novel DEX-free antiemetic treatment for prevention of moderate-emetogenic chemotherapy, (2) reduce DEX-related adverse effects and improve quality of life in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer and (3) support the potential incorporation of megestrol acetate into standard antiemetic medications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Certified Review Board of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Ethics Approval No 1116/2023). The results of this study will be disseminated via presentations at national and international scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2300075943.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luo, H., Hu, Q., Zeng, L., Huang, Q., Luo, Y., Li, T., Chen, P., Yi, C., Gou, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T06:57:55-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111001</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111001</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Megestrol acetate versus dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111001</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111001</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111713?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interventions for improving home food environments and household food security in adult populations residing in low-income settings: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111713?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Overweight and obesity are a growing global public health problem. Eating behaviours of adults and children are largely influenced by the home food environment (HFE). The lack of access to nutritious food in homes contributes to unhealthy dietary habits and, consequently, overweight and obesity among adults and children, as well as chronic diseases associated with poor diets. The present systematic review aims to identify existing HFE and household food security interventions and to determine the effects of these interventions in improving the availability of healthy food in the home, household access to food, diet quality and nutritional status of adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis protocols guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be searched for relevant articles using keywords and MeSH terms. Risk of bias will be assessed using the adapted Cochrane effective practice and organisation of Care risk of bias tool for studies with a separate control group and Risk of Bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. The overall strength of the evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Two reviewers will independently screen the identified records and assess the eligible full texts for inclusion. Any discrepancies will be resolved through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. Where sufficient homogeneous data are available, subgroup analysis will be conducted to explore heterogeneity. A thematic synthesis will be performed for qualitative studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has a systematic review and meta-analysis design, which will assess published data and does not require ethical approval. Findings of the systematic review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251030896.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madlala, S. S., Mabhida, S. E., Hill, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T06:57:55-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111713</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111713</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interventions for improving home food environments and household food security in adult populations residing in low-income settings: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111713</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111713</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112066?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alarm fatigue among critical care unit and emergency room nurses: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Iran]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112066?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the level of alarm fatigue among intensive care unit (ICU), cardiac care unit (CCU) and emergency room (ER) nurses, identify associated demographic and occupational factors, determine the most frequent sources of alarms and evaluate nurses&rsquo; psychological reactions to alarms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional, descriptive&ndash;analytical study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>ICUs, CCUs and ERs of six public teaching hospitals affiliated with Tehran and Kashan Universities of Medical Sciences in Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Using a multistage stratified random sampling method, 285 nurses were approached, of whom 260 completed and returned the questionnaires (response rate: 91%). Participants were registered nurses with at least a bachelor&rsquo;s degree or higher and 3 months of experience in ICUs, CCUs or ERs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the level of alarm fatigue measured using the validated Nurses&rsquo; Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with alarm fatigue and nurses&rsquo; reported psychological responses to frequent alarms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean score of alarm fatigue was 26.4&plusmn;7.9, indicating a moderate level. After adjusting for confounders and hospital-level clustering using multivariable mixed-effects regression, higher monthly income was significantly associated with lower alarm fatigue (&beta;=&ndash;0.15, p=0.03), and nurses working rotational shifts reported significantly higher fatigue compared with those with fixed shifts (&beta;=0.18, p=0.02). Other demographic and occupational factors were not significant. Reported psychological reactions to alarms included indifference (14%), irritability (18%) and anxiety/stress (15%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ICU, CCU and ER nurses experience a moderate level of alarm fatigue, with income and shift type as independent associated factors. The association between income and alarm fatigue may reflect the role of financial stress as an additional job demand that compounds the burden of frequent alarms, particularly in contexts where low base salaries lead nurses to rely on overtime and multiple shifts. These findings underscore the need for targeted managerial and educational interventions, including shift schedule optimisation and attention to workload-related stressors, alongside alarm prioritisation strategies. Due to the cross-sectional design, causal inferences cannot be drawn.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abbaszadeh, S. M., Poursaadat, N., Sadeghian, A., Karimi, N., Zarei, R., Dehghan Nayeri, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T06:57:55-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112066</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112066</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alarm fatigue among critical care unit and emergency room nurses: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Iran]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112066</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112066</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107440?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integration of PrEP dispensing with HIV self-testing among heterosexual men in Sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107440?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) continues to be the hub of the global HIV/AIDS pandemic, globally. Despite several attempts to meet their HIV prevention needs, men continue to have high rates of HIV infection. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective treatment that, when taken as prescribed, can be very efficient in preventing and reducing the risk of HIV acquisition. HIV self-testing (HIVST) has been demonstrated to be acceptable among men in SSA. As such, this review aims to explore the existing literature on the integration of PrEP dispensing with HIVST among men in SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We will systematically search bibliometric databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, Sociological Abstracts, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses global. Our review will be guided by the Arskey and O&rsquo;Malley framework and Levac <I>et al.</I> The review results will be reported using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: extension for scoping reviews guidelines. To assess the methodological quality of the included articles, the mixed methods appraisal tool version 2018 will be used. We will use NVivo software (V.11) to synthesise data from the included studies using a thematic approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required, as this review uses publicly available data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and engagement with key stakeholders in HIV prevention and treatment across SSA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hlongwa, M., Tsai, A. C., Choko, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T17:01:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107440</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107440</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integration of PrEP dispensing with HIV self-testing among heterosexual men in Sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107440</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107440</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e094809?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e094809?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Early screening of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is critical for early diagnosis and management. The disease was renamed and its diagnostic criteria revised as metabolic-associated FLD (MAFLD) in 2020 and further updated to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in 2023. This study evaluated the predictive performance and clinical feasibility of non-invasive diagnostic indicators across the NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD diagnostic criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Health Management Centre in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 5810 participants aged &ge;18 years were enrolled. Individuals with missing laboratory data, imaging results or self-reported information were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Disease-specific indicators included Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Hepatic Steatosis Index and Zhejiang University index (ZJU). Non-disease-specific indicators included lipid accumulation product (LAP), Visceral Adiposity Index and the Triglyceride and Glucose Index. Subgroup analysis was performed by gender and Body Mass Index (BMI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all six non-invasive indicators exceeded 0.7. FLI showed the optimal predictive performance across the three criteria (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.802, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.847 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.811), with comparable performance observed for ZJU (0.797, 0.838 and 0.809, respectively). Pairwise z-tests demonstrated a significant difference between FLI and ZJU for MAFLD (p&lt;0.05), but not for NAFLD or MASLD (all p&gt;0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed that ZJU performed better in males (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.790, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.839 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.803), while FLI was superior in females (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.832, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.838 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.838) and in participants who were overweight (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.709, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.765 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.709). LAP exhibited the highest predictive efficacy in the normal BMI subgroup (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.758, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.804 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.796).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>FLI exhibited the highest predictive efficacy across all diagnostic criteria, and ZJU showed comparable performance. Considering diagnostic accuracy and clinical practicality, ZJU is recommended as a favourable, non-invasive tool for population-based screening in the Chinese population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, X.-Y., Zou, H.-H., Huang, X., Guo, M.-J., Yu, R.-L., Liu, X.-L., Peng, T., Yang, X., Qin, C.-X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094809</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-094809</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e094809</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e094809</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e097686?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trends and factors associated with previous induced abortions among young women in Foshan, China: insights from a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e097686?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to explore the history of prior abortions and the factors influencing them among young women seeking abortion services in Foshan, Guangdong, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of young women seeking abortion care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Gynaecological outpatient clinics at the Department of Gynaecology, Foshan Women and Children Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China, between 2013 and 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 7361 young women aged 12&ndash;25 years seeking abortion services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measures</st>
<p>Data on abortion history, sociodemographic factors, contraceptive use and postabortion contraceptive choices were collected and analysed, with special emphasis on the incidence of repeat abortions and the factors associated with them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 7361 participants, 34.2% reported at least one previous abortion, underscoring a notable public health concern. The mean age of the participants was 22.30 years (SD=2.13). Women with a history of abortion were significantly older than those without (22.57 vs 22.08 years, p&lt;0.001). Logistic regression analyses suggested higher, but not statistically significant, odds of prior abortion among women aged 20&ndash;25 years compared with those aged 12&ndash;19 years (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.63, p=0.151). There was no significant difference in the odds of prior abortion between urban and rural residents (rural vs urban: aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.32, p=0.732), and single or divorced women had higher odds of reporting a prior abortion than married women (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.73, p=0.003). Importantly, while 13.92% of women reported using no contraceptive method at the time of conception, postabortion counselling reduced non-acceptance to only 3.65%, demonstrating the effectiveness of intervention but highlighting remaining gaps in prepregnancy contraceptive access. Women with a prior abortion history demonstrated higher postabortion contraceptive acceptance (80.30% vs 77.25%, p&lt;0.01) and increased uptake of long-acting reversible contraception, particularly intrauterine devices and systems (18.96% vs 10.76%, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study underscores the need for targeted interventions to address the multifaceted factors leading to repeat abortions among young women in China. The results offer valuable insights for improving reproductive health outcomes in this vulnerable population and highlight the importance of expanding access to contraceptive education and services in China.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ou, Y., Chokkakula, S., Chong, S., Wang, H., Liu, S., Si, A. I.-C., Pathakumari, B., Lyu, J., Yin, C., Ye, X., Huang, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097686</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097686</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trends and factors associated with previous induced abortions among young women in Foshan, China: insights from a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097686</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097686</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103609?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing dentists choice of restorative materials for occlusal cavities: a cross-sectional study from Palestine]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103609?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the factors influencing dentists&rsquo; choice of restorative materials for posterior restorations, with a particular emphasis on the perceived influence of social media on patient preferences among general dental practitioners in Palestine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional web-based survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants/Setting</st>
<p>A total of 550 general dentists practising in Palestine were invited between May and December 2023 through convenience and snowball sampling via social media platforms; 390 responded, and 350 complete responses were included in the final analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>No specific intervention was applied; this was an observational, questionnaire-based study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Dentists&rsquo; selection of restorative materials (composite, amalgam or high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC)) for posterior restorations in relation to tooth type, patient age, oral hygiene, moisture control, financial status and social media influence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Statistical analysis was performed</st>
<p>Descriptive statistics, &sup2; tests and multinomial logistic regression were used to examine associations and control for potential confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Material selection varied significantly by tooth type (p&lt;0.001), patient age (p&lt;0.001), oral hygiene (p&lt;0.001) and financial status (p&lt;0.001). In the multivariable analysis, financial influence remained the only significant predictor of material choice, whereas gender, clinical experience, postgraduate training and perceived social media influence were not independent determinants. Composite resin was preferred for premolars and aesthetically driven cases, whereas amalgam was favoured for molars and for patients with poor hygiene or inadequate moisture control. HVGICs were selected for mainly children (60%) and elderly patients (39%). Most dentists perceived that social media strongly influenced their patients&rsquo; preferences (p&lt;0.0001), with 97% of dentists reporting believing that their patients&rsquo; preferences were due to social media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patient-related factors were the main determinants of material selection, whereas practitioner demographics played a minimal role. HVGICs are preferred for paediatric and elderly patients because of their suitability for age-specific clinical needs. The influence of social media, assessed in this study as dentists&rsquo; <I>perceptions</I> rather than direct measures of patient behaviour, underscores its growing role in shaping dentists&rsquo; impressions of patient expectations and highlights the importance of evidence-based guidance and public education to support patient-centred, clinically appropriate restorative decisions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arandi, N. Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103609</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103609</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing dentists choice of restorative materials for occlusal cavities: a cross-sectional study from Palestine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103609</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103609</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106135?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Retinal vascular phenotyping for early detection of coronary artery disease: quantitative assessment and diagnostic modelling]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106135?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the association between quantitative retinal vascular parameters and coronary artery disease (CAD) and to evaluate the efficacy of a retinal phenotype-based diagnostic model as a non-invasive tool for early CAD screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A single-centre study conducted at the Cardiovascular Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, China, between January and October 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>417 patients with suspected angina undergoing their first coronary angiography (CAG) were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were age &gt;18 years and high-quality fundus photography within 24 hours pre-CAG. Major exclusions were prior coronary interventions, severe systemic/valvular heart diseases and ocular conditions impairing retinal vascular visualisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the association between quantitative retinal vascular parameters and the presence of CAD (defined as &ge;50% stenosis). Secondary outcomes included the diagnostic performance area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of three predictive models: one based on quantitative retinal vascular parameters alone, one based on traditional risk factors and a combined model integrating both retinal and clinical variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study enrolled 417 patients undergoing initial CAG. Compared with non-CAD controls (n=190), patients with CAD (n=227) had higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes, along with elevated levels of fasting blood glucose, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), triglyceride (TG) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (all p&lt;0.05). Quantitative fundus analysis revealed that multiple retinal vascular parameters were independently associated with CAD after multivariable adjustment, including fractal dimension (FD), vessel density (VD) and specific zonal measures of vessel diameter and tortuosity (all p&lt;0.05). Multivariable logistic regression incorporating both fundus and clinical variables identified the following independent predictors of CAD: a decrease in FD (OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.41, p&lt;0.01), reduced optic disc long-to-short axis ratio (OR=0.04, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.46, p=0.01) and optic disc-to-macula distance (OR=0.91, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.97, p&lt;0.01), male sex, dyslipidaemia and elevated levels of Lp(a), TG, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and HbA1c (all p&lt;0.05). The final diagnostic model achieved an AUROC of 0.802 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.845), with a sensitivity of 0.797 and a specificity of 0.679 at the optimal cut-off. Internal validation via bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations) confirmed the robustness of the identified predictors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our findings, derived from an artificial intelligence-based fully automated quantitative retinal vascular parameters measurement method, revealed that multiple quantitative fundus parameters&mdash;including FD, VD and other morphological parameters were significantly associated with CAD risk. The CAD diagnostic model we developed demonstrates strong performance and high interpretability, making it suitable for early CAD screening and diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wu, Z., Jiang, X., Xin, Y., Liu, J., Ling, S., Guo, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Retinal vascular phenotyping for early detection of coronary artery disease: quantitative assessment and diagnostic modelling]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106135</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106135</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106218?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multimorbidity patterns and their associations with healthcare services utilisation in inpatients with chronic hepatitis B infection from 2011 to 2023: a retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106218?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Multimorbidity among patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection has emerged as a priority for healthcare and public health systems worldwide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to characterise time-trends in multimorbidities among patients with CHB infection. We identified multimorbidity clusters and combinations and quantified their associations with healthcare services utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective observational study, using electronic medical record data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A large tertiary general hospital in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included 23 137 patients with CHB infection admitted between 2011 and 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Latent class analysis and association rule mining (ARM) were performed to identify multimorbidity clusters and combinations, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression quantified associations between the identified multimorbidity patterns and length of stay (LOS), daily expense and 1-year readmission for liver-related conditions (OYRL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean number of multimorbidities among hospitalised patients with CHB infection was 2.82&plusmn;1.89. From 2011 to 2023, mean age increased from 44.2&plusmn;13.7 to 48.4&plusmn;13.1 (p&lt;0.001). The prevalence of cirrhosis (45.50%&ndash;57.10%), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (13.10%&ndash;17.10%) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (3.15%&ndash;5.08%) increased over time. Similar trends were observed for non-liver multimorbidities, including diabetes mellitus (9.86%&ndash;11.90%), hypertension (7.34%&ndash;10.30%) and chronic kidney diseases (0.96%&ndash;1.58%). We identified three multimorbidity clusters: Cluster 1 (43.58%) included patients in the early phase of CHB infection with the lowest overall burden of multimorbidity. Cluster 2 (47.71%) was characterised prominently by cirrhosis and HCC. Patients in cluster 3 (8.70%) were the oldest and exhibited the highest probability of metabolic, circulatory and kidney-related multimorbidities. Three clusters demonstrated different association strengths with healthcare utilisation. Most multimorbidity combinations identified by ARM were significantly associated with higher LOS and OYRL, but lower daily expenses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Multimorbidity imposes a substantial burden on CHB-infected patients. Our findings highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of CHB infection, as well as tailored integral strategies for multimorbidity management in individuals with CHB infection.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, X., Xie, J., Wu, Y., Chen, G., Ao, H., Liu, Z., Jie, Y., Gu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106218</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106218</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multimorbidity patterns and their associations with healthcare services utilisation in inpatients with chronic hepatitis B infection from 2011 to 2023: a retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106218</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107590?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective cohort study of TIMP-1 and myocardial fibrosis in Chagas disease at a reference clinic in Pernambuco, Brazil: PTICH trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107590?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Chagas disease affects millions of individuals across Latin America and imposes a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems, particularly in rural and underserved regions. Chronic Chagasic cardiomyopathy remains one of the leading causes of heart failure-related mortality in endemic countries. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) has emerged as a potential biomarker of myocardial fibrosis in cardiomyopathies. This study was designed to investigate the association between TIMP-1 and myocardial fibrosis in chronic Chagas disease and to assess its potential as an early biomarker of fibrotic remodelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Bottom of form: The PTICH trial is a single-centre, prospective observational cohort study conducted at a government reference clinic in Pernambuco, Brazil. The study aims to enrol 210 adults with Chagas heart disease: 140 without ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &ge;52% in women and &ge;54% in men) and 70 with ventricular dysfunction (LVEF &lt;52% in women or &lt;54% in men, or previously reduced LVEF with subsequent improvement). Participants&rsquo; assessments occur at baseline and at 18 months (&plusmn;3 months), including clinical evaluation; transthoracic echocardiography (LVEF and global longitudinal strain); cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement quantified as a percentage of left ventricular myocardial mass and parametric mapping (native T1 and extracellular volume fraction), when available; and laboratory testing (plasma TIMP-1 and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Blood samples will be processed to plasma and stored at &ndash;80&deg;C. The primary outcome is the change in plasma TIMP-1 levels from baseline to 18 months and its correlation with CMR-assessed myocardial fibrosis. Statistical analyses will estimate within-participant changes using paired tests with 95% CIs and evaluate associations using correlation analyses and multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, sex and ejection fraction strata.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Research Ethics Committee (REC) of Chagas disease and heart failure outpatient clinic&mdash;PROCAPE approved the PTICH trial (CAAE number: 65746322.8.1001.5192). Written informed consent has been obtained from all participants enrolled to date, and data handling is in compliance with applicable privacy and data protection regulations. Study findings will be disseminated through targeted outreach to civil society, the scientific community, healthcare professionals and Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) policymakers; school-based science communication activities conducted in collaboration with state education departments (potentially including oral health educational materials); policy briefs and targeted reports for public health managers; technical meetings and institutional presentations; a plain-language summary published on the institutional website; and submissions to peer-reviewed journals and presentations at academic and health policy conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>RBR-3dcrj98.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martins, S. M., Macedo, C. T., Meira, C. S., Paim Santos, L. H., Larocca, T. F., Cavalcanti da Silva, F. F., Leandro Lira, C. N., da Silva, I. P. M., De Araujo, L. T., Soares, M. B. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107590</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107590</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective cohort study of TIMP-1 and myocardial fibrosis in Chagas disease at a reference clinic in Pernambuco, Brazil: PTICH trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107590</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109896?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[First population-based study on non-communicable diseases and risk factors in northeastern Iran: Sabzevar cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109896?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have become the leading cause of mortality globally, with a sharp rise in Iran due to lifestyle changes and urbanisation. Although many NCD risk factors are modifiable, limited understanding of their determinants hinders effective prevention. To address this, the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN) Cohort was established in 2014 to study NCDs nationwide. The Sabzevar PERSIAN Cohort Study (SPECS) is the first in northeastern Iran, aiming to investigate environmental and social factors influencing NCDs in a unique regional context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>SPECS enrolled 5174 adults (aged 35&ndash;70 years) in northeastern Iran between January 2018 and January 2019 through a census and an online registration process. The baseline data collection included demographic verification, informed consent, health questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and biological samples (blood, urine, hair, nails). The annual follow-up began in April 2019, with full reassessments every 5 years over a 15-year period. The data is gathered via an active and passive follow-up, supported by trained staff and registry linkages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>Of the 5174 participants, 4241 (81%) remained in the study. Among the cohort, 54.5% were female, with a mean age of 50.5 years. The majority were married (93.5%), and nearly half had at least high-school education (46.5%) and moderate socioeconomic status (49.4%). Drug abuse history (smoking/drugs) was reported by about 15% of the sample. The mean body mass index was 26.9 kg/m&sup2;, and the average blood pressure was higher in males (118.1/74.0 mm Hg) than in females (111.5/70.2 mm Hg). The common conditions included hypertension (22.8%), kidney stones (22.4%), fatty liver (15.4%) and diabetes (13.8%). Cancer had the highest treatment rate (100%), while fatty liver had the lowest (70.1%). Stroke had the highest mean age of onset (51.2 years), and epilepsy the lowest (23.7 years). All health data were self-reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>SPECS, part of the national PERSIAN cohort initiative, is the only adult NCD-focused study in Khorasan Razavi. Its 15-year follow-up aims to generate region-specific insights into the incidence of NCDs and their risk factors. The ethnically homogeneous sample enhances statistical power, and the findings may inform culturally tailored health policies. While self-reported data have limitations due to bias, high initial participation and access to free healthcare support long-term engagement, especially among lower-income groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghorat, F., Chaman, R., Javadinia, S. A., Rad, M., Mohammadzadeh, M., Hassanpour, K., Foroumandi, E., Nazarzadeh, M., Saghi, M. H., Salari, M., Bidel, Z., Eghtesad, S., Gohari, A., Mohammadi, Z., Borghabani, R., Ghorbani, M. M., Moslem, A., Norouzi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109896</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109896</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[First population-based study on non-communicable diseases and risk factors in northeastern Iran: Sabzevar cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109896</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109896</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109926?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of male global health and quality of life in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study using a gender-diverse approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109926?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Men, particularly those belonging to gender minority groups, often experience poorer physical health outcomes. This study examined global health and quality of life (QoL) across diverse male gender subgroups in Switzerland. While emphasising male gender diversity, we aimed to identify key sociodemographic risk factors associated with reduced global health and QoL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We analysed a subset of the Swiss Health Survey 2022, a cross-sectional nationally representative health-related dataset from the general Swiss population. Our sample included individuals falling into one of the three groups: cisgender men, transgender men (assigned female at birth with male gender identity) and men with &lsquo;other&rsquo; gender identities (assigned male at birth but identifying as non-binary or non-specified gender identity). Global health and QoL were assessed using the Minimum European Health Module (MEHM) and the global QoL item of the WHOQOL-Bref. Four binary logistic regression models examined the association between male gender identities, sociodemographic data and MEHM and QoL outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our study comprised 3 505 801 male cases after weighting. Of these, 12.9% reported fair to very poor health. Key risk factors included being unemployed, migration background and being a transgender man. The strongest protective factor was higher education. Chronic conditions were reported by 33.3% men, with unemployment again being the most relevant risk factor. Identifying as a man with &lsquo;other&rsquo; gender identities emerged as a protective factor. Regarding QoL, 8% stated impaired QoL, while the male gender identity &lsquo;other&rsquo; was the strongest risk factor and tertiary school education the most relevant protective factor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Risk and protective factors vary across different global health outcomes and QoL in men. These findings highlight the importance of disaggregating male gender categories beyond the binary to better understand the complexity of health disparities. A differentiated, gender-inclusive approach is essential for accurately identifying vulnerable groups and tailoring public health interventions accordingly.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lieb, M., Laskowski, N. M., Mu&#x0308;ller, R., Paslakis, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109926</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109926</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of male global health and quality of life in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study using a gender-diverse approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109926</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109926</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110875?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring subjective well-being for people racialised as Black in the USA: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e110875?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Subjective well-being, a measurement of quality of life, varies systematically across racialised groups. However, the use of inconsistent subjective well-being measures across academic disciplines results in conflicting subjective well-being findings for people racialised as Black or African American in the USA. The aim of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of how subjective well-being is measured for people racialised as Black or African American in the USA and to examine how subjective well-being reports differ between people racialised as Black and white in the nation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and report findings according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A predefined search strategy was used on 17 April 2024 to search PubMed (includes MEDLINE), APA PsycINFO (ProQuest), Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), EconLit (EBSCOhost) and Scopus for studies published in English. Articles will be included if they specify Black or African American population, subjective well-being, and include populations within the USA. Data will be extracted and presented quantitatively and qualitatively in tabular and/or figure form to describe the characteristics and conclusions of included studies, grouped by subjective well-being component and measure. Analysis will identify methodological inconsistencies and research gaps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study does not require review by our institution&rsquo;s review board as primary data will not be collected in this study. The findings of this scoping review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and condensed summaries for key partners in the field.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>10.17605/OSF.IO/M9GA8.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ford, T. N., Hanneke, R., Ezeani, T., Mitchell, U. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110875</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110875</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring subjective well-being for people racialised as Black in the USA: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110875</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110875</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113514?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus video-assisted lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: study protocol for an emulated target trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113514?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is a commonly employed surgical technique for the management of operable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This procedure, however, is dependent on the patient&rsquo;s ability to tolerate surgery. In light of this, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as a viable alternative treatment strategy for patients who are inoperable or who refuse surgery. Considering the lack of randomised controlled trials and the increased risk of bias in observational cohort studies, this study protocol proposes an emulated target trial design to investigate the causal effect of SABR, in comparison to VATS, on overall survival in operable early stage NSCLC patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Data on NSCLC patients will be collected from routinely collected university hospital records linked with German cancer registry data. This study protocol was developed using the target trial methodology outlined by Hernan <I>et al</I>. The protocol establishes specific parameters for key trial components in order to mitigate bias in the analysis of observational data and to facilitate the calculation of causal estimands. The target trial design that would be emulated is a multicentre open-label two-parallel arm superiority randomised trial. Mediators and confounding variables were determined through the use of a directed acyclic graph. The statistical analysis aims to measure the per-protocol and intention to treat effect of SABR versus VATS within 3 months of diagnosis, on survival, through the difference in restricted mean survival times, using weighted non-parametric Kaplan-Meier curves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg with an approved addendum with Dnr 2023&ndash;112 has approved this study. The study uses anonymised routinely collected hospital and cancer registry data in accordance with applicable data protection regulations. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bedir, A., Hassan, L., Wittenberg, I., Mu&#x0308;ller, J. A., Oesterling, F., Walles, T., Stang, A., Vordermark, D., Medenwald, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113514</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113514</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus video-assisted lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: study protocol for an emulated target trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113514</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113514</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114259?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spiritual care challenges and needs of carers, health professionals and relatives of individuals living with neurodegenerative diseases in palliative and end-of-life care: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114259?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Spirituality has gained increasing attention in healthcare, particularly in palliative care, as it supports meaning, purpose and connection during illness. While literature extensively explores patients&rsquo; spiritual needs, growing evidence highlights the importance of addressing the spiritual needs of caregivers and healthcare professionals. Caregivers and relatives often face emotional, ethical and practical challenges during prolonged care pathways, impacting their well-being. Limited training and tools can hinder spiritual care, contributing to distress and burnout among professionals and unmet needs for families. Addressing spirituality in neurodegenerative disease palliative care is essential for holistic, person-centred approaches that foster coping, hope and ethical decision-making. This scoping review aims to map evidence on spiritual needs and challenges of caregivers, relatives and healthcare staff in end-stage neurodegenerative disease care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute framework (JBI) for scoping reviews. The search and reporting process will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Inclusion criteria followed JBI&rsquo;s population, concept and context framework with no date or geographical limits; only English and Italian sources ensured accurate interpretation. Searches will use university-access databases and grey literature to capture policy and non-peer-reviewed sources. Databases selected: PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO and Scopus for comprehensive, multidisciplinary coverage. This inclusive approach is aligned with the purpose of scoping reviews, which aim to map the breadth and depth of available literature. Researchers independently screened titles/abstracts in Rayyan software with blinding, resolved discrepancies collaboratively, piloted and refined extraction tables, and jointly synthesised themes through iterative meetings to ensure rigour and consensus. Findings will highlight existing knowledge, identify gaps and inform future research and practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Since secondary data will be analysed, no ethical approval is required. The results will be disseminated through publications subject to peer review. The protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X9275">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X9275</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Luca, E., Saba, A., Bertarini, L., Brusini, A., Artioli, G., Dellafiore, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114259</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114259</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spiritual care challenges and needs of carers, health professionals and relatives of individuals living with neurodegenerative diseases in palliative and end-of-life care: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114259</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114621?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Household dynamics of maternal caregiving and agricultural labour in complementary feeding practices in rural farming communities in Geita Region, Tanzania: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114621?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Inappropriate complementary feeding contributes to child undernutrition, even in food-secure areas. This paradox highlights the need to look beyond food availability and examine the household-level mechanisms that shape everyday feeding decisions in the farming and food-secure settings. The objective of this study was to explore the household dynamics of maternal caregiving and agricultural labour in complementary feeding practices in rural farming communities in Geita.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Phenomenology study design was employed to explore the lived experiences and perceptions of mothers regarding complementary feeding practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Rural farming communities in Geita Region, Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Mothers of children aged 6&ndash;23 months were purposively selected to participate in seven in-depth interviews and two focus group discussions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In these farming communities, four household-level factors were found to influence complementary feeding practices: maternal responsibility and farming obligations, carrying children and porridge to the farms, limited paternal involvement, fatigue due to prolonged farm work, reliance on elder siblings for childcare and fear of judgement or sanctions for late arrival at the farm. Farming emerged as a cross-cutting theme that intersected all these sub-themes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Mothers described complementary feeding practices as closely linked to household division of labour, caregiving arrangements and the demands of farming activities that shaped daily routines. These findings suggest the need for context-sensitive strategies that consider intra-household roles and the time constraints associated with subsistence farming.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mashala, M. S., Mahiti, G. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114621</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114621</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Household dynamics of maternal caregiving and agricultural labour in complementary feeding practices in rural farming communities in Geita Region, Tanzania: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114621</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114621</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114665?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Characteristics and functionalities of digital tools supporting motivation and adherence to physical activity in older adults with health conditions: a protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114665?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Regular physical activity declines with age, particularly among older adults with health conditions. Digital tools, including wearable devices, mobile applications, virtual reality systems and tele-exercise platforms, offer promising ways to promote physical activity. However, the technological components of these tools and their reported associations with motivation, adherence and physical activity levels remain underexplored. This scoping review aims to map the characteristics and functionalities of digital tools used to promote physical activity among older adults with health conditions and to examine how these components are described in relation to psychobehavioural outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo and SportDiscus. The reference lists of included studies will also be screened to identify additional relevant articles. Eligible studies will include adults aged 60 years or older with health conditions using digital tools for physical activity. Two reviewers will independently select studies and extract data on the components of digital tools. A descriptive synthesis will summarise the key technological characteristics, and a content analysis will identify and categorise tool components, describing how they are reported in relation to psychobehavioural outcomes and theoretical constructs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review does not involve human participants, so ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and stakeholder summaries.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burin-Chu, S., Agbangla, N. F., Caby, I., Bossede, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114665</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114665</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Characteristics and functionalities of digital tools supporting motivation and adherence to physical activity in older adults with health conditions: a protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114665</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114665</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114801?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Utilisation of brain MRI for the diagnosis of dementia in low and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e114801?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To synthesise the prevalence and patterns of dementia-relevant structural brain MRI abnormalities in adults with suspected or confirmed dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and to summarise MRI protocols and the incremental diagnostic contribution of MRI beyond cognitive screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and PsycINFO (January 1990&ndash;27 January 2025), plus reference list screening and targeted manual searches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Observational or diagnostic-accuracy studies from World Bank-defined LMICs including adults (&ge;50 years) with suspected or confirmed dementia who underwent brain MRI as part of diagnostic evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-I. Random-effects models pooled prevalence of dementia-relevant MRI abnormalities; diagnostic-accuracy outcomes were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneous reference standards and incomplete reporting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>39 LMIC studies were included; 23 studies (2513 participants) contributed to the meta-analysis. Dementia-relevant MRI abnormalities (defined as &ge;1 clinically relevant structural abnormality per study definition) were present in 1248/2513 participants. The pooled prevalence of dementia-relevant MRI abnormalities was 58% (95% CI 43% to 72%), with substantial heterogeneity (I&sup2;=95%) and a wide prediction interval (8&ndash;96%), indicating marked between-study variability; this estimate should be interpreted as a descriptive summary of study-level proportions rather than a precise population parameter.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Brain MRI frequently demonstrates dementia-relevant pathology in LMIC clinical cohorts, usually with mixed neurodegenerative-vascular patterns. Structured visual ratings may add aetiologic specificity beyond cognitive screening, but pooled estimates should be interpreted as summaries of heterogeneous study-level findings rather than precise population parameters, given high heterogeneity and risk of bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024510241.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nassanga, R., Nakasujja, N., Mubuuke, A. G., Lwere, K., Kawooya, M. G., Ocan, M., Kaddumukasa, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114801</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114801</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Utilisation of brain MRI for the diagnosis of dementia in low and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114801</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114801</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115416?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of delayed care-seeking during acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115416?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are major drivers of hospitalisation, readmission and mortality. Patient delay, the interval between the onset or recognition of exacerbation symptoms and the first contact with a healthcare professional, represents a potentially modifiable part of the overall prehospital delay. Existing evidence on why people with COPD delay seeking care is fragmented, based on heterogeneous definitions of delay and limited sets of predictors, and has not yet been synthesised within a coherent theoretical framework. This protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify determinants of delayed care-seeking during AECOPD, structured by Andersen&rsquo;s Behavioural Model of Health Service Use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will include observational analytic studies (prospective or retrospective cohort, case-control and cross-sectional designs) involving adults (&ge;18 years) with physician-diagnosed COPD who have experienced at least one AECOPD. The primary outcome is delayed care-seeking, defined as the time interval between onset or recognition of exacerbation symptoms and first contact with a healthcare professional or facility; studies must report a clear definition of "delay" and provide effect estimates (or sufficient data to calculate them) for associations between candidate determinants and delayed presentation or delay duration. Determinants of interest will be mapped onto Andersen&rsquo;s predisposing, enabling and need-related domains. We will search PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and EMBASE from database inception to the date of the final search, supplemented by grey literature searching, backward reference list screening and forward citation tracking, without restrictions on country or, where feasible, language. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection and data extraction and will assess risk of bias using study design-specific critical appraisal tools appropriate to cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. Where at least three studies report comparable effect measures for the same determinant&ndash;outcome pair, random-effects meta-analyses will be conducted; otherwise, findings will be synthesised narratively. Certainty of evidence for key associations will be graded using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation approach adapted for observational and prognostic evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis, as it will use data extracted exclusively from published studies and other publicly available sources, with no involvement of individual participants or identifiable personal data. The findings of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at relevant academic and clinical conferences. The results are expected to inform clinicians, nurses and policymakers about key determinants of delayed care-seeking during AECOPD, and to support the development of theory-informed, targeted interventions aimed at promoting timely healthcare utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>This study has been registered in the PROSPERO (CRD420251244791).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fang, L., Zhu, X., Li, N., Gu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115416</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115416</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of delayed care-seeking during acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115416</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115416</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115562?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of ambient AI scribe in physicians clinical documentation: a protocol for a systematic review on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115562?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Clinical documentation is a significant driver of burnout among physicians. Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes, which leverage generative large language models to automate the creation of clinical notes from patient&ndash;physician conversations, are rapidly emerging as a potential solution. While these tools promise to enhance efficiency and reduce administrative tasks, concerns about the quality, accuracy and potential biases persist. There is now a need for a systematic synthesis of evidence to evaluate the impact of these technologies in clinical practice. To assess the effects of ambient AI scribes on physicians&rsquo; clinical documentation, the specific objectives are to: (1) evaluate the effectiveness of these tools on documentation, including accuracy and completeness; (2) synthesise evidence on the impact on physician efficiency after adoption, including time spent on documentation and (3) examine physicians&rsquo; satisfaction with these tools, including physicians&rsquo; perceived burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic review of quantitative or mixed-method studies as well as preprints will be conducted. We will perform a comprehensive search of four electronic databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, APA PsycInfo and Web of Science, along with medRix and ClinicalTrials.gov for preprints) for empirical studies published between January 2023 and March 2026. The review will synthesise studies comparing physicians&rsquo; use of ambient AI scribes with traditional documentation approaches. Given the anticipated heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis will be employed to summarise the findings. Where common quantitative outcomes exist, effect sizes will be calculated using Hedges&rsquo; g, mean differences or risk ratios/odds ratios as appropriate. The overall quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As no patient data are involved in the data collection, no ethical approval is acquired. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed, open-access journal, and presented at relevant academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251149086.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia Sanchez, C., Goer, V., Kharko, A., Ha&#x0308;gglund, M., Hagstro&#x0308;m, J., Schwarz, J., Blease, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115562</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115562</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of ambient AI scribe in physicians clinical documentation: a protocol for a systematic review on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115562</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115562</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115584?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using the suicide audit method to examine trajectories of adolescent girls following a suicide attempt in Quebec, Canada: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115584?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Suicide is a major public health concern among youth in Canada and worldwide. The most rapid increases in suicidal ideation, self-harm, and suicide attempts have been observed among adolescent girls, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent studies report disproportionately high rates of emergency department visits and hospitalisations for suicide-related concerns among adolescent girls. Despite these concerning trends, limited evidence exists on the life trajectories, needs, and service pathways of adolescent girls who attempt suicide. This protocol describes a qualitative suicide audit focused on adolescent girls aged 12&ndash;17 who were hospitalised following a suicide attempt in two regions of the province of Qu&eacute;bec, Canada. The aim is to understand developmental trajectories, document services received and identify individual, relational and systemic factors influencing these trajectories to generate recommendations that inform suicide prevention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Using a narrative qualitative design and a community-based research approach, data will be collected from semi-structured interviews with adolescents and parents, parent questionnaires and hospital health records. These data will be integrated to develop anonymised case vignettes. A multidisciplinary panel, including clinicians, health system stakeholders, community partners and individuals with lived experience, will review each case to identify gaps and strengths in care and generate case-level and cross-case recommendations for clinical practice, health policy and professional training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the research ethics committee (REC) of the Centre int&eacute;gr&eacute; de sant&eacute; et de services sociaux de Chaudi&egrave;re-Appalaches, which serves as the reviewing REC, with administrative reviews underway at two other health authorities. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and collaborative knowledge-mobilisation activities with clinical and community partners, including practice-oriented tools and accessible materials for adolescents and parents.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kourgiantakis, T., Mercier, E., Cote, M., Tousignant, R.-N., Dumais Michaud, A.-A., Maltais, N., Rassy, J., Lesage, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115584</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115584</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using the suicide audit method to examine trajectories of adolescent girls following a suicide attempt in Quebec, Canada: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115584</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115584</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112708corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: Determining the comparative pharmacodynamic equivalence of a non-invasive diagnostic test for patients with adrenal insufficiency using a randomised 2-way crossover trial: the STARLIT-3 study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e112708corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Date K, Baster K, Caunt S, <I>et al</I>. Determining the comparative pharmacodynamic equivalence of a non-invasive diagnostic test for patients with adrenal insufficiency using a randomised 2-way crossover trial: the STARLIT-3 study protocol. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2026;16:e112708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112708</p>
<p>The article has been corrected following its online publication.</p>
<p>The authors wish to inform readers that co-author Trevor N Johnson (Translational Sciences Group, Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, UK) was inadvertently omitted from the author list. TNJ contributed to data provision, data interpretation and references which were integral to the study methodology in the calculation of the required wash-out period for the IMP and advised on the drafting of this section of the manuscript.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-02T07:50:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112708corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112708corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: Determining the comparative pharmacodynamic equivalence of a non-invasive diagnostic test for patients with adrenal insufficiency using a randomised 2-way crossover trial: the STARLIT-3 study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112708corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112708corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099136?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099136?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are effective interventions to support patient involvement in health decisions and have the potential to impact favourably on health inequities by reducing gender bias in clinical practice. The aim was to explore sex and gender reporting and differences in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PtDAs for adults making treatment or screening decisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Secondary analysis of the Cochrane review of PtDAs of RCTs that reported sex and/or gender. The original review searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and EBSCO from journal inception to March 2022. Two team members independently screened citations, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. For this secondary analysis, we only included primary outcomes from the original review. We assessed appropriate use of terminology for sex (biological attribute) and gender (social construct). When terms were used interchangeably, it was considered inaccurate. Findings were synthesised descriptively, and we used meta-analysis when two or more RCTs were conducted with females/women or males/men using similar outcome measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Informed values-choice congruence and the quality of the decision-making process (eg, knowledge, accurate risk perceptions, feeling informed, clear values, participation in decision making, undecided) and adverse events (eg, decision regret, emotional distress) by sex and gender.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 209 RCTs in the original review, 206 reported sex and/or gender, with 35 (17%) using accurate terminology. Of 206 RCTs, 70 were with females/women only, 27 males/men only, 12 analysed by sex/gender and 97 RCTs did not disaggregate findings by sex or gender. Meta-analysis comparing RCTs for females/women to usual care and RCTs for males/men only compared with usual care showed similar mean differences in knowledge scores (10.84 vs 9.38 out of 100; p=0.44). Males/men had significantly higher self-reported participation in decision making compared with females/women (RR 3.16 vs 0.95; p&lt;0.01). Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in other outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In PtDA RCTs, sex and gender terms are used interchangeably and 6% analysed outcomes by sex or gender. Meta-analysis of males/men only given PtDAs showed higher self-reported decision making participation in clinical practice compared to usual care versus females/women only compared with usual care. Researchers must improve reporting sex and gender in PtDA RCTs to assess how it influences health inequities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey, D., Legare, F., Lewis, K. B., Smith, M., Carley, M. E., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C., Bravo, P., Steffensen, K. D., Finderup, J., Gendler, Y., Gogovor, A., Gunderson, J., Kelly, S. E., Pacheco-Brousseau, L., Trenaman, L., Trevena, L., Volk, R. J., Graham, I. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099136</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099136</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099136</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099136</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099841?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating a novel recovery device in diabetic patients with knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e099841?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disorder, often accompanied by comorbidities like type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These conditions have a significant impact on patients&rsquo; sleep quality and metabolic health. Current treatments for KOA primarily focus on symptom management, while innovative approaches targeting interconnected health outcomes remain underexplored. The lumbar knee recovery device, a non-invasive device patented in Iran, offers potential benefits by enhancing lumbar-knee synchronisation, improving blood circulation and optimising cellular metabolism. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the device&rsquo;s effectiveness in improving sleep quality and regulating blood glucose levels in diabetic patients with KOA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This RCT aims to evaluate the impact of using the lumbar knee recovery device (Kamarasa) on sleep quality, blood glucose levels, HbA1c (blood glucose control level over the past 90 days) and body mass index (BMI) in patients with T2DM and grade 1&ndash;3 KOA. The study will be conducted at the Orthopedic Clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, and the Health and Wellness Clinic. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: the intervention group (receiving 10 supervised sessions using the Recovery device over 3 months) and the control group (receiving standard KOA and diabetes care). A total of 37 participants will be included in each group. The primary outcome, sleep quality, will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at baseline and 3 months post intervention. Secondary outcomes will include random blood glucose levels, which will be measured at 10 intervals during the study; BMI, measured at the start and end of the study and HbA1c, assessed at both baseline and post intervention. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index will be used to assess pain, stiffness and physical function, also at both baseline and 3 months. Appropriate statistical tests, including two-sample t-tests, &sup2; tests, analysis of covariance or linear regression, will be performed based on the type of variables using SPSS V.23. Additionally, standardised intervention effect sizes will be calculated for each outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Tehran University of Medical Sciences with reference number (IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1403.145). Additionally, the study protocol was registered with the IRCT under the identifier IRCT20191027045257N7 on 24 November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20191027045257N7). This clinical trial was registered on 24 November 2024.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matourypour, P., Akbari, A., Zakerimoghadam, M., Arjmandi, R., Dehghan, A. H., Zarei, M., Parvizi, A., Parvizi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099841</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099841</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating a novel recovery device in diabetic patients with knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099841</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099841</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103354?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Virtual Baithak, an mHealth intervention to improve eye health literacy for the older adults in India: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e103354?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Settings with insufficient human resources struggle to provide timely eye care services and information to the population. mHealth (mobile healthcare) is a promising solution; however, evidence on the effectiveness of interactive voice response (IVR) and real-time phone-based education remains scarce, despite their potential to be scalable and cost-effective. This study aims to implement the <I>Virtual Baithak</I>, an interactive mHealth platform, to improve eye-health literacy among older adults residing in rural India. The objectives are to (1) Develop and validate the <I>Virtual Baithak</I> for improving vision health and (2) Determine its effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability among the older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This 3-armed, parallel, randomised controlled trial of 14 months duration will enrol 381 older adults (aged 60 years and above). Participants will be blinded and randomly (computer-generated) assigned to either of the three groups based on the intervention for eye-health education they receive: both IVR and group calls moderated by a healthcare professional, only IVR and usual care. The two intervention arms will receive the information weekly over a 3-month period through the <I>Virtual Baithak</I> platform, which will be designed for this study using a participatory research approach to develop the content. The primary study outcomes are digital health literacy and vision health knowledge scores, measured at baseline and 14 months. The secondary outcomes include m-health technology acceptance and usage practices. A mixed-method process evaluation will be conducted to assess the intervention feasibility and implementation, including in-depth interviews with participants. The qualitative data will be thematically analysed to explore factors that promote or restrain the implementation. The inferential statistical quantitative analysis will be performed using linear mixed models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the &lsquo;Institute Ethics Committee,&rsquo; PGIMER, Chandigarh, India (PGI/IEC/2022/EIC000282 dated 18 February 2022). The results will be disseminated via presentations and/or publications at the national and international levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CTRI/2023/02/049383, dated 1 February 2023.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rastogi, H., Sarkar, D., Rohilla, L., Kumar, S., Goyal, A., Rana, G. S., Singh, R., Goyal, A., Saini, S. K., Gupta, V., Pandav, S., Duggal, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103354</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103354</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Virtual Baithak, an mHealth intervention to improve eye health literacy for the older adults in India: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103354</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103354</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104786?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors associated with fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in an outpatient tertiary care setting: a cross-sectional cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104786?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms experienced by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Previous studies revealed the association of fatigue with various SLE and non-SLE-related factors. This study aims to explore the prevalence of fatigue and the factors that are associated with fatigue experienced by SLE patients in an outpatient rheumatology clinic setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective, observational study using a sample of convenience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Outpatient rheumatology clinic at a tertiary care centre.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Consecutive subjects with SLE presenting for their outpatient visits enrolled in the ongoing Institutional Review Board-approved &lsquo;Pathogenesis and Natural History of SLE&rsquo; protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Disease activity and organ damage accrual were measured by Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment Version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR DI), respectively. Fatigue was measured by the self-reported Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and a score of &ge;4 was used to define clinically significant fatigue. Correlation analyses were done to determine the association between fatigue and patient demographics, and SLE disease activity and damage indices. Results were considered as statistically significant at p&lt;0.05. All data analyses were carried out with the SAS program, release V.9.4 (SAS Institute).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>183 patients completed the study, with a significant proportion (144/183) belonging to ethnic minorities. The overall FSS score was mean (&plusmn;SD) 4&plusmn;1.8 and SELENA-SLEDAI score of 3&plusmn;2.6. The group reporting significant FSS scores &ge;4 (N=95) included a higher proportion of White patients, more organ damage (SLICC/ACR DI score mean (&plusmn;SD) 1.9&plusmn;1.9) and higher body mass index (BMI) mean (&plusmn;SD) 29.6&plusmn;6.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; as compared with the group with FSS scores &lt;4(N=85), which had a higher proportion of Black patients (p=0.034), lower SLICC/ACR DI scores (1.1&plusmn;1.3 (p=0.008)) and BMI 27.6&plusmn;5.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p=0.03).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our study found that organ damage accrual, specifically pulmonary fibrosis and neuropathy as measured by SLICC-ACR DI and high BMI, is associated with clinically significant fatigue in SLE. Furthermore, our results support previous findings that fatigue is independent of SLE disease activity. Findings of our study need to be replicated in independent SLE cohorts measuring fatigue at multiple time points. Mechanistic studies are needed to better understand pathogenesis of fatigue in SLE.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chapman, M., Rizvi, A. M., Qutab, M., Munday, A., Biehl, A., Manna, Z., Hasni, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104786</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104786</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors associated with fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in an outpatient tertiary care setting: a cross-sectional cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104786</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104786</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104988?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clean pulp versus sterile plastic for mid-stream urine collection: a paired equivalence study comparing the microbiological performance of a novel low carbon collection device with the standard of care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e104988?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine whether a novel urine collection device (the &lsquo;Pee-in-Pot (PiP)&rsquo;) produces the same rates of reportable urine culture results as standard of care (SOC) urine collection. To determine whether the PiP produces comparable microscopy results to SOC urine collection. To estimate the carbon footprint of the PiP compared to SOC urine collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A prospectively designed, single-centre, paired comparison study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A district general hospital in Southwest England, including antenatal clinical, accident and emergency, medical and surgical ward environments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults aged 18 or over.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Urine passed through the PiP device before being decanted into a 10 mL boric acid tube for microscopy and culture, compared with the same urine contained only in a sterile plastic vessel before being decanted into a boric acid tube for microscopy and culture.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>The proportion of positive urine culture results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The proportion of heavy mixed growth culture results. Comparison of particle counts: all small particles, bacteria, red blood cells and white blood cells.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Microscopy was performed for 1353 paired samples, of which 808 paired samples both underwent culture. Overall, urine cultures were positive in 9.3% (75/808) and 10.0% (81/808) of PiP and control cases, respectively. Overall matching between PiP and control arms for reportable positive culture results was 98.5% (796/808), with a Cohen&rsquo;s Kappa test coefficient () of 0.9149 (almost perfect agreement). There was no significant difference in the rate of positive urine culture results between testing arms for any organisms (margin of non-inferiority prospectively defined as &plusmn;2.5% for <I>Escherichia coli</I> positive cultures). For microscopy, there was agreement in meeting culture thresholds for 1308 of 1353 paired samples with a difference in culturing rates of 0.00517 (95% CI &ndash;0.0045 to 0.015, ie, high level of agreement). The estimated base case carbon footprint of PiP testing was 95g CO2e compared to 270g CO2e for SOC testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study found the PiP to be non-inferior for routine urine microscopy and culture testing and to have a lower carbon footprint compared with SOC urine testing.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John, J. B., Holdsworth, B., Clarke, N., Vere, A., Lynda, K., Walker, A., Yusuf, S., Yick, V., Doolan, T., Harvey, P., Ball, C., Butler, C., Lowe, N., Welsh, V., Mayne, A., Swann, S., Porter, R., Burns-Cox, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104988</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104988</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clean pulp versus sterile plastic for mid-stream urine collection: a paired equivalence study comparing the microbiological performance of a novel low carbon collection device with the standard of care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104988</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104988</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106492?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in OECD countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106492?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Socioeconomic inequalities in neonatal mortality are observed globally but gaps remain in the evidence from current reviews, specifically: a wider range of socioeconomic indicators at the individual, household and area level than previous reviews, and alternative time frames to define neonatal mortality. Thus, a comprehensive updated review of the literature is required, focusing on multiple measures of socioeconomic status and alternative time frames, to assess the relationship between maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in high-income countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Three different search approaches will be used: electronic searching of three databases, grey literature searching and reference list checking. First, the three databases Medline, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched using relevant synonyms and adapted terms from medical subject heading terms (MeSH) in Medline for maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality identified from previous systematic reviews on inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Second, grey literature will be searched by entering the relevant terms into Google. Title, abstract and full text screening will be conducted by the review team against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with at least 10% checked by a second reviewer to assess for any bias and errors. We will also conduct the kappa statistic for inter-rater reliability. Third, the reference lists of included studies will be reviewed for any additional studies that meet the criteria. Data will be extracted using a data extraction form and extracted studies will be assessed using the Liverpool Quality Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. If the data allow, subgroup analysis by neonatal care population and specific gestational ages will be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as all studies in this systematic review will be publicly available. The findings of this review will be presented at conferences and disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42022315407.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saberian, S., Gallagher, N., Maden, M., Maudsley, G., Esan, O. B., Djoumessi Tonle, S., Madden, M., Gale, C., Subhedar, N., Sinha, I., Schlu&#x0308;ter, D. K., Taylor-Robinson, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106492</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106492</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in OECD countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106492</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106492</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106920?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical practicum under strain: a mixed-methods study protocol for addressing its quality and sustainability in Spanish nursing education]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e106920?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The clinical practicum is a critical component of nursing education. In Spain, it is currently facing systemic challenges that compromise its quality and sustainability. A persistent nursing shortage, combined with increasing pressure on healthcare systems and a growing number of students intended to address this gap, is adding strain to clinical learning environments, which may compromise the capacity of nurses to provide adequate supervision and meaningful learning experiences for nursing students. This not only diminishes the quality of the training experiences, but also negatively affects the well-being of both students and nurses, further worsening the situation. This protocol outlines a study aimed at conducting an in-depth analysis of the current challenges affecting the clinical practicum and proposing a new model that effectively addresses them, with significant potential for adaptation and implementation across different health education fields and geographical locations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study will employ a sequential mixed-methods design comprising two integrated phases. In phase I, quantitative, qualitative and scoping review methodologies will be combined to identify current challenges and opportunities. Quantitative data will be obtained by administering questionnaires to nursing students and clinical mentors (CMs) tutoring them in Catalonia, examining potential barriers and facilitators to their mentoring role. Data will be analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data will emerge from semistructured interviews with CMs and nurse coordinators, as well as from a visual elicitation technique, the &lsquo;Emojional&rsquo; Calendar, conducted with students to understand their clinical practicum experiences. These will be analysed through an inductive thematic analysis approach. The scoping review, following the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework, will identify best practices in clinical practicums in nursing and other health studies globally. Phase II will involve a three-round qualitative Delphi study in which all preceding results will be presented to stakeholders and decision makers in order to redesign the clinical practicum model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Hospital del Mar Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref #2023/11123). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations, as well as via strategic actions (forums and meetings with healthcare managers, deans and policymakers) and general outreach (talks, social media and websites) targeted at professionals, students and the public.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Escrig-Pinol, A., Padrosa, E., Nunez-Doyle, A., Rodriguez-Monforte, M., Pedreira-Robles, G., McGilton, K. S., Alcover, C., Allaoui, I., Ayuso-Marganon, R., Carrillo-Alvarez, E., Ciercoles-Santamaria, S., Graells-Sans, A., Sanclemente-Dalmau, M., Insa-Calderon, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106920</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106920</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical practicum under strain: a mixed-methods study protocol for addressing its quality and sustainability in Spanish nursing education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106920</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106920</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107051?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy, moderators and mediators of cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP) versus behavioural activation (BA) in persistently depressed treatment-resistant inpatients: study protocol for the multicentre, randomised controlled changePDD trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e107051?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Up to 30% of individuals with depression develop persistent depressive disorder (PDD), an often disabling and difficult to treat condition. The Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is the only psychotherapy developed specifically for treating individuals with PDD. While several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated its efficacy in outpatient settings, evidence for its use in inpatient settings remains limited. Pilot studies of CBASP inpatient programmes in Germany have shown promising feasibility and effectiveness; however, no RCTs to date have systematically evaluated their outcomes. This study represents the first RCT to compare the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of CBASP with Behavioural Activation (BA), a first-line psychotherapy for depression, within an intensive multimodal inpatient setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this prospective, multicentre, rater-blinded RCT with an active control group, we aim to recruit 396 adults (aged 18&ndash;70 years) with treatment-resistant PDD at eight German university hospitals. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either (1) CBASP or (2) BA within an intensive treatment programme consisting of 10 weeks acute treatment in an inpatient and/or day clinic setting, followed by 6 weeks of outpatient continuation treatment. Primary and secondary outcome assessments will be conducted at multiple time points: baseline (T0), treatment onset (T1), after 5 and 10 weeks of acute treatment (T2, T3), at the end of continuation treatment (T4, week 16) and every 2 months up to week 64 (T5, naturalistic follow-up).</p>
<p>The primary outcome measure will be the change in depression severity, as assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24-item version), after 16 weeks of treatment (from T0 to T4). Secondary outcomes will include response, remission, deterioration and relapse rates, self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms and additional psychological variables. A cost-benefit analysis will evaluate the health-economic benefits of both interventions. Additionally, this RCT will explore personalised treatment selection and mechanisms of change, including potential moderators and mediators of treatment effects. The findings from this trial are expected to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance on choosing CBASP versus BA for inpatients with treatment-resistant PDD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethical approval from the ethics committees of all participating university hospitals. All participants will provide written informed consent before enrolment. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. We have involved people with lived experience from the earliest pilots onward, using their feedback to refine our study design. Ongoing consultation at conferences and public events has further ensured that our research remains grounded in patient perspectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04996433">NCT04996433</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brakemeier, E.-L., Klein, J. P., Zimmermann, J., Hollandt, M., Reinhard, M. A., Boger, S., Daldrup, L., Eldem, L., Gebhardt, P., Heinrich, S., Hirsmueller, M., Millerowski, J., Richter, M., Ridderbusch, I. C., Suerig, S., Schroeter, L., Velten-Schurian, K., Engeli, S., Witte, A., Bajbouj, M., Fallgatter, A. J., Kahl, K. G., Kircher, T., Ko&#x0308;hler, S., Philipsen, A., Walter, M., Wolf, J., Guhn, A., Schweiger, U., Hoyer, J., Gutzmer, D., Mauersberger, S., Demir, S., Stapel, S., Hallgans, J., Schu&#x0308;le, C., Frischholz, C., Heitland, I., Rek, S., Jobst, A., Kluge, I., Lux, S., Opel, N., Orlowski, S., Reinert, C., Voelz, H., Berwian, I. M., Frieling, H., Maier, H. B., Walter, H., Fassbinder, E., Kaiser, T., Kanter, J., Swan, J., Cuijpers, P., Hautzinger, M., Sterzer, P., Padberg, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107051</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107051</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy, moderators and mediators of cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP) versus behavioural activation (BA) in persistently depressed treatment-resistant inpatients: study protocol for the multicentre, randomised controlled changePDD trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107051</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107051</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sick leave and engagement as workforce well-being proxies in hospital departments: a cross-sectional study of routinely collected organisational data in a Dutch academic hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Well-being of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is vital for care quality, staff retention and overall healthcare system effectiveness. This study aims to identify the organisational and workplace variables associated with sick leave and measures of engagement of HCPs on department level within a single Dutch academic hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study using routinely collected organisational data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary-care academic hospital in the Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>25 clinical departments were included. Department level variables were derived from routinely collected hospital databases. Availability of data varied across variables. Analysis included information on patient population, human resources, care processes, quality of care and employee and patient experiences to assess differences, correlations and predictors for sick leave and engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome measures were (1) sick leave (%) and (2) engagement, assessed through two staff-survey items (vitality and connectedness; 0&ndash;10 Numeric Rating Scale). Both outcomes were analysed at department level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Employee population data showed the most consistent patterns across analyses. Departments with higher staffing capacity had higher sick leave and lower engagement in group comparisons (p=0.009, p=0.030, respectively). In multivariable models, higher staffing capacity remained associated with increased sick leave (B=1.38, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.23, p=0.003). Engagement was positively associated with higher inflow (B=0.92, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.77, p=0.037) and negatively associated with outflow (B = &ndash;1.36, 95% CI &ndash;2.08 to &ndash;0.63, p=0.001). No consistent associations were found with patient population and patient experience measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Workforce-related factors, particularly staffing capacity and inflow and outflow, are strongly linked to sick leave and engagement. Routinely collected hospital data can be used to identify at-risk departments and inform targeted strategies for improving workforce sustainability. Future studies should explore more granular, team-level data to better support staff well-being and care quality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bazuin, T., Oerbekke, M. S., Bontjer, S., Reijmerink, I. M., Dongelmans, D. A., Franx, A., Wietasch, J. K. G., Hooft, L., van der Laan, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109196</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109196</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sick leave and engagement as workforce well-being proxies in hospital departments: a cross-sectional study of routinely collected organisational data in a Dutch academic hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109196</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109745?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unbound cloxacillin plasma concentrations in relation to toxicity and renal function: protocol for a prospective, observational clinical trial in a real-world Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia population]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e109745?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p><I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> bacteraemia (SAB) is a common and severe infection, with a 90-day mortality of 24%&ndash;32%. Cloxacillin is regarded as a first-line antibiotic treatment in SAB in Sweden. However, exposure to cloxacillin in real-world hospitalised patients with SAB, most of whom are elderly patients treated outside the intensive care unit, is not well described. There are also limited data on the role of unbound cloxacillin exposure in relation to renal function or drug-induced toxicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, prospective, observational clinical trial will include 95 adult patients with methicillin-susceptible <I>S. aureus</I> bacteraemia, treated with cloxacillin. Patients with endocarditis, polymicrobial bacteraemia or those considered unsuitable for cloxacillin treatment are excluded. Trough and peak total and unbound cloxacillin concentrations will be measured at steady state at days 2 and 7. Blood cultures will be obtained at days 2, 3, 4 and 7 to assess time to negative culture. Renal function will be assessed daily for plasma creatinine and at days 1 and 6 for cystatin C and for 12-hour urine creatinine clearance. In a novel approach to detecting nephrotoxicity, renal tubular damage biomarkers will be measured at days 1 and 6 (KIM-1, N-acetyl-&beta;-D-glucosaminidase, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, urine cystatin C, alpha-1-microglobulin). Detection of neurologic symptoms such as confusion, tremor, hallucinations and convulsions, as well as consciousness, will be monitored daily using a structured evaluation form.</p>
<p>We aim to investigate to which extent target attainment (100% of the dosing interval during which the free (unbound) drug concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration) is achieved with standard dosing of cloxacillin in a real-world cohort of hospitalised patients with SAB, and whether initial renal function can predict who is at risk for underdosing or overdosing. We will also explore whether neurological or renal damage is prevalent and associated with cloxacillin levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval has been granted by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (EUCT 2023-505148-20-00) as part of a low-intervention clinical trial approval according to EU regulation 536/2014. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>EUCT 2023-505148-20-00.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damgaard, T., Hellborg, T., Larsson, A., Eliasson, E., Bonnedahl, J., Nielsen, E. I., Scho&#x0308;n, T., Ha&#x0308;llgren, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109745</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109745</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unbound cloxacillin plasma concentrations in relation to toxicity and renal function: protocol for a prospective, observational clinical trial in a real-world Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia population]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109745</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109745</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111270?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Everyday social contexts influence fluctuations into and out of chronic pain: an ethnographic study in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e111270?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The research explored how individuals experience chronic pain within their everyday social contexts over a 12-month period. The study focused on the interplay between pain and social worlds, through analysis of experiences of social relationships included in engagement in meaningful activities such as hobbies and work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Drawing on ethnographic approaches from social science, the study involved 295 research visits with 19 participants living with chronic pain (totalling approximately 418 hours of fieldwork) and 48 semistructured interviews (around 30 hours).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was carried out in South West England, UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>19 participants were identified through the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents, 12 women and 7 men, all identifying as white British, aged between 32 and 33 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analysis identified three key themes: (1) Social connections and everyday fluctuations in chronic pain; and (2) the interplay between work, family roles and fluctuations in chronic pain; and (3) Social spiralling and fluctuations in chronic pain. The third theme builds on and combines the patterns identified in the first two themes, drawing together how changes in social connections and balancing of roles coalesce in the experience of fluctuation in chronic pain. Relationships, roles and how these were experienced varied across participants, but all of their descriptions indicated that the constant flux was understood, even if financial or other circumstances meant that people were unable to exert agency that would have proved beneficial. Across themes, interconnected social processes appear to shift and move together, amplifying their collective impact on the experience of chronic pain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Fluctuations in chronic pain were complex, shaped by and entangled with social contexts that vary in meaningful ways. The findings suggest that to address chronic pain effectively, health and social care may need to move beyond individual-level solutions to consider the multiple, interacting layers of influence that shape and sustain the experience of chronic pain.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stone, S., Zeyen, A., Gooberman-Hill, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111270</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111270</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Everyday social contexts influence fluctuations into and out of chronic pain: an ethnographic study in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111270</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113028?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Colchicine and dialysis patients (CAD): protocol for a feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e113028?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Colchicine has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events and may improve outcomes in arteriovenous fistulas used for haemodialysis due to antiproliferative effects. However, it is often avoided in patients receiving dialysis. Therefore, a large trial assessing the potential benefits of colchicine in dialysis patients cannot begin without further data on feasibility. The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of carrying out future trials of colchicine in dialysis patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is an open-label, single centre, single arm study with 100 participants. The primary outcome is feasibility and the decision to progress to a full-scale trial. This will be based on the consent rate and the colchicine discontinuation rate. Secondary objectives are testing the feasibility of data collection procedures relating to quality-of-life measures, vascular access interventions and safety. Other secondary objectives are to assess the utility of the electronic health record for collecting trial data and to explore patients&rsquo; and healthcare providers&rsquo; experiences and attitudes towards colchicine and a feasibility study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has Research Ethics Committee approval (Wales REC 6; 24/WA/0277). It is intended that the results of the study will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN91308625">ISRCTN91308625</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, Y. T. D., Hughes, L. D., Norton, S., Robson, M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113028</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113028</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Colchicine and dialysis patients (CAD): protocol for a feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113028</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113028</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115797?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PERSEVERE: longitudinal assessment of quality of life and treatment toxicities in Chinese breast cancer patients - a multicentre cohort study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/4/e115797?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Survival outcomes for early-stage breast cancer have improved substantially; however, many survivors experience persistent treatment-related toxicities that adversely affect long-term quality of life (QoL) and functional recovery. Prospective survivorship data from China remain limited. The PERSEVERE study aims to characterise longitudinal trajectories of QoL and treatment-related toxicities among Chinese women treated for stage I&ndash;III breast cancer and to identify factors associated with suboptimal recovery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>PERSEVERE is a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study enrolling approximately 3000 women with newly diagnosed stage I&ndash;III invasive breast cancer across cancer centres in China. Data are collected at baseline and serially for up to 5 years, including clinical variables, a validated suite of patient-reported outcome measures collected via a centralised REDCap electronic platform and baseline biospecimens. The primary outcome is the change in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL score from baseline to 12 months. Longitudinal and time-to-event analytical approaches appropriate for observational cohort studies will be applied, with exploratory analyses planned to investigate symptom trajectories and biological correlates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol (ID: NCC25/629-5575) has been approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open-access publications and presentations at national and international conferences, with summaries shared with clinicians and patient advocacy groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07010939">NCT07010939</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qu, Z., Wang, H., Li, Q., Zhang, Y., Li, K., Pei, S., Yang, Y., Zhang, L., Yang, X., Wang, J., Fang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T07:06:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115797</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115797</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PERSEVERE: longitudinal assessment of quality of life and treatment toxicities in Chinese breast cancer patients - a multicentre cohort study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115797</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115797</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106929?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modifying continuity of care indices for adults with organ failure nearing the end of life: a retrospective population-based study in Ontario, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106929?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop and describe the performance of two modified relational continuity of care indices for adults with organ failure nearing the end of life, addressing limitations of existing indices that penalise multispecialty physician care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-based retrospective study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Linked routinely collected health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults aged &ge;19 years who died between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022, with kidney failure on dialysis, advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or heart failure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>We adapted the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) and Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care (BB) indices to avoid penalising multispecialty physician care, resulting in the UPC-Team and BB-Team indices. Indices were calculated for the last 2 years of life (truncating the last month) using outpatient physician visits. Correlation coefficients were produced between the unmodified indices, the modified indices and outpatient healthcare utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The cohort included 199 035 individuals, with a median age of 79 years (P25, P75: 70, 86); 55.5% were male. The median modified continuity scores were higher than the unmodified scores (UPC=0.44 (0.32, 0.61), UPC-Team=0.79 (0.67, 0.89); BB=0.24 (0.15, 0.40), BB-Team=0.75 (0.52, 0.95)). The modified indices shared weaker correlations with outpatient healthcare use (ie, number of visits or specialists involved), compared with the unmodified indices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The UPC-Team and BB-Team indices do not penalise patients for receiving multispecialty physician care, compared with the unmodified UPC and BB indices. The modified indices demonstrated more consistency in measuring continuity across patients with varying degrees of medical complexity and less correlation with outpatient healthcare use. Use of these indices is suggested to capture different aspects of relational continuity in the context of multispecialty care nearing the end of life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hafid, S., Jones, A., Isenberg, S., Gayowsky, A., Wills, A., Fernandes, A., Quinn, K., Gallagher, E., Hsu, A. T., Webber, C., Tanuseputro, P., Howard, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:12:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106929</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106929</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modifying continuity of care indices for adults with organ failure nearing the end of life: a retrospective population-based study in Ontario, Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106929</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106929</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107172?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact of an Australian Virtual Care service on low-acuity presentations to district emergency departments: an interrupted time series analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107172?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the impact of an Australian Virtual Care service on low-acuity patient presentations to emergency departments (EDs) across a local health district.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a retrospective study using an interrupted time series analysis to compare outcomes before and after the introduction of Mid North Coast Virtual Care (MNCVC). The comparison of these periods aims to identify changes in the rate of semi-urgent (category 4) and non-urgent (category 5) ED presentations following the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This analysis covers the Mid North Coast Local Health District, a coastal region in New South Wales, Australia. It encompasses EDs in Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Kempsey, Macksville, Dorrigo and Bellingen.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measure</st>
<p>Whether there was a reduction in low-acuity ED presentations (category 4 and 5) as a proportion of total ED presentations at Mid North Coast EDs following the commencement of MNCVC as an alternative to ED attendance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the years prior to intervention, the proportion of total ED presentations that were low-acuity presentations averaged 54.58%. Following intervention from July 2022 onwards, there was an immediate non-significant 1.04% decrease in the proportion of category 4 and 5 presentations (95% CI &ndash;2.11 to 0.04, p=0.063), with a further significant 0.12% decrease each month thereafter (95% CI &ndash;0.17 to &ndash;0.06, p&lt;0.001). By December 2024, the model estimated a cumulative 4.64% decrease in the proportion of low-acuity presentations since the introduction of the virtual care service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Following commencement of a virtual care service, a significant and sustained reduction in the proportion of low-acuity presentations was observed across the district EDs. Virtual care services may contribute to easing the burden of low-acuity presentations on EDs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chung, S., Maitland, L., Luke, C., Hodgson, B., Kuhne, C., Barker, D., Robinson, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:12:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107172</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107172</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact of an Australian Virtual Care service on low-acuity presentations to district emergency departments: an interrupted time series analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107172</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107172</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantitative and qualitative motion analysis for early detection of joint damage in haemophilia patients: study protocol for a pilot feasibility study at a German haemophilia treatment centre]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Joint bleeds are the most significant complication in haemophilia, leading to functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Repeated bleeding during early childhood can cause severe physical limitations in adulthood. Early detection of joint damage, combined with therapeutic interventions, has a huge impact on mobility, physical health and long-term quality of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A novel markerless video motion analysis method using deep neural networks will be explored in this single-centre, prospective, longitudinal pilot feasibility study. The study will include children and young adults with haemophilia, as well as age-matched healthy controls. Standardised video recordings, the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), clinical data, accelerometer-based physical activity tracking and questionnaires on quality of life and activity levels will be collected at baseline and after 12 months.</p>
<p>For haemophilia patients, individual consultations will be held after each assessment to discuss joint health and possible interventions. Results will be compared with those of healthy participants to assess the method&rsquo;s feasibility and to explore outcome differences and correlations. The primary focus will be on evaluating the study&rsquo;s feasibility, practicability, acceptance, possible risks and data quality with regards to a potential future multicentre trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee at the Medical Faculty and the University Hospital Tu&#x0308;bingen (project No. 188/2023BO1, approval 5 July 2023, protocol version 2.1) and registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (registered 22 September 2023, <A HREF="https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032707">https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032707</A>). Results will be shared at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
<p>This pilot study will explore the feasibility, practicability and acceptance of a protocol using artificial intelligence in gait analysis to identify patients at risk of early joint damage and to monitor the functional status of children and young adults with haemophilia in routine care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00032707).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schober, S., Hansmann, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:12:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108291</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108291</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantitative and qualitative motion analysis for early detection of joint damage in haemophilia patients: study protocol for a pilot feasibility study at a German haemophilia treatment centre]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108291</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111698?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of adding cognitive remediation therapy to methylphenidate in adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and addictive disorders (META): CRT in ADHD and addiction - META study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111698?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects 2.5% of adults in the general population, compared with more than 20% among individuals treated for addictive disorders (substance use disorders (SUD) and/or behavioural addictions (BAs)). The presence of ADHD is associated with earlier onset, greater severity and poorer prognosis of addictive disorders. In this context, pharmacological treatments, including methylphenidate (MPH), are widely recommended for adults with ADHD. However, their efficacy remains moderate and may be limited by poor adherence. The association between ADHD and addictive disorders may be explained by shared endophenotypes, particularly neuropsychological patterns, which may further amplify adherence difficulties. Cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) targets impaired cognitive functions and promotes compensatory strategies, and may thereby enhance treatment adherence and overall efficacy. However, evidence in adults with ADHD, especially those with comorbid addictive disorders, remains limited and methodologically constrained. We hypothesise that combining MPH with CRT targeting shared neuropsychological deficits will be more effective for patients with ADHD and comorbid addictive disorders. Demonstrating the efficacy of this combined approach could promote the widespread use of CRT in the multimodal management of ADHD, providing patients with access to affordable and autonomous care. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether this combined approach improves functional and symptomatic outcomes in the short and medium term.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>META (MEthylph&eacute;nidate dans la comorbidit&eacute; TDAH &ndash; Addiction(s)) is a multicentre, randomised, single-blind controlled trial (NCT06906328). It will include 248 adults (124 per group) with ADHD requiring MPH treatment and at least one addictive disorder (SUD and/or BA). After stabilisation of MPH dosage, eligible patients will be enrolled and randomised to either (1) active CRT+MPH using PRESCO software (HappyNeuron) or (2) control CRT+MPH using AUDITICO software (HappyNeuron). CRT sessions will take place two times weekly for 12 weeks, both at the hospital and at home. Follow-up visits will occur at the end of CRT (short-term) and 6 months after the final session (medium-term). Semistructured clinical interviews on psychiatric and addictive disorders, neuropsychological assessments and self-report questionnaires of ADHD, impulsivity, self-esteem and emotion dysregulation will be administered in an unblinded manner at baseline and follow-up assessments. The primary endpoint is defined as a reduction of at least 30% in the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale total score from baseline to medium-term follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has ethical approval from the French National Ethics Committee (24 December 2024) and follows Good Clinical Practice and Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2025 guidelines. Participants will provide written informed consent, and data will be pseudonymised and securely archived for 15 years. Data management and monitoring will follow internal procedures, with annual quality checks. Results will be shared with patients via a simplified summary and with professionals through publications, with preprints and final papers on a French open-access repository.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06906328">NCT06906328</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cabelguen, C., Challet-Bouju, G., Thiabaud, E., Donnio, Y., Lefebvre, L., Hardouin, J.-B., Grall-Bronnec, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:12:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111698</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111698</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of adding cognitive remediation therapy to methylphenidate in adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and addictive disorders (META): CRT in ADHD and addiction - META study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111698</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111698</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Increasing publication of fraudulent clinical trials poses a serious threat to evidence-based medicine. In the VITALITY Study I, we demonstrated that contamination by retracted trials significantly distorts evidence synthesis. The upcoming VITALITY Study II will take a step further and investigate how such problematic evidence undermines the credibility of guideline recommendations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analyses</st>
<p>The VITALITY Study II will adopt a retrospective cohort design and will be structured as three work packages (WPs). To start with, a cohort of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that were contaminated by retracted trials and/or meta-analyses that included retracted trials will be established based on forward citation searching (WP1). Then, recommendations from these CPGs that used evidence from retracted trials and/or meta-analyses that synthesised these retracted trials will be re-evaluated after removing such problematic evidence, in terms of both the direction and strength of effect sizes (WP2). Finally, the subsequent impact on patient outcomes attributable to distorted recommendations will be estimated on a hypothetical population, measured by the number of expected benefit loss and the number of expected harm increment per 100 000 patients (WP3).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Formal ethical approval is not necessary for this study as it does not involve human or animal participants, nor does it involve the collection of primary data. We will disseminate the findings through publication in peer-reviewed journals and, whenever possible, presentations at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, C., Furuya Kanamori, L., Cao, H., Wang, X., Loke, Y. K., Li, S., Wen, T., Fan, S., Gu, Z., Stone, J. C., Lin, L., Yisha, Z., Cristea, I. A., Du, L., Clark, J., Qin, Z., Song, Y., Zeng, L., Fan, Z., Golder, S., Chu, H., Murad, M. H., Lin, H., Mol, B. W., Vohra, S., Doi, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:12:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115303</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115303</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115303</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112420?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Remote personalised exercise in axial spondyloarthritis: the SPARK trial - protocol for a 6-month randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112420?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Current international guidelines recommend exercise as a first-line treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, there is no consensus on the mode and volume required to effectively reduce disease activity. It is advised that exercise for patients with SpA align with recommendations for the general population. For exercise to be sustainable and beneficial, it must be integrated into daily life and strategies to ensure long-term commitment are essential. The SpA Kardio (SPARK) trial aims to assess the impact of a remote, individually tailored exercise programme in patients with SpA with the proportion of patients reaching Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive at 3 months as the primary outcome. The exercise includes high-intensity cardiorespiratory intervals and muscle strength exercises, with digital follow-up and monitoring, in patients with SpA. The SPARK programme includes regular supervision, personalised follow-up, goal-setting and education delivered through an application available on smartphones or tablets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The SPARK trial is a randomised controlled superiority trial. Individuals recently diagnosed with SpA by a rheumatologist with disease activity measured by the ASDAS &ge;1.3 who have not used biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are eligible for inclusion. Consenting individuals will be randomised to treatment as usual (n=130) or the SPARK programme (n=130) with 12-week duration. After 12 weeks, all participants will be rerandomised to either a supervised or an unsupervised SPARK programme for weeks 12&ndash;24. The primary outcome will be achievement of an inactive disease state (ASDAS &lt;1.3) at week 12 in each group. Secondary outcomes include use of medication (bDMARDs and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)), cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, sleep quality and quantity, health-related quality of life, work participation, adverse events and disease activity at week 24 (ASDAS and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index). MRI of the lumbar spine and sacroiliac joints at baseline and full-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry will be performed in a subgroup.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The SPARK trial is approved by Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in South-Eastern Norway (#684555). The SPARK trial will contribute important knowledge on effects of a tailored digital exercise programme with monitored remote follow-up in patients with SpA and may improve the initial care of patients in terms of disease activity and ensure use of bDMARDs according to modern guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06462937">NCT06462937</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nellemann, B., Fongen, C., Dagfinrud, H., Berg, I. J., Kristianslund, E. K., Sexton, J., Norden, K. R., Lillegraven, S., Osteras, N., Jorgensen, T. S., Carmona, L., Sveaas, S. H., Provan, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112420</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112420</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Remote personalised exercise in axial spondyloarthritis: the SPARK trial - protocol for a 6-month randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112420</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112420</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112434?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex-based and age-based differences in participation in an in-hospital atrial fibrillation screening study: a prospective cohort study in Switzerland]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112434?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The under-representation of women in cardiovascular clinical trials is well documented but cannot be fully explained by sex-specific differences in disease prevalence. We investigated sex-related and age-related disparities in study participation within an atrial fibrillation (AF) screening study conducted among hospitalised patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>In-hospital patients in a single tertiary care centre in Bern, Switzerland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients aged 65&ndash;84 years evaluated for inclusion in the The SilenT AtRial FIBrillation cohort study, with inclusion stratified by sex and age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Screening for AF using three consecutive 7-day Holter ECG recordings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Prevalence of clinical and non-clinical exclusion criteria and participation rates among eligible patients, stratified by sex and age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 11 470 patients evaluated, 10 675 were not enrolled. Clinical exclusion criteria were more prevalent among men than women (60.2% vs 50.5%, p&lt;0.001), with prevalence increasing with age in both sexes. Consequently, fewer men met eligibility criteria compared with women (24.3% vs 32.6%, p&lt;0.001). Among eligible patients, women were less likely to participate than men (20.2% vs 30.0%, p&lt;0.001), and participation declined with advancing age in both sexes. Eligible men aged &lt;75 years demonstrated the highest participation rate (34%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Significant sex-dependent and age-dependent disparities exist in both the prevalence of clinical exclusion criteria and participation rates among eligible patients in an AF screening study. These differences should be carefully considered in the design and planning of future clinical studies to improve representativeness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanner, H., Dernektsi, C., Neugebauer, F., Goulouti, E., Lam, A., Elchinova, E., Nozica, N., Servatius, H., Noti, F., Haeberlin, A., Thalmann, G., Kozhuharov, N. A., Rodondi, N., Aujesky, D., Kueffer, T., Ju&#x0308;ni, P., Reichlin, T., Roten, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112434</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112434</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex-based and age-based differences in participation in an in-hospital atrial fibrillation screening study: a prospective cohort study in Switzerland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112434</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112434</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113246?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can immersive virtual reality assess hypothermia resuscitation decision-making? A cross-sectional study in a civil-military disaster management context]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113246?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an immersive virtual reality (VR) scenario for assessing decision-making in accidental hypothermia resuscitation within a civil&ndash;military disaster-management exercise, and to explore neurophysiological signals as hypothesis-generating correlates of decision-making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A multinational civil&ndash;military disaster-management exercise in Bulgaria (September 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Convenience sample of first responders who completed the VR scenario and post-experience questionnaire (n=62; mean age 30.6 years (SD 7.8); 59/62 male (95.2%) and 3/62 female (4.8%); 43/62 civilian (69.4%) and 19/62 military (30.6%)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants completed an interactive 360&deg; immersive VR scenario with multiple-choice decision points covering key steps in accidental hypothermia management. A subsample underwent exploratory neurophysiological monitoring (electroencephalogram (EEG)/ECG) during the scenario.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome was decision accuracy across scenario decision points. Secondary outcomes included perceived usefulness, ease of use, presence and physical discomfort. Exploratory outcomes (subsample) included EEG-derived engagement index and frontal alpha asymmetry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sixty-two participants completed the simulation. Perceived usefulness and ease of use reached the highest median score (7.0 (IQR 6&ndash;7.0)), with &gt;95% agreement across items. Decision accuracy across decision points ranged from 37.5% to 85.7%, with lower accuracy in hypothermia-specific algorithm steps compared with general resuscitation actions. In a very small exploratory EEG/ECG subsample, illustrative case-level, event-locked individual traces suggested possible differences preceding incorrect responses (hypothesis-generating only).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Immersive VR was feasible and well accepted for assessing hypothermia resuscitation decision-making in a civil&ndash;military exercise. Observed performance highlighted hypothermia-specific decision gaps. Controlled and longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate learning gain and training effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez Lopez, C. A., Greif, R., Semeraro, F., Ocampo Cervantes, A. B., Pons Claramonte, M., Nieto Caballero, S., Pardo Rios, M., Guillen Martinez, D. M., Sanchez Gomez, M., Georgiev, M. P., Ivanov, M. L., Lopez Ferrandiz, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113246</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113246</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can immersive virtual reality assess hypothermia resuscitation decision-making? A cross-sectional study in a civil-military disaster management context]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113246</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113246</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114180?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lived experiences of cancer care for people living with HIV who are treated for anal cancer: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114180?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This scoping review aims to identify existing evidence on the lived experiences of people living with HIV and treated for anal cancer, and to identify what aspects of health and well-being are addressed in clinical guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A preregistered protocol (Open Science Framework, 2025) guided the review. We followed the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework, incorporating Levac <I>et al</I>&rsquo;s refinements around stakeholder consultation. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance informed eligibility and data for charting, and reporting adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Systematic searches were performed across multiple databases, including CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase, using EBSCOhost and Ovid, supplemented handsearching reference lists. Two search strategies were used: one for research studies and one for clinical guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Sources included people living with HIV treated for anal cancer, capturing lived experiences directly through qualitative studies or indirectly via quantitative patient-reported outcomes and/or health-related quality of life. Guidelines addressing HIV or anal cancer were also included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data charting and summaries</st>
<p>Data were charted to capture patient experiences and outcomes on living with and beyond cancer, and how these are addressed in clinical management and guidance, including biomedical, psychosocial, sexual and functional aspects, and patient-reported outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 945 records, three studies and four guidelines met criteria. No study focused exclusively on people living with HIV; findings reflect broader anal cancer populations with HIV-positive subsets. Studies addressed aspects of health-related quality of life which we mapped into physical, psychosocial and sexual domains. Clinical guidance prioritised treatment dosage and survival, with limited attention to broader effects. Stakeholders highlighted that existing research and guidance miss important nuances of lived experience and care needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>No identified research solely explored the lived experiences of people living with HIV treated for anal cancer, leaving guidance non-specific and biomedical. The identified domains offer a starting point for future research; however, to inform patient-centred care, stakeholders emphasised the need to understand how living with HIV and anal cancer shapes health needs</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Addington, C., Davies, N., Howell, P., Cruickshank, S., Hainsworth, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114180</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114180</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lived experiences of cancer care for people living with HIV who are treated for anal cancer: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114180</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114180</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility and effectiveness of a multicomponent and multilevel personalised lifestyle intervention for adults with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a feasibility and multiple baseline one-arm effectiveness study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The LIFE-ID (lifestyle interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities) intervention, a multicomponent and multilevel lifestyle programme, was developed to improve the lifestyle of adults with ID and the support provided by their interpersonal and organisational environment. This paper describes the protocol of a multiple baseline one-arm feasibility and effectiveness study of the LIFE-ID intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>To evaluate the effectiveness of the LIFE-ID intervention for adults with ID, alongside an embedded assessment of feasibility, we employ a one-arm multiple-baseline trial in the Netherlands, in collaboration with healthcare organisations providing support to adults with ID. The LIFE-ID intervention intervenes at intrapersonal, interpersonal and organisational levels and uses a tailored approach to improve both physical activity and dietary quality in adults with ID. To support healthcare professionals in selecting interventions, the lifestyle support tool was developed, including existing, effective, and ID-specific nutrition and physical activity interventions. The lifestyle support tool takes into account intrapersonal, interpersonal and organisational characteristics and considers the participants&rsquo; wishes and needs related to their personal lifestyle goals. An embedded feasibility evaluation of the LIFE-ID intervention is conducted with the first 15 participants in the study and their involved healthcare professionals. Information on dose delivered, dose received, acceptability and fidelity of the intervention performance compared with the description is retrieved through biweekly reflection forms obtained from direct support professionals. Group interviews are conducted to collect feedback on the experiences with the LIFE-ID intervention discussing the following topics: acceptance and suitability of the intervention, and barriers and facilitators during execution. Outcomes related to the lifestyle support tool include usability, usefulness and ease of use. To evaluate the effectiveness of the 6-month LIFE-ID intervention, 80 adults (&ge;18 years) with ID are included (including 15 participants from the feasibility evaluation). The primary outcome is physical activity. Secondary outcomes on the intrapersonal level include dietary quality, physical fitness, body composition, calf circumference, blood pressure, heart rate, frailty, anxiety, depression, behavioural problems and goal attainment. On the interpersonal level, outcomes include attitude of professionals towards support in healthy exercise and nutrition. On the organisational level, outcomes are barriers and facilitators associated with creating a healthy living environment, and determinants that affect the implementation of the LIFE-ID intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol is approved by the Medical Ethics Review Board of the University Medical Center Groningen (METc 2023-520). Written consent is obtained from all participants who are capable to provide consent, and from legal representatives when they are not. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and accessible summaries for participants, families and healthcare organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The study has been registered in the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON; NL85438), which is linked to the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valentin, B., Schoufour, J. D., Overwijk, A., Lamberts, K. A., Pelle, T., Steenbergen, R. H. A., Weijs, P. J. M., Waninge, A., Oppewal, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114209</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114209</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility and effectiveness of a multicomponent and multilevel personalised lifestyle intervention for adults with intellectual disabilities: protocol for a feasibility and multiple baseline one-arm effectiveness study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114209</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117708?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Governance frameworks and decision-making models for intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117708?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intensive care units (ICUs) operate at the intersection of advanced technology, complex ethical decision-making and resource-intensive care. While many high-income countries have developed institutional governance mechanisms&mdash;such as Clinical Ethics Committees, structured triage policies and formal palliative care consultation pathways&mdash;to support ethical deliberation and accountability in ICUs, the applicability, structure and reported outcomes of such frameworks in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain unclear and dispersed across disciplines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This scoping review aims to map existing governance frameworks and ethical decision-making models guiding ICU practices globally, with particular attention to their relevance and reported application in LMIC contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) standards. Searches will be conducted across MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Global Health. Grey literature will be identified through Google Scholar, WHO Global Index Medicus and professional society websites (eg, Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), Indian Association of Palliative Care (IAPC) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)). Eligible sources will include empirical research, policy documents, guidelines and institutional reports published in English from 2000 onwards. Data will be charted using a structured template and synthesised through descriptive mapping and thematic analysis across domains, including structural design, decision processes, communication pathways, integration with palliative care, ethical-legal considerations and reported outcomes. The review is planned to be conducted between December 2025 and April 2026, including database searches, screening, data extraction and synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. OSF registration: <A HREF="https://osf.io/tkcav">https://osf.io/tkcav</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghoshal, A., Damani, A., Rao, S., Varghese V, C., Salins, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:29-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117708</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117708</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Governance frameworks and decision-making models for intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117708</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117708</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e088256?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e088256?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We explored the effectiveness of the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme which aimed to reduce the number of inappropriate procedures or diagnostic tests (&lsquo;interventions&rsquo;) in the English National Health Service (NHS). For 12 interventions, we evaluated whether expected intervention counts fell or geographical variation was reduced across England following the publication of EBI Wave 2 guidance in November 2020.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a retrospective observational study utilising routine hospital data. We applied a controlled interrupted time series analysis to examine both step and trend changes in the use of EBI interventions following the publication of the EBI Wave 2. We compared geographical variation in intervention rates pre-EBI and post-EBI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>English hospitals where NHS funded elective healthcare interventions are performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients who had NHS-funded elective interventions in England from March 2018 to February 2022 inclusive.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Half of the 12 interventions evaluated had significantly lower counts compared with their controls by February 2022. For five of these interventions, counts were between 20% and 57% lower than expected. This was the result of either (1) a larger fall in procedure counts by the end of the pandemic period (n=4 interventions); (2) declining counts post-pandemic (n=1); or (3) a combination of both (n=1). The remaining six interventions had similar or greater than expected counts by February 2022. There was limited evidence of reductions in geographical variation in procedure rates after publication of EBI guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Wave 2 of the EBI programme had a mixed impact on the use of the interventions targeted. There were some successes, however, following significant reduction in the use of elective care during the pandemic, half of the interventions evaluated returned to utilisation at or above predicted levels.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glynn, J., Jones, T., Bell, M., Blazeby, J. M., Burton, C., Conefrey, C., Donovan, J., Farrar, N., Morley, J., McNair, A. G., Owen-Smith, A., Rule, E., Thornton, G., Tucker, V., Williams, I., Rooshenas, L., Hollingworth, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088256</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-088256</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e088256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e088256</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102350?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of the Bangla Heart Manual in patients with coronary heart disease and their caregivers in Bangladesh: a feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102350?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the home-based Bangla Heart Manual of Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) programme for people with coronary heart disease (CHD) following revascularisation living in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and settings</st>
<p>Tertiary level cardiac hospital in Dhaka city; a single-centre feasibility pilot study, with a mixed-methods single arm pre&ndash;post design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study involved 33 patients with CHD admitted for revascularisation (coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention) between June and July 2024, selected from 72 screened. Two physiotherapists and one nurse conducted the research, focusing on patients deemed suitable for CR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Selected patients received the Bangla Heart Manual intervention that consisted of a 6-week programme of home-based CR including exercise training, self-care, relaxation, risk factor management and psychological support facilitated by a healthcare professional.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcomes</st>
<p>The primary outcomes focused on feasibility, assessing patient recruitment, retention and adherence to the intervention using quantitative and qualitative methods, including interviews with patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals. Secondary outcomes measured patient-reported metrics like health-related quality of life (HeartQoL, EQ-5D-5L), psychological well-being, exercise capacity (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and serious adverse events (hospitalisation and mortality) before and after the Bangla Heart Manual intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The 33 patients recruited included 29 (88%) males with a mean age of 55 years. The following feasibility outcomes were achieved: 46% (33 patients from 72 screened) recruited, 91% (30/33) retention (complete outcome data at follow-up) and 75% intervention adherence (&ge;6 sessions attended of 8 sessions). Improvements following CR participation were seen in patient-reported outcomes and exercise capacity. Two deaths and one rehospitalisation occurred during the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study showed that the Bangla Heart Manual home-based CR programme was acceptable and feasible for people with CHD in Bangladesh and healthcare professional staff to deliver. Our results also support the feasibility of recruitment and data collection processes for a future multicentre randomised trial to formally test the clinical and cost effectiveness of the adapted Bangla Heart Manual.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN1545620">ISRCTN1545620</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uddin, J., Faruque, M., Mashreky, S. R., Siddiqueea, Y., Chowdhury, M. A., Karim, R., Khaled, M. F. I., Taylor, L., Dalal, H. M., Taylor, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102350</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102350</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of the Bangla Heart Manual in patients with coronary heart disease and their caregivers in Bangladesh: a feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102350</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102350</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103421?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding mammary gland hyperplasia among adult women: a cross-sectional study in Shandong province, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103421?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding mammary gland hyperplasia (MGH) in adult women from Shandong province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted in Shandong province, China, from July to September 2023. Data were collected using a self-administered KAP questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the KAP scores of adult women regarding MGH. The secondary outcomes were the factors associated with the KAP scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 742 valid questionnaires were included in the final analysis (effective response rate 94 %). Adult women had insufficient knowledge (median 19, IQR 14&ndash;23) but positive attitudes (median 37, IQR 34&ndash;39) and proactive practices (median 30, IQR 27&ndash;33). Correlation analysis showed weak positive associations between knowledge and practice (r=0.137, p&lt;0.001), and attitude and practice (r=0.152, p&lt;0.001). Multivariable logistic regression indicated that not having undergone breast medical examination was associated with a lower likelihood of good practice (OR=0.664, 95% CI 0.466 to 0.947, p=0.024).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study indicated relatively low knowledge levels regarding MGH among adult women in Shandong province, despite generally positive attitudes and proactive practices, suggesting a notable knowledge&ndash;practice gap. These findings support the need for targeted and context-specific educational interventions, rather than general awareness campaigns alone, to improve breast health management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Y., Geng, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103421</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103421</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding mammary gland hyperplasia among adult women: a cross-sectional study in Shandong province, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103421</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103421</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103453?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of ICU-acquired hyperchloraemia on all-cause in-hospital mortality in adult patients who were critically ill: a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary grade A hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103453?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to investigate the association between acquired blood chloride abnormalities and all-cause in-hospital mortality in adult patients who were critically ill with normal blood chloride at admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Serum chloride concentration was measured by an indirect potentiometric method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study encompassed adult patients who were critically ill and admitted to the ICU, and who exhibited normal blood chloride levels (99&ndash;110 mmol/L) at Xiangyang Central Hospital between 1 April 2020 and 30 April 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, defined as death from any cause during hospitalisation. The secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, the length of ICU stay and the total length of stay in the hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study included 1131 patients. The baseline characteristics were comparable among the three groups of patients (all p&gt;0.05). The all-cause in-hospital mortality rate was 11.4% (n=129). The incidence of acquired hyperchloraemia 48 hours after admission was 16.53% (n=187), with a mortality rate of 17.6% (n=33). The incidence of acquired hypochloraemia was 9.37% (n=106), with a mortality rate of 12.3% (n=13). The proportion of patients with persistently normal blood chloride was 74.09% (n=838), with a mortality rate of 9.9% (n=83). ICU-acquired hyperchloraemia was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate than patients with persistently normal blood chloride (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.05, p=0.022). Furthermore, for every 1 mmol/L increase in blood chloride levels, there was an 11% increase in the risk of all-cause in-hospital mortality (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.20, p=0.014).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Acquired hyperchloraemia 48 hours after ICU admission is independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause in-hospital mortality in adult patients who were critically ill.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cao, F., Qiu, G., Zhang, L., Zhou, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103453</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103453</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of ICU-acquired hyperchloraemia on all-cause in-hospital mortality in adult patients who were critically ill: a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary grade A hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103453</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103453</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103938?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between decentralised clinical trial adoption and trial duration: a retrospective cross-sectional study of metabolic disease trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103938?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the association between decentralised clinical trial (DCT) adoption and trial duration in metabolic disease trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cross-sectional analysis using analyst-curated metadata from the GlobalData Clinical Trials Database, matched with ClinicalTrials.gov records via unique identifiers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Industry-initiated phases 1&ndash;3 trials for metabolic diseases involving the USA (first patient enrolment 2015&ndash;2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>444 trials (phase 1: n=140; phase 2: n=155; phase 3: n=149).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was clinical trial duration (CTD), defined as the interval from first patient in (FPI) to last patient last visit. The secondary outcome was the primary completion period (PCD&ndash;FPI), used for sensitivity analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 444 trials, 124 (27.9%) were identified as DCTs. Adoption differed significantly across clinical phases (phase 1: 11.4%; phase 2: 29.7%; phase 3: 41.6%; <f></f>). Two-way analysis of variance showed that clinical phase was significantly associated with CTD (<f></f>), whereas the main effect of DCT adoption was not significant (<f></f>). Phase 2 and 3 DCTs exhibited numerically shorter mean durations (17.3 vs 18.3 months; 23.4 vs 25.0 months), but these differences did not reach statistical significance (<f></f>). In phase-stratified regression analyses, DCT status remained non-significant across all phases. Older adult inclusion was associated with shorter CTD in phase 3 <f></f>). Sensitivity analysis using PCD-FPI yielded consistent findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>DCT adoption was not significantly associated with shorter trial duration in metabolic disease trials after adjustment for clinical phase and clinical characteristics. These findings may reflect the current stage of DCT implementation, in which operational complexities may coexist with theoretical expectations of efficiency. Further evaluation in more mature implementation settings may clarify whether decentralised approaches are associated with improved efficiency.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cho, K. H., Lee, S. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103938</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103938</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between decentralised clinical trial adoption and trial duration: a retrospective cross-sectional study of metabolic disease trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103938</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103938</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of comparative efficacy of healthcare delivery by mothers versus trained healthcare workers in adjunct to Vojta therapy on clinical outcomes in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: a protocol for randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A common and serious illness that frequently necessitates specific respiratory and developmental assistance is Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (NRDS), which affects premature infants. A neurophysiological physiotherapy technique called Vojta therapy has demonstrated potential in enhancing neuromotor development and breathing patterns. However, the availability of qualified healthcare professionals frequently limits its administration. This gap might be closed by involving mothers as qualified caretakers, particularly in environments with limited resources.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Comparing the effects of Vojta therapy administered by trained mothers against trained healthcare professionals on clinical, pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates with NRDS is the goal of this randomised controlled experiment. Preterm neonates before 36 weeks of gestation who have stable vital signs (pulse rate (PR) 160&ndash;180 bpm, respiratory rate (RR) &gt;60 or apnoea), mild to severe NRDS and no mechanical breathing will be included in this randomised controlled experiment. On the Silverman-Anderson Respiratory Severity Score, neonates must have a score between 1 and 7. Standardised training will be provided to mothers and healthcare professionals, and participation in care delivery will only be permitted for those who receive a score of &ge;9/10 on a paediatric physiotherapy competency evaluation. Two groups will be formed at random from the participants. Group B will receive the Vojta Approach from a trained healthcare worker, whereas Group A will receive the Vojta Approach in conjunction with maternal participation in healthcare. The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination will be used to measure neurodevelopmental status, early feeding skills (as determined by the Early Feeding Skills Assessment Tool), oxygen saturation, PR, RR, Silverman-Anderson Score and length of hospital and neonatal intensive care unit stay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Datta Meghe Institute of Higher and Research (DU) under ID: (DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2024/15) and by Clinical Trial Registry&mdash;India CTRI/2024/12/078619.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hullumani, S., Qureshi, I., Raghumahanti, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105327</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105327</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of comparative efficacy of healthcare delivery by mothers versus trained healthcare workers in adjunct to Vojta therapy on clinical outcomes in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: a protocol for randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105327</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106596?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strategies for prevention, early detection and management of penile and testicular cancer in primary healthcare: scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106596?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>To address the global increase in cancer incidence, improving prevention strategies, early detection and management of bowel and testicular cancer in primary healthcare can improve clinical decisions. Although national efforts are aligned with global health agendas, there is no consolidated evidence to support effective actions. In this context, this study aims to map the existing scientific evidence on the prevention, early detection and management of penile and testicular cancers within the scope of primary healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Scoping review protocol conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist, guided by the review question Prevention, Early Detection and Management of Penile and Testicular Cancer (concept) carried out by Primary Healthcare Professionals (population) in men&rsquo;s healthcare (context). The search for texts will be carried out in six databases (Ovid Medline ALL, Ovid Embase, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, Global Index Medicus and Cochrane Library) and the grey literature, from inception through to May 2025. Two reviewers will select the studies with the help of the blind-on tool of the Covidence. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer. Data will be extracted according to a specific form and organised in Covidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required, as this study does not involve human subjects or primary data collection. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed scientific publication and shared with healthcare professionals and stakeholders engaged in men&rsquo;s health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[SantAna, R. S. E., de Matos, W. D. V., Amaral, J. B. d. A., Calleja, S., Maheu, C., Hart, N. H., Rabelo, A. L., Sousa, A. R. d.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106596</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106596</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strategies for prevention, early detection and management of penile and testicular cancer in primary healthcare: scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106596</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106596</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107717?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nivel Panel Stronger Together: a longitudinal probability-based cohort capturing experiences and needs of people with chronic illnesses and disabilities concerning quality of life, healthcare and participation - a cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107717?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Nivel Panel Stronger Together (in Dutch: Nivel Panel Samen Sterk) is a probability-based panel, established to collect and analyse (longitudinal) data on the experiences and needs of individuals living with chronic illnesses and disabilities in the Netherlands, in specific regarding topics related to (1) quality of life, (2) healthcare and (3) participation in society.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The panel consists of approximately 3500 individuals who have a medically diagnosed chronic disease and/or a mild-to-severe physical disability. About half of the panel members (49.6%) have both a chronic disease and physical disability; 36.2% have only a chronic disease and 10.4% only a physical disability. The most prevalent chronic diseases represented in the panel are cardiovascular diseases (23.2%), chronic respiratory diseases (22.7%) and diabetes mellitus (9.2%). Of those having a physical disability, most have a mild-to-moderate disability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>Nivel Panel Stronger Together data are used for scientific publications, and to inform policy and practice on relevant challenges and changes regarding Dutch healthcare and participation in society. Among other things, it has been established how to support individuals with a long-term condition who experience challenges in self-management behaviours or health literacy, and what the needs of people with disabilities are in order to participate equally in society.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>We aim to establish new methods to include under-represented groups in the panel, such as young adults and those with a migration background. In addition, we are exploring options to complement self-reported panel-based survey data by linking it with routinely collected Dutch registration data.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Menting, J., Keij, S. M., Scherpenzeel, A., van Schelven, F., Scheffer, M. M. J., Zonneveld, E., Boeije, H., van Dijk, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107717</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107717</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nivel Panel Stronger Together: a longitudinal probability-based cohort capturing experiences and needs of people with chronic illnesses and disabilities concerning quality of life, healthcare and participation - a cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107717</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107717</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108611?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Descriptive analysis of interns basic psychological needs, burnout and empathy in the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108611?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The transition from medical student to doctor is recognised as challenging. Interns beginning their first clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic faced unprecedented uncertainty with unknown potential consequences for psychological well-being and the ability to practise empathetically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study investigated the effect of beginning the practice of medicine during the pandemic on the psychological needs, burnout and empathy of intern doctors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A mixed-methods, sequential cross-sectional study design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and setting</st>
<p>The national cohort of intern doctors registered to practise in Ireland between July 2020 and June 2021 across six Intern Training Networks was invited to participate in an online survey and semistructured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Interns reported slightly lower or comparable rates of burnout and emotional exhaustion compared with prepandemic studies. Frustration of interns&rsquo; autonomy was strongly associated with emotional exhaustion. Higher levels of personal accomplishment were described by interns regularly caring for patients with COVID-19, indicating professional reward from clinical responsibility. Interview analysis revealed five themes describing how interns experienced clinical practice; emotional experience, the need for future reflection, resilience strategies, mitigation measures and preservation of empathy. Protective factors against burnout included initial societal support, team cohesiveness and sharing, and the establishment of an overlap period between outgoing and incoming interns. Postponement of reflection and avoidant strategies employed during the crisis are indicators of future needs of this cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Interns beginning in practice during the pandemic experienced an extremely challenging clinical environment. Our work suggests they met these challenges head-on and retained empathy. Organisational, professional, community and societal responses were critical in supporting them to achieve relatedness and competence satisfaction. Further work is required to better understand autonomy supportive supervision.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patterson, A., Brady, C., Burke, E., Castello, S., Courtney, L., F Curley, G., Donnelly, S., Hennessy, M., McLoughlin, D. M., OConnell, F., Roberts, T. E., ten Cate, O., Wald, H., Zgaga, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108611</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108611</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Descriptive analysis of interns basic psychological needs, burnout and empathy in the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108611</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108611</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108617?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Uncovering the end-of-life trajectories of older people with serious chronic illnesses: study protocol for the quantitative longitudinal study of the TRAJECT project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108617?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Older people who die with a serious chronic disease are at risk of experiencing extended periods (ie, months or years) of fluctuations and deterioration in their health and well-being. Traditional categorisations of these end-of-life trajectories focus on physical functioning and often consider three types (ie, cancer, organ failure, frailty/dementia), but data supporting these categories are limited, often neglect psychological, social and existential domains of health and well-being and provide little information on the extent and determinants of variation in end-of-life trajectories. This study aims to identify distinct temporal patterns in the trajectories of older people with serious chronic illness and determine to which extent personal, clinical and social characteristics predict them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We have developed and piloted a novel, feasible and acceptable study protocol for a longitudinal survey study with older people nearing the end of life. We will conduct a longitudinal survey study with 280 older people, aged 70 years or over, who have one or more chronic illnesses and who are in deteriorating health. Assessments will be done at baseline and every 2 months, over 12 months or shorter if the participant dies before. Deteriorating health is determined based on disease-specific criteria which we developed in collaboration with clinical specialists. People without cognitive capacity to consent to research participation, those in the terminal phase of life (ie, last days) and those who cannot participate in data collection in Dutch or French will be excluded. Participants will be recruited from hospitals in Belgium. The survey covers health and well-being in the physical, social, psychological and existential domains and determinants related to sociodemographic, clinical and social environment characteristics. When a participant dies, we will invite an adult proxy respondent (a family member or another close person) to complete a mortality follow-back study covering the deceased participants&rsquo; health and care in the last 3 months of life. We will analyse trajectories with latent class growth models and mixed-effects models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The TRAJECT project has received approval from the Commissions for Medical Ethics from Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (Brussels University Hospital) and Ghent University Hospital. The findings of the study will be disseminated through scientific publications in international peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. For non-expert audiences, updates and findings will be shared through the project website, press releases and events for the general public.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van den Bossche, C., Tripathi, K., Van den Block, L., De Vleminck, A., Decoster, L., Naert, E., Van Den Noortgate, N., Pivodic, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108617</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108617</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Uncovering the end-of-life trajectories of older people with serious chronic illnesses: study protocol for the quantitative longitudinal study of the TRAJECT project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108617</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108617</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109624?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Leadership delegation, team efficacy and resilience in critical care: a simulation-based study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109624?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To quantitatively assess leadership delegation in expert critical care teams during simulated emergency scenarios, and to explore its association with team efficacy and resilience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multicentre, prospective observational study using high-fidelity simulation. Three critical care scenarios of increased difficulty were developed, each incorporating carefully calibrated expected and disruptive events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Five university-affiliated simulation centres in France.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>30 interprofessional teams (150 participants), each composed of a senior physician, resident, nurse, healthcare assistant and medical student, all having worked together clinically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Occurrence and characteristics of leadership delegation following events; team performance as evaluated by external experts; self-reported team member satisfaction, engagement and cohesion; statistical associations using sparse Partial Least Squares and unsupervised clustering.</p>
<p><I><b>Results</b></I></p>
<p>Delegation occurred less frequently with increased scenario difficulty (p=0.003 for comparison between scenarios). In contrast, delegations initiated by team members other than the senior physician were more frequent in scenarios with a higher number of disruptive events (p=0.004). Delegation was moderately correlated with resilience parameters (team satisfaction, engagement and cohesion parameters, typically &gt;0.25) but showed no association with simulated patient survival. Clustering revealed a mismatch in some team members between high satisfaction and low performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Delegation in emergency teams was associated with team resilience rather than with clinical performance. Disruptive events led to leadership coming from other team members than the leaders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poitrin, L., Le Bris, S., Rineau, E., Savary, D., Martin, L., Jourdain, M., Alcouffe, T., Riou, J., Martin, D., Lerolle, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109624</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109624</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Leadership delegation, team efficacy and resilience in critical care: a simulation-based study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109624</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109624</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109858?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for newborns in China: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109858?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Neonatal guidelines are critical for enhancing healthcare quality and reducing neonatal mortality in China. However, the methodological quality of existing guidelines varies considerably, and the credibility and implementability (CI) of their recommendations has not been systematically evaluated. Consequently, key areas for improvement remain unclear. This protocol aims to appraise the methodological quality of Chinese neonatal guidelines and assess the CI of their recommendations using two evaluation frameworks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols statement. We will search multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, the Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP) and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, from inception to 31 December 2025. The search will use keywords such as &lsquo;neonatal&rsquo;, &lsquo;clinical practice guidelines&rsquo; and &lsquo;China&rsquo;. The language of publication will be limited to Chinese or English. Two researchers will independently screen title, abstract and full text. Chinese-language clinical practice guidelines focused on neonatal disease management (rather than assessment or diagnosis) will be included. Relevant information (including guideline name, publication year, disease type, leading institution and guideline development group composition) will be extracted using a pre-designed form. Cross-verification will be performed, and discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer. Final data will be presented in tables. We will use a narrative synthesis to address two objectives: (1) to evaluate the methodological quality of Chinese neonatal guidelines (especially those published in the past 5 years) using AGREE II (6 domains, 23 items, scored 1&ndash;7) and identify critical deficiencies in the guideline development process; and (2) appraise the CI of recommendations for guidelines scoring &ge;60% in the domain 3 (&lsquo;Rigour of Development&rsquo;) of AGREE II using the AGREE-REX (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation &ndash; Recommendation EXcellence) tool, deriving context-specific, evidence-based optimisation strategies. This review will explore the strengths and limitations of Chinese neonatal clinical practice guidelines. The findings will provide evidence-based direction for future guideline development and recommendation formulation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is required. Results will be disseminated through open-access, peer-reviewed journal publications and conference presentations. The results will inform efforts to improve the methodological quality of future neonatal guidelines in China and the CI of their recommendations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>This systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD420251106060).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jing, L., Liao, Z., Liao, L., Zhai, X., Tang, M., Bin, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109858</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109858</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for newborns in China: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109858</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109858</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110540?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating outcomes of psychological support services in minimum security prisons in England: a quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching and survival analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110540?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To test whether individuals identified as having a likely personality disorder and high reoffending risk, who opted in to psychologically informed support in minimum security prisons (Pathways Enhanced Resettlement Service (PERS)), were (a) less likely to return to more restrictive closed prison conditions, and (b) released to the community sooner, compared with matched non-PERS users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Quasi-experimental retrospective cohort design using routine PERS and UK Ministry of Justice administrative data, for all clients enrolled on PERS between 1 April 2019 and 30 April 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Five minimum security male prisons in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>258 PERS users matched for ethnicity, age at first offence and sentencing, education, sentence type, personality disorder screening, risk of reoffending scores and historical drug and alcohol use to 358 controls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>PERS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PERS users waited longer for community release (HR=0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.71) and had a lower likelihood of return to closed conditions prisons (HR<I>=</I>0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99) than matched controls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PERS supports individuals to remain in open conditions for longer; however, further evaluation is needed to understand why PERS users waited longer for release, and if this was associated with a more successful release, without return to prison or reoffence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathlin, G., Jones, H., Lewis, C., Cooper, C., Freestone, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110540</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110540</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating outcomes of psychological support services in minimum security prisons in England: a quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching and survival analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110540</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110540</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111467?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Malignant upper urinary tract obstruction resulting in hospital admission: a qualitative study of patient, carer and clinician experiences and information received]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111467?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Malignant upper urinary tract obstruction (MUUTO) is caused by advanced cancer. Developing MUUTO is often associated with approaching the end of life. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) and retrograde ureteric stent insertion (RUS) are common interventions to treat patients with MUUTO, although neither intervention is likely to extend overall survival significantly. Little is known about patient, carer and healthcare professional (HCP) views of the MUUTO management pathway, the benefits and harms of the procedure and the treatment decision-making process. This study investigated the experiences, decision-making and priorities of patients admitted to hospital for MUUTO, and their carers, along with HCPs involved in providing care for this patient group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative, using semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted across two NHS trusts in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 patients, 8 carers and 14 HCPs were interviewed. Patients were interviewed in hospital during their admission and, where possible, follow-up interviews took place 2&ndash;3 weeks later at their homes. In total, 18 patient interviews were conducted. Interviews were analysed thematically by cohort and systematically cross-referenced for areas of congruence and divergence of priorities and views. Ethical approval was obtained before study commencement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most patients were admitted as emergencies and received PCNs to relieve severe pain and distress. Patients reported having little choice in the decision-making around intervention due to their symptoms and frequently described the PCN procedure as being painful. HCPs considered the availability of further cancer treatment options a rationale to support intervening for MUUTO. However, HCPs reported decision-making was often complicated by unclear prognosis and the need to address the emergency nature of patient circumstances. A lack of compassionate communication, disrespect and indignity, traumatic hospital admission and premature discharge, in addition to practical administrative difficulties caused patient and carer distress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Emergency admissions for MUUTO are associated with significant patient and carer distress and are complex for HCPs to manage. MUUTO patients would benefit from a specific pathway to avoid emergency admissions and to facilitate timely advance care planning discussions so that patients&rsquo; wishes and HCP views can be shared and incorporated into decision-making about the appropriateness and value of PCN and RUS interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stone, T., Banks, J., Bond, T. N., Selman, L. E., Harding, C., Aning, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111467</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111467</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Malignant upper urinary tract obstruction resulting in hospital admission: a qualitative study of patient, carer and clinician experiences and information received]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111467</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111467</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111483?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proactive anti-racism training for healthcare: study protocol for the development and evaluation of an Australian cognitive-behavioural therapy-informed racism reduction programme]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111483?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Racism in healthcare remains a barrier to health equity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia. This study protocol outlines the development and evaluation of a novel programme for racism reduction, drawing on aspects of cognitive behavioural therapy, motivational interviewing and the transtheoretical model of behaviour change. The project is led and governed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and responds to the lived experience of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people within the health system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>An interactive educational programme has been developed, with seven modules designed to move people from &lsquo;precontemplation&rsquo; through to identifying unhelpful beliefs and moving towards healthy relationships with themselves and others. An iterative developmental evaluation methodology will enable adaptation and improvement of the programme over three phases of implementation. Phase 1 will involve programme refinement and development of in-person and eLearning modules, informed by qualitative interviews with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous staff and students, and a cross-sectional survey of racist attitudes and beliefs among non-Indigenous people. In phase 2, an initial pilot to assess acceptability and feasibility will be carried out both in person (n=20) and online (n=30). Following further refinement, phase 3 will involve a larger pilot study with health professionals (n=50) and university students (n=50). The evaluation will incorporate pre-programme and postprogramme surveys and per-module evaluations, alongside qualitative interviews at key points during the project. The experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander staff, patients and visitors will be monitored via an established patient experience measure (Yarn-Up Survey) already included in routine practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2024/HRE0057) and the Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia Aboriginal Health Research Ethics Committee (04&ndash;24-1130). Research dissemination will occur through presentations to stakeholders, academic journals and conference presentations. Refining the model at each phase will maximise its readiness for scalability across multiple health, medical education and potentially broader sectors in the future.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reilly, R., Morey, K., Hammond, L., Pedler, M., Keeler, N., Laccos, T., Chur-Hansen, A., Larkin, M., Elvidge, E., DOnise, K., Sivak, L., Brodie, T., Larkin, S., Turner, L., Clark, Y., Kwenda, K., Lovegrove, J., Pearson, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111483</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111483</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proactive anti-racism training for healthcare: study protocol for the development and evaluation of an Australian cognitive-behavioural therapy-informed racism reduction programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111483</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111483</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111695?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Temporary interruption versus maintenance of anticoagulation in polypectomy of colorectal lesions: study protocol for a multicentre randomised non-inferiority clinical trial POLYPHEM]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111695?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Colorectal polypectomy plays a crucial role in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer. Postpolypectomy bleeding is the most common adverse event. Current European guidelines recommend a temporary suspension of anticoagulation for polypectomy, despite the lack of high-quality evidence supporting this practice. Recent data challenge this approach, suggesting that polypectomy without discontinuing anticoagulation is not only safe but may also reduce the incidence of thromboembolic events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, prospective randomised, endoscopist-blinded, investigator-initiated, non-inferiority clinical trial aims to compare the safety of temporary interruption versus maintenance of anticoagulation during polypectomy for colorectal lesions. A total of 481 patients on oral anticoagulant treatment (either vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants), and scheduled for an elective colonoscopy for any indication, will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to each group. Colonoscopy and polypectomy procedures will be conducted by experienced endoscopists at 11 Spanish hospitals. The primary outcome is clinically significant postpolypectomy haemorrhage, while the secondary outcomes involve evaluating the risk of thromboembolic events and other procedural-related variables. Non-inferiority will be assessed in the per-protocol population using an adjusted absolute risk difference margin of 10%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol was initially approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Hospital Cl&iacute;nico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (approval number: 24/330-EC_M). According to Spanish legislation on clinical trials, approval by a single CEIm is sufficient for multicentre studies and is recognised by all participating centres. The decision of the approving ethics committee is therefore applicable to all study sites. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment.</p>
<p>The results of this study will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presentation at relevant national and international gastroenterology and endoscopy conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07185295">NCT07185295</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Majano Diaz, L., Rodriguez de Santiago, E., Mucosal Resection and Third-Space Endoscopy SEED Working Group, Nunez Rodriguez, H., Corte, D. P., de Jorge Turrion, M. A., Pellise, M., Ocon, J. M., Pons, F. R., Santiago Garcia, J., Alonso, E. B., Escaja, C. R., Santos Rodriguez, A., Canete Ruiz, A., Muriel, A., Zamora, J., Garcia, B. P., Carbonell, S. P., Garcia Garcia de Paredes, A., Garrido Gomez, E., Lopez Cardona, J., Duran, S. L., Aicart-Ramos, M., Lalastra, C. S., Angel Rodriguez Gandia, M., Garcia de la Filia, I., Aldehuelo, R. S., Hernandez, E. T., Martinez Sanchez, A., Mateos Munoz, B., Martinez Gonzalez, J., Ortega, J. D., de la Fuente Briongos, E., Redondo, P. D., Cano, C. C., Alvarez, L. P., Pieter, C. E. C., Remizova, M. O., Gonzalez Silva, I., Ferrer Blanco, A., Claros, L. S., Tejedor-Tejada, J., Jimenez Jurado, A., Mazzola, V. K. C., Cabal, I. B., Leoz, D., Rivas, E., Calvo, A., Herreros-de-Tejada, A., de Frutos Rosa, D., Gomez, F. V., Gutierrez Landaluce, P., Colomet, R. M., Diez, P. F., Blanco Garcia, L., Castano Fernandez, O., Ruiz Zorrilla Lopez, R., Lorenzo, M. E. M., Lopez Fernandez, E., Sierra Morales, M., Garcia Centeno, P., Maestro Prada, I., Vazquez-Sequeiros, E., Albillos Martinez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111695</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111695</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Temporary interruption versus maintenance of anticoagulation in polypectomy of colorectal lesions: study protocol for a multicentre randomised non-inferiority clinical trial POLYPHEM]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111695</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111695</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112206?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Geographic variation in potentially preventable hospitalisations in Indonesia: a multilevel analysis using National Health Insurance Sample Data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112206?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Indonesian data on potentially preventable hospitalisations (PPH), a widely used indicator for measuring primary healthcare (PHC) quality, are lacking. This study aimed to describe Indonesia&rsquo;s PPH rates and to quantify variation in PPH across districts/cities and their associations with individual sociodemographic characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study conducted in Indonesia using the 2023 National Health Insurance Sample Data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Sample of 2.32 million individuals, representing 266.85 million national health insurance<I>&mdash;Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional</I> (<I>JKN</I>)&mdash;enrolees.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>PPH overall and by type: vaccine-preventable, acute and chronic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We quantified crude and age-standardised PPH rates (overall and by type) per 10 000 <I>JKN</I> enrolees. We applied multilevel negative binomial regression and estimated: (1) median rate ratios (MRRs) to quantify variation in PPH across districts/cities, unadjusted and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and (2) incidence rate ratios (IRRs) to quantify associations between PPH and sociodemographic characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were 4.83 million overall PPH in 2023, an overall rate of 180.9 per 10 000 <I>JKN</I> enrolees (acute: 94.8, chronic: 93.6, vaccine-preventable: 2.8). Overall PPH rates were generally highest in districts/cities in Java-Bali, Sulawesi, Sumatera and Kalimantan, lower in Nusa Tenggara and Maluku and lowest in Papua. Variation in PPH across districts/cities was similar for all PPH types (MRRs overall: 1.62, vaccine-preventable: 1.83, acute: 1.72, chronic: 1.53) and persisted after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics (MRRs of 1.52, 1.82, 1.61, 1.41, respectively). After adjustment, PPH rates were higher in the older age groups, particularly chronic (eg, compared with 25&ndash;34 years, adjusted IRRs for 55&ndash;64 years=11.94, 95% CI 11.15 to 12.79; 65&ndash;74 years=13.63, 12.67 to 14.67); the youngest age group (0&ndash;14 years) particularly vaccine-preventable (IRR 5.22, 95% CI 4.02 to 6.79) and acute (IRR 5.46, 95% CI 5.19 to 5.74); among those married or divorced compared with single (acute, chronic and overall PPH: IRRs range from 1.20 to 1.39 for married and from 1.42 to 1.69 for divorced individuals) and among non-subsidised compared with subsidised <I>JKN</I> enrolees (all PPH types: IRRs range from 1.25 to 1.68).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PPH varied across districts/cities as well as by sociodemographic characteristics. While PPH has potential for measuring PHC quality in Indonesia, context-specific interpretation is required as lower PPH may reflect limited accessibility to hospital care rather than better PHC quality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solikha, D. A., Butler, D., Korda, R. J., Kelly, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-30T20:30:28-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112206</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112206</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Geographic variation in potentially preventable hospitalisations in Indonesia: a multilevel analysis using National Health Insurance Sample Data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112206</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of lifestyle factors on breast cancer incidence from mid-life to older age: an Australian longitudinal cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>There is limited evidence on the association between lifestyle factors and breast cancer (BC) incidence from Australian longitudinal studies. This study aims to investigate the influence of lifestyle factors on BC incidence over time among Australian women from mid-life to older age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women&rsquo;s Health (ALSWH) and linked Australian Cancer Database (ACD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 782 women from the ALSWH 1946&ndash;1951 birth cohort linked with the ACD from 1996 to 2019.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome and measures</st>
<p>Time to the occurrence of BC, accounting for death as a competing event. Body mass index, alcohol consumption, smoking, marital status, oral contraception and hormone replacement therapy were considered as lifestyle factors due to their impact from mid-life to older age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 12 782 women in the cohort, a total of 941 incident BC cases (7.4%) were identified between 1996 and 2019. Time-dependent analysis disclosed that a higher hazard of BC in alcohol drinkers (rarely drinks/low-risk drinkers: Subdistribution HR [sHR]=1.49, 95% CI: 1.33-1.69; risky/high-risk drinkers: sHR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.14-1.62) relative to non-drinkers and those with overweight/obesity (sHR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.14-1.32) relative to underweight/acceptable weight. Results also revealed that non-partnered women (sHR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.12-1.57) had a higher hazard of BC than those with partners. Models were adjusted for lifestyle, reproductive and demographic factors. The probability of cumulative incidence of BC for alcohol drinkers and overweight/obese women steadily increased over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study demonstrated that being non-partnered, overweight/obese and consuming alcohol were associated with increased hazards of BC in women&rsquo;s mid-life to older age.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rana, M. S., Marinovich, M. L., Houssami, N., Cavenagh, D., Byles, J. E., Rahman, M. M., Yu, X. Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-29T06:12:39-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105193</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105193</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influence of lifestyle factors on breast cancer incidence from mid-life to older age: an Australian longitudinal cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105193</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105921?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the healthcare challenges and preparedness during disaster in south-western coastal areas in Bangladesh: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105921?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the challenges with healthcare services access, delivery and preparedness in the south-western coastal areas of Bangladesh, focusing on the experiences of communities and service providers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, participants and methods</st>
<p>An exploratory qualitative study was conducted, involving four focus group discussions (FGDs) with community people and 29 key informant interviews (KIIs) with different types of stakeholder, including the Upazila Health and Family Planning Officer, Social Welfare Officers, Union Parishad Chairman (local government member), Local Project Implementation Officers, Upazila Nirbahi Officers and non-government organisation (NGO) representatives. FGDs and KIIs were conducted with purposively selected participants between December 2022 and October 2023. Semi-structured guides were employed to facilitate the sessions and interviews. The duration of FGDs ranged from 1 to 1.5 hours, whereas individual interviews lasted between 40 and 60 min. The collected data were analysed manually using a phenomenological approach to explore participants&rsquo; lived experiences and perceptions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in south-western coastal Bangladesh, in Shyamnagar and Ashashuni Upazilas of Satkhira district, and Mongla and Rampal Upazilas of Bagerhat district.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We explored two main themes, challenges in healthcare access and delivery during disasters and preparedness strategies adopted by government, NGOs and communities. Healthcare access was constrained by poor transportation, riverine locations, limited ambulances, financial barriers and inadequate local facilities and supplies. Weak emergency response systems and facility readiness further delayed delivery of healthcare, particularly for maternal and injury services. Preparedness included government mobile and union-level medical teams, NGO medical camps and community-led informal care. Despite these efforts, the lack of infrastructure, planning and resources highlights the need for strengthened coordination and targeted interventions to ensure equitable, timely healthcare delivery in coastal Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings of this study demonstrated that effective collaboration among government authorities, NGOs and local communities with clearly defined roles is essential to ensure healthcare delivery during climate-related natural hazards. Such coordination enables efficient use of resources and addresses community needs. Policymakers should develop strategies to establish and maintain functional preparedness systems, strengthening disaster response and ensuring timely healthcare access.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akter, O., Rabbani, M. G., Prova, H. A., Ahmed, M. W., Rasheed, S., Mahmood, S. S., Hasan, M. Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-27T07:23:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105921</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105921</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the healthcare challenges and preparedness during disaster in south-western coastal areas in Bangladesh: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105921</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105921</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108599?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Haemoglobinopathies and health disparities: findings of a large-scale sample survey among indigenous populations in Odisha, India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108599?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the prevalence of sickle cell trait, sickle cell disease, beta-thalassaemia minor and beta-thalassaemia major among Odisha&rsquo;s indigenous populations and to examine associated haematological profiles and survival outcomes based on socioeconomic factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A population-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Fourteen tribal-dominated districts of Odisha, eastern India</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 8774 tribal individuals aged 11 months to 99 years, selected using multistage cluster sampling from 9711 households.</p>
<p>Primary and Secondary outcome:</p>
<p>Primary outcomes were the prevalence of sickle cell trait, sickle cell disease, beta-thalassaemia minor and beta-thalassaemia major. Secondary outcomes included haemoglobin levels, serum iron, unsaturated iron-binding capacity, awareness regarding the diseases, nutritional status and estimated survival by sex and wealth quintile.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of sickle cell trait was 5.20%, sickle cell disease 0.40%, beta-thalassaemia minor 4.18%, and beta-thalassaemia major 0.44%. Females had slightly higher traits and minor prevalence, while the disease was more common in males; however, these differences are not statistically significant. Median serum iron levels were higher among individuals with &beta;-thalassaemia major, while individuals with sickle cell disease exhibited consistently lower haemoglobin levels. Awareness was critically low (15.28%). Nutritional status and survival differed by condition, sex and wealth. Median survival was lowest for sickle cell disease and among the poorest, highlighting the need for targeted screening and education.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlights the substantial burden of haemoglobinopathies and significant health disparities among the Indigenous populations of Odisha. Expanding screening initiatives, enhancing health education and integrating haemoglobinopathy management into primary healthcare services are crucial for reducing disease burden and improving survival outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhattacharya, H., Pradhan, R., Singh, S., Kavitha, A. K., Bhattacharya, D., Kshatri, J. S., Pati, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-27T07:23:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108599</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108599</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Haemoglobinopathies and health disparities: findings of a large-scale sample survey among indigenous populations in Odisha, India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108599</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108599</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112683?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Scoping review protocol of E-Health interventions targeting Indigenous populations]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112683?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Electronic health (E-Health) technologies present a valuable opportunity to enhance healthcare access and outcomes for Indigenous populations by addressing persistent, often structurally determined, health disparities. Despite increasing recognition of the potential of E-Health interventions, there remains a lack of comprehensive synthesis of their modalities, cultural appropriateness and implementation within Indigenous communities globally. This scoping review will aim to systematically map the landscape of E-Health interventions for Indigenous populations, identifying effective strategies and gaps in current research and practice. By documenting global evidence, this review will contribute to broader efforts to integrate Indigenous health considerations into policy and practice, supporting health equity and realising the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A comprehensive search of multiple databases will be conducted to identify studies on E-Health interventions in Indigenous communities between 2013 and 2025. The review will focus on interventions targeting Indigenous populations published in English. A two-stage screening process, comprising abstract/title screening followed by full-text screening, will be independently conducted by two reviewers. A standardised data extraction template will be used, and qualitative data will be synthesised using narrative synthesis and thematic analysis. Quantitative data will be presented descriptively using graphs, diagrams or tables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As the study relied on publicly available research, institutional review board approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, S., Monteiro, S. M. D. R., Borana, R., Yarran, T., Topp, S. M., Castellanos, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-27T07:23:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112683</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112683</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Scoping review protocol of E-Health interventions targeting Indigenous populations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112683</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113603?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Platform trial of smartphone-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depressive symptoms among people with no or subthreshold depression: a protocol for the Best, Efficient and Affordable Training in Resilience in Constant Evolution (BEATRICE) platform trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113603?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The global burden of depression continues to rise despite evidence that prevention is feasible and cost-effective. Building on the Resilience Enhancement with Smartphone in Living ENvironmenTs (RESiLIENT) randomised controlled trial, the Best, Efficient and Affordable Training in Resilience in Constant Evolution (BEATRICE) platform trial evaluates and optimises smartphone-delivered cognitive&ndash;behavioural therapy (CBT) for adults with no to subthreshold depression. The primary objective is to minimise the Total Burden of Depression, measured by the integral of weekly to monthly Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) scores over 12 months, through a living, adaptive platform trial that sequentially tests multiple clinical questions and personalised algorithms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>BEATRICE is a nationwide, digitally centralised, multi-arm platform trial conducted via the &lsquo;Resilience Training App&rsquo;. Eligible participants are adults (aged &ge;18 years) with PHQ-8 &le;14, fluent in Japanese, owning a smartphone and not currently receiving mental health treatment. Recruitment takes place through health-insurance associations, companies, municipalities and online outreach. Participants are randomised centrally to CBT skill modules&mdash;behavioural activation, assertion training, behaviour therapy for insomnia, cognitive restructuringor problem-solving&mdash;delivered alone or in combination. Assessments are open-label and completed digitally by self-reports.</p>
<p>The initial list of clinical questions to be examined in this platform trial includes: external validity of the personalised and optimised algorithm for first-line interventions, strategies to help individuals not on track during initial weeks, second-line interventions at 6 months, development of super-personalised and optimised therapy algorithm, that is, longitudinally personalised and optimised in response to individuals&rsquo; responses after the first-line assignment. The primary outcomes, sample sizes and statistical analyses differ depending on the clinical question addressed within the platform trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine (C1733). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and public reports.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>UMIN000058696.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Furukawa, T. A., Noma, H., Kojima, M., Tajika, A., Toyomoto, R., Sakata, M., Luo, Y., Inoue,, K., Horikoshi, M., Akechi, T., Kawakami, N., Kondo, N., Nakayama, T., Fukuma, S., Christensen, H., Whitton, A., Lutz, W., Cuijpers, P., Kessler, R. C., Wason, J., Nahum-Shani, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-27T07:23:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113603</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113603</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Platform trial of smartphone-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depressive symptoms among people with no or subthreshold depression: a protocol for the Best, Efficient and Affordable Training in Resilience in Constant Evolution (BEATRICE) platform trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113603</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115821?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the impact of genomic secondary findings on clinical care and patient experience: a protocol for a prospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115821?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Genomic testing allows for the identification of disease-causing genetic variants and may also reveal secondary findings (SF) unrelated to the reason for testing. As the list of medically actionable genes continues to grow, it is important to understand the impact of these findings on clinical care and patient experience, particularly in paediatric settings. This work will generate novel evidence on the clinical, patient, family and system impacts of medically actionable SF generated from genomic testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This mixed-methods, prospective, observational study will describe the impacts of SF on clinical care and the patient and family experience. Participants include probands and/or parents of probands who receive SF (ie, cases), clinicians involved in managing their care and controls matched 2:1 to cases based on age group, phenotype and primary genomic testing result. We aim to enrol 50 cases and 100 controls among those who receive genomic testing through Genome-wide Sequencing Ontario or other local sequencing initiatives in Ontario, Canada. Clinicians involved in follow-up care will complete questionnaires related to risk assessment, medical recommendations and clinical utility of SF post-result disclosure and one year later. Patient questionnaires will record health service use and psychological outcomes (ie, personal utility, empowerment) every 6 months for 2 years. These data will be compared between cases and controls using parametric tests. Cases will be invited to a qualitative interview to learn about their experiences. Data will be analysed using quantitative and qualitative techniques, triangulating datasets to enhance the validity and depth of the findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study is approved by the Clinical Trials Ontario (CTO) Research Ethics Review System (REB# CTO 3655). We plan to present our results to academic, patient, clinician and decision-maker audiences through articles and presentations at provincial, national and international meetings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Assamad, D., Hansen, A., Fooks, K., Luca, S., Venkataramanan, V., Hsue, E., Shickh, S., Yan, J., Wu, V., Badalato, L., Balci, T. B., Beausejour Ladouceur, V., Chad, L., Chisholm, C., Gillespie, M. K., Huang, L., Jarinova, O., Lau, L., Lee, W., Mackley, M. P., Marshall, C. R., Mendoza-Londono, R., Morel, C. F., Richer, J., Sawyer, S., Stavropoulos, D. J., Szuto, A., Tarnopolsky, M., Villani, A., Zahavich, L., Somerville, M. J., Boycott, K. M., Ungar, W. J., Hayeems, R. Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-27T07:23:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115821</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115821</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the impact of genomic secondary findings on clinical care and patient experience: a protocol for a prospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115821</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115821</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e093618corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: 'SinoMAKS--protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the Chinese version of the non-pharmacological, multimodal MAKS intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia in Chinese nursing homes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e093618corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Scheuermann J-S, Scheerbaum P, Liu Y, <I>et al.</I> SinoMAKS&mdash;protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the Chinese version of the non-pharmacological, multimodal MAKS intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia in Chinese nursing homes. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2025;15:e093618. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093618</p>
<p>This article has been corrected since it was published online. An additional paragraph for using the MMSE has been added on request from PAR Inc.: "Use of the Chinese MMSE - An unauthorised version of the Chinese MMSE was used by the study team without permission, however this has now been rectified with PAR (Invoice IN-00565861). The MMSE is a copyrighted instrument and may not be used or reproduced in whole or in part, in any form or language, or by any means without written permission of PAR (<A HREF="www.parinc.com">www.parinc.com</A>)."</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-27T07:23:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093618corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-093618corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: 'SinoMAKS--protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the Chinese version of the non-pharmacological, multimodal MAKS intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia in Chinese nursing homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e093618corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e093618corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109677?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SAFER-Dem: generating co-designed adaptations to a discharge care planning bundle for people living with dementia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109677?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To gather insights from people living with dementia, unpaid carers and professionals to co-design and refine a dementia-inclusive adaptation of the SAFER-Mental Health discharge care bundle, SAFER-Dem, that addresses challenges in the discharge process from mental health inpatient settings. A secondary objective was to assess how stakeholders interact with and understand the revised materials, focusing on usability and the perceived effectiveness of the dementia-inclusive adaptations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative co-design study involving sequential workshops and &lsquo;think-aloud&rsquo; usability interviews, guided by participatory design and cognitive interviewing methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Mental health inpatient settings in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>17 stakeholders (nine people with lived experience as a person living with dementia or carer and eight healthcare professionals) took part in four co-design workshops. 12 additional stakeholders (four people living with dementia, four unpaid carers and four professionals) participated in &lsquo;think-aloud&rsquo; interviews. Participants were recruited via NHS Trust networks, advisory groups and social media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants highlighted widespread dissatisfaction with current discharge procedures, especially communication failures and environmental barriers. Changes to SAFER-Dem included simplified materials, flexible timing of delivery, realistic imagery and additional aids such as scenario cards and talking mats. Three main usability themes emerged: appropriateness, practical changes and usability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The SAFER-Dem care bundle was well received by stakeholders, showing promise for improving discharge quality for people living with dementia. Participants identified areas for improvement to enhance accessibility and effectiveness. Findings suggest that with further evaluation, SAFER-Dem could become a valuable tool in supporting dementia-inclusive discharge practices. Research and co-design with people living with dementia have been instrumental in understanding experiences during discharge.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler, N., Harbinson, G., Giles, S. J., Bifarin, O., Parveen, S., Robinson, C., Panagioti, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T17:13:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109677</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109677</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SAFER-Dem: generating co-designed adaptations to a discharge care planning bundle for people living with dementia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109677</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109677</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e097944?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gambling and the COVID-19 pandemic in the province of Quebec (Canada): results from an online cross-sectional survey of people who had gambled within the last 12 months]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e097944?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This article presents the quantitative phase of a two-phase mixed methods study. The main objective of this article is to examine how the COVID-19 pandemic affected adult gamblers&rsquo; gambling behaviours and mental health in Quebec.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional online survey was used to collect data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Quebec (Canada).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A sample of 973 gamblers completed the problem gambling severity index (PGSI). The participants were French-speaking adults living in the province of Quebec, and they had gambled at least once in the preceding 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Descriptive analysis, <I></I><sup>2</sup> or the Monte Carlo estimation, Kruskal&ndash;Wallis and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the sample, 24.7% were no-risk gamblers, 18.6% were low-risk gamblers, 27.9% were moderate-risk gamblers and 28.9% were high-risk or problem gamblers. Most of the participants reported an increase in their online gambling, in the duration in which they were available for gambling, and the frequency with which they gambled during the pandemic. The results of this study suggest positive associations between PGSI scores and symptoms of depression and anxiety. In this study, 11 independent variables explained 50.9% of the variance of problematic gambling (ie, PGSI &ge; 3) during the COVID-19 pandemic. These variables are related to types of gambling, psychosocial factors, changes in tobacco use and gambling expenditures and high gambling frequency in the last 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Given the general increase in gamblers&rsquo; various gambling behaviours during the pandemic, along with the observed impacts on their mental health and reluctance to seek assistance for problematic gambling, future research must explore the mental health of gamblers after COVID-19-related public health measures were eased.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brodeur, M., Fortier, M.-E., Carrier, N., Audette-Chapdelaine, S., Auger, A.-M., Savard, A.-C., Kairouz, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097944</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097944</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gambling and the COVID-19 pandemic in the province of Quebec (Canada): results from an online cross-sectional survey of people who had gambled within the last 12 months]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097944</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097944</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100895?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness analysis of Canadas National Overdose Response Service]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100895?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Canada&rsquo;s National Overdose Response Service (NORS) and in particular, highlight the conditions under which the cost-effectiveness decision would change, given the uncertainty in estimating the overall risk of fatal and non-fatal overdose in comparison to overall programme costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov cohort model from a health sector perspective, incorporating health states related to substance use, overdose and mortality. Model parameters were calibrated using Canadian overdose data, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess cost-effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Our study evaluated Canada&rsquo;s NORS, an overdose response hotline, and reflected community-based substance use settings where overdoses may occur without supervision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $C100 000 per QALY.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our model calibration accurately fit fatal overdose targets from 2020 to 2023 and included a total of 9402 calls and 148 overdose events over the study period. We estimated an 11% baseline risk of death for unwitnessed overdoses and a 78% probability of a witnessed overdose. Over a lifetime, NORS was the dominant strategy, yielding 0.46 additional QALYs (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.13 to 1.15) and cost savings of $C25 405 (CrI &ndash;$C123 618 to $C24 351). While not cost-effective in the first year (ICER=$C725 843/QALY), NORS became cost-effective beyond 5 years at a $C100 000/QALY threshold. Sensitivity analyses highlighted the cost per NORS call and EMS call-out probability as key cost drivers, while NORS coverage and overdose risk influenced QALYs. NORS remained cost-effective under a broad range of risk and cost scenarios.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The NORS intervention is a cost-effective and cost-saving strategy for reducing fatal overdose risk over a lifetime, offering substantial population-level health benefits and a critical opportunity to mitigate overdose fatalities amid shifting harm reduction policies and threatened supervised consumption site closures.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rioux, W., Enns, B., Viste, D., Ghosh, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100895</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100895</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness analysis of Canadas National Overdose Response Service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100895</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100895</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102751?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the factors influencing antipsychotic medication use in continuing care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative descriptive study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102751?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The objective of this project was to examine factors reported to affect changes in antipsychotic medication prescription and use in long-term care during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative descriptive study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Continuing care (CC) facilities in Alberta, Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were staff from CC who had worked during the pandemic, recruited from homes stratified by change in antipsychotic usage (decreased use, no change or increased use based on the Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI) quality indicator for potentially inappropriate antipsychotic medication use). Virtual interviews were conducted using a semi-structured guide. Data were inductively coded then mapped into the components of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation&mdash;Behaviour system, which served as our lens to understand the factors influencing change in medication use over the pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>44 staff members participated. Half worked at sites that experienced change in antipsychotic medication use. Many factors affected medication use. Primary motivations driving use included the need for staff to protect themselves and residents and increased staff stress. Opportunities to appropriately use antipsychotics were affected by policies requiring physical and social isolation and use of personal protective equipment. However, respondents demonstrated their capability of enacting appropriate use when describing their perspectives toward these medications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Staff attempted to provide quality care to residents aligned with antipsychotic medication guidelines while simultaneously complying with the restrictions and policies imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings highlight the factors influencing antipsychotic medication use among CC residents during the pandemic and may inform future planning or outbreak responses.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karimi-Dehkordi, M., Asaana, P., Wagg, A., Hanson, H. M., Harasym, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102751</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102751</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the factors influencing antipsychotic medication use in continuing care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative descriptive study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102751</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102751</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Womens empowerment and quality antenatal care in Ghana: analysis using the survey-based womens empowerment global index in the Ghana demographic and health survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the association between women&rsquo;s empowerment, measured using the Survey-based Women&rsquo;s emPowERment (SWPER) Global Index, and receipt of quality antenatal care (ANC) in Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative survey data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 3837 women aged 15&ndash;49 years who had a live birth or stillbirth in the 3 years preceding the 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey and reported at least one ANC visit for the most recent pregnancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Quality ANC was defined as receipt of four essential ANC components: blood pressure measurement, urine testing, blood sample collection and iron supplementation. Women&rsquo;s empowerment was assessed across three SWPER domains: attitude toward violence, social independence and decision-making, categorised as low, medium or high. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to examine associations while accounting for individual, household, community and regional-level factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 90.9% of women received all four ANC components. In bivariate and partially adjusted analyses, higher empowerment in the attitude toward violence and social independence domains was associated with higher odds of receiving quality ANC. However, these associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant in the fully adjusted multilevel model. The strongest independent associations with quality ANC were health-service utilisation factors. Late ANC initiation at 4&ndash;6 months (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.97) and &ge;7 months (AOR=0.28, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.49) reduced the likelihood of receiving quality ANC, whereas attending 4&ndash;8 visits (AOR=2.89, 95% CI 2.05 to 4.07) and &ge;nine visits (AOR=4.25, 95% CI 2.69 to 6.71) increased the likelihood. Receiving ANC at private hospitals was associated with lower odds of quality ANC compared with public hospitals (AOR=0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.74). Regular radio exposure was positively associated with quality ANC, and substantial regional disparities persisted, particularly in the Western North, Northern, Savannah, North East and Upper East regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In Ghana, women&rsquo;s empowerment indirectly influences the quality of ANC through pathways of early initiation and adequate continuity of care, whereas health-system factors and regional inequities remain the dominant independent determinants. Policy efforts should prioritise timely ANC initiation, continuity of care and equitable service delivery, alongside integrated empowerment strategies within broader health-system strengthening initiatives.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bessing, B., Koray, M. H., Baatiema, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104237</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104237</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Womens empowerment and quality antenatal care in Ghana: analysis using the survey-based womens empowerment global index in the Ghana demographic and health survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104237</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106351?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development, implementation, maintenance and impact of clinical academic career frameworks for healthcare professionals: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106351?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A clinical academic is a health professional engaged in clinical, research and academic activities, providing leadership to improve evidence-based healthcare and bridge the gap between research and clinical practice supporting evidence-based care. Clinical academics bring patient-focused insights to research, benefiting organisations and service users. A formal clinical academic career framework builds research capacity within the professions, embedding research into education and practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will provide an in-depth exploration of the approaches taken internationally to the development, implementation, maintenance and impact of clinical academic career frameworks. The systematic review with narrative synthesis will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 checklist. Searches for healthcare professionals, clinical academic as conjoined role, and organisational enablers and facilitators will be conducted by a librarian in CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO) and Embase (Ovid) with no timeline or language restrictions. A targeted grey literature search of select websites and databases will be performed. Screening will be performed by two persons independently, supported by the Covidence platform. Papers which describe the components of, or have evaluated, a clinical academic career framework will be included. A narrative synthesis will be presented to summarise the range of overarching structures, processes and approaches employed internationally to the development and implementation of clinical academic career frameworks for healthcare professionals. The results of the review will aid policymakers who are considering the implementation of policies which support the training, initiation and maintenance of healthcare professionals in roles that span clinical, research and academic contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review uses publicly available data within published papers; therefore, ethical approval is not required. Regular and ongoing contact with members of the Implementation Project Group will support the publication and wider dissemination of this systematic review.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hegarty, J., Cotter, L., Koc, I., Brosnan, M., Clarke, V., Cliffe, K., Crowley, P., Harnett, G., Lane, A., Leahy-Warren, P., Liu, Y., Nic Dhonnacha, S., OSullivan, K., Walsh, S., Gallen, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106351</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106351</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development, implementation, maintenance and impact of clinical academic career frameworks for healthcare professionals: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106351</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106351</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107607?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Burden of birth defects in a war and siege-affected region: a retrospective hospital-based cross-sectional study from Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107607?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the prevalence and patterns of externally visible structural birth defects in the Tigray Region during the war and siege period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of delivery records from 11 public hospitals in the Tigray Region of Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>11 selected public hospitals that remained relatively functional during the war in the Tigray Region of northern Ethiopia and provided maternity and neonatal care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All recorded delivery outcomes between October 2020 and December 2023 were reviewed. A total of 54 626 birth records, including both live births and stillbirths, were analysed. Each record was systematically screened to identify the presence and type of birth defects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The prevalence and patterns of externally visible structural birth defects were evaluated using retrospective hospital delivery record reviews. The primary outcome was the prevalence of externally visible structural birth defects per 10 000 births. Secondary outcomes was the distribution of the specific types of the congenital anomalies, the proportion of stillbirth among affected births and characteristics related to maternal antenatal care (ANC) and folate supplementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 54 626 deliveries reviewed, 2055 cases (3.8%) involved externally visible structural birth defects, corresponding to a prevalence of 376.2 per 10 000 births (95% CI 360.1 to 392.8). The most frequent anomalies were neural tube defects, particularly anencephaly (136.6 per 10 000 births) and spina bifida (110.6 per 10 000 births), together accounting for more than three-quarters of all defects. Other relatively common defects included hydrocephalus (33 per 10 000 births), clubfoot (23.4 per 10 000 births) and cleft lip/palate (20.5 per 10 000 births). A large proportion of affected births were stillbirths (73%). 82% of these mothers had not received periconceptional folate or multivitamin supplementation, and 87% did not attend ANC in the first trimester.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlights a substantial burden of structural birth defects in the conflict-affected Tigray Region, Ethiopia. The findings underscore the urgent need to improve access to ANC and periconceptional folate supplementation. Future research should explore the role of environmental, nutritional and genetic factors in the observed rise in congenital anomalies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berihu, B. A., Mekonen, H. K., Magana, T., Belay, T. G., Zelelew, Y. B., Debeb, Y. G., Yang, P., Berhe, H., Mulugeta, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107607</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107607</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Burden of birth defects in a war and siege-affected region: a retrospective hospital-based cross-sectional study from Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107607</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107607</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109280?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility and acceptability of measurement-based care and integrated service delivery: a mixed methods research protocol for integrated youth services]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109280?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>While mental health and substance use challenges have been shown to most frequently emerge during adolescence and young adulthood, a significant portion of these youth experience barriers when attempting to access quality and timely care. The Integrated Youth Service (IYS) model of care aims to transform healthcare for youth by bringing together a broad array of service providers in low-barrier, accessible settings across Canada. <I>Youth Wellness Hubs Ontario</I> (YWHO) is the IYS network in Ontario and consists of Networks across the province that serve diverse youth aged 12&ndash;25. YWHO is founded on six core components that were developed based on youth-centred approaches to care, including integrated service delivery (ISD) and measurement-based care (MBC). Despite ample evidence promoting ISD and MBC, there remains a gap in identifying key implementation considerations and recommendations within IYS settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will use the Quality Implementation Framework and a mixed methods approach to understand the perspectives of youth, caregivers/family and service providers&rsquo; experiences of ISD and MBC. Focus groups will be conducted with all participant groups to identify their perspectives on these two IYS core components. Group concept mapping will identify youth-friendly, higher-level conceptualisations of ISD and MBC. Quantitative data will be collected using the Service Provider Adopter and Innovation Characteristics Questionnaire (SPAICQ) and a Social Network Analysis approach. The study will use a Convergence Parallel Design (triangulation) as the primary integration strategy, where qualitative and quantitative data are collected concurrently and brought together during the interpretation phase. This will be supplemented by embedded sequential mixing where the outputs of one method (eg, focus groups) inform the design or analysis of another (eg, SPAICQ scores). Youth and caregivers/family members will be recruited through YWHO networks and youth advisory councils, and service providers will be recruited from YWHO Networks across the province.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health&rsquo;s (CAMH) Research Ethics Board (REB # 2023/030). Ongoing ethical approval will be maintained annually. As the study procedures are not greater than minimal risk, adverse events and/or serious adverse events are not expected. Findings from this study will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals, national and international conferences, regular briefings to interested parties and youth and family-friendly briefs through our networks and social media.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henderson, J., Chiodo, D., Quinlan-Davidson, M., Jackson-Best, F., Barbic, S. P., Linklater, R., Nyambi, A., El Dahr, Y., Dozet, D., Varadi, A.-L., Murcia, D., Goldsmith, R., Narajos, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109280</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109280</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility and acceptability of measurement-based care and integrated service delivery: a mixed methods research protocol for integrated youth services]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109280</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109666?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring patient adherence in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109666?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the main cause of death globally, but is by and large a preventable disease. We wished to identify, categorise and map adherence measurements of preventative treatment strategies in patients with ASCVD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and data sources</st>
<p>We conducted a scoping review according to the Joanna Briggs Institue (JBI) methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and EMBASE (Elsevier Biomedical Research database). The search was conducted in May 2023 and updated in November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Observational studies pertaining to major types of ASCVD and related preventive treatment with reported adherence measures in adults over the age of 18 were included in this review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Title and abstract and subsequent full-text review were performed by two independent reviewers in duplicate. We presented data from the included 108 studies and synthesised the results in an overview of the most commonly used adherence measurements according to ASCVD category.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 108 records met the inclusion criteria. ASCVD populations included ranged in age from 40 to 91 years, with a male predominance (85%). Medication adherence was mostly reported by the proportion of patients taking their medication (15 studies, 14%) or the proportion of days covered (12 studies, 11%). Among the 108 included studies, 67 (62%) reported on medication adherence, 65 (60%) on smoking cessation, 39 (36%) on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol guideline adherence, 39 (36%) on exercise, 17 (16%) on diet and 11 (10%) on alcohol abstinence. Unspecified patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were the most used method for assessing medication adherence, reported in 15 studies (22%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Medication adherence was the most frequently assessed domain in secondary prevention of ASCVD, with unspecified PROMs being the most applied measurement approach. Lack of a gold standard combined with inconsistent adherence measures across studies of ASCVD continues to pose a significant challenge for evaluating treatment quality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glud, M., Krarup, N. T., Juhl, C. B., Stenholt, L., Andersen, J. K., Kongsgaard Nielsen, L., Dahl, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109666</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109666</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring patient adherence in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109666</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109666</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110106?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Robotic-assisted endoscopic procedures in paediatric urology, gynaecology and general surgery: protocol for a multicenter observational registry study (MiniTrust study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110106?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has improved patient outcomes by reducing surgical trauma and recovery times. Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) advances MIS with superior precision, visualisation and ergonomics. These advantages are especially critical in paediatric procedures. The Senhance Surgical System (SSS) is a CE-marked robotic platform that enables RAS in children using 3 mm and 5 mm instruments. While RAS is routinely established in many adult procedures, its adoption and documentation in paediatric surgery are lagging. To address this disparity, the MiniTrust registry will generate real-world evidence on the safety and performance of the SSS in paediatric procedures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, observational post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) registry study includes both prospective and retrospective cases of paediatric patients undergoing RAS in urology, gynaecology or general surgery. If the underlying diagnosis is suitable for treatment with RAS, patients under 18 years of age and weighing &ge;10 kg are eligible. Primary outcomes include procedure-related adverse events (AEs) classified as Clavien-Dindo &gt;grade III within 30 days, and serious AEs within 3 months. Secondary endpoints include length of hospital stay, unplanned conversion rates and patient-reported pain outcomes. Data are collected via standardised case report forms and analysed descriptively, with results benchmarked against conventional paediatric laparoscopy literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Maastricht (2024&ndash;0425) and by the Ethics Committee of Munich (2024&ndash;0589). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and regulatory reports. This registry will contribute essential evidence to support the broader integration of RAS into paediatric surgical care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07081828">NCT07081828</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Killaars, R. E. M., Visschers, R. G. J., Cakir, H., Dinjens, D. J. A., Widmann, D. L., Friedrich, H., Muensterer, O., van Gemert, W. G., Goedeke, J., The MiniTrust Collaborative Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110106</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110106</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Robotic-assisted endoscopic procedures in paediatric urology, gynaecology and general surgery: protocol for a multicenter observational registry study (MiniTrust study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110106</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110553?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How does the implementation of AI-based automation of administrative tasks affect healthcare professionals work? Study protocol for a longitudinal embedded case study in Swedish primary and specialist care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110553?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare through enhanced computational capabilities that process vast amounts of data with unprecedented speed and precision. AI-powered administrative systems hold significant promise for reducing the substantial documentation burden on healthcare professionals, potentially improving operational efficiency and job satisfaction. However, critical knowledge gaps exist regarding how AI implementation affects professional boundaries, work identities and the healthcare work environment. This study protocol describes the Project EFAAI (Efficient and Flexible Working Life in Healthcare with the Support of Digital Tools and AI), which aims to explore how the implementation of AI-based automation of administrative tasks affects healthcare professionals&rsquo; work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This research employs a single-embedded case study with a longitudinal approach, following the implementation of an AI-powered healthcare administration system across 12 primary care facilities and 20 specialist care facilities of a major private healthcare provider in Sweden. Data collection spans 18 months through three sequential waves at 6-month intervals. The project consists of three work packages (WP): WP1 explores changes in professional boundaries and AI literacy requirements using exploratory meetings with healthcare leaders and in-depth semistructured interviews with 20 physicians from primary care and 20 from specialist care (n=40); WP2 investigates implementation barriers and facilitators through in-depth semistructured interviews with the same 40 physicians as WP1 for longitudinal follow-up; and WP3 examines the impact on efficient and flexible work conditions using a mixed-methods approach integrating quantitative operational and administrative data from the healthcare provider&rsquo;s information systems and administrative databases (eg, documentation completion times, consultation duration, workload distribution metrics, operational efficiency ratios) with qualitative data from four focus groups and workshops with physicians, nurses, healthcare leaders and administrative staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study adheres to the ethical guidelines of the Swedish Research Council and complies with the regulations of the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Data will be collected with informed consent from all participants, anonymised and stored in accordance with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements. Results will be disseminated through international publications, conferences, teaching activities and stakeholder engagement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irgang, L., Svedberg, P., Nygren, J., Petersson, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110553</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110553</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How does the implementation of AI-based automation of administrative tasks affect healthcare professionals work? Study protocol for a longitudinal embedded case study in Swedish primary and specialist care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110553</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110553</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111570?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lived experiences of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their parents: a qualitative descriptive study from eastern India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111570?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study explores the lived experiences of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and their parents, focusing on the physical, emotional and social challenges they encounter.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative descriptive study with a phenomenological orientation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in the outpatient endocrinology unit of a tertiary hospital in eastern India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Twelve children aged 10&ndash;19 years living with T1DM for at least 1 year and their parents were selected through purposive sampling and interviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five key themes emerged from parents&rsquo; narratives: physical and emotional toll of T1DM on children; emotional turmoil and the initial shock; challenges in diabetes management; navigating relationships amidst diabetes and balancing hopes and uncertainties with diabetes. From the children&rsquo;s accounts, three themes were identified: enduring the strain: the physical and emotional toll with diabetes; coping mechanisms and adaptation to life with diabetes and social hurdles and future hopes with diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Children with T1DM and their parents face multidimensional challenges in managing the condition. Holistic interventions that address emotional, financial and social aspects of care are essential. Strengthening support systems for both children and families is crucial for improving quality of life and coping mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayakrishnan, K., Joshi, P., Guin, A., Gayen, S., Kundu, H., Roy, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111570</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111570</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lived experiences of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their parents: a qualitative descriptive study from eastern India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111570</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111570</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111660?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Capacity building for ethical use of artificial intelligence in health: protocol for a scoping review of training initiatives and gaps in Africa]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111660?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in health systems, with applications spanning diagnostic imaging, clinical decision support, disease surveillance and health system planning. While international guidance frameworks outline principles for safe and ethical AI deployment, effective governance depends on the capacity of regulators, research ethics committees, policymakers, health technology assessment bodies and frontline health professionals to evaluate, supervise and implement AI tools in practice. Across African Union (AU) member states, training and capacity-building initiatives related to ethical AI use in health remain fragmented and unevenly documented. This scoping review aims to systematically map, characterise and synthesise evidence on training initiatives that support the ethical use and governance of AI in health across Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and applies the Joanna Briggs Institute population&ndash;concept&ndash;context framework. We will search PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, IEEE Xplore, SSRN and African Journals Online, alongside structured grey literature searches of African regional bodies (eg, AU, Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, AUDA-NEPAD, WHO Regional Office for Africa), national regulatory authorities, ministries of health, professional councils and donor programme portals. Searches will cover 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2025 and will be limited to English-language materials. Eligible sources must describe identifiable training, education or capacity-building initiatives focused on ethical use and/or governance of AI in health, including software as a medical device and AI-enabled medical devices, delivered in or explicitly targeting at least one AU member state. Purely technical AI training without governance or clinical integration components will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently screen records and extract data. Findings will be synthesised using descriptive statistics and reflexive thematic analysis. Where feasible, stakeholder consultation will be undertaken to contextualise the results and refine the draft competency framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The review will analyse publicly available documents and does not involve human participants; formal ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed open-access publication, a policy brief targeted at regional and national health governance stakeholders, and a public webinar. Search strategies, screening decisions and extraction tools will be deposited on the Open Science Framework (OSF) to enhance transparency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="https://osf.io/d2rcm/">https://osf.io/d2rcm/</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mwaka, J., Mulebeke, R., Dedibo, R., Nalubega, J. F., Ankunda, C., Musoki, D., Muluga, W. U., Nataliya, J., Kirabo, J., Jjuuko, E., Karamagi, Y., Imanzi, B., Nabukenya, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111660</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111660</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Capacity building for ethical use of artificial intelligence in health: protocol for a scoping review of training initiatives and gaps in Africa]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111660</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111660</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111798?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective randomised trial comparing thermal ablation With laparoscopic Adrenalectomy as an alternatiVE treatment for unilateral asymmetric primary aldosteronism: a protocol for the WAVE trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111798?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Unilateral aldosterone-producing adenomas (&gt;1 cm) and aldosterone-producing nodules (&lt;1 cm) are a common cause of primary aldosteronism (PA) and hypertension. Adrenal surgery can potentially cure or significantly improve the condition. However, fewer than 1% of patients with PA undergo adrenalectomy. For some, this is due to surgical risks, service capacity or patient preference against surgery. In these individuals, thermal ablation may provide an alternative. This paper describes the protocol for the WAVE trial, designed to compare thermal ablation with the current standard, laparoscopic adrenalectomy, in the treatment of unilateral PA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>WAVE is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing thermal ablation (experimental arm) with laparoscopic adrenalectomy (control arm) in the treatment of unilateral PA. 122 participants will be recruited and randomised to thermal ablation or laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a 1.5:1 ratio. Hierarchical co-primary endpoint data considering both biochemical and clinical outcomes will be judged at 6 months. Secondary endpoint data will consider adverse events, length of inpatient stay, patient satisfaction and time to return to activities of daily living. The full protocol is available at ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by the Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee (21/LO/0243). The results of the study will be shared with study participants, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national/international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05405101">NCT05405101</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laycock, K., Kearney, J., Lee, Y.-N., Macfarlane, J., Goodchild, E., Ng, E., Pineau Mitchell, A., Wu, X., Htut, Z., Goodchild, G., Lowe, D., Hilliard, N., Godfrey, E., Qazi, N., Bastos, J., Chua, A., Mahroof, R., Palma, A., Khatun, A., Varsani, C., Benu, D., Pereira, S. P., Krishnamurthy, M., Cheow, H., Chung, T.-T., Carroll, P., OToole, S., Wernig, F., Gurnell, M., Brown, M., Drake, W. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111798</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111798</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective randomised trial comparing thermal ablation With laparoscopic Adrenalectomy as an alternatiVE treatment for unilateral asymmetric primary aldosteronism: a protocol for the WAVE trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111798</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111798</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112364?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of carotenoids supplementation on visual function in Chinese adults free of retinal disease: protocol for the CSV double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112364?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The macula is a pigmented area located at the centre of the retina, responsible for central, high-resolution colour vision. Previous research has demonstrated that oral carotenoid supplementation can enhance contrast sensitivity (CS) in European populations. This study aims to investigate whether carotenoid supplementation can also improve visual function in the Chinese population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Contrast Sensitivity Vision (CSV) trial is a double-blind, randomised controlled trial conducted at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center in Guangzhou, China. 220 eligible Chinese adults will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral supplementation of 10 mg lutein, 10 mg meso-zeaxanthin and 2 mg zeaxanthin in a formula-based oil suspension (administered as one soft gel capsule) or a placebo oil soft gel capsule daily for 1 year. Participants in both groups will undergo ophthalmological study procedures including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, optical coherence tomography, fundus photography and skin carotenoid examinations at baseline and at 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits. Blood tests and a Dietary Carotenoid Screening Questionnaire will be administered at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up. Subjective visual function questionnaire interviews will be administered at baseline and at the 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. The primary outcome will assess change in CS at 6 cycles per degree (cpd) over the 1-year study intervention. Secondary outcomes will examine CS at 6 cpd at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up, CS at other cpd, BCVA, subjective visual function and skin carotenoid levels as measured at baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-ups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The CSV trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China (No. KYPJ141-4). Participants will have the opportunity to ask questions about the trial, and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to their involvement in the study. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06098677">NCT06098677</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, K., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Tay, J. P., Zhang, S., Qin, Y., Wong, W., He, M., Han, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112364</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112364</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of carotenoids supplementation on visual function in Chinese adults free of retinal disease: protocol for the CSV double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112364</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112364</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112777?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying ambulatory care sensitive conditions: a systematic review of studies defining sets of diseases with avoidable hospitalisations in European countries]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112777?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) are health conditions that can be adequately managed in the outpatient setting. Timely treatment and interventions may avoid the need for hospitalisation and emergency department visits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We aimed to identify ACSC lists developed for European populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review. We included primary studies that aimed to develop a list of ACSC for the general population or subpopulations within European countries. Studies reporting a formal methodology were eligible. Systematic or narrative reviews, and protocols were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched on 21 October 2025. Data search was complemented with the search for &lsquo;ambulatory OR preventable&rsquo; in the websites of the WHO Regional Office for Europe, OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) and NHSOF (British National Health Service Outcomes Framework).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently collected data on type of population, geographical coverage, bibliographic support, use of qualitative or quantitative methods, ontology system, as well as the identified conditions per list. Data on methodological characteristics was qualitatively synthesised. Conditions identified as ACSC were aggregated under International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10). Each primary study with Delphi component was assessed using the Diamond <I>et al</I> risk of bias tool. Studies with a qualitative component were assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for qualitative research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 12 articles were included. Six European countries have lists developed for general populations. A total of 263 unique ACSC have been defined (932 codes) for the general populations. For the paediatric age, 28 conditions (70 codes) were identified, while 37 diagnoses (58 codes) were listed for the nursing home population. Most commonly identified ACSCs were infection-related, chronic cardiovascular or respiratory diseases. Delphi methods were employed in eight studies, with a median of 3 (2&ndash;3.25) rounds with a median of 36.5 (32.8&ndash;42.5) panellists. Risk of bias assessment yielded a quality score of 2 (out of 4) for six studies and of 3 for the remaining two studies. Remaining studies were assessed with JBI yielding a median 6.5 (6.0&ndash;7.0) points (out of 10 possible points). The most used code system was ICD-10. Use of nationwide real-world databases was limited to six studies. No identified ACSC lists explicitly fulfilled all criteria defined by Solberg and Weissman for ACSC establishment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The evidence on ambulatory care sensitive conditions is heterogeneous and derives from different methodologies and covers six European countries. Most lists are diagnosis-based, aim at national, general populations and include Delphi components to define ACSC. We speculate that the future inclusion of primary care data could enhance ACSC evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42022349270.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinho-Dias, D., Sousa-Pinto, B., Canela-Pais, M., Garrido-Oliveira, A., Pinto, D., Costa-Pereira, A., Taveira-Gomes, T., Fonseca, J. A., Soares, A. J. d. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112777</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112777</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying ambulatory care sensitive conditions: a systematic review of studies defining sets of diseases with avoidable hospitalisations in European countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112777</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112777</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112825?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survival and predictors of mortality among people living with HIV (PLHIV) on antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia (2016-2023): a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112825?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Despite global progress in reducing HIV-related morbidity and mortality, preventable deaths persist, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Ethiopia has achieved near-universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage, yet survival outcomes and predictors of mortality in the era of &lsquo;test and treat&rsquo; remain underexplored. This study examined survival rates and predictors of mortality among people living with HIV (PLHIV) on ART in Ethiopia between 2016 and 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a retrospective open cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>65 public health facilities across Ethiopia. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were applied. Statistical significance was set at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The analysis included 33 416 PLHIV enrolled in care and treatment from 2016 to 2023. In the current study, baseline is defined as the start date of ART treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was survival status at the end of follow-up, defined as death versus alive.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>Among 33 416 PLHIV, 2659 deaths (8.6%) were documented during 85 972 person-years of follow-up, yielding a mortality incidence rate of 3.09 per 100 person-years. Most deaths occurred within the first 12 months of ART initiation. Independent predictors of mortality included age (&ge;35 years), bedridden (AHR 2.46, 95% CI 1.78 to 3.40) and ambulatory status (AHR 2.33, 95% CI 1.84 to 2.95), WHO stage IV (AHR 1.40, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.91), having opportunistic infections (AHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.76) and baseline CD4 &lt;200 cells/mm<sup>3</sup> (AHR 3.08, 95% CI 2.31 to 4.09). Receipt of tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) was protective (AHR 0.36, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.43).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The results show that many people appear to start ART late. Factors such as impaired functional status, the presence of opportunistic infections and older age appear to have further compounded risk, while TPT appears to be strongly protective. Improving early diagnosis, timely ART initiation and TPT uptake could further support better outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amogne, M. D., Kebede, A., Asfaw, D., Fetensa, G., Lemessa, F., Zealiyas, K., Belihu, W. B., Tamene, W., Gudeta, G., Wariso, F. B., Hailu, G., Shiferaw, A. Y., Debel, L., Dechassa, W., Bejiga, B., Itefa, K., Hailemariam, B. W., Habtesilase, A., Yenealem, D., Bekuma, T. T., Bulti, J., Tollera, G., Tadesse, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112825</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112825</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survival and predictors of mortality among people living with HIV (PLHIV) on antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia (2016-2023): a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112825</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112825</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113093?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113093?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a common subtype of heart failure, accounting for approximately 50% of all heart failure cases. It is characterised by a left ventricular ejection fraction of &ge;50%, alongside persistent symptoms and signs of heart failure. The pathophysiology of HFpEF is complex and multifactorial, involving mechanisms such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, right ventricular impairment, systemic inflammation and metabolic abnormalities. Although pharmacological therapies play a central role in the management of HFpEF, non-pharmacological interventions have also demonstrated potential in improving patients&rsquo; symptoms and quality of life. However, there remains no consensus regarding which non-pharmacological approach is most effective. This study will aim to systematically compare the efficacy of different non-pharmacological therapies in patients with HFpEF by conducting a systematic review and network meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will systematically search the following electronic databases from their inception to 14 February 2026: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese databases China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and SinoMed. The search will be restricted to studies published in English or Chinese. The primary outcomes will comprise all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, together with heart failure-related rehospitalisation. Pairwise meta-analyses will be performed using RevMan V.5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark), while network meta-analyses will be conducted using ADDIS V.1.16.6 (Drugis, Groningen, The Netherlands) and Stata V.16.1 (StataCorp) within a Bayesian framework employing Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to compare the relative efficacy of different non-pharmacological therapies. To ensure transitivity assumptions are met, we will conduct separate network meta-analyses for lifestyle and behavioural interventions (exercise training, dietary interventions and multidisciplinary management), device-based and surgical interventions (interatrial shunts, implantable haemodynamic monitors, cardiac contractility modulation and splanchnic nerve ablation), and a full network including all modalities. To ensure accuracy and reliability, study screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and certainty of evidence evaluation will be carried out independently by two reviewers. We will assess the risk of bias in individual studies with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and evaluate the certainty of evidence using both the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this study, as it is a systematic review of previously published literature. The findings will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and/or presented at relevant academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251165545.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, C., Kan, M., Chen, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113093</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113093</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113093</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113093</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113159?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of school meals programmes on education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113159?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Globally, school meals programmes (SMPs), otherwise referred to as school feeding programmes, are widely implemented with the aim of improving multisectoral outcomes, including education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture, among other cross-cutting impact areas. Despite their widespread adoption and the broad recognition of their potential benefits, evidence on their actual impact across these diverse outcomes remains limited, fragmented and often inconclusive. This lack of consolidated and robust evidence has prompted growing interest from development and humanitarian agencies, practitioners and policymakers in generating high-quality data to inform the design, implementation and scaling of these interventions. Therefore, to address this gap, we plan to conduct a systematic review aimed at assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SMPs on outcomes related to education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture in low-income and middle-income countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A comprehensive literature search will be conducted on relevant studies published between 2007 and 2025. The study will focus on four primary outcomes, which will include education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture. This systematic review will align with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We will search seven databases: MEDLINE (via Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase (via Ovid), PubMed and Global Health (via Ovid) using predefined keywords. The risk of bias of randomised and non-randomised studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool, respectively. Two reviewers will independently select studies, extract data and assess risk of bias. All included studies will be summarised and meta-analyses will be conducted when appropriate. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I&sup2; statistic, subgroup analyses and meta-regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethical considerations and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will not involve the collection of primary data and will thus not require any ethical approval. The dissemination of the outcome of the study will be through global conferences, policy briefs and scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024628180.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miki, G. N., Kiboi, W. K., Ohuma, E. O., Bundy, D. A. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113159</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113159</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of school meals programmes on education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113159</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113411?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[German Million Children Cohort: a historical birth cohort based on claims data to investigate the impact of immunisation and other early life factors on the risk of cancer and other diseases in childhood - cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113411?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>As a historical register-based birth cohort, the <I>German Million Children Cohort</I> was set up using data from the <I>German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD</I>), a health insurance database covering ~20% of the German population. The first cohort project aims to investigate the impact of <I>Prenatal and Childhood Immunization and the Risk of Childhood Cancer</I> project.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The cohort includes all newborns in <I>GePaRD</I> from 2004 to 2018 and is followed until occurrence of childhood cancer, death, the end of continuous insurance or currently available data years (31 December 2022). Information on vaccinations and confounders is collected from the inpatient and outpatient settings. For most children, information on vaccination exposure during pregnancy can be obtained through mother-child linkage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>The cohort includes 2 023 613 children with a maximum follow-up of 18 years. This results in 17 752 995 person-years at risk and 3410 cases of childhood cancer. Maternal linkage was possible for 78.3% of children. The vaccination coverage for both nationally recommended and other vaccines was assessed in the cohort. By age 30 months, 38.9% of children received all recommended vaccines, 52.4% received incomplete vaccinations and 8.8% remained unvaccinated. Regarding further characteristics, 57.6% of children were from families with higher education, 20.3% were hospitalised due to a severe infection during follow-up and 74.5% received at least one antibiotic prescription.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>While our first study with this historical cohort is dedicated to the question of whether immunity to childhood infections that are covered by the recommended baseline vaccination scheme reduces the risk of childhood cancer, the cohort will offer further opportunities. This includes the evaluation of additional factors potentially influencing the risk of cancer and other diseases in childhood, as well as an extension of the inclusion period beyond 2018 to also include children born during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brackmann, L. K., Mulanje, L., Langbein, S., Kollhorst, B., Haug, U., Ahrens, W., Nagrani, R., Marron, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113411</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113411</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[German Million Children Cohort: a historical birth cohort based on claims data to investigate the impact of immunisation and other early life factors on the risk of cancer and other diseases in childhood - cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113411</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113411</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114055?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What practical strategies improve recruitment and engagement of people experiencing homelessness in observational clinical research? A multistudy synthesis from Dublin, Ireland]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114055?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to identify practical, trauma-informed strategies to improve engagement of populations experiencing homelessness in observational health research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Data from three real-world observational studies involving people experiencing homelessness (PEH) and housed participants were analysed for study completion rates and participant demographics. A team of researchers, clinicians and people with lived experience of homelessness, reviewed their experience of study design, recruitment and assessment study procedures to identify strategies found to be effective in recruitment and retention of PEH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The Inclusion Health Research Group (IHRG) consists of 10 clinicians and researchers who study the effect of social exclusion, such as homelessness, on health. Many members of the group also provide clinical care to PEH. The three observational studies which informed this paper recruited participants in Dublin, Ireland between 2021 and 2025. Approximately 15 000 adults are currently experiencing homelessness in Ireland, of whom two-thirds reside in Dublin and more than 70% are accommodated in hostels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The three observational studies that informed this paper, designed and carried out by members of the IHRG, included populations of PEH recruited from sites in the community across Dublin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PEH were predominantly male with an average age in their mid-40s and a high prevalence of smoking, drug use and alcohol consumption. Study completion rates were high (83.3% to 94.1%). On review of the study design and implementation, eight key strategies were identified as effective in recruitment and retention of PEH: (1) involvement of people with lived experience in study design; (2) flexible recruitment locations; (3) flexible assessment timings; (4) trust-building through consistent communication; (5) collaboration with gatekeeper organisations and peer advocates; (6) use of non-financial incentives like health screenings; (7) validated assessment tools and (8) tailored support for participants with addiction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Using flexible, trauma-informed, participant-centred approaches informed by the involvement of people with lived experience and gatekeeper organisations can ensure high levels of recruitment and retention of PEH. This may enhance research inclusivity and ultimately contribute to better understanding of the complex health needs of populations experiencing homelessness within public health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard, G., Reddy, C., Lyons, C., Argue, R., Bourke, N. M., Ni Cheallaigh, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114055</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114055</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What practical strategies improve recruitment and engagement of people experiencing homelessness in observational clinical research? A multistudy synthesis from Dublin, Ireland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114055</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114055</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114082?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient perceptions of inhaled asthma medications: a qualitative study in Northern Sri Lanka]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114082?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study explores perceptions of inhaled medications among patients with asthma at an outpatient tertiary care setting in Northern Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive qualitative research design was used to gather data through focus group discussions (FGDs) that were transcribed, translated, manually coded and thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke&rsquo;s six-step approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at an outpatient medical clinic at a tertiary care centre in Northern Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Six FGDs were carried out among adult patients with asthma who had been on inhaled medications for at least 3 months. Participants were selected by maximum variation sampling, with each FGD consisting of 6&ndash;10 participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>51 participants between the ages of 20 and 71 years were recruited; 36 (70.6%) were female, and about a fourth had primary education or less. Seven subthemes were drawn out and organised into three overarching themes: (1) inhaler hesitancy; (2) fear-driven adherence and (3) conviction at last. Most participants were initially reluctant to use inhalers, primarily due to concerns about dependency and side effects, often influenced by opinions of family members. They delayed use until they experienced severe symptoms, with some describing nebulisation, hospitalisation and fear of death as turning points. Symptom alleviation and improved quality of life led to better adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Delays in inhaler use could lead to poor asthma control and outcomes. As many patients reported using their inhalers more consistently after an exacerbation or hospitalisation, asthma education programmes, involving both patients and family members, could address context-specific beliefs and misconceptions to promote early and sustained adherence to inhaled medications.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guruparan, Y., Navaratinaraja, T. S., Kumar, R., Selvaratnam, G., Ranganathan, S. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114082</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114082</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient perceptions of inhaled asthma medications: a qualitative study in Northern Sri Lanka]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114082</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114082</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114550?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of the Pressure Injury after Hospital Admission (PIAHA) screening tool for early assessment of hospital-acquired pressure injuries: a multiphase multicentre study protocol in acute care settings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114550?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Early prediction of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) is crucial for delivering prompt therapeutic interventions and personalised preventive measures to hospitalised patients. However, existing pressure injury (PI) assessment tools often lack transparency, objectivity, comprehensiveness and reliability. This study protocol aims to identify risk factors, develop a screening tool (Pressure Injury after Hospital Admission &ndash; PIAHA), and conduct a two-step validation for the early prediction of PI after hospital admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multiphase, multicentre, sequential research design comprises five phases. The first phase involves an umbrella review to synthesise comprehensive information on PI risk factors in hospitalised patients from published review studies. The second phase will use conventional content analysis and qualitative interviews with national and international experts to identify context-specific predictors of HAPIs. The third phase will employ a three-round E-Delphi method to integrate findings and establish a structured list of potential predictors. In the fourth phase, a cross-sectional study will evaluate the predictive value of identified risk factors for HAPI development among hospitalised patients, contributing to the development of the PIAHA screening tool. The final phase consists of a two-step validation: (1) a cross-sectional comparison of the PIAHA tool against the gold standard and (2) a cluster randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the novel &lsquo;IDEAL SKIIN CARES&rsquo; prevention bundle, administered by trained wound specialist nurses, vs routine standard care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was granted by Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences (IR.BMSU.REC.1402.059) covering all study phases. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or their legal representatives. The study follows the Declaration of Helsinki. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences, webinars, policy briefs and public engagement through social media, educational videos and podcasts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Implications for clinical practice</st>
<p>The PIAHA tool promises to enhance early detection of HAPI risk, facilitating individualised prevention and optimising clinical resource allocation. Implementation of the IDEAL SKIIN CARES bundle may improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs by standardising evidence-based preventive care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024532133.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06369688">NCT06369688</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bahramnezhad, F., Probst, S., Moradi, A., Gohari-Moghadam, K., Rahimi-Bashar, F., Mahmoodpoor, A., Ghamari, A. A., Jafari, I., Vahedian-Azimi, A., Pokorna, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114550</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114550</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of the Pressure Injury after Hospital Admission (PIAHA) screening tool for early assessment of hospital-acquired pressure injuries: a multiphase multicentre study protocol in acute care settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114550</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114550</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115670?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the implementation of neonatal care guidelines in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for a scoping review of rates, barriers, facilitators and strategies using Tanzania as a case study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115670?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) bears the highest global burden of neonatal mortality, a problem continued by the widespread &lsquo;know-do gap&rsquo;, the failure to translate evidence-based guidelines into practice. Tanzania&rsquo;s 2019 national neonatal care guideline illustrates this challenge, as its impact remains unevaluated despite stagnant mortality rates. A systematic mapping of implementation evidence, including its rates, determinants and improvement strategies, is urgently needed to identify gaps and inform actionable policies across SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We will systematically search six electronic databases (MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science, Cochrane Library and African Journals Online) and the grey literature from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen records using PCC criteria (Population: healthcare workers/systems; Concept: guideline implementation; Context: SSA/Tanzania). Data will be charted and analysed using descriptive statistics and deductive thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this synthesis uses published data. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal manuscript, conference presentations, integration into a PhD thesis and tailored outputs for policymakers (policy brief) and frontline workers (clinical implementation brief) in Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>This protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3FMBG">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3FMBG</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isack, M. N., Mkoka, D. A., Zheng, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115670</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115670</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the implementation of neonatal care guidelines in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for a scoping review of rates, barriers, facilitators and strategies using Tanzania as a case study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115670</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115670</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115873?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of community-based public health strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance in community settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115873?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), driven by unregulated antibiotic access, self-medication and weak health systems. Community-based interventions, including education, awareness campaigns, stewardship programmes and regulatory measures, are increasingly used to address inappropriate antibiotic use, yet evidence of their effectiveness in SSA remains fragmented. This systematic review aims to identify and synthesise studies conducted between 2015 and 2025 that evaluate public health interventions in SSA community settings aimed at reducing antibiotic misuse or AMR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines, eligibility criteria will be structured using the patient, intervention, comparison and outcome framework. Searches will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Studies published in English between 2015 and 2025 will be eligible. Two reviewers will independently conduct screening, data extraction and risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment (using Cochrane RoB V.2.0, ROBINS-I or Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review will synthesise evidence from previously published studies and therefore does not require formal ethical approval. The review will be conducted and reported in accordance with the methodological guidance of the JBI and the PRISMA 2020 statement for systematic reviews. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at national and international conferences focusing on AMR and community-based health approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251160424.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eneh, S. C., Onukansi, F. O., Dozie, U. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115873</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115873</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of community-based public health strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance in community settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115873</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115873</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117142?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SHORTER trial: protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of short-duration antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients with sepsis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117142?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome resulting from a dysregulated immune response to an infection. Patients with sepsis can become critically ill and require advanced organ support in a hospital critical care setting. Antibiotics are lifesaving in sepsis, but overuse is associated with harm and promotes antimicrobial resistance, a rising global challenge making antibiotic treatment less effective. The prevalence of antibiotic use is very high in patients admitted to critical care. Research indicates that shorter courses of antibiotics are as effective as longer durations in the treatment of certain infections, but uncertainty remains for patients with sepsis. The aim of SHORTER is to investigate whether treating critically ill patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis with a fixed 5-day, short course of antibiotics is clinically and cost-effective compared with standard of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>SHORTER is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. 2244 adults treated with antibiotics for suspected or confirmed sepsis in a critical care setting will be recruited from 50 UK National Health Service hospitals. Participants will be randomised to either a fixed 5-day index course of antibiotics (intervention) or standard of care duration antibiotics (control). The coprimary outcomes are 28-day mortality (non-inferiority) and antibiotic treatment days (superiority). Secondary outcomes will assess the effect of short-duration antibiotic therapy on 90-day mortality, hospital readmissions, further infection rates and health economic impacts. A process evaluation will be embedded in the trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Favourable ethical opinion has been received from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 4 (Ref: 23/WA/0197) and Scotland A REC (Ref: 24/SS/0013). Results will be publicly disseminated via Patient Public Involvement and Engagement representatives, charities and media, and to the clinical community via professional societies, peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN40090372">ISRCTN40090372</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mawson, P., Morton, M., Walmsley, Z., Wafer, R., Hancock, H. C., Mossop, H., Al-Ashmori, S., Emerson, L. M., Smith, J., Colquhoun, G., Wu, H., Fernandez-Garcia, C., Ternent, L., Kumar, R., Ogden, M., Loraine, L., Taylor, L., Ndlovu, S., Hall, P., Gordon, A. C., Rostron, A., McMullan, R., Felton, T., Walsh, T., McAuley, D. F., Dark, P., Simpson, A. J., Hellyer, T. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-26T05:57:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117142</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117142</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SHORTER trial: protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of short-duration antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients with sepsis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117142</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of anxiety, depression and stress symptoms among doctors in COVID-19 treatment units: a cross-sectional study in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to estimate the prevalence and associated factors of anxiety, depression and stress symptoms among doctors working in hospitals with COVID-19 treatment units in the Anuradhapura district, Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional descriptive study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study setting</st>
<p>Hospitals with COVID-19 treatment units in Anuradhapura district, Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methodology</st>
<p>This study was conducted during the third wave of the pandemic in Sri Lanka in 2021. The study included all the doctors working in hospitals with COVID-19 treatment units in Anuradhapura. The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 was used to assess the prevalence of anxiety, depression and stress. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with anxiety, depression and stress symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Doctors working in hospitals with COVID treatment units in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Anxiety, depression and stress symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the 385 participants, 52% (n=201) were male, with a mean age of 36.1 years (SD 7.2). The majority were married (76%, n=291). Nearly 50% had less than 5 years of work experience. Prevalence of anxiety, depression and stress was 38% (95% CI 32.8% to 42.7%), 34% (95% CI 30.1% to 39.8%) and 21% (95% CI 16.6% to 24.9%), respectively. Lack of professional fulfilment, excessive workload, lack of psychological support, being a junior staff member, inadequate guidance, lack of occupational safety equipment, working in a COVID unit, having young children, being quarantined during the pandemic and having a history of psychiatric illness were associated with anxiety, depression and stress symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study revealed that nearly half of doctors working in hospitals with COVID-19 treatment units experienced symptoms of anxiety, depression or stress, which may have a negative impact on healthcare service delivery, particularly during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rambukwella, G., Ediriweera, D. S., Isuru, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100281</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100281</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of anxiety, depression and stress symptoms among doctors in COVID-19 treatment units: a cross-sectional study in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100281</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104827?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for exploring health promoter-led mental wellness initiatives for early prevention, screening and quality of life in patients with cervical cancer of rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104827?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cervical cancer is in the top five list of highly prevalent cancers. It contributes to millions of premature deaths globally. Low- and middle-income countries like those in sub-Saharan Africa are among the worst affected despite the preventable nature of the disease. The disease is caused by the human papillomavirus, a sexually transmitted infection for which an effective vaccine exists. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of a health promoter-led intervention on early screening, prevention and quality-of-life improvement among patients with cervical cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study will be conducted in South Africa&rsquo;s Eastern Cape province. The study will employ an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, comprising four qualitative and quantitative substudies. For qualitative substudies, purposive sampling will select 20 cervical patients, and two to four focus group discussions will be conducted with health workers in the oncology units of two referral hospitals. Patients with a cervical cancer diagnosis will consent to participate in a survey on their quality of life and their mental health status, specifically screening for depression and anxiety. An equal number of patients (64) will be allocated to the two quantitative study arms. For substudies 1 and 2, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions will be conducted using a semistructured interview guide. The data will be audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and entered into NVivo V.15 for data analysis. For substudies 3 and 4, data will be collected using validated tools such as the WHO-Quality of Life tool to assess the quality of life of cervical cancer survivors, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder version 7 scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire version 9 for anxiety and depression. Data will be captured in Microsoft Excel and exported to SPSS V.29 software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). The study will use descriptive analyses of intervention participants&rsquo; responses using means, SDs, medians and IQRs, depending on the normality of the distribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The ethical clearance (protocol reference number: WSU HREC 023/2025) was approved by the Walter Sisulu University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ethics and Biosafety Committee, and access approval (reference number: EC_202503_022) was granted by the Eastern Cape Provincial Health Research Committee.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>PACTR202507608317068.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sigovana, K., Nomatshila, S. C., Chitha, W., Mabunda, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104827</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104827</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for exploring health promoter-led mental wellness initiatives for early prevention, screening and quality of life in patients with cervical cancer of rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104827</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104827</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106507?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between epidural analgesia experience and future fertility intention in China: a national cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106507?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the association between epidural analgesia (EDA) experience and subsequent fertility intention among reproductive-aged individuals with at least one child in China, and to examine whether this relationship varies by region and parity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted using multistage stratified and quota sampling across 148 cities in mainland China. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, generalised linear models and multinomial logistic regression (Mlogit).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-based data collection conducted across 148 cities in mainland China between 20 June and 31 August 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Of 21 872 respondents, 6349 reproductive-aged individuals (females aged 18&ndash;49 and males aged 18&ndash;65) with at least one child were included after applying standardised data quality criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was self-rated fertility intention, operationalised as a continuous measure for regression analysis. The main exposure variable was prior experience with EDA during vaginal birth. Secondary analyses explored variations by region and number of children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>EDA experience was positively associated with higher fertility intention (&beta;=0.067, 95% CI 0.007 to 0.126, p=0.028). Female respondents reported lower fertility intention compared with males. Regionally, significant positive associations were observed in the central (relative risk ratio (RRR)=1.433, 95% CI 1.011 to 2.032, p=0.043) and western regions (RRR=1.505, 95% CI 1.070 to 2.117, p=0.019). Among women, EDA use was significantly associated with increased fertility intention in primigravida but not in multigravida participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>EDA use is positively associated with fertility intention among Chinese reproductive-aged individuals with children. Although this study identifies an association rather than a causal relationship&mdash;given the cross-sectional design&mdash;it highlights the potential value of improving awareness and access to labour pain management, especially in less developed regions, to better support informed reproductive decision-making and childbirth experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2200061046.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yu, J., Gao, Y., Liu, T., Ma, X., Wu, C., Leung, C.-K., Huang, J., Akinwunmi, B. O., Liang, S., Fu, W., Liu, X., Zhang, C. J. P., Wu, Y., Fekadu, G., Ming, W.-K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106507</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106507</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between epidural analgesia experience and future fertility intention in China: a national cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106507</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106507</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108771?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Empowering healthy lifestyle behaviour through personalised intervention portfolios using a healthy lifestyle recommender system to prevent and control obesity in older adults: pilot study protocols from the HealthyW8 project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108771?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Obesity prevalence has increased globally, imposing a significant burden on individuals and societies. Innovative solutions are, therefore, essential to mitigate its impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol outlines the framework of seven independent European pilot studies conducted in Bulgaria, Germany, Luxembourg and Spain, under the EU-Horizon HealthyW8 project. These studies aim to evaluate as primary outcomes feasibility, usage patterns (adherence) and user satisfaction of the Healthy Lifestyle Recommender System (HLRS), a personalised digital tool designed to promote healthy lifestyles through tailored physical activity and meal recommendations, considering emotional aspects. The seven pilot trials will collectively include 240 (around 30 participants/trial) older adults (&ge;65 years) with overweight (body mass index (BMI) 25.0&ndash;29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) over a 3-month period. As a recruitment mitigation strategy, we will extend the age range to include individuals aged &ge;55 years and those with normal weight (BMI 18.5&ndash;24.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Other parameters collected include anthropometric measurements, questionnaires to survey lifestyle (alcohol and tobacco consumption, sleep quality), dietary patterns (food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour recall) and emotional well-being, as well as data collected from wearable devices (smartwatch, accelerometer) to track 24-hour activity patterns. Additionally, two pilot studies will collect blood, urine, saliva (only one partner) and stool samples to explore biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress, gut microbiome and circulating miRNAs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Expected outcomes</st>
<p>It is hypothesised that participants will use the HLRS consistently enough to assess its feasibility and impact. The findings will contribute to planning and executing long-term trials focused on health outcomes and enhance understanding of the multimodal nature of obesity risk and its comorbidities. This protocol facilitates comparisons across studies in diverse cultural and contextual settings, offering insights into how personal and environmental factors influence the implementation and effectiveness of the HLRS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained in each country independently. Dissemination efforts will prioritise high-impact journal publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07011368">NCT07011368</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vahid, F., Loyola-Leyva, A., Bouzas, C., Tur, J. A., Ivanova, Y., Doychinov, B., Nikolov, R., Chikalanov, A., De Magistris, T., Halimi, J., Forberger, S., Stahl, C., Evers, S., Devaux, Y., Malisoux, L., Mendon, P., Celebic, A., Vaillant, M., Gantenbein, M., Skhiri, L., Kallas, Z., Garcia, L., Bohn, T., on behalf of the HealthyW8 consortium, Bohn, Desai, Malisoux, Turner, Vahid, Leyva, Gantenbein, Vaillant, Stahl, Norhona, Forberger, Autexier, Estrada, Lopez, Kallas, Onorati, DAndrea, DUlzia, Magistris, Lamy, Tur, Bouzas, Stecchi, Anderssen, Ravn-Haren, Wang, Rodriguez, Ivanova, Doychinov, Gorp, Dionisio, Nikolov, Chikalanov, Manea, Kalliostra, Kolay, Wesseling, Togka, Barragan, Avolio]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108771</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108771</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Empowering healthy lifestyle behaviour through personalised intervention portfolios using a healthy lifestyle recommender system to prevent and control obesity in older adults: pilot study protocols from the HealthyW8 project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108771</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108771</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109458?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Qualitative exploration of gambling harm among UK veterans: normalisation, stigma and postservice escalation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109458?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study explored the lived experiences of UK Armed Forces veterans affected by gambling-related harm. It examined how military culture, institutional practices and life transitions shaped gambling behaviours, barriers to help-seeking and the long-term impact on well-being. While quantitative research has documented elevated gambling-related harm among veterans, little qualitative work has examined how veterans themselves understand, experience and navigate gambling harm across military and post-military contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Reflexive thematic analysis of one-to-one semistructured interviews, covering topics such as the nature of participants&rsquo; gambling activities, the impact on their lives, pathways to gambling behaviours and help-seeking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were UK veterans (n=14), aged 31&ndash;60, including one female, from three service branches, all of whom self-identified as having experienced gambling-related harm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four interrelated themes were generated: (1) Gambling as normalised in both civilian and military contexts, reinforced by institutional routines and downtime activities; (2) Gambling as an emotional coping mechanism, shaped by institutional norms of stoicism and emotional control; (3) Stigma, silence and structural barriers to help-seeking, including fears of professional repercussions and (4) Escalation postdischarge, driven by isolation, unstructured time, digital gambling access and difficulties adjusting to civilian life. Participants reported concealment, debt and relational breakdowns, with some disclosing suicidal ideation linked to gambling harm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Gambling harm among UK veterans is shaped by a complex interplay of cultural, emotional and institutional factors. While gambling opportunities are embedded in military life, systems of support remain inconsistent and often punitive. Gambling remains under-recognised as a serious mental health issue within military and veteran care pathways. Findings highlight the need for stigma-free, culturally informed interventions across the military life cycle, including routine screening, gambling harm education and trauma-informed care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dekel, D., Ekenna, A., Engward, H., Godier-McBard, L. R., Kay, C., Kersey, T., Fossey, M., Dymond, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109458</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109458</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Qualitative exploration of gambling harm among UK veterans: normalisation, stigma and postservice escalation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109458</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109458</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109580?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study protocol for testing a mobile app designed to improve health literacy and self-management in people with bronchiectasis: the ANIMA app]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109580?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patients with bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis (CF) present variability in daily symptoms. Recurrent episodes of worsening symptoms can have a negative impact on lung function and quality of life, as well as increasing costs and mortality. Daily symptom monitoring can improve patients&rsquo; awareness of variations and support self-management. Mobile applications for tracking symptoms may encourage engagement, enabling problems to be identified early and potentially reducing exacerbations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This manuscript describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate a digital symptom-monitoring tool (ANIMA) for patients with bronchiectasis unrelated to CF patients. Eligible participants will be randomised by sealed, opaque envelopes to intervention (GR-A) or control (GR-C). Both groups will complete the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ), Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ-BR); socioeconomic status will be assessed using a validated instrument. All will receive an educational leaflet. GR-A will use the ANIMA application for daily symptom monitoring, and a GR-C, which will continue with their usual healthcare follow-up without using the application. All participants will be followed for a period of 6 months. At the end of the 6 month follow-up, the baseline questionnaires (BHQ and HLQ-BR) will be reapplied in both groups, and the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire &ndash; Brazilian version will be administered exclusively to participants in the GR-A. The planned sample size is 86 participants (43 per group), with a minimum feasible recruitment target of 60 participants due to the limited eligible population and the fixed recruitment window. Data will be analysed using SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics will summarise baseline characteristics. Between-group comparisons will be performed with appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests according to data distribution. Primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, with a complementary per-protocol analysis considering participants completing at least 50% of planned assessments. Statistical significance will be set at p&lt;0.05. Recruitment began in April 2025 and will continue until October 2025, with follow-up completion in April 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the State University of Campinas (CAAE: 48830621.2.0000.5404). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC) &ndash; U1111-1313-6511. Registered prior to recruitment start.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Protocol version</st>
<p>V.1.0 &ndash; August 2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Campos Medeiros, J., da Silva, A. C., Lima, A. C. J. d. S., Torezzan, C., Alves dos Santos, R. A., Pereira, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109580</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109580</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study protocol for testing a mobile app designed to improve health literacy and self-management in people with bronchiectasis: the ANIMA app]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109580</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109580</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110093?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Becoming a coresearcher in dementia care research: a mixed-methods study protocol for evaluation of the Dementia Leaders programme]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110093?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The <I>Dementia Leaders</I> programme aims to enhance active public involvement in dementia research by developing a programme for potential coresearchers that includes the perspectives of individuals who experience the disease directly, such as people living with dementia, their informal caregivers and healthcare professionals. The planned study will evaluate this programme (which includes workshops, webinars and online meetings) with a focus on, for example, the content and structure of the programme as well as the experience of the participants regarding their active involvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A mixed-methods design will be used to evaluate the Dementia Leaders programme. For this purpose, we will conduct semistructured interviews with the participants in the programme. Additionally, we will conduct an online survey after each webinar associated with the programme. The data will be analysed using qualitative content analysis (for the interview data and the open-ended questions included in the online survey) and by employing descriptive statistical methods (for the closed-ended questions of the online survey). Finally, the results obtained via both analytical methods will be synthesised, interpreted and discussed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study received approval from the ethics committee of the German Society of Nursing Science (Number 25-014). The results will be presented and published alongside the coresearchers at (inter)national conferences and in journals targeting practitioners, caregivers and people living with dementia as well as in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felding, S. A., Altinok, K., Rommerskirch-Manietta, M., Hoffmann-Hoffrichter, A. L., Manietta, C., Roes, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110093</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110093</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Becoming a coresearcher in dementia care research: a mixed-methods study protocol for evaluation of the Dementia Leaders programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110093</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110093</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110791?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and predictors of diabetes distress in Volta Region, Ghana: a health facility-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110791?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Diabetes distress is a common health problem among people living with type 2 diabetes (T2D), making it difficult to manage the condition. Though it remains a problem, limited attention has been given to the mental health impact it has on people living with the condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Our study investigated the prevalence and predictors of diabetes distress at a public hospital in the Volta Region of Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a health facility-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Public hospital in the Volta Region of Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>164 people living with T2D at the diabetes clinic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data collection</st>
<p>We collected data using a standardised questionnaire, adopting Diabetes Distress Scale-17 and analysed with descriptive statistics and logistic regression test using STATA V.17.0. Statistical significance was set at a p value &lt;0.05 at 95% CI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We found a 43.9% prevalence of diabetes distress, including emotional (58.5%), interpersonal (51.8%), regimen-related (51.2%) and physician-related (12.8%). Those on combined insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) had higher odds (adjusted OR=7.26, 95% CI 1.15 to 45.87) of having diabetes distress compared with those on OAD-only regimen.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The high prevalence of diabetes distress highlights the mental health burden of T2D and gaps in management, a critical factor for poor T2D outcomes. This may decelerate progress towards the achievement of SDG 3.4 aiming to reduce premature mortality from non-communicable diseases through prevention and treatment, and promote mental health and well-being by 2030.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Attidigah, R. E. G., Adzikah, E., Glover, R. M., Ofei, A. O., Abomabiik, S., Attipoe, W. A., Saah, F. I., Amu, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110791</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110791</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and predictors of diabetes distress in Volta Region, Ghana: a health facility-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110791</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110791</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111093?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Community health worker-facilitated home visits for hypertension management in urban Nepal: a mixed-methods process evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111093?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Hypertension remains poorly controlled globally, highlighting the need for scalable community-based strategies. Although community health worker (CHW)-facilitated interventions show promise, implementation evidence from low- and middle-income countries remains limited. This study assessed the implementation processes, mechanisms of impact and contextual factors influencing a CHW-facilitated home visit intervention for hypertension management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Mixed-methods process evaluation nested within a randomised cluster trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>An urban municipality in Nepal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Individuals with hypertension were surveyed at baseline (n=1252) and follow-up (n=1098). CHWs completed routine monitoring forms and home visits were observed (n=47). In-depth interviews were conducted with individuals with hypertension (n=20), spouses (n=7), adult children (n=13), CHWs (n=8) and public primary healthcare providers (n=5).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 86% of participants completed all six planned home visits. Visits were generally delivered with fidelity, with minor adaptations to fit participant and family contexts. Participants reported high satisfaction and perceived benefits, including improved knowledge, family support and uptake of self-blood pressure monitoring. However, developed behavioural action plans often lacked specificity, limiting progress follow-up and accountability. Weak public primary care capacity, medication stockouts and preference for higher-level or private facilities constrained care linkage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>CHW-facilitated home visits addressed key individual and family-level barriers to hypertension management, but impact was limited by uneven behaviour uptake and constrained public primary healthcare capacity for medication supply and titration. Strengthened CHW training and mentorship are needed to support effective behaviour change. Integration of community interventions with functional primary care systems is essential for sustained hypertension control in low-resource urban settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial Registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05292469">NCT05292469</inter-ref>; date of registration: 22 March 2022; URL: <inter-ref locator="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05292469?cntry=NP&amp;draw=2&amp;rank=6" locator-type="url">https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05292469?cntry=NP&amp;draw=2&amp;rank=6</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhattarai, S., Poudel, L., Mjolstad, B. P., Asvold, B. O., Skovlund, E., Shrestha, A., Sen, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111093</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111093</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Community health worker-facilitated home visits for hypertension management in urban Nepal: a mixed-methods process evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111093</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111093</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111928?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Endo-SOFT: study protocol for a national multicentre randomised controlled trial - first-line surgery versus first-line assisted reproductive technologies in patients with advanced endometriosis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111928?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Endometriosis is a chronic, inflammatory and oestrogen-dependent disease frequently causing infertility. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are often required to achieve pregnancy, especially in women with advanced endometriosis. To date, there is no randomised controlled trial (RCT) exploring reproductive outcomes after first-line surgery followed by ART versus first-line ART in women with stage III-IV endometriosis. The aim in this study is to investigate if endometriosis surgery prior to ART in women with endometriosis stage III-IV and infertility results in improved reproductive outcomes compared with first-line ART.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A national multicentre prospective open label RCT including 350 subjects with stage III-IV endometriosis and infertility. Women aged 18&ndash;38 will be randomised 1:1 to endometriosis surgery prior to ART or first-line ART. Follow-up until 3 years from the first treatment.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is the cumulative live birth rate 3 years after inclusion. Secondary outcomes are cumulative pregnancy rate, reproductive outcomes per in vitro fertilisation cycle, miscarriage rate, time to pregnancy and live birth, plasma progesterone levels on the day of frozen embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles, obstetrical outcomes and complications, infections after oocyte retrieval, intraoperative and postoperative complications, pain, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol, patient information and informed consent are approved by Swedish Ethical Review Authority (dnr: 2024&ndash;04293-01, approved 7 October 2024, amendment, dnr: 2025&ndash;03699-02, approved 17 June 2025).</p>
<p>An interim analysis is scheduled to ensure the safety of the interventions.</p>
<p>The results of Endo-SOFT (Endometriosis: Surgery Or Fertility Treatment) will be published in scientific journals and are expected to influence clinical guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov, <A HREF="NCT07240363">NCT07240363</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marklund, A., Wa&#x0308;ngberg Nordborg, J., Asciutto, C., Elenis, E., Francis, J., Jokubkiene, L., Wennmo Zuk, K., Amark, H., Rodriguez-Wallberg, K. A., Sundfeldt, K., Forslund, M., Brunes, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111928</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111928</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Endo-SOFT: study protocol for a national multicentre randomised controlled trial - first-line surgery versus first-line assisted reproductive technologies in patients with advanced endometriosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111928</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111928</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112639?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of a digital resilience-based course-game sequential intervention on social participation in stroke survivors with limb dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112639?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Impairments in social participation are highly prevalent after stroke and are strongly associated with diminished quality of life. Existing interventions have demonstrated limited effectiveness, often focusing predominantly on physical functional training while neglecting the critical psychological and behavioural processes necessary for a successful transition from physical recovery to community reintegration. Furthermore, traditional models relying on face-to-face delivery suffer from poor accessibility, particularly in contexts with unevenly distributed rehabilitation resources. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a digital resilience-based course-game sequential intervention on improving social participation among stroke survivors with limb dysfunction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a single-centre, assessor-blinded, two-arm randomised controlled trial. A total of 152 stroke survivors with limb dysfunction will be recruited from three rehabilitation wards of a single tertiary rehabilitation hospital and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group. Participants in the intervention group will receive a digital resilience-based course-game sequential intervention, which is designed to first impart knowledge and skills through the course, followed by their application and reinforcement in the game context to facilitate behaviour transfer, over a 7-week period. The control group will receive a structured, attention-matched control condition comprising digitally delivered general health education materials. The primary outcome is social participation assessed immediately post-intervention using the Frequency subscale of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P). Secondary outcomes include resilience, exercise adherence, physical function, social network and life-space mobility. All outcomes will be measured at baseline, immediately post-intervention and at 3-month post-intervention. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai First Rehabilitation Hospital (YK-2025-03-011). Trial findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. If the intervention is effective, the research team aims to further implement the intervention as usual care within the participating services and beyond.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500110444.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, X., Li, Y., Gao, S., Liu, R., Wang, Y., Zhou, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112639</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112639</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of a digital resilience-based course-game sequential intervention on social participation in stroke survivors with limb dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112639</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112639</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112904?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reproductive journey in women with congenital heart disease: a systematic review of mental health implications]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112904?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Advances in medical care have led to increased survival rates among individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD), enabling many women to pursue pregnancy and motherhood; however, their reproductive journey remains complex, involving intertwined medical and psychological challenges that are still not fully understood. This review aimed to explore the lived experiences of women with CHD as they navigate these reproductive challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review of qualitative studies using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used for quality assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>APA PsycArticles, Medline Ultimate, APA PsycInfo, APA PsycTests and CINAHL Ultimate were searched on 10 March 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies were included if they examined the lived experiences of women with CHD, focused on reproductive health, used qualitative methods and were published in English without time or geographical limits. Exclusion criteria were studies focusing on family members, men or healthcare professionals; reproductive health in other non-communicable diseases; acquired cardiac disease; single case studies; or quantitative designs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>The data extracted from qualitative studies included author(s), aims, location, design, method, analysis, results and clinical implications. The synthesis followed the Thomas and Harden thematic synthesis approach to answer the review question.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis identified four analytical themes: (1) the need for psychological support in high-stakes decision-making, including the emotional burden of parenthood; (2) challenges of receiving conflicting medical guidance; (3) balancing reproductive autonomy with health risks, including the influence of social norms and comparisons with peers; and (4) the impact of geographical location on access to support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Women with CHD face unique challenges within their reproductive health which is shaped by medical uncertainty, challenges with healthcare systems and high-stakes decision-making. Holistic care is crucial to support women through this journey and improve their outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amato, M., Adeoye, M., Schofield, R., Di Cesare, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112904</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112904</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reproductive journey in women with congenital heart disease: a systematic review of mental health implications]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112904</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112904</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112977?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of community-based participatory health systems interventions on prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112977?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Despite global efforts to prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), important gaps remain, particularly in low-resource countries. Community-based health systems strengthening (HSS) interventions are emerging as a strategy towards effective prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV services. However, the nexus between interventions and impact indicators remains unclear. This systematic review aims to assess all available evidence on the impact of community-driven HSS interventions on PMTCT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will develop a search of studies published between 2015 and 2025 from databases such as PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and African Journals. We will use a combination of search terms such as &lsquo;participatory action research&rsquo;, &lsquo;health systems strengthening&rsquo;, &lsquo;PMTCT of HIV&rsquo;, &lsquo;childhood HIV&rsquo;, &lsquo;MTCT of HIV&rsquo; and &lsquo;under-five mortality&rsquo;. Studies aimed at community-based participatory health system intervention on PMTCT of HIV published in English will be used. Experimental, quasi-experimental and observational (including cohort and case-control) studies will be included. Data will be analysed using narrative and meta-analysis approaches. The risk of bias will be assessed using Cochrane Handbook guidelines. The primary outcome measure will cover PMTCT of HIV and secondary outcome measures are HIV prevalence and under-five mortality. Finally, the quality of evidence will be assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation technique.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As no original data will be collected, ethical approval is not applicable for this study. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presentations at health summits and conferences. The review would inform context-sensitive HIV policies and interventions in developing countries, particularly for women and children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251131511.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amon, S., Amankwah, S., Tiah, J. A. Y., Nsavyimana, Y. J., Agula, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112977</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112977</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of community-based participatory health systems interventions on prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112977</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112977</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113593?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[School health initiatives in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113593?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Schools are key settings for implementing school health initiatives to prevent health problems facing learners. Initiatives exist to help learners build health literacy, adopt positive behaviours and improve their health and academic outcomes. Yet, school health outcomes have not been achieved in many settings, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. This failure is attributed to mismatches between the initiatives and the problems being addressed, or the ill implementation of school health initiatives. Mapping these initiatives to school health problems and other school health characteristics is essential to fully understand and achieve the desired school health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will map literature on school health initiatives with other characteristics from 2013 to 2025. We will search articles in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Two reviewers will independently screen records and chart data; disagreements will be resolved by consensus and, when needed, adjudicated by a third reviewer. Analysis will include a qualitative review of key concepts in school health and a quantitative analysis of all included studies based on the main text categories and themes from the qualitative phase.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required because this study is a scoping review of published literature and does not involve human participants. The results will be published as an article in a peer-reviewed journal and presented to stakeholders involved in implementing school health initiatives.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hibusu, L., Mianda, S., Akintola, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113593</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113593</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[School health initiatives in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113593</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113593</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114968?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acute Rheumatic Fever Diagnostic Network (ARC Network) clinical recruitment protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114968?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Rheumatic heart disease, a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries, results from acute rheumatic fever (ARF), for which no diagnostic test currently exists. The ARF Diagnosis Collaborative Network (ARC Network) was established to address this gap by recruiting a rigorously phenotyped, globally representative cohort of children and adolescents with ARF and controls to support biomarker discovery. This paper describes the ARC Network&rsquo;s multicentre recruitment strategy and standardised procedures for classifying ARF cases and controls, enabling robust development of novel, accessible diagnostics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The ARC Network recruits children and adolescents aged 3&ndash;18 years with suspected ARF and matched controls across four countries. Clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic data are collected using standardised protocols. Echocardiographic and clinical core teams provide rigorous standardised case review. Biospecimens are processed locally following harmonised procedures and shipped to a central biobank for long-term storage and future biomarker studies. Centralised training, quality control and a research database ensure high-quality, globally representative data to support ARF biomarker discovery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The ARC Network follows Institutional Review Board protocols with local ethical approval and informed consent, and oversees clinical data and biobank use for ARF research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fall, N., Bowen, A. C., Buonfiglio, S., Francis, J. R., Gorman, C., Fonseca Mendoza, R., Fernandes, E., Moreland, N. J., Pereira Nunes, M. C., Sable, C., Sadiq, M., Shannon, C. P., Parks, T., Ralph, A., Sanyahumbi, A., Sarnacki, R., Tebbutt, S., Webb, R., Carapetis, J., Beaton, A. Z., ARC Diagnostic Network]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-25T08:29:48-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114968</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114968</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acute Rheumatic Fever Diagnostic Network (ARC Network) clinical recruitment protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114968</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114968</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e094569?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Logic model development through a feasibility RCT for a group-based weight management programme]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e094569?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Clinical psychology interventions for reducing obesity have developed alongside pharmacological and surgical treatments, but usually as interventions for individual patients. Any healthcare intervention rests on a logic model: assumptions that through specific physical and social mechanisms, it will produce certain intended outcomes, provided that conducive background conditions (&lsquo;contexts&rsquo;) exist. Using evidence from the feasibility trial preceding a full randomised controlled trial (RCT), this paper assesses the empirical validity of the initial logic model of a new group-based weight management intervention: PROGROUP, designed for patients with body mass index (BMI) &ge;40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> or &ge;35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with comorbidities. We aimed to test whether:</p>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>PROGROUP&rsquo;s programme components produce the intended outcomes at all, whatever their size and how.</p>
</li><li>
<p>The intervention can practicably be implemented (&lsquo;delivered&rsquo;) as designed.</p>
</li><li>
<p>How the programme and delivery components affected each other.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multimethod proof-of-concept study by means of realist evaluation of the initial PROGROUP logic model. We:</p>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>Elicited the logic model underlying the intervention design.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Compared these assumptions with data from a pre-RCT feasibility study in two English and one Welsh National Health Service (NHS) sites during 2021&ndash;2023.</p>
</li><li>
<p>Revised the logic model in light of the data, noting how much variation in delivery the programme components (therapeutic mechanisms) could tolerate.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Specialised ambulatory mental health services in the English NHS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults with severe obesity (BMI &ge;40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> or &ge;35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with comorbidities).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Group-building techniques to enhance group members&rsquo; adoption of evidence-based methods of behaviour change affecting their dietary behaviour and physical activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Qualitative outcomes. What kinds of:</p>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>Mechanisms were established and triggered by the attempt to implement PROGROUP (secondary outcome, see objective 1 above).</p>
</li><li>
<p>Patient behaviours resulted and whether patients sustained them after the intervention ended (primary outcome; see objective 1 above); and what kinds of context affected that (objectives 2 and 3).</p>
</li></l></p>
<p>Quantitative measures not used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The initial logic model assumed that the following sequence of mechanisms would produce weight loss: referral from GP to specialist weight management services; further referral to PROGROUP; preparatory individual consultation; facilitated group sessions produce a group identity; group identity reinforces weight management capability and motivation; further individual consultations adjust for individual circumstances; behaviour change outside the treatment setting, producing weight loss. Contexts necessary for these mechanisms to work included: sufficient catchment population; group size, continuity and membership retention; suitable location; facilitator training; and practical support outside the treatment setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings suggested revisions to the logic model, but more in the delivery components and contextual assumptions than the core therapeutic mechanisms. There was scope to simplify the referral mechanisms. Different professions could implement the model. A realist evaluation of a pre-RCT feasibility study can be used to make the intervention&rsquo;s logic model more securely evidence-based, serving as a proof-of-concept test for the intervention. It indicated the conditions under which such group psychological interventions might be more widely used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="ISRCTN22088800">ISRCTN22088800</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheaff, R., Moghadam, S., Hollands, L., Hawkins, L., Swancutt, D., Lloyd, J., Pinkney, J., Tarrant, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094569</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-094569</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Logic model development through a feasibility RCT for a group-based weight management programme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e094569</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e094569</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e098902?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experiences of internet addiction among junior college students in Taiwan: a qualitative descriptive phenomenological study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e098902?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study explored the lived experiences of internet addiction among Taiwanese junior college students. Specifically, it examined their perceptions of addiction, experiences of excessive use and attempts to manage their online behaviours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive phenomenological approach involving one-on-one, semi-structured, in-depth interviews was employed. Data analysis was conducted using Giorgi&rsquo;s phenomenological method assisted by NVivo V.12.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The interviewees were from a junior college with two campuses in northern Taiwan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Purposive and snowball sampling of 15 junior college students. All participants met the criteria for internet addiction using the Chen Internet Addiction Scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three main themes and eight subthemes were identified: continuous provocation (childhood exposure and unexpected pandemic), continuous promotion (irresistible immersion and compensatory self-isolation) and continuous resistance (varied self-awareness, dilemmas, perceived insignificance and futility). This study also explored how junior college students with internet addiction repeatedly struggle to resist a seamless virtual world.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>From the perspective of adolescents with internet addiction, early exposure to the internet, the boost of the pandemic, the growing demand, and negative beliefs and attitudes all contribute to the inability to overcome internet addiction. These findings offer valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of internet addiction, providing mental health professionals with a deeper understanding and establishing a foundation for the development of future intervention strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huang, I.-L., Li, J.-B., Chung, M.-h.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098902</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-098902</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experiences of internet addiction among junior college students in Taiwan: a qualitative descriptive phenomenological study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098902</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098902</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103753?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: the Mendelian randomisation in pregnancy (MR-PREG) collaboration - improving evidence for prevention and treatment of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103753?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes (APPOs), including pre-term birth, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes, can result in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, parental anxiety and increased healthcare costs. A better understanding of the causes of APPOs is essential to inform lifestyle and pharmaceutical interventions for their prevention and management. Given the difficulty of undertaking randomised controlled trials in pregnant women, triangulating evidence from across methods with different sources of bias may improve causal inference for APPOs. The purpose of the Mendelian randomisation in pregnancy (MR-PREG) collaboration is to support such triangulation using genetic (eg, Mendelian randomisation (MR)) and non-genetic (eg, partner negative controls) approaches to investigate the causal effects of maternal exposures on a comprehensive set of APPOs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The MR-PREG collaboration includes individual participant data from three birth cohorts (two from the UK and one from Norway) and UK Biobank, as well as summary data from FinnGen and publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Data have been harmonised across studies and currently include information on up to 35 APPOs in up to 707 797 women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>The main aims of MR-PREG are to strengthen the evidence base for (1) prevention, by advancing understanding of maternal lifestyle factors on APPOs, (2) the role of pre-conceptional health, by improving understanding of the effect of maternal pre-existing conditions on APPOs, and (3) treatments, by evaluating the efficacy and safety of existing medications used for pre-existing conditions, and by identifying and testing novel or repurposed therapies for APPOs. To date, our published work has mainly addressed aims 1 and 3. Examples include triangulation of evidence from MR, conventional multivariable regression and paternal negative control, showing that higher maternal body mass index increases the risk of multiple APPOs, as well as the identification of maternal circulating metabolites and proteins that may influence birth weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>Future priorities include increasing diversity within the MR-PREG collaboration by expanding representation of participants from non-European ancestries. We are also integrating molecular data, including circulating protein levels and placental transcriptomics, to better characterise the molecular mechanisms underlying APPOs. Additionally, we are using whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing to identify novel causal genes and to inform the prioritisation of candidate therapeutic targets for APPOs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McBride, N., Clayton, G. L., Goncalves Soares, A., Yang, Q., Bond, T. A., Taylor, A., Chatzigeorgiou, C., Aiton, E., West, J., Magnus, M. C., Lawlor, D. A., Borges, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103753</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103753</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: the Mendelian randomisation in pregnancy (MR-PREG) collaboration - improving evidence for prevention and treatment of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103753</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103753</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103862?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing response rates between mobile web and telephone surveys for patient experience: a randomised experimental study in South Korea]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103862?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Healthcare quality improvement increasingly relies on patient experience data, yet traditional survey modes face declining response rates and rising costs. Mobile web surveys have emerged as a promising alternative for improving response rates. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of mobile web surveys in improving response rates in South Korea&rsquo;s Patient Experience Assessment. We also aimed to assess the impact of a mixed-mode approach integrating mobile web and follow-up telephone surveys across different demographic groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A randomised experimental design was employed to compare response rates as well as contact and cooperation rates among survey modes. A total of 4800 patients from four general hospitals were randomly allocated to telephone, mobile web or mixed-mode survey, with 1600 patients per mode. Each mode allowed five contact attempts through calls or mobile survey links. The mixed-mode survey included follow-up calls for mobile non-respondents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The survey was conducted between October and November 2022 among patients discharged from four general hospitals in South Korea.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 4800 patients aged 19 years or older who were hospitalised for more than 1 day and discharged within 2&ndash;56 days from four general hospitals were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included patients in day clinics, palliative care, paediatrics and neuropsychiatry, as well as those without personal information consent forms during hospital admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome measure was the response rate for each survey mode. Secondary outcome measures included the contact rate and the cooperation rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mobile web survey yielded an overall higher response rate (32.5%) than the telephone survey (22.4%), with the mixed-mode survey achieving the highest response rate (39.3%). Decomposing response rates revealed that while contact rates were comparable for both telephone and mobile web surveys, the cooperation rate was considerably higher for the mobile web survey (73.2%) compared with the telephone survey (52.2%). Substantial gender-age subgroup differences were found.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Adopting mobile web surveys for patient experience assessments, which aligns with the public&rsquo;s preference for information and communication technologies, could significantly improve response rates in patient experience surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>KCT0011374 (post-results).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koo, B. M., Song, Y., Choi, Y.-G., Jo, M.-W., Lee, Y., Han, S. Y., Kim, S. K., Do, Y. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103862</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103862</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing response rates between mobile web and telephone surveys for patient experience: a randomised experimental study in South Korea]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103862</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103862</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104440?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are the dimensions of positive health associated with work participation and receiving disability benefit? A cross-sectional study in outclinic patients with chronic gastrointestinal disorders]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104440?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe work participation (WP) and receiving disability benefit (DB) in persons with chronic gastrointestinal disorders (CGID); to describe associations between the six dimensions of positive health (PH) and WP and DB, respectively; and to assess whether the type of CGID is associated with WP and receiving DB.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional and observational questionnaire study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (tertiary care hospital), including regional, supra-regional and national referrals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>441 patients of working age (18&ndash;66 years) with CGID who visited the outpatient department of the Gastroenterology-Hepatology Clinic between March 2019 and June 2021 (mean&plusmn;SD age: 45.0&plusmn;14.7 years, 68.5% women).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary/secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Associations of PH dimensions and WP and receiving DB, respectively; association of type of CGID and WP, and receiving DB. The main independent variables (PH dimensions) were bodily functions, mental well-being, meaningfulness, quality of life (QoL), participation and daily functioning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 441 working-age patients, 49% worked; 20% received DB (40% of non-workers). All PH dimensions related significantly to WP and DB (bivariate level). After adjusting for demographics and CGID type, better general health (dimension QoL) (OR 1.018; 95% CI 1.001 to 1.035, p=0.040) and daily functioning dimension (OR 1.030; 95% CI 1.013 to 1.047, p&lt;0.001) related to higher WP. In the fully adjusted model, daily functioning showed the strongest association with receiving DB. Each one-point increase in Short Form-36 physical functioning was associated with a 2% lower likelihood of receiving DB (OR 0.975; 95% CI 0.959 to 0.992; p=0.004).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Of the 441 working-age patients with CGID, only 49% worked; most non-workers did not receive DB. Of the PH dimensions, daily functioning appears most directly related to WP and receiving DB; CGID type had minimal impact.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lemlijn-Slenter, A., van Iperen, L., Wijnands, K., Masclee, A., de Rijk, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104440</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104440</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are the dimensions of positive health associated with work participation and receiving disability benefit? A cross-sectional study in outclinic patients with chronic gastrointestinal disorders]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104440</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104440</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107273?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trends in the mortality of vascular intestinal disorders in the USA: a CDC WONDER analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107273?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The principal aim of our study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the trends in vascular intestinal disorder (VID) mortality with respect to different demographic factors and identify which patient populations are at the highest risk for mortality. Secondarily, we aim to examine and discuss the underlying reasons behind disparities in mortality rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective ecological study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention&rsquo;s Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research Multiple Causes of Death database of US residents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>375 938 patients residing in the USA &ge;15 years old with VID listed on their death certificate between 1999 and 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) across the overall population and stratified by gender, race, census region and urban/rural location.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were 375 938 deaths overall, with 61.5% of deaths occurring in females and 38.5% in males. The overall AAMR was highest in 1999 and lowest in 2018, increasing from 2019 to 2021. American Indian and Alaska Native patients had the highest overall AAMR for the majority of the study period. In contrast, Asian or Pacific Islander individuals had the lowest overall AAMR. On average, AAMR was highest in the Midwest and lowest in the Northeast. For most of the study period, AAMR in rural areas remained higher than in urban areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>While VID mortality has decreased overall, this study has revealed several nuances demonstrating disproportionately higher mortality among certain demographic groups and geographic areas. Efforts to improve preventative care, early diagnoses and effective interventions for these groups are necessary and would make a significant impact on the overall mortality from VID in the USA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nooney, M., Rensted, A., Billion, T., Mirza, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107273</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107273</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trends in the mortality of vascular intestinal disorders in the USA: a CDC WONDER analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107273</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107663?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107663?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to understand hospital doctors&rsquo; priorities (target use cases and aetiologies) for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional online survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Europe-wide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Secondary and tertiary care doctors involved in patient assessment and diagnosis across Europe.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Online survey from April to September 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Importance of developing a new test on a scale of 1&ndash;10 for up to 19 &lsquo;use cases&rsquo; (types of febrile presentations in specific demographic groups): use case scores and ranks and differences across subgroups of respondents, with free text to capture additional suggestions; respondents&rsquo; preferences (multiple choice) regarding which aetiologies should be included in a new test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>265 respondents from 30 European countries (out of 270 starting the survey) were included in the analysis. Top priorities included febrile immunocompromised patients and fever without a focus for both paediatric and adult use cases, and 1&ndash;3 months old febrile infants. Rankings were similar across clinician subgroups despite some differences in average scores. 92% (243/263), 95% CI 89% to 95%, of respondents would find a &lsquo;generic&rsquo; test for bacterial aetiology useful, even if it does not differentiate between Gram-positive and Gram-negative aetiologies. 54% (63/116), 95% CI 45% to 63%, of respondents would find a &lsquo;generic&rsquo; test for inflammatory aetiology useful when seeking to diagnose children for whom Kawasaki&rsquo;s disease (KD) is on the differential, even in the absence of any KD-specific test, 83% (96/116), 95% CI 75% to 89%, would find such a &lsquo;generic&rsquo; test useful if they could use it alongside a KD test when desired.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Clinicians prioritise the most vulnerable patients (because of age or comorbidities) and unclear presentations (fever without a focus) for the development of a new fever diagnostic test. Even relatively simple (eg, bacterial, inflammatory) tests could provide added value to most clinicians.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonnet, G., Nielsen, M. J., Foss, A. M., Lewin, A., Nijman, R. G., Fitchett, E., Carrol, E., Yeung, S., the DIAMONDS consortium, Bonnet, Nielsen, Foss, Lewin, Nijman, Fitchett, Carrol, Yeung]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107663</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107663</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107663</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107663</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107940?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accelerating diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy through improved education: a mixed-methods study protocol from Myelopathy.org RECODE-DCM to define stakeholders, knowledge requirements and an optimal intervention strategy]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107940?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Outcomes for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) patients are limited by delayed and missed diagnoses, driven in part by poor professional awareness. Despite DCM being the most common cause of adult spinal cord injury, it remains under-recognised and undertaught in clinical education. Lessons from other common pathology like stroke and acute myocardial infarction highlight the potential of education to improve early diagnosis. This study will develop a professional education strategy to improve early DCM diagnosis. It will define key audiences and identify an effective delivery method, laying the groundwork for a sustained, targeted intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study aims to define who needs to know about DCM, what they need to know and how they can learn it. This will be carried out in three phases: phase 1&mdash;who and what: to establish the target population and to define core competencies for the educational intervention; phase 2&mdash;how: to create and review the educational intervention; phase 3&mdash;evaluation: to test whether the framework is an improvement to existing strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is in place from the University of Cambridge (HBREC.2024.24). Results from the study will be disseminated through scientific publication, conference presentation, blog posts and podcasts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023461838</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veremu, M., Deakin, N., Chauhan, R. V., Lantz, J. M., Toumbas, G., Tabrah, J., Kumar, V., Zipser, C. M., Plener, J., Ammendolia, C., Anderson, D. B., dos Santos Rubio, E. J., Tetreault, L., Parnaik, R., Rodrigues-Pinto, R., Ongwen, O. M., Sarewitz, E., Sadler, I., Roberts, T., Langridge, N., Swait, G., Hadfield-Law, L., Draper-Rodi, J., Wood, L., Stacpoole, S., Ganau, M., Baig, S., Bateman, A., Demetriades, A. K., Peul, W. C. W., Davies, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107940</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107940</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accelerating diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy through improved education: a mixed-methods study protocol from Myelopathy.org RECODE-DCM to define stakeholders, knowledge requirements and an optimal intervention strategy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107940</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107940</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109731?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding patient experiences of a community-based intervention to improve bowel screening uptake: a mixed-method evaluation of Call for a Kit clinics]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109731?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The study explored patient experiences of the Call for a Kit (CFAK) intervention, a community-based initiative designed to improve bowel cancer screening uptake and examined the mechanisms that may support participation among non-responders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The evaluation was conducted in general practices across Lancashire and South Cumbria, Northwest England, where CFAK clinics were delivered by an external health promotion team based within the Community Voluntary Services. These clinics target practices with low screening uptake.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 113 CFAK attendees aged 54 and above, and who had missed their most recent screening invitation, completed a patient experience survey. 12 participants were purposively sampled for follow-up interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Statistical analyses examined associations between patient experience and screening behaviours, including kit ordering and intention to complete the screening kit. Thematic analysis explored barriers and facilitators to participation, as well as experiences of CFAK clinics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patient experience scores were significantly higher among women than men and were positively associated with intention to complete the kit, though not with kit ordering. Qualitative findings indicated that CFAK addressed key barriers such as low awareness, confusion and emotional discomfort by providing personalised education, reassurance and culturally sensitive support. Participants particularly valued the relational aspects of the intervention, including the face-to-face delivery and communication in preferred languages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>CFAK clinics appear to enhance psychological capability and motivation for bowel screening by offering tailored, inclusive and supportive care. These findings highlight the value of patient-centred approaches in addressing inequalities in cancer screening and offer insights for the design of future community-based interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanif, S., Jefferson, R., Kerrison, R., Stoffel, S. T., Rowley, S., Morris, L., von Wagner, C., Hirst, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109731</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109731</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding patient experiences of a community-based intervention to improve bowel screening uptake: a mixed-method evaluation of Call for a Kit clinics]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109731</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109731</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109974?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mental health status and associated factors among rural adult women: findings of a community-based cross-sectional study in Bangladesh]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109974?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the mental health status and identify associated factors among rural adult women in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study using face-to-face interviews with a semistructured questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were collected between January and February 2025 in three rural upazilas (Dhamrai, Nawabganj and Sreepur) using multistage systematic sampling. The semistructured questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics, household assets and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). The wealth index was calculated using principal component analysis. Cases with mild to extreme levels of depression, anxiety and stress were grouped together to indicate the presence of any level of the three mental health problems. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses using &sup2;, Fisher&rsquo;s exact test and Welch two-sample t-test, and multivariable binary logistic regression to identify predictive factors of mental problems. A Venn diagram was generated to display the proportion of patients with anxiety, depression and stress. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (V.26) and R Studio (V.2025.05) with a significance level of p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1350 women aged 18 years or older who were available at home during the data collection period and gave consent to participate. Women who were unable to participate due to illness were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants had a mean (&plusmn;SD) age of 36.35 (&plusmn;12.58) years. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress was 47.7%, 60.7% and 23.2%, respectively. Moderate severity was most common among patients with depression (20.34%), anxiety (24.20%) and stress (8.03%). 20% of participants experienced all three conditions simultaneously, with 22% having both depression and anxiety. Multivariable analysis revealed that factors associated with an increased odds of depression, anxiety and stress were chronic diseases (ORs (95% CIs): 2.02 (1.50 to 2.73), 1.44 (1.05 to 1.99) and 1.91 (1.35 to 2.71), respectively) and history of abuse (1.84 (1.28 to 2.66); 3.15 (2.06 to 4.93) and 1.91 (1.28 to 2.83), respectively). Family history of mental illness was associated with an increased odds of anxiety (1.71 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.87)) and stress (1.61 (95% CI 1.01 to 2.52)). So was the presence of a caregiving role (1.68 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.42) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.19) for anxiety and stress, respectively). Having a financial problem was associated with an increased odds of anxiety (1.52 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.00)). A happy family relationship was associated with decreased odds of depression (0.28 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.93)), anxiety (0.22 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.60)) and stress (0.50 (95% CI 0.25 to 1.00)). Conjugal satisfaction was protective against anxiety (0.42 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.80) and stress (0.32 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.59)). Unexpectedly, higher wealth status (being rich) increased depression (1.56 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.34) and anxiety (1.57 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.41) risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A major segment of rural adult women of Bangladesh experiences mental health problems. The findings recommend community-based comprehensive mental health screening programmes, interventions and integration of mental healthcare into primary health systems to address this critical public health challenge.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Islam, M. Z., Sharf-Ul-Alam, S. M., Rahman, M. F., Mahmood, F., Farhana, N., Akter, S., Parveen, T., Alam, Z., Azim, A., Khan, M. A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109974</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109974</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mental health status and associated factors among rural adult women: findings of a community-based cross-sectional study in Bangladesh]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109974</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109974</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110779?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health worker capacity-building interventions and quality of primary healthcare delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110779?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Achieving high-quality primary healthcare (PHC) remains essential to improving health systems performance and advancing progress towards attainment of universal health coverage, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where gaps in service delivery persist. Capacity-building interventions, such as mentorship, in-service training and supportive supervision, have been widely employed to improve the quality of PHC delivery. The evidence base is, however, fragmented across diverse settings, intervention types and outcome measures. This systematic review will examine the evidence on how capacity-building interventions improve the quality of PHC services in SSA, with a focus on the domains of effectiveness, safety, people-centredness, timeliness, equity, integration and efficiency as propounded by the WHO.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We will conduct a systematic review using established evidence synthesis methods and report the findings in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies will include peer-reviewed and grey literature published in English between 2000 and 2025, focusing on capacity-building interventions aimed at improving PHC quality in SSA. We will search databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and the African Journals Online. Study selection will follow the Population (PHC providers), Exposure (capacity-building interventions) and Outcome (quality of PHC delivery across WHO domains) framework. Quality assessment will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data will be narratively synthesised using Atlas.ti software.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required because there will be no collection of primary data. Only published studies/records available on peer-reviewed literature and grey sources will be included. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal, academic conferences and stakeholder platforms in SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251131534) and reported according to PRISMA-P guidelines.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amu, H., Dzadza, A. E. L. A., Glover, R. M., Akpene, D. A., Tiah, J. A. Y., Agula, C., Bawah, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110779</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110779</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health worker capacity-building interventions and quality of primary healthcare delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110779</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110779</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111371?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of the trajectory of sleep quality changes and influencing factors in maintenance haemodialysis patients in Xinjiang, China: a prospective longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111371?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To analyse the trajectory of sleep quality changes and identify influencing factors among patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis (MHD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal study design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in the nephrology departments of two tertiary hospitals in Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study employed convenience sampling and completed follow-up assessments for 282 patients with MHD between December 2024 and August 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Data collection used a general information questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Self-Rating Depression Scale. Sleep quality assessment timepoints included baseline (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3). Latent class growth models were used to identify heterogeneous trajectories of sleep quality. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent predictors of sleep disorders trajectory categories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 282 MHD patients, latent class growth modelling identified four distinct sleep trajectories: &lsquo;High-Slightly Increasing&rsquo; (C1, 24.5%), &lsquo;Low-Slightly Increasing&rsquo; (C2, 29.4%), &lsquo;High-Declining&rsquo; (C3, 27.7%) and &lsquo;Moderate-Increasing&rsquo; (C4, 18.4%). Multivariable analysis showed that, compared with C2, baseline depression significantly increased the odds of belonging to C1 (OR=8.53, p&lt;0.001), C3 (OR=4.65, p&lt;0.001) and C4 (OR=2.71, p=0.012). Similarly, pruritus (OR=2.46, p=0.019) and elevated C reactive protein (OR=1.03, p=0.015) were specific predictors for the C1 relative to C2.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study reveals four heterogeneous sleep trajectories in MHD patients, underscoring a dynamic view of sleep quality. Depression is an overarching risk factor for unfavourable trajectories, while pruritus and inflammation specifically predict persistent poor sleep. Early screening and targeted interventions against these factors are crucial to improve sleep quality in MHD care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, H., Li, L., Zhang, Y., Gao, J., Lin, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111371</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111371</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of the trajectory of sleep quality changes and influencing factors in maintenance haemodialysis patients in Xinjiang, China: a prospective longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111371</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111371</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113432?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient and public involvement and engagement in target trial emulation framework: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113432?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Target trial emulation (TTE) has emerged as a methodological framework to strengthen causal inference from observational health data when randomised controlled trials are infeasible. The credibility of TTE studies depends not only on rigorous design and transparent reporting, but also on their relevance and acceptability to patients and the public. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) has been shown to enhance the relevance, transparency and impact of health research by shaping research priorities, informing study design and ensuring outcomes reflect patient perspectives. However, the extent to which PPIE has been incorporated into TTE studies remains unclear. This scoping review aims to systematically map the use and reporting of PPIE in published TTE studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. We will search MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) from January 2011 to present, limited to English-language publications. Eligible studies will be studies that self-identify as using the TTE framework and report empirical analyses of health outcomes using observational or trial data. We will exclude protocols, methodological or simulation-only studies, preprints, conference abstracts and grey literature. Three reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, and then full texts, with disagreements resolved by discussion or adjudication. Data extraction will include study characteristics and PPIE information guided by the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2-Short Form checklist. Findings will be summarised using descriptive statistics, tables, figures and narrative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required, as this review will use publicly available data. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and presented at conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Egesa, I. J., Baldwin, F. D., Wells, M., Maden, M., Mbizvo, G. K., Marson, A. G., Tudur-Smith, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113432</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113432</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient and public involvement and engagement in target trial emulation framework: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113432</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113432</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113611?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management of patients with autism spectrum disorder in psychiatric emergency: a single-centre retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113611?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is one of the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) and is frequently associated with psychiatric and somatic comorbidities. As a result, individuals with ASD use emergency departments more frequently than the general population. However, the core features of ASD pose specific challenges in emergency department care, particularly for adult patients and emergency staff frequently report limited training in this area. While paediatric presentations of ASD in the emergency department are well documented, the international literature on adults remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Materials and methods</st>
<p>we conducted a single-centre retrospective study including all patients aged 15 years and older with a diagnosis of ASD who attended the Centre Psychiatrique d'Orientation et d'Accueil (CPOA), GHU Paris (Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire) between 12 January 2016 and 31 December 2023. The objectives were to estimate the prevalence of ASD in this psychiatric emergency setting and to describe the patients&rsquo; socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, mode of arrival, reasons for consultation and referral following the emergency visit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 69 447 patients who attended the CPOA during this period, 484 (0.7%) had a diagnosis of ASD. This population was predominantly male (71.9%), with a mean age of 25.1 years. The most frequent reasons for consultation were hetero-aggressive behaviour (37.0%) and anxiety (31.0%). Overall, 39.2% of patients were hospitalised, including 17.3% involuntarily, and 6.2% required physical restraint. The number of consultations involving patients with ASD increased significantly between 2016&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion and conclusion</st>
<p>This study provides a clearer understanding of the clinical and organisational challenges associated with the management of adult patients with ASD in psychiatric emergency departments. Although this study was descriptive and did not assess specific interventions, the observed patterns, in line with previous literature, suggest that adopted care strategies may help better address the needs of this population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cordina, A., Todorov, L., Guetta, M., Pham-Scottez, A., Ambar Akkaoui, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113611</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113611</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management of patients with autism spectrum disorder in psychiatric emergency: a single-centre retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113611</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113611</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113692?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interfaces between communication, education and health: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113692?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The interfaces between the fields of communication, education and health have been indicated by international institutions such as the WHO and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. However, hegemonic scientific practices supersede dialogue between the three fields, isolating their practices. This fragmenting tendency is observed in scientific literature, which has created gaps in the dialogue and articulation between communication, education and health. Although health promotion requires both communicative and educational practices, the epistemological, historical, political, cultural and socioeconomic aspects have also engendered tensions between the fields. Communication is often seen as a mere instrument for other practices, rather than a phenomenon that (re)produces meanings and power dynamics. In opposing the reductionist and instrumentalising perspectives of knowledge fields, the primary objective of the scoping review is to map the scientific evidence on the interfaces between communication and education in health to indicate a conceptual framework that articulates communication and education practices within the context of health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A transdisciplinary team developed this protocol based on the 2024 Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The procedures required to conduct the review were guided by the frameworks proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac <I>et al</I> and Peters <I>et al.</I> The study eligibility criteria were established based on the Problem, Concept and Context outlined in the research questions. Primary and secondary studies will be retrieved from nine sources, covering both conventional and grey literature. These sources include Embase, ERIC, LILACS, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, and the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. A categorised form will be used for data collection and subsequent analysis. The reporting of the review findings will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The nature of the research and the use of secondary data sources do not require informed consent forms or approval from ethics committees in Brazil. The scientific findings from the review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and other scientific communication channels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study registration</st>
<p>The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is available at <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z3CX7">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z3CX7</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Araujo do Nascimento Batista, N., Henriques, S., Lacerda, J., de Pinho Dias, A., Munoz Gallego, A., Correia Neves Abreu, D., Aires Clemente, H., Emiliano Bidarra de Almeida, J. M., Sampaio de Araujo, K., Dantas Coutinho, K., Sanjuan Nunez, L., Romao, M. H., Cunha Dantas Freire, M. d. G., Nogueira Tavares, M. E., Santos Reis, M. K., Lorite Garcia, N., Valentim, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113692</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113692</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interfaces between communication, education and health: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113692</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113692</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113714?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How have outreach eye health services been delivered globally? Protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113714?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In all countries, some population groups experience barriers to accessing eye health services, contributing to health inequities. Outreach is a common strategy used to deliver healthcare services to populations experiencing inequities. This scoping review aims to summarise the nature and extent of the existing literature describing outreach as a service delivery model to improve access to eye health services, particularly among populations experiencing inequities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>An information specialist will search academic databases (Medline, Embase and Global Health) without language restrictions to find peer-reviewed articles describing outreach eye health services, published in any country between 1 January 2010 and the search date. Grey literature sources will also be searched. In Covidence, two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts and subsequently relevant full texts against the inclusion criteria. Data extraction will also be performed independently by two reviewers in Covidence. This scoping review will summarise the characteristics of the included outreach eye health services, including the type of eye health service delivered, personnel involved, mode of transport, source of funding and whether the service targeted any specific PROGRESS-Plus group (Place of residence, Race/ethnicity/culture/language, Occupation, Gender/sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital, Plus). We will present our findings quantitatively using diagrams, tables and graphs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was not sought, as this scoping review will use only publicly available reports. The results of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at eye health conferences. It will offer valuable insights for eye health providers, health and social service providers and policymakers who are interested in improving access to eye health services for populations experiencing inequities. This scoping review will inform a project in New Zealand which aims to develop outreach eye health services to populations experiencing inequities, such as unhoused people and refugees.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>This protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework on 11 November 2025 (<A HREF="https://osf.io/vyz32">https://osf.io/vyz32</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lai, E., Goodman, L., Lal, J., Gordon, I., Ramke, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113714</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113714</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How have outreach eye health services been delivered globally? Protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113714</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113714</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Non-randomised trial of a hepatitis C same-day test and treat model using antibody test only for people who inject drugs in Armenia, Georgia and Tanzania: a CUTTS HepC study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite the availability of curative treatments, hepatitis C diagnosis and treatment coverage is suboptimal globally with few countries on track to achieve the WHO&rsquo;s 2030 elimination targets. In 2022, an estimated 50 million people were living with hepatitis C, with 1 million new infections annually. Most people living with hepatitis C reside in low- and middle-income countries, and people who inject drugs are disproportionately affected by hepatitis C.</p>
<p>Continuing simplification of diagnostic pathways and treatment care models is required to improve linkage to care and reduce costs associated with hepatitis C treatment and cure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a multi-country non-randomised, quasi-experimental, prospective comparative two-arm trial. It aims to assess the feasibility of implementation, retention in hepatitis C care and achievement of cure and cost-effectiveness outcomes, comparing two simplified hepatitis C testing and treatment pathways.</p>
<p>Arm 1 is a standard simplified test and treat model of care following global guidance, and arm 2 is an innovative rapid, same-day treatment initiation model of care using a presumptive treatment approach based on shortened read-time of the point-of-care OraQuick hepatitis C antibody test result. Secondary outcomes include assessing the accuracy of the OraQuick hepatitis C antibody test in predicting viraemia and the acceptability of each pathway.</p>
<p>This study will be implemented in Armenia, Georgia and Tanzania. Treatment-nai&#x0308;ve people who inject drugs aged over 18 years in each country will be eligible for enrolment.</p>
<p>Recruitment commenced in October 2024 in Armenia, June 2025 in Georgia and August 2025 in Tanzania and is anticipated to close by December 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial has been reviewed by WHO Ethics Review Committee (ERC), Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (Australia) and local country ERCs. Alongside journal publications and conferences, the results from this study will be disseminated through summary reports and workshops with key stakeholders and with communities of people affected by HCV through relevant organisations/networks, including the global Community Advisory Board (CAB). The study results will inform national scale-up of simplified care models and inform potential pathways for further simplification of care models, including the potential for one-step diagnostic pathways and same-day treatment in particular scenarios for the three study countries, and other low- and middle-income countries globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06159504">NCT06159504</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Draper, B. L., Flynn, M., Schroeder, S., Wisse, E., Aikaeli, F., Han, Z. M., Ayako, M., Bajis, S., Butsashvili, M., Davtyan, K., Kordzadze, T., Lamand, P., Luhmann, N., Sargsyan, K., Senkoro, M., Scott, N., Stone, J., Vickerman, P., Voloshin, A., Walker, J., Madden, A., Stoove, M. A., Hellard, M., Pedrana, A., on behalf of CUTTS HepC Consortium, Hepatitis C Models of Care Study Team, Davidyants, Mirzoyan, Davidyants, Stepanyan, Sologashvili, Bedoshvili, Gavashelashvili, Abesadze, Bidzinashvili, Khutsishvili, Tordia, Janashia, Tsurtsumia, Kimaro, Meda, Benedict, Tonoyan, Stepanyan, Torosyan, Evinyan, Grigoryan, Hovakimyan, Eliadze, Rekhviashvili, Gigashvili, Tabuashvili, Kadzanaia, Chakvetadze, Benedict, Mtui, Mramba, Tabarani, Mtui, Luselema, Gondo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114119</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114119</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Non-randomised trial of a hepatitis C same-day test and treat model using antibody test only for people who inject drugs in Armenia, Georgia and Tanzania: a CUTTS HepC study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114119</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115195?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What factors influence patient participation in an artificial intelligence-based initiative to optimise referrals from primary to specialist haematology care? A multicentre retrospective observational study in four Spanish hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115195?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Increasing demand for haematological specialist care makes the optimisation of referrals and outpatient workflow a priority. Automated placing of standardised test orders prior to the first appointment may provide haematologists with necessary information to reach diagnoses and initiate treatment at the first patient encounter, reducing low-value follow-up appointments. We aimed to evaluate rates of patient participation in an initiative using artificial intelligence to place standardised test orders as well as reasons for non-participation, differences in the number of participants and non-participants discharged back to primary care with a diagnosis or appropriate treatment plan, and potentially avoidable referrals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective, multicentric cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Four academic hospitals in Madrid, Spain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>18 190 patients referred for a first haematologist appointment for 11 included presenting complaints.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Referral notes from primary care were classified using natural language processing and automated placement of standardised test order sets was carried out prior to first appointment for participating patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>We compared demographic differences between participants and non-participants, the main motives for not participating, and the number of patients discharged back to primary care at first appointment with a diagnosis and treatment plan. Most frequent International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision codes for each of the included presenting complaints were described.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>During the study period, 18 190 (41%) patients were referred for a first haematologist appointment for presenting complaints included in the intervention (&lsquo;eligible patients&rsquo;), of which 612 (3.3%) patients agreed to participate in the intervention. Participants were significantly younger than non-participants. Most common motives for not participating were administrative reasons (6268, 76.9%). Only 122 (1.5%) patients expressed explicit unwillingness to participate. A significant increase in the number of patients discharged upon first appointment was observed for participants (146 (23.9%) vs 3375 (19.36%); p=0.041), signifying a 22% relative reduction in avoidable follow-up. The diagnosis &lsquo;haematological disorders ruled out&rsquo; was constantly observed as one of the ten most common diagnoses made by the haematology specialist for all but one of the included presenting complaints.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Natural language processing of referrals from primary to specialist haematology care with automated placing of standardised test orders can decrease low-value follow-up appointments. Explicit refusal to participate was low. Participants tended to be younger than non-participants, underlining the importance of designing strategies to target the older population in order to improve participation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apellaniz, J. S., Cordoba Mascunano, R., Llamas Sillero, P., Paredes Coronel, C., Pfang, B., Villegas Garcia, M. A., Herrero Gonzalez, A., Pascual Martinez, A., Alonso Alonso, A., Hernandez-Sanchez, A. M., Rodriguez Garcia, G., Tunon Hernandez, J., del Olmo Rodriguez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115195</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115195</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What factors influence patient participation in an artificial intelligence-based initiative to optimise referrals from primary to specialist haematology care? A multicentre retrospective observational study in four Spanish hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115195</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115538?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strengthening and Targeted Rehabilitation for Optimal Neuromuscular Gains for chronic BACK pain (STRONG-BACK): protocol for a randomised controlled trial in participants with primary nociceptive pain drivers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115538?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Exercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP), with evidence supporting modest effects, likely due to the heterogeneity of patient presentations. Evidence suggests that matching individuals to the most appropriate exercise type could improve outcomes. Systematic reviews also emphasise that effective exercise interventions should be patient centred, target paraspinal muscle health and be of sufficient duration. This study addresses these gaps using a targeted care approach to identify a homogenous sample that is more likely to respond to our interventions. The inclusion of a sample with predominant nociceptive pain profile will be performed with the integration of the Pain and Disability Drivers Management Model (PDDM) and the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ). The primary aim of this two-arm randomised controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of motor control plus isolated lumbar extension exercises (MC+ILEX, arm 1) to free-weight resistance training (arm 2) in reducing LBP-related disability. Secondary aims include examining whether changes in multifidus composition mediate disability improvements comparing intervention effects on muscle size and quality, strength, mobility, pain, quality of life, sleep, physical activity and satisfaction; exploring baseline LSIQ scores and sex/gender as moderators of treatment response; and investigating participants&rsquo; perceptions and experiences of exercise therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A total of 106 participants will be recruited through primary and secondary care and randomised (1:1) to receive either MC+ILEX or free-weight resistance training. Both groups will complete 48 exercise sessions over 16 weeks. The primary outcome will be disability at 16 weeks, measured by the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes include multifidus muscle composition and size, lumbar and gluteal muscle strength, hip range of motion, pain, physical and mental function, satisfaction and recovery, health-related quality of life, sleep quality and physical activity levels. Linear mixed-effects models will be used to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Regression analyses will explore whether baseline LSIQ scores moderate treatment effects on multifidus composition and other outcomes. A subsample of participants will undergo semistructured interviews before and after the intervention to explore their illness perceptions, illness mindsets, perceptions of exercise therapy, as well as their experiences and satisfaction with the two exercise interventions. Reflexive thematic analysis will be used to analyse qualitative data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study received ethics approval from the Central Ethics Research Committee of the Quebec Minister of Health and Social Services (CCER-25-26-14). Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and scientific meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN14864451">ISRCTN14864451</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fortin, M., Rosenstein, B., Bertrand, C., Vaillancourt, N., Wright, A., Montpetit, C., Macedo, L., Elliott, J., Cook, C. E., Tousignant-Laflamme, Y., Ma, J., Page, M. G., Dover, G., Dang-Vu, T. T., Weber, M. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-24T06:54:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115538</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115538</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strengthening and Targeted Rehabilitation for Optimal Neuromuscular Gains for chronic BACK pain (STRONG-BACK): protocol for a randomised controlled trial in participants with primary nociceptive pain drivers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115538</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115538</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103742?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face programme on electrical stimulation and neck exercises for non-specific neck pain: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103742?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Neck pain is a common issue among the working-age population, with a high recurrence rate and one of the highest healthcare costs globally. Exercise is proposed as one of the key components in managing this condition, and electrotherapy is established as a safe and proven analgesic measure. Telemedicine improves access to healthcare by removing geographical barriers and reducing costs, allowing consultations from any location and supporting the work-life balance of the patient.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of e-Health versus a face-to-face programme in the therapeutic management of non-specific neck pain through exercise and analgesic electrotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A randomised clinical trial with 100 participants suffering from non-specific neck pain will be conducted. Participants will be evenly divided into two groups to receive analgesic electrotherapy combined with a cervical exercise programme delivered either via an e-Health programme or face-to-face programme. A total of 24 sessions will be administered over 8 weeks. Data collected will include demographic and clinical information, disability, pain intensity, fear of movement, sleep quality, catastrophising, quality of life and range of motion. Assessments will be conducted at the start of the study (baseline), at 8 weeks (post-treatment), and 2 months after completing the intervention (follow-up).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol has been approved by the Andalusian Biomedical Research Ethics Coordinating Committee (SICEIA) with number register (SICEIA-2024-000820) on 25 September 2024. Findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at international and national conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT06842381">NCT06842381</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castro-Sanchez, A. M., Sanchez-Ferre, C., Munoz-Manzaneda, J. M., Gomez-Garcia, S., Payan-Ibarra, C. M., Saavedra-Hernandez, M., Lara-Palomo, I. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103742</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103742</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face programme on electrical stimulation and neck exercises for non-specific neck pain: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103742</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103742</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103781?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring medication safety in prisons: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103781?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Drug-related problems (DRPs), which encompass medication errors (MEs), adverse drug reactions and adverse drug events (ADEs), represent significant challenges in healthcare settings. While medication safety has been extensively studied in hospitals and primary care settings leading to development of improvement strategies, there is limited understanding of these issues within prison healthcare environments. This knowledge gap is concerning given that prisoners often have complex medication needs due to higher rates of chronic physical and mental ill health and substance use disorders compared with the general population. Time in prison presents an opportunity to provide treatment for this socially disadvantaged group, making it an important setting to optimise medication management. This scoping review aimed to understand the nature and frequency of medication safety incidents, their contributory factors and evaluate strategies for enhancing medication safety within prison healthcare environments, where unique institutional constraints and security requirements may impact safe medication use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study conducted a systematic search across six databases to appraise the published literature from 2000 to 2023 (Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane and Web of Science), with reporting according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review guidelines. Data extraction was completed by one author, with validation of a sample by the other authors. The review included quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies examining DRPs in prison healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The review included 42 studies on medication safety in prison healthcare, comprising epidemiological perspectives (52.4%, n=22/42), aetiological exploration of DRPs (45.2%, n=19/42) and intervention evaluation (11.9%, n=5/42). Studies were predominantly from the USA (30.9%, n=13/42) and the UK (26.1%, n=11/42). Most studies focused on infectious disease management (52.3%, n=22/42), particularly HIV treatments (42.8%, n=18/42), followed by mental health medications (23.8%, n=10/42). Non-adherence emerged as the most commonly studied DRP, reported in both epidemiological (68.1%, n=15/22) and aetiological studies (68.4%, n=13/19). Contributing factors included medication delivery problems, psychosocial factors, accessibility challenges and conflicts between healthcare delivery and security requirements. Five intervention studies were identified, with two from the USA (40%, n=2/5). These interventions included those addressing medication non-adherence (40%, n=2/5) and potentially inappropriate prescribing (20%, n=1/5), and highlighted the potential efficacy of multidisciplinary and pharmacist-led approaches in addressing medication safety challenges within prison healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This represents the first comprehensive study to present a narrative report on the existing evidence regarding the epidemiology, aetiology and interventions for medication safety events in prison healthcare. While intervention studies demonstrate promising findings from multidisciplinary and pharmacist-led initiatives, further evidence is needed to address DRPs beyond medication non-adherence, guided by a deeper understanding of their contributory factors. Future studies should target preventable MEs and ADEs, as well as wider health conditions to broaden our understanding of prison-specific contributory factors to develop targeted interventions for this vulnerable population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alsuwat, M., Shaw, J., Keers, R. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103781</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103781</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring medication safety in prisons: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103781</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103781</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104065?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Struggling to cope in an unknown realm: a qualitative study of moral resilience in frontline healthcare professionals in Swedish hospital wards during a pandemic crisis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104065?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to explore the process of moral resilience among frontline healthcare professionals. By delving into experiences of handling moral challenges during a pandemic crisis, we aimed to understand dimensions of moral resilience, affecting factors and consequences. This understanding can inform the implementation of interventions to support healthcare professionals&rsquo; well-being and ability to deliver high-quality care, under both routine and extreme conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative exploratory study was conducted using grounded theory methodology. Data were collected retrospectively through written narratives and individual interviews (September to November 2020).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>General hospital wards allocated for patients with COVID-19 in two Swedish healthcare regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>46 informants, comprising registered nurses, nursing assistants, physicians, managers and allied health professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A conceptual model is presented that describes and explains the process of moral resilience among frontline healthcare professionals working in general hospital wards during a pandemic crisis. The model reveals a complex and dynamic iterative process, with components at both the individual and system levels being inevitably inter-related.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings emphasise that moral resilience within healthcare organisations is not solely dependent on individual qualities but also influenced by the working groups or teams, leadership and prevailing organisational structures. Supportive interventions should target workgroup dynamics and organisational culture while providing tailored support for individuals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nordgren, L., Lohela Karlsson, M., Conden Mellgren, E., Go&#x0308;ras, C., Bjurling-Sjo&#x0308;berg, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104065</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104065</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Struggling to cope in an unknown realm: a qualitative study of moral resilience in frontline healthcare professionals in Swedish hospital wards during a pandemic crisis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104065</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104065</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104338?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of severe fatigue after SARS-CoV-2 infection in Norway: a prospective 2-year follow-up study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104338?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to estimate the prevalence of long-lasting severe fatigue and identify possible risk factors in a 2-year follow-up of patients with predominantly mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A community-based cohort from Telemark and Agder Counties, Norway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 159 PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals in the period between 28 February and 17 December 2020 were included at 12 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 93 responded at 24 months follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Fatigue was assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and health-related quality of life using the RAND version of health-related quality of life Short Form 36 (SF-36), developed by the RAND Corporation. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured at 12 and 24 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Severe fatigue (FSS &ge;5) was reported by 36% at 12 months and 31% at 24 months. A higher proportion of women than men reported severe fatigue at 12 months (p=0.08). The number of acute-phase symptoms was associated with severe fatigue. No association was found between severe fatigue and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels, demographic variables or reinfection status. The severe fatigue group scored significantly lower on all domains of SF-36.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In this cohort, severe fatigue was common, greatly impacted quality of life and persisted for up to 2 years following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Fatigue severity was associated with symptom burden in the acute phase but not with antibody levels or other demographic variables. These findings underscore the need for long-term follow-up and support for affected individuals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berg, K. K., Sarjomaa, M., Tveten, Y., Thilesen, C., Fell, A. K. M., Nordbo, S. A., Reiso, H., Eikeland, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104338</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104338</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of severe fatigue after SARS-CoV-2 infection in Norway: a prospective 2-year follow-up study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104338</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104338</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106095?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Deaths with preceding hospitalisations within 180 days in eight countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: A secondary descriptive analysis of the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106095?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe (1) the proportion of deaths that were in recently hospitalised children and (2) causes of mortality among deceased children aged 0&ndash;59 months with preceding hospitalisations who enrolled in a mortality surveillance programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Descriptive study using prospectively collected data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Eight Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) community and healthcare sites in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Deaths among children aged 0&ndash;59 months enrolled in CHAMPS 2016&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Deaths with antecedent hospitalisations within 180 days of death. Causes of death determined by expert panels who reviewed clinical data and histopathologic and microbiologic results from postmortem minimally invasive tissue sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>CHAMPS enrolled 8548 deaths; we excluded 3688 neonates who died before discharge or &le;24 hours of birth and 482 with unclear information on antecedent hospitalisations. Out of the 4378 remaining deaths, 16.7% (95% CI 15.7% to 17.9%) were deaths that occurred within 180 days of a hospitalisation (n=733/4378). Of these, 55.7% (95% CI 52.0% to 59.3%) occurred outside healthcare facilities. Among included deaths with minimally invasive tissue sampling completed (n=337), lower respiratory tract infections (41.2%, 95% CI 36.0% to 46.7%), sepsis (39.8%, 95% CI 34.5% to 45.2%) and undernutrition (n=92, 27.3%, 95% CI 22.7% to 32.4%) were most common causes of death among cases with antecedent hospitalisations. The greatest proportion of deaths with antecedent hospital admissions occurred among cases aged 1&ndash;11 months (48.0%, 95% CI 44.4% to 51.7%), compared with those aged 0&ndash;1 months (21.7%, 95% CI 18.8% to 24.9%) and those aged 1&ndash;5 years (30.3%, 95% CI 27.0% to 33.8%). Moreover, the greatest proportion of deaths with antecedent hospital admissions occurred among infants/children with weight-for-age Z-score of &lt;&ndash;3 (62.5%, 95% CI 56.5% to 68.0%) compared with those with weight-for-age Z-score of &ge;&ndash;3 (37.5%, 95% CI 32.0% to 43.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We observed a high proportion of deaths with antecedent hospitalisations within 180 days among young children across eight sites in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Among those deaths, children aged 1&ndash;11 months and undernourished infants were over-represented, suggesting early follow-up as a potential point to focus targeted support and future research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varo, R., Cole, K., Madewell, Z. J., Iglesias, J. F., Igunza, K. A., Akelo, V., Mugah, C., Onyango, D., Were, J. A., Madhi, S. A., Dangor, Z., Johnstone, S., Lala, S. G., Ruder, T., Mandomando, I., Kincardett, M., Xerinda, E. G., Scott, J. A. G., Assefa, N., Madrid, L., Hassen, F. A., Edris, Y., Ogbuanu, I., Bassey, I.-A., Samura, S., Sillah, A. S., Kaluma, E., Arifeen, S. E., Biswas, R., Gurley, E. S., Rahman, A., Hossain, M. Z., Omer, S. B., Kazi, A. M., Belgaumi, S. M., Allana, R., Keita, A. M., Bassat, Q., Mutevedzi, P. C., Whitney, C. G., Rees, C. A., On behalf of the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network, on behalf of the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network, Solomon, Sorour, Lombaard, Wadula, Petersen, Hale, Govender, Swart, Lala, Velaphi, Chawana, Adam, Wise, Myburgh, Bari, Parveen, Kamal, Nawshad Uddin Ahmed, Hoque, Tasnim, Islam, Ariuman, Rahman, Zaman, Rahman, Ahmed, Flora, Shirin, Rahman, Oundo, Ibrahim, Temesgen, Gure, Alemu, Yeshi, Gizaw, Orlien, Ali, Igunza, Otieno, Onyango, Agaya, Oliech, Were, Gethi, George Aol, Owuor, Muga, Oluoch, Ochola, Tennant, Greene, Mehta, Kristie Johnson, Gaume, Keita, Koka, Fairchild, Kone, Sidibe, Sanogo, Onwuchekwa, Kourouma, Sissoko, Traore, Juma, Diarra, Traore, Diarra, Chawla, Nhampossa, Manhique, Mocumbi, Menendez, Munguambe, Nhacolo, Maixenchs, Moseray, Tarawally, Seppeh, Mash, Ojulong, Duduyemi, Bunn, Swaray-Deen, Bangura, Jambai, Mannah, Ita, Chukwuegbo, Sannoh, Nwajiobi, Kowuor, Kaluma, Balogun, Cain, Samura, Pratt, Moses, Sesay, Squire, Sesay, Kaykay, Halu, Legesse, Smart, Kenneh, Ameh, Ritter, Wilson, Winchell, Witherbee, Garel, Salzberg, Koplan, Lee, Martines, Warang, Diaz, Waller, Nair, Liu, Bursuc, LaHatte, Raymer, Blevins, Argeseanu, Vyas, Bhandari]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106095</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106095</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Deaths with preceding hospitalisations within 180 days in eight countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: A secondary descriptive analysis of the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106095</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106095</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106995?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Typologies of common maternal mental disorders and associated factors: a quantitative life course study applied to cohort data in a resource-constrained setting in Northeastern Brazil]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106995?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We aim to identify trajectories of probable maternal common mental disorders (CMD), as well as risk and protective factors associated with maternal mental health among postpartum women during the pandemic using life course theory approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective individual level cohort study from the Iracema-COVID Study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Population</st>
<p>Mothers (n=335) at postpartum period who delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic in the fourth largest city in Brazil.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Probable CMDs were accessed using validated instruments in five cohort waves at postpartum period. Sequence analyses (SA) were employed to extract CMD trajectories, and a set of generalised binomial logistic and log-Poisson multivariable regression models with robust variance were employed to assess risk and protective factors for probable CMDs diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Trajectories patterns of probable maternal common mental disorders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Fit indices demonstrated a two-cluster-SA solution of probable CMD. The patterns of probable CMDs indicated that 335 mothers were clustered into occasional/transitory (n=240, 71.64%) and mostly/persistent (n=95, 28.36%) CMD trajectories. We found that mothers with low education (OR: 2.44; 95% CI 1.13 to 5.23), single (OR: 1.97; 95% CI 1.03 to 3.75) or in a stable union (OR: 2.00; 95% CI 1.02 to 3.90) and travel time spent to access the nearest primary healthcare unit (OR: 1.02; 95% CI 1.006 to 1.04) were associated with increased OR of belonging to the mostly/persistent CMD trajectory. Deprived green areas acted as a risk factor to maternal CMDs prevalence (OR: 1.37; 95% CI 1.002 to 1.87).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study provides evidence that individual vulnerabilities and neighbourhood deprivation play an important role in understanding maternal mental health, beyond the patterns and trajectories of probable maternal CMD due to issues confronted during the COVID-19 outbreak in the northeastern region of Brazil. Policies to prevent and treat maternal mental health issues and improvement in neighbourhood deprivation need to be developed and addressed to avoid exacerbation of probable maternal CMDs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sampaio Morais, G. A., Correia, L. L., Farias-Antunez, S., Araujo, D. A. B. S., Vasconcelos, S. C., Tavares Machado, M. M., Castro, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106995</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106995</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Typologies of common maternal mental disorders and associated factors: a quantitative life course study applied to cohort data in a resource-constrained setting in Northeastern Brazil]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106995</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106995</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107238?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Current status and influencing factors of knowledge, attitude and practice of diet management in patients with enterostomy: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107238?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The incidence of malnutrition is high in enterostomy patients, which impacts their nutritional status and requires targeted dietary management strategies to improve outcomes. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of dietary management among enterostomy patients, identified influencing factors and provided recommendations for comprehensive nutritional care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>43 hospitals in Hubei Province.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A convenience sample of 643 enterostomy patients was surveyed between November 2024 and April 2025. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age of 18 years or older; (2) at least 4 weeks post-enterostomy surgery with recovery at home and (3) provision of informed consent and voluntary participation in the study. The exclusion criteria included: (1) inability to eat normally due to illness or other reasons and (2) presence of consciousness, cognitive or communication disorders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>KAP questionnaire score, social alienation scale score and general information.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 621 valid responses (96.58% valid questionnaires), the average KAP score was 185, with 79.07% achieving a passing score (&ge;111). Moderate social isolation was observed with a mean score of 40.04&plusmn;13.98. Regression analysis revealed that social isolation (&beta;=&ndash;0.393, p&lt;0.001), medical insurance type (employee medical insurance: &beta;=0.233, p&lt;0.001; resident medical insurance: &beta;=0.315, p&lt;0.001) and education level (&beta;=0.096, p=0.019) significantly influenced KAP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Enterostomy patients showed moderate to high knowledge, positive attitudes and good practices in dietary management, but experienced moderate social isolation. A multidisciplinary nutrition team should assess patients&rsquo; nutritional, physiological, psychological and social support needs. Personalised dietary plans based on education level and diverse educational methods can enhance intervention effectiveness. Encouraging self-care and leveraging the &lsquo;Internet Plus&rsquo; platform for regular progress monitoring can improve self-management capabilities. Continuous monitoring of nutrition and quality of life is essential to support enterostomy patients. These findings may have implications for enterostomy care in resource-limited settings, including low-income and middle-income countries, where multidisciplinary nutrition teams and patient education resources may be limited.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lu, Z., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, S., Zhu, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107238</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107238</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Current status and influencing factors of knowledge, attitude and practice of diet management in patients with enterostomy: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107238</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107238</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108381?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrating cardiovascular healthcare screening into a community pharmacy vaccination service: a scoping review to identify opportunities for patient engagement and service expansion]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108381?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Community pharmacies are increasingly recognised as accessible providers of public health services. Integrating cardiovascular health checks and behaviour change strategies with the community pharmacy vaccination service has the potential to improve population health outcomes. This scoping review aims to identify potential pharmacist-led cardiovascular-related services suitable for such integration, and to explore the acceptability and feasibility of pharmacy-led services among both service users and providers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science were systematically searched for UK-based empirical studies published between January 2013 and December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Primary studies reporting on pharmacist-led cardiovascular-related interventions (eg, blood pressure monitoring, cholesterol screening, smoking cessation) delivered to adults (&ge;18 years) in community pharmacy settings and reporting on clinical outcomes, feasibility or acceptability were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data were extracted using a standardised form on Excel and synthesised narratively. Key domains of interest included intervention characteristics, facilitators, barriers, perceived outcomes, delivery mode and intervention content including behavioural change strategies or components to support implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 8322 records screened, 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular-related interventions were broadly feasible and acceptable to both patients and pharmacy staff. High patient satisfaction was attributed to the accessibility and convenience of pharmacy locations, as well as the ability of pharmacy staff to establish rapport during interactions. Facilitators of service delivery included private consultation spaces, structured training and access to digital screening tools (eg, devices for atrial fibrillation detection). Barriers included workload constraints and limited public awareness of pharmacy services. Five studies described successful integration of lifestyle interventions within pharmacy-based settings, but the long-term clinical outcomes produced by the intervention were rarely reported. Patients valued the convenience and trusted relationships with pharmacists, though concerns about privacy were raised. Pharmacists reported the need for clearer clinical protocols, and multidisciplinary support and training to improve their confidence in delivering health checks as part of their routine work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Community pharmacies offer an optimal setting for integrating cardiovascular-related screening interventions with the vaccination service delivered within community pharmacy. Successful implementation will require attention to the identified facilitators including the quality of staff training, competing priorities and optimisation and utilisation of pharmacy space. Future research should prioritise definitive controlled trials and cost-effectiveness analyses to assess long-term health outcomes. Policy action is also needed to support service integration and expand pharmacists&rsquo; public health roles within the wider National Health Service.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tang, J., Mansell, G., Merks, P., Jones, A., Badenhorst, J., Koziol, M., Sandhu, D., Langley, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108381</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108381</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrating cardiovascular healthcare screening into a community pharmacy vaccination service: a scoping review to identify opportunities for patient engagement and service expansion]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108381</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108381</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108762?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-reported sexually transmitted infections among adolescents and adults in Zambia and Zimbabwe: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys, 2005-2018]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108762?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Globally, curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are increasing, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, yet epidemiological data remain limited, hindering progress towards the 2030 global STI targets. This study assessed the prevalence of self-reported STIs in the last 12 months among adolescent girls and women (AGW) and adolescent boys and men (ABM) aged 15&ndash;59 who ever had sex in Zambia and Zimbabwe at three time points. It also assessed whether observed changes across survey rounds persisted after adjusting for sociodemographic and sexual behaviour characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We analysed six rounds of Demographic and Health Surveys, three per country, collected between 2005 and 2018, using descriptive statistics and logistic regression, while accounting for survey design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Zambia and Zimbabwe.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total weighted sample of 86 366 AGW and ABM was included in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measure</st>
<p>Self-reported STIs in the last 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, self-reported STI prevalence was higher in Zimbabwe than Zambia. Among Zambian ABM, self-reported STIs increased from 6.2% in 2007 to 7.1% in 2018 (adjOR=1.28, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.57, p=0.005). Among Zimbabwean AGW, prevalence decreased from 11.7% in 2005/2006 to 8.3% in 2015 (adjOR=0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85, p&lt;0.001). No significant differences between survey rounds were observed among AGW in Zambia (2007: 5.2%, 2018: 5.1%, adjOR=1.01, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.22, p=0.070) and ABM in Zimbabwe (2005/2006: 7.9%, 2015: 8.4%; adjOR=1.13, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.38, p=0.371). Self-reported STIs were associated with marital status, HIV status and number of sexual partners in the last 12 months among ABM and AGW. Among ABM, self-reported STIs decreased with older age at sexual debut. In Zimbabwe, lower educational attainment and wealth were also associated with higher STI prevalence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These findings highlight differences in STI prevalence by sex and country across survey rounds, underscoring the need for tailored STI prevention, diagnostic and treatment strategies, particularly for high-risk groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rotsaert, A., Smekens, T., Dziva Chikwari, C., Phiri, M. M., Matambanadzo, P., Hensen, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108762</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108762</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sexual health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-reported sexually transmitted infections among adolescents and adults in Zambia and Zimbabwe: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys, 2005-2018]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sexual health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108762</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108762</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109192?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Machine learning for medication error detection: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109192?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Medication errors pose a significant threat to public health. Despite efforts by health agencies and the implementation of various interventions, such as staff training, medication reconciliation and automation, the persistence of these incidents highlights the need for more effective, scalable solutions. In recent years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising approach in healthcare, offering potential to detect and predict medication errors through data-driven insights. This scoping review aims to systematically map the existing literature on ML-based approaches to predict or detect medication errors across all stages of the medication use process. The review seeks to identify the range of ML applications in this domain, characterise methodological trends and highlight current knowledge gaps. The findings will provide a structured and accessible overview for both clinicians and researchers, supporting the development of safer, more data-informed medication practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Structured searches will be performed in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, covering publications from 1 January 2015 to 28 April 2025. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be used to identify eligible studies. Key information&mdash;including ML models, data sources and type, evaluation methods and clinical contexts&mdash;will be extracted and analysed using descriptive statistics, visualisations, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study involves a review of existing literature and does not involve human participants, personal data or unpublished secondary data. As such, ethical approval was not required. All data analysed were obtained from publicly available sources. Findings of the scoping review will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publications in scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/38SFY">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/38SFY</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heche, F., Yazdani, A., Ferdowsi, S., Kabak, R., Mu, G., Teodoro, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109192</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109192</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Machine learning for medication error detection: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109192</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109192</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109347?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What do patients think about home-based testing for better asthma diagnosis? Insights from a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109347?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Asthma is misdiagnosed in one-third of patients  . Due to its variable nature, international guidelines recommend performing key diagnostic tests during symptomatic periods or in the morning to improve accuracy. Limited access to timely clinic appointments and community-based diagnostics makes this difficult. Handheld spirometry and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are feasible for home use, enabling timely and flexible testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore patients&rsquo; views on performing spirometry and FeNO at home during the asthma diagnostic process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using the framework approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This prospective observational study was conducted at a National Institute for Health and Care Research Clinical Research Facility, based within a large National Health Service Trust, as part of the Rapid-Access Diagnostics for Asthma (RADicA) study (ISRCTN11676160).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A purposive sample of 15 symptomatic adult patients with general practitioner-suspected asthma who were referred for diagnostic evaluation of the condition; all patients were given home spirometry and FeNO devices during their diagnostic processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three themes emerged from the analysis: &lsquo;Perceived value of, and burdens of home testing&rsquo;, &lsquo;Views on device usability and acceptability&rsquo; and &lsquo;Information and support needs&rsquo;. Home testing was generally welcomed by patients as a way of improving their understanding of their condition and enabling an accurate diagnosis of their symptoms. Key barriers (eg, testing frequency, lack of privacy) and enablers to improve feasibility (eg, training and support) were also identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study provides valuable insights into the barriers and enablers of home-based diagnostic strategies for asthma. Findings can inform service design and implementation approaches to enhance the feasibility and effectiveness of home testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN11676160">ISRCTN11676160</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khatoon, B., Smith, J., Fowler, S., Simpson, A., Murray, C., Wang, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109347</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109347</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What do patients think about home-based testing for better asthma diagnosis? Insights from a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109347</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109347</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109560?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global patterns and disparities in maternal and child health: a panel analysis of global health observatory and world development indicators data, 2000-2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109560?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to evaluate global trends in maternal and child health-related indicators in the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) eras, examine whether these associations differ across regions and income groups and assess their impact on life expectancy (LE) at birth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>We conducted a country-level panel analysis using data from 2000 to 2023 obtained from the Global Health Observatory and the World Development Indicator database. All WHO Member States with available data were included. Data on under-five mortality rate (U5MR), maternal mortality ratio (MMR), neonatal mortality rate (NMR), skilled birth attendance, ratio of nurses and midwives, total fertility rate (TFR), LE, prevalence of anaemia and hypertension in women aged 15&ndash;49 years, diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis (DTP3) vaccine coverage, gross domestic product and government health expenditure as a percentage of GDP were collected, cleaned and prepared for analysis. Missing values (&lt;10%) were imputed using linear interpolation and 5-year mean methods. Descriptive statistics and panel regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between maternal and child health indicators and LE. In addition, Joinpoint regression models were applied to assess temporal trends and estimate annual percent changes (APCs) during the MDG and SDG eras. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata MP version 17.0. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Trends in LE and maternal and child health indicators and maternal and child-related factors associated with LE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Maternal and child health improved substantially, with faster progress during the MDG era (2000&ndash;2015) compared with the SDG era (2015&ndash;2023). The MMR declined by 130.30 (100 in MDG vs 30.30 in SDG) deaths per 100 000 live births overall, from 327.60 (95% UI: 308.80&ndash;348.60) in 2000 to 197.30 (95% UI: 174.50&ndash;234.00) in 2023. Similarly, U5MR declined by 39.95 (28 in the MDG vs 11.95 in the SDG era) deaths, from 76.67 (95% UI: 75.70&ndash;77.86) to 36.72 (95% UI: 34.66&ndash;41.09) deaths per 1000 live births. The NMR decreased by 13.38 per 1000 live births, from 30.71 (95% UI: 29.91&ndash;31.58) to 17.33 (95% UI: 16.25&ndash;19.41) deaths, and LE increased by 6.6 years, from 66.77 (95% UI: 66.23&ndash;67.18) to 73.33 (95% UI: 72.73&ndash;73.93) globally. Fixed-effects regression results showed that higher U5MR (&beta;=&ndash;0.0697, 95% CI &ndash;0.080 to &ndash;0.060, p&lt;0.001), MMR (&beta;=&ndash;0.0118, 95% CI &ndash;0.020 to &ndash;0.010, p&lt;0.001), TFR (&beta;=&ndash;0.0258, 95% CI &ndash;0.040 to &ndash;0.020, p&lt;0.001) and prevalence of anaemia (&beta;=&ndash;0.0223, 95% CI &ndash;0.030 to &ndash;0.010, p&lt;0.001) were associated with reduced LE, whereas skilled birth attendance (&beta;=0.0417, 95% CI 0.030 to 0.050, p&lt;0.001), DPT3 coverage (&beta;=0.0425, 95% CI 0.030 to 0.050, p&lt;0.001) and GDP (&beta;=0.0041, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.010, p=0.01) were associated with increased LE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Despite progress in maternal and child health, gaps remain, particularly in low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Strengthening and retaining the health workforce, expanding access to immunisation and family planning services and improving early detection and management of hypertension and anaemia among women are critical to sustaining gains and accelerating improvements in LE.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mandizadza, O. O., Phebeni, R. T., Ji, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109560</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109560</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global patterns and disparities in maternal and child health: a panel analysis of global health observatory and world development indicators data, 2000-2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109560</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109560</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110459?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combining structured exercise with a low-energy diet to attenuate lean mass loss in South Asian adults living with type 2 diabetes: the COMBINE randomised trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110459?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is rising and disproportionately affects South Asian adults, including those in the United Kingdom. South Asians develop T2D at a higher rate and at a younger age than their white British counterparts, at a lower body mass index. Active efforts to reduce adiposity can improve glycaemic control and in some cases achieve T2D remission. However, a substantial proportion of lean mass is lost while achieving weight loss, which may have physiological and metabolic consequences, affecting long-term health outcomes and quality of life for people living with T2D and obesity. We are examining the impact of a combined low energy diet and supervised exercise intervention versus a low energy diet alone for the preservation of lean mass in an understudied South Asian population living with T2D and excess adiposity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, randomised, two-arm parallel-group, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial is being conducted in Leicester, UK. 36 South Asian adults aged 40&ndash;65 years within 10 years of T2D diagnosis and not on insulin therapy will be enrolled. Both intervention arms will receive an 800&ndash;900 kcal/day low energy diet for 12 weeks. Those randomised to the exercise group will additionally receive a mixture of supervised and home-based resistance and aerobic exercise training three times per week. The primary outcome is the difference in the change of lean mass between groups measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 12 weeks and will be analysed using linear regression modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial was approved by the NHS research ethics service (23/WM/0201). All participants will provide informed consent prior to enrolment, and the study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Findings will be shared widely (publications, presentations, press releases, social media platforms) and will inform an effectiveness trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN11175684">ISRCTN11175684</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsenyadis, F., Henson, J., McCarthy, M., Papamargaritis, D., King, J. A., Redman, E., Whelehan, G., Wilkinson, T., Sargeant, J., Rowlands, A., Boule, N., Dasgupta, K., McCann, G. P., Davies, M. J., Khunti, K., Choudhary, P., Yates, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110459</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110459</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combining structured exercise with a low-energy diet to attenuate lean mass loss in South Asian adults living with type 2 diabetes: the COMBINE randomised trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110459</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110459</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111020?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global maternal and infant health monitoring systems: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111020?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Enhancing maternal and infant health is a cornerstone of global health advancement. This can be achieved by building sustainable health monitoring systems that can accurately and reliably generate high-quality data and produce evidence-based recommendations for policymakers. By identifying gaps and strengths in current systems, this review aims to highlight current practices in monitoring maternal and infant health outcomes, including low birth weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will adopt the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute&rsquo;s Scoping Review Methods Manual. Three databases, including PubMed, Embase and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), as well as relevant grey literature sources, will be searched for articles describing active global population-based maternal and infant health monitoring systems published in English from the year of database inception till 30 September 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, followed by independent full-text screenings against predefined eligibility criteria, with data extracted using a data extraction form. After data extraction, a narrative synthesis will be performed. The findings will adhere to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review is based on publicly available data; no ethical approval is required. The findings of this scoping review will be published in journals and presented at relevant conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al-Habbal, K., Hassan, Z., Kaddoura, R., Yousef, S., Fetty, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111020</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111020</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global maternal and infant health monitoring systems: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111020</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111020</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112112?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Geographic barriers to gynaecological cancer care in Indonesia: a geospatial and infrastructure analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112112?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to identify underserved regions and evaluate the population coverage based on travel time and distance to hospitals with gynaecologic oncologists in Indonesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The travel time and distance to hospitals with gynaecologic oncologists were evaluated using the Quantum Geographic Information System. Data from 139 gynaecologic oncologists and their affiliated hospitals were obtained from the Indonesian Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (November 2024) and cross-referenced with the Ministry of Health records. The female population density data were sourced from Facebook&rsquo;s high-resolution settlement layer. Isochrones were generated to estimate travel times and distances using zonal statistics, which facilitated the calculation of population coverage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 139 gynaecologic oncologists were identified nationwide, practising in 243 hospitals (7.6% of the 3202 hospitals in Indonesia), with a concentration in Java (60.4%). 11 of the 38 provinces lack sub-specialists. Population coverage varies sharply: the travel time to a hospital with gynaecologic oncologists is &le;2 hours for 79.1% of women in Java, compared with 4.9% in Papua; overall, 34.4% reside more than 100 km away from hospitals with gynaecologic oncologists. Hospitals with gynaecologic oncologists are predominantly urban class B general hospitals, and 83.1% participate in the National Health Insurance Schemes. Exploratory district-level correlations showed positive associations between the number of such hospitals and total female population (r=0.44, p&lt;0.001), female life expectancy (r=0.29, p&lt;0.001), per-capita expenditure (r=0.54, p&lt;0.001), female population density (r=0.68, p&lt;0.001), female Human Development Index (r=0.4, p&lt;0.001) and a negative association with land area size (r=&ndash;0.15, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Gynaecological oncology services in Indonesia remain heavily concentrated in Java, leaving nearly one-fifth of women residing more than 100 km away. The travel time is greater than 2 hours for many. Targeted expansion of the gynaecologic oncologists workforce, diagnostic and treatment infrastructure, and sustainable financing mechanisms are required to close these gaps.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tjokroprawiro, B. A., Sulistya, H. A., Rahma, A. A., Novitasari, K., Ulhaq, R. A., Yuliati, I., Utami, T. W., Anggraeni, T. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112112</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112112</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Geographic barriers to gynaecological cancer care in Indonesia: a geospatial and infrastructure analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112112</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112112</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112344?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and sustainability of physical activity interventions for non-Hispanic African American and black women in the USA: umbrella review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112344?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite the well-established benefits of regular physical activity, only a small percentage of African American (AA) women meet national physical activity guidelines. This population faces unique cultural, social and environmental determinants that contribute to low participation rates. In response, various interventions have been developed to promote physical activity. While individual studies and reviews have examined these interventions, the evidence remains fragmented and of inconsistent quality. An umbrella review, or a review of reviews, provides a comprehensive method for summarising this body of literature. This protocol outlines the methods for conducting an umbrella review of physical activity interventions targeting AA women living in the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A comprehensive search will be conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection, Social Sciences Full Text, SportDiscus, CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Evidence Synthesis, grey literature and relevant reference lists. Eligible articles published in English through September 2025 will be screened independently by &gt;2 reviewers. Data extraction, analysis and quality assessment will follow. The AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2) and JBI recommendations for umbrella reviews will be used to assess methodological quality. The Corrected Covered Area will be used to characterise the overlap of primary studies across reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This umbrella review synthesises published data and does not involve human subjects, so ethics approval is not required. We will follow established guidance and best practice for transparency and integrity in evidence synthesis. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, community-partner briefs, open materials (eg, search strategies and data extraction templates) and in an Open Science Framework repository.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hubbell, A., Sender, J., Fogg, L., Garland, M., Buchholz, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112344</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112344</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and sustainability of physical activity interventions for non-Hispanic African American and black women in the USA: umbrella review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112344</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112344</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112444?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of home-based walking exercise and education on early functional recovery after lung cancer surgery: protocol for the WalkLung multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112444?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Walking, as a simple, low-cost and easily implemented form of exercise, offers multiple health advantages. The WalkLung trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a home-based walking exercise and education intervention in promoting early functional recovery after lung cancer surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>WalkLung is a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted at three hospitals in China, with stratification by study centre. A total of 116 patients with postoperative lung cancer will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group (home-based walking exercise and education for 4 weeks) or the control group (usual care). The primary outcome is the longitudinal walking difficulty score during the 4-week postdischarge, measured by the validated perioperative symptom assessment for lung surgery scale (0&ndash;10 scale), assessed at discharge and weekly for 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes are the 6-min walk test, pulmonary function, complications, physical activity level, quality of life, social functioning, exercise adherence and adverse events. Long-term outcomes (up to 6 months) will be analysed and reported separately. All analyses will use an intention-to-treat approach, with outcome measures analysed as appropriate using generalised estimating equations for repeated measures, and t-tests or <sup>2</sup> tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee for Medical Research and New Medical Technology of Sichuan Cancer Hospital (No. SCCHEC-02-2025-091) and all participating subcentres. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The manuscript is based on protocol V.1.0 (2 January 2025). The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500103081.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Shi, X., Feng, P., Chen, Y., Lei, C., Zeng, H., Li, T., Gui, P., Li, M., Wang, L., Zhang, R., He, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, D., Zhang, Y., Liao, J., Wei, X., Tian, B., Liu, X., Li, Q., Shi, Q., Chen, X., Dai, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112444</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112444</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of home-based walking exercise and education on early functional recovery after lung cancer surgery: protocol for the WalkLung multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112444</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112444</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge and attitudes towards contraception among undergraduate students: a multicentre, cross-sectional study in Vietnam]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate Vietnamese undergraduate students&rsquo; knowledge and attitudes towards contraception and their associated factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Six universities in Vietnam from April to May 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1134 undergraduate students.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Students&rsquo; knowledge and attitudes towards contraception were measured via an online survey, and a cut-off point of 50% was used to categorise their scores. Associations between students&rsquo; knowledge and attitude scores and their sociodemographic characteristics, academic background, sexual and relationship experiences, contraceptive education and information sources were evaluated using multivariable linear regression. Independent variables were selected through Bayesian Model Averaging.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Students&rsquo; average knowledge and attitude scores were 10.93&plusmn;2.86 (possible range: 0&ndash;22; actual range: 0&ndash;19) and 54.14&plusmn;6.57 (possible range: 15&ndash;75; actual range: 35&ndash;74), respectively. 62.1% demonstrated good knowledge, and 91.4% showed positive attitudes towards contraception. Higher knowledge was observed among older students (per 1 year increase, &beta;=0.33, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.43), those from public universities (&beta;=1.32, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.00), using mass media as a contraceptive information source (&beta;=0.58, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.91) and having sexual experience (&beta;=1.16, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.58). By contrast, students who were single and had never been in a romantic relationship (&beta;=&ndash;0.88, 95% CI &ndash;1.23 to &ndash;0.52) and those enrolled in non-healthcare disciplines (&beta;=&ndash;1.06, 95% CI &ndash;1.55 to &ndash;0.56) had significantly lower knowledge scores. Positive attitudes were more prevalent among female students (males vs females: &beta;=&ndash;2.07, 95% CI &ndash;2.80 to &ndash;1.34), those using the Internet as a source of contraceptive information (&beta;=5.65, 95% CI 4.29 to 7.01) and those with higher knowledge scores (per one-unit increase, &beta;=0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.79). All associations were statistically significant (p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In general, undergraduate students&rsquo; knowledge of contraception was relatively low, while their attitudes were positive. Implementing education programmes focusing on correct usage and storage of condoms and the safety of emergency contraceptive pills may help improve their understanding and promote safer sexual practices, thereby contributing to reducing the risk of sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doan, D. A., Pham, S. T., Nguyen, T. T. X., Luu, T. N. N., Nguyen, T. T. P., Le, G. B., Dinh, D. X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113363</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113363</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge and attitudes towards contraception among undergraduate students: a multicentre, cross-sectional study in Vietnam]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113363</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113374?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between continuity of care and detection of hypertension in Dutch general practice: a 10-year cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113374?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and timely detection enables interventions that can substantially reduce this risk. General practice, with continuity of care (COC) as one of its core values, plays a pivotal role in hypertension detection. This study aimed to investigate the association between COC and the detection of hypertension in general practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal dynamic cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study used routine care data from 48 Dutch general practices between 2013 and 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>106 755 adults without known cardiovascular diseases or risk factors at baseline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, an established measure for COC, was used to calculate both general practitioner (GP)- and team-COC. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the association between COC level (low, intermediate, high) and the incidence of hypertension detection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 106 755 patients (59.5% female, median age 35 years) in our analysis. The overall incidence rate was 9.42 hypertension diagnoses per 1000 person-years (95% CI 9.20 to 9.64). Compared with low COC, patients receiving intermediate or high GP-COC had a 1.9 (95% CI 1.7 to 2.1) to 4.9 (95% CI 4.4 to 5.4) higher HR of hypertension detection; patients receiving intermediate or high team-COC had a 2.3 (95% CI 2.2 to 2.5) to 7.3 (95% CI 6.8 to 7.8) higher HR of hypertension detection. High personal continuity was associated with up to 8.3 months (95% CI 8.6 to 7.9) earlier detection of hypertension. The association between COC and hypertension detection was dose-dependent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study shows that both GP-COC and team-COC are dose-dependently associated with increased HRs and earlier detection of hypertension in adults without preregistered cardiovascular conditions. Promoting COC contributes to cardiovascular preventive care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Velde, N. R., te Winkel, M. T., Kanning, J. P., Lissenberg-Witte, B. I., Harskamp, R., Maarsingh, O. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113374</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113374</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between continuity of care and detection of hypertension in Dutch general practice: a 10-year cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113374</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113374</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114705?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bayesian randomised controlled trial of guided parent-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for children with anxiety disorders via remote sessions in Japan: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114705?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Guided parent-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (GPD-CBT) is an evidence-based, low-burden treatment programme for childhood anxiety disorders with demonstrated efficacy, cost-effectiveness and accessibility. However, it has been tested primarily in Western countries, and the efficacy and cost-effectiveness have not been evaluated in Japanese families. The current study aims to examine GPD-CBT&rsquo;s efficacy and cost-effectiveness in Japanese samples and explore potential cultural adaptations of the programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>This study is designed as a Bayesian single-blind randomised controlled trial with two parallel groups: GPD-CBT (intervention group) and a waitlist control group. The primary outcome is remission of primary anxiety disorders evaluated through diagnostic interviews by independent evaluators. Secondary outcomes include child and parent-reported child anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms and life interference. Additionally, measures of parental psychological characteristics, programme acceptability and quality of life are collected. We will conduct qualitative interviews with parents who participated in the programme and therapists who delivered the intervention to explore potential cultural adaptations. We aim to recruit 54&ndash;170 families, depending on the results of sequential Bayesian analyses. GPD-CBT consists of seven weekly 20 min sessions and a 1-month follow-up session. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 13 weeks post randomisation (primary endpoint for between-group comparison), with an additional 25 weeks post randomisation. The waitlist control group will receive GPD-CBT after the 13-week assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics Review Committees of Chiba University and the University of Tokyo. We will disseminate results through academic conference presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications. If the GPD-CBT intervention proves efficacious, we will promote wider implementation in Japan through the development of training programmes for mental health professionals and key stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p>jRCT1032250421 (<A HREF="https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1032250421">https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1032250421</inter-ref>) and jRCT1030250422 (<inter-ref locator="https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1030250422" locator-type="url">https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1030250422</A>) registered on 9 October 2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Okawa, S., Blackwell, S. E., Violato, M., Creswell, C., Ishikawa, S.-i., Obikane, E., Takahashi, T., Arai, H., Nakamura, H., Ishitsuka, K., Shimizu, E., Sasaki, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114705</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114705</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bayesian randomised controlled trial of guided parent-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for children with anxiety disorders via remote sessions in Japan: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114705</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114705</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114977?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Access to primary care for people with chronic pain: a lived/living experience-informed mixed-methods study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114977?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>People with chronic pain are a high health service using population, representing a significant proportion of primary care visits, but their health service use and needs have been largely understudied. This mixed-methods study investigates experiences of accessing primary care services for people with chronic pain in British Columbia (BC), Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This research programme includes a retrospective cohort study using administrative data, semistructured interviews with people with chronic pain, and triangulation of data. The aim is to support a more robust understanding of how people with chronic pain access primary care services and how this impacts other health services use. These studies emphasise the importance of lived/living experience of chronic pain through the inclusion of individuals with lived experience on the research team and study council, qualitative interviews with people with chronic pain and application of a critical disability theory lens.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>We have obtained ethics approvals from the Simon Fraser University research ethics board. Population Data BC has granted access to de-identified administrative data. Study findings will be disseminated through academic outputs and through knowledge mobilisation with relevant community partners.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gooderham, E., Lavergne, M. R., McCracken, R. K., Holtorf-Ma, E., Hedden, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114977</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114977</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Access to primary care for people with chronic pain: a lived/living experience-informed mixed-methods study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114977</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114977</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of intrathecal pemetrexed and bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM): protocol for a single-arm, prospective, phase Ia trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The prolonged survival of lung cancer patients is accompanied by an increasing incidence of leptomeningeal metastases (LM). Patients with LM have a poor prognosis, significantly impacting their quality of life and overall survival. Recent studies have shown that while intrathecal pemetrexed (IP) can improve symptoms and confer a survival benefit in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with LM, drug resistance remains a significant challenge. As for systemic therapy, intravenous bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated clinical benefits in NSCLC patients. However, clinical data on intrathecal bevacizumab remain scarce. Therefore, this study aims to preliminarily explore the efficacy and safety of intrathecal pemetrexed and bevacizumab in the treatment of NSCLC patients with LM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, single-arm, prospective, investigator-initiated phase Ia clinical trial sponsored by Shanghai Chest Hospital, involving patients with advanced NSCLC and LM. Participants will be enrolled and allocated into two predefined cohorts. Cohort A: six participants will receive IP monotherapy for safety exploration. Cohort B: participants will receive intrathecal pemetrexed and bevacizumab. Pemetrexed will be administered at a fixed dose, while the dosage exploration for bevacizumab will employ a combination of a 3+3 design and an accelerated titration design (ATD). The primary endpoint is the safety and the secondary endpoint is the overall survival (OS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol (Version 1.1, dated 8 October 2024) was approved by the Ethics Commission of Shanghai Chest Hospital (IS24103) on 23 October 2024. Trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06663306">NCT06663306</A>, ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuang, Y., Teng, J., Wang, W., Zhang, B., Cheng, L., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Gao, Z., Nie, W., Xiong, L., Shi, C., Zhang, W., Lou, Y., Han, B., Zhong, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116187</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116187</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of intrathecal pemetrexed and bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM): protocol for a single-arm, prospective, phase Ia trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116187</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116530?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical network modulation and functional recovery in patients with chronic ankle injury following surgery: study protocol for randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116530?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Single-modality motor rehabilitation is often insufficient to address the complex functional restoration needs of patients with chronic ankle injuries following surgery. Research indicates that non-invasive neuromodulation techniques, such as intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), may enhance motor recovery by increasing cortical excitability and facilitating neural network reorganisation. Compared with exercise therapy alone, this study aims to explore the rehabilitation efficacy of combining iTBS with exercise therapy in patients with chronic ankle injuries following surgery. It also investigates the associated cortical network modulation, providing scientific evidence to optimise rehabilitation strategies for these patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial with single-blind assessment. A total of 28 patients with chronic ankle injuries following surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group according to centre-stratified randomisation. The experimental group will receive iTBS combined with exercise therapy, while the control group will receive sham iTBS combined with exercise therapy. Both groups will undergo one session per day, 5 days per week, for a total of 3 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score (AOFAS). Secondary outcome measures will include isokinetic muscle strength assessment of the ankle dorsiflexor and plantarflexor muscles, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, ankle joint range of motion (ROM) and the 10-Metre Walk Test. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) will also be used to assess cortical functional activity and neurophysiological changes. All outcome measures will be collected at baseline prior to enrolment, post-intervention at week 3, and at follow-up at week 6. Primary outcomes analyses will use group-by-time comparisons to examine between-group differences in functional and neurophysiological measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital (Application No. 2025-SR-0333). All participants will provide written informed consent before enrolment. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500110905.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Protocol version</st>
<p>V1.0.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, R., Hu, J., Cao, X., He, Y., Wang, Q., Zhu, J., Yu, C., Chen, Y., Guo, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T07:58:04-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116530</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116530</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical network modulation and functional recovery in patients with chronic ankle injury following surgery: study protocol for randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116530</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116530</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e092372?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spatial distribution of HIV prevalence and associated factors in Guinea: retrospective cross-sectional study using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from 2012 and 2018]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e092372?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>In Guinea, around 17 new cases of HIV occurred each day and it was responsible for 10 deaths a day in 2022. In addition to this burden, regional disparities have emerged over the years. This study aimed to describe and explain the uneven distribution of HIV infection in Guinea using spatial analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a retrospective cross-sectional secondary analysis using data from the 2012 and 2018 Guinea Demographic and Health Survey (DHS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted in Guinea.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and methods</st>
<p>We conducted a secondary analysis of data from 300 and 400 enumeration areas, respectively, included in the 2012 and 2018 DHS Program for participants aged 15 to 49 who underwent HIV testing. Spatial analysis methods, including Moran I, interpolation and Kulldorff&rsquo;s scan statistic, were applied to examine variation and identify high-risk spatial clusters of HIV prevalence rate. The potential relationship between HIV status and socio-demographic, biological, behavioural and socio-environmental explanatory variables was explored using logistic regression at individual level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 7922 individuals in 2012 and 8539 in 2018 participated in the study. HIV prevalence rate in 2012 and 2018 was 1.9% and 1.5%, respectively. Across Guinea&rsquo;s 33 prefectures, HIV prevalence rate varied from 0% to 3.9% in 2012 and from 0% to 3.5% in 2018. Spatial analysis identified four significant high-risk spatial clusters in 2012 and one high-risk cluster in 2018. The high-risk clusters in 2012 were in Kissidougou (relative risk (RR)=3.97; p value=0.037), Matam (RR=2.80; p value=0.019), Pita (RR=3.46; p value=0.035) and N&rsquo;zerekore prefectures (RR=6.08; p value=0.027), the high-risk cluster in 2018 was located in Boffa prefecture (RR=3.95; p value=0.022). Factors significantly and positively associated with HIV infection in 2012 included age class 25&ndash;34 (aOR: 2.20; 95% CI 1.40 to 3.47), age class 35&ndash;49 (aOR: 2.43; 95% CI 1.51 to 3.92), number of HIV healthcare facilities&gt;30 (aOR: 2.14; 95% CI 1.34 to 3.43). HIV infection was significantly lower in men (aOR: 0.52; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.77). In 2018, in addition to age groups 25&ndash;34 years (aOR=1.90; 95% CI 1.18 to 3.04) and 35&ndash;49 years (aOR=2.25; 95% CI 1.40 to 3.64), the Soussou ethnicity group (aOR=1.73; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.87) was also positively associated with HIV infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study describes the spatial distribution of HIV prevalence rate and identified high-risk clusters in Guinea. In addition, risk factors associated with HIV status were identified. The information can help prioritise surveillance and response efforts to control HIV in Guinea.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balde, I., Toure, A. A., Abbate, J. L., Sow, A., Sow, M. S., Bangoura, S. T., Hounmenou, C. G., Sidibe, S., Camara, A., Delamou, A., Ouattara, C. A., Dieng, S., Toure, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092372</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-092372</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spatial distribution of HIV prevalence and associated factors in Guinea: retrospective cross-sectional study using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from 2012 and 2018]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e092372</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e092372</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e095768?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of macrosomia in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e095768?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Macrosomia is an emerging but neglected obstetric challenge in Africa, associated with potentially life-threatening complications to both the mother and the fetus, including maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to determine the pooled prevalence, associated risk factors, and neonatal and maternal outcomes of macrosomia by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science to extract data from those that have investigated various aspects of the prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of macrosomia from the earliest records to 26 August 2025. Appropriate search terms were used for each database.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We included observational studies that examined the prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of macrosomia in Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to estimate the pooled prevalence of macrosomia. The I<sup>2</sup> statistic was used to examine statistical heterogeneity. Egger&rsquo;s test and Funnel plot were used to evaluate publication bias. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to assess the quality of the meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 29 studies comprising 269 934 mother&ndash;infant pairs from 9 African countries were included. The pooled prevalence of macrosomia in Africa was 6.35% (95% CI 5.22% to 7.48%), with substantial heterogeneity (I&sup2;=94.9%). Sensitivity analysis excluding one outlier study reporting a prevalence of 35.89% produced a similar pooled estimate (6.02%, 95% CI 4.94% to 7.10%). Significant risk factors for macrosomia included male neonate (OR=1.58, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.11), gestational age &ge;40 weeks (OR=1.54, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.97) and history of macrosomia (OR=5.44, 95% CI 1.82 to 9.06). With respect to outcomes, macrosomia was associated with an increased risk of shoulder dystocia (OR=2.07, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.03), and a reduced risk of postpartum haemorrhage (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.91), while no significant associations were observed for gestational diabetes mellitus, caesarean delivery, neonatal mortality or maternal mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Macrosomia remains a significant public health concern in Africa, with a pooled prevalence of 6.35%. There are multiple risk factors associated with macrosomia in Africa, including the male sex, prolonged gestation and a prior history of macrosomia. Also, macrosomia increases the likelihood of shoulder dystocia and other delivery complications. Preventive strategies and targeted interventions are needed to reduce the burden of macrosomia in Africa. At the same time, enhanced obstetric preparedness for macrosomic deliveries is essential to mitigate the associated adverse perinatal outcomes. However, our study is limited by high heterogeneity and publication and language biases, which should be addressed in future studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023485419.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayoola, S. O., Adeoye, I. A., Asowata, O. J., Adediran, K., Bello, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095768</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095768</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of macrosomia in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095768</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095768</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102448?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematic review of prediction models and meta-analysis of risk factors for invasive fungal infection in children]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102448?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To review the application of prediction models and risk factors identified by prediction models for invasive fungal infection (IFI) in children, and assess model performance, methodological rigour and applicability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a systematic review of diagnostic prediction models and a meta-analysis of the risk factors. This study was registered on PROSPERO and performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis and Prediction model risk of bias assessment tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Medline, Cochrane Library and four Chinese Databases were searched on 10 Mar 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included original studies that developed diagnostic prediction models for IFI in children and excluded the informal records.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for risk factors, and a random-effects meta-analysis was applied to factors reported in at least two studies. For prediction models, a descriptive analysis was conducted to summarise model characteristics, model performance and the risk of bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Nine studies were included from 4069 articles. Nine studies developed ten diagnostic prediction models, and logistic regression was the most commonly used method. The predictive performance showed an area under receiver operating curves (AUROC) ranging from 0.76 to 0.95, but meta-analysis of AUROC was not conducted due to heterogeneity. All studies were identified as having a high risk of bias in critical appraisal, particularly in the analysis, mainly due to the lack of validation, as well as the failure to appropriately evaluate model performance and overfitting. Only two of nine studies that developed prediction models used internal or external validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Logistic regression is a common method for predicting IFI in children, although machine learning methods have been popular in prediction models. Our study identified all studies as high risk of bias. To reduce bias, studies should use calibration measures, internal and external validation more frequently, and consider shrinkage methods when developing models.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, J., Gao, R., Huang, L., Zhu, Y., Cheng, G., Zeng, L., Yu, Q., Li, H., Zhang, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102448</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102448</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematic review of prediction models and meta-analysis of risk factors for invasive fungal infection in children]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102448</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102448</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103881?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring motivations, barriers and solutions for interdisciplinary practice in work-focused healthcare: a qualitative study among Dutch healthcare professionals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103881?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore the motivations, barriers and potential solutions from professionals&rsquo; perspectives for achieving effective interdisciplinary practice, focusing on communication and collaboration to support work participation and facilitate patients&rsquo; return-to-work (RTW).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative exploratory interview study using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary and work-focused healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>22 healthcare professionals, including occupational physicians (n=5), social insurance physicians (n=5), general practitioners (n=7) and occupational physiotherapists (n=5), were purposively recruited. All participants had at least 1 year of experience and were actively involved in patient care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Identified motivations, experienced barriers and proposed solutions for improving communication and collaboration across disciplines in work-focused healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participating healthcare professionals emphasised the importance of early, proactive and person-centred communication across care domains, particularly in complex or stagnating RTW trajectories. Key barriers included a lack of shared knowledge and common goals, limited understanding of each other&rsquo;s roles, time constraints, fragmented systems and regulatory restrictions. Proposed solutions focused on clearer coordination of care, improved role clarity and development of a secure, cross-domain digital communication platform to streamline information exchange.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Effective work-focused healthcare requires improved interprofessional communication and patient-centred collaboration. This study highlights when collaboration is most valuable, identifies key barriers and outlines feasible practical solutions. Future research should focus on developing and implementing guidelines that clarify communication pathways and coordination mechanisms within interdisciplinary teams.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zipfel, N., Colkesen, E., Hagendijk, M. E., Melles, M., van der Burg-Vermeulen, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103881</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103881</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring motivations, barriers and solutions for interdisciplinary practice in work-focused healthcare: a qualitative study among Dutch healthcare professionals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103881</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103881</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104470?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of antenatal care attendance on maternal and birth outcomes in Somaliland: a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104470?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Antenatal care (ANC) plays a critical role in improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, incomplete ANC attendance in Somaliland is associated with adverse maternal and birth outcomes. Barriers to ANC attendance may increase the risk of pregnancy-related complications, including maternal morbidity, mortality and poor neonatal health outcomes. Understanding the effect of ANC attendance on maternal and birth outcomes is crucial for informing policies and interventions aimed at reducing these risks. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effect of ANC attendance on maternal and birth outcomes in Somaliland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A prospective cohort study was conducted among 1205 pregnant women enrolled by systematic sampling method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>The study was conducted in the Republic of Somaliland, which is situated in the Horn of Africa. Baseline data were collected at recruitment, and participants were followed up to delivery for the collection of outcome variables. The number of ANCs was considered to be a dichotomous independent variable; incomplete attendance (&le; 3 visits) and complete attendance (&ge;4 visits). The risk of pregnancy outcome among those with incomplete ANC was assessed using multi-variable logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Variables</st>
<p>The outcome variables of the study were the maternal and birth outcomes. The independent variables included socio-demographic characteristics, such as age, residence, educational status, occupation, family size, wealth index and marital status, and reproductive factors, such as parity, gestational age at first ANC visit, current pregnancy desirability and previous pregnancy history.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of the total participants, 43.3% of women had complete attendance. The incidence of postpartum haemorrhage was 10.0% (95% CI 8.6 to 12.3); antepartum haemorrhage, 3.6% (95% CI 2.6 to 4.7); caesarean section, 14.8% (95% CI 12.9 to 16.8); preterm delivery, 13.7% (95% CI 11.7 to 15.4); low birth weight, 25.8% (95% CI 23.4 to 28.1); and stillbirth, 3.2% (95% CI 2.3 to 4.2). Complete attendance to ANC significantly reduced the risk of antepartum haemorrhage, caesarean section, preterm delivery and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and stillbirth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Nearly more than half of women in Somaliland had less than four ANC visits. The incidence of maternal and birth complications is higher among pregnant women who attended &lt;4 ANC visits than among those who attended &ge;4 ANC visits. Promoting access and quality ANC services would help in reducing maternal and neonatal complications in the country.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdiwali, S. A., Geta, T. G., Adesina, O. A., Fekadu, G. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104470</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104470</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of antenatal care attendance on maternal and birth outcomes in Somaliland: a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104470</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104470</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104840?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measurement of heart rate and respiratory rate using remote photoplethysmography in paediatrics: a prospective comparative trial protocol - 'rMonitoped1]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104840?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Vital signs such as heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR), crucial for clinical assessment, are often challenging to measure in paediatric populations. Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), a video-based measurement tool, has demonstrated accuracy in adults. The objective of this study is to compare HR and RR measurements obtained using rPPG with those from standard clinical monitoring in a paediatric population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a monocentric, prospective study enrolling 600 paediatric participants. Each participant will have standard monitoring electrodes (ECG/impedance) placed on the chest while seated facing a camera for rPPG recording. Simultaneous HR and RR measurements will be recorded over periods of 30 and 60 s using both the standard monitor and the rPPG device. The intraclass correlation coefficient will be calculated to assess agreement between the rPPG and standard monitor measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (ANSM (Agence nationale de s&eacute;curit&eacute; du m&eacute;dicament) registration no. IDRCB 2023-A02524-41) and by a French ethics committee (CPP Sud M&eacute;diterran&eacute;e III at 29 August 2024, n&deg;2024-A01324-43). The study&rsquo;s findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at national and international conferences and through press releases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Clinical Trials Registry (<A HREF="NCT06231654">NCT06231654</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haas-Ferrua, S., Giaccardi, H., Ancey, B., Freyssinet, E., Baranton, E., Joulie, A., Bendimerad, I., Olla, M., De Oliveira, F., Moussaoui, A., Boyer, L., Fontas, E., Tran, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104840</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104840</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measurement of heart rate and respiratory rate using remote photoplethysmography in paediatrics: a prospective comparative trial protocol - 'rMonitoped1]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104840</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104840</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard ropivacaine for pain control in adults receiving continuous supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks for open elbow arthrolysis: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Open elbow arthrolysis effectively treats post-traumatic elbow stiffness, but severe postoperative pain during early rehabilitation impedes recovery. Continuous brachial plexus blocks, though effective, face limitations such as catheter displacement and infection risks. Liposomal bupivacaine, an ultra-long-acting local anaesthetic, offers prolonged analgesia and may circumvent these challenges. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of a single-dose liposomal bupivacaine supraclavicular block versus continuous ropivacaine infusion in patients undergoing open elbow arthrolysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial will enrol 72 adults (ASA I&ndash;III&#xFF0C;the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification for preoperative risk) scheduled for open elbow release surgery. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either a single supraclavicular block with 10 mL liposomal bupivacaine plus 10 mL 0.5% ropivacaine followed by saline infusion (liposomal bupivacaine group) or continuous catheter infusion with 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine followed by 0.2% ropivacaine infusion (control group). The primary outcome is the weighted area under the curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores during functional exercises within 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include resting NRS scores, sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), rehabilitation metrics (range of motion, grip strength), recovery quality (Quality of Recovery -15) and long-term functional outcomes (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, Quick-DASH scores) at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Non-inferiority will be established if the upper 95% confidence limit of the AUC difference is &le;1.3. Statistical analyses will employ intention-to-treat principles with SPSS V.24.0.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was granted by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Ethics Committee (K2025-213-00). The trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500103911). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, contributing evidence on liposomal bupivacaine&rsquo;s role in perioperative analgesia and rehabilitation for elbow surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR ID provided on acceptance).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luo, T., Zheng, S., Zhao, Y., Yang, X., Li, X., Ji, Y., Wang, Y., Tang, H., Xiao, R., Zhang, W., Li, T., Wang, G., Yuan, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106279</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106279</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Liposomal bupivacaine versus standard ropivacaine for pain control in adults receiving continuous supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks for open elbow arthrolysis: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106279</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106636?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-designing an intergenerational dance programme using the 6SQuID framework: a development and proof-of-concept study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106636?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Dance is an artistic and social form of exercise and has been shown to be effective across the lifespan. Intergenerational dance programmes can have beneficial effects in reducing discrimination and fostering communities. Previous intergenerational dance programmes included small sample sizes or were not designed to target physical outcomes. There is a need for well-designed community-based intergenerational dance programmes to target the needs of older adults (OAs) and adolescents addressing physical activity, ageism and loneliness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims and objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to co-design and refine the content of an intergenerational dance programme with OAs and adolescents using the &lsquo;six steps in quality intervention development framework&rsquo; (6SQuID). The objectives were to complete steps 1&ndash;4 of the 6SQuID framework and run a short pilot study with OAs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A proof-of-concept pilot study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The programme took place in a local community centre.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 participants were recruited (n=5 adolescents; n=7 OAs). Adolescents were aged between 14 and 16 years. OAs were aged 60 years and older.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>The intervention was led by a physiotherapist and dance teacher and comprised of intergenerational practice and social dance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Outcome measures focused on physical activity, well-being, ageism and mobility. Accelerometers were used to establish programme intensity. Focus groups were conducted to explore the opinions of participants. Qualitative data were analysed using Thematic Analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six OAs and four adolescents completed the programme. The average age of OAs was 72.8&plusmn;6.69 years and the adolescents were aged 14&ndash;16 years. The intensity of the classes was driven by participants, with some achieving vigorous intensity, and most achieving light-moderate intensity. This accounted for an average of 28.36 (&plusmn;11.02) min of the class. The outcome measures were found to be meaningful for participants; however, more challenging balance measures were suggested by both cohorts. The social dance was enjoyable, especially when the music was tailored to participants&rsquo; preferences. Meeting with other age groups was valued, and it was suggested that more time should be given to icebreakers and socialising.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Intergenerational dance may be a promising way of improving well-being, intergenerational connections and achieving moderate-intensity activity. The process of designing an evidence-based intervention in this paper can be used to guide researchers and practitioners in designing an intergenerational arts-based programme.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[OReilly, S. M., Ni Bhriain, O., Thabane, L., Clifford, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106636</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106636</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-designing an intergenerational dance programme using the 6SQuID framework: a development and proof-of-concept study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106636</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106636</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lobeglitazone and the risk of renal progression in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the effect of lobeglitazone on renal disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using longitudinal real-world data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Hospital-based Common Data Model database.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 14 712 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who visited the Diabetes Center of Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital between 2013 and 2019 were identified. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to compare patients treated with lobeglitazone plus metformin with those receiving metformin monotherapy, sulfonylurea plus metformin, or a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor plus metformin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Treatment with lobeglitazone plus metformin compared with metformin monotherapy, sulfonylurea plus metformin or DPP4 inhibitor plus metformin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Renal progression, defined as initiation of renal replacement therapy, a sustained &ge;30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline, or doubling of serum creatinine with a concurrent eGFR &le;45 mL/min/1.73 m&sup2;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The HR of renal progression was 0.84 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.21) in the lobeglitazone plus metformin compared with metformin monotherapy, 1.00 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.27) compared with sulfonylurea plus metformin group, 1.10 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.44) compared with DPP4 inhibitor plus metformin group after adjusting for multiple variables. Subgroup analyses demonstrated significant interactions by sex in the comparison with metformin monotherapy (P for interaction=0.0179) and by glycaemic control in the comparisons with sulfonylurea plus metformin (P for interaction=0.0161) and DPP4 inhibitor plus metformin (P for interaction=0.0006), suggesting potential heterogeneity in treatment effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Lobeglitazone showed renal outcomes comparable to those of other antidiabetic medications, with a possible heterogeneity in treatment effects according to sex and glycaemic control.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hong, S.-h., Lee, H., Lee, S.-y., Sung, Y.-A., Hong, Y. S., Song, D. K., Jung, H., Kim, M.-h.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107482</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107482</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lobeglitazone and the risk of renal progression in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107482</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108287?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Do sociodemographic variables influence sexual dysfunction in young people with type 1 diabetes? A quantitative study in Poland]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108287?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to examine the impact of type 1 diabetes (T1D) on the sexual functioning of young women and men, concerning demographic and social factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional quantitative survey study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Online survey distributed via internet forums for people with T1D in Poland (March 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>344 individuals completed the survey; 329 sexually active participants were included in the analyses (15 excluded due to sexual inactivity), of whom 177 had T1D (aged 20&ndash;60 years; mean age 31.31&plusmn;7.40) and 152 were healthy controls (mean age 35.43&plusmn;7.46).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Sexual functioning was assessed using the CSFQ-14 (Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire), available in female and male versions. Additional author-designed questions were included to enhance understanding of the problem.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>34.4% of men and 28.4% of women with T1D reported sexual dysfunctions. Women with T1D showed significantly lower overall sexual functioning compared with controls (mean difference: &ndash;4.09 points, 95% CI (&ndash;6.29 to &ndash;1.90), Cohen&rsquo;s d=&ndash;0.54). Men with T1D demonstrated substantially greater impairment (mean difference: &ndash;11.15 points, 95% CI (&ndash;14.89 to &ndash;7.41), Cohen&rsquo;s d=&ndash;1.47). Among men with T1D, significant differences were found in the total CSFQ score (&sup2;=8.98, p=0.003, V=0.26) and the orgasm subscale (&sup2;=11.91, p&lt;0.001, V=0.29). Among women, a significant difference was observed in the intensity of desire subscale (&sup2;=15.65, p&lt;0.001, V=0.29). Age did not affect the frequency of sexual dysfunctions among people with T1D.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Sexual dysfunction in young adults with T1D is more common than in healthy individuals. Men with T1D are more likely to report difficulty achieving orgasm and decreased desire for their partner, whereas women with T1D are more likely to report difficulty experiencing pleasure and lower levels of arousal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bartnikowska, W., Seget, S., Piatek, K., Skalacka, K., Jarosz-Chobot, P., Krzystanek, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108287</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108287</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Do sociodemographic variables influence sexual dysfunction in young people with type 1 diabetes? A quantitative study in Poland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108287</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108337?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Excitatory amino acid inhibitors in adults with acute moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108337?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the effectiveness of early administration of excitatory amino acid (EAA) inhibitors on long-term neurological outcomes in adults with acute moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study selection</st>
<p>RCTs comparing EAA inhibitors with placebo, standard care or any other interventions were included. Trials enrolled adult patients (&ge;18 years) with moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score &le;12) receiving the intervention within the acute phase of care (first week).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Pairs of reviewers independently screened trials, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias (RoB) with the Cochrane RoB tool 2 and graded the certainty of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Random effects models were used for all effect measures and trial sequential analyses (TSA) were performed for each outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was long-term neurological function at 6 months (or the nearest earlier time point), assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) or extended version (GOS-E), using the classical definitions of an unfavourable outcome (GOS 1&ndash;3 or GOS-E 1&ndash;4).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>28 trials enrolling 4238 patients were included. Early administration of EAA inhibitors was not associated with reduced unfavourable neurological outcomes (relative risk 0.93 (95% CI (0.84 to 1.03); I&sup2;=40%; 15 trials, n=3613, moderate certainty). No statistically significant difference was observed based on EAA inhibitor type, timing or duration of administration, RoB or TBI severity. Mortality, intensive care unit lengths of stay and mean intracranial pressure were not statistically different between groups, but hospital length of stay was reduced in the EAA inhibitors group. The early use of EAA inhibitors was not associated with adverse events (low certainty). TSA showed insufficient power for the primary outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In adults with moderate to severe TBI, the early administration of EAA inhibitors was not associated with a reduction of unfavourable neurological outcomes. Further high-quality and adequately powered RCTs are required to clarify their role in TBI management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42025635527.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bouras, M., Costerousse, O., Verret, M., Oconnor, S., Zarychanski, R., Gagnon, M.-A., Torkomyan, T. H., Ouellet, A., Lauzier, F., English, S., Moore, L., Turgeon, A. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108337</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108337</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Excitatory amino acid inhibitors in adults with acute moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108337</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108337</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109958?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Autism outcomes and neurobehavioural markers in young children born to mothers with HIV in Kenya: a protocol for the Alama project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109958?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The over 14 million African children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected (CHEU) are at risk for poor health outcomes, including neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism; however, no study to date has examined autism in CHEU in Africa, where the vast majority of these children live. Scalable diagnostic and neurobehavioural tools, including powerful, low-cost approaches such as eye-tracking, for detection and study of mechanistic neural processes are necessary to advance autism research in these settings. The objective of this study is to examine autism diagnostic outcomes and eye-tracking biomarkers in relation to CHEU while at the same time building capacity for neuro-health research in Kenya.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will leverage a longitudinally assessed cohort of CHEU and children who are HIV-unexposed and uninfected (CHUU) with well characterised HIV-related and contextual exposures. We will first determine and compare autism diagnostic outcomes between young CHEU and CHUU across a large cohort (n=850) of Kenyan children using research-grade autism assessment tools, and, second, determine whether neurobehavioural eye-tracking markers predict autism outcomes across this cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Human subjects approvals have been obtained from Moi University Institutional Review and Ethics Committee (IREC; IREC/909/2024; Approval #0004835), Kenya&rsquo;s National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI; Reference #NACOSTI/P/25/415028), the Institutional Review Board of the Indiana University School of Medicine (Protocol #23171), with reliance agreements executed with Purdue University and Boston University. Dissemination of findings will occur through multiple channels within the research and clinical community, including peer-reviewed journal publications and conference abstracts and presentations. As part of capacity building efforts, the research team will also communicate study results to policy makers, the lay public and other health systems involved in the care of young children with disabilities via study-hosted workshops and conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oyungu, E., Keehn, B., McHenry, M. S., Monahan, P. O., Joseph, R. M., Yoon, S.-Y., Carlucci, J. G., Saina, C., Khaitan, A., Baliddawa, J., McNally Keehn, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109958</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109958</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Autism outcomes and neurobehavioural markers in young children born to mothers with HIV in Kenya: a protocol for the Alama project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109958</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109958</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110369?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional study of respiratory virus infections in upper respiratory tract infection patients: post-COVID-19 pandemic trends in Sichuan, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110369?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Post-COVID-19 respiratory infection patterns require updated epidemiological data. To investigate the prevalence and infection patterns of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), a survey was conducted to assess the presence of influenza A (IFV A), influenza B (IFV B), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human rhinovirus (HRV), adenovirus (Adv), and SARS-CoV-2 among outpatients diagnosed with URTIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A community-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three cities in Sichuan, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1174 outpatients diagnosed with URTIs from December 2023 to February 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Oropharyngeal swabs were collected using sterile flocked swabs, preserved at 4&deg;C and analysed within 24 hours. Viral nucleic acid was extracted automatically and detected via multiplex PCR-melting curve analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Results showed in positive detection rates varied significantly by age (p&lt;0.001), peaking in children (77.42%), followed by adolescents (73.23%), adults (63.59%) and older adults (57.58%). IFV B and A predominated, followed by HRV, Adv, RSV and SARS-CoV-2. 12 co-infection types were identified, with HRV/Adv and IFV B/HRV most prevalent. In children and adolescents, co-infections were significantly more common, with predominant types including HRV/Adv, HRV/RSV and RSV/IFV B.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study reveals persistent influenza dominance and age-stratified co-infection risks and provides critical baseline data for optimising respiratory infectious disease control in the post-pandemic era.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, Y., Yin, W., Zhang, L., Sun, M., Yang, Q., Ren, S., Lin, X., Liu, J., Yang, J., Zhu, S., Li, W., Luo, H., Chen, X., Xu, Y., Zhang, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110369</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110369</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional study of respiratory virus infections in upper respiratory tract infection patients: post-COVID-19 pandemic trends in Sichuan, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110369</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110369</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112677?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Open-label randomised controlled trial of aripiprazole/sertraline combination in comparison with quetiapine for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of treatment of bipolar depression (the ASCEnD study): study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112677?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Bipolar disorder affects around 2% of the population and is linked with reduced life expectancy and socioeconomic burden. Depressive episodes are difficult to treat and typically more prevalent, enduring and burdensome than manic episodes. The use of antidepressants alone has limited effect and is associated with significant clinical risk through polarity switch. Current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend quetiapine, olanzapine (with or without fluoxetine) and lamotrigine; however, these medications have limited efficacy, tolerability and acceptability. The ASCEnD study aims to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole plus sertraline compared with quetiapine, offering potential improvements for outcomes in bipolar depression. The study is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR132773).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>ASCEnD is a prospective, two-arm, superiority, individually 1:1 randomised, controlled, pragmatic, parallel group, type A open-label clinical trial of aripiprazole/sertraline medication combination compared with quetiapine for bipolar depression. The study is conducted in the UK National Health Service setting with the aim of recruiting and randomising 270 participants followed-up for 24 weeks. Adults with bipolar disorder self-refer or are recruited through primary and secondary care services. The primary outcome is change in depressive symptoms 12&ndash;16 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include measures of symptom change, treatment satisfaction, tolerability, medication adherence, concomitant medication use, psychosocial functioning, quality of life and cost-effectiveness and informal carer measures of quality of life and costs of caring. The exploratory outcome is change in participant reward and punishment responsiveness. Analysis will follow a prespecified statistical analysis plan. A nested qualitative study is included to examine feasibility and acceptability of the trial design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>A Clinical Trial Authorisation from Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and approval from the Health Research Authority (IRAS 1007468) and North East &ndash; Newcastle and North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee (23/NE/0132) were obtained. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and lay summaries for participants and patient and public groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN63917405">ISRCTN63917405</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azim, L., Al-Ashmori, S., Butcher, C., Cipriani, A., Chew-Graham, C. A., Clare, E., Clark, E., Cole, M., Carella, S., Dixon, L., Evans, J., Gergel, T., Gibson, J., Hancock, H. C., Hoppe, I., Kessler, D., Kabir, T., Lewis, G., Mathias, A., Morris, R., Nixon, N., Simon, J., Teare, M. D., The Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Wahba, M., Wall, L., Walmsley, Z., Wienand, D., Wolstenhulme, F., Ahuja, N., Watson, S., Cammack, Davies, Kemp, Keys, Thompson, Turnbull, Webster]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112677</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112677</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Open-label randomised controlled trial of aripiprazole/sertraline combination in comparison with quetiapine for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of treatment of bipolar depression (the ASCEnD study): study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112677</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112677</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113466?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of an early warning system on the outcome of patients with haematological malignancies receiving high-dose chemotherapy with or without haematopoietic cell transplantation: a protocol of the ALHERT cluster randomised trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113466?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patients with haematological malignancies undergoing intensive chemotherapy with or without haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are at high risk of complications that may require intensive care. While some studies advocate for early admission of these patients to the intensive care unit (ICU), it has not been formally demonstrated that admission to the ICU as soon as patients have organ injury may improve their outcomes. To demonstrate the efficacy of implementing the National Early Warning System (NEWS) with immediate ICU admission for patients with NEWS &ge;7 to decrease hospital mortality and organ failure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>ALHERT is a randomised cluster, controlled trial carried out in 10 French centres. With their informed consent, adult patients undergoing induction therapy for acute lymphoblastic or myeloblastic leukaemia, autologous or allogeneic HCT in one of the participating centres will be included. Five centres will follow local guidelines for ICU admission (control group) while five centres will assess the NEWS at least three times per day with immediate ICU admission for patients with NEWS &ge;7 (interventional group). The primary outcome is hospital mortality without organ sustaining therapy. Secondary objectives will be to study the relative weight of each parameter used to calculate the NEWS for predicting the risk of organ failure requiring life-sustaining organ support, to evaluate the feasibility of implementing early warning scores in routine practice by analysing the proportion of patients with NEWS &ge;7 effectively admitted to the ICU in the investigational arm, to assess quality of life with EQ-5D-5L (five level European Quality of Life five Dimensions) and assess the cost-effectiveness of this strategy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol has been approved by the Comit&eacute; de Protection des Personnes Ile de France I (Ethics Review ID-RCB: 2024-A00969-38). It is carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The findings of this study will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06409767">NCT06409767</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taillantou-Candau, M., Kouatchet, A., Darsonval, A., Monmousseau, F., Darras, E., Schmidt, A., Riou, J., Orvain, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113466</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113466</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Haematology (incl blood transfusion)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of an early warning system on the outcome of patients with haematological malignancies receiving high-dose chemotherapy with or without haematopoietic cell transplantation: a protocol of the ALHERT cluster randomised trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Haematology (incl blood transfusion)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113466</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113466</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114524?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Real-world effectiveness of perinatal RSV immunoprophylaxis: protocol for a test-negative case-control study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114524?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of hospitalisation in infants worldwide. New immunoprophylactic products, including long-acting monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccines, have demonstrated high efficacy in prelicensure clinical trials. Understanding how these interventions perform outside controlled trials, and how viral evolution or host factors influence protection, is essential for sustaining confidence in RSV prevention programmes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a 5-year, test-negative case&ndash;control study among infants &le;12 months of age who present with acute respiratory illness (ARI) within a large healthcare delivery network serving a demographically diverse population. Cases will be infants testing positive for RSV by PCR, and controls will be RSV-negative infants meeting the same ARI criteria. Data will be obtained from electronic health records, structured caregiver surveys and state immunization registries to ensure accurate classification of exposures and covariates. Vaccine effectiveness will be estimated using multivariable logistic regression controlling for potential confounding. RSV-positive specimens will undergo full-genome sequencing to identify variant lineages and potential immune-escape mutations. A subset of participants will provide acute and convalescent blood samples for single-cell immune profiling to define innate and adaptive responses associated with breakthrough infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the Yale Human Investigation Committee (HIC #2000036550). Written informed consent will be obtained from all parents or legal guardians prior to participation. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings and public repositories, with fully de-identified participant data to protect privacy and confidentiality. Viral genomic data will be shared in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Genomic Data Sharing Policy, and analytical code will be made publicly available to ensure reproducibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06172660">NCT06172660</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aparicio Llorente, C., Wats, A., Araujo, B. L., Moniz Ganem, J., Oliva, I. O., Xu, H., Brodsky, N. N., Lucas, C. L., Aronson, P. L., Grubaugh, N. D., Breban, M., Redmond, S., Shapiro, E. D., Niccolai, L. M., Weinberger, D. M., Oliveira, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114524</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114524</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Real-world effectiveness of perinatal RSV immunoprophylaxis: protocol for a test-negative case-control study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114524</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114524</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115295?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experiences of heat stress and adapting practices among farmworkers in northwest Nicaragua: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115295?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Chronic heat stress and recurrent dehydration from strenuous labour in hot environments are recognised drivers of acute kidney injury among agricultural workers in Mesoamerica and may contribute to Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Aetiology (CKDu). This study explored how members of a long-term community-based cohort in northwest Nicaragua perceive, experience and adapt to extreme heat, within the broader context of environmental and labour changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This qualitative study used focus group discussions with participants from a community-based cohort followed for over a decade and community members. Transcripts were analysed thematically using an interpretative approach, with trustworthiness ensured through peer debriefing, audit trails, triangulation and achievement of thematic saturation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>Rural agricultural communities in northwest Nicaragua participating in a long-term community-based cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were purposively sampled from a prospective community-based cohort and community members were invited to participate. Men and women across different age groups were invited. In total, 91 adults aged &ge;18 years participated in 11 face-to-face focus groups, each comprising 8&ndash;11 men or women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Themes describing experiences of heat stress, occupational risk and adaptive responses among agricultural workers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants described worsening heat linked to deforestation, unsafe and inadequate water access and unrealistic production targets that prioritised output over health. In response, workers reported adaptive practices including self-paced labour, hydration routines and peer monitoring. Community solidarity and mutual aid emerged as key sources of resilience despite structural constraints.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Heat stress amplifies occupational hazards and exacerbates health inequities among marginalised agricultural workers. Integrating climate adaptation and equity into labour protections&mdash;ensuring access to clean water, adequate shade and fair workloads&mdash;can strengthen resilience in agricultural communities facing rising heat-related health risks.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pineda Reyes, A. L., Jaime, A., Aragon, A., Lopez-Bonilla, I., Pearce, N., Caplin, B., Gonzalez-Quiroz, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T07:12:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115295</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115295</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experiences of heat stress and adapting practices among farmworkers in northwest Nicaragua: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115295</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103021?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Distribution disparities among medical specialists in Thailand: an equity analysis of the national health workforce database (2015-2024)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103021?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Ensuring equity in medical specialist distribution is essential for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). This study explored the changes in the availability and distribution of medical specialists in Thailand from 2015 to 2024 and assessed the equity impacts on workforce.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective longitudinal analysis of national administrative workforce data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Public and private hospitals across Thailand, covering 1471 facilities in 77 provinces.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome and explanatory variables</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were specialist-to-population ratios and geographical equity measured using the Gini coefficient (G), where values closer to 0 indicate greater equity. Explanatory variables included specialty type, geographical region and the timing of major workforce policies, including mandatory service and specialty-specific legislative interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Between 2015 and 2024, the GPs and specialists in Thailand expanded significantly, with improvements in both density and distribution. The Gini coefficient for GPs showed the largest equity improvement (G=0.42 in 2015 and G=0.22 in 2024), reflecting the impact of mandatory service programme and rural recruitment programmes. Among specialists, emergency and family medicine have shown rapid growth and significant reductions in distribution inequity, reflecting the success of legislative policies. Sustainability of workforce policies was challenged by the &lsquo;leaking stock&rsquo; phenomenon due to attraction of career opportunities and economic drives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Workforce targeted interventions have led to improvements in the availability and equitable distribution of GPs and medical specialists over the past decade. Further policy, such as retention incentives and assisted technology, is needed to achieve equitable distribution across all specialties, particularly in low-density fields. Thailand&rsquo;s experience offers the lessons for other low- and middle-income countries as the evidence-based and equity-focused workforce policies for UHC advancement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sitthirat, P., Suppawittaya, P., Yoadsanit, S., Osotthanakorn, P., Srithamrongsawat, S., Suriyawongpaisal, P., Kaewkamjonchai, P., Tangcharoensathien, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T03:26:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103021</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103021</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Distribution disparities among medical specialists in Thailand: an equity analysis of the national health workforce database (2015-2024)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103021</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103021</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104542?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of eating disorders and/or insulin omission with impaired glycaemic control in persons living with type 1 diabetes: cross-sectional analysis of the French SFDT1 study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104542?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To address whether eating disorders (ED) or insulin omission (IOM) in adult persons living with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D) are associated with impaired glycaemic control.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>The French-Speaking Diabetes Society&mdash;Type 1 Diabetes Cohort (SFDT1) is an ongoing epidemiological cohort study that includes pwT1D in France who attend hospitals or private ambulatory diabetes centres.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult participants from the SFDT1 study, with data on ED and IOM. The current analysis was performed on data collected during the baseline visit in participants enrolled between December 2020 and March 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Using the SCOFF, a self-reported questionnaire to screen for ED, and a single question on IOM to screen for IOM, we described four categories of pwT1D: no ED &amp; no IOM, ED &amp; no IOM, no ED &amp; IOM and ED &amp; IOM. We performed unadjusted and adjusted (for age, sex, diabetes duration, social vulnerability, smoking, alcohol status and insulin treatment) multinomial logistic regression models with the four categories as the outcome and glycaemic variables as explanatory variables, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) variables and HbA1c. No ED &amp; no IOM was the reference outcome for all comparisons. We stratified each model by sex and fear of hypoglycaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 1113 participants, 51% males, median (IQR) age 38 (29&ndash;50) years, diabetes duration 21 (12&ndash;32) years. Prevalences were as follows: no ED &amp; no IOM: 68% (n=758), ED &amp; no IOM: 11% (n=124), no ED &amp; IOM: 16% (n=177) and ED &amp; IOM: 5% (n=54). With the fully adjusted model, and compared with the group no ED &amp; no IOM, time in range (OR (95% CI) 0.5 (0.4 to 0.7)) and time below range (0.5 (0.3 to 0.8)) were inversely associated with ED &amp; IOM. Moreover, time in range (0.4 (0.4 to 0.5)) was associated with IOM &amp; no ED. Time above range (2.2 (1.6 to 2.9)), Glycaemic Risk Index (1.8 (1.3 to 2.5)), glucose monitoring indicator (2.2 (1.7 to 2.9)) and HbA1c (2.0 (1.5 to 2.5)) were directly associated with ED &amp; IOM. We did not observe associations between CGM variables and ED &amp; no IOM. Most associations were valid in both men and women. The associations were stronger in participants with a fear of hypoglycaemia. However, the associations remained even in people with a fear of hypoglycaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Both ED and IOM are frequent in pwT1D, and IOM seems to be associated with impaired glycaemic control. As our analysis was cross-sectional, we cannot infer causality and cannot know whether IOM was a result of glycaemic control or the inverse (reverse causality). Our results suggest that IOM should be systematically screened in clinical practice. Further research is needed to better identify and care for EDs, with or without IOM, in T1D.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04657783">NCT04657783</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ritz, P.-J., Aguayo, G. A., Cosson, E., Canha, D., Renard, E., Merwin, R. M., Amouyal, C., Arnault, G., Bilariki, K., Borot, S., Chevalier, N., Lemoine, A., Franc, S., Fremy, B., Gouet, D., Julla, J.-B., Marchand, L., Pinto, S., Rigalleau, V., Sonnet, E., Tatulashvili, S., Tauveron, I., Riveline, J.-P., Hanaire, H., Fagherazzi, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T03:26:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104542</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104542</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of eating disorders and/or insulin omission with impaired glycaemic control in persons living with type 1 diabetes: cross-sectional analysis of the French SFDT1 study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104542</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104542</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109028?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reliability and validity of EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels in patients with haematologic malignancies: a cross-sectional study in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109028?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Robust assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is essential for evaluating the disease burden in patients with haematologic malignancies. This study examined the performance of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D) instrument in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), acute leukaemia (AL) and lymphoma using time trade-off (TTO)-elicited utility scores as the reference, and explored factors contributing to discrepancies between EQ-5D and TTO utilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We performed a cross-sectional observational study using EQ-5D and TTO to assess HRQoL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A leading tertiary care hospital in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>158 patients consecutively admitted to hospital for MM (n=50), AL (n=63) and lymphoma (n=45) between January and August 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the EQ-5D performance in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha;), criterion validity (Spearman&rsquo;s correlation with TTO), and structural validity (exploratory factor analysis). The secondary outcome was the patient characteristics associated with discrepancies between EQ-5D and TTO utilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>TTO utility scores were highest in AL (0.798), followed by lymphoma (0.755) and MM (0.693). EQ-5D utility values were consistently higher than TTO across all groups. Among the three groups, EQ-5D demonstrated the best psychometric performance in patients with MM, with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha;=0.899), strongest correlation with TTO (r=0.538, p&lt;0.001) and high structural validity. By contrast, EQ-5D showed moderate validity in AL (r=0.386, p=0.002) and poor validity in lymphoma (r=0.230, p=0.129). In patients with AL, chronic kidney failure was significantly associated with greater TTO&ndash;EQ-5D utility discrepancy (coefficient=0.213, p=0.035).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>EQ-5D performed well in patients with MM, supporting its use in this population. In patients with AL, adjustments for clinical characteristics such as chronic kidney failure may improve the accuracy of EQ-5D utility values. The poor psychometric performance of EQ-5D in patients with lymphoma raises concerns about its appropriateness as a standalone instrument for HRQoL.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qin, W., Chen, Y., Ouyang, Y., Xiao, H., Yu, D., Zeng, C., Chen, J., Chen, T., Huang, H., Qian, Z., Chen, W., Xu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T03:26:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109028</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109028</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Haematology (incl blood transfusion)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reliability and validity of EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels in patients with haematologic malignancies: a cross-sectional study in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Haematology (incl blood transfusion)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109028</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109028</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109136?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of dyslipidaemia and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target attainment: a descriptive cross-sectional study among adults in the Western Province of Sri Lanka]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109136?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the prevalence of dyslipidaemia and associated risk factors, and evaluate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target attainment among adults in the Western Province of Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional epidemiological study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Western province, Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were recruited through a community-based survey of non-institutionalised adults aged &ge;20 years residing in the Western Province for at least 1 year (n=1800), using multistage stratified random cluster sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome</st>
<p>Dyslipidaemia was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Programme/Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Prevalence estimates are presented with 95% CIs. Multiple logistic regression results are reported as adjusted ORs with 95% CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Secondary outcome</st>
<p>Cardiovascular risk in participants aged &ge;40 years was assessed using the WHO laboratory-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk chart for South-East Asia. Achievement of LDL-C targets was evaluated according to the Sri Lankan guidelines on management for dyslipidaemia management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Data from 1333 subjects were analysed. Mean age was 49.8 (&plusmn;14.9) years. The majority were females (63.6%). The age-sex standardised prevalence of any form of dyslipidaemia was 73.3% (95% CI 70.9% to 75.7%). Age standardised prevalence in females was 77.1% (95% CI 74.3% to 79.9) and males was 69.3% (95% CI 65.3% to 73.3%). The most prevalent type of dyslipidaemia was low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (46.6%, 95% CI 43.9% to 49.3%), followed by high LDL-C (32.5%, 95% CI 30.0% to 35.0%) and high triglycerides (21.7%, 95% CI 19.5% to 23.9%). Low HDL-C was positively associated with smoking (OR: 1.89, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.18) and inversely with male sex (OR: 0.29, 95% CI 19 to 0.45) and physical activity (OR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.99). Elevated LDL-C was associated with male sex (OR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.89), diabetes (OR: 5.34, 95% CI 3.53 to 8.08), and hypertension (OR: 1.62, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.23). Male sex (OR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.18), diabetes (OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.58) and hypertension (OR: 1.81, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.91) were positively associated with elevated triglycerides, whereas urban sector (OR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91) was protective. Physical activity (OR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.98) and male sex (OR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.89) inversely associated with any form of dyslipidaemia, whereas diabetes (OR: 7.08, 95% CI 3.99 to 12.55), hypertension (OR: 1.93, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.73), and body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.2) were positively associated. The majority of participants (66.6%) had a &lt;10% 10-year CVD risk, of whom 64.9% (95% CI 60.1 to 69.8) did not achieve the LDL-C target of &lt;3.0 mmol/L.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Three-fourths of adults in Western Province, Sri Lanka had any form of dyslipidaemia, more common in females. Low HDL-C was the most frequent abnormality. Most participants aged above 40 years were at low cardiovascular risk, yet two-thirds failed to meet LDL-C targets. Non-communicable disease prevention in Sri Lanka should expand through population-wide strategies, including awareness campaigns, promoting self-monitoring, targeted education and surveillance to evaluate interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katulanda, P., Thevarajah, R., Fernando, D. R., Katulanda, G., Wickramasinghe, V. P., Wijewickrama, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T03:26:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109136</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109136</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of dyslipidaemia and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target attainment: a descriptive cross-sectional study among adults in the Western Province of Sri Lanka]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109136</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109136</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111744?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Supported implementation of tailored hospital fall prevention interventions: a protocol for the PROTECT stepped wedge type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111744?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patient falls in hospitals lead to patient harm, staff distress and economic burden on health systems. There are few strategies with robust evidence demonstrating benefit for the prevention of falls, especially in acute hospital settings. Education and multicomponent fall prevention approaches are promising. Rigorous systematic measurement of implementation has been lacking in most hospital fall prevention trials. This paper describes the protocol for a trial that will evaluate the impact of supported implementation of tailored multicomponent fall prevention interventions on patient falls in hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A stepped-wedge hybrid type I effectiveness implementation cluster randomised trial will be conducted. Twelve inpatient wards across four metropolitan hospitals will be enrolled in the trial, clustered into groups of four and randomised to commence the intervention at one of three time periods. Patients and ward staff will be recruited to complete pre-implementation surveys, which, combined with analysis of routinely collected local falls data and staff brainstorming, will inform tailored multicomponent fall prevention interventions for each ward. Wards will receive quality improvement training, clinical facilitation and staff education for at least 4 months to support implementation of their fall prevention interventions. The primary outcome&mdash;rate of falls&mdash;will be measured using routinely collected hospital falls data from the incident management system and medical records. Pre-implementation and post-implementation patient and staff surveys, qualitative interviews and bedside audits will measure secondary effectiveness and implementation outcomes. Healthcare utilisation from hospital data will inform the cost-effectiveness analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (RPAH Zone) approved this trial (protocol number X24-0087 and 2024/ETH00583). The trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000896572). Data collection commenced in October 2024, due for completion in May 2026. Results will be published in reputable international journals and presented at relevant conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000896572).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLennan, C., Hassett, L., Tilden, W., Naganathan, V., Haynes, A., Jennings, M., Ni Chroinin, D., Richards, B., Hallahan, A., Biswas, R. K., Kwok, W., McVeigh, T., Heppleston, E., Jackson, D., Nayak, V., Delaney, S., Howard, K., Pinheiro, M., Macpherson, A., Rayner, J., Hill, A.-M., Haines, T., Sherrington, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T03:26:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111744</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111744</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Supported implementation of tailored hospital fall prevention interventions: a protocol for the PROTECT stepped wedge type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111744</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111744</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113797?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional study to assess filarial infection among the never treated individuals in selected districts in India: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113797?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>With the global lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination goal set to 2030, it is necessary to address challenges hindering the last-mile efforts. Never treated individuals are those who self-report that they have never taken the drugs for LF during any mass drug administration (MDA) rounds. Hence, it is necessary to identify these individuals and assess if they can be potential reservoirs of infection and understand the reasons for non-compliance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This mixed method study, proposed for a period of 2 years, will assess the filarial infection status of never treated individuals from four LF-endemic districts in India. A multi-stage cluster sampling design will be followed to select the health subcentres from one highly endemic block in each of the selected districts. A random sample of 2535 never treated individuals from each block will be assessed for filarial infection by a cross-sectional blood survey. Qualitative surveys, including in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, will be conducted to elicit the reasons for their non-compliance. The prevalence of filarial infection will be summarised as frequencies and percentages. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis will be performed to find the factors associated with filarial infection. Exploring the various reasons, such as sociocultural, behavioural and programmatic drivers of non-participation, will enable the programme to design tailored communication and community engagement strategies to bring them under the umbrella of MDA and thereby support the ongoing LF elimination efforts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the institutional ethics committee (IHEC 07-0824/N/F, dated 25 September 2024). After completion of the study, a workshop will be held with all stakeholders to disseminate the study findings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinesh, R. J., Srividya, A., Jabir, M., Kishanthini, M., Dogra, V., Tripathi, B., Sharma, R., Jain, T., Rahi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T03:26:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113797</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113797</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional study to assess filarial infection among the never treated individuals in selected districts in India: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113797</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113797</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115492?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Latent trajectories of role adaptation in first-time pregnant women and their associations with pregnancy-specific psychological disorders: a longitudinal research protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115492?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pregnancy constitutes a pivotal developmental transition for primigravidas. Although inadequate maternal role adaptation is a recognised predictor of antenatal distress, most existing studies have employed cross-sectional designs or concentrated primarily on the postpartum period. Little is known about the dynamic, longitudinal patterns of role adaptation during pregnancy or how these trajectories shape stage-specific psychological challenges. This study seeks to identify latent heterogeneous trajectories of maternal role adaptation among primigravidas and to evaluate their associations with stage-specific psychological outcomes, including pregnancy-related stress, body image disturbance and fear of childbirth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, prospective, longitudinal observational cohort study will enrol 240 primigravidas with a gestational age of 14 weeks or less from six tertiary hospitals in Shijiazhuang, China. Data will be collected at three clinically important time points, T0 (12&ndash;14 weeks), T1 (26&ndash;28 weeks) and T2 (35&ndash;37 weeks). Latent class growth analysis will be used to identify distinct trajectory subgroups of maternal role adaptation. The associations between these trajectory classes and stage-specific psychological outcomes, including pregnancy stress at T0, body image disturbance at T1 and fear of childbirth at T2, will be examined using the Bolck-Croon-Hagenaars method with demographic covariates controlled. Missing data will be managed using full information maximum likelihood estimation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been granted by the Ethics Committee of Hebei Provincial People&rsquo;s Hospital (approval number 2025586). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at international academic conferences and summary reports shared with the participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500114060.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, H., Ge, L., Wang, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T03:26:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115492</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115492</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Latent trajectories of role adaptation in first-time pregnant women and their associations with pregnancy-specific psychological disorders: a longitudinal research protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115492</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115492</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117236?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Postmarketing safety surveillance for GSKs AS01E-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein-based vaccine in the USA: protocol for a non-interventional postauthorisation safety study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117236?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In May 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initially approved an AS01<SUB>E</SUB>-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (adjuvanted RSVPreF3) for adults aged &ge;60 years. The approval was expanded in June 2024 to include adults 50&ndash;59 years of age at increased risk for RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease. In this paper, we describe the protocol of a postmarketing safety study evaluating the association between adjuvanted RSVPreF3 and new-onset Guillain-Barr&eacute; syndrome (GBS), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) among adults &ge;50 years of age in the USA and provide our rationale for key methodological decisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The potential associations between adjuvanted RSVPreF3 and GBS, ADEM and AF will be evaluated using secondary healthcare data and the self-controlled risk interval (SCRI) design. Data from five research partners in the USA spanning August 2023 through June 2030 will be used for the conduct of yearly monitoring queries and, sample size permitting, SCRI analyses. Claims-based definitions for new-onset outcomes (first diagnosis in 365 days) are: &ge;1 inpatient diagnosis for GBS and ADEM; &ge;1 inpatient or &ge;2 ambulatory/emergency diagnoses for AF. The primary risk and control windows are 1&ndash;42 and 43&ndash;84 days, respectively, for GBS and ADEM; and 1&ndash;8 and 9&ndash;16 days for AF. SCRI analyses for GBS and ADEM will include chart-confirmed cases. SCRI analyses for AF will adjust for the positive predictive value obtained from validation against charts. Conditional Poisson regression will be used to calculate incidence rate ratios.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute; WIRB-Copernicus Group, Inc and its affiliates (collectively, &lsquo;WCG&rsquo;); WCG IRB, Inc; and Sterling IRB, with Federal Wide Assurance (FWA) numbers FWA00000100, FWA00033319 and FWA00025632, respectively, for all participating research partners. Study results will be shared with the US FDA and publicly disseminated through national or international clinical or scientific conferences and peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>This protocol has been registered in the Heads of Medicines Agencies&ndash;European Medicines Agency Real World Data Catalogues (EUPAS1000000486).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adimadhyam, S., Luyts, D., Oraichi, D., Deraedt, Q., Pircon, J.-Y., Bilker, W. B., Agan, A. A., Rajbhandari, R., Carbonari, D. M., Djibo, D. A., Wang, X., Nolan, M. B., DeVries, A., Selvan, M., Ma, Q., Wentz, A. E., Daniels, K., Platt, R., Lo Re, V., Cocoros, N. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T03:26:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117236</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117236</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Postmarketing safety surveillance for GSKs AS01E-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein-based vaccine in the USA: protocol for a non-interventional postauthorisation safety study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117236</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e094514?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of the environmental parenting scale: a precaution theory-based measure of preventive parenting behaviours]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e094514?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study developed and validated the precaution theory-based Environmental Parenting Scale (EPS) to assess proactive parental behaviours that reduce children&rsquo;s environmental risk exposure. Existing measures lack theory-based assessments of preventive parenting under environmental uncertainty.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study involves the development of a scale based on Kriebel&rsquo;s precaution theory to construct measures of environmental parenting behaviour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting/participants</st>
<p>For exploratory factor analysis, 216 participants with children under the age of 18 were recruited from Jeonju, Cheonan and Milyang in South Korea between 16 September 2024 and 21 September 2024 using convenience sampling. Content validity was confirmed by three professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Validation</st>
<p>The preliminary items were gathered through a literature review and in-depth interviews with 10 participants. We assessed convergence validity, known-group validity and internal consistency reliability. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a cumulative variance of 65.73% for explaining the target behaviours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The EPS comprises 21 items across four factors: hygiene management, natural product use, prevention of toxin exposure and protection from radiation. Convergent validity with the personal environmental health behaviours scale was supported (<I>r</I>=0.75, p&lt;0.001), and Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; was 0.93.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The EPS is a valid and reliable scale for measuring environmental parenting behaviours in the context of climate change and environmental diseases.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo, H., Kim, H.-K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094514</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-094514</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of the environmental parenting scale: a precaution theory-based measure of preventive parenting behaviours]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e094514</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e094514</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e099320?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of safety culture in adults and paediatric critical care units in governmental hospitals in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e099320?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe healthcare professionals&rsquo; (HCPs) assessment of safety culture in adults and paediatric critical care units in governmental hospitals in Kuwait.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional survey study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Adults and paediatric critical care units in Kuwait from January to April 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Full-time HCPs (physicians, nurses and clinical pharmacists) who are in direct contact with patients and work in adults and paediatric critical care units.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Patient safety culture practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The population consisted of 945 HCPs from adult and paediatric critical care units. In general, across most dimensions, perceptions were more positive toward the patient safety culture. Adult critical care settings were mostly higher in negative responses compared with the paediatric setting. In general, all the HCPs responded positively towards &lsquo;Teamwork Climate&rsquo;, ranging from 41.5% to 85.0%, with the same pattern in the adult and paediatric settings. In both settings, &lsquo;Safety Climate&rsquo; in general was responded to positively, ranging from 51.3% to 86.2%, and patterns between the two settings were the same. &lsquo;Job Satisfaction&rsquo; showed positive responses between 68.2% and 88.3%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this study, HCPs from adult and paediatric critical care units rated patient safety culture dimensions positively. The patient safety procedures needing improvement were staff shortages, harsh workloads, poor communication and training. Providing frequent communication training and supporting personnel could further strengthen the critical care safety culture.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alsaleh, F., AlHamad, B., AlSuwaidan, S., Naser, A. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099320</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099320</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of safety culture in adults and paediatric critical care units in governmental hospitals in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099320</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101098?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy online registry in Shenzhen: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open, observational cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101098?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), a leading cause of neurological disability in neonates, is managed with therapeutic hypothermia, yet systematic data on its aetiology and prognosis are lacking, particularly in China. Herein, our study addresses this gap by establishing a prospective registry in Shenzhen and aims to clinically characterise HIE, identify its risk factors and document its long-term outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will recruit 200 neonates with HIE from 10 hospitals in Shenzhen, China, between January 2025 and December 2028. In parallel, clinical data will be collected during hospitalisation, with supplemental referral information obtained from birth hospitals via an online, specialised HIE database. We will include HIE severity, survival status and the incidence of serious complications, such as arrhythmias, pulmonary haemorrhage, neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn and disseminated intravascular coagulation, to assess key outcomes of HIE in neonates.</p>
<p>Longitudinal follow-up is scheduled for 18, 24 and 36 months, involving assessments using physical developmental scales, video-electroencephalogram (VEEG) recordings, the Chinese version of the Bayley Infant and Toddler Developmental Scale, Fourth Edition and cranial MRI at 18 months. The primary objectives of this study are to determine survival status, track loss-to-follow-up rates and evaluate neurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 years, with the ultimate goal of enhancing our understanding of HIE risk factors, hypothermia therapy and prognosis to reduce HIE-related morbidity and disability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Children&rsquo;s Hospital (Ethics No. 2024096), and the findings will be disseminated through presentations at national academic conferences and publication in peer-reviewed paediatric journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400094994.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, X., Liu, L., Tu, H., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., Zhang, R., Guo, Y., Lin, H., Guo, X., Pan, Y., Li, X., Yu, Z., Feng, J., Yang, X., Huang, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101098</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101098</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy online registry in Shenzhen: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open, observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101098</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101098</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102172?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of experiential preoperative instruction of virtual reality-based intensive care unit for neurosurgical patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102172?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Preoperative anxiety is prevalent among neurosurgical patients and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Virtual reality (VR) technology offers an innovative approach to delivering immersive preoperative education, particularly in familiarising patients with the intensive care unit (ICU) environment. This study aims to evaluate whether a VR-based ICU orientation can reduce perioperative anxiety and improve psychological preparedness in adult neurosurgical patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre randomised controlled trial plans to enrol 108 patients at Xuanwu Hospital. Using a computer-generated random sequence, participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two groups: a control group receiving standard preoperative guidance, and an experimental group receiving standard guidance plus a VR-based ICU experience tour conducted 1 day before surgery. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of anxiety within 24 hours before discharge from the ICU. Secondary outcome measures include the incidence of depression, cognitive impairment and delirium, duration of delirium, safety events and other clinical outcomes. Data collection points include baseline (T0), 24 hours before surgery (T1), during ICU stay (T2) and 30 days after discharge (T3). All data analyses will be performed using SPSS V.26.0 software and will follow the intention-to-treat principle. This study seeks to determine the effectiveness of a VR-based ICU experience tour in reducing perioperative psychological stress and improving postoperative clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University (Approval ID: (2024) NO.152-002). The initial approval was obtained on 4 July 2024, and remains valid through 4 July 2026. All participants will provide written informed consent before any data collection takes place. The research findings are intended to be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400093170.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ji, Y., Zhang, N., Lu, S., Guan, X., Wang, N., Zhang, X., Liang, J., Wang, N., Wang, X., Zhao, Y., Ou, M., Namuna, D., Wu, Y., Wang, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102172</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102172</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of experiential preoperative instruction of virtual reality-based intensive care unit for neurosurgical patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102172</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102172</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102470?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychosocial risk screening in the inpatient care of physically ill patients: study protocol for a feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102470?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The length of hospital stay for patients with physical illnesses is longer for those with mental health comorbidity, particularly in the presence of severe physical multimorbidity. Integrating psychosocial risk screening at hospital admission, with a subsequent care pathway, could address psychosomatic and social care needs early and reduce length of stay. However, implementation may be hindered by organisational factors such as increased staff workload and timely integration into existing processes. In addition, patient factors such as low acceptance of screening and follow-up may affect uptake. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of implementing this integrated approach to screening and follow-up in preparation for a confirmatory trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The present study is a single centre, randomised feasibility study conducted on a pilot ward. Patients will be enrolled and assigned to the intervention or the control group. Only the intervention group will receive tablet-based psychosocial risk screening conducted by ward physicians or medical students in their practical year. If the psychosomatic screening is positive and the patient agrees, he or she is referred to the psychosomatic consultation service. If the social service screening is positive, the patient will be seen by a social worker. The main objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-sized confirmatory trial. An informed consent rate of 30% of eligible patients is set as the feasibility criterion. A study period of 4 months is planned for the feasibility study. The feasibility study will be analysed using descriptive statistics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University (S-301/2024) on 24 May 2024. The results of this feasibility study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06651164">NCT06651164</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feder, S. C., Simsek, Z., Simon, J. J., Hartmann, M., Bruns, B., Bugaj, T. J., Hoch, J., Dugas, M., Friederich, H.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102470</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102470</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychosocial risk screening in the inpatient care of physically ill patients: study protocol for a feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102470</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102470</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102627?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Latent profile analysis and influencing factors of engagement in medication safety among older adults with cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102627?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to explore the latent profiles and influencing factors of engagement in medication safety among elderly patients with cardiometabolic multimorbidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at a class III hospital in Jiangsu, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included a sample of 316 older adult inpatients with cardiometabolic multimorbidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Participants completed the Inpatients&rsquo; Involvement in Medication Safety Scale and the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire. Latent profile and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify subgroups and their associated factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Latent profile analysis identified three distinct profiles: &lsquo;passive participation&rsquo; (22.47%), &lsquo;moderate participation&rsquo; (52.53%) and &lsquo;active participation&rsquo; (25.0%). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that occupational status, marital status, medical payment method, daily medication type and treatment burden were significant independent factors distinguishing among these profiles (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study confirms significant heterogeneity in medication safety engagement among older adults with cardiometabolic multimorbidity. The identified profiles and their specific influencing factors provide a basis for clinicians to stratify patients and develop targeted interventions, particularly for the vulnerable &lsquo;passive participation&rsquo; group, to improve medication safety outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, C., Chen, J., Jin, R., Li, J., Cui, M., Wang, F., Chen, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102627</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102627</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Latent profile analysis and influencing factors of engagement in medication safety among older adults with cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102627</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102627</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103001?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Respiratory syndromic disease study in Shanghai community population]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103001?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>This prospective community-based cohort study (Acute Respiratory Infection Epidemiological Characteristics Assessment Study (ARI-ECAS)) aims to systematically monitor acute respiratory infection (ARI) incidence, characterise multiple pathogen coinfection patterns and explore microbial landscape dynamics in Shanghai&rsquo;s general population. By integrating syndromic surveillance, molecular diagnostics and metagenomic sequencing, the study seeks to enhance understanding of ARI epidemiology, seasonal variation and host&ndash;pathogen interactions to inform predictive modelling and optimise public health interventions in high-density urban environments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study enrolled 15 199 permanent residents from all 16 districts of Shanghai, with baseline oropharyngeal swab samples across five representative districts (Xuhui, Jing&rsquo;an, Jiading, Songjiang and Fengxian). Inclusion criteria required residency &ge;6 months and consent for weekly follow-ups. Exclusion criteria addressed mobility limitations (planned relocation &gt;6 months) and recent ARI history. Participants provided demographic, behavioural and clinical data via the Shanghai Health Cloud platform, with baseline and symptomatic-phase biological samples collected for analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>During the initial 8-month surveillance period (May 2024&ndash;January 2025), the ARI-ECAS cohort demonstrated critical insights into the epidemiology of acute respiratory infections in Shanghai&rsquo;s urban communities. Among 15 199 participants, 10.96% reported symptomatic episodes, of whom 21.43% experienced recurrent infections. Pathogen detection using targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) identified microbial aetiologies in 53.52% of symptomatic cases, revealing a high prevalence of coinfections: 27.96% involved dual pathogens, while 33.01% showed polymicrobial interactions (&ge;3 pathogens). Notably, 85.09% of symptomatic episodes were self-managed, underscoring a low healthcare-seeking rate (14.91%) consistent with patterns observed in urban China during postpandemic transitions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>The current phase of data collection will conclude in June 2025; however, syndromic surveillance and tNGS protocols will be sustained to capture multiyear seasonal transmission patterns. To enhance comparative rigour, future protocols will aim to collect samples from participants during asymptomatic periods in the subsequent year to serve as seasonal baseline controls. Building on this foundation, the study will integrate contact behaviour and mobility surveys to quantify parameters critical for understanding pathogen transmission dynamics (eg, household contacts and public transportation usage). Furthermore, pathogen detection and metagenomic data will be combined with transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling in selected cases to model multipathogen interaction networks and delineate host immune response pathways, thereby advancing mechanistic insights into polymicrobial cocirculation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yu, X., Wen, Z., Zhou, W., Zheng, Y., Chen, J., Xiao, W.-j., Lin, S., Liang, H., Duan, X., Wang, W., Wu, H., Chen, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103001</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103001</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Respiratory syndromic disease study in Shanghai community population]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103001</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103001</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103120?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-STARS: a feasibility evaluation of a co-produced mental health literacy training package to reduce mental health inequities for Black young people in underserved communities - study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with an external pilot, process evaluation and economic analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103120?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Severe mental illness such as psychosis is among the most disabling illnesses worldwide, disproportionately affecting minoritised ethnic groups and those in socioeconomic disadvantage. In the UK, people from Black ethnic backgrounds are more likely to experience a first episode of psychosis and to be detained under the Mental Health Act than White British people. There is a clear need for mental health services to improve cultural awareness and understanding of the broader social needs of minoritised groups, as well as the need to improve mental health literacy (MHL) within Black communities to empower individuals to seek timely mental health support. This protocol describes our programme of work which aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of Co-STARS, which is a co-produced, culturally appropriate tiered training package.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We co-produced a culturally appropriate, place-based, tiered MHL training package (Co-STARS) to deliver within underserved Black communities and via an e-learning package implemented among staff within mental health trusts. The training will be evaluated in stages. First, a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial will assess the feasibility and acceptability (defined as participants&rsquo; perceptions of the training&rsquo;s relevance, usefulness and delivery) of a lived experience-led MHL training package delivered by Black young people with experience of mental ill health, to underserved communities in Birmingham, UK. Acceptability will be quantified through participation and completion rates and explored qualitatively via focus groups and interviews. Second, a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial will evaluate the feasibility of an e-learning training programme for mental health professionals. We will embed a process evaluation to explore change mechanisms and identify barriers and enablers for future implementation. Third, we will use realist-informed participatory systems mapping and novel epidemiological analyses to explore downstream effects (ie, improved care access for Black ethno-racial groups within the intervention areas). Last, a cost-effectiveness framework will be developed to assess whether the intervention is good value for money in future efficacy trials. In the cluster trial, eight clusters will be randomised to the intervention arm (face-to-face training in the community) and control arm (display of MHL materials) with pre- and post-assessments in 120 participants from 8 clusters, 3 weeks apart. In the stepped wedge trial, six clusters (clinical teams within NHS mental health trusts) including 120 NHS staff in total, will move from control phase to intervention phase in a stepped wedge manner, with pre-assessments and post-assessments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This proposal was reviewed by the Research Governance of the University of Birmingham and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) grant reviewers. Ethics approval was granted by East of Scotland Research Ethics Service. The findings will be communicated in research conferences, stakeholder meetings, via social media, through publication in peer-reviewed journals and as a policy document.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN10517405">ISRCTN10517405</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumarendran, B., Cherrington, E., Bandyopadhyay, S., Crowe, F., Machaczek, K. K., Brown, L., Campbell, N., Jordan, G., Pope, M. A., Antonovic, M., Taylor, M., W, N., Mahamud, A., Chandan, J. S., Griffiths, S. L., on behalf of the Co-STARS youth co-production group, Okita]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103120</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103120</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-STARS: a feasibility evaluation of a co-produced mental health literacy training package to reduce mental health inequities for Black young people in underserved communities - study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with an external pilot, process evaluation and economic analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103120</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103120</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103512?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of a patient-centred levothyroxine decision support tool on rapid achievement of target dosage and improved patient outcomes: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103512?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The hormone replacement drug levothyroxine is the most common therapy for people with reduced function of the thyroid gland. The optimal dosage varies considerably between individuals, and reaching the correct dosage is often a time-consuming task. To reduce the time needed for dose adjustments, we have developed a model for calculating each patient&rsquo;s optimal dosage and an associated decision support tool (DST). We present the study protocol for a randomised controlled trial using the DST in initiation and adjustment of levothyroxine therapy for thyroidectomised patients. The aim of the study is to assess the tool&rsquo;s efficacy on therapeutic target achievement and to investigate whether faster dose adjustments lead to better patient-reported outcomes on symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a randomised, controlled, multicentre, non-blinded, parallel arm trial with three intervention groups and one control group. We will include 240 patients undergoing total or completion thyroidectomy in three Norwegian hospitals. Patients allocated to the three intervention groups will have the option to use the DST in dose adjustments after the operation. Each intervention group will test a different version of the DST. The control group will follow standard care practice. The randomisation ratio will be 1:1:1:1. Our primary outcome is proportion of patients within biochemical target at 8 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are distance from biochemical target at 8 weeks, mean time to achieve biochemical target, change in HRQoL, adverse events and number of days absence from work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Norwegian Medical Products Agency (CIV-23-02-042436), The Norwegian Ethics Committee for Clinical Trials on Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (547311), and the patient protection officer at the University Hospital of North Norway. All participants will give written informed consent prior to inclusion. Results will be published open access in international peer-reviewed journals and communicated to the public through appropriate channels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06455371">NCT06455371</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Konst, S. R., Hellemo, L., Garcia, B. H., Brun, V. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103512</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103512</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of a patient-centred levothyroxine decision support tool on rapid achievement of target dosage and improved patient outcomes: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103512</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103512</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104272?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Random-effects modelling of timely initiation of breastfeeding in Tanzania: What predicts the practice?]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104272?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine individual and community-level predictors associated with timely initiation of breastfeeding among women in Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Analytical cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This was an analytical cross-sectional study that used the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey, which was conducted across all regions of Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Data from 4308 women were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome</st>
<p>The outcome variable was timely initiation of breastfeeding, defined as starting breastfeeding within the first hour after birth, coded as 1 if timely and 0 otherwise. Mixed-effects generalised linear model (family- Binomial and link-logit) approach was used to account for the hierarchical structure of the data. Four models were constructed to assess individual and community-level predictors. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) with 95% CIs were reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Women aged 25&ndash;34 years were significantly more likely to initiate breastfeeding within 1 hour (APR=1.40; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.65). Vaginal delivery was strongly associated with the timely initiation of breastfeeding (TIBF) (APR=10.13; 95% CI 7.84 to 13.09), whereas home delivery (APR=0.29; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.36) was negatively associated with TIBF. Multiparity (APR=1.22; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.43) increased the likelihood of TIBF. Women in the richest wealth category were less likely to practise TIBF (APR=0.70; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.96). Approximately 12.3% of the variation in TIBF was explained by cluster-level differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Both individual and community-level factors influence TIBF in Tanzania, highlighting the need for strong communication between mothers and healthcare providers to consistently promote its importance across all ages and wealth groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tibenderana, J. R., Musa, K. M., Pius, A. G., Kagasyeko, J. N., Kessy, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104272</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104272</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Random-effects modelling of timely initiation of breastfeeding in Tanzania: What predicts the practice?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104272</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104740?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experience of patients with total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis in China: a patient journey map based on qualitative research]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104740?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to address the lack of a holistic understanding of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) journey in China by systematically mapping patient experiences to identify interconnected needs, emotional transitions and critical pain points across the entire care continuum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A longitudinal descriptive qualitative study using patient journey mapping methodology. Data from three sequential one-on-one semistructured interviews (preoperative, in-hospital postoperative and home rehabilitation phases) were chronologically coded into journey stages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Twelve patients scheduled for elective TKA, aged 61&ndash;80 years (mean 70.25&plusmn;5.86).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five categories with 17 subcategories were identified: (1) declining quality of life drives the need for change, (2) trust compensates for information gaps in decision-making, (3) hospital adaptation challenges heighten anxiety, (4) strong support needs emerge post-surgery and (5) navigating complex home recovery needs with insecurity. The patient journey was mapped across four stages: intention to change, consultation and decision-making, hospitalisation and surgery and rehabilitation and recovery. Analysis revealed several cross-stage issues: (1) the influence of disease status and treatment decision quality on postoperative outcomes, (2) inadequate preadmission preparation hindering hospital adaptation and comorbidity management and (3) insufficient predischarge planning leading to negative post-hospital rehabilitation experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Quality deficits in early-stage interactions can trigger a cascading effect on subsequent patient experience and clinical outcomes. During the two critical phases of selecting a healthcare provider and deciding on surgery, patients undergo a transition from &lsquo;insufficient information support&rsquo; to &lsquo;reliance on trust&rsquo;. However, irrational decision-making and unrealistic expectations collectively form a potential risk for postoperative decisional regret and dissatisfaction. Underused preoperative preparation leads to difficulties during hospitalisation, while inadequate discharge support hinders home recovery. Identifying these cross-stage pain points highlights timely intervention opportunities. Future improvements can be achieved through process redesign and technology integration, such as intelligent decision aids and remote rehabilitation systems, to enhance overall patient experience and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhan, Y.-f., Yang, L., Zhang, S.-z., Wu, B.-y., Li, H.-w., Zhai, Z.-j., Bian, W.-w., Liu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104740</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104740</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experience of patients with total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis in China: a patient journey map based on qualitative research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104740</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104740</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105939?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SOCAV: a nurse-led support programme for self-direction in people with dementia receiving home care, involving informal caregivers - a feasibility study with process evaluation in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105939?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To adapt the SOCAV programme&mdash;originally developed for residential dementia care&mdash;for home care use, and to evaluate its feasibility and potential to foster behavioural change in nurses and informal caregivers supporting self-direction in people with dementia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Development and feasibility study guided by the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions. Feasibility was evaluated using Bowen&rsquo;s framework (demand, acceptability, practicality, implementation, limited efficacy). Data collection involved semistructured interviews, focus groups and reflective coaching diaries, as well as validated outcome measures (self-direction, quality of life and depressive symptoms) assessed at multiple time points. Qualitative data were analysed using qualitative content analysis (Bowen&rsquo;s feasibility framework) and constant comparative analysis; quantitative data were analysed descriptively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two home care teams in different Dutch municipalities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Development phase: 16 participants (4 people with dementia, 6 informal caregivers, 6 nurses). Feasibility phase: 59 participants (12 people with dementia, 14 informal caregivers, 33 nurses).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>SOCAV-Home Care integrates person-centred communication training with reflective coaching for nurses and joint meetings involving people with dementia and informal caregivers. It aims to embed self-direction into daily care routines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The programme was feasible and well-received, though demanding. Nurses reported increased reflection, more person-centred communication and greater professional confidence. Informal caregivers showed attitudinal shifts from control to autonomy-supportive care. Programme complexity, scheduling difficulties and emotional burden contributed to dropout. Quantitative trends showed reduced behavioural symptoms in people with dementia, though no statistical analysis was performed due to sample size.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>SOCAV-Home Care shows potential to foster behavioural change in nurses and informal caregivers, promoting self-direction and relational care in dementia home care. Findings, grounded in rich reflective data, offer a valuable foundation for further evaluation. Simplifying delivery and enhancing flexibility are key to broader implementation. Future research should evaluate the sustainability strategies proposed and examine long-term outcomes in diverse home care contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07347639">NCT07347639</A>; Post-results.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Das, P., Douma, G., Donkers, H., Roets-Merken, L., Graff, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105939</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105939</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SOCAV: a nurse-led support programme for self-direction in people with dementia receiving home care, involving informal caregivers - a feasibility study with process evaluation in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105939</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105939</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106397?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of non-ophthalmologist-led and offline AI-assisted models for diabetic retinopathy screening in India: a pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106397?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-ophthalmologist-led diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) at health and wellness centres (HWCs) and offline artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted community-based screening, using specialist grading as the reference standard in India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, settings and participants</st>
<p>Pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study in primary healthcare settings. The settings included HWCs and community-based screening sites in rural Block Boothgarh, Mohali District, Punjab, India. A total of 600 people with diabetes aged &ge;30 years were enrolled across three screening models: (1) non-ophthalmologist-led DRS at the HWC, (2) AI-assisted smartphone-based DRS in the community and (3) standard referral-based care. Retinal images were captured using non-mydriatic fundus cameras and independently graded by two masked human graders; a senior retina specialist resolved any disagreements. The AI was assessed for its ability to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) and referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR). Diagnostic performance metrics were reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The non-ophthalmologist-led model demonstrated 86.4% sensitivity (95% CI 65.1% to 97.1%) and 94.3% specificity (95% CI 88.5% to 97.7%) for DR detection, with an ungradability rate of 8%. For RDR, sensitivity reached 95.8% (95% CI 78.9% to 99.9%) and specificity was 93.1% (95% CI 88.0% to 96.5%). The offline AI-assisted model achieved 93.3% sensitivity (95% CI 68.1% to 99.8%) and 85.1% specificity (95% CI 76.9% to 91.2%) for RDR, but with a higher ungradability rate (38%), mainly due to cataracts and poor image quality. Both approaches effectively identified referable cases; however, the non-ophthalmologist-led model demonstrated greater accuracy and operational feasibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study demonstrates that non-ophthalmologist-led DRS at HWCs can enhance access to primary care. Offline AI-enabled screening demonstrates potential for community use but is currently limited by image quality and binary classification outputs. Integrating both approaches may strengthen DRS coverage in resource-limited settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Clinical trials registry of India</st>
<p>CTRI/2022/10/046283.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chauhan, A., Vale, L., Kankaria, A., Tigari, B., Kumar, S., Yadav, M., Kumar, L., Kaur, G., Bhadada, S. K., Gupta, V., Duggal, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106397</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106397</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of non-ophthalmologist-led and offline AI-assisted models for diabetic retinopathy screening in India: a pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106397</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106397</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106742?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in rehabilitation service utilisation during COVID-19 bed surges in Japan: a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) analysis of care utilisation with 10-year claims data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106742?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the association between COVID-19 bed utilisation and changes in rehabilitation service provision in Japan, focusing on cerebrovascular, musculoskeletal and respiratory rehabilitation in the pre-COVID-19, during-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective study using seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average model to predict expected values, which were compared with actual values to calculate observed-to-expected (OE) ratios.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Acute care hospitals in Kanagawa Prefecture, which has the second largest population in Japan after Tokyo, covering April 2014 to March 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients aged 0&ndash;74 years who were enrolled in the National Health Insurance of Kanagawa Prefecture and underwent the studied types of rehabilitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Exposure</st>
<p>COVID-19 pandemic waves and associated bed utilisation rates, with multiple distinct peaks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The difference between the predicted and actual values of the volume of rehabilitation services provided and the number of patients per insured person calculated as OE ratios during periods of peak bed utilisation for COVID-19.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The OE ratio of inpatient rehabilitation services for cerebrovascular showed a significant decrease after five waves at &ndash;14.3%, and musculoskeletal conditions showed a similar decline during periods of high COVID-19 bed utilisation. Outpatient services experienced sharp declines initially but showed differential recovery patterns. Respiratory rehabilitation displayed unique patterns, with inpatient services increasing up to 62.4% above expected levels until September 2021, before sharply declining. By March 2024, musculoskeletal rehabilitation demonstrated complete recovery, cerebrovascular rehabilitation showed partial recovery, while respiratory rehabilitation exhibited mixed patterns with persistent outpatient deficits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Rehabilitation services in Japan showed substantial changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, with inpatient services for cerebrovascular and musculoskeletal conditions being particularly vulnerable to disruptions during high COVID-19 bed utilisation periods. The differential recovery patterns across rehabilitation types, with some structural changes persisting beyond the acute pandemic phase, indicate the need for flexible healthcare systems to deal with future healthcare crises. These findings underscore the importance of developing strategies to maintain essential rehabilitation services during public health emergencies, especially considering the ageing global population and rising demand for rehabilitation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Egashira, Y., Watanabe, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106742</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106742</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in rehabilitation service utilisation during COVID-19 bed surges in Japan: a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) analysis of care utilisation with 10-year claims data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106742</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106742</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107352?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Central and peripheral neuroplasticity in cervical spinal cord injury following intensive upper limb motor training: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107352?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigates the effects of intensive upper limb (UL) motor training on neurophysiological and functional recovery in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (c-SCI) during the sub-acute phase. The study aims first to assess neurophysiological adaptations in the central and peripheral nervous systems and functional changes to evaluate the impact of intensive UL motor training on recovery. Second, it determines dose dimensions and their correlation with neural and functional improvements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A total of 44 individuals with c-SCI within 13 weeks post-injury will be recruited from five rehabilitation centres in Belgium and the Netherlands. They will be randomised into an intervention group, receiving six additional hours of goal-directed UL training per week for 8 weeks, or a control group receiving standard care. Primary outcomes are changes in resting motor threshold, a proxy for corticospinal tract integrity; compound muscle action potential amplitude, indicating peripheral nerve excitability and functionality; and assessments of strength, sensory function and prehension, with the primary comparison between groups at baseline and after the intervention period. Secondary outcomes cover additional neurophysiological assessments and motor function. Dose dimensions will be quantified and related to primary and secondary outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The central medical ethics committees, METC M&aacute;xima MC (NL84212.015.23) and MEC Gent (B6702023000227), as well as local ethics committees, reviewed and approved this trial. The protocol is registered (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT06065384). The findings of this RCT will be disseminated through articles in peer-reviewed journals and at neurological rehabilitation conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06065384">NCT06065384</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hrycyk, I. J., Bertels, N., Tankisi, H., Glinsky, J. V., Oostra, K., van Laake-Geelen, C., Tedesco Triccas, L., Spooren, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107352</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107352</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Central and peripheral neuroplasticity in cervical spinal cord injury following intensive upper limb motor training: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107352</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107352</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107396?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER) deprescribing intervention in hospital: protocol for a cluster randomised stepped-wedge trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107396?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>While almost half of older adults admitted to hospital are prescribed potentially inappropriate medicines, less than 1% have a medicine proactively deprescribed during admission in the UK. The CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER) intervention is designed to address geriatricians&rsquo; and pharmacists&rsquo; barriers and enablers to deprescribing. The CHARMER definitive trial will evaluate effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 20 hospitals in England, with four hospitals in reserve. All hospitals will collect baseline data. Every 3 months, five hospitals will be randomised to receive the intervention. The intervention, implemented by a local project manager, comprises a hospital action plan to set deprescribing as an organisational goal; workshops for pharmacists and geriatricians to change beliefs about deprescribing; weekly briefings between geriatricians and pharmacists to discuss opportunities for deprescribing; benchmarking reports to compare deprescribing performance across participating hospitals. With an average of 200 patients admitted and discharged during each step, the study will have 89.5% power at 5% significance level and intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.05 to detect a 3% difference in 90-day re-admission rate from 16.7% versus 13.7%. Anonymised routinely collected data, including readmissions, will be obtained for all patients admitted during the study period. Enhanced data collection periods of 1 month during control and intervention periods will be used to recruit patients and data for secondary outcomes and process evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>A stepped-wedge design enabled a smaller number of hospitals and patients to be included than a traditional cluster-randomised design. The complexity of intervention implementation necessitated a project manager in addition to the principal investigator responsible for trial conduct. Using routinely collected data for the primary outcome measure should ensure that the trial has sufficient power on completion. Planned enhanced data collection for short periods of time improves trial efficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN13248281">ISRCTN13248281</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wright, D. J., Alldred, D. P., Scott, S., Atkins, B., Clark, A. B., Colles, A., Hammond, A., Jones, C. E. L., Martin-Kerry, J. M., Patel, M., Sims, E., Turner, D., Witham, M., Bhattacharya, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107396</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107396</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER) deprescribing intervention in hospital: protocol for a cluster randomised stepped-wedge trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107396</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107396</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between medication adherence and glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in Luzhou: a retrospective cohort study (2018-2023)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the longitudinal association between medication adherence and glycaemic control among patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Luzhou City, identify modifiable factors and provide actionable evidence to inform targeted diabetes management strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Western China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Data from 30 508 T2D patients in the Luzhou City Health Information Management System (2018&ndash;2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome measure: glycaemic control rate. Secondary outcome measures: medication adherence, hypertension comorbidity and lifestyle factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients with consistent adherence achieved significantly higher glycaemic control rates (39.6%, 95% CI 38.8% to 40.4%) compared with intermittent adherents (20.8%, 95% CI 19.9% to 21.7%, p&lt;0.001). Poor adherence to medical advice is a major barrier to effective blood glucose control, particularly among intermittent adherents, reducing their success rate by 29.4% (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.706, 95% CI 0.643 to 0.774). Conversely, male gender (aOR=0.879, 95% CI 0.813 to 0.950) and higher educational attainment (aOR=1.004, 95% CI 1.002 to 1.007) were positively associated with glycaemic control. Additionally, temporary residence status provided a marginal benefit (aOR=1.064, 95% CI 1.013 to 1.117), suggesting potential disparities in access to medical resources between urban and rural areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>While medication adherence remains fundamental for glycaemic control, its association with glycaemic control varied according to hypertension comorbidity and lifestyle factors. These findings advocate for integrated care models that simultaneously address cardiovascular risk factors and promote behavioural modifications, particularly in resource-constrained settings experiencing rapid epidemiological transitions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, M., Zhou, D., He, L., Ren, N., Li, Y., Fan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107509</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107509</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between medication adherence and glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in Luzhou: a retrospective cohort study (2018-2023)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107509</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107773?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biological impacts of rising temperatures on maternal, fetal and newborn health: protocol for a cohort study (BIRTH-Cohort)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107773?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Climate change has led to extreme heat events, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. Heat stress during pregnancy is linked to adverse health outcomes, yet the biological mechanisms remain poorly understood. This research study aims to investigate the effect of environmental heat on maternal, fetal and infant health and examine the biological pathways linking heat stress to adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective cohort study will recruit 6000 pregnant women from three districts in Sindh, Pakistan. Eligible participants &ge;18 years old, will have a minimum of five scheduled visits from &lt;14 weeks&rsquo; gestation and will be followed up to 12 months postpartum. Primary outcomes include low birth weight and small vulnerable newborns (SVN); secondary outcomes include preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), miscarriage, stillbirth, and composite maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Fetal ultrasound scans with Doppler assessments will be performed at each visit to measure fetal growth, uteroplacental and fetoplacental circulation. Each woman&rsquo;s heat exposure will be measured using wearable sensors and heat strain biomarkers. In a subset of 1000 women, maternal heart rate, skin temperature sleep patterns and physical activity will be monitored throughout pregnancy using wearable devices. Time-varying, distributed lag and non-linear models will examine associations between heat stress indices and pregnancy outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received ethical approval from the Aga Khan University (AKU) (Ref: 26249) and the Pakistan National Bioethics Committee (Ref: 1065/23/1736). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment. Referral pathways to healthcare facilities will be established to ensure timely management of pregnancy complications. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences, and engagement with policymakers and public health stakeholders to inform climate-resilient maternal health strategies. Results will also be shared with participants and communities through meetings and informal sessions to raise awareness and support evidence-based heat adaptation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT01234567">NCT01234567</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Das, J. K., Malik, A. A., Papageorghiou, A. T., Piryani, S., Ambareen, M., Zuberi, N., Islam, Z., Mohammed, N., Hussain, N. F., Samad, Z., Baloch, F. M., Qazi, S., Rizvi, A., Chauhadry, I. A., Iqbal, J., Mohsin, S. S., Ali, F., Sheikh, L., Begum, K., Zuberi, R., Cousens, S., Kennedy, S., Bhutta, Z. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107773</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107773</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biological impacts of rising temperatures on maternal, fetal and newborn health: protocol for a cohort study (BIRTH-Cohort)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107773</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107773</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107806?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-benefit analysis of a 24/7 text-based online emotional support platform for at-risk youth in Hong Kong]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107806?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study was to estimate the potential social value and net benefit of OpenUp, a 24/7 text-based online counselling service for youth in Hong Kong, and draw policy-relevant conclusions for service provision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective, model-based cost&ndash;benefit analysis using social return on investment (SROI) methods. Adopting a societal perspective, service, health and social outcomes were valued over a 1-year period, and productivity gains associated with avoided suicide deaths were valued over a 10-year period. Costs are reported in 2022 HK dollars (HK$; US$1=HK$7.8). Reporting was guided by Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A text-based, synchronous online emotional support counselling platform in Hong Kong was accessible through WhatsApp, Facebook, SMS and the official web portal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 19 543 users aged 11&ndash;35 years accessed OpenUp services during the study period (1 December 2020 to 31 May 2022).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>These included total social value (HK$), net social benefit (social value minus investment) and the SROI ratio. The secondary outcomes included monetised savings in medical and social services and productivity gains from avoiding suicide attempts and death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The total social value was estimated to be HK$226 119 729 against an investment of HK$47 655 000 (SROI=4.74). Suicide risk reduction (productivity gains from avoided attempts and deaths) accounted for 75.4% of the social value. Deterministic one-way sensitivity analyses yielded SROI values ranging from 3.62 to 6.99 aggregated across the three groups, with results being most sensitive to assumptions about the duration of productivity impacts for avoided attempts and avoidable mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Based on conservative assumptions, OpenUp can generate potential social value by providing an online emotional support service. Given the study&rsquo;s reliance on modelling and proxy monetisation, these estimates should be interpreted with caution. Further integration of offline services with online intervention strategies requires continuous investment and evaluation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yip, P. S. F., Chen, J., Tang, R. L. M., Chau, C. L. I., Cheng, W. M. K., Lui, E. N. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107806</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107806</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-benefit analysis of a 24/7 text-based online emotional support platform for at-risk youth in Hong Kong]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107806</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107806</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gender differences in clinical profiles, management and outcomes of valvular heart disease in China: insights from a nationwide cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To compare the distribution, aetiology, treatment patterns and 2-year outcomes of moderate to severe valvular heart disease (VHD) between men and women in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nationwide, prospective, multicentre cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>46 tertiary hospitals across China, representing a mix of primary and secondary care settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 13 917 adult patients with moderate-to-severe VHD were enrolled between April and June 2018. Of these, 6296 (45.24%) were women. Inclusion criteria included moderate or severe native valve disease, infective endocarditis or prior valve intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Patients received either conservative therapy or valve interventions, including surgical repair/replacement or transcatheter procedures. Intervention decisions were based on clinical assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>2-year all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalisation and major adverse cardiovascular events. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify outcome predictors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall intervention rate was 31.72%, with no gender difference (men: 31.26% vs women: 32.27%). Among the 5427 patients with severe symptomatic VHD, 49.11% received interventional therapy. The sex-specific pattern was particularly significant in severe symptomatic multiple valvular heart disease, where women had a higher propensity for intervention (p&lt;0.001, OR: 1.19&ndash;1.66). In severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation patients, women were less likely to receive valve replacement (p=0.03, OR: 0.39&ndash;0.95).</p>
<p>The 2-year survival rate was 90.85% with no gender difference (men: 90.41% vs women: 91.38%, p=0.086). Valve intervention improved survival to 97.0%, with no gender disparity (men: 96.92% vs women: 97.01%, p=0.87). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed no significant gender effect (p&gt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Significant gender differences exist in VHD aetiology and subtypes in China. Women had more rheumatic VHD, while men had more degenerative and functional VHD. Intervention improved survival, with no gender disparity. Age and VHD subtype influenced intervention rates and prognosis, supporting individualised, sex- and age-stratified management strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT03484806">NCT03484806</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, H., Lu, Q., Li, Z., Ye, Y., Zhang, B., Wang, W., Liu, Q., Lv, J., Zhao, Z., Duan, Z., Wang, B., Yu, Z., Guo, S., Zhao, Y., Gao, R., Wu, Y., Xu, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108331</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108331</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gender differences in clinical profiles, management and outcomes of valvular heart disease in China: insights from a nationwide cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108331</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Healthcare financing in Morocco on the path towards universal health coverage: a protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>All countries around the world have been encouraged to implement universal health coverage, emphasising its essential role in global health policy. Morocco has long been part of this international movement. Several health reforms have been implemented over the years, significantly improving the health status of the population and service coverage. However, several gaps continue to hinder the expected results. The current health financing model in Morocco is one of the main persistent challenges. It remains largely dependent on out-of-pocket expenditure, with no significant change since 1997/1998. This situation contributes to restricting access to care for low-income individuals, thereby exacerbating inequalities. In this context, the objective of this scoping review is to map the literature on health financing functions in the context of progress toward universal health coverage in Morocco.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review protocol was developed following the best practice guidelines for scoping study protocols from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review Methodology Group. The final study will be reported in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping studies. Relevant databases such as PubMed, SCOPUS, WOS and Google Scholar will be searched for articles published in English and French between 2005 and 31 January 2026. Additionally, government reports, technical reports and policy and institutional documents from grey literature will be included. We will include all interventions that address the implementation of health financing approaches aimed at achieving universal health coverage in Morocco. Article selection will be conducted by pairs of independent reviewers. Data extraction will also be performed by two independent reviewers. A narrative and thematic approach will be used to synthesise the findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>It should be noted that formal ethical approval is not required, as no patients will be involved in the process. The results of this scoping review will be prepared and submitted for presentation as conference presentations and published in the form of a peer-reviewed article.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hajji, O., El Abbadi, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108407</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108407</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Healthcare financing in Morocco on the path towards universal health coverage: a protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108407</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108525?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring the continuum of maternal, newborn, child,and reproductive health services among postpartum women in Ethiopia: a quantile regression analysis of the composite coverage index]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108525?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to assess the level of continuum of maternal, newborn, childand reproductive health coverage using the composite coverage index (CCI) and to identify its determinants, including socioeconomic, community context, individual and family, and health service-related factors, among postpartum women one year after childbirth in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study was a secondary analysis of longitudinal data from the second cohort of the performance monitoring for action (PMA) Ethiopia survey, which was conducted from 2021 to 2023. Data were collected at four intervals: a baseline survey, a 6 week postpartum survey, a 6 month postpartum survey and a 1 year postpartum survey to track reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health indicators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>The study was conducted from the major regions of Ethiopia, namely Amhara, Oromia, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples&rsquo; and the city administration of Addis Ababa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 2297 women enrolled in cohort two of PMA Ethiopia. Of these, 2072 completed the 6 week, 1874 the 6 month and 1858 (along with their 1800 children) the 1 year postpartum follow-up surveys. The final analysis was based on a weighted sample of 1793 participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The outcome variable for this study was the continuum of maternal, newborn, child and reproductive health services, assessed using the CCI. We applied quantile regression analyses at the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th quantiles of the outcome variable. Statistical significance of predictors was determined based on p values &lt;0.05. Estimates for the regression coefficient, standard errors, p values and CIs were generated across the quantiles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>The findings revealed that the mean CCI was 56.2% (95 % CI 52.5% to 59.8%), indicating the proportion of maternal, newborn, child, and reproductive health services received. Notably, only 4% of women received all 12 maternal, newborn, child, and reproductive health services as part of the continuum of care, while 1.1% did not receive any intervention. The study identified several factors significantly associated with CCI across different quantile levels, including maternal age, maternal education level, household wealth index, first antenatal care visit (ANC1), parity, previous facility delivery, partner encouragement, use of maternity waiting homes, and administrative regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Based on the findings of this study, the coverage of continuum of maternal, newborn, child and reproductive health services in Ethiopia remains low. This highlights a substantial gap in Ethiopia&rsquo;s progress toward the 2030 sustainable development goal target. Ethiopia must significantly accelerate efforts to improve maternal, newborn, child and reproductive health services in order to achieve the set goals. Policymakers and programme implementers should carefully consider the identified determinants when designing policies and programmes aimed at enhancing maternal, newborn, child and reproductive health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hagos, A., Demissie, K. A., Tafere, T. Z., Yehuala, T. Z., Jejaw, M., Tadele, A., Aschalew, A. Y., Kefale, G. T., Baykemagn, N. D., Mekurianew, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108525</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108525</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring the continuum of maternal, newborn, child,and reproductive health services among postpartum women in Ethiopia: a quantile regression analysis of the composite coverage index]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108525</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108525</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108561?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reporting completeness and outcomes of the diet- and nutrition-related systematic review planning process: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108561?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Dietary recommendations should be based on scientific evidence, and ideally, systematic reviews (SRs) are conducted as part of the guideline development process. The usability of SRs for decision-making is primarily determined by the quality of the evidence from available primary studies, as well as the quality of the SRs themselves. A comprehensive SR protocol ensures high-quality implementation and minimises bias, while making these protocols publicly accessible, promotes transparency and prevents redundancy. The PROSPERO database offers valuable insights into planned methodologies. The aim of this study is to investigate the completeness of reporting in SR protocols for diet- or nutrition-related trials, determine how this has changed over time, and examine the publication of completed SRs by comparing their content with those described in the corresponding protocols.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We developed a systematic search strategy for PROSPERO to identify nutrition- or diet-related SR protocols registered at two different time points (2019 and 2024). Following a screening process to identify eligible protocols, relevant predefined data will be extracted. Subsequently, a structured search will be conducted to identify potential journal publications of the selected protocols, as well as publications describing the results of the SRs, from which relevant predefined data will be also extracted. The methodology of the published articles will be compared with the corresponding a priori protocols registered in PROSPERO. The PROSPERO records registered in 2019 will be compared with those registered in 2024. The results will be evaluated by descriptive statistics, the reporting completeness of PROSPERO records will be assessed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), the planned use of any approaches to assess certainty of evidence will be investigated, and the adherence of published SRs to the methodological details outlined in their corresponding PROSPERO entries will be examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Since both databases and publications used in this study are publicly available, ethical approval is not required. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in an international, peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>The present study has previously been registered with the Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://osf.io/8fsx7">https://osf.io/8fsx7</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nemeth, J., Ku&#x0308;llenberg de Gaudry, D., Czina, L., Lohner, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108561</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108561</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reporting completeness and outcomes of the diet- and nutrition-related systematic review planning process: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108561</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108561</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109445?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adaptive intervention to improve self-management behaviours among hypertensive patients in rural primary care settings: protocol for a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial (SMART)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109445?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Hypertension remains a major public health challenge in rural China, where blood pressure control rates remain low, primarily due to inadequate self-management behaviours among patients. While physician-patient interaction plays a critical role in shaping self-management behaviours, few interventions leveraging this mechanism&mdash;particularly those tailored to individual behavioural trajectories&mdash;have been implemented in rural primary care. This study aims to design and evaluate the effectiveness of an adaptive, interaction intervention to improve self-management behaviours among patients with hypertension in rural China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial (SMART) will be used to develop and evaluate an adaptive intervention based on physician-patient interaction. Two initial strategies will be tested: (1) a standard strategy involving monthly interactive follow-ups and (2) an enhanced strategy incorporating behavioural incentives into the standard protocol. In the first stage, 320 patients were recruited from 16 villages and were randomised to either strategy. After 6 months, patients with adequate improvement will continue their original strategy, while those with suboptimal progress will be re-randomised to either an enhanced intervention with a reminder or a further version with both the reminder and physician feedback. All interventions will be delivered via a Smart Medical Assistant Telephone Robot (SMAT-R) integrated within routine primary care services. The primary outcome is patient self-management behaviour, assessed using the Hypertension Patient&rsquo;s Self-Management Behaviour Rating Scale; secondary outcomes&mdash;including blood pressure, quality of life and acceptability of the intervention&mdash;will be collected by trained personnel using standardised procedures and the SMAT-R digital system. Data will be collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months post-implementation. Marginal structural models will be used to assess the dynamic effects of intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This study aims to inform the development and evaluation of an adaptive, scalable and technology-assisted intervention to improve self-management behaviours among patients with hypertension in rural primary care settings. Using a SMART design, the trial will generate evidence on optimal sequencing and tailoring of strategies based on behavioural responses. The findings are expected to guide sustainable improvements in chronic disease management within primary care systems in low-resource contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Forth Hospital and West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University (Gwll2024130). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All the participants provided written consent before participation. Trial results will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, ClinicalTrials.gov, and with healthcare providers and local health authorities, without publication restrictions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06869031">NCT06869031</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xian, X., Zhao, T., Du, S., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Zhou, H., Wu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109445</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109445</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adaptive intervention to improve self-management behaviours among hypertensive patients in rural primary care settings: protocol for a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial (SMART)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109445</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109445</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109523?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reference intervals for fasting insulin and insulin-related indices in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study in Gandaki Province, Nepal]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109523?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Accurate assessment of insulin resistance, sensitivity and &beta;-cell function is essential for early detection and management of metabolic disorders. However, reference intervals (RIs) commonly used in Nepal have been adapted from Western populations, which may not accurately reflect local physiological characteristics. Thus, this study aimed to establish population-specific RIs for fasting insulin and key insulin-related indices using a direct priori method in healthy adults from Gandaki Province, Nepal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study recruited 135 healthy adults (20&ndash;69 years, body mass index 18.5&ndash;24.9 kg/m&sup2;) representing different districts of Gandaki Province, Nepal. Fasting blood samples were analysed for glucose, insulin and lipids using standardised assays. Insulin was measured using the chemiluminescence immunoassay method. Nineteen different insulin-derived indices (Homeostasis Model Assessment 1 of Insulin Resistance (HOMA1-IR), Homeostasis Model Assessment 2 of Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR), Homeostasis Model Assessment for Triglycerides, Fasting Insulin to Glucose Ratio, Fasting Insulin Resistance Index, Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR), InsuTAG, HOMA1-%S, HOMA2-%S, Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI), McAuley, Bennett, Raynaud, Glucose-to-Insulin Ratio, Fasting Insulin Sensitivity Index, Single Point Insulin Sensitivity Estimator (SPISE), reciprocal insulin, HOMA1-%B and HOMA2-%B) were calculated. Non-parametric 95% double-sided RIs (2.5th&ndash;97.5th percentiles) were established following outlier removal per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine EP28-A3c guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The RI for fasting insulin was 2.63&ndash;14.56 &micro;IU/mL (median 7.69 &micro;IU/mL). Among the 19 mathematically correlated insulin-derived indices which are calculated from core measurements (fasting serum insulin and glucose), consistent patterns emerged across functional categories. Insulin resistance indices (HOMA1-IR: 0.56&ndash;3.50; HOMA2-IR: 0.30&ndash;1.70; METS-IR: 25.14&ndash;38.94) exhibited concordant right-skewed distributions with elevated upper limits. Conversely, insulin sensitivity indices (QUICKI: 0.32&ndash;0.42; HOMA2-%S: 58.83&ndash;233.20; SPISE: 5.75&ndash;10.86) demonstrated inverse, left-skewed patterns. Beta-cell function indices (HOMA1-%B: 0.54&ndash;322.21; HOMA2-%&beta;: 40.74&ndash;159.52) also exhibited right skewed characteristics and revealed wide interindividual variability, reflecting preserved pancreatic reserve despite varying insulin resistance. Composite indices incorporating lipid parameters showed broader ranges, capturing additional metabolic heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This is the first study to define the RIs of fasting insulin and a spectrum of insulin derived indices in a Nepalese population. These findings offer a valuable framework for early detection and management of metabolic disorders in South Asian populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paudel, P., Paudel, P., Khanal, A., Nagila, A., Pokharel, D. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109523</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109523</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reference intervals for fasting insulin and insulin-related indices in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study in Gandaki Province, Nepal]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109523</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109523</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109702?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adolescents perspectives on spectacle wear and adherence following a school-based outreach programme in Indonesia: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109702?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The aim of this study is to explore in depth adolescents&rsquo; insights regarding experiences of spectacle lens wear and its correlation with self-perception, quality of life, social interactions, adherence and barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative design through individual interviews and thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Middle school students in five regions of Jakarta Province.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>31 middle school adolescents who participated and received free spectacle wear by the Indonesian Ophthalmologist Association.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A set of semistructured questionnaires exploring adolescents&rsquo; perception regarding spectacle lens wear, adapted from the PedEyeQ. Interviews were conducted on site or through Zoom and were then transcribed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Thematic analysis identified three themes, as follows: (1) experience with eyeglasses, (2) motivation and encouragement and (3) barriers to usage. This study found that more than half of adolescents received their first spectacles during the outreach programme, with most reporting improved vision and academic performance after spectacle wear. However, adherence varied, as some participants&mdash;particularly those with moderate to high myopia and astigmatism&mdash;did not use their new glasses due to discomfort, poor fit or dissatisfaction with visual clarity. While initial adaptation often involved dizziness or soreness, most adjusted within a week. The majority recognised the importance of spectacle wear, describing clearer vision, reduced eye strain and improved confidence, though a minority viewed it as unnecessary. Parents played a central role in influencing health-seeking behaviour, and limited prior access to eye examinations and geographic challenges restricted care for several adolescents. Financial concerns were reported by a small proportion, while psychological barriers such as fear of teasing or negative self-perception were the major barrier. Overall, adolescents highlighted both the benefits and challenges of spectacle wear, with motivation shaped by personal experience, parental influence and accessibility of eye care services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Findings showed insight that adolescent understanding regarding eye health is imperative to support adherence. However, psychological barriers act as a major factor that impedes lens wear. Involving parents and teachers in understanding urgency and severity of eye health in adolescents, specifically refractive error and its long-term negative impact, as well as the prominent psychological barriers, may improve adolescent perception and adherence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahayu, T., Barliana, J. D., Lestari, Y., Chandra, A. P., Nadira, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109702</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109702</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adolescents perspectives on spectacle wear and adherence following a school-based outreach programme in Indonesia: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109702</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109702</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between preoperative COVID-19 and major postoperative pulmonary complications: a multicentre observational cohort study in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the relationship between preoperative COVID-19 infection and major postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) risk after major elective surgeries during the Omicron wave.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Four tertiary medical centres in Beijing, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All adult patients who underwent major elective surgeries under general anaesthesia from 30 December 2022 to 18 May 2023 were screened for eligibility. A total of 3211 patients were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was 30-day major PPC, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome or unexpected postoperative ventilation. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS), reoperation and mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Major PPC occurred in 3.5% of patients with preoperative COVID-19 and 3.3% of those without. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted analysis showed no significant association between preoperative COVID-19 within 12 weeks and PPC risk (adjusted OR, 0.89; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.13). However, multivariable analysis revealed that COVID-19 infection within 3 weeks was independently associated with an increased PPC risk (OR, 3.44; 95% CI 1.37 to 8.68). Cardiothoracic surgery (OR, 12.47; 95% CI 8.11 to 19.17) and longer duration of surgery (OR, 1.24 per hour; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.37) were significant risk factors. In the cardiothoracic subgroup, PPC risk was significantly elevated within 7 weeks of infection. No significant differences were observed in LOS, reoperation rates or mortality between patients with and without preoperative COVID-19 infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Preoperative COVID-19 infection within 12 weeks was not associated with an increased overall risk of major PPC during the Omicron wave. Although very short infection-to-surgery intervals and cardiothoracic surgery showed exploratory signals of higher risk, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and support an individualised approach to perioperative risk assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2200067250.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, T., Lyu, Y., Zhang, H., Zhao, L., Wu, Y., Ma, Q., Yang, D., Zhang, R., Li, Z., Han, Y., Liu, C., Guo, X., Feng, Y., Wang, D., Wang, T., Li, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110131</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110131</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between preoperative COVID-19 and major postoperative pulmonary complications: a multicentre observational cohort study in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110131</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110439?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: a prospective, observational study in 498 patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110439?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the relation between component rotation in total knee replacement and clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective, observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Deventer hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>498 adults aged 18 years and older undergoing total knee replacement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants underwent Persona posterior stabilised total knee replacement. Femoral and tibial component rotation was measured using low-dose CT scans.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the change in Oxford Knee Score from baseline to 1 year, analysed in relation to femoral, tibial and combined component rotation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Binary logistic regression analysis showed no statistically significant association between femoral component rotation (OR=1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21, p=0.644), tibial component rotation (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.03, p=0.467), or combined rotation (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.03, p=0.552), and achievement of the minimal clinically important difference of 5 points for the 48-point Oxford Knee Score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This prospective study of 498 patients undergoing total knee replacement did not provide evidence of a relation between the rotational alignment of total knee arthroplasty components and clinical outcomes. These findings do not support routine evaluation of rotational alignment as a basis for revision surgery in patients with persistent pain in the absence of mechanical problems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Dutch Trial registry ID: 23362.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Jonbergen, H.-P., Gelderman, S., Landman, E., Jutte, P., Kleinlugtenbelt, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110439</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110439</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient-reported outcomes and component rotation in total knee replacement: a prospective, observational study in 498 patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110439</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110439</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110621?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the role of diagnostic stewardship concepts outside of antimicrobial stewardship: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110621?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Diagnostic stewardship is an emerging concept, so far primarily associated with microbiology, specifically antibiotic stewardship. However, its core idea, ensuring &lsquo;the right test at the right time for the right patient&rsquo;, holds relevance across all areas of clinical medicine. By optimising the diagnostic process, diagnostic stewardship aims to enhance clinical decision-making and promote more effective, efficient and patient-centred care. Key objectives are the reduction of diagnostic errors, namely overdiagnosis, underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis, as well as optimal resource management. The aim of our review was to establish whether and how diagnostic stewardship has been implemented outside the area of antibiotic stewardship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Proquest Thesis and Dissertation will be searched using a search strategy based on the population, concept, context (PCC) framework, adding an outcome variable. Studies will be screened by two independent reviewers and reported using the PRISMA flowchart. Included will be studies starting from 2015, which will describe stewardship interventions in different diagnostic modalities. Excluded will be results regarding antimicrobial stewardship. No language restriction will be applied. Information on the definition and application of the concept of diagnostic stewardship, as well as general study characteristics, will be extracted using a previously developed and piloted data extraction form. Extracted data will be analysed and reported using narrative and descriptive analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Dissemination activities include peer-reviewed journal publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siragusa, L. M., Gamba, M., Wertli, M. M., Hug, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110621</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110621</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the role of diagnostic stewardship concepts outside of antimicrobial stewardship: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110621</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110621</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110921?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Applying medical hypnosis in the management of atopic dermatitis in children and young adolescents: study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (Hypno-AD)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110921?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting up to 14% of the French children. Topical treatments are restrictive, leading patients to seek alternative options. Medical hypnosis may be a therapeutic approach, providing hypno-analgesia through comfort and soothing of the skin as well as anxiolysis by managing stress and boosting self-esteem. To date, only five studies have explored medical hypnosis in AD, showing promising results but limited by small sample sizes and lack of control arms. This study protocol describes the methodology for an initial evaluation of medical hypnosis within a therapeutic patient education (TPE) programme, called Hypno-DA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Hypno-Atopic Dermatitis (Hypno-AD) study is a prospective, monocentric, non-blinded, parallel, cluster-randomised controlled trial conducted at the University Hospital of La Reunion, France. The study commenced on 13 August 2024 and is scheduled to conclude on 13 August 2026. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of recruiting for a medical hypnosis programme for children with mild-to-severe AD. 32 patients (aged 8&ndash;17 years) will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive TPE sessions combined with medical hypnosis (experimental arm) or the usual TPE sessions performed for AD without medical hypnosis (control arm). The experimental arm will employ a hypnosis-based intervention, referred to as the &lsquo;superhero costume&rsquo; technique. Reinforcement will be provided through the practice of self-hypnosis at home, guided by listening to an audio recording provided on a Universal Serial Bus (USB) key. Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 1-month, 3-month and 6-month post-randomisation. These will include compliance with the required practice of self-hypnosis at home, rate of loss of follow-ups, patient satisfaction, effectiveness of the hypnosis programme on the control of AD (ADCT) and severity of AD (Patient-Oriented SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) and the global impression parents may have concerning the changes in their child&rsquo;s AD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the Ile de France I Research and Institutional Ethics Committee (No. 2022-A01153-40). All methods were carried out in accordance with French law No. 2012-300 (5 March 2012) related to research involving humans as well as Good Clinical Practices (International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) version 4 of 9 November 2016, and the decision of 24 November 2006). Methods will conform to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed oral consent from at least one legal guardian of each participant will be obtained in addition to oral consent from the child. Results will be published in an indexed peer-reviewed journal as well as presented and disseminated at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial Registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05611346">NCT05611346</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thysebaert, Z., Espagnon, C., Bocquet, V., Bruneau, L., Miquel, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110921</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110921</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Applying medical hypnosis in the management of atopic dermatitis in children and young adolescents: study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (Hypno-AD)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110921</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110921</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110956?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of systolic blood pressure time in target range and all-cause mortality in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: an analysis of a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110956?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the association between systolic blood pressure time in target range (SBP-TTR) and the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Analysis of data from a prospective cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study used data from the Kailuan Study. Participants diagnosed with ASCVD from 11 hospitals affiliated with the Kailuan Group in Tangshan, China were included in the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We included 6732 participants who developed ASCVD between 1 July 2006 and 31 December 2013, and who had two or more blood pressure measurements recorded between the ASCVD diagnosis date and 31 December 2017. All participants were followed up until 31 December 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>SBP-TTR was defined as the proportion of time during which SBP remained within the target range, calculated using the linear interpolation method. Participants were stratified into five SBP-TTR categories: 0%, &gt;0% to &lt;25%, 25% to &lt;50%, 50% to &lt;75% and &ge;75%. Associations between SBP-TTR categories and all-cause mortality were evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>When the target SBP range was defined as 120&ndash;140 mm Hg, compared with the SBP-TTR=0% group, the multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality were 0.92 (0.78 to 1.07), 0.82 (0.72 to 0.94), 0.79 (0.68 to 0.92) and 0.76 (0.65 to 0.89) for the SBP-TTR groups of &lt;25%, 25% to &lt;50%, 50% to &lt;75% and &ge;75%, respectively. For each SD increase in SBP-TTR, the risk of all-cause mortality decreased, with a multivariable-adjusted HR of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.95). The inverse association between SBP-TTR and all-cause mortality was more pronounced in younger participants (aged &lt;67 years) (p for interaction=0.008).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study demonstrated a significant inverse association between SBP-TTR and all-cause mortality among patients with ASCVD. The association between maintaining SBP within the 120&ndash;140 mm Hg target range and reduced mortality was more evident in younger individuals. These findings suggest that sustained and stable blood pressure control may improve long-term survival in patients with ASCVD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR-TNC-11001489.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, L., Wu, S., Chen, S., Zhao, L., Chen, B., Li, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110956</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110956</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of systolic blood pressure time in target range and all-cause mortality in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: an analysis of a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110956</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110956</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying common mental disorders among perinatal and non-perinatal women in northern India: a cross-sectional validation study of the diagnostic accuracy of six self-report measures]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To translate and culturally adapt six self-report measures for depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and somatic symptom disorder into Hindi and determine their diagnostic accuracy against a diagnostic clinical interview.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional validation study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Rural Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, northern India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>480 perinatal (pregnant or within 12 months postpartum) and non-perinatal (not currently pregnant and not given birth within 12 months) women at one tertiary hospital and district-level Anganwadi (community health) centres.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Symptom endorsement; and discriminant validity, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the Kessler Scale of Psychological Distress (K10), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD7), Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS), PTSD Checklist (PCL-5) and Scale for the Assessment of Somatic Symptoms (SASS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Complete data were available for 443 participants. Tiredness and body weakness were the most commonly endorsed symptoms among participants with common mental disorders. Among perinatal participants, the AUROC was highest for the GAD7 (0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96) and SASS (0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.96). Among non-perinatal participants, the AUROC was highest for the SASS (0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) and PHQ9 (0.91, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.96).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Measures which assess for fatigue, tiredness and somatic symptoms may help to identify women experiencing common mental disorders in this setting. Small numbers of participants with clinically diagnosed mental disorders in our sample mean results must be interpreted cautiously.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05485701">NCT05485701</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fellmeth, G., Sharma, D., Kanwar, P., Chawla, K., Gupta, V., Thakur, A., Harrison, S., Quigley, M. A., Bharti, O., Chandra, P. S., Desai, G., Thippeswamy, H., Singh, S., Nair, M., Kishore, M. T., Alderdice, F., Verma, A., Perinatal Mental Health Study (PMHS) Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying common mental disorders among perinatal and non-perinatal women in northern India: a cross-sectional validation study of the diagnostic accuracy of six self-report measures]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the multifactorial reasons for treatment-seeking delays among young and middle-aged stroke patients: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify multifactorial contributors to treatment-seeking delays among Chinese young and middle-aged stroke patients using socioecological model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Descriptive phenomenological interview study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary hospital in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Twenty acute stroke patients with treatment-seeking delays and 16 family members were recruited for dyadic semistructured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Barriers influencing treatment-seeking delays across individual, interpersonal and systemic levels. And how do interlevel interactions shape decision-making trajectories?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Data analysis revealed 5 overarching themes encompassing 12 subthemes: (1) limited stroke-specific health literacy; (2) psychological barriers at symptom onset; (3) inadequate interpersonal support systems; (4) structural impediments to timely care; (5) decision-making dynamics across levels. Delay was characterised as a sequential cascade mediated by cognitive misattribution, emotional paralysis, relational dependency, institutional constraints and cross-level feedback loops. Two dominant pathways, silent progression and diverted seeking, were identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Treatment-seeking delay among young and middle-aged stroke patients arises through dynamic interactions across socioecological strata rather than isolated factors. Integrated interventions targeting public awareness, familial preparedness, workplace policies and healthcare accessibility are required to disrupt this cascade.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, Q., Fang, C., Wang, X., Huang, S., Li, L., Tian, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111267</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111267</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the multifactorial reasons for treatment-seeking delays among young and middle-aged stroke patients: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111267</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111328?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an 'anchor institution: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111328?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To improve social determinants of health, healthcare organisations can support societal and economic goals in their role as anchor institutions (large organisations with an important presence and ties to a place). In England, the National Health Service (NHS) Long Term Plan highlighted the role of the NHS as an Anchor. Despite a clear policy mandate on this, less is known about specific indicators to measure and benchmark anchor performance. A set of metrics was developed to quantify anchor activity using the Greater Manchester (GM) region in England as a case study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Descriptive cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data were received on employment and procurement for the financial year 2022/2023 from NHS trusts located in GM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Performance against two anchor metrics, local spending and employment, was assessed. &lsquo;Local&rsquo; was defined as the Integrated Care Board (ICB) footprint in which the trusts are located. The proportion of procurement spend to the local economy was derived from procurement data. Employment data was aggregated by ethnicity codes and deprivation levels and compared with ICB-level ethnicity and deprivation profiles using the Index of Multiple Deprivation based on 2021 Census data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The included trusts employed 65 597 residents of GM and spent &pound;389 million on local procurement, demonstrating their importance as anchor organisations. Considerable variation was observed between trusts in local spending, ranging from 6.4% (95% CI 6.4% to 6.41%) to 52.7% (95% CI 52.69% to 52.72%) (with the mean at 21%). The percentage of locally employed staff ranged from 82.7% (95% CI 81.45% to 83.90%) to 89.5% (95% CI 89.12% to 89.95%). All trusts demonstrate strong workforce representation from minoritised ethnic groups, but most employed a lower proportion of staff from the most deprived areas than expected based on the local population profile.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>It is feasible to quantify aspects of anchor activity using routine NHS data, and meaningful variation exists across trusts, even within a single health system. GM provides a useful case study, but further work is needed to embed anchor metrics in routine reporting and to extend measurement to other domains such as estates and sustainability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wattal, V., Camacho, C., Gkiouleka, A., Ford, J. A., Munford, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111328</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111328</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an 'anchor institution: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111328</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111328</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111343?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrating healthcare system context to improve risk prediction and assess racial disparities among dual-eligible Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries: a retrospective cohort study using national fee-for-service claims]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111343?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Medicare&ndash;Medicaid dual-eligible beneficiaries comprise &lt;15% of enrollees but account for disproportionate spending. Current models used to predict future spending rely on patient demographics and diagnoses, potentially missing healthcare system context (provider availability, care fragmentation, facility characteristics). We estimated the degree to which healthcare context data improve risk prediction and what portion of risk and risk disparities among racial/ethnic groups is predicted by such data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study with 6-month feature window (January&ndash;June 2023) and 6-month outcome window (July&ndash;December 2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>National fee-for-service Medicare programme across 50 US states, District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>3 877 563 dual-eligible beneficiaries with &ge;8 months enrolment in Medicare Parts A, B and D during 2023. Mean age 64.9 years; 56% female; 65% White, 15% Black, 7% Hispanic and 6% Asian.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary: prospective Medicare spending (per-member-per-month) and acute care utilisation (&ge;1 hospitalisation/emergency department visit) July&ndash;December 2023. Secondary: concurrent spending January&ndash;June 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Adding healthcare system context to patient data improved model performance from R&sup2;=0.454 (0.450&ndash;0.458) to 0.615 (95% CI 0.611 to 0.619) for prospective spending prediction (a 35% improvement, p&lt;0.001). The sensitivity of predicting acute care visits improved from 25.0% (24.2&ndash;25.8%) to 33.8% (32.9&ndash;34.7%, p&lt;0.001), while maintaining specificity (&gt;97%). System context reduced predicted risk for 86% of beneficiaries (mean &ndash;8.8 percentage points), while increasing risk for 14%. Black beneficiaries experienced higher rates of contextual risk amplification (15.8% vs 13.6% White) and showed distinct vulnerability to large practice coordination and workforce composition factors, while Hispanic populations&rsquo; risk was primarily associated with geographic access barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Healthcare delivery context substantially improves prediction of future spending among dual-eligible beneficiaries. These findings suggest risk adjustment incorporating context should account for differential racial impacts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patel, S. Y., Basu, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111343</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111343</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrating healthcare system context to improve risk prediction and assess racial disparities among dual-eligible Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries: a retrospective cohort study using national fee-for-service claims]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111343</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111343</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111422?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Brief narrative interventions for adults with chronic illness or psychosocial distress: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111422?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Narrative interventions elicit personal stories from participants to impact outcome(s). The process of organising a troublesome experience into a cohesive story may benefit individuals dealing with a variety of complex medical conditions and psychosocial stressors. A better understanding of prior work is a critical step to guide further development, refinement and expansion of this under-recognised therapeutic modality for new populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews to map and summarise the content and context of brief narrative interventions intended for individuals with chronic illness and/or psychosocial distress. Inclusion criteria are records describing brief (&le;4 discrete session) interventions eliciting personal stories with the intent of impacting patient-centred outcomes (eg, depression, quality of life) delivered in any context. Participants will be adults (&ge;18 years old) living with chronic medical or psychiatric conditions (eg, metastatic cancer, chronic pain) or psychosocial distress (eg, grief, loneliness). Studies whose focus is not direct participant benefit or studies conducted in populations without evident illness or psychosocial stressors will be excluded. An initial search of PubMed (MEDLINE) identified sentinel articles; a comprehensive strategy was developed with the assistance of a librarian for systematically searching PubMed (MEDLINE), PsycInfo (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost) and Embase (Ovid). Bibliographies of relevant articles will also be examined. Two independent reviewers will screen articles; disagreements will be discussed at regular meetings. U-M GPT, an artificial intelligence-powered institutional large language model, will perform initial data abstraction with a human reviewer verifying accuracy. Findings will be qualitatively summarised according to the three research questions, presented in tabular format, and described narratively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As data will be obtained only from secondary sources, no ethics approval will be sought. Findings will be disseminated via the scoping review Open Science Framework (OSF) project site and submitted for peer review. Results will elucidate promising areas for future research, including narrative intervention development and refinement; these findings will guide expansion into new populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="https://osf.io/85hjd/">https://osf.io/85hjd/</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polenz, B., Rigby, T., Logue, C., Krein, S. L., Powell, V. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111422</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111422</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Brief narrative interventions for adults with chronic illness or psychosocial distress: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111422</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111422</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in pregnancy and miscarriage risk: a French nationwide retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the association between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and miscarriage, which remains elusive in the actual literature, using modelling approaches to mitigate time-related bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study used data from the French National Mother-Child Register (EPI-MERES), developed from the French National Health Data System containing the health information (hospital admissions, drug dispensing, comorbidities, etc.) of about 99% French population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>4 857 907 pregnancies ended in a live birth, a stillbirth or a miscarriage from 2013 to 2019.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Exposure to NSAIDs from 2 weeks before conception to the 20th week of pregnancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Miscarriage (ie, spontaneous abortion before the 20th week of pregnancy) from the sixth week of pregnancy. The Cox regression with a time-dependent exposure that incorporated a 3-day lag was used to estimate HRs and their 95% CIs adjusted for maternal characteristics. The 3-day lag period allows for addressing protopathic bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, there were 163 666 (3,37%) miscarriage cases, and 349 294 (7.19%) pregnancies were exposed to NSAIDs. Unexposed pregnancies were used as the reference category in all analyses. In the main analysis, exposure to NSAIDs increased the risk of miscarriage (HR, 1.83; 95% CI 1.81 to 1.86). The effect of individual drugs was heterogeneous, with 7 of the 19 drugs evaluated shown to increase the risk (flurbiprofen had the highest risk (HR, 3.28; 95% CI 3.15 to 3.41) and naproxen the lowest (HR, 1.09; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18)). In the sensitivity analyses, increasing the lag time decreased the estimated HR (from HR, 2.25; 95% CI 2.21 to 2.28 with no lag to HR, 1.56; 95% CI 1.54 to 1.59 with a 7-day lag). Overall, the risk of miscarriage remained statistically significant in all the analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our study found that early exposure to NSAIDs could increase the risk of miscarriage. This finding contributes to the body of evidence on their safety profile and may help inform future recommendations for their use in pregnant women.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duong, C.-H., Quentin, E., Demailly, R., Quantin, C., Escolano, S., Botton, J., Tubert-Bitter, P., Ahmed, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111456</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111456</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in pregnancy and miscarriage risk: a French nationwide retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111456</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111459?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cluster randomised controlled trial for service delivery redesign of primary care for people with diabetes: study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111459?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Strong primary healthcare enhances resource efficiency and resilience. Type 2 diabetes poses a growing global health challenge, with Argentina&rsquo;s healthcare system struggling to detect and manage the disease effectively. Many patients bypass primary healthcare for secondary facilities, undermining continuity of care and increasing costs. Following a diagnostic process in collaboration with policymakers, we propose evaluating a redesigned primary care model consisting of codesigned evidence-based implementation strategies to improve type 2 diabetes management in Mendoza, Argentina.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is an efficient, parallel-arm cluster randomised controlled Hybrid Type II trial with 12 clusters (administrative areas with 2&ndash;3 health facilities) allocated 1:1 to control (usual care) or intervention. In phase I, we will codesign, pilot and refine an implementation strategy package. In phase II, we will conduct the trial: 9-month baseline data collection, 15-month intervention and 6-month sustainability period. We will enrol a cohort of 396 patients with type 2 diabetes at primary healthcare centres and follow them for 12 months during the intervention and 6 months sustainment using routine clinical records and patient surveys. In phase III, we will conduct analysis, report and disseminate findings. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome including glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) &lt;8%); blood pressure control (&lt;140/90 mm Hg) and statin prescription (limited to patients &ge;40 years) from clinical records. The primary analysis will compare the proportion of patients achieving this composite clinical outcome between the trial arms at the end of the study. Secondary analyses include assessing patient experience and primary healthcare engagement; testing the implementation strategies&rsquo; impact on service use patterns, system competence, user confidence and cost per visit; exploring inequalities by sociodemographic factors; and assessing patient empowerment. We will use all available data from all randomised clusters and conduct all analyses on the intention-to-treat population, regardless of intervention adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>All study activities will comply with national and international ethics guidelines, presenting minimal risk to participants. The protocol was submitted and approved by the local independent ethics committee at the Mendoza Ministry of Health (Consejo Provincial de Evaluaci&oacute;n &eacute;tica en investigaci&oacute;n en Salud-Provincial Health Research Ethics Review Board, Reference number: 149/2024). Facility-level permission will be obtained for participation and sharing of deidentified data. Written informed consent will be required from study participants, who will receive information on the study&rsquo;s purpose, procedures, risks and benefits. Dissemination activities and outputs will include writing and submitting manuscripts for publication; writing policy briefs to support strategy implementation in other regions or countries; and tailoring outputs for patients, clinicians and researchers. We anticipate that improvements in disease management and patient experience will have clinical and economic benefits related to reduced usage of secondary-level and tertiary-level facilities, lower cost per visit and a reduced number of clinical events related to diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN63277390">ISRCTN63277390</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mazzoni, A., Roberti, J., Guglielmino, M., Jorro-Baron, F., Mazzaresi, Y., Falaschi, A., Alvarez, J., Gibbons, L., Leslie, H. H., Silva, C., Garcia, P. J., Garcia-Elorrio, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111459</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111459</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cluster randomised controlled trial for service delivery redesign of primary care for people with diabetes: study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111459</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111459</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111649?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorso-lateral-prefrontal cortex in combination with exercises for the treatment of individuals with chronic low back pain (STOP-Low Back Pain Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111649?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) remains a leading cause of disability worldwide and imposes a substantial personal and socioeconomic burden. Despite exercise being the first-line recommended intervention in clinical guidelines, its efficacy on pain relief remains modest and the hypoalgesia induced by exercise seems to be limited in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. Previous transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies have mainly targeted the motor cortex, yielding heterogeneous results, underscoring the need to evaluate alternative brain areas. Recently, tDCS studies targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) may enhance endogenous pain modulation and thereby potentiate the response to exercise. This study aims to compare the effects of adjunctive anodal DLPFC tDCS combined with a standardised exercise programme versus sham tDCS combined with the same exercise programme on pain and function in adults with CLBP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, triple-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled trial. 48 participants with CLBP will be randomly assigned to receive either anodal tDCS over the left PFC combined with exercises, or sham tDCS combined with the same exercise programme, over nine sessions during a 3-week period. The primary outcome is the change in the multidimensional impact of CLBP, assessed using the Core Outcome Measures Index, from baseline to postintervention (week 4). Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, disability, psychological factors (fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophising, anxiety, depression), measured at baseline, postintervention and at 12- and 24-week follow-up. Functional brain connectivity via electroencephalography and neuromuscular function of the erector spinae (flexion&ndash;relaxation phenomenon) will be measured at baseline and postintervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Commission Cantonale d&rsquo;Ethique de la Recherche sur l&rsquo;&ecirc;tre humain (CCER) in December 2022 (reference number: 2022-D0077). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05757609">NCT05757609</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pourchet, T., Armand, S., Martins, C., Barrue-Belou, S., Genevay, S., Nicolo, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111649</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111649</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorso-lateral-prefrontal cortex in combination with exercises for the treatment of individuals with chronic low back pain (STOP-Low Back Pain Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111649</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111649</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112682?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Statin prescription rates for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in adults 40-75 years old with type 1 diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112682?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are at markedly elevated risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Guidelines recommend statin use for ASCVD prevention in diabetes between the ages of 40 and 75 years. This study aimed to evaluate statin prescribing rates for primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD in this age range with T1D and to identify disparities and barriers to optimal statin use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design, setting, and participants</st>
<p>A retrospective cross-sectional study of 266 adults with T1D aged 40&ndash;75 years was conducted at an integrated health system between 2020 and 2024. Demographic features, statin prescribing patterns, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and use of additional lipid-lowering agents were extracted from medical records. Barriers to prescribing were identified via endocrine physician documentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 266 adults with T1D aged 40&ndash;75 years, only 43.2% (95% CI 0.37 to 0.49) were prescribed guideline-recommended statin and 39.3% of those with a history of ASCVD received a high-intensity statin. Overall, 47.7% (95% CI 0.42 to 0.54) of patients achieved the latest LDL cholesterol targets, and 53.0% (95% CI 0.47 to 0.59) if using pre-2023 targets. Deferral to another healthcare professional (23.3%), statin intolerance (15.8%), and clinical inertia (9.0%) were the most common barriers to therapy. In multivariable analyses, female sex was independently associated with lower odds of receiving guideline-recommended statin therapy (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.85, p=0.015) and lower odds of achieving LDL targets (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.64, p=0.046), while ASCVD history was associated with higher odds of statin use (aOR 2.75, 95% CI 1.34 to 5.57, p=0.005). Very few patients received adjunctive lipid-lowering agents (ezetimibe 4.1%, PCSK9 inhibitor 0.4%, none on bempedoic acid).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Notable gaps exist in statin prescribing and LDL goal attainment among adults with T1D, particularly women. Efforts to enhance care coordination, promote healthcare professional education and expand the use of adjunctive lipid-lowering therapies may help improve cardiovascular prevention in this high-risk population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lundholm, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112682</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112682</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Statin prescription rates for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in adults 40-75 years old with type 1 diabetes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112682</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112682</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112947?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PCSK9 inhibitoRs for Early Passivation of coRonary athEroSclerotic plaqueS in acute coronary syndromes (REPRESS): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112947?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The &lsquo;strike early and strike strong&rsquo; lipid-lowering strategy emphasises rapid reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are increasingly used alongside statins to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C targets after ACS. However, despite substantial LDL-C reductions with early PCSK9i initiation, their effects on non-culprit coronary atherosclerotic plaques remain unclear. This study aims to assess the impact of early intensive LDL-C lowering with PCSK9i added to moderate-intensity statin therapy on optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived plaque characteristics in non-culprit coronary lesions in patients with ACS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this prospective, multicentre, open-label trial, 212 patients with ACS will be randomised 1:1 to an early intensified lipid-lowering strategy (PCSK9i added to moderate-intensity statin) or guideline-directed medical therapy for 6 months. Serial OCT imaging of non-culprit coronary arteries with 20&ndash;70% stenosis will be performed at baseline and 6 months. The primary endpoint is the absolute change in minimum fibrous cap thickness within a matched target arterial segment from baseline to 6 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in minimum lumen area, maximum lipid arc, presence of macrophage infiltration, LDL-C reduction and achievement of LDL-C targets. The primary endpoint will be analysed using analysis of covariance, adjusting for treatment group, baseline LDL-C stratification (&ge;1.8 vs &lt;1.8 mmol/L), and baseline minimum FCT. Secondary continuous outcomes will be analysed similarly, while categorical outcomes will be compared using chi-square, Fisher&rsquo;s exact test or logistic regression, as appropriate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was granted by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2024 Review No 1943). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06791031">NCT06791031</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Z., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, R., Zhou, M., Li, C., Chen, Y., Wang, H., He, Y., for the REPRESS trial investigator]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112947</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112947</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PCSK9 inhibitoRs for Early Passivation of coRonary athEroSclerotic plaqueS in acute coronary syndromes (REPRESS): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112947</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112947</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113371?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards personalised follow-up care in ovarian cancer using online remote PROMs monitoring: a study protocol of a feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113371?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Ovarian cancer patients often experience persistent symptoms such as fatigue and pain, impacting their quality of life. Current follow-up care, focused primarily on recurrence detection, may not adequately address these symptoms and can be burdensome. This study evaluates the feasibility of remote monitoring using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and measurements of weight and abdominal circumference as an alternative to standard hospital visits. We aim to assess feasibility (ie, usability and satisfaction) of this approach and identify implementation barriers and facilitators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a single-centre longitudinal observational pilot that uses both qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate the feasibility of an innovative remote monitoring system for ovarian cancer follow-up care (Controle op Afstand, CopA). It is accessible to both healthcare professionals in the electronic health record and patients through the patient portal. Instead of 3-monthly in-hospital visits, patients are invited to complete regular surveys assessing PROMS about symptoms and quality of life and home measurements of weight and abdominal circumference. Feasibility will be assessed by (1) analysing patient and healthcare professional (HCP) experiences with CopA with the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations questionnaire for HCPs, and the &lsquo;Experienced Usability and Satisfaction with Self-monitoring in the Home Setting&rsquo; questionnaire for patients, (2) investigating implementation barriers and facilitators using qualitative method and (3) performing a process evaluation of the intervention, assessing components such as reach, fidelity and compliance, time to response and number of (tele)consultations during the study period. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (METC 2022.0256) and exempted it from further review as this study was not subject to the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subject Act. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed open-access publications, scientific conferences and targeted communication to patient organisations, healthcare providers and the wider public.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aarts, J. W. M., Oudbier, S. J., Van Muilekom, M. M., Ro&#x0308;ling, P., Tromp, J., Smeulers, M., van Lonkhuijzen, L. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113371</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113371</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards personalised follow-up care in ovarian cancer using online remote PROMs monitoring: a study protocol of a feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113371</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113371</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113480?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors associated with return to meaningful activities following physiotherapy for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: 3-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113480?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate whether women who experienced pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during pregnancy were able to engage in meaningful activities at 4 months and 3 years post partum, and to identify factors associated with long-term functional outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial comparing acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pregnancy-related PGP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Physiotherapy outpatient clinics in Sweden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>In total, 113 pregnant women with clinically verified PGP were randomised in the original trial; 86 participated in the initial study phase, 77 attended the 4-month follow-up and 57 completed the 3-year follow-up questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was functioning, assessed using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Secondary outcomes included self-reported PGP, overall functioning and the prognostic value of pelvic pain provocation tests at 4 months post partum for persistent PGP at 3 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>3 years post partum, the mean PSFS score was 8.64, and 45.6% of the participants scored 10, indicating full return to baseline activities. In repeated linear regression analyses, estimated PSFS scores were approximately 3 points lower at baseline and post-treatment compared with the 3-year follow-up (both p&lt;0.001), indicating improved functioning over time, with no differences between treatment groups. Higher pain-related concern and higher Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire scores were associated with greater activity limitations (estimate &ndash;0.21, p=0.019 and &ndash;0.06, p&lt;0.001, respectively). Logistic regression showed that the number of positive pelvic provocation tests at 4 months post partum significantly predicted self-reported PGP at 3 years (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.26 to 7.05, p=0.013).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Most women with pregnancy-related PGP regained functioning by 4 months post partum, and this recovery was sustained at 3 years. The number of positive pelvic provocation tests at 4 months post partum predicted persistent pain at 3 years, suggesting potential prognostic value for identifying women at risk of long-term PGP and informing postpartum follow-up strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>In &lsquo;FoU i Sverige&rsquo; (R&amp;D in Sweden) No. 12726. <A HREF="https://www.researchweb.org/is/sverige/project/127261">https://www.researchweb.org/is/sverige/project/127261</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Svahn Ekdahl, A., Fagevik Olsen, M., Gutke, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113480</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113480</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors associated with return to meaningful activities following physiotherapy for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: 3-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113480</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113480</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114709?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of manual diaphragmatic techniques in adults with non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114709?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that altered diaphragmatic function may be associated with lumbar pain, impaired trunk stabilisation and functional disability. Manual diaphragmatic techniques have been proposed as an intervention to modulate diaphragmatic tension, mobility and neuromyofascial relationships; however, their effectiveness has not yet been synthesised using rigorous systematic review methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidance and has been prospectively registered in PROSPERO. Randomised controlled trials evaluating manual techniques specifically applied to the diaphragm in adults with NSLBP will be eligible. The primary outcomes will include pain intensity and functional disability; secondary outcomes will include lumbar mobility, respiratory function, quality of life and adverse events. Searches will be performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, PEDro, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase and clinical trial registries without language or date restrictions. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Where appropriate, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted; the certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity is anticipated across trials, which may limit the feasibility of quantitative data pooling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this study uses data from previously published trials, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and a plain-language summary for clinical stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration</st>
<p>CRD420251172616.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vera-Serrano, F. J., Vinolo-Gil, M. J., Aragon-Martin, R., Perez-Perez, C., Dominguez-Vera, P. A., Diaz-Mancha, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114709</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114709</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of manual diaphragmatic techniques in adults with non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114709</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114709</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114803?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term infection risks in haematological cancer survivors compared with individuals with no cancer history: protocol for a systematic review aided by artificial intelligence-based methods]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114803?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among individuals with haematological cancers, but the duration of elevated risk in long-term survivors remains uncertain. Although previous attempts to summarise the existing literature on this topic would have been hampered by the sheer volume of studies on cancer and all-cause infections, emerging artificial intelligence tools now offer the ability to streamline the screening process, allowing for broader and more comprehensive reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. Eligible studies will include original observational data reporting long-term (&ge;1 year follow-up from diagnosis) infection-related outcomes in haematological cancer survivors compared with a general or cancer-free population. Screening will be supported by ASReview, an artificial intelligence-based tool for abstract prioritisation. An internal validation step will be conducted by comparing artificial intelligence-assisted screening results with manual review performed by two independent researchers on a subset of abstracts. The primary outcomes of infection incidence and infection mortality will be summarised by type of infection, type of haematological cancer and time since cancer diagnosis. Information on anti-cancer treatments received will also be described. Data synthesis will be mostly narrative due to the broad scope of the review, though meta-analyses will be performed in cases where studies are sufficiently homogenous. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not applicable to this study. The results of the review will be disseminated to clinical audiences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251047091.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson, W., Forbes, H., Hazell, M., Hopkins, L., Funston, G., OReilly, M., Bhaskaran, K., Carreira, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114803</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114803</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term infection risks in haematological cancer survivors compared with individuals with no cancer history: protocol for a systematic review aided by artificial intelligence-based methods]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114803</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114803</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114885?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Older adults as active research partners: protocol for an umbrella review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114885?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The involvement of older adults as active partners in research is increasingly being promoted to improve the relevance and impact of scientific knowledge. However, the evidence base on how older adults have been involved as active partners in healthcare research remains fragmented. To our knowledge, no review of reviews has yet provided a comprehensive overview of this body of evidence. Therefore, this umbrella review aims to synthesise review-level evidence on the involvement of older adults as active research partners. We address three questions: (1) How have older adults been involved as active partners in research? (2) What terminology, models and frameworks have been used? (3) What benefits and challenges have been reported related to involving older adults as active partners in research?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for umbrella reviews. A comprehensive search will be conducted in Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts and Web of Science. Eligible reviews will be those reporting on the involvement of older adults (aged 60 years or older) as active partners in research. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts and perform data extraction using a standardised form. Methodological quality will be assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews. Findings will be synthesised narratively and thematically, with attention to reported roles, terminology, conceptual frameworks and the benefits and challenges of involvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this umbrella review draws exclusively on secondary data from published sources, ethical approval is not required. Older adults, engaged as independent public contributors, have been involved in shaping the review protocol and will take part in interpreting the findings. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at academic and stakeholder conferences, and used to inform the design of a subsequent mixed-methods study focused on strengthening the involvement of older adults as active partners in research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251064947.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hedqvist, A.-T., Strandberg, S., Holmberg, B., Niklasson, J., Violasdotter Nilsson, P., Carlsson, W., Andreassen, M., Bergstrand, S., Holmberg, M., Nilsen, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114885</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114885</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Older adults as active research partners: protocol for an umbrella review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114885</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114885</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicentre, adaptive, double-blind, three-arm, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial examining antimicrobial prophylaxis duration in cardiac surgery (CALIPSO): trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Administration of antibiotics before incising the skin (&lsquo;surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis&rsquo;) is a critical infection prevention strategy in surgery. Extending doses of prophylaxis into the postoperative period is a common practice in cardiac surgery; however, the benefit has not been clearly established and may lead to emergence of antimicrobial resistance and patient harm. We present the protocol for a large international multicentre, adaptive, pragmatic, double-blind, three-arm, placebo-controlled, randomised, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the incidence of surgical site infection after three different durations of postoperative surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This adaptive, multi-arm multistage non-inferiority trial will compare intraoperative only (Arm A), to intraoperative and 24 hours (Arm B) and, to intraoperative and 48 hours (Arm C) of intravenous cefazolin and placebo as surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in 9180 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The adaptive design allows for potential dropping of any of the three arms if clear inferiority is indicated at any of the scheduled interim analyses. The trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the three different antibiotic prophylaxis durations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval will be obtained at all participating sites. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and the key findings presented at national and international conferences. Patients and members of the public will also be involved in the dissemination and translation of the trial results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05447559">NCT05447559</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peel, T., McGiffin, D., Smith, J., Forbes, A., Marasco, S., Pilcher, D., Stewardson, A. J., Petrie, D., Peleg, A. Y., Wisniewski, J., Forster, S., Druce, P., Roney, J., Astbury, S., Berkovic, D., Mccracken, P., Myles, P. S., on behalf of the CALIPSO Trial Steering Committee, Peel, Stewardson, Myles, McGiffin, Smith, Marasco, Pilcher, Peleg, Forbes, Petrie, Wisniewski, Forster, Roney, Druce, Astbury, Berkovic, McCracken]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115209</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115209</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicentre, adaptive, double-blind, three-arm, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial examining antimicrobial prophylaxis duration in cardiac surgery (CALIPSO): trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115209</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115233?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validation of the Workplace COVID-19 Knowledge and Stigma Scale (WoCKSS) in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study using item response theory and factor analyses]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115233?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To validate the Workplace COVID-19 Knowledge and Stigma Scale (WoCKSS) using item response theory (IRT), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional psychometric validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Manufacturing companies registered in Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 137 factory workers participated in the exploratory phase and 300 in the confirmatory phase. Inclusion criteria were Malaysian nationality and ability to read Malay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The knowledge domain was examined using the two-parameter logistic IRT model in two stages: an exploratory IRT analysis in phase 1 to screen items and a confirmatory IRT analysis in phase 2 to evaluate the final item set. The stigma domain was analysed using EFA followed by CFA. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha and McDonald&rsquo;s omega (). The development process and content and face validity results were previously published.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>14 knowledge items were retained after exploratory IRT and formed the final knowledge scale evaluated in confirmatory IRT. For these final items, discrimination parameters ranged from 0.77 to 3.17 and difficulty values from &ndash;4.47 to 0.23, with unidimensionality supported (p=0.644). EFA supported a three-factor stigma structure (stereotype, fear, prejudice), and CFA confirmed excellent model fit (<sup>2</sup>=8.91, df=11, p=0.630; root mean square error of approximation=0.00; Comparative Fit Index=1.00; Tucker-Lewis Index=1.00; standardised root mean square residual=0.021). Composite reliability by McDonald&rsquo;s omega ranged from 0.691 to 0.893.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>WoCKSS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing workplace COVID-19 knowledge and stigma in industrial sectors in Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baharuddin, I. H., Naing, N. N., Patterson, M., Yasin, S. M., Ibrahim, K., Ismail, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115233</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115233</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation of the Workplace COVID-19 Knowledge and Stigma Scale (WoCKSS) in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study using item response theory and factor analyses]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115233</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PRECISION study: impact of personalised cardiac anaesthesia and cerebral autoregulation on neurological outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery - protocol for an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adverse neurological complications, including postoperative delirium (POD) and stroke, remain one of the major risks after cardiac surgery. A lack of comprehensive knowledge about their causes and neuroprotective strategies has hindered the development of effective interventions to reduce these events. Personalised cerebral autoregulation (CA)-oriented blood pressure monitoring aims to identify blood pressure targets tailored to each individual patient, thereby reducing brain injury. The PRECISION study aims to assess whether perioperative duration and magnitude of mean arterial pressure (MAP) deviation from an individual&rsquo;s CA limits are associated with adverse neurological complications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study is conducted at two Swiss and one British hospital. Patients aged 65 years or older undergoing elective primary or re-operative coronary artery bypass graft and/or valvular and/or ascending aorta surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass are included. Preoperatively, the patient&rsquo;s baseline of physical, cognitive and mental status is established. Intraoperatively, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) are recorded in real-time to generate NIRS-derived and TCD-derived CA indices. The primary endpoint is POD, assessed daily on postoperative days 0 to 7 or up to discharge, whichever occurs earlier with the 3D-Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM) or CAM-Intensive Care Unit. Secondary endpoints include a composite neurological outcome of POD and overt stroke, postoperative neurocognitive disorders, major morbidity and mortality. Associations between neurologic outcomes, neurobiomarkers and genetic variation will be explored.</p>
<p>A total of 500 participants is required to achieve 90% power to find a statistically significant effect of the area under the curve MAP&lt;lower limit of CA (LLA) on the risk of POD at the 5% level. This includes adjustment for potential confounders and for the inability to determine the LLA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from all responsible ethics committees (Swiss lead ethics committee EKNZ 2022-01457 and Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales, UK, REC 23/SW/0076). Results will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05595954">NCT05595954</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomes, N. V., Edgar-Whelan, H., Beqiri, E., Young, J., Schindler, C., Gregor, M., Erb, J. M., Siegemund, M., Kuhle, J., Maleska Maceski, A., Needham, E., Cichon, S., Burger, B., Monsch, A. U., Hasemann, W., Wu&#x0308;est, A., Fassl, J., Kaiser, H. A., Hight, D., Levis, A., Gu&#x0308;nsch, D., Menon, D. K., Czosnyka, M., Smielewski, P., Klein, A. A., Dell-Kuster, S., Steiner, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115288</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115288</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PRECISION study: impact of personalised cardiac anaesthesia and cerebral autoregulation on neurological outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery - protocol for an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115288</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115290?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of fermented versus unfermented red cabbage on symptoms, immune response, inflammatory markers and the gut microbiome in young adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115290?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) is a highly prevalent immune-mediated condition associated with substantial symptom burden, impaired quality of life and increased healthcare use. Emerging evidence highlights the role of the gut microbiome in immune regulation and allergic disease. Fermented foods may contain live microbes (when unpasteurised or uncooked) and bioactive postbiotic metabolites that can modulate immune responses. Despite growing interest in dietary strategies targeting the microbiome, no randomised controlled trial has compared fermented versus unfermented red cabbage for ARC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analyses</st>
<p>This single-centre, randomised, controlled trial with a sensory-matched, unfermented cabbage comparator investigates the effects of daily consumption of fermented red cabbage for 8 weeks compared with an unfermented red cabbage control in young adults (18&ndash;35 years) with ARC. A total of 158 participants will be randomly assigned (1:1). The primary outcome is change in Total Nose and Eye Symptom Score from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes include daily symptoms and medication use captured via mobile ecological momentary assessments, quality of life, psychological well-being, gastrointestinal symptoms, systemic inflammatory markers, total IgE, immune cell profile and metagenomic characterisation of stool samples. A nested qualitative component explores participants&rsquo; experiences and acceptability of the intervention. Analyses will include mixed-effects models, time-series analyses incorporating daily pollen counts and comprehensive microbiome statistics. Safety outcomes and adverse events will also be assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Charit&eacute;&mdash;Universita&#x0308;tsmedizin Berlin (EA4/043/25) and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and a lay summary provided to participants. Anonymised datasets and analysis scripts will be made available in public repositories, and metagenomic sequencing data will be deposited in an international sequence archive to ensure transparency and reproducibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00036475.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ngoumou, G. B., Ngandeu Schepanski, S., Blakeslee, S. B., Diedering, A., Twal, E., Raue, S. L., Schroeder, M., Wicaksono, W. A., Stritter, W., Berg, G., Seifert, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115290</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115290</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of fermented versus unfermented red cabbage on symptoms, immune response, inflammatory markers and the gut microbiome in young adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115290</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115290</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Design and rationale of the EFFORTII project: a multicentric randomised-controlled trial on the impact of continued nutritional therapy at hospital discharge]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Malnutrition is a highly prevalent chronic condition that contributes to higher morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple comorbidities. While positive effects of nutritional therapy in the in-hospital setting have recently been demonstrated, the benefits of long-term nutritional therapy after hospital discharge remain uncertain. Herein, we outline the design and rationale of the EFFORTII trial, the largest nutritional trial to date to assess the effects of continued nutritional support after hospital discharge in medical patients, with particular attention to key design decisions regarding nutritional strategy, patient selection criteria and study endpoints.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The <I>Effect of Continued Nutritional Support at Hospital Discharge on Mortality, Frailty, Functional Outcomes and Recovery</I> (EFFORTII) is an investigator-initiated, non-commercial randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate whether ongoing, individualised nutritional therapy after hospital discharge&mdash;targeted to meet specific energy and protein requirements&mdash;offers a cost-effective approach to lowering mortality, minimising complications and maintaining functional status compared with standard care. Eligible participants are adult, chronically ill medical inpatients at risk of malnutrition. Patients in the intervention group receive individualised nutritional therapy delivered by an experienced dietitian through a combination of telemedicine and in-person consultations. The intervention aims to meet personalised nutritional targets, supported by a trained dietitian. Control group patients receive nutritional counselling at discharge, but no structured nutritional management during follow-up. We designed the trial as an event-driven trial with a target of 247 mortality events (primary endpoint), which will be assessed over approximately 5 years until event-driven endpoint is met. The minimum total sample size is at least 802 participants, based on the assumed treatment HR of 0.70. The main trial is enrolling patients across multiple sites in Switzerland. During the trial, additional sites in Spain joined the study, and their data will be analysed using a patient-level pooled approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study involves human participants and was first granted ethical approval by the Ethics Committee Northwest- and Central Switzerland and then by all participating local ethics committees. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04926597">NCT04926597</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wunderle, C., Tribolet, P., Kaegi-Braun, N., Haller, V., Escher, R., Aujesky, D., Trennepohl Da Costa Heinen, G., Bra&#x0308;ndle, M., Bregenzer, T., Henzen, C., Zehnder, T., Schait, S., Gassmann, C., Dorfschmid, M., Ballesteros-Pomar, M. D., Cuerda, C., Burgos, R., De Luis, D., Olveira, G., Rodriguez-Manas, L., Stanga, Z., Mueller, B., Schuetz, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115456</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115456</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Design and rationale of the EFFORTII project: a multicentric randomised-controlled trial on the impact of continued nutritional therapy at hospital discharge]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115456</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biphasic sleep in shift workers and its related outcomes: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Shift work is associated with disrupted sleep, circadian misalignment and increased risks of adverse health, performance and safety outcomes. Although recommendations for shift workers typically focus on obtaining one long sleep period, many shift workers divide sleep into two episodes, referred to as biphasic sleep. Biphasic sleep may help mitigate sleep loss-related impairments, yet its prevalence, characteristics and potential benefits for shift working populations remain unclear. Existing reviews have examined sleep duration, mental health, or the consequences of shift work broadly, but none have specifically mapped evidence comparing biphasic and monophasic sleep between shifts. This scoping review will identify and summarise the available literature on biphasic sleep among adult shift workers. In addition, we will describe the outcomes and subsequently highlight any possible gaps to inform future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and be reported in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Biphasic sleep is defined as two distinct sleep episodes within a 24-hour period between work shifts, including two similarly timed sleep periods or one longer sleep combined with a shorter nap. A comprehensive search will be conducted in April 2026 in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CENTRAL using controlled vocabulary (eg, Medical Subject Headings) and free-text terms related to shift work and split sleep. Peer-reviewed primary research examining biphasic sleep among adult shift workers will be included, and studies focusing solely on naps during work hours will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or by consulting a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a standardised template including study characteristics, sleep parameters and reported outcomes. Results will be summarised descriptively and presented in tables and evidence maps. No statistical synthesis will be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This scoping review will synthesise data from articles published in peer-reviewed journals. As no primary data will be collected and no human participants will be involved, the review is exempted from formal ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated in terms of a peer-reviewed publication and will inform future systematic reviews on sleep strategies among shift workers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This project is registered with the Open Science Framework accessible at 10.17605/OSF.IO/WY7KJ.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moen, L. V., Lie, J.-A. S., Jorgensen, I. L., Frojd, L., Pallesen, S., Matre, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115567</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115567</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biphasic sleep in shift workers and its related outcomes: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115567</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116969?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Montreal model of ketamine-therapy for alcohol use disorder and comorbid treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116969?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Alcohol use disorder and treatment-resistant depression (TRD) often co-occur, presenting a major clinical challenge with limited effective treatments. However, ketamine produces rapid antidepressant effects and has shown promise in reducing alcohol use, and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) can be effective for both substance use and mood disorders. This study explores the feasibility and acceptability of combining ACT with ketamine within the framework of the Montreal Model&mdash;a structured, integrative psychedelic ketamine therapy developed for severe TRD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a single-group, open-label feasibility trial at the Centre hospitalier de l'Universit&eacute; de Montr&eacute;al (CHUM) Neuromodulation Ketamine Clinic in Montreal, Canada. 30 participants diagnosed with both alcohol use disorder and treatment-resistant depression will receive eight weekly in-person or virtual ACT sessions in addition to six intravenous ketamine infusions. The primary outcome is feasibility, assessed through study completion and protocol adherence. Secondary outcomes include recruitment rate, tolerability, safety, data completeness and healthcare resource use. Exploratory measures will examine changes in depressive symptoms, alcohol use and quality of life using validated tools. A subset of participants will participate in semistructured qualitative interviews to explore their experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the ethics committee of the CHUM on 14 May 2025. The results of the trial, including primary and secondary outcomes, will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06620276">NCT06620276</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McAnulty, C., Lavoie, P., Cyr, S., Lavin, P., Elkrief, L., Richard-Devantoy, S., Rizkallah, E., Lesperance, P., Gamin, N., Lembke, A., Jutras-Aswad, D., Greenway, K., Garel, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116969</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116969</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Montreal model of ketamine-therapy for alcohol use disorder and comorbid treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116969</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116969</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117499?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using flow cytometry for paediatric leukaemia diagnosis in Kenya: a protocol for mixed methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e117499?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Each year, an estimated 1700 children should be diagnosed with cancer in western Kenya, with leukaemia making up nearly one-third of cases. However, far fewer are actually diagnosed, highlighting significant delays or errors in diagnosis. Flow cytometry, which the WHO considers essential for leukaemia diagnosis, remains underused across sub-Saharan Africa due to high costs, outdated equipment and a lack of trained personnel. In Kenya, decades-old cytometers have been adapted for leukaemia detection, but these systems are now outdated. Newer platforms, such as simplified single-tube multiparametric assays, provide a scalable and sustainable alternative. This study presents a protocol to evaluate the accuracy of diagnosis and the potential for implementing a streamlined flow cytometry assay using peripheral blood, supported by a regional educational initiative.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, mixed-methods implementation study has three aims: (1) to assess the concordance between the Beckman Coulter ClearLLab 10C gold standard 4-tube assay and the streamlined ClearLLab LS 1-tube assay using paired bone marrow and peripheral blood samples; (2) to evaluate the feasibility of peripheral facility referrals and transport logistics with couriered peripheral blood samples from referring sites across western Kenya; and (3) to measure training effectiveness and knowledge gain through a multimodal educational programme using the Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) model. Up to 300 patients at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital in Eldoret, Kenya, will be enrolled in Aim 1. A separate sample of 100 patients from peripheral facilities will be included in Aim 2. Surveys, knowledge assessments and structured interviews will be used to evaluate training impact under Aim 3. Diagnostic concordance, sensitivity, specificity and knowledge gain will be measured through appropriate quantitative and qualitative methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol has received approval from institutional ethics committees at Moi University, MTRH and Indiana University. De-identified data will be analysed and shared through peer-reviewed publications, stakeholder presentations and educational platforms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Severance, T., Lotodo, T., Serem, E., Njuguna, F., Melly, B., Orido, M., Tonui, R., Olbara, G., Koima, R., Kigen, N., Kussick, S., Ratliff, V., Holl, E., Monahan, P. O., Boova, T., Vik, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T13:31:41-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117499</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-117499</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using flow cytometry for paediatric leukaemia diagnosis in Kenya: a protocol for mixed methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e117499</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e117499</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111065?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Top 10 research priorities for adolescent and young adult cancer in Canada: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111065?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Cancer in adolescents and young adults (AYAs; ages 15&ndash;39 years) is a rising global epidemic. Yet, AYAs remain an understudied population, and little is known about what research topics should be prioritised according to those with lived experience. The AYA Cancer Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was established to identify the top 10 research priorities for AYA cancer in Canada according to patients, caregivers, and clinicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This project followed the James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) methodology that included two national cross-sectional surveys and a final priority setting workshop following an adapted nominal group technique.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A national sample was recruited to participate from across Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were patients, caregivers, and clinicians with lived personal and/or professional experience of AYA cancer in Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>In the first survey, open-ended responses were collected from participants about questions they would like answered by research. Responses were collated into overarching summary questions and a literature search was undertaken to verify if questions were true uncertainties and not fully answered by existing evidence. Unanswered questions were ranked by participants in a second survey. The top-ranked questions were prioritised through consensus at the final priority setting workshop. The final outcome was the top 10 priorities for AYA cancer research in Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the initial survey, 1916 potential research questions were submitted by 275 patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Following data processing, summary question formation, and the evidence check, 58 questions were put forward for interim prioritisation in a second survey (n=285 patients, caregivers, and clinicians). The top 20 questions from the interim prioritisation were ranked at the final priority setting workshop attended by a diverse group of 23 patients, caregivers and clinicians from across Canada. The resulting top 10 priorities reflect topics across the cancer continuum including: diagnostic delays, screening and early detection, novel therapies, psychosocial impacts, end-of-life concerns, and survivorship issues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This patient-directed research agenda will guide researchers, funding agencies, and policymakers to ensure that future research is aligned with what matters most to the AYA cancer community.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tutelman, P. R., Thurston, C., Ranger, T., Rader, T., Henry, B., Abdelaal, M., Blue, M., Buckland, T. W., Del Gobbo, S., Dobson, L., Gallant, E., Heykoop, C., Jansen, M., Larsen, L., Maseja, N., Oberoi, S., Ramasamy, V., Smith, M., Wendowsky, N., Beattie, S., Bender, J. L., Birnie, K., Garland, S. N., Jibb, L., Noel, M., Schulte, F. S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T09:31:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111065</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111065</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Top 10 research priorities for adolescent and young adult cancer in Canada: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111065</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111065</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e090247?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar-related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e090247?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) compared with hysteroscopic niche resection (HNR) for women with niche-related postmenstrual spotting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective, conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A single-centre study at a university hospital in Shanghai was carried out between October 2019 and January 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 208 women aged 18&ndash;48 years with niche-related spotting who were suitable for a HNR, defined as a residual myometrium of at least 2.2 mm confirmed by MRI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Participants were randomly assigned to LNG-IUS insertion (n=104) or HNR (n=104).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was reduction in postmenstrual spotting at 6 months, defined as &ge;50% decrease in spotting days compared with baseline. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), calculated by dividing cost differences in effective rate and spotting days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Statistical analyses</st>
<p>Mean costs (diagnostic, examination, surgical) were compared between groups using Student&rsquo;s t-test, standardised to 2019 price levels. Uncertainty around cost-effectiveness was assessed with non-parametric bootstrapping and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At 6 months, 78.4% (80/102) of women in the LNG-IUS group and 73.1% (76/104) in the HNR group reported improvement in spotting symptoms (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.25). Spotting reduction was greater with LNG-IUS (0.0 days, IQR 0.0 to 2.8) compared with HNR (2.0 days, IQR 0.8 to 4.3; p&lt;0.001). Mean costs were significantly lower in the LNG-IUS group (2273.8 RenMinBi (RMB)) versus the HNR group (6318.0 RMB), with a mean cost difference of &ndash;4044.2 RMB (95% CI &ndash;4367.3 to &ndash;3721.1). The ICER of LNG-IUS over HNR was &ndash;763.2 RMB per one-percentage-point effective rate gained. Each day reduction in spotting was associated with cost savings of 1833.8 RMB. The probability of LNG-IUS being dominant was 0.99 at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 0 RMB and 0.97 at WTP 10 000 RMB per effective rate point, and 0.99 and 0.60, respectively, per spotting day reduced.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>LNG-IUS is highly cost-effective compared with HNR for the treatment of niche-related postmenstrual spotting at 6 months. These findings support LNG-IUS as first-line therapy for niche-related spotting in women with a residual myometrium &ge;2.2 mm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR1900025677.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhu, C., Wang, Y., Yan, L., Zhao, X., Xia, W., He, C., Xu, H., Zhang, J., Mol, B. W., Huirne, J., Zhu, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-13T04:35:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090247</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-090247</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar-related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e090247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e090247</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106587?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between high-risk drinking and cardiovascular health based on Lifes Essential 8: analysis using 2016-2021 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106587?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Alcohol consumption above recommended limits has been associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in observational studies. In particular, little is known about the association between high-risk drinking and cardiovascular health (CVH), as assessed by the American Heart Association&rsquo;s Life&rsquo;s Essential 8 (LE8) health metrics, in the context of community-based population datasets. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the relationship between high-risk drinking and CVH status using data from the 2016&ndash;2021 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional secondary analysis study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The 2016&ndash;2021 KNHANES.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This analysis included 18 500 adults aged 19 years or older.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>High-risk drinking was defined as consuming seven or more drinks (or five cans of beer) in one sitting for men, and five or more drinks (or three cans of beer) for women, at least once a month. The frequency of high-risk drinking was categorised as follows: &lsquo;rarely or never&rsquo;, &lsquo;less than once per month&rsquo;, &lsquo;at least once per month&rsquo;, &lsquo;once a week&rsquo; or &lsquo;nearly daily&rsquo;. We calculated an LE8 score for each of eight composite metrics, with each metric ranging from 0 to 100. LE8 total scores were categorised as 0&ndash;49, 50&ndash;79 and 80&ndash;100, representing low, moderate and high CVH, respectively. We used weighted log-linear regression models to analyse the relationship between high-risk drinking and CVH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Nearly daily or weekly high-risk drinking was reported by 37.3% of men and 14.7% of women. The mean CVH score of groups with more frequent high-risk drinking decreased linearly in both sexes. Using the &lsquo;nearly daily&rsquo; drinking group as the reference group, the exponential coefficients (exp(B)) showed that the total CVH score increased progressively as the frequency of high-risk drinking decreased in both men and women. Compared with the &lsquo;nearly daily&rsquo; group, the total CVH score was 5% higher in the &lsquo;once a week&rsquo; group (exp(B)=1.05, p&lt;0.001) and 14% higher in the &lsquo;rarely or never&rsquo; group (exp(B)=1.14, p&lt;0.001) for men. Similar trends were observed for female participants (once a week: exp(B)=1.04, p&lt;0.001; rarely or never: exp(B)=1.13, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study found that high-risk drinking was negatively associated with ideal CVH in Korean adults, and this association showed sex differences. Interventions targeting high-risk drinking may be more effective than focusing on overall alcohol consumption.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, S., Kim, Y., Kim, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-13T04:35:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106587</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106587</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between high-risk drinking and cardiovascular health based on Lifes Essential 8: analysis using 2016-2021 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106587</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106587</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106707?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating prevalence and predictors of glucose-lowering overtreatment among older adults with type 2 diabetes in long-term care and community settings: a machine learning-based cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106707?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To estimate the prevalence of potential overtreatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among older adults and to develop and compare predictive models to identify patient and physician characteristics associated with overtreatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-based retrospective cohort study with predictive modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A province-wide, publicly funded healthcare system in British Columbia, Canada, using linked administrative health claims data from 2016 to 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Residents of long-term care facilities over age 65, and community-dwelling individuals over age 75, with a diagnosis of T2DM and a glycated haemoglobin (A1C) laboratory value &le;7.0%. Participants were required to have &ge;365 days of continuous provincial health insurance coverage prior to their index A1C test. Patients receiving palliative care and those with missing physician information were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Potential overtreatment of T2DM, defined a priori as overlapping prescriptions for &ge;2 glucose-lowering medications or &ge;1 insulin or sulfonylurea dispensing within 90 days after the index A1C test.</p>
<p>Model performance outcomes included discrimination (area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value). Performance metrics were calculated with 95% CIs using a 25% temporally distinct test dataset (2021&ndash;2023). No changes were made to outcome definitions after protocol development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 133 773 patients with an A1C&le;7.0%, 38 074 (28.5%) were classified as overtreated. These patients had a mean age of 79.6 years, were 47% female, and had a median A1C of 6.4%. The gradient boost model was the best performing model overall, using a combination of expert-selected variables and data-driven variables, achieving an AUC of 0.87, sensitivity of 0.81 and negative predictive value of 0.89. The top predictors of overtreatment included use of blood glucose test strips, A1C test volume, polypharmacy, specialist involvement and measures of diabetes severity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Overtreatment of T2DM was prevalent among older adults in our cohort. Machine learning algorithms that integrate clinical expertise with data-driven variable selection performed the best in predicting T2DM overtreatment. We identified several patient and physician characteristics as key contributors that may inform future clinical practice and quality improvement initiatives, although external validation is required before clinical implementation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carney, G., Burnett, S., Ambasta, A., Thompson, W., Lapp, L., Dormuth, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-13T04:35:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106707</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106707</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimating prevalence and predictors of glucose-lowering overtreatment among older adults with type 2 diabetes in long-term care and community settings: a machine learning-based cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106707</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106707</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107343?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact of a medical telephone helpline and the use of a structured initial assessment on demand for acute and emergency care in Germany: an ecological study using secondary data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107343?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess whether a medical telephone helpline and the use of a computer-assisted structured triage tool led to a reduction in demand for acute and emergency care in hospital emergency departments (EDs) or other ambulatory out-of-hour (OOH) services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted an ecological study using secondary data on outpatient care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in 10 out of 16 federal states of Germany.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The analysis was based on ambulatory claims data for the years 2016&ndash;2020 by 11 Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (ASHIPs) covering more than 64% of the total German population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>The evaluated intervention comprised two components. The first was the introduction of a 24/7 medical helpline (116117), established to assist individuals with medical concerns in accessing appropriate care. The second component was the introduction of the computer-assisted triage tool SmED (Strukturierte medizinische Ersteinscha&#x0308;tzung in Deutschland, Structured medical initial assessment in Germany) to support call-takers by suggesting medically relevant questions to identify red flags and determine the urgency of treatment and a possible treatment facility. For the analysis, approximately 3 years before and 1 1/2 years during the intervention were considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Main outcome was the effect on acute and emergency care which was measured as the number of personal doctor-patient contacts (1) in EDs (ED cases, data of 10 ASHIPs could be considered) and (2) in EDs or other OOH services (ED and OOH cases, data of 11 ASHIPs could be considered).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analysis was limited by legal changes mandating intervention components across all study sites&mdash;leading to a loss of control groups and delayed implementation&mdash;and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Across all ASHIPs and counties, the number of calls to 116117 and the number of SmED assessments showed a negative association with the number of ED cases (total change: 295.0 cases to 224.5 cases per 100 000 inhabitants, 116117 calls: r=&ndash;0.04; 95% CI &ndash;0.04 to &ndash;0.035; p&le;0.001, SmED: r=&ndash;0.15; 95% CI &ndash;0.35 to 0.05; p=0.138) as well as with the combined number of ED and OOH cases (total change: 516.4 cases to 400.3 cases per 100 000 inhabitants, 116117 calls: r=&ndash;0.02; 95% CI &ndash;0.03 to &ndash;0.001; p&le;0.01, SmED: r=&ndash;0.58; 95% CI &ndash;0.98 to &ndash;0.19; p&le;0.01). However, the association between the number of SmED assessments and ED cases was not statistically significant. Moreover, the magnitude and direction of effects varied across ASHIPs. Sensitivity analyses restricted to time periods preceding the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic showed a non-significant negative association for 116117 calls and a significant positive association for SmED assessments with both ED cases and combined ED and OOH cases (ED cases: 116117 calls: r=&ndash;0.001; 95% CI &ndash;0.019 to &ndash;0.018; p=0.928; SmED: r=0.37; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.45; p&le;0.001; ED and OOH services cases: 116117 calls: r=&ndash;0.03; 95% CI &ndash;0.06 to 0.003; p=0.077; SmED: r=0.34; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.48; p&le;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings indicate a trend suggesting that implementation of a 24/7 medical helpline may reduce the demand for acute and emergency care at EDs and OOH services, although clear evidence is lacking. The impact of SmED use remains inconclusive. Further research should ideally incorporate data linkage and controls and assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the triage process, as well as the quality of subsequent care at the individual level.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zoch-Lesniak, B., Steiger, E., Kroll, L. E., von Stillfried, D. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-13T04:35:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107343</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107343</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the impact of a medical telephone helpline and the use of a structured initial assessment on demand for acute and emergency care in Germany: an ecological study using secondary data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107343</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107343</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111289?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Microsimulation model to identify suboptimal recurrence detection in patients with colorectal cancer following the current standard of care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111289?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Stage II/III patients undergo curative-intent surgery yet still face the recurrence risk. Detecting recurrences early provides the best opportunity for optimal treatment. We aimed to develop a microsimulation model to evaluate CRC management-associated outcomes based on current guidelines, including the performance of guideline-recommended surveillance in detecting recurrences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Two separate individual-level state transition (microsimulation) models for colon and rectal cancer were built with a lifetime horizon using monthly cycles. The models integrated treatment and surveillance strategies per current guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The currently recommended surveillance modalities by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for surveilling patients with CRC after curative-intent surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>65-year-old patients with stage II and stage III CRC who underwent curative-intent surgery in the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Cumulative recurrences, detected recurrences, detection rate, overall survival and recurrence-free survival in a 5-year horizon, as well as average life expectancy, were the outcome measures used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over 5 years, disease recurrence was observed in 9.5% of patients with stage II&ndash;III colon cancer and in 38.0% of patients with stage II&ndash;III rectal cancer. Of these, 82.5% and 85.5% were detected via surveillance, respectively, within 5 years. The predicted 5-year overall survival was 86.0% for colon cancer and 69.3% for rectal cancer, with corresponding recurrence-free survival rates of 78.9% and 53.8%. Based on current guidelines-recommended surveillance, detecting one colon cancer recurrence requires 148 carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tests, 37 CT scans and 21 colonoscopies. In contrast, detecting one rectal cancer recurrence requires 31 CEA tests, 8 CT scans and 4 colonoscopies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our validated model suggests that relative to an optimal benchmark in which all recurrences are detected, recurrence detection under current guidelines may be suboptimal, indicating room for improvement. As new tests emerge, this model could be a valuable tool for evaluating existing clinical practices and the potential of new tests to enhance patient outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samur, S., Gursel, E., Gu, N. Y., Carter, G. C., Sahinkoc, M., Ayer, T., Chhatwal, J., Subramaniam, S., Palomares, M., Parikh, A. R., Neugut, A. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-13T04:35:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111289</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111289</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Microsimulation model to identify suboptimal recurrence detection in patients with colorectal cancer following the current standard of care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111289</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and factors associated with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia among men aged 50 years and above in Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to identify associated sociodemographic, lifestyle and comorbidity-related factors among men aged &ge;50 years in a community setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Community-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care and community settings in a district of southern India using multistage cluster sampling across urban and rural areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 560 men aged &ge;50 years were enrolled and completed the study. Participants were selected through multistage cluster sampling. Men with known alternative causes of LUTS (such as urinary tract infection, neurological disorders or prior prostate surgery) were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the prevalence of LUTS, suggestive of BPH, defined as an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) &ge;8. Secondary outcomes included the distribution of individual urinary symptoms, IPSS severity categories, quality-of-life scores and factors associated with LUTS. Outcomes were analysed using survey-weighted methods accounting for clustering and sampling weights.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The survey-weighted mean (SD) IPSS score was 3.46 (2.64), with a median (IQR) of 3 (2-4). Most participants reported minimal urinary symptoms, including no incomplete emptying (82.1%), no urgency (81.4%), normal urinary stream (90.5%), and no straining (90.0%). Nocturia was common, with 43.6% waking once and 28.8% waking twice per night. Overall, 80.2% were mildly symptomatic, 10.1% moderately symptomatic and 0.4% severely symptomatic. The prevalence of LUTS suggestive of BPH was 10.32% (n=58; 95% CI 5.7 to 18.0). In survey-weighted multivariable Poisson regression, below-poverty-line status (adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) 4.13; 95% CI 1.38 to 12.41), physical inactivity (APR 2.89; 95% CI 1.81 to 4.63), diabetes mellitus (APR 2.58; 95% CI 1.26 to 5.30), cardiac disease (APR 3.27; 95% CI 1.67 to 6.41), and arthritis (APR 1.88; 95% CI 1.03 to 3.42) were independently associated with LUTS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Approximately one in ten men aged &ge;50 years had LUTS, suggestive of BPH. The findings indicate a higher prevalence of LUTS among men with socioeconomic disadvantage, physical inactivity and cardiometabolic comorbidities. Integrating symptom-based screening for LUTS into routine primary care and chronic disease follow-up may facilitate early identification and improve quality of life among older men. Further research is warranted to explore longitudinal relationships and alternative symptom thresholds in community populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pandi, B. N. S., George, S., Olickal, J. J., Thankappan, K. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-13T04:35:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112138</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112138</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and factors associated with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia among men aged 50 years and above in Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112138</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114232?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Burden of atherosclerosis, cardiovascular risk factors and atrial fibrillation in individuals with covert brain infarcts in late midlife: the Akershus Cardiac Examination 1950 Study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114232?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Current expert consensus statements generally suggest cardiovascular risk assessment, including atrial fibrillation (AF) screening, on detection of covert brain infarctions (CBIs). However, evidence to guide management of CBI remains limited. In the absence of randomised clinical trials specifically targeting CBI populations, observational studies comparing individuals with and without CBI can provide insights into the prevalence and burden of cardiovascular risk factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We aimed to compare the burden of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors in participants with CBI to those without, and to explore the yield of AF screening in individuals with CBI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A prospective population-based birth cohort study including men and women born in 1950 and resident in Akershus County, Norway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The two hospitals serving the population of Akershus county, Norway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants included in the Akershus Cardiac Examination (ACE) 1950 study who also underwent a subsequent MRI examination were eligible for this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Cardiovascular risk assessment was performed at study inclusion (2012&ndash;2015). Carotid ultrasound was used to quantify atherosclerosis through a carotid plaque score, and CHA<SUB>2</SUB>DS<SUB>2</SUB>-VA and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) scores were calculated to estimate cardiovascular risk. Brain MRI was performed in a randomly selected, blood pressure-stratified subset of participants (2016&ndash;2024). CBI was defined as focal lesions consistent with ischaemia in the absence of clinical stroke. Participants with CBI were offered 72-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring for AF detection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>MRI was performed in 414 of 3706 (11%) participants in the ACE 1950 Study. The mean age at the time of the MRI examination was 70.2&plusmn;2.3 years, and 165 (41%) were women. CBI was identified in 54 participants (13%), of whom 45 (83%) completed 72-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring. There were no differences in mean carotid plaque score, SCORE2 or CHA<SUB>2</SUB>DS<SUB>2</SUB>-VA score between participants with CBI compared with those with normal MRI findings. AF was detected in one (2%) participant with CBI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this community-based cohort of individuals in late midlife, individuals with CBI did not have an increased cardiovascular risk compared with those without, as indicated by SCORE2, CHA<SUB>2</SUB>DS<SUB>2</SUB>-VA score, age-appropriate carotid plaque burden and a low prevalence of AF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>URL: <A HREF="https://www.clinicaltrials.gov">https://www.clinicaltrials.gov</inter-ref>. Unique identifier: <inter-ref locator="NCT01555411" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT01555411</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ihle-Hansen, H., Walle-Hansen, M. M., Berge, T., Ihle-Hansen, H., Ronningen, P. S., Omland, T., Rosjo, H., Tveit, A., Beyer, M., Steine, K., Lyngbakken, M. N., Ronning, O. M., Vigen, T., Quinn, T., Cameron, A., Hagberg, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-13T04:35:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114232</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114232</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Burden of atherosclerosis, cardiovascular risk factors and atrial fibrillation in individuals with covert brain infarcts in late midlife: the Akershus Cardiac Examination 1950 Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114232</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116461?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Listening effort among adult cochlear implant users: a protocol for a systematic review and measure-specific meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116461?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Cochlear implants (CIs) are the standard of care for profound deafness, yet clinical success is often measured solely by speech recognition scores. These metrics provide an incomplete picture; they indicate what a patient hears but fail to account for the mental workload required to achieve that performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The primary goal of this meta-analysis is to quantitatively compare the magnitude of listening effort in post-lingually deafened adults using cochlear implants (CIs) versus normal-hearing controls. Secondary goals are to: (1) evaluate within-group CI contrasts under varying task demands and signal-to-noise ratios; (2) compare the sensitivity and effect sizes of listening effort across subjective, behavioural and physiological measurement domains and (3) conduct planned subgroup analyses to assess the impact of clinical characteristics on listening effort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A comprehensive systematic search will be conducted from inception to the present across MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Cochrane Central. The review focuses on post-lingually deafened adults (&ge; 12 months device experience and &ge;18 years of age). We will employ a measure-specific meta-analytical approach, synthesising data separately across three domains: subjective (eg, self-reported scales), behavioural (eg, dual-task paradigms), and physiological (eg, pupillometry). Pooled effect sizes (<I>Hedges&rsquo; g</I>) will be calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed via <I>I<sup>2</sup></I> and <I>X&sup2;</I> statistics, while the certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE approach. By quantifying the disparity between speech accuracy and mental workload, this review provides an evidence-based framework for clinicians to identify patients at risk of chronic communicative fatigue, regardless of speech perception scores. Furthermore, this synthesis will guide future research by identifying which measurement modalities are most sensitive for monitoring the neurocognitive demands unique to auditory rehabilitation via CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this study involves the secondary analysis of publicly available data, external ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420261278088</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patro, C., Mishra, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-13T04:35:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116461</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116461</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Listening effort among adult cochlear implant users: a protocol for a systematic review and measure-specific meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116461</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116461</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101505?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What do patients value? A retrospective study of compliment letters from a single institution]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101505?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to analyse patient-initiated compliment letters from a single institution, identify the key elements that patients value and offer actionable insights to enhance patient-centred care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective, single-institution study using the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool (HCAT), text network analysis and latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modelling on patient compliment letters to pinpoint key valued care elements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A newly established general hospital in Gwangmyeong, South Korea, opened on 22 March 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1213 compliment letters were collected through the hospital&rsquo;s feedback system, which accepted both online and on-site submissions between 25 March 2022 and 28 June 2024. Letters lacking substantive descriptive content and those containing purely administrative requests were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The HCAT was adapted to categorise positive statements into clinical, management and relationship domains, along with six stages of care. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using Gwet&rsquo;s AC1 statistic. A text network analysis, applying a term frequency&ndash;inverse document frequency approach, was conducted to identify prominent keywords. Subsequently, LDA was performed to extract thematic topics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most compliments concerned the &lsquo;relationship&rsquo; domain (62%), particularly during the care in the ward stage (56%). Keyword analysis indicated that the most frequently mentioned terms were &lsquo;gratitude&rsquo;, &lsquo;kindness&rsquo;, &lsquo;nurse&rsquo;, &lsquo;doctor&rsquo; and &lsquo;heart/mind&rsquo;, underscoring patients&rsquo; high valuation of positive interactions, professional competence and compassionate communication with medical staff. Topic modelling identified three primary topics, namely, &lsquo;appreciation of nursing care&rsquo; (39%), &lsquo;professionalism in surgery and treatment&rsquo; (35%) and &lsquo;effective communication during consultations&rsquo; (26%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Positive relationships with medical staff, particularly kindness, professionalism and effective communication, influence patient satisfaction. Patient compliment letters serve as important indicators of exceptional care and can inform quality improvement initiatives. Healthcare institutions should leverage these insights to enhance patient-centred services by strengthening patient&ndash;provider relationships and promoting a culture of excellence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwon, Y. G., Namgung, M., Kim, M. K., Choi, J. C., Jeong, D., Kim, C. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101505</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101505</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What do patients value? A retrospective study of compliment letters from a single institution]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101505</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101505</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102594?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ageing phenotypes and behavioural determinants of health on age acceleration: the Cancer Survivors Trajectories of Ageing Research (C*STAR) study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102594?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Age acceleration in survivors of breast cancer is a critical issue because cancer and its treatment can increase structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations, while simultaneously shortening telomere length and changing ageing phenotype. Therefore, the current study will be using machine learning architectures to accurately predict the factors that contribute to age acceleration among survivors of breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Cancer Survivors&rsquo; Trajectories of Ageing Research (C*STAR) is a hospital-based cross-sectional study involving multi-ethnic Malaysian survivors of breast cancer and a non-breast cancer control group, frequency-matched by age group (&plusmn;5 years), sex and ethnicity. The three main stages of this study will be conducted in the predictive model development. First, a set of validated questionnaires will be used to collect the data on modifiable factors of ageing phenotypes and behavioural determinants of health. Second, 3 mL non-fasting blood samples will be collected, and lymphocytes will be isolated to determine telomere length using real-time PCR as a biomarker of age acceleration. Lastly, a machine learning architecture will be deployed to identify modifiable factors that may contribute to age acceleration in survivors of breast cancer and controls, with these factors used as input and ageing biomarkers of telomere length as output. The study outcomes may serve as guidance to enhance the quality of life of survivors of breast cancer and hinder the recurrence of cancer while ageing successfully.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (JEP-2022-700) to carry out this study. Written informed consent will be obtained from each survivor of breast cancer and each cancer-free woman prior to participation. The results of this study will be published for future research and clinical applications.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zaujan, N. A. M., Shahril, M. R., Shahar, S., Mohamad Hanif, E. A., Ab Muin, N. F., Sharif, R., Subramaniam, P., Abdullah, A., Fenech, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102594</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102594</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ageing phenotypes and behavioural determinants of health on age acceleration: the Cancer Survivors Trajectories of Ageing Research (C*STAR) study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102594</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102594</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105035?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in the prevalence of adolescent tobacco use and its associated factors in Indonesia: analysis of repeated cross-sectional survey 2009-2019]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105035?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Adolescent tobacco use (ATU) is a global public health concern, causing significant morbidity and premature death. This study aimed to assess trends in the prevalence of ATU in Indonesia between 2009 and 2019 and to identify factors contributing to the observed changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study performed secondary data analysis of three consecutive waves (2009, 2014, and 2019) of the Indonesian Global Youth Tobacco Survey (IGYTS). Weighted prevalence estimates and complex survey data analysed using multivariate logistic regression were established across the three-wave surveys. A pooled IGYTS data set was explored to determine the risk factors of the ATU. A multivariate decomposition analysis (MDA) was used to determine factors contributing to the prevalence change in male adolescents over the last two surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of ATUs was 21.1% (38.2% in males; 6.4% in females), 18.6% (32.7% in males; 3.9% in females) and 19.8% (36.8% in males; 3.5% in females) for the three consecutive surveys, respectively. Being older adolescents, male, exposed to SHS (secondhand smoke) at home, tobacco industry promotion, not knowledgeable of the dangers of tobacco smoke and SHS, and against banning smoking in public places were associated with ATU consistently across the surveys. In addition, inadequate anti-cigarette media and not being knowledgeable of the difficulty of quitting smoking were also identified as risk factors in the pooled data. MDA showed that 88.94% of the explained change was due to differences in the composition of explanatory variables between the last two surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study suggests that social influence and tobacco industry promotion significantly impact ATU in Indonesia. Governments should emphasise these factors in their tobacco control interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suryadarma, A. Y., Saputro, S. A., Isnuwardana, R., Destiwi, M., Bassey, P. E., Martini, S., Sebayang, S. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105035</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105035</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in the prevalence of adolescent tobacco use and its associated factors in Indonesia: analysis of repeated cross-sectional survey 2009-2019]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105035</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105035</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105991?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of untimely receipt and non-receipt of routine childhood immunisation in Ebonyi state based on the Adapted Omale INDEPT FORCIS Framework and recommendations for policy and practice: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105991?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The significant morbidity and mortalities from, and the recurrent outbreaks of, the vaccine-preventable infectious diseases (VPDs) of childhood could be due not only to non-receipt of recommended vaccinations but also to untimely receipt, which impairs the validity of immunisation coverage and protection against VPDs. This study explored the determinants of untimely receipt and non-receipt of routine childhood immunisation and made recommendations for policy and practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This qualitative study was based on the Adapted Omale INDEPT FORCIS Framework &ndash; Determinants of Routine Childhood Vaccination Receipt Conceptual Framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study setting and participants</st>
<p>From 22 August 2022 to 9 September 2022, 15 semi-structured, face-to-face focus group discussions were conducted in English, pidgin English and the local language with 127 purposively selected consenting parents of infants aged 0&ndash;2 months (with other key community members) and primary healthcare workers involved in the provision of routine childhood immunisation in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>Data analysis involved deductive (and some inductive) thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were many underlying determinants of untimely receipt and non-receipt of routine childhood immunisation, which included individual-related factors (mothers&rsquo; unfavourable experiences and perceptions and lack of knowledge about childhood diseases, vaccines/vaccinations and the vaccination system, relocation/travel from place of residence, children and/or mothers being ill); childhood disease-related, vaccination-related and the vaccination system-related factors (diseases not always severe/fatal, vaccinations causing side-effects, vaccination system constraints in availability, accessibility, affordability and acceptability); family and other individual-related factors; and broader context-related sociopolitical, cultural, economic, infrastructural, historic and health system factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The evidence demonstrates many specific and fundamental complex and interrelated determinants of untimely receipt and non-receipt of routine childhood immunisation and emphasises the need for multifaceted and innovative actions in dealing with the determinants in the drive to address the high morbidity and mortalities and recurring outbreaks of VPDs in Ebonyi state, Nigeria, and similar settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omale, U. I., Iwegbulam, C. C., Ekwuazi, L. C., Amuzie, C. I., Ikegwuonu, C. O., Nkwo, G. E., Ewah, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105991</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105991</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of untimely receipt and non-receipt of routine childhood immunisation in Ebonyi state based on the Adapted Omale INDEPT FORCIS Framework and recommendations for policy and practice: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105991</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105991</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106124?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Peer network approaches for improving HIV testing, prevention and care utilisation among men in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106124?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Limited male engagement in HIV prevention and care is a global challenge more pronounced in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) contributing to ongoing transmission. However, peer network interventions show promise in improving engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To map and synthesise evidence on peer network interventions for HIV prevention and care among men in SSA, with a focus on the types of strategies used, populations reached and how these interventions address cultural, social and structural barriers across the HIV care cascade.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review of peer-reviewed literature, conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community and facility-based HIV prevention and care settings across multiple countries in SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Populations included men having sex with men, men in key occupational groups (fishermen, truck drivers), adolescents and young people, and men living with HIV. Studies not conducted in SSA, not peer-reviewed or not focused on male peer networks were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Peer network interventions included peer education, peer navigation, HIV self-testing (HIVST) distribution, adherence support groups, disclosure and stigma-reduction counselling, technology-enabled peer support (SMS and social media) and community-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery. Intervention duration and intensity varied across studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes included HIV testing uptake, linkage to care, ART initiation, adherence, retention in care and viral suppression. Secondary outcomes included stigma reduction, disclosure and engagement among hard-to-reach male populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a review of literature published between November 2013 and November 2024, searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Studies were included if they examined peer network approaches in HIV prevention and care among men in SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 905 records were identified, of which 75 studies met the inclusion criteria. Peer network interventions were implemented across diverse SSA contexts and male populations. Strategies such as peer-led education, social diffusion models, HIVST distribution and technology-enabled peer support consistently improved HIV testing uptake, linkage to care, ART initiation and adherence. Contextually tailored interventions such as community-based outreach addressing occupational risk environments and economic vulnerabilities were particularly effective in engaging men traditionally underserved by facility-based services. However, challenges persisted, including variable linkage to care following HIVST and sensitivity to user costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Peer-led interventions in HIV care for men in SSA effectively address cultural, social and structural barriers, improving testing, ART adherence and viral suppression. Tailored, technology-enhanced and community-based approaches ensure equitable HIV prevention and treatment outcomes, despite challenges like linkage to care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otambo, W. O., Harling, G., Inghels, M., Otto, M., Blose, N., Tram, K. H., Tanser, F., Mee, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Peer network approaches for improving HIV testing, prevention and care utilisation among men in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106124</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107127?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment gaps in guideline-directed medical therapy for HFrEF in Singapore: findings from a multicentre retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107127?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe prescription patterns, dosing and persistence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Singapore, and to identify factors associated with the use of quadruple therapy (ACE inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), &beta;-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective, observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary and tertiary care settings across seven public hospitals in Singapore.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>3999 adults hospitalised from 2020 to 2022 with a first heart failure-related admission and left ventricular ejection fraction &le;40%. Patients with absolute contraindications to specific GDMT classes were excluded from eligibility calculations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were the proportions of eligible patients prescribed each GDMT class and quadruple therapy at discharge. Secondary outcomes were 6-month prescription patterns, dose attainment and predictors of quadruple therapy use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among eligible patients, 80%&ndash;99% met criteria for each GDMT drug class, yet only 29% received quadruple therapy at discharge in 2022. Prescription rates for ACEi/ARB/ARNI (67%), beta-blockers (89%), MRAs (40%), and SGLT2 inhibitors (46%) remained suboptimal despite high eligibility. At discharge, over 90% of patients on ACEi/ARB/ARNI and beta-blockers received &le;50% of target doses. By 6 months, prescription rates declined by 16% for ACEi/ARB/ARNI, 26% for beta-blockers and 7% for MRAs, while SGLT2 inhibitor use increased. Older age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.98) and chronic kidney disease stage 3a&ndash;4 (OR 0.65 to 0.04) were associated with lower odds of receiving quadruple therapy, while significant institutional variation was observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite high eligibility, uptake and optimisation of GDMT remain poor in Singapore, with substantial treatment gaps driven by underprescription, inadequate dosing and discontinuation. Interventions targeting clinician awareness, postdischarge support and institutional practice variation may improve adherence to guideline-recommended therapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senanayake, S., Lee, A. S. Y., Graves, N., Win, P. P. S., Lee, A., Lau, Y. H., Hausenloy, D. J., Yeo, K.-K., Chan, M. Y.-Y., Wong, R. C. C., Loh, S. Y., Sim, K. L. D., Chow, W., Tan, K. B., Kularatna, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107127</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107127</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment gaps in guideline-directed medical therapy for HFrEF in Singapore: findings from a multicentre retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107127</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields associated with glioma risk? An Australian population-based family case-control study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study investigated occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) using two job-exposure matrices (JEMs) and risk of glioma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-based family case&ndash;control study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Cases were recruited from participating hospitals in the Australian states of New South Wales, Queensland, Tasmania, Western Australia and Victoria between January 2013 and November 2017.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study population consisted of 467 cases of glioma and 367 family controls recruited for the Australian Genomics and Clinical Outcomes of Glioma case&ndash;control study between 2013 and 2017. Participants completed questionnaires on demographic and other information, including a detailed occupational history.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Exposures</st>
<p>Exposure to RF EMF was estimated using both the multicountry case&ndash;control study INTEROCC JEM and the Canadian JEM (CANJEM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>ORs and 95% CIs were calculated from logistic regression models adjusted for relatedness between cases and controls, sex, age, ethnicity, education level, smoking status and alcohol consumption.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was no statistically significant positive association overall for risk of glioma when applying either JEM. For the highest compared with the lowest quartile of lifetime exposure, results using the INTEROCC JEM showed an OR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.15) for electric fields and 0.92 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.45) for magnetic fields, while the CANJEM showed an OR of 0.85 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.32). We also did not observe associations when applying different assumptions regarding latency or time windows or with glioma grade.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Overall, this study found no evidence of an association between occupational RF EMF exposure and glioma. Future research should focus on refining occupational RF EMF exposure assessment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mate, R., Benke, G., Loughran, S. P., Abramson, M. J., Vjadic, C., Turner, M., Turuban, M., Cardis, E., Karipidis, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107281</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107281</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields associated with glioma risk? An Australian population-based family case-control study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107281</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107512?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Digital Intervention for Psychedelic Preparation (DIPP): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing meditation- and music-based programmes in healthy volunteers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107512?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Psychedelic-assisted therapy shows promise for treating various mental health conditions; however, its reliance on intensive psychological preparation limits its broader application. Digital health interventions have the potential to address this limitation by providing structured, accessible and scalable preparation solutions. This randomised controlled feasibility trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the Digital Intervention for Psychedelic Preparation (DIPP), a 21-day mobile-accessible programme designed to prepare individuals for psychedelic experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study will recruit 40 non-treatment-seeking adults without a clinical diagnosis, randomly assigning them to one of two conditions: (1) DIPP-MEDITATE, which combines daily guided meditation with background music or (2) DIPP-MUSIC, which provides the same background music without guided meditation. Both groups will complete the 21-day digital intervention remotely. Following the intervention, participants will attend an in-person supervised psilocybin session, receiving a standardised 25 mg dose. Primary outcomes focus on feasibility metrics including recruitment efficiency, participant retention and adherence to the intervention protocol. Secondary outcomes assess subjective feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy, specifically evaluating psychedelic preparedness, the quality of the psychedelic experience and changes in wellbeing, with follow-up assessments at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6 and 9 months post-session. Exploratory measures include neuroimaging, physiological, cognitive and psychological assessments, as well as voice note experience sampling through a chatbot (referred to as &lsquo;DIPP-bot&rsquo;) to monitor inner speech, thought and emotional states during the intervention and follow-up periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by UCL Research Ethics Committee (ID: 19113/003), this study follows the Declaration of Helsinki. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. Confidentiality will be maintained throughout.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06815653">NCT06815653</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McAlpine, R., Jaglinska, M., Jedlovszky, K., Kuc, J., Castro, A., Piot, A., Timmermann, C., Skipper, J. I., Sacchet, M. D., Kamboj, S. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107512</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107512</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Digital Intervention for Psychedelic Preparation (DIPP): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing meditation- and music-based programmes in healthy volunteers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107512</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107512</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research on latent class of multisymptom characteristics and transition mechanism of patients with coronary heart disease after PCI: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional and prospective longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients frequently experience multidimensional symptoms (somatic, psychological, social), yet research remains fragmented. Current evidence lacks integration of dynamic symptom interactions and longitudinal evolution patterns. This study addresses critical gaps by characterising latent symptom classes and transition mechanisms during recovery, accounting for sociodemographic environmental influences across three Chinese provinces.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A multicentre study combines cross-sectional baseline assessment (T0) with prospective longitudinal follow-ups at 1 month (T1) and 6 months (T2) post-PCI. We will recruit 600 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and undergoing their first PCI from six Class A Tertiary Hospitals across Hunan, Jiangsu and Hainan provinces (July 2025&ndash;January 2026). Symptom phenotyping will use validated instruments: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. Latent profile analysis will identify baseline symptom profiles; latent transition analysis will model probabilities of transitioning between classes over time. Model selection will optimise fit indices (Akaike information criterion/Bayesian information criterion/bootstrap likelihood ratio test bootstrap) and clinical interpretability. Covariate-adjusted analyses will explore sociodemographic and environmental effects on symptom trajectories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by the University of South China Ethics Committee (2024NHHL037). Written informed consent precedes participation, with data deidentified and securely stored. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and presented at international cardiovascular conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500097028.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[You, J.-C., Li, Q., Chen, R., Zhang, W.-K., Liu, Y.-Q., Zeng, W., Huang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108103</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108103</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research on latent class of multisymptom characteristics and transition mechanism of patients with coronary heart disease after PCI: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional and prospective longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108103</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108450?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tai Chi interventions for older adults living in aged care homes in Sri Lanka: a study protocol for a single-arm pretest-posttest feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108450?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The institutionalisation of older adults has become increasingly common in Sri Lanka due to recent socioeconomic changes. Tai Chi is a traditional Chinese martial art that provides numerous physical and psychological health benefits. Despite its proven effectiveness, Tai Chi is a relatively new intervention in Sri Lanka, with no local research on its feasibility and efficacy among older adults. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of Tai Chi on physical function and fall risk, lung function, depression, pain and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in older adults residing in aged care homes in Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A single-arm pretest-posttest feasibility study will be conducted among older adults aged 60 and over (n=40) living in aged care homes in Kandy District, Sri Lanka. A certified Tai Chi instructor will deliver two 60 min sessions of the Tai Chi for Arthritis and Fall Prevention programme per week over a 12-week period in aged care home settings. Acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, adaptation, integration, expansion and study limitations will be assessed to determine feasibility. Baseline and post-12-week Tai Chi programme outcomes will be assessed, focusing on physical function and fall risk, lung function, pain, depression and HRQOL. Additionally, field notes will be taken during the intervention, and a post-intervention follow-up group discussion will be conducted. Paired t-tests will be used to assess the effectiveness of the Tai Chi programme. A narrative synthesis will be used to analyse qualitative data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, approved this study (No.: 2024/EC/34). Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant before data collection. The findings will be presented at national and international research conferences and published in a reputed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This study was registered with the Sri Lanka Trial Registration (SLCTR/2025/025) at <A HREF="https://slctr.lk/trials/slctr-2025-025">https://slctr.lk/trials/slctr-2025-025</A> (date: 26 June 2025).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rathnayake, S., Liyanage, I., Ekanayaka, J., Liyanage, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108450</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108450</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tai Chi interventions for older adults living in aged care homes in Sri Lanka: a study protocol for a single-arm pretest-posttest feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108450</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108450</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110074?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to implementing a shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug-drug interactions: a qualitative study across three academic medical centres in the USA]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110074?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify barriers and facilitators to implementing an electronic shared decision-making tool for managing anticoagulant-related drug-drug interactions that affect bleeding risk in routine clinical care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Preimplementation qualitative study using semistructured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three academic medical centres in the southeastern and western USA. Interviews were conducted between 27 March and 25 September 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>36 participants, including 19 clinicians involved in prescribing or managing anticoagulants and seventeen patients prescribed anticoagulants, were recruited using purposive and convenience sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants identified multiple barriers and facilitators to tool implementation. Common barriers included limited visit time, challenges integrating the tool into existing workflows, role and scope-of-practice constraints, and variation in patient digital literacy. Facilitators included clear visualisation of bleeding risk, access to supporting evidence, familiar interface design and perceived potential to support patient engagement and shared decision-making. Several determinants functioned as both barriers and facilitators, depending on clinical context and user role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This preimplementation qualitative study identified context-specific determinants that influence the adoption of an electronic shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug&ndash;drug interactions. Findings highlight the importance of early attention to workflow integration, role alignment and usability to support uptake in routine care. Addressing these factors during design and implementation may inform strategies to support adoption and future evaluation in real-world clinical settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Becker, R. A., Bonnet, K., Shah, M. V., Dang, E., Ancker, J. S., Malone, D. C., Trinkley, K. E., Gomez-Lumbreras, A., Del Fiol, G., Kawamoto, K., Tawfik, A. G., Cornia, R., Jones, A. E., Mitchell, J., Reese, T. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110074</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110074</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to implementing a shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug-drug interactions: a qualitative study across three academic medical centres in the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110074</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110074</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110607?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Navigating silence and voice: South Asian women healthcare professionals in the UK NHS during COVID-19 and beyond - a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110607?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the experiences of South Asian female healthcare professionals in the UK National Health Service (NHS) during COVID-19, examining how the pandemic conditions exposed the ways in which race, gender and professional identity intersect to shape risk, silence and discrimination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>27 South Asian female doctors and nurses, employed across NHS trusts in London, Greater Manchester and Liverpool, were recruited through purposive snowball sampling between 2021 and 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period when existing workplace inequality became more visible and consequential. Although the research was initially motivated by evidence of disproportionate COVID-19 risk among ethnic minority healthcare staff, participants consistently foregrounded experiences of voice, silence and power within the NHS. It was through these accounts, situated in the heightened pressures and uncertainties of the pandemic, that four key themes emerged: (1) how discrimination and ethnic bias suppress voice; (2) fear of retaliation and the consequences of speaking out; (3) internalised cultural norms and the emotional labour of adaptation; and (4) finding voice through experience and action. Participants reported microaggressions, disproportionate disciplinary scrutiny and informal silencing tactics that left them feeling vulnerable and voiceless. For many, cultural expectations around hierarchy and respect inhibited confrontation, even in the face of unfair treatment. Some women engaged in self-reflexive strategies, learning to interpret institutional codes, recalibrating their behaviour or selectively speaking out. For many, this process of adaptation&mdash;learning, recalibrating and navigating institutional expectations&mdash;was less a path to upholding their agency and more a survival mechanism within a system they perceived as structurally biased. While a few participants described finding ways to speak out and support others through union membership and legal awareness, most described adaptation as emotionally taxing and ineffectual in the face of structural barriers. Silence (eg, withdrawing, transferring departments, leaving their roles altogether) remained the dominant strategy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>COVID-19 did not create these dynamics, but it did expose and intensify pre-existing constraints on voice in the NHS. Drawing on South Asian women&rsquo;s accounts, this study provides insight into how institutional and cultural dynamics constrain voice and inclusion, particularly under conditions of heightened organisational pressure. We argue that voice is not just a personal capacity but a structural condition that can either reinforce silence or enable change. Our study highlights the need for structural reforms that strengthen psychological safety, ensure clarity around rights and protections and address the persistent gap between inclusion rhetoric and lived experience.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kauser, S., Figueiredo, A. P., Pandya, B. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110607</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110607</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Navigating silence and voice: South Asian women healthcare professionals in the UK NHS during COVID-19 and beyond - a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110607</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110607</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110673?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acceptability and feasibility of a community-hospital parenting support and prevention programme for families of infants at high neurodevelopmental risk following neonatal encephalopathy: protocol of the PRePaR (PRevention and support for Parenthood in early Rehabilitation) mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110673?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Neonatal encephalopathy, particularly situations involving neonatal hypoxic&ndash;ischaemic encephalopathy (NHIE) and neonatal stroke (NS), covers complex neonatal conditions associated with a risk of neurodevelopmental difficulties. Early prevention programmes have shown benefits for neurodevelopment, but few address both NHIE and NS populations. Following an initial joint development phase with families and professionals, we identified two areas of intervention: (1) Making infant care and referral more streamlined and (2) Increasing parent empowerment. The PRevention and support for Parenthood in an early Rehabilitation programme is a multidisciplinary intervention initiated in the neonatal intensive care unit and continuing at home until the infant reaches a corrected age of 4 months. Its objectives are to: (1) Ensure that the family environment is adapted to the child&rsquo;s needs, (2) Introduce parents to digital support suggesting information on the care pathway and developmental interventions, (3) Maintain continuity of care and (4) Maximise early detection by sharing videos for analysis of the child&rsquo;s movements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>This longitudinal study uses a mixed-methods approach to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the early parenthood support programme involving parents and healthcare professionals. The qualitative research will be carried out through focus groups (parents and professionals) held at the end of the intervention programme. The corpus of semidirected collective interviews (focus group) will be processed by thematic content analysis. Initial coding and analysis will be conducted by the sociologist with expertise in qualitative methods, and the emerging themes and interpretations will then be discussed, refined and validated through interdisciplinary analysis meetings involving the broader research team. This collective analytical process will allow for deeper engagement with the data and ensure that interpretations are challenged and enriched by multiple professional perspectives. The quantitative research will rely on self-administered questionnaires (parents and professionals), assessment of child neurodevelopment using standardised tools by physiotherapists and assessment of parental skills using standardised observation grids.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has full approval from an independent ethics committee (CPP Ile de France I). Its findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. The trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05457569).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fromion, C., Krumm, S., Jandet, S., Ksiazek, E., Gueugnon, M., Ornetti, P., Meunier-Beillard, N., Fournel, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110673</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110673</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acceptability and feasibility of a community-hospital parenting support and prevention programme for families of infants at high neurodevelopmental risk following neonatal encephalopathy: protocol of the PRePaR (PRevention and support for Parenthood in early Rehabilitation) mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110673</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110673</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110840?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The experiences of nurses in implementing clinical nursing research: a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110840?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to systematically synthesise and analyse nurses&rsquo; experiences in implementing clinical nursing research (CNR) to inform administrators and researchers involved in CNR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative meta-synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>The following six databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO) and Embase. The search period included material published up to December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We included qualitative studies exploring perspectives, experiences and other similar factors. JBI Critical Appraisal Tool (2024 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of included studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently conducted the literature search, study selection and data coding. Using principles of similarity and integration, findings from the included studies were grouped into general categories. A final synthesis was produced through analysis of the relationship between categories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>11 studies were included, from which four themes were identified: feelings and motivations prior to participation in CNR; understanding the role of the clinical nursing researcher; factors hindering CNR implementation; and expectations for CNR development. These themes comprised 12 sub-themes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This review highlights nurses&rsquo; experience in implementing CNR. Strengthening motivation and clarifying the roles and responsibilities associated with CNR may facilitate the translation of research findings into clinical practice. In parallel, healthcare administrators should foster a supportive CNR culture and provide resources to address barriers to implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42025631159.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gong, H., Wang, X., He, Y., Huang, J., Ding, M., Xie, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110840</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110840</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The experiences of nurses in implementing clinical nursing research: a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110840</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110840</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy for family caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>With the rapid ageing of the global population, the number of persons with dementia (PwDs) is increasing, placing substantial psychological and physical burdens on family caregivers. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a mindfulness and values-based psychological intervention, has shown potential in improving mental health outcomes across various populations. However, its effectiveness, specifically for dementia family caregivers, remains to be systematically evaluated. This review aims to evaluate the effects of ACT on psychological outcomes (eg, depression, anxiety, psychological flexibility), caregiver burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among family caregivers of PwDs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A comprehensive search of English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycInfo, CNKI, CBM and Wanfang Data, will be conducted from inception to July 2025. Randomised controlled trials involving family caregivers (aged &ge;18) of PwDs will be included in which ACT is delivered either alone or as a core component. Outcomes include psychological outcomes (eg, depression, anxiety, psychological flexibility), caregiver burden and HRQoL. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 1.0 tool. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan V.5.4, with mean difference or standardised mean difference calculated for continuous outcomes. Random or fixed-effects models will be applied depending on heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and evaluation of publication bias will also be conducted where applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required because only published data will be used. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251127238.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hao, X., Gao, W., Lu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111183</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111183</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy for family caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111183</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112369?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stimulation methods for collecting urine from hospitalised precontinent infants: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, open-label, three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112369?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Obtaining clean-catch urine (CCU) samples from non-continent infants is a common clinical challenge due to low urine volume and irregular urination. Non-invasive stimulation techniques, such as the bladder stimulation technique (BST) and the Quick-Wee method, have been proposed to improve success rates and reduce contamination. However, the supporting evidence remains inconsistent, and no multicentre randomised trials have directly compared the effectiveness and safety of Quick-Wee, BST and standard CCU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study will enrol 342 infants aged 1&ndash;12 months requiring urinalysis, recruited from paediatric wards across three tertiary hospitals in China. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three intervention groups: BST, Quick-Wee or standard CCU. The primary endpoint is the success rate of urine collection within 5 min of intervention. Secondary endpoints include time to urination, 5 min urination rate, infant discomfort scores, parental and clinician satisfaction, and urine contamination rates. Safety will be evaluated by monitoring the incidence of adverse events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (No. 114/2025). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants&rsquo; parents prior to enrolment. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. Individual participant data will be kept strictly confidential and securely stored in compliance with data protection regulations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500098691.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, F., Yuan, C., Cao, F., Feng, P., Li, S., Xiang, L., Hu, Q., Feng, L., Wang, C., Bao, P., Zhang, M., Mei, L., Li, J., Cheng, Y., Zheng, Z., Huang, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112369</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112369</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stimulation methods for collecting urine from hospitalised precontinent infants: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, open-label, three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112369</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112369</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112478?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Obesity and arthritis of the knee Study (OAKS): study protocol for a prospective cohort study examining the treatments and outcomes of people with obesity and severe knee arthritis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112478?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>People with body mass index (BMI) &ge;35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> have an approximately 19-fold increased risk of undergoing total knee replacement (TKR); however, many UK integrated care boards (37%) have restrictive policies which limit access to TKR for people based on BMI. Therefore, access to both surgical and non-surgical treatments varies widely, exacerbating existing health inequalities. It remains unclear how decisions about offering TKR are made in people with severe knee osteoarthritis, which weight-loss interventions are provided in practice and how different management pathways relate to patient outcomes among individuals with high BMI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will recruit 400 participants with severe Kellgren-Lawrence grade four knee osteoarthritis from eight secondary care centres in England. All participants, irrespective of BMI, will provide baseline clinical data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), enabling characterisation of baseline associations between BMI, knee function and body image.</p>
<p>A prespecified subgroup of participants with BMI &ge;35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (minimum n=105) will undergo longitudinal follow-up at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months, including repeat BMI measurement, PROMs and detailed data on access to surgical and non-surgical interventions, including weight-loss strategies and TKR. For those with BMI &ge;35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, statistical modelling will be used to explore associations between baseline factors and longitudinal outcomes including Oxford Knee Score and weight change at 12 months (n&ge;105). Structural equation modelling will be used to quantify associations between BMI and knee pain/function mediated by psychosocial factors using data from all participants (n=400). A nested qualitative study of surgeons and patients will explore obstacles and preferences in the management of severe knee osteoarthritis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study received ethical approval from the West of Scotland REC 5 (Ref: 24/WS/0146) on 10 October 2024. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN42984928">ISRCTN42984928</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dhaif, F. G., Parsons, N., Ellard, D. R., Rodrigues, J., Metcalfe, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112478</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112478</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Obesity and arthritis of the knee Study (OAKS): study protocol for a prospective cohort study examining the treatments and outcomes of people with obesity and severe knee arthritis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112478</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112478</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112678?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Top 10 priorities for problematic hip replacement research: a priority setting partnership led by the British Hip Society and the James Lind Alliance]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112678?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify and prioritise research uncertainties regarding the assessment, management and rehabilitation of patients with problematic hip replacements through a national Priority Setting Partnership (PSP).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A national PSP using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients, carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the care of patients with problematic hip replacements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A steering group was established. The James Lind Alliance methodology was followed throughout. A nationwide survey was conducted to collect unanswered questions. These were refined, prioritised through an interim survey and ranked at a final consensus workshop.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The initial survey yielded 201 questions, refined to 32. The interim survey had 191 respondents, leading to 19 questions at the final workshop. The top 10 research priorities were agreed on.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This PSP identified key research priorities for problematic hip replacements, focusing on diagnosis, pain management, perioperative optimisation and infection. These priorities can inform researchers and funders to improve outcomes for affected patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Board, T. N., Khan, A., Sorial, A. K., Divecha, H. M., Lamb, J. N., Reed, M., Khanduja, V., Whitehouse, M. R., OBrien, F., Staley, K., Ellis, P., on behalf of the Problematic Hip Replacement Steering Group, Jones, Clarke, Harle, Briggs, Kearney, Daboo, Angadji, Newton]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112678</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112678</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Top 10 priorities for problematic hip replacement research: a priority setting partnership led by the British Hip Society and the James Lind Alliance]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112678</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112678</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113430?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for an open-label, randomised, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sotatercept add-on therapy compared with pulmonary vasodilator-based standard of care for pulmonary vasodilator-resistant pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with unrepaired congenital shunts (atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect or patent ductus arteriosus), including Eisenmenger syndrome: the SuMILE trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113430?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Eisenmenger syndrome and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) due to unrepaired congenital shunts, including atrial septal defect (ASD), ventricular septal defect (VSD) and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), remain life-threatening conditions despite advances in congenital heart disease (CHD) care. In this population, vasodilator-based therapies effective in other forms of PAH have shown limited benefit, and no disease-modifying treatment has been established. Sotatercept, an activin-signalling inhibitor, improved exercise capacity and haemodynamics in phase 2/3 PAH trials; however, patients with unrepaired CHD, including Eisenmenger syndrome, were excluded. The efficacy and safety of sotatercept in this population remain unknown.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The SuMILE trial is a prospective, exploratory, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial conducted at 11 Japanese tertiary centres. 36 adults with vasodilator-resistant PAH due to unrepaired ASD, VSD or PDA, including Eisenmenger syndrome, will be randomised 2:1 to sotatercept add-on therapy plus vasodilator-based PAH therapy versus vasodilator-based PAH therapy alone. Sotatercept will be administered subcutaneously every 3 weeks in accordance with label-approved dose-modification rules for haemoglobin and platelet changes. The primary endpoint is the change in 6-min walk distance from baseline to week 24. Key clinical events will be independently adjudicated. Secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality or lung transplantation; pulmonary hypertension-related hospitalisation or initiation of parenteral prostacyclin and changes in WHO functional class, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and emPHasis-10. Exploratory endpoints include genotype, right heart catheterisation and cardiac MRI parameters. The primary analysis will use ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline 6-min walk distance and randomisation stratum in the intention-to-treat population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol has been reviewed and approved by the certified central review board (Kyushu University Hospital Clinical Ethics Review Board) and participating institutions. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and trial registries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Japan Registry of Clinical Trials no. 1071250069; ClinicalTrials.gov <A HREF="NCT07356778">NCT07356778</A>. Protocol version and date: V.1.3; 23 October 2025</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoshida, K., Hosokawa, K., Hiraide, T., Akagi, S., Ejiri, K., Taniguchi, Y., Adachi, S., Inami, T., Nakanishi, N., Kataoka, M., Satoh, T., Tatebe, S., Shinke, T., Tomita, H., Akazawa, Y., Higaki, T., Tagawa, K., Ishikita, A., Asakawa, S., Abe, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113430</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113430</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for an open-label, randomised, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sotatercept add-on therapy compared with pulmonary vasodilator-based standard of care for pulmonary vasodilator-resistant pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with unrepaired congenital shunts (atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect or patent ductus arteriosus), including Eisenmenger syndrome: the SuMILE trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113430</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113430</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115656?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising metformin use in polycystic ovary syndrome (MET-PCOS): study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115656?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most prevalent endocrine disorders globally, affecting 11&ndash;13% of women during reproductive age. PCOS is associated with an elevated risk of reproductive, metabolic, endocrine and mental health features. While lifestyle changes are first-line treatment for managing PCOS, metformin is often recommended for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) &ge;25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The aim of the metformin use in polycystic ovary syndrome (MET-PCOS) trial is to determine whether a metformin dose of 1500 mg per day or 2250 mg per day is superior in managing biochemical and clinical outcomes in PCOS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>MET-PCOS is a double-blind randomised controlled trial with two arms. It will be carried out at the Reproductive Medicine Unit at Helsinki University Hospital, starting from November 2025. Participants aged 18&ndash;37 years with a BMI&ge;25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> meeting the updated 2023 Rotterdam criteria for a PCOS diagnosis will be included. The participants (n=184) will be allocated (1:1) to a metformin dose of 1500 mg or 2250 mg per day. Outcomes include anthropometry, metabolic outcomes, hyperandrogenism, polycystic ovary morphology, menstrual cyclicity, mental health and gastrointestinal adverse effects. Measurements for study endpoints will be undertaken at baseline, 14 and 26 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Finnish Medicines Agency has authorised the clinical trial (FIMEA/2025/00755) and the Regional Committee Medical Research Ethics, Finland (T7323/2024) has approved the trial protocol. This study will guide care providers in selecting the ideal metformin dose for individuals with PCOS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07120815">NCT07120815</A>, EU trial number: 2023-509259-15-01.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hautama&#x0308;ki, H.-M., Savolainen-Peltonen, H., Ro&#x0308;no&#x0308;, K., Melin, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115656</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115656</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising metformin use in polycystic ovary syndrome (MET-PCOS): study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115656</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115656</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115815?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CognIFied: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of a culturally adapted, task-shifted compensatory cognitive training intervention for young adults with first-episode psychosis in Nigeria]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115815?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cognitive impairment is present in the majority of individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and is a strong predictor of long-term functional disability. Despite this, evidence-based cognitive interventions are rarely available in routine mental healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries, where most young people with psychosis reside. This protocol describes the CognIFied study, a pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally adapted, task-shifted compensatory cognitive training (CCT) intervention for young adults with FEP in Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>CognIFied is a multicentre, assessor-blind, parallel-group pilot randomised controlled trial with an embedded mixed-methods process evaluation. The study will recruit 180 young adults aged 18&ndash;30 years with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)-defined FEP (onset within the past 5 years) and objective cognitive impairment from three public psychiatric hospitals in Nigeria. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either culturally adapted CCT or an active control condition, Enhanced Recreational Therapy. Both interventions comprise 12 weekly group sessions lasting 60&ndash;90 min. CCT is delivered by trained psychiatric social workers using a manualised curriculum co-designed with young people with lived experience. Primary outcomes assess feasibility (recruitment, retention, intervention adherence), acceptability (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8) and intervention fidelity. Secondary outcomes include preliminary signals of effectiveness on global cognitive functioning (Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia) and functional capacity (University of California, San Diego [UCSD] Performance-Based Skills Assessment), assessed at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Quantitative analyses will be descriptive and exploratory, supplemented by qualitative inquiry guided by Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research frameworks and an exploratory economic evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from relevant institutional review boards. Findings will be disseminated through open-access publications, policy-focused stakeholder engagement and community dissemination co-led by a Youth Research Team.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN44794154">ISRCTN44794154</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adewuya, A. O., Okewole, A., Ola, B., Oladipo, O. E., Lebimoyo, A., Esangbedo, A., Ayankola, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115815</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115815</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CognIFied: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of a culturally adapted, task-shifted compensatory cognitive training intervention for young adults with first-episode psychosis in Nigeria]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115815</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115815</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102586corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: 'Family functionality and its association with non-communicable diseases among urban adults in Selangor, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102586corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Abdullah NN, Azzani M, Mohamad M, <I>et al</I>. Family functionality and its association with non-communicable diseases among urban adults in Selangor, Malaysia: a crosssectional study. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2026;16:e102586. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102586</p>
<p>This article has been corrected since it was published online. The second author&rsquo;s name has been updated from &lsquo;Meram Mohammed Ali Azzani&rsquo; to &lsquo;Meram Azzani.&rsquo;</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T06:33:58-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102586corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102586corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: 'Family functionality and its association with non-communicable diseases among urban adults in Selangor, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102586corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102586corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108316?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nurse Prescribing Self-Efficacy Scale]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108316?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to translate the Nurse Prescribing Self-Efficacy Scale (NP-SES) into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic methodological framework was used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study&rsquo;s setting was hospitals and nursing schools in Jiangsu province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A convenience sample of 309 practising nurses and nursing graduates was recruited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The reliability and validity of the scale were assessed. Item screening was based on critical ratio values and item&ndash;total correlation coefficients. Validity was evaluated through content validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; coefficient and split-half reliability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>EFA identified three common factors, accounting for 78.608% of the total variance. CFA indicated that model fit indices met acceptable thresholds, supporting the scale&rsquo;s structural validity. Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; and split-half reliability for subdimensions ranged from 0.907 to 0.957 and from 0.867 to 0.944, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The Chinese version of the NP-SES demonstrates good reliability and validity and is suitable for assessing clinical nurses&rsquo; self-efficacy in prescribing.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xue, M., Cheng, X., Sun, Y., Jiao, J., Xu, H., Hu, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T23:03:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108316</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108316</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nurse Prescribing Self-Efficacy Scale]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108316</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dilemma of self-management among patients with diabetes in primary care settings in China: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This qualitative study aimed to explore the self-management dilemmas faced by patients with diabetes in Chinese primary care and collect suggestions for improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative methods are used in this study. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the transcripts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Four primary care communities in Beijing. The interviews were conducted between April and August 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This qualitative study used face-to-face, semi-structured interviews with 32 patients with type 2 diabetes. Data collection continued until information saturation was reached.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four core themes and multiple subthemes were identified. The first theme, &lsquo;Inadequate Disease Cognition and Health Literacy&rsquo;, showed that patients had a limited understanding of diabetes, often delaying diagnosis and only learning about complications after they appeared. Misconceptions about diet and a lack of medication management knowledge were also common. The second theme, &lsquo;Suboptimal Daily Management&rsquo;, highlighted that physical activity was unstructured, glucose monitoring was irregular and emergency response capabilities were poor. The third theme, &lsquo;Fragmented Healthcare Resources and Inadequate Family Support&rsquo;, revealed systemic barriers such as limited primary care competencies, homogeneous health education formats that failed to meet patients&rsquo; needs and insufficient family support. The fourth theme, &lsquo;Limitations in Self-Management Decision-Making&rsquo;, demonstrated that patients&rsquo; decision-making processes were predominantly experience-driven, relying on personal or communal anecdotes rather than scientific medical evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The self-management challenges among Chinese patients with diabetes in primary care are a complex interplay of inadequate individual cognition, suboptimal daily practices and fragmented support systems. The study suggests that future interventions should focus on enhancing general practitioner training, developing culturally sensitive health education and rebuilding family and community support networks to sustainably resolve these management dilemmas.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jin, F., Fang, W., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Zheng, J., Wang, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T23:03:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110237</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110237</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dilemma of self-management among patients with diabetes in primary care settings in China: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110237</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113812?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising Primary thErapy in pRimAry biliary cholangitis (OPERA): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of enhanced primary therapy with obeticholic acid]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113812?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare chronic cholestatic disease that despite current therapy has significant ongoing unmet needs, including risks of cirrhosis and life-impairing symptoms. The current treatment approach is a step-up model, wherein first-line therapy, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), is given for a minimum of 12 months before the addition of second-line therapy is considered for non-responding patients. This &lsquo;waiting to fail&rsquo; approach, focused on the needs of low-risk patients, allows, we postulate, a key process of biliary epithelial cell (BEC) senescence to become established, driving accelerated bile duct loss and aggressive disease. Preclinical mouse modelling has shown that early use of the farnesoid X receptor agonist obeticholic acid (OCA), currently only used as second-line therapy following UDCA failure, reverses BEC senescence, changing the clinical course of disease. Here, we describe the design of the Optimising Primary thErapy in pRimAry biliary cholangitis (OPERA) trial. The aim of OPERA is to explore a new paradigm for disease-modifying treatment of PBC: risk-informed early treatment stratification, with patients at increased risk offered UDCA and OCA combination with the goal of complete biochemical remission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>OPERA is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of OCA in combination with UDCA, as first-line treatment for high-risk PBC. This is a multicentre trial in England, which will be undertaken in specialist clinics in secondary/tertiary referral centres (or as per local set up). These centres will be specialists in the area of PBC management and will manage patients from across their local region. OPERA will recruit and randomise 106 adults, within 6 months of PBC diagnosis, who are at an enhanced risk of non-response to standard first-line therapy, between either: (1) UDCA and OCA or (2) UDCA and matched placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The primary efficacy outcome measure is the percentage of participants showing normalisation of serum alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin values at 26 weeks (disease remission).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Favourable ethical opinion was received from London &ndash; Riverside Research Ethics Committee (reference: 22/LO/0878). Potential participants will be fully informed of their rights and the benefits and harms of the trial by the research team before giving informed consent to participate in the trial. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications, at national and international conferences, in peer-reviewed journals and to participants and the public (using lay language).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN17176388">ISRCTN17176388</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunn, S., Evans, L., Kennedy, C., Wafer, R., Moody, S., Wolstenhulme, F., Burton, E., Konkoth, A. B., Fisher, H., Chadwick, T., Banham, A., Hale, F., Christie, M., Barclay, S. T., Dyson, J., Smith, R., Aithal, G., Culver, E., Aspinall, R., Thorburn, D., Heneghan, M., Hancock, H. C., Trivedi, P., Mells, G., Wason, J., Jones, D. E. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T10:18:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113812</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113812</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising Primary thErapy in pRimAry biliary cholangitis (OPERA): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of enhanced primary therapy with obeticholic acid]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113812</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113812</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100314?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How do we measure data sharing in the biomedical sciences? A measurement systematic review of biomedical data sharing-related knowledge, attitudes and practices across stakeholder groups, data types and geographies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100314?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Enabling the reuse of participant-level health data is central to advancing public health and clinical practice. Measuring knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to data sharing is essential for understanding how stakeholders perceive data reuse and where further investment is needed. We conducted a measurement systematic review to identify and describe the development, scope and measurement properties of quantitative surveys assessing data-sharing-related KAP in biomedical research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Ovid (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and HaPI were searched for relevant surveys from 1 January 2000 to 7 April 2021. The Ovid (MEDLINE) search was updated on 30 May 2022 and 15 April 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Quantitative surveys measuring knowledge, attitudes, behaviours or practices related to sharing or reusing participant-level health data were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data and, where possible, applied the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist to assess survey measurement properties. We summarised survey scope, target populations, data types, development and measurement properties narratively. Due to substantial heterogeneity, survey findings were not compared across studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We screened 3684 title-abstracts, reviewed 104 full texts and extracted data from 72 publications representing 60 independent surveys. Most surveys originated from high-income countries and were used only once. Fewer than one-third reported pilot testing. Only six surveys provided sufficient information to apply COSMIN, and only three reported measurement properties, indicating low certainty in the available evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This is the first systematic comparison of the development and measurement properties of quantitative survey instruments assessing data-reuse KAP. Most surveys lacked rigorous development and reporting, limiting their utility for comparing KAP related to data sharing across stakeholders and settings. The review findings will inform the creation of a cross-country, cross-disciplinary question bank to support future tool development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42021243926.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maxwell, L., Shreedhar, P., Gilyan, R., Naccache, M., Terry, R. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100314</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100314</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How do we measure data sharing in the biomedical sciences? A measurement systematic review of biomedical data sharing-related knowledge, attitudes and practices across stakeholder groups, data types and geographies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100314</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100835?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a web-based preventive postpartum depression programme in pregnancy, with/without telephone support: a randomised control trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100835?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based secondary prevention programme for postpartum depression, delivered with or without telephone support, compared with usual care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We first conducted a randomised controlled superiority trial to test whether the web-based Parents and Babies programme (Toi, Moi, B&eacute;b&eacute;; TMB) delivered with motivational telephone support (ie, coaching) was superior to the fully automated programme (ie, self-help). TMB incorporated classic and third-wave cognitive&ndash;behavioural therapy components and psychoeducation. Then, we tested whether TMB (both treatment modalities combined) was superior to usual care. The usual care comparison group was drawn from the CONCEPTION prospective pan-Canadian perinatal cohort (N=592).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A remote study based at Sainte-Justine Hospital Centre, Quebec, Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Web-based intervention programme participants were women aged &ge;14 years at 12&ndash;25 weeks&rsquo; gestation, with subclinical to moderate clinical Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores: 9&ndash;16. Exclusion criteria were psychosis and self-reported substance abuse. The usual care comparison group was pregnant women &ge;18 years old. All participants were living in Canada at study inception.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was EPDS scores at 3 months post partum, accounting for baseline EPDS scores and depression events defined as EPDS &ge;13 at 3 months post partum. The secondary outcomes were EPDS scores at 6 months post partum, depression events (EPDS&ge;13) at 6 months post partum, anxiety symptoms (Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale, GAD-7) at 3 and 6 months post partum, accounting for baseline scores for the continuous outcomes; as well as the number of completed intervention modules and well-being scores (WHO 5-Item Well-being Index) at 3 months post partum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We randomised 510 participants to TMB self-help (n=255) or TMB with coaching (n=255); 211 and 214 participants, respectively, were included in the complete-case intention-to-treat analyses. At baseline, 91% lived with a partner, 71% were university graduates and 42% self-reported GAD-7&ge;10. Randomisation was successful. First, TMB with coaching was not superior to TMB self-help: at 3 months post partum, EPDS scores were TMB self-help (mean 8.0&plusmn;4.3) vs TMB with coaching (mean 8.6&plusmn;4.5); effect size was 0.01 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.03; p=0.16). Second, TMB (regardless of intervention arm) was superior to usual care: in adjusted regression models, EPDS scores were 6.2 units lower (per SD, 95% CI &ndash;8.2 to &ndash;4.3) in TMB (both treatment modalities combined) than in usual care; and proportions of depression events were 4.7 units lower (per SD on the logit scale, 95% CI &ndash;6.6 to &ndash;2.7) in TMB (combined) than in usual care. No other group differences were observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings suggest that, in women with subclinical to moderate clinical antenatal depressive symptoms, receiving a web-based cognitive&ndash;behavioural therapy-based programme in addition to usual care can reduce depression postnatally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05110456">NCT05110456</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dessy, T., Montreuil, T. C., St-Andre, M., Herba, C. M., MacKinnon, A. L., Clement, M., Boucoiran, I., Dinello-Goupil, C., Beland, J., Samson, V., Tchouangue-Dinkou, G.-D., Berard, A., Morin, L., Amirali, L., Dennis, C.-L., Masse, B., Cote, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100835</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100835</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a web-based preventive postpartum depression programme in pregnancy, with/without telephone support: a randomised control trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100835</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100835</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101276?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Home-based physical activity intelligent programme for patients with lower extremity Ilizarov: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101276?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Lower extremity Ilizarov surgery, a common procedure for correcting bone deformities, is often associated with reduced physical activity (PA) and functional decline. The home-based PA intelligent programme (HB-PAIP) has shown promise in improving postoperative outcomes. However, standardised, intelligent programmes specifically designed for patients undergoing lower extremity Ilizarov surgery are lacking. This study aims to evaluate the effects of a 6-month home-based intelligent interaction programme on PA levels and to assess its impact on mental health, self-efficacy and quality of life among patients with lower extremity Ilizarov.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A total of 166 participants aged &ge;18 years who have undergone lower extremity Ilizarov surgery will be randomly allocated to either the HB-PAIP group or control group (CG) at a 1:1 ratio. The HB-PAIP group will receive a 6-month, structured and algorithm-guided home rehabilitation programme via an intelligent motion rehabilitation management system, whereas CG will receive traditional care. The assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months (mid-intervention) and 6 months (post-intervention). The primary outcome is functional mobility assessed by the Timed Up-and-Go test. Secondary outcomes include the 10-metre walking test, the passive ankle range of motion, the Activity of Daily Living score, the Visual Analogue Scale score, the mental status measured using the Hamilton Anxiety and Hamilton Depression Scales and serum levels of haemoglobin and albumin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was initially approved by the Human Ethics Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine on 26 January 2024 (approval number: 20240139). The protocol amendment was approved on 28 January 2026 (approval number: 20260134). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400093880.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lu, F., Wang, X., Wang, W., Zhi, X., Liu, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101276</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101276</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Home-based physical activity intelligent programme for patients with lower extremity Ilizarov: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101276</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104471?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary thromboembolism in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104471?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is rare but potentially life-threatening in children and differs substantially from adult PTE in epidemiology and risk factors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and risk factors of paediatric PTE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>We searched eight databases (PubMed, Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Library and four Chinese databases) on 2 March 2023, with an updated search on 2 July 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included original studies reporting epidemiology (incidence/prevalence, major clinical outcomes and long-term sequelae), clinical characteristics, or risk factors of PTE in patients younger than 18 years. Reviews, case reports/series without extractable epidemiological data and studies not focused on paediatric PTE were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using appropriate tools for observational studies. A random-effects model was applied to pool prevalence and incidence estimates, along with related outcomes, and their 95% CIs, regardless of the degree of heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From 14 438 records, 26 studies were included: 16 cross-sectional, 9 cohort and 1 case&ndash;control study. 23 studies were marked as high quality and three as moderate quality. The pooled incidence of paediatric PTE was 0.016% (95% CI 0.0011% to 0.0298%). Autopsy-confirmed prevalence was 5.29% (95% CI 1.28% to 9.30%). Case fatality was 4.04% (95% CI 0.49% to 7.58%), and recurrence was 26.31% (95% CI 19.62% to 33.01%). Available evidence suggested an increasing trend in PTE occurrence over recent years. Female sex and oral contraceptive use were frequently reported clinical characteristics in adolescents. Reported risk factors clustered into genetic predisposition, underlying diseases, immobilisation or surgery and central venous catheter-related thrombosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Paediatric PTE remains uncommon but appears to be increasing, with notable recurrence and non-negligible fatality. Given heterogeneous study settings and definitions, further high-quality, population-based studies are needed to refine epidemiological estimates and clarify age-specific risk profiles, thereby informing prevention strategies and clinical management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>PREPARE-2023CN922.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, J., Ni, X., Zeng, L., Song, X., Diao, S., Chen, L., Liu, H., Zhang, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104471</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104471</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary thromboembolism in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104471</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104471</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105215?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring experiences following participation in a concentrated micro-choice-based rehabilitation programme for long covid: a focus group study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105215?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore how individuals with long covid experienced various aspects of a micro-choice-based rehabilitation programme and if these experiences could facilitate behaviour change.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study with three focus groups was conducted, in mean 9.8 months after completing the rehabilitation programme. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in a university setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>19 participants (aged 23&ndash;55 years, 15 women) were included between Spring 2021 and Autumn 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>The participants in this study had participated in a 3-day concentrated micro-choice-based rehabilitation programme. One of the main features of this intervention was to support participants in shifting their focus from targeting symptoms to choosing alternative actions aimed at improving everyday functioning, referred to as micro-choices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five themes were identified: (1) reduction in uncertainty achieved through reassurance and motivation; (2) &lsquo;in the same boat&rsquo;: sharing experiences and supporting each other; (3) knowledge about the body&rsquo;s stress responses and micro-choices; (4) shifting between individual practice and close collaboration with the therapists; and (5) sustaining behaviour change is challenging. These themes illustrated how participants&rsquo; experiences with different aspects of the rehabilitation programme facilitated both the initiation and maintenance of behaviour change. The participants highlighted the importance of acknowledging their challenges, reducing fear, sharing experiences with peers, feeling understood and supported, collaborating with a skilled team, receiving personalised guidance and gaining insights through the exploration and implementation of micro-choices. Participants also highlighted that behaviour change is an ongoing process requiring sustained effort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings showed how participants experienced various aspects of a concentrated micro-choice-based rehabilitation programme as supportive of behaviour change. The findings indicate that a concentrated rehabilitation programme may facilitate self-management and improve everyday function in individuals with long covid.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05234281">NCT05234281</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Njoten, K. L., Magnussen, L. H., Haugstvedt, A., Ju&#x0308;rgensen, M., Kvale, G., Frisk, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105215</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105215</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring experiences following participation in a concentrated micro-choice-based rehabilitation programme for long covid: a focus group study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105215</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108406?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NewbornsInSA multi-omic newborn screening: protocol for a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108406?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is freely and universally available to babies born in Australia, with nearly 300 000 newborns screened each year. The NBS programme screens for approximately 30 conditions; however, there are hundreds of childhood conditions that could be treated if identified earlier and asymptomatically. Contemporary screening platforms have relied on mass spectrometry-based technologies, limiting surveillance to conditions with validated biomarkers detectable within the neonatal period. Advancements in metabolic techniques and genomics have expanded the range of conditions that could be detected. The NewbornsInSA research study will develop, validate and evaluate a novel multi-omic model of newborn screening, integrating metabolomic and genomic newborn screening as complementary methodologies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Parents can opt in to additional NBS through NewbornsInSA during pregnancy or shortly after birth. One thousand prospectively recruited families will be offered genomic NBS by whole-genome sequencing, including analysis of a virtual gene panel of over 600 genes, and concurrent metabolomic screening. Clinically actionable pathogenic or likely pathogenic genetic variants will be reported to parents and whole genome sequencing data will be available on request for diagnostic reanalysis, if required later in life.</p>
<p>Acceptability of the NewbornsInSA programme will be evaluated through stakeholder engagement activities with healthcare professionals, members of the public and patient advocacy groups. Family experiences will be assessed using online surveys. The diagnostic yield, accuracy and the costs and consequences of the multi-omic NBS model will be assessed by comparison to standard-of-care NBS.</p>
<p>NewbornsInSA will investigate the acceptability, feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a multi-omic newborn screening model in a prospectively recruited South Australian population. We hypothesise that this approach will increase the number of conditions identified, reduce the time to diagnosis and facilitate earlier care with better outcomes for newborns with genetic conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This research study has been ethically approved by the Women&rsquo;s and Children&rsquo;s Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/HRE00258 and 2023/HRE00236). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anastasi, L., Chowdhury, A., Ashenden, A., Rozek, T., Louise, J., Lam, K., Skinner, S., Stallard, K., Merlin, T., Schubert, C., Vogan, A., Morris, S., Cohen-Woods, S., Smith, N., Ranieri, E., Saxon, B., Scott, H. S., Bratkovic, D., Barnett, C. P., Siu, C. W.-K., King, J., Kassahn, K. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108406</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108406</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Genetics and genomics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NewbornsInSA multi-omic newborn screening: protocol for a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Genetics and genomics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108406</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108406</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108999?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chronic rhinosinusitis: a qualitative study of patient and clinician experiences of the MACRO randomised controlled trial of surgical versus medical management]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108999?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore patient and clinician experiences of participation in the MACRO randomised controlled trial (RCT)&mdash;which found endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) to be clinically effective whereas clarithromycin was no better than placebo for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS)&mdash;and to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the trial results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study embedded within the multicentre MACRO RCT. Semistructured interviews with patients and clinicians were analysed using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>21 secondary and tertiary ear, nose and throat centres in England and Scotland participating in the MACRO RCT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>20 CRS patients (16 with nasal polyps, 4 without) were interviewed approximately 6 months after trial completion, and 17 clinical staff including principal investigators (PIs), associate PIs and research nurses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study explored patients&rsquo; and clinicians&rsquo; experiences of the trial to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing the findings. Adopting the outcomes of the trial would involve recommending surgery to more patients with CRS. Yet patient and clinician interviews highlighted polarised views on ESS among patients, between those with positive experiences and expectations of ESS and those expressing fear of complications and hesitancy to receive surgery. During the trial, many participants randomised to surgery reported rapid improvement in symptoms, but with postoperative challenges for some patients including pain, unexpected symptoms and variations in recovery period. Priorities for implementation include providing patients with information about risks and support to make informed choices. Clinicians also reflected on the resource implications for offering ESS to more patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ESS is effective for CRS, but patient hesitancy and recovery concerns persist. Implementation requires clear communication, recognition and respect for individual preferences, tailored support for decision-making and post-surgical care to optimise acceptance and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN36962030">ISRCTN36962030</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vennik, J., McDermott, C., Williams, S. J., Thomas, M., Boardman, J., Philpott, C. M., Little, P., Schilder, A., Hopkins, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108999</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108999</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chronic rhinosinusitis: a qualitative study of patient and clinician experiences of the MACRO randomised controlled trial of surgical versus medical management]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108999</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108999</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109584?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Promoting CHANGE cluster randomised controlled trial to improve food outlet healthiness in Australian sport and recreation facilities: protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109584?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Food retail outlets in sports and recreation facilities often fail to support healthy eating, despite aligning with healthy lifestyles and goals of local governments (LGs) that often own or manage them. LGs face barriers to implementing facility changes including inadequate staffing, training and incentives. The Promoting CHANGE initiative was co-designed to support LGs in improving and sustaining healthier food and drink offerings in these settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A 3-year, type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid cluster randomised controlled trial will evaluate the Promoting CHANGE capacity-building and support package in three Intervention and four Control LGs in Victoria, Australia (August 2023&ndash;July 2026). The co-designed initiative includes human resource support, training, tools, technical assistance, community-of-practice groups, feedback based on food outlet audit and sales data and small grant incentives. Using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) evaluation framework, the trial&rsquo;s co-primary outcomes are the percentage of least healthiest food and drinks (1) displayed (implementation) and (2) sold weekly (effectiveness). Key secondary outcomes are effectiveness (sales and revenue); facility-level adoption, implementation, maintenance of healthy changes; cost-effectiveness (within-trial modelled economic evaluation). Findings will provide evidence of the initiative&rsquo;s effectiveness and scalability, informing recommendations for advancing healthier food environments in over 6000 community-based food outlets across 500 Australian LGs, with implications globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received approval from the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number HEAG-H 92_2023). The results will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals along with plain language summaries for participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12621001120864.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lalchandani, N., Romaniuk, H., Cameron, A., Orellana, L., Ananthapavan, J., Peeters, A., Backman, B., Adam, M., Allender, S., Nguyen, P., Sacks, G., Brimblecombe, J. K., McMahon, E., Blake, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109584</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109584</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Promoting CHANGE cluster randomised controlled trial to improve food outlet healthiness in Australian sport and recreation facilities: protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109584</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109584</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110675?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How do staff and team characteristics relate to ward safety incidents in adult inpatient mental health settings? A protocol for a systematic integrative review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110675?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A neglected area of patient safety research is how the characteristics of mental health staff and teams may influence incidents, specifically, through unintended and harmful consequences of clinical care. While the research literature into patient safety has increased, there is still a need to further consider safety on mental health wards, for example, the role of the staff team in containment and conflict. This review aims to explore the question, &lsquo;How do staff and team characteristics relate to safety incidents in adult inpatient mental health settings?&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow Whittemore and Knafl&rsquo;s integrative review framework. CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science will be searched. Literature published after 1999, that includes extractable quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods data exploring the relationship between staff and team characteristics on incidents in adult inpatient mental health settings, will be suitable for inclusion. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used for quality appraisal and data analysis and will comprise data reduction, display and comparison.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No new data or access to participants will be involved in this review. As such, ethical review will not be required. Dissemination will include publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>This review has been registered on PROSPERO (ref. CRD420251119981; <A HREF="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251119981">https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251119981</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenfield, K., Griffin, B., Kendal, S., Woodnutt, S., Hallett, N., Johnson, J., Berzins, K., Bojke, C., Henderson, M., Lomani, J., Wadey, E., Baker, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110675</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110675</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How do staff and team characteristics relate to ward safety incidents in adult inpatient mental health settings? A protocol for a systematic integrative review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110675</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110675</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113194?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stimulating amyloid-{beta} clearance in cerebral amyloid angiopathy with low-sodium oxybate and/or non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (Clear-Brain): study protocol for a randomised pre-post trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113194?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is caused by the accumulation of amyloid-beta (A&beta;) in the cerebrovasculature. The glymphatic system is thought to be involved in the clearance of cerebral waste products, including A&beta;. Stimulation of the glymphatic system through enhancing deep sleep with low-sodium oxybate (LXB) or inhibition of cortical spreading depolarisations via non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) could potentially increase clearance of A&beta; and hence improve disease course.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will perform a pre-post trial to assess whether treatment with LXB, nVNS or a combination of both interventions can enhance the clearance of A&beta; in patients with CAA. A total of 60 participants, 30 with sporadic CAA and 30 with Dutch-type CAA, will be randomly assigned to receive either LXB, nVNS or both interventions, resulting in three groups (20 in each group: LXB, nVNS and both). The study spans 6 months, comprising a 3-month observational phase and a 3-month intervention phase. The primary outcome measure will be the morning levels of A&beta;40 and A&beta;42 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) before and after the intervention. We will assess possible disease progression with (non-)haemorrhagic imaging markers on 7-Tesla MRI at baseline, before and after intervention, as a secondary outcome. Additionally, the activity of the glymphatic system by means of fluid dynamics will be assessed with CSF-Selective T2-weighted Readout with Acceleration and Mobility encoding (CSF-STREAM) on 7-Tesla MRI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden The Hague Delft (P23.100) on 8 April 2024. The first participant was enrolled on 27 March 2025. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. Additionally, study updates and results will be shared with participants via our newsletter twice a year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>EU CT number 2023&ndash;5 06 128-10-00, Universal Trial Number U1111-1295-1113, ClinicalTrials.gov <A HREF="NCT06421532">NCT06421532</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schriemer, S. E., Hirschler, L., van Etten, E. S., van Zwet, E. W., Lammers, G. J., Liebler, E. J., van Walderveen, M. A. A., Slats, A. M., van Es, A. C. G. M., Verbeek, M. M., van Osch, M. J. P., Wermer, M. J. H., Fronczek, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113194</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113194</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stimulating amyloid-{beta} clearance in cerebral amyloid angiopathy with low-sodium oxybate and/or non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (Clear-Brain): study protocol for a randomised pre-post trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113194</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113194</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114024?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hybrid drug-coated balloon strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114024?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Recently, drug-coated balloons (DCB) have emerged as a promising alternative for side branch treatment in coronary bifurcation lesions, in combination with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the main vessel, the hybrid DCB approach. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with the hybrid DCB approach and to compare this strategy with other bifurcation techniques.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up until January 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included randomised controlled trials and observational studies investigating clinical outcomes in patients treated with the hybrid DCB approach for coronary bifurcation lesions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The outcome of interest was the combined endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at the longest available follow-up. Crude event rates, stratified by treatment strategy, were provided for the overall incidence of the primary endpoint. Furthermore, we conducted meta-analyses on the combined endpoint, comparing different bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>13 studies, consisting of 2393 patients, were included in our systematic review. Investigated techniques were the hybrid DCB approach in all studies, and a two-stent strategy or the combination of DES in main vessel and balloon angioplasty (BA) in the side branch as potential comparators. Median follow-up duration was 12 months (IQR 7.5&ndash;12). The combined endpoint of cardiac death, MI or TLR was found in 5.6% in the hybrid DCB group, 15.4% in the two-stent group and in 10.0% in the BA group. The pooled analyses, including three and two studies, respectively, showed that the hybrid DCB approach was associated with a lower risk of the composite endpoint of cardiac death, MI or TLR when compared with a two-stent strategy (7.9% vs 15.4%; risk ratio (RR): 0.53; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.85) and compared with BA in the side branch (5.6% vs 10.0%; RR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.88). The certainty of the evidence was graded as very low.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the hybrid DCB approach is a feasible and promising treatment approach for bifurcation lesions, when compared with other bifurcation PCI strategies. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously as the certainty of evidence was graded as very low, underlining the importance of larger trials to confirm these findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CRD420250651469.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dillen, D. M. M., van Beek, K. A. J., Vermeer, A. J. E., Vlaar, P.-J., El Farissi, M., Demandt, J. P. A., Eerdekens, R., van het Veer, M., Tonino, P. A. L., Teeuwen, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T07:50:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114024</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114024</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hybrid drug-coated balloon strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114024</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114024</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101666?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and associated factors of nutritional status among children under 5 years: a community-based cross-sectional study in Bhimdatta municipality, Kanchanpur, Nepal]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101666?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the nutritional status and identify associated factors among children under 5 years residing in Ward 10 of Bhimdatta Municipality, Kanchanpur District, Sudurpashchim Province, Nepal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Community-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Ward 10 of Bhimdatta Municipality, the second-largest ward by population within the municipality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participant</st>
<p>A total of 248 children aged 6&ndash;59 months were selected using simple random sampling from a list of eligible children compiled through the local vitamin A supplementation programme. Children who were ill for more than 7 days, had physical deformities or whose mothers were illiterate were excluded. Data were collected between 2 January and 25 May 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Nutritional status was assessed using anthropometric indicators&mdash;height-for-age (stunting), weight-for-height (wasting) and weight-for-age (underweight)&mdash;according to WHO Child Growth Standards. Measurements were taken using a ShorrBoard to the nearest 0.1 cm, and WHO Anthro V.3.1.0 was used to generate Z-scores. Data were analysed using EpiData V.3.1 and SPSS V.20. Descriptive statistics were computed, and <sup>2</sup> tests identified candidate variables for multinomial logistic regression to determine factors associated with nutritional status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study found that 35.08% of children under 5 years in Ward 10 were affected by some form of under-nutrition. A significant association was observed between under-nutrition and exclusive breastfeeding practices (p&lt;0.05), underscoring the importance of early infant feeding practices. Model adequacy was confirmed using likelihood ratio and Pearson&rsquo;s <sup>2</sup> tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Under-nutrition remains a major public health concern among children under 5 years in Bhimdatta Municipality. Interventions focusing on promoting exclusive breastfeeding, improving maternal education and strengthening household food security are recommended to enhance child nutritional outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kalauni, D., Gyawali, P., Malla, N., Basnet, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101666</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101666</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and associated factors of nutritional status among children under 5 years: a community-based cross-sectional study in Bhimdatta municipality, Kanchanpur, Nepal]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101666</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101666</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103389?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk factors for COVID-19 symptom severity across clinical categories among hospitalised patients in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103389?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to quantify how patient risk factors relate to COVID-19 severity across categories 1&ndash;5 in a prospective, hospital-based cohort. We hypothesised that greater severity would be associated with higher odds of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality. Secondary aims were to assess associations with age, viral variants, symptom clusters, lymphocyte count, fasting blood glucose and cytokine profiles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A secondary-care/tertiary-care hospital and linked community settings in Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study was nested within the COVGEN project, a prospective COVID-19 cohort conducted at Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM (HCTM), Cheras Health Clinic and the Bandar Tun Razak COVID-19 Assessment Centre in Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, from 1 August 2021 to 31 October 2022. 2532 participants were enrolled at baseline. Eligible participants were Malaysian citizens aged 12&ndash;18 years (paediatric/adolescent) or &ge;18 years who had reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction&ndash;confirmed COVID-19 at recruitment and resided in Kuala Lumpur or Selangor. Patients who had a clinically unstable condition and those who declined participation (personally or via a next-of-kin or legal representative) were excluded. This analysis included 559 patients hospitalised at HCTM; after excluding five with incomplete questionnaires, 554 remained for analysis (413 admitted to general wards and 141 to ICUs). Categories 3&ndash;5 comprised hospitalised patients, whereas categories 1&ndash;2 included hospitalised individuals and a subset recruited from community settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes included disease severity (categories 4&ndash;5 vs 1&ndash;3), ICU admission and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included associations with age strata, viral variant (delta vs omicron), symptom clusters, lymphocyte count, fasting blood glucose and cytokines: interferon gamma-inducible protein 10, interferon gamma, interleukins 8, 10, 2, 6 and 7 and tumour necrosis factor alpha.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>141 of 554 (25.5%) patients required ICU care. Compared with milder categories, category 5 was associated with markedly higher odds of ICU admission (OR 204.50; 95% CI 37.54 to 1114.18; p&lt;0.001) and death (OR 13.20, 95% CI 3.97 to 43.86; p&lt;0.05). Older age was associated with greater severity: &gt;55 versus &lt;36 years for categories 3 (OR 4.575; 95% CI 1.472 to 14.218; p=0.009) and 5 (OR 18.003; 95% CI 1.139 to 284.601; p=0.040) and 36&ndash;55 versus &lt;36 years for category 5 (OR 18.412; 95% CI 1.094 to 309.951; p=0.043). Delta accounted for 47.7% of infections compared with 17.9% for omicron, with a higher proportion of category 4 presentations among delta cases. Systemic, pulmonary/respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, lymphopenia, hyperglycaemia and elevated cytokines were each associated with increasing severity (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>An increasing clinical severity category was strongly associated with ICU admission and mortality. Age, delta infection, specific symptom clusters, lymphopenia, hyperglycaemia and pro-inflammatory cytokines identified higher-risk patients, supporting risk-stratified management and prioritisation for enhanced monitoring.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johdi, N. A., Abdullah, N., Goh, Y.-X., Min, J. O. S., Muhammad Azami, N. A., Abdul Jalal, M. I., Mohammed Nawi, A., Ahmad, N., Hassan, M. R., Sulong, A., Kori, N., Periyasamy, P., Hamid, F., Sapuan, N. M., Selvam, S. B. P., Hajib, N., Mustafa, N., Rashid, N. Z. Z., Salleh, S. A., Alias, H., Mohamed Said, M. S., Othman, S. N., Koon, P. B., Hamzah, F. A., Jamal, S. M., Jarmin, R., Othman, H., Nawawi, K., Harunarashid, H., Mokhtar, M. N., Wan Mat, W. R., Kamalul Arifin, A. S., Khuzaimi, A. N., Abd Jalal, N., Ismail, N., Mhd Yusuf, N. A., Dauni, A., Wan Sallam, W. A. F., Shafie, A. S., Kamaruddin, M. A., Jamal, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103389</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103389</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk factors for COVID-19 symptom severity across clinical categories among hospitalised patients in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103389</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103389</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106511?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards urinary calculi among patients: a cross-sectional study in Jiangsu Province, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106511?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of patients with urinary calculi in China, where prior KAP research on this condition is lacking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was carried out in Jiangsu Province between August and September 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients diagnosed with urinary calculi were included, with 440 valid questionnaires analysed (65.9% male).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were KAP scores (knowledge: 0&ndash;30, attitude: 6&ndash;30, practice: 7&ndash;35). Secondary outcomes included structural equation modelling (SEM) analysing relationships between KAP domains.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mean scores were 10.63&plusmn;3.73 (knowledge), 22.37&plusmn;4.16 (attitude) and 22.40&plusmn;5.36 (practice). SEM revealed direct effects of knowledge on attitude (&beta;=0.652, p&lt;0.001) and practice (&beta;=0.375, p&lt;0.001), and attitude on practice (&beta;=0.432, p&lt;0.001). Knowledge also indirectly influenced practice via attitude (&beta;=0.281, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients with urinary calculi tended to demonstrate limited knowledge but moderate attitudes and practices towards their condition. These findings suggest potential gaps in patient understanding and indicate that educational approaches may play a role in supporting urinary calculi management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, N., Shu, M., Jiang, Y., Chen, Z., Zhao, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106511</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106511</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards urinary calculi among patients: a cross-sectional study in Jiangsu Province, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106511</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106511</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107754?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of low-dose nalmefene on recovery from general anaesthesia in adult patients: a multicentre randomised controlled study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107754?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate the impact of low-dose intravenous nalmefene on anaesthesia recovery in adult patients aged 18&ndash;65 undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial with two parallel arms clinical study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Four hospitals from China</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 514 patients aged 18&ndash;65 who underwent elective orthopaedic, urologic and thoracic surgeries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>On completion of skin suturing, the intervention group received a single intravenous dose of nalmefene (0.25 &micro;g/kg). The control group received an equivalent volume of normal saline at the same time point.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the interval time between the end of anaesthesia and the Aldrete score &ge;9 being achieved in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). The secondary endpoints included the time interval from the end of operation to extubation; Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score at extubation; the time at Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) orientation score &ge;5; visual analogue scale (VAS) score in PACU and 24 hours postoperatively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>514 patients were included in the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) analysis. The time interval between the end of anaesthesia and Aldrete score reached &ge;9 in PACU was significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (mean (SD) 24.8 (11.8) min vs 33.8 (12.5) min; 95% CI &ndash;8.8 (&ndash;10.8 to &ndash;6.7); p&lt;0.001). Furthermore, the time interval from the end of surgery to extubation was shorter in the intervention than in the control group (mean (SD) 20.0 (9.9)min vs 27.6 (11.6) min; 95% CI &ndash;7.6 (&ndash;9.43 to &ndash;5.7), p&lt;0.001). The time at Montreal cognitive assessment score &ge;5 was also shorter in the control than in the intervention group (mean (SD) 20.0 (15.9) min vs 27.0 (20.5) min; 95% CI &ndash;7.0 (&ndash;10.2 to &ndash;3.8); p&lt;0.001). Compared with the control group, the intervention group had better analgesic effect at the recovery endpoint (P Aldrete score &ge;A was achieved as well as lower 24 hours points postoperatively (p&lt;0.05)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In patients aged 18&ndash;65 who underwent elective orthopaedic, urologic and thoracic surgeries, low-dose nalmefene administered at the end of surgery can accelerate postanaesthesia recovery without compromising analgesic effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04713358">NCT04713358</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, X., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Zhang, G., Xing, L., Huai, X., Tang, Y., Xie, Y., Su, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107754</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107754</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of low-dose nalmefene on recovery from general anaesthesia in adult patients: a multicentre randomised controlled study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107754</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107754</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108286?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol RCT for active informed consent in spine and urologic surgery in the metropolitan city of Bologna: does an increased patient engagement improve satisfaction of complex surgical procedures?]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108286?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Informed consent is an essential component of surgical care; however, patients often struggle to fully understand procedures, associated risks and available alternatives. Factors such as preoperative anxiety, limited health literacy and the complexity of consent documents can further impair comprehension and information retention. The active informed consent (CIA) pathway, based on a Patient Educational Program that combines multimedia resources with a comprehension test, aims to enhance patient understanding, improve satisfaction and reduce medicolegal issues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study will be conducted as a multicentre, non-pharmacological, randomised controlled trial in three hospitals in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy). A total of 300 patients undergoing elective complex spinal surgery or robotic radical prostatectomy will be enrolled and randomised (1:1) to the experimental arm or to the standard informed consent arm, using block randomisation stratified by centre. Outcomes will include patient satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire), comprehension, psychological distress (Depression Anxiety Stress Scales), pain (Numeric Rating Scale), functional recovery (Oswestry Disability Index/International Prostate Symptom Score/International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form/International Index of Erectile Function) and medicolegal complaints. Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), discharge (T1), 2 months (T2) and 6 months (T3), with extended monitoring of medicolegal outcomes for up to 5 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of Emilia-Romagna (protocol CIA21, V.1.3 dated 14 December 2022). Participation is voluntary and does not affect standard care. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and communication with health authorities. If effective, the intervention may be implemented as a scalable model to improve patient empowerment and transparency in surgical consent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06059599">NCT06059599</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boriani, L., Quattrini, I., Maccaferri, B., Lima, C., Benuzzi, A., Salvador, M., Schiavina, R., Brunocilla, E., Deiure, F., Maselli, V., De Stefano, R., Vommaro, F., Gasbarrini, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108286</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108286</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol RCT for active informed consent in spine and urologic surgery in the metropolitan city of Bologna: does an increased patient engagement improve satisfaction of complex surgical procedures?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108286</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108286</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108729?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['We just give the phone so they stay quiet: a qualitative exploration of screen time practices among caregivers of children younger than 5 years in south India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108729?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the perceptions, challenges and strategies of caregivers in managing screen time among children younger than 5 years in the urban and rural areas of Tamil Nadu, India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGDs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Rural Health and Training Centre in Vayalanallur, Thiruvallur district and Urban Health and Training Centre, Thiruvanmyur in Chennai district, Tamil Nadu, India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>54 caregivers (27 rural, 27 urban, 46 mothers, 6 grandmothers, 2 fathers) of children younger than 5 years whose screen time exceeded WHO age-specific recommendations participated. Six FGDs were conducted, each with 8&ndash;10 participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>FGDs were conducted in familiar community locations near the participants&rsquo; homes to ensure comfort and accessibility. The audio recordings were transcribed verbatim in Tamil and translated into English and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Coding was manually performed by two independent researchers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six major themes emerged: (1) circumstances leading to screen exposure, (2) perceived advantages, (3) perceived disadvantages, (4) challenges in reducing screen time, (5) methods adopted to reduce screen time and (6) strategies for sustaining reduction. Safety concerns, lack of play space and the need to manage household chores were commonly cited reasons for screen use. Although most caregivers were aware of the potential harms, screens were often used to feed or pacify children. Emotional resistance from children, inconsistent family norms and grandparents&rsquo; screen use were common barriers. Caregivers employed strategies, such as limiting access, engaging in outdoor play and enrolling children in structured activities. Urban&ndash;rural differences were minimal, and thematic saturation was achieved after six FGDs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Caregivers face multiple, structural and family level challenges in managing screen time among young children. Awareness and interventions need to be tailored to address family dynamics, caregiver fatigue and lack of alternatives. Health providers, community workers and policymakers should collaborate to offer structured support, promote screen-free engagement and ensure child-friendly spaces in urban and rural communities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varadarajan, S., Govindarajan Venguidesvarane, A., Rajamohan, M., Krupa, M., Ramaswamy, K. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108729</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108729</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['We just give the phone so they stay quiet: a qualitative exploration of screen time practices among caregivers of children younger than 5 years in south India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108729</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108729</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109072?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of Vunakizumab in Erosive haNd osteoarthritiS (VENuS): protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109072?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hand osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and debilitating joint disorder that impairs daily functioning and quality of life. Current treatments are often inadequate in managing the symptoms and progression of the disease. The cytokine interleukin (IL)-17 has been implicated in the inflammatory processes associated with OA, making it a potential target for therapeutic intervention. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of vunakizumab, an IL-17A inhibitor, in reducing pain and improving functional outcomes in patients with erosive hand OA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial will enrol 150 participants aged 30&ndash;80 years with symptomatic erosive hand OA. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vunakizumab 120 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, with a loading dose injection period during the first 4 weeks. The primary outcome is the change in hand pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale at 28 weeks. Secondary outcomes include changes in physical function measured by the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and the Health Assessment Questionnaire, as well as changes in grip strength and radiographic and MRI evaluations of the hands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Sixth People&rsquo;s Hospital (2024&ndash;217) and will adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki. Research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500101031; <A HREF="https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=264789">https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=264789</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fu, K., Yu, S. P., Zheng, W., Bracken, K., Ding, C., Mei, Y., Wei, J., Lei, G., Wang, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Zheng, Y., Xie, D., Jie, L., Qi, W., Venkatesha, V., Zhu, Z., Zheng, X., Zhang, C., Hunter, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109072</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109072</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of Vunakizumab in Erosive haNd osteoarthritiS (VENuS): protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109072</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109072</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109931?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Facilitators experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109931?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The aim is to explore co-design facilitators&rsquo; perspectives and experiences of using co-design to improve intrapartum care in four sub-Saharan African settings. The inquiry focuses particularly on how they fostered engagement, built trust and mitigated unintended consequences during the co-design process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative interview study with reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Sixteen public and private not-for-profit hospital-based maternity units in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda (four per country).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total population sample of 10 co-design facilitators involved in a hospital-based co-design project implemented in maternity units in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda were interviewed. Semistructured interviews were conducted between December 2022 and January 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Co-design facilitators viewed co-design as a collaborative process to develop contextually relevant solutions. Our findings elucidate their role in facilitating consensus-building and fostering stakeholder ownership amidst significant power divides. They described approaches co-design facilitators take to maintain ongoing stakeholder engagement and manage misaligned expectations in a trusting and collaborative environment, while being mindful of existing tensions and power imbalances. They also highlighted key challenges faced, including navigating norms, power imbalances and unintended consequences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study underscores the importance of power-sharing, fostering ownership and engaging end users equitably and continuously in co-design efforts, while also being aware of how to address its potential unintended consequences. Further research is needed to understand co-design facilitators&rsquo; impact on co-design and how to address unintended consequences for stakeholders during and after co-design activities in intrapartum interventions in low-resource settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saliba-Gustafsson, E. A., Rodriguez Neufeld, N. S., Hanson, C., Chipeta, E., Alvesson, H. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109931</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109931</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Facilitators experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109931</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109931</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110319?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of pain and functional outcomes after lower limb amputation: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110319?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Pain, including phantom limb pain (PLP), residual limb pain (RLP) and low back pain (LBP), is highly prevalent after lower limb amputation (LLA) and compromises quality of life. Although both pain and function have been studied extensively, methods of assessment and reporting vary, limiting comparability. A clearer overview of how these domains are measured and interrelated is needed to guide research and practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To synthesise evidence on how postamputation pain and functional outcomes have been assessed and reported in adults with LLA, and to examine reported relationships between pain and mobility/function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO (inception to 15 August 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Quantitative studies that measured pain and functional outcome in adults with LLA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics, pain measures and functional outcomes in Covidence; findings were narratively synthesised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eighty-four studies were included. RLP (n=46), LBP (n=32) and PLP (n=28) were most frequently examined. Pain was mainly assessed by self-report scales; mobility was typically assessed by clinical tests and less often by biomechanical instrumentation. PLP was associated with altered gait and balance deficits; RLP with limited walking distance, asymmetric weight-bearing and reduced community participation; LBP with gait asymmetry, trunk&ndash;pelvis discoordination and increased energy cost of walking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Postamputation pain is often linked to reduced mobility and functional limitations. However, heterogeneous definitions and inconsistent methodology hinder synthesis across studies. Future research should combine validated pain scales with objective analysis, wearable sensors and musculoskeletal modelling to clarify mechanisms and inform rehabilitation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, J. M., Balthazaar, S. J. T., Alsayed, K., Nightingale, T., Falla, D., Yeo, S.-H., Ding, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110319</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110319</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of pain and functional outcomes after lower limb amputation: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110319</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110319</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110995?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments in post-stroke depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110995?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Depression is a common complication of stroke that adversely affects functional recovery. Although a wide range of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are used in clinical practice, evidence regarding their comparative efficacy and acceptability remains inconclusive. Therefore, we will conduct the first systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare and rank available interventions for post-stroke depression (PSD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we will search PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from database inception to 1 September 2025 to identify published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We will include studies comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, or any control conditions as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with PSD. We will assess the certainty of evidence using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework. The primary outcomes will be the change score on depression scales from baseline to the end of treatment (efficacy) and all-cause discontinuation (acceptability). Secondary outcomes will include quality of life, cognitive and neurological function scores, anxiety and sleep quality. Two reviewers will independently screen and select eligible studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk of bias in all RCTs included in the NMA will be assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2). A frequentist NMA will be conducted in Stata and R. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses will be performed to assess robustness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This NMA does not need ethical approval, as the data used here are based on aggregated data in the public domain. Findings from the analysis will provide an overview and information on the relative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments in PSD. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251136670</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yao, X., Pu, J., Fan, Y., Jiang, X., Zhao, H., Wang, Y., Ye, Y., Wei, Y., Yang, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110995</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110995</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments in post-stroke depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110995</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110995</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111778?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Accessibility in pharmacy education: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111778?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Accessibility (EDIA) are recognised as core principles in higher education, yet their practical integration into pharmacy education remains underexplored. This review aims to identify the scope of existing research, highlight knowledge gaps and provide valuable insights for pharmacy educators, researchers and policymakers seeking to enhance EDIA integration within pharmacy education.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analyses</st>
<p>This protocol describes the methodology for a scoping review to systematically map the existing peer-reviewed literature on EDIA in pharmacy education, focusing on three critical areas: faculty development, curriculum content and teaching strategies. Using the Population, Concept and Context framework, the review will include studies examining faculty members, students and administrators within formal pharmacy education contexts worldwide. The scoping review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The search will include peer-reviewed academic studies, accessed through databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, ERIC and Web of Science. Backward snowballing will also be employed. Data will be charted using a predefined extraction tool, and findings will be synthesised and presented in tabular and narrative formats. A pilot search took place in March 2025, and the final search, study selection and data extraction will be conducted from May to December 2025. The subsequent analysis, presentation and interpretation of results are planned thereafter.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required. We plan to share findings through a variety of means including professional networks, peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations, invited workshops and webinars, on the FPD-Include project website and on our research groups&rsquo; university websites.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kan, I., Vander Kloet, M. A., Lein, R. K., Koehler, T., Blokzijl, M.-R., Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K., Alfarah, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111778</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111778</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Accessibility in pharmacy education: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111778</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111778</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for the development of the Asian consensus recommendations on the standardised diagnosis and imaging of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis applying a modified Delphi approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a leading cause of ischaemic stroke, particularly among Asian populations, and continues to impose a significant burden across the region. Despite this, evidence from Asia remains fragmented. Findings from our previously conducted scoping review revealed an absence of standardised diagnostic criteria and imaging protocols. This resulted in marked methodological inconsistencies in regional ICAS research, thereby limiting the validity and interpretability of existing data. To address this, we have initiated a consensus process that aims to establish standardised definitions, develop harmonised diagnostic protocols and outline research standards and priorities for ICAS across Asia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A modified Delphi approach will be employed to formulate consensus-based recommendations through a structured, iterative, multistage process. Draft Delphi statements will be informed by targeted literature reviews and formatted into five-point Likert scale questionnaires with fields allowing for qualitative feedback. An expert core group was selected based on their established clinical and research expertise in intracranial atherosclerosis, cerebrovascular imaging and stroke, with deliberate consideration for geographic and disciplinary diversity. This group will serve as the formal voting panel. The process will comprise three to four anonymous online rounds, with a predefined consensus threshold of &ge;80% agreement. Statements that do not reach consensus will be revised based on aggregated feedback and re-evaluated in subsequent rounds. A non-voting hybrid conference, open to the public, will follow the second round to facilitate broader engagement and discussion; relevant points will be incorporated into the subsequent round. Consensus on research standards and priorities will follow the finalisation of recommendations on standardised definitions and harmonised diagnostic protocols to ensure alignment with preceding outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This consensus was granted exemption by the Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center Institutional Review Board (No. 2025&ndash;221). Resulting recommendations will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presentation at scientific fora.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MB6GP">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MB6GP</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Navarro, J. C., Pedregosa, B. C., Belen, A. A., Gan, R. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for the development of the Asian consensus recommendations on the standardised diagnosis and imaging of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis applying a modified Delphi approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112266</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112394?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of artificial intelligence for health science in low- and middle-income countries: NIH portfolio landscape, gaps and opportunities]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112394?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To analyse the landscape of active US National Institutes of Health (NIH) artificial intelligence (AI) health research grants, with emphasis on studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to characterise use cases, health challenges addressed and gaps relevant to the ethical and responsible application of AI-enabled health science.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Descriptive portfolio analysis of NIH-funded AI health research grants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>NIH research portfolio analysis, with a focus on global health studies in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>None. Data are derived from active NIH-funded grants involving AI applications in health research, as of 31 January 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Not applicable (portfolio analysis).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary measures included the proportion and funding of AI health research grants focused on LMICs and their thematic use cases. Secondary measures compared LMIC-focused and high-income country (HIC)-focused grants by research focus and health area and identified gaps relevant to ethical and responsible AI use in global health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 1850 active NIH AI health research grants, 97 (5.2%) focused on LMICs, representing US$40.2 million (2.4%) of the total US$1.66 billion portfolio. compared with HICs, LMIC-based studies emphasised diagnostics and treatment (72.2% vs 66.8%), health system optimisation (18.6% vs 15.6%), disease surveillance and outbreak response (14.4% vs 8.8%), and telemedicine and remote care (7.2% vs 4.4%). HIC-based grants more frequently addressed public health education (10.4% vs 8.2%) and ethics and data governance (12.8% vs 7.2%). All settings emphasised data science training and capacity strengthening, as well as basic research and early-stage AI-augmented tools. LMIC-based studies most often targeted non-communicable diseases (39%), communicable diseases (30%) and health system strengthening (24%). 31 awards were made directly to LMIC-based principal investigators (1.7% of the portfolio), most commonly in South Africa, Kenya and Uganda.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>NIH investment in peer-reviewed AI-enabled health research is expanding globally. LMIC-focused studies prioritise areas aligned with pressing global health needs, including outbreak detection, disease surveillance, diagnostics and treatment, health system optimisation and remote care. Greater attention to ethics, data governance and public health communication, alongside support for digital infrastructure and meaningful collaboration, may help strengthen the relevance and sustainability of AI-enabled research for population health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forsyth, A. D., Povlich, L. K., Kilmarx, P. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112394</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112394</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of artificial intelligence for health science in low- and middle-income countries: NIH portfolio landscape, gaps and opportunities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112394</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112394</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112627?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of an adjunctive INtervention for Debilitating symptom complexes attributed to ticks (FIND): study protocol for a randomised, waitlist-controlled feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112627?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Debilitating Symptom Complexes Attributed to Ticks (DSCATT) is a new term for an unexplained Australian syndrome&mdash;people who suffer from a chronic, multifaceted and debilitating illness, characteristically attributed to tick bites, but in a country without endemic Lyme disease. Despite the profound morbidity of DSCATT, no single causative agent has been identified and there are no recognised treatments for the illness at present. An increasing body of evidence shows psychological therapies such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) can be effective in reducing symptom-related disability and improving quality of life for other unexplained syndromes. Here we present a study protocol to assess the feasibility of an ACT-informed intervention for patients suffering from DSCATT, to be used adjunctively to their pre-existing healthcare. The study aims to assess the acceptability, practicality and demand for the treatment. Additionally, we will examine the effects of therapy on participants&rsquo; health and well-being, its safety, potential mediators of response to therapy and its preliminary cost-effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We will assess the feasibility of a 32-week, randomised, waitlist-controlled, parallel convergent mixed-methods pilot trial for DSCATT. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 16 sessions of ACT-informed therapy adjunctive to their pre-existing healthcare, delivered one-to-one with a trial therapist within a 20-week period or be assigned to the waitlist control group where they will continue their treatments as usual. We will collect quantitative and qualitative data to address study aims, with retention rate being the primary feasibility outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has ethical approval from Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). The outcomes will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Data from participants who have given extended consent will be available for other HREC-approved studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12623000372684, prospectively registered 13 April 2023, URL: <A HREF="https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385579&amp;isReview=true;">https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385579&amp;isReview=true;</A> the last participant is expected to complete in November 2026.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kanaan, R. A. A., Macdonell, R., Long, M., Richardson, R. J., Rogers, C., Mcmanus, M., Braat, S., Zaloumis, S., Mihalopoulos, C., Chatterton, M. L., Gibney, K. B., Oliver, G., Wilson, S. J., Chalder, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112627</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112627</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of an adjunctive INtervention for Debilitating symptom complexes attributed to ticks (FIND): study protocol for a randomised, waitlist-controlled feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112627</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112627</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112903?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on ART access and timely initiation in people living with HIV in 31 countries: a regression discontinuity design study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112903?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic threatened global HIV Test and Treat Efforts. We assessed whether it affected (1) the number of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiations and (2) the proportion of timely ART initiations in people living with HIV (PLWH) globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Quasi-experimental, regression discontinuity design using routinely collected data from HIV clinics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>360 HIV care clinics across primary and secondary levels of care, participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS consortium, in 31 countries in Asia, Africa and the Americas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>177 391 PLWH (&ge;18 years old) who initiated ART 2 years before and 1 year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in their country.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the number of ART initiations per week; the secondary outcome was the proportion of timely ART initiations (ie, ART initiated within 7 days of enrolment). We assessed changes in these outcomes in the 52 weeks after compared to the 104 weeks before the pandemic onset, defined using each country&rsquo;s peak Oxford Stringency Index score between January and June 2020.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 177 391 newly enrolled PLWH, 129 743 initiated during the pre-pandemic and 47 648 post-pandemic onset. 72.5% of ART initiations were timely pre-pandemic whereas 82.3% were during the pandemic. Absolute number of ART initiations remained stable during the pandemic period in 25 of 31 countries but decreased significantly in six countries: India (&ndash;5.0 p, 95% CI &ndash;9.2 to &ndash;0.7), Rwanda (&ndash;10.0 p, &ndash;18.6 to &ndash;1.4), Malawi (&ndash;33.4 p, &ndash;54.1 to &ndash;12.3), South Africa (&ndash;130.8 p, &ndash;188.6 to &ndash;73.1), Zimbabwe (&ndash;12.9 p, &ndash;20.0 to &ndash;5.8) and Togo (&ndash;19.6 p, &ndash;39.1 to &ndash;0.1). The proportion of timely initiations was stable in all countries except in Kenya (+4.2 pp, 95% CI +0.3 to +8.1) and in Mozambique (+2.7 pp, +0.5 to +4.9), where it increased significantly.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A deeper understanding of the factors that contributed to sustaining ART initiations, particularly in settings with stringent public health and social measures, is needed. These insights should inform preparedness strategies, resource allocation and policy development to ensure continuity of HIV services during future health emergencies, in line with World Health Organisation recommendations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Farhat, J., Messou, E., Borse, R., Varela Bustillo, D., Madimabe, M., Nash, D., Byakwaga, H., Shah, N. S., Ezechi, O., Pujari, S., Veloso, V. G., Hobbins, M., Murenzi, G., Mkwashapi, D., Hogan, B., Choi, J. Y., Minga, A., Crabtree-Ramirez, B., Twizere, C., Diero, L., Haw, J., Bolton-Moore, C., Cortes, C. P., Lee, M.-P., Mbewe, S., Brazier, E., Humphrey, J. M., Althoff, K. N., Bonnet, F., Barger, D., Jaquet, A., IeDEA International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112903</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112903</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on ART access and timely initiation in people living with HIV in 31 countries: a regression discontinuity design study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112903</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112903</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113203?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychological and emotional outcomes after bariatric surgery: a cross-sectional comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass patients ]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113203?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to assess depressive and anxiety symptoms after bariatric surgery and to identify clinical, socioeconomic and psychosocial factors associated with postoperative psychological outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study included 300 adults who had undergone bariatric surgery at least 12 months previously (172 sleeve gastrectomy and 128 gastric bypass). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Psychosocial factors were assessed using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), Emotional Eating Scale (EES) and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Socioeconomic status, psychotropic medication use and percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) were recorded. Group comparisons, correlation analyses and multivariable linear regression were performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients who underwent gastric bypass reported significantly higher depressive and anxiety symptoms compared with sleeve gastrectomy patients (PHQ-9: 9.7&plusmn;4.2 vs 7.3&plusmn;3.7; GAD-7: 8.5&plusmn;4.0 vs 6.5&plusmn;3.9; both p&lt;0.01). Greater %TWL was inversely associated with depressive (r = &ndash;0.29, p&lt;0.001) and anxiety symptoms (r = &ndash;0.24, p&lt;0.001). Participants with struggling socioeconomic status had higher PHQ-9 scores than those with comfortable status (10.4&plusmn;4.5 vs 7.1&plusmn;3.4; Cohen&rsquo;s d=0.73), and psychotropic medication users reported greater symptom severity than non-users (PHQ-9: 10.8&plusmn;4.3 vs 7.3&plusmn;3.6; p&lt;0.001). Depressive and anxiety symptoms were moderately correlated with lower self-esteem (RSES), greater body image dissatisfaction (BSQ), higher emotional eating (EES) and lower perceived social support (MSPSS) (all |r|=0.30&ndash;0.55). In multivariable regression, surgery type, %TWL, socioeconomic status and psychotropic medication use independently predicted depressive symptoms, with the model explaining approximately 33% of the variance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Bariatric surgery affects physical and mental health. Gastric bypass patients report more depression and anxiety, sleeve gastrectomy boosts self-esteem, and weight loss improves well-being, though social and medication factors raise psychological risk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tariq, A., Ammar, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113203</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113203</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychological and emotional outcomes after bariatric surgery: a cross-sectional comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass patients ]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113203</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of ABO and Rh blood groups among individuals attending a tertiary care hospital in Nepal: a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Understanding the regional blood group distribution is essential for safe transfusion practice and efficient blood bank inventory management, as local variations in the ABO and Rh blood group systems guide donor recruitment and minimise shortages and transfusion incompatibilities. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups among individuals attending a tertiary care hospital in Lalitpur, Nepal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Department of Transfusion Medicine and Blood Bank of KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All individuals attending a tertiary care hospital between 17 July 2018 and 31 July 2023 who underwent ABO and Rh blood group testing were included in this study. Individuals younger than 4 months of age and those with discrepant blood group results were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Frequency and distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups among different categories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among individuals attending a tertiary care hospital after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (reference number: 2080/81/91) of KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital. The blood grouping and sociodemographic data of individuals were analysed using SPSS V.17.0, and statistical significance was established at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of 20 966 individuals, 12 956 (61.80% (95% CI 61.14% to 62.45%)) were female, and 8010 (38.20% (95% CI 37.55% to 38.86%)) were male. The most common blood group was A+ 6629 (31.62% (95% CI 30.99% to 32.25%)), while AB&ndash; was the least common blood group 49 (0.23% (95% CI 0.17% to 0.30%)). The RhD+ cases were 20 432 (97.45% (95% CI 97.24% to 97.67%)) and the RhD&ndash; cases were 534 (2.55% (95% CI 2.33% to 2.76%)). O+ blood (OR 1.25 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.32), p&lt;0.001) was most common in the males, whereas A+ was common in the females (OR 1.22 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.30), p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Of the two major blood group systems, the ABO and RhD systems, A+ and RhD+ blood groups were the most prevalent among individuals attending a tertiary care hospital. Understanding the regional distribution of blood groups supports effective blood bank management and transfusion services, ultimately improving patient care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chand, A. B., Sen, B., Khadka, J., Pandey, S., Nepal, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:36-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114395</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114395</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of ABO and Rh blood groups among individuals attending a tertiary care hospital in Nepal: a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114395</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e096942?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring teamwork in fluid multiteam systems (MTS): a qualitative analysis of team effectiveness in public health emergent response teams in Wales, UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e096942?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives&nbsp;</st>
<p>The research aims to understand key contributors to multiteam system (MTS) effectiveness by qualitatively exploring team members&rsquo; experiences working in a fluid MTS, their ability to effectively collaborate with component teams, and the effect of social dynamics on collaboration and cooperation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>In-depth qualitative case study with semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and open-ended answers from an online survey. Thematic analysis was applied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A COVID-19 Test, Trace and Protect Service in the UK was formed as a partnership between a local health board, Public Health Wales and public sector organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Senior managers from different partner organisations, as well as current and former staff members from various positions and teams, were recruited via the service&rsquo;s project management office.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study identifies a strong influence of situational strength on team functioning, whereby the pandemic situation fuelled the teams&rsquo; commitment to the common purpose and promoted a shared identity across the teams. Further, the study highlights the key role of leadership in enabling MTS effectiveness through the establishment of effective governance structures, role-modelling (supporting that all voices are heard), and enhancing a psychologically safe working climate. Lastly, the study demonstrates the impact of social dynamics on team functioning, whereby team commitment, engagement and a shared team identity appeared to promote mutual support, communication and cooperation across component teams.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Results hold lessons for managers tasked with leading fluid MTS: communication of a clearly defined overarching purpose and aim, alignment of individual team contributions to the overarching aim alongside feedback cycles and acknowledgement of individual team efforts, selecting team members with the ability to cope with volatile, uncertain and ambiguous circumstances; selecting team leaders with inclusive and compassionate leadership styles, the establishment of collaborative governance structures and the introduction of staff well-being measures for coping with work stressors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krczal, E., Behrens, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096942</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096942</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring teamwork in fluid multiteam systems (MTS): a qualitative analysis of team effectiveness in public health emergent response teams in Wales, UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096942</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096942</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e098478?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Observational analysis of factors associated with completion of four or more antenatal care visits in Sarlahi district, Nepal]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e098478?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A significant number of women die from pregnancy and childbirth complications globally, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Receiving at least four antenatal care (ANC) visits is important in reducing maternal and perinatal deaths. However, few studies have investigated the factors linked to the completion of &ge;4 ANC visits in Nepal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate factors associated with attending &ge;4 ANC visits in Sarlahi district of southern Nepal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>A secondary analysis was conducted on data from the Nepal Oil Massage Study (NOMS), a cluster-randomised, community-based longitudinal pregnancy trial including 34 village development committees. We investigated the associations between attendance of &ge;4 ANC visits and socioeconomic, demographic, morbidity and pregnancy history factors using logistic regression; generalised estimating equations were used to account for multiple pregnancies per woman. All pregnancies resulting in a live birth (LB) (n=31 867) were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Attendance of &ge;4 ANC visits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>31.4% of those pregnancies received 4+ ANC visits. Significant positive associations included socioeconomic factors such as participation in non-farming occupations for women (OR=1.52, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.93), higher education (OR=1.79, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.93) and wealth quintile (OR=1.44, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.59), nutritional status such as non-short stature (OR=1.17, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.27), obstetric history such as adequate interpregnancy interval (OR=1.31, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.45) and prior pregnancy but no LB (OR=2.14, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.92), symptoms such as vaginal bleeding (OR=1.35, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.65) and awareness of the government&rsquo;s conditional cash transfer ANC programme (OR=2.26, 95% CI 2.01 to 2.54). Conversely, identifying as the Shudra caste (OR=0.56, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.67), maternal age below 18 or above 35 (OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.88; OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.96), preterm birth (OR=0.41, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.49), parity &ge;1 (OR=0.66, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.72) and the presence of hypertension during pregnancy (OR=0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.90) were associated with decreased likelihood of attending &ge;4 ANC visits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings demonstrate the importance of socioeconomic factors, including education, caste, wealth and occupation in completion of &ge;4 ANC visits. In addition, biological factors including birth spacing, pregnancy complications and nutrition are important. The association with awareness of the government&rsquo;s conditional cash transfer programme is a motivation for a full evaluation of whether expanding that programme might improve prenatal care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The clinicaltrial.gov trial registration number for NOMS was <A HREF="NCT01177111">NCT01177111</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yue, Y., Hazel, E. A., Subedi, S., Zeger, S., Mohan, D., Mullany, L. C., Tielsch, J. M., Khatry, S., LeClerq, S. C., Katz, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098478</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098478</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Observational analysis of factors associated with completion of four or more antenatal care visits in Sarlahi district, Nepal]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098478</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098478</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e099887?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematic review and meta-analysis of information source usage: do medical specialists use the best evidence for clinical decision-making?]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e099887?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine which information sources medical specialists use to answer clinical questions in daily practice and to describe the relative frequency of use for each source.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review with narrative synthesis and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Academic Search Premier, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Emcare, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and PubMed were searched for relevant studies published from 2000 to 1 June 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included peer-reviewed English-language studies reporting on the frequency of information source usage by medical specialists when addressing clinical questions. Studies reporting usage on a continuous (0&ndash;100%) scale were eligible for meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened studies. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment tool with Diverse Studies tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted for studies that were not eligible for quantitative pooling to summarise patterns in information-seeking behaviour and reported barriers. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting continuous usage percentages and assessing at least four information sources. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using a leave-one-out approach. Potential publication bias was explored descriptively using funnel plots.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>25 studies were included, of which 6 (with 8641 participants) were eligible for meta-analysis. The narrative synthesis of non-pooled studies showed a consistent reliance on standalone information sources and identified barriers to the use of aggregated sources. In the meta-analysis, digital databases such as PubMed were the most frequently used information source (74%, 95% CI 63% to 85%), followed by textbooks (71%, 95% CI 57% to 85%) and consultation with colleagues (43%, 95% CI 15% to 71%). Systematically aggregated sources, including clinical practice guidelines (38%, 95% CI 27% to 49%) and point-of-care websites (49%, 95% CI 17% to 81%), were used less frequently. Sensitivity analyses indicated that pooled estimates were generally robust, although results should be interpreted cautiously given methodological variability across studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Medical specialists predominantly rely on standalone information sources when addressing clinical questions, while systematically aggregated and interpreted sources such as clinical practice guidelines and point-of-care tools are used less frequently. These findings highlight the need to better understand and address barriers to the use of aggregated information sources in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42022267431.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weller, F. S., Repping, S., Hamming, J. F., van Bodegom - Vos, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099887</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099887</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematic review and meta-analysis of information source usage: do medical specialists use the best evidence for clinical decision-making?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099887</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099887</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100377?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Annual Patient EXposure of residents in training over 20 years (APEX-trial): a retrospective analysis from a public teaching hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100377?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the clinical patient exposure of residents over 20 years following the statutory introduction of a maximum working week of 50 hours in 2005.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective analysis of longitudinal cohorts of residents who worked on the medical wards between 2001 and 2023 or the emergency department (ED) between 2007 and 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Cantonal Hospital of Baden, a representative, large Swiss teaching hospital affiliated with the University Hospital of Zurich.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Residents in training working on the internal medical wards and the ED.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Annual Patient Exposure (APEX) of residents, which is the ratio of annual patients to residents and describes the annual number of patients treated per resident.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We assessed time trends of the APEX in annual cohorts of residents in training on the internal medicine wards (2001&ndash;2023) and the ED (2007&ndash;2023). We analysed the annual case severity (Case Mix Index and Emergency Severity Index (ESI)), patient age and the length of hospital stay (LOS) as a proxy for changes in the patient population over time and the readmission rate as a quality indicator.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The medical ward APEX even increased by 5.2% from 325 patients to 342, despite the workhour restrictions and the increased number of residents (+90%). Inpatients increased by 100% (from 3250 to 6507). Their LOS decreased from 12.4 to 7.5 days and the readmission rate decreased from 4.2% to 3.3%.</p>
<p>In the ED, the APEX decreased by 21% (from 3261 to 2576), but the case complexity (ESI) and the LOS increased substantially.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In contrast to the general belief, work hour restrictions and the increased number of residents did not reduce the inpatient APEX over 20 years. The reduced APEX in the ED may be compensated by the increase in case complexity and the LOS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sturm Kunz, C., Gerhards, V., Ballmer, F. H., Gantenbein, A., Schwendinger, M., Beer, J.-H., Wertli, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:35-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100377</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100377</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Annual Patient EXposure of residents in training over 20 years (APEX-trial): a retrospective analysis from a public teaching hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100377</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100377</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113558?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alloplastic total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement registry: a protocol for a prospective global multicentre observational cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113558?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Total alloplastic replacement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a viable treatment option for severe TMJ disorders (TMDs) unresponsive to conservative approaches, as well as for reconstruction of congenital or acquired TMJ defects. However, clinical data on indications, outcomes, complications and long-term effects remain limited, and no global registry currently exists. This study aims to address this gap by establishing an international registry to collect data from patients undergoing total alloplastic TMJ replacement systematically. The registry will document clinical indications and disease progression, explore relationships between treatments, outcomes and quality of life, identify predictors of favourable outcomes and inform future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This international, prospective, multicentre, observational registry will enrol approximately 200 patients with TMD requiring total alloplastic TMJ replacement, with follow-up lasting up to 5 years postoperatively. The data collected will include underlying disease, treatment details, functional outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and procedure-related adverse events. The registry will also monitor patients who decline surgery and record their reasons. All treatments will adhere to the standard of care at each participating centre.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the responsible ethics committee (EC) at each participating site prior to TMJ surgery. All patients will be enrolled following an informed consent process approved by the relevant EC. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.</p>
<p>Approving ECs include: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital EC, KCDS/Ethical Comm/54/2022&ndash;23; Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz, 2019&ndash;02387; University of Belgrade School of Dental Medicine EC, 36/19; National Videnskabsetisk Komit&eacute;, 2401881; University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research EC, BREC/00001592/2020; Etikpro&#x0308;vningsmyndigheten, 2019&ndash;04477; Ethikkommission Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, 8660_BO_K_2019; Ethik-Kommission an der Medizinischen Fakulta&#x0308;t der Universita&#x0308;t Leipzig, 080/21-lk; Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica de la Investigaci&oacute;n con Medicamentos Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 19/392; Landesa&#x0308;rztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz EC, 2025&ndash;18012-andere Forschung/nachberatend; Local Ethical Committee at National Medical and Surgical Centre named after NI Pirogoov, LEC meeting 5; Ethikkommission bei der LMU Mu&#x0308;nchen, 19&ndash;589; Komisja Bioetyczna przy Warmi&#x0142;sko-Mazurskiej Izbie Lekarskiej w Olsztynie, 12/2021; De Medisch Ethische Toetsings Commissie Erasmus MC, MEC-2019&ndash;0696 and Comiss&atilde;o Nacional de &Eacute;tica em Pesquisa, 3.825.711.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT03991728">NCT03991728</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thor, A., Bengtsson, M., Dowgierd, K., Epifanov, S., Fichter, A. M., Jelovac, D., Korn, P. N., Nilsson, J. L., Pastore, G., Rughubar, V., Smolka, W., Talvilahti, J., Thiem, D., Thieringer, F., Ulmner, M., Wolvius, E. B., Zubillaga Rodriguez, I., Kumar, V. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113558</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113558</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alloplastic total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement registry: a protocol for a prospective global multicentre observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113558</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113558</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114270?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychometric properties and cultural validity of mental health assessment tools for refugees and asylum seekers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114270?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Migration is a complex global phenomenon, with millions of people relocating each year driven by various social or personal reasons. Among them, refugees and asylum seekers form a particularly vulnerable subgroup, often forced to escape conflicts, persecution or life-threatening conditions. Most mental health assessment tools, originally developed in high-income countries and validated primarily in Western populations, may lack the cultural validity needed for this demographic. The primary objective is to systematically review and synthesise the psychometric properties and cultural validity of mental health assessment tools validated for refugees and asylum seekers. Secondary objectives are to (a) identify the range of mental health symptoms these tools assess and (b) describe the geographical coverage in terms of the regions of origin and host countries where tools have been validated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, the review will conduct searches across different databases (ie, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, Global Index Medicus, CINAHL and Scopus), from inception to January 2025, with no restrictions on language. We will include validation, adaptation or diagnostic accuracy studies, as well as any other study design that reports at least one psychometric property of a mental health assessment tool. Two pairs of reviewers will screen, extract and appraise each study independently. Methodological quality will be assessed with the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) Risk-of-Bias checklist for measurement studies and QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) for diagnostic accuracy studies; the certainty of the evidence per property will be graded using the COSMIN-GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Narrative synthesis will be performed for all properties; where appropriate, meta-analyses will pool Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha; (Fisher-Z), intraclass correlations and sensitivity/specificity estimates using random-effects models. Inconsistency will be explored with subgroup analyses and meta-regressions; publication bias will be investigated with funnel plots and Egger&rsquo;s test when &ge;10 studies are available.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review, as no empirical data will be collected. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication in a scientific journal and presented at relevant conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024510901.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tempia Valenta, S., Conti, A., Porru, F., Giovannardi, G., Andersen, I., Bramer, W. M., Atti, A. R., De Ronchi, D., Panella, M., Hubloue, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114270</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114270</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychometric properties and cultural validity of mental health assessment tools for refugees and asylum seekers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114270</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114593?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Public versus private clinical radiography training in Lagos State, Nigeria: a comparative cross-sectional survey of associations with graduate self-perceived competence and practice readiness]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114593?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To compare clinical radiography training experiences (structure, resources, participation, feedback) and self-perceived competence/practice readiness between public and private radiography centres in Lagos State, Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Comparative cross-sectional survey design from August to October 2025 using a validated self-administered questionnaire distributed in person during departmental seminars and clinical debriefings at University of Lagos-affiliated centres.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Centre-based settings at public and private radiodiagnostic centres.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 260 final-year students and recent graduates, 130 each from public and private radiodiagnostic centres. Inclusion criteria included: age &ge;18 years, with &ge;6 months clinical exposure, from centres affiliated to the University of Lagos. All participants completed the self-administered questionnaire. There were no interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the self-perceived competence/practice readiness, and the secondary was participation, extent and feedback mechanisms, measured as planned without protocol deviations. All variables were measured using validated items in the questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Private centres significantly outperformed public centres in hands-on practice and feedback, with higher self-perceived competence (mean 35.6&plusmn;5.7 vs 32.8&plusmn;6.4; p=0.001). There were no significant differences in training structure (p=0.78). Public centres reported higher patient loads (86.2% vs 68.5%; p=0.001) but lower equipment availability (47.7% vs 72.3%; p&lt;0.001); while private centres reported higher participation (80.0% vs 74.6%; p=0.03), hands-on practice (76.2% vs 68.5%; p=0.009) and feedback (70.0% vs 60.0%; p=0.002). Centre type was independently associated with self-perceived competence (&beta;=2.45, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.78). Challenges included public overcrowding (70.8% vs 40.8%; p&lt;0.001) and private equipment downtime (51.5% vs 34.6%; p=0.009).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Private centres were associated with higher self-perceived competence and readiness, better resources and feedback, while public centres offered greater patient volumes. Hybrid placements and targeted infrastructure investment are recommended to help address disparities in perceived readiness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Udo, E. O., Emordi, O. R., Kalu, E. I., Enebeli, U. U., Uzochukwu, B., Kalu, F. A., Igwe, P. C., Kalu, J. J., Kalu, B. O., Cherima, Y. J., Nwokenna, U. S., Hassan, R. K., Amadi, A. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114593</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114593</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Public versus private clinical radiography training in Lagos State, Nigeria: a comparative cross-sectional survey of associations with graduate self-perceived competence and practice readiness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114593</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114593</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115036?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MULTIsite feasibility of MUSIc therapy to address Quality Of Life in Sickle cell disease (MULTI-MUSIQOLS): protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial at two US medical centres]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115036?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Accessible, person-centred, non-pharmacologic modalities are needed to address chronic pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Building off prior single-site pilot studies of music therapy (MT) in SCD, the purpose of this study is to (1) examine the data collection processes and intervention implementation overall and across two sites and (2) evaluate the implementation of the MT and health education interventions using quantitative and qualitative data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This three-arm, two-site, feasibility randomised controlled trial will include 90 individuals &ge;14 years who have SCD, chronic pain and access to a mobile device who are not currently engaged in mind-body pain management interventions under the supervision of a healthcare professional. Participants will be randomised to six sessions over 8 weeks of either: (1) in-person MT, (2) hybrid (one in-person, five virtual) MT or (3) hybrid health education. Patient-reported outcome measures of HRQoL and self-efficacy will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention and 6 weeks post-intervention. 24 participants (eight per arm) and 20 stakeholders (eg, haematologists, music therapists, nurses) will be invited to complete semi-structured interviews to further examine intervention acceptability, perceived benefits and implementation. Sessions will be monitored for fidelity, and participants lacking access to home internet or videoconferencing technology will be provided tablets to engage in virtual sessions. Feasibility will be determined by rates of data completion, recruitment, retention, session attendance and home practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Institutional Review Board (STUDY20231055). The dissemination plan includes presenting findings at national and international scientific conferences and publishing in peer-reviewed journals. All activities will be conducted in collaboration with SCD community stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06853158">NCT06853158</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodgers-Melnick, S. N., Gorthi, V., Foss, A., Erande, A., DiFrancesco, K., Owusu-Ansah, A., Anim, S., Bretz, S., Ketter, P., Fuqua, T., Anderson, A. R., Karasz, A., Bailey, L., Ezenwa, M., Jenerette, C., Dusek, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115036</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115036</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Complementary medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MULTIsite feasibility of MUSIc therapy to address Quality Of Life in Sickle cell disease (MULTI-MUSIQOLS): protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial at two US medical centres]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Complementary medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115036</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115036</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116603?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[VR-CARE: a protocol for a mixed-methods study and pilot trial with embedded process evaluation to develop and evaluate virtual reality training for risk reduction in care homes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116603?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Risk reduction training for UK care home staff is limited, not standardised and challenging to implement. Virtual reality (VR) is an immersive, engaging method of education delivery that is being adopted in health and social care. VR may be an effective education tool in care homes, but this research has yet to be conducted.</p>
<p>The VR-CARE project aims to create a new VR risk reduction training programme for care homes that combines hand hygiene and falls prevention modules, and to evaluate this through a pilot trial to inform a future randomised controlled trial (RCT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>There are two research phases with patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) activities embedded throughout. Care home stakeholders are collaborating to design the training and toolkit, oversee methods, review resources for accessibility, support recruitment and ensure the project meets the needs of the workforce and positively impacts resident care.</p>
<p>In phase 1, we will use a mixed-methods and user-centred design approach to develop the VR training and an accompanying implementation toolkit needed to deliver it. The training will be developed and tested by 15 care home staff across three rounds to identify and inform changes that maximise usability and acceptability. We will conduct up to 20 interviews with staff from VR companies and care homes to support toolkit development.</p>
<p>Phase 2 is a mixed-methods pilot cluster RCT, with a waitlist control and process evaluation with up to 80 unregistered staff members from six North England care homes, to develop the measures and methods to inform a future trial. The process evaluation will generate knowledge about VR as a training mechanism in care homes. This phase will focus on the practicality of using VR, broader impacts (eg, on residents), contextual considerations and how it might be scaled up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The University of Manchester Proportionate University Research Ethics Committee has approved phase 1 (Reference: 2025-24416-44642). We will obtain further approval before commencing phase 2.</p>
<p>Outputs will include user-friendly and acceptable VR risk reduction training for care homes, accompanied by an implementation toolkit adaptable for other VR training in social care settings. Materials (eg, training overviews, infographics and videos) will be developed to support uptake. Findings will be presented at conferences and published in journals. Lay summaries will be co-created with our PPIE group, and additional dissemination methods will be co-developed to broaden reach.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gasteiger, N., Ford, C. R., Hawley-Hague, H., Wilkinson, J., Jones, D., Whittaker, W., Ullah, A., Kislov, R., Stanmore, E., Laverty, L., Chantrell, J., Callaghan, C., Edmondson, V., Dowding, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:32-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116603</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116603</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[VR-CARE: a protocol for a mixed-methods study and pilot trial with embedded process evaluation to develop and evaluate virtual reality training for risk reduction in care homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116603</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e095757?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perspectives of female and under-represented physicians on well-being in medicine: a qualitative study from an academic medical centre in the USA]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e095757?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Stress and burnout are pervasive among physicians. Academic physicians who are female and physicians who are under-represented in medicine (URM) face inequities in the workplace and beyond. Understanding their experiences is crucial for workforce sustainability and diversity, especially given the disproportionate effects on these individuals and overall workforce capacity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To qualitatively explore the perspectives of academic female and URM physicians and identify key themes affecting their careers and well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 physicians at an urban academic health system. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using a general inductive approach. Interview guides were informed by prior literature and constructs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>Female and URM physicians from a large, academic medical centre were recruited via email. Participants self-reported demographic information, including sex, race, ethnicity and tenure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes and measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes encompassed the main themes identified through the analysis of interviews with female and URM physicians regarding their perspectives on well-being, mental health and academic medicine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>30 female or URM physicians were interviewed (27 (90%) female; 14 (47%) black, Asian or multi-racial). Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: physician identity (URM, female, family), well-being in the workplace (emotional health, staffing burden, non-clinical responsibilities), barriers to accessing well-being resources (workplace environment, culture, overgeneralisation) and facilitators to well-being (physician camaraderie, leadership support). Physicians discussed how their identities influenced their experiences of well-being. They highlighted emotional health challenges, staffing burdens and administrative tasks contributing to stress. Barriers to accessing resources included workplace culture and broad-based interventions, while supportive leadership and camaraderie were identified as facilitators of access.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Female and URM physicians face systemic challenges impacting their well-being and careers. These findings underscore the need to address systemic changes and specifically design programmes focused on promoting the well-being and inclusivity of female and URM physicians. Tailored interventions to these individuals, supportive leadership structures and collaborative working cultures are crucial for addressing these issues and sustaining a diverse physician workforce.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agarwal, A. K., Gonzales, R. E., Sharma, M., Schroeder, D., Asch, D. A., Mitra, N., Southwick, L., Bellini, L. M., Merchant, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095757</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095757</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perspectives of female and under-represented physicians on well-being in medicine: a qualitative study from an academic medical centre in the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095757</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095757</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100094?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital services utilisation of patients with vestibular disease in France: a retrospective nationwide study using electronic hospital health records]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100094?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>While most acute vestibular disorders do not require a hospital stay, admission to inpatient care because of acute vertigo, dizziness and balance problems (VDB) seems to be more frequent than necessary. The aim of this study was to analyse the frequency and regional distribution of hospital admissions for acute VDB and to estimate the associated healthcare costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>We used the complete database of inpatient stays from the French healthcare system between January 2014 and December 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients were included if they had a typical diagnosis code and at least one of the diagnostic or therapeutic procedures for vestibular diseases. Information on regional deprivation and physician density at a regional level is included in our analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Inpatient stay for acute VDB.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of 277 409 765 hospitalisations, a total of 482 578 inpatient stays could be directly attributed to VDB as a primary diagnosis. Patients were predominantly female (range 63.0%&ndash;64.3%) and older (from 2014 to 2022, mean age 52.8 to 56.0 years). Total costs per year ranged from 61.3 million euros in 2020 to 72.8 million in 2021 with an average cost per case ranging between 1237 and 1394 euros. There was a positive association between age, general practitioner density, neurologist density and a high hospitalisation rate of the respective area with &beta;=0.01 (95% CI 0.003 to 0.02; p=0.0005), &beta;=0.13 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.14; p&lt;0.0001) and &beta;=1.49 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.70; p&lt;0.0001), respectively. A negative association between otorhinolaryngologist density &beta;=&ndash;2.41 (95% CI&ndash;2.49 to &ndash;2.33 p&lt;0.0001) and rate was found.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>High social deprivation was independently associated with higher hospitalisation rates. We show considerable regional variations of hospital admissions for VDB in France. Awareness and training efforts for VDB must be increased.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez, S., Bouazzi, L., Chabbert, C., Darrouzet, V., Dubernard, X., Grill, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100094</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100094</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital services utilisation of patients with vestibular disease in France: a retrospective nationwide study using electronic hospital health records]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100094</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100094</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105529?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Innovative adoption model for digital health technologies among elderly with chronic diseases: integrating Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Knowledge-Attitude-Practice model in a survey of 1222 patients in Shanghai]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105529?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To propose and test an innovative model by integrating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Knowledge-Attitude-Practice model to explain the mechanisms influencing the adoption of digital health technologies by elderly patients with chronic diseases from the perspective of both internal and external factors, promoting the acceptance and utilisation of digital health technologies among elderly chronically ill patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>A face-to-face questionnaire survey was conducted from July to September 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in 12 medical institutions in Shanghai, including 6 tertiary hospitals, 3 secondary hospitals and 3 community hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1222 participants aged 60 years or more, diagnosed with one or more of the following chronic diseases: essential hypertension, type 2 diabetes, coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were involved in the study using convenience sampling. Critically ill emergency patients and those who were involved in medical disputes were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measure</st>
<p>The behavioural intention and usage behaviour of older patients with chronic diseases to use digital health technologies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The explanatory power of the proposed model for behavioural intention was 72.9%. There is a significant negative association between technology anxiety and the intention to use digital health technologies among older patients with chronic diseases (&beta;=&ndash;0.224, p&lt;0.001); effort expectancy (&beta;=0.530, p&lt;0.001) and performance expectancy (&beta;=0.193, p&lt;0.001) were also significantly associated with intention to use digital health technologies. Men (&beta;=&ndash;0.104, p=0.016), relatively younger (&beta;=&ndash;0.061, p=0.005), with experience in using digital health technologies (&beta;=&ndash;0.452, p&lt;0.001) were more likely to translate behavioural intention into use behaviour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Acceptance of digital health technologies among older patients with chronic diseases was associated with a combination of internal and external factors, with the former playing a dominant role. These valuable findings provided insights and inspiration for improving digital health technologies acceptance and utilisation among older patients with chronic diseases.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Y., Yuan, J., Li, C., Wang, H., Shi, L., Zhao, S., Oliveira, A., Zhao, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105529</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105529</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Innovative adoption model for digital health technologies among elderly with chronic diseases: integrating Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Knowledge-Attitude-Practice model in a survey of 1222 patients in Shanghai]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105529</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105529</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106313?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing consensus definitions and methods for non-visually impairing eye conditions for population-based eye surveys in Nigeria: a Delphi study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106313?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To establish consensus definitions for non-visually impairing eye conditions (NVICs) and their methods of assessments to provide standards for use in population-based eye surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A literature review of NVICs in sub-Saharan Africa, a questionnaire of inquiry based on the literature review developed by an expert panel and a modified Delphi exercise with three iterative rounds with eye health experts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Eye health academia and community eye health in Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Nigerian ophthalmologists, including subspecialists experienced in population-based eye health surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Definitions and statements where at least 70% of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Forty-two ophthalmologists practising in Nigeria with experience in conducting population-based eye health surveys were invited to take part in the Delphi exercise. There were three rounds with response rates of 39/42 (92.9%) in round 1, (94.9%) in round 2 and 100% in round 3. Consensus for NVICs to be included in population-based eye surveys, their definitions and methods for assessment was reached by the third round.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We propose case definitions for NVICs to be assessed in population-based eye surveys through a modified Delphi approach with an expert panel of ophthalmologists from across Nigeria. These case definitions will allow for standardisation of NVICs in population-based eye surveys to assess the prevalence and magnitude of the different types of NVICs for planning purposes. Further studies are needed to validate these case definitions and inform their evolution.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aghaji, A., Okoye, O., Nwachukwu, N. Z., Ezegwui, I., Okoye, O., Umeh, R., Gilbert, C. E., The Nigeria National Non-Visually Impairing Conditions Study Group, Aghaji, Okoye, Nwachukwu, Ezegwui, Okoye, Umeh, Gilbert, Abdu, Abraham, Achigbu, Ademola-Popoola, Adenuga, Adepoju, Ajite, Akpe, Alhassan, Awoyeseku, Bekibele, Chuka, Ezepue, Fashina, Ferife, Hassan, Kyari, Mohammed, Mohammed, Momoh, Mpyet, Musa, SNN, Odugbo, Ogbonnaya, Olawoye, Olusanya, Omoti, Onwubiko, Pedro-Egbe, Oyeleye, Rabiu, Ramyil]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106313</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106313</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing consensus definitions and methods for non-visually impairing eye conditions for population-based eye surveys in Nigeria: a Delphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106313</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106313</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106622?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers, facilitators and unmet needs for achieving a good death and enhancing end-of-life care in the Catalan Health System: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106622?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and objective</st>
<p>A qualitative study was conducted in Catalonia (Spain), incorporating the views and opinions of relatives, healthcare professionals and patients on what they considered a &lsquo;good death&rsquo;. This study aimed to describe barriers, facilitators and unmet needs related to the achievement of a good death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We recruited adult patients with advanced or chronic conditions, relatives and health and social care professionals involved in end-of-life processes of care, management or strategic planning. All participants took part in a qualitative study. The study was informed by phenomenological, hermeneutical and social constructivist perspectives and included 23 in-depth interviews and three focus group discussions with a total of 31 participants. Fieldwork was conducted between February and April 2022. Data were transcribed and analysed using qualitative thematic content and discourse analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six main themes were identified, comprising 17 subthemes. Facilitators and barriers related to achieving &lsquo;a good death&rsquo; were categorised according to whether they occurred before death or during the dying process. Key facilitators include high-quality palliative care, open communication about death and the ability to choose the place of death. Key barriers included bureaucratic delays, inadequate resources, insufficient professional training and lack of respect for patients&rsquo; preferences and wishes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our study highlights the need to understand factors that facilitate or hinder the achievement of a good death and the quality of the dying process. Specifically, understanding individual preferences and unmet needs, enhancing communication, increasing awareness, reducing bureaucratic barriers and ensuring adequate resources are essential to support a more dignified end-of-life experience for patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serra-Sutton, V., Fernandez-Giner, L., Caldeiro, M., Garcia-Altes, A., Espallargues, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106622</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106622</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers, facilitators and unmet needs for achieving a good death and enhancing end-of-life care in the Catalan Health System: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106622</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106622</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107028?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Osteoporosis treatment gap and prescribing patterns in Ireland: a cross-sectional analysis of the DXA HIP project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107028?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Previous studies suggest Ireland has the smallest osteoporosis treatment in Europe and very little inappropriate prescribing, in contrast to our experience. In this study, we examine the osteoporosis treatment gap in Ireland by assessing the prevalence of appropriate and inappropriate prescribing in 2 subgroups of the Irish dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Health Informatics Prediction (HIP) Project. Treatment eligibility was defined using established intervention thresholds, including prior fracture, femoral-neck T-score &le;&ndash;2.5, glucocorticoid use, or Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) major osteoporotic fracture risk &ge;20% or hip fracture risk &ge;3%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Secondary cross-sectional analysis of a subgroup of the DXA HIP Project Cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>3 hospitals in the West of Ireland. DXA referrals come from primary care providers, hospital consultants and the osteoporosis service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>5564 participants of a previously described convenience cohort including: (i) 3474 subjects referred for a DXA scan, and (ii) 2090 patients who completed a DXA scan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>82.4% were female with a mean age of 66.6 years, 59.6% of whom had a prior fracture. Prescribing data of calcium and vitamin D were available for 3738 (67.2%) subjects, and osteoporosis medication for 4157 (74.7%) subjects. Prescribing information was available for more than 99% of the DXA group, but just over 50% of the referral group. When examined in aggregate, the treatment gap is 6% for calcium and vitamin D and 38% for osteoporosis medication, in line with prior publications. However, among those with prescribing information and at least one indication for treatment, only 58.3% were prescribed calcium and vitamin D and 39.1% an osteoporosis medication. Furthermore, among patients without a clear indication for treatment, 50.6% were prescribed calcium and vitamin D, and 32.5% an osteoporosis medication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These data suggest the majority of patients with osteoporosis or at high risk of fracture in Ireland today do not receive appropriate osteoporosis treatment, while inappropriate prescribing is substantial. These findings suggest that the true treatment gap in Ireland is substantially larger than aggregate estimates imply.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carey, J. J., Brennan, A., Armstrong, C., Heaney, F., Dempsey, A., Egan, R., Gorham, K., Yang, L., DXA MAP, Erjiang, Wang, Whelan, OSullivan, Silke, Yu, Dempsey, Fitzgerald]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107028</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107028</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Osteoporosis treatment gap and prescribing patterns in Ireland: a cross-sectional analysis of the DXA HIP project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107028</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107028</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107067?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Petit volunteer protocol for loneliness alleviation in community-dwelling older adults in Japan: a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107067?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Older adult loneliness is associated with depression, disability and higher mortality rates. As a public health concern, it contributes to increased medical and nursing care costs. Several intervention studies have been conducted to reduce loneliness; however, no universally effective method has been established. We hypothesise that if older adults use their physical abilities to perform petit volunteering, their feelings of loneliness would likely be reduced. This trial aims to investigate the benefits of using petit volunteers for loneliness alleviation (PetitVOLA) application as a sustainable programme to prevent loneliness through the creation of an Ikigai-based volunteer system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We intend to conduct a randomised controlled trial with a 3-month intervention period to verify the effectiveness of the PetitVOLA programme (sample size, 126 participants; power, 0.8; significance level, 0.05). The primary outcome is loneliness, which we will measure using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (V.3). Secondary outcomes include social isolation (assessed via multicomponent objective criteria), life satisfaction, physical function (gait speed and grip strength), cognitive function, psychological status and lifestyle, each assessed with validated instruments (eg, Mini-Mental State Examination, Geriatric Depression Scale-15 and the Active Mobility Index). The main analysis uses an intention-to-treat approach, while a full analysis set and a per-protocol set are included for sub-analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan (approval No. 1794). The results of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and reports to the participating community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>UMIN000056649.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomida, K., Shimoda, T., Nakajima, C., Kawakami, A., Shimada, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107067</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107067</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Petit volunteer protocol for loneliness alleviation in community-dwelling older adults in Japan: a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107067</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107067</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107381?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Delivering integrated diabetes and mental healthcare for people with type 1 diabetes disordered eating (T1DE): a mixed methods evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107381?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>People with type 1 diabetes may be at increased risk of disordered eating, which may increase risk of elevated poor outcomes and high-risk complications. Type 1 diabetes disordered eating (T1DE) services were set-up to integrate diabetes and mental healthcare to better support people with T1DE and improve longer-term outcomes. A rapid evaluation was conducted to explore the implementation of T1DE services. Specifically, we aimed to: describe service delivery models; investigate staff experiences of impact and delivery of implementation; explore patient experiences of T1DE services; and to report health outcomes and associated costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Rapid evaluation using mixed methods (service mapping, staff and patient interviews, staff survey, analysis of clinical and economic data). Health outcome data was reported at baseline and 6 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study explored the implementation of five new T1DE services and three existing services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Staff working within T1DE services and patients who received care from T1DE services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Assessment of our mixed methods study identified four key findings: (1) T1DE delivery models: The T1DE services displayed modest variation in models of delivery, but similarities were more evident, with a focus on direct delivery to patients involving joint meetings between diabetes and mental health staff. Nevertheless, some services also took on a &lsquo;consultation&rsquo; role, providing advice and support to wider staff outside the service also managing these patients. Delayed implementation of the services slowed the formation of fully integrated teams and the ability of services to operate at scale. (2) Staff experience: Workforce issues were a crucial aspect of T1DE pilots. Managing this patient population is associated with high levels of anxiety for staff. Nevertheless, once formed, staff reported a very positive experience of working in integrated teams. (3) Patient experience: Although only a small sample of patients were interviewed, they reported a profoundly different experience to their previous care, which was now perceived as supportive and relationship focused. Although such improvements were aligned with the integrated care model underlying T1DE, it was less clear how such changes in patient experience would feature in decisions about commissioning. (4) Health outcomes and associated costs: There were 139 patients accepted onto the care pathway. Improvements were seen for all health outcomes. Compared with baseline measures, there was a mean 0.97% reduction in HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin) from 11.2% to 10.2% at 6 months. Improvements were also seen in other outcomes, including the diabetes eating problem scale and the diabetes distress scale. However, the number of patients on the care pathway with follow-up at 6 months was relatively small (n=29&ndash;47) and definitive statements about clinical or cost-effectiveness were not possible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Overall, T1DE services were well received by both staff and patients. Due to a number of logistical challenges, the implementation of services was slower than anticipated, resulting in a limited number of patients on the care pathway. Securing local funding for existing services, once national pilot funding ended, was identified as a significant challenge. In order to ensure services are sustainable and commissioned at a local level, consideration may need to be given to alternative service delivery models.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harkness, E. F., Bashir, S., Kletter, M., Gillibrand, S., Wilson, P., Dumville, J., Bower, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107381</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107381</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Delivering integrated diabetes and mental healthcare for people with type 1 diabetes disordered eating (T1DE): a mixed methods evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107381</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107381</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107929?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, trial of Bactek for the prevention of lower respiratory tract infections in preterm infants in the UK: BALLOON study - study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107929?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A significant proportion of infants born at &le;29+6 weeks&rsquo; gestation develop lung disease during the neonatal period, thus putting them at risk of developing prematurity-associated lung disease in childhood and adulthood. After discharge from the neonatal unit, pre-existing lung disease in preterm-born infants is exacerbated by (often frequent) respiratory viral infections requiring greater health utilisation, including hospital admissions, than their term-born equivalents. Opportunities to prevent viral infections in infancy are largely limited to anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antibody prophylaxis and recently maternal RSV immunisation, but in term-born infants, trained immunity-based vaccines such as Bactek (MV130, Inmunotek, Spain) are increasingly used. Bactek provides a promising therapeutic avenue for preterm-born infants to target postdischarge respiratory viral infection in this vulnerable group of infants. The BALLOON study aims to assess this treatment in a very/extremely preterm-born population and determine if treatment with the trained immunity-based vaccine Bactek decreases the risk of unscheduled visits to healthcare professionals for lower respiratory tract infections, when compared with placebo. Included infants are born at &le;29+6 weeks&rsquo; gestation and treated daily from term-equivalent (37&ndash;43 weeks&rsquo; postmenstrual age, PMA) or from discharge, if earlier, up to 1 year of corrected age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>542 infants are being recruited prior to discharge by neonatal units in the UK. They are being randomised to receive Bactek or placebo, once daily dose of 2 sprays (each 0.1 mL) of IMP (300 Formazin Turbidity Units), from 37 to 43 weeks&rsquo; PMA or discharge if earlier up to 1 year of corrected age. The primary objective is to assess if sublingual Bactek spray decreases the risk of health professional diagnosed lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) (unscheduled visits to general practitioners, accident and emergency departments and hospital admissions) between enrolment and 1 year of corrected age. Secondary outcomes include the number of parent-reported, health professional-confirmed unscheduled visits for LRTIs, the time to first parent-reported, health professional-confirmed unscheduled visit for LRTI, parent-reported wheeze episodes (identification aided by WheezeScan (Omron, Japan)), parent-reported use of respiratory medications, growth (weight, length and head circumference), parent(s)/guardian(s) reported time missed from work and/or nursery time missed for the infant and volume of adverse reactions. Viruses associated with LRTIs will also be identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics permission has been granted by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 (Ref 24/WA/0181), and regulatory permission by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (CTA reference 21323/0063/001-0004). The study is registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN14019493). Findings will be disseminated via national and international peer-reviewed journals, and conferences. Oversight of the study is being provided by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee and an independent Trial Steering Committee (TSC). The Trial Management Group (TMG) meets every month.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN14019493">ISRCTN14019493</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kotecha, S. J., Lowe, J., Gillespie, D., Perez-Alijas, M., Aboklaish, A. F., Mahachi, T. L., Cumming, O. S., Harris, D., Hubbard, M., Thomas-Jones, E., Jones, T., Ladell, K., Moore, C., Humpreys, I., Grigg, J., Berrington, J., Kotecha, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107929</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107929</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, trial of Bactek for the prevention of lower respiratory tract infections in preterm infants in the UK: BALLOON study - study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107929</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107929</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108513?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic inequalities in the self-reported use of antibiotics in the European Union, 2009-2022: a repeated cross-sectional analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108513?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to explore trends in the use of antibiotics, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, across the European Union (EU), focusing on socioeconomic inequalities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Repeated cross-sectional analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>26 EU member states.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Analyses were conducted using data from five waves of the Eurobarometer survey (2009&ndash;2022, n=1 27 299).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>We used multilevel logistic regression, stratified by financial difficulty, to examine changes in the past-year use of antibiotics and in obtaining antibiotics inappropriately over time, adjusting for gender, age, type of community, children under 10 years in the household and antibiotic-related knowledge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We found that the odds of self-reported use of antibiotics decreased between 2009 and 2022 in those with (OR=0.59, 95% CI 0.55&ndash;0.63) and without financial difficulties (OR=0.53, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.56), with a substantial reduction between 2018 and 2022. However, a relatively higher proportion of Europeans who used antibiotics in the past year were obtaining them inappropriately in those with (OR=2.03, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.45) and without financial difficulties (OR=1.83, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.19) in 2022. Among those with financial difficulties, higher self-reported use of antibiotics and inappropriately obtaining antibiotics were associated with lesser knowledge about antibiotics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Despite notable progress made in the EU in reducing antibiotic use, current efforts fall short in addressing the issue of inappropriate antibiotic use. A targeted approach prioritising outreach to vulnerable populations to advance attitudes and behaviours related to appropriate antibiotic use may be required to achieve further progress.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patel, M. J., Filippidis, F. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108513</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108513</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic inequalities in the self-reported use of antibiotics in the European Union, 2009-2022: a repeated cross-sectional analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108513</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108513</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108996?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Organ failure type in fatal and near-fatal anaphylaxis: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108996?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Anaphylaxis is a sudden onset multiorgan allergic reaction that infrequently but regularly causes fatalities which may be preventable with appropriate organ support. There is limited data about the type of organ failure leading to death or near-fatal episodes resulting in permanent neurological disability. To assist clinicians facing anaphylaxis in diverse clinical settings, we aimed to quantify the frequency of organ failure type contributing to death or neurological disability from anaphylaxis according to allergen trigger.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review of published peer-reviewed literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Three databases were searched to January 2025: MEDLINE from 1946, Embase from 1947 and Web of Science from 1900.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies were eligible if they contained data about the type of clinical deterioration during anaphylaxis resulting in death or permanent neurological disability. No language restriction was implemented. Exclusion criteria were: hydatid anaphylaxis; five or more stings from an insect; death from acute atheromatous myocardial infarction and where anaphylaxis was only a differential diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>We extracted information using pre-specified criteria to determine the primary organ failure involved: either upper airway obstruction, lower respiratory obstruction (bronchospasm) or cardiovascular failure. Baseline demographics including age and asthma status were collected along with the allergen trigger, time course and treatment. We reported frequencies according to allergen trigger for case reports and a narrative analysis of case series weighted by risk of bias assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>277 case studies and 14 case series were identified reporting 896 deaths and 28 disabilities. There were no other study types. Separate case series and case report analyses produced similar findings despite varying quality of published clinical data. Respiratory failure was the most common primary organ failure in case reports (73.4%), whereas primary cardiovascular failure was reported in 26.6% of case reports. Primary organ failure type differed in frequency by allergen trigger and was primarily caused by: respiratory failure when food was the allergen trigger (95%); respiratory failure in 65% of cases of drug allergen triggers; cardiovascular failure in 65% venom allergen triggers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In this review, respiratory failure (primarily bronchospasm) is the most common primary physiological event leading to decompensation in fatal anaphylaxis, particularly for food and drug allergen deaths. Emphasising the significance of respiratory involvement, particularly from bronchospasm, in both patient and clinician facing anaphylaxis treatment guidelines may help further reduce the risk of fatalities. Prospective anaphylaxis management registries or whole population data are needed to better capture primary organ failure present in fatal anaphylaxis to validate this finding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023434206.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McKenzie, B., Marshall, S. D., Sanci, L., Poonian, J., Nair, R., J Selman, C., Douglass, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108996</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108996</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Immunology (including allergy)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Organ failure type in fatal and near-fatal anaphylaxis: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Immunology (including allergy)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108996</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108996</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Which factors mediate the effect of childhood socioeconomic disadvantage on mental health in young adulthood? A protocol for a target trial emulation using linked administrative data from New South Wales, Australia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Early-life socioeconomic status (SES) increases the risk of poor mental health outcomes in adulthood. However, the mechanistic pathways underlying this relationship remain poorly understood. While addressing socioeconomic inequalities remains a long-term goal, identifying specific mediating pathways could reveal more immediate opportunities for effective interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Using linked administrative data from New South Wales, Australia (1990&ndash;2022), we will emulate a target trial examining the relationship between SES at birth and acute mental health admissions and presentations between the ages of 18 and 25 years. An interventional mediation analysis will be used to examine the effect of multiple mediating pathways, including education, housing stability, child protection contact, parental incarceration and justice system involvement, on the outcome. The analysis will estimate direct and indirect interventional effects, quantifying how much of the SES-mental health relationship could be modified by interventions on specific mediators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethics approval from the University of Newcastle (H-2024-0015) and Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council (2265/24) Human Research Ethics Committees. All dissemination activities will be conducted in accordance with data access agreements and following approval from all relevant data custodians (New South Wales Health System Data Services). Key findings will be communicated to relevant government agencies and policymakers through policy briefs and stakeholder meetings, and publication in appropriate academic journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh, L., Hinwood, M., Oldmeadow, C., Bryant, J., Heard, T., Fakes, K., Hobden, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109541</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109541</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Which factors mediate the effect of childhood socioeconomic disadvantage on mental health in young adulthood? A protocol for a target trial emulation using linked administrative data from New South Wales, Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109541</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109575?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Caring beyond the procedure: a qualitative study on thoracic surgery nurses perspectives on chronic illness experiences of individuals with myasthenia gravis undergoing thymectomy]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109575?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore how thoracic surgical nurses perceive and respond to the chronic illness needs of individuals with myasthenia gravis undergoing thymectomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were collected through four focus group interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. The analysis followed a hermeneutic approach, identifying recurring themes through iterative interpretation and critical reflection. Nineteen thoracic surgical nurses from ward and postanaesthesia care unit settings participated, representing a diverse range of clinical experience. The study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist for reporting the findings of this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analysis identified three overarching themes reflecting nurses&rsquo; experiences of caring for individuals with myasthenia gravis undergoing thymectomy. <I>First</I>, nurses described how the chronic aspects of the illness often &lsquo;disappeared&rsquo; within the surgical care process, with attention focused mainly on procedural recovery, leaving patients&rsquo; broader illness needs unaddressed. <I>Second</I>, nurses experienced a dilemma between providing acute surgical care and responding to patients&rsquo; chronic illness understanding, highlighting uncertainty due to limited knowledge and lack of clear guidelines. <I>Third</I>, nurses emphasised the difficulty of managing the invisible and unpredictable symptoms of myasthenia gravis, which created a heightened need for vigilance but also uncertainty in symptom assessment and support. Across all themes, the findings suggest that surgical care practices may insufficiently recognise patients&rsquo; ongoing illness experiences, emphasising the need for greater knowledge, interdisciplinary collaboration and chronic illness-sensitive care approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study highlights the need for increased attention to chronic illness needs in surgical care, supporting interdisciplinary collaboration and tailored nursing practices that address the lived experiences of patients with chronic conditions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Missel, M., Donsel, P. O., Nielsen, T. F., Secher, E. L., Medeiros, E. B. Z., Rude, K., Hojgaard, J. L. S., Viby, N.-E., Birnbaum, S., Andersen, L. K., Petersen, R. H., Witting, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109575</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109575</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Caring beyond the procedure: a qualitative study on thoracic surgery nurses perspectives on chronic illness experiences of individuals with myasthenia gravis undergoing thymectomy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109575</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109575</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110041?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trajectories of metabolic risk clusters and adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study in Taiwan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110041?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the association between longitudinal trajectories of metabolic risk clusters and the risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and major adverse kidney events (MAKEs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective registry-based cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary and tertiary care settings in Taiwan, using data from a multidisciplinary pre-ESKD care programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1494 adult patients with CKD stages 3b&ndash;5 enrolled in a structured pre-ESKD care programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Time to initiation of dialysis (primary outcome) and time to MAKE, defined as a composite of dialysis initiation or all-cause mortality (secondary outcome). Group-based multitrajectory modelling was used to categorise longitudinal trajectories of metabolic risk clusters, including systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four trajectory groups were identified: Group I had controlled blood pressure and glucose but elevated LDL (dialysis incidence: 19.5 per 1000 person-years); Group II had borderline-high blood pressure and elevated glucose (33.6 per 1000 person-years); Group III had controlled glucose and low LDL but borderline-high blood pressure (38.8 per 1000 person-years) and Group IV had controlled glucose but elevated blood pressure and LDL (46.7 per 1000 person-years). Compared with the other groups, Group I exhibited significantly longer dialysis-free and MAKE-free survival (log-rank test, p&lt;0.001). With covariates adjusted for, Groups II (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.00) and III (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.52) showed non-significant elevations in dialysis risk, whereas Group IV (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.78) exhibited a significantly higher risk compared with Group I. Similar patterns were observed for MAKE outcome, confirming the association between trajectory groups and adverse kidney events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Longitudinal trajectories of metabolic risk cluster are associated with differential risks of CKD progression to ESKD and death. Our findings provide valuable insights into the monitoring of metabolic risk profiles over time in patients with CKD.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lo, W.-C., Wu, M.-Y., Chen, Y.-H. R., Wu, M. S., Wong, C.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110041</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110041</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trajectories of metabolic risk clusters and adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study in Taiwan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110041</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110041</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110251?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Antibiotic use among patients admitted to tertiary hospitals in Uganda: a trend analysis of 2020-2023 point prevalence surveys]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110251?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Limited data exist on temporal changes in antibiotic use in low and middle-income countries. We evaluated trends in antibiotic use at tertiary hospitals in Uganda.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective trend analysis of a repeated point prevalence survey (PPS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>This study utilised antibiotic use data from quarterly PPS conducted among inpatients at nine regional referral hospitals in Uganda between October 2020 and December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>We determined the proportions of antibiotic use, prescriptions guided by culture and sensitivity tests (CST), WHO AWaRe (<I>Access, Watch and Reserve</I>) categories, and prescriptions without documented indication. Linear regression was used to derive slope coefficients and 95% confidence interval (CI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 15,154 patients surveyed, 8,892 (58.7%) received systemic antibiotics. The median age was 23 years (IQR: 11&ndash;38), 5,338 (60.5%) were female, and 4,583 (51.5%) were on treatment for infectious syndromes, including sepsis (1,400, 15.7%) and pneumonia (867, 9.8%). The drug utilisation index (DU75) consisted of ceftriaxone, metronidazole, gentamicin and ampicillin, which accounted for 76.9% (12,291/15,989) of total antibiotic use. The distribution of prescribed antibiotics was 46.6% Access, 45.5% Watch, 0.1% Reserve and 7.7% unrecommended combinations. Overall, 5,402 (60.8%) prescriptions were aligned with national guidelines, 2,147 (24.1%) prescriptions were issued without an indication, and CST guided 271 (3%) prescriptions. Over time, there was no significant change in antibiotic prescription prevalence (slope=0.09, CI &ndash;0.93 to 1.10) and prescriptions without indication (slope=&ndash;0.70, CI &ndash;1.79 to 3.98). However, adherence to treatment guidelines (slope=2.06, CI 0.14 to 3.98) and prescriptions based on CST results (slope=0.62, CI 0.12 to 1.13) significantly increased, while &lsquo;<I>Watch&rsquo;</I> antibiotics prescriptions decreased (slope=&ndash;0.40, CI &ndash;0.63 to &ndash;0.17).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The antibiotic prescription rate remained high, with no significant change over time. Improvements were seen in adherence to treatment guidelines, use of CST and reduced use of &lsquo;<I>Watch&rsquo;</I> antibiotics. Strengthening antibiotic stewardship is recommended to further improve practices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nakasendwa, S., Mayito, J., Twemanye, V., Tumwine, C., Kiggundu, R., Galiwango, R., Nuwamanya, E., Muleme, J., Dhikusooka, F., Mwanja, H., Twinomuhwezi, E., Akello, H., Seru, M., Mackline, H., Byonanebye, D. M., Kakooza, F., Kambugu, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110251</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110251</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Antibiotic use among patients admitted to tertiary hospitals in Uganda: a trend analysis of 2020-2023 point prevalence surveys]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110251</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112224?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring the impacts of exposure to daycare quality on child development and nutrition measures through a large-scale randomised trial in Kenyan informal settlements: protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112224?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>High-quality early childhood education can fundamentally alter children&rsquo;s long-term education, earnings and well-being. In low-resourced settings, children&rsquo;s development is hampered by undernutrition, poverty and limited access to services. This study will generate high-quality evidence on child development from children who both attend and do not attend daycare across informal settlements in Kenya by (1) examining the relationship between child development, nutritional status and household characteristics using a large, community-based sample and (2) measuring the impact of exposure to improvements in childcare quality on child development and nutritional status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We combine a cross-sectional observational study of child development and anthropometrics among approximately 4700 children aged 0&ndash;5 across 11 counties in Kenya with a cluster randomised controlled trial that measures the impact of improved daycare quality on these outcomes. We use International Development and Early Learning Assessment to measure child development and record child height and weight to measure height-for-age and weight-for-height z-scores. Primary analyses will (1) estimate associations between child development outcomes and nutritional status using multivariable regression models, adjusting for prespecified covariates; and (2) examine differences in outcomes between children attending daycares in communities exposed to quality improvements and children attending daycares in control communities. Subgroup analyses will examine heterogeneity by child sex and daycare participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Strathmore University Institutional Scientific and Ethical Review Committee (SU-ISERC) has provided ethical review for this study, with initial approval SU-ISERC1602/23. This study has also received IRB approval from The Ohio State University (#2023B0300). Written informed consent will be obtained from caregivers before participation. We will disseminate findings through peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs and presentations to local stakeholders, and we will publish de-identified data and replication code on a public repository.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>AEARCTR-0011747.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beam, E., Fitzpatrick, A., Reimao, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112224</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112224</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring the impacts of exposure to daycare quality on child development and nutrition measures through a large-scale randomised trial in Kenyan informal settlements: protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112224</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113011?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of electroacupuncture for pain relief in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: protocol for a randomised, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113011?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a progressive and disabling condition, with pain being its predominant symptom. Electroacupuncture (EA) has shown promise in the management of chronic pain; however, high-quality evidence on its efficacy and safety in ONFH is still lacking. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EA for pain relief in ONFH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This triple-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group randomised controlled trial will be conducted at a single centre in China and will include 176 participants with ONFH. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either active EA or sham EA. The active intervention involves EA applied to specific acupoints (GB30, GB29, ST31, BL54 and Ashi points) twice weekly for 4 weeks. Sham EA consists of superficial needling at non-acupoint locations using a deactivated device. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving a clinically meaningful reduction in pain at 4 weeks (end of treatment). Secondary outcomes are changes in the Visual Analogue Scale score, the proportion of participants achieving clinically significant pain improvement at weeks 8, 12 and 16, modified Harris Hip Score, psychological scales (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Pain Catastrophising Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, pain sensitisation tests, rescue analgesic use and the incidence of adverse events. Data will be analysed using the intention-to-treat principle, and appropriate statistical models will be used to compare the primary outcome between groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province (Approval No: 2025ZXKT0001-02). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. The results of this trial will be disseminated regardless of the findings through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN15751942">ISRCTN15751942</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, Z., Yang, Y., Liu, X., Guo, M., Cheng, Y., Yan, X., Yue, C., Guo, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-09T06:04:31-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113011</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113011</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Complementary medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of electroacupuncture for pain relief in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: protocol for a randomised, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Complementary medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113011</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113011</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102179?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Societal consequences of IPS implementation in Norway 2012-2019: study protocol for the IPSRON effectiveness study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e102179?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Individuals experiencing moderate to severe mental illness have low rates of workforce inclusion, with a consequence of high welfare dependency, affecting both societal costs and health. Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is an approach to supported employment where the goal is to help people obtain jobs on the open rather than sheltered labour markets. Despite multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) indicating that the IPS model enables employment better than treatment as usual, with widespread adoption in some jurisdictions, the broader impacts of this large-scale implementation on mental health, quality of life and social functioning remain unknown.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Between 2012 and 2019, Norway introduced IPS through both local and national government projects. This study assesses the social and economic benefits of the implementation of IPS using Norwegian registry data, focusing on 18&ndash;45-year-old people receiving specialist mental healthcare, and who did not have steady employment at treatment start. Instead of assessing IPS efficacy in an RCT design, we use a naturalistic study design, evaluating IPS effectiveness by comparing aggregate population-level outcomes over time between areas where IPS was not available.</p>
<p>In work package (WP) 1, we mapped the availability and implementation of IPS across Norway. This involved analysing information on funding, resource and capacity levels to understand how IPS had been rolled out across the country. While completed, we include a description of WP1 here, as it informs WP2 and WP3. WP2 is an effectiveness evaluation investigating the population-level outcomes of implementing IPS, focusing on health, mortality, quality of life and social functioning. Finally, in WP3, we assess the financial implications of implementing IPS from a public purse perspective, synthesising data on resource use and costs of implementation with data from WP2.</p>
<p>Overall, we will examine the societal effects of IPS implementation on employment, welfare dependency, mental healthcare use, emergency care visits, self-harm and suicide, general mortality, crime and victimisation. Emphasis will be on long-term outcomes, and we will model the economic consequences of IPS. This study aims to inform policy making and strategies for implementing IPS at scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This is an effectiveness study using registry data. The Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics Northern Norway, <A HREF="https://rekportalen.no/">REK North</A> has approved the use of registry data without informed consent for this project (approval number 134553).</p>
<p>The findings will be disseminated both in academic peer-reviewed journals, directly to informants in WP1, to the public through media and the project website, and at relevant conferences and seminars for specific relevant target groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Not applicable</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mykletun, A., Aars, N. A., Lorentzen, T., Rinaldi, M., Sandtorv, E., McDaid, D., Moe, C. F., Park, A.-L., Killackey, E., Brinchmann, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102179</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102179</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Societal consequences of IPS implementation in Norway 2012-2019: study protocol for the IPSRON effectiveness study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102179</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104480?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A multicentre, prospective, observational study on detecting medication discrepancies using medication reconciliation as a tool at the emergency department among geriatric patients in northwest Ethiopia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104480?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Geriatric patients often face issues related to polypharmacy and adverse drug events. Re-evaluating prescribed medications and considering deprescribing is critical. Medication discrepancies (MDs) during care transitions can compromise patient safety, as over 60% of medication errors occur at these points. This study aimed to assess the magnitude of MDs and their contributing factors through the medication reconciliation (MedRec) process among geriatric patients in emergency departments of comprehensive specialised hospitals in northwest Ethiopia, as well as to determine the acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>In this multicentre prospective observational study, the best possible medication history (BPMH) was obtained within 24 hours of emergency department admission from at least two sources. A comparison of the BPMH list with medication orders from treating physicians revealed discrepancies. Data were analysed using STATA V.17.0, using multivariable logistic regression to assess variable associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Adult emergency departments of comprehensive specialised hospitals in northwest Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Overall, 384 geriatric patients with chronic conditions and current medication use who visited the adult emergency department of the hospital from 10 January 2025 to 30 March 2025 were involved in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Magnitude and types of MDs, acceptance of pharmacist interventions, and factors associated with MDs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 384 patients with chronic diseases visiting the hospital emergency department were recruited in the present study. Out of 384 patients involved in the study, 218 (56.77%) had encountered at least one MD. Omission error 190 (45.24%) was the most common type of MD, followed by wrong dose 82 (19.50%). Among 420 interventions, 80.48% of the total cases were accepted. Number of previous/home medications (&ge;5 medicines; adjusted OR (AOR)=3.12; 95% CI 1.190 to 8.151), older age (&ge;75 years; AOR=1.62; 95% CI 1.054 to 2.495), and number of comorbidities (&ge;3; AOR=1.65; 95% CI 1.066 to 2.546) were associated factors with MDs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study revealed a high prevalence of MDs in the emergency department. Polypharmacy, comorbidities and older age were factors associated with MDs. The study findings show the need for a clinical pharmacist-led MedRec implementation to enhance patient safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moges, T. A., Zewdu, W. S., Yazie, T. S., Sema, F. D., Dagnew, F. N., Tarekegn, G. Y., Wondm, S. A., Kiflu, M., Zeleke, T. K., Tamene, F. B., Ferede, Y. A., Dagnew, S. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104480</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104480</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A multicentre, prospective, observational study on detecting medication discrepancies using medication reconciliation as a tool at the emergency department among geriatric patients in northwest Ethiopia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104480</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104480</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107035?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations between age, gender and health deterioration in caregivers aged 75 and older in Spain: an observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107035?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to explore how age and gender are associated with health deterioration related to caregiving among caregivers aged 75 and older in Spain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Nationwide survey in Spain: 2020 Survey on Disability, Personal Autonomy and Situations of Dependency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All non-professional caregivers identified by the survey (3746): 3166 caregivers younger than 75 (CG75&ndash;) and 580 caregivers 75 years old or older (CG75+).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Self-reported caregivers&rsquo; health deterioration, as a categorical variable (present or absent).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The majority of caregivers in both groups were women (63.2% of CG75&ndash; and 57.0% of CG75+, p=0.011). CG75+ provided care 16 hours/day (vs 14.1 hours/day of CG75&ndash;, p=0.032). Over half of CG75+ reported health deterioration (53.0%), compared with 43.5% of CG75&ndash; (p&lt;0.001). Being 75 or older was significantly associated with caregivers&rsquo; health deterioration only for women (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.57). For men, age was not associated with caregivers&rsquo; health deterioration (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.43).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In Spain, older caregivers have a specific socio-demographic profile, provide high-intensity care and report a higher caregiving-related health deterioration. However, the association between older age and health deterioration was found only in women. Public health interventions must prioritise older female caregivers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernal-Alonso, A., Ayala, A., Kirvalidze, M., Calderon-Larranaga, A., Forjaz, M. J., Rodriguez-Blazquez, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107035</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107035</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations between age, gender and health deterioration in caregivers aged 75 and older in Spain: an observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107035</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107035</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Promoting active outdoor play and healthy dietary behaviours through the co-creation of supporting physical and social environments for and with primary school-aged children living in underserved neighbourhoods in Europe: the protocol of the B-Challenged project]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>An alarmingly low number of children meet public health guidelines for physical activity and dietary behaviours and, therefore, are at increased risk of developing lifestyle-related diseases. This paper describes the protocol of the B-Challenged project, which aims to co-create systemic actions to promote active outdoor play and healthy dietary behaviours before, during or after their outdoor play together with children themselves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In five European countries, child-centred Participatory Action Research (PAR)&mdash;combined with systems dynamics methods&mdash;was conducted with 15&ndash;20 child co-researchers (aged 9&ndash;12 years) and 15&ndash;20 adult actors (eg, youth workers, local policy makers). In the first phase, the main drivers of children&rsquo;s active outdoor play and related dietary behaviours were mapped by (1) analysing existing cohort data, and (2) conducting child-centred PAR. In the second phase, systemic actions targeting the local physical and social environments will be co-created and implemented by child co-researchers and adult actors to promote children&rsquo;s active outdoor play and related healthy dietary behaviours. A mixed-methods design will be used to evaluate (1) if actions positively contributed to systems change and 6- to 12-year-olds&rsquo; outdoor play and related dietary behaviours (140 children per country); (2) the process of conducting multi-actor, child-centred PAR and implementing the co-created actions and (3) if the child-centred PAR positively contributed to child co-researchers&rsquo; feelings of empowerment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval for the mapping phase was obtained and approval for implementation and evaluation will be obtained from the five local research institutions. Participating children, one of their parents/caregivers and adult actors had given informed consent before participating in the project. Throughout the project, child-friendly methods, materials and language will be applied, and ethical challenges and potential solutions will be discussed. Project results will be disseminated locally and internationally through various channels and activities among the scientific community, professionals&mdash;for example, in health and policy making, children and other citizens.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07136376">NCT07136376</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Altenburg, T. M., Pawlowski, C. S., Ahrens, W., Brand, T., Buck, C., Bo&#x0308;rnhorst, C., Dzielska, A., Klaufus, L., De Miguel-Etayo, P., Moreno, L., Okulicz-Kozaryn, K., Vrijkotte, T. G. M., Wink, R., Belmon, L. S., Chinapaw, M. J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108281</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108281</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Promoting active outdoor play and healthy dietary behaviours through the co-creation of supporting physical and social environments for and with primary school-aged children living in underserved neighbourhoods in Europe: the protocol of the B-Challenged project]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108281</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108911?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospitalisation, associated factors and out-of-pocket expenditure among patients with multimorbidity in Kerala, India: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108911?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the rate of hospitalisation, identify associated factors and assess out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) among adults with multimorbidity in Kerala, India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Community-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two districts of Kerala, representing different geographic regions of the state.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 432 adults aged &ge;30 years with multimorbidity were selected using multistage cluster sampling; 52.3% were women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Self-reported hospitalisation in the preceding 12 months and OOPE related to multimorbidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Hospitalisation in the past year was reported by 26.62% of participants (n=115; 95% CI 22.5% to 31.1%). Among them, the majority (n=78, 67.83%) were admitted to government hospitals, and most hospital stays lasted &lt;7 days (n=77, 67%). Hospitalisation was significantly higher among residents of Kollam district (adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) 1.52; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.12), participants with health insurance (APR 1.38; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.89) and those with more than two chronic conditions (APR 1.76; 95% CI 1.28 to 2.41). Among participants who incurred OOPE (90.7%), the median annual expenditure was 30 720 (US$353) (IQR 17 850&ndash;59 725). Medicines constituted the largest share of OOPE (61.7%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>One in four adults with multimorbidity in Kerala reported hospitalisation. A significant proportion of OOPE was for drugs. These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted financial protection measures, equitable resource allocation and strengthening of primary care services to reduce avoidable hospitalisations and economic burden. The increase in hospitalisation among those with insurance coverage requires careful attention from policy makers. Regulation of drug prices may be required to reduce the financial burden imposed by drugs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adhila, S., Olickal, J. J., Thankappan, K. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108911</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108911</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospitalisation, associated factors and out-of-pocket expenditure among patients with multimorbidity in Kerala, India: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108911</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108911</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110667?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of artificial agents in loneliness alleviation among older adults: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110667?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Approximately 20%&ndash;40% of older adults face loneliness. The effectiveness of artificial agents used to treat loneliness in this population is contentious in current studies. We aim to investigate the efficacy of this treatment for loneliness and other well-being outcomes in the elderly and identify factors that moderate its effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions with control groups involving artificial agents to alleviate loneliness in older populations; data sourced from PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL (EBSCO) and PsycINFO (EBSCO). Two reviewers will independently assess the literature, with a third reviewer consulted to resolve disagreements. Study characteristics will be narratively summarised. A meta-analysis will assess treatment effects on loneliness and other outcomes. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis will be conducted based on artificial agent type, treatment strategy and participants&rsquo; settings; and comparisons performed via a random-effects model, using Cochrane Review Manager V.5.4.1 and STATA V.16.0 for quantitative synthesis. Study quality will be assessed using appropriate risk-of-bias assessment tools. Cochran&rsquo;s Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics will assess heterogeneity. Publication bias will be identified using Egger&rsquo;s test and a funnel plot.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Since this systematic review is carried out based on published scientific databases, it is exempt from ethics approval. The findings of this review will be disseminated in a related peer-review journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023428127.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yan, M., Han, X., Fu, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110667</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110667</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of artificial agents in loneliness alleviation among older adults: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110667</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110667</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110799?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strategies for assessing posthospitalisation outcomes in trauma survivors and their feasibility of implementation: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110799?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Each year, physical traumas affect over one billion people worldwide, generating a substantial burden in terms of mortality, disability and productivity loss. The period following hospital discharge, encompassing the transition to home, short-term stays in rehabilitation facilities, as well as outpatient and community-based follow-up care, represents a critical phase in the recovery process for trauma injury patients. Yet, this phase remains poorly documented. We aim to (1) Map data on assessment strategies for various outcomes among trauma survivors after hospital discharge, including the tools used and how they are administered, as well as the resources required, and the barriers and facilitators to their implementation, and (2) Compare the feasibility of implementing the assessment strategies while considering response rates, resource use, costs and sustainability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO for studies published since 1990 to reflect the evolution of contemporary follow-up practices, including the emergence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and digital tools. There will be no language restrictions. We will consider all studies involving trauma survivors, focusing on the evaluation of postdischarge health outcomes. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and extract data on population characteristics, assessment strategies and feasibility. Results will be analysed thematically and presented narratively. We will present counts and percentages for each assessment strategy, along with its characteristics and associated barriers and facilitators. Subgroup analyses will also be conducted based on clinical and social determinants and contextual factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this review. The results of this scoping review will be shared through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentations and our network of knowledge users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Open science framework registration number</st>
<p>DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/KZHS4</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laberge Sevigny, M., Moore, L., Gabbe, B. J., Haagsma, J., Wake, E., Haas, B., Skaff, D., Green, R., Trevino, C., Finstad, J., Gagnon, M.-A., Deziel, P.-L., Berube, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110799</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110799</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strategies for assessing posthospitalisation outcomes in trauma survivors and their feasibility of implementation: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110799</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110799</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111221?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Examining social camouflaging and its cognitive, mental health and neurophysiological correlates in autistic adolescents through triangulation-based assessment using self, parent and daily diary reports: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111221?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Social camouflaging (SC; ie, the concealing of autistic traits to socially assimilate) is associated with poor mental health, self-identity and quality of life outcomes, yet its typology, consequences and contextual triggers remain unexplored in autistic adolescents. Further study is necessary to identify protective factors against the potentially negative outcomes associated with SC to promote long-term well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The current project will investigate SC in youth and its mental health, cognitive and neurophysiological correlates. Camouflaging will be captured by triangulating self-reported and caregiver-reported SC behaviours, as well as SC behaviours in day-to-day contexts using intensive longitudinal methods (ie, daily diaries). Non-autistic, self-identifying autistic and formally diagnosed autistic adolescents aged 15&ndash;18 years (N=150) will be recruited. Adolescents and caregivers will complete rating scales to assess mental health, and adolescents will complete in-lab cognitive assessments of attention, executive function, intellectual ability and theory of mind. Brain neurophysiological function and cortisol concentration over time will be measured during the same visit using electroencephalography and hair samples, respectively. Over the following 7 days, adolescents will complete daily diaries using their smartphones. The daily diaries pose survey questions about the type and degree of SC behaviour used within their daily environment, including the social context, individuals who are present and current well-being. Adolescents will also complete brief performance-based cognitive assessments of attention and executive function integrated within the daily diary surveys. Finally, adolescents and their parents will complete a follow-up of SC behaviours and mental health at 3 months. Correlations and regression analyses will be conducted to explore the associations between SC and mental health/cognitive outcomes and how baseline measures of cognition, mental health and SC predict patterns seen on the daily diaries. Multilevel modelling will be used, nesting daily data to capture within-person and between-group differences in contextual predictors of camouflaging behaviour. Results will contribute to current understanding of the typology of camouflaging, as well as inform intervention to mitigate mental health challenges for autistic youth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This project is approved by the University of Victoria Human Research Ethics Board (#23&ndash;0013) and the University of Calgary Conjoint Faculties Research Ethics Board (#23&ndash;0641). Informed consent will be obtained from caregivers and adolescent participants, and safety procedures will be put in place to support the adolescent should mental health concerns arise. Results will be disseminated through academic publications and conferences, as well as summarised and communicated to interested participants and relevant stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klein, J., Krahn, R. L., Howe, S. J., Cormier, A., Rush, J., Ames, M., McMorris, C. A., Macoun, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111221</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111221</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Examining social camouflaging and its cognitive, mental health and neurophysiological correlates in autistic adolescents through triangulation-based assessment using self, parent and daily diary reports: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111221</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112382?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of disease burden on VO2max, physical performance and frailty in ankylosing spondylitis: a comparative cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112382?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine the association between spinal mobility, disease activity, frailty and cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal oxygen uptake (VO<SUB>2</SUB>max)) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at the University of Lahore and seven government hospitals (March&ndash;August 2025) including 74 patients with AS (40&ndash;55 years, modified New York criteria) and 77 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls. Assessments included disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index), functional limitation (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index), spinal mobility (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)), chest expansion, frailty (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, Loss of weight scale), pulmonary function and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO<SUB>2</SUB>max) via symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Functional performance was measured with the 6 min walk test (6MWT), and physical activity with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Data were analysed using t-tests, <sup>2</sup> tests, correlations and regression models to examine associations between clinical measures and cardiorespiratory fitness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 151 participants (74 AS, 77 controls), AS patients showed significantly reduced pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in one second 83.5% vs 91.2%, forced vital capacity 85.1% vs 93.0%), lower VO<SUB>2</SUB>max (27.8 vs 33.4 mL/kg/min), impaired spinal mobility (BASMI 5.1 vs 1.2) and decreased chest expansion (2.8 vs 5.6 cm; all p&lt;0.01). They also had shorter 6MWT distance, higher frailty and lower physical activity. VO<SUB>2</SUB>max was inversely correlated with disease activity, spinal stiffness, frailty and structural damage and positively correlated with chest expansion, 6MWT and activity levels. AS status, higher disease activity, greater spinal stiffness and reduced chest expansion independently predicted low physical activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>AS is associated with impaired pulmonary function, reduced spinal mobility and lower cardiorespiratory fitness, with disease activity, stiffness and restricted chest expansion potentially influencing physical activity and overall functional capacity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tariq, A., Ammar, M., Saad, A., Zadeh, S. A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112382</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112382</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of disease burden on VO2max, physical performance and frailty in ankylosing spondylitis: a comparative cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112382</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112382</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112453?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Program LIFT: protocol for a pilot feasibility factorial randomised controlled trial of digital single-session interventions to address self-harm and suicidal ideation in Australian community-based adolescents]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112453?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours (SITBs) represent a critical public and mental health challenge. Adolescents are disproportionately at risk for engaging in SITBs. Intervening early and addressing pathogenic and proximal risk/vulnerability factors is of critical importance for this vulnerable population. Digital Single-Session Interventions (D-SSIs) offer a promising solution to unmet need for accessible, scalable and engaging care. This pilot study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions and clinical trial protocol for Programme LIFT (Little Interventions for Teens), a newly developed suite of D-SSIs targeting emotional regulation, self-criticism, rumination and hopelessness as key risk processes involved in the maintenance of SITBs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We aim to recruit 216 Australian adolescents aged 15&ndash;19 years who have experienced SITBs in the past 2 months into an online, 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>2 factorial randomised controlled trial to pilot the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention protocol (D-SSI+28 days of skill practice) and trial procedures, and establish study retention. Random allocation procedures will be used to test factors that may affect adherence to the intervention protocol (primary feasibility outcome), by testing the effect of: (1) intervention assignment method (free choice vs clinician prescribed), and (2) a postintervention brief, supportive phone check-in at 7 days postcompletion of the D-SSI (phone call vs no call). Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using online surveys at postintervention (T1) and 30 days follow-up (T3), along daily brief assessments of skill practice between T1 and T2 (T2). The trial and its protocol were developed and reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items for Interventional Trials checklist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study is approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC#9032). Results will be published in an open access peer-reviewed journal, and key study findings will be shared with participants and stakeholders within 3 months after completion of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12625000963426.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hatoum, A. H., Wong, Q., Hunt, Z., ODea, B., Josifovski, N., Gan, D., Torok, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112453</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112453</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Program LIFT: protocol for a pilot feasibility factorial randomised controlled trial of digital single-session interventions to address self-harm and suicidal ideation in Australian community-based adolescents]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112453</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112453</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112494?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cognitive-behavioural therapy smartphone app for low mood and worry management in female armed forces veterans in Great Britain: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112494?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Emotional difficulties, such as low mood and worry, are more prevalent among female forces veterans compared to their male peers. However, female veterans are more reluctant to access mental health services available for armed force veterans. To enhance help seeking, the Iona female forces veterans (IonaFFV) research app has been developed and adapted for low mood and worry management among female veterans. This feasibility randomised controlled trial primarily seeks to explore the methodological uncertainties of conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial using IonaFFV. Secondary aims seek to explore acceptability and engagement with IonaFFV. Additionally, progression criteria will be assessed to determine feasibility of moving to a definitive trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Participants were recruited online and asked to complete two screening assessments to assess eligibility. Eligible participants were randomised using block randomisation to use either the IonaFFV or Iona sham app for 6 weeks. Recruitment and randomisation are complete, and data collection is currently ongoing. At the end of the 6-week intervention period, participants will complete the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and Work and Social Adjustment Scale outcome measures. At 4 weeks postintervention (10 weeks postrandomisation), participants will complete the same outcome measures in addition to the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) to assess acceptability of both IonaFFV and Iona sham. At the end of the study, the participants who were in the Iona sham group will be given an option to use the IonaFFV app for 6 weeks. Proportions will be reported for feasibility and demographic data with descriptive analysis conducted for the outcome measures. Median values with IQRs will be conducted for each subscale of MAUQ.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study received ethical approval from the University of Exeter Psychology Ethics Committee with consent obtained from all participants. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences, with a final report presented to the funders of the project.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN50744553">ISRCTN50744553</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janbakhsh, M., Turnbull, E., Baker, J., Bacon, A., Farrand, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112494</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112494</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cognitive-behavioural therapy smartphone app for low mood and worry management in female armed forces veterans in Great Britain: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112494</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112494</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113095?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ACHTSAM study protocol: outreach diagnostics and assessment of tolerability in severe ME/CFS--a pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113095?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a severe, multisystem condition that often emerges after viral infections and affects physical and cognitive function. Severely affected patients are underrepresented in research due to immobility and exertional intolerance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This is a prospective, non-interventional observational study investigating the feasibility and tolerability of home-based diagnostics in patients with severe and very severe ME/CFS. Phase 1 includes remote identification using validated questionnaires. Phase 2 involves home visits for physiological, cognitive and biological assessments. The primary outcome is feasibility; secondary outcomes include tolerability and methodological barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics/dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Freiburg (No. 25-1031-S1). Written informed consent is obtained from all participants. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and patient support groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00035231; FRKS005506.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fricke, C., Deibert, P., Maier, P., Kern, W., Krumnau, O., Barsch, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113095</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113095</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ACHTSAM study protocol: outreach diagnostics and assessment of tolerability in severe ME/CFS--a pilot study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113095</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113095</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrating care in a childrens hospital: a qualitative interview study with mental and physical health professionals in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore physical and mental health professionals' hopes and concerns around integrating their services in a colocated children&rsquo;s hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>One-off semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 participants (16 mental health and 15 physical health professionals). Participants were purposively sampled to ensure representation across each trust and professional background. Participants included allied health professionals, nurses, team managers, paediatricians, psychiatrists and psychologists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Staff described integration as both promising and ambiguous. While many welcomed the potential for improved collaboration and holistic care, others expressed uncertainty about what integration would entail. Six key themes were identified: (a) siloed and patchy beginnings, (b) one whole child, (c) day-to-day of colocation, (d) the integrated worker, (e) patients not in the same boat and (f) extending integration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This novel analysis offers insights around the practical and emotional processes involved in integrating care systems. Staff valued the potential for holistic, child-centred care, improved collaboration and shared learning but expressed concerns around ambiguity, shifting professional identities and the practicalities of colocating services. These tensions underscore the need for clearer communication, relationship-building and support structures during service redesign. Our findings also support integrating wider community and social care systems and call for future research involving young people&rsquo;s perspectives to ensure meaningful, inclusive integration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan, T., Pilimatalawwe, D., Mannes, J., Morse, I., Folwell, J., Hain, P., Walsh, C. M., OCurry, S., Duschinsky, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113196</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113196</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrating care in a childrens hospital: a qualitative interview study with mental and physical health professionals in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113196</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114457?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Involving family caregivers in co-design research: a systematic review protocol for developing evidence-based engagement strategies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114457?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Stakeholder involvement in research processes is widely recommended to enhance the relevance, quality and uptake of research findings. However, existing studies highlight persistent challenges in engaging family caregivers in co-design research. This gap may result in research outcomes that fail to reflect family caregivers&rsquo; needs and preferences, contradicting the core purpose of co-design. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the available evidence on family caregivers&rsquo; experiences of involvement in co-design research and to generate evidence-based strategies to support effective engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will be conducted using a meta-aggregative approach, following the Joanna Briggs Institute&rsquo;s (JBI&rsquo;s) Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Systematic searches will be conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO, with no date restrictions. Preliminary searches were performed in EMBASE between September and October 2025. Qualitative primary studies that explore family caregivers&rsquo; experiences of involvement in co-design research will be included. Study selection and quality appraisal will be performed independently by two researchers using predefined protocols, disagreements will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. After calibration, a single reviewer will extract the data using a customised data extraction template with the dataset distributed among the authors. The first author will then review all extractions. Data will be analysed following JBI&rsquo;s meta-aggregative method, and results will be presented in narrative summaries, tables and diagrams. The findings will inform strategies for stakeholder involvement in future co-design research. Family caregivers and co-design researchers will be involved in reviewing and revising generated recommendations to enhance their relevance and practical utility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol does not involve human participants. The findings of this review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant scientific conferences and meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251229190.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alfaro-Diaz, C., Rothausen, C. S., Bonde Hansen, E. V., Samuelsson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-06T05:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114457</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114457</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Involving family caregivers in co-design research: a systematic review protocol for developing evidence-based engagement strategies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114457</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114457</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110831?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of diabetes severity with cognitive function in US adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the AI-READI multicentre cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110831?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate whether type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) presence and severity are associated with differences in global and domain-specific cognitive function among US adults, using standardised Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three U.S academic medical centres participating in the Artificial Intelligence&ndash;Ready and Equitable Atlas for Diabetes Insights (AI-READI) study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults aged &ge;40 years enrolled in the AI-READI cross-sectional study at three US academic medical centres were eligible. The study excluded individuals with type 1 diabetes, pregnancy or inability to speak, read and understand English. For this secondary analysis, 1067 participants from the first publicly released AI-READI data set who had MoCA data and assigned glycaemic status were included. Participants were classified into four prespecified glycaemic groups: controls without diabetes (n=371), pre-diabetes (n=239), medication-controlled type 2 diabetes (n=323), and insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes (n=129).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was global cognitive function measured by the MoCA total score. Secondary outcomes included MoCA domain scores and the prevalence of cognitive impairment, defined as MoCA&lt;26.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Significant differences in MoCA total scores were observed across glycaemic groups (p&lt;0.001), with the lowest mean score (24.0) among insulin-dependent individuals and highest among controls (25.8), and the significant difference remained in multivariable analyses (p=0.02). Among MoCA subdomains, mean abstraction scores were significantly lower (1.76) in insulin-dependent T2DM group than other glycaemic groups (mean score 1.87&ndash;1.89) in multivariable analysis (p=0.03). The prevalence of cognitive impairment increased from 39% in controls to 58% in the insulin-dependent group. In multivariable analysis, increasing diabetes severity was associated with higher risk of cognitive impairment with adjusted OR 1.85 (95% CI: 1.11 to 3.07) for insulin-dependent T2DM and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.05 to 2.15) for medication-controlled T2DM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Individuals with more advanced T2DM, particularly those on insulin, had significantly higher risk of cognitive impairment. These findings support routine cognitive screening in patients with T2DM, especially those on insulin therapy. Early identification of cognitive impairment may improve diabetes management and cognitive outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Um, K. M., Kim, B. J., Ying, G.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-05T05:13:39-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110831</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110831</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of diabetes severity with cognitive function in US adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the AI-READI multicentre cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110831</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110831</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113729?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on early mobilisation in patients undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113729?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Early mobilisation represents a core element of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and is recommended after minimally invasive spine surgery including unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE). However, strategies to facilitate early mobilisation after UBE remain limited. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) may improve postoperative pain and recovery after spine surgery, but available evidence in UBE remains inconclusive.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate whether perioperative TEAS enhances postoperative recovery after UBE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This single-centre randomised controlled trial with blinded assessors will enrol 114 patients undergoing elective UBE discectomy. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) by simple randomisation to receive stimulation via self-adhesive electrodes, either single-session TEAS at Neiguan, Dazhui, Chengshan and Sanyinjiao initiated 30 min before surgery until the end of the procedure using a disperse&ndash;dense waveform (2/100 Hz) with individualised intensity (10&ndash;15 mA) or sham stimulation applied at four non-meridian, non-acupoint sites with brief initial stimulation followed by 0 mA output. Standardised general anaesthesia with bispectral index and analgesia nociception index monitoring will be provided following ERAS recommendations. The primary outcome is successful ambulation rate at 6 hour postoperatively; baseline pain, nausea, quality of recovery and functional status will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale, Visual Analogue Scale, Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at baseline before intervention while postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, opioid consumption and Quality of recovery will be evaluated at 6, 24 and 48 hours after surgery, with ODI and JOA assessed during longer-term follow-up and surgery-related adverse events monitored postoperatively. Continuous outcomes will be analysed using parametric (repeated-measures analysis of variance) or non-parametric (Mann-Whitney U) tests, and categorical variables using &sup2; or Fisher&rsquo;s exact tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethical considerations and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Friendship Hospital (No: 2024-P2-087-01) and registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400083344.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luo, X., Qi, Y., Ma, Z., Li, Y., An, L.-X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-05T05:13:39-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113729</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113729</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on early mobilisation in patients undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113729</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113729</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100412?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disclosure experiences in LGBTQ+ healthcare staff: a systematic review and meta-synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100412?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Workplace disclosure of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ+) identity by healthcare employees is an understudied area and existing reviews of LGBTQ+ disclosure in the healthcare sector focus on patient perspectives, overlooking the unique challenges that healthcare professionals encounter. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-synthesis of existing qualitative studies exploring disclosure experiences of LGBTQ+ healthcare employees.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>The literature search integrated current research from 2011 to March 2023 and focused on qualitative studies exploring disclosure experiences of LGBTQ+ healthcare professionals. Ovid served as the primary platform for literature searches, supplemented by forward and backward citation tracking and additional searches in academic databases such as Google Scholar and Scopus. The studies underwent quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme 2022 checklist and were synthesised using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The findings revealed seven studies with five prominent themes: (1) risk associated with disclosure, (2) making the decision to disclose, (3) cost of non-disclosure, (4) cost of disclosure and (5) benefit of disclosure. Additionally, five critical factors of disclosure were identified: level, scope, time, elements and method. Finally, the risk&ndash;benefit analysis underscored the dilemma and balance between authenticity and conformity, largely influenced by pervasive heteronormativity, resulting in a significant mental toll.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings must be interpreted considering certain limitations, such as the lack of generalisability of studies. However, the findings emphasise the critical need for cultivating trusting and accepting healthcare work environments for LGBTQ+ staff.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prakkash, R., Manning, L., Becares, L., Hatch, S. L., Akande, I., Dorrington, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100412</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100412</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disclosure experiences in LGBTQ+ healthcare staff: a systematic review and meta-synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100412</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100412</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101227?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Speech-to-Speech Voice-Cloning Care (SVCC) for improving ICU-acquired anxiety for critically ill patients in a tertiary hospital in Beijing, China: protocol of a randomised, controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101227?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intensive care unit (ICU) visiting restrictions in hospitals, implemented due to infection control and other factors, limited contact between patients and family members, affecting patients&rsquo; well-being and clinical outcomes. With the evolution of voice-cloning based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology, it has become possible for health providers to communicate with critically ill patients using highly similar synthetic voices of their loved ones during ICU care. This current randomised, controlled trial will explore the effect of voice-cloning care on improving mental health outcomes for critically ill patients, with ICU-acquired anxiety as the primary indicator.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will enrol 234 adult ICU patients, who are expected to require mechanical ventilation for over 24 hours and an ICU stay exceeding 72 hours. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups. The control group will receive standardised communication as part of usual ICU care, while the intervention group will receive Speech-to-Speech Voice-Cloning Care (SVCC) in addition to standard ICU care. The SVCC interventions involve nurses using a participant&rsquo;s family member&rsquo;s cloned voice to deliver pre-set communication scripts during awakening, soothing and preparation for endotracheal tube removal. The primary outcome is expected to lead to improvements in ICU-acquired anxiety for the intervention group, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Secondary outcomes include ICU-acquired depression, the incidence of delirium, the mean duration of mechanical ventilation and the average length of ICU stay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Approval Number: K-6842). The protocol version number is 1.2 and the version date is 8 October 2024. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: <A HREF="NCT06743321">NCT06743321</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, M., Yang, Y., Hao, J., Xue, Y., Weng, D., Jiang, H., Song, W., Yang, Y., Long, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101227</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101227</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Speech-to-Speech Voice-Cloning Care (SVCC) for improving ICU-acquired anxiety for critically ill patients in a tertiary hospital in Beijing, China: protocol of a randomised, controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101227</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101858?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[American Heart Associations Lifes Simple 7 for cardiovascular health assessment among Iranian adults: a national cross-sectional study from STEPwise approach to non-communicable diseases risk factor surveillance (STEPS) survey 2021]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e101858?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics using the American Heart Association&rsquo;s Life&rsquo;s Simple 7 (LS7) tool as a comprehensive measure of several metabolic and behavioural risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study, nationally representative Iran STEPwise approach to non-communicable diseases risk factor surveillance (STEPS) survey 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Iran, 2020&ndash;2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>25 202 adult individuals aged 25 years and older participated in the STEPS survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Using the LS7 framework, seven factors were assessed: current smoking, body mass index (BMI), physical activity level, modified healthy diet score components, total cholesterol, blood pressure and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Each factor was categorised into three levels of poor, intermediate and ideal, according to the LS7 methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study participants had a sex distribution of 55.5% females. The findings revealed a high prevalence of ideal levels of smoking (80.1%; 95% CI 79.3 to 81.0), total cholesterol (69.4%; 95% CI 68.5 to 70.4) and FPG (61.0%; 95% CI 60.0 to 62.1). BMI and blood pressure were ideal in about one-third of the population (33.0%; 95% CI 32.1 to 34.0, and 30.5%; 95% CI 29.6 to 31.4, respectively). However, only 13.3% (95% CI 12.6 to 14.0) of participants achieved ideal levels of physical activity, and a mere 0.4% (95% CI 0.3 to 0.6) adhered to an ideal healthy diet. Modest disparities in CVH metrics were observed across provinces and between two sexes. Ideal CVH status was significantly associated with lower risks of major diseases such as ischaemic heart disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite favourable scores in some CVH metrics, critical gaps in diet and physical activity highlight the need for intensive public health efforts to enhance CVH in Iran. The study emphasises the urgency of implementing region- and sex-specific public health policies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azadnajafabad, S., Rezaei, S., Almasi, G., Ahmadi, N., Golestani, A., Rashidi, M.-M., Abbasi-Kangevari, M., Rezaei, N., Rezaei, N., Farzi, Y., Ghasemi, E., Yoosefi, M., Haghshenas, R., Nasserinejad, M., Kazemi, A., Abdolhamidi, E., Saeedi Moghaddam, S., Malekpour, M.-R., Momen Nia Rankohi, A., Djalalinia, S., Farzadfar, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101858</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101858</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[American Heart Associations Lifes Simple 7 for cardiovascular health assessment among Iranian adults: a national cross-sectional study from STEPwise approach to non-communicable diseases risk factor surveillance (STEPS) survey 2021]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101858</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101858</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103004?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Test to assess claims about treatment effects for Spanish primary school children: the development process and cross-sectional validation study of the test]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103004?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aims of this study were (1) to develop and validate the interactive CLAIM Test (iCLAIM Test) to measure children&rsquo;s ability to assess claims about treatment effects and make informed health choices and (2) to measure this ability in Spanish primary school children using the developed test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We followed a multistep process including (1) definition of the test scope, (2) selection of the questions, (3) translation process, (4) design and development of the online test, (5) external review with experts, (6) user-test with children and (7) cross-sectional validation study with Rasch analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Spanish primary schools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Twelve experts (75% women) participated in the review, 11 children (45% girls) participated in the user-test and 480 Spanish primary school children (46.5% girls) from fourth to sixth grades (9&ndash;12 years old) participated in the cross-sectional validation study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The iCLAIM Test is an online, interactive and user-friendly test in Spanish that measures children&rsquo;s ability to understand and apply key concepts of the informed health choices (IHC) Project when assessing claims about treatment effects and making IHCs. The test includes 30 questions: six demographic questions and 24 questions from the Claim Evaluation Tools item bank. Less than 40% of the students who participated in the cross-sectional validation study showed basic knowledge of the IHC Key Concepts and how to apply them, and less than 4% showed a clear knowledge. The test showed a good fit to the Rasch model and was acceptable to the target audience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The iCLAIM Test is the first instrument validated for measuring children&rsquo;s ability to assess treatment claims in Spain. In the future, we can tailor IHC education interventions and improve critical thinking skills about the health of Spanish children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samso Jofra, L., Dahlgren, A., Alonso-Coello, P., Canovas Martinez, E., Perez-Gaxiola, G., Roque i Figuls, M., Rosenbaum, S., Sanz-Herranz, H., Valenzuela Rubio, N. G., Martinez Garcia, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103004</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103004</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Test to assess claims about treatment effects for Spanish primary school children: the development process and cross-sectional validation study of the test]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103004</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103004</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104771?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a lifelong core outcome set for oesophageal atresia {+/-} tracheoesophageal fistula: the OCELOT study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104771?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Despite anatomical correction, people born with oesophageal atresia&plusmn;tracheoesophageal fistula (OA-TOF) experience lifelong morbidity. Core outcome sets (COSs) are recognised as a means of improving research quality and, as a consequence, improving patient outcomes; one was not available for this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The scope of the study was to develop a COS for people born with OA-TOF that would be applicable regardless of age or geographic location.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>Patient input was paramount to this study. For long-list generation, in addition to the systematic review (SR), patients and representatives were invited to participate in focus groups, interviews or complete activity packs to ascertain outcomes that matter most to them. International consensus was then sought using a two-step Delphi survey followed by an online consensus meeting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eight outcomes were identified through patient events that had not been picked up from SR. 175 people completed the Delphi survey from 26 countries and health care professionals from 13 different disciplines. 24 outcomes met predefined criteria for inclusion and following discussion and voting in the consensus meeting, and 14/24 outcomes were agreed for inclusion in the COS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>14 outcomes have been agreed on to form the COS. 12 of these outcomes are relevant to people of all ages, 1 to paediatric population and 1 to adult cohorts. The COS is, therefore, truly applicable lifelong, which was the scope of the project. This COS will help reduce research heterogeneity, enabling better quality research outcomes and more comparable data.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thursfield, R., Gorst, S., Teunisson, N., Lansdale, N., Faulkner, J., Krishnan, U., Kovesi, T., Slater, G., Cullis, P., Bray, L., Donne, A., Teague, W., Losty, P. D., Carr, S., Gray, V., Gutierrez-Gammino, L., Nah, S. A., Hall, N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104771</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104771</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a lifelong core outcome set for oesophageal atresia {+/-} tracheoesophageal fistula: the OCELOT study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104771</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104771</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106029?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How is long-term sickness absence due to different mental disorders associated with future disability pension risk? A population-based prospective cohort study in Finland]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106029?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The rise in mental disorders in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries warrants close consideration, as mental disorders cause long-term sickness absences (LTSA) and increase the risk of disability pensioning (DP). This study compared how different mental disorders as a basis for LTSA pose risks for a subsequent DP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-based prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>18&ndash;59-year-old Finns starting a new psychiatric LTSA in 2020. LTSA was measured through sickness allowance accumulated over 12 months. A 48-month follow-up started from the onset of LTSA. Six mental disorder types were identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The outcome variable was the time in months to a first paid DP spell. Using Cox proportional hazards regression stratified by sex, the DP risks of different mental disorders were examined, adjusting for comorbidity, length of LTSA and sociodemographic variables. The risks are presented as absolute risk differences and both unadjusted and covariate-adjusted HRs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with depression-related LTSA, psychoses (HRs 2.93 (95% CI 2.55 to 3.36) for women/2.99 (95% CI 2.67 to 3.36) for men) and other mood disorders (HRs 1.64 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.92)/1.49 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.78)) were associated with higher covariate-adjusted HRs, while anxiety disorders (HRs 0.65 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.72)/0.76 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.87)) and psychiatric sleep disorders (HRs 0.47 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.59)/0.58 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.78)) showed lower HRs. Higher age, lower education and socioeconomic status, comorbid mental disorders, chronic diseases and longer LTSA increased the risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Different mental disorders as basis for LTSA pose differing risks for permanent work disability. Among mental disorders, depression poses a relatively average risk for DP. Although anxiety and sleep disorders commonly cause LTSA, they are not associated with high DP risks. Psychotic and bipolar disorders are especially detrimental to work ability in today&rsquo;s work life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perhoniemi, R., Blomgren, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106029</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How is long-term sickness absence due to different mental disorders associated with future disability pension risk? A population-based prospective cohort study in Finland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106029</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106029</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106381?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Availability, acceptability and adoption of decision aids for HIV prevention and contraception for young people: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106381?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Young people face challenges in accessing information on HIV and sexual and reproductive health services, with corresponding suboptimal uptake. Decision aids can provide information and decisional support to improve young people&rsquo;s engagement with health interventions. However, they have not been widely implemented among young people. The availability of different choices for HIV and pregnancy prevention means that it is important to implement interventions that facilitate informed choices for these methods. We describe a protocol for a scoping review that aims to explore the availability, acceptability and use of decision aids for HIV prevention and contraception for young people.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will identify relevant studies from the following electronic databases from inception to current date: PubMed, Scopus and Global Health; and grey literature databases, namely medRxiv and Open Access Theses and Dissertations. Eligible studies will report on HIV prevention and/or contraception decision aids and be written in English. Data extraction will be done by two reviewers independently using templates, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Analysis will be done narratively, and separate for HIV prevention and contraception decision aids. Analysis will also include determination of the suitability of each decision aid for use by young people aged 15&ndash;24 years. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews will be employed to present results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review does not require ethics approval. The findings from this work will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at local and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This scoping review protocol is registered in Open Science Framework with Project DOI: 10.17605/OSF/IO/46YWG (accessible via: <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/46YWG">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/46YWG</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kabonga, I., Kuguyo, O., Mancitshana, L., Chidhanguro, K., Munhenzva, S., Masiyambiri, F., Ruhode, N., Mangenah, C., Sibanda, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106381</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106381</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Availability, acceptability and adoption of decision aids for HIV prevention and contraception for young people: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106381</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106381</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106687?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and comparative risk of mental health disorders in persons with vitiligo: a retrospective matched cohort study using claims data with expert-informed case validation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106687?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the prevalence and comorbidity patterns of mental health disorders (MHDs) in persons with vitiligo and compare relative risks (RRs) with dermatological diseases (atopic dermatitis and psoriasis) and non-vitiligo comparator cohorts using claims data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective matched cohort study using nationwide statutory health insurance claims data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>German statutory health insurance claims (DAK-Gesundheit), 2016&ndash;2020.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A 40% anonymised sample of insured persons (N=2 885 984). In 2020, persons with vitiligo (International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, German Modification L80) were compared with cohorts with atopic dermatitis (L20), psoriasis (L40) and persons without vitiligo. Cohorts were propensity score matched (1:3) by age and sex.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Prevalence of MHDs and RRs across comparator cohorts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Internal plausibility of expert-informed claims-based MHD case definitions using diagnosis-only versus diagnosis-plus-care criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In 2020, 4 631 persons were diagnosed with vitiligo. Affective disorders and neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders showed the highest prevalence, with depressive episodes ranging from 8.9% to 19.2% and somatoform disorders from 5.3% to 17.9% across definitions. In matched comparisons with atopic dermatitis, only a few and inconsistent differences were observed. In contrast, more pronounced and consistent differences were identified in comparisons with psoriasis. Emotional disorders in childhood showed higher risks under the most sensitive case definition (RR=2.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.61), whereas hyperkinetic disorders showed consistent effects across all definitions (RR range=1.58&ndash;1.93). Compared with persons without vitiligo, risks were higher for social phobia (RR range=2.10&ndash;2.81) and anxiety disorders (RR range=1.64&ndash;1.93).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Persons with vitiligo show a substantial burden of affective and stress-related MHDs. The mental health comorbidity profile was largely comparable to that of atopic dermatitis, whereas more pronounced differences were observed in comparisons with psoriasis. Claims-based prevalence estimates were sensitive to case definition, highlighting the importance of transparent operationalisation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klinger, T., Augustin, M., Leicht, G., Moritz, S., Hagenstro&#x0308;m, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106687</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106687</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and comparative risk of mental health disorders in persons with vitiligo: a retrospective matched cohort study using claims data with expert-informed case validation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106687</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106687</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106982?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers to Helicobacter pylori management among the regular health screening population at a tertiary hospital healthcare centre in China: results from a qualitative analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106982?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We aimed to better understand patients&rsquo; perspectives on <I>Helicobacter pylori</I> (<I>H. pylori</I>) treatment to develop tailored interventions for improving adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured, in-depth interviews from September to December 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at a large, university-affiliated healthcare centre which provides comprehensive health check-up services to a geographically diverse adult population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Individuals aged between 35 and 65 years old who had tested positive for <I>H. pylori infectio</I>n by 13C urea breath test in two consecutive annual health screenings and who had received their most recent <I>H. pylori</I> screening results within the past 6 months were enrolled.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 23 participants involved in this study, 13 (56.5%) were male, with age ranging from 39 to 62 years. Five key themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Participants perceived <I>H. pylori</I> as common but not serious, with limited understanding of its association with gastric cancer, (2) Physician recommendations and familial concerns acted as primary cues to treatment initiation, (3) Barriers included low perceived severity, reinfection concerns, side effects, time constraints and absence of symptoms or family history, (4) Adherence was challenged by treatment side effects and lack of follow-up testing and (5) Despite low treatment completion, participants reported engaging in preventive behaviours such as using separate utensils and reducing dining out.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Barriers to <I>H. pylori</I> eradication among health screening populations are multifaceted, involving informational deficits, cultural dining norms and logistical hurdles. Interventions should enhance physician-patient communication, emphasise follow-up testing and address misconceptions about reinfection and disease risk. Strengthening general practitioners&rsquo; capacity for evidence-based <I>H. pylori</I> management and integrating post-screening educational support are essential for improving eradication rates and reducing infection-related morbidity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Jiang, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106982</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106982</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers to Helicobacter pylori management among the regular health screening population at a tertiary hospital healthcare centre in China: results from a qualitative analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106982</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106982</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108203?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can topical coconut oil reduce late-onset sepsis in extremely preterm infants? A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108203?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Infants born before 28 weeks&rsquo; gestation account for approximately 75% of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Late-onset sepsis (LOS) affects around 25% of these infants and is associated with an increased risk of adverse long-term outcomes. The topical application of coconut oil has been used for centuries in newborn care. Coconut oil is rich in saturated fatty acids, several of which have demonstrated antimicrobial properties. It is considered safe for extremely preterm infants, improves skin condition and may reduce the incidence of LOS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, two-arm, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III clinical trial evaluating the effect of topical coconut oil versus routine skin care on the incidence of LOS in extremely preterm infants. Participating neonatal units will be cluster-randomised, and all infants born at &lt;28 weeks gestational age will receive either routine skin care or routine care with the addition of topical coconut oil. A minimum of 616 infants will be recruited into each treatment arm. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses will be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Following ethical approval, patients will be recruited at participating sites under a waiver of consent with opt-out framework. The trial results will be disseminated through conferences, media sources and publication in relevant peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12620001332910.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strunk, T., Mountain, J., Gordon, A., Deshpande, G., van den Boom, J., DePaoli, A. G., Jacobs, S., Giannoutsos, N., Doherty, D. A., Patole, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108203</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108203</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can topical coconut oil reduce late-onset sepsis in extremely preterm infants? A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108203</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108492?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spatial distribution and multilevel analysis of factors associated with healthcare access barriers among women of reproductive age in Somalia: insights from the 2020 Somalia Demographic and Health Survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108492?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to address the spatial distribution and multilevel analysis of healthcare access barriers among women of reproductive age in Somalia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study setting, design and analysis</st>
<p>The study was conducted across Somalia, an East African country facing significant spatial disparities in healthcare access. A cross-sectional study design was employed, using data from the 2020 Somali Demographic and Health Survey (SDHS). The data were analysed using both multilevel logistic regression and spatial analysis. To pinpoint barriers and identify statistically significant spatial clusters, the data were analysed using multilevel logistic regression in Stata V.17 and spatial analysis in R Studio (V.4.4.1), respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study population consisted of a weighted sample of 5118 women of reproductive age (15&ndash;49 years) from the SDHS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Spatial analysis revealed significant regional heterogeneity, with high-prevalence areas concentrated in the northern region of Togdheer and a south-central cluster encompassing Galguduud, Hiiraan and Bakool. Multilevel analysis presented that women in the Bay region had nearly 10 times (AOR: 9.62) the risk of facing healthcare access barriers. While women in the highest quintile of wealth (AOR 0.21), those in higher education (AOR 0.30), those aged 45&ndash;49 (AOR 0.49) and not currently working (AOR 0.46) were significantly less likely to report access barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion and recommendations</st>
<p>Healthcare access barriers in Somalia are driven by a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors, specifically maternal age, education, employment and household wealth, and profound geographical disparities. Access barriers are not uniform but are geographically clustered in the south-central regions (Bay, Bakool, Hiiraan) and Togdheer in the northern region. Policy efforts must prioritise infrastructure investment in these identified high-burden hotspots while simultaneously dismantling systemic inequalities through the expansion of female education and financial protection schemes. This data-driven approach offers a definitive roadmap for decision-makers to equitably allocate resources and ensure that the most vulnerable populations are not left behind.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aw-Ali, Y. D., Abdikarim, H., Abdilleh, M. M., Hassan Muse, A., Nadarajah, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108492</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108492</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spatial distribution and multilevel analysis of factors associated with healthcare access barriers among women of reproductive age in Somalia: insights from the 2020 Somalia Demographic and Health Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108492</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108492</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109903?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding influences of care-seeking behaviours for diarrhoeal illnesses: a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109903?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Diarrhoeal illnesses remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Understanding when and where individuals seek healthcare is essential for accurately assessing disease burden and improving access to appropriate care. We conducted a meta-synthesis of qualitative research examining barriers and facilitators to care-seeking for diarrhoeal illness among individuals and caregivers of children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We systematically reviewed qualitative studies examining the motivations for seeking care for diarrhoeal illness and conducted a thematic analysis to synthesise findings across studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Global Index Medicus were searched through 3 September 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We included qualitative studies that used interviews and/or focus group discussions to examine care-seeking decisions for diarrhoeal illness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers assessed studies for eligibility, extracted study information and coded factors influencing care-seeking decisions. The two researchers then independently created thematic trees based on patterns in the coded data and, through discussion with the full research team, synthesised findings into a thematic framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 47 studies met our inclusion criteria, 36 of which focused on caregiver decision-making for children with diarrhoea in low- and middle-income countries. Our meta-synthesis identified several key factors that influenced whether and when individuals sought care. Sociocultural norms, including locally held beliefs about disease causation, were frequently cited as influencing decisions to seek or delay formal care. Additional barriers included long travel distances to health facilities, transportation costs, limited trust in healthcare providers, negative feelings and inconsistent availability of care. Conversely, episodes perceived as severe were more likely to prompt care-seeking outside the home.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings highlight the importance of contextually grounded interventions that improve physical and financial access to care, foster trust in healthcare providers through consistent and effective service delivery and strengthen community engagement around recognising signs of severe illness and the potential benefits of timely treatment. They also underscore the need for future studies to define diarrhoea in locally relevant terms and to clearly define sources of care-seeking, as variation in these definitions can limit our full understanding of who is affected and how individuals respond to illness.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller, M. H., Hilbert, S. M., Rosser, E. N., Sinko, L., Lee, E. C., Wiens, K. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109903</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109903</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding influences of care-seeking behaviours for diarrhoeal illnesses: a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109903</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109903</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111727?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Establishing criteria for emergency department-based episode of care definitions: a modified Delphi study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111727?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Traditional encounter-based analyses overlook downstream costs and complications that follow emergency department (ED) care. To enable more comprehensive evaluations, we developed standardised episode of care definitions for five common, high-cost conditions: chest pain, congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and suicidality.</p>
<p>A two-round modified Delphi panel study was conducted following a literature review and evidence synthesis. Using structured surveys with anonymous feedback, panellists rated candidate criteria. To be retained in the final episode definitions, criteria were required to meet a predefined validity threshold without panellist disagreement. Data were analysed descriptively, and meeting deliberations were recorded and reviewed thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Virtual, supported by an online survey platform.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A multidisciplinary panel of 11 experts in emergency medicine and relevant clinical specialties with 9 members participating in each round.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Criteria to determine inclusion, exclusion (including pre-trigger, post-trigger and event exclusion) and risk-adjustment standards for constructing ED-based episodes of care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Candidate criteria were presented to the panel by condition: 30 for chest pain, 54 for CHF, 30 for COPD, 79 for pneumonia and 375 for suicidality. Following deliberations and re-rating, the number of valid criteria was reduced, primarily in the episode exclusion category. Thematic analysis highlighted trade-offs between episode exclusion criteria and the use of risk adjustment to account for heterogeneity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Operational definitions for ED-based episodes of care for five conditions were established. These may support healthcare administrators, policymakers and researchers in evaluating variation in ED care delivery and its downstream cost and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kocher, K. E., Myers, A. D., Urech, T. H., Asch, S., Admon, A., Fuehrlein, B. S., Gettel, C. J., Patel, N., Pines, J. M., Potochny, N. S., Sabbatini, A. K., Vanneman, M., Ward, M. J., Vashi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111727</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111727</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Establishing criteria for emergency department-based episode of care definitions: a modified Delphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111727</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111727</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Targeting Vascular Inflammation In Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia (TIN-CAP): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Inflammation plays a central role in atherosclerosis development and subsequent cardiovascular complications, including heart attack and stroke. Patients with inflammatory conditions such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) present with an elevated risk of cardiovascular events, which is likely driven by unresolved systemic inflammation. Targeting this heightened inflammatory burden may present a novel therapeutic strategy to attenuate heart attack risk in CAP survivors. Icosapent ethyl (IPE), an omega-3 fatty acid, demonstrates both pro-resolving and cardioprotective properties. The Targeting Vascular Inflammation In Patients with CAP (TIN-CAP) trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of IPE in mitigating vascular inflammation in CAP survivors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>TIN-CAP is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible adults diagnosed with CAP in hospital or the emergency department will complete baseline assessments within 14 days of diagnosis including <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/CT angiography, bloodwork and quality of life evaluation (EuroQol &ndash; 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)). Participants will then be randomised 1:1 to receive IPE (4 g/day) or placebo for 6 months. Follow-up visits will occur at 30 days (bloodwork and EQ-5D only) and 6 months. The primary endpoint is the change in FDG uptake in the ascending aorta from baseline to 6 months between IPE and placebo groups. Secondary endpoints include FDG uptake in the bone marrow, spleen, lungs and other vasculature, in addition to major adverse cardiac events and quality of life assessments. An initial lead-in cohort of 18 patients will be enrolled to assess recruitment, imaging feasibility and IPE tolerability prior to full trial enrolment. These patients will remain blinded and will be included in the final analysis (Vanguard design).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The TIN-CAP trial has been approved provincially by the Clinical Trials Ontario Research Ethics Board (approval number: 5045). Participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06710080">NCT06710080</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stotts, C., Corrales-Medina, V. F., deKemp, R. A., Wells, G. A., Beanlands, R., Raggi, P., Ferrara, G., Sligl, W., A Connelly, K., Paul, N., Brouwers, M., Contreras-Dominguez, V., Yadav, K., Torres, C., Tavoosi, A., Wiefels, C., Kirpalani, A., Romsa, J. G., Grey, B., Deva, D., Rayner, K., Boczar, K. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114239</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114239</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targeting Vascular Inflammation In Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia (TIN-CAP): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114239</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114351?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ASPIRE-Med project: a study protocol on an Australian psychotropic medicines training programme for disability support workers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114351?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Overmedication of off-label use of psychotropic medicines to address behaviours of concern in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities is a major public health concern. Disability support workers (DSWs) play a pivotal role in supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities who are prescribed psychotropic medicines. Therefore, there is an urgent need to train DSWs to help understand the appropriate use of these medicines. This paper describes the protocol of a project that aims to develop such a programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A participatory action framework will underscore the programme and follow a Universal Design for Learning approach. It will be a co-production involving all stakeholders, including people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, their families, members of the disability workforce, healthcare professionals and educational designers. The programme will be developed using the following steps: (a) development of a consumer advisory committee and expert panel groups, (b) an online survey of learning needs analysis, (c) a rapid umbrella review of the relevant literature, (d) focus groups involving participants from different parts of Australia, (e) co-design events in four Australian cities, (f) field testing on 6&ndash;12 DSWs to determine any practical difficulties of implementing the programme, (g) a feasibility trial involving at least 1200 DSWs using a train-the-trainer model and online resources and (h) a mixed-method process evaluation using interviews of a purposive sample of trainees and online questionnaire survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval will be sought at each stage of the co-design process. Each step of the project will include an academic language paper and Easy Read report developed. The training programme will be shared across Australia, with DSWs able to complete the project for free. We expect the training will help improve DSWs&rsquo; knowledge of appropriate psychotropic medicine prescribing in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, confidence in effectively communicating with health professionals and using non-pharmacological approaches to support behaviours of concern, promote shared decision-making with clients, advocate for psychotropic medicine reviews by healthcare professionals, encourage positive interactions with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families and self-reflection on their own behaviour and attitude can influence their client and behaviours of concern.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barratt, M., Speer, K., Deb, S., Bellon, M., Cahalan, T., Simpson, A., Koncz, R., Limbu, B., Bushell, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114351</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114351</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ASPIRE-Med project: a study protocol on an Australian psychotropic medicines training programme for disability support workers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114351</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114351</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116180?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Common factors and unique pathways for linkages between HIV/STI prevention and syndemic behaviours in high-risk youth: protocol for a secondary analysis of harmonised data from six clinical trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116180?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention interventions are only modestly successful among youth, particularly for young people of colour and sexual and gender minority (SGM) youth. Even among disparate intervention modalities delivered with high fidelity, differences between intervention types have been minimal. One consistent theme has emerged: the role of the youth:provider relationship in predicting intervention response. In line with calls for examination of relational factors, the next essential step is a harmonised analysis to evaluate connections between the youth:provider relationship and co-occurrence of alcohol and cannabis use, in youth HIV/STI prevention intervention response.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Our team has completed six sizeable HIV/STI behavioural prevention studies, generating n=1136 independent youth (baseline M<SUB>age</SUB>=17, range=13&ndash;24; 43% female; 21% SGM; 54% Hispanic; 9% African American; 7% Native American/Alaska Native) who received prevention programming and were followed at 1-, 3-, 6-, and/or 12 months. We will harmonise these studies and build a longitudinal mixed-effects machine learning model, with youth:provider relationship as a predictor of intervention response. Participant factors, provider factors and their interaction will be included in the model. Given high rates of alcohol and cannabis comorbidity, we will also examine syndemic outcomes (co-occurring HIV/STI risk behaviours, alcohol use and cannabis use). These data are crucial to informing next step HIV/STI and syndemic intervention programming with this age group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This secondary analysis study is exempt from human subjects regulations under category 4(iii) as determined by the Institutional Review Board at UConn Health. Results will be disseminated via presentations at annual scientific conferences, submissions to peer-reviewed journals, to mental health and substance use providers, as well as community programmes for youth at high risk for HIV/STI and substance use.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feldstein Ewing, S. W., Dash, G. F., Yang, M., Hudson, K. A., Chung, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116180</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116180</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Common factors and unique pathways for linkages between HIV/STI prevention and syndemic behaviours in high-risk youth: protocol for a secondary analysis of harmonised data from six clinical trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116180</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116180</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116480?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Organisation and support of orthopaedic and trauma services in Tanzania: a national cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116480?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives</b></p>
<p>To describe orthopaedic department-level organisational characteristics, the availability of multidisciplinary specialist support, the role of external support mechanisms, and the presence of in-hospital orthopaedic training opportunities across hospitals delivering orthopaedic and trauma services in Tanzania.</p>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>National cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Hospitals delivering orthopaedic and trauma services across all levels of care and ownership categories in Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Licensed orthopaedic and trauma surgeons practising in Tanzania served as key informants for their respective hospitals. A total of 171 surgeons provided data on 92 unique hospitals nationwide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes included orthopaedic departmental structural capacity, availability of multidisciplinary specialist support, external support mechanisms and in-hospital orthopaedic training activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A response rate of 77.7% yielded data on 92 hospitals delivering orthopaedic and trauma services nationwide. Structural capacity varied widely, with only 19.6% of hospitals reporting more than 50 orthopaedic beds, 43.5% relying on a single orthopaedic surgeon, and 47.8% operating with one or two functional theatres. Access to specialist support was limited, with vascular trauma surgeons available in 9.8% of hospitals and plastic and reconstructive surgeons in 8.7%. Intensivists were available in 41.3% of facilities and anaesthesiologists in 57.6%, while physiotherapists were present in 90.2% of hospitals but occupational therapists in only 28.3%. External dependence was common, with 41.3% of hospitals relying on donated implants and 29.3% participating in outreach programmes. In-hospital orthopaedic training opportunities were limited, with seminars or workshops available in 25.0% of hospitals. Across domains, higher-tier hospitals demonstrated significantly greater structural capacity and specialist availability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Orthopaedic and trauma services in Tanzania are available across multiple levels of the health system but are characterised by inequitable workforce distribution, limited capacity at lower-tier hospitals and substantial reliance on external assistance. Integrated strategies linking infrastructure development, multidisciplinary workforce expansion, sustainable procurement and decentralised training are essential to strengthen the organisation and resilience of orthopaedic and trauma services nationwide.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Issa, S. A., Muhamedhussein, M. S., Njambilo, G. M., Mgisha, W. R., Mrita, F. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T04:24:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116480</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116480</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Organisation and support of orthopaedic and trauma services in Tanzania: a national cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116480</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116480</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103035?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fighting for care: how can we better support people with multiple long-term conditions who are accessing community mental health groups? A qualitative interview study within a UK arts therapies trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103035?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the impact of multiple long-term conditions (MTLCs) and a comorbid mental health condition on decision-making processes, attendance and engagement in NHS community-based therapy groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative in-depth interviews analysed using reflexive codebook analysis as part of a study within a trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary community mental health teams from two UK sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Purposive sample of 20 participants recruited to a randomised controlled trial of group therapies (arts therapies and counselling) holding a mental health diagnosis and self-reported as having at least one additional physical health condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six themes were constructed: (1) MLTCs influenced arts modality choices and goals; (2) importance of planning ahead to be organised; (3) the journey loomed over participants; (4) the impact of MLTCs on group attendance and participation; (5) the group was valued and important; (6) determination and fighting to get what I need.</p>
<p>Decisions about arts modalities and group attendance were based on a self-perceived level of felt capability. It was important for participants to plan in advance and feel informed ahead of making commitments, enabling them to prepare and manage symptoms. Travelling to the groups was dreaded, and many participants required support with travel in order to attend. Managing symptoms during the journey and groups was challenging; however, participants had a strong determination to uphold the commitment to attend despite their difficulties, as the group was highly valued.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>MLTCs have a large impact on people&rsquo;s capacity to engage in community groups, requiring additional planning and effort. The scale of this impact is often not recognised. Despite this, the benefits of groups for people with MLTCs are especially important, including motivation to leave the house, opportunities for socialisation and a means of reaching one&rsquo;s own goals. Clinicians are recommended to accommodate the needs of MLTCs when designing community group interventions and consider multiple attendees with MLTCs in the group composition to improve attendance and group engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN88805048">ISRCTN88805048</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hounsell, L., Millard, E., Medlicott, E., Fry, E., Fernandes, J., Carr, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103035</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103035</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fighting for care: how can we better support people with multiple long-term conditions who are accessing community mental health groups? A qualitative interview study within a UK arts therapies trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103035</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103035</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of the ICF CoreSets for Autism Strengths and Needs Assessment in NHS diagnostic services in England: protocol for a randomised pilot trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>There are approximately 700 000 autistic people in the UK, and autism is increasingly being diagnosed in adulthood. Diagnosis on its own does not provide adequate information to plan post-diagnostic support for autistic people, and clinicians often plan support without the use of validated standardised tools which may exacerbate inequities in care. This study will evaluate a novel strengths and needs assessment, based on the WHO&rsquo;s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health CoreSet for Autism, for use in adult diagnostic services immediately on receipt of an autism diagnosis. Potential issues, including the length of the assessment, timing of delivery and selection bias, will be explored as part of the trial process evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A two-arm, multisite, randomised pilot trial design will be used to evaluate the ICF CoreSets for Autism Strengths and Needs Assessment in three diagnostic services in England. A total of 72 newly diagnosed autistic adults will be recruited across the three sites over a 6-month period and randomised into an assessment group (strengths and needs assessment plus standard care) and a treatment as usual group (standard care only). The assessment group will receive a summary report of their strengths and needs on completion of the assessment. Both groups will complete measures of mental health and quality of life at baseline and 3 months follow-up (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder questionnaire-7, Recovering Quality of Life questionnaire-10, EuroQoL-5D). Acceptability and feasibility will be measured for the strengths and needs assessment and for trial procedures using standardised measures, progression criteria and qualitative data from clinician focus groups and interviews with a subsample of autistic participants. The study design and procedures are being co-produced with an autistic advisor/patient and public involvement lead and with a steering group of autistic adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was reviewed by the East Midlands&mdash;Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee and was given Health Research Authority approval on 18 March 2025 (REC reference:25/EM/0041). The results will be disseminated via reports to the funder (NIHR), a peer-reviewed journal paper and academic conferences. We will email a summary report of findings to study participants and will invite participants to an information dissemination event at the end of the study. Links to reports and a lay summary will be provided on the research group&rsquo;s website: <A HREF="https://sharl.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/home">https://sharl.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/home</A></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN10283350">ISRCTN10283350</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Day, M., Scargill, K., Poole, D., Kellar, I., Young, T. A., Bo&#x0308;lte, S., Clarke, S., Lodge, K.-M., Woods, A., Freeth, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103303</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103303</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of the ICF CoreSets for Autism Strengths and Needs Assessment in NHS diagnostic services in England: protocol for a randomised pilot trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103303</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Performance validation of an artificial intelligence-assisted chest radiograph algorithm for incidental pulmonary nodule detection in Malaysian healthcare facilities: a multicentre cross-sectional study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Incidental pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are commonly encountered on chest radiographs (CXRs) performed for routine clinical indications and may represent early manifestations of significant pulmonary pathology, including lung cancer. While low-dose CT screening has mortality benefits in selected high-risk populations, its implementation remains limited in many healthcare settings. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted CXR interpretation has the potential to enhance pulmonary nodule detection. However, evidence from Malaysian clinical practice is scarce. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI-assisted CXR interpretation for detecting IPNs across healthcare facilities in the Klang Valley, Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, multicentre study will include 2452 CXRs from patients aged &ge;35 years over a 6-month period across four Klang Valley healthcare facilities. Each CXR will be independently interpreted by an experienced radiologist (&gt;5 years of experience) and analysed separately using an AI system (qXR-LNMS). An independent thoracic radiologist will determine the final classification for analysis if there is IPN detection discordance. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy) will be calculated using a 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>2 classification matrix. Agreement between AI-assisted interpretation and radiologist reports will be assessed using Cohen&rsquo;s kappa statistic. The prevalence of IPNs detected by AI-assisted interpretation and radiologist reporting will be compared using a two-proportion z-test. AI discriminative performance will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve estimation. Statistical analyses will be conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences V.29, with p&lt;0.05 considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Research Ethics Committee and the Ministry of Health Malaysia Medical Research and Ethics Committee. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and engagement with relevant stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Megat Ramli, P. N., Ahmad, N., Aizuddin, A. N., Abdul Hamid, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103331</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103331</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Performance validation of an artificial intelligence-assisted chest radiograph algorithm for incidental pulmonary nodule detection in Malaysian healthcare facilities: a multicentre cross-sectional study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103331</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103495?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing, inappropriate medication use, prescription omission and drug interactions among older adults in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e103495?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), potential prescription omission (PPO), potentially harmful drug&ndash;drug interactions (PDDI) and identify associated factors among older Ethiopians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data source</st>
<p>We searched PubMed, HINARI, Scopus and Web of Science databases to identify eligible studies published up to 31 October 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study selection</st>
<p>Observational studies reported the prevalence of PIP, PIM, PPO and PDDI among older adults from any healthcare settings were screened.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The quality and risk of bias of the studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Hoy risk of bias tool, respectively, while the certainty of evidence of outcomes was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation based on Cochrane recommendations. We used a random-effects model for analyses to estimate the pooled prevalence and associated factors. All data analyses were done using Stata V.17 software.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcomes and measures</st>
<p>The national prevalence of PIP, PIM, PPO and PDDI was estimated as main outcomes. Variations were estimated based on regions, age groups, outcome evaluation tool, disease type and healthcare setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The review included 25 studies (n=5662 participants) for PIP or PIM, 14 studies (n=2706 participants) for PDDI and 6 studies (n=1342 participants) for PPO. The pooled prevalence estimate was 41% (95% CI 33% to 48%), I<sup>2</sup>=96.87% for PIP, 37% (95% CI 31% to 44%), I<sup>2</sup>=96.33% for PIM, 55% (95% CI 36% to 73%), I<sup>2</sup>=99.00% for PDDI and 14% (95% CI 6% to 24%), I<sup>2</sup>=95.07% for PPO. The majority of the studies have very good quality (very good=13, good=1, satisfactory=11 for PIP and PIM; very good=11, satisfactory=3 for PDDI; very good=6 for PPO) and low risk of bias (low risk=18, moderate risk=7 for PIP and PIM; low risk=12, moderate risk=2 for PDDI and low risk=6 for PPO), while all studies for each outcome have low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analyses revealed significant regional and contextual variations. Polypharmacy was significantly associated with PIP (OR=3.72, 95% CI 2.53 to 5.46, p&lt;0.01, I<sup>2</sup>=69.56%), PIM (OR=4.20, 95% CI 2.91 to 6.06, p&lt;0.01, I<sup>2</sup>=57.83%) and PDDI (OR=4.51, 95% CI 3.05 to 6.69, p&lt;0.01, I<sup>2</sup>=0.00%), while hypertension (OR=2.46, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.36, p&lt;0.01 I<sup>2</sup>=0.00%) was associated with PIP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions and relevance</st>
<p>This review found a high prevalence of PIP, PIM, PDDI and PPO among older adults in Ethiopia, with notable heterogeneity across regions. Polypharmacy was associated with PIP, PIM and PDDI, while hypertension showed association with PIP. Despite generally good study quality, the certainty of evidence was low for the included studies due to the cross-sectional design nature, with high heterogeneity. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. This study indicates a high burden of inappropriate medication prescribing and its associated factors, underscoring the importance of further robust studies to clarify prescribing practices and associated factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024556744.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yazie, T. S., Alemu, M. A., Zewdu, W. S., Asmare Emiru, Z., Tarekegn, G. Y., Meharie, B. G., Belete, A. M., Debasu Addisu, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103495</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103495</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing, inappropriate medication use, prescription omission and drug interactions among older adults in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103495</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103495</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105136?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Utility of Xpert MTB/RIF using bronchoalveolar lavage samples for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in negative or sputum-scarce adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105136?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Tuberculosis is the leading cause of death globally from a single infectious agent. Early diagnosis is critical to reducing morbimortality. In cases of negative smear microscopy or limited sputum production, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples offer an alternative for diagnosis. Culture, the gold standard, requires a high bacterial load, extensive infrastructure and is time-consuming. Xpert MTB/RIF provides faster results with a higher cost. Previous systematic reviews present substantial limitations, including significant heterogeneity. Therefore, the diagnostic utility of Xpert MTB/RIF using BAL samples in adults with negative or scant sputum for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) needs to be reassessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and Web of Science will be conducted without language or publication date restriction. Cross-sectional diagnostic studies of negative or sputum-scarce adults with presumptive PTB who underwent bronchoscopy to obtain samples for Xpert MTB/RIF and culture will be included. Screening and data extraction will be performed independently. Methodological quality will be assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate hierarchical random-effects model will synthesise sensitivity and specificity. Meta-analysis will be performed using Meta-DiSc 2.0. Heterogeneity will be assessed using <I>I</I><sup><I>2</I></sup> and Cochrane thresholds. Subgroup analyses will be performed based on study design, population differences, country, culture method and risk of bias. Publication bias will be investigated using a funnel plot. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. There was no patient or public involvement in the development of the systematic review protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this study will use publicly available data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42025639440.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sabella-Jimenez, V. L., Sabella-Jimenez, V., Estupinan-Bohorquez, A. F., Acosta-Reyes, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105136</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105136</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Utility of Xpert MTB/RIF using bronchoalveolar lavage samples for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in negative or sputum-scarce adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105136</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105136</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106396?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of wearable technology in improving emergency care and health outcomes for patients with urgent health complaints: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106396?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Since the 1970s, telemedicine has transformed significantly, becoming a critical component of modern healthcare delivery. Over time, technological innovation has increasingly emphasised the integration of the human body with digital systems to develop non-invasive methods for monitoring physiological parameters. Among these technologies, wearable sensors demonstrate substantial potential for continuous patient monitoring. These devices can facilitate real-time data collection, enable more rapid clinical decision-making and promote active patient participation in health management. Such capabilities are particularly valuable in emergency contexts, including prehospital care provided by ambulance services and telephone triage systems. Despite the growing interest in wearable health technologies, their integration into emergency medical services (EMS) remains insufficiently explored and warrants further investigation. We aim to map current research, explore the use of wearables in EMS settings and identify gaps in knowledge regarding their use in EMS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute&rsquo;s (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search of relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ProQuest and Web of Science) will be conducted, from inception to March 2026. All types of study designs, including quantitative and qualitative studies, will be considered in this scoping review. The inclusion is limited to studies published in English. Two independent reviewers (RA and AA) will conduct a thorough screening of titles and abstracts against the predefined inclusion criteria. Studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be reviewed in full text. Quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the JBI&rsquo;s critical appraisal tools for the relevant study types. The findings will be presented using diagrams or tables, supplemented by narrative summaries following the JBI guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required. The findings of this study will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/MUEFX).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alotaibi, R., Alghaith, A., Noehrer, L. H., Kitchen, G. B., Body, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106396</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106396</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of wearable technology in improving emergency care and health outcomes for patients with urgent health complaints: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106396</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106396</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106602?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers to integrating evidence-based practices into intrapartum care during vaginal births: a descriptive qualitative study in Sri Lanka]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106602?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study intended to investigate barriers to implementing evidence-based intrapartum care during vaginal births, from maternity care providers&rsquo; point of view.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive qualitative study was conducted using in-depth interviews, with data analysed through thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The labour room of a major tertiary care hospital in Central Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Purposively selected 17 maternity care providers including doctors, nurse managers, nurse-midwives and midwives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three major themes and twelve sub-themes were generated: (1) barriers related to care providers (lack of human resources, negative attitudes of care providers, poor relationship among care providers, poor relationship between women and care providers, lack of knowledge on evidence-based practice in childbirth care); (2) barriers related to organisational environment (gaps in management, heavy workload, inadequate physical resources, insufficient in-service training and lack of availability/use of updated guidelines) and (3) barriers related to women&rsquo;s birth preparedness (women&rsquo;s limited knowledge on childbirth and intrapartum practices and women&rsquo;s limited engagement during labour and childbirth). Many maternity care providers perceived that prevailing challenges to implement evidence-based childbirth care were one of the major reasons that impacted the quality of current childbirth care in the labour room.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings showed that an integrative approach may be essential to address the diverse barriers to the implementation of evidence-based intrapartum care. It is necessary to engage healthcare administrators, healthcare professionals and care recipients to enhance the quality of current childbirth care in the setting through the successful implementation of evidence-based care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weerasingha, T. K., Ratnayake, C., Rathnayake, A., Tennakoon, S. U. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106602</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106602</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers to integrating evidence-based practices into intrapartum care during vaginal births: a descriptive qualitative study in Sri Lanka]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106602</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106602</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107850?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations between indices of body composition and metabolic status in normal-weight adults: a cross-sectional study of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e107850?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate associations between body composition indices and metabolic status among normal-weight adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study using data from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (phaseVII: 2019&ndash;2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care and community health services in an urban Tehran population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1298 adults (40.5% men, 59.5% women), aged 18&ndash;80years, body mass index (BMI) 18.5&ndash;24.9 kg/m&sup2;. Exclusions: known diabetes, cardiovascular disease, kidney failure, malignancy, pregnancy or lactation, diuretic or glucocorticoid use. Participants were classified as metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW) or unhealthy (MUHNW).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the association between body composition and anthropometric indices with metabolic status. The secondary outcome was identification of the strongest predictors of MUHNW. Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis to obtain fat mass (FM), body fat percentage (BFP), skeletal muscle mass percentage (SMM%), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass index, skeletal muscle indices and the fat-to-muscle mass ratio (FMR). Anthropometric measures included waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Associations were examined using logistic regression adjusted for age, smoking and physical activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mean age: 37.5&plusmn;12.8 y; MUHNW participants were older than MHNW (44.5&plusmn;13.2 vs 35.8&plusmn;12.1 years, p&lt;0.001). MUHNW prevalence was 19.4% (higher in men, p&lt;0.001). Adjusted mean BMI, WC, WHR, FM, BFP, FMR and FMI were higher in MUHNW in both sexes. SMM% was protective in men (OR0.90, 95% CI0.84 to 0.96). WHR was the strongest predictor of MUHNW (OR1.52, 95% CI1.20 to 1.93 men; OR1.31, 95% CI1.07 to 1.61 women).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>BMI, WC, WHR and body fat indices were positively associated with metabolically unhealthy status among normal-weight adults of both sexes. WHR was the strongest predictor, highlighting its value for identifying at-risk individuals where advanced body composition tools are unavailable.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maleki, S., Hosseinpanah, F., Mahdavi, M., Momenan, A. A., Ebadi, S. A., Rahmani, F., Azizi, F., Valizadeh, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107850</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107850</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations between indices of body composition and metabolic status in normal-weight adults: a cross-sectional study of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107850</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107850</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108022?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Household determinants of healthcare utilisation in three informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108022?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Healthcare utilisation (HU) is key to improving the health of residents in urban informal settlements. This study aimed to explore household-level factors influencing HU among informal settlement households in Freetown, Sierra Leone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three informal settlements (Cockle Bay, Dwarzark and Moyiba) in Freetown, Sierra Leone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Primary data from 4871 households were collected during the Health and Wellbeing survey conducted between April and May 2023, targeting households with adults aged 18 years and older.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were households HU both within and outside informal settlements. Household-level predisposing and enabling explanatory variables were derived from Andersen&rsquo;s Behavioural Model of HU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Disability in households increases HU within settlements (especially in Dwarzark, 13% and Moyiba, 10%) but is less likely outside. Households engaged in income-generating activities are more likely to seek healthcare within settlements, but 12% less likely outside in Cockle Bay and Dwarzark. Food insecurity decreases HU within Dwarzark (9%) and increases HU outside by 174% in Moyiba. Longer water fetching times and water shortages were associated with higher HU (between 6% and 16%) within settlements, especially in Cockle Bay and Dwarzark. Clean water sources (eg, piped dwelling, bowser, surface, bottled) were consistently associated with higher HU both within and outside settlements. Shared sanitation facilities (such as shared toilets) were positively associated with HU both within and outside settlements, particularly in Dwarzark and Moyiba. Households with income from fishing, informal salaried work and bike riding showed higher HU both within and outside settlements, especially in Dwarzark and Moyiba.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We identified strong settlement-specific patterns of household-level factors that influence HU both within and outside Freetown&rsquo;s informal settlements. These findings provide a foundation for developing targeted policies such as strengthening local services, addressing affordability and accessibility barriers and supporting vulnerable occupation groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sesay, S., Sesay, I. J., Tengbe, S. M., Wurie, H., Fullah, S., Vangahun, D., Gandi, I., Teixeira de Siqueira Filha, N., Lakshman, R. W. D., Conteh, A., Saidu, S., Koroma, B., Mansaray, B., Elsey, H., Whittaker, L., Dean, L., Wiltgen Georgi, N., Nganda, M., Refell, F., MacCarthy, J., Leyland, A. H., Tolhurst, R., Kibuchi, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108022</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108022</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Household determinants of healthcare utilisation in three informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108022</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108022</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hepatitis B virus infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: protocol for umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis 2025]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Among the five hepatitis viruses, the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major cause of serious acute and chronic liver infections worldwide. The major public health impact of HBV infection arises from chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, which predominantly affects young and middle-aged adults of both sexes. Therefore, preventive interventions focusing on mothers and infants are critical due to vertical and early childhood transmission dynamics.</p>
<p>HBV prevalence largely varies among pregnant women in Ethiopia because of multiple interrelated factors. This umbrella review will consolidate all existing systematic reviews and create a more reliable picture of HBV infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This umbrella review will be conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting standards. The review will focus on identifying and integrating evidence from eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses, with methodological quality appraised using the MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews instrument. A comprehensive literature search strategy will be developed using relevant Medical Subject Headings alongside free-text keywords. Electronic searches will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, African Journals Online, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Statistical heterogeneity among the included reviews will be quantified using the I&sup2; statistic. Data management and meta-analytic procedures will be performed using STATA version 17, and effect estimates will be presented with corresponding 95% CIs to determine statistical precision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review uses only published or publicly available data, so ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and shared with policymakers, healthcare partners, clinicians and patients to inform policy, enhance education and guide future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>PROSPERO (CRD420251118982).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bekele, M., Oche, W. O., Geltore, T. E., Sileshi, E., Hadaro, T. S., Alano, B. A., Abera, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109176</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109176</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hepatitis B virus infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: protocol for umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis 2025]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109176</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109764?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Population-based study of pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics in Southern African patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (PoPG): a protocol for the Namibian cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109764?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is an urgent public health challenge in Namibia, with profound socioeconomic consequences. The high burden of both tuberculosis and HIV complicates treatment and underscores the need for optimised drug therapies. Precision medicine, which leverages patient-specific genetic and molecular information, offers promise for improving MDR-TB outcomes. However, its effective application relies on population-specific data, particularly understanding how individuals metabolise tuberculosis drugs and how genetic diversity drives variability in treatment response. Currently, no pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacogenetic (PG) data on TB treatment exist for Namibian populations. This gap is particularly concerning, given the country&rsquo;s genetic diversity, environmental factors and comorbidities that may uniquely influence drug metabolism. This study aims to generate PK and PG data to inform dose optimisation and support personalised treatment strategies for MDR-TB in Namibia. The findings will contribute to improved patient care and inform health system strengthening based on locally relevant evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study will consist of 100 Namibian participants with matched human DNA and PK data of MDR-TB cases receiving isoniazid, clofazimine, bedaquiline and the fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin or moxifloxacin). PK sampling will be divided as follows: 30 individuals will undergo intensive PK sampling, while the remaining (n=70) will undergo sparse PK sampling. DNA will be extracted at Stellenbosch University (SU), and samples will be genotyped using the H3Africa microarray. Sequences will be aligned to the human reference genome, hg38 (GRCh38p13), using the freely available Burrows-Wheeler Aligner. A subset of the samples (n=20&ndash;30) will undergo whole genome sequencing (WGS) to verify imputation results and identify novel genetic variants potentially affecting PK in this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data analysis</st>
<p>Quality control and variant call format file generation will be performed using the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices (V.3.5). Intensive and sparse PK data will be pooled for the development of a population PK (popPK) model using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. The popPK model will characterise the relationship between TB drug dose and exposure, including quantifying covariates, including genetic variation, explaining PK variability, providing a foundation for dose optimisation and personalised treatment strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Namibia Human Research Ethics Committee for Health (Ref. SOM18/2024), the Ministry of Health and Social Services (Ref. 22/4/2/3), the SU Health Research Ethics Committee (Ref. N21/11/136) and the University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref. 500/2022).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boois, L., Ekandjo, H., Shavuka, O., Nepolo, E., Ndong Sima, C. A., Oelofse, C., Uren, C., Petersen, D. C., Mo&#x0308;ller, M., Wijk, M., Kellermann, T., Decloedt, E., McIlleron, H., Denti, P., Claassens, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109764</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109764</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Population-based study of pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics in Southern African patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (PoPG): a protocol for the Namibian cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109764</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109764</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109782?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of barriers to accessing healthcare services among married women in Somalia: a multilevel analysis of nationwide survey data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109782?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify the individual and community-level factors associated with barriers to accessing healthcare services among currently married women in Somalia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2020 Somalia Demographic and Health Survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Somalia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A nationally representative sample of 30 311 currently married women aged 15&ndash;49 years with complete data on outcome and explanatory variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was &lsquo;reporting at least one barrier to accessing healthcare&rsquo;, a composite binary variable based on four specific problems: obtaining permission to go for treatment, getting money for treatment, distance to the health facility and not wanting to go alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A substantial majority (77.06%) of married women reported experiencing at least one barrier to accessing healthcare. Financial cost was the most common barrier (69.91%), followed by distance to health facilities (65.95%), reluctance to go alone (49.64%) and the requirement for permission (46.03%). Multilevel analysis confirmed that higher household wealth was strongly protective (richest vs poorest: adjusted OR (aOR)=0.27, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.32). Paradoxically, factors typically considered protective were associated with increased barriers: women with secondary education (aOR=1.19, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.41) and those with educated husbands (aOR=1.23, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.33) reported more obstacles. Similarly, urban residents faced higher odds of barriers than their nomadic counterparts (aOR=1.40, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.55). Significant regional disparities were evident, with community-level context explaining 26.30% of the total variance in reporting barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Access to healthcare for married women in Somalia is predominantly hindered by economic, educational and community-level constraints. Targeted interventions addressing socioeconomic disparities, infrastructural deficits and specific community contexts are essential to alleviate these barriers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali, A. S., Hassan, Y. S. A., Ahmed, M. M., Omar, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109782</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109782</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of barriers to accessing healthcare services among married women in Somalia: a multilevel analysis of nationwide survey data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109782</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109782</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109943?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of the English National Enhanced Service on weight management referral rate: an interrupted time-series analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e109943?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the impact of a National Enhanced Service (NES) incentive for weight management that financially rewarded practices for each eligible patient referred to a weight management programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Interrupted time-series analysis to examine the rate of weight management referral and weight management advice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary healthcare records from January 2018 to December 2024 in the Oxford Clinical Informatics Digital Hub, covering 8.3 million patients in 1198 primary care clinics around England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>NES payments to practices for weight management were introduced in April 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The rate of referral increased from 1 referral per 1000 patients per month before the incentive to around 4 referrals per 1000 patients per month afterwards. There was no evidence that the increase differed by age, gender, ethnic group or socioeconomic status. The occurrence of weight management advice was unchanged by the introduction of the NES and was at least three times more common than referral to weight management services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The NES was associated with a fourfold increase in referrals to weight management services. However, clinicians are much more likely to offer advice rather than a referral to a weight management programme. There is a clear opportunity to improve outcomes for patients by encouraging greater use of referrals to effective weight management services in place of advice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haffner, S. J. P., Stevens, R. J., Amies-Cull, B., Heath, L., Bankhead, C., Aveyard, P., Jebb, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109943</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109943</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of the English National Enhanced Service on weight management referral rate: an interrupted time-series analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109943</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109943</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110580?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From mother to child: a protocol paper on the longitudinal effects of a perinatal intervention on maternal self-efficacy and emotion regulation and child outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110580?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Parental psychological challenges and poor well-being are key factors in shaping both the quality of parent-child interactions and child development. Specifically, maternal psychological distress is a central determinant of child development. Elevated levels of distress in mothers are associated with poorer child cognitive, behavioural and social-emotional outcomes, with effects persisting into adolescence and adulthood. While this highlights the critical importance of early prevention and intervention efforts to support parents, postpartum mental healthcare remains limited, despite ongoing and evident needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol outlines a 2-year longitudinal follow-up study investigating the impact of a secondary perinatal programme (ie, <I>Toi, Moi, B&eacute;b&eacute;</I>), completed by mothers during pregnancy, and its impact on children&rsquo;s cognitive and social-emotional functioning at 24 and 48 months. Further, the study aims to explore whether maternal self-efficacy and emotion regulation may serve as potential mediators or moderators of the relationship between programme participation and child development outcomes. The research aims to leverage the <I>Toi, Moi, B&eacute;b&eacute;</I> programme, by recruiting mother-child dyads (n=250) in which the mothers participated in the programme during pregnancy. Mothers were randomly assigned to complete the parenting well-being intervention either independently or with added telephone support. Participants who consent will be invited to take part in a two-wave follow-up at 24 months (T1) and 48 months postpartum (T2). At both time points, mothers will complete demographic questionnaires and standardised measures assessing maternal well-being (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Perceived Stress Scale), child cognitive functioning (Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 and MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory), child social-emotional functioning (Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Social Emotional&mdash;second Edition-2 and Child Behaviour Checklist for Ages 1.5&ndash;5), maternal emotion regulation (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) and maternal self-efficacy (Parental Cognitions and Conduct Towards the Infant Scale &amp; Me as a Parent Scale). Parents&rsquo; perceptions of their parenting experience will be measured using the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. Mother-child interaction, parenting quality and cognitive stimulation in the home environment will be measured using a brief virtual interview (StimQ<SUB>2</SUB>-Toddler) and a naturalistic observation assessment (Parenting Interactions with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcomes). Using RStudio, linear mixed models will be used to assess the impact of the intervention (online intervention only vs only with telephone support) on child cognitive and social-emotional development at T1 and T2. In parallel, separate models will be conducted to examine associations between maternal emotion regulation and self-efficacy on the child development outcomes at the same timepoints. Exploratory analyses will be conducted to examine potential moderating effects of child sex and group assignment on the associations between maternal emotion regulation and self-efficacy and child developmental (cognitive and socioemotional) outcomes, using causal inference models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The current study has been registered, reviewed and approved (MP-37-2025-10894) by the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board. Findings from this research will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open access publications, and presentations at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05110456">NCT05110456</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montreuil, T., Skinner, J., Humez, L., Gratton, C., Herba, C. M., Cote, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110580</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110580</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From mother to child: a protocol paper on the longitudinal effects of a perinatal intervention on maternal self-efficacy and emotion regulation and child outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110580</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110580</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111367?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding integrated mental healthcare for people experiencing forced migration: a realist review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111367?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Forced migrants (i.e., asylum seekers and refugees) experience greater mental health disparities and inequities in care. Mental health services and systems lack clear policy on integrated mental healthcare. Understanding the causal mechanisms of integrated mental health for migrants can promote a resilient and adaptive health and social care system. However, to achieve a functional mental health service integration, there is a need to understand how and why mental health system integration works and under what health systems conditions. The purpose of this realist review protocol will be to outline a process for refining an initial programme theory (IPT), developed through deliberative dialogues with key interest groups in British Columbia, Canada, and to test the IPT against the global evidence base.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A realist review is an interpretive methodological approach to synthesising the literature based on the realist philosophy of science. Realist reviews are pragmatic approaches to theory development because they involve the participation of real-world actors or people who work within complex systems. Realist reviews are particularly useful for synthesising complex knowledge. We plan to conduct a seven-step review process, with iteration between each step. Steps 1&ndash;3 have already been completed in our previous work and included the development of an IPT, which will be refined systematically by exploring the global literature and consulting with an international advisory group. These will be used iteratively to identify, test and refine the programme theory. The quality of included literature will be appraised using the relevance, richness and rigour criteria and the realist quality appraisal tool, TAPUPASM (transparency, accessibility, propriety, utility, purposiveness, accuracy, specificity and modified objectivity). Steps 4&ndash;7 will include data extraction and realist analysis through retroductive theorising using the ICAMO (intervention, context, actor, mechanism and outcome) heuristic to help distinguish actors and resources from contexts, mechanisms and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval for the deliberative dialogue interviews that inform this realist review and IPT were obtained by the University of British Columbia (ref: REB Number: H22-03195). Study recruitment occurred between 21 November 2023 and 16 January 2024. All participants provided informed consent to take part in deliberative dialogues and to have their interviews audio recorded and transcribed for the purpose of this research. We will disseminate results of the review through academic papers, conference presentations and through iterative interest group workshops and discussions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024580083.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark, N., Argu&#x0308;elles Bullon, A., Huq, M., Mukumbang, F. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111367</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111367</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding integrated mental healthcare for people experiencing forced migration: a realist review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111367</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111367</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence on dietary acculturation post-migration among Indian immigrants in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Indian immigrants experience significant dietary acculturation post-migration, shifting from traditional diets to more westernised eating patterns influenced by socioeconomic and environmental factors. This transition, often marked by increased processed food consumption and reduced intake of traditional staples, contributes to elevated risks of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Despite the growing Indian diaspora in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK, the evidence on their dietary acculturation remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will adopt the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. A three-step search strategy will be applied across databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science. Google Scholar will be used as a supplementary search tool to identify additional relevant studies. The search will include peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published in English between 1 January 2000 and 22 May 2025. First-generation Indian immigrants of all ages will be included, while second-generation immigrants, refugee populations and studies linked to non-communicable disease interventions will be excluded. Screening will be conducted in Covidence by two independent reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a standard JBI tool, charted in tabular form, and synthesised narratively and thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this review will use published and publicly available data, formal ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and community engagement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bachani Singh, S., George, M. S., Upton, P., Knight-Agarwal, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111482</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111482</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the evidence on dietary acculturation post-migration among Indian immigrants in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111482</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112563?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of health-related quality of life, cognitive, physical and psychological impairments in critically ill adults after status epilepticus (POSEIDON 2): protocol for a multicentre longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112563?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Status epilepticus (SE) in adults is a serious neurological emergency that can lead to high morbidity and mortality rates. Although functional outcomes are often assessed using general scoring systems, limited data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) are still limited. Furthermore, comprehensive evaluations of patient-reported physical, cognitive, mental health and psychological outcomes are lacking in this population. POSEIDON 2 aims to assess HRQoL and cognitive, physical and psychological impairments at 3 and 12 months after ICU discharge following SE and quantify caregiver burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>POSEIDON 2 is a prospective, multicentre, longitudinal study conducted in 19 French ICUs. The study combines data from the SE ICTAL Registry with data from patients who survived admission to the ICU for SE, who will be recruited for the study. The study also includes patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collected 3 (M3) and 12 (M12) months after discharge from the ICU using validated instruments. The Zarit scale will be used to measure the burden on caregivers at M3 and M12. The primary endpoint is the prevalence of overall HRQOL impairment at M3 and M12, as defined by dichotomous scores on the physical and mental components of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey compared with those of the general population. Secondary endpoints include domain-specific impairments, such as cognitive function, dependence, mental health and patient experiences. The sample size has been calculated based on an estimated prevalence of 75% for HRQoL impairment, with a planned sample size of 140 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The POSEIDON 2 study protocol received ethical approval from the ethics committee &lsquo;Comit&eacute; de Protection des Personnes Ouest VI&rsquo; on 5 October 2023 (#2023-A01223-42). The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice and the regulatory requirements of France. Written informed consent is obtained from participants, who are able to decline participation or withdraw from the study at any time. Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06100978">NCT06100978</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legriel, S., Bernard, C., Sboui, G., Sigaud, F., Lascarrou, J.-B., Mayenco-Cardenal, N., Chelly, J., Bruel, C., Mongardon, N., Marzouk, M., Quenot, J.-P., Hugues, R., Schnell, D., Beuret, P., Bailly, P., Lesieur, O., Argaud, L., Chambon, R., Jacq, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112563</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112563</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of health-related quality of life, cognitive, physical and psychological impairments in critically ill adults after status epilepticus (POSEIDON 2): protocol for a multicentre longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112563</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112563</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112768?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 9 week multi-component cycling programme versus an existing single cycling training session: protocol for the Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e112768?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cycling can be beneficial for health, well-being and the environment; however, cycling participation in the UK remains low. Effective and cost-effective strategies are needed to support people in the community to increase cycling. The Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate whether a 9 week multi-component cycling programme (Cycle Nation) is more effective and cost-effective than an existing national cycle training session on cycling participation, transport use and health and well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This pragmatic, single-blinded, two-arm RCT will recruit &ge;268 adults who cycle infrequently. Participants will be randomised to the 9 week multi-component individual/social-level group-based Cycle Nation programme or an existing national standard single group-based cycle training session. Both arms will be delivered by community-based cycling organisations in Glasgow. Participants will complete self-reported measurements at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants cycling at least weekly at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include proportion of participants cycling at least weekly at 12 weeks; change in weekly number of rides and minutes of cycling and use of private car, taxi, public transport and walking at 12 weeks and 12 months; change in motivation, perceptions of cycling safety, confidence to cycle, self-esteem, vitality, health-related quality of life and perceived general physical health at 12 weeks and 12 months. A within-trial economic evaluation from a National Health Service/personal social service and a broader societal perspective will be undertaken. Pending within-trial results, a long-term model may be developed. An embedded process evaluation will use participant and facilitator interviews, participant acceptability questionnaires, facilitator delivery proforma and session observations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Glasgow Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee (11 April 25). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to stakeholders and the public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07005674">NCT07005674</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawlor, E. R., Gabler Trisotti, M. F., McIntosh, E., McConnachie, A., Gill, J. M. R., Gray, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112768</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112768</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 9 week multi-component cycling programme versus an existing single cycling training session: protocol for the Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112768</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112768</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113185?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of prehabilitation before total knee replacement on postoperative patient-reported joint awareness, enablement and knee function: protocol for the PROTEKT randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113185?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) causes pain, reduced function and disability and may require total knee replacement (TKR). Although TKR is effective, up to 20% of patients remain dissatisfied, partly due to poor preoperative function and unrealistic expectations. Long waiting times for surgery may worsen patients&rsquo; function, yet preoperative physiotherapy is rarely offered. Prehabilitation&mdash;exercise and education before surgery&mdash;could improve postoperative recovery, but current evidence is limited. This trial investigates whether adding prehabilitation to standard care before TKR improves postoperative patient-reported joint awareness, enablement and knee function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, randomised controlled parallel-group trial is planned to be conducted within two specialised orthopaedic outpatient rehabilitation units in the southeast healthcare region of Sweden. Eligible patients (40&ndash;85 years, awaiting unilateral TKR) are randomised 1:1, stratified by age (&le;67, &gt;67 years), to either 8 weeks of prehabilitation&mdash;comprising two times per week supervised exercise therapy (strength, range of motion and balance) and education&mdash;in addition to standard care, or to standard care alone. Standard care consists of self-care, a single standardised preoperative education session and standardised postoperative rehabilitation. Assessments are conducted at baseline, post-intervention, 1 week pre-surgery and 6, 12 and 52 weeks post-surgery. A total of 110 patients will be recruited to the trial. Primary outcomes are joint awareness (Forgotten Joint Score-12) and patient enablement (modified Patient Enablement Instrument-2). Secondary outcomes are patient satisfaction (5-category Likert scale), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the EuroQol 5 Dimension 3 Level questionnaire, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire&mdash;short form, objective function and accelerometer-based physical activity. Analyses will follow intention-to-treat and per-protocol principles. Between-group and within-group differences will be tested using t-tests or non-parametric equivalents, and linear mixed models or generalised linear models. Multiple linear regression and logistic regression will be used to analyse predictor variables for the primary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses will be performed to quantify the magnitude of missing data from patients lost to follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial has received ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (reg. no.2023-05120-01) and complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Signed informed consent is collected for all patients before entering the trial. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international/national conferences. The findings may improve future clinical guidelines and care pathways for patients undergoing TKR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06290336">NCT06290336</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ljung, M., Gustafsson, K., Kvist, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113185</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113185</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of prehabilitation before total knee replacement on postoperative patient-reported joint awareness, enablement and knee function: protocol for the PROTEKT randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113185</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113691?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative recovery and analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e113691?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite the minimally invasive nature of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), moderate-to-severe postoperative pain remains frequent and impairs recovery. Intravenous lidocaine possesses multimodal analgesic, antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory properties that may improve pain control and functional outcomes, but robust evidence in thoracic surgery is lacking. Moreover, its potential to attenuate neuropathic pain, a key component of chronic post-thoracic pain syndromes, has not been adequately investigated. This trial will determine whether continuous perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion improves recovery, reduces acute pain intensity and prevents the development of neuropathic pain after VATS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will enrol 84 adult patients undergoing elective VATS. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either intravenous lidocaine (bolus 1 mg/kg at induction followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/hour intraoperatively and postoperatively for 24 hours) or matched normal saline postoperatively, with identical intraoperative management in both groups. The primary outcome is the incidence of moderate-to-severe movement-evoked pain at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include pain at 48 and 72 hours, opioid consumption, pulmonary complications, sleep quality, quality of recovery, neurocognitive outcomes and chronic neuropathic pain at 3 months. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tongji Hospital (Reference No. TJ-IRB202509102) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500111163). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500111163.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omindo, W. W., Xiao, Z., Wang, X., Fu, L., Wang, J., Zhang, R., Ping, W., Zhou, B., Zhang, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113691</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113691</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative recovery and analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113691</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113691</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114079?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of perioperative esketamine administration for postoperative sleep disturbance following general anaesthesia: protocol for a planned systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114079?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative sleep disturbance (PSD) is a common complication following major surgery, occurring in 15%&ndash;72% of patients. PSD poses a significant threat to both postoperative recovery and long-term outcome, leading to elevated risks of cognitive decline, pain sensitivity and cardiovascular events in patients. The current pharmacological treatments for PSD are typically reactive, administered only after symptoms have manifested, highlighting a critical unmet need for effective prophylactic strategies during the perioperative period. Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the effect of esketamine on preventing PSD, but their findings are inconsistent. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of perioperative esketamine on the prevention of PSD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A comprehensive search will be conducted in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Ovid), PubMed and Web of Science by two authors independently. The search terms will comprise indexed and free-text terms to encompass the concepts of esketamine and PSD. The primary outcome is the incidence of PSD at postoperative days 1, 3 and 7. Two authors will independently conduct study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment with the Cochrane Collaboration&rsquo;s tool. RevMan V.5.4.1 and Stata V.17.0 software will be used to conduct the statistical analysis. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and assessment of publication bias will be performed to verify the strength of our conclusions. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to recommend evidence quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this study. The findings will be presented at national or international conferences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251232636.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yin, H., Wang, S., Huang, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114079</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114079</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of perioperative esketamine administration for postoperative sleep disturbance following general anaesthesia: protocol for a planned systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114079</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114079</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114238?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional observational study evaluating social brain health in HIV using a research domain criteria-based approach: a protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114238?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Some people with HIV (PWH) experience brain changes that affect neurocognition, but little is known about how HIV impacts social cognition or related brain regions. Social cognition, the ability to perceive, understand and respond to social information, is important for maintaining relationships and quality of life. This article provides the protocol for the first comprehensive study examining social brain function in PWH and people without HIV (PWoH). With three aims, this study will: (1) examine neural circuits related to social cognition; (2) examine social cognitive performance across two social cognitive domains and (3) examine the role of social cognition in everyday social functioning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Referred to as Social Brain Health Study in HIV Study, this cross-sectional study will enrol 105 PWH and 105 demographically matched PWoH aged 18&ndash;65 years. The study administers a comprehensive assessment battery across two visits within a 2-week period. Visit 1 includes behavioural measures of social cognition (Perceiving Social Cues and Understanding Others), neurocognition and social functioning (social network size and loneliness). Visit 2 involves functional MRI procedures with three social cognitive tasks designed to activate key brain regions (ie, fusiform face area, superior temporal gyrus, temporo-parietal junction, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH139613) and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (IRB-300013394). Data collection is ongoing. The first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2030. Findings of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international conferences as well as patient organisations such as AIDS service organisations and community talks.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vance, D. E., Brennan-Ing, M., Lambert, C. C., Hellemann, G., Zeng, X., Lee, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114238</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114238</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional observational study evaluating social brain health in HIV using a research domain criteria-based approach: a protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114238</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114238</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115028?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for postoperative pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115028?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative pain is common after surgery, with a high incidence and risk of becoming chronic. Current multimodal analgesia has drawbacks, including limited efficacy from single agents and opioid side effects and addiction risk. These issues have led to opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is non-invasive and convenient. Studies have shown it can reduce postoperative pain, improve mood and lower adverse events. However, taVNS lacks a comprehensive evaluation and standardised protocols, so further research is needed to provide reliable evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study strictly adheres to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. To identify suitable randomised controlled trials (RCTs), eight credible databases will be searched, including four English databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE) and four Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database). RevMan V.5.3 will be employed to integrate the retrieved data and conduct meta-analyses. The methodological quality of included RCTs will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment 2.0 tool. Additionally, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system will be applied to assess the strength and certainty of the evidence. We will also conduct publication bias analyses, sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical review is required as no private or confidential patient data will be included. Results of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251207651.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lu, Y., Lv, H., Bian, Z., Shen, Y., Li, R., Xia, Y., Fang, J.-Q., Wan, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115028</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115028</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Complementary medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for postoperative pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Complementary medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115028</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115028</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115607?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative effectiveness and safety of digital health delivery models for pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115607?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects approximately 480 million individuals globally and is projected to reach 600 million by 2050, representing a substantial burden on healthcare systems and patient quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a cornerstone intervention for COPD management, delivering clinically meaningful improvements in exercise capacity, health-related quality of life and dyspnoea. Despite strong guideline recommendations and established efficacy, only 2%&ndash;4% of eligible patients with COPD access traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation due to geographical barriers, transportation difficulties, scheduling conflicts and limited healthcare resources. Digital health technologies offer promising alternatives to overcome these access barriers while potentially maintaining therapeutic benefits. Various digital delivery models have emerged, including video-based telerehabilitation, virtual reality platforms, mobile health applications and web-based programmes. However, their comparative effectiveness remains unclear, limiting evidence-based clinical decision making. This systematic review and network meta-analysis will aim to compare and rank the effectiveness and safety of different digital health delivery models for pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD, providing evidence to inform optimal intervention selection in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Network Meta-Analyses guidelines. Comprehensive searches will be performed across five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, CINAHL) from inception to January 2026, without language restrictions. Eligible studies will include randomised controlled trials comparing digital health delivery models for pulmonary rehabilitation in adults with COPD. Digital health interventions will be categorised into four distinct delivery models: video-based telerehabilitation, virtual reality rehabilitation, mobile health rehabilitation and web-based platform rehabilitation. Interventions combining multiple modalities will be categorised according to the predominant component based on intervention frequency, duration and primary therapeutic mechanism. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. The primary outcome will be change in 6 min walk distance. Key secondary outcomes will include disease-specific quality of life measures, dyspnoea severity, hospitalisation rates, exacerbation frequency, intervention adherence and adverse events. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis will be conducted, calculating mean differences or ORs with 95% credible intervals. Treatment rankings will be estimated using surface under the cumulative ranking curve probabilities. Evidence certainty will be assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework. Planned subgroup analyses will explore potential effect modifiers including disease severity, intervention duration, supervision mode and technological features.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this systematic review will use data from previously published studies, formal ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, presentations at relevant scientific conferences and communication to healthcare providers, policymakers and patient advocacy organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251268701.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, L., Chen, X., Yang, C., Feng, M., Wu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115607</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115607</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative effectiveness and safety of digital health delivery models for pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115607</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115607</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116847?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to guide initial therapy for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis comparing standard of care (prednisolone) to adalimumab without glucocorticoids: REACT trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e116847?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised cancer treatment through targeted disruption of the physiological pathways that maintain tissue tolerance, but which are co-opted by cancers to evade immunosurveillance. Thus, the resultant T-cell activity often causes immune-related adverse events including immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA). ICI-IA results in functional impairment that frequently persists, even after ICI discontinuation, with substantial quality-of-life impacts for cancer survivors.</p>
<p>A high-quality body of evidence to guide ICI-IA management remains an unmet need. Pharmacological treatment may be prolonged, typically begins with non-specific immunosuppression, including systemic steroids, and is usually only rationalised to more targeted therapy in resistant cases. Moreover, retrospective data suggest the high dose glucocorticoids sometimes used in new-onset ICI-IA may be associated with worse cancer outcomes.</p>
<p>Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibition strategies are well established with excellent efficacy and safety profiles in &lsquo;spontaneous&rsquo; inflammatory arthritides including rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Mechanistic evidence from ex vivo and murine studies also supports the utility of anti-TNF therapy for steroid-refractory cases of ICI-IA. Although good clinical responses have been reported in this setting, the REACT trial (REmission induction of Arthritis caused by Cancer ImmunoTherapy) aims to provide randomised and robust clinical evidence for deploying targeted therapy earlier in ICI-IA management. It will test whether up-front anti-TNF therapy can more effectively and quickly control symptoms, reduce glucocorticoid exposure, prevent early ICI discontinuation and increase the frequency of drug-free ICI-IA remission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>REACT is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, superiority, two-arm, randomised controlled clinical trial to guide initial therapy for patients with ICI-IA. The trial will compare the current standard of care (initial prednisolone; Arm A) with the anti-TNF drug, adalimumab without glucocorticoids (Arm B).</p>
<p>The primary outcome is glucocorticoid-free arthritis remission rate at 24 weeks where remission is defined as: (i) No use of systemic or intra-articular glucocorticoids (except when used for adrenal insufficiency) within 4 weeks prior to assessment at 24 weeks; and (ii) absence of synovitis on clinical examination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by East Midlands&mdash;Leicester South Research Ethics Committee on 31-Oct-2024 (Ref: 24/EM/0202). Participants are required to provide written informed consent. The results of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN18217497">ISRCTN18217497</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fisher, B. A., Rowe, A., Hodson, C., Wilkhu, M., Williams, E., Turner, E., Allard, A., Blake, T., Bombardieri, M., Cope, A. P., Dubey, S., Mankia, K., Malley, T., Moore, O., Payne, M., Plummer, R., Tilby, M., Tillett, T., Wong, E., Wu, Y., Filer, A., Pratt, A., Pallan, L., Homer, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T04:40:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116847</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116847</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to guide initial therapy for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis comparing standard of care (prednisolone) to adalimumab without glucocorticoids: REACT trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116847</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116847</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100158?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ReFIT study (reversing frailty in transplantation): protocol for a longitudinal study to assess clinical and biomedical changes in frailty through kidney transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e100158?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Losses of functional reserve across multiple physiological systems have been identified in frail patients, yet the exact aetiology of frailty remains unclear. Although strongly associated with chronological age, frailty often develops at a younger age in patients with organ failure. Frailty is prevalent in patients with kidney failure; however, individuals experience improvements in physical frailty measures following kidney transplantation. This makes younger patients with kidney failure a unique population for studying both the accelerated onset of frailty and its reversal. This research project aims to test the hypothesis that frailty secondary to organ failure and age-related frailty are associated with similar molecular and physiological measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This longitudinal study will recruit 150 patients in three groups. Group A (kidney transplant recipients aged &ge;40 years; n=50) and Group B (patients aged &ge;40 years active on the kidney transplant waitlist; n=50) will comprise younger adults with frailty from organ failure. Group C (adults aged &ge;65 years (or &ge;55 years for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients); n=50) will comprise older community dwellers. The primary outcome is the Frailty Index (FI). Secondary outcomes include the change in FI over time, and at baseline when considering various clinical metadata, immune parameters, kidney function and nutrition intake which will be measured at baseline and 12-month time points. Longitudinal changes in frailty will be analysed using linear mixed models with multiple testing corrections for false discovery rates.</p>
<p>Endocrine profiles and metabolomics, measures of immune function and microcirculatory dysfunction, will be measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and/or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The gut microbiome will be sequenced via shotgun metagenomics (Illumina NextSeq500, 150 bp paired-end, <sup>3</sup>Gbp/sample). Circulating cell-free DNA/mitochondrial DNA will be quantified through droplet digital PCR. Microcirculation will be assessed via sublingual dark field videomicroscopy with glycocalyx markers measured by ELISA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will be conducted with all stipulations of this protocol, and the conditions of the ethics committee approval. Ethical principles have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, all Australian and local regulations and in the spirit of the standard of Good Clinical Practice (as defined by the International Conference on Harmonisation). Organs/tissues will be sourced ethically and will not be sourced from executed prisoners or prisoners of conscience or other vulnerable groups.</p>
<p>Ethics approval was received by the Metro South Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2023/QMS/95392) and ratified by the University of Queensland.</p>
<p>Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, participant newsletters and health organisation collaboration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Payne, T., Shaw, A., Hanjani, L. S., Homes, R., Giddens, F., Ravuri, H. G., Yap, C. X., Walsh, J., Kumar, V., Garton, F. C., Rhee, H., Huang, A., Francis, R. S., Reid, N., McAdams-DeMarco, M., Gordon, E., Midwinter, M., Hubbard, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100158</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100158</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ReFIT study (reversing frailty in transplantation): protocol for a longitudinal study to assess clinical and biomedical changes in frailty through kidney transplantation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100158</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100158</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104174?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the doctors office: a longitudinal study mapping womens experiences of the maternal healthcare journey as a pathway to reducing maternal mortality in Nigeria]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e104174?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Nigeria has one of the highest maternal mortality burdens globally. Improving maternal outcomes requires a better understanding of how women experience care across pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period. This study explored women&rsquo;s maternal healthcare experiences across the perinatal continuum in Nigeria, with a focus on how challenges emerge and interact over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal qualitative study using patient journey mapping.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Public primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare facilities in Abuja, Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 pregnant women were purposively sampled. Each woman participated in two rounds of in-depth interviews: once in late pregnancy and again 2&ndash;6 weeks postpartum. All participants completed both interview rounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were collected through 24 semistructured in-depth interviews conducted longitudinally to capture changes in women&rsquo;s experiences before and after childbirth. Interview guides were informed by existing maternal health frameworks. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and organised across five stages of the maternal healthcare journey: Awareness, Consideration, Access, Treatment and Recovery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>This study introduces a five-stage framework: Awareness, Consideration, Access, Treatment and Recovery, to comprehensively explore maternal healthcare experiences. The findings reveal systemic inefficiencies at every stage of the pregnancy journey, from limited awareness of pregnancy test kits to unreliable booking systems and inadequate postpartum mental health support. This study highlights how early-stage barriers cascade into later phases, unlike traditional research that focuses only on clinical interactions. This study emphasises the importance of maternal care accessibility and recovery support, moving beyond a treatment-centric lens.&nbsp;</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study presents a transformative framework for understanding maternal healthcare as a continuum of interconnected experiences. The research offers actionable insights to enhance maternal health outcomes through stage-specific strategies. The globally adaptable framework provides policymakers and healthcare practitioners with a roadmap to improve maternal healthcare systems in Nigeria and beyond. This holistic approach lays the foundation for reducing maternal mortality while ensuring equitable care for all.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ope, B. W., Attwood, P., Mullins, E., Hirst, J. E., Norton, R., Peden, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104174</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104174</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond the doctors office: a longitudinal study mapping womens experiences of the maternal healthcare journey as a pathway to reducing maternal mortality in Nigeria]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104174</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105055?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospitalisations and deaths due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions among adults with and without intellectual disabilities in Scotland: a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e105055?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore how well the primary care system in Scotland works for adults with intellectual disabilities (ID), using the rate of unplanned hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) as a proxy indicator. As part of this, to investigate those rates and rate ratios among adults with ID and without ID, adjusting for the prevalence of a given ACSC in each population. The secondary aim was to explore deaths due to ACSC among the ID and no-ID populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A population-based retrospective cohort data linkage study of adult respondents to Scotland&rsquo;s 2011 Census. Self-reported or proxy-reported ID status from the Census was linked to hospital admissions data and deaths data. The cohort was followed until the end of 2019. The prevalence of ACSCs in each population was calculated from aggregate-level data published by the National Health Service, as it was not possible to use the linked dataset for this purpose.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Whole population of Scotland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>People aged 18+ on census day (27 March 2011), including all adults with ID (n=16 840) and a 15% randomly selected comparator sample of adults without ID (n=566 074).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Crude and age-sex standardised incidence rates and ratios; cumulative incidence; prevalence ratios. The exposure was ID status, and the outcomes were (1) unplanned ACSC hospital admission, (2) death with an ACSC condition listed as the main cause on the death certificate and (3) death with an ACSC condition listed as one of the causes on the death certificate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Adults with ID under the age of 55 had only a slightly higher risk of an unplanned ACSC hospitalisation than their general population counterparts (standardised incidence ratio 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.20). After adjusting for different ACSC prevalence in ID and non-ID cohorts, this difference in risk disappeared. These findings contrast with existing evidence from England, where a much higher unadjusted risk of unplanned ACSC hospitalisations was found among people with ID. Adults with ID had a higher risk of dying due to ACSC than adults without ID (standardised mortality ratio 2.54; 95% CI 2.19 to 2.95).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings on unplanned ACSC hospitalisations suggest that the primary care system in Scotland appears to be similarly effective for adults with ID than for adults without ID. However, the higher risk of dying from ACSC among people with ID suggests that this system is less effective for people with ID. Future research should investigate this tension and aim to understand why the operation of the primary healthcare system seems to be worse with regards to ACSC mortality than with regards to unplanned ACSC hospitalisations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sosenko, F., Cairns, D., Jani, B., Ward, L. M., Truesdale, M., Hughes-McCormack, L., Henderson, A., Melville, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105055</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105055</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospitalisations and deaths due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions among adults with and without intellectual disabilities in Scotland: a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105055</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105055</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106797?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of Devine gastric partitioning in locally advanced gastric cancer: palliation and bridge to definitive care-protocol for a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106797?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Gastric outlet obstruction syndrome (GOOS) is a clinically significant condition often associated with advanced malignancies, particularly gastric and pancreatic cancers. Management strategies focus on symptom relief, nutritional improvement and quality of life enhancement. Surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ), especially laparoscopic GJ, is commonly recommended for patients with good functional status and life expectancy exceeding 2 months. The modified Devine partial stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (PSPG) was introduced to address functional limitations of conventional GJ, including duodenogastric reflux and afferent loop syndrome. However, PSPG has not been widely adopted, and its role in malignant GOOS remains unclear.</p>
<p>This systematic review aims to synthesise the available evidence on the application, functional outcomes and oncological implications of the modified Devine technique in malignant GOOS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The PICO framework was employed to define eligibility criteria, focusing on studies examining PSPG for malignant GOOS as palliative surgery or a bridge to resection. Literature searches were conducted across Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and grey literature sources using a prospectively registered search strategy, between August and October 2025, following protocol submission. Two independent reviewers will screen articles, extract data and assess quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale where applicable. Data will be synthesised narratively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this study is a systematic review of published literature, formal ethical approval was not strictly required. In accordance with institutional policy, the protocol was submitted to the Institutional Review Board of Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, which confirmed that the study met criteria for ethical exemption. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024593540). Search strategy is registered in searchRxiv <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.1079/searchRxiv.2025.00838">https://doi.org/10.1079/searchRxiv.2025.00838</A>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Systematic review registration</st>
<p>PROSPERO CRD42024593540</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Search strategy registration</st>
<p><A HREF="https://doi.org/10.1079/searchRxiv.2025.00838">https://doi.org/10.1079/searchRxiv.2025.00838</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomes, A., Reis, M. I., Costa, B., Nunes, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106797</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106797</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of Devine gastric partitioning in locally advanced gastric cancer: palliation and bridge to definitive care-protocol for a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106797</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106797</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106837?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a prospective cohort study for the assessment of sarcopenia in gestational diabetes: the SiGnal-D study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e106837?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sarcopenia is characterised by loss of muscle mass and strength. Although ageing is the most likely risk factor of sarcopenia, sarcopenia is prevalent even in non-elderly people. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for sarcopenia, as T2D shares with sarcopenia several aetiological factors. Meanwhile, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is characterised by metabolic alterations that resemble those observed in T2D, including increased insulin resistance (present even in physiologic pregnancies). Hence, GDM presents two major risk factors for sarcopenia, that is, dysglycaemia and insulin resistance. Moreover, the number of pregnancies at age &gt;40 years is increasing, which is in an age range in which sarcopenia prevalence is already not negligible. However, data on the prevalence of sarcopenia prevalence in GDM and its effect on pregnancy outcomes are limited. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia in women with GDM (and in pregnant women without GDM), identify risk factors and determine its effect on delivery and maternal and fetal outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>For this study, 100 each of women with and without GDM will be recruited. Women will undergo an oral glucose tolerance test within weeks 24&ndash;28 for possible GDM diagnosis (in weeks 16&ndash;18 for high-risk women). Muscle/physical performance tests will be conducted at weeks 28&ndash;32 for possible diagnosis of sarcopenia/presarcopenia. Cognitive function will also be assessed. For all women, information regarding pregnancy progression, along with any complications, will be collected. Collected data will be analysed according to the main objectives of the study: (i) determine the prevalence of sarcopenia/presarcopenia in pregnancy with and without GDM, (ii) identify factors associated with sarcopenia risk, (iii) determine the effect of sarcopenia/presarcopenia on pregnancy outcomes, (iv) explore the relationship between sarcopenia and cognitive function. Therefore, this study will provide information on sarcopenia/presarcopenia prevalence in GDM and, possibly, in pregnancy not complicated by dysglycaemia. Furthermore, the study will provide knowledge on the main factors associated with sarcopenia/presarcopenia in GDM/pregnancy. The identification of such factors will be relevant for an initial guidance for treatments that may prevent sarcopenia in GDM/pregnant women. This will become of even greater interest if sarcopenia/presarcopenia influences pregnancy outcomes, especially in GDM women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the Comitato Etico Regione Toscana - Area Vasta Nord Ovest (CEAVNO) on 25 July 2024 and by the Local Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna on 17 June 2024. Participants&rsquo; enrolment began in May 2025. The results of the study will be presented at national and international conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <A HREF="NCT06876090">NCT06876090</A>; Registration Date: 2025-03-14</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dardano, A., Daniele, G., Go&#x0308;bl, C. S., Tura, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106837</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106837</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a prospective cohort study for the assessment of sarcopenia in gestational diabetes: the SiGnal-D study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106837</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106837</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Common mental health outcomes among children in conflict with the law in Africa: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e108468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Common mental health outcomes among children in conflict with the law in correctional facilities in Africa are an under-researched area with significant public health implications. This review will synthesise available and accessible evidence on the prevalence and associated factors of common mental health outcomes among children in conflict with the law in Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Comprehensive electronic searches will date from 01 January 2015 to 31 December 2025 and will be conducted in PubMed, Sabinet, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Web of Science and PsycINFO. Articles will be screened using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessed for eligibility by three independent reviewers. Discrepancies will be reviewed by a ninth reviewer. The selection process of included articles will be reported by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses will be used. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will assess study quality, and data will be synthesised using meta-analysis or a narrative synthesis approach, depending on heterogeneity levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will not require ethical approval from an institutional review board, as it does not entail the direct collection of data from children in conflict with the law, nor does it pose any risk to their privacy. Once finalised, the full review report will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The key findings will also be shared at both local and international conferences, highlighting common mental health outcomes among children in conflict with the law.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251011484.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maotoana, M., Phalane, K., Ndlovu, S. M., Rapau, M., Quarshie, E. N.-B., Ntho, T. A., Sepadi, M. D., Oppong Asante, K., Sodi, T., Themane, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108468</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108468</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Common mental health outcomes among children in conflict with the law in Africa: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108468</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110929?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Harm reduction and pharmacy practice: a scoping review of services for people who use drugs provided by pharmacy staff]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e110929?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The roles of pharmacy staff have expanded to include public health functions, such as delivering harm reduction services for people who use drugs (PWUD), particularly unregulated substances and non-medical drug use, in response to an ongoing drug overdose crisis. Nonetheless, their involvement across the full spectrum of harm reduction services remains underexplored. This study mapped existing research describing or evaluating the implementation of harm reduction services for PWUD provided by pharmacy staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library (inception to July 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study selection</st>
<p>Studies reporting on the description or evaluation of harm reduction services for PWUD provided by pharmacy staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction</st>
<p>Two team members screened studies for eligibility and extracted the data. The data were analysed primarily to describe harm reduction services and the role of pharmacy staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>43 articles were included. The most frequently reported harm reduction services were sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection care (33%), needle and syringe programmes (21%), naloxone distribution (19%) and medication treatment for opioid use disorder (19%). Pharmacy staff were integrated into multidisciplinary teams (79%), with their roles varying from education to medication prescribing. Included studies reported harm reduction services for PWUD delivered by pharmacy staff as effective, feasible and safe. However, implementations were not tailored to equity-deserving populations. Services primarily addressed opioid-related harms, while strategies focusing on the use of non-opioid substances were limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This scoping review highlights the diverse roles pharmacy staff play in delivering harm reduction services for PWUD. Positioned at the intersection of accessibility and healthcare delivery, pharmacy staff are ideally situated to expand access to equitable care. To fully harness this potential, future research and practice should embed harm reduction as a core philosophy, extending beyond individual interventions to support the creation of person-centred, non-judgmental and low-barrier services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Navarrete, J., Berg, E., Hughes, C., Salokangas, E., Taylor, M., Kung, J. Y., Johnson, J. A., Hyshka, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110929</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110929</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Harm reduction and pharmacy practice: a scoping review of services for people who use drugs provided by pharmacy staff]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110929</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110929</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111325?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping the direct and indirect costs of patient and public involvement (PPI) in stroke and aphasia research: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e111325?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly embedded in stroke and aphasia participatory research, enhancing relevance and inclusivity. While the benefits of PPI are well-documented, the costs, both direct (eg, honoraria, travel, accessibility materials) and indirect (eg, time, administrative burden, emotional labour), remain poorly reported. This scoping review aims to (1) identify and categorise direct and indirect costs of PPI in stroke research, (2) examine how these costs are defined, reported or implied, (3) map cost-related barriers and facilitators and (4) expose evidence gaps to inform the Mapping the Economic and Social Tangible and Emotional Resources of Patient and Public Involvement (MASTER-PPI) framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, we will search Medline, PUBMED, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science, as well as grey literature (NIHR INVOLVE, Horizon Europe, non-governmental organisation (NGO) reports). Eligible studies include those reporting or implying direct or indirect costs of PPI in stroke research. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract data, which will be synthesised descriptively and thematically. Findings will be aligned with the MASTER-PPI framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations, social media posts in lay language and policy briefs tailored for NGOs and funders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>This protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (<A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VM9ZU">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VM9ZU</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charalambous, M., Kountouri, A., Kola, E., Claudia De Souza, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111325</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111325</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping the direct and indirect costs of patient and public involvement (PPI) in stroke and aphasia research: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111325</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111325</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114478?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of rural medical practice in Aotearoa New Zealand: a national outcomes prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e114478?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Identifying the factors that increase the likelihood of medical graduates choosing rural medical careers is key to addressing the global shortage of rural doctors. Using linked graduate-workforce outcomes data, this study aimed to identify predictors of rural medical practice in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A national prospective cohort study linking data from the longitudinal Medical School Outcomes Database to workforce location data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to generate ORs for putative predictors of rural medical career.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>All NZ medical graduates from 2011 to 2019 were followed for a minimum of 3 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>During the study period, there were a total of 4152 medical graduates nationally. Included in the analysis were 3291 graduates who had linked longitudinal medical school and workforce data, of whom 133 (4%) doctors were classified as having decided on a career in rural medicine. Independent predictors of rural practice included being of rural origin (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.81, p=0.011), age older than 25 years at entry to medical school (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.54 to 5.36, p&lt;0.001) and participation in an extended rural medical school placement (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.48 to 4.25, p&lt;0.001). Regional background and short regional medical experiences did not significantly improve rural medical workforce outcomes. Despite these predictors, students of urban origin and those with no rural career intentions at the start of medical school made up over half of the early career rural medical workforce.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This is the first national study linking medical school data to rural medical workforce outcomes. It demonstrates that previously known predictors of rural practice intention are borne out with actual career outcomes, and these also hold true at a national level. However, this research highlights that diverse pathways into rural practice are vital, given that urban-origin students and those with no early rural career intention make up a substantial number of the early-career rural medical workforce.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costello, K., Nixon, G., Stokes, T., Frampton, C., Lander, J., Wilkinson, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114478</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114478</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of rural medical practice in Aotearoa New Zealand: a national outcomes prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114478</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114478</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adapting substance use treatment for black adolescents in the US legal system: protocol for a mixed-method, exploratory, feasibility and acceptability study using the eight-step ADAPT-ITT framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/3/e115193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This community-led research study protocol emphasises placing black youth impacted by the legal system, their families and their communities at the forefront of substance use treatment development research and decision-making. The study, the Cultural Adaptation of a Substance Use Treatment (CAST) Project, challenges traditional top-down approaches to treatment creation, advocating for a grassroots model that centres community knowledge, values and active participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The CAST project is a US-based mixed-methods study with an exploratory design that examines the impact of racial discrimination on substance use in black youth impacted by the legal system. The study participants are black youth impacted by the legal system (N=15), parents of black youth impacted by the legal system (N=10) and community members who serve black youth (N=10) (total N=35 study participants). Study participants from each group (youth, parents and community members) will participate in three separate focus groups, respectively, to provide feedback on the culturally responsive content needed to best support black youth impacted by the legal system around substance use and mental health. The eight-step Assess, Decision, Adaptation, Production, Topical Expert, Integration, Training, Testing framework will be used as a guide to inform adaptations to the Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (MET/CBT12) for black youth impacted by the legal system. Once the cultural adaptation process has been completed, the study will conclude with an open feasibility and accessibility trial of the culturally adapted MET/CBT12 manual. The primary outcomes of this study are the feasibility and acceptability of the culturally adapted manual, measured by treatment attendance and participant feedback. Secondary outcomes include reductions in substance use and discrimination distress, and improvements in mental health symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of California, San Francisco (IRB Protocol Number: 23-40126). All study procedures will be conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined by the institutional review board. The results from this study will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, community forums and policy briefs to support broader implementation of culturally adapted adolescent substance use interventions that address discrimination-related stress and substance use among black individuals impacted by the legal system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06003725">NCT06003725</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryant, B. E., Tolou-Shams, M., Ezimora, I., Zapolski, T. C., DiClemente, R., Jordan, A., Becker, S. J., Squeglia, L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T04:30:04-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115193</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115193</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adapting substance use treatment for black adolescents in the US legal system: protocol for a mixed-method, exploratory, feasibility and acceptability study using the eight-step ADAPT-ITT framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115193</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095699?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Simplified two-question screening for elevated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores in orthopaedic patients: a retrospective cohort study with prospective validation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095699?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess whether it is possible to reduce the burden of completing the full Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) by identifying patients at risk for elevated HADS &ge;11 using fewer questions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study followed by prospective validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A large Dutch hospital with orthopaedic patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>13 345 orthopaedic patients with a median age of 53 years (IQR: 37&ndash;65) for the retrospective cohort; 100 patients for prospective validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Incidence of HADS scores &ge;11 and performance of a simplified screening model for elevated HADS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The full HADS questionnaire consists of 14 items (7 each for anxiety and depression). Logistic regression models were developed retrospectively to predict HADS &ge;11 using one or two questions. Models were evaluated based on sensitivity (&gt;90%), negative predictive value (NPV &gt;90%) and reduction of the response burden (&gt;50%). The most effective model was validated prospectively in 100 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The retrospective cohort included 13 345 patients, with 20% (n=2671) having a HADS score &ge;11. The final model, using questions 4 (&lsquo;I can laugh and see the funny side of things&rsquo;) and 5 (&lsquo;Worrying thoughts go through my mind&rsquo;), achieved an area under the curve of 0.934, sensitivity of 95%, NPV of 98% and reduced the questionnaire burden by 57%. Prospective validation confirmed high sensitivity (94%) and NPV (98%) for identifying patients at risk of elevated HADS scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In a large Dutch hospital, 20% of orthopaedic patients exhibited elevated HADS scores (&ge;11). Screening for elevated HADS using only two questions was highly effective, with significant reductions in patient burden. Patients who screen positive should complete the full HADS for accurate diagnosis and management. This approach could reduce the need for full HADS completion in over half of the patients, without sacrificing screening accuracy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van de Kuit, A., van Maarseveen, O. E. C., Kempen, D. H. R., Scholtes, V. A. B., Broekman, B. F. P., Poolman, R. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095699</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095699</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Simplified two-question screening for elevated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores in orthopaedic patients: a retrospective cohort study with prospective validation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095699</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095699</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095874?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment and maintenance of normal fluid status in older people living in care homes: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095874?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Maintaining normal fluid status is critical to health and well-being. Older people are vulnerable to abnormal fluid status and associated complications, morbidity and mortality. Care home residents are especially vulnerable due to dependence on care home staff, frailty and multiple comorbidities. However, it is unclear what evidence-based assessments and interventions are available to support effective fluid-status management in care homes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This article describes a protocol for a scoping review aiming to explore current evidence on assessment and maintenance of normal fluid status in older people living in care homes. It is written in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Reviews guidelines. The literature search will cover 10 clinical databases and include research registries and grey literature, and reference lists of included articles. Screening of sources will comprise two stages: title and abstract and full-text screening. Articles will be managed in Covidence and data charting will use bespoke data extraction forms used to generate a narrative synthesis of results. Screening and data extraction will be completed by two coauthors, blinded to each other&rsquo;s results, with discrepancies adjudicated by a third author when required.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As a scoping review of existing evidence, rather than conducting new research, ethical approval is not required. Dissemination will comprise a peer-reviewed publication, presentation at a national conference focused on care of older people, and local patient and public involvement and engagement groups. We will explore opportunities to develop care home-facing education materials working with our local Applied Research Collaboration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>Open Science Framework: <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AVS5B">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AVS5B</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fielding, C., Hodge, S. Y., Lunt, E., Mortimore, G., Smith, B. E., Ashworth, S. J., Carroll, R., Sobieraj, C., McGuire, C., Bloxham, A., Cooper James, E., Hamza, R., Torr, L., Buchanan, H., Hurst, H., Gordon, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095874</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095874</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment and maintenance of normal fluid status in older people living in care homes: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095874</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095874</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099993?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Promoting engagement in patient-initiated follow-up and self-care behaviours: acceptability of the 'ACT now & check-it-out intervention for head and neck cancer (PETNECK2 study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099993?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Due to increasing incidence of head and neck cancer (HNC) and overwhelming clinical demand on follow-up services, a new risk-stratified pathway, patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) with a patient support package is being evaluated (PETNECK2 study). We aimed to (a) explore acceptability to both HNC patients and health professionals and the impact on self-management behaviours including self-surveillance and fear of cancer recurrence and (b) conduct intervention optimisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative interviews conducted 1&ndash;2 months after receiving the PIFU support package.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Eight hospital trusts across the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>25 patients around 1-year post-HNC treatment receiving the PETNECK2 intervention, and 7 health professionals from NHS Trusts involved in recruitment and/or intervention delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>All patients received the intervention (PIFU) following a clear PET-CT scan, which included a face-to-face education session with a health professional and a digital app and/or booklet, that aimed to support engagement in PIFU self-care behaviours (including regularly checking for symptom changes; prompt help-seeking; self-management of fear of recurrence). Patients had open access to their hospital team if concerns arose.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The PIFU intervention with a patient support package was largely acceptable to health professionals and most patients. Engagement in new habitual self-care behaviours was evident in most, influenced by having increased knowledge and confidence regarding these behaviours, provided by key elements of the PIFU support package (eg, demonstration of self-examination). Acceptability appeared lower in a few patients reporting low self-efficacy for self-examination, ongoing challenges with fear of recurrence and concerns over no scheduled appointments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our intervention support package was largely acceptable and promoted patient engagement with PIFU and key self-management behaviours. Findings can usefully inform the design of future PIFU support packages and highlight important considerations for future evaluations of patient acceptability of PIFU pathways. Following intervention optimisation, a UK-wide trial is now underway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN13709798">ISRCTN13709798</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matheson, L., Watson, E., Fulton-Lieuw, T., Mittal, S., Gaunt, P., Sissons, J., Liaskou, E., Gaunt, C., Nankivell, P., Mehanna, H., Brett, J., on behalf of the PETNECK2 Research Team, Abou-Foul, Karwath, Lorenc, Main, Greaves, Moore, Secher, Gkoutos, Ozakinci, Wolstenholme, Dretzke, Duda, Jepson, Wells, Calvert, Rhodes, Kiely, Thomas, Winter, Wong]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099993</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099993</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Promoting engagement in patient-initiated follow-up and self-care behaviours: acceptability of the 'ACT now & check-it-out intervention for head and neck cancer (PETNECK2 study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099993</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099993</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102349?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenges in conducting an individual participant data meta-analysis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with (sub)acute low back pain: a systematic review and report on data availability]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102349?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We planned to conduct an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) to investigate the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) compared with placebo in patients with (sub)acute low back pain (LBP). This report describes the challenges encountered in conducting this IPD-MA and their implications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Medline ALL, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through January 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane review on NSAIDs for (sub)acute LBP and trials identified through the aforementioned data sources. We compared NSAIDs (regardless of administration route) to placebo on effectiveness outcomes. Our primary outcomes were pain intensity, physical functioning and health-related quality of life at 1-, 3- and 12-week follow-ups, with secondary outcomes including adverse events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers screened and included eligible studies. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool 2. Original authors of included RCTs were contacted based on a hierarchy: Corresponding &gt; First &gt; Last &gt; Other authors via email, social media or institution. For contributors, we requested their study protocol, codebook and IPD, and provided our data-sharing agreement and transfer protocol. One-stage IPD-MA was planned with a generalised linear mixed model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 10 RCTs. Seven authors responded, but only one author agreed to share IPD. Data were unavailable or lost due to the age of the trials, dissolution of research departments, lack of records by sponsoring companies, market withdrawal of the studied drug, or contractual restrictions on data sharing. Two RCTs had a &lsquo;low&rsquo; overall RoB, four had &lsquo;some concerns&rsquo; and four had &lsquo;high&rsquo;. With only one IPD set obtained, the planned IPD-MA could not be conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This IPD-MA on NSAIDs for (sub)acute LBP could not be completed due to challenges in data acquisition. In future IPD research, researchers should focus on clearer rationale, recent RCTs, improved data-sharing and storing practices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fu, Y., de Zoete, A., Madsen, S. D., Abdel Shaheed, C., Koes, B., Chiarotto, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102349</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102349</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenges in conducting an individual participant data meta-analysis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with (sub)acute low back pain: a systematic review and report on data availability]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102349</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102647?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advanced therapeutic approaches for inherited retinal diseases: an umbrella review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102647?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of advanced therapeutic approaches for inherited retinal disease (IRD) using evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Umbrella review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>We searched for Epistemonikos, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, Google Scholar, Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects from inception to November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>This included English-language systematic review and meta-analysis assessing advanced therapies in patients with IRD (including congenital retinal dystrophies, retinal dystrophies, retinitis pigmentosa (RP), Stargardt disease, X linked RP, achromatopsia, cone-rod dystrophy, choroideraemia and X linked retinoschisis). Reviews that did not meet the methodological quality threshold were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Findings were synthesised narratively due to the substantial overlap of primary studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>Six systematic reviews and meta-analyses published from 2020 onwards were included, comprising between 6 and 21 primary studies per review. The therapies evaluated included gene therapy, cell-based therapy and stem cell-based interventions. Reported effect estimates showed modest to clinically meaningful improvements in best-corrected visual acuity and retinal structural outcomes in selected IRD subtypes, although effect sizes varied widely across interventions and conditions. The GRADE certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low, reflecting bias, imprecision and heterogeneity risks. Substantial overlap of primary studies was observed (corrected covered area = 28.9%), precluding quantitative pooling across reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings suggest notable improvements in visual acuity, retinal structure and other critical outcomes, with therapies such as cell therapy, gene therapy and stem cell therapy showing promising results in enhancing treatment efficacy. Although there are examples of successes with supportive evidence, the overall evidence is not sufficiently strong to make general recommendations, as studies still need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Further high-quality, large-scale randomised controlled trials are needed to better confirm their efficacy and safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ekemiri, K., Daniel, E., Seemongal-Dass, R., Ekemiri, C., Victor, V., Amobi, M., Adebo, O., Tekalign, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102647</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102647</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advanced therapeutic approaches for inherited retinal diseases: an umbrella review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102647</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102647</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102844?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Retrospective cohort study protocol to determine prenatal and infant lead exposure using novel dentition analysis in Flint, Michigan: Flint Tooth FAIRY (Flint assessment of in-utero and at-risk young)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102844?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Flint water crisis (FWC) exposed thousands of in-utero fetuses and infants to lead-contaminated drinking water, yet the full extent of exposure remains unknown due to limitations in traditional biomonitoring methods. While blood lead levels provide momentary snapshots of exposure, novel dentition analysis using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) enables detailed reconstruction of prenatal and early-life exposure through deciduous teeth ("baby" teeth). This protocol describes a retrospective study investigating prenatal and early life exposure to lead during the FWC using shed deciduous teeth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Flint Tooth Flint assessment of in-utero and at-risk young study aims to recruit approximately 364 children born in Flint, Michigan, between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2015, through the Flint Registry. Recruitment began in July 2021 and the expected study period is through December 2026. Caregivers will complete questionnaires detailing residential history and infant feeding practices. Naturally shed deciduous teeth will be analysed via LA-ICP-MS to measure lead and other plumbing-related metal concentrations. Using dental growth patterns, measurements will be assigned temporal points to construct weekly exposure profiles. Statistical analyses will assess associations between tooth metal concentrations and potential risk factors, including residential water service line material, household water consumption patterns, infant feeding practices and residential history. This study focuses on exposure reconstruction only and does not include child health outcome assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Biomedical and Health Institutional Review Board (study ID STUDY00003045). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations to stakeholders. Individual exposure profiles will be shared with families using the Tooth Lead Report-Back Toolkit, created by researchers at The Institute for Climate Change, Environmental Health and Exposomic Research at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Land, D., Goldsworthy, M., Hanna, M., Arora, M., Midya, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102844</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102844</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Retrospective cohort study protocol to determine prenatal and infant lead exposure using novel dentition analysis in Flint, Michigan: Flint Tooth FAIRY (Flint assessment of in-utero and at-risk young)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102844</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102844</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103398?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disease-related and self-management-related knowledge, attitude and practice among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and acne in Hebei, China: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103398?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Self-management emerges as paramount for effective outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and acne. This study aimed to investigate the disease and self-management-related knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) in PCOS patients with acne.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Demographic information and KAP scores were collected through a self-administered questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study enrolled PCOS patients with acne at Hebei Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences between April and October 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were the total scores for disease-related and self-management-related KAP and the proportions of participants with adequate levels in each KAP dimension. Secondary outcomes were the associations between KAP levels and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including employment status and duration since PCOS diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 489 valid questionnaires were enrolled, including 458 (93.66%) patients unmarried, with a mean age of 23.03&plusmn;2.46 years. The mean scores of KAP were 11.98&plusmn;4.82 (possible range: 0&ndash;20), 40.48&plusmn;3.16 (possible range: 11&ndash;55), 38.04&plusmn;3.92 (possible range: 9&ndash;45), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that people who were unemployed or without a fixed job had lower knowledge levels (OR=0.370, 95% CI 0.182 to 0.753, p=0.006), those who had suffered from PCOS for 1&ndash;3 years (OR=18.067, 95% CI 9.259 to 35.254, p&lt;0.001), those with PCOS for greater than or equal to 3 years (OR=19.195, 95% CI 7.508 to 49.074, p&lt;0.001) were associated with sufficient knowledge. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that longer PCOS duration was significantly associated with higher total KAP scores, with 1&ndash;3 years (&beta;=5.678, 95% CI 3.858 to 7.498, p&lt;0.001) and &ge;3 years (&beta;=5.817, 95% CI 3.170 to 8.465, p&lt;0.001) showing substantial positive associations compared with those diagnosed less than 6 months ago.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PCOS patients with acne had inadequate knowledge, active attitude and proactive practice towards disease and self-management. To enhance clinical practice, targeted educational interventions are recommended, specifically addressing the knowledge gaps observed in unemployed individuals and those in the early stages of PCOS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kou, X., Ma, S., Li, X., Pei, D., Zhang, G., Zhang, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103398</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103398</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disease-related and self-management-related knowledge, attitude and practice among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and acne in Hebei, China: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103398</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103398</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103638?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic factors for pain intensity and function in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs): a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103638?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the prognosis and prognostic factors associated with pain intensity and function in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Secondary objectives included identifying prognostic factors related to symptom progression, subsequent treatment needs and psychosocial outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review with meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Medline, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source, SportDiscus and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) were searched up to September 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Prospective longitudinal studies examining prognostic factors for pain intensity or functional outcomes in adults with TMD, with a minimum follow-up of 3 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and assessed full texts for eligibility. Data were extracted in duplicate using a standardised protocol that included study characteristics, prognostic factors and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS (Quality in Prognosis Studies) tool, and the certainty of evidence was graded using a modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Meta-analyses were performed with random-effects models, reporting ORs and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was evaluated using <I>I&sup2;</I> (I-squared) and Tau&sup2; (Tau-squared) statistics. Where pooling was not feasible, findings were synthesised narratively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Nine prospective studies met the inclusion criteria; eight were included in quantitative analyses (n=4282) and one large cohort was synthesised narratively (n=94 769), for a total of 99 051 participants. After standardising definitions, 56 candidate factors were analysed. In adjusted models for pain, pain provoked by movement or palpation was associated with a worse course (eg, joint pain with sound: OR=2.10, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.18; muscle pain during movement: OR=2.10, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.31), while shorter pain duration (OR=0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.70) and greater pain-free mouth opening (OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.90) were protective. For the function outcome, pain intensity was associated with poorer outcomes (OR=1.39, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.69), whereas age, sex, depression, somatisation, disability days and self-efficacy showed no consistent associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In adults with TMD, pain provoked by movement or palpation and higher pain intensity were consistently associated with less favourable prognoses. Conversely, shorter pain duration and greater pain-free opening were associated with better outcomes. These associations are non-causal and based on low to very low certainty evidence amid methodological heterogeneity. While they may inform risk stratification, they should not guide treatment decisions without confirmatory longitudinal studies using standardised outcomes and improved control of confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024557159.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amaral, M., Fukusawa, L., Lourenco, B. M., Campos, M. G. M., El-Hage, Y., Oliveira, V. C., Galace de Freitas, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103638</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103638</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic factors for pain intensity and function in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs): a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103638</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103638</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104039?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dietitians views on the advantages and limitations of online dietary counselling for adults in Malaysia: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104039?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to explore clinical dietitians&rsquo; views on the advantages and limitations of online dietary counselling for adults, as their views are essential for the successful adoption and implementation of teleconsultation methods in chronic disease management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study using 16 semi-structured in-depth interviews and thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Public healthcare institutions across five regions of Malaysia, including the West, North, East, South Peninsular and East Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>16 clinical dietitians were purposively selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirteen were from government hospitals and three from government clinics. All participants were registered and actively involved in providing dietary counselling services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The main advantages of online dietary counselling include improved accessibility to dietetic services, convenience for patients and cost-effectiveness. However, the study also identified several limitations, such as technological challenges, internet connectivity issues and staff shortages. Despite these obstacles, most dietitians offered valuable recommendations for adopting online dietary counselling to enhance its implementation. Based on their insights, they suggested a hybrid model that combines both online and in-person counselling as a more effective approach for managing diseases among adults in the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Most dietitians showed strong support for online dietary counselling, acknowledging its potential to improve accessibility and convenience. However, they also recognised practical challenges and offered valuable recommendations to overcome these barriers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheah, K. J., Razalli, N. H., Mat Ludin, A. F., Abdul Manaf, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104039</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104039</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dietitians views on the advantages and limitations of online dietary counselling for adults in Malaysia: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104039</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104039</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105738?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Communication during out-of-hours primary care contacts for people with a terminal illness: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105738?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To summarise what is known about communication during out-of-hours primary care contacts for people with a terminal illness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews and conducted in accordance with Arksey &amp; O&rsquo;Malley&rsquo;s methodological framework for scoping reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Searches of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE were conducted from inception to 23 July 2024, alongside grey literature searches and hand searching reference lists of relevant reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Sources were eligible if they provided evidence about communication between people with a terminal condition, their families and/or healthcare professionals during contacts with out-of-hours primary care services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data were extracted by two independent researchers following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews. Findings were thematically synthesised to create a narrative account of the evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 1745 records identified, 18 studies were included in the review. Most used qualitative interviews and/or focus groups. Barriers to good communication included a lack of continuity of care, problems relating to remote consultations, the delegitimising of help seeking, and the challenges of conducting specialist palliative care consultations within a generalist out-of-hours system. Facilitators to good communication included the availability of information about patients and families out of hours, an empathetic and confident approach from out-of-hours professionals, and support from colleagues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The scoping review showed that there is limited research focusing specifically on end-of-life communication in out-of-hours primary care settings. Further research is needed, particularly using observations or recordings of real interactions. There are several challenges to communication in this setting, but providing clinicians with access to palliative care summaries, alongside training and support in this specialised communication, can facilitate good end-of-life communication with patients and their families.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson-Kittow, R., Dillon, R., Barnes, R. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105738</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105738</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Communication during out-of-hours primary care contacts for people with a terminal illness: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105738</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105738</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107941?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of restricted prophylactic antibiotic guidelines on surgical site infection rates following spinal surgery in Korea: a nationwide cohort analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107941?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the impact of restrictive prophylactic antibiotic guidelines on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) following elective spinal surgery using nationwide quality assessment data from South Korea.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nationwide retrospective cohort study comparing SSI rates between unrestricted (seventh and eighth quality assessment waves) and restricted (ninth wave) prophylactic antibiotic guideline periods using multivariable logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All healthcare institutions performing elective spinal surgery and participating in the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) quality assessment programme in South Korea.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 58 829 adult patients who underwent elective spinal surgery during the seventh (2015), eighth (2017) and ninth (2020) HIRA quality assessment waves were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the incidence of post-operative SSIs. Secondary outcomes included non-surgical site infections and factors associated with SSI occurrence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall post-operative infection rate was 5.79%. The incidence of SSIs was significantly higher in the restricted antibiotic group than in the unrestricted group (2.41% vs 0.84%). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, restrictive prophylactic antibiotic use was independently associated with an increased risk of SSIs (adjusted OR, 2.48; 95% CI 2.13 to 2.89; p&lt;0.001). When stratified by hospital type, patients treated in tertiary hospitals had the highest SSI risk (adjusted OR, 4.47; 95% CI 3.65 to 5.47), followed by those treated in general hospitals (adjusted OR, 3.03; 95% CI 2.55 to 3.60) (all p&lt;0.001). Non-surgical site infections were also more frequent in the restricted group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Restrictive prophylactic antibiotic guidelines were associated with a higher incidence of post-operative infections following elective spinal surgery. These findings suggest that prophylactic antibiotic strategies may need to consider patient risk profiles and surgical complexity rather than applying a uniform approach.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, Y.-H., Kim, Y., Kim, S., Lee, J.-S., Kim, S.-I., Kim, B.-Y., Park, H.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107941</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107941</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of restricted prophylactic antibiotic guidelines on surgical site infection rates following spinal surgery in Korea: a nationwide cohort analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107941</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107941</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108228?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence and prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in chronic lung disease: insights from a retrospective cohort study using a UK nationwide health database]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108228?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with lung disease (Group 3 PH) is a serious complication that negatively impacts patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the epidemiology and disease burden of Group 3 PH in the UK, focusing on interstitial lung disease (ILD-PH).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Electronic medical records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, linked to Hospital Episode Statistics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>6690 incident cases of Group 3 PH, including 1561 ILD-PH cases, were identified from a sample of approximately 33 million individuals between January 2017 and December 2019.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes included prevalence and incidence of Group 3 PH and ILD-PH. Secondary outcomes included patient characteristics, overall survival, hospitalisations, outpatient visits and healthcare costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over the 3-year period, prevalence and annual incidence were 139/million (95% CI 134 to 142) and 73/million/year (95% CI 70 to 76) for Group 3 PH and 36/million (95% CI 33 to 37.3) and 17/million/year (95% CI 16 to 19) for ILD-PH. Median overall survival was 19.3 (95% CI 17.77 to 20.8) for Group 3 PH and 15.1 months (95% CI 12.66 to 18.2) for ILD-PH. Following a PH diagnosis, all-cause inpatient visits increased by 33.6% from baseline. The all-cause annual hospitalisation rate was 1.63 (95% CI 1.6 to 1.65) for Group 3 PH and 1.36 (95% CI 1.31 to 1.4) for ILD-PH, with about half linked to PH diagnosis. Pulmonologists were the most consulted specialists, averaging 1.78 (95% CI 1.76 to 1.81) and 2.31 (95% CI 2.25 to 2.37) visits per patient per year for Group 3 PH and ILD-PH, respectively. Annual per-patient costs were &pound;7761 (95% CI 7759 to 7762) for Group 3 PH and &pound;7170 (95% CI 7167.17 to 7173.69) for ILD-PH.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Incidence and prevalence of Group 3 PH in the UK are consistent with other European countries. Patients had poor survival, with PH associated with half of hospital admissions, highlighting the negative impact of PH in chronic lung disease.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiely, D. G., Wort, S. J., Funes, D., Fernandez Delgado, M., Petrica, N., Proenca, C., Bacchini Jeanneret, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108228</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108228</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence and prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in chronic lung disease: insights from a retrospective cohort study using a UK nationwide health database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108228</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108623?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prosthetist screening for comorbidity during routine care visits: a randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating benefits, acceptability and feasibility]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108623?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Comorbidity among adults with lower-limb amputation exceeds that in the general population and contributes to poor outcomes. The primary objectives of this clinical trial were to explore benefits, acceptability and feasibility of comorbidity screening by prosthetists during routine follow-up visits. Our primary hypothesis was that when compared with standard-of-care (SOC) follow-up visits, standard-of-care + comorbidity screening (SOC+) would result in greater patient satisfaction and reduced prosthetic care minutes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Randomised controlled clinical trial with mixed-methods approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>Prosthetic clinical practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>70 adults with unilateral lower-limb amputation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants were randomly assigned to receive SOC or SOC+, which included assessment for depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, moderate-to-high risk low back pain, lack of pedal pulses suggestive of peripheral arterial disease and lack of protective sensation suggestive of peripheral neuropathy. Screening results were reviewed with participants and faxed to primary care with telephone follow-ups when indicated. Prosthetists participated in a focus group. Healthcare utilisation over the subsequent 3 months was tracked.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Patient satisfaction surveys and care utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Few adverse events and protocol deviations occurred; intervention fidelity was &gt;95%. There were no significant between-group differences in overall patient satisfaction, prosthetic care utilisation over the subsequent 3 months, nor initial prosthetic care visit length (p&gt;0.050). Item-by-item analysis found participants rated prosthetist responsiveness to concerns higher with SOC+ (p=0.046, r=0.251). Prosthetists identified benefits from screening. Screening prompted positive healthcare seeking behaviours in this vulnerable population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Comorbidity screening by prosthetists appears feasible and acceptable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05410548">NCT05410548</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sions, J. M., Stauffer, S. J., Horne, J. R., Pohlig, R. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108623</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108623</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prosthetist screening for comorbidity during routine care visits: a randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating benefits, acceptability and feasibility]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108623</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108623</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108987?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are self-management skills associated with depressive symptoms, quality of life, and healthcare utilisation? A cross-sectional survey among patients with advanced cancer in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108987?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Patients with advanced cancer are increasingly encouraged to self-manage the medical, psychosocial, and practical consequences of their illness. However, the impact of self-management skills on patient outcomes and healthcare utilisation remains unclear. Therefore, we examined self-management skills among patients with advanced cancer and their associations with depressive symptoms, quality of life, and formal and informal healthcare utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>We embedded a cross-sectional questionnaire study in a Dutch nationwide prospective observational cohort study (eQuiPe study).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>464 patients with advanced cancer (response rate 42.1%). 50% of the participants were women, and the mean age was 66 years (SD = 10).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Self-management skills were assessed using three scales of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Skill and technique acquisition (STA), Self-monitoring and insight (SMI), and Health services navigation (HSN) (range: 1&ndash;4). Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations (adjusting for sociodemographic and medical characteristics) between self-management skills and depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), and healthcare utilisation in the past month (healthcare organisations and disciplines; hospital admissions; emergency care visits; informal care).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mean (SD) scores were 3.0 (0.5) for STA, 3.2 (0.4) for SMI, and 3.4 (0.5) for HSN. Higher scores of self-management skills on all three scales were significantly associated with fewer depressive symptoms (STA: &beta; = &ndash;2.36, 95% CI &ndash;2.98 to &ndash;1.69; SMI: &beta; = &ndash;2.88, 95% CI &ndash;3.64 to &ndash;2.09; HSN: &beta; = &ndash;2.06, 95% CI &ndash;2.76 to &ndash;1.37). Patients with higher levels of STA and SMI reported better quality of life (&beta; = 8.54, 95% CI 5.84 to 11.01 and &beta; = 8.41, 95% CI 4.75 to 11.99, respectively). Regarding healthcare utilisation, only HSN showed a significant association, with higher scores being associated with increased nurse contact (&beta; = 1.65, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.56).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Greater self-management skills were associated with fewer depressive symptoms and improved quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. However, self-management skills were hardly associated with healthcare utilisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Netherlands Trial Register; NTR6584.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bakker, E. M., van Dongen, S., Witkamp, E., Kranenburg, L. W., van der Rijt, C. C. D., Lorig, K., Raijmakers, N., van Roij, J., van der Heide, A., Rietjens, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108987</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108987</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are self-management skills associated with depressive symptoms, quality of life, and healthcare utilisation? A cross-sectional survey among patients with advanced cancer in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108987</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108987</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109747?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk factors for renal stone development in adults with primary hyperparathyroidism: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109747?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is characterised by overactive parathyroid glands and consequent calcium dysregulation. Renal stones (RS) are a recognised complication and are associated with substantial morbidity. However, RS risk factors in PHPT are not well established, and recent international guidelines identify &lsquo;renal stone risk&rsquo; as a research priority. We aim to summarise and meta-analyse evidence on prespecified risk factors for RS in adults with PHPT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols-aligned protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched from inception. Eligible designs include prospective and retrospective cohort, case&ndash;control and cross-sectional studies of adults (&ge;18 years) with PHPT; randomised trials, case reports, commentaries and conference abstracts will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently screen records, extract data and assess risk of bias using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Prespecified risk factors are age, sex, urinary calcium, serum calcium, serum parathyroid hormone and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. We will pool adjusted ORs (primary) and unadjusted estimates (secondary) using random-effects models, assess heterogeneity with the <I>I&sup2;</I> statistic and rate certainty with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Publication bias will be explored when &ge;10 studies are available. Literature searches will be updated prior to analyses to ensure currency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required as only published data will be used. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024608180.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay, M., Andrei, S., Hoang, P., Samhat, H., Fu, R., Jones, R., Lipscombe, L. L., Eskander, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109747</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109747</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk factors for renal stone development in adults with primary hyperparathyroidism: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109747</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109747</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112430?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multidomain evaluation and data-driven approaches to predict recurrent neck pain (END-RNP): a study protocol for a multicentre prospective longitudinal cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112430?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Neck pain (NP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and affects more than 200 million people. Incidence and associated economic burden are constantly increasing, and little is known about the factors that promote new and more severe episodes in those individuals with recurrent NP. Current evidence supports that changes in physical, psychological and social factors persist between NP episodes, and these changes might contribute to the development of new episodes. The End Recurrent Neck Pain (END-RNP) study aims to use physical, psychological and social factors tested while in symptom remission to predict, within a 12-month period, the frequency and severity of new NP episodes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The END-RNP study is a multicentre, prospective cohort study conducted from March 2025 to February 2028 at the University of Birmingham and the University of Essex (UK). 300 adults reporting two or more NP episodes in the previous year will be recruited from September 2025 to form the recurrent NP cohort, and 48 adults without a history of NP will provide normative data. Laboratory testing will be conducted for all participants when pain-free by assessing cervical kinematics and proprioception, neck-muscle strength, endurance and activation, pain processing, psychological and social factors. All recurrent NP participants will complete online questionnaires every 2 weeks for 12 months, recording days with NP, pain intensity/interference, healthcare use and other behavioural and environmental factors. Participants in the recurrent NP cohort who experience an acute NP episode during the 12-month follow-up will repeat the laboratory assessment. To develop the prediction models, candidate predictors will be the baseline measurements of any feature that shows either cross-sectional differences between recurrent NP and control groups or within-subject changes between the pain-free baseline and a pain episode. From the identified candidate predictors, two multivariable models will be developed using penalised regression, with (i) number of days with NP (linear regression) and (ii) NP severity (ordinal regression) as their respective dependent variables. Internal validation will use bootstrap resampling to estimate optimism-adjusted performance (R<sup>2</sup>, C-statistic and calibration slope), prediction instability and uncertainty, and clinical utility. The models from the END-RNP study will provide clinical prediction tools to help identify those at high risk of frequent and severe NP episodes and to inform the personalised prevention of recurrent NP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The END-RNP study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the University of Birmingham (ERN_4005-Aug2025) and by the University of Essex (ETH2526-0098) on 2 September 2025, prior to the recruitment of the first participant. The findings will be presented at national and international conferences and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devecchi, V., Liew, B., Price, J., Snell, K., Riley, R., Falla, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112430</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112430</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multidomain evaluation and data-driven approaches to predict recurrent neck pain (END-RNP): a study protocol for a multicentre prospective longitudinal cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112430</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112430</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112552?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: design and respondent characteristics for the longitudinal Survey of Trauma, Resilience and Opportunity Among Neighbourhoods in the Gulf (STRONG) cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112552?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Survey of Trauma, Resilience and Opportunity among Neighbourhoods in the Gulf (STRONG) is a longitudinal study assessing disaster exposures and outcomes of adults living along the US Gulf Coast. Initially conceived to examine effects of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, five follow-up surveys have explored impacts of hurricanes and COVID-19.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 2520 adults completed the baseline survey in 2016. Compared with the region, survey respondents were older, more likely to be female and less likely to be Hispanic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>As a longitudinal disaster cohort, STRONG provides a unique opportunity to examine disaster impacts. Research using STRONG data has explored how a wide range of disaster exposures are associated with behavioural health. Consistent with other disaster research, analyses with STRONG data suggest that resource loss is linked with worse behavioural health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harding, A. B., Parker, A. M., Parks, V., Seelam, R., Atshan, S., Dormanesh, A., Becker, K., Ghosh Dastidar, B., Ramchand, R., Finucane, M. L., Slack, T., Waldron-Moore, P. N., Ayer, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112552</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112552</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: design and respondent characteristics for the longitudinal Survey of Trauma, Resilience and Opportunity Among Neighbourhoods in the Gulf (STRONG) cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112552</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112552</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112826?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of bumetanide for cognitive improvement in children and adolescents with Down syndrome: study protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112826?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Down syndrome (DS) is a major cause of genetically defined intellectual disability, characterised by low IQ and cognitive deficits. Among the neurobiological causes of these deficits, disruptions in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic signalling in the hippocampus and an excitation/inhibition imbalance are thought to impair learning and memory. Evidence suggests that GABA<SUB>A</SUB> receptor-mediated signalling in DS is significantly depolarising and potentially excitatory rather than predominantly hyperpolarising and inhibitory, and is accompanied by increased hippocampal expression of the cation-chloride cotransporter NKCC1. The treatment with the NKCC1 inhibitor bumetanide restored GABAergic signals, synaptic plasticity, hippocampus-dependent memory and sleep quality in adult DS mice. We hypothesise that the use of bumetanide, by re-establishing GABAergic signals, may improve memory, learning and psychological characteristics in children and adolescents with DS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The present study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month treatment with the drug bumetanide (0.02 mg/kg two times per day or placebo) on memory and psychological functioning in children and adolescents with DS. We also aim to identify possible predictors and biological and genetic markers related to treatment.</p>
<p>The target recruitment is 64 children and adolescents with DS (aged 10&ndash;17 years). Seven visits are scheduled for each participant, during which outcome and safety measures are assessed through various clinical and instrumental investigations.</p>
<p>Outcome measures include neuropsychological and psychological assessments, as well as biomarkers. Neuropsychological measures consist of tests evaluating cognitive level, memory and executive functions. Psychological measures include parent-reported questionnaires on psychopathological and behavioural symptoms, quality of life, sleep and adaptive functioning. Biomarkers encompass electroencephalogram (EEG) and genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic evaluations from blood and urine samples.</p>
<p>Safety measures include physical, nephrological, cardiological and audiometric evaluations, as well as blood and urine analysis, EEG, ECG and a pregnancy test (if applicable). Neuropsychological, psychological, biomarker and safety measures are collected at baseline (visit 1 (V1)), at the end of treatment (V6) and during follow-up (V7), which is scheduled for 2 months after the end of treatment. Interim psychological and safety assessments are conducted at 1 week (V2), 2 weeks (V3), 1 month (V4) and 2 months (V5) after the start of treatment. We expect bumetanide treatment to improve visual long-term memory skills (primary outcome). Additionally, we expect improvements in total scores and subdomain scores across other visual, verbal and spatial long-term memory tasks, as well as executive functions, psychopathological measures, adaptive functioning, sleep quality and quality of life scores (secondary outcomes). Furthermore, we expect potential differences in genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic profiles between patients who respond to therapy and those who do not.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Bambino Ges&ugrave; Children&rsquo;s Hospital Ethics Committee (process number 1042_OPBG_2016) and the Italian Medicines Agency. Substantial Amendment No 5 (ES5) was approved on 20 September 2023 by the Italian National Paediatric Ethics Committee and involved a revision and integration of the study protocol, now updated to version 8.1, in line with the recommendations of the Data Safety Monitoring Board.</p>
<p>This study is being conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The present study protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines and was prepared using the SPIRIT 2025 Checklist. In accordance with Good Clinical Practice, written informed consent is obtained from all participants&rsquo; parents or caregivers, and assent is obtained from participants when possible. The main features of the study will be presented at both international and national conferences, during scientific meetings, in presentations to families and on social media using documentation approved by competent authorities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>The study was prospectively registered in the EudraCT portal on 16 August 2016, prior to the enrolment of the first participant on 11 January 2023 (<A HREF="https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2015-005780-16/IT">https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2015-005780-16/IT</inter-ref>). In accordance with Regulation (EU) 536/2014 for pharmacological interventional trials, the study was subsequently transitioned to the Clinical Trials Information System (EU CT No 2024-519342-71-00), with the initial record entered on 23 December 2024, and the transition authorised on 3 February 2025 (<inter-ref locator="https://euclinicaltrials.eu/search-for-clinical-trials/?lang=en&amp;EUCT=2024-519342-71-00" locator-type="url">https://euclinicaltrials.eu/search-for-clinical-trials/?lang=en&amp;EUCT=2024-519342-71-00</A>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>EudraCT 2015-005780-16.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costanzo, F., Mongiovi, V. M., Alfieri, P., Pontrelli, G., Abbate, S., De Palma, L., Chinali, M., Massella, L., Scorpecci, A., Rocchi, F., Fuca, E., Averna, R., Rava, L., Rossetti, S., Franco, L., Contestabile, A., Cancedda, L., Vicari, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112826</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112826</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of bumetanide for cognitive improvement in children and adolescents with Down syndrome: study protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112826</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112826</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a structured breathing-based intervention to reduce burnout and enhance mental well-being among healthcare professionals in community-based practice settings: study protocol for a single-arm pilot feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Burnout among healthcare professionals remains a critical public health issue linked to impaired cognition, emotional exhaustion and diminished clinical performance. Structured breathing practices have demonstrated promise in improving autonomic regulation and cerebral oxygenation, yet their feasibility, acceptability and implementation in real-world healthcare settings remain underexplored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This single-arm pilot feasibility trial aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and implementation appropriateness of a structured breathing-based intervention for healthcare professionals across community-based Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) sites. Secondary objectives include assessing usability and engagement with the mobile breathing platform, while exploratory analyses will describe magnitude of variability and feasibility of collecting psychological and cerebral haemodynamic measures. This study will commence in November 2025 and is expected to be completed by June 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A total of 40 clinicians (MD/DO/MBBS/PA) and nurses reporting moderate or greater burnout will be enrolled across four MCHS sites. Participants will complete a 4-month structured breathing programme delivered primarily online, supported by a mobile application for practice tracking. Assessments will occur at baseline, 2 months and 4 months, with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measures of cerebral oxygenation collected at baseline and 4 months in a population subset. Primary outcomes include (1) recruitment yield, retention and adherence rates; (2) acceptability and participant satisfaction (survey and qualitative feedback); and (3) implementation appropriateness measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Secondary outcomes include digital engagement and usability through mobile analytics and the System Usability Scale. Exploratory outcomes are psychological indicators (burnout, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, sleep, fatigue, professional fulfilment and resilience) and physiological endpoints (fNIRS). Analyses will be descriptive, summarising feasibility metrics with 95% CIs. Progression criteria (recruitment&ge;75%, retention&ge;80%, adherence&ge;70%, AIM/IAM/FIM&ge;4.0) will determine readiness for a definitive hybrid effectiveness&ndash;implementation trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB # 25-009320). All participants will provide informed consent. Study procedures ensure confidentiality, cultural sensitivity and participant safety. Data will be securely stored in REDCap and disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07218458">NCT07218458</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharma, P., Osman, R., Nycklemoe, M., Boos, D. M., Murphy, C. M., Flock, C., Jacobson, D. N., Lim, S., Nation, J. L., Wilson, M. A., Schuldt, K., Min, P. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113105</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113105</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a structured breathing-based intervention to reduce burnout and enhance mental well-being among healthcare professionals in community-based practice settings: study protocol for a single-arm pilot feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113105</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113212?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of quality routine health data utilisation on health service delivery outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113212?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Evidence-based decision-making in healthcare relies heavily on routine health information. However, in many low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), concerns persist regarding the use of quality routine health data for health service delivery. Moreover, no systematic synthesis currently exists on how the use of quality data influences health service delivery in these settings. This systematic review aims to address this gap by consolidating existing evidence on the utilisation of quality routine health data and its impact on health service delivery in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework for identification, screening and reporting of studies. We will develope our keywords and search strategy using a public involvement approach, generative artificial intelligence (AI) and a combination of keywords and Boolean operators in relevant databases. Studies will be retrieved from CENTRAL, PubMed, Science Citation Index and Scopus. The review will include studies that were published from 2000 to 2025 and that determined the impact of quality routine health data utilisation on health service delivery. It will include both experimental and observational study designs. Two independent authors will screen all titles, abstracts and full-text data. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements that may arise between the two reviewers. The primary outcome of interest is the impact of the use of quality routine health data on health service delivery. Assessment of risk of bias of all relevant studies will be evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses tool. The narrative synthesis approach and thematic analysis will be employed for the review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No institutional ethics approval will be obtained for this study. However, during the review process, only articles published in peer-reviewed journals/databases will be included in this review. Further, all studies to be included in the review should have obtained ethical approval from relevant institutional review boards. The findings from the systematic review will be disseminated through technical reports, conferences, academic publications, LinkedIn and all relevant platforms available to the researchers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251131622.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Addo, P., Bour, H., Akanbonga, S., Amu, H., Amon, S., Agula, C., Frempong, C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113212</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113212</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of quality routine health data utilisation on health service delivery outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113455?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation for muscle health in community-dwelling older adults at high risk of sarcopenia: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113455?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sarcopenia imposes a substantial burden on society, while omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) supplementation holds the potential for preventing and treating this condition. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of three different n-3 PUFA supplementation regimens compared with each other and to corn oil placebo intervention on muscle health in community-dwelling older adults at high risk of sarcopenia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A total of 400 community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older, with handgrip strength &lt;28 kg (men) or &lt;18 kg (women), will be recruited for this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) to one of four groups for 6 months: (1) the high eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) group, (2) the high docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) group, (3) the high sn2-DHA group, (4) the corn oil control group. All intervention products will be packaged as capsules and administered at a daily dose of 2.5 g. The primary outcome is the change in handgrip strength. Secondary outcomes include changes in skeletal muscle mass, physical function, inflammation- and metabolism-related blood biomarkers and gut microbiota diversity.A</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ruijin Hospital Ethics Committee. Trial findings will be disseminated via publications in international peer-reviewed journals and presentations at relevant academic conferences. Study results will be made available to participants and the public on study completion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500110506.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Z., Jiang, Y., Su, S., Wang, L., Bian, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T05:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113455</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113455</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation for muscle health in community-dwelling older adults at high risk of sarcopenia: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113455</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113455</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095089?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of combined intense pulsed light (IPL) and low-level light therapy (LLLT) in preventing laser corneal refractive surgery-induced dry eye: the Treat Eye Before Laser induced Dry (TEBeLiD) study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095089?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Laser corneal refractive surgery is a widely adopted approach for correcting refractive errors, but postoperative dry eye remains a common side effect. Intense pulsed light (IPL) and low-level light therapy (LLLT) are two emerging treatments that have shown potential in managing dry eye disease. However, their role as a prophylactic treatment in patients without pre-existing symptomatic dry eye undergoing refractive surgery has not been explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-blind, randomised controlled trial comparing the prophylactic efficacy of combined IPL and LLLT treatment versus standard care in preventing dry eye after laser corneal refractive surgery (FS-LASIK, SMILE or PRK). Eligible patients aged 18 or older scheduled for surgery will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the treatment or control group. The primary endpoint is the French version of Ocular Surface Disease Index score at 1 month postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include Fluorescein Break-Up Time, Schirmer I test, Oxford score and Meibomian Gland Dropout. Data will be analysed using a mixed-effects linear model adjusted for surgery type and baseline dry eye parameters. The study started in June 2023 and end in April 2025 but data have not been yet analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board Est III, France, and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05803798). All participants will provide written informed consent. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05803798">NCT05803798</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerkouri, S., Garcin, T., Cochener, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095089</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095089</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of combined intense pulsed light (IPL) and low-level light therapy (LLLT) in preventing laser corneal refractive surgery-induced dry eye: the Treat Eye Before Laser induced Dry (TEBeLiD) study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095089</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095089</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099489?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic impact of tumour deposits across N stages in stage III colon cancer: development and validation of a novel N staging system using the SEER database and a Chinese single-centre cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099489?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the prognostic significance of tumour deposit (TD) across different N stages in patients with stage III colon cancer and to develop and validate a novel N staging system that incorporates TD count to improve prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study based on population-based data and external validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary and tertiary care settings; data from the SEER database, a population-based cancer registry capturing cancer incidence and survival information (USA, 2010&ndash;2017); and a single-centre validation cohort from South China (2015&ndash;2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 8739 stage III colon cancer patients from the SEER database who underwent curative surgery were included; 1335 (15.3%) had TD. Patients with &lt;12 examined lymph nodes and those who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. An independent external validation cohort included 326 patients from Guangdong Provincial People&rsquo;s Hospital. Selection criteria were consistent with the SEER cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The outcome was cancer-specific survival (CSS). The prognostic impact of tumour deposit (TD) and the comparative performance of the novel N staging system versus the AJCC system were evaluated using the Fine-Gray competing risks model, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>TD was independently associated with poorer CSS: 1 TD (SHR=1.23, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.47, p=0.017), 2&ndash;3 TDs (SHR=1.36, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.58, p&lt;0.001) and &gt;3 TDs (SHR=2.02, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.35, p&lt;0.001). The adverse effect of TD was more pronounced in N1 compared with N2 patients. Based on these findings and the work of Mayo <I>et al</I>, TDs were converted to metastatic lymph nodes (mLNs) using the following weighting: 1 TD=3 mLNs (N1c), 1 TD=2 mLNs (N1) and 1 TD=1 mLN (N2). The novel N staging system stratified patients as nN1a (1 nLN), nN1b (2&ndash;3 nLNs), nN2a (4&ndash;6 nLNs) and nN2b (&ge;7 nLNs). This approach showed improved prognostic accuracy compared with AJCC N staging: 3-year AUC (0.623 vs 0.614) and Brier score (0.151 vs 0.157, p&lt;0.001). A similar performance was observed in the external validation cohort: 3-year AUC=0.709 and 5-year AUC=0.684.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>TD significantly worsens prognosis in stage III colon cancer, particularly in lower N stages. Incorporating TD counts into the N staging system with different weightings based on N stage enhances prognostic accuracy and risk stratification within stage III disease, particularly for the heterogeneous AJC N1c category. This novel staging system provides better prognostic value and more accurate treatment guidance and should be considered for broader clinical use, subject to further (eg, prospective) validation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lam, W., Yang, Z., Lyu, Z., Lin, G., Wu, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099489</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099489</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic impact of tumour deposits across N stages in stage III colon cancer: development and validation of a novel N staging system using the SEER database and a Chinese single-centre cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099489</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099489</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100282?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lack of association between the brain penetrance of calcium channel blockers and the incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes: a retrospective, multidatabase cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100282?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To use best practices in pharmacoepidemiology to assess the association between new use of brain-penetrant calcium channel blockers (BP-CCBs) compared with use of non-brain-penetrant CCBs (NP-CCBs) and the incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective comparative cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary data from nine claims and electronic health record databases from across the globe were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>First use of a CCB was the index date. There were 1.2 million BP-CCB patients and 9.3 million NP-CCB patients identified across all databases, with 881 758 matched in each group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Patients were categorised as either initiating BP-CCBs or NP-CCBs. On-treatment and intention-to-treat analyses were conducted. Large-scale propensity models were used to match cohorts and control for observed confounding. Cox models were used to analyse the time to incident neuropsychiatric disorders. Negative control outcomes were used to calibrate estimates, CIs and p values to account for residual confounding. Diagnostics were used to assess the validity of the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The time to first diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder was assessed independently. HRs compared the BP-CCB group to the NP-CCB group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For the outcome of incident MDD in the intention-to-treat design, the meta-analytic HR (95% CI) was 1.02 (0.97, 1.08). Meta-analytic HRs for bipolar disorder (1.04 (0.96, 1.13)), schizophrenia (1.05 (0.94, 1.18)) and schizoaffective disorder (1.04 (0.87, 1.23)) showed similar null effects. The on-treatment analysis was largely consistent: MDD (1.01 (0.96, 1.06)), bipolar (1.05 (0.86, 1.27)), schizophrenia (1.09 (0.87, 1.38)) and schizoaffective (1.00 (0.71, 1.40)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There was no evidence of an association with any of the neuropsychiatric conditions of interest between use of BP-CCB and NP-CCB. This does not rule out the potential beneficial effect of CCB formulations and doses targeted specifically for the brain rather than the cardiovascular system.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kern, D. M., Bohn, J., Maher, M. P., Dymshyts, D., Shoaibi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100282</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100282</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lack of association between the brain penetrance of calcium channel blockers and the incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes: a retrospective, multidatabase cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100282</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100282</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101697?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicentre, open-label, prospective, parallel-controlled study protocol evaluating the effects of amino acid peritoneal dialysis solution on nutritional status in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101697?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a widely used renal replacement therapy for chronic kidney disease patients, yet malnutrition remains a common complication linked to poor outcomes. Nearly 40% of PD patients in China are malnourished, with serum albumin levels below 35 g/L. Amino acid-based peritoneal dialysis solutions (AA-PDS), which replace glucose with amino acids as the osmotic agent, have been used globally for decades to improve nutrition and reduce peritoneal damage, but they were introduced to mainland China only in 2022. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AA-PDS in improving nutritional status and clinical outcomes among malnourished PD patients in mainland China, providing a potential new therapeutic option for this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, open-label, prospective, parallel-controlled study will enrol patients with end-stage kidney disease who were stable on PD for more than 3 months. A total of 500 eligible patients will be divided into the intervention group undergoing PD once every morning using 2.0 L of amino acid (15) PD solution and the control group using conventional PD solution (lactate) in a 4:1 ratio based on their willingness and clinical needs. Our primary outcome is serum albumin, while other nutritional indicators, including serum prealbumin, serum transferrin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ultrafiltration volumes are considered secondary outcomes. Information such as demographics, clinical and biochemical characteristics, examination indicators, anthropometry measurements and Subjective Global Assessment scores will be collected at baseline, 1 month, 3 month and 6 month follow-up. Statistical analysis will be conducted using SAS V.9.4 or higher versions. All statistical tests are conducted through the two-tailed test, and a p value&le;0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The description of quantitative indicators will be used in calculating the number of cases, mean, SD, median and IQR method. The classification indicators will be used to describe the number of cases and percentages (frequency and frequency rate).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This multicentre study obtained ethical approval from the lead ethics committee at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (approval no.: 2024-KLS-379-02). Additionally, each participating site provided local ethical approval or a formal waiver, as required by their institutional policies. The results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal and a relevant academic conference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trail registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400090896.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, J., Jiang, W., Zhang, X., Shi, J., Ai, L., Xia, C., Lin, F., Xiang, X., He, Q., Chen, H., Hu, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101697</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101697</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicentre, open-label, prospective, parallel-controlled study protocol evaluating the effects of amino acid peritoneal dialysis solution on nutritional status in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101697</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101697</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101868?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dairy intake in relation to metabolic health status, serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and adropin: a cross-sectional study on Iranian adults]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101868?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Findings of previous studies on associations between dairy consumption and metabolic health status were inconsistent. This study aimed to assess the link between consumption of dairy foods and metabolic health status, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and adropin levels in adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>An observational study in Isfahan, Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults (n=527) selected by multistage cluster random sampling. Dietary intakes were assessed via a validated 168-item food frequency questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Anthropometric indices, blood pressure and biochemical parameters were assessed. The criteria proposed by Wildman <I>et al</I> were used to categorise participants into metabolically healthy and metabolically unhealthy (MU).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants had a mean age of 42.66 years (45.7% women). Moderate consumption of total dairy was, respectively, linked to 58% lower odds of MU (OR <SUB>T2 vs T1</SUB>=0.42; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96), after taking all confounders into account. Participants in the middle versus low tertile of low-fat dairy intake showed 51% marginally lower odds of MU (OR <SUB>T2 vs T1</SUB>=0.49; 95% CI 0.22 to 1.08; p=0.08). No significant association was discovered between high-fat dairy intake and MU chance. However, higher total dairy intake was associated with lower odds of hypertension (OR <SUB>T3 vs T1</SUB>=0.36; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.93). No significant associations were observed between dairy intake and BDNF or adropin levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Moderate consumption of total and low-fat dairy was associated with lower odds of being metabolically unhealthy in Iranian adults, but high-fat dairy intake was not. Hypertension was less common among individuals with higher dairy intake. No association was found between dairy intake and serum levels of BDNF or adropin.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moradmand, Z., Amani Tirani, S., Shahdadian, F., Hajhashemy, Z., Rouhani, P., Saneei, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101868</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101868</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dairy intake in relation to metabolic health status, serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and adropin: a cross-sectional study on Iranian adults]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101868</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101868</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102932?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interventions to improve functionality among paediatric patients with oncological diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102932?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cancer is the leading cause of death and morbidity among children and adolescents worldwide. Functionality-based interventions are relevant among children and adolescents with an oncological diagnosis, whence studies summarising evidence on this topic are needed. This systematic review will summarise evidence on the effect of interventions to improve functionality indicators among paediatric patients diagnosed with cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-Protocols reporting guidelines. The systematic review will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA 2020. Studies will be searched in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, LILACS and PEDro. Additional searches will include Google Scholar, reference lists of included studies, relevant reviews and trial registries. Studies will be included if they implement a functionality-based intervention. They must evaluate effects among paediatric patients with an oncological diagnosis. Secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life. There will be no limits to language or year of publication, and articles published in peer-reviewed journals will be accepted. Only randomised controlled trials will be included. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2. Two independent reviewers will select studies, extract data and assess risk of bias. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis will be conducted if studies are clinically and methodologically homogeneous. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed using Higgins&rsquo; inconsistency test (I<sup>&sup2;</sup>). Meta-analysis may estimate combined effects using random-effects and the inverse variance method. The R statistical software will be used. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study used data from previously published studies, thus waiving submission to an Ethics Committee. Scientific dissemination strategies will include publication in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and workshops for the public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024462833.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holanda, K. M., Vivas Costa, J., Pereira, W. M. G., Barbosa, A. S., Martinez-Silveira, M., Garcia-Hermoso, A., Guerra, P. H., Bezerra, I. N., Barbosa Filho, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102932</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102932</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interventions to improve functionality among paediatric patients with oncological diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102932</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102932</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103971?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Symptomatic changes and influencing factors following manipulation under anaesthesia in patients with adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: a protocol for a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103971?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder is a common shoulder disease. With the ageing population, the incidence of adhesive capsulitis has been rising year by year, posing a significant threat to the quality of life of middle-aged and elderly individuals. As one of the main means of treating adhesive capsulitis, manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) can achieve good clinical results while maintaining high economic benefits. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic factors and the longitudinal recovery trajectory of patients, so as to provide a basis for the precise treatment of MUA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study is a longitudinal prospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up. A trajectory analysis model (latent growth curve modelling) will be used to observe the recovery changes of adhesive capsulitis patients. Linear mixed-effects models will be employed to analyse the prognostic factors of adhesive capsulitis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (approval number: 2025-1707-047-02), following ethical guidelines and standard reporting practices. The research findings will be disseminated through presentations at both regional and global medical conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500100645.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Y., Pang, J., Shi, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103971</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103971</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Symptomatic changes and influencing factors following manipulation under anaesthesia in patients with adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: a protocol for a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103971</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103971</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104198?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relationship between the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and cardiovascular adverse outcomes in the Beijing community population: a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104198?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the correlation between the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the Beijing community population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Beijing, China, from May 2014 to December 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Recruited from a survey conducted as part of an ongoing atherosclerosis cohort study in the communities of Gucheng and Pingguoyuan, Shijingshan District in Beijing, China. Excluded participants who already had a history of stroke or myocardial infarction at baseline. Finally, 3627 eligible participants were included in this analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Exposure</st>
<p>The participants were divided into three groups on the basis of baseline UACR: the normal group (UACR&lt;30 mg/g), the microalbuminuria group (30 mg/g&le;UACR&lt;300 mg/g) and the dominant proteinuria group (UACR&ge;300 mg/g).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint (major adverse cardiovascular event, MACE) of cardiovascular death, first acute myocardial infarction or first stroke, whereas secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, first acute myocardial infarction, first stroke or all-cause death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study included 3627 participants. According to the multivariable Cox model, compared with those in the normal group, the risks of MACE (HR=1.47; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.06; p=0.023), cardiovascular death (HR=3.03; 95% CI 1.56 to 5.88; p=0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR=1.91; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.97; p=0.004) were significantly greater in the microalbuminuria group. The risk of MACE (HR=3.65; 95% CI 2.14 to 6.23; p&lt;0.001), cardiovascular death (HR=7.91; 95% CI 2.92 to 21.43; p&lt;0.001), stroke (HR=2.57; 95% CI 1.30 to 5.08; p=0.007) and all-cause death (HR=3.59; 95% CI 1.63 to 7.89; p=0.001) in the group with dominant proteinuria was significantly greater than that in the normal group. The absolute risk differences (per 1000 person-years) for MACE were 14.86 (95% CI 7.20 to 22.51) in the microalbuminuria group and 64.85 (95% CI 26.76 to 102.94) in the dominant proteinuria group, compared with the normal group (incidence rates: 25.24 and 75.23 vs 10.38, respectively). In populations with a UACR less than 30 mg/g, there was a significant increase in the risk of MACE as the UACR increased (HR=1.02; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04; p=0.036).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study indicates that an elevated UACR is a significant risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes within the community population. This association remains consistent in individuals with low-grade albuminuria.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, S., Jia, J., Huo, Y., Fan, F., Zhang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104198</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104198</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relationship between the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and cardiovascular adverse outcomes in the Beijing community population: a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104198</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104570?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acceptability and adoption of a multiparameter point-of-care testing (POCT) device in primary healthcare for non-communicable diseases in resourced-limited communities in Peru]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104570?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the acceptability and adoption of multiparameter point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for the diagnosis and management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at the primary healthcare level in a resource-limited region of Peru.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative case-control process evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Eight primary healthcare facilities in northern Peru, including both urban and rural centres, where routine chronic care and laboratory services are provided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Sixty-three participants: 36 patients, 12 laboratory technicians, 10 healthcare professionals and five facility heads. Eligible patients were &ge;18 years, residing in the catchment area, with or without prior NCD diagnoses. Healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, laboratory staff and facility managers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Multiparameter POCT devices were installed in four intervention facilities, accompanied by staff training and community awareness activities, while four control facilities continued with conventional laboratory diagnostics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome: perceptions of patients and healthcare workers regarding the acceptability and adoption of POCT devices. Secondary outcomes: identification of facilitators and barriers to implementation, including infrastructure, supply chains and training gaps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>(1) Individuals: POCT was valued for speed and comfort, but concerns over accuracy were mentioned. (2) Intervention characteristics: laboratory staff valued POCT&rsquo;s practicality in emergencies, but noted limitations in handling multiple samples. (3) Outer setting: urban centres outperformed rural facilities, with more staff and longer operating hours. (4) Inner setting: calibration gaps impacted POCT and conventional test reliability, requiring quality control and training. (5) Process: clear staff communication boosted patient confidence in POCT, but inconsistent training could lead to reliability doubts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Multiparameter POCT devices show promise for enhancing NCD care in resource-limited primary healthcare settings, particularly in rural areas. However, their sustainability depends on broader health system reforms, including reliable supply chains, expanded training and stronger quality assurance mechanisms. Further research should examine strategies for embedding POCT within national regulatory and policy frameworks.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huayanay-Espinoza, C. A., Moran, D., Albitres-Flores, L., Bernabe-Ortiz, A., Cahuana-Hurtado, L., Vetter, B., Safary, E., Lazo-Porras, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104570</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104570</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acceptability and adoption of a multiparameter point-of-care testing (POCT) device in primary healthcare for non-communicable diseases in resourced-limited communities in Peru]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104570</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104570</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106677?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing communication with bereaved relatives about emergency and critical care trials (ENHANCE): a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106677?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Clinical research in emergency and critical care is vital, but recruitment and consent are complex. Research may be conducted without prior consent when patients are critically ill, and interventions are time critical. Some patients may die before research participation can be discussed with relatives, leaving the bereaved unaware of their involvement. This study explored potential communication strategies for informing bereaved relatives when a patient has died following enrolment into an emergency or critical care study without prior consent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>A mixed-methods study using a telephone survey and semi-structured interviews conducted simultaneously. The survey was conducted within a National Health Service Trust in North West England with relatives of deceased study participants. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with bereaved relatives and research and clinical staff across the UK, and medical examiner (ME)/ME officers based in England and Wales. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Data were synthesised using a constant comparison approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>11 bereaved relatives completed the survey. 53 individuals (21 research and clinical staff, 18 relatives and 14 MEs/officers) participated in semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Although many trials do not include a process for notifying bereaved relatives about research participation, most relatives valued the opportunity to learn about their family member&rsquo;s participation, emphasising the importance of transparency and trust. However, some raised concerns over the potential burden of automatic disclosure by the ME service. Offering bereaved relatives the option to receive sensitively worded information about research involvement at an appropriate time, soon after death, was recommended.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Bereaved relatives should have the choice to be informed about research participation without prior consent. Our findings support the need for transparent and sensitive communication and will contribute to future guidance for the design and conduct of adult emergency and critical care studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doughty, H., Deja, E., Young, B., Welters, I., Shepherd, V., Milosevic, S., OHara, K., Carman, J., Sankar, V., Thomas-Jones, E., Euden, J., Woolfall, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106677</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106677</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing communication with bereaved relatives about emergency and critical care trials (ENHANCE): a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106677</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106677</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107743?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disparities in adverse event perception between patients and healthcare providers in gynaecologic anticancer therapy: results from an observational web-based study in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107743?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore patients&rsquo; perceptions of managing adverse events (AEs) from anticancer drugs for gynaecological cancer, focusing on AEs they want to avoid, views on dose adjustments and communication with healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational study using a web-based questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Women in Japan who had received chemotherapy for endometrial or ovarian/fallopian tube cancer were enrolled. Healthcare professionals, including obstetrics and gynaecology physicians, nurses and pharmacists, who administered chemotherapy to these patients, were also enrolled.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>AEs that patients wished to avoid or found distressing; varied perceptions of AEs before and after treatment; discrepancies in the communication of AEs between patients and healthcare professionals; administration time and intervals between hospital visits patients found distressing; patient awareness of dose adjustment (reduction, interruption or discontinuation) to suppress AEs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants comprised 153 physicians, 166 nurses, 154 pharmacists and 154 patients. Nausea/vomiting (28.6%), alopecia (18.2%) and peripheral neuropathy (9.1%) were the most distressing AEs overall. Physicians rated nausea/vomiting lower (15.4%) and alopecia higher (38.2%) than patients, while pharmacists emphasised peripheral neuropathy (25.7%). Many patients found AEs, including peripheral neuropathy (53/99), fatigue (52/105) and alopecia (46/120), to be more severe than expected. Communication patterns revealed that 49.4% of patients reported all symptoms, even uncertain ones, but younger patients tended to communicate fewer symptoms. Physicians (54.2%), nurses (92.2%) and pharmacists (85.7%) preferred full disclosure of symptoms. While 28.6% of patients wished to avoid dose reductions because of fears of disease progression, 18.2% preferred dose reduction or discontinuation when AEs became intolerable. Drug administration times and visit intervals influenced patient distress. Treatment administration of over 3 hours (19.5%) and visits occurring more frequently than once every 3 weeks (27.3%) were the most distressing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study highlights discrepancies in AE perceptions and communication between patients and healthcare professionals, emphasising the need for tailored communication strategies and shared decision-making to improve cancer treatment experiences and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>jRCT1040220088, Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hashimoto, H., Soejima, A., Nishimura, Y., Ike, A., Sugawara, M., Shimada, M., Abe, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107743</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107743</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disparities in adverse event perception between patients and healthcare providers in gynaecologic anticancer therapy: results from an observational web-based study in Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107743</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107743</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108188?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors associated with low levels of resilience among French university students during COVID-19 lockdown: results of the cross-sectional PIMS-CoV19 survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108188?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify the factors associated with low psychological resilience among university students in the Grand Est region of France at the end of the first national COVID-19 lockdown.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted (May 2020) among students at the University of Lorraine using the LimeSurvey platform and institutional mailing lists.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Higher education setting in north-eastern France, involving students from the University of Lorraine (multicampus public university) and Sciences Po Nancy, a political science institute in the same region.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 3708 students fully completed the online questionnaire, including the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), resulting in an estimated response rate of 7.1%. All students enrolled at the University of Lorraine and Sciences Po Nancy during the 2019&ndash;2020 academic year were eligible to participate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was psychological resilience, measured using the BRS. Secondary measures included perceived social support assessed with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, quality of interpersonal relationships evaluated using the Quality of Interpersonal Relationships Scale (&Eacute;chelle de la Qualit&eacute; des Relations Interpersonnelles, EQRI) and frequency of positive and negative thoughts measured with the Thermometer of Thoughts Tool. Factors associated with low resilience were analysed using bivariable and multivariable logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 3708 students included in the sample, corresponding to a response rate of approximately 7.1%, 50.6% had normal resilience, while 37.3% reported low resilience. Female gender (OR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.8 to 2.6) and low social support (OR=1.7, 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.6) were the factors associated most strongly with low resilience. Negative thoughts (OR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.4 to 1.5), lower quality of relationships with people in general (OR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.3 to 1.8) and studying arts, humanities or languages (OR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.8) were identified as factors associated with low resilience. Increased age (OR=0.9, 95% CI: 0.9 to 1.0) and flat sharing (OR=0.6, 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.9) were inversely associated with low resilience levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Resilience seems to be impacted primarily by internal and micro-environmental factors. Consolidating levels of individual resilience of at-risk populations by acting on these factors could be the key to improving their mental health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todorovic, A., Baumann, C., Tarquinio, C., Rotonda, C., Rousseau, H., Bourion-Bedes, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108188</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108188</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors associated with low levels of resilience among French university students during COVID-19 lockdown: results of the cross-sectional PIMS-CoV19 survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108188</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109725?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Applications of artificial intelligence for real-world evidence generation: a protocol for a living scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109725?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, offering an expanding suite of capabilities that go beyond the traditional focus on prediction and classification. Generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI could create transformative practices to support real-world evidence (RWE) generation for health research by streamlining studies, accelerating insights and improving decision-making. However, there is no published overview available describing the range of applications in RWE generation. This review aims to describe where and how genAI and agentic AI are applied across the domains of healthcare research tasks for RWE generation. Additionally, to map applications by tasks and methods across the product lifecycle continuum, and to identify emerging gaps and opportunities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This Living Scoping Review (LSR) will include studies reporting an application and/or evaluation of genAI or agentic AI applied to one or more RWE generation research tasks. Searches will be conducted in Embase, MEDLINE and additional sources (eg, grey literature). Citations will be independently screened by two human senior reviewers for a substantive training dataset and a commercially available screening algorithm (Robot Screener) will complete screening with a human reviewer. The LSR will include reports of studies (primary or reviews) describing and/or evaluating the application of any genAI model for RWE generation in healthcare, in English, published from 1 January 2025 to the date of search. Data will be extracted from all studies included in the LSR by one independent senior reviewer using a piloted template, with 10% quality check by a second senior reviewer. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise the applications of genAI per RWE research task, and the results of genAI evaluations. Thematic analysis will be used to describe genAI application patterns, trends, gaps and opportunities. The LSR protocol and reports will be updated annually, and findings will be published on a publicly available website (eg, ISPE&mdash;the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required due to use of previously published data. Planned dissemination includes peer-reviewed publication, presentation and short summaries.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oikonomidi, T., Raad, H., Diaz-Decaro, J., Li, H., Y Smith, M., Rivera, D. R., Liu, W., Soriano Gabarro, M., Bennett, D., Mack, C. D., Teltsch, D. Y., Gerber, J. E., Bray, B., Dickinson, H., Jani, M., Naidoo, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109725</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109725</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Applications of artificial intelligence for real-world evidence generation: a protocol for a living scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109725</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109725</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110602?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of bupivacaine combined with morphine intrathecal injection on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing pulmonary surgery: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110602?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Acute pain following pulmonary surgery can affect the recovery process of patients. The use of intrathecal morphine (ITM) injections offers a long-lasting analgesic effect, but its clinical application remains controversial. This study aims to investigate the impact of combining bupivacaine with ITM injections on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients who have undergone pulmonary surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and design</st>
<p>This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial will enrol 254 patients undergoing elective lung surgery, who will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either group IT (receiving an intrathecal injection of 3 mg bupivacaine and 0.25 mg morphine before general anaesthesia induction) or the control group (C group). The primary outcome includes postoperative recovery quality on day 1 (quality of recovery, QoR-15), with secondary outcomes encompassing postoperative recovery quality on days 2 and 3 (QoR-15), pain scores within 72 hours postoperatively, analgesic rescue, intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, opioid consumption, postoperative adverse reactions, recovery metrics, complications, chronic pain incidence and sleep quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. This study protocol (V.2.0, 30 October 2024) involves human participants and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University (number 2024-08-02-2), Taicang Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University (number 2025 SR-041) and Yichang Central People&rsquo;s Hospital (number 2024-513-02). Each individual who agrees to participate in the research will provide written informed consent after the objectives and procedures of this study are explained to them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400092935. Registered on 26 November 2024.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, D., Zhao, M., Tang, S.-H., Gong, Y., Xia, H., Jiang, M., Peng, K., Lai, H., Han, Q., Zheng, Z., Gong, Y., Zhang, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110602</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110602</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of bupivacaine combined with morphine intrathecal injection on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing pulmonary surgery: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110602</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110602</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111268?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bridging the stroke care gap: development and validation of CaknaStrok Education Package (CEP) for caregivers of stroke survivors in Malaysia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111268?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Stroke is one of the top causes of disability in Malaysia, yet caregivers have limited access to structured, culturally tailored education to support poststroke care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop and validate the CaknaStrok Education Package (CEP), a blended learning intervention comprising a printed guidebook and a trilingual mobile health application for informal stroke caregivers in Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Methodological study involving the development and validation of a caregiver education programme guided by the Analyse, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate (ADDIE) instructional design framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Development and validation were conducted in Malaysia between January 2022 and December 2023. Both experts and caregivers were recruited from two tertiary hospitals on the East Coast of Malaysia, with caregivers identified from inpatient wards and outpatient clinics at these hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Content validation involved 10 multidisciplinary experts. Face validation involved 14 informal stroke caregivers who met eligibility criteria, and all completed the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>CEP was developed based on prior needs assessment and expert input. Content validation was undertaken using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and face validation using the Face Validity Index (FVI), both assessed on a four-point Likert scale. Qualitative feedback was also obtained from the participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>CEP consists of six modules delivered via a printed guidebook and a trilingual app with videos, assessment tools and local resources. Experts rated the content highly valid (Scale-level (S)-CVI/the average method (Ave): 0.97&ndash;0.99 across domains). Caregivers reported strong acceptability (S-FVI/Ave: 0.95&ndash;0.99). Qualitative feedback from experts and caregivers informed refinements to content clarity, usability and presentation, including improved navigation, consistent language use and enhanced visual design. Suggestions requiring substantial structural changes were documented for future iterations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The CEP shows strong content and face validity as a blended caregiver education tool. By combining printed and digital formats, CEP addresses cultural and access challenges and provides a scalable model for stroke caregiver education in Malaysia. Further pilot or feasibility studies are warranted to evaluate usability, engagement and implementation in real-world settings prior to effectiveness evaluation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sidek, N. N., Kamalakannan, S., Musa, K. I., Long Tuan Kechik, T. S. M., Hamzah, N., Abd Hamid, R. I., Darus, D., Ibrahim, K. A., Seman, N., Ahamad Fouzi, L., Abdul Hamid, F., Ismail, T. A. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111268</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111268</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bridging the stroke care gap: development and validation of CaknaStrok Education Package (CEP) for caregivers of stroke survivors in Malaysia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111268</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111364?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of sequential denosumab after teriparatide for 6 months compared with denosumab monotherapy in reducing risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with new fractures: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (STAND study) protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111364?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic skeletal disorder that increases fragility and susceptibility to fractures. Despite the availability of teriparatide for the treatment of patients with acute fractures with better efficacy, its long-term daily injection and high cost limit its broader use among a wider patient population, especially for those living in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a novel sequential treatment with teriparatide daily for 6 months followed by denosumab every 6 months for another 18 months, in comparison with denosumab monotherapy every 6 months for 24 months, in reducing the risk of fractures in patients with newly diagnosed osteoporotic fractures. The study will also explore the possible difference between two sequential treatments (shifting to denosumab treatment at 6 or 12 months) in their effect on increasing bone mineral density (BMD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is designed as a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial among 2478 patients with newly diagnosed osteoporotic fractures from 58 hospitals across China. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 10:10:1 ratio to three treatment groups: 24 months of denosumab monotherapy, early sequential treatment (teriparatide for 6 months followed by denosumab for 18 months) and late sequential treatment (teriparatide for 12 months followed by denosumab for 12 months). The primary outcome is the incidence of vertebral fractures over 24 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes include changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck, changes in bone turnover markers (&beta;-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide), treatment adherence and cost-effectiveness. Follow-up assessments are scheduled at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months post-randomisation for primary and secondary outcomes, and biannually afterwards for the primary outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and has received ethical approval from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (1-22PJ939). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05866029">NCT05866029</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chi, Y., Zhu, Y., Yuan, J., Pang, Q., Cui, L., Jiang, Y., Jiajue, R., Liu, W., Wang, O., Li, M., Xing, X., Li, H., Xie, G., Wu, Y., Xia, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111364</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111364</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of sequential denosumab after teriparatide for 6 months compared with denosumab monotherapy in reducing risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with new fractures: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (STAND study) protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111364</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111364</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112225?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incorporation of social medicine curriculum in academic and community health centres: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112225?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In the field of medicine, there has been a growing understanding of the impact of social and economic inequities on patients&rsquo; health outcomes. Social medicine was established with the intention of addressing these social and economic drivers of health when caring for patients. Physicians who practise social medicine aim to take an interdisciplinary and interprofessional approach to patient care with an emphasis on the promotion of health equity and patient advocacy. As the effects of social determinants of health (SDOH) on health outcomes have become more widely appreciated, medical professional organisations and accrediting bodies have advocated for formal education on the impact of SDOH in undergraduate and graduate medical curricula. The goal of this scoping review is to examine how undergraduate and graduate medical education programmes in the USA have implemented social medicine concepts into their curricula.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The review team worked with a medical librarian, who created a unique search for five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, ERIC and the Web of Science Core Collection). Additionally, we will conduct a grey literature search that includes medical school and residency programme websites, as well as Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD), Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine (AAIM) and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) conference abstracts. Two independent reviewers will assess all articles for eligibility. Data will be extracted using the Covidence data extraction tool. We will present the results of the extraction in tabular form. Themes identified during the full-text review and data extraction process will be discussed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Data will be gathered from publicly accessible sources, so ethics approval is not necessary. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and reported at conferences related to medical education and social medicine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This protocol is registered on OSF (<A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7PZ8U">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7PZ8U</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cydis, M., Hudson, E., Shipper, A. G., Lane, A., Salzman, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112225</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112225</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incorporation of social medicine curriculum in academic and community health centres: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112225</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112225</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112405?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of exoskeleton training on turning-while-walking and balance control in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: protocol for a randomised clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112405?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) often experience impaired balance control and turning-while-walking ability, which increase the risk of falls and limit their community mobility. While overground exoskeleton training has shown promise in improving gait and balance, evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on ambulation of individuals with iSCI remains limited. This protocol outlines a cluster RCT investigating the effectiveness of overground exoskeleton-assisted gait training compared with conventional training and usual care in improving turning-while-walking performence, balance control, and functional mobility in individuals with iSCI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, cluster RCT will compare 12-week interventions across three groups: (1) overground exoskeleton training group, (2) conventional training group and (3) usual care group. Participants with ambulatory iSCI will be recruited from three centres in Hong Kong SAR and mainland China. Primary outcomes include turning duration and number of steps during a 2-m turning-while-walking test. Secondary outcomes include static and dynamic balance, sensorimotor integration, gait performance, muscle strength, spasticity, quality of life, self-efficacy and fall incidence. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention, postintervention and at the 1-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received approval from the Research Ethics Committees of Hong Kong Metropolitan University, the Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, and Changzhou Sunshine Rehabilitation Hospital. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment. Study findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summaries available to participants upon request.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06971510">NCT06971510</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, M., Chan, C. W.-n., Wang, P. Y., Tsang, W. W.-n.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112405</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112405</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of exoskeleton training on turning-while-walking and balance control in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: protocol for a randomised clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112405</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112405</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e116827?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring stress and coping among black women in early midlife with elevated blood pressure in a safety-net health system: a qualitative focus group protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e116827?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Black women in early midlife experience disproportionate exposure to stress and elevated cardiovascular risk, including hypertension. Despite this, few stress management interventions are designed with and for this population. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of stress and coping among black women in early midlife with elevated blood pressure to inform the codesign of a culturally relevant, multilevel stress management intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct one-time, semistructured focus groups with black women aged 35&ndash;50 who have elevated blood pressure, recruited from a large safety-net health system. Data will be analysed using a constructivist grounded theory approach, with inductive theme development supported by line-by-line, focused and theoretical coding. The Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease framework will serve as a sensitising guide to multilevel contextual factors rather than a prescriptive coding structure. An artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analytic component will complement human-led analysis by supporting preliminary theme exploration and enhancing transparency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board (Protocol #21785). All participants will provide written informed consent. Findings will be shared via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and lay summaries for stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sprague, B. N., Beverly, A. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T04:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116827</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116827</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring stress and coping among black women in early midlife with elevated blood pressure in a safety-net health system: a qualitative focus group protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116827</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116827</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e097857?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cause-specific excess mortality in rural India during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-2023: longitudinal analyses of deaths in 0.2 million rural health facilities]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e097857?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>India had an estimated three to five million excess deaths from causes attributable to SARS-CoV-2 during 2020&ndash;2021, far exceeding official government statistics. Most deaths in India occur in rural areas, where medical certification of deaths is limited. Yet, the effects of the pandemic in rural settings remain largely undocumented. We estimated the cause-specific excess mortality in rural areas of selected states of India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal analyses of hospital mortality data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>India&rsquo;s Health Management Information System (HMIS) reports the number of deaths by cause for adolescents or adults aged 10 years or more. We examined eight states with high coverage of the expected number of deaths in rural areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We analysed monthly death reports from the HMIS, which covered approximately 0.2 million health facilities during 2018&ndash;2023. We compared excess deaths during the peak COVID-19 months in rural health facilities to pre-COVID-19 and non-peak periods of 2021, and categorised reported causes by their probable association with COVID-19.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Excesses of cause-specific and total mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>During the April&ndash;June 2021 SARS-CoV-2 wave, predominantly driven by the Delta variant, monthly deaths in rural health facilities across India surged from approximately 200 000 to 500 000. In eight states with high-quality reporting, rural facility deaths increased by 270% (95% CI 267% to 272%) compared with the same months in 2018&ndash;2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Notably, this surge occurred despite a sharp decline in hospital admissions following the national lockdown in March 2020. The largest relative increase was for fever-related and respiratory diseases, and these deaths were markedly elevated even when compared to non-peak months of 2021. Generalising these findings from eight states to all of rural India yields an estimate of approximately 2.6 million excess rural deaths in April&ndash;June 2021. In contrast, there were few excess deaths during the Omicron viral waves in 2022&ndash;2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>COVID-19 substantially increased deaths in rural India during April&ndash;June 2021, but reassuringly, no significant excess mortality was observed in subsequent years. The HMIS provides an important opportunity to strengthen routine mortality surveillance in rural India.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumar, P., Suraweera, W., Karlinsky, A., Jha, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097857</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097857</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cause-specific excess mortality in rural India during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-2023: longitudinal analyses of deaths in 0.2 million rural health facilities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097857</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097857</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103595?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of unplanned 30-day hospital readmission: a retrospective cohort study in north-east Italy]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103595?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge measure the quality of healthcare. This study aims to identify the characteristics of patients at higher risk of readmission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>North-east Italy (Marca Trevigiana Local Health Authority).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data source</st>
<p>The study examined a total of 39 467 index admissions from hospital discharges (SDO) in the 890 000-inhabitant area during 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measure</st>
<p>Readmission rates and 95% CIs were computed by risk factor, age and type of admission (surgical or medical). A logistic mixed-effects model was used to estimate readmission OR, adjusting for potential confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 2197 readmissions occurred within 30 days of the index admission, resulting in an overall rate of 30-day readmissions of 6.7% (CI 6.4% to 7.0%). The median time to readmission was 11 days (IQR 5 to 20). In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age and sex, the following clinical conditions were associated with a higher risk of readmission: alcohol-related disease (OR=2.06, CI 1.36 to 3.13), metastatic cancer (OR=1.98, CI 1.57 to 2.50), epilepsy (OR=1.93, CI 1.36 to 2.75), dialysis or end-stage kidney disease (OR=1.92, CI 1.39 to 2.66), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR=1.88, CI 1.49 to 2.36), stoma (OR=1.72, CI 1.22 to 2.44), transplant (OR=1.62, CI 1.03 to 2.55), being bedridden (OR=1.57, CI 1.28 to 1.93), anaemia (OR=1.57, CI 1.35 to 1.83), urinary tract infection (OR=1.54, CI 1.30 to 1.83), pneumonia (OR=1.52, CI 1.31 to 1.75), dementia (OR=1.49, CI 1.24 to 1.79), diabetes (OR=1.37, CI 1.17 to 1.61) and transfusion (OR=1.34, CI 1.03 to 1.73).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Several chronic and acute conditions at index admission significantly increased the risk of readmission. Strengthening transitional care, outpatient services and palliative care could mitigate readmissions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sartor, G., Fusco, M., Milana, M., Marcon, E., Battagello, J., Zardetto, A., Ruggieri, M. G., Grotto, G., Rigon, L., Arcara, G., Conte, P., Buja, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103595</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103595</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of unplanned 30-day hospital readmission: a retrospective cohort study in north-east Italy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103595</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103595</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105371?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How public health practitioners in the UK are using parental guidance on talking to children about weight: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105371?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To understand how public health practitioners (PHPs) are using parental guidance on talking to children in their work with parents. In 2021, evidence-based guidance was produced for parents of young children to facilitate these conversations, but it is unclear how this guidance is being promoted to parents or used by PHPs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study, consisting of in-depth, semistructured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Local authority, National Health Service or other healthy weight service providers in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were PHPs working on children&rsquo;s healthier lifestyles programmes in the UK as part of the UK&rsquo;s National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP). Invitations to participate were distributed via the Department of Health and Social Care and regional and national networks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>24 participants were interviewed. Practice varied between organisations with the guidance being used in NCMP letters to parents, in follow-up phone calls with parents and in training NCMP staff and other health or education professionals. Participants valued the evidence-based guidance and its compassionate tone, feeling it gave them and parents, confidence in addressing a sensitive topic. Some felt it was too lengthy for parents with learning disabilities or low literacy levels. Others identified a need for similar guidance for older children. Though helpful, participants acknowledged the guidance was only one small part of a necessary systems-wide approach to promoting healthy weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The guidance is a useful tool but needs systematic promotion to increase use and effectiveness. Further work is warranted to develop adapted versions for other populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brockman, R., Gillison, F., Grey, E. B., Jago, R., MacArthur, G. J., Gutteridge, C., Langford, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105371</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105371</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How public health practitioners in the UK are using parental guidance on talking to children about weight: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105371</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105371</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106954?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations of oxidative balance score with mortality and cardiovascular events: cohort study from NHANES and UK Biobank]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106954?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate the associations of oxidative balance score (OBS) with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence in two large, population-based cohorts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cohort study and cross-sectional study were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the UK Biobank.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 33 566 adults from NHANES (1998&ndash;2018) and 55 760 adults from the UK Biobank were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and CVD. Mortality outcomes were ascertained through national death registries. Prevalent CVD was identified in NHANES through questionnaire, and incident CVD events were identified in the UK Biobank using linked hospital admission and death registry data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Higher OBS was consistently associated with lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in both cohorts. In NHANES, participants in the highest OBS quartile (Q4) had a 39% lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.72) and a 45% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.74) compared with those in Q1. Similarly, in the UK Biobank, Q4 was associated with an 18% lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) and a 41% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR: 0.59, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.87). In NHANES, Q4 was associated with lower odds of prevalent CVD (adjusted OR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.67), whereas in the UK Biobank, Q4 was associated with a 19% lower risk of incident CVD during follow-up (adjusted HR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.9). Subgroup analyses in NHANES indicated heterogeneity by ethnicity and socioeconomic status, whereas associations in the UK Biobank followed an L-shaped pattern with a flattening of estimated risk at moderate OBS levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Higher OBS was associated with more favourable mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. These findings indicate that OBS is a composite indicator associated with cardiovascular health at the population level.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, H., Chen, S., Bai, X., Zhou, X., Zhang, F., Wang, X., Chen, L., Wang, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106954</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106954</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations of oxidative balance score with mortality and cardiovascular events: cohort study from NHANES and UK Biobank]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106954</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106954</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108207?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Empathy and burnout in healthcare professionals: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108207?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Previous reviews have investigated the relationship between empathy and burnout. However, these are now out of date, did not capture the effect of the pandemic, did not include healthcare professionals other than doctors and nurses or medical students, did not assess the impact of differences in profession and did not pool the data, which made estimating the strength of the association unclear. We therefore aim to address these shortcomings in an up-to-date, rigorous, systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and flowchart.</p>
<p>We will search American Psychological Association (APA) PsycINFO, APA PsycArticles, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), The Cochrane Library, PubMed and Scopus. We will also search ResearchSquare and Social Science Research Network (SSRN) for preprints; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Electronic Theses Online Service for relevant theses. Forward and backward citation searches will identify additional studies. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts and extract data. Two independent reviewers will assess risk of bias using Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) for randomised controlled trials, Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomised interventional studies and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) for observational studies.</p>
<p>For all included studies, we will summarise the study characteristics, including number of participants; health profession, specialty and career stage; country and gender. If data are suitable, we will pool results and conduct subgroup analyses (including by health profession, career stage and clinical specialty). We will also explore the relationships between subscales of empathy and burnout. We will use metaregression to explore the impact of theoretically derived factors (such as study design and profession) on the strength of the association. Sensitivity analyses will assess the impact of low-quality research. In our discussion, we will summarise results, the limitations and provide a general interpretation of the results and implications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this review, as primary data will not be collected. The review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presentation at conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251075618.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edwards, R. J., Nockels, K., Howick, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108207</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108207</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Empathy and burnout in healthcare professionals: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108207</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108632?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling of neonatal, infant and under-5 mortality (2000-2022) in 41 Asian countries: a population-level observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108632?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Child mortality continues to pose a major public health challenge across Asia. This study examines trends in under-5, infant and neonatal mortality and identifies key determinants, spatial risk patterns and projections through 2030 using spatiotemporal modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used national-level data from 41 Asian countries, representing over 80% of Asia&rsquo;s population, between 2000 and 2022, incorporating 26 health, environmental and sociodemographic indicators. A hierarchical Bayesian model using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation, incorporating fixed effects, spatially structured and unstructured random effects, and temporal smoothing, was used. Model performance was assessed via the Deviance Information Criterion, Watanabe-Akaike Information Criterion, coefficient of determination (R&sup2;), root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error metrics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Under-5 mortality decreased significantly (p&lt;0.001) from 46.73 to 18.53 per 1000 live births. Strong negative associations were observed between child mortality and vaccination coverage&mdash;rubella (r=&ndash;0.79), Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis (DTP) (r=&ndash;0.74), hepatitis B (r=&ndash;0.58) and rotavirus (r=&ndash;0.20). Female literacy (r=&ndash;0.20) and life expectancy (r=&ndash;0.30) also contributed to improved outcomes. Spatial analyses identified Afghanistan (under-5: 77.12), Bangladesh (57.12) and Myanmar (63.16) as high-risk hotspots, while Japan, Sri Lanka and the UAE maintained low predicted rates (0). Neonatal mortality patterns were flatter across time and space, peaking in Bangladesh (6.30), Indonesia (5.08) and Azerbaijan (5.00). Predictive accuracy was highest for neonatal mortality (R&sup2;=0.99; RMSE=1.93). Some countries, such as Yemen and the UAE, displayed near-zero or negative forecasts, suggesting sensitivity to spatial priors in sparse-data contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study highlights the critical role of immunisation and maternal education in reducing mortality, and the need for more targeted neonatal interventions. The white-box modelling framework enables both interpretability and reliable forecasting, supporting data-driven policy planning toward achieving advanced, equitable child survival, as outlined in Sustainable Development Goal 3.2.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahman, M. S., Shiddik, M. A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108632</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108632</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling of neonatal, infant and under-5 mortality (2000-2022) in 41 Asian countries: a population-level observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108632</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108632</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108946?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mechanisms of SGLT inhibitor action and physiological mediators: systematic review and protocol for the MOSAIC collaborative meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108946?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors have shown substantial benefit in reducing cardiovascular and kidney events across diverse clinical populations, but the underlying physiological mechanisms remain unclear. However, existing mechanistic studies on renal and cardiovascular haemodynamics show variability in design, have limited statistical power and yield inconsistent outcomes, thus limiting the ability to draw generalisable conclusions. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review and proposed the first meta-analysis to aggregate individual participant-level data from mechanistic studies to identify consistent physiological patterns and enhance understanding of the therapeutic effects of SGLT inhibition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Gold-standard measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) was selected as the primary outcome for this systematic review, which aimed to identify all completed mechanistic studies investigating the effects of SGLT inhibition. Electronic databases including Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using a detailed search strategy. In total, 24 studies (n=1296) were identified. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Key variables including demographics, medical history, concomitant medications, vital signs, mGFR, renal haemodynamics, urine and plasma biochemistry, tubular sodium handling, echocardiography, cardiac output monitoring, arterial stiffness and fluid volume will be extracted. A one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis under a Bayesian framework will be conducted, using hierarchical models to simultaneously analyse data from all eligible studies. The risk of bias due to missing results will be assessed. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup evaluations will be incorporated to explore sources of heterogeneity and assess robustness of findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. Findings from the Mechanisms of SGLT Inhibitor Action and Physiological Mediators (MOSAIC) meta-analysis will be published in peer-reviewed journals and results will be disseminated at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251001413.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kugathasan, L., Nardone, M., Muskiet, M. H., Diaz Martinez, J. P., Lovblom, L. E., Orchanian-Cheff, A., Nielsen, S., Rotbain, V., Kazup, A., Cersosimo, E., Gullaksen, S., Vernstrom, L., van Baar, M. J. B., van Bommel, E., Kannenkeril, D., Scholtes, R., Hesp, A., Mosterd, C., Touw, D. J., Lambers Heerspink, H., Krebbe, M., Joles, J., Kvitne, K., Laugesen, E., Mose, F., Marup, F. H., Nieuwdorp, M., Geist, B., Maruyama, S., Kato, S., Kalambokis, G., Tsiakas, I., Jensen, J., Schou, M., Omar, M., Kistorp, C. M., Perna, A., Ruggenenti, P., Persson, F., Schmieder, R., Singh, S., van Raalte, D. H., Cherney, D., Srinivasan Sridhar, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108946</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108946</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mechanisms of SGLT inhibitor action and physiological mediators: systematic review and protocol for the MOSAIC collaborative meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108946</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108946</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109428?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring patient navigation services in physical activity for people with chronic conditions in Canada: a rapid review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109428?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adults living with chronic conditions may need to access health programmes to mitigate health-related challenges that persist long after discharge from the hospital. Community physical activity programmes represent critical opportunities for health promotion and chronic disease self-management that can extend beyond hospital-based services. However, navigating the healthcare system and connecting to much-needed physical activity programmes can be challenging due to fragmentation of the health and social care system, especially for those who are transitioning between different healthcare providers, settings, stages of recovery and funding sources (eg, public, private). Patient navigation services can assist with this fragmentation by providing tailored support to individuals with chronic conditions. However, our understanding of patient navigation services in Canada is limited. This rapid review seeks to explore the landscape of patient navigation services supporting Canadians with chronic conditions in connecting to physical activity programmes in the community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The rapid review will follow the recommendations published by Garritty <I>et al</I> in 2024. Integrated Knowledge Translation will be employed to facilitate meaningful engagement of people with lived experience of chronic conditions throughout the entire research process. Studies published in English that examine patient navigation services in physical activity for community-dwelling Canadians with chronic conditions will be included. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL and Google Canada will be searched for articles published from 1990 to May 2025 to identify the characteristics, strengths and limitations, and prioritised features of patient navigation services for community physical activity programmes. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to assess the quality of included studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol is a rapid review of published literature and does not require ethical approval. Review findings will be disseminated to various key interest groups through publications, presentations, infographics, social media posts and/or videos.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p><A HREF="https://osf.io/gd2zm">https://osf.io/gd2zm</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheung, L., Tseung, V., Abreu, J., Park, J., McKenney, S., Pinili, K., Bello, C., Singh, H., Smith-Turchyn, J., Richardson, J., Tang, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109428</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109428</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring patient navigation services in physical activity for people with chronic conditions in Canada: a rapid review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109428</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109428</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109656?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Imaging the choroidal microvasculature in intensive and high dependency care unit patients: a pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109656?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Microcirculatory dysfunction drives the end-organ pathophysiology of circulatory shock but is not reflected within existing clinical indices of perfusion, such as blood pressure. The choroidal vasculature of the retina can be measured non-invasively and we hypothesised that this may reflect dysfunction in other organs. We tested the feasibility of measuring the choroid in intensive care and explored associations between choroidal measurements and clinical parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A pilot study of optical coherence tomography conducted in a sample of general intensive care unit (ICU) patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary mixed ICU within the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>15 patients were recruited. One patient was excluded following withdrawal of active treatment. 12/14 (86%) of the remaining patients had successful baseline imaging and 6 (40%) of these had follow-up imaging within intensive care. These patients had a mean age of 56.3 years, were 71% (10/14) male and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 (APACHE2) score on ICU admission was 20.4.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Choroidal anatomy, including choroidal and suprachoroidal thickness, as well as volumetric analysis of intrachoroidal blood vessels, was assessed using automated image segmentation along with clinical, physiological and biochemical data at ICU admission and after an interval of 12&ndash;72 hours. Feasibility and safety data were assessed throughout ICU admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Baseline choroidal vascular index and choroidal thickness were positively associated with fluid balance, and negatively with APACHE2 score, haematocrit and albumin content. A measurable suprachoroidal space was seen in nine (75%) patients (range 25.0&ndash;110.0 microns) and was inversely associated with heart rate. There was substantial intraindividual variation in choroidal measurements over time. There were no safety concerns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Measuring the choroid is feasible in patients with Intensive Care Society Level 2 or Level 3 requirements. The suprachoroidal space may be markedly enlarged in these patients. Exploratory associations with systemic variables suggest that the choroid may provide information about the microvascular function of other major organs. Size and change of choroidal measurements may reflect perfusion pressure and vascular leakage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooper, G. M., Burke, J., Hamid, C., Godden, E., Dhaun, N., King, S., MacGillivray, T., Baillie, K., Griffith, D. M., MacCormick, I. J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109656</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109656</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Imaging the choroidal microvasculature in intensive and high dependency care unit patients: a pilot study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109656</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109656</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110352?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contribution of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of adnexal torsion (COVARIAN): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110352?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adnexal torsion is a gynaecological emergency in which prompt diagnosis and management are critical to preserving ovarian function. However, the clinical presentation is often non-specific, and diagnosis primarily relies on pelvic ultrasound, a modality with limited sensitivity that can lead to misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgery. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has emerged as a promising imaging technique that may enhance diagnostic accuracy by better characterising adnexal vascularisation.</p>
<p>The aim of this study is to assess whether the addition of CEUS to standard diagnostic procedures can reduce the rate of unnecessary emergency surgeries. Specifically, we compare two diagnostic strategies in cases of high clinical suspicion of adnexal torsion: the current standard approach versus an experimental strategy incorporating CEUS. The primary outcome is the rate of inappropriate surgical interventions, defined as emergency surgery performed within 6 hours without intraoperative confirmation of torsion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised (1:1), controlled, superiority trial. A total of 256 women presenting with a high clinical suspicion of adnexal torsion will be enrolled over a period of 36 months. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the standard diagnostic strategy or an experimental strategy that includes CEUS. The primary endpoint is the proportion of emergency surgical procedures (performed within 6 hours of hospital admission) in which adnexal torsion is not confirmed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the French Ethics Committee, the CPP (Comit&eacute; de Protection des Personnes) on 28 October 2024. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant national and international conferences. The ethical approval number from the CPP is 6115.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06677554">NCT06677554</A>; 2024-511720-13-00.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fijean, A.-L., Manhertz, D., Massicot, L., Lecointre, L., Mottet, N., Raimond, E., Simon, E., Gabriele, V., Morel, O., Beaumont, M., Hossu, G., Bertholdt, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110352</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110352</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contribution of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of adnexal torsion (COVARIAN): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110352</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110352</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110958?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol of the RADIO-STAR trial: a phase 1 safety and dose finding study of hypofractionated radiotherapy to the stellate ganglia for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110958?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Sympathetic activation is the hallmark of cardiac disease, driving disease progression and triggering ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Despite optimal medical therapy, many patients experience recurrent VAs refractory to medical therapy, leading to repetitive implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, worse quality of life and adverse outcomes. Cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) through surgical removal of the stellate ganglia is an effective treatment for refractory VAs but carries a high complication rate. We hypothesise that high precision image guided radiotherapy can be used to target the stellate ganglia to achieve CSD non-invasively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>RADIO-STAR (hypofractionated radiotherapy to the stellate ganglia for ventricular arrhythmia) is a first-in-human, phase 1 safety and dose finding study of radiotherapy to the stellate ganglia in patients with recurrent VAs. Patients with structural heart disease requiring recurrent ICD therapy for VAs are invited to undergo radiotherapy bilaterally to their stellate ganglia with a predetermined sample size of n=13. Radiotherapy dose will be determined by a prespecified dose escalation protocol. The primary outcome is safety defined as any treatment-related grade 3&ndash;5 toxicity occurring within 6 months of radiotherapy treatment, as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events or any treatment-related side effects detected on patient symptom questionnaires and clinical examination during study visits. Secondary outcome measures to evaluate feasibility and efficacy include ability to safely deliver radiotherapy and consequent changes in circulating catecholamines and neuropeptide-Y, heart rate variability, structural changes in the stellate ganglia on MRI imaging and ICD therapy burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethical approval by the South Central&mdash;Oxford B Research Ethics Committee (REC/SC/0005). Study findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at national and/or international scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN49861434">ISRCTN49861434</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bussmann, B. M., George, B., Robinson, M., Grist, J., Sukumar, P., Chinherende, E., Sheerin, F., Enzhil, V., Rider, O., Jones, B., Sabharwal, A., Herring, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T19:41:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110958</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110958</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol of the RADIO-STAR trial: a phase 1 safety and dose finding study of hypofractionated radiotherapy to the stellate ganglia for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110958</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110958</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098021?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098021?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, considering the high cost of sugemalimab, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment for advanced ESCC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A partitioned survival model with a 3-week cycle length and the lifetime time horizon was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ESCC. The key survival data, drug costs, and utility values were obtained from the GEMSTONE-304 trial, YAOZHI database and the published literature. Total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the uncertainty and model stability. In addition, subgroup and scenario analyses were conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The Chinese healthcare system perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A hypothetical Chinese cohort of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic ESCC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Costs, QALYs, ICERs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with the placebo plus chemotherapy, the sugemalimab plus chemotherapy provided an additional 0.36 QALYs, with an incremental cost of $44 376.88. The result of ICER was $119 400.69/QALY, which was significantly higher than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three times per capita gross domestic product ($38 024.68/QALY) in 2023. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the cost of sugemalimab, the discount rate and the utility values were the most influential parameters on the base-case analysis results. Subgroup analyses showed that programmed cell death - ligand 1 subgroup ICERs exhibited dose-dependent efficacy: the ICERs for sugemalimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy were $138 739.23/QALY and $108 051.81/QALY in advanced ESCC patients with 1 &le; combined positive score (CPS) &lt;10 and CPS &ge;10. Scenario analysis indicated that even with patient assistance programme, the total cost of the sugemalimab plus chemotherapy group ($23 474.25) would be $15 030.18 higher than that of the placebo plus chemotherapy group ($8444.07), which had an ICER of $40 440.28/QALY. When the price of sugemalimab decreased by 50% and 85%, the probabilities of sugemalimab plus chemotherapy being cost-effective were 0% and 100%, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>From a Chinese healthcare system perspective, sugemalimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ESCC might not be a cost-effective treatment option at the WTP threshold of $38 024.68/QALY.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yan, C., Li, Z., Li, J., Huang, R., Li, S., Diao, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098021</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098021</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098021</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098021</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102006?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How do people with post-COVID syndrome in Germany experience healthcare and information provision? A qualitative interview study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102006?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine how people with post-COVID syndrome in Germany experience medical care and what healthcare problems they see in relation to post-COVID.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews with a topic guide; audio-recording, transcription and analysis in terms of content.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>13 digital interviews and one face-to-face meeting between April and June 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>14 German people with post-COVID syndrome (10 female; 4 male).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The experiences of the study participants in the care of their post-COVID symptoms were heterogeneous and suggested the continued, at least partially persisting, presence of problems in Germany that have already been addressed in the past. While other studies focus primarily on structural hurdles, our study provides indications that the interactions between healthcare professionals and patients may be important for their satisfaction with care. In particular, physician initiative, education and communication appear to play central roles. In addition, respondents often felt inadequately informed and reported problems with obtaining information. The level of knowledge about the disease in society as a whole has also been frequently criticised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Doctor&ndash;patient interaction may be a critical factor in improving the care of post-COVID patients, with both supportive and problematic experiences indicating that empathic communication and transparent education can play an important role in reducing miscommunication and perceived stigma. In addition, people with post-COVID syndrome appear to need easier access to disease-specific information, which might be facilitated by expanded digital resources and additional dedicated support information services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weippert, J., Vogel, H., Niedermeier, S. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102006</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102006</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How do people with post-COVID syndrome in Germany experience healthcare and information provision? A qualitative interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102006</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102006</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105415?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Non-infectious skeletal complications in the lower extremity after treatment with a transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis: a retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105415?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The use of bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs) has greatly increased quality of life for lower limb amputees. However, the long-term frequency of skeletal fractures and the need for arthroplasty surgery in the lower extremities following BAP use is scarce.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The current study aimed to investigate the frequency of fractures and arthroplasties in the lower limb after BAP surgery with the Osseointegrated Prosthesis for the Rehabilitation of Amputees (OPRA) system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study using the OPRA database and medical record review for data collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A single-centre study at a tertiary hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients with a transfemoral BAP (OPRA system) who underwent surgery between 1999 and 2019, and had completed at least 2 years of follow-up were included in the study. Patients with bilateral transfemoral amputations were excluded. A total of 100 patients were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>The primary outcome measure was to identify patients who had a fracture or had undergone arthroplasty surgery in the lower extremities after BAP surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 100 patients included, 16 patients (16%) had an event in their lower limb. 11 patients (11%) had a fracture, all of the femur, and six patients (6%) underwent arthroplasty surgery due to osteoarthritis. Long-term prosthetic use was not affected by the occurrence of an event.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients with BAP may be at a higher risk for femur fractures and arthroplasty surgery than the general population. Although encouraging that prosthetic usage is not affected after a fracture or arthroplasty surgery, prospective studies on larger cohorts and control groups need to be conducted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Svensson Malchau, K., Malchau, H., Thomsen, P., Hagberg, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105415</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105415</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Non-infectious skeletal complications in the lower extremity after treatment with a transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis: a retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105415</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105415</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105724?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring potential pathogenesis mechanisms of onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy through cerebrospinal fluid analysis of children with complex febrile seizures: a pilot study in Aketi, Democratic Republic of the Congo]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105724?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Onchocerciasis, commonly known as river blindness, is a parasitic disease caused by <I>Onchocerca volvulus</I> affecting millions predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa. Robust epidemiological evidence points to a clinical relationship between onchocerciasis and epilepsy, a condition termed onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy (OAE). Despite extensive research and various successful elimination programmes over the past decades, the pathogenesis of OAE is still unknown. Current hypotheses propose that <I>O. volvulus</I> microfilaria, their excretory-secretory products or the newly discovered filarial <I>O. volvulus</I> RNA virus 1 (OVRV1) virus may traverse the blood-brain barrier, triggering seizures or immune responses that result in neurological damage. However, direct evidence of microfilaria or their DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or brain tissue remains elusive, likely due to immune-mediated parasite clearance. Additionally, investigations into the potential neurotoxicity of these novel filarial viruses have yet to be pioneered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective cohort study will involve 100 ivermectin-nai&#x0308;ve children aged 2&ndash;5 years, recruited from rural communities in the Aketi health zone, located in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This region is known to be an onchocerciasis-endemic area with a high prevalence and transmission of OAE, despite years of community-directed treatment with ivermectin. Lumbar punctures (LP) will be performed in children presenting with complex febrile seizures according to WHO&rsquo;s paediatric guidelines. CSF samples will be examined for white blood cells, protein levels, glycorrhachia, microfilaria, OVRV1 and <I>O. volvulus</I> biomarkers. Children will be followed annually, monitoring the development of epilepsy and <I>O. volvulus</I> infection. This approach aims to elucidate the presence of <I>O. volvulus</I> and OVRV1 in the brain and their role in the pathogenesis of epileptic seizures and the myriad of clinical symptoms observed in OAE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Kisangani (UNIKIS/CE/KGB/001/2025) and the University of Antwerp (project ID 7323-Edge n/a-BUN B3002025000078). Written informed consent will be obtained from all parents and/or legal guardians of children for whom an LP is considered. Findings will be disseminated at national and international levels via meetings and peer-reviewed open-source publications. Study data will be stored in an open repository.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202507670131109).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kungu Gbulu, R., De Wilde, B., Lubbers, C., Falay, D. S., Siewe Fodjo, J. N., Colebunders, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105724</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105724</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring potential pathogenesis mechanisms of onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy through cerebrospinal fluid analysis of children with complex febrile seizures: a pilot study in Aketi, Democratic Republic of the Congo]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105724</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105724</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107175?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on frontline healthcare workers in Ethiopia: a scoping review of associated mental health risk and protective factors]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107175?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The mental health impacts of COVID-19 on frontline healthcare workers have been reported globally; however, there is limited evidence from low-income countries such as Ethiopia. We reviewed the literature to understand how COVID-19 impacted the mental health of frontline healthcare workers, including the associated risk and protective factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A scoping review of peer-reviewed research was conducted between 2020&ndash;2025 to explore the mental health and well-being of frontline healthcare workers in Ethiopia during COVID-19. The process adhered to the guidelines for data extraction outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Our search identified 35 studies, of which 29 studies were included in the final synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Three online databases, PubMed, Web of Science and PsycInfo, were systematically searched for data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies were considered for inclusion in the review if they focused on mental health conditions and psychosocial well-being among healthcare workers during COVID-19 in Ethiopia. Studies were only included if published in English and excluded if they were conference abstracts, case studies, reviews, commentaries, contained incomplete data or lacked variables of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data extraction was conducted manually by two reviewers by using a data extraction sheet created in Excel.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most frontline healthcare workers experienced symptoms of insomnia, psychological distress, stress, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and depression during COVID-19. Female frontline healthcare workers, nurses, midwives and laboratory technicians reported higher rates of adverse mental health outcomes. Our results found that being married, living together with a spouse and having a high educational level were risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The mental health and well-being of frontline healthcare workers is at risk during a global health crisis; however, there is a limited understanding of how to protect the mental health of frontline healthcare workers in low-income countries, such as Ethiopia, at such a critical time. Additional research is needed to better inform mental health preparedness interventions for frontline healthcare workers in these contexts, particularly given predictions of another pandemic occurring within the next decade.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Draebel, T. A., Birhanu, Z., Lien, L., Soerensen, J. B., Andersen, L. S., Terefe Tucho, G., Mekonnen, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107175</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107175</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on frontline healthcare workers in Ethiopia: a scoping review of associated mental health risk and protective factors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107175</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107401?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for the development and testing of a web-based patient decision aid for early-stage breast cancer patients within a cancer centre care: a mixed-method approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107401?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Early breast cancer (BC) detection enhances survival, with treatment options influenced by cancer stage, pathological characteristics and patient preferences. Patient decision aids (PDAs) promote shared decision-making (SDM), enhancing patients&rsquo; engagement, adherence to treatment and satisfaction. However, few PDAs for early-stage BC patients exist in the Italian context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A first developmental phase will include a systematic review on current PDAs and semistructured interviews with patients and healthcare professionals. Outcomes will be used to develop a first draft of PDA. Following international guidelines, the PDA will be sent to patients to gather first qualitative feedback and subsequently quantitative feedback regarding the attractiveness, usability and comprehensibility of the tool and patients&rsquo; health literacy. Once having reached a final version of PDA, a pilot randomised controlled trial study will be implemented: a control group will receive standard care (n=75) and an experimental group (n=75) will receive standard care and the PDA. Depression, anxiety, SDM, quality of life (QoL) and distress levels will be assessed through validated questionnaires in both groups at three different time points. Measures will include attractiveness, usability and comprehensibility of the PDA as well as efficacy measures assessed through evaluation of patients&rsquo; levels of anxiety, depression, distress and QoL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol was approved by the ethical committee Comitato Etico Territoriale Lombardia 2 of the Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico European Institute of Oncology (L2-253; approved in November 2024). All participants will be given written and verbal information, and informed consent will be obtained from all participants across all phases of our project. Participation in the study will be fully voluntary. All the methodologies mentioned in this protocol will be carried out according to both national and international declarations, guidelines and regulations compliant with proper ethical research involving human subjects. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, through traditional academic pathways. This protocol study has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov in January 2025 (Identifier: NCT06762496).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06762496">NCT06762496</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sdinami, S., Sebri, V., Monzani, D., Zagami, P., Criscitiello, C., Grasso, R., Bagnardi, V., Curigliano, G., Pravettoni, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107401</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107401</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for the development and testing of a web-based patient decision aid for early-stage breast cancer patients within a cancer centre care: a mixed-method approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107401</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107401</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107465?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ALARUM: Active One Health surveillance in LMICs to monitor and predict Antimicrobial Resistance Using Metagenomics - a cross-sectional study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107465?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In rural sub-Saharan Africa (sSA), the burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains high. As AMR continues to rise, there is a strong need for practical, implementable surveillance to monitor and mitigate risks, as well as inform timely, evidence-based clinical decision-making. Emerging evidence points to possible community-level drivers, such as transmission between human, animal and environmental reservoirs as contributing factors, yet microbiological surveillance or opportunities for wastewater-based surveillance are often limited and insufficient in these settings. Therefore, alternative sustainable and affordable approaches are needed. We intend to build on the demonstrated potential of metagenomic profiling of pooled faecal material, which accurately predicted population-level AMR prevalence in invasive <I>Enterobacterales</I> infections.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We aim to validate this metagenomic pooled approach on additional populations, and to evaluate whether AMR patterns could be similarly predicted from surveillance of community One Health reservoirs. We will assemble existing data from hospital-based microbiology diagnostic laboratories in rural Burkina Faso and Kenya, and determine to what extent community-level metagenomic data, and/or faecal material of patients on hospital admission, can predict AMR in clinical isolates. We will perform community-level surveys in eight clusters per country, randomly selecting 15 households per cluster. We will systematically sample suspected environmental AMR exposure sites in and around households (soil, drinking water, latrines, chicken faeces) and collect data on community-level antibiotic use, hygiene practices, contact with domestic animals and sanitary facilities. Samples and data will be collected twice: during the dry and during the rainy season.</p>
<p>In addition to evaluating the accuracy of predicting resistance in clinical isolates, we will quantify community-level exposure risks. We will conduct metagenomic profiling on pooled DNA extracts from human stool samples (hospital and community-level) and from household environments. Bayesian statistical models will quantify relationships between AMR gene abundance in the environment and in human stool, and invasive bacteria identified among clinical patients, accounting for geography and seasonality. A cost-utility analysis will determine under what circumstances the use of pooled metagenomic data to inform empirical antibiotic policies would represent an efficient use of resources.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The proposed surveillance protocol is developed in partnership with local communities and local and international researchers and has received ethical approval in Kenya and Burkina Faso. It will assess whether intermittent, pooled-sample metagenomics provides a viable, low-cost and practical approach for population-level AMR surveillance in settings that&mdash;like many in rural sSA&mdash;lack systematic microbiological diagnostics and where sewage systems for wastewater-based surveillance are absent. By providing an alternative to routine microbiological-based surveillance where this proves challenging to implement, this approach may help improve treatment outcomes, contribute to equity and public health. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences and will contribute to the recently proposed WHO AMR surveillance strategy, which combines survey-based approaches with routine AMR surveillance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Sande, M. A. B., Valia, D., Tigoi, C., Stoesser, N., Stamm, L., Marten, A., Riems, B., Musyimi, R., Sibidou, Y., Schurch, A. C., Tiendrebeogo, E. W., Mwaringa, S., Kohns Vasconcelos, M., Ingelbeen, B., Tinto, H., Bielicki, J. A., Cooper, B. S., Berkley, J. A., van Kleef, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107465</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107465</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ALARUM: Active One Health surveillance in LMICs to monitor and predict Antimicrobial Resistance Using Metagenomics - a cross-sectional study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107465</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107465</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109888?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Digital patient decision aids for endometriosis management: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109888?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Endometriosis is a chronic, oestrogen-dependent condition with a wide range of symptoms and comorbidities that significantly affect physical, emotional and psychological well-being, as well as quality of life. Women with endometriosis often face complex treatment decisions with no universally accepted gold-standard therapy. Shared decision-making, supported by patient decision aids (PtDAs), can enhance patient knowledge and promote informed preferences and decisions. Digital PtDAs, in particular, offer potential for personalised, interactive and accessible decision support. Their characteristics, development process and evaluation in endometriosis care remain underexplored. The objective of this scoping review is to map the existing literature on digital PtDAs developed for women of reproductive age (18&ndash;49) with endometriosis, across a range of healthcare and digital health contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. A comprehensive three-step search, developed with an information specialist, will be conducted across MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane databases and grey literature sources. Citations will be imported into Rayyan for screening. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection, data extraction and analysis. Data will be summarised using tables and descriptive content analysis to identify key features, development processes and evaluation methods of digital PtDAs. The review will be reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review started off in July 2025, and the anticipated end date is November 2025. We plan to disseminate this research through publications, presentations at relevant national and international conferences and meetings with relevant stakeholders. This scoping review protocol has been registered at Open Science Framework (osf.io/fp86m). As this scoping review will use data from published and publicly available sources, research ethics approval is not required.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pittet, O., Delvallee, M., Pluchino, N., Selby, K. J., Elwyn, G., Durand, M.-A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109888</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109888</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Digital patient decision aids for endometriosis management: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109888</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109888</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112054?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of and factors associated with pain-related disabilities among First Nations people living off-reserve in Canada in 2017: a secondary analysis of data from the 2017 Aboriginal Peoples Survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112054?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence and factors associated with pain-related disabilities among First Nations people living off-reserve in Canada in 2017.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>Secondary analysis of the 2017 Aboriginal Peoples Survey, a cross-sectional survey of individuals living in private dwellings throughout Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>First Nations people living off-reserve aged 15 years and older (n=9115; weighted n=482 066).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measure</st>
<p>Pain-related disabilities, defined as pain-related activity limitations lasting &ge;6 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 22.1% (95% CI 20.9% to 23.4%) of First Nations people living off-reserve reported pain-related disabilities. Prevalence was higher among females (26.1%; 95% CI (24.3% to 28.0%)), increased with age (34.3%; 95% CI (30.3% to 38.5%) among those 45 to 54 years) and was similar across geographic areas (ranging from 21.0%; 95% CI (18.3% to 23.9%) to 22.5%; 95% CI (20.8% to 24.2%)). Pain-related disabilities increased with the number of coexisting disabilities (96.2%; 95% CI (94.3% to 97.5%) among those with &gt;3 disabilities) and was highest among those reporting physical disabilities (ranging from 88.2%; 95% CI (85.6% to 90.4%) for those with mobility disabilities to 91.0%; 95% CI (88.6% to 92.9%) for those with disability related to flexibility). Regression models suggested that individuals with unmet basic needs, housing dissatisfaction, unmet healthcare needs, a history of mental health consultations, part-time or no employment, chronic conditions, residential school attendance or a low sense of belonging were more likely to report pain-related disabilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Pain-related disabilities are common among First Nations people living off-reserve, and their aetiology may be multifactorial. Continued collaboration with Indigenous partners is required to contextualise findings and to inform culturally responsive clinical and rehabilitation strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeSouza, A., Cancelliere, C., Hogg-Johnson, S., Sheppard, A. J., Taylor, D., Ward, J. L., Radyk, R., Maher, J., Garner, J., Lynds, R., Cote, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112054</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112054</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of and factors associated with pain-related disabilities among First Nations people living off-reserve in Canada in 2017: a secondary analysis of data from the 2017 Aboriginal Peoples Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112054</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112054</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112178?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and evaluation of a mobile health (mHealth) application for smoking cessation among adolescents in Indonesia: a mixed methods randomised controlled trial study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112178?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adolescent smoking poses a critical public health challenge in Indonesia, where approximately 7.4% of adolescents are current smokers. This issue is compounded by the tobacco industry&rsquo;s aggressive marketing strategies, particularly targeting youth. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions offer promising alternatives for smoking cessation because of their accessibility and adaptability. However, while mHealth applications have shown potential in promoting smoking cessation, their efficacy remains inconsistent, particularly among adolescent populations in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to develop an innovative mHealth intervention model designed explicitly for adolescent users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study used a mixed-methods, sequential, exploratory approach, including a randomised controlled trial. The research will be conducted in three phases: (1) a qualitative study to inform the app&rsquo;s design; (2) a development phase using the Rapid Application Development model; and (3) a single-blind, two-arm randomised controlled trial to evaluate the app&rsquo;s efficacy. Participants will be randomised into either the mHealth intervention group or a paper-based control group using block randomisation to ensure balanced allocation and minimise bias. The protocol is compliant with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines for transparency and reporting. The study population will consist of adolescent smokers aged 13&ndash;15 years who reside in Padang City. A total of 110 participants will be recruited, with 55 adolescents in the intervention group and 55 in the control group. The primary outcome is smoking abstinence at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-ups, which will be assessed through a self-report questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include changes in self-efficacy, motivation, social support, nicotine dependence and user engagement with the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study complies with protocols, the Helsinki Declaration, the principles of Good Health Research Practice and regulatory requirements. The protocol was approved by the Medical and Health Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University (Ref No: KE-FK-0864-EC-2025). Informed consent will be obtained from both adolescents and their parents/guardians, ensuring confidentiality and voluntary participation. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07198828">NCT07198828</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ilmaskal, R., Prabandari, Y. S., Oktaria, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112178</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112178</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Smoking and tobacco]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and evaluation of a mobile health (mHealth) application for smoking cessation among adolescents in Indonesia: a mixed methods randomised controlled trial study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Smoking and tobacco</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112178</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112178</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112198?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transmission dynamics and control of tuberculosis in high-altitude regions: a modelling study in Xizang, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112198?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate tuberculosis (TB) incidence trends in the high-altitude Xizang, China, and to explore the key intervention strategies on achieving the WHO 2030 TB control target.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We developed a susceptible&ndash;exposed&ndash;infectious&ndash;recovered transmission model using routinely reported TB surveillance data from 2004 to 2022. Scenario-based simulations were conducted to project future TB incidence under alternative intervention strategies. Model assumptions are as follows: (1) a stable population, (2) lifelong vaccine-induced immunity, (3) infectiousness of active TB cases, (4) relapse risk after recovery and (5) homogeneous mixing within the population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Seven prefectures of Xizang Autonomous Region on the Tibetan Plateau, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>An estimated population of approximately 3 million individuals residing in Xizang.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>We assessed the epidemiological impact of four interventions implemented independently: increasing vaccine efficacy rate, reducing transmission rates of susceptible individuals, decreasing progression rate from latent TB infection to active disease and reducing relapse rate among successfully treated patients, compared with continuation of current control measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The estimated basic reproduction number (<I>R<SUB>0</SUB>  </I>) for TB in Xizang was 0.39 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.71) in the absence of additional interventions, which was the highest among all regions of China. Model simulations indicated that all four evaluated interventions were each likely to reduce TB incidence, but only reducing the latent-to-active TB progression had a substantial effect. A 50% reduction in the progression rate was predicted to lower TB incidence from 66.56 (62.00&ndash;70.11) to 40.54 (37.15&ndash;43.77) cases per 100 000 population, meeting the WHO 2030 TB control target.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Targeted management of individuals with latent TB infection should be strengthened to substantially reduce TB transmission in high-altitude areas.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, M., Zheng, R., Guo, L., Wu, Y., Dong, J., Jiang, H., Song, D., Cui, Z., Li, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112198</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112198</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transmission dynamics and control of tuberculosis in high-altitude regions: a modelling study in Xizang, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112198</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112198</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112308?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between smoking behaviours during early pregnancy and the severity of gestational diabetes mellitus: a secondary analysis of prospectively collected cohort data in Korea]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112308?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the association between smoking behaviours during early pregnancy and the risk and severity of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), with a particular focus on smoking status, smoking intensity and secondhand smoke exposure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Secondary analysis of prospectively collected cohort data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Multi-centre study conducted in South Korea (Korean Pregnancy Outcome Study) between March 2013 and January 2017.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>From 4537 pregnant women initially enrolled, 3457 singleton pregnancies were included after excluding cases with transfer, loss to follow-up, twin pregnancies, miscarriages and pre-existing diabetes mellitus. All participants were women of Korean ethnicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome was GDM and its subtypes (A1GDM: diet-controlled; A2GDM: insulin-requiring). Secondary outcomes were associations with active smoking (before pregnancy and during early pregnancy), smoking intensity dose&ndash;response relationships (pack-years) and secondhand smoke exposure among never-smokers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 3457 participants, 231 women (6.7%) were diagnosed with GDM (198 A1GDM, 33 A2GDM). Active smoking before pregnancy (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.98, 95% CI 1.58 to 9.30) and during early pregnancy (aOR 9.90, 95% CI 2.97 to 29.45) were significantly associated with A2GDM, while no significant association was observed with A1GDM. A clear dose-response relationship was observed, with smoking intensity &gt;4 pack-years markedly increasing A2GDM risk (aOR 20.68, 95% CI 6.75 to 59.39). Detailed pack-year analysis showed 4&ndash;6 pack-years (aOR 20.57, 95% CI 5.80 to 65.46) and &gt;6 pack-years (aOR 25.98, 95% CI 3.21 to 146.45). Among never-smokers, secondhand smoke exposure showed a borderline association with overall GDM risk (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.81).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Maternal active smoking before and during early pregnancy, as well as higher smoking intensity, was associated with an increased risk of pharmacologically treated GDM (A2GDM). Although secondhand smoke exposure did not reach statistical significance, the trend suggested a potential association with GDM risk among never-smokers. These findings provide important evidence for public health strategies for prenatal care, as smoking cessation and environmental smoke avoidance during prenatal and early antenatal care in women reduce the risk of gestational diabetes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lim, J. H., Joo, E. H., Han, H.-J., Ko, J. S., Chung, B., Kim, J. W., Kim, J. Y., Choi, Y. J., Yang, S. J., Han, Y. J., Kwak, D. W., Lee, H. J., Ryu, H. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112308</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112308</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between smoking behaviours during early pregnancy and the severity of gestational diabetes mellitus: a secondary analysis of prospectively collected cohort data in Korea]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112308</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113050?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Markov-model cost-effectiveness evaluation of a cessation programme when tobacco policies are comprehensive]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113050?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study conducts a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Tobacco Treatment Programme (TTP) of Uruguay&rsquo;s National Resource Fund (NRF), within the context of the country&rsquo;s advanced implementation of tobacco control policies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We run a 10 000 Markov model simulation with three states (people who smoke, people who have quit smoking and death) to simulate the trajectories of a cohort. The model has been widely used in previous studies evaluating smoking cessation interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>For the simulations, we use information from the 2016 to 2017 NRF TTP cohort. Nearly half of the participants lived in the capital, one-fifth had tertiary education, and about one-third had public health coverage. Participants began smoking at an average age of 16 years and smoked about 20 cigarettes per day when entering the TTP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>The process of tobacco cessation is simulated under different alternatives: no intervention, the current TTP (bupropion, nicotine gum and counselling), an expanded TTP that incorporates nicotine patches as a replacement therapy, and a potential future programme with cytisine and counselling (with and without mortality adjustments).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>We focus on Uruguay, which has been recognised as a global leader in tobacco control, including 100% smoke-free environments, a full advertising ban, plain packaging and steady tax increases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measurements</st>
<p>We compare cost-effectiveness of policy alternatives using years of life lost (YLL) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, comparing policy alternatives with no intervention and the current tobacco cessation programme in the country. The analysis considers the direct costs of treatments for smoking-related diseases (healthcare perspective) as well as social costs resulting from loss of productivity (societal perspective).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results indicate that all policy interventions lead to a reduction in the YLL compared with no intervention. Among these options, the inclusion of cytisine emerges as the most cost-effective choice. In a scenario including the transition probabilities from the TTP cohort, this alternative would result in a 10.9% reduction in YLL, with a particularly positive impact among women (&ndash;16.5% vs &ndash;4.0% in men). In terms of cost-effectiveness, the costs per YLL averted would be on average US$3991 per YLL from a healthcare perspective, and US$3773 per YLL from a societal perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Tobacco cessation programmes in Uruguay are highly cost-effective, and our results justify their expansion and optimisation. The incorporation of cytisine into the TTP and a focus on groups with more severe tobacco consumption are recommended.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mussio, I., Triunfo, P., Gerstenblu&#x0308;th, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113050</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113050</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Markov-model cost-effectiveness evaluation of a cessation programme when tobacco policies are comprehensive]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113050</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113050</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114000?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting outcomes in selective fetal growth restriction of monoChOrioNic Twins: an inteRnAtional observational cohort STudy protocol (CONTRAST study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114000?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. Current management relies on umbilical artery Doppler patterns in the smaller twin. These patterns are, however, inconsistent and do not represent a reliable severity scale, complicating clinical decision-making and parental counselling. This study aims to improve risk stratification by identifying predictors of adverse outcomes, while also evaluating the pathophysiology and multi-organ impact of sFGR in early childhood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study conducted in six tertiary fetal medicine centres with expertise in complicated twin pregnancies. Recruitment began in March 2023 and will continue until December 2026, targeting 274 MCDA twin pairs with complete follow-up to develop a prediction model for adverse perinatal outcomes in sFGR at the time of diagnosis. Standardised data collection includes serial ultrasound examinations, advanced fetal imaging (cardiac, cerebral and 3D volumetric), fetal brain MRI and detailed placental phenotyping. Maternal and parental well-being are assessed during pregnancy and after birth. Neurodevelopmental outcome is evaluated up to 2 years after birth using validated tools. The statistical analysis plan includes predictive modelling with internal validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the ethical review boards of all participating centres. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, international conferences and engagement with clinical guideline committees.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05952583">NCT05952583</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noll, A., Javinani, A., Slaghekke, F., Haak, M. C., van Klink, J., Van der Meeren, L., Lopriore, E., Russo, F., Aertsen, M., Shamshirsaz, A., Shinar, S., Bennasar, M., Tiblad, E., Herling, L., Lewi, L., Verweij, E., CONTRAST Study Group, Keizer, Steggerda, Smit, Teunissen, Buul, Baldewijns, Thewissen, Devlieger, Merwe, Zamprakou, Sirotkina, Bohlin, Masoller, Rebollo, Cabral, Nadal, Roca, Stratulat, Mieghem, Miller, Rojhani, Sambatur, Schenone]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114000</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114000</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting outcomes in selective fetal growth restriction of monoChOrioNic Twins: an inteRnAtional observational cohort STudy protocol (CONTRAST study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114000</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114000</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114064?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Generative artificial intelligence in dementia care: a scoping review protocol on nursing roles, experiences and ethical perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114064?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Generative artificial intelligence (GAI), including large language models and multimodal generative systems, is rapidly emerging in healthcare with growing interest in its potential applications for dementia care. These technologies offer new possibilities for communication support, cognitive engagement and personalised interaction, yet they also introduce complex ethical, relational and practical challenges. Nurses&mdash;who hold central, sustained roles across dementia care settings&mdash;are key mediators of technology adoption and are positioned to assess the appropriateness, safety and ethical implications of GAI use. However, existing literature remains fragmented and largely focused on technological development or patient-facing outcomes, with limited synthesis of nurses&rsquo; roles, experiences and ethical perspectives. This scoping review aims to map the current evidence regarding how nurses engage with GAI in dementia care and to identify gaps that may inform practice, policy and future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the methodological framework of Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley, refined by Levac <I>et al</I> and guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Reporting will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. The review will be conducted between March 2026 and October 2026, encompassing database searching, screening, data charting, synthesis and reporting. A comprehensive search will be conducted across MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science using controlled vocabulary and keywords related to nursing, generative artificial intelligence and dementia. Eligible sources will include empirical studies, reviews, conceptual papers and policy analyses that report nursing roles, experiences or ethical considerations related to GAI in dementia care. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts and extract data using a structured charting form. Findings will be synthesised through descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis, supported by conceptual mapping to illustrate relationships among GAI types, nursing roles, ethical concerns and care settings. Critical appraisal will not be undertaken, as it is optional in scoping reviews and is not aligned with the primary mapping objectives of this review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as the review synthesises publicly available literature. Should the optional interest-holders consultation be undertaken, ethical clearance will be obtained from an appropriate institutional review board prior to participant engagement. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and knowledge-translation outputs targeted at clinicians, educators, policymakers and AI developers. The review will support informed, ethically grounded integration of GAI in dementia care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Y.-C., Nieh, H.-C., Chen, H.-C., Chen, J.-C., Chang, M.-Y., Wu, P.-O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114064</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114064</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Generative artificial intelligence in dementia care: a scoping review protocol on nursing roles, experiences and ethical perspectives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114064</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114064</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115730?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Delivering hospital care at home in a Dutch Tertiary University Hospital: protocol for a prospective feasibility cohort study evaluating a Virtual Ward for early discharge of inpatients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115730?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Virtual Wards (VWs) facilitate hospital-level monitoring, diagnostics and treatment within patients&rsquo; homes, while the hospital team retains responsibility for care. International research indicates that VWs decrease hospital length of stay without increasing readmissions; however, the feasibility and key operational determinants within Dutch care remain uncertain. This protocol outlines the VW for Early Discharge in Patients Receiving Inpatient Care (VIP Care) study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The VIP Care study is a single-centre prospective feasibility cohort study conducted at Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The study encompasses seven predefined subcohorts with n=51 eligible patients per subcohort: (1) bacterial, fungal or parasitic infections; (2) viral respiratory infections; (3) dehydration; (4) decompensated heart failure; (5) high-dose corticosteroid treatment; (6) post-transsphenoidal pituitary surgery follow-up and (7) severe inflammatory skin disease with or without bacterial or viral superinfection. Adults who require hospital-level monitoring and/or therapy may qualify for early discharge to the VW.</p>
<p>The VW integrates scheduled, patient-performed measurements using (European Conformity) CE-marked devices with structured symptom assessment submitted via a patient application, and data review in an electronic health record-integrated clinician cockpit. Submissions are evaluated by VW tele-nurses using prespecified Early Warning Score based thresholds and an escalation protocol. Patients receive a daily physician telephone review. Diagnostics and treatments are administered at home to hospital standards through established home-care services.</p>
<p>The primary outcome (feasibility) is adherence to transfer, defined as the proportion of eligible inpatients who provide written informed consent and are subsequently successfully transferred to the VW. The prespecified feasibility threshold is 30%. Secondary outcomes include reach (eligibility, invitation and consent rates among admitted patients), operational performance during the VW episode (alert frequency and handling, contact volumes and actions), length of stay on the ward and in the VW, emergency department reassessments and 30-day readmissions. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to identify implementation determinants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study received approval from the Erasmus MC Medical Ethics Committee (MEC-2024&ndash;0060; amendment MEC-2024&ndash;0060 A0001). Incremental risk is considered minimal. Written informed consent is obtained. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and an accessible lay summary.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov <A HREF="NCT06936891">NCT06936891</A>; CCMO NL85516.078.24. Recruitment began in May 2025 and is ongoing.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Herwerden, M. C., Scholte, N. T. B., Mkrtchjan, A., Feyz, L., Mol, A. P., Aitken, J., de Boer, R. A., Chandoesing, P. P., Gommers, D. A. M. P. J., De Haan, B., Den Hoed, C. M., van den Hoogen, M. W. F., Peeters, R. P., Wlazlo, N., Van Der Boon, R. M. A., van De Weg, C. A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115730</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115730</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Delivering hospital care at home in a Dutch Tertiary University Hospital: protocol for a prospective feasibility cohort study evaluating a Virtual Ward for early discharge of inpatients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115730</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115730</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e116557?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying innovative models of urgent care in rural coastal areas in England: the Elevate study - a mixed-methods protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e116557?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Urgent and emergency care (UEC) systems in England face unprecedented pressures, with record accident and emergency attendances, persistent breaches of ambulance response targets and poorer outcomes for time-sensitive conditions. National UEC recovery plans have introduced multiple innovations&mdash;such as same-day emergency care, virtual wards and specialty hubs&mdash;to manage these pressures and improve patient flow. Rural coastal areas are particularly vulnerable to excessive demand due to higher levels of deprivation, older populations with complex health needs, seasonal surges that generate unpredictable demand and challenges in attracting and retaining staff. Following the Chief Medical Officer&rsquo;s 2021 Annual Report, funding research and developing bespoke solutions to manage UEC demand and address geographical disparities has been recognised as a national priority. The Elevate study responds to this priority by identifying and evaluating innovative models of UEC in rural coastal communities in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Elevate study is a 30-month, mixed-methods evaluation that comprises three interlinked work packages: (1) <I>National service mapping</I>&mdash;outlining provision of innovative models of UEC in rural coastal areas of England. This will be developed through document review and interviews with regional and national service leaders. (2) <I>Quantitative analysis</I>&mdash;quasiexperimental and longitudinal approaches will use National Health Service (NHS) England&rsquo;s Emergency Care Data Set and linked routine NHS datasets to evaluate the impact of UEC models on health and process outcomes. Standard and bespoke metrics will be developed and used to assess performance. (3) <I>Qualitative case studies</I>&mdash;up to 12 case studies of UEC models in rural coastal communities. Interviews with patients and staff and non-participant observation will explore how and why different UEC models influence patient experience, clinical outcomes, resource use and the workforce. Findings will be integrated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify components of UEC models that are effective, scalable and sensitive to local context,</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for qualitative components was granted by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (25/NS/0099). Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, creative media and community engagement activities to ensure findings are communicated inclusively and effectively to policymakers, health and social care practitioners and the public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Research Registry (researchregistry11126).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lampard, P., Adamson, J., Anderson, H., Ballantine, L., Bell, F., Benger, J. R., Blakey, R. L., Dickinson, P., Dykes, S., Gaughan, J., Maitland-Knibb, S., Mensah, D., Ransome, Z. A., Richardson, G., Santos, R., Sheridan, R., Sivey, P., Smith, E., Song, W., Sutcliffe, M., Stockwell, C. J., Voss, S., Scantlebury, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T07:52:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116557</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2026-116557</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying innovative models of urgent care in rural coastal areas in England: the Elevate study - a mixed-methods protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116557</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116557</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e093113ret?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[RETRACTION: Wealth-based inequality and dropout rate in the completion of the continuum of maternal healthcare in Ethiopia: a secondary data analysis of the Mini Demographic and Health Survey of 2019]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e093113ret?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>This article<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> is retracted by the journal.</p> <sec id="s1"><st>What happened after publication</st> <p>Concerns were raised with BMJ about the accuracy of the authorship of the work including that the listed authors had not conducted the work.</p> <p>The work is based on a thesis by Samrawit Berihun,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> completed at Haramaya University. Berihun submitted this work to a non-BMJ journal for publication.</p> <p>Melsew Setegn Alie was invited to peer review Berihun&rsquo;s article. After providing a reviewer&rsquo;s report, Alie then made minor edits to Berihun&rsquo;s manuscript and submitted this to <I>BMJ Open</I> without Berihun&rsquo;s permission. The <I>BMJ Open</I> submission included a new author list. Berihun was unaware of the submission to <I>BMJ Open</I>, and was not listed as an author. The individuals who are listed as authors on the paper published in <I>BMJ Open</I> could not provide evidence that they contributed to the work.</p> </sec> <sec id="s2"><st>Reasons for...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T20:32:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093113ret</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-093113ret</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[RETRACTION: Wealth-based inequality and dropout rate in the completion of the continuum of maternal healthcare in Ethiopia: a secondary data analysis of the Mini Demographic and Health Survey of 2019]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Retraction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e093113ret</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e093113ret</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098602?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing patient involvement in treatment decision-making for diabetic retinopathy: a mixed methods study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098602?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The diversity of treatment options for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the high uncertainty about the benefits and risks of different treatment modalities necessitate shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals. However, little is known about the involvement of individuals with DR in treatment decision-making in China. This study aims to gain insight into the current status and factors associated with involvement in treatment decision-making in patients with DR. Furthermore, we will explore the experiences and perceptions of patients with DR regarding their involvement in treatment decision-making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a mixed-method study using an explanatory sequential design. In the quantitative research (n=350), participants&rsquo; actual decision-making roles, sociodemographic data, disease-related data, health literacy, need for involvement in decision-making, decision-making self-efficacy, social support and ophthalmologist facilitation of patient involvement will be investigated to analyse the current state of patient involvement in treatment decision-making and the factors influencing it. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance and multinomial logistic regression will be performed. During this period, individual semistructured interviews will be conducted with a subset of these participants to understand the perceptions and experiences of people with DR regarding their involvement in treatment decision-making, and thematic analysis will be used to analyse the interview data. Finally, the joint display will be used to integrate quantitative and qualitative data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the Ethical Review Committee for Human Trials of Shanghai General Hospital, China (number: 2024&ndash;098). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants after they have been fully informed about the study, prior to any data collection. The study&rsquo;s findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference reports.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400087906.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, L., Zhang, H., Shen, Y., Pu, J., Wu, Q., Chen, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098602</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098602</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing patient involvement in treatment decision-making for diabetic retinopathy: a mixed methods study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098602</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098602</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101017?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physical activity advice from general practitioners in Germany: findings from a cross-sectional population survey of individuals with chronic ischaemic heart disease (OptiCor study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101017?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The current German treatment guideline for chronic ischaemic heart disease (IHD) recommends that general practitioners (GPs) deliver brief advice on physical activity (PA) to patients with IHD. Such advice consists of at least three elements (ie, 3As): (1) assessing the PA level, (2) advising on PA and (3) assisting with recommendations. This study examined the extent to which individuals with self-reported IHD in Germany reported the receipt of such advice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional population-based face-to-face survey (from June 2023 to August 2024).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Households across Germany.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1004 individuals aged 35+ years with self-reported IHD and GP contact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome: self-reported proportions of receipt of GP-delivered PA advice according to the 3As. Main secondary outcome: associations between person characteristics and the likelihood of receiving PA advice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among individuals with self-reported IHD, 36.4% (95% CI 33.4% to 39.4%) received all 3As of PA advice, 42.1% (95% CI 39.1% to 45.2%) received one or two elements, 9.9% (95% CI 8.1% to 11.8%) received no advice at all and 3.8% (95% CI 2.7% to 5.1%) were advised to avoid PA (7.9% did not remember/refused to answer). Women (vs men) were more likely to receive no advice (OR=1.74, 95% CI 1.11% to 2.72%), while middle (vs younger) aged individuals (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.22% to 0.99%), those with PA levels of 1&ndash;149 min/week (vs no PA; OR=0.16, 95% CI 0.08% to 0.31%) and of 150+ min/week (vs no PA; OR=0.13, 95% CI 0.07% to 0.23%) and those with higher (vs lower) education (OR=0.39, 95% CI 0.20% to 0.76%) were less likely to receive no advice. Individuals living in urban (vs rural) areas (OR=0.65, 95% CI 0.46% to 0.88%) and those with PA levels of 1&ndash;149 min/week (vs no PA; OR=0.59, 95% CI 0.37% to 0.95%) and of 150+ min/week (vs no PA; OR=0.55, 95% CI 0.36% to 0.84%) were less likely to receive only one or two (vs all) of the 3As. Of those who received at least one element of advice (n=788), 72.5% reported they were more active afterwards, with a higher proportion when all 3As (vs only some elements) were provided (86.8% vs 59.6%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Only one-third of individuals with self-reported IHD in Germany received comprehensive PA advice. Specific person characteristics, such as female gender and lower education, were associated with lower proportions of received PA advice. Efforts are needed to improve GP-led PA guidance, particularly for underserved groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00031304).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoppe, S., Prinz, A., Kotz, D., Mons, U., Kuss, O., Crutzen, R., Kastaun, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101017</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101017</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physical activity advice from general practitioners in Germany: findings from a cross-sectional population survey of individuals with chronic ischaemic heart disease (OptiCor study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101017</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101017</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101101?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with GEMOX and lenvatinib in combination with adebrelimab for resectable high-risk recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC): study protocol of the NEO-ERA-01 feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101101?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a high recurrence rate after curative surgery, with no standard neoadjuvant therapy. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown efficacy in locally advanced ICC, while immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents have demonstrated promising response rates. The NEO-ERA-01 study evaluates the feasibility of neoadjuvant HAIC-GEMOX plus lenvatinib and Adebrelimab in high-risk resectable ICC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>NEO-ERA-01 is a prospective, multicentre, phase II trial using Simon&rsquo;s two-stage design. Thirty patients with histologically confirmed resectable ICC and high-risk recurrence factors will be enrolled in China. Neoadjuvant therapy consists of HAIC-GEMOX (gemcitabine 800 mg/m&sup2;, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m&sup2; every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (8 mg/day from Day 5) and Adebrelimab (1200 mg on Day 3, every 3 weeks) for 2&ndash;4 cycles. Surgery eligibility will be assessed post-treatment. Resected patients will receive adjuvant capecitabine (1250 mg/m&sup2; two times per day on Days 1&ndash;14, every 3 weeks) and Adebrelimab (1200 mg on Day 1, every 3 weeks) for 6 months.</p>
<p>The primary endpoint is the completion rate of study treatment. Secondary endpoints include safety, R0 resection rate, response rate, event-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include immune microenvironment and biomarker analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is approved by the ethics committee of all sites and follows the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06208462">NCT06208462</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheng, Y., Xia, J., Chi, Y., Rao, J., Cheng, F., CLEAP China Liver Cancer Study Group Young Investigators (CLEAP)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101101</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101101</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with GEMOX and lenvatinib in combination with adebrelimab for resectable high-risk recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC): study protocol of the NEO-ERA-01 feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101101</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102058?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between lifestyle changes and metabolic syndrome: a prospective cohort study in middle-aged Koreans]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102058?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to determine whether certain lifestyle factors, specifically alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, sleep duration and sleep quality, are associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and to assess how changes in lifestyle behaviours over time influence MetS prevalence in the middle-aged Korean population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Community-based, prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>South Korea, baseline in 2017&ndash;2019 and follow-up in 2020&ndash;2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included 1436 adult individuals aged &ge;30&ndash;59 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of MetS at follow-up, determined according to established diagnostic criteria. Secondary outcomes included the association between MetS and five key lifestyle factors: alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, sleep quality and sleep duration. Lifestyle changes were categorised into four groups based on stability between baseline and follow-up assessments. Outcome measures remained consistent with the study&rsquo;s initial protocol, with no modifications to the planned variables or measured criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of MetS increased from 15.3% at baseline to 19.6% at follow-up. At follow-up, insufficient physical activity (OR=1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.92) and poor sleep quality (OR=1.37, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.84) were significantly associated with MetS. Among lifestyle change patterns, long-term unhealthy physical activity (OR=1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.39) and sleep quality (OR=1.50, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.24) behaviours were associated with an increased risk of MetS. Poisson regression analyses of incident cases showed that only unfavourable changes in sleep duration were significantly associated with incident MetS (rate ratios=1.74, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.95). However, no significant associations were observed for other lifestyle change patterns, including behaviours that improved or worsened over time, and no meaningful associations were identified for non-significant lifestyle factors, such as smoking and alcohol consumption.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The prevalence of MetS was associated not only with individual lifestyle factors but also with long-term patterns of unhealthy behaviours, with persistent shortage of physical activity, poor sleep quality and inadequate sleep duration identified as significant contributors to increased MetS risk. Future research should explore a broader range of risk factors over longer follow-up periods to better understand the long-term impact of lifestyle modifications on MetS development.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeong, K., Kim, H., Lee, S., Baek, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102058</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102058</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between lifestyle changes and metabolic syndrome: a prospective cohort study in middle-aged Koreans]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102058</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102058</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patiromer utility as an adjunct treatment in patients needing urgent hyperkalaemia management (PLATINUM): a randomised controlled trial in the emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Hyperkalaemia (HK) is common in the emergency department (ED) and can cause life-threatening arrhythmias. Patiromer is a potassium binder whose role in acute HK management is uncertain; therefore, we investigated the efficacy and safety of patiromer as an adjunct to the standard of care treatment of HK in the ED.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>16 ED sites across the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients aged &ge;18 years treated at a participating ED who were found to have serum potassium &ge;5.8 mEq/L.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants were randomised 1:1 to standard combination therapy (25 g intravenous dextrose, 5 units intravenous insulin and 10 mg albuterol) with either patiromer or placebo. The initial dose was given within 1 hour of the potassium result, and the second dose 24 hours later.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary endpoint was net clinical benefit (NCB) at 6 hours, defined as the change in number of potassium-lowering interventions minus change in serum potassium. Adverse events (AEs) were also recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study was terminated early and did not reach the prespecified sample size. Overall, 111 patients (53 patiromer and 58 placebo) were analysed. Mean (SD) age was 61.34 (15.21) years, 34% were female, 48% white and 22.5% received chronic haemodialysis. Mean baseline potassium was 6.5 mmol/L. NCB at 6 hours was similar between patiromer and placebo (&ndash;0.6 vs &ndash;0.4; p=0.44). Potassium levels at 2, 4 and 6 hours were similar between the groups (5.50 vs 5.70, 5.45 vs 5.65, 5.50 vs 5.60; patiromer and placebo (all p&gt;0.05)). The number of interventions per patient was similar (p&gt;0.05) between groups at each time point. The proportion of patients experiencing AEs was not significant between the patiromer and placebo groups (16.98% vs 32.76%; p=0.08).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>No differences in efficacy were reported in this study, which was underpowered to detect statistical efficacy of patiromer over placebo.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04443608">NCT04443608</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafique, Z., Safdar, B., Duanmu, Y., Boone, S., Meltzer, A., Bischof, J. J., Robinson, D., Budden, J., Budd, J., Quinn, C. M., Milliet, C., Singer, A. J., Soto, K., Peacock, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105103</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105103</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patiromer utility as an adjunct treatment in patients needing urgent hyperkalaemia management (PLATINUM): a randomised controlled trial in the emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105103</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105124?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-utility analysis of the Circle of Security-Parenting programme to reduce perinatal psychopathology in birthing parents in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105124?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) group intervention has demonstrated efficacy in reducing maternal perinatal mental health difficulty (PMHD) symptoms in some contexts. The Circle of Security Intervention (COSI) study, a multisite, individually randomised, single-blind, parallel-arm controlled trial, was conducted in England to assess the clinical effectiveness of COS-P in reducing perinatal psychopathology, parenting and infant development, as well as its acceptability among the National Health Service (NHS) participants and staff. The main aim of this work is to estimate the cost-utility of COS-P plus treatment as usual (TAU) relative to TAU among mothers and birthing parents receiving NHS perinatal mental health services (PMHS) in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A within-trial economic evaluation was performed comparing COS-P plus TAU with TAU alone, using data from the COSI trial, which employed a 2:1 randomisation ratio. Analyses were conducted from both NHS and personal social services (PSS) and societal perspectives. A 12-month time horizon was used, consistent with the final trial follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary care NHS perinatal health services across multiple centres in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 371 mothers and birthing parents with PMHD were randomised and had complete economic outcome data; 248 received COS-P plus TAU and 123 received TAU alone. Participants were eligible if they were receiving NHS PMHS; exclusion criteria were defined in the trial protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants in the intervention arm received the COS-P group programme in addition to TAU. The control group received TAU alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary economic outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 12 months, derived from the 5-level EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire - responses. Costs were estimated from NHS and PSS as well as societal perspectives, including healthcare utilisation and productivity losses due to work absence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with TAU, COS-P was associated with higher costs from both NHS and PSS (&pound;180.58; 95% CI &ndash;&pound;1075 to &pound;1436) and societal (&pound;72.94; 95% CI &ndash;&pound;1473 to &pound;1619) perspectives. COS-P was marginally less effective in terms of QALYs (&ndash;0.01; 95% CI &ndash;0.06 to 0.05). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated substantial uncertainty around cost and effectiveness estimates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>On average, COS-P was associated with higher costs and did not demonstrate improvements in health-related quality of life compared with TAU alone. Given the uncertainty surrounding the estimates, further research is warranted to explore potential longer term economic and clinical impacts of COS-P in perinatal mental health settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>SRCTN18308962.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, J., Rosan, C., Alyousefi-van Dijk, K., Darwin, Z., Babalis, D., Cornelius, V., Waddingham, E., Richards, L., Pilling, S., Fearon, P., Fonagy, P., Pizzo, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-utility analysis of the Circle of Security-Parenting programme to reduce perinatal psychopathology in birthing parents in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105124</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106828?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematic review and meta-analysis assessing longitudinal changes in symptom prevalence, severity and health-related quality of life in post-COVID-19 syndrome: a protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106828?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is characterised by persistent symptoms, such as fatigue, dyspnoea, depression and sleep problems, following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The long-term course and impact on quality of life remain unclear. This review aims to synthesise evidence on longitudinal changes in symptom prevalence, severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with PCS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will include longitudinal studies (randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies) of adults (&ge;18 years) with PCS, defined by symptoms persisting beyond 4 weeks after acute infection. Eligible studies must report changes in prevalence or severity of fatigue, dyspnoea, depression, sleep problems or HRQoL from baseline to at least one follow-up visit.</p>
<p>We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and Epistemonikos, with no restrictions on language, date or publication status. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using validated tools appropriate to study design. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer.</p>
<p>A narrative synthesis will summarise study characteristics and symptom trajectories. Where sufficient data are available, random-effects meta-analyses will be conducted to estimate pooled changes in symptom prevalence (ORs), severity ((standardised) mean differences) and HRQoL ((standardised) mean differences). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses will explore potential effect modifiers. Certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is required. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and plain language summaries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251011612.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarpari, K., Tho&#x0308;lking, T., Ro&#x0308;ver, C., Ammous, O., Mu&#x0308;ller, F., Hummers, E., Wolff, L., Friede, T., Behrens, G. M., Schro&#x0308;der, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106828</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106828</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematic review and meta-analysis assessing longitudinal changes in symptom prevalence, severity and health-related quality of life in post-COVID-19 syndrome: a protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106828</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106828</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107569?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Left atrial strain and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107569?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The prognostic value of left atrial (LA) strain in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study investigated the prognostic value of LA strain in HFrEF patients in relation to all-cause mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 822 echocardiograms from HFrEF patients admitted to a heart failure clinic were analysed offline. To calculate left atrial reservoir strain (LA RS) and left atrial contractile strain (LA CS), LA two-dimensional speckle tracking was performed in the 4-chamber, 2-chamber and 3-chamber view. The end-point was all-cause mortality. The association between LA strain parameters and outcome was examined using Cox regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The median follow-up time was 40 months and follow-up was 100% complete. During follow-up, a total of 137 patients (16.7%) died of all causes. In a final multivariable model adjusted for clinical and echocardiographic parameters including global longitudinal strain, LA RS and LA CS were significantly associated with all-cause death during follow-up (LA RS, HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99, p=0.014, pr. 1% increase) (LA CS, HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98, p=0.002, pr. 1% increase).</p>
<p>When added to the final multivariable model, both LA RS and LA CS contributed with incremental prognostic value as determined by C-statistic (LA RS: C-stat difference 0.007, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.020, p=0.050) (LA CS: C-stat difference 0.009, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.023, p=0.030).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In HFrEF patients, LA RS and LA CS were associated with all-cause mortality and contributed incremental prognostic value in addition to established prognostic measures.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O&#x0308;zbek, B. T., Modin, D., Sengelov, M., Jorgensen, P. G., Bruun, N. E., Fritz-Hansen, T., Biering-Sorensen, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107569</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107569</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Left atrial strain and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107569</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107569</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109480?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vocal biomarkers for geriatric health assessment: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109480?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Global ageing populations require accessible, non-invasive tools for early detection and monitoring of neurological chronic and neurodegenerative diseases. Current diagnostic methods face limitations including invasiveness, high costs and infrequent clinical assessments. The human voice has emerged as a promising digital biomarker, with vocal characteristics reflecting physiological and cognitive changes associated with conditions like dementia and Parkinson&rsquo;s disease. While artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have enabled sophisticated vocal analysis, the literature remains fragmented without comprehensive synthesis. This scoping review protocol delineates a systematic approach to collate and synthesise existing research on the application of AI-driven audio biomarkers for the detection and management of neurological diseases (eg, cognitive decline, Parkinson&rsquo;s disease, Alzheimer&rsquo;s, dementia and depression) in older adults aged 65 years and above.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley, incorporating recent methodological advancements. The eligibility criteria for study selection will be formulated using the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework. A comprehensive literature search will be performed across several electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Embase, Compendex, CINAHL, Scientific Information Database (SID), Magiran, IranMedex and Barakat Knowledge Network System (BKNS). The search will encompass peer-reviewed articles published in Persian and English from 1 January 2012 to 31 March 2026. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts and extract data according to the predefined PCC-based eligibility criteria. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion or, if necessary, by consultation with a third reviewer. The results will be synthesised and presented narratively, accompanied by summary tables, charts and figures to address each research question.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Research Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences approved the protocol for this scoping review (approval number: IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1404.223). They concluded that since the review involves only analysis of existing literature without direct patient involvement or clinical procedures, it meets the relevant ethical standards. Results from the review will be shared through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations to provide valuable insights for researchers, clinicians and policymakers on the use of audio-based biomarkers in older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>Not registered.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amir-Behghadami, M., Gholipour, K., Mohammadzadeh, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109480</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109480</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vocal biomarkers for geriatric health assessment: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109480</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109480</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109766?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising electroacupuncture parameters for post-stroke hand dysfunction: protocol for a multi-arm randomised controlled trial using orthogonal design]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109766?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Hand dysfunction following stroke, especially during the flaccid paralysis phase, significantly impairs patients&rsquo; motor abilities and daily functioning. Electroacupuncture (EA) is widely used in post-stroke rehabilitation; however, inconsistent clinical outcomes and lack of standardised treatment parameters have limited its broader adoption.</p>
<p>This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial designed to determine optimal EA parameters for post-stroke hand dysfunction using an orthogonal experimental design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods/design</st>
<p>This protocol presents a single-centre, randomised controlled trial design with 10 arms. A total of 110 patients with post-stroke hand dysfunction will be randomly assigned to nine electroacupuncture groups or one sham acupuncture group in equal proportions. Participants will receive 12 treatment sessions over 2 weeks. The EA groups are designed based on a four-factor, three-level orthogonal design to systematically evaluate the main effects of acupoint selection, stimulation frequency, needle thickness and treatment duration. The primary outcome is the effective response rate, defined as reduction in the Chinese Stroke Scale (CSS) score at 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes include assessments with the Modified Lindmark Rating Scale, range of motion measures, Modified Barthel Index and hand motor subscores of the CSS. As this is a trial protocol, results are not yet available. Statistical analyses will be conducted after completion of recruitment and follow-up according to the prespecified analysis plan. Safety and adverse events will be monitored throughout the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This trial is designed to address the current lack of evidence-based standardisation of EA parameters for post-stroke hand dysfunction. By systematically evaluating key treatment components using an orthogonal experimental design, the study aims to identify optimal EA strategies and provide a methodological framework to improve consistency, reproducibility and clinical effectiveness in post-stroke hand rehabilitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This manuscript describes a study protocol and does not report any data from participants at this stage. Ethical approval for the planned trial was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Approval No. TYLL2024(K)072). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. The results of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ITMCTR2024000819.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharma, A., Han, L., Deng, H., Sun, W., Wang, F., Zhang, C., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Guo, H., Meng, Y., Chen, Y., Hou, J., He, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109766</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109766</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Complementary medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising electroacupuncture parameters for post-stroke hand dysfunction: protocol for a multi-arm randomised controlled trial using orthogonal design]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Complementary medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109766</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109766</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111865?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor use and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure: a 1-year prospective cohort study from Jordan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111865?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Heart failure (HF) is associated with complex symptoms and frequent hospitalisation that reduce patients&rsquo; quality of life (QoL). This study aims to assess the association between angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) use and changes in QoL and disease-related outcomes among patients with HF in Jordan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>The study was conducted among patients with HF attending the outpatient cardiology clinics at Jordan University Hospital, a tertiary care centre in Amman, Jordan. Patients either initiated on ARNI or receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) were included in the study at a 1:2 ratio. All participants were followed up for up to 1 year after recruitment. The study period was from 4 February 2024 to 29 May 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Data on QoL, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were collected at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Hospitalisation data were collected for the preceding year and the year following participants&rsquo; recruitment. Medication adherence and ARNI side effects were assessed after 3-month of follow-up period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 227 patients with HF were included; 74 were initiated on ARNI, and 153 were receiving ACEIs/ARBs. At baseline, significantly lower QoL scores and LVEF were observed in the ARNI group compared with the ACEIs/ARBs group. After 3-month, the ARNI group showed improvements in all QoL scores, NYHA functional class and LVEF (p&lt;0.05). Worsened QoL scores (symptom stability, symptom burden, self-efficacy domains and clinical summary score) were detected within the ACEIs/ARBs group (p&lt;0.05). One-year post-recruitment a significant reduction in cardiovascular and all-cause hospitalisations (p&lt;0.05) was observed in the ARNI group compared with the ACEIs/ARBs group. Adherence levels assessed after 3 months of treatment were shown to be high in both study groups (p=0.558). The main ARNI side effect was hypotension.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ARNI use was associated with favourable QoL, NYHA class, and LVEF as well as lower hospitalisation rates among patients with HF in Jordan. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Odeh, R. S., Abdel Jalil, M., Qudah, M. A., Al-Makhamreh, H. K., Saleh, A., Awwad, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111865</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111865</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor use and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure: a 1-year prospective cohort study from Jordan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111865</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111865</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115592?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bereavement practices within older adult care homes in Scotland: a focus group study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115592?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe how care home staff experience bereavement and their perspectives on providing bereavement care within care home settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative descriptive study using focus groups analysed with the Framework Method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Seven residential and nursing care homes for older adults in Scotland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>37 care home staff were recruited through the Enabling Research In Care Homes (ENRICH) Scotland research network. Participants included registered nurses, care workers, senior care workers, managers and ancillary workers with experience of resident death and bereavement practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Bereavement was woven through everyday care home life, understood as a tapestry of experiences, relationships and practices that involved staff, residents and their relatives. Three themes that connected to the tapestry metaphor were identified: Warps: structural threads grounding bereavement within the culture of homely living, where close bonds normalise death and dying, and pragmatic acceptance. Wefts: strengthening practices nurturing resilience, including relational trust, mutual support, rituals and follow-up with relatives. Moths: disruptions undermining bereavement practice include family secrecy, hospital deaths with withheld information, difficulty supporting residents with advanced dementia and dissatisfaction with online training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Bereavement in care homes is collective, relational and embedded in routine practice. Organisational recognition of grief improved interservice communication. Tailored reflective support for staff is needed to sustain compassionate care. Further research should explore how residents experience repeated exposure to death and bereavement within communal living environments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drummond, M., Burton, J., MacEachen, D., Johnston, B. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115592</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115592</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bereavement practices within older adult care homes in Scotland: a focus group study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115592</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115592</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115775?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Careful ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the protocol of the CAVIARDS international multicentre randomised basket trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115775?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major public health problem, accounting for 23% of intubated patients and associated with high mortality rates. Although lifesaving, invasive mechanical ventilation can worsen lung injury when ventilator settings are poorly adjusted to lung physiology. We hypothesise that individualising ventilator settings via (1) the bedside assessment of lung recruitability using a one-breath derecruitment manoeuvre and measurement of airway opening pressure to set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), (2) controlling the distending pressure and (3) controlling respiratory drive improves ARDS outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The CAreful Ventilation In ARDS trial is an investigator-led multicentre (33 centres in eight countries), open-label, randomised controlled basket trial comparing two ventilation strategies in two subpopulations of moderate-to-severe ARDS: induced or not by COVID-19. A total of 740 patients will be randomised (370 in each substudy) in a 1:1 ratio to individualised ventilator settings or to using traditional PEEP to inspired fraction of oxygen tables for PEEP setting. Indications for proning and weaning strategies are similar in both arms. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at day 60. Secondary outcomes include duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, organ dysfunction, barotrauma and mortality in ICU, at day 28 and in hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval has been obtained for all participating centres: Unity Health Toronto Research Ethics Board (for three centres: St Michael&rsquo;s Hospital, Toronto General Hospital and Toronto Western Hospital); Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica de Investigaci&oacute;n con Medicamentos del Hospital Universitari Vall d&rsquo;Hebron; Comit&eacute; de protection des personnes Ile de France III; Comit&eacute; d'&Eacute;tica de la Investigatci&oacute;n con Medicamentos de la Fundaci&oacute; de Gesti&oacute; Sanit&agrave;ria del Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau; Comitato Etico&mdash;Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli; Comitato Etico di Area Vasta Emilia Centro; NYU Langone Health Institutional Review Board; Comit&eacute; &Eacute;tico Cient&iacute;fico de Ciencias de la Salud; Il Comitato Etico Area 1 dell&rsquo;Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria &lsquo;Ospedali Riuniti&rsquo; di Foggia; HIGA &lsquo;Eva Per&oacute;n&rsquo; Comit&eacute; de Bio&eacute;tica; Comit&eacute; de Revisi&oacute;n Institucional del Hospital Brit&aacute;nico Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica en Investigaci&oacute;n; Complejo M&eacute;dico Churruca-Visca Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica Biom&eacute;dica; Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica SATI Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica en Investigaci&oacute;n; Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica en Investigaci&oacute;n del CEMIC; Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica SATI Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica en Investigaci&oacute;n; Medical Research Ethics Committees United. Findings will be disseminated in peer review journals and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT03963622">NCT03963622</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coudroy, R., Telias, I., Jonkman, A., Thille, A. W., Diehl, J.-L., Peron, N., Ko, M., Bourion, A.-A., Tiribelli, N., Fredes, S., Gutierrez, M., Manchado Bruno, A., Vasquez, D. N., Pratto, R. A., Plotnikow, G. A., Bianchini, F., Accoce, M., Dorado, J., Spadaro, S., La Rosa, R., Prat, G., Bailly, P., Delbove, A., Pacheco-Reyes, A., Roca, O., Kuteifan, K., Rouze, A., Grieco, D. L., Izura-Gomez, M., Mancebo, J., Sigaud, F., Terzi, N., Saccheri, C., Dellamonica, J., Richecoeur, J., Setten, M., Rauseo, M., Beloncle, F., Repusseau, B., Roze, H., Tran-Van, D., Damiani, F., Slama, M., Kaufman, D. A., Maraffi, T., Goligher, E. C., Plantefeve, G., Determann, R., Giamou, M., Pham, T., Del Sorbo, L., Keown-Stoneman, C. D. G., Nisenbaum, R., Thorpe, K., Piraino, T., Chen, L., Ju&#x0308;ni, P., Ferguson, N. D., Slutsky, A. S., Brochard, L., The CAVIARDS study group, Guignon, Roubin, Deletage, Chatellier, Boissier, Arrive, Frat, Benhamouche, Rodriguez, Reynaud, Guerot, Santi, Augy, Chekhrit, Younan, Hermann, Hauw-Berlemont, Sandhu, Khalid, Kim, Sklar, Lu, Santos, Wong, Greco, Every, Churcher, Moffatt, Samant, Ko, Seguin, Jacob, Vallee, Mazzoni, Lemeur, Francois, Jarousseau, Moelli, Cayla, Dupeyrat, Terrier, Varela, Feldman, Quaranta, Lompizano, Echavarria, Durlach, Lavorato, Sabate, Badariotti, Zurra, Solarte, Eiguren, Aphalo, Quiroga, Acosta, Wilhelm, Nunez, Antonini, Escalier, Ariel, D'Annunzio, Gomez, Bono, Gutierrez, Murias, Loustau, Sac, Brozzi, Melgarejo, Pozo, Torres, Perez, Vergottini, Davalos, Masso, Cesio, Volta, Marangoni, Chiavieri, Ottaviani, Scaramuzzo, Mainguy, Bigot, Fedun, Goepp, Merlet, Lebas, Huntzinger, Jan, Acilu, Colomina, Camon, Rodriguez, Benaiges, Ramstein, Alzina, Stiel, Pointurier, Baldacini, Perrin, Dureau, Ionescu, Labro, Joy, Oudeville, Pinto, Poidevin, Rabouel, Mariller, Cuvelliez, Delcourte, Cerf, Duthoit, Waeghe, Gravio, DelSignore, Pascale, Cutuli, Menga, Farre, Chorro, Abalde, Sonet, DeIrujo, Montero, Sintes, Orella, Martinez-Sahuquillo, MoralesAlarcon, Beny, Gamon, Collomb-Muret, Turbil, Revil-Misnetti, Dartevel, Latchimy, Vallod, Tucakovic, Refes, Pierre, Turbe, Bouskila, Hyvernat, Doyen, Devanlay, Morand, Jozwiak, Buscot, Gazoppi, Houyou, Salas, Douadi, Diliberto, Huysman, Caplin, Sagnier, Combaux, Luis, Mercier, Cieri, Hunter, Rodriguez, Maskin, Frosiani, McCredie, Rampersaud, Singh, Ravichandran, Guan, Daou, Coman, Lamanna, Izzi, Pepe, Laforgia, Visconti, Masson, Jaubert, Beaumale, Pelletier, Ballarini, Clerc, Cronier, Monziols, Belveyre, Perrier, Boisselier, Batsale, Bonnardel, Gallo, Durand, Ridolfo, Khan, Stecken, Carenco, Gaydon-Serres, Masson, Oviedo, Alegria, Garcia, Amthauer, Wilpotte, Brault, Maizel, Zerbib, Witzi, Alimohammadi, Gutierrez, Pollard, Ostie, Budhu, Beitler, Dzierba, Garcia, Olney, Patel, Serra, Mezdad, Santi, Younan, Tabra, Fan, Abdelhady, Romagnuolo, Graham, Yan, Roman-Sarita, Prin, Chenal, Chettaoui, Parco, Ali, Benrezzak, Koopmans, Koster, Huiberts, Endeman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T03:58:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115775</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115775</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Careful ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the protocol of the CAVIARDS international multicentre randomised basket trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115775</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115775</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098280?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between maternal age at childbirth and childrens internalising problems in the USA: a cross-sectional mediation analysis of housing instability and family support using the 2022 National Survey of Childrens Health (NSCH)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098280?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The optimal maternal age at childbirth has been a topic of bourgeoning literature, with earlier ages offering physiological benefits for maternal recovery. In contrast, later ages to give birth may provide psychological advantages due to greater emotional maturity. This study investigates the impact of maternal age at childbirth on children&rsquo;s internalising problems and explores the mediating roles of housing instability and family support in this relationship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study; mediation analysis of the 2022 National Survey of Children&rsquo;s Health (NSCH) data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Response in the 2022 NSCH in the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study is based on the 2022 NSCH, collecting a total of 54 103 completed surveys from randomly selected households across the USA. In this study, after excluding participants due to missing values in critical variables, 48 073 participants were included in the final analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that increasing maternal age at childbirth is associated with lower children&rsquo;s internalising problems. Analysis suggested this association operates directly and is indirectly linked to child outcomes through lower levels of housing instability and higher levels of family support. However, a distinct indirect effect emerged: increased maternal age was also associated with reduced family support, which was in turn linked to more internalising problems. The results illuminate potential mechanisms linking maternal age at childbirth to children&rsquo;s internalising problems and underscore the importance of stable housing and family support in mitigating risk factors for children&rsquo;s emotional well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>We found an association between advanced maternal age and fewer internalising problems in children. This relationship appears to operate directly and indirectly via a sequential pathway: higher maternal age correlates with lower housing instability, which in turn is associated with increased family support, ultimately correlating with improved child mental health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, M. M., Li, D. M., Ju, Q. R., Zhao, Y. J., Tuo, Z. T., Zhang, X. S., Liu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098280</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098280</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between maternal age at childbirth and childrens internalising problems in the USA: a cross-sectional mediation analysis of housing instability and family support using the 2022 National Survey of Childrens Health (NSCH)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098280</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102007?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analgesic efficacy of peri-operative methadone in orthopaedic surgery: protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102007?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Optimising post-operative pain management is crucial for recovery in orthopaedic surgery. Methadone has attracted interest due to its long half-life, <I>N</I>-methyl-D-aspartate -receptor antagonism and potential to reduce post-operative opioid consumption. Existing reviews combine multiple surgical populations, limiting applicability to orthopaedic settings. This protocol outlines a systematic review assessing the analgesic efficacy and safety of peri-operative methadone in adult and adolescent orthopaedic patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will include randomised controlled trials evaluating intravenous peri-operative methadone vs placebo or standard analgesic regimens in orthopaedic surgery. Primary outcomes are post-operative rescue opioid consumption and pain intensity within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, mobility scores and the length of hospital stay. If available data permit, a methadone dose&ndash;response pattern may be investigated. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov without date restrictions. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. When appropriate, random-effects meta-analysis methods will be performed. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using Grading of recommendations assesment, development and Evaluation (GRADE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this study uses previously published data, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42025616291.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evaldsson, B. B., Nygaard, K. H., Petersen, S. R., Moos, C. M., Stroem, T., Specht, K., Schonnemann, J. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102007</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102007</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analgesic efficacy of peri-operative methadone in orthopaedic surgery: protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102007</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102007</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103040?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and practices toward skin cancer prevention among Malaysian adults: a cross-sectional online survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103040?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the levels of knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) toward skin cancer prevention among Malaysian adults and to examine differences in KAP across socio-demographic groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional online survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-based study conducted in Malaysia using social media recruitment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 386 adults aged &ge;18 years residing in Malaysia. Most participants were young adults (86.3%), female (55.4%) and of Chinese ethnicity (65.5%). Healthcare professionals were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were levels of knowledge, attitude and preventive practices toward skin cancer, measured using the validated KAP-SC-Q (Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Skin Cancer Questionnaire) and categorised as poor, moderate or good. Secondary outcomes included differences in KAP across socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, analysed using independent t-tests and <sup>2</sup> tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over half of participants demonstrated poor knowledge of skin cancer (56.0%) and the vast majority showed inadequate preventive practices (84.2%), while attitudes toward skin cancer were predominantly positive (62.4%). Significant differences in mean KAP scores and categorical levels were observed across several socio-demographic variables. Participants with tertiary education had higher knowledge (14.32 vs 12.61) and attitude scores (20.01 vs 15.95; p&lt;0.001) than those with lower education. Individuals with a diagnosis of skin disease had significantly higher knowledge (14.95 vs 13.03; p=0.001), attitude (20.03 vs 18.21; p=0.007) and practice scores (12.10 vs 9.72; p&lt;0.001). Personal history of skin cancer and severe sunburn was associated with better preventive practices but poorer attitudes (p&lt;0.001), and light-skinned participants were more likely to have poor knowledge and attitudes (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Malaysian adults exhibited limited knowledge and very poor preventive practices toward skin cancer despite generally positive attitudes. These findings highlight substantial gaps between awareness and behaviour and support the need for targeted public health interventions to correct misconceptions, improve risk perception especially in high-risk groups and promote effective ultraviolet protection behaviours.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wong, Y. J., Ying, L. H., Hong, M. L. B., Nee, A. W. S., Ying, L. S., Ramachandram, D. S., Hassan, H. S., Jia, L. J., Dujaili, J., Blebil, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103040</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103040</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and practices toward skin cancer prevention among Malaysian adults: a cross-sectional online survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103040</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103040</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104092?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale in Chinese nurses]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104092?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Mentoring has been identified as a promising strategy for implementing and sustaining evidence-based practice (EBP) in healthcare organisation. However, no appropriate tools were specifically developed or cross-culturally adapted into Chinese context to assess nurse&rsquo;s perceived EBP mentoring, impeding comprehensive evaluation of the effects of mentoring intervention studies. This study aimed to cross-cultural adapt the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring (EBPM) scale into Mainland China and evaluate its psychometric properties, including validity and reliability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A comprehensive translation and adaptation process was adopted to achieve the Chinese version of the EBPM (C-EBPM) scale. It consists of four steps: (1) trilateral translation procedure, (2) cognitive interview, (3) psychometric testing and (4) cross-time confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted in four 3A-level hospitals located in Shaanxi and Zhejiang provinces, China, during two different data collection periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 598 registered nurses participated in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After two rounds of the trilateral translation procedure, a 9-item version of the C-EBPM scale was generated. Ten registered nurses participated in cognitive interview understood the meaning of all items but the response options. All items had significant critical ratio values (t=15.866~20.584, p&lt;0.001). The item-total correlations ranged from 0.865 to 0.940 (p&lt;0.001). The item-level Content Validity Index and item-level Translation Validity Index were 1.000. Horn&rsquo;s parallel analysis suggested that one factor should be extracted, which accounted for 84.656% of the total variance. Factor loadings extracted from principal axis factoring ranged from 0.862 to 0.942. Cronbach&rsquo;s &alpha;, ordinal &alpha;, McDonald&rsquo;s  and Guttman split-half coefficient all exceeded 0.900. The one-factor CFA model provided an acceptable fit: <I></I>&sup2;/df=65.681/27&lt;3, root mean square error of approximation=0.073 (90% CI 0.051~0.096) &lt; 0.080, Comparative Fit Index=0.974 &gt; 0.950, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.966 &gt; 0.950, and standardised root mean square residual=0.026 &lt; 0.080. Composite reliability was 0.93 (&gt;0.70) and average variance extracted was 0.60 (&gt;0.50).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The 9-item C-EBPM scale demonstrated robust reliability and validity and is suitable for assessing EBP mentoring among nurses.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, M., Sun, S., Guo, M., Qian, J., Sun, Y., Chen, M., Yu, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104092</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104092</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale in Chinese nurses]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104092</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104092</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104400?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Typology of ageing and its associations with the end of life and death among older adults in China: a longitudinal person-centred study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104400?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Studies on ageing trajectories typically foreground intrinsic capacities and focus on frailty and mortality outcomes. Instead, research capturing aspects of people&rsquo;s living environment alongside individuals&rsquo; capacities is limited. This study aimed to identify qualitatively distinctive ageing profiles among deceased older adults in China using individual-based and environment-based indicators. It further examined sociodemographic correlates of profile membership and investigated associations between these profiles and end-of-life and death-related outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Individual level, longitudinal data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study (CLHLS) between 2008 and 2018 were analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included older participants of the CLHLS (2008&ndash;2018) who died between survey waves (N=9755).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Ageing profiles were categorised using latent class modelling based on individuals&rsquo; intrinsic capacity (functional, physical, cognitive, mental and social dimensions; 20 indicators) and environment characteristics (healthcare-related, financial and social aspects; 10 items). Sociodemographic correlates of profile membership included age, sex, education, marital status, living arrangement and residence location. End-of-life and death experiences were assessed by length of survival and functional status measured at the wave prior to death, pain at death and terminal delirium.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Within the study sample, four profiles emerged: healthy-and-supported (57%), cognitively-competent-but-functionally-dependent (12%), functionally-capable-but-cognitively-challenged (18%) and frail-and-support-lacking (13%). While profiles were primarily distinguished by functional and cognitive capacities and financial status, social participation was insufficient across all groups. Sociodemographic disparities (sex, education, marital status, living arrangement and residence) were associated with profile membership. The first and third profiles enjoyed a better quality of life in their final months. The healthy-and-supported adults were most prone to painful deaths in hospitals. The functionally capable participants most often died at home. The frail-and-support-lacking individuals were at the highest risk of terminal delirium.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The heterogeneity of ageing revolved around functional and cognitive capacities and economic/financial characteristics, the latter particularly salient for the frail-and-support-lacking group. The uniformly low social engagement observed across profiles highlighted the need for boosting overall social participation and developing community-level social services. Distinct end-of-life patterns emphasise the importance of targeted care strategies for rural and urban residents and interventions for delirium prevention.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, J., Song, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104400</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104400</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Typology of ageing and its associations with the end of life and death among older adults in China: a longitudinal person-centred study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104400</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104400</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative risk of the neurodegenerative outcomes between sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and thiazolidinediones in type 2 diabetes: a multicentre cohort study using the Korean healthcare database (2014-2025)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia, with patients being 1.5&ndash;2 times more likely to develop these conditions. While both sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have shown potential neuroprotective effects in previous studies, their comparative effectiveness for preventing neurodegenerative outcomes has not been established. This study aimed to compare the risk of stroke, dementia and Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease (AD) between patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and those treated with TZDs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multicentre, retrospective, observational, new-user, active-comparator cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Electronic health record-based databases from 11 secondary and tertiary institutions in South Korea from 1 January 2014 to 31 July 2025. The study period began in 2014, following the post-marketing surveillance initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors in Korea (November 2013), to ensure adequate drug availability and clinical adoption.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients aged 40 years or older who were newly prescribed either SGLT2 inhibitors or TZDs without prior exposure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using sex as the primary covariate due to data availability constraints in the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model framework. The HRs with 95% CIs were measured via Cox regression analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study analysed 24 172 matched pairs for stroke outcomes (40 483 person-years in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 39 363 person-years in the TZD group), 25 111 matched pairs for dementia (41 924 person-years in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 40 726 person-years in the TZD group) and 25 237 matched pairs for AD (42 139 person-years in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 40 895 person-years in the TZD group) across 11 participating hospitals. After a 1:1 propensity score matching, the SGLT2 inhibitors showed no significant difference in stroke risk (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.23, p=0.62), while having significant reductions in dementia risk (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.98, p=0.04) and AD risk (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.83, p=0.005). Moreover, these protective effects for neurodegenerative outcomes were shown to be consistent across multiple hospital sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with a reduced risk of dementia and AD compared with TZDs in patients aged 40 years or older with type 2 diabetes and have neutral effects on stroke risk. These findings confirm the potential selective neuroprotective benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors for neurodegenerative outcomes, which may inform therapeutic decision-making for diabetic patients at risk of cognitive decline.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Park, S. J., Kim, H. J., Seo, M., Byun, D. W., Suh, K., Yoo, M. H., Yang, H., Lee, I., Kwon, S. H., Kim, M., Mok, J.-O., Kim, D.-Y., Sohn, S. Y., Park, R. W., Seo, W.-W., Kwon, S. Y., Rhee, S. Y., Kwon, J.-M., Cha, J. M., Park, H. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105271</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105271</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative risk of the neurodegenerative outcomes between sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and thiazolidinediones in type 2 diabetes: a multicentre cohort study using the Korean healthcare database (2014-2025)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105271</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105830?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Blood pressure control rates among hypertensive patients managed in community health centres in Shenzhen, China: a megacity population-based observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105830?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Hypertension represents a major public health challenge globally, with a rising prevalence in China. This study aims to explore the factors shaping blood pressure (BP) control among hypertensive patients managed in community health centres (CHCs), with a particular emphasis on the association with age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This was a population-based, observational study that used healthcare records from CHC in Shenzhen, covering the period from 1 January 2000 to 8 October 2024. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the independent associations of various factors with BP control rate. Additionally, the study evaluated the relationship between age and BP control across six distinct age subgroups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study included 1 073 914 participants who met the eligibility criteria, with 955 415 (88.97%) patients achieving BP control. The median baseline age was 55.9 (IQR 18&ndash;109) years. Individuals aged 45 years and above demonstrated better BP control rates (46&ndash;55, OR 1.053, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.087; 56&ndash;65, OR 1.246, 95% CI 1.205 to 1.289; 66&ndash;75, OR 2.183, 95% CI 2.103 to 2.265; &gt;75, OR 2.159, 95% CI 2.060 to 2.262). Among young adults aged 18&ndash;35 years, increasing age was consistently associated with poorer BP control across most subgroups. For the middle-aged groups (36&ndash;45 and 46&ndash;65 years), age had little impact on BP control. In the 66&ndash;75 years age range, older age was linked to better BP control in some groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The association between age and BP control varied across age groups. Hypertension management strategies should be tailored to address the unique needs of different age groups, geographical regions and targeted populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[He, J., Zhang, N., Kang, L., Yan, W., Zeng, H., Wu, L., Zhu, Z., Liu, M., Liang, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105830</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105830</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Blood pressure control rates among hypertensive patients managed in community health centres in Shenzhen, China: a megacity population-based observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105830</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105830</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106307?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Its never one size fits all: a qualitative exploration of vision-impaired patients preferences for mental health support]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106307?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>It is widely known that a diagnosis of visual impairment has significant mental health impacts. Proposed approaches to addressing these include cognitive behavioural, problem-solving and stepped care solutions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Limited research has focused specifically on vision-impaired patients&rsquo; preferences for mental health support following diagnosis. This study aimed to address this gap.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The study was qualitative and cross-sectional, involving thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with patients diagnosed with vision impairment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Twenty vision-impaired patients, aged from 20 to 84 years old and with a range of diagnoses, were interviewed regarding their experience of and recommendations for mental health support at the point of diagnosis and thereafter.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three main themes were identified: (1) Mapping the Journey: The Critical Role of Accessible Information, (2) Navigating the Emotional Impact: Help-Seeking Attitudes and Experiences and (3) Tailored Mental Health Support: Timing, Delivery and Preferred Providers. Each theme had three subthemes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>It was concluded that clear information about diagnosis, prognosis and available supports is fundamental to promoting and maintaining mental health for vision-impaired patients. Person-centred and/or peer support is highly valued. To be maximally effective, specific mental health support should be informed by knowledge of vision impairment, with standardised treatment programmes not being valued highly. The study results strongly suggest that mental health support needs to be tailored to the unique needs of each individual, and therefore, a stepped care approach may be most helpful, encompassing clear information, practical advice and ongoing peer and professional support.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott, J. A., Gillard, J., Vasconcelos e Sa, D., Oliver, A., Hawkins, R., Pardhan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106307</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106307</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Its never one size fits all: a qualitative exploration of vision-impaired patients preferences for mental health support]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106307</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106500?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disaster preparedness of Australian hospital networks: a qualitative study with key actors]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106500?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Disasters can have a disproportionate impact on highly vulnerable hospitalised patients. Managers preparing hospital networks for disasters play an important role in enhancing networks&rsquo; readiness by creating disaster plans and imparting that knowledge through training and simulation exercises. The objective of this research was to uncover how those working in disaster preparedness roles in Australian hospital networks perceived the challenges that they face while ensuring adequate preparation for disasters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study design was employed which involved purposive sampling of Australian hospital network professionals responsible for disaster preparedness. Thematic analysis of data collected through individual online interviews generated prominent challenges of disaster preparedness in Australian hospital networks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Local hospital networks across Australia</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Twenty-six disaster preparedness managers, including hospital executives, disaster managers, emergency management coordinators and business continuity managers from 23 hospital networks located in five Australian states and one territory, participated in semi-structured online interviews. Interview transcripts were coded through an iterative inductive thematic analysis process to synthesise the predominant challenges faced by these participants when preparing their hospital networks for disasters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Participants reported four challenges: staff&rsquo;s limited interest in preparedness, budgetary constraints, staffing issues and ambiguous relationships with state and national health departments. They also presented four related solutions: capitalising on interest after disasters, attracting funding with evidence from prior disasters, facilitating staff&rsquo;s availability for disaster training and specifying network-government relationships for accountability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Disasters, although infrequent, are known to occur and can be catastrophic, yet those working in hospital network disaster preparedness roles encounter limited availability of wider staff for training and low interest in disaster planning. The sudden onset of a disaster can take a heavy toll on patients if hospitals&rsquo; staff are not sufficiently trained in disaster response or are not aware of the disaster plan. By identifying the perceptions of managers to disaster preparedness, this research presents specific challenges that hospital networks can address to improve awareness and preparation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naru, F. S., Churruca, K., Long, J. C., Sarkies, M. N., Braithwaite, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106500</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106500</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disaster preparedness of Australian hospital networks: a qualitative study with key actors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106500</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106500</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107930?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coproduction of an occupation-based complex intervention for living well with anxiety and Parkinsons (OBtAIN-PD) using online logic modelling in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107930?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Anxiety is a common non-motor symptom of Parkinson&rsquo;s disease (PD). There is no specific pharmacological intervention for people with PD who experience anxiety. Current non-pharmacological treatments have mixed or inconclusive results and there does not appear to be a non-pharmacological intervention for people with PD disease and anxiety that focuses on activity and participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To co-produce an occupation-focused complex intervention to help people with PD live well with anxiety that community-based occupational therapists can deliver.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Six-stage complex intervention development was conducted using online logic modelling and a participatory approach to organise the new intervention&rsquo;s key inputs, processes and outcomes important to people with PD living with anxiety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data were collected via online logic modelling sessions involving people with Parkinson&rsquo;s, care partners and occupational therapists across the UK from April 2022 to June 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>34 participants were recruited (people with PD n=14, care partners n=9, occupational therapists n=11) for the online logic modelling sessions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Resources to support the new intervention (&lsquo;inputs&rsquo;) include adequate resourcing, education for professionals and people with PD, flexibility of delivery methods and goal setting. The intervention&rsquo;s actions to produce outcomes (&lsquo;processes&rsquo;) should include 1:1 support, lifestyle management, providing meaningful information, collaborative goal setting, therapeutic use of everyday activities, and involvement of friends and families. The intended results (&lsquo;outcomes&rsquo;) should include a reduction in anxiety symptoms, people with PD enjoying more meaningful activities, increased understanding of anxiety and PD, improvement in clinical outcomes and improvement of service-level outcomes. These key aspects were incorporated into an intervention manual, educational material and training video.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We have systematically coproduced a new occupation-focused complex intervention to help people with PD to live well with anxiety. This provides the basis for the next project in which this intervention will be tested for feasibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN62762494">ISRCTN62762494</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lovegrove, C., Bannigan, K., Marsden, J., Sturkenboom, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107930</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107930</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coproduction of an occupation-based complex intervention for living well with anxiety and Parkinsons (OBtAIN-PD) using online logic modelling in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107930</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107930</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108672?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term physical health conditions among UK female veterans: a UK Biobank cohort study comparing male veterans and female civilians]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108672?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine differences in physical health conditions among female veterans compared with male veterans and female civilians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cohort analysis using data from the UK Biobank, incorporating self-reported and hospital-derived health information.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Veteran status was identified using Standard Occupational Classification codes. The study included female veterans (n=546), male veterans (n=2722) and female civilians (n=66 305).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Physical health conditions were identified through self-report and hospital records. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated associations between veteran status and selected health conditions, adjusting for age, sociodemographic factors, time in service, body mass index and current smoking status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with female civilians, female veterans had increased odds of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.79, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.08) and lower odds of hypertension (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.93), with no significant difference in musculoskeletal conditions or osteoarthritis. Compared with male veterans, female veterans had significantly higher odds of osteoarthritis (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.08), migraine (aOR 2.63, 95% CI 1.66 to 4.19) and thyroid disorders (aOR 4.42, 95% CI 2.83 to 6.89).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Female veterans have distinct physical health profiles, including a greater burden of musculoskeletal and respiratory conditions compared with male veterans and female civilians. These findings highlight the need for targeted prevention and clinical interventions for women with a history of military service.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, A. C., Mckenzie, A., Godier-McBard, L. R., Fear, N. T., Stevelink, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108672</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108672</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term physical health conditions among UK female veterans: a UK Biobank cohort study comparing male veterans and female civilians]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108672</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108672</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109621?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence of all-cause and vaccine-preventable, radiologically confirmed community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalised adults in Germany: a multicentre surveillance study (2021-2023)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109621?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Accurate estimates of the burden of vaccine-preventable community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) hospitalisations both overall and due to the most frequent and vaccine-preventable pathogens are needed to inform the use of respiratory vaccines in adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>This was a prospective, population-based CAP surveillance study at three hospitals in Germany. All patients admitted with clinically suspected CAP were tested for <I>Streptococcus pneumoniae</I> using urine antigen tests and for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 using multiplex PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs. Incidence rate calculations for all-cause CAP were based on eligible patients, regardless of enrolment status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Individuals admitted to study hospitals within the surveillance period with suspected or confirmed diagnosis of pneumonia who provided informed consent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Radiologically confirmed (RAD) CAP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Active surveillance between 1 January 2021 and 30 June 2023 identified at the three study sites 4319 adults with RAD-CAP that met eligibility criteria, of which 1479 (34.2%) were enrolled and included in the analysis for pathogen distribution. The main reason for non-enrolment was the inability to provide informed consent. Incidence estimates were based on 1254 study-eligible individuals admitted at the largest study site. SARS-CoV-2, <I>S. pneumoniae</I>, RSV or influenza were identified in 36.5%, 9.1%, 3.7% and 1.8% of patients with RAD-CAP, respectively. Serotypes included in the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine were detected in 6.9% of RAD-CAP and 76.0% of pneumococcal CAP. The overall adjusted annual incidence of all-cause RAD-CAP over the study period was 490/100 000 (95% CI 461 to 521). The incidence of pneumococcal and RSV-related RAD-CAP increased 8.6-fold and 10.0-fold over the study period, resulting in an incidence of 60/100 000 (95% CI 45 to 75) and 30/100 000 (95% CI 19 to 41) in 2022/2023, respectively, while SARS-CoV-2 related RAD-CAP declined by 70% to 97/100 000 (95% CI 78 to 116).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Active pneumonia surveillance reported a high burden of RAD-CAP hospitalisations in Germany, especially among older adults. The resurgence of CAP due to RSV, <I>S. pneumoniae</I> or influenza, alongside maintained activity of SARS-CoV-2, was associated with an overall increase of RAD-CAP among adults.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theilacker, C., Hagel, S., Ankert, J., Schwarz, C., Tinworth, A. C., von Eiff, C., Wolf, R.-D., Vietri, J., Wang, E., Pan, K., Gessner, B. D., Pletz, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109621</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109621</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence of all-cause and vaccine-preventable, radiologically confirmed community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalised adults in Germany: a multicentre surveillance study (2021-2023)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109621</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109621</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109851?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Detecting undiagnosed hypertension using repeated blood pressure measurements: a cross-sectional study in rural Sidama Region, Ethiopia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109851?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension and its risk factors among adults in rural Sidama Region, Ethiopia, using a two-step diagnostic method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 April to 31 July 2024. Data were collected among adults aged 45 years and above using the World Health Organization STEPwise Approach to Surveillance questionnaire. The Demographic and Health Survey questionnaire was also used to collect data on household characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Selected rural kebeles of Shebedino district, Sidama, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>2875 adults aged &ge;45 years identified via census.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Undiagnosed hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure &ge;140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure &ge;90 mm Hg, in individuals with no history of the condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension ranged from 7.7% (95% CI: 6.7% to 8.7%) to 14.3% (95% CI: 13.0% to 15.6%). The previously diagnosed hypertensive cases were found in 3.3% (95% CI: 2.7% to 4.1%). Female sex (AOR 2.02; 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.82), age &ge; 65 years (AOR 1.48; 95%CI: 1.01 to 2.15), and history of alcohol drinking and khat chewing (AOR 2.94; 95%CI: 1.52 to 5.66) were significantly associated with undiagnosed hypertension. Lack of awareness of salt-related health risks (AOR 3.14; 95% CI: 2.30 to 4.30) and no prior blood pressure measurement (AOR 5.60; 95% CI: 1.73 to 18.07) were also associated with undiagnosed hypertension.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Undiagnosed hypertension is common among adults aged &ge;45 years in the rural Sidama Region. Female sex, older age, substance use, limited awareness of salt-related health risks, and lack of prior blood pressure measurement were the identified risk factors. Regular screening should be implemented to detect cases at an early stage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birhanu, B. E., Likka, M. H., Areru, H. A., Hibstu, D. T., Lindtjorn, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109851</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109851</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Detecting undiagnosed hypertension using repeated blood pressure measurements: a cross-sectional study in rural Sidama Region, Ethiopia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109851</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109851</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111579?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of preoperative liposomal bupivacaine single-injection pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients with hip fractures: a randomised controlled, double-blind, prospective clinical study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111579?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs has a significantly higher incidence among elderly populations than that observed in other types of fractures, prolonged immobilisation and the systemic inflammatory response triggered by preoperative pain are the main risk factors. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) single-injection pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has demonstrated effective analgesia both before and after surgery, while preserving motor function in patients with hip fracture. Although regional nerve block is a well-established component of preoperative multimodal analgesia, its potential role and underlying mechanisms in the prevention of DVT in elderly patients with hip fracture remain largely unexplored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will be conducted as a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, prospective clinical trial. On admission, a total of 132 participants will be randomly assigned using block randomisation to receive either treatment group (LB single-injection PENG block) or sham group (saline solution single-injection PENG block). The primary outcome was the incidence of DVT, while secondary outcomes included perioperative inflammatory and immune-related stress levels and functional-based pain scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol complies with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 guidelines and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Shunde Hospital, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Approval No KY-2025005). The raw data are planned to be made publicly available on the ResMan raw data&ndash;sharing platform (IPD sharing platform) of the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry in December 2027 and can be accessed at <A HREF="http://www.medresman.org.cn">http://www.medresman.org.cn</A>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500100799.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peng, H., Wen, J., Chen, M., Jiang, Y., Ou, J., Wu, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111579</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111579</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of preoperative liposomal bupivacaine single-injection pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients with hip fractures: a randomised controlled, double-blind, prospective clinical study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111579</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111579</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111981?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prediction of 6-year mortality in advanced splenomegaly-subtype schistosomiasis: a retrospective cohort study from Hubei, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111981?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop and validate a mortality-risk prediction model for patients with advanced splenomegaly-subtype schistosomiasis, enabling accurate prognosis assessment and informed resource allocation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective, population-based cohort study using clinical data from a single-centre registry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Endemic regions of Hubei Province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study includes 628 patients with advanced splenomegaly-subtype schistosomiasis from the Hubei Provincial Advanced Schistosomiasis Registry between September 2014 and January 2015. The splenomegaly subtype is defined as splenomegaly extending below the umbilical line or with a transverse diameter exceeding the mid-abdominal line. We divided the study population into two cohorts. The derivation cohort included 452 patients selected from several counties within the registry. These patients had a confirmed diagnosis of advanced splenomegaly-subtype schistosomiasis. Only those with complete data were retained. The external validation cohort comprised 176 patients from geographically distinct counties in the same registry, and the same inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. 10-fold cross-validation was employed to evaluate the model&rsquo;s generalisation on the derivation cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>6-year all-cause mortality was the outcome measure. Baseline variables, included age, serum aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, splenectomy history and frequency of ascites &ge;5 episodes were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Model performance was assessed via C-statistics, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five predictors were integrated into the mortality risk model. The C-statistic for predicting 6-year mortality was 0.79 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.83) in the derivation cohort, with robust validation in the external validation cohort (0.78, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.86). Simplified models using subsets of predictors showed slight reductions in discrimination (NRI and IDI). Patients with a frequency of ascites &ge;5 episodes had significantly lower survival rates and should be given special attention in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The validated prediction model identifies high-risk patients using accessible clinical variables. The approach may optimise prognostication and prioritisation of healthcare resources for advanced schistosomiasis. The model&rsquo;s performance remains to be confirmed in a prospectively enrolled cohort.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Li, Z., Ma, Q., Pan, L., Zhou, Z., Li, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111981</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111981</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prediction of 6-year mortality in advanced splenomegaly-subtype schistosomiasis: a retrospective cohort study from Hubei, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111981</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111981</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of preventive precision multimodal analgesia (PPMA) on postoperative acute pain process and rehabilitation in adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative acute pain following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) impedes patient rehabilitation. While multimodal analgesia effectively mitigates postoperative acute pain and facilitates the postoperative rehabilitation process, the efficacy of preventive precision multimodal analgesia (PPMA) remains uncertain. This study designs a PPMA strategy targeting incisional pain, inflammatory pain and visceral pain in VATS. It aims to investigate the impact of the PPMA strategy on the postoperative acute pain process and rehabilitation outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial will enrol adult patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy. A total of 1372 participants will be recruited and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the preventive precision multimodal analgesia group (PPMA Group) or the conventional multimodal analgesia group (CMA Group). Patients in the PPMA Group will receive a regimen consisting of local anaesthetic infiltration of surgical incision (for incisional pain), intravenous injection of oxycodone (for visceral pain) and parecoxib sodium (for inflammatory pain) before surgery initiation. Patients in the CMA Group will receive the same regimen after specimen isolation. This trial will be conducted across 13 medical centres in China from 2023 to 2026. The primary outcome is the duration of postoperative acute pain. Secondary outcomes include postoperative analgesic consumption, postoperative pain scores, intraoperative haemodynamic parameters and the Indexes of Consciousness (IoC<SUB>1</SUB> and IoC<SUB>2</SUB>), as well as intraoperative arterial blood gas and ventilation parameters, intraoperative dosages of general anaesthesia, inflammatory markers at predefined time points, postoperative rehabilitation process and perioperative adverse events and complications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University (Linyanshen[2023]-NO.012-003-Revised Vision 1). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300072176).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fan, Z., Zhang, Y., Lei, Q., Ma, H., Zhu, X., Yao, L., Li, L., Zheng, H., Jin, H., Gao, J., Ge, Y., Lin, J., Lv, J., Wang, X., Xiao, Z., Xiao, W., Wang, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-22T09:08:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112197</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112197</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of preventive precision multimodal analgesia (PPMA) on postoperative acute pain process and rehabilitation in adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112197</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e076854?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Establishing patient perceptions and preferences for a journal transparency tool to support health literacy: a mixed-methods online survey and focus group study of Canada-based patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e076854?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine how patients use the internet to get health information and to identify their needs and preferences for a journal transparency tool which would highlight journal transparency practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A mixed-methods study comprising a cross-sectional online survey followed by virtual focus groups to further explore the survey responses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 183 adult patients and caregivers completed our online survey. 29 survey respondents participated in the subsequent focus groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>We report descriptive statistics (counts and percentages) for all quantitative survey items. We used thematic content analysis for text-based survey responses. The focus groups asked patients about four key topics: (1) the content they would like to see in a journal transparency tool, (2) how they would like the content visually displayed, (3) how to best share the tool with patients and (4) how to determine whether the tool was successful over time. We conducted a thematic content analysis to identify core themes discussed. Focus group participants then rank-ordered the themes identified by their perceived importance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 183 survey respondents, 146 (82%) indicated they use the internet most often when looking for health information, 66 (37%) indicated they sometimes read original research articles when searching for health information and 92 (52%) indicated they sometimes have difficulty knowing if the information they read online is reliable. Approximately half (86; 49%) of the survey respondents had never heard of predatory journals. We identified 32 themes across the four key topic areas that were discussed in the focus groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients have expressed a need for a journal transparency tool. This study will inform the tool&rsquo;s development to ensure that it meets the needs and preferences of patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricketts, A., Lalu, M. M., Proulx, L., Halas, M., Castillo, G., Almoli, E., Albert, M. A., Grudniewicz, A., Bryson, G. L., Moher, D., Cobey, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076854</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2023-076854</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Establishing patient perceptions and preferences for a journal transparency tool to support health literacy: a mixed-methods online survey and focus group study of Canada-based patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e076854</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e076854</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098443?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What are the drivers of the change in modern contraceptive use among women in sub-Saharan Africa? A repeated cross-sectional multivariable Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098443?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify the drivers of changes in modern contraceptive use (MCU) among women of reproductive age in three selected sub-Saharan African countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data using a multivariable Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>The sample consisted of 73 777 women aged 15&ndash;49 years from the two most recent DHSs conducted in Gabon (2012, 2019&ndash;2021), Senegal (2018, 2023), and Tanzania (2015, 2022). Pregnant women were excluded from the sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measure</st>
<p>We assessed the change in MCU over the two most recent DHS waves for the three countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>MCU declined in Gabon from 26.5% to 18.4%, in Senegal from 20.5% to 18.5% and in Tanzania from 29.7% to 27.6%. Across the three countries, the contributions of compositional changes to trends in MCU varied significantly. In Senegal, characteristics explained 181% of the change, driven by reduced exposure to family planning information (157%), high parity (147%) and employment (9%), while education, urbanisation, union type and lower parity mitigated the decline. In Gabon, the overall characteristics included led to an increase in MCU (&ndash;44%), rather than a decline, reflecting the effect of favourable changes toward higher education (&ndash;19%) and urban residence (&ndash;10%). However, the behavioural effect was predominant (144%). This suggests that modifications in individual attitudes, practices and preferences regarding contraception outweighed structural changes, leading to the overall downward trend observed in Gabon. In Tanzania, neither characteristics nor coefficients significantly explained observed changes. Results for Tanzania indicate that none of the factors included in the model made a significant contribution to the change in MCU. Conversely, increases in educational attainment and urbanisation contributed to an increase in MCU in both Senegal and Gabon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Interventions promoting MCU should consider the role of receiving family planning information at a health facility, parity, work status, educational attainment and urbanisation in informing changes in the use of modern contraceptive methods.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sawadogo, P. M., Biney, A. A. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098443</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098443</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What are the drivers of the change in modern contraceptive use among women in sub-Saharan Africa? A repeated cross-sectional multivariable Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098443</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098443</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099979?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancement of the capacity of a healthcare team through real-time information-sharing using a wireless intercom system: a prospective simulation study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099979?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Rising patient numbers and limited resources are creating a challenging environment for healthcare providers recently. Anaesthesiologists are also increasingly faced with complex situations, requiring high adaptability in the operating room. To enhance team adaptability during emergencies, effective communication methods are essential. This study aimed to compare the impact of mobile phones and intercoms on the response time and effectiveness of anaesthesiologist teams in emergency situations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective, observational and simulation study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and methods</st>
<p>This study, conducted at Yokohama City University Medical Center (Yokohama, Japan), evaluated how communication methods (intercoms vs mobile phones) impact the efficiency of anaesthesiologists in the simulation setting. Two scenarios were tested: (1) retrieving a video laryngoscope during a difficult intubation and (2) gathering support during cardiac arrest.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Outcomes measured included time to secure equipment, time for assistance to arrive and staff numbers gathered. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the outcomes between the intercom and mobile phone groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In scenario 1, the time to secure the video laryngoscope was significantly shorter with intercom use compared with mobile phones (intercom vs mobile phone, median (IQR): 29 (25&ndash;33) s vs 50 (39&ndash;62) s; p=0.013, effect size 20 (95% CI 7 to 31)). In scenario 2, the time from the request for assistance until the first supporting staff member reached the operating room was significantly shorter in using the intercoms (intercom vs mobile phone, median (IQR): 16 (14&ndash;18) s vs 35 (31&ndash;38) s; p=0.04, effect size 17 (95% CI 6 to 24)), and more personnel were available in the intercom group (intercom vs mobile phone, median (IQR): 3 (3&ndash;3.5) persons vs 2 (1&ndash;2) persons; p=0.04, effect size 1.5 (95% CI 1 to 3)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Real-time information sharing through intercoms improved the ability of the anaesthesiologist team to respond more rapidly and effectively in emergency situations, enhancing overall team adaptability. This approach may improve patients&rsquo; outcomes by shortening response times and increasing team coordination.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sato, H., Kuwabara, D., Minoguchi, K., Masubuchi, T., Matsumoto, M., Okuyama, Y., Kawakami, H., Abe, T., Nakamura, K., Goto, T., Nakajima, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099979</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099979</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancement of the capacity of a healthcare team through real-time information-sharing using a wireless intercom system: a prospective simulation study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099979</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099979</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100890?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations between self-reported upper limb motor ability, life satisfaction and life problems in people with cervical spinal cord injury from the community in the United States: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100890?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to evaluate relationships between self-reported fine motor ability and quality of life (assessed by life satisfaction and life problems) from people with spinal cord injury (SCI) at T1 and above.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>Observational cohort study (current analysis from a cross section)</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>279 individuals with SCI at T1 or above</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community members sampled from records from two Midwestern hospitals and a speciality hospital in the Southeast United States</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Fine motor ability was assessed via the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index-Short Form 9A, while two facets of quality of life, life satisfaction and life problems, were assessed by the Life Situation Questionnaire-Revised version (LSQ-R). Pearson correlations and multivariate analysis were utilised to identify cross-sectional relationships between fine motor ability, life satisfaction and life problems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Fine motor ability was positively correlated with total life satisfaction score (<I>r</I>=0.16; <I>p</I>=0.02) and was negatively correlated with the total life problems score (<I>r</I>=&ndash;0.18; <I>p</I>=0.01), health problems factor (<I>r</I>=&ndash;0.24; <I>p</I>&lt;0.01), and social isolation factor (r=&ndash;0.27; &lt;0.01). When controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity and level of injury, better fine motor ability was significantly associated with greater life satisfaction (<I>&beta;</I>=0.25; <I>p</I>=0.02), fewer life problems (<I>&beta;</I>=&ndash;0.40; <I>p</I>&lt;0.01), less social isolation (<I>&beta;</I>=&ndash;0.11; <I>p</I>&lt;0.01) and fewer health problems (<I>&beta;</I>=&ndash;0.10; <I>p</I>&lt;0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The results identified significant, modest associations between self-reported outcomes, as better fine motor ability was related to less social isolation, fewer health problems and higher life satisfaction. Further investigation into the relationship between fine motor ability, life satisfaction and life problems is warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewis, A. F., Cao, Y., Dellenbach, B. H., Thompson, A. K., Krause, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100890</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100890</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations between self-reported upper limb motor ability, life satisfaction and life problems in people with cervical spinal cord injury from the community in the United States: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100890</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100890</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105937?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring civilian minds and lives during the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict: a phenomenological study in Lahore, Pakistan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105937?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to investigate the lived experiences of civilians in Lahore during the 2025 India&ndash;Pakistan conflict, focusing on psychological distress, social disruption, coping mechanisms and perceptions of national response and preparedness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The study employs an exploratory phenomenological approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study has been conducted in Lahore, the capital city of Punjab, the largest by population province of Pakistan. Lahore was selected as a research site due to its historical, strategic and political significance in Indo-Pak conflicts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Data were collected from 10 participants aged 18 or above years, who lived in Lahore between April and May 2025, and were willing to discuss personal, social or psychological experiences related to the conflict. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted in Urdu, transcribed, and were thematically analysed using both manual and NVivo V.12 software-supported coding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Seven inter-related themes were identified. Participants reported intense anxiety, hypervigilance and insomnia driven by hybrid warfare tactics, including misinformation, drone sightings and media sensationalism. Social life was disrupted through withdrawal from public, religious and communal activities. Coping strategies included religious faith, family cohesion, humour and expressions of national solidarity. Notably, many participants experienced psychosomatic symptoms such as palpitations, gastrointestinal distress and stress-induced fever. A prominent finding was the absence of civilian preparedness guidance, which amplified fear and uncertainty during the escalation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The conflicts, although short lived and geographical restrained, casts a long psychological and social on civilians, marked by fear, uncertainty, social disruption and dissatisfaction with institutional preparedness. While some coping and resilience were evident, the findings highlight the need to strengthen civilian-focused public health responses during periods of conflict escalation, including mental health awareness, media literacy and community-level support within Pakistan&rsquo;s emergency response frameworks.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saleem, J., Hameed, S., Shehzad, M. N., Shahzad, R. B., Ali, N., Aftab, M. M., Khan, S., Asif, A., Amna, I., Khan, H. Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105937</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105937</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring civilian minds and lives during the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict: a phenomenological study in Lahore, Pakistan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105937</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105937</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107264?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breast cancer screening best practices: a Canadian multidisciplinary consensus-based approach for primary care providers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107264?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>International guidelines on breast cancer (BC) screening have differing recommendations leading to uncertainty on best practices for primary care providers. The purpose of this study was to create a Canadian best practices document on BC health and screening for primary healthcare providers through multidisciplinary consensus using Nominal Group Technique and Delphi method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A 9-member multidisciplinary expert group and a patient advocate participated in the consensus methods and voting. Experts included those involved in BC management and two primary care physicians. Twenty-nine experts across BC disciplines participated in external review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcomes</st>
<p>Two study objectives included (1) building consensus on key &lsquo;best practice&rsquo; behaviours related to BC-related health and screening and (2) building consensus on specific definitions related to BC screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The final consensus document consists of 65 statements grouped in five categories with companion resources to support uptake of all best practices. Categories include identification and work-up for diagnostic imaging, risk factors and identifying individuals eligible for high-risk screening, shared decision-making, decisions and referrals for BC screening and screening outcomes. Special areas of focus were shared decision-making, age to initiate screening, and BC screening in special populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We created a comprehensive consensus document distilling the latest evidence to provide practical Canadian consensus-based advice on specific &lsquo;best practice behaviours&rsquo; related to BC health and screening to serve as a resource for providers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pathak, N., Corrado, A. M., Seely, J. M., Heisey, R., Lofters, A., Cil, T., Sussman, J., Zhong, T., Amir, E., Isenberg, A., Nadler, M. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107264</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107264</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breast cancer screening best practices: a Canadian multidisciplinary consensus-based approach for primary care providers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107264</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107977?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceptions of determinants for the provision and uptake of maternal influenza vaccination from the perspective of healthcare providers in Kuwait: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107977?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore the current context in which maternal influenza vaccination (MIV) is delivered in Kuwait and to identify determinants influencing its provision and uptake from the perspectives of preventive medicine professionals (PMPs), including policymakers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with purposely selected PMPs including policymakers. Interview questions were obtained from the Tailoring Immunization Programme for improving MIV in Europe.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>PMPs from six governmental regions of Kuwait, including hospitals and associated polyclinics. Data collection was conducted between March and June 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 10 participants reflected diverse professional and population contexts, including Kuwaiti and non-Kuwaiti professionals working in rural and urban settings. Cell sampling was used to ensure representation across key roles involved in MIV delivery, including policymakers, vaccination campaign managers and campaign implementers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Thematic analysis identified four overarching themes: barriers, facilitators, influences on MIV uptake and suggested interventions. Key barriers included limited knowledge among pregnant women and healthcare providers (HCPs), lack of prioritisation of pregnant women within vaccination programmes, shortage of vaccine supply and the COVID-19 pandemic. Facilitators and influential factors included the presence of vaccination champions, targeted health promotion activities and the availability of a Ministry of Health (MoH) hotline for addressing concerns and system-level accessibility and digital facilitation of MIV uptake. Suggested interventions emphasised strengthening HCP education through continuous training aligned with clear national policies and guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlights the need for clear national policies and clinical guidelines to support consistent MIV provision, alongside ongoing education for HCPs in Kuwait to strengthen MIV recommendation. Future research should include obstetricians, given their central role in antenatal care, to ensure MIV strategies are clinically grounded and integrated into routine maternity services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alhendyani, F., Lindsey, L., Hayes, L., McNally, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107977</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107977</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceptions of determinants for the provision and uptake of maternal influenza vaccination from the perspective of healthcare providers in Kuwait: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107977</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107977</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108529?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding antimicrobial resistance among primary health care prescribers in Imo State, Nigeria: implications for digital health readiness]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108529?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most urgent global health threats, responsible for an estimated 4.95 million deaths annually, including 1.27 million directly linked to drug-resistant infections. Nigeria is particularly affected, ranking 19th globally in AMR-related mortality, with an estimated 64 500 attributable and 263 400 associated deaths in 2019. These estimates are likely conservative due to limited surveillance. Economically, AMR could cost Nigeria 5%&ndash;7% of its GDP by 2050.</p>
<p>Despite this burden, antibiotic misuse remains widespread, with 42% of adults and over 46% of children under 5 receiving antibiotics without prescriptions. At the primary healthcare (PHC) level, where most antibiotics are prescribed, challenges such as limited diagnostics, inconsistent prescription and poor access to digital tools hinder effective antimicrobial stewardship (AMS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The primary objective of this study is to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among PHC prescribers in Imo State, Nigeria. A secondary objective is to explore preliminary indicators of their digital readiness to inform future technological interventions for AMS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>PHC facilities across all 27 local government areas of Imo State, Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A purposive sample of 547 facility-based public PHC prescribers included 84% of all facility Officers-in-Charge of health facilities in the state and 16% of other PHC workers who were involved in prescription.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome measures were composite scores for knowledge (adequate/inadequate), attitude (positive/negative) and prescribing practice (good/poor), derived from a validated questionnaire. Secondary measures included sources of AMR information and indicators of digital readiness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>While 77.1% demonstrated adequate knowledge, only 32.7% exhibited positive attitudes and 88.5% reported poor prescribing practices. Attitude was the strongest predictor of good practice (OR=17.585, p&lt;0.001). Though 69.5% were aware of AMR, most learnt through professional training and colleagues, with only 13.3% citing online medical resources. Indicators of digital readiness, such as access to digital tools, were low; only 21.2% had access to an antibiogram, and 44.2% had never participated in AMS training, including virtual sessions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings underscore a critical gap between knowledge and practice, driven in part by limited access to digital decision-support tools. To address the documented gaps in tool access and training, strengthening digital inclusion through context-adapted e-learning, offline-compatible AMS tools and simplified digital antibiograms is a necessary implication for improving antibiotic stewardship and clinical outcomes at the PHC level.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Basil, I. C., Ekeleme, U. G., Udujih, O. G., Dozie, U. W., Iwuala, C., Ibe, S., Nwoke, E., Mbakwem, B., Okoro, L. I., Uzoma, F. C., Okoroama, C. L., Uzoma, M.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108529</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108529</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding antimicrobial resistance among primary health care prescribers in Imo State, Nigeria: implications for digital health readiness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108529</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108529</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109024?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ozone exposure and semen quality in low-income men with unhealthy behaviours in Foshan, China: a case-control study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109024?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the association between ambient ozone (O<SUB>3</SUB>) exposure and semen quality among men with unhealthy behaviours and low income.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>A case-control study was conducted from February 2024 to January 2025, in which male participants aged 18&ndash;45 years were recruited from Foshan, and following propensity score matching, a total of 820 participants were included in the final analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The evaluated the association between O<SUB>3</SUB> exposure during the 70&ndash;90 days, 10&ndash;14 days, 0&ndash;9 days and 0&ndash;90 days prior to semen collection and semen quality using stepwise conditional logistic regression analyses, and restricted cubic splines were incorporated into the models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>O<SUB>3</SUB> exposure during the 70&ndash;90 days and 0&ndash;90 days preceding semen sample collection was significantly associated with an increased risk of low semen quality, with ORs of 1.020 (95% CI 1.003 to 1.039) and 1.056 (95% CI 1.008 to 1.108), respectively. Additionally, O<SUB>3</SUB> exposure during the 0&ndash;90-days period showed a significant positive association with abnormal sperm concentration. A non-linear relationship between O<SUB>3</SUB> exposure and sperm concentration was also observed. Notably, O<SUB>3</SUB> exposure during the 0&ndash;9 days before semen collection was inversely associated with the risk of low semen quality. Subgroup analyses across age, lifestyle factors and socioeconomic strata revealed no significant effect modifications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study found that O<SUB>3</SUB> exposure during the 70&ndash;90 days and 0&ndash;90 days before sampling was associated with reduced semen quality in men with unhealthy behaviours and low income.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, W., Zou, H., Shui, H., Luo, L., Jiang, Y., Wan, Z., Yue, Q., Li, Q., Liu, W., Liu, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109024</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109024</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ozone exposure and semen quality in low-income men with unhealthy behaviours in Foshan, China: a case-control study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109024</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109024</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Equality, diversity and inclusion strategies of NIHR biomedical research centres and clinical research facilities across England: a qualitative content analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) has 20 Biomedical Research Centres (BRCs) and 28 Clinical Research Facilities (CRFs) that work with NHS organisations and universities to translate cutting-edge research into new interventions. As mandated by NIHR, all BRCs/CRFs have an Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) strategy which details how they will implement EDI through their practices, research and organisational systems. This UK-based study aimed to conduct a pilot qualitative analysis of EDI strategies to compare all 20 NIHR BRCs/CRFs, identify common priorities and improve inclusion across research infrastructures. The analysis was presented at the first in-person seminar for NIHR EDI professionals (Birmingham, October 2024).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative content analysis of publicly available EDI strategy documents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>48 research infrastructures (20 BRCs and 28 CRFs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>EDI strategies were collated into NVivo and Microsoft Excel where inductive coding and content analysis was executed for objectives, action plans and success measures. Both quantitative and qualitative content analyses were conducted to analyse the prevalence of categories and similarities or differences between them. Logic models were developed to map the process of implementing EDI for each main category generated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The most common main category across objectives was &lsquo;Cultural change in workplaces&rsquo; for BRCs and &lsquo;Leadership, governance and policy&rsquo; for CRFs. For action plans, codes for &lsquo;Collaborations and Networks&rsquo; and &lsquo;Research development and delivery&rsquo; were most prevalent for BRCs&mdash;for CRFs, it was &lsquo;Workforce culture change&rsquo; and &lsquo;Research development and delivery&rsquo;. Success measures for both BRCs and CRFs most often related to &lsquo;Summary reports, feedback, audits and monitoring&rsquo;. Differences between BRCs and CRFs reflected their organisational roles and strategic maturity, with BRCs tending to have more comprehensive, measurable strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study provides the first systematic analysis of EDI strategies across all NIHR BRCs and CRFs, offering a comprehensive mapping of how EDI priorities are articulated and operationalised across objectives, action plans and success measures. While both infrastructures align with NIHR&rsquo;s inclusion goals, BRCs generally showed more strategic maturity than CRFs. As the analysis was based solely on publicly available strategy documents, it could not determine the extent to which any strategy had been implemented in practice. Future research is needed to examine implementation and impact. The contribution of this work lies in demonstrating systematically and for the first time the ways in which EDI commitments are framed across NIHR infrastructures and their varying levels of depth and maturity. Our findings support the development of more measurable EDI frameworks and highlight opportunities to strengthen inclusion across NIHR-funded research infrastructures.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hua, P., Dawson, S., Phillips, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109321</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109321</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Equality, diversity and inclusion strategies of NIHR biomedical research centres and clinical research facilities across England: a qualitative content analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109321</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109342?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the experiences of the Windrush Generation, living in UK care homes: protocol for a qualitative study using the Silences Framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109342?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Windrush Generation describes a group of individuals who migrated, primarily from the Caribbean to the UK between 1948 and 1971, many of whom are now entering older age. Now entering later life, many face ongoing health inequalities shaped by systemic racism and cultural marginalisation. Despite a growing number of ethnic minority residents in UK care homes, little is known about the lived experiences of Black African Caribbean people in these settings, particularly at the end of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This qualitative study explores the experiences of Black African Caribbean care home residents and their families, focusing on how race, identity and marginalisation shape care. Guided by the Silences Framework, semistructured interviews will be conducted with up to 16 participants across diverse care home settings. Data will be analysed thematically, with attention to under-represented narratives. A Patient and Public Involvement group of African Caribbean community members has codeveloped the study and will support analysis and dissemination to ensure cultural relevance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been secured (REC: 24/WM/0151; protocol number: RG_21087; IRAS project ID: 302629), and the study will follow rigorous consent and capacity procedures, including caregiver affirmation and UBACC assessment where needed. Given the sensitive, potentially distressing focus on racism, marginalisation and end-of-life experiences, the research will be conducted by an experienced clinician-researcher using a reflexive, ethically grounded approach that safeguards both participants and researcher. Interviews will be held in private, accessible settings with appropriate advocacy, safeguarding concerns will follow care home and national protocols, and all data will be securely stored, anonymised and managed under General Data Protection Regulation and university governance, with the University of Birmingham as sponsor and data controller.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hollowood, L., Taylor, J., Allen, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109342</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109342</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the experiences of the Windrush Generation, living in UK care homes: protocol for a qualitative study using the Silences Framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109342</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109342</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111365?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Culturally sensitive stress management strategies for parents of preterm infants in the NICU: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111365?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Parenting a preterm infant in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is a profoundly stressful experience, shaped by clinical uncertainty, physical separation and emotional vulnerability. Although stress management strategies&mdash;such as counselling, peer support and psychoeducation&mdash;are commonly available in NICU settings, little is known about how parents experience these forms of support when they are intended to be culturally sensitive or delivered within diverse cultural contexts. Cultural values, beliefs and practices shape how parents interpret stress and engage with support, highlighting the need to synthesise qualitative evidence on parents&rsquo; lived experiences of culturally sensitive stress management strategies during NICU hospitalisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review of qualitative evidence will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. A comprehensive search will be undertaken across six databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Airiti Library. This review will include qualitative studies that examine parents&rsquo; experiences, perceptions and meaning-making in relation to stress management strategies that are explicitly culturally sensitive or situated within identifiable cultural contexts in NICU settings. Studies published in English or Chinese between 2014 and 2024 will be eligible. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, assess methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal checklist and extract data using the standardised JBI data extraction tool. Meta-aggregation will be used to synthesise findings, and the ConQual approach will be applied to assess confidence in the synthesised outputs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review of qualitative evidence will synthesise data from previously published studies and does not require formal ethical approval. The review will be conducted and reported in accordance with the JBI methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines for systematic reviews. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at national and international conferences on neonatal care, nursing and family-centred healthcare. Target audiences include NICU clinicians, hospital administrators, educators and policymakers interested in integrating culturally responsive approaches into stress management and family support practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42022357472.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, Y.-C., Chang, M.-Y., Wu, T.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111365</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111365</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Culturally sensitive stress management strategies for parents of preterm infants in the NICU: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111365</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111365</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112171?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rationale and design of uLtrasOund applicability in the assessment of patients with fibRosing interstitial lung Disease (LORD): a research protocol of a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112171?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Fibrosing interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) are a heterogeneous group of diseases with multiple subtypes. Both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other ILDs associated with a risk of developing progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) are subtypes of this category. A multidisciplinary team discussion, including a chest high-resolution CT (HRCT), is usually considered the gold standard for diagnosis of F-ILD. Repeated HRCT is one of several established methods to assess progression and thus development of PPF, but it is associated with substantial costs and radiation exposure. Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) and other ultrasound (US) methods have emerged as radiation-free methods for both diagnosing and monitoring disease severity in F-ILD. Yet, consistent knowledge on the use of different TUS- and US methods in patients with F-ILD is limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The LORD study is a prospective cohort study conducted in participants with F-ILD at a tertiary ILD centre in Denmark. Physiological testing and patient-related outcome measures, together with TUS- and US examinations, will be performed at inclusion, after 6 and 12 months. The correlations between these assessments will be evaluated. HRCT will be conducted between 3 months prior to and 1 month after baseline, and after 1 year. At least 34 participants will be included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (journal number: 22/45135) and the Science Ethics Committee for the Region of Southern Denmark (journal number: S-20220036). Results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and will be presented at an international congress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06844331">NCT06844331</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patabendige, S., Harders, S. M. W., Bendstrup, E., Durheim, M. T., Laursen, C. B., Andersen-Ranberg, K., Brockhattingen, K. K., Kildegaard, C., Bendixen, M., Davidsen, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112171</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112171</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rationale and design of uLtrasOund applicability in the assessment of patients with fibRosing interstitial lung Disease (LORD): a research protocol of a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112171</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112469?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence on implementing WHO Package of Essential Non-communicable (PEN) Diseases Interventions: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112469?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The WHO Package of Essential Non-communicable Diseases Interventions (WHO PEN) provides a core set of measures to prevent, detect and manage non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in low-resource settings. Many countries have adopted WHO PEN to strengthen primary healthcare, yet there is limited consolidated evidence on what components have been implemented and how WHO PEN has been implemented across different contexts. Understanding both the &lsquo;what&rsquo; (disease modules, intervention activities, tools) and the &lsquo;how&rsquo; (strategies, approaches, target populations and contextual factors) is crucial to assess the short-term to medium-term effects on health system readiness, provider performance, patient outcomes and long-term population health impact.</p>
<p>This protocol outlines a systematic review that will be updated as new evidence emerges and additional countries adopt or adapt WHO PEN. It represents the first systematic review focused on the implementation of the multifaceted interventions under WHO PEN. Findings will support efforts to sustain and scale up NCD interventions at the primary healthcare level and inform future updates of WHO PEN and related WHO guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar for studies published up to June 2025, supplemented by grey literature and reference checking.</p>
<p>The review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. Given the complexity, the review will be conducted in two stages. Stage 1 consists of an overview of review, mapping of existing review and evidence and guiding deeper inquiry of stage 2. Stage 2 will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review of the primary studies, forming the main output of this protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required. The protocol and findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, webinars and conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251064835.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, H., Cieza, A., Qama, E., Hu, Y., Li, M., Yang, J., Wu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-19T03:57:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112469</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112469</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence on implementing WHO Package of Essential Non-communicable (PEN) Diseases Interventions: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112469</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112469</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099326?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy programme to prevent perinatal depression: a unified protocol for two harmonised randomised controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099326?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Perinatal depression poses substantial risks to both mothers and their offspring. Given its chronic and recurrent nature, developing effective prevention strategies is crucial. Internet-based cognitive&ndash;behavioural therapy (iCBT) has shown promise. However, the efficacy of specific CBT skills and the influence of individual differences remain unclear.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol describes two harmonised multicentre, open-label, six-arm randomised controlled trials. Across both trials, a total of 2400 pregnant women between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation will be enrolled. After completing psychoeducation (PE), participants will be randomised to either the control condition (PE only) or one of five CBT programmes: behavioural activation (BA), assertion training, BA+cognitive restructuring, BA + problem solving or BA + behaviour therapy for insomnia. The objectives of the study are: (1) to ascertain that the iCBT approach is effective in perinatal depression, (2) to identify active CBT skills for perinatal women and (3) to examine interactions between these CBT skills and individuals&rsquo; baseline characteristics to find personalised and optimised therapy for individual women. The primary outcome is the point prevalence of depression at 1 month postpartum, defined as scoring of 9 or higher on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Ethics Committee (C1710) and Nagoya City University Certified Review Board (2024A007). Anonymised study results will be presented at conferences and published by the investigators in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>jRCTs042240162 (hospital-based, on-site trial) and jRCT1050250074 (nationwide online trial).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toyomoto, R., Furukawa, T. A., Noma, H., Tajika, A., Watanabe, M., Honda, Y., Banno, C., Ogasawara, S., Kitaori, T., Sugiura-Ogasawara, M., Goto, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099326</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099326</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy programme to prevent perinatal depression: a unified protocol for two harmonised randomised controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099326</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099326</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102586?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family functionality and its association with non-communicable diseases among urban adults in Selangor, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102586?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are rapidly escalating in developing countries and social factors such as the dynamics of the family play an important part in the lifestyle choices that lead to the onset and maintenance of chronic illness. There remains a gap in Malaysia as the majority of the studies were focused on the normal population rather than directly towards persons having NCDs. This study aimed to examine emerging risk factors such as family functionality and its association with NCD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a multistage random sampling method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Urban residential areas in Selangor, Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 2542 adults residing in urban areas of Selangor were recruited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Family functionality was measured using the APGAR (Adaptation, Participation, Gain or Growth, Affection and Resources) scale and multiple logistic regression was performed to measure the association between emerging risk factors and NCD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension was 10.8% and 6.1%, respectively. Widowed/separated status (adjusted OR (AOR) 41.53, 95% CI 19.06 to 90.48, p value=0.001) was reported to be a predictor of diabetes. As for hypertension, familial functionality (AOR 4.2, 95% CI 1.11 to 14.50, p value&lt;0.05) was found to be a significant predictor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is a growing concern that family functionality is an emerging risk factor for NCDs. Future family-centred health promotion programmes should be incorporated to improve self-management behaviours and health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdullah, N. N., Azzani, M., Mohamad, M., Ismail, Z., Jamil, A. T., Isa, M. R., Yasin, S. M., Suddin, L. S., Ibrahim, K., Selamat, M. I., Azhar, Z. I., Ismail, N., Ahmad Saman, M. S., Xin Wee, C., Samsudin, E. Z., Muzaini, K., Yaacob, S. S., Roslan, D., Mat Ruzlin, A. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102586</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102586</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family functionality and its association with non-communicable diseases among urban adults in Selangor, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102586</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102586</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104451?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lipid accumulation product (LAP) index and its relation to anthropometric, metabolic and liver function factors in obese patients with NAFLD: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104451?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to assess the association between lipid accumulation product (LAP) index, a novel index combining waist circumference (WC) and triglyceride levels, and anthropometric indices, metabolic factors and hepatic function markers in obese subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Specialised and subspecialised outpatient clinics of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Overall, 232 adult patients with obesity and ultrasound-proven NAFLD were included in the present study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Anthropometric measurements (body weight, height and waist and hip circumferences) were measured, and serum levels of glucose, lipid profile, ferritin and liver enzymes were assessed subsequent to an overnight fasting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mild and Moderate NAFLD were found in 43.5% and 48.2% of the participants, respectively. LAP index markedly increased with higher grades of steatosis, showing values of 63.72&plusmn;22.26, 84.57&plusmn;44.96 and 112.14&plusmn;56.97 for healthy, grade I and grade II groups, respectively (p&lt;0.001). There were significant differences in body weight (p=0.003), WC (p&lt;0.001), fasting blood sugar (FBS) (p=0.004) and lipid profile (p&lt;0.001) among LAP index quartiles. Moreover, the LAP index was positively correlated with body weight, liver function and, as expected, with lipid profile in all of the subjects with NAFLD. Sex differences showed an additional marked association of LAP with FBS (r=0.363 and p&lt;0.001, respectively) and glycosylated haemoglobin (r=0.321 and p=0.002, respectively) in males and serum aspartate aminotransferase levels in females (r=0.223 and p=0.009, respectively).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In conclusion, the LAP index was not only associated with anthropometric indices, metabolic parameters and hepatic function markers, but also increased in line with higher grades of liver steatosis in NAFLD.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bohlouli Sardroudi, S., Arefhosseini, S., Ebrahimi-Mameghani, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104451</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104451</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lipid accumulation product (LAP) index and its relation to anthropometric, metabolic and liver function factors in obese patients with NAFLD: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104451</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104451</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105013?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of containment strategies for respiratory diseases on infections imported via international travel to the USA: a modelling study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105013?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine outcomes from respiratory pathogens containment strategies focused on international travellers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We developed a compartmental model generalisable to respiratory infectious diseases, in which international travellers interact with each other and airline/airport workers during transit. We used SARS-CoV-2 Omicron surge data (basic reproduction number (R<SUB>0</SUB>): 9.5) as a case example and performed sensitivity and scenario analyses, including varying the R<SUB>0</SUB> for different respiratory pathogens.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>A US high-volume airport.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Simulated international travellers and airline/airport workers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Projection of new and imported SARS-CoV-2 infections without intervention (<I>No Intervention</I>); pre-travel screening for travellers who intend to travel (intended travellers) with PCR (<I>Pre-travel PCR</I>); or antigen testing (<I>Pre-travel Ag</I>); mask-wearing guidance for travellers and workers (<I>Mask-wearing</I>); and a <I>Combined</I> strategy (<I>Pre-travel PCR &amp; Mask-wearing</I>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The number of new and imported respiratory disease infections over the 90-day simulation period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over the 90-day simulation, the number of infected travellers entering the USA would be: 1 155 580 (27.2% of 4.2 million (M) intended travellers) with <I>No Intervention</I>; 709 560/4.2M (16.7%) with <I>Pre-travel PCR</I>; 862 330/4.2M (20.3%) with <I>Pre-travel Ag</I>; 1033 820/4.2M (24.4%) with <I>Mask-wearing</I>; and 650 480/4.2M (15.3%) with <I>Combined</I>. The number of new infections among airline/airport workers would be: 25 670 (73.3% of 35 000 workers) with <I>No Intervention</I>; 25 260 (72.2%) in <I>Pre-travel PCR</I>; 25 590 (73.1%) in <I>Pre-travel Ag</I>; 24 630 (70.4%) in <I>Mask-wearing</I>; and 18 770 (53.6%) in <I>Combined</I>. In scenario analyses, the most impactful parameters were R<SUB>0</SUB> of the respiratory pathogen and population immunity level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A <I>Combined</I> strategy of pre-travel PCR testing and mask-wearing would most effectively reduce respiratory infection among international travellers and airline/airport workers, but would still allow a substantial number of infections to enter the USA, especially when the pathogen is highly transmissible.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koiso, S., Lee, H., Ciaranello, A. L., Freedberg, K. A., Ryan, E. T., Jalali, M. S., LaRocque, R. C., Hyle, E. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105013</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105013</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of containment strategies for respiratory diseases on infections imported via international travel to the USA: a modelling study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105013</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105013</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105559?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pregnancy outcomes among women with and without HIV infections who underwent excisional treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study in low-resource settings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105559?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The standard treatment for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions is excisional involving the uterine cervix, while surveillance is an acceptable approach for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. There is controversy about excisional treatment on pregnancy outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine pregnancy outcomes in women living with and without HIV who underwent excisional treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This retrospective cohort study compared the pregnancy outcomes of women with and without HIV who were or were not treated for cervical intraepithelial lesions. A cohort of 488 women with and without HIV infection who did or did not receive excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions between 2009 and 2022 was enrolled. Adverse pregnancy outcomes (preterm delivery and pregnancy loss) in women with and without HIV, untreated or treated for cervical dysplasia, were recorded and analysed. The significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study settings</st>
<p>The study was conducted at all Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare-Kenya satellite sites, which offer cervical cancer screening and treatment for cervical dysplasia in western Kenya. The Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital was also included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A cohort of 488 women aged between 20 years and 49 years, with and without HIV, diagnosed and treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and those followed up for low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between 2009 and 2022, were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes measured</st>
<p>The study was interested in adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly pregnancy loss and preterm delivery following cervical excision treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After adjustment for confounding factors, excisional treatment involving the uterine cervix&mdash;particularly cold knife conisation&mdash;was associated with higher odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes (OR 13.1; 95% CI 1.1 to 137.1; p=0.032). A prior history of adverse pregnancy outcomes was also strongly associated with subsequent adverse outcomes after treatment (OR 37.7; 95% CI 13.8 to 102.7; p&lt;0.001). In contrast, maternal HIV infection was not independently associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes after adjustment (p=0.125).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Adverse pregnancy outcomes after excisional treatment of the uterine cervix for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions are multifactorial and were associated with cold knife conisation and prior adverse pregnancy outcomes, while maternal HIV infection was not independently associated with adverse outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amubuomombe, P. P., Itsura, P., Tonui, P. K., Orango, E. O., Odongo, B. E., Loehrer, P. J., Cu-Uvin, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105559</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105559</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pregnancy outcomes among women with and without HIV infections who underwent excisional treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study in low-resource settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105559</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105559</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107014?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility and efficacy of virtual reality rehabilitation for upper extremity impairment in ischaemic stroke patients: an open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107014?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a non-immersive virtual reality (VR) system on upper extremity (UE) recovery in ischaemic stroke patients in comparison to a conventional physiotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial randomly assigned the participants to two groups, VR intervention or conventional physiotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two tertiary stroke care centres in South India participated in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Sixty first-ever ischaemic stroke patients (1&ndash;6 months of stroke onset) having spasticity grades of 1 or 1+ as per Modified Ashworth scale and Brunnstrom recovery stages of 3, 4 or 5 in the UE were included in the intention-to-treat analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>High-intensity non-immersive VR-based comprehensive rehabilitation gaming system with a duration of 12 weeks (3 days/week) was compared with equally intensive conventional physiotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The feasibility outcome was the compliance with the treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the improvement in the motor function assessed by the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) and Wolf motor function test (WMFT). The secondary outcomes included the performance in activities of daily living by the Barthel index (BI) and the quality of life by the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The treatment compliance was similar in two groups (p=0.19). Both groups improved in motor performance, activities of daily living and quality of life. However, there were no significant differences in the FMA (p=0.58), WMFT (functional ability scale, p=0.33; performance time, p=0.44), BI (p=0.84) and SF-36 (physical, p=0.87; mental, p=0.99) scores between the groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The non-immersive VR system was feasible, effective and safe; however, it was not found to be superior to conventional physiotherapy. The trial was stopped early and did not reach its proposed sample size and hence, the findings are to be interpreted cautiously.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Clinical trial registry India: CTRI/2021/11/038339 (<A HREF="https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NTc1OTI=&amp;Enc=&amp;userName=CTRI/2021/11/038339">https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NTc1OTI=&amp;Enc=&amp;userName=CTRI/2021/11/038339</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sylaja, P. N., PR, S., Paul, R., Chakravarthy, S., Sinha, A., Bapi, R. S., Kesavadas, C., Bharath, R. D., Sarma, P. S., Elango, S., Hafsath, S., Darshini, D., F, A. J. A., Dhasan, A., Sambath, S., Amal, M. G., R S, A., Akhil, S., Devan, H. S., Anjana Madhu, M. V., S, S. E., Ambikapathy, R., Shaji, S., Raja, P., Gupta, A., Kulkarni, G. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107014</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107014</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility and efficacy of virtual reality rehabilitation for upper extremity impairment in ischaemic stroke patients: an open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107014</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107014</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107588?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paediatric kidney transplant and school life: a qualitative study of childrens academic experiences in Lahore, Pakistan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107588?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Paediatric kidney transplantation, while life-saving, presents significant academic challenges for children. Frequent hospitalisations, medical treatments and the psychosocial impact of chronic illness can severely disrupt educational trajectories. This study aimed to explore the post-transplant academic experiences of children from the perspective of their parents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative phenomenological study. Data were collected through in-depth, semistructured interviews and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in Lahore, Pakistan, with participants recruited from the registry of the Punjab Human Organ Transplantation Authority (PHOTA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Thirteen parents of children who had undergone a kidney transplant and were enrolled in a formal school.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) academic disruption and coping, detailing declines in performance and motivation alongside efforts to maintain engagement; (2) cognitive fatigue and emotional strain, encompassing reduced focus, memory difficulties and psychological distress; (3) school attendance, participation and support, highlighting frequent absenteeism, limited engagement in activities, and the critical role of institutional flexibility; (4) social identity and peer exclusion, revealing fears of stigma, self-isolation and misunderstanding from peers and (5) navigating the future, reflecting parental anxieties about long-term educational and career prospects alongside adaptive hope. The findings underscore that formal support systems in schools and healthcare settings are currently underdeveloped to meet these children&rsquo;s complex needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study illuminates the profound and multifaceted academic challenges faced by children after kidney transplantation. The results emphasise that a transplant is not merely a medical event but a life-altering experience with significant educational consequences. There is a critical need for integrated, targeted interventions that provide robust psychological support, flexible educational policies and comprehensive school reintegration programmes to ensure these children can achieve their full academic and personal potential.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saleem, J., Asghar, R. S., Ali, F., Zafar, A., Riaz, A., Rashid, M., Khan, F., Mehmood, F., Amjad, A., Saqib, L., Abbas, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107588</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107588</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paediatric kidney transplant and school life: a qualitative study of childrens academic experiences in Lahore, Pakistan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107588</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107588</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109079?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epidemiological investigation of perinatal depression among pregnant and postpartum women: findings from a cross-sectional survey in the Philippines]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109079?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study investigated perinatal depressive symptoms among pregnant and postpartum Filipino women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The Philippines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were recruited online and face-to-face from maternal care facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Perinatal depressive symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score, with prevalence calculated based on &ge;13 cut-off, indicating clinically significant symptoms of depression. Patterns of depressive symptoms were examined by demographics, perinatal time period and other obstetric information using adjusted regression coefficients (a<I>b</I>) and risk ratios (aRR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 856 women participated in the study, comprising 356 pregnant and 500 postpartum women. EPDS scores were, on average, similar between pregnant (14.4) and postpartum women (14.1). Using the locally validated cut-off of &ge;13 revealed that 69.1% of pregnant and 62.0% of postpartum women reported clinically significant depressive symptoms. Consistent EPDS scores and prevalence were observed across pregnancy trimesters and within 12 months postpartum and beyond. Women who received adequate prenatal care were less likely to experience antenatal (a<I>b</I>=&ndash;1.59, 95% CI &ndash;3.13 to &ndash;0.05) and postpartum (a<I>b</I>=&ndash;1.30, 95% CI &ndash;2.48 to &ndash;0.12) depressive symptoms. Postpartum EPDS scores and depressive symptom prevalence (EPDS score &ge;13) were higher among 18&ndash;24-year olds (a<I>b</I>=1.96, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.61; aRR=1.23, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.47) and single mothers (a<I>b</I>=3.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 6.71; aRR=1.42, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.90), compared with older and married mothers, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>At least 60% Filipino mothers experienced clinically significant perinatal depressive symptoms, which exceeds the established global average of 25%. Younger and single postpartum women were at greater risk, while pregnant and postpartum women who attended adequate prenatal visits were less likely to report depressive symptoms. Our study underscores the need for further research to uncover the true burden of poor perinatal mental health and calls for targeted early interventions and integrative public health strategies to support at-risk mothers, particularly those from socially disadvantaged backgrounds.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Filoteo, J. A., Maravilla, J. C., Mamaat, J. E., Flores, A. D., Jumamil, A. N., Cardenas, R. L., Quijencio, W., Bayani, M. A., Santos, N., Acena, J. L., Alfonso, A. L., Rivera, M., Guarino, R., Sarmiento, R., Flenady, V., Boyle, F. M., Loughnan, S. A., Taragua, A. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109079</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109079</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epidemiological investigation of perinatal depression among pregnant and postpartum women: findings from a cross-sectional survey in the Philippines]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109079</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109079</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109326?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anaesthesia workforce distribution, practices and essential resources in Sierra Leone: a nationwide, cross-sectional, facility-based study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109326?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess anaesthesia capacity and practice in Sierra Leone by enumerating the anaesthesia workforce by volume, training level and distribution across urban and rural areas and facility ownership; estimating the prevalence of anaesthesia methods used for common surgical procedures by provider category; and evaluating hospital infrastructure and the availability of essential anaesthesia-related medications and equipment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A nationwide, cross-sectional, facility-based study combining structured questionnaires administered through face-to-face interviews with facility leads and retrospective review of surgical and anaesthesia logbooks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Public and private hospitals and clinics in Sierra Leone providing surgical care with general, regional or local anaesthesia within an operating theatre.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>69 of 78 eligible surgical facilities nationwide were included. Facilities providing surgical services between September 2022 and August 2023 were eligible; facilities without registries or declining participation were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Across participating facilities, the anaesthesia workforce comprised 198 full-time positions, predominantly non-physician providers, with only 40.4% (80/198) trained to administer anaesthesia independently. Ketamine-based and spinal anaesthesia were most common, while general anaesthesia with a protected airway accounted for just 5.0% (415/8339) of procedures. Anaesthesia practices varied by provider training level. Essential infrastructure, equipment and medications fell below international minimum standards, with shortages most pronounced in rural facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Severe shortages of certified anaesthesia providers, limited anaesthesia techniques and inadequate material resources remain major barriers to safe anaesthesia and surgical care in Sierra Leone. Targeted investments in workforce development, infrastructure and resource allocation&mdash;particularly in rural areas&mdash;are required to improve the safety, quality and equity of anaesthesia care nationwide.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovreas, E., Vreede, E., van Duinen, A. J., Svengaard, M., Furre, M. E., Kamara, A. K., Sesay, D. A., Lonnee, H., Nathani, P., Kabba, M. S., Bolkan, H. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109326</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109326</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anaesthesia workforce distribution, practices and essential resources in Sierra Leone: a nationwide, cross-sectional, facility-based study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109326</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109326</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy and neural mechanisms of a vibrotactile-enhanced, brain-controlled soft robotic glove for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Soft robotic gloves (SRGs) integrated with brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have demonstrated potential in facilitating motor recovery after stroke by enabling active, intention-driven rehabilitation. Emerging evidence suggests that incorporating vibrotactile stimulation (VTS) into SRG-BCI systems may further enhance sensorimotor feedback. The objective of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and underlying neural mechanisms of BCI-driven, intention-based glove activation compared with automated glove-assisted training, with VTS applied identically in both groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial will involve 48 post-stroke patients within 1 week to 3 months after stroke onset, with stratification by time since stroke during randomisation. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the BCI-SRG group (n=24) or SRG group (n=24). Both groups will receive identical VTS. Patients in the BCI-SRG group will actively initiate movements of the SRG through motor imagery, while those in the SRG group will receive automated glove-assisted training without BCI control. The intervention will be administered 5 days per week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity. Secondary outcome measures include Wolf Motor Function Test, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Generic Set, Barthel Index, Modified Ashworth Scale, Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test, as well as event-related spectral perturbation and event-related desynchronisation. All assessments will be conducted at both baseline and post-intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval of this study protocol has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University (2025-SR-508). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and communication with scientific, professional and general public audiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500106951.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catherine Chan, K. L., Yan, C., Wang, X., Huang, S., Dai, W., Luo, Y., Cheng, Y., Xu, B., Zhang, W., Shen, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110321</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110321</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy and neural mechanisms of a vibrotactile-enhanced, brain-controlled soft robotic glove for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110321</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110424?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: Sub-cohort study on the second phase of the Chiba Study of Mother and Child Health (C-MACH), Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110424?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The second phase of the Chiba Study of Mother and Child Health (C-MACH) was initiated to investigate how environmental exposures from the fetal period to early childhood influence maternal and child health outcomes. The sub-cohort focuses specifically on detailed assessments of indoor environmental factors and neighbourhood-built and social environments. By integrating environmental metrics with biological, behavioural and sociodemographic data, the study aims to elucidate their role in the development of allergies, neurodevelopmental disorders and other non-communicable diseases in early life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Between June 2021 and April 2023, 505 pregnant women were enrolled in the second phase of the C-MACH main study. Of these, 298 participants consented to join the sub-cohort study, including 258 in the sleep and physical activity monitoring option (Option 1) and 148 in the indoor allergen exposure sub-study (Option 2). The study includes biological sampling, environmental monitoring and repeated questionnaire surveys. At baseline, 253 live births were recorded from 251 pregnancies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>Of the 298 women, 272 completed early pregnancy questionnaires. The mean maternal age was 33.1 years (SD 4.6); 97.8% were married. University-level education was reported by 51.0% of mothers and 53.7% of fathers. Most households had an annual income of 6 to &lt;8 million yen. Only 0.8% of mothers reported smoking; 28.9% reported passive smoking. Fathers&rsquo; smoking rate was 24.4%. Baseline characteristics of mothers and fathers in the Sub-cohort were comparable to those in the main study. Most homes were wooden structures (54.3%), with a mean floor area of 83.7 m&sup2;; 85.9% had wooden flooring.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>Longitudinal follow-up will continue until the children reach age 15. Future analyses will examine associations between environmental exposures and allergic, developmental, endocrine/metabolic and obesity-related outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Takaguchi, K., Yoda-Tsumura, K., Nakayama, Y., Shimatani, K., Sakurai, K., Suzuki, N., On behalf of the Chiba Study of Mother and Child Health Group, Mori, Shimojo, Hata, Fukuoka, Koshizaka, Hanazato, Yamamoto, Kawanami, Eguchi, Hisada, Takatani, Konno]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110424</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110424</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: Sub-cohort study on the second phase of the Chiba Study of Mother and Child Health (C-MACH), Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110424</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110424</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112005?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality of care metrics contributing to the development, implementation, and evaluation processes of telehealth solutions in home-care settings for paediatric palliative care: protocol for a systematic literature review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112005?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Paediatric palliative care (PPC) aims to improve the quality of life of children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions. PPC addresses the needs of both the child and family and preferably starts immediately after a palliative diagnosis. It includes effective symptom management, psychosocial, spiritual and emotional support. Receiving PPC is often challenging due to the varied and complex nature of conditions and the difficulties in reaching all children who require palliative care. Telehealth offers a promising solution by enabling virtual access to interdisciplinary teams, facilitating real-time consultations, extending care into the home, educating professionals across regions and fostering consistent, collaborative, patient- and family-centred PPC. As this requires a seamless integration into the daily routines of all relevant stakeholders, telehealth may raise complexity in terms of privacy, data protection and regulatory compliance. Nevertheless, studies indicate that parents and children are open to using telehealth applications.</p>
<p>Since the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth development in paediatrics showed a rapid and substantial scale-up. Evaluating the quality of these new technical solutions remains important. One of the main outcome measures used in telehealth evaluation studies is quality of care. Currently, the literature has no consensus on which quality of care metrics can be used to assess the development, implementation and evaluation of telehealth solutions in home-care PPC. In addition, a timely update on the fast-growing field of telehealth solutions in PPC is required. Therefore, this study aims to update and examine quality of care metrics in telehealth solutions for PPC, contributing to the conceptual foundation for the development, implementation and evaluation of home-based PPC telehealth services. Findings from our review will contribute to a deeper understanding of how children and families can receive timely and accessible palliative care regardless of their location, ultimately informing future telehealth models and research projects.</p>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Our systematic review will evaluate studies that describe telehealth solutions in PPC home-care settings, using the Cochrane handbook, and the reporting will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We will include peer-reviewed articles without language or geographical restrictions. The search will be conducted by an information specialist and data synthesis will be documented via a data extraction table in MS Excel. Along with a Mixed-Method-Appraisal-Tool (MMAT) quality appraisal, data extraction will be managed by Covidence. Two reviewers will screen and extract data independently, with a third reviewer resolving discrepancies. We will present a narrative synthesis, using clear language, defining key terms and following open-access standards to ensure accessibility for non-expert audiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No primary or clinical data will be collected. Therefore, ethical approval is not relevant. Review findings will be shared via peer-reviewed journal publications, conferences, stakeholder meetings and online presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251035350.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adlung, C., Niehot, C., van Capelle, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112005</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112005</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality of care metrics contributing to the development, implementation, and evaluation processes of telehealth solutions in home-care settings for paediatric palliative care: protocol for a systematic literature review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112005</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112005</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113162?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study of topical anaesthetic for paediatric laser procedures (STAPLE): a protocol for a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113162?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cutaneous vascular anomalies and scars can cause significant physical and psychosocial difficulties for children, but can be ameliorated with pulsed dye laser (PDL) and neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser treatment. Given that multiple rounds of treatment are often required, and that the procedures are painful, achieving adequate analgesia is imperative in this setting. Paediatric procedural pain management guidelines suggest that multimodal non-pharmacological and pharmacological analgesia should be used for such procedures; however, the place of topical anaesthetic (TA) within this paradigm has not been adequately studied.</p>
<p>This feasibility and pilot trial will investigate the feasibility of performing a randomised, placebo-controlled trial assessing pain intensity in children receiving TA in conjunction with other multimodal analgesic methods for laser procedures. The primary objective of the trial will be to assess feasibility, and secondary objectives will be to assess pain intensity, acceptability of trial procedures to participating families and their clinical team, to assess the laser treatment response, and obtain data necessary for full-scale trial sample size calculations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The trial will include 50 children aged 0&ndash;18 years old who are undergoing awake PDL and/or Nd:YAG laser treatment for scars or vascular anomalies. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either TA cream (lidocaine 2.5%/prilocaine 2.5% (Numit 5% cream, Ego Pharmaceuticals, Braeside, VIC, Australia)) or a placebo, along with our unit&rsquo;s standard multimodal analgesic agents for laser treatment (including paracetamol, ibuprofen or oxycodone and intraprocedural sucrose solution or intranasal fentanyl). Investigators, participants and their caregivers, and clinicians will be blinded to participant allocation.</p>
<p>The primary outcome of the trial will be trial feasibility based on pre-specified criteria. The secondary outcome of pain intensity will be assessed by observer, caregiver and self-reported measures, and the secondary outcome of trial method acceptability with a Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire. The assessment of laser treatment response will be assessed with lesion-specific evaluation tools. Feasibility and acceptability data will be summarised using descriptive statistics. The association between treatment groups and pain scores, treatment groups and laser treatment response will be investigated using a univariable linear regression model, with the effect estimate reported as mean difference and 95% CI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial has undergone ethical review and has been granted approval by the Children&rsquo;s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (ref HREC/23/QCHQ/91002) and the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (ref 2023/308). The protocol has been prospectively registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000494639). Results of this trial may be presented at scientific meetings and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Participating families that have indicated an interest in trial results will receive a plain-language summary of the trial results by email.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12623000494639.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shilova, M., Plummer, K., Ware, R. S., Kimble, R., Griffin, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113162</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113162</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study of topical anaesthetic for paediatric laser procedures (STAPLE): a protocol for a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113162</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114569?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a co-adapted virtual discharge education app on disease knowledge and health behaviours in patients following heart attack: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial protocol in Sydney, Australia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114569?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Active self-management by patients following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can reduce recurrent events. Patient education for transitioning from hospital to home promotes effective self-management but can be limited in the acute setting due to time and resource pressures. Patients from ethnic minority and immigrant backgrounds face additional language, cultural and health literacy barriers to receiving patient education. Self-administered virtual patient education presents an innovative solution to these challenges. This study aims to evaluate a co-adapted, virtual avatar nurse-guided, discharge education application (app) for Chinese-speaking patients following ACS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial will recruit 98 Chinese-speaking inpatients following ACS with evaluation at 1 and 3 months postdischarge. Control participants in the control group will receive the usual ward-based patient discharge education. Intervention participants will additionally receive the education app installed on their devices before hospital discharge with unlimited access during the study period. Cultural relevance and linguistic accuracy for this Chinese version of an existing app were ensured through co-adaptation with Chinese-speaking consumers; the primary outcome will be coronary heart disease (CHD) knowledge, and secondary outcomes will include knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding heart attack symptoms and responses, CHD self-management behaviours, utilisation of healthcare services and quality of life. A process evaluation will be conducted alongside the trial to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the app. Between-group comparisons will be made using 95% CIs, accounting for baseline differences using linear mixed effects or mixed effects logistic regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee has approved this study protocol (26 February 2024, amendment number 2) (2024/STE00147), with site-specific authorisations obtained from each participating hospital. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ACTRN12624000408583.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, L., Shi, W., Zhao, E., Hyun, K. K., Zecchin, R., Gao, Y., Brunorio, L., Stanaway, F., Ellis, T., Redfern, J., Clark, R., Du, H., Gallagher, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114569</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114569</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a co-adapted virtual discharge education app on disease knowledge and health behaviours in patients following heart attack: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial protocol in Sydney, Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114569</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114569</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115864?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cytometry-based blood immune cell markers associated with clinical outcomes in systemic sclerosis: protocol for a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115864?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by skin and organ fibrosis, vasculopathy and immune dysregulation. Given the disease heterogeneity and severity, accurate prognostic and predictive markers are needed. Blood immunophenotyping by flow or mass cytometry offers a promising non-invasive approach to identify immune signatures associated with disease subtypes, complications (eg, interstitial lung disease, scleroderma renal crisis, digital ulcers) and treatment responses. However, findings remain inconsistent and lack clinical standardisation. This systematic review aims to identify cytometry-based blood immune markers associated with clinical outcomes in SSc.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A comprehensive search will be conducted on three databases: PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, from their inception to the date of the final search (21 December 2025). Data will be extracted and analysed using a predefined charting form. Studies published in English or French reporting the use of flow or mass cytometry for peripheral blood cells phenotyping in adults with SSc will be included. Comparators will include healthy controls, other autoimmune diseases, disease severity groups and treatment response subgroups. The primary outcome will be the association with the diffuse cutaneous subtype, while secondary outcomes will include overall survival and disease-specific mortality, organ involvement, progression of the disease and treatment response.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this review is an analysis of published scientific literature and does not involve patients. The results of this systematic literature review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration</st>
<p>CRD420250644594.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Souffez, M., Dumontet, E., Lecureur, V., Lescoat, A., Ferrant, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115864</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115864</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Immunology (including allergy)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cytometry-based blood immune cell markers associated with clinical outcomes in systemic sclerosis: protocol for a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Immunology (including allergy)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115864</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115864</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109433corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: 'Implementation of the community health system innovation project in three low- and middle-income countries: COHESION-I study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109433corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Lazo-Porras M, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Damasceno A, <I>et al.</I> Implementation of the community health system innovation project in three low- and middle-income countries: COHESION-I study protocol. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2025;15:e109433. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025&ndash;1 09 433</p>
<p>This article has been corrected since it was published online. The funding section in Footnotes has been updated from "COHESION-I receives funding from the National Institute for Health and Care Research under the NIHR Global Health Policy and Systems Research Programme NIHR150261" to "This research was funded by the NIHR (project NIHR150261) using UK international development funding from the UK Government to support global health research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK government."</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-18T05:51:30-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109433corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109433corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: 'Implementation of the community health system innovation project in three low- and middle-income countries: COHESION-I study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109433corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109433corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095400?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of texting thumb among medical students and its association with behavioural patterns during digital device usage: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095400?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Teenagers widely use digital devices for information sharing and other daily activities. Their heavy reliance on smartphones and tablets may contribute to repetitive-use injuries of the thumb.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of texting thumb (TT) among medical students and to identify the potential associations between TT and behavioural patterns during digital device use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study employed an online, self-developed questionnaire to assess demographic and behavioural patterns associated with smartphone use. Data on thumb pain and its features were evaluated for diagnostic purposes. This study comprised medical students from six medical schools in Jordan. Data were collected from 482 medical students, excluding those who did not meet the inclusion criteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of TT was 34%, predominantly on the right side (53%) and at the thumb base (69%). The findings suggest that TT was significantly associated with specific behavioural patterns, including supporting the forearm (p=0.026, adjusted OR: 1.611; 95% CI 1.059 to 2.449), number of texting per day (p=0.005, adjusted OR: 1.319; 95% CI 1.086 to 1.603) and studying hours per day using a digital device (p=0.002, adjusted OR: 1.586; 95% CI 1.193 to 2.109). Also, students&rsquo; attitudes toward thumb pain were significantly associated with the TT (p=0.005, adjusted OR: 1.351; 95% CI 1.094 to 1.668).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Students&rsquo; attention to behavioural patterns is crucial when using digital devices. Supporting the forearm, limiting text message use, avoiding prolonged use of digital devices, never ignoring hand pain and resting the hand significantly reduce the risk of thumb overuse injury.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salameh, M. A., Odeh, H., Boyajian, S. D., Amaireh, E. A., Jaradat, E., Bawardi, S. S., AlTaamreh, B., Al Haj Ali, N. S., Madi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T04:17:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095400</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095400</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of texting thumb among medical students and its association with behavioural patterns during digital device usage: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095400</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095400</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096080?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trends and predictors of caesarean section in Thailand before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective analysis of national hospitalisation data under the Universal Coverage Scheme]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096080?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Since 1985, the international healthcare community has recommended the ideal rate of caesarean section (CS) to be 10%&ndash;15% at the national level. The literature has reported that overused CS without necessary medical indications can be harmful to both maternal and child health. To generate evidence to support policy on CS, this study evaluated the trend over time of CS in Thailand during January 2016 to October 2021 (which included the COVID-19 pandemic period) and explored predictors of CS use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>This study was a retrospective secondary data analysis of de-identified hospitalisation data under the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) from the National Health Security Office&rsquo;s e-Claims database. Descriptive analyses were conducted to explore the number and rate of CS over time and across different characteristics (ie, age, hospital type, COVID-19 status and delivery day) including a multivariable logistic analysis to explore predictors of CS. Interrupted time series analysis was adopted to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on CS rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>569 321 CS cases under UCS from 2016 to 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results showed an increasing trend of CS rate, from 30% in January 2016 to 35% in October 2021. Both clinical (eg, medical indication and age) and non-clinical (eg, region and day of delivery) factors were significantly associated with CS. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic had no significant effect on CS rate (level: &ndash;0.0016, 95% CI &ndash;0.0085 to 0.0053, p=0.66).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlighted an increasing trend of CS in Thailand and could present supportive evidence that Thailand might have been facing an overuse of CS. More awareness and actions are warranted to ensure the movement towards reduction of unnecessary CS in Thailand.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karunayawong, P., Sukmanee, J., Butchon, R., Saeraneesopon, T., Boonma, C., Kunanusont, C., Lumbiganon, P., Morton, A., Teerawattananon, Y., Isaranuwatchai, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T04:17:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096080</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096080</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trends and predictors of caesarean section in Thailand before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective analysis of national hospitalisation data under the Universal Coverage Scheme]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096080</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096080</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100092?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Genetic, lifestyle and environmental influences on health: a Finnish biobank recall study protocol (BioRecall)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100092?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-communicable diseases are the leading causes of premature mortality worldwide. Both genetic predispositions and environmental exposures affect disease risk. While biobanks have increased understanding of genetic predictors of these diseases, environmental influences are expected to have a greater impact on disease development. Individuals also create their own environments and lifestyles based on genetically regulated preferences, leading to gene&ndash;environment interactions that require large datasets to study. Finnish biobanks typically lack sufficient lifestyle and environmental data, which limits their use. We present a protocol for a biobank-recall study (BioRecall) to collect data on lifestyle and environmental exposures and combine these findings with genotypes, biological samples and clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>All previously genotyped donors from the Central Finland Biobank who have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and have consented to recall will be invited to participate in the pilot study. The preliminary feasibility assessment reveals that there are 1580 suitable candidates. Participants will complete an electronic questionnaire on a secure online platform. The questionnaire includes validated questions on lifestyles, anthropometrics, weight loss history, health, symptoms, work characteristics, emotional states and residential environments. Postcode information will facilitate the addition of spatial environmental data. Genotype and related clinical data will be provided in the study in accordance with the Finnish Biobank Act and combined with questionnaire data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Human Sciences Ethics Committee of the University of Jyva&#x0308;skyla&#x0308; delivered a favourable statement regarding the study protocol (1671/13.00.04.00/2023). Central Finland Biobank approved the research plan (no: BB24-0333-A01). The data collected will be returned to the Central Finland Biobank for research purposes with the participants&rsquo; consent. Permission for data usage can then be applied through standard protocols of the Fingenious service (<A HREF="https://site.fingenious.fi/en/">https://site.fingenious.fi/en/</A>). If successful, the study will be expanded to other donors and Finnish biobanks.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sillanpa&#x0308;a&#x0308;, E., Fo&#x0308;hr, T., Kurtti, E., Aittola, K., Ma&#x0308;kela&#x0308;, J., Southerington, T., Lakka, T. A., Jokela, T., Ahtiainen, M., Laakkonen, E., Rantakokko, M., Ravi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T04:17:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100092</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100092</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Genetic, lifestyle and environmental influences on health: a Finnish biobank recall study protocol (BioRecall)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100092</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100092</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106481?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unravelling antecedents and bidirectional impacts of nurse work rumination: a scoping review to enhance nurses well-being and improve nursing quality]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106481?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Globally, work rumination is a common phenomenon related to nurse burnout. However, most existing studies focus on the single negative impacts of rumination, with less exploration of its dual effects and antecedents. Therefore, comprehensively exploring the effect of nurse work rumination and its influencing factors is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of nursing management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Identify the antecedents and dual effects of nurse work rumination to deepen understanding of this phenomenon and provide references for formulating interventions that enhance nurses&rsquo; well-being and improve the quality of nursing work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Included studies were original research articles focusing on work-related rumination of nurses in clinical settings. Excluded studies were those involving nurses without patient contact, rumination unrelated to work, studies not addressing the effects or influencing factors of rumination and non-Chinese or non-English language publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources of evidence</st>
<p>CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Sinomed, Wanfang, VIP and CNKI were searched to identify articles about nurse work rumination which were published up to January 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Charting methods</st>
<p>A scoping review of the published articles of nurse work rumination was performed with the methodological process guided by the framework proposed by Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley. A three-step coding procedure was used to synthesise the impacts and antecedents of nurse work rumination, which were subdivided into four categories individually based on the conservation of resources theory, the three-dimension theory of happiness and the distinctive features of the nursing profession.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>30 articles from 12 countries were included. The findings indicate that nurse work rumination has 28 kinds of impacts, including positive, negative and double-edged sword effects, in four aspects: nursing quality and safety (n=7), happiness (n=7), health (n=10) and relationship (n=4) from 29 articles. The findings also suggest that from 26 articles, work rumination will be influenced by 31 factors, which are based on conservation of resources theory classified into four categories: resource depletion (n=14), resource protection (n=4), consequences of resource depletion (n=5) and behaviour and cognition (n=8).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This scoping review constructs a conceptual framework of &lsquo;antecedent factors-nurse work rumination-dual impacts&rsquo; by systematically synthesising 30 studies. Rooted in the conservation of resources theory, three-dimensional theory of happiness and nursing professional characteristics, the framework clarifies the classification logic and internal connections of 31 influencing factors and 28 bidirectional impacts. The positive effect of work rumination can promote nurses&rsquo; personal development by facilitating the problem-solving pondering. Nursing managers can leverage this integrated framework to design targeted intervention strategies, maximising the constructive effects of rumination while mitigating its adverse impacts. Classifying the factors affecting nurse work rumination according to the conservation of resources theory provides an important basis for exploring the influence mechanism of nurse work rumination. Future research should focus more on empirical studies on rumination to reduce nurses&rsquo; burnout and improve the quality of nursing work.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hu, W., Xie, X., Xu, X., Wei, S., Zhu, L., An, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T04:17:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106481</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106481</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unravelling antecedents and bidirectional impacts of nurse work rumination: a scoping review to enhance nurses well-being and improve nursing quality]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106481</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106481</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106584?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[STRATUM-OS: first step in the development and validation of the STRATUM tool based on multimodal data processing to assist surgery in patients affected by intra-axial brain tumours - observational study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106584?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Integrated digital diagnostics can support complex surgeries in many anatomic sites, and brain tumour surgery represents one of the most complex cases. Neurosurgeons face several challenges during brain tumour surgeries, such as differentiating critical tissue from brain tumour margins. To overcome these challenges, the STRATUM project will develop a 3D decision support tool for brain surgery guidance and diagnostics based on multimodal data processing, including hyperspectral imaging, integrated as a point-of-care computing tool in neurosurgical workflows. This paper reports the protocol for the development and technical validation of the STRATUM tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This international multicentre, prospective, open, observational cohort study, STRATUM-OS (study: 28 months, pre-recruitment: 2 months, recruitment: 20 months, follow-up: 6 months), with no control group, will collect data from 320 patients undergoing standard neurosurgical procedures to: (1) develop and technically validate the STRATUM tool and (2) collect the outcome measures for comparing the standard procedure versus the standard procedure plus the use of the STRATUM tool during surgery in a subsequent historically controlled non-randomised clinical trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by the participant ethics committees. Results will be disseminated in scientific conferences and peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07036783">NCT07036783</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fabelo, H., Ramallo-Farina, Y., Morera, J., Pineiro, J. F., Lagares, A., Jimenez-Roldan, L., Burstro&#x0308;m, G., Garcia-Bello, M. A., Garcia-Perez, L., Falero, R., Gonzalez, M., Duque, S., Rodriguez-Jimenez, C., Hernandez, M., Delgado-Sanchez, J. J., Paredes, A. B., Hernandez, G., Ponce, P., Leon, R., Gonzalez-Martin, J. M., Rodriguez-Esparragon, F., Callico, G. M., Wa&#x0308;gner, A. M., Clavo, B., STRATUM Consortium, Callico, Leon, Wa&#x0308;gner, Quintana, Vega, Hernandez, Rodriguez-Almeida, Alvarez-Male, Davila, Brito, Zinger, Verbers, Manni, Rovers, Burstro&#x0308;m, Persson, Moreto, Marco, Cervero, Badouh, Fernandez, Falevoz, Dumont, Kokorin, Legriel, Lacouture, Brocard, Leporati, Marenzi, Torti, Juarez, Chavarrias, Villa, Sancho, Lagares, Jimenez-Roldan, Weis, Fabelo, Morera, Danese, Pineiro-Marti, Clavo, Ramallo-Farina, Garcia-Bello, Garcia-Perez, Girado-Fuentes, Szolna, Hernandez, Sosa, Bisshopp, Espino, Ragusa, Sanchez-Ortega, Carrera, Tabes, Santana-Machin, Munoz-Gomez, Zumbado, Delgado-Sanchez, Gonzalez, Paredes, Falero, Duque, Hernandez, Ponce, Gonzalez-Martin, Rodriguez-Esparragon, Gelabert-Rebato, Rodriguez-Jimenez, Rial, Albaladejo, Riemenschneider, Bairaktari, Ortega, Marin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T04:17:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106584</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106584</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[STRATUM-OS: first step in the development and validation of the STRATUM tool based on multimodal data processing to assist surgery in patients affected by intra-axial brain tumours - observational study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106584</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106584</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108168?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhancing palliative care in intensive care units: protocol of EPIC, a controlled, cluster-randomised, non-blinded stepped-wedge design trial with crossover phase]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108168?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and their families face existential physical, psychosocial and spiritual distress. Integrating palliative care (PC) into ICU care may benefit patients, relatives and ICU clinicians. Prior PC studies have shown a reduction in ICU length of stay (LOS) and distressing symptoms without altering overall mortality. A shorter ICU LOS may alleviate the burden for patients and relatives and help optimise the use of limited intensive care resources. PC in the ICU, however, remains underused, partly due to limited access and knowledge of ICU clinicians. Also, robust data regarding the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PC treatment in the ICU are scarce. We established the &lsquo;enhancing palliative care in ICUs&rsquo; (EPIC) study to implement a system-based harmonised practice model across European ICUs. The aim is to investigate if early integration of PC via telemedicine, clinician education and bedside tools is effective and cost-effective, ultimately benefiting patients, relatives and ICU clinicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised, non-blinded stepped-wedge design trial with crossover phase aims to recruit around 2,000 patients from five European countries. All adult patients admitted to participating ICUs&mdash;with an ICU LOS exceeding 72 hours, where cancer is not the primary cause of critical illness, and who are not expected to die within the next 24 hours&mdash;are screened for the need for specialised PC based on the attending physician&rsquo;s judgement. This judgement is triggered by the presence of one or more of the following: (1) significant disagreement among ICU team members and/or relatives about the appropriateness of current ICU treatment, (2) considerations of limiting life-sustaining therapy or (3) the anticipation that a specialised PC consultation may benefit the patient, their relatives or the ICU team. Patients identified as needing specialised PC and their relatives are then enrolled after obtaining written informed consent.</p>
<p>The complex intervention consists of (a) a blended-learning programme to foster knowledge and attitude about PC among ICU clinicians, (b) bedside tools, including a checklist to identify patients in need of PC and a factsheet and (c) standardised telemedical consultations from trained EPIC interventionists. Patient and relative follow-up is conducted 3 months post-ICU discharge. Outcomes include clinical measures (including ICU LOS (primary outcome), severity of critical illness, invasive treatments and health-related quality of life), economic endpoints (resource use, costs, cost&ndash;consequence situation, cost-effectiveness), ICU clinician burnout and distress, and patient and family perception about the quality of symptom management, care and communication. Endpoint analyses will employ generalised linear mixed models, accounting for the clustered data structure and stepped wedge design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>EPIC complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by all local ethics committees. A decision-making structure is established to ensure trial procedures are carried out according to Good Clinical Practice. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to participants, healthcare professionals and the public. Sets of anonymised study data will be made available following Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable principles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06605079">NCT06605079</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Hartog, C. S., Tenge, T., Schwenkglenks, M., Piper, S. K., Barbier, M., Rusinova, K., Neukirchen, M., Schu&#x0308;u&#x0308;rhuis, S., Jensen, H. I., van Heerden, V., Dutzmann, J., Drescher, D., Zvara, M., Metaxa, V., Nachshon, A., De Robertis, E., Spies, C., Edel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T04:17:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108168</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108168</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhancing palliative care in intensive care units: protocol of EPIC, a controlled, cluster-randomised, non-blinded stepped-wedge design trial with crossover phase]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108168</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108399?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Synthesising evidence on the association between the structure, function and quality components of social connection and quality of life for people with dementia: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108399?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Social connection describes how individuals connect, relate and interact with one another, and can affect quality of life (QoL) in persons with dementia. Much of the existing research on social connection does not explicitly differentiate social connection&rsquo;s structure, function and quality components. Due to this, social connection is described using inconsistent terminology, making it unknown how each component is associated with health and well-being outcomes. However, for people with dementia, it is unknown which components of social connection are associated with QoL and whether factors such as gender and type of dementia influence these relationships. This scoping review will identify which components of social connection have been studied in relation to the QoL for people with dementia. This will address inconsistent definitions of social connection terminology and clarify what components of social connection are described and measured in the existing literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The six-stage scoping review framework developed by Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley (2005), with updates from Levac <I>et al</I> (2010), will be used. In March 2025, a comprehensive literature search in the following databases will be conducted: MEDLINE ALL (Ovid), APA PsycInfo (Ovid), Embase Classic and Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost) and Scopus, from database inception. Studies will be included if they are observational studies reporting on an association between social connection and QoL in community-dwelling people with dementia. In Covidence, two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts and review full-text articles based on the inclusion criteria. Data extraction will be carried out by one reviewer and cross-checked by another reviewer. A content analysis for scoping reviews will be used to analyse data and synthesise findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required. Dissemination activities will include peer-reviewed publications, academic presentations and lay summaries on professional websites and social media.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liougas, M. P., Campos, J. L., Montanari, L., Rabin, J. S., McGilton, K. S., Bethell, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T04:17:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108399</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108399</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Synthesising evidence on the association between the structure, function and quality components of social connection and quality of life for people with dementia: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108399</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108399</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101309?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised-controlled feasibility study evaluating the REgulate your SItting Time (RESIT) intervention for reducing sitting in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a process evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101309?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The REgulate your SItting Time (RESIT) is a tailored intervention targeting reductions and breaks in sitting in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A feasibility trial of RESIT had been conducted and the purpose of this paper is to report findings from the process evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A mixed-methods process evaluation within a randomised controlled feasibility trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted remotely in the community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Ambulatory individuals with T2DM aged 18&ndash;85 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>A tailored intervention comprising an online education session, regular health coaching and technology for self-monitoring behaviour and prompting breaks in sitting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Questionnaires (intervention participants n=22 at both 3 and 6 months; control participants n=21 at 3 months, n=29 at 6 months) and interviews (n=30, with n=13 intervention participants, n=12 control participants, n=5 health coaches) to assess perceptions of the intervention components, strategies and barriers for sitting less, the role of the study evaluation measures, and reasons for taking part.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The trial operated a largely successful online education element for those in the intervention group (82% completion; &ge;76% engagement in individual educational elements). There was good use of self-monitoring and prompt technology (apps and wearables) with 73% of participants reporting using these at 6 months. Health coaching had high engagement and was perceived as enjoyable and useful. Data revealed strategies used for behaviour change (eg, active functional tasks) alongside barriers to change (eg, restrictions at work). There were also potential behavioural influences from the study evaluation measures (eg, activity measures increasing awareness and execution of behaviours) for both intervention and control participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A comprehensive process evaluation identified successful intervention elements (ie, online education, health coaching, wearables and smartphone apps) alongside strategies and barriers to behaviour change. These findings can inform future sedentary behaviour interventions for adults with T2DM and a definitive randomised controlled trial evaluating RESIT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN14832389">ISRCTN14832389</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biddle, S. J. H., Brierley, M. L., Castle, E., Hunt, E. R., Chater, A., Edwardson, C., Bailey, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101309</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101309</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised-controlled feasibility study evaluating the REgulate your SItting Time (RESIT) intervention for reducing sitting in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a process evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101309</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101309</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102693?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stigma and risk of self-injury and suicidality in adults with Tourette syndrome: findings from a cross-sectional impact survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102693?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Adults with Tourette syndrome (ATS) face increased risks of self-injury behaviours (SIBs) and suicidality, yet research has largely focused on biological factors. Despite stigma being a known contributor to these outcomes in marginalised groups, its role in ATS remains unexplored. This study aims to address this gap by examining the impact of stigma on SIBs and suicidality in ATS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study analysed adult data from the Tourette Association of America&rsquo;s 2022 Impact Survey, conducted online via convenience sampling. Stigma was assessed via six items, generating scores ranging from 1.0 to 4.0, with higher scores indicating greater stigma. The outcomes included lifetime self-harm, past-year suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Owing to missing data, a Heckman selection model with a probit link function was used to examine the relationships between stigma and these outcomes, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study included 601 US ATS, with moderate to high stigma levels. Among the participants, 58% reported lifetime self-harm, 43% had past-year suicidal ideation and 27% had attempted suicide at least once in the past year. The Heckman selection model confirmed a significant association between stigma and all three outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This sample of ATS, on average, endures medium&ndash;high levels of stigma, which significantly contributes to their risk of self-injury, suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviours. Given this heightened risk, it is crucial to integrate stigma reduction interventions into health and mental health services for this vulnerable population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shiu, C., Arbing, R. H., Piacentini, J., Talty, A., Hermetet, K., Chen, W.-T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102693</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102693</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stigma and risk of self-injury and suicidality in adults with Tourette syndrome: findings from a cross-sectional impact survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102693</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102693</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103632?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Left atrial appendage closure versus direct oral anticoagulants after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial (PROMOTE study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103632?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Atrial fibrillation (AF), with a prevalence of 1&ndash;2%, is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. AF is associated with a fivefold increased risk of cardioembolic events; approximately 20% of all strokes are caused by AF. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become the first-line treatment for AF. However, PVI cannot eliminate the residual stroke risk. Current guidelines recommend that anticoagulation be continued in this specific group of patients, regardless of the presence or absence of AF. In this large AF population post-PVI, who are considered to be in an earlier stage of AF, it is unknown whether left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) offers an alternative to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The trial will be a prospective, randomised, multicentre non-inferiority study comparing two treatment strategies in AF patients after atrial ablation. Patients will be randomly assigned to either percutaneous LAAC (group A) or DOAC treatment (group B) in a 1:1 ratio; both sequential and concomitant planned ablation with or without LAAC are accepted. Randomisation will be conducted using web-based randomisation software. A total of 1012 participants (506 patients per group) will be enrolled. The primary effectiveness measure will be the occurrence of any of the specified events within 24 months after randomisation: stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic thromboembolism, cerebral haemorrhage, other major haemorrhages (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium &ge;2), cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Shanghai Chest Hospital, China (KS(Y)20287). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The trial will follow the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Confidentiality will be maintained with anonymised, securely stored data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2000036538.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shen, L., Jiang, L., Hao, Z., Chu, H., Wang, X., Ning, Z., Zhang, J., Yang, B., Xu, Y., Fang, R., Kong, L., Zhang, X., He, Q., Zhang, Z., Zhang, T., Du, C., Wu, Y., Zhao, D., Huang, H., Ma, W., Liang, Z., Pan, X., Wang, C., Miao, Y., Shen, L., He, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103632</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103632</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Left atrial appendage closure versus direct oral anticoagulants after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial (PROMOTE study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103632</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103632</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103651?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dietary practices among antenatal women in Sri Lanka: prevalence and associated factors]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103651?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the prevalence and associated factors of dietary practices among antenatal women in Colombo district, Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This descriptive cross-sectional study examined dietary practices among antenatal mothers in four Medical Officer of Health areas in Colombo, Sri Lanka. A total of 422 participants were selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected via a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire and analysed using SPSS V.26. Dietary diversity, food variety and animal-source food consumption were assessed. Poisson regression identified predictors of dietary practices, adjusting for socio-economic and pregnancy-related factors. The statistical significance was set at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 380 antenatal mothers (mean age: 30.72&plusmn;3.96 years), most were married (98.2%) with 73.7% living in urban areas. Regarding dietary practices, 64.7% had high dietary diversity, while 35.3% had low diversity. Of the sample, 52.1% had a high food variety score and 64.7% had a high animal-source food score. More than half (64.7%) had appropriate dietary practices. Fruits, vitamin A-rich vegetables and rice were the most consumed foods. Key factors influencing dietary practices included age, religion, education, employment and geographical location.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study highlights the prevalence and factors influencing dietary practices among antenatal mothers. Although the predominant mothers had fair dietary diversities, a considerable number were found to have poor dietary practices. Better dietary practices were associated with major educational attainment, formal employment status and selected residential areas, while younger age, low educational qualification and housewife status were associated with poorer nutrition. The findings indicate that there is an urgent need for interventions related to nutrition for specific vulnerable groups so that they can improve their maternal nutrition and produce better pregnancy outcomes through education and support programmes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayasooriya, L. H. D. D., Uthpala, U. H. T., Rajamuni, R. D. S. G., Afridi, A. M. M., Nawanjana, N. M. I., Fernando, H. S. P., De Silva, D. K. M., Herath, H. M. C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103651</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103651</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dietary practices among antenatal women in Sri Lanka: prevalence and associated factors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103651</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103651</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104102?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term habitual physical activity and risk of mortality and long-term care insurance certification in cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study in the LIFE study, Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104102?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of long-term and habitual physical activity on mortality and long-term care insurance (LTCI) certification among cancer survivors using a population database.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>5-year retrospective study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>13 Japanese municipalities participated in the Longevity Improvement &amp; Fair Evidence study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Among 471 511 participants who underwent health check-ups, 39 435 met the following eligible criteria: documented in the cancer claims database without a suspected diagnosis and participated in a health check-up at least once in a 12-month period, had no missing exercise data and had already been certified for LTCI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Outcomes were new LTCI certification and all-cause mortality. LTCI certification was assigned by a trained local government official through a systematic process (involving various items&mdash;physical function, daily activity function, cognitive function, behavioural disorders, adjustment to social life and daily use of medical services&mdash;as well as overall consideration of computer-based and specialist team assessments), and the LTCI severity level correlates with the Barthel index. LTCI certification reflects some impairment in activities of daily living. All-cause mortality was defined based on claims data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three physical activity categories, &lsquo;exercise and walking&rsquo;, &lsquo;exercise or walking&rsquo; and &lsquo;no physical activity&rsquo;, were used. Among survivors aged 65&ndash;74 years, the &lsquo;no physical activity&rsquo; group had a higher risk of mortality and LTCI certification than the &lsquo;exercise and walking&rsquo; group (adjusted model HR: 1.72, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.94). Among survivors aged &ge;75 years, the low physical activity groups had a higher risk of mortality and LTCI certification than the &lsquo;exercise and walking&rsquo; group (adjusted model: &lsquo;exercise or walking&rsquo;, HR: 1.51, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.85; &lsquo;no physical activity&rsquo;, HR: 1.66, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.92). The effects of physical activity differed according to cancer type.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Habitual physical activity had positive effects on cancer survivors. These effects differed according to age and cancer type.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nakatsuka, K., Ono, R., Maeda, M., Murata, F., Nishimura, K., Fukuda, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104102</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term habitual physical activity and risk of mortality and long-term care insurance certification in cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study in the LIFE study, Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104300?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Designing an implementation strategy to improve referral from general practice to a National Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Delphi survey with healthcare professionals and the Behaviour Change Wheel]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104300?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>While diabetes prevention programmes (DPPs) effectively reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes, optimising referral to these programmes is challenging. Our prior research (a qualitative study on the pilot of the National Diabetes Prevention Programme (NDPP) and a systematic review) identified a range of barriers and facilitators to referral from healthcare workers&rsquo; perspectives. This study aims to gain consensus on the main factors influencing referral to a newly established NDPP and using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) to select behaviour change techniques (BCTs) for an implementation strategy to improve referral to the programme in the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A two-round modified online Delphi survey prioritised 17 barriers and facilitators of the referral process, followed by a mapping exercise with the BCW, which guided the identification of techniques to change referral behaviour from general practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The survey took place online with healthcare professionals working in the primary care setting in Ireland (April to June 2024). The NDPP was in the pilot phase and was not available in all areas. This study sought to learn from this pilot phase to inform the referral process, which was not yet fully established.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Healthcare professionals eligible to refer or involved in referral to the NDPP in Ireland (general practitioners, practice nurses and dietitians delivering the NDPP) took part in the Delphi survey. Recruitment was through a number of gatekeepers, a health service manager and professional groups who shared invitations to participate with eligible healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>In the Delphi survey round 1, respondents were asked to rate the importance of 17 factors (nine facilitators and eight barriers) influencing referral on a 5-point Likert scale (not important to very high importance) and an open text box captured other suggested important factors. Barriers included limited practical information about the availability of the programme, concerns about workload, competing priorities and concern about patient motivation, the time commitment for patients and referral delays. Facilitators included electronic referral and feedback, promotion of the programme by healthcare professionals and consultation with patients before referral. Consensus was defined as agreement of &ge;70% for each factor in the combined categories of high importance/very high importance, low/moderate importance or not important. Factors not reaching consensus after the first round were included in round 2 with any new factors from round 1. Factors that did not reach consensus or reached consensus as not important or of low/moderate importance were excluded. Only factors reaching consensus as being of high importance/very high importance across the two rounds were included in the final prioritised list.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Delphi survey had 37 responses to round 1 and 23 (62%) responses to round 2. 12 factors reached consensus as being of high/very high importance to improve referral. The 12 factors are mapped to seven intervention functions in the BCW and to nine key BCTs (feedback on the outcome of the behaviour, social support, instruction on how to perform a behaviour, information about the health consequences, information about social and environmental consequences, demonstration of the behaviour, prompts/cues, credible source and restructuring the physical environment). The strategy to improve referrals should include education delivered by educators to referrers, educational materials on the DPP and practical support to facilitate referrals. The health service should continue to provide electronic referrals and electronic prompts to refer could be considered as part of the electronic health record.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study systematically prioritises factors perceived to influence referral and identifies BCTs to improve referral to an NDPP. The BCTs are a starting point for a strategy to improve referral to DPPs. Further consultation with stakeholders is recommended to discuss the acceptability, feasibility and operationalisation of the BCTs in the Irish setting.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haseldine, C., ODonoghue, G., Kearney, P. M., Riordan, F., Humphreys, M., Kirby, L., Mc Hugh, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104300</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104300</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Designing an implementation strategy to improve referral from general practice to a National Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Delphi survey with healthcare professionals and the Behaviour Change Wheel]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104300</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104300</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104489?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of portal vein embolisation uses in colorectal liver metastases: evidence from a rapid review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104489?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent portal vein embolisation followed by liver resection (PVEfLR) with those who underwent other treatment strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Rapid review of the literature retrieved through a systematic search.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Ovid MEDLINE were searched from 1 April 2014 to 31 December 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies were included if they involved only patients with CRLM, applied PVEfLR and reported comparative outcomes against other interventions (eg, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), liver transplantation and portal vein ligation). Only randomised controlled trials, cohort and case&ndash;control studies published in English were included. Studies that included patients other than those with CRLM were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two authors independently screened records, extracted data and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were narratively synthesised and presented in summary tables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>14 studies (n=2,022 patients) were included. The overall median survival time for the PVEfLR group was similar to that of the ALPPS group but significantly lower than that of the liver transplantation group (19 vs 41 months, p=0.007). Postoperative complications were significantly lower for PVEfLR than for ALPPS (27% vs 65%, p&lt;0.05) but higher than for liver resection without portal vein embolisation (51% vs 36%, p&lt;0.001). The future liver remnant growth and completion rates for PVEfLR were variable compared with those of other techniques.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PVEfLR is an effective strategy for converting selected patients with initially unresectable CRLM to resectable status, achieving long-term survival comparable to other complex techniques such as ALPPS, although with a different perioperative risk profile. The choice of technique should be individualised based on the patient&rsquo;s anatomy, disease burden and institutional expertise.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moinuddin, M., Tran, P. U., Bekheit, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104489</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104489</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of portal vein embolisation uses in colorectal liver metastases: evidence from a rapid review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104489</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104489</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104957?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing severe breathlessness with dronabinol in the group of patients with severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (BONG): a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study in an outpatient clinic in Denmark - a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104957?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cannabis-based medicine may alleviate breathlessness. This study will investigate whether dronabinol, a synthetic form of <sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (<sup>9</sup>-THC), reduces breathlessness in patients with severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (sCOPD) compared to placebo.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This single-centre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial will enrol 30 patients with sCOPD and persistent breathlessness despite optimal treatment. Patients will be recruited from a pulmonary outpatient clinic in Denmark over 24 months. Eligible patients (aged &ge;18 years) will receive either dronabinol or placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout, before crossing over to the other treatment for 4 weeks. Exclusion criteria include ongoing infection, substance abuse and significant comorbidities. Primary outcome is breathing discomfort or unpleasantness measured using the 0&ndash;10 Numerical Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes include lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second), hair cortisol concentrations, functional tests, plasma THC blood concentrations and questionnaires assessing breathlessness, activity, quality of life, anxiety and depression. Continuous monitoring of vital signs, activity and sleep will be performed using a Garmin Venu 3 smartwatch. Data will be entered into electronic case report forms and monitored by the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) unit in Odense.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This will be the largest randomised, double-blinded, crossover trial to investigate dronabinol in patients with COPD and will provide new knowledge on the efficacy and safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Written informed consents will be obtained from study patients. The study has been approved by the Danish Medicines Agency (case number: 2023010659) and the medical research ethics committees (case number: 2301456). It is registered in the European Union Clinical Trials Registry (2024-513593-22-00) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06473701). The trial follows the Declaration of Helsinki II and International Council for Harmonisation-GCP guidelines. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The European Union Clinical Trials Registry (2024-513593-22-00) and ClinicalTrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT06473701">NCT06473701</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolsing, S. K., Hilberg, O., Lokke, A., Farver-Vestergaard, I., Andersen, C. U., Hansen, K. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104957</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104957</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing severe breathlessness with dronabinol in the group of patients with severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (BONG): a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study in an outpatient clinic in Denmark - a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104957</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104957</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105312?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trajectory and influencing factors of swallowing function in adults after orotracheal extubation in an intensive care unit in China: a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105312?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the trajectories of swallowing function recovery and associated influencing factors in adult patients following orotracheal extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Emergency ICU of a tertiary hospital in Shenyang, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 182 adult patients who underwent orotracheal intubation were enrolled between December 2023 and December 2024 using convenience sampling. Among them, 168 patients completed all follow-up assessments, with a loss-to-follow-up rate of 10.1%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Swallowing function was assessed using the Standardised Swallowing Assessment (SSA) at 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours after extubation. Latent class growth modelling (LCGM) was used to identify distinct swallowing function trajectories. Unordered multinomial logistic regression was performed to examine factors associated with different trajectory classes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the 168 patients who completed all six assessments, no significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between patients who completed follow-up and those lost to follow-up (all p&gt;0.05). LCGM identified three distinct swallowing function trajectories: a low-risk group (46.1%), characterised by consistently low SSA scores below the dysfunction threshold (26 points); a rapid recovery group (24.6%), in which SSA scores declined to below 26 points within 24 hours after extubation and a high-risk group (29.3%), characterised by persistently elevated SSA scores above 26 points. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that age &le;50 years, absence of spinal cord injury or rib fractures, APACHE II score &lt;10 and intubation duration &lt;5 days were associated with a higher likelihood of belonging to the low-risk or rapid recovery groups compared with the high-risk group (all p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Distinct trajectories of swallowing function recovery were observed in adult ICU patients after orotracheal extubation. Several clinical factors were associated with more favourable recovery patterns. These findings may help improve the understanding of heterogeneity in postextubation swallowing function and inform future risk stratification and individualised management strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval and consent to participate in the trial were approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of General Hospital of Northern Theatre, Shenyang, Liaoning province, PR China (Project Number: Y (2023)232). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All procedures were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, W., Wang, S., Dong, T., Zhou, Y., Ma, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105312</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105312</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trajectory and influencing factors of swallowing function in adults after orotracheal extubation in an intensive care unit in China: a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105312</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105547?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Surgical approaches, choice and positioning of implants in the surgical treatment of proximal tibia fractures in adults: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105547?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Tibial plateau fractures present a complex orthopaedic challenge and usually require surgical intervention to restore joint alignment and stability as well as to prevent complications. In practice, determining the most appropriate surgical approach, implant selection and positioning remains a challenge and depends on the surgeon&rsquo;s experience and patient-specific factors. Therefore, this scoping review aims to map the current evidence on surgical fixation methods for proximal tibia fractures in adults. In particular, we seek to first assess study types and their distribution across levels of evidence and second to identify knowledge gaps to support evidence-based surgical planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Information for this study will be gathered from Medline, Cochrane and Embase. Data analysis will involve categorising the studies by their level of evidence and extracting predefined parameters, including fracture characteristics, surgical approach, implant type and key findings relevant to the review question. The study focuses on surgically stabilised intra-articular proximal tibia fractures in adults. Only English- and German-language studies that are available in full text and published after 1995 will be included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is required. The findings of the proposed review will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Review registration</st>
<p>Open Science Framework, osf.io/g9zfu.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zierke, J. N., Kro&#x0308;pelin, A., Heyland, M., Duda, G. N., Tzscha&#x0308;tzsch, H., Bejaoui, A., Agha-Mir-Salim, L., Zhou, H., Back, D. A., Ho&#x0308;lzl, S., Tuttle, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105547</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105547</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Surgical approaches, choice and positioning of implants in the surgical treatment of proximal tibia fractures in adults: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105547</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105547</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of treatment-induced thrombosis on the prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106123?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Therapy-associated thrombosis remains a challenge in the management of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Thrombosis associated with asparaginase-containing chemotherapy complicates patient management strategies, prompting the need for effective prophylaxis. Assessing the relationship between chemotherapy-induced thrombosis and patient outcomes is crucial for optimising ALL management strategies. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a synthesis on whether the development of thrombosis during asparaginase-containing chemotherapy regimens impacts the overall and event-free survival of patients with ALL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p><I>Data sources</I>: to identify relevant studies, a comprehensive search will be conducted on the major electronic databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science (Clarivate), Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost), clinicaltrial.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 30 January 2026.</p>
<p><I>Inclusion criteria for selecting studies</I>: randomised and non-randomised clinical studies evaluating the impact of asparaginase-containing chemotherapy-associated thrombosis on survival outcomes in patients with ALL will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen the retrieved studies, extract data and assess study quality using a predefined criteria. A narrative synthesis will be undertaken, and if feasible, meta-analyses will be conducted. A subgroup and sensitivity analysis will be performed to explain the sources of heterogeneity. The quality of cumulative evidence will be assessed using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation tool. The findings from this systematic review will inform evidence-based clinical guidelines for thrombosis risk assessment and management in patients with ALL, potentially improving treatment outcomes and reducing thrombosis-related morbidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval will be required and the findings of this meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024532665.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mkhwanazi, Z. A., Fabunmi, O. A., Nkambule, B. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of treatment-induced thrombosis on the prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106123</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107894?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can provision of near vision glasses as an early intervention improve visual outcomes in infants at risk of perinatal brain insult? The Babies in Glasses (BiG) randomised feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107894?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the feasibility of recruiting patients to examine the effect of near vision glasses in young infants at risk of cerebral visual impairment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A three-arm, parallel-group, open-label randomised feasibility trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Tertiary neonatal intensive care in London, UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We included babies born before 29 weeks of gestation or at full term with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Babies who needed ongoing inpatient care, with established eye anomalies or with very high refractive errors at baseline (&lt;&ndash;6.00 dioptres (D) or &gt;&plusmn;8.00D) were not included. Infants with retinopathy of prematurity were not excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>At 8 weeks corrected age, we allocated 18 infants to wear glasses (+3.00D over full cycloplegic refraction) immediately (intervention 1), 18 to wear the same glasses at 16 weeks (intervention 2) and 19 infants were allocated to standard treatment (no glasses).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Recruitment and retention of study participants (primary), compliance wearing glasses, preferential-looking visual acuity (with glasses) and visual function as determined using A Test Battery of Child Development for Examining Functional Vision at 3-month and 6-month age post-term.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 70 eligible families, 55 consented and 34 attended baseline assessments, and 28 completed the study. Non-attendance was due mainly to prolonged inpatient stay, infant health and scheduling conflicts. Glasses were worn for similar periods in each group (Intervention 1: median 2 hours/day (95% CI 1 hour to 4 hours); Intervention 2: median 2 hours/day (95% CI 1.5 hours to 3 hours)). Visual acuity improved from baseline to 6 months. Mean (SE) LogMAR (Minimum Angle of Resolution) improvements were standard care: 0.47 (0.45); intervention 1: 0.66 (0.44); intervention 2: 0.37 (0.36). Among the 29 very preterm infants, there were similar findings: standard care: 0.35 (0.35); Intervention 1: 0.67 (0.47); Intervention 2: 0.34 (0.40). As a functional measure, object permanence was present at the following rates by randomised arm: standard care: 29%; whereas intervention 1: 56%; and intervention 2: 44% (OR intervention 1 vs standard care: 3.13 (95% CI 0.38 to 25.57), ie, not statistically significant).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We demonstrate feasibility for a definitive RCT (randomized controlled trial) with good recruitment and retention and observed potential benefits for vision and development following the dispensing of glasses at 8 weeks post-term age compared with untreated controls. We identified methodological modifications to further improve recruitment processes for a future larger study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN14646770">ISRCTN14646770</inter-ref>; <inter-ref locator="NCT05048550" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT05048550</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bullaj, R., Dyet, L., Mitra, S., Bunce, C., Clarke, C. S., Saunders, K., Dale, N., Horwood, A., Williams, C., St Clair Tracy, H., Marlow, N., Bowman, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107894</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107894</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can provision of near vision glasses as an early intervention improve visual outcomes in infants at risk of perinatal brain insult? The Babies in Glasses (BiG) randomised feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107894</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107894</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107988?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Womens health and well-being over the life course: conceptual framing supported by a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107988?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As a framework to conceptualise well-being, the capability approach (CA) combines structural drivers with personal freedoms, making it a compelling approach for understanding women&rsquo;s health and well-being (WHW). The WHW Project of the Exemplars in Global Health initiative chose the CA for its conceptual framing, while emphasising the influential role of gender and other intersecting inequalities (intersectional gender inequality) in shaping health and well-being over the life course. We discuss the Exemplars in Global Health &ndash; Women&rsquo;s Health and Well-being (EGH-WHW) Framework and a scoping review that supports it.</p>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p><l type="ord"><li><p>To identify well-established and/or validated CA-based frameworks and measures attuned to intersectional gender inequality that analyse women&rsquo;s well-being over the life course and across multiple geographies.</p>
</li><li>
<p>If needed, to develop a new conceptual framework to analyse WHW over the life course through an intersectional gender inequality lens.</p>
</li></l></p></sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The scoping review, which was carried out between January and May 2024 and re-run in May 2025, adhered to the methodology by Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley, Levac <I>et al</I> and Daudt <I>et al</I>, and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The EGH-WHW Framework was developed by a multidisciplinary Working Group comprising representatives of organisations in the WHW Project consortium.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>The review drew upon database searches (Scopus, PubMed) and targeted online hand searches for CA-based frameworks and measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>All CA-based frameworks and measures of multidimensional well-being were included. CA-based empirical research was considered if it applied a framework or measure; or if it analysed multidimensional well-being across multiple geographies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Information about each type of CA-based application&mdash;its choice of well-being dimensions, methods, focus on inequality, intersectionality and the life course&mdash;was recorded in a data charting form. Thematic summative syntheses of publications about each CA-based framework or measure led up to an overall evaluative synthesis of the fit between existing work and our requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The review culminated in 94 publications, including six frameworks and 14 measures that met only some of the WHW Project&rsquo;s requirements: multidimensionality of well-being; attention to intersectional gender inequality and the life course; as well as demonstrated and intended measurements across multiple geographies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The review reaffirms the need for the EGH-WHW Framework, which recognises that WHW depend on their freedom &lsquo;to be&rsquo; and &lsquo;to do&rsquo;, and proposes three interconnected clusters of dimensions depicting key capabilities, agency and functionings that are sensitive to intersectional gender inequality and the life course. Each dimension is mapped to specific indicators to support comparative assessments of country performance and drivers of progress across low-income and middle-income countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The EGH-WHW Framework distinguishes itself from other CA-based frameworks by incorporating both an intersectional gender lens and a life course perspective. The framework&rsquo;s conceptualisation of multidimensional well-being allows for a rich and nuanced foundation on which to build policies and programmes that address the complex determinants of health, well-being and human rights of different groups of girls and women.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iyer, A., Sen, G., Rao Seshadri, S., Snow, R., Ataullahjan, A., Liang, M., Baird, S., Drake, J. K., Sharafi, L., Bhutta, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107988</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107988</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Womens health and well-being over the life course: conceptual framing supported by a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107988</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107988</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109663?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and acceptability of interventions to improve faecal immunochemical test (FIT) return in both asymptomatic (screening) and symptomatic populations: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109663?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer in the UK and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a non-invasive home-based test used for both symptomatic assessment and population-based screening. However, approximately 30% of screening FIT kits and 10% of symptomatic FIT kits are never returned. Under-served populations, including ethnic minorities, socioeconomically deprived communities and those with mental health conditions, experience particularly low FIT return rates, contributing to health inequalities in CRC outcomes. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions to improve FIT returns in both asymptomatic screening and symptomatic populations, with particular focus on under-served communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence. We will search Scopus, MedLine via Ovid, CINAHL via Ebsco and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from September 2010 onwards, supplemented by reference screening and trial registry searches. Eligible studies will include randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, qualitative studies, mixed-methods studies and implementation studies examining FIT interventions in screening or symptomatic populations. Two reviewers will independently screen search results for eligible studies. Data extraction will capture study characteristics, population demographics, intervention components and outcomes including FIT return rates, acceptability, feasibility and implementation factors. Quantitative data will undergo systematic tabulation and meta-analysis where appropriate, with narrative synthesis for heterogeneous studies. Qualitative data will be analysed using framework-based thematic analysis, mapping findings to both the theoretical domains framework and theoretical framework of acceptability. A mixed-methods synthesis will integrate quantitative and qualitative findings to identify intervention characteristics, implementation strategies and contextual factors associated with improved outcomes across different population groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required as this systematic review will analyse published studies. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251111663.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ezaydi, N., Kurien, M., Allchin, O., Biggs, K., Chowdhury, N., Humes, D., Kellar, I., Shanbhag, S., Brown, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109663</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109663</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and acceptability of interventions to improve faecal immunochemical test (FIT) return in both asymptomatic (screening) and symptomatic populations: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109663</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109663</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110284?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Economic information in clinical decision-making: focus group discussions with Finnish general practitioners and patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110284?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To study the factors that influence physicians&rsquo; and patients&rsquo; use of, and willingness to use, economic information in clinical decision-making, and examine physicians&rsquo; views on whether clinical practice guidelines can support its use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Semistructured focus group discussions with an inductive content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Finnish health centre general practitioners (GPs) and adult patient representatives, five groups of each.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>22 GPs and 15 patient representatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the GP groups, five factors involved in using economic information in clinical decisions were raised: the issue of who pays, knowledge about cost information, the cost-benefit ratio of treatments, care planning and health economic understanding. Concerning the inclusion of economic information in clinical guidelines, GPs raised themes including the content and means of presentation of economic information, and advantages and challenges related to the integration of economic information into clinical guidelines. In the patient groups, the identified themes related to seeing the costs of treatments, the organisation of healthcare services, inclusion of cost information in clinical guidelines, patient information and support, and cost containment in healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study suggests that GPs and patients are willing to use economic information in clinical decision making. It also implies a need for easily accessible and understandable economic information, and that clinical guidelines may be a good way to support this. In addition, the study highlights the need for education on the economic aspects of healthcare for physicians.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahonen, J. E., Sipila&#x0308;, R., Kortteisto, T., Komulainen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110284</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110284</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Economic information in clinical decision-making: focus group discussions with Finnish general practitioners and patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110284</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110732?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical teaching behaviours of preceptors of undergraduate nursing students: results from a convergent mixed-methods study in Islamabad, Pakistan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110732?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Clinical learning is central to undergraduate nursing education, with preceptors translating theoretical knowledge into practical competence. Preceptors&rsquo; clinical teaching behaviours (CTBs) shape students&rsquo; confidence, skill development and professional identity. While CTBs have been studied globally, evidence from Pakistan is limited, highlighting the need for research that offers a comprehensive, integrated perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate preceptors&rsquo; CTBs by evaluating students&rsquo; perceptions, exploring preceptors&rsquo; experiences, and integrating these insights to identify points of agreement and discrepancy for a thorough understanding of CTB.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Convergent mixed-methods study, with quantitative and qualitative data collected concurrently, analysed independently, and integrated using the Pillar Integration Process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary teaching hospital in Islamabad, Pakistan, providing clinical placements for undergraduate nursing students.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All undergraduate nursing students (n=50) engaged in clinical practicum and their preceptors (n=14) were included through census sampling. Students completed the CTB Inventory (CTBI) following student-preceptor interactions. Preceptors participated in semistructured face-to-face interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Quantitative data from 44 undergraduate nursing students, based on 88 student&ndash;preceptor encounter observations, showed generally positive ratings of preceptors&rsquo; CTBs across all six CTBI domains (mean scores range: 3.48&ndash;3.97 on a 5-point scale). The highest-rated domain was guiding interprofessional communication (M=3.97, SD=0.89), with 85.2% of students agreeing that preceptors demonstrated professional role modelling. The lowest-rated domain was showing concern and support (M=3.48, SD=0.89), with only 31.8% of students agreeing that preceptors expressed concern about students&rsquo; lives outside work. Qualitative interviews with 14 preceptors identified six categories reflecting clinical teaching practices, including commitment to teaching, learning environment creation, instructional strategies, communication facilitation, feedback and evaluation, and supportive behaviours. Integration of quantitative and qualitative findings yielded six overarching themes, demonstrating convergence in professional role modelling, structured teaching, scaffolded learning, feedback and communication practices. Divergence was observed in the area of personalised support, with qualitative findings explaining lower quantitative ratings through heavy workloads, competing clinical responsibilities and limited protected teaching time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Preceptors play a critical role in shaping undergraduate nursing students&rsquo; clinical competence and professional identity. Enhancing preceptor training, institutional recognition and supportive policies can strengthen teaching effectiveness and optimise student learning outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan, A., Yasir, S., Raheel, S., Asmat, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110732</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110732</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical teaching behaviours of preceptors of undergraduate nursing students: results from a convergent mixed-methods study in Islamabad, Pakistan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110732</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110732</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110878?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Possible preventive effect of surgical glove compression therapy on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: study protocol of a multicentre, phase II/III, randomised controlled trial-the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO)-12 trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110878?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Oxaliplatin, a key drug in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC), can cause oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) in a dose-dependent manner. These symptoms can severely affect daily life, and chronic OIPN often limits treatment continuation because of its correlation with the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin. Currently, effective preventive measures are unavailable. However, surgical glove compression therapy may reduce paclitaxel-induced neuropathy, suggesting its potential in preventing OIPN.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II/III trial evaluates surgical glove compression therapy to investigate the possible preventive effects of OIPN in patients with CRC receiving adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin chemotherapy. Patients with stage III CRC undergoing curative surgery will be enrolled and randomised into two groups. The intervention group will wear two layers of tight-fitting surgical gloves from 30 min before to 30 min after oxaliplatin infusion, whereas the control group will receive standard care. The primary endpoint is the incidence of grade &ge;2 chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria. Secondary endpoints include quality of life assessments (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecological Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity-12 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20-item), duration and extent of OIPN as assessed using the Debiopharm Neurologic and Sensory Toxicity Criteria, chemotherapy completion rates, and adverse events. To detect a significant reduction in the incidence of CIPN, 170 patients will be enrolled (36% in the control group vs 15% in the intervention group). The planned case enrolment period is from 1 November 2024 to 31 October 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hiroshima University, Japan (approval no. CRB2024-0008), and has been registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs062240066). The results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and shared with the scientific community at international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>jRCTs062240066</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shimomura, M., Ishikawa, S., Miguchi, M., Shinozaki, K., Ikeda, S., Kobayashi, H., Nakahara, M., Sumitani, D., Shimizu, W., Kohyama, M., Saito, Y., Mukai, S., Hirata, Y., Kochi, M., Shimizu, Y., Takakura, Y., Yoshimitsu, M., Kodama, S., Uegami, S., Yano, T., Okuda, H., Ohdan, H., Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110878</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110878</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Possible preventive effect of surgical glove compression therapy on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: study protocol of a multicentre, phase II/III, randomised controlled trial-the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO)-12 trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110878</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110878</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111081?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perspectives on primary healthcare careers across career stages among medical students and primary healthcare providers in Chinas Greater Bay Area: a qualitative interview study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111081?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background or context</st>
<p>Primary healthcare (PHC) workforce shortages remain a critical global and national challenge, threatening progress toward Universal Health Coverage. Limited research has examined career-stage-specific motivations and deterrents. This study explores how perceptions of PHC careers differ between final-year medical students and current PHC providers, offering insights for targeted recruitment and retention strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>We conducted semi-structured face-to-face and online interviews (November 2023 to December 2024) with final-year medical students and primary healthcare providers (PCPs) from Greater Bay Area institutions. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure diversity in key characteristics. Interviews continued until thematic saturation was reached. Data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke&rsquo;s six-step framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Interviews with 17 PCPs and 13 students identified five themes: systemic and institutional factors, education and training, professional development, community perceptions and personal motivations and trade-offs. The analysis identified common barriers across the participant groups, including inadequate resources, fragmented health information systems, unstructured career pathways and inequitable pay-for-performance mechanisms. Career-stage differences were notable: students associated success with hospital-based specialisation and viewed PHC as a fallback option, influenced by limited PHC training exposure, unclear advancement pathways and prevailing stigma. In contrast, PCPs described professional fulfilment through developing niche expertise and fostering continuity of care, increasingly perceiving PHC as an innovative platform for specialised practice. PCPs with prior hospital experience described their transition from hospital settings as motivated by burnout and the pursuit of better work&ndash;life balance, an opportunity often overlooked in workforce planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Career-stage-specific recruitment strategies are essential to strengthen the PHC workforce. Policies that address early-career and mid-career needs, establish structured development pathways and enhance the societal value of PHC will be critical to building a resilient primary care system. Findings offer practical implications for health system reforms in China and other countries advancing toward Universal Health Coverage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, J., Wong, E. L. Y., Yu, S., Wang, Y., Cheung, A. W. L., Xu, R. H., Yeoh, E. K., Wang, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111081</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111081</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perspectives on primary healthcare careers across career stages among medical students and primary healthcare providers in Chinas Greater Bay Area: a qualitative interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111081</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111081</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111353?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gut microbiome profile among children and adolescents living with sickle cell disease: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111353?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This systematic review aims to synthesise current evidence on gut microbiome profiles among children with sickle cell disease (SCD), assess the influence of analgesic and antibiotic use, and explore the contributions of environmental factors on their gut microbiota diversity. Through identification of consistent microbial patterns and gaps in the existing literature, this review will provide vital insight into potential microbiome-targeted strategies for improving health outcomes in paediatric SCD care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Studies describing the gut microbiota among paediatric SCD human subjects (&lt;18 years) will be identified by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Scopus from inception to November 2025. Two independent reviewers will complete title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction. The grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation tool will be employed to assess the strength of evidence for each outcome. Extracted data will be presented in tables, and a meta-analysis will be conducted if appropriate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval will not be required as this is a systematic review of published data. The findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at relevant scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251102736.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salako, A. O., Ogbeh, J. I., Adekola, H. A., Odubela, O., Akinsolu, F., Jimoh, R., Musari-Martins, T. E., Luka, S., Oba, A., Ayegbeso, D., Odubela, O. O., Gbaja-Biamila, T. A., Musa, A. Z., Salako, B. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111353</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111353</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gut microbiome profile among children and adolescents living with sickle cell disease: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111353</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111353</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111829?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Burnout and coping strategies among healthcare professionals in the emergency departments of public and private tertiary hospitals in Karachi]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111829?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To understand the experiences of burnout and coping strategies among healthcare professionals working in the emergency department of tertiary care public and private hospitals in Karachi.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative exploratory design was employed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>One public-sector and one private-sector tertiary care hospital located in Karachi, Pakistan were selected for this study. Audio-recorded in-depth interviews were conducted with a total of 15 healthcare professionals working in the emergency department, which were later transcribed verbatim and analysed inductively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The findings of the study identified two major themes contributing to burnout: individual and organisational themes, along with coping strategies used by healthcare professionals. Individual-level subthemes included emotional distress, arising from ethical dilemmas and constraints within the work environment, and work-life imbalance, where participants experienced difficulty maintaining personal well-being due to professional demands. Organisational-level subthemes included lack of leadership support and recognition, role conflict, inadequate resources, excessive workloads and exposure to workplace violence, all of which contributed significantly to burnout. Healthcare professionals reported both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies. Adaptive strategies included positive reframing, peer support and relaxation techniques, whereas maladaptive strategies involved venting frustration and, in some cases, substance use to manage prolonged stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings revealed that the experience of burnout is caused by a range of interdependent factors at the individual and organisational levels. Multifaceted interventions are needed to address these issues such as national and emergency department staffing policies, mental health support, resilience training, workload management, flexible scheduling and the promotion of work-life balance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Majlis Khan, B., Hameed, W., Tharani, A., Khan, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111829</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111829</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Burnout and coping strategies among healthcare professionals in the emergency departments of public and private tertiary hospitals in Karachi]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111829</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111829</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113208?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A cultural lens on decision-making in treatment decisions about inflammatory bowel disease: a qualitative analysis with South Asian patients, caregivers and clinicians in Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113208?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>There are limited data about how South Asian (SA) patients, their caregivers and their physicians make decisions about treatment, in particular advanced therapies. The study aimed to explore how SA people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), their family members and clinicians experience and perceive treatment-related decision-making with the aim of identifying strategies to improve treatment decision-making in Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive qualitative study with in-depth semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults residing in Canada, who self-identified as SA, had received treatment or cared for someone who received treatment for IBD from a gastroenterologist in Canada, and who spoke and understood English, Hindi and/or Punjabi were eligible to participate in the study. Clinician participants (eg, nurses, gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons) were eligible if they had experience treating SA patients with IBD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Data from 1:1, semi-structured interviews were analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The length of time spent in Canada played a central role in patient perspectives on decision-making around IBD treatment. First or second-generation SA people, residency status, family and community involvement, universal factors like stigma, medication costs and preferences for non-pharmacological treatments influenced decision-making. Patient and caregiver participants reported high satisfaction with treatment-related decision-making processes, while clinician participants self-reported lesser satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Clinicians and researchers working with SA patients in chronic disease specialties can use these findings to meet the healthcare needs and reduce disparities in optimal treatment for this patient population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>N/A.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suryaprakash, N., Ruzycki, S. M., Raman, M., Singh, S., Nasser, Y., Rai, P. P. K., Sidhu, K., Sidhu, S., Marshall, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113208</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113208</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A cultural lens on decision-making in treatment decisions about inflammatory bowel disease: a qualitative analysis with South Asian patients, caregivers and clinicians in Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113208</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104994corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): study protocol for a multicentre randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104994corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Aritake T, Yokoyama Y, Ando M<I>, et al</I>. Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): study protocol for a multicentre randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2025;15:e104994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104994</p>
<p>This article has been corrected since it was first published. One reference has been deleted from the Introduction as it was retracted. No amendments to the text were required.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T05:29:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104994corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104994corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): study protocol for a multicentre randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104994corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104994corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104466?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing a policy maturity model for prescription digital therapeutics based on expert consensus: protocol for an eDelphi study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104466?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Prescription digital therapeutics (PDTx) represent an emerging frontier in healthcare, leveraging software-based solutions to treat or manage specific medical conditions. However, despite rising interest and encouraging evidence of clinical benefits, the policy landscape remains fragmented. Jurisdictions vary widely in their regulatory approaches, reimbursement pathways and processes for clinical integration, thus creating uncertainties for developers, payers and healthcare providers. This protocol outlines an eDelphi study to develop and validate a comprehensive policy maturity framework guiding systematic assessment of national or regional readiness for PDTx adoption.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct an e-Delphi study with up to three rounds to refine and validate a PDTx policy maturity framework. Experts will be recruited purposively from six stakeholder groups (regulators, healthcare providers, payers/health economists, developers, researchers and patient advocates), prioritising Europe while seeking variation across health system types and levels of economic development; a small number of non-European experts may be invited to broaden perspectives. An optional pilot round will gather initial feedback on the prototype framework, followed by iterative rounds to assess and revise domains, scoring criteria and maturity thresholds. A 5-point Likert scale (from &lsquo;strongly disagree&rsquo; to &lsquo;strongly agree&rsquo;) will collect quantitative data, while open-text prompts will capture qualitative insights. Consensus will be defined as &ge;70% agreement and/or an IQR &le;1 for critical items. Quantitative summaries and thematic analysis will guide iterative revisions of the model. This Delphi protocol aims to produce a consensus-driven framework that captures the essential elements of PDTx policy development and implementation. If validated, the framework can serve as a reference for policymakers, industry leaders, healthcare providers and researchers seeking to benchmark or advance the adoption of PDTx within health systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto (reference: 320/CEFMUP/2025). Panellists will provide electronic informed consent, and data will be kept confidential. The finalised framework will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and policy briefs targeting stakeholders involved in digital health governance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocha-Gomes, J., Sousa-Pinto, B., Neves, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104466</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104466</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing a policy maturity model for prescription digital therapeutics based on expert consensus: protocol for an eDelphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104466</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104466</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104498?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Utilisation of simulation-based training to teach bedside management of acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104498?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of hospitalisation and decompensation in the hospital, is routinely managed by a wide variety of subspecialties, and requires a host of both technical and non-technical skills (NTS). Simulation-based training (SBT) exercises are an excellent means of training physicians and other healthcare professionals in both technical skills and NTS and are frequently used to teach and assess management of high-stress situations such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation and trauma situations. The manner in which SBT is used to train other types of clinical situations&mdash;and at what frequency&mdash;is less clear. The extent to which such training programmes are evaluated is also not clear. Here, we intend to characterise the body of literature describing SBT programmes for bedside management of GIB. In doing so, we will gain valuable insight into the current state of SBT as it relates to training healthcare professionals to handle complicated clinical situations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Our review will follow the six-stage framework outlined by Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley while considering elaborations and guidance made by Levac <I>et al</I> and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The protocol and review will be created in alignment with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses&mdash;scoping review checklist and explanatory paper. Using a carefully constructed search strategy, the following databases will be queried from their inception through 31 December 2025: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC. Following the initial database query and two-step screening process, included articles will be systematically examined and will serve as our data source. Our efforts will ultimately answer the following research question: <I>How is simulation-based training currently used to teach bedside management of GIB to physicians (residents, fellows and attending physicians), and how are these simulation-based training exercises studied and evaluated?</I></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board is not required for this study since all investigations are being carried out on previously published manuscripts. Final results will be compiled and submitted for publication once the study has been completed and all data has been charted/analysed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morton, J. M., Applegarth, J., Bin Hameed, U., Morato, M., Aggarwal, N., Novotny, N., Nguyen, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104498</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104498</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Utilisation of simulation-based training to teach bedside management of acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104498</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104498</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107472?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dyspnoea patterns in patients with advanced diseases: a functional MRI feasibility study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107472?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Dyspnoea is an existentially burdensome symptom in patients with advanced and progressive diseases such as cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and advanced heart failure. Recent studies have highlighted that symptomatic treatment of dyspnoea is often ineffective and may depend on the underlying disease. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) has emerged as a &lsquo;digital therapeutic&rsquo; for conditions such as pain, anxiety, and dyspnoea. Brain functional MRI (fMRI) offers the opportunity to identify distinct patterns of dyspnoea. Current findings are mainly limited to healthy volunteers, but clinical data from patients with life-limiting conditions are needed. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of identifying dyspnoea patterns in different life-limiting conditions using fMRI and IVR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is an observational monocentric feasibility study, conducted in a tertiary university centre. Healthy volunteers and patients diagnosed with advanced cancer, COPD, or heart failure and suffering from persistent dyspnoea will undergo an fMRI of the brain using IVR. The primary outcome of feasibility will be evaluated using descriptive statistics. Secondary outcomes include analysis of fMRI patterns of dyspnoea across populations, patient-reported burden of participation, and correlation between dyspnoea and psychological symptoms. These preliminary data will help determine the sample size required for a future study evaluating differences in dyspnoea patterns. Exploratory comparison between the characteristics of all four groups will be assessed with Fisher&rsquo;s test (for proportions) and either independent Student&rsquo;s t-test or Mann-Whitney test, depending on distribution. Correlations between variables will be tested using the Pearson&rsquo;s correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis will be performed using STATA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol received ethical approval on 23 April 2025 from the <I>Commission cantonale d&rsquo;&eacute;thique de la recherche</I> in the Canton of Geneva, Switzerland. The identification number is 2024-02289. Submission to peer-reviewed journals and presentation in international congresses for the dissemination of the study findings are planned.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Clinical Trials number is <A HREF="NCT07319039">NCT07319039</A>; Pre-results.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaertner, J., Hentsch, L., Guerreiro, I., Kannape, O. A., Delahaye, M., Bianchi, F., Cantero, C., Pautex, S., Bergeron, A., Lovblad, K.-O., Kurz, F. T., Fusi-Schmidhauser, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107472</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107472</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dyspnoea patterns in patients with advanced diseases: a functional MRI feasibility study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107472</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107472</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107969?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicentre, retrospective observational study on risk factors of major cardiovascular adverse events in patients with chronic kidney disease in Taiwan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107969?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the incidence and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in Taiwan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary and tertiary care; data were collected from three affiliated hospitals in northern Taiwan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 7038 adult patients with clinically confirmed CKD stages 3&ndash;5 were included, of whom 14.09% had progressed to ESKD. Patients were identified from a multicentre database in northern Taiwan. Key exclusion criteria included age under 20 years, prior MACE, cancer or renal transplantation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the incidence of MACE during follow-up. Secondary analyses included time to MACE and subgroup comparisons by CKD stage and comorbid conditions (eg, diabetes, cardiovascular disease).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>MACE occurred in 49.8% of patients with CKD and 64.1% of those with ESKD. After adjustment for covariates, the ESKD group had a significantly higher risk of MACE (HR=1.52; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.16) compared with the non-ESKD group. Relative to stage 3a, the adjusted HRs for MACE were 1.13 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.73) for stage 3b, 1.13 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.70) for stage 4, 1.82 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.81) for stage 5 (non-ESKD) and 2.32 (95% CI 1.51 to 3.57) for stage 5D (ESKD). Diabetes and cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with increased MACE incidence and shorter time to MACE, but their associations became non-significant after adjustment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Based on a multicentre cohort from Taiwan, our findings provide insights into the prognosis of patients with CKD across disease stages and highlight the importance of targeted interventions and integrated care to improve cardiovascular outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, C.-S., Wu, M.-Y., Chen, Y.-H. R., Lo, W.-C., Wu, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107969</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107969</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicentre, retrospective observational study on risk factors of major cardiovascular adverse events in patients with chronic kidney disease in Taiwan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107969</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107969</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109399?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the effectiveness and impact of the 'HSE Spark Innovation Programme: a qualitative study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109399?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>According to the WHO, healthcare in Europe requires &lsquo;systemic change through innovation&rsquo; if it is to respond to the demographic, epidemiological, environmental and technological challenges the region is facing. However, top-down methods of innovation in healthcare, driven by the macro levels of the system, have been struggling to impact the healthcare system at the scale that is required to drive meaningful and sustainable change. It has been widely acknowledged that frontline-led, employee-driven innovation will be the main driver to ensure that innovation in healthcare is human-centred and prioritises the needs of the patients.</p>
<p>This study protocol presents a research project designed to evaluate the experiences of frontline innovators supported by the Irish Health Service Executive&rsquo;s HSE Spark Innovation programme. The purpose of this research is threefold. First, the findings will further strengthen the provision of support for frontline healthcare professionals, ensuring that they can continue to address the challenges they experience in providing care. Second, the research will provide insight into the structures required to support frontline innovation within the public healthcare sector, forming a starting point for other public sector organisations interested in establishing their own support system for frontline innovation. Finally, it will highlight the impact supporting frontline clinicians to innovate has on service users, staff and the wider healthcare organisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A qualitative research design, situated in a phenomenological framework, will be adopted for this research. &lsquo;Participants&rsquo; in this study will include staff from the Irish public healthcare system who have obtained innovation support (either funding or human centred design support) from HSE Spark. The participants will be invited to share their experiences of the innovation support they received from HSE Spark, as well as their understanding of the impact of this support on their professional development, their service and the wider healthcare organisation. A stratified purposive sampling approach will be used to ensure the sample provides information-rich representations of individuals&rsquo; experiences engaging innovation initiatives supported by HSE Spark. One-to-one, semistructured interviews will be conducted with participants. Transcripts from these interviews will be analysed through a thematic approach, using the data analysis software NVivo. Themes will be derived from the data and used to understand the healthcare professionals&rsquo; experiences of engaging with innovation projects and with the support provided to them by HSE Spark. These themes will be used to identify the unspoken needs of innovators within healthcare, the support they need to continue innovating in this sector, and the impact supporting frontline innovation has on the service users, staff and the healthcare organisation.</p>
<p>We used the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) reporting guideline to draft this manuscript, and the SRQR reporting checklist when editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval for this study has been obtained from HSE Regional Ethics Committee (No. 20251650-RDMLRREC) and Maynooth University Social Sciences Research Committee (Approval Number: SRESC-2025-40031). Dissemination of results will be via journal articles, conference presentations and proceedings. Study findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and through conference presentations. Lay summaries of the findings will also be prepared for distribution in internal Irish Health Service publications. Other dissemination activities include the preparation of a book of case studies and key findings on the challenges of integrating human-centred design into public services, to be presented to the Irish Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kessie, T., Ryan, L., Howard, M., Heffernan, C., Hyland Reilly, L., Gormly, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109399</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109399</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the effectiveness and impact of the 'HSE Spark Innovation Programme: a qualitative study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109399</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109399</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109510?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring how parental mental health and rearing styles relate to childrens mental health: a cross-sectional study among migrant and local primary school students in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109510?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To exploratorily examine whether parental rearing styles mediate the association between parental mental health and children&rsquo;s anxiety tendencies and to explore whether these associations differ between local urban and rural-to-urban migrant children in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two primary schools in Hangzhou, eastern China: one primarily serving rural-to-urban migrant children and one serving local urban children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 929 children in grades 4&ndash;6 and 1273 parents participated. Inclusion criteria were parental consent and child assent; exclusion criteria were inability to complete questionnaires.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Children&rsquo;s mental health was assessed using the Mental Health Test; parental anxiety and depression were measured with the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Parental rearing styles were assessed with the Egna Minnen Betra&#x0308;ffande Uppfostran and the Hereford Parents&rsquo; Attitudes Survey. Mediation and structural equation modelling were applied to test associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In exploratory analyses, maternal anxiety was significantly associated with children&rsquo;s self-blaming and sensitivity tendencies. Parental rearing styles, particularly overprotection and emotional warmth, mediated the relationship between maternal anxiety and children&rsquo;s mental health outcomes. Mediation effects were stronger among urban children compared with migrant children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our results indicate that maternal anxiety is associated with children&rsquo;s mental health, with parental rearing styles acting as mediators. Although the cross-sectional and exploratory nature limits causal inference, the findings suggest that interventions addressing both parental mental health and rearing practices may be helpful in promoting children&rsquo;s mental well-being, particularly in migrant populations. Further longitudinal research is needed to clarify these pathways and to understand how contextual factors shape parent-child dynamics.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wu, H., Zhu, S., Tan, Z., Zhou, G., Ni, Z., Xu, L., Zhang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109510</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109510</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring how parental mental health and rearing styles relate to childrens mental health: a cross-sectional study among migrant and local primary school students in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109510</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109510</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109615?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility and results of joint ambulatory monitoring of exposure to particulate matter pollution and lung function in children in Abidjan, Cote dIvoire: a cross-sectional observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109615?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Children are largely exposed to air pollution in low- and middle-income countries, yet data on exposure and respiratory effects of air pollution remain limited. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of joint ambulatory monitoring of exposure to fine particulate matter (particles with a diameter of less than 2.5 &micro;m (PM<SUB>2.5</SUB>)) and spirometry in children living in Abidjan, C&ocirc;te d&rsquo;Ivoire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We did a cross-sectional observational study among children aged 7&ndash;17 years. After a baseline spirometry, children were asked to wear portable PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> sensors and to perform 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>3 daily flow&ndash;volume curves using a portable spirometer for 7 days. We described the proportion of acceptable measurements, per cent predicted forced expiratory volume (ppFEV<SUB>1</SUB>), and hourly geometric mean PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations, and analysed the cumulative delayed effects of PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> on ppFEV<SUB>1</SUB> using distributed lag non-linear models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 29 children enrolled, 18 (62.1%) were female, median age 12 years, all performed spirometry with 1101 (90.4%) of 1218 expected flow-volume curves obtained. Of these, 625 (51.3%) acceptable curves were received and 313 valid, non-duplicate curves were analysed. The median ppFEV<SUB>1</SUB> was 79.6% (71.5&ndash;87.4), with lower values in the morning than in the evening (p&lt;0.001). Of 146 160 expected PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> measurements, 93 689 (64.1%) were obtained; 6328 aberrant data were excluded. The median hourly PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> concentrations were 164.2 (107.0&ndash;272.2) &micro;g/m<sup>3</sup>. PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> levels varied throughout the day, with pollution peaks observed in the morning. A significant decrease in ppFEV<SUB>1</SUB> was observed between 0 and 2 hours post-exposure, after an IQR increase of 120.9 &micro;g/m<sup>3</sup> in PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> exposure (&beta;=&ndash;2.21; CI &ndash;3.74 to &ndash;0.69).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Ambulatory spirometry and PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> measurements are feasible with portable devices in African children. High PM<SUB>2.5</SUB> exposure and individual variability in lung function highlight the need for further research on the respiratory effects of air pollution in children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pajot, A., Yapo, M., Liousse, C., Doumbia, M., Gnamien, S., Ahoua, S., Dje, S., Dick, F., Fayon, M., Yoboue, V., Marcy, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109615</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109615</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility and results of joint ambulatory monitoring of exposure to particulate matter pollution and lung function in children in Abidjan, Cote dIvoire: a cross-sectional observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109615</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109615</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109706?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of caregivers burden and mental health status in caregivers of patients with cancer from central rural India: a mixed-method study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109706?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cancer remains a growing public health challenge in India, impacting not only patients but also their caregivers, often family members who bear the emotional, physical and financial burdens of care. These family caregivers face overwhelming stress, anxiety and depression, particularly in rural areas with limited healthcare access. Cultural expectations often lead them to neglect their own well-being. Many are forced to reduce work or quit jobs, worsening financial strain. Despite their vital role, caregivers are largely overlooked in cancer care discourse. There is an urgent need for India-specific, empathetic research and policies that support caregiver health and recognise caregiving as a public health priority.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study employs a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design to examine the association between caregiver burden and mental health status among informal caregivers of patients with cancer in central rural India. In the quantitative phase, a cross-sectional survey will be conducted using systematic random sampling. Data will be collected via a semistructured questionnaire and standardised tools: the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory to assess burnout levels, and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 to evaluate psychological distress. Statistical analysis will include descriptive statistics and regression analysis.</p>
<p>The qualitative phase will involve in-depth interviews with purposively selected caregivers to explore lived experiences, coping mechanisms and emotional challenges. Interviews will be transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis. Integration of quantitative and qualitative findings will provide a comprehensive understanding of caregiver burden and mental health, reflecting both measurable patterns and the human experience of caregiving in a rural setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical clearance for this study protocol was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha (Approval No. DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2025/436). Permission for data collection was further granted by both the institutional ethics committee and Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha. The findings of this research will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals and by engaging relevant stakeholders through appropriate channels of communication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CTRI/2025/08/093357.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Panicker, D., Joshi, A. U., V P, A. A., Raut, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109706</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109706</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of caregivers burden and mental health status in caregivers of patients with cancer from central rural India: a mixed-method study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109706</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109706</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110048?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Scoping review of AI-driven wearable technologies for rehabilitation and functional assessment in Parkinsons disease: a protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110048?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Parkinson&rsquo;s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder characterised by high prevalence and disability rates, severely impairing patients&rsquo; quality of life and imposing a substantial societal burden. Rehabilitation interventions are an essential component of PD management; however, conventional face-to-face rehabilitation is constrained by limited resources and poor adherence. In recent years, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with wearable technologies has offered new avenues for rehabilitation, enabling continuous monitoring, objective assessment and personalised feedback. Although relevant studies have emerged, most are limited by small sample sizes, short-term designs and a lack of comprehensive synthesis. This study aims to conduct a scoping review to summarise the current applications of AI-driven wearable technologies in PD rehabilitation and functional assessment, and to identify existing research gaps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines and employ the Joanna Briggs Institute three-step search strategy. After an initial pilot search, a comprehensive search strategy will be developed to systematically search 10 databases (CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, SinoMed, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase and the IEEE Xplore Digital Library). One researcher will independently perform data extraction, and another will independently verify the extracted data. Eligible studies will include original research articles, dissertations and conference papers published after 2020, involving PD patients and using AI-driven wearable devices for rehabilitation or functional assessment. Data will be synthesised narratively and presented using tables and figures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study involves only publicly available published data and therefore does not require ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and presentations at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, S., Chen, S., Yu, X., Quan, M., Deng, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110048</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110048</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Scoping review of AI-driven wearable technologies for rehabilitation and functional assessment in Parkinsons disease: a protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110048</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110048</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110217?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Construction of an emergency nursing-sensitive quality indicator system for patients with severe trauma: a modified Delphi study in the Chinese context]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110217?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of the study was to develop a nursing-sensitive quality indicator system for emergency care of patients with severe trauma, providing a scientific measurement tool for evaluating the quality of emergency trauma nursing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A modified Delphi study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Experts working in emergency surgery or trauma surgery departments were recruited. First, initial nursing-sensitive quality indicators were derived from an analysis and synthesis of existing evidence and semistructured interviews with 12 clinical experts. Subsequently, two-round expert consultations were conducted with 15 experts from various regions of China to refine and finalise the indicators. Finally, the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of each indicator.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The valid response rates of questionnaires in the two rounds of expert consultation reached 88.89% and 93.75%, respectively, and the expert authority coefficients were 0.856 and 0.880. The experts ultimately reached a consensus, establishing a nursing-sensitive quality indicator system for emergency care of patients with severe trauma, comprising 3 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators and 49 third-level indicators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study provides a tool for the assessment of emergency nursing service quality for patients with severe trauma, establishing a scientific and effective nursing-sensitive quality indicator system to evaluate and improve the quality of nursing services provided by emergency nurses to patients with severe trauma.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xie, L., He, M., Xing, N., Feng, M., Liu, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110217</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110217</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Construction of an emergency nursing-sensitive quality indicator system for patients with severe trauma: a modified Delphi study in the Chinese context]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110217</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110461?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Organ donation and transplantation education in UK medical schools: a protocol for parallel national cross-sectional surveys of students and educators]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110461?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Solid organ transplantation is a cornerstone of care for end-stage organ disease and a critical consideration for all doctors managing chronic conditions such as chronic kidney disease. Transplantation is wholly dependent on organ donation (both living and deceased), with shortages directly limiting access to life-saving therapy and resulting in preventable mortality for patients on waiting lists. Yet undergraduate exposure to organ donation and transplantation (ODT) across UK medical schools is anecdotally poor and not mapped nationally. The most substantive UK evidence is more than two decades old and demonstrates limited exposure and significant knowledge gaps among final-year medical students.</p>
<p>We here describe a protocol for two coordinated national surveys: U-KNOW-RT (<I>U</I>nderstanding and <I>Know</I>ledge of <I>R</I>enal <I>T</I>ransplantation; final-year students) and U-TEACH-ODT (<I>U</I>ndergraduate <I>T</I>eaching in <I>ODT</I>; educator leads). Together, these will provide the first UK-wide mapping of undergraduate ODT education, generating contemporary evidence on teaching provision, student exposure, knowledge, attitudes and career intentions. This work will directly inform the design of a standardised national ODT teaching module to ensure that all UK medical graduates attain a core level of literacy in ODT. Survey distribution is scheduled for January 2026, with completion expected by summer 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct two parallel cross-sectional online surveys. U-KNOW-RT will recruit final-year medical students from all 44 UK medical schools via social media, institutional channels and student societies. U-TEACH-ODT will invite deans and senior curriculum leads. The student target is ~1200 responses (&ge;10 per school) to enable national mapping and triangulation with educator reports. Analyses will follow the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies and the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys reporting frameworks. Prespecified outcomes include student knowledge, exposure and attitudes alongside educator-reported curricular provision. Primary analyses will use mixed-effects regression with school-level clustering, agreement between student and educator reports will be quantified and selected items will be readministered to allow 20-year comparisons with legacy surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study involves human participants and was granted ethical approval by the University of Sheffield Ethics Department (reference 070914) on 25 November 2025. Participants provided informed consent before taking part. This manuscript reports a study protocol only; no results will be reported. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and feedback to medical schools and national bodies. De-identified data, questionnaires and analysis code will be shared openly on Open science framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>OSF preregistration (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/38W5N).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prigg, A. R., Smith, O. A., Lipkin, G., Ong, A., Patel, K., Dabare, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110461</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110461</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Organ donation and transplantation education in UK medical schools: a protocol for parallel national cross-sectional surveys of students and educators]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110461</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110461</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110759?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preventive effect of liraglutide on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery: protocol for a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110759?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious complication after cardiac surgery, particularly in elderly patients, and is associated with adverse short- and long-term outcomes. Effective preventive strategies remain limited. Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has demonstrated potential neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory and metabolic benefits, which may reduce the incidence of POD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive liraglutide or placebo from the day before surgery until postoperative day 3. A total of 260 patients are planned to be enrolled in this study. The primary endpoint is the incidence of POD within 7 days, assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) or CAM-intensive care unit. Secondary outcomes include delirium severity, neurocognitive and psychological function, cardiac function, clinical outcomes, major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year and perioperative biomarker changes. Exploratory outcomes include functional MRI in selected subgroups and additional biomarker analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500106943.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bai, S., Wei, M., Wu, Y., Zhu, X., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhu, C., Guan, Y., Wang, D., Liu, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110759</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110759</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preventive effect of liraglutide on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery: protocol for a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110759</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110759</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of smart glasses for ultrasound-guided radial arterial catheterisation in obese patients: study protocol for a single-centre randomised clinical trial in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate and efficiency of radial arterial catheterisation (RAC). However, the procedure remains more challenging in obese patients, in whom excess subcutaneous tissue can impair anatomical visualisation. Additionally, frequent head shifts between the procedural site and ultrasound screen usually increase procedural complexity, prolong the procedural time and adversely affect both patient comfort and clinician performance. Smart glasses that project real-time ultrasound images directly into the clinician&rsquo;s field of view offer a potential solution. The study aimed to evaluate whether the use of smart glasses improves the efficiency of ultrasound-guided RAC in obese patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial, a total of 176 eligible obese patients (body mass index &ge;30 kg/m&sup2;) requiring RAC for perioperative monitoring will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the control group, receiving conventional ultrasound-guided RAC, or the smart-glasses group, undergoing ultrasound-guided RAC with real-time image display and needle-tracking assistance via smart glasses. The primary outcome is the first-attempt success rate. Secondary outcomes include the second-attempt success rate, time to successful catheterisation within the first and second attempts, overall procedural time, overall number of arterial catheterisation attempts; ultrasound scanning time, number of probe repositionings and needle redirections; incidence of RAC-related complications, and satisfaction scores of both patients and clinicians. Statistical analyses will be performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and GraphPad Prism.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment. The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. This study has been prospectively registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Study results will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500108023.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Y., Yu, Q., Xue, T., Guo, E., Wu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111115</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111115</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of smart glasses for ultrasound-guided radial arterial catheterisation in obese patients: study protocol for a single-centre randomised clinical trial in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111115</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111648?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of online supportive counselling on quality of life in women with high-risk human papillomavirus in Iran: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111648?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases and affects the quality of life (QoL) of individuals, necessitating interventions beyond physical treatments. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of individual supportive counselling on the QoL in women with high-risk HPV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This randomised clinical trial will include 80 women with HPV who will be selected from 2025 to 2026 in Babol, Iran. Following selection based on inclusion criteria, samples will be randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. Then, they will complete demographic&ndash;social questionnaires, QoL in HPV patients and general health questionnaires. Individuals in the intervention group will receive 4 weekly online supportive counselling sessions in addition to routine care. The control group will receive routine care. Both groups will complete the questionnaires again at 6 weeks and 4 months postbaseline. Data will be analysed using SPSS V.26 software and statistical tests including &sup2;, t-test and repeated measures analysis of variance, and regression models if necessary. A significance level of 5% will be used for the tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Babol University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUBABOL.HRI.REC.1404.082). The trial will adhere to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>IRCT20180218038783N11, 14 September 2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikaeil, A., Nasiri-Amiri, F., Shafizadeh, F., Behmanesh, F., Hamzehpour, R., Bijani, A., Delavar, M. A., Afshar, Z. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111648</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111648</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of online supportive counselling on quality of life in women with high-risk human papillomavirus in Iran: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111648</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111648</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111653?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biobanking knowledge and donation willingness among musculoskeletal patients in England: a multisite cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111653?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To date, few studies have investigated the factors associated with musculoskeletal patients&rsquo; willingness to donate biological samples and their knowledge regarding the use of such samples. We investigated the associations between these distinct knowledge factors, patients&rsquo; willingness to donate and socio-demographic factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Musculoskeletal outpatient clinics across four sites in England, representing varied demographic populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 469 adult patients attending musculoskeletal appointments were recruited through convenience sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Ordinal regression models were employed to identify socio-demographic and clinical predictors of patients&rsquo; willingness to donate biological samples. Other outcome measures specifically in two areas of patient knowledge include: (1) knowledge of sample use and (2) knowledge of surgical waste tissue value and management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Only 37% of participants were aware of the term &lsquo;biobank&rsquo;. Despite this, participants showed a high level of knowledge regarding both biological sample use and surgical waste tissue management, although their understanding varied considerably by ethnicity and education. Participants with no formal education exhibited a lower level of knowledge in both areas related to sample use and surgical waste tissue management for biomedical research ((OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.61; p=0.001); (OR=0.29, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.52, p&lt;0.001), respectively). Individuals with &ge;2 A-levels or equivalent (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.79, p=0.006) and those identifying as Asian/Asian British (OR=0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.88, p=0.016) also demonstrated a lower understanding of the value and management of surgical waste tissue. Willingness to donate was generally high but was significantly lower among non-Caucasian participants (Black (OR=0.23, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.61, p=0.004); Asian (OR=0.29, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.56, p&lt;0.001)) and those with lower education levels (no formal education (OR=0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.91, p=0.029); preferred not to disclose (OR=0.27, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.57, p&lt;0.001)). Participants from Manchester were 2.18 times more likely to report a higher willingness (OR=2.18, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.33, p=0.027). Finally, participants who were aware of the term "biobank" had 2.16 times the odds of willingness to donate to biobanking initiatives for biomedical research (OR=2.16, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.77, p=0.007).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite low awareness, musculoskeletal patients showed a high willingness to participate in biobanking. However, significant disparities by ethnicity and education persist. Targeted, inclusive engagement strategies are needed to address under-representation and foster informed, equitable participation of musculoskeletal patients in biomedical research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boakye Serebour, T., Kerasidou, A., Gray, N., Griffin, X. L., Peach, C., Singh, H. P., Wheway, K., Ambrosio, M. d. G., Baldwin, M., Snelling, S. J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111653</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111653</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biobanking knowledge and donation willingness among musculoskeletal patients in England: a multisite cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111653</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111653</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114590?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trans-sectoral patient pathways in urgent and emergency care (TRANSPARENT study): protocol for a prospective, mixed-methods study in Germany]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114590?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Urgent and emergency care in Germany is delivered across multiple, loosely connected sectors. In the absence of coherent, time-resolved data on patient movements between emergency medical services (EMS), out-of-hours ambulatory care, emergency departments (EDs) and inpatient care, inefficiencies and coordination gaps remain difficult to quantify. A process-centric, trans-sectoral analysis is required to characterise real-world patient pathways and identify actionable levers for improvement. The study aims to reconstruct, model and analyse patient pathways for urgent health complaints across all relevant sectors of the healthcare system in a German model region.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will employ a mixed-methods observational study design. Routine data from EMS, out-of-hours ambulatory care, EDs and subsequent inpatient care will be pseudonymised at source, linked via a trusted third party and analysed within a trusted research environment. Time-stamped event logs will support process mining for discovery, conformance and performance analysis alongside descriptive statistics with stratification by context, such as setting, time of day, urgency and patient cohorts. Anonymous cross-sectional surveys of patients and front-line professionals, complemented by quarterly snapshot surveys in out-of-hours ambulatory care and interviews, will provide convergent evidence on the motives, barriers and coordination of utilisation behaviour. Enrolment for surveys is anticipated from the fourth quarter of 2025; routine data capture covers 1 January&ndash;31 December 2026; analyses and dissemination run until 31 December 2027.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at RWTH Aachen University (EK 25-351). Survey modules are conducted anonymously with voluntary participation and without collection of direct identifiers; routine care data are processed in pseudonymised form and analysed within a trusted research environment. Stakeholder interviews will be conducted with informed consent. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summary reports for participating institutions and stakeholders, complemented by plain-language materials to support patient-centred navigation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00035916.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bienzeisler, J., Hertwig, M. K., Heidemeyer, H., Alhaskir, M., Majeed, R. W., Kombeiz, A., Hoy, W., Huening, S., Goettgens, F., Unterkofler, J., Rademacher, S., Panagiotidis, D., Marewski, V., Sommer, A., Schirrmeister, W., Walcher, F., Otto, R., Ehrentreich, S., Beyel, H. H., Peeva, V., Schwanen, C. T., Pegoraro, M., Zoch-Lesniak, B., Pollmanns, J., Wittmar, R., von Stillfried, D. G., Ro&#x0308;hrig, R., Beckers, S. K., van der Aalst, W. M. P., Brokmann, J. C., TRANSPARENT Research Group, Schumacher, Gehrke, Capellmann, Schneiders, Bru&#x0308;cken, Mu&#x0308;lly, Tosuncuk-Ari]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-15T10:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114590</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114590</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trans-sectoral patient pathways in urgent and emergency care (TRANSPARENT study): protocol for a prospective, mixed-methods study in Germany]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114590</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101051?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health visitor and community health nurse perspectives of supporting parents caring for unsettled babies: a qualitative interview study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101051?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aims of this study were to explore how health visitors (HVs) and community health nurses (CHNs) assess unsettled baby behaviours, how their perceptions of these behaviours influence decisions about support offered, and how able they feel to deliver support to families of unsettled babies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted, recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Potential participants were invited nationally via social media and via Health Visiting Service managers from an NHS Trust. Interviews took place remotely.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>17 HVs and 3 CHNs were purposively selected to include a wide range of perspectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three themes were developed, (1) HVs&rsquo; perceptions of parents&rsquo; sense-making which explains how HVs/CHNs understand parents&rsquo; beliefs around unsettled babies; (2) care pathway which highlights the importance HVs place on creating emotional space for the baby, the parent and the health visitor within the pathway (containment); and (3) service delivery decline, which outlines the impact of funding cuts to the services on the HVs&rsquo; ability to provide support for families. Lastly, a new concept &ndash; the Tipping Point model - was created to holistically conceptualise the experiences of HVs providing support for unsettled babies in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Policy makers need to organise services to value and support the role of the health visiting team in &lsquo;containment&rsquo;. HVs identified a training need around assessing and advising about unsettled babies to place them in a stronger position to support families. Further research is needed into different models of support for families of unsettled babies from the wider primary care team and/or from digital services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, L., Hornsey, S. J., Latter, S., Dobson, A., Miller, S., Henaghan-Sykes, K., Adams, S., Santer, M., Muller, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T16:06:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101051</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101051</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health visitor and community health nurse perspectives of supporting parents caring for unsettled babies: a qualitative interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101051</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101051</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e094395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of syncope history on long-term physical activity in patients >=2 years after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-centre cross-sectional study in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e094395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore long-term physical activity (PA) among patients 2 years post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and assess the impact of syncope history on post-TAVR activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional study conducted using an on-site questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>In this cross-sectional study, we used convenience sampling to recruit participants from the outpatient department at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China, between July 2023 and December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients who had undergone TAVR for 2 years or more were included in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The self-reported PA levels were assessed using the validated Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. Additionally, medical records of the patients were thoroughly reviewed to accurately document the history of syncope for everyone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>Via convenience sampling, we recruited 179 consecutive participants aged 60 years and older who underwent TAVR. Only 36.31% (65/179) of patients remained physically active &ge;2 years post-TAVR, with 27.37% having a syncope history. After adjusting for potential confounders, a history of syncope was independently associated with significantly lower levels of long-term PA (adjusted OR 0.287, 95% CI 0.122 to 0.675). This negative association was particularly pronounced among men and individuals with a normal body mass index (BMI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A history of syncope is a strong independent predictor of reduced PA in the long term after TAVR. These findings highlight that patients with a history of syncope, especially men and those with normal BMI, represent a high-risk subgroup warranting particular attention in post-TAVR care. Targeted assessment and rehabilitation strategies should be considered for this population, and further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shen, Z., Zhu, Z., Huang, C., Zhou, D., Lv, J., Lin, Y., Zhang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094395</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-094395</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of syncope history on long-term physical activity in patients >=2 years after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-centre cross-sectional study in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e094395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e094395</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101656?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a machine learning model for prediction of 1-year mortality following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101656?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop a machine learning (ML)-based risk prediction model for 1-year mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Patient data, including demographic, clinical, biochemical, imaging and procedural details, were extracted from electronic medical records. Data were split into training (80%) and test (20%) sets. Eight supervised learning algorithms were evaluated: least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, ridge, Elastic Net (EN, decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, AdaBoost and gradient boosting. Feature selection was performed sequentially with subsets of the top 5/10/15/20/25/30 features. Model hyperparameters were optimised using fivefold cross-validation with area under the curve (AUC) as the scoring metric.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Single, tertiary Australian centre.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We analysed data from 1863 consecutive STEMI patients treated at a tertiary Australian centre from July 2010 to December 2019.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The 1-year mortality rate was 13.6% (n=254) in our cohort. The EN model with five key features (parsimonious model) demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.821, which was comparable to the full 30-variable model (AUC 0.821). Advanced age, pre-hospital cardiac arrest and management with balloon angioplasty alone were identified as predictors of increased mortality risk, while family history of premature coronary disease and higher left ventricular ejection fraction were associated with improved survival. To facilitate clinical implementation, we developed a user-friendly web application for individualised risk assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our ML model accurately predicts 1-year mortality in STEMI patients using only five clinical variables. This tool offers improved accuracy and ease of use compared with existing risk stratification methods, potentially enhancing patient stratification and guiding treatment decisions in STEMI management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sritharan, H. P., Nguyen, H., Ciofani, J. L., Bhindi, R., Allahwala, U. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101656</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101656</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a machine learning model for prediction of 1-year mortality following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101656</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101656</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness, acceptability and oral health-related quality of life of silver diamine fluoride compared with atraumatic restorative treatment for the management of early childhood caries: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Early childhood caries (ECC) continues to be a public health problem. The application of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is a simple, non-invasive procedure. This study aims to evaluate SDF&rsquo;s effectiveness, acceptability and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) compared with atraumatic restorative treatment in managing ECC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>An open-label parallel superiority randomised clinical trial will be conducted involving children aged 2&ndash;5 years. Participants will include children with at least one active cavitated lesion (ICDAS 5+) of their primary teeth, with no signs of pulp involvement. The trial will occur at preschools in the La Araucan&iacute;a and Metropolitan Regions of Chile from 2025 to 2027. The primary outcome variable will be the caries lesion arrest, acceptability and OHRQoL. We will also determine the presence of any adverse effects. Evaluations will be carried out at 6 and 12 months. A sample of 234 teeth with carious lesions per group is estimated. The primary inferential analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis; a per-protocol analysis will be conducted for adverse effects. For caries lesion arrest, a multilevel logistic regression model adjusted for significant covariates will be used to account for within-child clustering. The acceptability will be assessed through quantitative and qualitative methods. The magnitude of change in OHRQoL between baseline and follow-up will be quantified using effect size estimates derived from the early childhood health impact scale survey data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study&rsquo;s implementation benefits the study population, and the ethical principles of research have been considered and approved by the Science Committee of the University, Resolution N&deg;049_19. The results and conclusions of the clinical trial will be published in academic conferences and peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06786975">NCT06786975</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munoz Millan, P., Pineda, P., Fontana, M., Freyhofer, V. A., Ormeno, A., Munoz, K., Martinez-Zapata, M. J., Zaror, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106271</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106271</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness, acceptability and oral health-related quality of life of silver diamine fluoride compared with atraumatic restorative treatment for the management of early childhood caries: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106271</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106443?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementing a bundle of interventions to support older adults transitioning from hospital to residential aged care: a protocol for the process evaluation of the OPTIMAL stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106443?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Optimising older People&rsquo;s Transition from acute care Into residential aged care through Multidisciplinary Assessment and Liaison (OPTIMAL) trial is a multisite hybrid type II stepped wedge randomised controlled trial with an embedded process evaluation that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing a bundle of evidence-based interventions to provide systematic support to older adults being discharged from hospital to residential aged care (RAC) homes for the first time. The trial is based on evidence from models of care used internationally to improve the quality of care transitions and addresses a need to provide evidence of transferability and effectiveness of these models in the Australian context. The embedded process evaluation will assess the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adoption and fidelity of the OPTIMAL intervention, as well as the mechanisms of impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The OPTIMAL trial will be implemented across the three metropolitan local health networks (LHNs) in South Australia. The process evaluation will be conducted in parallel with the main trial and is theoretically informed by the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) implementation framework, which theorises that the implementation success of OPTIMAL is determined by the facilitation of the intervention with the intended recipients in their inner and outer contextual setting. The process evaluation will employ a mixed methods approach. Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected through baseline context mapping of LHNs, interviews with key LHN and RAC stakeholders, online survey of clinical teams, fortnightly check-in forms, and activity logs and field notes maintained by the nurse facilitator in each LHN. Data will be mapped and reported based on the i-PARIHS framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for the OPTIMAL trial was obtained from the Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (approval 2023/HRE00111), and the relevant governance approvals were obtained for each participating LHN. Ethical approval includes a waiver of the requirement for consent for routinely collected patient data. Study findings will be disseminated via journal publications, presentations at conferences, stakeholder discussions, consumer forums and advocacy to key decision makers to support knowledge translation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12624001008516, registered 20 August 2024.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando, R. L., Crotty, M., Inacio, M. C., Batta, I., Bourke, A., Forward, J., Furst, C., Whitehead, C., Shaw, S., Shepperd, L., Harvey, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106443</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106443</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementing a bundle of interventions to support older adults transitioning from hospital to residential aged care: a protocol for the process evaluation of the OPTIMAL stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106443</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106443</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106645?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is intensive behavioural change enhanced with dialectical behavioural therapy feasible for weight management in adolescents living with higher body weight? A protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial in three centres in Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106645?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>For adolescents living with higher body weight, changing lifestyle behaviours can be met with challenges due to psychosocial factors, such as mental health and emotional challenges. Few behavioural interventions have included skill development to manage these mental health and emotional challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The feasibility of a dialectical behavioural therapy (DBT)&ndash;enhanced lifestyle intervention will be evaluated through a pilot randomised controlled trial. We will recruit 90 adolescents aged 14&ndash;17 years with a body mass index Z-score &gt;1.4 and mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms to participate with a caregiver in the trial. Adolescents will be randomised 2:2:1 to one of the three study arms: (A) behavioural lifestyle intervention with DBT skills training, (B) behavioural lifestyle intervention alone (ie, without DBT skills training) or (C) control. The interventions will include two sessions weekly for 16 weeks that include (1) one modified DBT skills training with two facilitators, supervised by a clinical psychologist, combined with one behavioural lifestyle session delivered by a dietitian and/or a kinesiologist and (2) two behavioural lifestyle sessions alone. DBT skills training will consist of teaching mindfulness, emotion regulation, distress tolerance, interpersonal effectiveness and walking the middle path modules. Behavioural sessions will be guided by evidence-based practices for goal setting, dietary counselling, improving sleep, reducing screen time and structured physical activity. The main outcomes are enrolment rates, adherence to the intervention and retention rates for follow-up measurements. The secondary outcome will be changes in the quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory) and daily physical activity levels between baseline and immediately post-intervention. Adolescents will participate in a focus group incorporating photo elicitation to explore satisfaction, acceptability and perceived benefits of the study arms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethical approval from the University of Manitoba&rsquo;s Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (HS24295-H2020:427), Hamilton Health Sciences &amp; McMaster University (HiREB 18159) and The Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (CHREB), University of Calgary (REB24-1084). Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and be relevant to researchers and clinicians involved in paediatrics and paediatric weight management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05338944">NCT05338944</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cameron, E. E., Morrison, K. M., Ho, J., Roos, L., Katz, L., Mushquash, A., Dart, A., Wicklow, B. A., Senechal, M., Jung, M. E., Strachan, S. M., Afifi, T. O., Archibald, M., Andrade, B., Hadjiyannakis, S., Hamilton, J., Slaght, J., Penner, K., Balshaw, R. F., McGavock, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106645</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106645</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is intensive behavioural change enhanced with dialectical behavioural therapy feasible for weight management in adolescents living with higher body weight? A protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial in three centres in Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106645</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106645</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107661?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Cervical Epidural STimulation After Neurological Damage: protocol for phase I/II open label controlled CE-STAND trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107661?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects over 18 000 individuals annually, leading to significant motor and autonomic dysfunctions that reduce quality of life (QoL). Epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS) has shown potential in restoring function in chronic individuals with SCI. However, research on cervical and autonomic dysfunction-related SCI remains limited. This study will assess the safety and efficacy of eSCS in improving autonomic and volitional functions, as well as truncal stability, bowel, bladder and sexual function, and overall QoL.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study is a phase I/II trial in which participants will serve as their own controls. The Abbott Eterna epidural stimulator system will be implanted, and assessments will occur every 3 months. The study will be conducted over a period of 4 years. A total of 36 participants will be enrolled and followed for 1 year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>Bayesian optimisation will be used to determine the most effective stimulation settings, with 15 settings programmed at the end of each visit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Food and Drug Administration and University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board approvals have been secured for the study. Interim reports will be made available through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and clinical network reporting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>CE-STAND (Cervical Epidural STimulation After Neurological Damage) seeks to advance SCI treatment by expanding eSCS applications in chronic cervical SCI, improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. Future studies could consider a larger sample size, long-term safety, matched-control and randomisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06410001">NCT06410001</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mansour, N., Keller-Ross, M., Low, W., Balser, D. Y., Parr, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107661</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107661</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical publishing and peer review]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Cervical Epidural STimulation After Neurological Damage: protocol for phase I/II open label controlled CE-STAND trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical publishing and peer review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107661</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107661</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Latent profiles of frailty in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify distinct latent frailty profiles using latent profile analysis (LPA) in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) and to examine the factors associated with profile membership.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This research used data acquired from a major tertiary referral hospital in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study recruited 391 HNC patients receiving radiotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Validated instruments included a demographic questionnaire, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, FRAIL Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Perceived Social Support Scale. Profile membership associations were assessed using <sup>2</sup> tests, univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The frailty status of patients can be divided into three different categories: (1) robust group (23.0%), (2) prefrail group (49.6%) and (3) frail group (27.4%). Frailty demonstrated independent associations with nine clinical parameters in adjusted regression models: radiotherapy session frequency, social support, age, CCI score, educational attainment, metastasis, nutritional risk, radiation-induced injuries and serum albumin levels (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The distinct frailty profiles identified by LPA can inform the future development of targeted care protocols for specific subgroups (eg, the frail group), with a focus on key predictors such as age and nutritional risk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pu, X., Ju, M., Han, X., Ma, W., Wang, L., Wang, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108357</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108357</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Latent profiles of frailty in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108357</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108910?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Setting research priorities for palliative and end-of-life care: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership Refresh]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108910?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Palliative care supports the physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs of people with serious life-limiting illness. Future research must align with the priorities of people approaching the end of their lives, and those close to them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To undertake a refresh of the James Lind Alliance Palliative and End of Life Care Priority Setting Partnership, to identify and prioritise areas for future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The James Lind Alliance process was applied, between May 2023 and February 2025. An initial online survey collected areas for future research from participants. These were synthesised into a long list of questions and shortlisted through a second online survey. Final ranking of priorities was achieved using an adapted Nominal Group Technique within a prioritisation workshop.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>People living with serious life-limiting illnesses, carers, friends and family members supporting them, bereaved people, health and social care professionals, volunteers working in palliative and end-of-life care and members of the public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>1032 and 626 responses were received to survey 1 and 2, respectively. 20 people with lived and professional experience attended the prioritisation workshop. An updated list of 24 priorities for palliative and end-of-life care research was produced.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The priorities reflect the range of issues shaping end-of-life experiences and serve as a call to action for researchers and funders.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hudson, B. F., Ashcroft, P., Bedford, J., Bush, J., Bowers, B., Dawson, A., Hussain, J., Holmes, S., Kumar, R., Minton, O., McCullagh, A., Nicoll, L., Penny, A., Rabbitte, M., Reece, A., Robinson, D., Simpson-Greene, C., Taylor, M., Best, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108910</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108910</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Setting research priorities for palliative and end-of-life care: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership Refresh]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108910</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108910</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109026?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of self-abdominal massage on gastrointestinal function in postoperative ileus: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109026?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication after colorectal surgery, characterised by impaired gastrointestinal motility leading to abdominal distension, delayed flatus and defecation, nausea and vomiting. Self-abdominal massage (SM) can promote bowel peristalsis, but its clinical efficacy on improving colorectal cancer patients with POI treated with an intestinal decompression tube remains to be further verified. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SM in improving gastrointestinal function in colorectal cancer patients with POI treated with an intestinal decompression tube.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled, assessor-blinded and statistician-blinded trial. A total of 102 colorectal cancer patients with POI undergoing intestinal decompression tube placement will be recruited. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive basic treatment (BT), BT plus SM (BT-SM) or BT plus simple physical stimulation (BT-SPS). The primary outcome is the time to first defecation after intestinal decompression tube placement. Secondary outcomes include time to first flatus, radiological evaluation, time to tolerability of semiliquid and solid foods, severity of nausea, vomiting, pain and abdominal distension, analgesic consumption, time to intestinal decompression tube removal, incidence of complications and adverse events after intestinal decompression tube placement. Outcome measures are collected at baseline, at 1, 2, 3 and 4 days after the end of the intervention. The primary time point will be 4 days postintervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the ethical application of the Shanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Ethics Committee (2025-K-49-01). All patients will be required to provide informed consent. Study results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ITMCTR2025001401.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, Y., Wang, H., Liu, S., Xu, Z., Cao, Y., Wang, G., Liu, X., Zhang, K., Guo, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109026</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109026</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of self-abdominal massage on gastrointestinal function in postoperative ileus: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109026</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109026</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of prison-based parent-child joint intervention for incarcerated fathers: protocol for mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Paternal incarceration represents a significant stressor that disrupts family cohesion, undermines paternal identity and adversely affects children&rsquo;s psychosocial well-being. While family-focused programmes show promise in improving outcomes for incarcerated parents and their children, culturally attuned prison-based parenting interventions remain underdeveloped and scarce, particularly in Asian contexts. To address this gap, a local parenting intervention grounded in the Double ABCX model of family resilience, the &lsquo;Be My Hero&rsquo; programme, was designed for incarcerated fathers in Hong Kong, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A concurrent mixed-methods design will be used to evaluate the intervention. A convenience sample of 20&ndash;30 incarcerated fathers of children aged 3&ndash;11 will be recruited from three correctional facilities. Quantitative measures assessing paternal competence, father&ndash;child attachment, communication and resilience will be collected preintervention and postintervention. Qualitative data will be triangulated through semistructured interviews with participants, their children and social workers, supplemented by session logs documenting perceived shifts in paternal identity and programme feasibility. The intervention is expected to mitigate disruptions in paternal identity and strengthen father&ndash;child bonds. This may, in turn, reduce intergenerational disadvantage and improve overall family well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethical approval from The University of Hong Kong. Informed consent and assent will be obtained from the participants, their children and current guardians. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals or conferences to inform correctional rehabilitation practices, encouraging the integration of family-focused and resilience-based approaches. Stakeholders, including practitioners and policymakers, may adopt similar interventions to promote healthier re-entry outcomes and reduce intergenerational disadvantage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yiu, W. Y., Fung, Y. L., Tsang, S. K. M., Chan, C. H. Y., Wong, P. W. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109245</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109245</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of prison-based parent-child joint intervention for incarcerated fathers: protocol for mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109245</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110399?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a resource use measure to capture costs related to unpaid care for people living with non-memory led dementia: a modified Delphi study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110399?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine the personal, National Health Service and wider societal resource use in relation to caring responsibilities for carers of people living with non-memory led dementias (NMLDs); and to design a resource use measure (RUM) that can be delivered in the Better Living with Non-memory-led Dementia (BELIDE) randomised controlled trial, part of the Rare Dementia (RD) - TALK research programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The first stage was to identify and review any existing RUMs that could be used or adapted to the trial population and setting. If no measures were identified, the second stage was initial informal discussions with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and the programme patient and public involvement representatives to inform the perspective, settings of care and main resource items to develop a new RUM. In the third stage, a first draft of the RUM was tested for content and face validity in a modified Delphi study comprising HCPs and carers. The measure was revised and, in the final stage, piloted in the first 3 months of the BELIDE trial to assess acceptability and feasibility of collecting the economic outcomes and the completeness of data collection. The key drivers of resource use and costs were assessed, and appropriate face validity checks were applied to ensure accurate description of the treatment pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and setting</st>
<p>Carers and family of people living with NMLD recruited from Rare Dementia Support members in the UK, and a broad range of HCPs with experience of working with people who have NMLD to capture the different dimensions of experience, grade and skill mix.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 20 people participated in the modified Delphi study, 11 HCPs and 9 carers. Rare Dementia Support groups and 1:1 calls were highly rated, as were general practitioner appointments. The greatest consensus was in the productivity and carer tasks; all caring tasks were highly rated. Healthcare practitioners rated healthcare items as higher importance than carers themselves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Unpaid carers and HCPs are the experts in the resource impact of caring for someone with NMLD and have been underserved in research to date. This research, as part of preparatory stages of the BELIDE trial, has enabled the timely development of a comprehensive and valid RUM for unpaid carers of people with NMLD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42022356943.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06241287">NCT06241287</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cullen, K., Brotherhood, E. V., Hayes, O., Mansfield, V., Suarez-Gonzalez, A., Zimmermann, N., Stott, J., Fitzsimmons, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110399</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110399</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a resource use measure to capture costs related to unpaid care for people living with non-memory led dementia: a modified Delphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110399</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110399</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110435?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cognitive and physical exercise to improve outcomes after surgery (COPE-iOS) study: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial in the USA examining the efficacy of a combined cognitive and physical exercise programme performed before and after major surgery in improving cognitive and functional outcomes for older adults]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110435?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Surgery and its resulting hospitalisation are associated with subsequent cognitive and functional decline. Interventions to reduce this decline have exhibited limited success. Prehabilitation is the process of enhancing capacity and reserve before an acute stressor to improve tolerance of the acute physiologic insult. Older adults requiring major surgery are an ideal population for prehabilitation. Prehabilitation exercise studies have mostly focused on physical training to improve physical outcomes after specific surgery types, and data on cognitive outcomes and in broader surgical populations are needed. Computerised cognitive training (CCT) has been shown to enhance memory, processing speed, attention and multitasking. Combining CCT with a physical exercise may be most effective in reducing cognitive and functional decline in older patients undergoing major surgery, but has yet to be evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The COgnitive and Physical Exercise to improve Outcomes after Surgery (COPE-iOS) study is a randomised, controlled, participant and assessor blinded clinical trial testing the hypothesis that a pragmatic programme combining CCT and physical exercise throughout the perioperative (ie, preoperative and postoperative) period will improve long-term cognitive and disability outcomes in older surgical patients at high risk for decline. The trial aims to randomise 250 patients who undergo major surgery for a treatment period of approximately 1 month prior to surgery and 3 months after surgery, with a follow-up period of 12 months after surgery. The primary outcome is global cognition at 3 months after surgery. Key secondary outcomes include global cognition at 12 months after surgery and disability in activities of daily living and depression at 3 and 12 months after surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Trial protocol has been approved by Vanderbilt Human Research Protections Programme (#202496) and an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board. Results will be presented at scientific conferences and submitted for publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov Registry <A HREF="NCT04889417">NCT04889417</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rengel, K. F., Archer, K. R., Jackson, J. C., Raman, R., Orun, O. M., Ellison, T., Vanston, S. W., Ervin, H., Lauck, A., Provin, M., Pandharipande, P. P., Hughes, C. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110435</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110435</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cognitive and physical exercise to improve outcomes after surgery (COPE-iOS) study: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial in the USA examining the efficacy of a combined cognitive and physical exercise programme performed before and after major surgery in improving cognitive and functional outcomes for older adults]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110435</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110435</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111007?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: Infant Gut Bacterial Study in Nigeria (INBUGS-NG)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111007?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Infant Gut Bacterial Study in Nigeria (INBUGS-NG) investigates how delivery mode, antibiotic exposure, feeding practices and environmental factors shape gut microbiome development and acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) during the first year of life in northern Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Between February and July 2024, 90 mother&ndash;infant dyads were enrolled at a tertiary hospital in Kano city, Nigeria. This was a prospective longitudinal cohort with follow-ups at 10 scheduled time points: days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 28, 90, 180 and 365. We also intensified stool sampling after infant antibiotic administration, enabling dense early-life sampling. To date, the cohort has contributed 480 infant stool samples, 232 maternal rectal swabs, 254 breast milk samples and 806 environmental samples (total 1772). In parallel, socio-demographic, clinical and cultural data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) and household visit diaries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>Baseline data show that 84/90 mothers (93.3%) received postpartum antibiotics, and 26/90 infants (28.9%) received antibiotics within the first 3 months of life. Only 8% of infants were exclusively breastfed, with early water supplementation common. Caesarean deliveries accounted for 25% of births, and the mean gestational age was 38.5 weeks. Across the cohort, high retention was achieved, and the study has generated a unique long-read metagenomic resource from an African infant population, with analyses ongoing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>Shotgun long-read metagenomic sequencing (Oxford Nanopore) will enable strain-level and plasmid-level profiling of microbial communities and ARGs. Planned analyses include associations between early-life exposures and resistome dynamics, as well as cross-cohort comparisons with a parallel study in Pakistan. Follow-up will continue through 12 months.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akpulu, C. P., Maikudi Sada, H., Ahmed, H., Idris, H. B., Yakubu, R., Aminu, A., Iregbu, K., Oduwo, J., Owinoh, E., Lankapalli, A. K., De Nies, L., Achi, C. R., Thomson, K., Stracy, M., Walsh, T. R., Sands, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111007</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111007</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cohort profile: Infant Gut Bacterial Study in Nigeria (INBUGS-NG)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111007</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111007</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111606?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Essential newborn care practices and determinants in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of national survey data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111606?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the prevalence and determinants of essential newborn care (ENC) practices among Ethiopian mothers using the 2023 Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional analysis of the nationally representative 2023 PMA Ethiopia survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1933 mothers with complete data on ENC practices were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Ethiopia, using a multi-stage stratified cluster sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>ENC, defined as the adoption of at least four of five WHO-recommended practices: immediate drying, delayed bathing, skin-to-skin contact, clean cord care and early initiation of breastfeeding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 32.1% (95% CI 28.1% to 36.0%) of mothers practised at least four ENC components. Coverage was highest for immediate drying (95.4%) and delayed bathing (87.3%), but lower for skin-to-skin contact (53.6%) and clean cord care (64.5%). Health facility delivery showed a strong association with higher ENC practice (adjusted OR (AOR)=106.00; 95% CI 46.14 to 243.54). Mothers who were spouses, rather than household heads, had higher odds of practising ENC (AOR=2.88; 95% CI 1.20 to 6.89) and those mothers with parity two or three had higher odds of practising ENC compared with first-time mothers (AOR=2.00; 95% CI 1.33 to 3.02 and AOR=3.39; 95% CI 1.76 to 6.53, respectively). Lack of postnatal care attendance was negatively associated with ENC (AOR=0.56; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.85). Regional disparities were observed, with mothers in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples&rsquo; region being significantly less likely to practise ENC compared with those in Addis Ababa (AOR=0.31; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.64). All results are based on weighted data to ensure national representativeness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The prevalence of ENC practices remains low in Ethiopia. Health facility delivery, maternal role in the household, parity and region of residence were significant predictors of ENC practice. Strengthening facility-based delivery, promoting maternal empowerment and addressing regional disparities are essential to improving newborn health outcomes in the country and achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mekonnen, T. S., Delie, A. M., Hailu, M., Mehari, M. G., Bizuneh, G. K., Mengistie, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111606</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111606</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Essential newborn care practices and determinants in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of national survey data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111606</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111606</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111826?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence to improve the detection and risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism (AID-PE): protocol for a pragmatic quasi-experimental comparator study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111826?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal condition requiring timely diagnosis and treatment. CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for diagnosis and indicates PE severity through radiological markers of right heart strain. However, accurate interpretation and communication of these findings is often suboptimal in real-world practice. Artificial intelligence (AI) could alleviate pressure on radiology services by supporting PE identification, risk stratification and worklist prioritisation. Before widespread adoption, AI tools must be rigorously validated for diagnostic accuracy, safety and clinical impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This pragmatic single-centre, non-randomised quasi-experimental study will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and clinical-cost impact of AI-assisted PE detection and risk stratification using AIDOC and IMBIO software. We will recruit two consecutive cohorts of adult patients undergoing CTPAs for suspected PE: a comparator cohort (12 months pre-AI implementation) and an intervention cohort (12 months post-AI implementation). AI will be applied retrospectively to the comparator cohort, while in the intervention cohort, radiologists will have contemporaneous access to the AI&rsquo;s interpretation of CTPA images.</p>
<p>A subset of retrospective scans, both PE-positive and PE-negative, will undergo expert thoracic radiologist review to establish a reference standard. Data on patient demographics, clinical management and outcomes will be collected. Clinical management pathways and patient outcomes will be compared between cohorts to assess AI&rsquo;s influence on acute PE management. Health economic modelling will assess the cost-effectiveness of integrating AI technology within the diagnostic workflow of acute PE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the UK Healthcare Research authority (IRAS 311735, 10 May 2023). Ethical approval was granted by West of Scotland Research Ethics Service (23/WS/0067, 3 May 2023). Results will be shared with stakeholders, presented at national and international conferences, and published in open-access peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06093217">NCT06093217</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gunning, S. G. S., Page, J., Rossdale, J., Charters, P. F. P., Hudson, B., Lyen, S., Mackenzie Ross, R., Seatter, A., Bartlett, J. W., Austin, L., Myring, G., McLeod, H., Mitchell, P., Stimpson, D., Cookson, A., Suntharalingam, J., Rodrigues, J. C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111826</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111826</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence to improve the detection and risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism (AID-PE): protocol for a pragmatic quasi-experimental comparator study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111826</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111826</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111860?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Start4All protocol for a Bayesian cost-effectiveness model of tuberculosis screening and diagnosis in seven high burden low-income and middle-income countries]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111860?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>High costs of screening and diagnostic tests remain a major barrier to timely tuberculosis (TB) identification in resource-limited settings. Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of scalable screening algorithms is limited. Start4All is a research project aimed at developing and evaluating algorithmic approaches to TB screening and diagnosis, with the goal of optimising technical and allocative efficiency when expanding diagnostic coverage to primary healthcare and community settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Five screening and diagnostic tests will be evaluated: a capillary blood-based assay (C-reactive protein (CRP)), sputum-based rapid molecular tests (PCR; individual and pooled Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Xpert Ultra, Cepheid&reg;, California, USA)), a lateral-flow urine-based test for lipoarabinomannan (LF-LAM), and digital chest X-rays with artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection (CXR-CAD). A microbiological reference standard of positive culture using the mycobacteria growth indicator tube will be used to confirm TB disease.</p>
<p>We will compare the cost and effectiveness of concurrent and sequential positive serial combinations (screening algorithms) of CRP, CXR-CAD, LF-LAM, individual and pooled Xpert Ultra. Diagnostic performance will be estimated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and proportions of positive results, with Bayesian inference used to derive these estimates. The analysis will include adults (15 years and older) only and will be stratified by HIV status and level of care, including facility and community-based case finding. Effectiveness will be assessed based on the number of people with TB detected. Cost analysis will be conducted from the provider perspective, incorporating commodity and implementation costs. A decision tree model will be developed to assess the cost per number of persons with confirmed TB detected across all countries. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be conducted to account for uncertainty in model parameters, incorporating willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept thresholds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>WHO ethical review committee approval ERC.0003921. Data will be available on reasonable request to the principal investigator of the consortium.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05845112">NCT05845112</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCoy, A., Garg, T., Henrion, M., Vo, L. N. Q., Wingfield, T., Worrall, E., On behalf of the Start4All: Start Taking Action for TB Diagnosis investigators, on behalf of the Start4All: Start Taking Action for TB Diagnosis investigators, Wingfield, Bertel Squire, Byrne, Kontogianni, Iem, Atienzar, Henrion, McCoy, Worrall, Akinwande, Read, Creswell, Garg, Choko, Banda, Sander, Mbuli, Banu, Mazidur Rahman, Ahmed, Saha, Kabir, Uddin, Choudhury, Rahman, Miah, Ruhee, Chowdhury, Santos, Gurgel, Suraj Abdulkarim, John, Bimba, Iwakun, Wandiga, Agaya, Okumu, Omondi, Vo, Codlin, Nguyen, Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111860</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111860</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Start4All protocol for a Bayesian cost-effectiveness model of tuberculosis screening and diagnosis in seven high burden low-income and middle-income countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111860</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111860</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112097?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Key protective factors that mitigate the impact of childhood trauma on poor mental health in adulthood: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112097?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>A significant proportion of adults in England and Wales report experiencing childhood trauma, which is often associated with poor health and negative social outcomes including a significant increase in the risk of poor mental health outcomes in adulthood. This proposed scoping review adopts a broad definition of childhood trauma and applies both a salutogenic framework and ecological systems theory to explore how protective factors at five ecological levels can support mental well-being. The review will also examine how protective factors vary across different population groups and contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) protocol for scoping reviews. The databases that will be searched are Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Medline. Studies will be included if they include protective factors and involve adults aged 18 and over who have experienced childhood trauma, whether self-identified, retrospectively self-reported or measured using a validated instrument. Studies will be excluded if they focus on participants under the age of 18.</p>
<p>All search results will be uploaded to Covidence, duplicates removed, and titles/abstracts screened by at least two reviewers based on inclusion criteria. Full texts of potentially relevant sources will be imported into EndNote 21. Reasons for exclusions will be documented and disagreements resolved through discussion or a third reviewer. The full process will be reported using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. Data will be extracted by at least two reviewers using a tool developed by the team based on the JBI guidance. A best-fit framework analysis will be used, using a matrix developed by the researchers including the four salutogenic domains and the five levels of the ecological framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Formal ethical approval is not necessary for this scoping review as it does not involve the collection of primary data. The outcomes of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles, conference/seminar presentations, and developed into resources for stakeholders and collaborators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/CJRUY).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clarke, A., Hallett, N., Brown, Y., Cunnington, C., Dauvermann, M. R., Jordan, G., Reniers, R., Taylor, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112097</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112097</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Key protective factors that mitigate the impact of childhood trauma on poor mental health in adulthood: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112097</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112097</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relationships between alcohol use and dementia: protocol for an observational study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Alcohol consumption is an increasingly recognised modifiable risk factor for dementia, yet whether it has differential impacts on dementia subtypes and its role in disease progression remains unclear. This study aims to: (1) quantify the association between alcohol intake and incidence of dementia subtypes and (2) examine whether individuals who drink heavily and develop dementia referred to hereafter as &lsquo;alcohol-related&rsquo;&mdash;have poorer post-diagnosis outcomes compared with other dementia cases. Clarifying these relationships will determine whether alcohol selectively increases risk for specific dementia phenotypes or broadly heightens neurodegenerative vulnerability, with implications for prevention, clinical counselling and therapeutic targeting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This population-based cohort study of alcohol and dementia will use linked UK electronic health records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics (ONS). Participants will be eligible if they have available linked data from January 1998, when ONS death registrations became available, until the end of follow-up. Alcohol exposure will be defined through self-reported recorded weekly alcohol units and diagnostic codes for harmful or dependent alcohol use. Primary outcomes including incident all-cause and subtype-specific dementia (eg, Alzheimer&rsquo;s, vascular, Lewy body, Parkinson&rsquo;s, frontotemporal) as well as secondary outcomes (ie, mortality, care-home entry and neuropsychiatric symptoms). Key covariates encompassing socio-demographic factors, smoking and relevant comorbidities will be adjusted for. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models will estimate associations with dementia incidence. Post-diagnosis prognosis will be compared for dementia in individuals with a history of heavy alcohol use (&lsquo;alcohol-related&rsquo;) and dementia in individuals with minimal alcohol exposure (&lsquo;non-alcohol-related&rsquo;) cases using survival and logistic regression models. Multiple testing correction will be applied across dementia subtype comparisons. Alcohol exposure will be modelled continuously and non-linearly using restricted cubic splines and categorically using binary indicators of harmful/dependent use. Missing covariate data will be assessed and addressed using appropriate methods, including multiple imputation and complete-case analysis. Data extraction and analysis are scheduled from October 2025 to October 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Use of de-identified routine data will proceed under existing Research Ethics Committee and data governance approvals. Findings will be disseminated via open-access peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and summaries targeted at patient, public and policy audiences. The results of this study will be reported according to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) guidelines.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fatih, N., Bhaskaran, K., Kwok, A. C. H., Ebmeier, K. P., Nichols, T., Gelernter, J., Christodoulou, M. D., Topiwala, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112153</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112153</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relationships between alcohol use and dementia: protocol for an observational study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112153</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112890?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigating the impact of residual refraction within {+/-}1.0 dioptre on uncorrected distance visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112890?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the impact of residual refraction within &plusmn;1.0 dioptre (D) on uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in pseudophakic eyes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was based on retrospectively collected electronic refraction records from a tertiary care academic ophthalmology centre in southern China between May 2022 and July 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients aged &ge;40 years who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery with in-the-bag monofocal intraocular lens implantation and achieved a postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of &le;0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution were enrolled. They were stratified by astigmatism subtypes: minimal astigmatism (&lt;0.50 D), with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism, against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism and oblique astigmatism.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes measures</st>
<p>Postoperative evaluation (&ge;1 month) included spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, UDVA and CDVA. UDVA was compared across eyes with SE intervals of 0.50 D within &plusmn;1.0 D. ORs were calculated to assess the relative risk of failing to achieve a UDVA of 0.1 or better for postoperative SE within &plusmn;1.0 D, using 0.00 D as the reference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study included 1333 eyes from 1333 patients (mean (SD) age, 66.1 (8.96) years; 532 male (39.9%)). Overall, and particularly in the minimal astigmatism (&lt;0.50 D), ATR astigmatism and oblique astigmatism subgroups, hyperopic eyes exhibited significantly better UDVA than their myopic counterparts. Slight myopia [&ndash;0.50 D, 0 D) significantly worsened UDVA versus 0 D in both the overall population and the minimal astigmatism subgroup. Slight hyperopia (0 D, +0.50 D] minimally affected UDVA, whereas an equivalent degree of myopia increased the odds of not achieving UDVA &le;0.1 by 1.55-fold (95% CI 1.08 to 2.21) overall and by 3.14-fold (95% CI 1.49 to 6.58) in the minimal astigmatism subgroup. Additionally, UDVA was optimal with minimal astigmatism and decreased progressively with each 0.50 D increment in residual astigmatism magnitude, a dose-dependent trend consistent across astigmatism subtypes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The impact of refractive errors (&le;1.0 D) on UDVA was associated with the magnitude and type of astigmatism. Residual astigmatism of &ge;0.50 D exerted a significant negative effect on UDVA. A plano SE (0 D) was optimal for minimum and WTR astigmatism, whereas slight hyperopia yielded superior UDVA in ATR and oblique astigmatism.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, D., Zhang, J., Jin, L., Han, X., Chen, L., Liu, Y., Cai, W., Cao, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112890</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112890</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigating the impact of residual refraction within {+/-}1.0 dioptre on uncorrected distance visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112890</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112890</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113096?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Application of process mining in healthcare logistics: a systematic literature review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113096?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Healthcare logistics involves the coordination of resources, services and infrastructure to ensure timely and efficient care delivery. Process mining offers data-driven insights into logistical workflows such as patient transport, inventory management and scheduling. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on the application of process mining in healthcare logistics, focusing on its impact on operational efficiency, resource utilisation and service delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic search will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science and ABI/Inform for studies published from 1999 onward. Eligible studies will include observational studies, case reports, conference papers and meta-analyses focusing on process mining applications to logistical processes in healthcare settings. Studies screening, data extraction and methodological quality assessment will be conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data will be extracted on key dimensions and performance indicators and will be presented in a structured format. A narrative synthesis will be conducted, and findings will be categorised and thematically analysed where appropriate. Primary outcomes include improvements in logistical efficiency, traceability, resource utilisation and sustainability. Secondary outcomes include implementation challenges, data integration issues and limitations in applying process mining techniques to logistical workflows.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The results of the systematic review will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. The data we will use do not include individual patient data, so ethical approval is not required.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251164812.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murazzano, L., Landa, P., Ghafourian Nasiri, M., Bergeron, F., Cote, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113096</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113096</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Application of process mining in healthcare logistics: a systematic literature review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113096</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113096</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113269?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping evidence on implementation research in oral health: a global scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113269?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Oral health is an integral part of overall health and well-being, yet oral diseases remain highly prevalent, affecting an estimated 3.7 billion people worldwide. The greatest burden arises from periodontitis, tooth loss and oral cancers, while untreated dental caries continue to be the most common condition globally. Despite advances in preventive technologies, community-based programmes and clinical innovations, the global burden of oral diseases has not proportionately declined. This highlights a persistent evidence&ndash;practice gap in oral health, where effective interventions have not been translated into routine practice at scale. Implementation research provides a valuable lens to understand how oral health interventions can be adopted, adapted and sustained in diverse real-world contexts. However, evidence on implementation strategies, frameworks and contextual factors in oral health remains fragmented, with no comprehensive synthesis to date.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A three-step search strategy will be applied to locate published and unpublished literature, including PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase and grey literature sources such as World Health Organisation and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publications, government and non-governmental organisation reports and academic theses. No date restrictions will be applied. Duplicates will be removed using Zotero. Following screening and full-text review in JBI SUMARI, data will be extracted using a predesigned tool and synthesised descriptively. Results will be presented in evidence tables and a narrative synthesis, supported by figures and thematic mapping of strategies, frameworks and contextual factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rao, A., James, A., Monga, N., Janakiram, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113269</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113269</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping evidence on implementation research in oral health: a global scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113269</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113269</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113575?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Central venous versus short midline catheter in difficult intravenous access patients: a randomised clinical pilot trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113575?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) are at increased risk of delays, discomfort and complications due to multiple failed intravenous access attempts. However, evidence comparing commonly used alternatives, short midline catheters (SMLs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) in this population is limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the feasibility of a larger randomised controlled trial comparing SMLs with CVCs in DIVA patients using predefined feasibility outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This trial was a pragmatic, open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled pilot trial with 1:1 randomisation. Participants were recruited from January to August 2025 with follow-up until September 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Ryhov County Hospital, Jo&#x0308;nko&#x0308;ping, a teaching county hospital in Sweden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult patients (&ge;18 years) with DIVA, requiring intravenous therapy for 4&ndash;29 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Patients received either a 10-cm SML in the upper arm or a single- or double-lumen CVC in the jugular or subclavian vein.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were feasibility criteria: eligibility, recruitment, retention, adherence, missing data and skin puncture attempts. Secondary outcomes included insertion and dwell time, and catheter complications (infection, thrombosis and malfunction).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 73 patients screened, 40 (55%) were eligible and 30 (75%) (15 males (50%); median (IQR) age, 73 (61&ndash;82) years) were randomised to receive SML (n=15) or CVC (n=15). Three patients in the SML group were not included in the data analysis due to one failed insertion and two incomplete follow-ups. Retention (93%), adherence (97%) and missing data (0%) fulfilled predefined thresholds. The only criterion not met was the number of skin puncture attempts, with 52% of patients requiring two or more. Median catheter dwell time was 5.5 days for SML and 4.0 days for CVC. Complication rates per 1000 catheter days were 101.4 for SML versus 9.1 for CVC, primarily due to a higher rate of malfunction in SML (58% versus 7%). No infections or thromboses were observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This pilot trial met all but one feasibility criterion, demonstrating that a larger randomised controlled trial is achievable. The findings highlight practical challenges, particularly related to puncture attempts and catheter performance, that should be addressed in the design of a definitive trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06719869">NCT06719869</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mellander, C., Seifert, S., Hammarskjo&#x0308;ld, F., Taxbro, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113575</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113575</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Central venous versus short midline catheter in difficult intravenous access patients: a randomised clinical pilot trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113575</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113575</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114287?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Support for Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals Seeking Vaginoplasty (STRIVE) study: protocol for a national randomised pragmatic trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114287?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Transgender and gender-diverse individuals often face significant barriers to accessing gender-affirming care, such as hormones and/or surgery, leading to poorer mental health, lower quality of life, and higher rates of substance use and suicidal ideation. Vaginoplasty, the most commonly sought genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS), is desired by over half of all trans women but has been performed in only a minority. This is due largely to limited surgeon availability and long wait times. Peer support has been shown to improve health outcomes and reduce stigma in marginalised populations, including trans communities, but has never been studied for efficacy during the perioperative period of GGAS. Building on priorities identified by multi-stakeholder engagement from the Transgender &amp; Non-Binary Surgery Allied Research Collective, the Support for Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals Seeking Vaginoplasty (STRIVE) study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a centralised peer support and education intervention for patients seeking vaginoplasty, addressing a critical gap in perioperative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The STRIVE Study is a pragmatic, multi-site randomised controlled trial enrolling trans adults seeking full depth vaginoplasty. Participants are randomised to one of two arms; enhanced usual care, or a facilitated group intervention. The primary outcome is coping self-efficacy at 6 months, with a secondary outcome of surgical readiness. Primary analysis uses an intention-to-treat approach with linear mixed effects modelling, adjusting for selected baseline values and site. The feasibility evaluation data collected via qualitative interviews will be analysed thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approvals were granted by the primary site&rsquo;s Institutional Review Board on 10 May 2024 (STUDY00026957). The trial was registered on 24 May 2024. Results will be published in open access journals and made available to community members in plain language formats.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06436560">NCT06436560</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sage, L., Hart, E., Meyer, N., Hnilicka, O., Penkin, A., Poteat, T. C., Aguayo-Romero, R., Comstock, B. A., STRIVE Publications Committee, Dy, G. W., Blasdel, Corman, Deutsch, Gallo, Gore, Marsiglio, Sevelius, Solo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T10:06:34-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114287</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114287</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support for Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals Seeking Vaginoplasty (STRIVE) study: protocol for a national randomised pragmatic trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114287</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096952?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: a German real-world study with focus on treatment changes, effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes (ESCALATE-RA)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096952?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify predictors of treatment changes and to evaluate the effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating tofacitinib in a real-world setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The non-interventional study ESCALATE-RA included 1518 patients with RA from Germany. RA treatment, including all changes in therapy, was documented for 24 months starting from the initial intake of tofacitinib.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients started with tofacitinib therapy, either as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate (MTX).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The impact of several factors of interest on the number and timing of treatment changes was assessed as primary outcome using Cox proportional hazards models. Further outcomes were tofacitinib drug survival and the use of follow-up disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs after first treatment change. We also assessed the effectiveness, concomitant glucocorticoid (GC) use, PROs (such as functional ability, patient satisfaction, pain and quality of life) and safety. Analyses were based on observed data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>&lsquo;Lack of efficacy&rsquo; (HR 3.30) and &lsquo;intolerance&rsquo; (HR 4.43) leading to termination of tofacitinib were key factors favouring therapy changes. Higher patient satisfaction was significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of treatment changes (HR 0.82). Increasing GC doses were associated with a higher probability of step-up/switch changes (HR 1.21). The estimated tofacitinib drug survival was 48% at the end of study. Proportions of patients achieving low disease activity (both Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 62%) and remission (SDAI 25%, CDAI 28%) increased from baseline under tofacitinib and were comparable between monotherapy and combination therapy with MTX. Mean concomitant GC dose decreased (2 mg/day). PROs indicated reduced pain and fatigue, while functional ability and quality of life improved. 63.9% of the patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), 8.8% a treatment-emergent AE of special interest and deaths occurred in 0.5%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Key factors for therapy changes in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib were lack of efficacy and intolerance. Higher patient satisfaction was associated with a reduced probability of treatment changes, while increased GC doses led to a higher likelihood of step-ups/switches. Patients demonstrated a marked reduction in disease activity for up to 24 months, along with improvements in functional ability, pain and quality of life. Observed AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of tofacitinib.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT03387423">NCT03387423</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krueger, K., Behrens, F., Brandt-Juergens, J., Detert, J., Feuchtenberger, M., Prothmann, U., Behmer, O., Hsieh, M.-J. M., Jobst, J., Klaus, P., Meng, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096952</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096952</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: a German real-world study with focus on treatment changes, effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes (ESCALATE-RA)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096952</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096952</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Awake suction tracheal extubation using a tracheal tube as a suction catheter: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103123?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>During recovery from general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation, the tracheal extubation is a necessary step. 22% of anaesthesia-related complications occur after extubation. In a few patients, the hypoxic brain injury and death may occur. Inflation and suction techniques are two common techniques for tracheal extubation; however, it is unclear which technique is superior. In our practice, the suction tracheal extubation is typically performed via a suction catheter, and the tracheal and oropharyngeal secretions are often not completely cleared. Additionally, cough often occurs. When a suction catheter is substituted with a tracheal tube, the clearance of tracheal and oropharyngeal secretions seems to improve. In addition, even without prior tracheal and oropharyngeal suctions before tracheal extubation, the tracheal and oropharyngeal secretions can be effectively cleared when a tracheal tube is used as a suction catheter. This study was designed to investigate the use of tracheal tubes as suction catheters in awake suction tracheal extubation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, single-blinded, prospective, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial will include 600 patients (aged 18&ndash;65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists score &lt;grade III) who will undergo elective surgery. All participants will receive general anaesthesia and be randomly divided into four groups: Inflation, Suction<SUB>suction catheter</SUB>, Suction<SUB>tracheal tube-1</SUB> and Suction<SUB>tracheal tube-2</SUB> groups. In the Inflation group, a positive airway pressure will be given via the anaesthesia machine during awake tracheal extubation. In the Suction<SUB>suction catheter</SUB> group, negative pressure suction will be implemented during awake tracheal extubation by inserting a suction catheter into the trachea. In the Suction<SUB>tracheal tube-1</SUB> and Suction<SUB>tracheal tube-2</SUB> groups, negative pressure suction will be applied during awake tracheal extubation by directly connecting the tracheal tube with a negative pressure suction device. In the Inflation, Suction<SUB>suction catheter</SUB> and Suction<SUB>tracheal tube-1</SUB> groups, the tracheal and oropharyngeal suctions under anaesthesia state will be carried out before cuff deflation and removal of the tracheal tube. In the Suction<SUB>tracheal tube-2</SUB> group, the tracheal and oropharyngeal suctions will not be performed. The primary outcome is the incidence of blood oxygen saturation &lt;92% within 10 min after tracheal extubation. The secondary outcomes include the dose of general anaesthetics, the duration of surgery and anaesthesia, the duration in the postanaesthesia recovery room (PACU), the length of hospital stay, the airway complications before leaving the PACU, the respiratory intervention before leaving the PACU and the postoperative complications within 3 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzho University of Chinese Medicine (Permit No. K2022-162-01, Chairperson Professor Mingzhen Xu) on 17 October 2022 and was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (<A HREF="https://www.chictr.org.cn/usercenter.aspx">https://www.chictr.org.cn/usercenter.aspx</A>) on 18 November 2022 (identifier ChiCTR2200065904). The study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, professional societies and meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2200065904.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wen, G., Xu, Y., Yu, Y., Pu, Y., Gu, C., Dai, L., Huang, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Awake suction tracheal extubation using a tracheal tube as a suction catheter: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103123</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103384?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of communication disorder status on risk for eleven common health conditions in the All of Us Research Program in the USA: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103384?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine if communication disorders (1) increase the risk for common mental and physical health conditions and (2) if risk varies by age of onset (&le;25 years (developmental) or &gt;25 years (acquired)) by using the large-scale All of Us Research Program participant-reported survey data to electronic health records (EHR) data. We hypothesised that adults with a communication disorder would have a higher risk of mental and physical health conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary analysis of EHR and online surveys conducted in the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We assessed 410 360 US adults enrolled in the All of Us Research Program from August 2023 to May 2024 for study eligibility. We used medical diagnosis of a communication disorder from EHR data to group participants into communication disorder (CD) and typical communication (TC) groups, and age of first diagnosis to assign to age of onset (&le;25 years (developmental) or &gt;25 years (acquired)) groups. 234 519 participants (median (IQR) age 57.00 (41.00, 68.00); 3700 (1.6%) qualified for the CD group) were included in the analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome measures were diagnosis of 11 common mental and physical health conditions from EHR data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Multiple logistic regression models with propensity score weighting revealed that participants with CD had higher odds for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, asthma, cancer, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, depression, diabetes and hypertension. Estimates for chronic kidney disease (acquired: adjusted OR (AOR), 1.89 (1.62, 2.20); developmental: AOR, 1.26 (0.42, 3.82)), diabetes (acquired: AOR, 1.64 (1.49, 1.81); developmental: AOR, 1.51 (0.95, 2.41)), hypertension (acquired: AOR, 2.02 (1.85, 2.19); developmental: AOR, 1.16 (0.80, 1.68)) and substance use (acquired: AOR, 1.76 (1.47, 2.12); developmental: AOR, 1.08 (0.65, 1.82)) varied by age of onset. Confounding factors are controlled in the analysis, such as age, income, employment, enrolment, sex at birth, gender identity and US census division.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our study demonstrates that adults with CD experience health disparities compared with adults with TC, and that these disparities vary by age of onset of CD.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lancaster, H. S., Nayak, S., Buttner, A., Davis, T. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103384</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103384</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of communication disorder status on risk for eleven common health conditions in the All of Us Research Program in the USA: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103384</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103384</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103989?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction and their associated factors among older adults with heart failure: a prospective observational study in selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103989?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment satisfaction and associated factors among older adults with acute heart failure in Northwest Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective, multicentre observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Three tertiary hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia provide secondary and tertiary care services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 422 patients aged &ge;60 years with a confirmed diagnosis of acute heart failure were consecutively enrolled between December 2024 and April 2025. Patients with unstable psychiatric conditions or advanced kidney disease were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>HRQoL was assessed using the WHO Quality of Life &ndash; Brief Version questionnaire, and treatment satisfaction was measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). Multiple linear regression identified factors associated with HRQoL and treatment satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>95% of participants reported moderate HRQoL, and 3% reported poor HRQoL. Weight loss was positively associated with HRQoL (&beta;=1.52; 95% CI 0.04 to 3.07; p=0.021), whereas asthma was negatively associated with HRQoL (&beta; = &ndash;3.28; 95% CI 6.94 to 0.37; p=0.001). Regarding treatment satisfaction, 65% of patients were moderately satisfied, with notable concerns regarding medication safety and overall experience. Rural residents reported lower satisfaction than urban residents (&beta; = &ndash;0.20; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.05; p=0.007). Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III had higher satisfaction (&beta;=0.25; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.45; p=0.016). Effective hypertension management was linked to increased satisfaction (&beta;=0.20; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.37; p=0.026), whereas coronary heart disease was associated with lower satisfaction (&beta; = &ndash;0.40; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88; p=0.012).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Among older adults with heart failure in Northwest Ethiopia, 98% reported moderate to low HRQoL. Asthma and polypharmacy negatively affected HRQoL, whereas weight loss was positively associated with HRQoL. An NYHA class III status and well-managed hypertension improved treatment satisfaction, whereas rural residency and coronary heart disease were associated with lower satisfaction. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance outcomes and QoL in this vulnerable population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarekegn, G. Y., Dagnew, F. N., Wondm, S. A., Anberbr, S. S., Tamene, F. B., Tsega, S. S., Asmare, Z. A., Zeleke, T. K., Dagnew, S. B., Zerihun, T. E., Kassaw, A. T., Mussie, D. A., Melese, T. B., Moges, T. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103989</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103989</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction and their associated factors among older adults with heart failure: a prospective observational study in selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103989</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103989</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Upper limb amputations in Germany: a nationwide retrospective study of incidence, aetiologies and revision patterns from 2019 to 2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To provide a nationwide epidemiological assessment of upper limb amputations (ULAs) in Germany, including incidence trends, underlying aetiologies, amputation levels and revision patterns, with a comparative analysis between 2019 and 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nationwide retrospective cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected inpatient hospital data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All acute-care hospitals in Germany reporting to the national Diagnosis-Related Groups and Operation and Procedure Classification System (OPS) from 2019 to 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients undergoing ULA procedures (OPS 5-862 and 5-863) or revision procedures (OPS 5-866) within the study period. No exclusion criteria were applied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary measures were annual incidence of ULAs, the distribution of amputation levels and underlying medical aetiologies. Secondary measures included the incidence of revision procedures and revision aetiologies stratified by anatomical level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>A total of 5427 ULAs were performed in 2023, representing a 7.3% decrease compared with 2019 (5,852). Distal amputations remained most frequent, though proximal amputations increased proportionally over time. Above-wrist amputations were predominantly associated with malignancy (40.3%) and vascular disease (23.7%), whereas distal amputations were mainly trauma-related (43.6%). Infection-related distal amputations increased from 23.4% in 2019 to 30.4% in 2023. Revision procedures occurred in 32.4% of proximal amputations and 6.1% of distal amputations in 2023. Infection was the most common indication for distal revisions (53.3%), while infection and neuroma formation each accounted for 29.4% of proximal revisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This nationwide analysis provides a comprehensive epidemiological overview of ULAs in Germany, demonstrating stable overall incidence but clear level-specific differences in underlying aetiologies. Proximal amputations were mainly associated with malignant and vascular disease, whereas trauma predominated at distal levels. High rates of infection-related and neuroma-related revisions, particularly after proximal amputations, highlight the complexity of surgical management and the need for level-specific perioperative and follow-up strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdo, B., Lips, K. S., Walter, N., El Khassawna, T., Biehl, C., Heiss, C., Rupp, M., Knapp, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104567</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104567</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Upper limb amputations in Germany: a nationwide retrospective study of incidence, aetiologies and revision patterns from 2019 to 2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104567</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104871?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disability severity transitions in the community-dwelling Swiss ageing population: secondary analysis of the Swiss version of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) using multistate models]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104871?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To describe disability severity transitions in the ageing population in Switzerland using an overall functioning score to define four disability severity states (no, mild, moderate and severe) and death, and to investigate the association of multimorbidity and further predictors with these transitions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Secondary analysis of the Swiss version of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Switzerland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Community-dwelling population aged 50+ with at least two interviews in SHARE (N=3505).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures and methods</st>
<p>Primary outcome measures are the disability severity as assessed by a previously developed overall functioning score, and death status as assessed by the SHARE end-of-life interview. Transition analysis between disability severity states and death was conducted using multistate Markov models. The association between predictor variables and transition intensities was quantified using the proportional hazards assumption. Two distinct operationalisations of multimorbidity (count, burden) were used and analysed according to two separate models (A, B).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The findings for both models were similar: Estimated HRs for transition intensities suggest that being multimorbid or having a higher disease burden score increases the risk of transitioning to higher disability severity states and death for most transitions (HRs between 0.90 and 2.34 for model A compared with not being multimorbid; HRs between 0.95 and 1.46 for model B for a one-point increase in the disease burden score). In addition, most transitions to higher disability severity states and death are more likely for higher age (HRs between 1.00 and 1.14 for model A, and between 1.00 and 1.15 for model B for a 1 year increase in age), and transitions to death are less likely for women, compared with men (HRs between 0.34 and 0.88 for model A, and between 0.38 and 0.71 for model B).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study is a first attempt to understand disability severity transitions in the older population in Switzerland. Although we believe that such an approach is suitable to inform resource allocation to LTC, rehabilitation and prevention, more detailed information on contextual factors will be important to consider for future research. Moreover, our study contributes to the discussion on how to operationalise multimorbidity in healthy ageing research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hodel, J., Rothacher, Y., Moreira, B., Fellinghauer, C., Pacheco Barzallo, D., Weisstanner, D., Ehrmann, C., Sabariego, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104871</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104871</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disability severity transitions in the community-dwelling Swiss ageing population: secondary analysis of the Swiss version of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) using multistate models]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104871</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104871</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105308?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mental Health First Aid training for Chile and Argentina: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105308?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Community support for individuals with mental health problems is a global public health issue. Poor mental health literacy and high levels of stigmatising attitudes among the general population can hinder both help-seeking behaviours and limit the capacity of community members to provide support to people experiencing mental health challenges. The Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training course was created to educate community members to provide initial help towards a person developing a mental health problem. MHFA training has spread to high-income countries, but there is relatively little research on cultural adaptation to lower-resource settings. This study aims to fill that gap and is the first cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) assessing the effectiveness of MHFA training in Chile and Argentina.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study involves a two-arm wait-list cRCT with 240 participants (120 in each country). The study will be conducted in three settings in each of Chile and Argentina (eg, universities, health services and workplaces). Two clusters per setting in each country will be paired and randomly allocated to the intervention (the MHFA training for Chile and Argentina) or the wait-list control group. Participants in the intervention arm will be asked to complete questionnaires at baseline (T1), after training completion (T2) and 6 months after completion (T3), with control arm participants completing data collection at corresponding time points. The primary outcome will be intended support towards someone experiencing a mental health problem or experiencing a mental health crisis. Secondary outcome measures will include the ability to recognise depression and psychosis in vignettes; beliefs about the helpfulness of different types of interventions and helping actions, confidence in providing MHFA and stigmatising attitudes towards a person with depression or psychosis. Findings will demonstrate whether the culturally adapted MHFA training for Chile and Argentina can effectively enhance intended support, knowledge, attitudes and supportive actions towards other individuals within the community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval has been granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Melbourne (Australia), Proyecto Suma (Argentina) and the University of Chile (Chile). Dissemination will be via academic publications and conference presentations. These will also be made available to participants and other interested parties on request.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN63724445">ISRCTN63724445</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agrest, M., Encina-Zuniga, E., Ardila-Gomez, S., Fernandez, M. A., Gabriel, R., Bargamian, J., Alvarado, R., Morgan, A. J., Kelly, C. M., Reavley, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105308</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105308</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mental Health First Aid training for Chile and Argentina: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105308</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106184?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Racial and Socioeconomic Determinants of Major Adverse Liver Outcomes in Patients with Coexisting Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Chronic Liver Disease: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106184?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with worse major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Although the interplay between these conditions is recognised, the contribution of external factors such as race and socioeconomic status (SES) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association of race and socioeconomic factors with MALO in patients with IBD and CLD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This retrospective cohort study analysed hospitalised adults with IBD and CLD using the National Inpatient Sample database (2015&ndash;2021). Demographic variables included age, sex and race. SES included household income. Clinical variables included length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality and comorbidities. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the independent associations between MALO and patient demographics, comorbidities and social determinants of health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 97 628 hospitalised adult patients with IBD, 4.11% (4011/97 628) had secondary CLD. The majority of patients with IBD-CLD were white (74.94% or 2928/3907), and over half (53.83% or 2118/3934) resided in lower-income households with incomes below US$35 000. Racial disparities were evident, with significant differences in comorbidities such as sepsis, cholangitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Among white patients, the prevalence of depression and anxiety was 20.18% (591/2928) and 24.21% (709/2928), respectively, which was higher compared with other racial groups. In adjusted analyses, African American race (OR 1.42, p=0.003) and lowest SES (OR 1.19, p=0.04) were independently associated with increased odds of MALO.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>African American race and lower SES are independently associated with higher odds of MALO in patients with IBD-CLD. These findings highlight disparities that warrant further investigation and suggest that targeted interventions may help improve liver-related outcomes. Interventions reducing health inequities are desperately needed to mitigate disparities in this patient population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vo, K., Sierra, L., Amador-Martinez, K., Duong, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106184</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106184</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Racial and Socioeconomic Determinants of Major Adverse Liver Outcomes in Patients with Coexisting Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Chronic Liver Disease: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106184</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107490?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of symptoms at heart failure diagnosis with hospitalisation and mortality at 6 and 12 months: a retrospective cohort study using UK primary care health records]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107490?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>We investigated symptoms reported before and after heart failure (HF) diagnosis and their associations with 3-month hospitalisation and mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine associations between symptoms recorded in primary care and short-term hospitalisation and mortality in HF patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Landmark analysis using Royston-Parmar survival models at baseline (diagnosis), 6 and 12 months post-diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care database (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) linked to hospital and mortality data (1998&ndash;2020).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults (&gt;40 years) with a first HF diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Exposures</st>
<p>Shortness of breath, ankle swelling, oedema, fatigue, chest pain, depression and anxiety in the 3 months before diagnosis and at 6 and 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>3-month all-cause hospitalisation and mortality; secondary outcomes included HF and non-cardiovascular hospitalisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 86 882 HF patients (62 742 and 54 555 surviving to 6 and 12 months, respectively), the magnitude of symptom risk varied by timepoint. Specifically, the symptoms with the strongest associations with adverse outcomes were: depression for all-cause hospitalisation at diagnosis (HR: 1.26; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.39) and 6 months (1.46; 1.25 to 1.70); ankle swelling for mortality (1.49; 1.14 to 1.94) at 6 months and SOB for HF hospitalisation (1.18; 1.12 to 1.26) at diagnosis and 12 months (1.99; 1.68 to 2.35).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Symptoms persisted and were more prominent at 6 and 12 months post-diagnosis than at diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali, M. R., Lam, C. S. P., Stromberg, A., Hand, S. P. P., Booth, S., Zaccardi, F., McCann, G. P., Khunti, K., Lawson, C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107490</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107490</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of symptoms at heart failure diagnosis with hospitalisation and mortality at 6 and 12 months: a retrospective cohort study using UK primary care health records]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107490</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107490</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109015?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence, prevalence and mortality of anorexia nervosa in individuals with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Sweden]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109015?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the incidence, prevalence and mortality of anorexia nervosa (AN) among individuals with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared with matched controls in Sweden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective nationwide cohort study using linked registry data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Nationwide, Sweden; population-based registers (covering the period 1977&ndash;2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 202 individuals diagnosed with T1D before age 15 years (5618 females; 6584 males) and 48 484 age-matched, sex-matched and municipality-matched controls without diabetes (23 618 females; 24 866 males).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>AN diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases-10 codes F50.0 and F50.1) identified via the National Patient Register. Outcomes were period prevalence, point prevalence at ages 15 and 20 years, 10-year incidence rates and proportional mortality ratios (PMR), stratified by sex. ORs and incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% CIs were estimated using Mantel-Haenszel methods; Kaplan-Meier analysis compared time to AN diagnosis between groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The period prevalence of AN among females with T1D was 1.9% compared with 1.1% in controls (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.06; p&lt;0.001). The 10-year incidence rate for females with T1D was 74.7 per 100 000 person-years vs 45.2 per 100 000 person-years in controls (IRR 1.77, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.32). Point prevalence at age 15 years was 0.87% (T1D) vs 0.53% (controls) (IRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.35), and at age 20 years was 1.73% (T1D) vs 1.11% (controls) (IRR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.99). The PMR for females with both T1D and AN compared with controls without either condition was 20.4 (95% CI 6.6 to 47.6). Male cases were few (n=4 in the T1D group; n=12 in controls).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Females with childhood-onset T1D in Sweden have an elevated risk of AN and markedly higher mortality when both conditions are present. Despite the increased relative risk, the absolute risk of AN in females with T1D remained below 2%. These findings support routine screening for eating disorders in the T1D population, particularly among adolescent and young adult females.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sjo&#x0308;gren, M., Englund, E., Erlandsson, A. A. E., Mo&#x0308;llsten, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109015</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109015</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence, prevalence and mortality of anorexia nervosa in individuals with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Sweden]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109015</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109015</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109285?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding cognitive dysfunction in depression: perspectives and practices of UK health and social care professionals, a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109285?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore how health and social care professionals (HSCPs) in the UK conceptualise and respond to cognitive dysfunction in depression, including its potential long-term implications for brain health and dementia risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative, semi-structured interview study. Data was analysed using a code-book approach to thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>The study was conducted in the UK, with HSCPs from diverse professional backgrounds including general practitioner, psychology, psychiatry, mental health nursing, psychological well-being practitioner and occupational therapy. A total of 12 participants were recruited via purposive and convenience sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three master themes were developed, (1) Cognitive dysfunction in depression, (2) Persistence of cognitive dysfunction and (3) Depression and dementia risk. HSCPs expressed challenges in screening for cognitive dysfunction in depression, particularly as dementia-related screening tools were used which may not be sensitive enough to detect depression-related cognitive deficits. A number of potential explanations were reported as to why cognitive dysfunction may persist after mood symptoms have lifted. These included substance misuse, role of education, neurological conditions and depression as a prodrome to dementia. Depression as a potential risk factor for poorer brain health in the context of dementia risk reduction was not communicated in clinical settings to service users. Barriers to communication included lack of evidence base on depression as a potential risk factor, as well as lack of guidance on communication practices in the context of mental health issues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Cognitive dysfunction in depression is a complex phenomenon and remains under-explored. Challenges around identification and screening indicate a need for validation studies of cognitive screening measures for use in mood disorders, as well as pilot, acceptability and feasibility trials of interventions targeting cognitive functioning in mood disorders. Mixed-methods research is warranted to understand whether guidance on communicating depression as a risk factor for brain health is required and/or justified.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akhtar, A., Nwofe, E., Shafiq, S., Parveen, S., Windle, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109285</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109285</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding cognitive dysfunction in depression: perspectives and practices of UK health and social care professionals, a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109285</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond barriers: a qualitative evidence synthesis protocol of South Asian involvement in mental health research in high-income countries]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>There is a recognised need to provide equity in healthcare through inclusion of ethnic minorities in research. South Asians, the largest ethnic minority group in the UK, experience high levels of mental illness, often against the backdrop of socioeconomic deprivation and discrimination. The research community recognises that South Asian communities are often excluded from health research. Efforts have been made to understand the barriers and facilitators to their participation. However, the participation of individuals at the intersection of mental ill health and South Asian ethnicity remains understudied. This is a protocol for the synthesis of qualitative evidence from mental health research studies about participation, motivation and barriers to recruitment of South Asians in high-income countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will search 10 databases for qualitative evidence on participation of South Asian individuals in mental health research studies in high-income countries: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Health Management Information Consortium, Social Policy and Practice, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Citation Index. Search terms for the following five concepts will be used: (1) South Asia, (2) ethnic minority, (3) mental health conditions, (4) barriers and facilitators to participation and (5) high-income countries. No date restriction will be applied to the search. Searches will be limited to studies in the English language. Study selection and data extraction will be performed by two researchers independently, using Covidence. Demographic data, thematic outputs and salient discussion points will be extracted from final full-text inclusions and entered into NVivo for coding. Meta-ethnographic approaches using first and second-order constructs from included studies will be used to form third-order constructs. This synthesis will generate new knowledge regarding the intersectionality of mental health and South Asian ethnicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this study is a synthesis of published data. This review will provide new knowledge regarding the requirements for researchers and practitioners to advance the involvement of South Asian populations in mental health research. This will undoubtedly enhance equity in the long term, reduce the burden of mental disorders and enable the provision of more effective mental health care for South Asian communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42025626382.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khan, N. A., Coventry, P. A., Ali, H., Fulbright, H., Brown, J. V. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109567</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109567</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond barriers: a qualitative evidence synthesis protocol of South Asian involvement in mental health research in high-income countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109567</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110636?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Blood flow restriction during walking training in bilateral cerebral palsy (EMBRIN): a pilot feasibility study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110636?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Children with bilateral cerebral palsy (BCP) frequently develop progressive gait impairments driven in part by muscle weakness. Although power training, which involves high-velocity loaded movements, can enhance functional capacity, its substantial physical demands often limit feasibility in this population. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training has emerged as a promising alternative, capable of eliciting comparable physiological benefits while using low-intensity exercise. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety and clinical effects of integrating BFR with treadmill training in children with BCP, an innovative approach that may deliver the advantages of intensive strengthening while reducing physical burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre pilot study uses a double-baseline design with 13 participants with BCP (Gross Motor Function Classification System II-III), aged 8&ndash;18. The protocol consists of a 10-week usual care period followed by a 10-week Blood Flow Restriction Treadmill Training (BFR-TT) intervention, with three sessions per week. Feasibility targets were defined as completion of at least 80% of at least 80% of sessions. Safety is monitored through pain scales and adverse events. Outcomes assess body function (strength, GAITRite), activity (walking speed, walking endurance and motor function) and participation (daily activities), comparing changes between the usual care and BFR-TT periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the French Protection of Persons Committee (2024-A00791-46). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06533956">NCT06533956</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christiaens, A., Dinomais, M., Gilquin, V., Coelho, A., Carcreff, L., Loiez, A., Demas, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110636</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110636</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Blood flow restriction during walking training in bilateral cerebral palsy (EMBRIN): a pilot feasibility study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110636</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110636</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111127?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How threshold customisation affects the performance of a multiclass X-ray AI model for primary care triage: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111127?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe the structured process of threshold optimisation for a commercially available multiclass chest X-ray (CXR) deep learning model, to evaluate its diagnostic performance across different operating thresholds, and to estimate its potential operational impact within an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled triage workflow in a primary care setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective diagnostic performance evaluation with threshold-based analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care radiography services in Singapore, using data derived from two primary care clinics and a tertiary hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 816 adult frontal chest radiographs were included (multiethnic Asian, 464 males, 352 females; mean age 60.8 years). Images were selected to represent the spectrum of findings often encountered in primary care. Exclusion criteria included paediatric studies, lateral or oblique radiographs, and findings not supported by the AI model (eg, bony abnormalities and medical devices).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive value (NPV and PPV). Secondary outcomes included estimated potential operational improvement, which is calculated by dividing the number of true negatives by the total number of CXRs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At the default threshold of 0.15, the AI model achieved a sensitivity of 87.3% (95% CI 83.9% to 90.4%) and an NPV of 87.0% (95% CI 83.6% to 90.2%). Lowering the threshold to 0.10 increased sensitivity to 93.2% (95% CI 90.7% to 95.5%) and NPV to 91.3% (95% CI 88.2% to 94.3%), with specificity of 71.7% (95% CI 67.3% to 76.1%). These trade-offs were considered acceptable for a safety-focused co-triage workflow prioritising minimisation of false negatives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Threshold optimisation is critical for adapting AI models to context-specific clinical workflows. Our study shows that adjusting the operating threshold enabled prioritisation of sensitivity and NPV, supporting safe AI-assisted triage in primary care. This is a deeply collaborative process that must involve radiology and clinical teams: selecting appropriate thresholds aligned with clinical objectives for safe and effective implementation. Future work will assess real-world operational impact and user acceptance following prospective deployment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sim, J. Z. T., Lin, J., Fong, Q. W., Soon, A. Y. Q., Khin, L. W., Balakrishnan, S., Lin, T., Wong, S., Tan, C. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111127</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111127</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How threshold customisation affects the performance of a multiclass X-ray AI model for primary care triage: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111127</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111247?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Learning from patients about their experiences with early adoption of virtual care appointments in primary care in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111247?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The objective of this study was to examine patient experiences with virtual (telephone and video) encounters in primary care and make recommendations to inform the broader adoption of virtual care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews for data collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Ontario, Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Fifty-five primary care patients across Ontario, Canada, who had experienced at least one virtual (telephone or video) encounter with a healthcare provider in primary care, participated in semi-structured individual interviews conducted between 15 January 2021 and 22 March 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>With respect to patients&rsquo; experiences with virtual care appointments, we identified the following seven themes: (1) Enhancing access, (2) Importance of patient-provider relationship, (3) Active communication and attunement, (4) Assuring privacy and confidentiality, (5) Shorter appointments, (6) Asynchronous technologies being underutilised and (7) Strengthening the future of virtual care. Despite the rapid adoption of synchronous virtual care, participants generally reported positive experiences. Virtual care enhanced access to care and was overwhelmingly supported for continued use. While new patient-provider relationships faced challenges, pre-existing, positive relationships thrived. Concerns about the shortness of virtual care appointments were reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Virtual care offers a promising modality for patients to experience care. Moving forward, primary care practices should consider expanding options for asynchronous virtual care, consider the length of virtual care appointments and offer patients greater choice in the modality of their care appointments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashcroft, R., Dahrouge, S., Lam, S., Saluja, K., Jessa, H., Boudreault, A., Rayner, J., Dolovich, L., Brown, J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111247</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111247</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Learning from patients about their experiences with early adoption of virtual care appointments in primary care in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111247</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112539?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Linking everyday physical activity and capacity tests using wearable and mobile technologies in older adults and cardiac cohorts: protocol for a pilot observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112539?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This study investigates the potential of digital health technologies (DHTs), such as wearable devices and smartphones, to complement traditional submaximal functional capacity tests, such as the 6 min walk test (6MWT) and the timed up and go test (TUG). While these traditional tests are widely used due to their simplicity and relevance to daily living activities, they have limitations, including infrequent administration and the need for clinical observation. DHT offers continuous, real-world monitoring, which may accurately reflect patients&rsquo; health status and effectively inform clinical decisions. However, there is a need to establish the validity of the data and metrics computed through DHT and understand patient perspectives on using such technology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is an observational pilot study (Synergy Digital Health study) that aims at linking wearable data with traditional test outcomes and assessing participants&rsquo; acceptance and usage of such DHT. A cohort of 30 cardiovascular patients from Oxford University Hospitals, UK, and 30 community-dwelling elderly people from social centres in Helsingborg, Sweden, will use wearable devices for 2 months in free-living conditions, they will fill out technology acceptance questionnaires (AQs), have baseline assessments and perform physical tests such as the 6MWT and TUG using the Mobistudy smartphone app. Subgroups will participate in codesign workshops to identify experience-based design recommendations for the technology. Quantitative and qualitative methods will be adopted to analyse the collected data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol received ethical approval in Sweden from the Etikpro&#x0308;vningsmyndigheten (2024-04886-01) and in the UK from the National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committees (Iras project ID: 340870), in accordance with local regulations. All participants are asked for written informed consent. The results of the study will be shared via scientific journals and conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caramaschi, S., Maus, B., Olsson, C. M., Smedberg, D., Kristen, H., Whitehead, M., Orchard, E., Salvi, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112539</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112539</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Linking everyday physical activity and capacity tests using wearable and mobile technologies in older adults and cardiac cohorts: protocol for a pilot observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112539</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112539</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113227?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of acupuncture and mindfulness-based stress reduction for chronic non-specific low back pain: study protocol for a 2x2 factorial randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113227?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is a multifactorial disease involving physical dysfunction and psychological distress. Acupuncture and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) are two non-pharmacological therapies recommended by guidelines, which have been proven effective in improving the clinical symptoms of CNLBP. However, the efficacy of their combined use has yet to be explored. This study aims to explore whether the combination of acupuncture and MBSR would have different synergistic effects in patients with CNLBP compared with acupuncture or MBSR alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol describes a randomised controlled trial with a 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>2 factorial design involving 120 CNLBP patients. Participants will be randomly allocated to four groups: (1) acupuncture, (2) MBSR, (3) acupuncture combined with MBSR, and (4) health education. The intervention period is 6 weeks. The outcome measurements will include the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Tactile Acuity Test, Short-form of McGill Pain Questionnairethe(SF-MPQ); Roland-Morris Functional Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Oswestry Disability Index(ODI), the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the Regulatory Self-Efficacy Scale (RESE), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS);Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire(PSQ); Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI). All evaluations will be conducted at the baseline stage as well as 6 weeks and 4 months after the implementation of the intervention measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of the Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2024KY-041-04). The results of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ITMCTR2025000764.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, K., Chen, Y., Li, H., Zhan, X., Zhao, X., Zhou, J., Yang, J., Fu, S., Niu, Z., Liu, H., Jiang, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113227</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113227</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of acupuncture and mindfulness-based stress reduction for chronic non-specific low back pain: study protocol for a 2x2 factorial randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113227</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115466?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Prison (DECISION) care pathway and training package: protocol for a realist-informed mixed-methods feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115466?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Recent research indicates that around 8% of older people living in prison have signs or symptoms of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), yet the care they receive is not equivalent to care in the community and this means their needs may not be met. We co-developed an intervention specifically for older people living in prison with dementia/MCI (Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in prison care pathway and training package&ndash;DECISION). To date, this has not been implemented or evaluated. This paper presents our protocol for a study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of DECISION.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This is a non-randomised, realist-informed mixed-methods feasibility study with integrated process evaluation, which will take place in two prisons in England. The intervention was codeveloped with experts with lived experience. Participants will include older people living in prison, staff working in prison and peer supporters. We will assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention (eg, numbers eligible; rates of recruitment and retention), and the evaluation design (eg, completion rates of standardised outcome measures). Methods will include semistructured, realist-informed interviews; an audit to assess implementation fidelity; focused ethnography; training questionnaires; and collection of resource use data. We will refine the DECISION programme theory using realist-informed methods to examine and refine how contexts and mechanisms interact to produce the intervention&rsquo;s outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study received a favourable ethical opinion from the Wales REC 3 Research Ethics Committee in January 2025 (reference number 24/WA/0323). HMPPS National Research Committee approval was also granted in January 2025 (reference number 2024-1451). Findings will be disseminated through a range of avenues, including stakeholder engagement events, open-access papers, conference presentations, evidence briefings for commissioners, providers and practitioners, and newsletters for service users.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forsyth, K., Buck, D., Stalker, K., Allgar, V., Shaw, J., Cowley-Sharp, R., Hunter, R., Lennox, C., ONeill, A., Robinson, C., Ware, S., Robinson, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115466</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115466</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Prison (DECISION) care pathway and training package: protocol for a realist-informed mixed-methods feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115466</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115466</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111872corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: Does luteal phase support in MOH-IUI treatment improve cumulative live birth rates in couples with unexplained subfertility? Study protocol of the LUMO study: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111872corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Preesman E, Drechsel K, Crommelin H<I>, et al</I>. Does luteal phase support in MOH-IUI treatment improve cumulative live birth rates in couples with unexplained subfertility? Study protocol of the LUMO study: a centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2025;<b>15:</b>e111872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111872.</p>
<p>This article has been updated since it was first published. The study design in the title was incorrectly described as "a centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial".</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T05:16:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111872corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111872corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: Does luteal phase support in MOH-IUI treatment improve cumulative live birth rates in couples with unexplained subfertility? Study protocol of the LUMO study: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111872corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111872corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112336?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of the MAINTAIN intervention to support independence after a fall for people with dementia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial in participants own homes]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112336?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the MAINTAIN intervention, designed to support recovery and independence following a fall among people living with dementia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (c-RCT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-based healthcare services across six UK sites representing primary and secondary care settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>31 participant-carer dyads were recruited. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of dementia and a recent fall. Exclusion criteria included severe comorbidity precluding participation. The consent rate was 84%, and retention at follow-up was 81%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>The MAINTAIN intervention comprised tailored, home-based therapy sessions delivered by trained professionals, focusing on functional recovery, confidence and re-engagement in daily activities, compared with usual care. The intervention was delivered over 12 weeks with booster sessions up to week 24, with the full trial period lasting 28 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, intervention adherence and data completeness for outcome and economic measures. Exploratory outcomes assessed functional performance and quality of life. Feasibility outcomes were assessed at baseline, 12 weeks and 28 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Recruitment occurred over an 8-month period (September 2023&ndash;April 2024) across six UK sites. Most intervention participants (89%) attended at least 60% of planned sessions. Completion rates for outcome and economic data were high, indicating strong acceptability and feasibility of both the intervention and trial procedures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The pilot c-RCT demonstrated that recruitment, retention and intervention delivery were feasible and well accepted. Findings support progression to a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the MAINTAIN intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN16413728">ISRCTN16413728</A> (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greene, L., Connors, J., Hulme, C., Ukoumunne, O. C., Barber, R., Bingham, A., Conroy, S., Fox, C., Duff, C., Goodwin, V., Gordon, A. L., Hall, A. J., Harwood, R. H., Jackson, T., Litherland, R., Morgan-Trimmer, S., Parry, S. W., Sharma, A., Whale, B., Allan, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112336</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112336</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of the MAINTAIN intervention to support independence after a fall for people with dementia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial in participants own homes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112336</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112336</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112546?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of a mobile health intervention to motivate adolescent fitness and high-intensity exercise adherence (Motivating Adolescent Fitness (MOTAFIT)): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112546?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Most adolescents fail to achieve recommended levels of vigorous-intensity physical activity, despite the established benefits for cardiorespiratory fitness and vascular health. Supervised interventions can be effective, but are resource-intensive and lack scalability. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies may provide a cost-effective and accessible approach to support structured, individualised training for adolescents. The Motivating Adolescent Fitness (MOTAFIT) trial will assess the feasibility and acceptability of an mHealth-supported exercise intervention for adolescents to inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>MOTAFIT is a three-arm feasibility RCT targeting 120 adolescents aged 13&ndash;16 years from the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia. Participants will be randomised (1:1:1) to: (1) MOTAFIT, (2) active control or (3) control group. The 12-week intervention targets &ge;40 min/week of vigorous-intensity exercise (&ge;80% HRmax), co-designed with an exercise specialist and supported by mHealth technology. Primary outcomes for feasibility, including recruitment, retention, adherence, fidelity and acceptability, will be assessed as part of a process evaluation. Secondary measures (cardiorespiratory fitness, vascular health and blood pressure) will provide preliminary estimates to guide future sample size calculations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received approval from the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (H22-03183) and the University of Victoria Human Research Ethics Board. Parental consent and adolescent assent will be obtained prior to participation. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and community engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06409793">NCT06409793</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koep, J. L., Sansum, K. M., Low, J., Smith, K. J., Cocks, M., McManus, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112546</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112546</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of a mobile health intervention to motivate adolescent fitness and high-intensity exercise adherence (Motivating Adolescent Fitness (MOTAFIT)): protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112546</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112546</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112691?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is home-based self-swabbing feasible for postoperative wound culture after cardiac surgery? A multicentre mixed-methods feasibility study in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112691?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Poor access to surgical wound swabbing in the community often results in delayed or inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for surgical site infections. This delay can contribute to prolonged wound healing and poor antimicrobial stewardship. Patient self-swabbing at home could improve access to diagnostic testing, but its feasibility and acceptability remain unexplored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>TREASURE is a multicentre, mixed-methods feasibility study. A total of 40 patient participants and 10 staff stakeholders will be included. 40 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy will be recruited from Harefield Hospital (n=25) and the Royal Sussex County Hospital (n=15). Eligible participants will receive a coproduced self-swabbing set of instructions and kit at discharge and perform wound swabbing at home within 1&ndash;21 days, observed remotely by a researcher via Microsoft Teams. Swabs will be couriered to a central laboratory for bacterial culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing for pathogens.</p>
<p>The primary feasibility outcome is the proportion of patients successfully completing self-swabbing at home to obtain usable culture swabs with samples received at the laboratory within 24 hours and deemed suitable for processing. Secondary safety and acceptability outcomes include usability of the kit and instructions; patient satisfaction; viability of samples for laboratory analysis; and recruitment and retention rates. A 30-day follow-up will capture wound complications, antibiotic prescribing and healthcare utilisation via patient questionnaires, case note review, general practitioner confirmation and patient interviews. 10 staff stakeholders will be interviewed to inform pathway development.</p>
<p>Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, with proportions reported alongside 95% CIs. Qualitative data from patients will undergo thematic analysis, and stakeholder interviews will be coded using Normalisation Process Theory. An early health economic model will be developed to explore resource use, costs and proportions of appropriate and timely antibiotic use between current pathways and a proposed pathway, including self-swabbing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>West of Scotland Research Ethics Service has reviewed and approved the study (REC reference: 25/WS/0079). Findings will be disseminated through the study website, a webinar, peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, patient and public involvement-led activities and engagement with National Health Service (NHS) stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07200401">NCT07200401</inter-ref>, <inter-ref locator="ISRCTN28466609" locator-type="isrctn">ISRCTN28466609</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rochon, M., Tanner, J., Cariaga, K., Harris, R., Wilson, K., Newby, C., Kariwo, K., Sowole, L., Bolton, S. J., Bouttell, J., Ahmed, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112691</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112691</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pathology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is home-based self-swabbing feasible for postoperative wound culture after cardiac surgery? A multicentre mixed-methods feasibility study in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pathology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112691</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112691</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113370?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ecological momentary assessment of daily patient-reported outcomes and actigraphy-measured physical activity and sleep in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113370?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) are chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases characterised by pain, fatigue, mood disturbances, sleep problems and reduced quality of life. These symptoms are highly variable both between individuals and within individuals across days, reflecting the fluctuating nature of disease activity and daily functioning. Although physical activity is known to alleviate many of these symptoms, individuals with RA and SpA often encounter barriers that limit regular engagement. Capturing the dynamic interplay between symptoms and physical activity therefore requires methods that account for day-to-day and moment-to-moment variability. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA), especially when combined with actigraphy, enables real-time, context-sensitive monitoring of symptoms and physical activity in daily life. However, little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of such protocols in individuals with RA and SpA, for whom participant burden and adherence may represent significant challenges. This pilot study therefore aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a 14-day EMA protocol and to explore factors associated with objectively measured physical activity in individuals with RA and SpA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>50 adults diagnosed with RA or SpA will be recruited through rheumatology clinics or via advertisement. Eligible participants must be smartphone users without cognitive or physical impairments affecting participation. After providing consent, participants will complete baseline questionnaires regarding disease activity, quality of life, sleep, pain, fatigue, affective states and will attend a remote session with a member of the research team to learn how to use the mobile app. They will then complete a 14-day EMA protocol, during which data on patient-related outcomes (PROs), including pain, fatigue, sleep quality and affective states (i.e. positive and negative affects) will be assessed four times daily: upon awakening, 11:00, 15:00 and 20:30. Physical activity and sleep will be continuously monitored using both a wrist-worn and a thigh-worn device. Feasibility will be evaluated based on adherence to EMA prompts and actigraphy wear time. Acceptability will be assessed via a study-specific questionnaire and qualitative interviews conducted at the end of the protocol. Exploratory analyses will examine real-time, temporal and lagged relationships between PROs (pain, fatigue affective states), sleep and physical activity levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the French national ethics committee [<I>Comit&eacute; de protection des personnes Nord Ouest I, 2025-A01349-40</I>] on 24/07/2025. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07167784">NCT07167784</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aymard, N., Darmaillacq, A., Bailly, S., Kechichian, A., Baillieul, S., Bernardy, C., Gastaldi, R., Flore, P., Baillet, A., Mendelson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113370</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113370</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ecological momentary assessment of daily patient-reported outcomes and actigraphy-measured physical activity and sleep in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113370</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113370</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113842?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advancing Strategies to Optimise the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting (ASPIRE-PONV) study: rationale and design for a sequential, repeated crossover trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113842?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This project, in adult surgical patients, will evaluate whether the creation of a customised checklist, driven by a clinical decision support tool, is able to improve anaesthesia providers&rsquo; adherence to consensus guidelines and standardised practice recommendations for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The intervention will be evaluated using a sequential, repeated crossover design at the institutional level, with designated washout, control and intervention periods. The surgical case will serve as the unit of analysis. The primary outcome is adherence to appropriate PONV prophylaxis administration guidelines. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of PONV and length of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol and statistical analysis plan provide an outline of the study design, primary and secondary end points and analytic approach. The Advancing Strategies to Optimise the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting trial has received approval from the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB: 250773). The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national conferences. Findings from this trial will inform best practices for timely antiemetic prophylaxis, with the goal of reducing PONV incidence and shortening PACU stay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07152249">NCT07152249</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stallings, E. G., Wanderer, J. P., Balavage, M., Henson, C. P., Fowler, L., Eden, S., Shotwell, M. S., Gruss, C., Neuhafen, K. R., Gelfand, B. J., Kertai, M. D., for the ASPIRE-PONV Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113842</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113842</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advancing Strategies to Optimise the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting (ASPIRE-PONV) study: rationale and design for a sequential, repeated crossover trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113842</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113842</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e094491?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing recommendations for promoting wellbeing in individuals with alopecia areata: a modified Delphi study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e094491?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Develop recommendations for multidisciplinary, multisector care providers involved in supporting individuals with alopecia areata (AA) to promote their well-being of these individuals. AA is a condition that causes hair loss on the scalp and, for some, the head or whole body and is associated with difficulties in psychosocial adjustment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A modified Delphi consensus study with three rounds: round 1 was a qualitative survey to generate recommendations; round 2 involved a rating survey to work towards consensus on important items to retain and round 3 asked panellists from four different support roles to establish the most relevant items for their respective roles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The UK, across healthcare, charitable and private health and mental health sectors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Panellists held two forms of expertise. One group consisted of experts in support roles, comprising medical professionals (general practitioners and dermatologists), mental health professionals, peer facilitators and trichologists. All were selected due to their experience of working with individuals who have AA. The other group consisted of experts by experience, namely adults living with AA who had some experience of receiving support from the above care providers. 48 panellists contributed to round 1 (22 experts by support role, 29 experts by experience and 3 with dual roles), 46 to round 2 (21 experts by support role, 27 experts by experience and 3 with dual roles) and 23 experts by support role completed round 3.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data analysis</st>
<p>In round 1, data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. In round 2, panellists rated the importance of all recommendation items on a single 1&ndash;5 scale. Consensus was determined by &ge;80% agreement between panellists that items were moderately or very important.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Multiple candidate recommendations were generated from round 1, and following round 2, all but one were retained in the list presented in round 3. Items rated as relevant to all care providers in round 3 included &lsquo;Validate (and explore) the emotional impact of AA&rsquo;, &lsquo;Respect and work with individuals&rsquo; chosen coping strategies (where no clear harm is caused)&rsquo; and &lsquo;There should be a holistic, multi-support-role and multisector approach to psychological support&rsquo;. There was notable overlap in the recommendation principles generated across each support role, but the details of how these can be delivered by each group differed. There were also a number of unique recommendations for each support role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Medical professionals, mental health professionals, trichologists and peer support facilitators can each play a role in promoting the psychological well-being of individuals with AA. The distinct roles and skill sets of each group point to the need for a multidisciplinary approach to supporting the well-being of affected individuals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zucchelli, F., Montgomery, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094491</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-094491</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing recommendations for promoting wellbeing in individuals with alopecia areata: a modified Delphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e094491</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e094491</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096783?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oral fluoroquinolone use and the risk of aortic and mitral valve regurgitation: a nationwide cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096783?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to investigate whether oral fluoroquinolone use is associated with an increased risk of aortic and mitral valve regurgitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A nationwide cohort study based on linked healthcare register data encompassing patient characteristics, prescription data and cases of aortic and mitral valve regurgitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Sweden, 2006&ndash;2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Study participants were adults aged 18&ndash;75 years. 794 588 courses of fluoroquinolones (88% ciprofloxacin) propensity score-matched (1:1) to an equal number of courses of penicillin V.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Aortic or mitral valve regurgitation leading to ED visit, hospitalisation or death. Cox regression was used to estimate HRs for the first incident of valve regurgitation within 120 days of treatment initiation. Subgroup and supplementary analyses included sex, age, first episode, surgery or death only, 356-day follow-up and analysis using amoxicillin as comparator drug.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were 29 (incidence rate 0.5 per 1000 person-years) cases in the fluoroquinolone group compared with 43 (0.7 per 1000 person-years) cases in the penicillin V group during the main (1&ndash;30 days) follow-up period; corresponding to a HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.11). Analyses of subsequent time periods yielded results consistent with the main period: HR 1.06 (0.63&ndash;1.78) for days 31&ndash;60 and 0.90 (0.59&ndash;1.36) days 61&ndash;120. No significant differences were found in any of the subgroup- or supplementary analyses. The absolute risk difference was &ndash;17 (95% CI &ndash;33 to 6) cases of valve regurgitation per 1 000 000 courses of fluoroquinolones.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In a nationwide cohort study, there was no statistical support for an increase in the risk of mitral or aortic valve regurgitation associated with oral fluoroquinolone use.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nibell, O., Bjo&#x0308;rk, J., Inghammar, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096783</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096783</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oral fluoroquinolone use and the risk of aortic and mitral valve regurgitation: a nationwide cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096783</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096783</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e097011?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social support and its associated factors among people on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in three selected hospitals in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e097011?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Social support is an important factor for psychosocial well-being and motivation to follow the treatment strictly in people with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). Thus, this study aimed to determine the availability of social support and its association factors in people with DR-TB in selected hospitals in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Addis Ababa (at Saint Peter and ALERT hospitals) and Bishoftu Hospital in Ethiopia. The study involved 130 people with DR-TB from January to May 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All adult people on DR-TB treatment for at least 2 months were enrolled consecutively from the registration book. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Data were entered to Open Data Kit and analysed with SPSS V.22. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the participants. A linear regression model was used to assess factors associated with social support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome</st>
<p>Availability of social support from different sources.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall proportion of availability of social support obtained from different sources was 97.7% with 95% CI of (93.1% to 99.5%). Sex (&beta;=0.61, 95% CI (0.28 to 0.94); p&lt;0.001), marital status (&beta;=0.59, 95% CI (0.26 to 0.93); p=0.001) and patient self-stigma score (&beta;=0.60, 95% CI (0.42 to 0.78); p&lt;0.001) were significantly associated with social support score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A considerable proportion of people with DR-TB were obtaining social support from different sources. Interventions targeted female sex, single marital status and perceived social stigma are required to enhance social support conditions in people with DR-TB.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bedada, T. D., Bejiga, B., Gemtesa, D. F., Gutema, G., Abebe, S., Tola, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097011</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097011</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social support and its associated factors among people on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in three selected hospitals in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097011</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097011</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098301?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experiences of healthcare providers, survivors and caregivers with hospital-to-home stroke transitional care in Tanzania: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098301?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore experiences of healthcare providers, stroke survivors and caregivers on stroke transitional care delivery at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative descriptive design with a phenomenological approach was used. Colaizzi&rsquo;s thematic analysis was conducted using Dedoose software to identify significant information that describes the transitional care experiences of the study participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted in the internal medicine and outpatient departments of a tertiary hospital in Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>15 triads of healthcare providers, stroke survivors and caregivers were purposively recruited to participate in semi-structured in-depth interviews between June and September 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analysis identified four themes: communication and exchange of information, involvement of patients and caregivers in transitional care, coordination of transitional care and experiences with changing care setting. Effective communication and information exchange among healthcare providers, survivors and caregivers ensured that survivors and their caregivers were well informed about the care process, clinical condition, prognosis and transitional care needs. A collaborative care approach enabled survivors and caregivers to actively participate in care, decision-making and discharge planning during hospital-to-home transition. Coordination of care was equally important during hospital-to-home transition as it provided survivors with home-care instructions and opportunities for follow-up care. However, miscommunication among the healthcare team, insufficient information exchange, inadequate discharge planning, poor social support and lack of care coordination prevented smooth hospital-to-home transition leading to a crisis at home.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The experiences of healthcare providers, patients and caregivers during stroke transitional care in Tanzania highlight achievements and key areas for improvement. Hospital-to-home transition is often characterised by uncertainty and emotional strain, emphasising the need for effective communication, involving patients and caregivers in care, as well as coordinating transitional care to address medical and psychosocial needs of survivors and their caregivers during and after discharge.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael, N. A., Mselle, L. T., Bureta, C. A., Tarimo, E. M., Cao, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098301</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098301</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experiences of healthcare providers, survivors and caregivers with hospital-to-home stroke transitional care in Tanzania: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098301</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098301</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099348?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a biomarker discovery study to identify correlates of risk for future tuberculosis disease progression in South African children (INTREPID)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099348?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Young children and children living with HIV are at high risk of progressing to tuberculosis (TB) disease following <I>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</I> (<I>Mtb</I>) exposure and infection, and also of developing severe forms of disease and TB-related mortality. Identifying children who have very early (sub-clinical) TB disease, prior to progression to clinically apparent TB, would mean that TB preventive treatment (TPT) could be more efficiently targeted to this group. Identifying biomarker changes on drug therapy in children with <I>Mtb</I> infection or very early disease could pave the way for the development of tests that can identify which children have viable bacilli and are therefore at increased risk of disease progression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The INTREPID study will use already collected samples taken from well-phenotyped paediatric cohorts in three clinical studies conducted in South Africa in children &lt;5 years, including a drug-resistant TPT trial (TB-CHAMP), an observational household contact study (interferon-gamma release assay studies) and a prospective diagnostic study (Umoya), all conducted in a setting with a high burden of TB and HIV. We will employ transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic and serology approaches to analyse changes in host blood profiles at every stage along the TB continuum, from <I>Mtb</I> exposure to disease and from children treated for <I>Mtb</I> infection and early TB disease, as well as targeted <I>Mtb</I> antibody analysis. Data on viral co-infections and relevant clinical and epidemiological parameters will be integrated and evaluated to identify the optimal biosignatures that can predict future progression to clinically overt disease in children below 5 years of age, including those living with HIV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol received ethical approval from the Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee (N23/03/025). The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and formal presentations to healthcare professionals and to local communities, in collaboration with the Desmond Tutu TB Centre Community Advisory Board.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton, M. S., Derks, I. P., Kaforou, M., Dunbar, R., McNamara, R. P., Fortune, S. M., Basu-Roy, R., van Deventer, A., Bosch, C., Dunican, C., van der Zalm, M. M., Levin, M., Schaaf, H. S., Altin, J. A., Hesseling, A. C., Seddon, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099348</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099348</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a biomarker discovery study to identify correlates of risk for future tuberculosis disease progression in South African children (INTREPID)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099348</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099348</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101295?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Circadian patterns of patient symptoms in a tertiary university emergency department: a single-centre retrospective analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101295?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate emergency patient care from a chronophysiological perspective, examining circadian variations in symptom presentations and physiological parameters.</p>
<p>Single-centre retrospective analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Department of Emergency Medicine, Clinical Centre, University of P&eacute;cs, Hungary (August 2022 to August 2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patient data including symptom categories, time of presentation (divided into eight 3-hour intervals), sex and age were collected. A total of 32 977 patient records were analysed. Symptoms were classified using the <I>International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision</I>. For hypertension, random proportionally stratified sampling was performed (n=120).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were the circadian distribution of emergency presentations across 14 symptom categories and their variation by time of day, age and sex. Secondary outcomes included diurnal variation in hypertension-related cases, examining blood pressure, pulse rate, triage time and medication use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Cardiovascular cases peaked between 09:00 and 12:00 (p&lt;0.001), toxicological emergencies between 18:00 and 21:00 (p&lt;0.001) and endocrine&ndash;metabolic cases between 12:00 and 15:00 (p&lt;0.001). In hypertensive patients, the lowest systolic pressure occurred between 12:00 and 15:00 (p=0.037). More patients presented on weekdays than weekends (p=0.013).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Symptom presentations in emergency care follow distinct circadian patterns, highlighting the influence of biological rhythms on clinical demand. Recognition of these temporal trends may support more effective ED scheduling and resource allocation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fusz, K., Deak, A., Zavodi, P., Jonas, B., Szilber, V. D., Kanizsai, P. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101295</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101295</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Circadian patterns of patient symptoms in a tertiary university emergency department: a single-centre retrospective analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101295</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of an educational video to support guideline panels in incorporating patient values and preferences into recommendation-making: qualitative one-on-one interviews and brainstorming meetings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to develop an educational video introducing an innovative panel survey approach to facilitate guideline panels in making inferences about patient values and preferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A user testing of the educational video through one-on-one interviews and iterative refinement of the video through brainstorming meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Interviews and brainstorming meetings were conducted through Zoom.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The participants of the interviews include guideline panellists who had used the panel survey approach, and guideline panellists who had not used the approach but would or would not participate in a panel survey soon. The participants of the brainstorming meetings were a steering committee with expertise in guideline methodology and qualitative research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The understandability and usefulness of the educational video.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We interviewed 18 guideline panellists from eight different guideline panels, all of whom carefully reviewed the video. Most participants found the video useful in explaining the panel survey approach and its role in incorporating patient values and preferences. Participants suggested improvements, including clarifying key concepts and using plain language instead of technical terminology to make the content more accessible. The major change the steering committee decided to make through brainstorming meetings was to add clarification, refine the wording and replace some text with animation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>User testing resulted in an improved educational video that is more useful and understandable for guideline panellists. Wider implementation of this resource has the potential to enhance the incorporation of patient values and preferences in guideline recommendations, supporting more patient-centred decision-making.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeng, L., Li, R., Li, S.-A., Clarissa, S., Agoritsas, T., Chen, J., Li, X., Vandvik, P. O., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Li, X., Zhang, L., Guyatt, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101468</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101468</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of an educational video to support guideline panels in incorporating patient values and preferences into recommendation-making: qualitative one-on-one interviews and brainstorming meetings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101468</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101792?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combined determinants of adverse birth outcomes in Ethiopia: an application of ecological model using Demographic and Health Survey data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101792?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Studies of determinants of adverse birth outcomes (ABOs) were conducted in Ethiopia; however, there is a lack of a single study considering the factors operating at multiple levels (individual, interpersonal, organisational, environmental and policy levels). Therefore, this study identified combined determinants of ABOs at all levels in Ethiopia by analysing the Demographic and Health Survey data guided by the Ecological model, considering that birth outcomes are shaped by the interaction between a mother&rsquo;s environment and her biological and psychological health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to identify combined determinants of ABOs at all levels in Ethiopia by analysing the Demographic and Health Survey data guided by the Ecological model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study design based on interviewer-administered questionnaires was used for the respective Demographic and Health Surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>We used data from the 2016 Ethiopian and Demographic Health Survey, a stochastically national representative study with inclusive information on ABOs, to examine how various levels of influence from individual behaviours to environmental-level factors are affecting birth outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>An effective number of 11 023 live births within the 5 years preceding the survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measure</st>
<p>ABOs, including low birth weight and preterm birth. Multivariable multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was used to identify determinants of ABOs through five hierarchical models in Stata V.14. Model I was the null model; models II, III, IV and V sequentially included intrapersonal, interpersonal, organisational and environmental variables, respectively. Statistical significance was determined using ORs with 95% CIs at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The weighted prevalence of ABOs in Ethiopia is 27.0% (95% CI 25.7% to 28.3%). The final model of the multivariable multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression identified several predictors of ABOs at the intrapersonal or individual level, including maternal age of 15&ndash;24 completed years (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.24, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.51); poorest (AOR=1.41, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.00), poorer (AOR=1.42, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.01) and middle wealth quintiles (AOR=1.45, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.06); first-born twin (AOR=2.61, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.21) and second-born twin (AOR=4.05, 95% CI 2.16 to 7.61); and female childbirth (AOR=1.41, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.63). On the other hand, intimate partner physical violence (AOR=1.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.34) was the only factor associated with ABOs at the interpersonal level; cluster altitudes of 180&ndash;1500 m (AOR=1.28, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.55) and 2501&ndash;3455 m (AOR=1.51, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.99) were found to be an exposure of ABOs at the environmental level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The prevalence of ABOs in Ethiopia is high. Factors associated with ABOs at the individual level include maternal age, wealth quintile, twin birth and female birth. In contrast, exposure variables at the interpersonal level comprise intimate partner violence, and those at the environmental level include cluster altitude. To improve ABOs and consequently reduce neonatal mortality, maternal and child health investment and future studies should act at all levels.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kusheta, S., Mekonnen, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101792</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101792</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combined determinants of adverse birth outcomes in Ethiopia: an application of ecological model using Demographic and Health Survey data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101792</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101792</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102583?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding patient experience during Lokomat rehabilitation in children and adolescents: a clinical observational study combining self-evaluation and physiological metrics]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102583?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the emotional, cognitive and dispositional experience of children and adolescents undergoing Lokomat rehabilitation by integrating self-evaluation, therapist observations and physiological metrics across repeated sessions, with the aim of characterising how patient experience evolves throughout paediatric robot-assisted gait training.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective observational study using a multidimensional assessment approach combining self-report, therapist ratings and physiological measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Inpatients undergoing robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) with the Lokomat at the Scientific Institute Eugenio Medea in Bosisio Parini (Italy).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>42 children and adolescents (N=42; mean age 11.66&plusmn;5.59 years) undergoing RAGT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Robot-assisted gait therapy with the Lokomat. Participants underwent 30-minute therapy sessions as per routine rehabilitation protocols, with treatment durations ranging from 15 to 20 sessions, as prescribed by their referring clinician.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Participants completed ad-hoc questionnaires about emotional, cognitive and dispositional factors before and after therapy; therapists provided structured assessments of patient engagement and psychological states. Physiological data, such as heart rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal activity (EDA), were recorded using wearable sensors to capture physiological correlates of emotional and cognitive engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results showed that by the end of Lokomat therapy, patients displayed increased cognitive engagement and better emotional regulation, along with higher vagal activity (normalised high-frequency) and increased phasic EDA responses. According to the therapists, patients appeared more confident, calm and cooperative. Sympathetic activation observed during satisfaction ratings reflected the involvement of the autonomic nervous system in positive emotional experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study, therefore, emphasises a multidimensional approach to rehabilitation, which involves subjective patient self-assessments, therapist observations and physiological signals in an effort to capture a more comprehensive patient experience. The findings highlight the importance of personalised, patient-centred approaches and contribute new evidence on the psychological and physiological effects of RAGT in paediatric populations. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and explore their clinical implications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05767268">NCT05767268</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chiappini, M., Malerba, G., Dei, C., Bellazzecca, S., Falivene, A., Costantini, S., Morganti, R., Diella, E., Storm, F., Ambrosini, E., Cavallo, A., Biffi, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102583</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding patient experience during Lokomat rehabilitation in children and adolescents: a clinical observational study combining self-evaluation and physiological metrics]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102583</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102583</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103243?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of multimorbidity and uptake of guideline-directed medicines for cardiovascular conditions in Australian hospitalised adults: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103243?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Multimorbidity, defined as two or more chronic medical conditions, leads to the use of multiple medicines, including for cardiovascular conditions. This is associated with frailty and an increased risk of medication-related harm. Hospitalised adults have higher rates of multimorbidity and frailty compared with non-hospitalised adults. The aim of this study was to examine the use of medicines for hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation among patients with multimorbidity and frailty, who are generally not well represented in clinical trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was performed of adults aged &ge;45 years with inpatient admissions during an 18-month period. Regular medications prescribed at discharge and coding data were obtained from the electronic medical record and hospital datasets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The prevalence of multimorbidity (using coded chronic medical conditions or the RxRisk pharmaceutical comorbidity index), frailty (using hospital frailty risk score) and polypharmacy (defined as &ge;5 medicines) were calculated. The uptake of medicines recommended by the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines for patients with coded hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation was also assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Two large acute care, teaching hospitals in Adelaide, South Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>23 980 unique patients were identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>69% (n=16 637) of patients had multimorbidity using the coding definition compared with 94% (n=22 620) using the pharmaceutical comorbidity score. 81% (n=19 366) had polypharmacy and 46% (n=11 091) had frailty. More than 85% of patients with hypertension were taking an antihypertensive. More than 75% of patients with ischaemic heart disease were taking an antithrombotic or a lipid-lowering agent and more than 50% were taking an agent acting on the renin-angiotensin system. Over 70% of patients with atrial fibrillation without a contraindication to anticoagulation were taking an anticoagulant. Patients with multimorbidity were 11&ndash;51% more likely to be taking an antihypertensive, antithrombotic or lipid-lowering medicine for the respective cardiovascular conditions, whereas those with frailty were 31&ndash;48% less likely to be taking guideline-directed medicines for all conditions studied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Over two-thirds of hospitalised patients with these cardiovascular conditions were taking at least one guideline-directed medicine. Medication use was generally more common in multimorbidity and less common in frailty. Outcomes studies are needed to quantify the risks and benefits of cardiovascular medicines in these patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inglis, J. M., Caughey, G. E., Liew, D., Shakib, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103243</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103243</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of multimorbidity and uptake of guideline-directed medicines for cardiovascular conditions in Australian hospitalised adults: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103243</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104603?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and their association with health-related quality-of-life: a cross-sectional study among a cohort of Sri Lankan adolescents]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104603?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study assessed the associations between asthma, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) among adolescents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Six randomly selected schools across all five educational zones of the Anuradhapura district in Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1127 adolescents aged 13&ndash;14 years were included from six randomly selected schools representing all five educational zones in the Anuradhapura district, Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Prevalence of asthma and GORD, the associations between asthma, GORD and HRQoL among adolescents in Sri Lanka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study of 1127 adolescents (44.8% male, mean age 13.66&plusmn;0.56 years) found that 16.1% (n=181) had current asthma and 17.9% (n=202) exhibited symptoms of GORD. A significant association was observed between current asthma and GORD (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.59 to 3.31, p=0.0005). Comorbidity of asthma and GORD was observed in 4.8% of participants (n=54). The total HRQoL score was not associated with asthma, GORD or those having both asthma and GORD. However, the presence of GORD was associated with poor emotional functioning (unstandardized regression coefficient &plusmn; standard error = -4.7&plusmn;1.7, p=0.008).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Asthma and GORD were significantly associated among early adolescents in Sri Lanka. While overall HRQoL did not differ by disease status, the presence of GORD was associated with poorer emotional functioning.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumari, M. V., Rajapakse, S., Mohamed, S., Devanarayana, N., Rajindrajith, S., Amarasiri, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104603</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104603</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and their association with health-related quality-of-life: a cross-sectional study among a cohort of Sri Lankan adolescents]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104603</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104918?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Differences in sexual risk behaviours, HIV care utilisation and experiences of stigma between transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men: findings from integrated biobehavioural surveys in Ukraine 2013-2018]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104918?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess whether transgender women who have sex with men (TGWSM) sampled in men who have sex with men (MSM) biobehavioural surveys in Ukraine experience different levels of sexual risk, stigma, HIV prevalence and engagement in the HIV care than cisgender MSM (CMSM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Analysis of secondary data from three population-level cross-sectional surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The analysis was conducted on data from three rounds of integrated biobehavioural surveys of MSM in 27 cities of Ukraine from 2013 to 2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Data from n=18 621 MSM with n=18 102 CMSM and n=503 TGWSM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were differences in sexual risk behaviours, HIV testing and treatment uptake, and the secondary outcomes were differences in lifetime experiences of stigma, coercive sex and physical assault (in the 2018 survey only) between CMSM and TGWSM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with CMSM, TGWSM were more likely to be clients of non-governmental organisations (adjusted OR, aOR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.67), engage in commercial sex (last month; aOR: 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.61), have group sex (aOR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.61), more long-term sex partners (last month; adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.27), history of imprisonment (aOR: 1.51, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.31) and engage in chemsex (last month, aOR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.23). We found no difference in HIV prevalence (5.17% in TGWSM vs 5.43% in CMSM, p=0.065). In 2018, more TGWSM reported lifetime experience of stigma from family and friends (aOR: 3.58, 95% CI 2.54 to 5.04), general social stigma (aOR: 3.13, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.41), anticipated healthcare stigma (aOR: 3.63, 95% CI 2.53 to 5.16), physical assault (aOR: 2.73, 95% CI 1.85 to 4.03) and coercive sex (aOR: 3.01, 95% CI 1.99 to 4.55) than CMSM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>TGWSM in Ukraine may be at increased risk of HIV acquisition compared to CMSM due to many factors including elevated levels of stigma and violence. Services specifically tailored for transgender people are needed to help reduce these high-risk behaviours.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aijaz, S., Vickerman, P., Saliuk, T., Nicholls, J., Gillespie, D., Hood, K., Stone, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104918</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104918</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Differences in sexual risk behaviours, HIV care utilisation and experiences of stigma between transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men: findings from integrated biobehavioural surveys in Ukraine 2013-2018]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104918</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104918</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105785?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative effectiveness of weight loss interventions on blood pressure in obese patients with hypertension: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105785?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>High blood pressure (BP) in obese populations poses significant cardiovascular risks, yet the comparative effectiveness of various weight loss interventions on BP remains unclear. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to assess the comparative effectiveness of weight loss interventions in overweight/obese adults with prehypertension/hypertension on BP change and adverse events (AEs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic review and Bayesian NMA of randomised controlled trials of weight loss interventions in overweight/obese patients with prehypertension/hypertension will be conducted. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library (CENTRAL) and relevant references will be searched up to June 2025. Primary outcomes are changes in systolic and diastolic BP; secondary outcomes include AEs, body weight reduction (kg) and quality of life. Study selection, data extraction and methodological quality assessment using Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) 2.0 will be performed by independent two authors. A Bayesian NMA will be conducted using BUGSnet, with surface under the cumulative ranking curve to rank interventions. Subgroup analyses will explore heterogeneity by baseline BP severity, intervention duration and comorbidities, and sensitivity analyses will be performed for robustness of the results by RoB and sample size.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review as it will involve analysis of data only from previously published studies. The results will be disseminated through presentations at international conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42022376688.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noh, E., Bae, I., Won, J., Han, D., Park, C., Lee, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105785</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105785</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative effectiveness of weight loss interventions on blood pressure in obese patients with hypertension: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105785</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105785</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110427?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of the revised Shock Index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score for predicting survival in paediatric patients with trauma: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110427?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) is widely used to predict survival in patients with trauma; however, its predictive accuracy in paediatric populations remains suboptimal. In contrast, the revised Shock Index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG), a simple physiological marker, has shown potential utility in adults and children. Therefore, we aimed to compare the predictive performance of rSIG and TRISS in paediatric patients with trauma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Japan Trauma Data Bank.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Paediatric patients with trauma aged &le;17 years who were registered in the Japan Trauma Data Bank between 2009 and 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The optimal cut-off value for rSIG was determined using the derivation cohort (2009&ndash;2018). In the validation cohort (2019&ndash;2021), the predictive accuracy of rSIG and TRISS for in-hospital survival was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the derivation cohort, the optimal cut-off value for rSIG was 10.13. In the validation cohort, the overall AUC for rSIG was 0.857 (95% CI 0.796 to 0.918) compared with 0.740 (95% CI 0.661 to 0.820) for TRISS, demonstrating the significantly superior predictive accuracy of rSIG (p=0.006). Age-stratified analyses revealed that rSIG significantly outperformed TRISS in the 7&ndash;12 and 13&ndash;17 age groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The rSIG demonstrated higher predictive accuracy for in-hospital survival among paediatric patients with trauma than TRISS. These findings suggest that rSIG is a more effective prognostic tool for paediatric trauma care. Validation and the establishment of age-specific cut-off values are warranted to enhance its clinical applicability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minami, S., Toida, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110427</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110427</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of the revised Shock Index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score for predicting survival in paediatric patients with trauma: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110427</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110427</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110798?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Characterising cystic fibrosis in African populations: a scoping review protocol on phenotype, diagnosis, genetics and barriers to care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110798?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-shortening genetic disorder traditionally mischaracterised as affecting only populations of European descent. This framing has contributed to under-recognition of CF in African populations, despite emerging evidence of both common and region-specific cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mutations across the continent. Diagnostic barriers, structural inequities and lack of surveillance further exacerbate disparities in care and visibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review aims to characterise CF in African populations by synthesising evidence on clinical presentation, diagnostic practices, genotypic diversity, prevalence and structural barriers to care. We will include case reports, cohort studies, registry analyses and other primary data sources involving individuals of African descent with suspected or confirmed CF. Key outcomes include clinical phenotype, age at diagnosis, mutation profile, diagnostic testing access and mortality. Data sources include Ovid Medline, Embase, Ebsco Global Health, CAB Abstracts and Web of Science Core Collection. Multiple-reviewer screening and extraction will be conducted. We will use narrative synthesis, thematic analysis and meta-analysis for prevalence where feasible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is required as the review uses published data. Results will be shared with clinicians, researchers and CF networks in Africa and globally to inform diagnostic strategies and policy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratner, L., Marangu-Boore, D., Hamouda, S., Kwarteng Owusu, S., Eze, J., Dakshi, A., Wordui, S., Hamdy, A., Owusu, S. A., Weldetsadik, Y., Uluer, A., Daimi, H., El Makhzen, N., Abriel, H., Nasr, S., Moosa, S., Swanson, C., Cronin, A. E., Zampoli, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110798</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110798</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Characterising cystic fibrosis in African populations: a scoping review protocol on phenotype, diagnosis, genetics and barriers to care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110798</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110798</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111078?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and risk factors of chronic kidney disease among Iranian adults with and without diabetes: a cross-sectional study using STEPS 2021 national survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111078?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health concern and a major long-term complication of diabetes, yet its burden remains understudied in regions with limited epidemiological data. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CKD and its associated risk factors in the Iranian adult population, stratified by diabetes status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Nationally representative survey across Iran (STEPS 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>17 607 adults aged &ge;25 years with complete kidney function and albuminuria data, selected through systematic sampling with weighting to ensure national representativeness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m&sup2; (CKD-EPI equation) or urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) &ge;30 mg/g and categorised into four KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) 2024 risk groups for CKD progression. Logistic regression assessed the associations between CKD and sociodemographic, clinical and behavioural factors; multinomial logistic regression examined diabetes associations with KDIGO risk categories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The national prevalence of CKD was 11.9% (95% CI 11.2% to 12.6%), with 9.1% (8.5% to 9.9%) among individuals without diabetes and 28.6% (26.2% to 31.1%) among those with diabetes. According to KDIGO classification, 88.1% (87.4% to 88.8%) were at low risk, 9.0% (8.4% to 9.6%) at moderate risk, 2.0% (1.6% to 2.4%) at high risk and 0.9% (0.7% to 1.1%) at very high risk. Albuminuria was more prevalent than low eGFR in both groups with (22.5% (20.4% to 24.8%) vs 10.3% (8.7% to 12.1%)) and without (5.7% (5.2% to 6.3%) vs 4.3% (3.8% to 4.8%)) diabetes. Diabetes was more strongly linked to albuminuria than low eGFR and was progressively associated with higher risk categories (adjusted ORs (aORs) 2.41 (2.03&ndash;2.86) for moderate, 2.63 (1.74&ndash;3.97) for high, 3.93 (2.56&ndash;6.07) for very high vs low-risk). CKD prevalence was highest in northwest Iran, increased significantly with age, with a stronger association observed for low eGFR than albuminuria, and was associated with hypertension (aOR 2.41 (2.07&ndash;2.82)), dyslipidaemia (1.60 (1.31&ndash;1.94)), obesity (1.94 (1.59&ndash;2.36)), ischaemic heart disease (1.53 (1.25&ndash;1.87)) and physical inactivity (1.40 (1.20&ndash;1.62)). Higher socioeconomic status and education were associated with lower odds of CKD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>CKD is a major burden, especially in individuals with diabetes, with regional and socioeconomic disparities. Addressing risk factors, integrating CKD into non-communicable disease surveillance and prioritising it in global health agendas, including the Sustainable Development Goals, are essential.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ataei, S. M.-N., Almasi, G., Kazemi, A., Ahmadi, N., Golestani, A., Rashidi, M.-M., Rezaei, N., Azadnajafabad, S., Rezaei, N., Dilmaghani-Marand, A., Ghasemi, E., Farzi, Y., Yoosefi, M., Rezaee, K., Foroutan Mehr, E., Nasserinejad, M., Haghshenas, R., Alipour Derouei, A., Momen Nia Rankohi, A., Djalalinia, S., Farzadfar, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111078</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111078</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and risk factors of chronic kidney disease among Iranian adults with and without diabetes: a cross-sectional study using STEPS 2021 national survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111078</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111078</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111730?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers to and enablers of prophylactic compression use by people at risk of venous leg ulcer recurrence: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111730?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are complex, chronic wounds that often recur after healing. The ongoing use of compression hosiery is the primary strategy to reduce the risk of VLU recurrence. However, adherence to this prophylactic treatment is low, undermining treatment effectiveness and placing a substantial burden on individuals with a history of VLUs and on healthcare systems. Understanding the factors influencing people&rsquo;s adherence to compression hosiery for secondary VLU prevention is essential to support approaches to promote uptake.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The study aimed to (1) draw on the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations of Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore factors influencing individuals&rsquo; use of prophylactic compression hosiery for the secondary prevention of VLUs and (2) use the behaviour change wheel to identify intervention strategies to support the ongoing use of prophylactic compression hosiery by individuals after VLU healing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive, interpretive qualitative study involving individuals with a history of healed VLUs. Semistructured interviews were conducted with people who had experienced healed VLUs. The interviews were guided by the COM-B model. Framework analysis was conducted using deductive coding informed by the TDF and inductive coding to capture emerging themes linked to barriers to and enablers of the target behaviour (ongoing compression use). Data management was aided by NVivo software, and coding was conducted by two researchers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>Interventions were conducted in person, by telephone or online, based on participants&rsquo; preferences, at community leg clubs or in their homes, from April 2024 to January 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants with experience of healed VLUs were recruited from three National Health Service (NHS) trusts and community leg clubs in the North of England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 15 participants were interviewed, comprising 4 males and 11 females aged between 49 and 89 years. Our analysis identified six factors that may influence individuals&rsquo; use of prophylactic compression hosiery following VLU healing: knowledge, skills, environmental context and resources, emotion, social influences and beliefs about consequences. Deficits in knowledge, skills and resources, such as limited availability of prophylactic compression sizes, delays in prophylactic compression delivery and limited access to NHS services after healing, were primary barriers to people&rsquo;s use of compression hosiery in this context. Conversely, positive beliefs about the benefits of ongoing use of prophylactic compression hosiery were a strong enabler. Emotion and social influences were identified as both barriers and enablers: fear of recurrence and social support encouraged adherence, while stigma and negative feelings hindered it. We identified six intervention functions (education, training, persuasion, environmental restructuring, modelling and enablement) and eight linked behaviour change techniques that could be explored further to support people&rsquo;s ongoing use of prophylactic compression therapy. These techniques include providing information about antecedents, discussing health and emotional consequences, instruction, demonstration, rehearsal, social support, framing/reframing and vicarious reinforcement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The identified intervention functions and behaviour change techniques provide theoretically informed insights for designing interventions to support sustained use of prophylactic compression hosiery following VLU healing. Key barriers to address include addressing gaps in individuals&rsquo; knowledge about prophylactic compression therapy, prioritising posthealing VLU services, ensuring timely access to appropriately fitted compression and enhancing social support networks.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alkahtani, A. M., Dumville, J., Mott, L., Armitage, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111730</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111730</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers to and enablers of prophylactic compression use by people at risk of venous leg ulcer recurrence: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111730</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111730</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111837?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rapid realist review of organisational supports for youth peer support workers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111837?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Providing peer support can benefit youth peer support workers (peers)et by supporting self-determination, recovery and resilience to self-stigma. There is a need to clarify the role of the organisation in providing benefits for peers. We aimed to identify the organisational contexts and mechanisms that result in the creation of healthy workplaces for peers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Rapid realist review guided by the Realist and Meta-Narrative Evidence Syntheses&ndash;Evolving Standards guidelines and Pawson&rsquo;s iterative approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, SocINDEX, Google Scholar and Embase were searched from 1979 to 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included qualitative and quantitative peer-reviewed studies and grey literature that captured characteristics of organisational practices and employment considerations in youth peer support programmes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Articles were screened independently by multiple reviewers. Inclusion criteria were adjusted to capture literature on organisational practices, and employment considerations for youth peer support programmes. Data were extracted and analysed retroductively to develop Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations (CMOCs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five employment-related risks to peer well-being were identified: (1) difficulty entering the job market, (2) lack of role clarity, (3) pressure to live up to ideals, (4) retraumatisation and (5) stigma. Six CMOCs were developed; all focused on the creation of equitable employment and supporting peer development and empowerment were developed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Community-based mental health organisations can facilitate equitable peer employment through strategies that reduce professional stigma, enhance peer resilience and promote professional and personal development. Policy reform that addresses precarious work conditions is needed to support healthy work environments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hews-Girard, J., Halsall, T., Cullen, E., Bellefeuille, A., Daley, M., Evans, C., Sandoval, V., Dunning, A., Lee, J., Carde, B., Couturier, J., Ferrari, M., Kimber, M., Patten, S. B., Iyer, S., Dimitropoulos, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111837</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111837</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rapid realist review of organisational supports for youth peer support workers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111837</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111837</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112218?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Longitudinal study of childbirth readiness and its related factors and consequences among low-risk pregnant women attending health centres in Tabriz, Iran]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112218?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Childbirth readiness can reflect women&rsquo;s childbirth readiness in terms of knowledge, psychological aspects and planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate childbirth readiness, its related factors and consequences in Iranian pregnant women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This longitudinal study was the first stage (quantitative stage) of a sequential explanatory mixed-method study. It followed women during late pregnancy (from 37 weeks of gestation) and the postpartum period (4&ndash;6 weeks after childbirth) from March to September 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Health centres of Tabriz, Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study involved 360 pregnant women with a gestational age of 37 weeks and above, selected via cluster sampling. Participants were excluded for high-risk pregnancies, unfavourable incidents in the last 3 months, mental-psychological diseases or a prior caesarean section.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Childbirth readiness and its related factors were assessed using several instruments completed from the 37th week of pregnancy onward, including the Childbirth Readiness Scale, a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Pregnancy Experience Scale and the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire Version A. The consequences of childbirth readiness were then evaluated 4&ndash;6 weeks post partum using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the Postpartum-Specific Anxiety Scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean (SD) childbirth readiness score was 67.83 (9.41) out of 90. In the adjusted general linear model (GLM), several factors were significantly associated with lower readiness. These included a higher fear of childbirth score (&beta; &ndash;0.12, 95% CI &ndash;0.16 to &ndash;0.08, p&lt;0.001), first pregnancy (&beta; &ndash;5.84, 95% CI &ndash;9.71 to &ndash;1.96, p=0.003), nulliparity (&beta; &ndash;12.50, 95% CI &ndash;15.95 to &ndash;9.05, p&lt;0.001), no history of abortion (&beta; &ndash;2.90, 95% CI &ndash;5.42 to &ndash;0.43, p=0.021), non-participation in readiness classes (&beta; &ndash;2.24, 95% CI &ndash;4.41 to &ndash;0.08, p=0.042), lower educational attainment (&beta; &ndash;4.55, 95% CI &ndash;7.60 to &ndash;1.50, p=0.004) and having a husband who was a worker (&beta; &ndash;2.07, 95% CI &ndash;3.87 to &ndash;0.28, p=0.023). In contrast, being a homeowner was associated with a higher readiness score (&beta; 2.14, 95% CI 0.05 to 4.24, p=0.045). Based on GLM, pregnancy experience was not significantly associated with childbirth readiness, and childbirth readiness was not significantly associated with childbirth experience or postpartum anxiety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Key factors associated with readiness included fear of childbirth, obstetric history (gravidity, parity, history of abortion and participation in childbirth readiness classes), maternal education, home ownership, husband&rsquo;s occupation&mdash;though several associations showed small effect sizes. After adjustment, readiness did not independently predict childbirth experience or postpartum mental health. The low participation rate in readiness courses highlights a major service gap. Integrating readiness assessment into prenatal care and expanding access to targeted education are recommended to improve outcomes such as birth satisfaction and caesarean rates.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alizadeh-Dibazari, Z., Abbasalizadeh, F., Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, S., Mirghafourvand, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-10T05:17:41-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112218</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112218</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Longitudinal study of childbirth readiness and its related factors and consequences among low-risk pregnant women attending health centres in Tabriz, Iran]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112218</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095515?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of COgNitive Training in Community-dwelling Older Adults at High Risk for demENTia (CONTENT): study protocol of two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e095515?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Dementia contributes to the disease burden worldwide, and people with hypertension or type 2 diabetes are at an elevated risk of developing dementia. It is essential to prevent or delay cognitive decline in people at high risk within the community. Our trials aim to evaluate the effects of adaptive cognitive training on community-dwelling older adults with hypertension or type 2 diabetes but no dementia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>Two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials, named COgNitive Training in community-dwelling older adults at high risk for demENTia and with Hypertension (CONTENT-Hypertension) and COgNitive Training in community-dwelling older adults at high risk for demENTia and with Diabetes (CONTENT-Diabetes), will be conducted to investigate the effects of adaptive cognitive training on participants aged 60 years or above who have been diagnosed with hypertension or type 2 diabetes but no dementia. Each trial will enrol 120 participants. Participants will be recruited from the local community in Shijingshan and Haidian Districts, Beijing, and allocated to either the intervention or control group using a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group will engage in 12 weeks of adaptive cognitive training, while the control group will receive 12 weeks of placebo cognitive training. A 24-week follow-up assessment will be conducted for all participants to evaluate the persistence of the effects. The primary outcome is the 12-week change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Basic scores from baseline to the end of the intervention (12 weeks). Secondary outcomes include 6-week and 24-week changes in the MoCA from baseline; 6-week, 12-week and 24-week changes in Trail Making Test-A&amp;B (TMT-A, TMT-B), Digit Symbol Substitution Test, the WHO/University of California at Los Angeles Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Boston Naming Test scores of cognitive functions; 6-week and 12-week changes in Geriatric Depression Scale, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and 12-week change in blood pressure (CONTENT-Hypertension) or fasting blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin (CONTENT-Diabetes) from baseline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will adhere to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and comply with international standards for Good Clinical Practice. All participants will sign the informed consent at baseline. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences &amp; Peking Union Medical College (approval numbers: 2023-139 and 2024-162). The findings of the trials will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06512922">NCT06512922</inter-ref> and <inter-ref locator="NCT06524388" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT06524388</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pan, Y., Ji, M., Liang, J., Ma, J., Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Dai, Y., Gao, D., Zhang, Y., Xie, W., Zheng, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095515</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095515</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of COgNitive Training in Community-dwelling Older Adults at High Risk for demENTia (CONTENT): study protocol of two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095515</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095515</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098901?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proportion and risk factors associated with 'never been tested for HIV among women of reproductive age in Tanzania: evidence from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e098901?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Despite several intensive interventions, HIV remains a major public health challenge affecting many individuals worldwide and highlighting ongoing gaps in HIV testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the proportion of &lsquo;never been tested for HIV&rsquo; and the risk factors associated therewith among women aged 15&ndash;49 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey data were used for this study. The variable of interest was whether women of reproductive age (WRA) reported never being tested for HIV. A total weighted sample of 15 254 WRA participated in the study. A survey logistic regression model was employed to determine factors associated with never being tested for HIV, as it accounts for the complexity of the sampling design. Analysis was performed at a 5% level of significance using R statistical software V. 4.5.2.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 15 254 WRA that participated, 3082 (20.2%) reported never being tested for HIV. The median (IQR) age of participants was 28 (21&ndash;37) years. The odds of never being tested for HIV decreased with increasing age (OR=0.96; 95% CI 0.95 to 0.97). Furthermore, factors such as having primary or secondary education, being pregnant or breastfeeding, marital status (married, living with a partner, widowed, divorced or separated), living in a female-headed household, using the internet, abstaining from sex, being aware of HIV test kits but never using them, media exposure, belonging to the middle wealth index category, using contraceptives and having other sexual partners besides a spouse within the past 12 months was found to be associated with never being tested for HIV among WRA in Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This current study identified several factors associated with never being tested for HIV among WRA. To enhance HIV testing uptake in this population, government and public health stakeholders should design targeted interventions that address these determinants, particularly by improving access to education, promoting health awareness and integrating HIV testing into routine reproductive health services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mbona, S. V., Chifurira, R., Ndlovu, B. D., Ananth, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098901</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-098901</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proportion and risk factors associated with 'never been tested for HIV among women of reproductive age in Tanzania: evidence from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098901</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098901</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychological burden and its association with preferred form of psychological assistance of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study focused on the preferences for psychological assistance and associated factors among Chinese healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis of survey data collected from Chinese HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Nationwide psychological service platforms in China that facilitated participation of HCWs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 901 HCWs aged 19&ndash;84 years, including doctors, nurses and other medical staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Preference for psychological assistance was assessed through survey options, including psychological materials, stress management skills, telephone hotline, online non-video psychological counselling, online video psychological counselling and no need or others. Prevalence of mental health symptoms was evaluated using validated scales: Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) for depression, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (PC-PTSD-5) for stress. Additional measures included sleep disturbance, suicidal ideation and demographic characteristics such as age, education level and occupation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 901 HCWs surveyed, the prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress was 12.32% (PHQ-2 score &ge;3), 42.18% (GAD-7 score &ge;5) and 28.75% (PC-PTSD-5 score &ge;3), respectively. Sleep disturbance and suicidal ideation were reported by 29.41% (cut-off value=2) and 9.32% (cut-off value=1) of participants. Among the 602 respondents who preferred psychological assistance, the most preferred options were stress management skills, psychological materials and online non-video counselling. HCWs with severe suicidal ideation (item 9 of PHQ-9=3) preferred online video counselling (80%). Logistic regression indicated that age was negatively correlated with the preference for psychological materials (<I>&beta;</I>=&ndash;0.86, p=0.034) but positively associated with the preference of telephone hotlines (26&ndash;35 years: <I>&beta;</I>=1.69, p=0.035; &ge;45 years: <I>&beta;</I>=1.90, p=0.031). Higher educational attainment was associated with greater preference for psychological materials (undergraduates: <I>&beta;</I>=0.71, p=0.014; masters: <I>&beta;</I>=1.13, p=0.007) and online counselling (masters: <I>&beta;</I>=1.743, p=0.002). Nurses were more likely to prefer stress management skills (<I>&beta;</I>=0.71, p=0.014), while HCWs with suicidal ideation showed a stronger preference for online video counselling (<I>&beta;</I>=0.66, p&lt;0.05). Linear regression further showed that participants with a bachelor&rsquo;s or master&rsquo;s degree and those with severe anxiety were more likely to use multiple forms of psychological assistance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The high prevalence of mental health problems among HCWs highlights an urgent need for targeted psychological support. Distinct characteristics of HCWs were associated with different preferences for psychological assistance, highlighting the importance of tailoring interventions to the specific needs of HCWs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, L., Peng, Z., Cheng, P., Zheng, W., Xu, L., Li, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102149</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102149</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychological burden and its association with preferred form of psychological assistance of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102149</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103580?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of enhanced support for coping with side effects during medication counselling on the nocebo effect in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving initial chemotherapy: protocol for a multicentre exploratory open-label randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103580?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common symptom in cancer, and it is one of the distressing symptoms in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Information about side effects may exacerbate CINV due to the nocebo effect. This study aims to examine the efficacy of pharmacist-led enhanced support for coping with side effects during medication counselling, which includes providing information about side effects, with the goal of mitigating the nocebo effect and reducing CINV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre exploratory open-label randomised controlled trial will examine the efficacy of pharmacist-led enhanced support for coping with the side effects of treatments during medication counselling in patients with advanced lung cancer. The control group will receive medication counselling as usual. The study population will consist of patients with advanced lung cancer who have not received chemotherapy and are receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy or equivalent chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the prevention of nausea, and the secondary endpoints include complete response (no vomiting event and no rescue medication), stress (objectively assessed using the salivary cortisol and immunoglobulin A), coping strategies and quality of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study received approval from the medical ethics committee of Kansai Medical University. The results will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal, and the findings will be presented at international scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Protocol version</st>
<p>1.0, 18 Mar 2025</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Registration number: UMIN000056068.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fujii, R., Matsuda, Y., Okada, M., Ishikura, H., Imai, Y., Muraoka, R., Hasuo, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103580</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103580</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of enhanced support for coping with side effects during medication counselling on the nocebo effect in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving initial chemotherapy: protocol for a multicentre exploratory open-label randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103580</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103580</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105390?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping social determinants of health data in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105390?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Research has increasingly underscored the impact of factors such as socioeconomic status, education, healthcare access, housing and environmental conditions in shaping population health outcomes. These factors, collectively called social determinants of health (SDOH), provide crucial context for understanding drivers of health outcomes. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the study of SDOH is critical due to the region&rsquo;s unique sociocultural and economic conditions. Understanding how SDOH interacts with health systems and capturing SDOH in data is crucial for informing modelling efforts and policies improving population health more effectively. This scoping review aims to map the types of data used to capture SDOH in research conducted in SSA, to identify research gaps and to summarise key findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley methodological framework, enhanced by Levac <I>et al</I>, providing best practices for identifying, selecting and analysing eligible studies. Key steps include (1) identifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting eligible studies via a locally curated search, (4) extracting information, (5) collating, summarising and reporting results and (6) consultation with stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required, as this review relies solely on published literature. Findings will be disseminated across academic channels (journals, conferences) and through targeted stakeholder engagement efforts, such as policy briefs and public health workshops, to reach policymakers, healthcare practitioners and community health organisations. This dissemination strategy aims to inform health policy and drive programme development in SSA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anyiam, F. E., Gjonaj, J., Osango, N. A., Mugo, R., Aber, P., Shah, J., Mangeni, J., Vedanthan, R., Hogan, J. W., Mwangi, A., Chunara, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105390</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105390</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping social determinants of health data in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105390</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105390</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105422?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unmet needs for non-communicable diseases and sexual and reproductive health services among women of reproductive age in low-and-middle-income countries: evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105422?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite international efforts to address women&rsquo;s long-term health and well-being, significant gaps in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) prevention remain, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We analysed data from 726 278 women aged 15&ndash;49 from six national surveys (2017&ndash;2021, Benin, Cameroon, Gabon, India, Madagascar and Mauritania) on unmet needs for NCD prevention (blood pressure, glucose, cervical cancer screening) and SRH services (contraception, antenatal, postnatal care). Unmet needs prevalence was calculated as the percentage of participants with specific unmet needs and estimated across demographics and socioeconomic groups using multivariable logistic regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Unmet needs were strikingly high for NCD prevention: 36.6% for blood pressure, 70.0% for blood glucose and 98.5% for cervical cancer screening. In contrast, unmet needs for contraception, antenatal care and postnatal care were relatively lower: 7.5%, 14.5% and 14.5%, respectively. Significant variations were observed across countries. India had the lowest unmet needs for SRH services: 6.7% for contraception, 13.1% for antenatal care and 13.1% for postnatal care. Gabon had lower unmet needs for prenatal (16.8%) and postnatal care (14.8%) compared with other African countries and the lowest unmet need for cervical screening at 84.7% (95% confidential interval 83.1% to 86.2%), over 10 percentage points lower than others. Furthermore, socioeconomic factors like higher education, better economic status, healthcare access, insurance and internet use significantly lowered unmet needs, especially for antenatal and postnatal care. Employed women had higher unmet needs for antenatal (35.7%) and postnatal (37.3%) care than unemployed women (28.1%, 27.8%) but lower for NCDs prevention (98.9%, 71.8%) under two definitions than unemployed women (99.3%, 79.2%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlights the urgent need to address high unmet needs for NCD prevention among women in LMICs, particularly cervical cancer screening. Unmet SRH needs are also a major concern, given significant disparities across countries. Especially, governments should prioritise measures to focus on vulnerable groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yin, Y., Du, Y., Zheng, Z.-J., Ren, M., Wang, M., Jin, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105422</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105422</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unmet needs for non-communicable diseases and sexual and reproductive health services among women of reproductive age in low-and-middle-income countries: evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105422</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105422</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105575?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a pharmacist-led patient-self-testing model for warfarin management in patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement in China: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105575?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Patient self-testing (PST) for warfarin management is well-established in developed countries but remains underused in developing regions. This study compared the safety and effectiveness of PST with usual care (UC) in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A total of five centres participated in this study, including one provincial tertiary hospital, two municipal tertiary hospitals and two primary hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients undergoing mechanical heart valve (MHV) replacement at five centres were prospectively enrolled. Patients were trained and stratified according to time on warfarin at enrolment and were randomly assigned to the PST or UC group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>The PST group used a point-of-care testing device for at-home international normalised ratio (INR) monitoring with pharmacist-guided warfarin dosing, while the UC group attended outpatient clinics for INR monitoring and dosing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the difference in time in therapeutic range (TTR). The secondary outcomes were incidences of major bleeding, thromboembolism and all-cause deaths in 12 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From March 2021 to March 2023, a total of 556 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 47.5 years, 45.1% being male. 342 were newly initiating warfarin therapy, while 214 had been on warfarin for over 6 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between the PST and UC groups. The PST group showed significantly higher TTR (67.2% vs 55.1%, p&lt;0.001) and lower incidences of major bleeding (0.7% vs 7.9%, p&lt;0.001) and thromboembolism (0.4% vs 6.8%, p&lt;0.001), with no difference in all-cause mortality (0.4% vs 1.8%, p=0.22). Logistic regression identified that using PST and younger age were independent factors associated with fewer warfarin-related adverse events.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A pharmacist-led PST intervention with ongoing education and counselling led to improved TTR and clinical outcomes in patients with MHV in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000038984).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, C., Luo, J., Zhou, X., Guo, Y., Cao, W., Zhang, D., Song, L., Tan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105575</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105575</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a pharmacist-led patient-self-testing model for warfarin management in patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement in China: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105575</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105575</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107797?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Suicidal thoughts and behaviours in pre-adolescent children: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107797?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe the incidence, presentation and long-term health outcomes of suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STBs) in children aged 12 years or under.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This population-based study included children identified through the Rochester Epidemiology Project who presented between 2005 and 2023 with STBs across primary, secondary and tertiary care centres in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA. Information related to the patient and family characteristics, presentation, prior history and outcomes was manually extracted by two independent researchers. Patients were excluded if the index visit note could not be located, the patient had no suicidal ideation, attempts, intent or plan, was older than 12 years 11 months at the index date, less than 2 years old or was a duplicate entry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The average annual population was 28,035 children, of which 637 presented with STBs (mean (SD) age, 10.6 (1.7) years; 51.2% girls, 76.3% White, average follow-up 7 years). The majority of the cases presented to the emergency department (ED) 491 (77.1%). The annual incidence per 100,000 person-years tripled from 68.8 in 2005 to 208.6 in 2023. Overall, 105 patients (16.5%) presented with a suicidal attempt. There were no cases of death by suicide. A prior psychiatric diagnosis was present in 454 (71.3%). STB events were preceded by a precipitating event in 471 (73.9%), the most common of which was an argument with a parent, followed by a bullying event and family distress. A specific suicide plan was reported by 328 (51.5%) with laceration reported most frequently, followed by hanging and overdose. Significant predictors of a suicide attempt were previous use of mood stabilisers (OR 3.21; 95% CI 1.24 to 7.97) and having a specific plan (OR 2.73; 95% CI 1.72 to 4.41). Children who had suicidal attempts had more subsequent ED visits (3.50 vs 2.58; p=0.009) and hospitalisations for psychiatric reasons (1.90 vs 1.30; p=0.003) and psychiatric hospitalisation days (12.70 vs 9.04; p=0.048). Subsequent suicide attempts occurred in 31% of the cohort during follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>STBs in preadolescent children are rare but are increasing in incidence. Such children have significant psychological diagnoses, use of mental health services, and subsequent suicide attempts. Novel age-appropriate interventions are needed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramachandran, N., Firwana, M., Murad, S. T., Kabbara Allababidi, A., Wang, Z., Murad, M. H., Sim, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107797</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107797</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Suicidal thoughts and behaviours in pre-adolescent children: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107797</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107797</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108424?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sleep disturbance and risk of incident incontinence in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: a 4-year national cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108424?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the longitudinal association between sleep disturbance and the risk of new-onset incontinence in middle-aged and older Chinese adults and to explore whether chronic lung diseases mediate this relationship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A prospective cohort study based on a nationally representative survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, a national survey of middle-aged and elderly community-dwelling Chinese adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 7098 participants aged &ge;50 years who were continent at baseline in 2011 and completed follow-up in 2015 were included in the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measures</st>
<p>Sleep disturbance was assessed via self-report and categorised into good versus poor quality. Incident incontinence was defined as a new onset of difficulty in controlling urination or defecation. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between baseline sleep disturbance and incident incontinence, adjusting for sociodemographic, behavioural and health-related covariates. Mediation analysis was conducted to evaluate the indirect role of chronic lung disease in the sleep&ndash;incontinence pathway. Subgroup and interaction analyses assessed whether key demographic or health factors influenced the sleep&ndash;incontinence association.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sleep disturbance at baseline was significantly associated with a higher risk of developing incontinence over 4 years (adjusted OR 1.34, p=0.040). This association remained robust across subgroups, particularly among participants aged &ge;65 years, rural residents, those with higher education and those with chronic lung disease. Mediation analysis revealed that chronic lung disease partially mediated the relationship between sleep disturbance and incontinence, accounting for 7.59% of the total effect (indirect effect: 0.00104, 95% CI 0.00012 to 0.00170). Subgroup and interaction analyses confirmed the consistency of the findings across various demographic and health strata.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Sleep disturbance was associated with higher odds of incident incontinence among middle-aged and older Chinese adults. Chronic lung disease contributed modestly to this association. These findings underscore the potential importance of sleep health and comorbidity management in continence care for ageing populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shen, Y., Zhang, W., Gao, J., Shao, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108424</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108424</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sleep disturbance and risk of incident incontinence in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: a 4-year national cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108424</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108424</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109126?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social determinants of health and risk of lower extremity amputation in patients with peripheral artery disease in Canada: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109126?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affected approximately 800 000 Canadians aged 25 years or older in 2015 and it poses a substantial risk of lower extremity amputation (LEA). While clinical risk factors for amputation are well-established, the impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) on amputation risk remains unclear, particularly in a Canadian context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This systematic review aims to: (1) synthesise evidence on the associations between multilevel SDoH domains and LEA (both major and/or minor) risk in Canadian PAD patients including intersectional effects of race and ethnicity with another SDoH domain, and (2) evaluate the statistical methodologies used in the researched literature to inform future study design and analysis approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, EmCare, Global Health, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Web of Science for studies examining SDoH and LEA in Canadian patients with PAD (including chronic limb-threatening ischaemia which is a severe form of PAD). Date limits for each database will be from inception through December 2025. SDoH will be categorised using a modified Healthy People 2030 SDoH framework under six domains: economic stability, education, food, neighbourhood and physical environment, healthcare system and community and social context. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data will be extracted on study characteristics, SDoH measures, outcomes and statistical methods. Risk of bias will be assessed using RoB 2 for randomised trials, ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies of interventions and ROBINS-E for studies investigating exposures. A narrative synthesis, and where data permit, a Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis using both effect size and contingency table approaches will be conducted. Statistical heterogeneity will be explored through subgroup analyses and meta-regression, examining study design, SDoH measurement approaches and population characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As a systematic review and meta-analysis, ethics approval is not required. For institutional oversight, we provide the contact of Dr Sonia Anand (Associate Vice-President, Global Health, McMaster University; anands@mcmaster.ca). Results will be reported following PRISMA guidelines and disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251115759.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chowdhury, A., Sheikh, F., Azab, S. M., de Souza, R. J., Banfield, L., Balakrishnan, N., Anand, S. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109126</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109126</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social determinants of health and risk of lower extremity amputation in patients with peripheral artery disease in Canada: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109126</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111332?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adolescent community reinforcement approach in secure care for adolescents with substance use and serious norm-violating behaviour: a randomised feasibility trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111332?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Adolescents placed in state-run secure youth homes (by the Swedish National Board of Institutional Care) due to substance misuse and serious norm-violating behaviour (including offending) are in pressing need of effective help, yet available treatments lack scientific support. The treatment Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) supports abstinence and improves social functioning in outpatient settings, but has not been evaluated in secure youth homes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of A-CRA in Swedish secure youth homes, and assess the feasibility of study procedures before a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In a randomised feasibility trial, 42 adolescents (16&ndash;20 years) at four secure youth homes were allocated to A-CRA plus treatment as usual (A-CRA+TAU; n=22) or TAU alone (n=20). Substance use was measured with self-reports and registry data at baseline, post-treatment and up to 24 months after treatment; participants were also interviewed about acceptability and satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Feasibility was demonstrated: 77% reached the predefined exposure threshold (&ge;12 A-CRA procedures). Adolescents found the intervention acceptable and helpful in secure care. Study procedures were largely workable, though questionnaire data showed substantial missingness. Preliminary effects were favourable, with no evidence of harm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A-CRA appears feasible in secure youth care, with minor adjustments, and is perceived as helpful and acceptable by adolescents. Treatment effects will be evaluated in an upcoming multicentre RCT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05081934">NCT05081934</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma&#x0308;larstig, I., Tyrberg, M., Spa&#x0308;nnargard, A., Garke, M. A., Lundgren, T., Alfonsson, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111332</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111332</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adolescent community reinforcement approach in secure care for adolescents with substance use and serious norm-violating behaviour: a randomised feasibility trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111332</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111332</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111336?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Laparoscopic bariatric surgery versus any non-surgical intervention for adolescents or adults with obesity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111336?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The number of people living with obesity is increasing rapidly worldwide, and the WHO estimates approximately 5 million deaths yearly from non-communicable diseases related to elevated body mass index (BMI). The most effective treatment for weight loss is bariatric surgery, but due to the associated risks and the need for lifelong care, this is not a viable treatment for every patient. With the advent of gut-hormone-based medications to treat obesity, the effectiveness of non-surgical treatment is approaching that of surgical interventions. We therefore aim to investigate the beneficial and harmful effects of laparoscopic bariatric surgery versus any non-surgical treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis applying our eight-step procedure to assess thresholds for clinical significance and trial sequential analysis to mitigate the risk of random errors. To identify relevant trials, we will search for both published and unpublished trials, without any language restriction, in major medical databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, SCI-EXPANDED and CPCI-S) and trial registries. The date range covered by the search is from database inception until final search date&mdash;within 3 months prior to submission of final results manuscript. Two review authors will independently screen references, extract data and perform risk-of-bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. We will include randomised clinical trials comparing laparoscopic surgery currently in use with any non-surgical comparator in adults or adolescents with BMI &gt;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Quasi-randomised studies or non-randomised studies will not be included. Our critical outcomes are all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and quality of life, and our important outcomes are major cardiovascular events, weight at follow-up, physical function and glycaemic control. In addition, we have two explorative outcomes: metabolic syndrome or Z-score and reported incident of alcohol abuse or other addictive disorder or self-inflicted harm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review will collect and perform secondary analysis of data from publicly available sources and ethical approval is therefore not required. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant scientific conferences. We will strive to publish with open access. Awareness will be made through social media platforms. This review aims to help clinicians in identifying best practices in the wide-spanning field of obesity treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251135341.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duun, O., Dichman, M.-L., Lindschou, J., Scragg, J., Petersen, J. J., Bojsen-Moller, K. N., Jebb, S. A., Gluud, C., Dirksen, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111336</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111336</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Laparoscopic bariatric surgery versus any non-surgical intervention for adolescents or adults with obesity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111336</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111336</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111351?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of medical school initiatives on help seeking for mental health problems among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111351?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Many medical students with mental health problems do not seek help. However, it is unclear what medical schools can do to promote help seeking. We sought to establish the effect of medical school initiatives on help seeking for mental health problems among medical students.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2013 and 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE Ovid, EMBASE Ovid, PsycINFO Ovid, Web of Science, ERIC, BEI and Education Abstracts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies that assess the effect of an intervention delivered by a university or healthcare organisation on medical students&rsquo; attitudes towards help seeking or their help-seeking behaviour for mental health problems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (for randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (for non-randomised studies). Studies were grouped according to intervention type. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The evidence from the meta-analyses was of very low to low certainty. Improvements in help seeking were noted in the meta-analyses of pre-post studies investigating the effect of interventions with a lived-experience component (five studies, n=492, standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.62, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.91, p&lt;0.001); of educational interventions (two studies, n=260, SMD 0.38, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.74, p=0.04); and of interventions to improve access to services (two studies, n=1120, OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.88, p=0.02). Effects on help seeking diminished over time. The meta-analysis of three pre-post studies (n=677) evaluating the effect of clinical clerkships found no benefit on personal help-seeking attitudes (SMD 0.21, 95% CI &ndash;0.08 to 0.51, p=0.16). Meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing different approaches did not find superiority of face-to-face lived-experience interventions over active control interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Overall, the evidence is of very low to low certainty, due to the serious risk of bias in the included studies, most of which used uncontrolled pre-post designs. Interventions with a lived-experience component may improve medical students&rsquo; help-seeking attitudes. Standard clinical clerkships did not appear to impact personal help seeking, despite multiple previous studies suggesting they reduce stigma, suggesting barriers to help seeking extend beyond stigma and mental health literacy in this student population. Further high-quality research, particularly RCTs with long-term follow-up, is needed to firm up the evidence base in this area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024319771.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manley, A. E., Perry, R., Moran, P., Dawson, S., Biddle, L., Savovic, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111351</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111351</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of medical school initiatives on help seeking for mental health problems among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111351</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111351</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111645?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicentric longitudinal study on malaria burden, vector bionomics and health system assessment in diverse eco-epidemiological settings in the context of malaria elimination in India: study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111645?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Malaria remains a major public health challenge in India, with transmission dynamics varying widely across ecological, epidemiological, sociobehavioural and health system contexts. Achieving the national malaria elimination target by 2030 requires integrated, context-specific evidence to design effective interventions. This study aims to generate a comprehensive understanding of malaria transmission and factors surrounding it across diverse eco-epidemiological settings in India by assessing malaria burden, identifying determinants of transmission, evaluating health system performance and equity, characterising vector bionomics and insecticide resistance, and examining the influence of environmental drivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This longitudinal, multicentric study will be conducted in collaboration with the national programme in 12 districts spanning 10 states in India, covering a population of around 25 000 individuals representing varied ecological contexts (urban, periurban, rural, forest-foothill and coastal) and malaria endemicity levels. In each district, two clusters (villages) with a population of 1000 individuals will be included. A baseline mass survey will estimate malaria prevalence using bivalent rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and blood smear microscopy, with low-density parasitaemia detected by PCR in a subset of RDT-negative samples. Participants will be followed for 1 year, with monthly screening of symptomatic individuals using RDT and microscopy, and testing a subset of asymptomatic individuals to detect subclinical infections. Sociobehavioural data will be collected through structured interviews and household observations, with purposive inclusion of vulnerable groups, pregnant women, migrants, elderly persons, individuals with disabilities and tribal populations to assess equity dimensions through mixed-methods approaches. Health system performance will be evaluated through key informant interviews with programme officials, health workers, patients, private practitioners and traditional healers. Entomological surveillance will document vector species composition, density, infection rates and assessment of susceptibility status and intensity of insecticide resistance to commonly used public health insecticides. Environmental variables, including temperature, rainfall and humidity, will be linked with entomological and epidemiological data to explore spatiotemporal relationships.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by the Institute Human Ethics Committee of ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre (IHEC 03-0125/N/F). All standard ethical practices will be adhered to. The findings will be shared with stakeholders and published in reputed open-access journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahul, A., Thiruvengadam, K., Sharma, R., Jabir, M., Viswan, A., Jency, P. J., Bharadwaj, N., Muthukumaravel, S., Shriram, A. N., Raju, H. K., Kannan, S., Singh, M., Bhuyan, P. J., Jain, T., Rahi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111645</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111645</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicentric longitudinal study on malaria burden, vector bionomics and health system assessment in diverse eco-epidemiological settings in the context of malaria elimination in India: study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111645</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111645</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112489?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are equity, diversity and inclusion considered in early-phase studies evaluating innovative and developing surgical procedures? Protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112489?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Increased risks and concerns regarding patient safety in early-phase studies exist because knowledge about the new intervention is still accumulating. This means that narrow eligibility criteria are needed. However, if early-phase studies are narrow in their inclusion, for example, by not including diverse populations, there is a potential risk that new therapies have insufficient relevant efficacy and safety data. Existing research has explored equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) factors in early-phase pharmaceutical studies, but it has not been possible to find studies that have systematically examined whether EDI factors have been considered in surgical studies reporting innovative procedures. We aim to examine how EDI factors are considered in early-phase surgical studies and surgical innovation reports to explore how this may impact on later-phase evaluation and inclusive intervention implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A scoping review following the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) and Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley&rsquo;s five-step process is being conducted. We will search Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for surgical early-phase studies. A two-step screening process for eligibility is being used. Independent double screening will take place for 20% of the papers. Eligible articles will report early evaluation of an innovative surgical/invasive procedure. Excluded will be comparative and later-phase studies and early evaluations of pharmaceutical products even in a surgical setting. Data on article details, patient eligibility and whether protected characteristics are reported and considered will be extracted. Information about EDI considerations reported in the introduction or discussion of the papers will also be extracted. Findings will be discussed with a patient advisory group. A content synthesis approach will be undertaken and descriptive summaries presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study does not require ethical approval being a secondary analysis. The findings will be disseminated through academic journal publications and oral presentations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Etemadi, M., Macefield, R., Avery, K., Elliott, D., Dawson, S., Blencowe, N. S., Coyle, M., Richards, H. S., Graham, B., Jones, E., Torkington, A., Chatfield, K., Malik, H., Garlick, M., Blazeby, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112489</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112489</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are equity, diversity and inclusion considered in early-phase studies evaluating innovative and developing surgical procedures? Protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112489</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112489</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112758?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Benzodiazepine receptor agonists in hospitalised patients in the Netherlands: initiation, continuation and discontinuation - a retrospective observational analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112758?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine inpatient benzodiazepine receptor agonists prescribing patterns and assess how hospitalisation affects use at discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Subanalysis of the WEsleep trial, a cluster-randomised controlled single-centre study conducted at Amsterdam University Medical Center (Amsterdam UMC) (two locations) between July 2023 and March 2024. Twelve departments (six medical, six surgical) were matched and randomised to intervention or standard care. On intervention wards, multiple measures to improve sleep were implemented, including minimising nighttime disruptions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Amsterdam UMC, across medical and surgical hospital departments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Patients</st>
<p>Adult patients admitted for &ge;2 nights (medical) or undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery in a surgical department.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Benzodiazepine use was classified as no use, pre-admission use or new in-hospital initiation. Prescribing patterns were summarised descriptively according to type, timing, indication and discharge status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 746 patients, 187 (25%) used benzodiazepines: 80 (43%) had pre-admission use, and 107 (57%) were newly initiated during their hospital stay. Among pre-admission users, two discontinued and five had adjustments at discharge. Among newly initiated users, 94 (88%) had their benzodiazepine discontinued at discharge. Approximately half of pre-admission prescriptions and one-third of in-hospital prescriptions lacked a documented indication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Although most newly initiated benzodiazepine treatments were discontinued during hospitalisation, pre-existing use was rarely reassessed and nearly 10% of new users were discharged with a prescription. Structured deprescribing protocols, better documentation of indications and improved discharge planning are needed to promote safer and more rational benzodiazepine use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05683483">NCT05683483</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Gans, C. J., van den Ende, E. S., Meewisse, A. J. G., van Zuylen, M. L., Stenvers, D. J., Hermanides, J., Nanayakkara, P. W. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112758</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112758</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Benzodiazepine receptor agonists in hospitalised patients in the Netherlands: initiation, continuation and discontinuation - a retrospective observational analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112758</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112758</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112879?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of visual field defects in patients with open-angle glaucoma: a monocentric, randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study: the TES-GPS study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112879?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness and is characterised by progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells. While therapies to lower intraocular pressure slow the progression of the disease in most patients, a significant subset still shows progression despite treatment. Transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) may potentially activate neuroprotective pathways and slow the progression of visual field defects. The OkuStim 2 System is a medical device for TES which was originally developed for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa and similar retinal dystrophies and shall now be tested for the treatment of glaucoma. Stimulation of the diseased retina with weak currents can activate signalling pathways and the release of substances that have a protective effect on the retinal cells. This neuroprotective effect might preserve physiological functions of the retina for longer and slow down its gradual degeneration. Long-term use is required to maintain this effect. The TES-GPS study is investigating the safety and efficacy of TES in open-angle glaucoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>TES-GPS (short title for glaucoma pilot study) is a prospective, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, single-centre pilot study at the University Medical Center Mainz. 50 patients with progressive visual field loss due to open-angle glaucoma will be randomised 1:1 to receive either TES with the OkuStim 2 System or sham stimulation. The primary endpoint is the change in visual field sensitivity (Humphrey mean deviation) after 18 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in visual acuity, intraocular pressure, optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters and quality of life (National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25, NEI-VFQ 25). The intervention consists of weekly 30 min TES sessions, which are conducted in the patient&rsquo;s home after initial training in the clinic. The study comprises up to 13 scheduled visits over 18 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is conducted in accordance with ISO14155, Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745, International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Landesaerztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz in Mainz and from Bundesinstitut fuer Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06682962">NCT06682962</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorenz, K., Schuster, A., Michel, H. M., Ruckes, C., Kronfeld, K., Schippert, R., Stett, A., Beck, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112879</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112879</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of visual field defects in patients with open-angle glaucoma: a monocentric, randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study: the TES-GPS study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112879</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112879</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115077?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a multimethods study evaluating a transition pathway between hospital settings and postsecondary institutions: the NavigateCAMPUS study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115077?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The surge in postsecondary students reporting mental health concerns, coupled with increased utilisation of on-campus and hospital-based mental healthcare, highlights a need to understand effective service navigation. To address this system gap, the University of Toronto and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) leveraged their unique expertise and resources to develop the University of Toronto Navigation (UTN) service. UTN introduces care navigators to facilitate postsecondary student transitions from acute mental health services to community or campus mental healthcare. There has been limited implementation and evaluation of navigator models specific to the postsecondary context to date, which hinders scalability. This paper describes the study protocol of Navigation to Enhance Post-Secondary Students&rsquo; Acute Mental Health Care Transitions, a study that aims to collaborate with students, navigators and clinicians to evaluate the UTN service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A one-stage, single-arm multimethods study design will be used to evaluate the UTN service. We will recruit 103 students following their UTN intake appointment. Students will complete quantitative measures assessing health outcomes, experiences of care and service utilisation at baseline and at three subsequent time points across a 6-month follow-up period. The quantitative data will be linked to administrative healthcare data. The primary evaluation outcome will be defined as attending an appointment with an appropriate care provider (in person or virtually) within 30 days of discharge from the hospital. We will conduct interviews with students and referring clinicians to gather perspectives regarding their experiences and satisfaction with the UTN service in greater depth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Research ethics board approvals have been obtained from the University of Toronto and CAMH. Results will be disseminated through publications and presentations, and a toolkit will be cocreated to support implementation and adaptation of hospital-based navigator interventions in postsecondary contexts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cleverley, K., Brennenstuhl, S., Davies, J., Ewing, L., Sainsbury, K., Salman, S., Levinson, A., Chiasson, C.-A., Nasir, S., Bartha, C., Ma, C., de Oliveira, C., Mason, J., Barbic, S. P., Dimitropoulos, G., Freeland, A., Halladay, J., Hamza, C. A., Lam, J. S. H., Munn, C., Rash, J. A., Simpson, S., Stergiopoulos, V., Szatmari, P., Uliaszek, A. A., Young, L. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T06:19:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115077</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115077</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a multimethods study evaluating a transition pathway between hospital settings and postsecondary institutions: the NavigateCAMPUS study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115077</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115077</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e093030?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Applying the socioecological model to examine the beliefs, perceptions and attitudes surrounding preterm birth in Ethiopia: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e093030?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Premature birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Understanding perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards preterm births, and how these factors influence care provision at health facilities and at home is crucial for improving preterm newborns&rsquo; health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted an exploratory qualitative study at Batu and Meki communities in the East Shewa Zone of Oromia Region, Ethiopia. We conducted in-depth interviews (n=81) and focus group discussions (n=8) using semistructured guides. The study participants included women who had preterm births, family members, community members, healthcare workers and expert stakeholders. We audio-recorded, transcribed the interviews and coded the transcripts. We employed the socioecological model to present perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards preterm birth at individual, interpersonal, organisational and societal levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Giving birth to a preterm newborn is often associated with fear, stress, unhappiness, concern and worry. At the individual level, preterm newborns&rsquo; mothers often feel guilt and self-blame. Families tend to keep preterm birth a secret due to perceptions of &lsquo;incompleteness&rsquo;. At the interpersonal level, preterm newborns are often stigmatised and families are disappointed by mothers who give birth prematurely. However, some believe that preterm newborns are accepted within the community. At the organisational level, healthcare providers find the causes of preterm birth unpredictable, they do not consider preterm births prevalent, and consider some of them as abortion. There is also a common belief that preterm infants have a low survival rate, leading to the deprioritisation of their care. At the societal level, some believe preterm births are caused by divine will as punishment for sins committed by the mother, while others think they occur naturally. Preterm newborn&rsquo;s death is often not acknowledged as true loss and families are discouraged from grieving.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our study found that the beliefs, perceptions and attitudes surrounding preterm birth, held by families, communities, healthcare providers and society at large, influence the care that preterm newborn&ndash;mother dyads receive both at home and within health facilities. Addressing these requires a multifaceted approach targeted at deeply ingrained attitudes and perceptions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Estifanos, A. S., Gelaw, M. A., Getachew, H., Ireso, B. R., Dimtse, A., Metaferia, G., Woldehawariat, T. D., Walelegn, M., Magge, H., Roro, M. A., Gobena, R. G., Nigatu, Y. D., Mengistu, Y., Shikur, B., Demissew, R., Beyene, S. A., Tumilowicz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093030</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-093030</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Applying the socioecological model to examine the beliefs, perceptions and attitudes surrounding preterm birth in Ethiopia: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e093030</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e093030</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096338?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HIV diagnostic implementation in the Dominican Republic: an in-depth qualitative context analysis for health technology developers]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096338?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To understand the political, economic, social and technological facilitators and barriers in obtaining an HIV diagnosis to inform implementation strategies for HIV diagnostics in the Dominican Republic (DR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>In-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A high complexity public hospital in Santiago de los Caballeros, DR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A convenience and purposive sample of 36 internal medicine physicians and laboratory personnel involved in sample collection, sample analysis or oversight of biological sample analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Using the Social Ecological Model, our results highlighted several interrelated barriers and facilitators to sample analysis at the individual (patient), interpersonal (interactions between laboratory personnel, physicians and patients), organisational (the hospital), community (Santiago de Los Caballeros) and societal (the DR) levels. Some key findings include the importance of psychological support in receiving an HIV diagnosis, how spoken language can be a barrier to care, how inconsistent access to laboratory supplies is a barrier for patients, laboratory personnel and clinicians, and the importance of government public health investment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Employing qualitative methods to investigate a bioengineering challenge yielded rich data on the sociotechnical implementation context of HIV diagnostics in the DR. Several context-relevant suggestions were developed for HIV diagnostic developers which include incorporating psychological support into the diagnosis workflow, delivering information in multiple languages (ie, Haitian Creole and Spanish) and with non-stigmatising phrasing, working with the public sector to develop and implement technologies, and reducing the supply chain reliance on high-income countries to lessen delays in care. These findings can apply to other types of health technologies and settings and demonstrate the importance of utilizing human-centered design to understand implementation context and promote global health equity in health technology development and adoption.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, K., Arango, D., Morel, S., Sterling, K., Agenor, M., Tripathi, A., Rodriguez, C., Rosen, R., Sanchez, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096338</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096338</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HIV diagnostic implementation in the Dominican Republic: an in-depth qualitative context analysis for health technology developers]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096338</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096338</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103060?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the impact of targeted exercise in women experiencing homelessness, addiction and mental health challenges: a mixed-methods feasibility study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103060?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Low physical functioning and frailty are prevalent in non-geriatric vulnerable populations such as people experiencing homelessness, addiction and mental health challenges. The objective of this study was to explore the feasibility and impact of a targeted exercise intervention with protein supplementation for women experiencing homelessness, addiction and mental health challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Mixed-methods feasibility study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A women&rsquo;s-only day service for people with homelessness and addiction issues, in Dublin, Ireland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Women experiencing homelessness, addiction and mental health challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>The intervention was a 10-week <I>low-threshold exercise and protein</I> supplementation pre-post programme (LEAP-W). Qualitative interviews were conducted following the intervention with programme participants and key stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was feasibility measured by recruitment, retention, adherence, safety and acceptability, and secondary outcomes measured pre-post intervention change in physical function, pain, nutritional and frailty status, and overall health status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 33 participants were recruited. Data generated demonstrated that LEAP-W was feasible by its safety, acceptability and high retention in certain subgroups, and high adherence to the exercise and protein supplement; its impact was demonstrated by pre-post intervention improvement in multiple domains (strength (chair stand test), balance (the single leg stance test), pain and quality of life/mental health (mental component summary of the Short Form-12; 95% CI, p&lt;0.05)). Three themes emerged from the qualitative inquiry: (1) the power of exercise; (2) challenges to engagement and (3) the LEAP approach, driven by the trauma-informed and low threshold approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Targeted exercise interventions with trauma-sensitive, flexible design can be successfully delivered and yield impact in women with complex needs who experience homelessness, addiction and mental health challenges. Service design should be considered when delivering interventions to this population. Further higher-powered longitudinal studies are warranted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06264895">NCT06264895</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kennedy, F., Murray, D., Ni Cheallaigh, C., Romero-Ortuno, R., Gavin, S., Broderick, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103060</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103060</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the impact of targeted exercise in women experiencing homelessness, addiction and mental health challenges: a mixed-methods feasibility study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103060</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103060</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103366?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maternity care bundle for UK women with multiple long-term health conditions: coproduction workshops]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103366?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The objective of this study is to co-produce a care bundle for women with multiple long-term health conditions (MLTC) that could be pilot tested and implemented in UK maternity services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Online co-production workshops each attended by 20&ndash;30 key interest holders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>United Kingdom, October 2023-February 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Population</st>
<p>Women with experience of pregnancy with MLTC, healthcare professionals and other interest holders involved in commissioning, planning and delivering care for pregnant women with MLTC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study followed a three-step process: (1) a consolidated list of key components of care for pregnant women with MLTC was created through secondary analysis of prior collected qualitative data; (2) the list of care components was explored during four co-production workshops; and (3) findings from (1) and (2) were synthesised to develop a maternity care bundle of 4&ndash;5 key care components for pregnant women with MLTC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>A maternity care bundle of five key care components for pregnant women with MLTC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A list of 25 care components was refined to develop a proposed care bundle of five components. These were provisions of early and reliable medication advice and decision support; creation of a &lsquo;goals of care summary&rsquo; accessible to women and the care team; provision of continuity of midwifery care throughout pregnancy and postnatal care; provision of a named care coordinator; and a formal postnatal handover of care from the multidisciplinary care team to the General Practitioner (GP) and secondary care team involving the woman.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study coproduced an evidence-based care bundle for pregnant women with MLTC to enhance communication and ensure individualised care and support. Further collaborative work with women and professionals is required to refine, implement and evaluate its impact on outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanley, S., McCann, S., Singh, M., Vowles, Z., Lee, S. I., Plachcinski, R., Nirantharakumar, K., Black, M., Locock, L., Taylor, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103366</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103366</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maternity care bundle for UK women with multiple long-term health conditions: coproduction workshops]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103366</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103366</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103498?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a mixed-methods modified Delphi study for the development of a core domain set to assess the health-related quality of life of patients with mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome in clinical trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103498?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that primarily affects the skin and can mimic inflammatory dermatoses. Unlike many skin diseases, CTCL can lead to disabling symptoms, and advanced CTCL can even be fatal. Early studies investigating health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) and S&eacute;zary syndrome (SS), common subtypes of CTCL, demonstrated significant impairment across numerous domains. The aim of this current study is to develop a core domain set (CDS) to identify the essential aspects of MF/SS that influence HRQOL that should be measured in therapeutic clinical trials. In the future, this set of core concepts will be used to identify the best patient- reported outcome measure(s) (PROM) for HRQOL for MF/SS clinical research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Multiple strategies will be used to generate candidate concepts: systematic review of the literature, qualitative study and a survey study of healthcare providers. A Delphi consensus process including a comprehensive group of stakeholders (patients, caregivers/care partners, a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, patient advocacy groups, pharmaceutical industry representatives, methodologists and government agencies) will be used to achieve consensus. Statistical corrections for multiple significance testing and false positive findings will be undertaken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was submitted for and received institutional review board approval at the University of Washington (IRB# STUDY00018890 and STUDY00019407). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants where necessary. We will disseminate our findings through peer-reviewed, open access publications and presentations at national/international conferences. We will provide a plain language summary in lay terms for patients and families to patient advocacy groups for distribution to their network.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration details</st>
<p>The protocol is registered in the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asare, C., Raymundo, C., Chen, J., Perez-Chada, L., Tawa, M., Thornton, S., Ottevanger, R., Scarisbrick, J., Olsen, E., Khan, N., Kim, E. J., Shinohara, M. M., Larocca, C., International Dermatology Outcomes Measures Cutaneous Lymphoma Working Group Additional Members: Neha Mehta Shah, Jenny Park, Krithika Nayudu, Asare, Raymundo, Chen, Park, Nayudu, Mehta Shah, Perez-Chada, Tawa, Thornton, Ottevanger, Scarisbrick, Olsen, Khan, Kim, Shinohara, Larocca]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103498</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103498</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dermatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a mixed-methods modified Delphi study for the development of a core domain set to assess the health-related quality of life of patients with mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome in clinical trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dermatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103498</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103498</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103982?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-management experiences of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in China: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103982?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the self-management experiences of individuals living with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) through the lens of the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behaviour model to inform the design of personalised self-management interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A phenomenological method, common in qualitative research, was used. Data were collected using semistructured in-depth interviews. Data collection and analysis were conducted concurrently, guided by the principle of reaching data saturation. The data were evaluated using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in a quiet, private setting, either a classroom or consultation room, free from external disturbances.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Between March and September 2023, 15 individuals diagnosed with SLE who met the inclusion criteria participated in the in-depth interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 15 patients were interviewed, and 3 themes and 9 subthemes regarding self-management experiences were extracted: (1) Capability level: Deficiency in disease knowledge and insufficient self-management skills; (2) Motivation level: Lack of self-management awareness, perceived benefits and risks, uncertainty about disease progression and appearance-related anxiety; (3) Opportunity level: Family understanding and support, social support and environmental facilitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>SLE patients&rsquo; self-management behaviours are influenced by both personal experiences and external environments. Healthcare professionals should enhance health education, deliver individualised guidance, strengthen patients&rsquo; self-management awareness and psychological positivity, optimise medical resource allocation, and bolster social support to improve patients&rsquo;self-management capabilities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, Y., Zhong, W., Ma, X., Ren, D., Li, X., Shi, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103982</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103982</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-management experiences of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in China: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103982</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103982</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105202?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychological recovery of nurses after emergencies and disasters: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105202?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>With the increasing frequency and intensity of disasters globally&mdash;and their profound effects on the mental well-being of healthcare professionals, particularly nurses&mdash;the psychological distress experienced by nurses following natural disasters has become a pressing issue. This study aims to explore prevalent patterns and effective interventions for supporting nurses&rsquo; psychological recovery after disaster exposure, ultimately aiming to propose an optimal recovery model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will include qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies, as well as relevant systematic reviews, published in English between 2010 and 2025. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed independently by multiple reviewers, with methodological quality and risk of bias evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Due to anticipated heterogeneity, findings will be synthesised using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study protocol raises no ethical issues. The results will be shared through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at appropriate academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251014914.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akbari Shahrestanaki, Y., Sadat Hosseini, F., Kashiha, E., Norouzi, S., Mirzaei Jirandehi, F., Beyrami Jam, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105202</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105202</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychological recovery of nurses after emergencies and disasters: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105202</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106079?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ultra long peripheral catheter versus accelerated Seldinger technique long peripheral catheter in difficult intravenous access patients (ULAST): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106079?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Ultrasound-guided peripheral cannulation by specialised nurses is increasingly used to improve first-stick success rates in patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA). Long peripheral catheters are indicated for extended dwell times and the reduction of central venous catheters and their associated complications. Recently, multiple types of catheters and insertion techniques have been used in clinical care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This prospective, two-arm, single-centre, non-blinded, pragmatic randomised controlled trial will compare two types of long peripheral catheters. A 63 mm ultra-long peripheral catheter using the catheter-over-needle approach will be compared with an 80&ndash;100 mm accelerated Seldinger technique-long peripheral catheter, which is the standard of care. Adult inpatients with DIVA, requiring a long peripheral catheter, will be included. The study aims to compare the mean dwell time, therapy completion rates and incidences of catheter-related thrombosis, infections, phlebitis, infiltration, loss of catheter usability and unplanned removal among adult DIVA patients. A priori sample size calculation based on average dwell times from published studies indicates that a minimum of 52 patients (26 per group) is needed. Consecutive sampling will be used until the sample size is reached. Upon signing the informed consent form, patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Due to the distinct visual differences between the two types of long peripheral catheters, blinding the inserter during the procedure is impractical.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The ethics committee of Ghent University (B6702024000487) and University Hospital of Brussels approved this study. On completion of the study, results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant peer-reviewed scientific journal. No external funding was received for the execution of this trial. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07005310">NCT07005310</A>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Protocol version</st>
<p>Version 1, 17/03/2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pieteraerens, W., Vanhonacker, D., Beeckman, K., Torsy, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106079</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106079</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ultra long peripheral catheter versus accelerated Seldinger technique long peripheral catheter in difficult intravenous access patients (ULAST): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106079</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106079</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106359?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Design and rationale of the artifiCiAl intelligence Model for Evaluating the surgical techniques of caRdiAc surgeons (CAMERA): a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106359?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a technically demanding procedure where surgical skill directly influences outcomes. Traditional evaluation relies on expert subjective judgement, which is resource-intensive and lacks scalability. The emergence of computer vision and deep learning offers potential for objective, automated skill assessment. Prior research has explored phase recognition and gesture classification in surgery; however, few studies have applied AI-driven evaluation in high-stakes cardiac procedures. Therefore, the objective of this study is to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based framework for the automated assessment of surgical technical skills in CABG using real-world surgical videos, benchmarked against expert ratings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a prospective, single-centre observational study conducted in a high-volume surgical hospital. Eligible participants are adult patients undergoing elective CABG with complete intraoperative video data. Videos are analysed using a hybrid AI pipeline to generate scores based on visual impression and tool trajectory accuracy. The primary outcome is the feasibility of AI annotation, that is, the intraclass correlation coefficient value of AI predicted score and human rating data. Secondary outcomes include the consistency between AI and expert skill assessments, analysis of surgical instrument trajectories and the correlation of AI-derived skill scores with intraoperative graft flow and resistance. Exploratory outcomes aim to correlate surgical skill with graft patency at 1 year and major adverse cardiovascular events within 6 months and 12 months postoperatively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Ethics Committee in Fuwai hospital approved this study (2024-2563). The results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06739005">NCT06739005</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuan, X., Liu, F., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Li, J., Lei, L., Gao, S., Bao, H., Yuan, J., Zhang, X., Feng, W., Liu, H., Zhao, W., Hu, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106359</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106359</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Design and rationale of the artifiCiAl intelligence Model for Evaluating the surgical techniques of caRdiAc surgeons (CAMERA): a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106359</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106703?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medico-social predictors of low work ability: a cross-sectional study of 2104 workers in southern France]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106703?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to determine the medico-social factors that predicted workers&rsquo; low work ability (LWA) leading to long-term absenteeism and permanent medical unfitness for work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional analysis based on a cohort of workers followed up by an occupational health service in the south of France.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Employees visited by the service completed the Work Ability Index (WAI), a self-administered questionnaire. A score of 26 points or more defines high work ability while a score of 25 points or less defines LWA (scoring from 6 to 50 points). Occupational and medico-social data were obtained from computerised medical records. Logistic regression models were applied.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 2104 WAIs completed the baseline questionnaire, the factors most associated with LWA were mental disorders (OR: 3.46), adaptation of the workstation (OR: 2.88) and long/iterative stoppages (OR: 2.87). Blue collar (OR: 2.50), white collar (OR: 2.34), permanent contracts (OR: 1.79), disability (OR: 2.63), recognition as a disabled worker (OR: 2.37), musculoskeletal disorders of the neck (OR: 2.52) and back (OR: 1.69) also appear to be associated with a risk of LWA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>White-collar and blue collar workers affected by mental disorders and musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and back appear to be significantly associated with a risk of LWA. To adjust LWA preventive measures, future studies are needed to discuss further these risk factors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bellagamba, G., Daumail, N., Landi, A., Lehucher-Michel, M.-P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106703</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106703</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medico-social predictors of low work ability: a cross-sectional study of 2104 workers in southern France]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106703</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106703</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107032?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceptions of best practice, pain science and structure-focused education for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a content analysis of qualitative data from a randomised experiment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107032?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore how people perceive different forms of education for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain in terms of words or feelings evoked by the education and treatments they feel are needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>We performed a content analysis of qualitative data collected in a randomised experiment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>2237 participants with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain were randomly assigned to receive three forms of education: <I>best practice education</I>, <I>best practice education plus pain science messages</I> and <I>structure-focused education</I>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcomes</st>
<p>After receiving the education, participants answered two questions regarding (1) words or feelings evoked by the education and (2) treatments they felt were needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>2232 responses for each question were analysed (99.7% response rate). Participants who received <I>best practice education</I> more frequently expressed feelings of unhappiness/frustration. The addition of <I>pain science messages</I> to <I>best practice education</I> resulted in slightly more emotional responses and a greater sense of being validated or cared for. In contrast, participants who received <I>structure-focused education</I> more frequently expressed trust in the clinician&rsquo;s expertise and the need for medication, activity modification, rest, diagnostic imaging, injections and surgery. These participants also less frequently considered exercise as a viable treatment option.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Participants with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain expressed generally similar emotional responses across groups, with small differences in treatment preferences favouring self-management in the <I>best practice education</I> groups compared with those who received <I>structure-focused education</I>. Those in the <I>best practice education</I> also less frequently reported needing potentially unnecessary treatments (eg, imaging, injections and surgery).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000197639).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Z., Ferreira, G. E., Muller, R., Sousa, F., Malliaras, P., West, C. A., OKeeffe, M., Maher, C., Zadro, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107032</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107032</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceptions of best practice, pain science and structure-focused education for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a content analysis of qualitative data from a randomised experiment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical management</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107032</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107032</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108782?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Potential impacts of adult growth hormone deficiency: a population-based study in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108782?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the potential long-term impacts of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational, retrospective matched cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database of primary care records with linkage to deprivation, secondary care and mortality data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults registered with CPRD between 31/03/2002 and 29/03/2021. Individuals with GHD were exact matched up to 1:4 with unaffected controls on sex, age group (by decade) and general practice with propensity score matching on age, ethnicity and deprivation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD), osteoporosis, fractures, depression, time off work and unemployment were investigated using Cox proportional hazards modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>1573 adults with GHD were matched to 6234 unaffected controls. Median follow-up was 5.2 years for cases (IQR 2.2, 10.6) and 5.1 years for controls (IQR 2.2, 10.3). Adult GHD was associated with an increased risk of premature mortality (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.61; 95% CI 1.27, 2.03), CVD (aHR 2.38; 95% CI 1.84 to 3.07) and osteoporosis (aHR 4.03; 95% CI 2.88 to 5.65), but there was no evidence for an increased risk of fractures. A higher rate of depression (aHR 1.72; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.40) and unemployment (aHR 2.06; 95% CI 1.56 to 2.71) was also seen in adults with GHD, although there was no evidence for increased time off work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>GHD in adults is associated with increased risk of premature mortality, CVD, osteoporosis, depression and socioeconomic challenges such as unemployment. Timely diagnosis, appropriate treatment and comprehensive support are critical to mitigating these adverse outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Criseno, S., Gayton, E., Araghi, M., Machtiger-Azoulay, N., Toogood, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108782</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108782</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Potential impacts of adult growth hormone deficiency: a population-based study in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108782</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108782</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109038?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicentre international observational study on airway management for anaesthesia: the STARGATE study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109038?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>More than 300 million major surgical procedures are carried out under general anaesthesia each year worldwide, and advanced airway management remains one of the leading daily challenges for clinicians. Data from large international prospective cohort studies on adverse events such as cardiovascular collapse, cardiac arrest and severe hypoxaemia during advanced airway management to facilitate anaesthesia are lacking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The International ob<b>S</b>ervational s<b>T</b>udy on <b>A</b>i<b>R</b>way mana<b>G</b>ement in oper<b>A</b>ting room and non-opera<b>T</b>ing room ana<b>E</b>sthesia (STARGATE) study will be an international prospective observational cohort study describing the incidence of major adverse events associated with advanced airway management (tracheal intubation or supraglottic airway device placement) for general anaesthesia in the operating and non-operating room for surgery and medical procedures. The secondary aim will be to describe the practice of airway management in a large international cohort. Critically ill patients will be excluded from this study. Data on patients&rsquo; characteristics, type of procedure and the adopted airway management strategy, post-procedure adverse events, operator characteristics and in-hospital mortality will be prospectively collected. The study aims to enrol 10 500 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the coordinating centre (Comitato Etico Interaziendale AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, N&deg; 25/2023). Each of the participating centres will then seek approval of their local Ethics Committee before enrolment. Data will be disseminated to the scientific community by original articles submitted to international peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05759299.">NCT05759299</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russotto, V., Sansovini, C., Muraccini, M., Collino, F., Myatra, S. N., Higgs, A., Brewster, D., Curic Radivojevic, R., Parotto, M., Karamchandani, K., Landoni, G., Sorbello, M., Monfroglio, M., Rovescala, G., Martinelli, P., Tinelli, O., Meessen, J., Bellani, G., Laffey, J. G., Langeron, O., Caironi, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109038</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109038</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicentre international observational study on airway management for anaesthesia: the STARGATE study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109038</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109038</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between severe maternal morbidity and health service use in the first postpartum year: a population-based retrospective cohort study in British Columbia, Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess health service use between days 43 and 365 postdelivery, comparing individuals with and without severe maternal morbidity (SMM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-based cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Linked datasets from Population Data BC in British Columbia, Canada, April 2013&ndash;March 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Postpartum individuals aged &gt;18 years with a hospital or home delivery, with/without SMM occurring from 20 weeks&rsquo; gestation through 42 days post partum. Ectopic pregnancies, missing identifiers and maternal deaths at delivery or within 42 days post partum were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was high health service use, defined as being in the 95th percentile for use of one or more of the following non-obstetric visits: emergency department, hospitalisations and outpatient visits to a primary care physician or specialist&mdash;each occurring between 43 and 365 days after delivery hospitalisation discharge. Secondary outcomes included being in the 95th percentile for each visit type. Log binomial regression assessed the rate and risk of high health service use in SMM compared with non-SMM pregnancies, adjusting for confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The cohort included 261 287 deliveries (5575 (2.1%) with SMM). Those with &gt;15 visits within 43&ndash;365 days postdelivery were classified as having high health service use. SMM-affected individuals were twice as likely to have high health service use (9.2% vs 4.3%; adjusted relative risk (aRR)=1.96, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.17). Individuals with non-hypertensive cardiovascular SMM had markedly higher health service use (21.4% vs 4.3%; aRR=5.18, 95% CI 3.28 to 8.16). There was heterogeneity in the association between SMM and high health service use among those without versus with previous comorbidities, without versus with high service use in the 2 years prior to delivery, and without vs with preterm birth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our study revealed high health service use after SMM. These findings can help guide the development of standardised postpartum care pathways.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanner, L., Lisonkova, S., Shapiro, G. D., Panagiotoglou, D., Platt, R. W., Ukah, U., Dayan, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110105</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110105</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between severe maternal morbidity and health service use in the first postpartum year: a population-based retrospective cohort study in British Columbia, Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110105</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe, informed by stakeholder insights on the impact of COVID-19, emerging innovations and recommendations to enhance resilience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Mixed-methods study comprising three phases: (1) survey among European cardiac care providers; (2) five multistakeholder focus groups and (3) participatory tool development. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The survey targeted cardiology professionals from the 27 European Union Member States and Ukraine who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Focus group participants were purposefully sampled to represent clinical, organisational and policy perspectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 177 survey respondents and 40 informants in focus groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six key resilience dimensions of cardiac care pathways were identified: workforce, organisation of care delivery, governance and trust, communication and cooperation, medical devices and products, and data collection and use. Staff shortages and infrastructure capacity were key challenges during the pandemic. The most frequent measures were the reallocation of health staff (75%; n=133) and repurposing infrastructures (38%; n=32). Participants discussed the six resilience dimensions around a total of 17 subdimensions and 39 recommended actions to enhance resilience were identified. The resulting resilience assessment tool included four components: (1) mapping a context-specific cardiac care pathway; (2) stakeholder identification critical to participate in collective self-assessment; (3) a preparedness checklist generating a visual heat map and (4) a resource toolkit.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The resilience assessment tool offers step-by-step guidance to strengthening cardiac care pathways across six key resilience dimensions, supported by actionable recommendations. The tool enables the identification of context-specific vulnerabilities and improvement priorities, thereby supporting healthcare professionals and policymakers in enhancing preparedness and ensuring care continuity before, during and after crises. Its implementation is currently being piloted in European hospitals to evaluate and refine its practical applicability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[V Carvalho, A. S., Brito Fernandes, O., Piek, J. J., Mauri, J., Sanz Escartin, A., Wijns, W., Klazinga, N., Kringos, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110266</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110719?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Azithromycin use in labour to prevent sepsis among pregnant women undergoing vaginal delivery in Nigeria (AZIN-V): a study protocol for a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110719?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Nigeria has the highest number of maternal deaths globally, and maternal peripartum sepsis is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. A single oral dose of azithromycin (AZM; 2 g) is safe and effectively reduces 33%&ndash;60% of maternal sepsis during planned vaginal birth in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the clinical and cost-effectiveness of oral AZM during vaginal birth in Nigeria remains unknown in the context of poor antimicrobial stewardship practices, significant antimicrobial resistance and healthcare financing. Evidence is also lacking on the standard care for the prevention of maternal sepsis among pregnant women undergoing vaginal births in Nigeria. The AZIN-V trial is a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial to determine the safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of intrapartum oral AZM versus usual care in the prevention of peripartum maternal sepsis. The trial will also examine the impact of implementation strategies in enhancing adherence to the oral AZM protocol during planned vaginal births and identify effective strategies to improve adherence (fidelity) to the protocol in real-world LMIC settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre hybrid type 2 trial conducted in six Nigerian states: Ebonyi, Edo, Gombe, Kano, Kwara and Lagos. The study aims to simultaneously test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of AZM (clinical trial) and the impact of implementation strategies (implementation research) in Nigeria&rsquo;s unique healthcare context. The clinical trial is a two-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial conducted across 48 health facilities, randomly assigned (1:1) to either intrapartum administration of oral AZM (intervention group) or usual care&mdash;the current routine practice (control group). A total of 5040 study participants (2520 in each group) will be enrolled in the clinical trial. The implementation trial is a two-arm cluster non-randomised controlled trial conducted in 12 health facilities (1:1) allocated to either a bottom-up approach using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle or a usual top-down approach with a one-time training workshop and distribution of clinical guidelines, with both arms administering oral AZM during vaginal birth while assessing fidelity (primary outcome).</p>
<p>For the clinical trial, data will be analysed using intention-to-treat statistical methods. The cost-effectiveness outcome will be analysed using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio. Implementation outcomes will be analysed using descriptive statistics and a thematic approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the National Health Research Ethics Committee, Nigeria (NHREC/01/01/2007-30/09/2024), the ethics committees of the participating health institutions (Lagos University Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Committee: ADM/DSCST/HREC/APP/6325; University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital Health Research Ethics Committee: ERC/PAN/2025/03/0581; University of Benin Teaching Hospital Health Research Ethics Committee: ADM/E22/A/VOL. VII/483117141; Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Committee: AKTH/MAC/SUB/12 A/P-3/VI/2509 and Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Committee: ISTH/HREC/20241507/605), the Ministries of Health of the six states and the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control. Written informed consent will be obtained from all eligible study participants before enrolment. Results will be shared with communities and policy stakeholders and through peer-reviewed journals and will be presented at conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN16415327">ISRCTN16415327</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Afolabi, B. B., Makwe, C. C., Oluwole, E. O., Obi-Jeff, C., Mitchell, E. J., Banke-Thomas, A., Adeyemo, T. A., Abioye, A. I., Eboreime, E. A., Saidu, A. D., Okoro, U. A., Akintan, P., Osuagwu, C. S., Chieme, C. F., Lawanson, T., Hossain, A., Walker, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110719</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110719</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Azithromycin use in labour to prevent sepsis among pregnant women undergoing vaginal delivery in Nigeria (AZIN-V): a study protocol for a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110719</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110719</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111158?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Connecting families--randomised controlled trial of poverty screening and financial support navigation for families of young children in primary care: an internal pilot study informed protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111158?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Poverty can have profound negative impacts on parent, child and family health. Primary care providers are in a unique position to address child poverty. Some team-based models have integrated community support workers (CSWs) for social service system navigation assistance. The overall aim of this study is to rigorously test a poverty reduction intervention (navigation of financial supports) embedded in primary care. The primary objective is to compare parenting stress between CSW-supported, structured review of financial supports and social system navigation (intervention) and receipt of written summary of local resources (usual care).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multisite pragmatic superiority randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation to the CSW-supported social system navigation versus no navigation. Parent&ndash;child dyads (80 parents of children aged &lt;3 years endorsing &lsquo;<I>Do you ever have difficulty making ends meet at the end of the month</I>?&rsquo;) will be recruited during a scheduled health supervision visit from primary care practices in Kingston, Ontario. Intervention group participants will have a structured review of financial supports with a trained CSW and will meet up to 6 times over 6 months. Outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcome is the Parenting Stress Index Fourth Edition Short Form (PSI-4-SF) total score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include household income, food insecurity, parent mental health (depression and anxiety) and child health. An internal pilot study was used to obtain more reliable estimates of the SD of PSI-4-SF at 6 months to recalculate the sample size (if needed) and assess randomisation and completion rates. Qualitative interviews conducted 9 months after enrolment explore parent experiences with the CSW intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Research ethics approval by Queen&rsquo;s University Health Sciences REB. Results will be shared with the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit and academic forums.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Connecting Families (Registered 12 October 2021 at <A HREF="www.clinicaltrials.gov">www.clinicaltrials.gov</inter-ref>; <inter-ref locator="NCT05091957" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT05091957</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bayoumi, I., Parkin, P. C., Tabassum, F., Johnson, C., Sherwood, M., Mitchell, M., Birken, C. S., Bloch, G., Carsley, S., Cole, M., Green, M., Keown-Stoneman, C. D. G., Maguire, J. L., Purkey, E., van den Heuvel, M., Weir, S., Wong, P., Borkhoff, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111158</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111158</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Connecting families--randomised controlled trial of poverty screening and financial support navigation for families of young children in primary care: an internal pilot study informed protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111158</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111158</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111163?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of limited health literacy in blue-collar workers: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111163?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Health literacy (HL) is defined as the ability to access, understand, evaluate and apply health-related information, which can influence individuals&rsquo; health outcomes. Blue-collar workers, who often have lower educational attainment and experience language barriers, are at increased risk of limited HL. This systematic review aims to assess the prevalence of limited HL among blue-collar workers to inform the development of appropriate interventions for its improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The systematic review will assess the prevalence of limited HL among blue-collar workers. We will include all quantitative study designs using any instrument for measuring general HL. We will exclude studies that focus on specific types of HL and specific health conditions. We have performed a literature search from inception up to 30 April 2025, in the Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. We will also search eligible articles from Google Scholar and Open Grey as sources of unpublished studies/gray literature. Two independent reviewers will conduct the primary screening of articles, data extraction and quality assessment (using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials and risk of bias in non-randomised studies of exposure), with a third individual available to resolve conflicts. We will assess heterogeneity using the &sup2; test and I&sup2; test. If there is sufficient homogeneity, we will pool studies in a meta-analysis or summarise the findings narratively if heterogeneity is too high. We will use a random effects model for our analysis, and we will use funnel plots to evaluate potential publication bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the certainty of findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval will not be required for this review as there is no primary data collection involving humans. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024597732.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pires Rodrigues, G. A., Duong, P., Luthi, F., Leger, B., Melly, P., Durand, M.-A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111163</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111163</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of limited health literacy in blue-collar workers: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111163</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111273?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Deep phenotyping of suicidal ideation after discharge from psychiatric inpatient care: study protocol for an interdisciplinary, multicentre prospective observational study in Psychiatric University Hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111273?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STB) are a critical public health concern, with 700 000 deaths by suicide each year. The period immediately following hospital discharge is associated with an elevated risk for suicide. Monitoring suicidal ideations throughout this period is therefore critical. However, its highly dynamic nature limits the utility of traditional risk assessments through infrequent outpatient visits. Recent advancements in ambulatory assessments and multimodal predictive approaches offer a promising new avenue. Hence, the present study aims to examine how psychological, linguistic, neurobiological and smartphone-based characteristics relate to suicidal ideation and to improve STB monitoring through a deep phenotyping approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this interdisciplinary, multicentre, prospective observational study, we plan to recruit a total of 200 inpatients with current and/or past STB. The study comprises the following components: (1) a baseline assessment, conducted while participants are still in the hospital. This includes interviews, an electroencephalography recording, a video-recorded verbal task and self-report questionnaires; (2) data collection through a smartphone application during the first 4 weeks after hospital discharge with two active collection weeks of five daily ecological momentary assessments and two 1 min video diaries every other day, as well as smartphone passive sensing for 28 consecutive days and (3) two follow-up assessments, 4 weeks and 3 months after discharge. The primary outcome is self-reported suicidal ideation after hospital discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences of the University of Zurich, Switzerland, approved the study for the Zurich and Basel sites (Ref: 22.09.19). Approval for the New York Site was granted by the Institutional Review Board of NYU Langone Health (i23-00366). Study findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed, open-access publications, conference presentations, patient and public events, and dedicated social media outlets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CRSII5_205913.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monn, A., Homan, S., Mocellin, J., Raja, S. M., Kirchhofer, L., Walser, V., Dolev, E. L., Nissen, M., Kowatsch, T., Seiler, G., Schultebraucks, K., Olbrich, S., Kleim, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111273</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111273</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Deep phenotyping of suicidal ideation after discharge from psychiatric inpatient care: study protocol for an interdisciplinary, multicentre prospective observational study in Psychiatric University Hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111273</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111934?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Remote symptom assessment and management via mobile app for adults with chronic kidney disease in Vietnam (SAM-CKD programme): a randomised feasibility trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111934?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) experience a wide range of symptoms that significantly lower their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Using mobile-based applications for symptom assessment and management has the potential to alleviate the symptom burden of CKD and improve patient outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a randomised feasibility trial to assess the feasibility, acceptability, usability and potential effects of a remote symptom assessment and management (SAM-CKD) 6 week programme delivered via a mobile application. Adults aged 18 years or older with CKD grade 4 or 5 (including those on dialysis) will be randomly assigned to the SAM-CKD programme or usual care. Primary outcomes assess the intervention&rsquo;s feasibility, acceptability and usability. Secondary outcomes are changes in CKD symptoms and HRQoL between baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks later. Data analysis involves descriptive and intention-to-treat analyses. The study will be undertaken between December 2025 and March 2026. The findings will inform whether an effective trial is feasible and whether the study design and/or its methods need modification.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was granted by the Vin University and Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee. Results will be disseminated at the participating hospital and CKD patient groups and shared via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07186361">NCT07186361</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bui, K. L., Hyun, A., Purtell, L., Hoang, V. L., Bonner, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111934</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111934</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Remote symptom assessment and management via mobile app for adults with chronic kidney disease in Vietnam (SAM-CKD programme): a randomised feasibility trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111934</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111934</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112113?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perioperative intravenous fluid management in paediatric surgery: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112113?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intravenous fluids are essential components of perioperative care, supporting intravascular volume, acid&ndash;base balance and electrolyte homeostasis. Despite extensive research in adult surgical populations, paediatric-specific evidence remains limited, and clinical practice frequently relies on extrapolated adult-based recommendations. This gap is particularly relevant in paediatric non-cardiac surgery, where fluid choice may influence key physiological outcomes such as acid&ndash;base status, electrolyte balance, renal function and haemodynamic stability. Given the heterogeneity of study designs, perioperative phases, age groups and reported outcomes in the paediatric literature, a comprehensive synthesis of the existing evidence is needed before a systematic review can be undertaken.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct this scoping review following the methodological guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis, and the reporting will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guideline.</p>
<p>This scoping review will map existing evidence on perioperative intravenous fluid management in paediatric patients (&lt;18 years) undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery in outpatient and inpatient settings. Eligible study designs will include randomised trials, observational studies and systematic reviews. A comprehensive search will be developed with a medical librarian and applied to MEDLINE (PubMed), Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov, with no date restrictions and limited to English, Spanish and German.</p>
<p>Eligibility is framed using participants, concept and context: paediatric patients (&lt;18 years) undergoing non-cardiac surgery; concepts related to preoperative fasting/replacement period, intraoperative period and postoperative period up to 24 hours, intravenous fluid management for maintenance/replacement; and hospital/outpatient surgical settings. Study selection and data charting will follow established scoping review methodology. Data will be synthesised descriptively using narrative and tabular formats. No meta-analysis or formal risk-of-bias appraisal is planned, consistent with scoping review methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This scoping review involves no primary data collection and relies exclusively on published literature; therefore, formal ethical approval is not required. The protocol received administrative approval from the Comit&eacute; de &Eacute;tica para la Investigaci&oacute;n Cient&iacute;fica of Universidad del Cauca (approval no. 6553, 11 June 2025). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and targeted communication with paediatric anaesthesia and surgical communities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanchez, V. L., Pinzon Rodas, V., Cabra-Bautista, G., Florez, I. D., Klimek, M., Calvache, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112113</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112113</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perioperative intravenous fluid management in paediatric surgery: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112113</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient perspectives on harmonica playing as an intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To qualitatively explore the lived experiences and perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using the harmonica as a therapeutic intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients with COPD who had participated in supervised harmonica playing for at least 12 weeks. (clinical trial registration: NCT05995847).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The study focused on patients&rsquo; experiences, including perceived facilitators, barriers and needs regarding the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We interviewed 19 patients with COPD between September and December 2024, with interviews lasting an average of 54 min (range: 36&ndash;77 min). Five primary themes were identified. Participants reported better physical functioning, including better breathing control, enhanced functional capacity and improved sleep quality. Psychological well-being improved with increased relaxation, emotional improvement and mental engagement. Patients also experienced increased social engagement and role shift, such as expanded social connections, family support and restored family roles. Harmonica playing promoted enhanced self-reliance and personal development, with increased self-management confidence, mastery of the harmonica and encouragement for lifelong learning. Barriers and challenges included physical limitations, breathing difficulties, adherence issues and concerns about the sustainability of long-term benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our study indicates that harmonica playing could improve physical health, psychological well-being, social participation and self-reliance, although barriers persist. Tailored programmes could enhance benefits and adherence, and future research should evaluate durability within comprehensive COPD care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05995847">NCT05995847</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, W., Huang, J., Zeng, Q., Ye, Z. J., Li, J., Li, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112115</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112115</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient perspectives on harmonica playing as an intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112115</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112376?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recurrent COVID-19 infection and the risk of exacerbation, mortality and long covid in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112376?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate how recurrent COVID-19 infections influence the clinical course of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), focusing on moderate-to-severe symptom flare-ups, all-cause mortality and long covid.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nationwide retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database covering the entire Korean population between January 2020 and December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 313 760 patients aged &ge;40 years who met an established operational definition of COPD based on diagnostic codes and inhaled therapy prescriptions. Patients were stratified by the number of COVID-19 events: none, one, two or three or more.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was long covid, defined by WHO criteria using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes persisting &ge;2 months within 3 months after infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 313 760 patients, 154 095 (49.1 %) experienced at least one COVID-19 event. COVID-19 infection was associated with increased risk of exacerbations (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.64, 95% CI 1.62 to 1.66) and mortality (aHR 2.25, 95 % CI 2.19 to 2.31). Risk rose progressively with repeated infections, reaching an aHR of 2.41 for exacerbations and 2.93 for mortality after three or more events. Long covid was more frequent in patients with multiple infections, but most cases occurred after the first event, with diminishing occurrence after subsequent infections.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Recurrent COVID-19 infections in patients with COPD were linked to progressively higher risk of exacerbations and mortality, whereas the burden of long covid was greatest after the first infection. Preventing the initial infection and reducing reinfection risk remain critical components of COPD care in the post-COVID-19 era.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, H. W., Choi, K. Y., Lee, J.-K., Yoon, W. S., Kim, Y., Yoo, K.-H., Hwang, Y. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112376</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112376</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recurrent COVID-19 infection and the risk of exacerbation, mortality and long covid in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112376</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112376</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physical fitness and cognitive function: a cross-sectional study among adults in Qatar]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e113261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to investigate the association between physical fitness and markers of cognitive function in adults aged 40 and above in Qatar.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The Qatar Biobank, data of 1000 adults aged 40 and above.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A population of 1000 adults aged 40 years and older was included. Available data comprised measures of physical fitness including cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, body composition and physical fitness capacity, as well as cognitive function assessed through tests of short-term visual memory and psychomotor coordination.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcomes</st>
<p>This paper investigated the physical fitness effect on cognitive functioning through short-term visual memory and psychomotor coordination testing. Logistic regression was used to measure the association between physical fitness and cognitive functioning tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our study showed that lower physical fitness capacity was significantly associated with lower psychomotor coordination in females (OR=1.57, p=0.040) and showed no significant association in males (OR=1.65, p=0.062). For short-term visual memory, the association was significant in females (OR=1.68, p=0.042) unlike in males (OR=1.58, p=0.062). Males with greater muscle strength were about half as likely to have lower psychomotor coordination (OR=0.48, p=0.04). In females, a higher body fat percentage was associated with poorer cognitive function, with each 1% increase in body fat being linked to 6% higher odds of low short-term visual memory (p=0.02) and low psychomotor coordination (p=0.006). Cardiorespiratory fitness showed no statistically significant association with short-term visual memory and psychomotor coordination level in either sex.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our findings suggest that overall physical fitness capacity is associated with better cognitive function in Qatari adults. The relationship between specific fitness measures and cognitive function varied by sex, with muscle strength having a stronger effect for males and body composition for females. These results highlight the potential importance of maintaining physical fitness for cognitive health in adulthood.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alabdulrazzak, A., Al-louzi, T., Rahhal, M. O., Albaloshi, A.-J., Al-Emadi, R., Al Mohannadi, M., Abdulrahman, J., Hasan Farooqui, H., Pedersen, S., Mahmood Al Saady, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113261</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113261</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physical fitness and cognitive function: a cross-sectional study among adults in Qatar]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113261</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114175?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tabata training and its effect on childrens and adolescents physical and mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114175?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Childhood and adolescence are critical developmental periods marked by increasing physical inactivity, stress and mental health problems. TABATA training, a supramaximal form of high-intensity interval training, has been increasingly promoted as a time-efficient approach to improving health. However, evidence on its specific effects in children and adolescents remains limited, fragmented and not systematically synthesised. The objective of this review is to determine whether TABATA training improves physical fitness and mental health outcomes in children and adolescents aged 6&ndash;18 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will perform a systematic review of experimental studies in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The initial literature search was conducted in May 2025, and the systematic review is expected to be completed by March 2026. Eligible studies will include multisession Tabata interventions defined as repeated 20 s high-intensity bouts with 10 s rest intervals, typically performed for 7&ndash;8 cycles per set, with or without multiple sets. Outcomes will include physical fitness indicators and mental health indicators. Study selection and data extraction will follow the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study design framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomised trials and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions for non-randomised studies. When sufficient data are available, quantitative synthesis will be conducted using a three-level random-effects meta-analytic model to account for dependency among effect sizes and anticipated clinical and methodological heterogeneity across studies. Effect sizes for continuous outcomes will be calculated as standardised mean differences. Sensitivity analyses will be performed, and publication bias will be assessed using funnel plots when an adequate number of studies is available. Statistical analyses will be performed using R and Review Manager (RevMan) V.5.4, where appropriate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The results of the systematic review will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. As we will not use individual patient data, ethical approval is not required.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42025632986.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tang, Q.-K., Li, H., Fairof, M. H. Z., Lew, L.-C., Mat Ludin, A. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114175</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114175</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tabata training and its effect on childrens and adolescents physical and mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114175</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114483?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[FoodCHOMP (Food Challenge--at HOme or in Medical Practice): a pilot multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating home versus clinic-based food allergy challenges in low-risk adults-study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e114483?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Approximately 6%&ndash;10% of adults carry food allergy labels. Many such labels are unverified and may be incorrect, contributing to delays in appropriate care, significant dietary restriction, anxiety and unnecessary use of emergency medications. Oral food challenges (OFCs) are the gold standard for confirming or excluding food allergy, but the current model of clinic-based challenges often has long wait times and logistical barriers. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of home-based OFCs compared with standard in-clinic challenges in adults with negative skin-prick testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p><b>Food C</b>hallenge at <b>HO</b>me or in <b>M</b>edical <b>P</b>ractice is a pilot multicentre randomised controlled trial enrolling 120 adults with reported food allergy labels and negative skin prick testing to the implicated food. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to undergo an OFC either at home or in-clinic. The study is designed to generate feasibility and preliminary safety data for home-based OFC, measured by the proportion of participants experiencing immune-mediated adverse events (AEs), compared with clinic-based OFC. Feasibility metrics (screening to recruitment ratio, protocol completion), non-immune AEs, protocol adherence and quality of life assessed using the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire-12 at baseline prior to OFC and 6 months post OFC will also be collected. Statistical analysis will include descriptive statistics, with comparisons between arms using risk differences and relative risks with 95% CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial has received ethics approval from the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/111750/Austin-2024). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings. Data will be presented in aggregated, de-identified form.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06916819">NCT06916819</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godsell, J., Vogrin, S., Chan, S., Henri, M., Ng, I., Andrews, E., Spriggs, K., Perrett, K. P., Trubiano, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-06T05:29:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114483</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114483</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Immunology (including allergy)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[FoodCHOMP (Food Challenge--at HOme or in Medical Practice): a pilot multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating home versus clinic-based food allergy challenges in low-risk adults-study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Immunology (including allergy)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114483</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114483</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100583?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multiarm multistage randomised controlled trial of inflammatory signal inhibitors (MATIS) for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia during the UK pandemic]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100583?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib (RUX) and fostamatinib (FOS) compared with standard of care (SOC) in patients requiring hospital admission for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Adaptive multiarm, multistage, randomised, open-label trial (three arm, two stage).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Five hospitals in England between October 2020 and September 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Hospitalised patients (&ge;18 years) with COVID-19 pneumonia defined by a modified WHO COVID-19 severity grade of 3 or 4.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive RUX (10 mg two times per day for 7 days then 5 mg two times per day for 7 days), FOS (150 mg two times per day for 7 days then 100 mg two times per day for 7 days) or SOC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome was development of severe COVID-19 pneumonia (modified WHO severity grade&ge;5) within 14 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes included mortality, invasive and non-invasive ventilation, venous thromboembolism, duration of hospital stay, readmissions, inflammatory markers and serious adverse events (SAEs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At stage 1, 181 patients were randomised, with 4 assessed as ineligible post randomisation. FOS was stopped early for futility with 16 participants (27.6%, n=58) developing severe COVID-19 pneumonia compared with 15 (25.0%, n=60) in the SOC arm (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) compared with SOC: 1.12; 95% CI 0.49 to 2.58; p=0.608). RUX progressed to stage 2 but the trial was stopped early due to slow recruitment. At the final analysis, 10 participants (16.1%, n=62) developed severe COVID-19 pneumonia in the RUX arm compared with 15 (24.6%, n=61) in the SOC arm (aOR: 0.63; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.57; p=0.161). Four (7.4%) participants in the FOS arm, none in the RUX arm and three (5.5%) in the SOC arm died within 14 days of randomisation. Infections were the most frequently reported SAE and were numerically higher in the FOS (10, 17.2%) and RUX (10, 16.1%) arms compared with SOC (7, 11.5%). Two unexpected serious adverse reactions occurred in the RUX arm only.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We found no evidence that FOS was superior to SOC for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia in patients requiring hospital admission. Due to early stopping, the trial was underpowered to establish RUX&rsquo;s effect in this population. Further study is needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04581954">NCT04581954</inter-ref>; EUDRA-CT: <inter-ref locator="https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-001750-22/GB" locator-type="url">https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-001750-22/GB</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazell, L., Pillay, C., Cornelius, V., Phillips, R., Charania, A., Wason, J., Cherlin, S., Savic, S., Whittington, A., Neelakantan, P., Collini, P., Cook, L., Willicome, M., Milojkovic, D., Kon, O. M., Youngstein, T., Innes, A., Thursz, M., Cooke, G. S., Vergis, N., Cooper, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100583</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Immunology (including allergy)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multiarm multistage randomised controlled trial of inflammatory signal inhibitors (MATIS) for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia during the UK pandemic]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Immunology (including allergy)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100583</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100583</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102923?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the dimensions of role transition to clinical educator among masters anaesthesia students in Iran: protocol for a sequential multimethod study (exploratory-analytical)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102923?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The transition from clinical practice to an academic role presents a multifaceted challenge for anaesthesia master&rsquo;s students in Iran, as it demands not only clinical expertise but also the development of educational competencies. This protocol outlines a sequential multimethod study designed to explore the dimensions of this role transition, identify the challenges and facilitators inherent in assuming a clinical educator role, and ultimately provide a foundation for evidence-based educational interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This sequential multimethod protocol comprises three phases. Phase I involves qualitative thematic content analysis using semistructured focus groups and, where necessary, individual interviews with MSc anaesthesia students to explore experiences of role transition. Qualitative data will be analysed using Braun and Clarke&rsquo;s six-phase approach. Phase II consists of an integrated review of the literature to synthesise existing evidence on transition to clinical educator roles in anaesthesia and related healthcare disciplines. Phase III integrates findings from both phases using the Pillar Integration Process to generate a comprehensive, evidence-informed framework of role transition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for the study has been obtained from Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.SPH.REC.1403.236), and written informed consent will be secured from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through publications in reputable peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences, contributing to the refinement of training programmes for clinical educators within anaesthesia education.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shamsi, A., Yarahmadi, S., Abolhassani zeraat kar, A., Shahidi Delshad, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102923</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102923</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the dimensions of role transition to clinical educator among masters anaesthesia students in Iran: protocol for a sequential multimethod study (exploratory-analytical)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102923</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102923</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102944?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of geriatric nursing care among nurses at specialised hospitals in North-West Ethiopia: a facility-based, mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102944?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the level of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of nurses regarding geriatric nursing care, and to identify factors associated with these outcomes among nurses working in specialised hospitals in North-West Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Facility-based, mixed-methods study, consisting of a cross-sectional survey and qualitative interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Specialised hospitals in the Gojjam area, North-West Ethiopia. The study was conducted from 25 October to 30 November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>For the survey component, 424 nurses were selected using simple random sampling. Twelve nurses were purposively selected for the qualitative in-depth interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Knowledge and attitudes towards geriatric nursing care were measured using the Knowledge of Participants Questionnaire and the Older People in Acute Care Survey. Logistic regression identified factors associated with knowledge and attitudes. Qualitative data were analysed thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>44.6% (95% CI 39.8% to 49.4%) of nurses had good knowledge and 45.3% (95% CI 40.5% to 50.2%) had a favourable attitude towards geriatric nursing care. Knowledge was significantly associated with being female (AOR 1.61; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.43), holding a diploma (AOR 0.40; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.93), holding a degree (AOR 0.32; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.65), having 6&ndash;10 years of experience (AOR 0.48; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.74) and room adequacy (AOR 0.63; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.95). Attitude was associated with 6&ndash;10 years of work experience (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.99) and working in academic hospitals (AOR 0.34; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.53). Qualitative findings highlighted gaps in training, workload challenges and environmental limitations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Less than half of nurses had good knowledge or favourable attitudes towards geriatric nursing care. Gender, educational level, experience and room adequacy were associated with knowledge, while experience and hospital type were associated with differing attitudes. Integrating geriatric nursing into the curriculum and allocating adequate resources are recommended.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abawa, E. D., Amlak, B. T., Bewket, B., Alem, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102944</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102944</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of geriatric nursing care among nurses at specialised hospitals in North-West Ethiopia: a facility-based, mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102944</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102944</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103984?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and associated factors of undernutrition among children under the age of 5 years: a cross-sectional study in riverbank erosion areas of Bangladesh]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103984?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The study aimed to determine the prevalence and identify the associated factors of undernutrition among children under 5 years of age living in riverbank erosion areas in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>A community-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was carried out in riverbank erosion-prone areas of the Tangail and Kushtia districts of Bangladesh, which were selected because they are highly vulnerable to riverbank erosion and related livelihood disruptions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were selected using a two-stage cluster sampling technique based on the criterion that mothers had at least one child under the age of 5 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>Stunting, wasting and underweight were considered independently as outcome variables to assess nutritional status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Descriptive analysis was performed to determine the prevalence of undernutrition, while the &sup2; test and multivariable Poisson regression model were used to identify significantly associated factors with undernutrition among children under 5 years of age in riverbank erosion areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The average prevalence of stunting, wasting and underweight was 37.74%, 22.64% and 9.81%, respectively. Results from the Poisson regression model showed that children who were average or large in size at birth had a much lower prevalence of all forms of undernutrition compared with those born very small. Female children had a 30% lower prevalence of stunting compared with male children. In addition, having educated parents, receiving four or more antenatal care visits and household livestock ownership were each associated with a lower prevalence of undernutrition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The prevalence of stunting in this study was higher than that reported in the most recent Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022. Child size at birth, sex, parental education, antenatal care visits and household livestock ownership were identified as significantly associated factors with undernutrition in riverbank erosion areas of Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahman, T., Rashid, M., Arafat, Y., Fahim, M., Sultana, P., Merajul Islam, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103984</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103984</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and associated factors of undernutrition among children under the age of 5 years: a cross-sectional study in riverbank erosion areas of Bangladesh]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103984</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103984</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104706?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of a phase 3 partially randomised clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of paediatric praziquantel for schistosomiasis treatment in children aged 3 months to 6 years in endemic regions of Brazil: a pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104706?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study assessed the feasibility of implementing a phase 3 field-based clinical trial protocol to evaluate paediatric praziquantel (PED-PZQ) for the treatment of <I>Schistosoma mansoni</I> infection in children aged 3 months to 6 years in endemic areas of Brazil, focusing on operational aspects such as recruitment logistics, documentation management, investigational product handling and protocol adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Pilot and feasibility study for a phase 3 clinical trial, comprising two components: a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, two-arm trial and a single-arm trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Conde, Bahia, Brazil, from December 2024 to January 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Two trials aim to screen 5774 participants from three rural areas in Bahia and three in Sergipe, states in northeastern Brazil, and enrol 403 children eligible for either randomisation or allocation. Trial 1 will randomise (1:1 ratio) 240 children aged 4&ndash;6 years into the PED-PZQ treatment arm or the standard praziquantel (PZQ) 1. Trial 2 will enrol 163 children aged 3 months to 3 years, all receiving PED-PZQ. Both trials are open label. Eligible participants shall meet age criteria, test positive for <I>S. mansoni</I> and fulfil other inclusion criteria. In the first recruiting centre, Conde (Bahia), it was estimated that 650 participants would need to be screened for trial 1 and 552 for trial 2, assuming schistosomiasis prevalence of 5% and 4%, respectively. This pilot study reports on the first 60 participants enrolled.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome of this pilot study is the feasibility of implementing the research protocol in a real-world field setting, focusing on key aspects such as study documentation challenges, participant safety, investigational medicinal product custody chain and protocol adherence. In addition to providing preliminary data on the parasitological cure rate, secondary outcomes include the prevalence of <I>S. mansoni</I> infection and the reduction in <I>S. mansoni</I> egg count (Kato-Katz method). Furthermore, the occurrence and severity of drug-related adverse events are monitored from drug administration to day 21 post-treatment, alongside changes in renal, hepatic and cardiac functions assessed through biochemical markers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 60 participants were recruited, and 55 provided stool samples for screening. The pilot phase demonstrated the feasibility of implementing the clinical protocol under field conditions, with successful completion of all planned procedures and minimal protocol deviations. Operational challenges were identified mainly in documentation processes, participant recruitment and investigational product management and were addressed through preventive and corrective quality assurance actions. The experience also highlighted logistical and infrastructural barriers typical of field-based trials in remote endemic areas, which informed adjustments for the subsequent phase 3 study. Preliminary parasitological results indicated an overall <I>S. mansoni</I> prevalence of 9.1% (5/55), with 21% in trial 1 and 2.8% in trial 2. All infected participants met the eligibility criteria, received treatment and completed follow-up. Four achieved a parasitological cure, and one case of treatment failure was observed (trial 1, PZQ group). Two mild adverse events (diarrhoea) were reported, with no serious complications or clinically significant changes in biochemical parameters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a field-based phase 3 clinical trial protocol for PED-PZQ in endemic areas of Brazil. The findings confirm that the protocol can be successfully applied in primary care settings, despite operational challenges related to recruitment, logistics and documentation. The study also provided preliminary evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of the paediatric formulation and highlighted the need to revise prevalence assumptions to improve future screening strategies. Overall, the experience offers valuable insights to guide the large-scale phase 3 trial and supports the incorporation of PED-PZQ into national schistosomiasis control policies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry; RBR-86kcy37.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Menezes, C. A., Casaes, A. C., Silva, B. R. B. C., Brito dos Santos, M. G., Martins, C. D., Oliveira Francisco, I. M., dos Santos, K. R., Souza, B. O. L., Pinho, A. G. S. F., Mayer, D. M. O. B., Moleiro, G. P. d. R. M., de Queiroz, L. C., Nascimento, R. M., Silva, R. O., de Souza, R. d. P., Silva, L. K., Reis, M. G., Graeff-Teixeira, C., Dolabella, S. S., Carneiro, L. C., de Senna, T. C. R., Daher, A., de Oliveira, D. L., Medeiros, J. J. S., Bezerra, F. S. d. M., de Siqueira, I. C., Oliveira, R. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104706</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104706</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of a phase 3 partially randomised clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of paediatric praziquantel for schistosomiasis treatment in children aged 3 months to 6 years in endemic regions of Brazil: a pilot study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104706</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104706</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109109?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Malaria service readiness and associated factors among health facilities that provide antenatal care services in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study using generalised estimating equation analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109109?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess malaria service readiness and its associated factors among health facilities that provide antenatal care (ANC) services in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nationally representative cross-sectional facility-based study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1156 public and private health facilities that reported providing ANC services at the time of the survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Health facilities across nine regions and two city administrations of Ethiopia based on data from the 2021/2022 Ethiopia Service Provision Assessment survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Only 15.7% (95% CI 13.8 to 18.0) of facilities demonstrated full malaria service readiness, while 14.3% had none of the key components. Substantial regional variation was observed: facilities in Somali region were more likely to be ready (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.53; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.95), whereas readiness was significantly lower in several regions, including Amhara, Oromia, Gambella, Harari, Addis Ababa, Dire Dawa and Sidama, compared with Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples&rsquo; Region. Governance-related factors were strong predictors of readiness&mdash;the presence of a client suggestion box (AOR=1.60; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.29), recent report submission (AOR=2.79; 95% CI 1.15 to 6.76) and monthly staff meetings (AOR=1.64; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.14) were associated with higher readiness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Malaria service readiness in Ethiopian health facilities providing ANC services is low and unevenly distributed across regions. Strengthening supply chains, staff training and governance systems may improve facility preparedness and support more effective malaria service delivery for pregnant women.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bogale, K. A., Asemahagn, M. A., Gelaye, K. A., Muchie, K. F., Engedaw, H. A., Azage, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109109</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109109</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Malaria service readiness and associated factors among health facilities that provide antenatal care services in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study using generalised estimating equation analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109109</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109205?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Causal language jumps and non-alignments between clinical practice guidelines and original studies: a systematic evaluation of diabetes guidelines and their cited evidence]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109205?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Clinical practice guidelines are designed to guide clinical practice and often make causal claims when making recommendations. Sometimes, guidelines make or require stronger causal claims than supplied in the original studies, a phenomenon we call &lsquo;causal language jump&rsquo;. We aimed to evaluate the strength of expressed causation in guidelines and the evidence they reference to assess the pattern of jumps, taking diabetes as an illustrative example.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a systematic evaluation of guidelines and original studies cited by them, using scoping review design with deviations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data source</st>
<p>Randomly sampled 300 guideline statements (narrative sentences describing evidence to support recommendations) from four selected diabetes guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>The eligible guidelines should focus on non-pharmacological treatments or preventive strategies for adult type 2 diabetes mellitus management and related complications. The eligible action recommendations and guideline statements should intend to support non-pharmacological treatments or preventive strategies of type 2 diabetes or in a general diabetic context.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>We rated the causation strength in the statements and the dependence on causation in recommendations supported by these statements using existing scales. Among the causal statements, the cited original studies were similarly assessed. We then evaluated jumps by checking if the causal claims in guideline statements were stronger than in original studies, and if the causation-dependence in guideline recommendations was stronger than supplied in guideline statements. We also assessed how well they report target trial emulation (TTE) components as a proxy for reliability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 300 statements, 114 (38.0%) were causal, and 76 (66.7%) expressed strong causation. 27.2% (31/114) of causal guideline statements stated stronger causation than any of their references and demonstrated &lsquo;causal language jump&rsquo;; 34.9% (29/83) of guideline recommendations required stronger causation than provided in statements. Of the 53 eligible studies for TTE rating, most did not report treatment assignment and causal contrast in detail. The prevalence of these jumps could be partially attributed to the suboptimal use of causal and associational words.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Causal language jumps were common among diabetes guidelines. While these jumps are sometimes inevitable, they should always be justified by good causal inference practices.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, K., Wei, C., Labrecque, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109205</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109205</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Causal language jumps and non-alignments between clinical practice guidelines and original studies: a systematic evaluation of diabetes guidelines and their cited evidence]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109205</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109205</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109583?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical application of dynamic visual acuity for detection of eye diseases: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109583?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Many eye diseases are asymptomatic in their early stages; thus, timely detection is essential for improved outcomes. Dynamic visual acuity (DVA)&mdash;the ability to perceive moving targets&mdash;has been reported as a valuable screening tool for early disease detection. However, unlike static visual acuity, DVA is not routinely assessed in the eye clinic, perhaps due to a lack of standardised measurement protocols and limited understanding among clinicians of its physiological and diagnostic relevance. This scoping review aims to assess the evidence on DVA; provide insight into its physiological basis, measurement techniques and potential for early detection of disease; and identify research gaps to inspire future studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and will involve all relevant articles, including reviews and original studies published in online databases such as PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, Global Health and ScienceDirect. Also, a reference list of relevant articles will be searched, and insight from expert consultations and information from grey literature will be included in the review. Studies conducted with human subjects and in English, irrespective of the year of publication or study design, will be reviewed. Two independent reviewers will screen identified articles, with a third reviewer confirming findings. The data extraction tool will be tested in a pilot review, and the findings will be presented using tables and visual summaries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is required. Findings will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tagoh, S., Kwarteng, M. A., March De Ribot, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109583</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109583</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical application of dynamic visual acuity for detection of eye diseases: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109583</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109583</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110560?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Doravirine versus dolutegravir-based regimen in antiretroviral treatment-naive people living with HIV-1 (ANRS0392s ELDORADO): protocol for an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase III trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110560?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Increasing evidence suggests that dolutegravir (DTG), endorsed by the WHO since 2018 for first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), is associated with significant weight gain and potentially also with cardiometabolic disorders. In an effort to expand therapeutic options for people living with HIV (PLHIV), the EvaLuating the non-inferiority of DORAvirine vs DOlutegravir trial aims to compare the virologic efficacy of doravirine (DOR) and DTG-based regimens and to assess their safety, including a focus on cardiometabolic effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is an international, phase III, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial that will enrol 610 ART-nai&#x0308;ve PLHIV (HIV RNA&ge;1000 copies/mL at screening) across six countries (Brazil, Cameroon, France, C&ocirc;te d&rsquo;Ivoire, Mozambique and Thailand) spanning four continents. Key inclusion criteria include age &ge;18 years, confirmed HIV-1 infection with plasma RNA levels &ge;1000 copies/mL, indication for ART initiation and no prior ART exposure. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either DOR 100 mg once daily in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (300 mg daily) plus lamivudine (3TC) (300 mg daily) or DTG (50 mg daily) in combination with TDF (300 mg once daily) plus either emtricitabine (FTC) (200 mg daily) or 3TC (300 mg daily). Randomisation will be stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA load (&le;100 000 or &gt;100 000 copies/mL) and by country. The primary outcome is virological efficacy, defined as the proportion of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA &lt;50 copies/mL at week 48 on the assigned treatment (FDA Snapshot algorithm). Secondary outcomes include cardiometabolic safety endpoints (ie, weight gain, insulin resistance, hypertension, diabetes, waist and hip circumferences, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting glycaemia, insulin and fasting serum lipids), along with mental health, quality of life, virological and immunological parameters. Final data collection is expected by July 2028.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Primary outcome results (week 48) are expected in early 2028. The project was submitted to and approved by national ethics committees and pharmaceutical regulatory authorities in all participating countries: Brazil (CEP INI FIOCRUZ (21.040-900)/CEP HGNI (26.030-380)); Cameroon (CNERSH (2024/09/1717/CE/CNERSH/SP)/Ministry of Public Health (D30-1464/AAR/MINSANTE/SG/DROS/CRC); C&ocirc;te d'Ivoire: (CNESVS (0018224/MSHPCMU/CNESVS-km)/AIRP (1329/AIRP/DISMP/Om/kbaag); France (CTIS CPP/ANSM (2023-508626-10-00)); Mozambique (CNBS (20/CNBS/25)/ANARME (4635/380/ANARME)); Thailand: (IHRP (08/1944)/Thai FDA: ongoing on 19 January 2026). The trial received authorisation from the French National Commission for Data Protection and Liberties (CNIL) under approval number 924 302. Written informed consent is obtained from all participants prior to any study-specific procedures and trial enrolment, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable national regulations. Study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international scientific conferences. Results will also be communicated to policymakers, healthcare professionals, community stakeholders and study participants through appropriate dissemination activities, including policy briefs, stakeholder meetings and lay summaries on dedicated and easily accessible platforms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration numbers</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06203132">NCT06203132</A>; EU-CT, 2023-508626-10-00.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lhostellier, A., Kouanfack, C., Chazallon, C., Wagner-Cardoso, S., Eholie, S. P., Banze, N., Halue, G., Capeau, J., Delaugerre, C., Moh, R., Bonnet, F., Mfeukeu Kuate, L., Jaquet, A., Perazzo, H., Bernard, C., Bastard, J.-P., Goldwirt, L., Vilquin, P., Nhassengo, P. P., Lavalee, M., Minvielle, N., Dodd, P. J., Marcy, O., Molina, J.-M., Grinsztejn, B., Sellier, P. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110560</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110560</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Doravirine versus dolutegravir-based regimen in antiretroviral treatment-naive people living with HIV-1 (ANRS0392s ELDORADO): protocol for an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase III trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110560</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110560</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110760?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing perspectives of volunteers and patients on the Health Champions intervention in secondary mental healthcare: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110760?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>People with serious mental illness (SMI) can experience significant physical health challenges. The Health Champions intervention was developed to support their physical health through using trained volunteers. However, volunteer and patient perspectives on the impact and implementation of this intervention have yet to be understood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>To compare the views of patients and volunteers on the Health Champions intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on interviews with 29 study participants. Interviews were carried out either face-to-face, via Microsoft Teams, or by telephone and included 12 patients (6 men and 6 women) and 17 volunteers (the Health Champions) (5 men and 12 women).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four overarching themes were identified, highlighting both similarities and differences between stakeholders&rsquo; perspectives: (1) supporting goal setting; (2) impact on positive lifestyle; (3) experiences and perception of the programme and (4) navigating challenges during the programme. Both groups found the programme to be largely successful, by motivating patients to work towards their physical health goals and facilitating successful matching of patients with volunteers. Volunteers and patients valued good communication with the research team. Though both groups shared some views on the challenges with scheduling and a lack of face-to-face contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, their perceptions on how patients incorporated their health changes during and after the programme, as well as other administrative concerns such as views on the efficacy of journaling and breakdown of roles, differed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The Health Champions intervention was perceived as useful to improve the physical health of patients with SMI. Differences in the views between the two stakeholders may result from their distinct experiences and expectations. Future volunteering programmes should further support the diverse physical health needs of patients with SMI.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pinto da Costa, M., Chang, W. C. A., Wu, Y., Spence, S., Cho, H. J., Mcgrath, R., Sadler, E., Tredget, G., Mdudu, I., Gaughran, F., Sevdalis, N., Bakolis, I., Williams, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110760</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110760</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing perspectives of volunteers and patients on the Health Champions intervention in secondary mental healthcare: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110760</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110760</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110820?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sleep quality and associated factors in people with schizophrenia in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110820?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of poor sleep quality and its determinants in people with schizophrenia in Northwest Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Institutional-based cross-sectional study design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>University of Gondar, Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, Gondar, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 405 people with schizophrenia attending outpatient treatment at University of Gondar, Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital were recruited in this study employing systematic random sampling technique from 1 April to 30 May 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measurements</st>
<p>An interviewer-administered questionnaire and chart review were used to collect the data. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale, Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-Effects Scale, Medication Adherence Report Scale and Oslo Social Support Scale were used. A binary logistic regression was employed to measure the association of poor sleep quality and its determinants and variables with a p value of &lt;0.05 were declared statistically significant and adjusted OR with 95% CIs were computed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall prevalence of poor sleep quality in people with schizophrenia was found to be 58.3% with a 95% CI 53.38 to 63. Age less than 45 years (adjusted OR (AOR)=2.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.7), poor and moderate social support (AOR=10, 95% CI 5.7 to 17.8 and AOR=4.7, 95% CI 2.5 to 8.8), poor medication adherence (AOR=1.9, 95% CI 1.8 to 3.1) and a family history of mental illness (AOR=1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.3) were significantly associated with poor sleep quality in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study revealed that around six in 10 people with schizophrenia experience poor sleep quality. Therefore, healthcare providers should routinely screen people with schizophrenia for sleep and consider targeted interventions to achieve the ultimate goal of treatment process.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rtbey, G., Kelebie, M., Kibralew, G., Aderaw, M., Endeshaw, W., Fentahun, S., Nakie, G., Tadesse, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110820</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110820</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sleep quality and associated factors in people with schizophrenia in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110820</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110820</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110949?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prophylactic norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion on postpartum blood glucose in women undergoing caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110949?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Norepinephrine (NE) and phenylephrine (PE) are routinely administered vasopressors used to maintain haemodynamic stability during caesarean section. Emerging evidence suggests that sustained infusion of these agents may disrupt maternal blood glucose regulation. This randomised controlled trial aims to compare the effects of NE and PE infusion on changes in postpartum blood glucose levels, insulin concentrations and insulin resistance in women after caesarean delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods analysis</st>
<p>In this double-blind, randomised trial, 100 eligible parturients will receive prophylactic intravenous infusion of either NE or PE at a rate of 30 mL/hour immediately after subarachnoid anaesthesia, continuing until the end of surgery. The primary outcome is the difference between maternal preoperative and immediate postoperative blood glucose levels. Secondary outcomes include immediate and 6-hour postoperative insulin levels, as well as Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Institutional Ethics Committee of Xuancheng People&rsquo;s Hospital approved the trial protocol (ID: 2025-yjky022-02). Findings will be published in an appropriate journal, and original data will be made available in November 2029 via the ResMan primary data-sharing platform of the China Clinical Trial Registry (<A HREF="http://www.medresman.org.cn">http://www.medresman.org.cn</A>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500107683.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, K., Cao, H., Ji, H., Yu, G., Wu, L., Shen, Q., Qian, W., Tao, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110949</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110949</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prophylactic norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion on postpartum blood glucose in women undergoing caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110949</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110949</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112391?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence-based team intervention to reduce diagnostic errors in anaemia and CKD diagnoses in primary care: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster RCT]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112391?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Diagnostic errors in primary care are common, particularly in the interpretation and follow-up of abnormal haemoglobin (Hgb) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) results. These errors frequently result in missed or delayed diagnoses of serious conditions such as anaemia and chronic kidney disease. This protocol describes a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate a novel, evidence-based, team-based intervention aimed at improving diagnostic safety and efficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study will be conducted across 12 University of Texas Physicians (UTPs) primary care clinics in Houston, Texas, USA. Adult patients (&ge;18 years) with newly identified abnormal Hgb or eGFR results will be eligible for inclusion. The intervention integrates automated tracking of abnormal laboratory results, nurse navigators to support patient follow-up and engagement, and clinical pathologists to provide diagnostic guidance to primary care providers. The primary outcome is diagnostic safety, defined as the proportion of patients who receive a correct diagnosis within 6 months. Secondary outcomes include diagnostic efficiency, appropriate test utilisation, cost-effectiveness, patient activation and implementation metrics such as acceptability, fidelity and sustainability. The study will also explore barriers and facilitators to successful implementation using mixed-methods evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial has been approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, and findings will be reported to UTP leadership to inform potential system-wide implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05735314">NCT05735314</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Novikov, Z., Mehra, N., Li, X., Wells, R., Ottosen, M., Hwang, K., Avritscher, E. B. C., Green, C., Lee, K. H., Oguin, X., Janecka, M., Espinoza, M., Adebowale, B., Araya, A., Wahed, A., Thomas, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112391</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112391</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence-based team intervention to reduce diagnostic errors in anaemia and CKD diagnoses in primary care: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster RCT]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112391</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112708?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determining the comparative pharmacodynamic equivalence of a non-invasive diagnostic test for patients with adrenal insufficiency using a randomised 2-way crossover trial: the STARLIT-3 study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112708?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Inadequate production of the essential stress hormone, cortisol, results in adrenal insufficiency (AI), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The current standard diagnostic test for AI is the Short Synacthen Test (SST), but this is both invasive and resource-intensive, involving cannulation and blood sampling. A novel formulation, Nasacthin, has been developed in which the same Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient can be delivered intranasally, with the resultant glucocorticoid levels either measured in serum, or in saliva samples to render the test non-invasive, thus creating a potentially more cost-effective test. The Salivary Test of Adrenal Response to Liquid Intranasal Tetracosactide (STARLIT-3) study aims to determine the diagnostic utility of the test in patients with AI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>STARLIT-3 is a randomised 2-way crossover trial which aims to collect data from 32 AI patients allocated to receive both Synacthen and Nasacthin in a random order across two study visits. Paired blood and saliva samples will be collected from participants at baseline, and then at 30 and 60 min after drug administration. Glucocorticoid levels in study samples will be quantified with the aim to determine whether the Nasacthin test is able to correctly diagnose patients with AI by estimating the positive percent agreement with the standard SST using serum cortisol at 30 and 60 min. Data on any reported harms and on the acceptability, usability and tolerability of the Nasacthin test will also be collected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study and subsequent amendments have been reviewed and approved by South Central&mdash;Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Plans for dissemination of results to trial participants will be developed in collaboration with patient and public involvement and engagement groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN26461337">ISRCTN26461337</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Date, K., Baster, K., Caunt, S., Cohen, J., Debono, M., Fearnside, J., Johnson, T. N., Laud, P., Ross, R. J., Taylor, R., Elder, C. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112708</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112708</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determining the comparative pharmacodynamic equivalence of a non-invasive diagnostic test for patients with adrenal insufficiency using a randomised 2-way crossover trial: the STARLIT-3 study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112708</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112708</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e116043?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the impact of temporary childbirth migration on maternal and child health: study protocol of a community-based prospective cohort study in India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e116043?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Temporary childbirth migration (TCM), where women return to their natal homes for pregnancy, delivery or postpartum for a limited duration, is a long-standing sociocultural practice in India. While often motivated by familial support and traditional norms, its implications for maternal and child health and health system engagement remain poorly understood. This study aims to quantify the impact of TCM on maternal and newborn outcomes and to explore how continuity of perinatal care and social support mediate these relationships.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We are conducting a three-site, community-based, prospective cohort study across the Health and Demographic Surveillance System sites of Vadu (Maharashtra), Sevagram (Maharashtra) and DEESHA (Delhi). A total of 3000 pregnant women will be enrolled in pregnancy (&lt;24 weeks gestation) and followed through 12 months postpartum. Data collection includes sociodemographic characteristics, pregnancy and delivery histories, maternal morbidity, health service utilisation and quality, social support, empowerment and mental health, complemented by infant anthropometry and morbidity data. Data are captured using electronic case report forms in REDCap to ensure data quality. Analyses will assess the relationship between TCM and adverse perinatal outcomes, including preterm birth, small for gestational age and neonatal mortality, as well as potential mediating and moderating pathways including the continuum of care, quality of healthcare services and types of support (social, instrumental, emotional).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics committees at the KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune (KEMHRC/RVM/EC/1931), Society for Applied Studies (SAS/ERC/TCM Study/2024), Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (MGIMS/lEC/COMMED/8412023) and University of California San Francisco (22-36484). All research activities are conducted in accordance with Indian Council of Medical Research Guidelines for biomedical research and the Declaration of Helsinki. On study completion, findings will be disseminated to diverse local, national and global stakeholders and published in academic journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CTRI/2024/02/062881.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patil, R., El Ayadi, A. M., Tonde, K., Choudhari, B., Bhujbal, S., Murro, R., Agarwal, D., Charlebois, E., Bansal, P., Nitnaware, N., Kalantri, A., Mundra, A., Goyal, N., Raut, A., Rongsen-Chandola, T., Juvekar, S. K., Diamond-Smith, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116043</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116043</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the impact of temporary childbirth migration on maternal and child health: study protocol of a community-based prospective cohort study in India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116043</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116043</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101557corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction for 'patient experiences with a smartwatch 1L-ECG versus traditional holter monitoring for ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101557corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Karregat EPM, Vooijs P, Wierda E, <I>et al</I> Patient experiences with a smartwatch 1L-ECG vs traditional Holter monitoring for ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring: a qualitative study. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2025;0:e101557. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025&ndash;1 01 557</p> <p>This article has been corrected since it was published online. Unfortunately, the alignment of <cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref> was not displayed correctly, whereby the numbers presented in the second column did not correspond to the correct corresponding characteristics presented in the first column. With this correction, this issue has been resolved.</p> <p>Here below, you find the correct table:</p> <p> <tbl id="T1" loc="float"><no>Table 1</no><caption><p>Characteristics of included participants</p> </caption><tblbdy top-stubs="1"><r><c ra="b" cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c ra="b" cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c ra="b" cspan="1" rspan="1">Included (n=18)</c></r><r><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1"><b>Age</b></c><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1"><b>Range (min-max</b>)</c><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1">32&ndash;85</c></r><r><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1"><b>Median (IQR</b>)</c><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1">66 (46&ndash;73)</c></r><r><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1"><b>&lt;50</b></c><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1">6</c></r><r><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1"></c><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1"><b>50&ndash;74</b></c><c ra="t" cspan="1" rspan="1">8</c></r><r><c...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-05T04:02:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101557corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101557corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction for 'patient experiences with a smartwatch 1L-ECG versus traditional holter monitoring for ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101557corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101557corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096253?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unwarranted variation in potentially inappropriate medication in general practice: a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e096253?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine how the population composition, practice organisation and geographical context of general practice clinics are associated with unwarranted variation in prescribing patterns (variation not explained by patient characteristics), using potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) as an indicator of treatment quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A nationwide register-based cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and population</st>
<p>Data on eligible general practice clinics (1703 clinics) in Denmark and their listed patient populations (4 369 915 individuals) were collected from 1 January to 31 December 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Unwarranted variation in PIM was estimated using the clinics&rsquo; PIM propensity. PIM propensity in clinics was defined as the ratio between observed and expected PIM incidence among listed patients and was stratified into indicators of underprescribing and overprescribing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results demonstrate a 13% difference in PIM propensity between clinics with the highest propensity (90th percentile) and the lowest propensity (10th percentile). When stratifying by underprescribing and overprescribing, we found a relative difference of 12% for underprescribing and 50% for overprescribing between the two groups. Clinics serving male-dominated populations (&gt;55% men 1.11, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.14) and more socially deprived patient populations (deprivation index &gt;40 10.11, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.14) had a higher propensity for overprescribing. Organisational factors associated with overprescribing included single-handed practices (1.08, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.10), smaller patient lists (&lt;1500 patients: 1.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.09) and shorter organisational longevity (&lt;10 years: 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.06). The propensities for underprescribing and overprescribing varied between the regional administration of clinics and increased with increasing urbanisation (&gt;100 000 citizens: 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.07). In contrast, disease burden and age distribution in listed patients appeared to have no clinically relevant association with PIM propensity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study indicates unwarranted variation in the medical treatment quality, primarily related to overprescribing. Inferior treatment quality was associated with patient composition, practice organisation and geographical context. This emphasises a need for new strategies to address the inverse care law and enhance patient safety.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paust, A., Vestergaard, C. H., Gronkjaer Laugesen, I., Bro, F., Mygind, A., Utoft, N. B., Prior, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096253</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096253</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unwarranted variation in potentially inappropriate medication in general practice: a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096253</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e097167?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic inequalities in healthcare access among patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e097167?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Socioeconomic inequalities significantly impact access to healthcare services for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study investigates these inequalities in Iran, focusing on factors such as asset, sex, urban&ndash;rural residence, age, education, employment status, and marital status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study used data from the national &lsquo;Diabetes Care (DiaCare)&rsquo; study, a population-based survey conducted from 2018 to 2020 in Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on assets. Socioeconomic inequalities in access to physicians, pharmacies and laboratories were measured using the Concentration Index (CI) and Erreygers Corrected Concentration Index (ECI). Decomposition analysis was performed using a probit regression model to assess the contributions of various factors to the observed inequalities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 13 315 patients with T2DM, 5.8% lacked access to physicians, 6.8% to pharmacies and 8.7% to laboratories. The CI was positive and statistically significant for access to physicians (0.0614), pharmacies (0.0787) and laboratories (0.0875), indicating better access concentrated among higher SES individuals. Urban residents had the largest positive marginal effects on access to physicians (0.032), pharmacies (0.078) and laboratories (0.053), with percentage contributions of 13.21%, 23.23% and 17.39%, respectively. Higher asset quintiles showed substantial contributions to inequalities, with the highest quintile contributing 10.5% to physician access inequality, 9.68% to pharmacy access and 9.16% to laboratory access. Education level also positively impacted access, with high school education contributing 0.64% and college education 0.52% to access inequalities. Sex differences showed a negative marginal effect for women, indicating slightly lower access.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Socioeconomic factors, particularly asset, residence and education, significantly impact access to healthcare services for patients with T2DM in Iran. Policies should focus on reducing barriers to healthcare access, especially for lower SES and rural populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikkhah, A., Darvishi, A., Aghakhani, A., Nasli Esfahani, E., Zargar Balajam, N., Heshmat, R., Shafiee, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097167</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097167</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic inequalities in healthcare access among patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097167</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097167</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099614?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Suicide prevention interventions and supports for the Autistic community: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099614?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Suicide is a leading cause of death among Autistic adults globally. Autistic people are up to six times more likely to die by suicide than people in the general population. Research highlights a lack of appropriate support for Autistic individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A scoping review will be conducted to map available literature on Suicide Prevention Interventions and Supports used with the Autistic community. This scoping review will use the methodological guidelines set out by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The searches will be conducted in January 2025. The following electronic databases will be searched; PubMed, CINAHL Ultimate, PsycINFO and EMBASE, as well as the reference lists of included articles and grey literature (including conference abstracts, PhD theses, grey literature databases and preprints). The search strategy will be used to identify literature with an aim of preventing suicide in Autistic individuals. Only literature published in English will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen all literature based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction will be piloted by two reviewers and continued by one reviewer. The extracted data will be checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. A narrative summary of findings will be conducted. Results will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review statement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this study as it is protocol for a review of published literature and does not involve human participants or private data. Findings will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://osf.io/bpxnf/overview">https://osf.io/bpxnf/overview</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell, A., Cremen, C., Rainbow, E., Melia, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099614</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099614</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Suicide prevention interventions and supports for the Autistic community: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099614</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099614</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing community-based monitoring to hospital-based care of patients with quiescent age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study of patient and practitioner perspectives on acceptability and access]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This process evaluation explores patient and healthcare professional acceptability of community-based monitoring versus hospital-based care for patients with quiescent neovascular age-related macular degeneration (QnAMD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative process evaluation was conducted as part of a randomised controlled trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Six hospitals and six community-based practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>25 patients and 16 healthcare professionals (ophthalmologists and optometrists). This approach helped differentiate between common issues and those specific to community-based monitoring.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>The Quality-Assured Follow-Up of QnAMD by non-medical practitioners trial aimed to examine whether non-medical practitioners follow-up patients with QnAMD in the community in a safe and clinically and cost-effective way. The process evaluation aimed to examine whether the intervention was acceptable by patients and professionals. The process evaluation was based on interviews which contained open-ended questions focused on patient experience and confidence in community-based care, issues concerning the practicalities of the organisation and management of the clinic, and resources including IT and digital equipment. The theory of acceptability framework was used to interpret the findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients reported positively on the experience of receiving QnAMD services in the community and highlighted staff professionalism and clear communication. Key themes were the proximity of care provision for patients, IT interoperability and the real-world costs of running the service. Some patients randomised to the hospital showed preference for the intervention to take place in the hospital, mediated mainly by prior experience of hospital care and travel distance. The location of the clinic and transport routes affected the experience of attending appointments, with strong preference expressed for proximity to one&rsquo;s home. Inaccessibility due to non-modifiable internal building structures in the community and parking in hospital eye services was reported by a small proportion of patients. Healthcare professionals reported positively about their ability to deliver QnAMD services in community settings but raised concerns about the compatibility of technological infrastructure that facilitates the sharing of optical coherence tomography image and video files. Some optometrists were also concerned about the financial sustainability of the intervention after the end of the trial due to the costs involved in the administration of QnAMD follow-up care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The delivery of QnAMD services in the community by non-medical personnel was broadly accepted by both patients and practitioners. This implies that non-medical practitioners can follow up patients with QnAMD in the community in a safe way. Further research would be needed to establish whether similar results would be obtained during routine practice outside a research project and whether the long-term follow-up for QnAMD would be financially sustainable for independent as well as chain community optometry practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT03893474">NCT03893474</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vougioukalou, S., Read, S. M., Csontos, J. K., Jones, A., Jaber, A., Sharma, A., Balaskas, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101379</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101379</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing community-based monitoring to hospital-based care of patients with quiescent age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study of patient and practitioner perspectives on acceptability and access]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101379</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101626?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Criterion validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form against activPAL in overweight and obese adults: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101626?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the criterion validity and test&ndash;retest reliability of the Chinese version International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (cIPAQ-SF) for assessing sedentary behaviour and physical activity (PA) in overweight and obese Chinese adults, using activPAL as the reference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was conducted at a Clinical Nutrition Clinic in China. Participants completed the cIPAQ-SF before and after wearing an activPAL for 7 consecutive days. Criterion validity was assessed using Pearson&rsquo;s/Spearman&rsquo;s correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots for sitting time (hours/day), moderate, vigorous and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) (min/week). Sensitivity and specificity evaluated the IPAQ-SF&rsquo;s accuracy in identifying those not engaging in any PA and those not meeting the PA recommendation (MVPA &ge;150 min/week). Test&ndash;retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 80 participants (age 33.9&plusmn;7.3 years; body mass index 29.1&plusmn;4.5 kg/m&sup2;), the IPAQ-SF demonstrated moderate criterion validity for sitting time (r=0.577 on weekdays, r=0.444 on weekends) and MVPA (=0.451) compared with activPAL. It underestimated sitting time by 3.5 hours/day on weekdays and 2.9 hours/day on weekends. The cIPAQ-SF showed moderate-to-high sensitivity for correctly identifying individuals who were not engaging in any PA (53.6%&ndash;85.7%) or not meeting PA recommendations (93.8%), but its specificity was low to moderate (47.8%&ndash;73.7%) for PA engagement and meeting guidelines (55.2%). Test&ndash;retest reliability was moderate for sitting time (ICC=0.549&ndash;0.614) and poor to moderate for PA levels (ICC=0.453&ndash;0.592).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The IPAQ-SF demonstrates moderate validity and reliability in assessing sedentary behaviour and insufficient PA among overweight and obese Chinese adults. It can be used to identify physically inactive individuals for targeted interventions and monitor changes in sedentary behaviour.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, J., Chen, W., Li, W., Fong, D. Y. T., Ho, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101626</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101626</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Criterion validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form against activPAL in overweight and obese adults: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101626</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101626</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101867?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of the predictive value of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, GCS and GCS-P scores for in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients after craniotomy: a retrospective cohort study in a Chinese tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101867?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different scoring systems, including the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils (GCS-P), in predicting in-hospital mortality for critically ill patients after craniotomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a single-centre retrospective diagnostic study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in three intensive care units (70 beds) of a teaching hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult patients who underwent craniotomy and stayed in the ICU for more than 24 hours were included. Pregnant or lactating women and patients enrolled in other clinical studies were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Data on demographics, clinical characteristics and scoring systems (APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, GCS and GCS-P) were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the predictive accuracy of each scoring system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 1717 patients included, the in-hospital mortality rate was 6.8%. SAPS II (AUC = 0.822) and APACHE II (AUC = 0.819) demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, followed by GCS-P (AUC = 0.812), GCS (AUC = 0.803) and SOFA (AUC = 0.762). SAPS II and APACHE II significantly outperformed SOFA, while no significant differences were observed among SAPS II, APACHE II, GCS and GCS-P. For patients with supratentorial lesions, APACHE II, SAPS II, GCS and GCS-P showed similar predictive accuracy, all superior to SOFA. For infratentorial lesions, SOFA outperformed GCS and GCS-P. Among patients with cerebrovascular diseases, SOFA had the lowest predictive accuracy, while GCS-P outperformed GCS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>APACHE II, SAPS II, GCS and GCS-P demonstrated comparable predictive accuracy for in-hospital mortality in critically ill post-craniotomy patients, with SOFA being less effective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06762184">NCT06762184</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, J., Luo, X.-Y., Li, H.-L., Shi, G. Z., Chen, G.-Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101867</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101867</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of the predictive value of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, GCS and GCS-P scores for in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients after craniotomy: a retrospective cohort study in a Chinese tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101867</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101867</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102853?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring child development at the 2-21/2-year health and development review in England: a rapid scoping review of available tools]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e102853?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>All children in England should receive a health review at 2&ndash;21/2 years, with the Ages and Stages Questionnaire third edition (ASQ-3) used to collect public health surveillance data on child development. However, practitioners also value tools that assess individual children&rsquo;s development&mdash;consistent with ASQ-3&rsquo;s original purpose. Concerns about licensing costs and barriers to digitalisation have prompted interest in alternative tools to the ASQ-3 in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>To inform policy, we conducted a rapid scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to identify tools that can measure or assess early child development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Searched PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science from January 2012 to November 2022, with targeted search update November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included English-language studies published after January 2012 that described or evaluated tools in English which could measure or assess early child development in children &lt;5 years across five domains: motor, cognitive, communicative, social and emotional.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction</st>
<p>We extracted key features and reliability, validity, sensitivity and specificity of tools which could feasibly be implemented at the 2&ndash;21/2-year review (eg, including multiple age versions and &lt;30 min to use). We used Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-I to assess risk of bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 112 unique publications describing 34 tools; six met our feasibility criteria for the 2&ndash;21/2-year review (reported in 53 studies). Only ASQ-3 and CREDI offer domain-specific scoring&mdash;a government priority. ASQ-3 moderately detects mild delays and performs better for severe delays in at-risk groups. Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI) was designed for public health surveillance, and we do not yet know how it performs for individual assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ASQ-3 and CREDI are most promising for use at the 2&ndash;21/2-year review. However, we lack UK-based validation and norming studies, even for ASQ-3. Ultimately, careful implementation and integration into existing systems will determine a tool&rsquo;s value for identifying developmental needs, supporting families and producing high quality data for public health surveillance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lysons, J., Mendez Pineda, R., Alarcon, G., Aquino, M. R. J., Cann, H., Stoianov, D., Fearon, P., Kendall, S., Kirman, J., Gladstone, M., Woodman, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102853</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102853</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring child development at the 2-21/2-year health and development review in England: a rapid scoping review of available tools]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102853</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102853</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104106?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of connecting the residual ear to the cartilage scaffold in the first-stage versus second-stage surgery: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial in non-expanded auricular reconstruction for concha-type microtia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104106?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Concha-type microtia, classified as a milder form of microtia under Nagata&rsquo;s classification, is characterised by the presence of more normal ear subunits compared with other types. The non-expanded auricular reconstruction using autologous rib cartilage is a standard procedure treating conchal microtia, and this operation typically comprises two stages. To maximise the utilisation of native auricular cartilage, the lower half of a patient&rsquo;s ear is preserved as residual ear, which should be connected to the rib cartilage scaffold in this operation. However, it remains unclear whether this connection should be performed in the first-stage or second-stage surgery. Current literature lacks sufficient evidence to determine the safer and more effective approach. Thus, we plan to conduct this randomised controlled trial to formally compare the safety and efficacy of first-stage versus second-stage connection, hypothesising that second-stage connection may be a better choice since it may reduce skin cutting, operative risk and improve recovery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, randomised controlled trial comparing two surgical treatments. Based on sample size calculations, a total of 78 eligible patients will be randomised with a 1:1 allocation. The control group will be treated with connecting the residual ear with the framework in stage 1, while the experimental group will be treated with connecting the residual ear with the framework in stage 2.</p>
<p>The safety of the surgery will be evaluated based on the grade-A healing rate and the incidence of complications (infection, haematoma, flap or skin necrosis and cartilage scaffold exposure). Efficacy of the surgery will be assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) scores. Patients will be scheduled for follow-up 3&ndash;6 months after each surgery. Descriptive analyses will be performed to summarise baseline demographics. The incidence of grade-A healing and complications will be analysed using the <sup>2</sup> test. GBI and POSAS scores of the two groups will be analysed using independent-samples t test. A p value &lt;0.05 will be considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sichuan Provincial People&rsquo;s Hospital (no. 2025-256-1) on 9 April 2025, and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. At the time of manuscript submission, patient recruitment began in April 2025 and is expected to continue until January 2027. Surgical procedures and follow-up will continue until February 2028. Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and will be disseminated to the media and the public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06763991">NCT06763991</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Chen, M., Wang, Y., Du, L., Cai, Z., Jiang, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104106</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104106</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of connecting the residual ear to the cartilage scaffold in the first-stage versus second-stage surgery: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial in non-expanded auricular reconstruction for concha-type microtia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104106</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104483?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sexuality and sexual boundary violations in healthcare organisations: a qualitative focus group study in mental health and disability care in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104483?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore how sexuality and sexual boundary violations are perceived and experienced in healthcare teams and organisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative focus group study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Mental health and disability care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>In total, 56 people participated across 15 focus groups in three healthcare organisations. Participants included client experts (former clients), healthcare professionals such as a psychologist, speech therapist, sexologist and personal coach, team leaders, managers and directors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 14 different types of situations in which sexuality and sexual boundary violations play a role on four different levels: between clients, between clients and healthcare professionals, between healthcare professionals and on the management level. Situations ranged from attraction and intimacy between clients and/or professionals, promoting sexual health of clients, gut feelings and speaking up, transgressive behaviour from clients and professionals, false accusations and investigations into allegations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Situations regarding sexuality and sexual boundary violations are varied and complex. They unfold at different levels of interaction within the organisation. To deal with this and come to practical approaches, it is important that clients, professionals and managers engage in reflection and dialogue about their experiences, opinions and perspectives.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weenink, J.-W., Kro&#x0308;ger, C., van Baarle, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104483</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104483</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sexuality and sexual boundary violations in healthcare organisations: a qualitative focus group study in mental health and disability care in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104483</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104483</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104530?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical indication-based diagnostic reference levels in CT: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104530?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>A growing number of national diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications (NDRL<SUB>ci</SUB>) in CT have been implemented worldwide since the International Commission on Radiological Protection&rsquo;s 2017 recommendation. This study aims to compare NDRL<SUB>ci</SUB> practices, identify influencing factors and propose evidence-based recommendations for NDRL<SUB>ci</SUB> development, based on the literature published between 1996 and 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus from 1996 to 24 august 2025. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis framework was followed to report the study selection process in this review. Joanna Briggs Institute&rsquo;s critical appraisal tools were used to evaluate the articles critically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult patients undergoing CT scans for various clinical indications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Clinical indication-based CT protocols with reported NDRL<SUB>ci</SUB> values as CT dose index volume and dose length product (DLP).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were NDRL<SUB>ci</SUB> values reported for various clinical indications. The secondary outcomes were CT technology, protocol parameters and patient characteristics influencing NDRL<SUB>ci</SUB>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>A total of 4146 articles were identified. 410 full texts were examined and 11 studies were included in the systematic review. 25 clinical indications across seven anatomical regions were identified across 11 included studies. The NDRL<SUB>ci</SUB> for urinary stones and cerebrovascular accident had the highest number of references, while flank pain and occlusion had the lowest number. The highest NDRL<SUB>ci</SUB> in DLP was found for total body CT in severe trauma (3830 mGy cm) and the lowest for sinusitis (70 mGy cm).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Several factors contribute to dose discrepancies for the same clinical indications in CT imaging, including kilovolt peak and milliampere-second, scan length, number of phases, patient size, reconstruction algorithm, CT scanner age and specifications, underscoring the need for standardised and optimised CT protocols. This review highlighted several challenges, which emphasise the importance of international organisations to standardise the development of NDRL<SUB>ci</SUB> to improve comparability across countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024603574.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alim, A., Leong, S. S., Thomas Sudin, A. E. L., Awla, D. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104530</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104530</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical indication-based diagnostic reference levels in CT: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104530</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104530</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104689?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in COPD with arteriosclerosis: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104689?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Arterial stiffness, an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk, enables detection of early vascular alterations preceding major clinical outcomes, making it critical for COPD management. Pharmacotherapy currently represents a major focus of therapeutic research for arterial stiffness modulation in this population. However, while current evidence supports specific pharmacological approaches, such as statins&rsquo; vascular modulation in certain subgroups, their clinical efficacy remains inconclusively demonstrated across trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>To address this critical knowledge gap, we propose a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis focusing specifically on COPD patients with concomitant arterial stiffness, aiming to evaluate the efficacy of vascular-targeted pharmacotherapies (statins, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, long-acting bronchodilators). We conduct an extensive search across various databases (including MEDLINE and Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Epistemonikos, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and China National Knowledge Infrastructure). The search will focus on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacotherapy interventions associated with concurrent arteriosclerosis in COPD patients published from the date of creation of these databases to 1 May 2025. The primary outcome will be arterial pulse wave velocity, with secondary outcomes encompassing vascular function biomarkers, COPD clinical characteristics, systemic inflammatory markers (including tumour necrosis factor-alpha), clinical remission rate and adverse events. Two independent reviewers will systematically search seven biomedical databases using validated strategies, followed by risk-of-bias assessment (Cochrane RoB 2.0) and evidence quality grading (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Subgroup analyses will be initiated contingent on identification of significant statistical heterogeneity. Stratification variables may include, but are not limited to, disease severity (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria), cumulative smoking exposure (quantified in pack-years) and comorbidity burden (eg, cardiovascular/metabolic disorders). Both conventional pairwise and network meta-analyses will be implemented to hierarchically rank therapeutic interventions and identify the optimal regimen.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review protocol is based on published RCTs and does not contain private information about the patient; therefore, ethical approval is not required.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024628739.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wei, X., Wang, S., Yu, H., Shi, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104689</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104689</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in COPD with arteriosclerosis: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104689</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104689</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["I would like to know what happened to me": coerced and involuntary sterilisation of women seeking asylum in the USA]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Involuntary sterilisation, the non-consensual medical control of an individual&rsquo;s fertility, is recognised by the WHO, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and UN Women as a serious human rights violation and form of gender-based violence. Survivors of involuntary sterilisation who can prove they were sterilised in their countries of origin have a legal path to asylum in the USA. This study aims to describe the experiences of women seeking asylum in the USA who were subjected to involuntary sterilisation in their countries of origin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Semistructured, first-person interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A New York City-based medical human rights programme.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>14 adult women who experienced involuntary sterilisation at an average age of 27 years old in their countries of origin (79% from Honduras, 14% from Guatemala, 7% from Mexico) before applying for protected immigration status in the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Inductive qualitative analysis identified common themes across participants including shared experiences of discrimination due to race/ethnicity, exposure to lifelong violence in women&rsquo;s home countries, involuntary sterilisation during antepartum and intrapartum care, lack of informed consent, psychological symptoms, delayed discovery, an appreciation for more responsive healthcare in the USA and a desire to have additional children. Of note, only 43% of participants were aware that they had been sterilised and were therefore eligible for asylum when they entered the USA. 71% of participants had been granted protected status in the USA at the time of interview; 29% were engaged in the asylum process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results of the study can inform clinicians about the impact of involuntary sterilisation, heighten awareness of this violation in the context of gender-based violence as a nexus for asylum and advance advocacy in healthcare and policy. Results suggest women would benefit from more comprehensive screening for involuntary sterilisation before and during the asylum process, as well as culturally-responsive and trauma-informed support.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blech, A. E., Baranowski, K. A., Buehler, N. J., Stradone, D., Mendoza, N., Singer, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105245</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105245</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA["I would like to know what happened to me": coerced and involuntary sterilisation of women seeking asylum in the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105245</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105555?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Direct-to-consumer commercial virtual care: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105555?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The literature examining direct-to-consumer (DTC) commercial virtual care has expanded rapidly over the past decade. Our objective was to synthesise the nature and range of evidence on DTC commercial virtual care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE ALL, EMBASE Classic+Embase, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and grey literature sources.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included original research studies published in English or French between 1 January 2016 and 30 April 2025 that assessed DTC commercial virtual care in all contexts and in all populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Screening titles and abstracts, and full-text manuscripts, and extracting data was done in duplicate. We analysed quantitative data using descriptive statistics and reported findings in tables. We provided a narrative summary of textual data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After excluding duplicates, we identified 8055 studies for title and abstract screening; 691 articles for full-text screening; and 103 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. 32 studies (31.1%) reported financial ties to the virtual care industry. 67 (65.0%) studies were conducted in the USA. Studies were largely quantitative (87/103 (84.5%)) or mixed methods (8/103 (7.8%)) studies and used cross-sectional (85/95 (89.5%)) designs. Most quantitative studies were descriptive, reporting on quality of care, health outcomes, platform characteristics and patient views, with only 24 of the 95 quantitative studies (25.3%) including a control or comparison group. 18 of these 24 studies (75.0%) compared the quality of care, costs and/or utilisation to other models of care and reported variable findings. The rest compared patient characteristics. Few studies assessed clinician perspectives or addressed privacy-related ethical concerns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite a large number of studies assessing DTC commercial virtual care, we have little insight into impacts on quality of care, health outcomes, health system utilisation and privacy-related ethical concerns. The financial ties with industry suggest that there may be bias in the body of research literature.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spithoff, S., Arnott, C. A., Visanji, A., Bhavsar, P., Goulem, B., Lapointe-Shaw, L., Merriman, K., Raza, D., Xie, E. C., Hedden, L., Abejirinde, I.-O. O., Motulsky, A., Shaw, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105555</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105555</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Direct-to-consumer commercial virtual care: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105555</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105555</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105870?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Enhanced recovery after surgery in elective benign general gynaecological surgery: postoperative recovery outcomes and health economic value of hospitalisation costs under Chinas diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment system - a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e105870?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The aim of this study was to explore the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery. This investigation included an analysis of the postoperative recovery curve and the factors that influenced the number of postoperative recovery days. This study also aimed to further investigate the impact of various factors on health economics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Fourth Ward of the General Gynaecology Centre of the Peking Union Medical College Hospital. A total of 1000 patients who had undergone elective benign gynaecological surgery between July 2021 and December 2022 were included. Demographic, perioperative and other relevant data were collected, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) survey was conducted using the European Five-Dimensional Health Scale (EQ-5D). The factors that influenced the number of postoperative recovery days were analysed using a multivariate linear regression analysis. Additionally, patients who had undergone laparoscopic myomectomy, laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, laparoscopic total hysterectomy, abdominal myomectomy and abdominal total hysterectomy were grouped based on whether their ERAS implementation rate was &ge;70%. Our goal was to evaluate the health economic value of the diagnosis-related group (DRG) payments from multiple perspectives and provide actionable recommendations for health insurance bureaus, hospitals and patients from a multi-dimensional perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>ERAS completion rates for measures such as avoiding preoperative sedation and early postoperative ambulation exceeded 95%, whereas rates for chewing gum and intraoperative temperature monitoring were &lt;5%. The follow-up EQ-5D questionnaire VAS scores were as follows: a preoperative score of 79.48&plusmn;13.75, score on the day of surgery of 74.18&plusmn;15.43, score on the first postoperative day of 76.43&plusmn;14.25, and score on the second postoperative day of 79.84&plusmn;13.12. Patients returned to a healthy state with a median recovery time of 3 (range, 0&ndash;8) days. The postoperative recovery curve was then drawn based on the VAS scores. Additionally, a multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting, correction of preoperative anaemia and malnutrition, ERAS completion rate and VAS score on the second postoperative day significantly influenced the number of postoperative recovery days (p&lt;0.05). Patients with ERAS compliance rates of &lt;70% incurred an average hospital cost increase of 8% compared with those with a compliance rate of &ge;70%. Specifically, patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and laparoscopic total hysterectomy experienced more significant and more obvious increases in hospitalisation costs of approximately 15% (p&lt;0.001) and 8% (p=0.031), respectively.</p>
<p>An analysis of the relationship between hospital costs and different ERAS measures, insurance types and disease types showed that seven measures could reduce hospital costs without negatively affecting the patient recovery speed, and five measures could slightly increase hospital costs. In addition, hospitalisation cost differences based on various insurance types and disease categories were statistically significant (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The postoperative recovery speed was accelerated, the recovery time was shortened and the patient&rsquo;s quality of life was enhanced during gynaecological surgery due to the implementation of ERAS practices. Increasing the ERAS completion rate can significantly reduce patient average hospitalisation costs. Additionally, variations in medical insurance, disease categories and specific ERAS measures influenced these costs. Therefore, hospitals that are unable to fully implement all ERAS measures must prioritise those that promote recovery. In addition, hospitals should adopt flexible strategies to minimise costs, thereby achieving mutual benefits for patients and hospitals. These findings establish a foundation for the implementation of a simplified ERAS version. It has been observed through the perspective of DRG implementation in China that payment standards exceed the average hospitalisation costs associated with specific surgical procedures. This result suggests that DRG implementation can benefit both patients and hospitals. These study results will serve as a valuable reference for decision-making by health insurance bureaus, hospitals and patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jia, X., Liu, H., Qin, T., Zhong, X., Li, Y., Liu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105870</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105870</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Enhanced recovery after surgery in elective benign general gynaecological surgery: postoperative recovery outcomes and health economic value of hospitalisation costs under Chinas diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment system - a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105870</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105870</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106082?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Direct healthcare costs associated with sickle cell disease complications: a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected healthcare data in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106082?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Due to the multisystemic nature of sickle cell disease (SCD), complications can occur together and thus discerning costs associated with individual complications requires a methodology that can estimate the costs of a given complication while accounting for the presence of other complications. In this study, we aimed to estimate period-based incremental costs associated with specific chronic complications in patients with SCD in England while accounting for multimorbidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design/setting</st>
<p>All-cause primary and secondary care healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) was obtained for a retrospective cohort of patients with SCD using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) datasets. Annualised HCRU and costs were calculated, dividing patient-level events by patient-level time (in years) to obtain per person per year estimates. A series of generalised linear models were used with adjustment for demographic factors and proportion of follow-up time with each complication to estimate the costs associated with 10 chronic SCD-related complications of interest. For these costs, annual equivalent costs can be obtained by dividing by the median follow-up time of 4.74 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients with a diagnosis of SCD, with or without complications, in CPRD or HES with at least 12 months follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Period-based all-cause direct healthcare costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 1271 patients with SCD included in the study, 49.9% (n=634) had at least one complication and of these 41.3% (n=262) had two or more complications either at baseline or during follow-up. Patients with complications had higher all-cause healthcare costs compared with patients without complications (mean (SD) annualised cost &pound;16 058 (&pound;21 488) vs &pound;4399 (&pound;6635)). Patients with complications had four times the number of annualised inpatient admissions (6.1 vs 1.5 admissions) and more than double the number of annualised bed days in hospital (8.3 vs 3.8 days) over a median 4.74 years of follow-up. Of the complications evaluated, end-stage renal disease had the highest estimated incremental cost of &pound;252 083 (95% CI &pound;214 478 to &pound;283 745) over 4.74 years; this is in addition to the &pound;18 547 period-based cost among patients with SCD without complications. Osteonecrosis was the most common complication with an estimated incremental cost of &pound;27 399 (95% CI &pound;6417 to &pound;43 319) over the same period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Estimating the cost of complications, while accounting for multimorbidity, is essential to determine the true direct cost of SCD. The modelling method presented in our study provides period-based estimates of cost and hospital admissions for individual complications in patients with SCD, accounting for multimorbidity. This approach can be used and extended to other diseases with multisystemic complications to estimate the direct HCRU and costs of individual complications.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barcelos, G. T., Besser, M., Davidson, J. A., Filonenko, A., Telfer, P., Joao Carvalho, S., Jiang, L., Wirz, R., Rice, C. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106082</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106082</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Direct healthcare costs associated with sickle cell disease complications: a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected healthcare data in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106082</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106082</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106903?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex differences and associated factors of dietary diversity among older adults in Bangladesh: findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106903?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the sex-specific status of dietary diversity (DD) and its associated factors among older men and women (aged &ge;60 years) in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A nationally representative cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2018&ndash;2019 on food security, nutrition and health of older adults of both sexes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data were collected from 82 clusters (rural 57, non-slum urban 15 and slum 10) from all eight administrative divisions of Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 4817 participants aged &ge;60 years (2482 men and 2335 women) were enrolled.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measures</st>
<p>A list-based (24-item) recall method was employed, and the items were later aggregated into 10 food groups. The outcome variable was the prevalence of inadequate DD, defined as consumption of less than 5 food groups out of 10.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Men and women had mean DD scores of 4.33&plusmn;1.6 and 4.13&plusmn;1.7, respectively. Women had a higher prevalence of inadequate DD than men (61.2% vs 56.3%, p=0.028). Among the food groups, women consumed significantly less fish and eggs than men (fish: 50.96% vs 57.76%, p=0.002; eggs: 17.13% vs 22.10%, p=0.004). Poor education, rural dwellings, living in homes with fewer individuals and living in food-insecure households were associated with inadequate DD in both sexes. Furthermore, among men, older age and not being currently married, and among women, lower age and living in households with middle wealth status were associated with inadequate DD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study found that older women consume relatively less diverse diets than men, and several sociodemographic factors influence inadequate DD among older adults of both sexes in Bangladesh. These factors should be considered while developing policies and programmes to promote equitable access to a diversified diet and improve geriatric health and nutritional outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akter, F., Hossain, M. M., Shamim, A. A., Sarker, T., Hasan, M., Hanif, A. A. M., Ullah, M. A., Mridha, M. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106903</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106903</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex differences and associated factors of dietary diversity among older adults in Bangladesh: findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106903</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106903</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106978?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HappyMums mobile application study protocol: use of a smartphone application to gather data predictive of antenatal depression]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106978?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have become increasingly popular for monitoring mental health symptoms and lifestyle behaviours, and are largely reported to be feasible and acceptable to users. However, to date, the efficacy of such technologies to improve perinatal mental health outcomes has been mixed. Within the perinatal context, much of this work has been done in the context of postpartum depression, stemming from electronic health records as well as cohort studies. There is, however, a dearth of studies focusing on depression in pregnancy, and machine learning-based clinical decision support systems remain underexplored. The HappyMums application has been developed to meet this need, and its use across Europe will be tested in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A total of 1000 pregnant people currently suffering from, or at risk of, antenatal depression will be recruited across six countries. All participants will be between 13 and 28 weeks&rsquo; gestation and will be given access to the new purposefully developed HappyMums mobile application, to use from enrolment until 2 months postpartum. The application leverages passively collected data from smartphone sensors relating to physical activity and behaviour, as well as requiring active engagement from the user to complete mental health questionnaires and &lsquo;game-like&rsquo; activities. Digital data types will be combined with traditional mental health measurement methods, such as standardised questionnaires and interviews, to develop novel predictive models capable of identifying mental health trajectories in women at risk of developing antenatal depression and to test the app&rsquo;s utility for use as personalised risk prediction and depression identification tool. The primary outcome of this study is to determine what proportion of users will continue to use the mobile application and engage with its tasks and activities at least weekly, while secondary exploratory outcomes include assessing usability of the app and testing the predictive ability of a novel machine learning-based model. These outcomes will, for the first time, be assessed by integrating active as well as passive data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been granted by local research ethics committees in each recruiting centre. At King&rsquo;s College London (leading the clinical study), the study was reviewed by the East of England&mdash;Essex Research Ethics Committee and granted favourable opinion (REC reference 24/EE/0129). All other sites collecting participant data have the study approved for local delivery. Findings relating to the primary and secondary outcomes will be submitted for publication in open access, peer-reviewed journals, as well as presentations at conferences as symposia or posters. Findings will be made available to a non-specialist audience through open access digital mental health magazines and promotion on social media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06578845">NCT06578845</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priestley, K., Laijawala, R., Hazelgrove, K., Bind, R., Rebecchini, L., Mariani, N., Alford, S., Kirkpatrick, M., Mancino, F., Kim, S., Pushpakanthan, S., Biaggi, A., Cavaliere, L., Di Benedetto, M. G., Matijas, M., Zutic, M., Brekalo, M., Nakic Rados, S., Zukowska, K., Braniecka, A., Jackowska, M., Bessi, M., Agnoletto, E., Melloni, E. M. T., Benedetti, F., Bulgheroni, M., La Gamba, M., Martin Isla, C., Izquierdo Morcillo, C., Lekadir, K., Salo, V., Seikku, T., Ra&#x0308;ikko&#x0308;nen, K., Godara, M., Schneider-Schmid, U. M., Entringer, S., Buss, C., de Barra, D., Woods, A., Dazzan, P., Cattaneo, A., Pariante, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106978</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106978</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HappyMums mobile application study protocol: use of a smartphone application to gather data predictive of antenatal depression]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106978</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106978</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106999?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recombinant human growth hormone (rHGH) for muscle enhancement in knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a pilot, randomised placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106999?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The management of active patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KnOA) who are too young for total knee arthroplasty poses a specific challenge to clinicians. Research studies show that improving quadriceps muscle strength improves pain and function; however, aspects of the disease render it difficult for patients to achieve and maintain improvements. Recombinant human growth hormone (rHGH) is shown to increase the magnitude and duration of muscle growth when combined with exercise treatment in adult populations. Hence, rHGH combined with physical therapy may provide meaningful benefits in the treatment of KnOA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, double-blind, randomised trial to pilot a future Phase III trial from 2025 to 2028. Participants are aged 18&ndash;60 with clinical and radiographic evidence of isolated degenerative arthritis of the knee (patellofemoral or tibiofemoral). The investigational product is rHGH (Saizen (somatropin of rDNA origin, EMD Serono)) and a saline placebo. Participants will deliver the solution via subcutaneous injection area once per day at a dose of 0.5 mg HGH per body surface area (0.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) for 6 weeks, alongside participation in a lower limb strengthening programme developed by rehabilitation specialists. 17 participants will be recruited into each study arm.</p>
<p>The primary outcomes are feasibility (compliance with the study drug regimen for the 6-week administration period and enrolment rate) and safety (the proportion of minor and major adverse events between groups). The primary endpoint for these outcomes will be at 6 weeks. The secondary outcomes are knee extension strength, knee flexion strength, radiographic arthritis progression, thigh muscle circumference, MRI-measured quadriceps muscle volume and patient-reported outcome measures (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), SF-20 and Tegner). The primary endpoint for these outcomes will be at 12 weeks, and the final endpoint will be 24 months, where final radiographic (X-ray) assessment will take place.</p>
<p>The primary outcome of compliance will be a calculation of mean compliance between groups, which can be analysed as a t-test after the treatment period. A two-sample, two-sided t-test will compare the clinical (secondary) outcome of greatest interest: knee extension strength at baseline versus week 6 compared between treatment groups. Other secondary outcomes will be compared using a simple linear mixed-effects model. The <sup>2</sup> test will be used to determine whether the number of participants who made meaningful changes was different between groups. The null hypotheses are that the rHGH and placebo groups will have no difference in compliance rates, safety events, knee extension strength at 12 weeks and arthritis grade progression at 24 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Sunnybrook Research Institute Research and Ethics Board (#6427) and received a no-objection letter from Health Canada Clinical Trials. The primary sponsor is the Sunnybrook Centre for Clinical Trial Studies (CCTS). The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at orthopaedic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07036003">NCT07036003</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shah, A., Ravi, B., Tomescu, S., Catapano, M., Burkhart, T. A., Whyne, C., Kiss, A., Marks, P., Wasserstein, D. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106999</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106999</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recombinant human growth hormone (rHGH) for muscle enhancement in knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a pilot, randomised placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106999</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106999</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107055?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for Personalised Prediction of Persistent Postsurgical Pain]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107055?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) affects up to 15% of patients after major surgery, impairing physical function, quality of life and increasing risk for long-term opioid use. Current PPSP prediction models rely on static or retrospective data and fail to incorporate dynamic perioperative factors. The Personalised Prediction of Persistent Postsurgical Pain (P5) study aims to develop individualised, multimodal prediction models by integrating preoperative behavioural, psychophysical and neurocognitive assessments and high-frequency symptom monitoring.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>P5 is a prospective, single-centre cohort study enrolling 2500 adults aged 18&ndash;75 undergoing major surgery at a tertiary academic hospital. Participants complete baseline surveys, cognitive testing and quantitative sensory testing preoperatively. Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) are collected via smartphone three times per day through 30 days postoperatively, capturing pain, mood, catastrophising and medication use. Participants are assessed on postoperative day 1 and complete online surveys at 3 and 6 months, evaluating pain persistence, interference, neuropathic symptoms and related outcomes. Clinical and perioperative data are extracted from the electronic health record. The primary outcome is PPSP at 3 months. Predictive models will be developed using supervised machine learning and dynamic structural equation modelling to extract latent features from EMA data. Model performance will be assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the precision-recall curve and SHapley Additive exPlanations for interpretability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethics approval from the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board #202101123. Informed consent is required. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at research conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04864275">NCT04864275</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holzer, K. J., Alaverdyan, H., Xu, Z., Frumkin, M. R., Frey, K. A., Gregory, S. H., Rodebaugh, T. L., Lu, C., King, C. R., Head, D., Kannampallil, T., Haroutounian, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107055</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107055</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for Personalised Prediction of Persistent Postsurgical Pain]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107055</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107055</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107178?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the Ronnie Gardiner Method in individuals with stroke in the late phase of recovery: a protocol for a single-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107178?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Stroke is a prevalent neurological condition that frequently results in long-term disabilities and considerable societal costs. While existing rehabilitation approaches provide some benefits, residual motor impairments often persist and become permanent, leading to ongoing activity restrictions. Music-based intervention, such as the Ronnie Gardiner Method (RGM), adheres to best practice principles of stroke rehabilitation by simultaneously engaging motor, sensory, cognitive and emotional functions, potentially offering enhanced recovery outcomes. However, research examining its effectiveness in chronic stroke rehabilitation remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, randomised controlled trial will recruit 84 community-dwelling individuals with chronic stroke over a 2-year period across four sites in Sweden. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving RGM training (n=42) or a passive waitlist control group (n=42). Only the investigators and outcome assessors will remain blinded to group allocation. RGM training consists of 60 min group sessions twice weekly for 12 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome is to evaluate the effectiveness of RGM training on balance performance using the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test. Secondary outcomes include assessment of gait function (10-Metre Walk Test, 6 min Walk Test, Short Physical Performance Battery), upper limb function (9-Hole Peg Test, Observational Drinking Task Assessment), cognitive abilities (Victoria Stroop Test, Rey Complex Figure Test, Memory Test), fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale-International) and stroke-related functional impact (Stroke Impact Scale-16). Broader health-related quality of life will be assessed using the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, and depressive symptoms will be measured with the Montgomery-&Aring;sberg Depression Rating Scale. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, postintervention and at a 3-month follow-up. Additional assessments will include qualitative evaluations of participants&rsquo; and trainers&rsquo; subjective experiences, cognitive screening (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and postintervention enjoyment assessment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approvals for the study have been obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr: 2025-01269-01 and Dnr: 2025-08232-02). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and targeted communication with stakeholders and the media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06979050">NCT06979050</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghai, S., Pohl, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107178</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107178</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the Ronnie Gardiner Method in individuals with stroke in the late phase of recovery: a protocol for a single-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107178</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107178</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Post-secondary student adoption of mental health labels through their use of social media: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Social media is a significant source of information for post-secondary students, who are usually at the age at which many common mental disorders first express themselves. Social media can have a role in the way post-secondary students identify and act on mental health issues.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Explore how the use of social media influences post-secondary students&rsquo; adoption of mental health labels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included empirical studies on mental health labelling in the context of social media use among post-secondary students published in English between January 1995 and April 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources of evidence</st>
<p>The review includes references from five databases: Scopus, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE (to access APA PsycINFO), Web of Science and ProQuest Global Dissertations and Theses. Based on the included studies from the initial search, we built a complementary search strategy using Research Rabbit artificial intelligence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Charting methods</st>
<p>We present a table listing characteristics of the studies and brief summaries of their findings. A narrative synthesis compiled the information from each study to answer the research questions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The search identified 7551 references and 1099 additional records from Research Rabbit. 11 studies published since 2011 met the inclusion criteria with qualitative, mixed methods and quantitative designs, without major quality concerns. Approaches to measuring social media exposure varied, including platform reports of user activity and self-reported indicators. Individuals adopted labels themselves or received labels from peers or researchers. Most research focused on self-presentation and symptom disclosure rather than labelling itself. The accuracy of self-diagnosis was higher for common disorders and lower for complex conditions such as mania or panic disorders. Labelling varied across social media platforms. Online interaction revealed issues that students were reluctant to share face-to-face. Label use appeared to influence help-seeking and peer support, with effects shaped by social stigma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The adoption of mental health labels via social media among post-secondary students remains largely unexplored. The concept of labelling and its operationalisation vary across research. Future studies should provide more formal definitions, investigate mechanisms driving labelling and assess its potential effects on human health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander, E. D., Sarmiento, I., Chung, V.-H.-A., Yacovelli, A., Andersson, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107379</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107379</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Post-secondary student adoption of mental health labels through their use of social media: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107379</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107586?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health service contacts for mental health and substance use on release from prison: a retrospective population-based data linkage study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107586?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Mental health and substance use problems among people released from prison contribute substantially to premature mortality and emergency services demand. Understanding of mental health and substance use-related health service contacts prior to these severe and costly outcomes is limited. We assessed mental health and substance use-related contact with multiple services, comparing rates of contact among people released from prison to a matched general population sample who had not recently been in prison.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To compare rates of health service contacts for mental health and substance use between people released from prison and a matched general population sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data with nationwide coverage. The cohort contained all people released from any Scottish prison in 2015 (exposed group), and a random general population sample matched (ratio 1:5) on sex, age, postcode and deprivation indices, who had no imprisonment in the 5 years prior (unexposed group). We linked individual-level administrative healthcare (prescriptions, outpatient, inpatient, emergency/unscheduled care: 2010&ndash;2020), prison (admissions, releases: 2010&ndash;2020) and deaths records (2015&ndash;2020). We estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) with 95% CIs using fixed-effects Poisson regression with cluster-robust standard errors, controlling for time-in-community, pre-index mental health and substance use-related health service contacts, and comorbidities. We stratified models by mental health (MH), substance use (SU) and dual diagnosis (attributable to both MH and SU).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Scotland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We linked records for 8313 people released from prison, and 41 213 matched individuals. Mental health and substance use-related contact rates were significantly higher for people released from prison across all services, and particularly for emergency and unscheduled care. aIRRs for ambulance contacts were MH=7.75 (95% CI 5.76 to 10.42), SU=7.58 (95% CI 5.71 to 10.08), dual diagnosis=8.28 (95% CI 6.50 to 10.55); and accident and emergency department contacts were MH=4.88 (95% CI 3.78 to 6.29) and SU=7.98 (95% CI 5.71 to 11.17). aIRRs for community prescriptions were MH=1.80 (95% CI 1.67 to 1.94), SU=5.95 (95% CI 4.83 to 7.32), dual diagnosis=5.33 (95% CI 3.70 to 7.68); drug and alcohol services were 7.13 (95% CI 6.00 to 8.48); and outpatient attendances were 2.61 (95% CI 2.17 to 3.16). aIRRs for 24-hour unscheduled telephone support were MH=7.63 (95% CI 4.93 to 11.83) and SU=8.29 (95% CI 3.99 to 17.22); and out-of-hours general practice were MH=5.14 (95% CI 3.66 to 7.22), SU=5.89 (95% CI 3.11 to 11.14) and dual diagnosis=8.85 (95% CI 2.94 to 26.63). aIRRs for general/acute hospital admissions and day cases were MH=2.97 (95% CI 1.43 to 6.16), SU=7.85 (95% CI 4.42 to 13.91), dual diagnosis=13.11 (95% CI 7.95 to 21.61); and for psychiatric admissions were MH=3.62 (95% CI 2.39 to 5.49), SU=10.74 (95% CI 6.12 to 18.84) and dual diagnosis=7.74 (95% CI 4.30 to 13.94).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Improved post-release mental health and substance use care is vital for individual and public health. Despite elevated rates of contact with community mental health and substance use services, people released from prison have disproportionately high rates of contact with emergency and unscheduled care services. This suggests that early support is either inadequate or not accessed by those in greatest need.</p>
<p>Policymakers and service providers should consider investment in tailored transitional and post-release intervention at individual and population level, to improve health and thus prevent later high-cost service use and avoidable mortality. Our results also suggest high-quality care must be available and accessible beyond the immediate post-release period to permit sustained engagement or engagement at a later date.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connell, C., Kjellgren, R., Savinc, J., Dougall, N., Kurdi, A., Watson, J., Haddow, C., Brown, A., Parkes, T., Hunt, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107586</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107586</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health service contacts for mental health and substance use on release from prison: a retrospective population-based data linkage study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107586</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107586</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107685?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Continence care quality from the perspective of older adults in long-term care or in receipt of home care: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107685?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the state of the research literature addressing what is known about the quality of continence care from the perspective of older adults in long-term care or in receipt of home care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review of the literature according to the Joanna Briggs Institute method, reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. <I>Participant:</I> older adults (&gt;65 years of age), either in receipt of home health or social care services or older adult residents of long-term care (nursing homes). <I>Concept:</I> older adult perspectives on quality of continence care (access, care to meet needs, continuity, goals, expectations, delivery, experiences, personalised care, partnerships in care, well-being and social support). <I>Context:</I> older adults in long-term care or in receipt of home care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We identified 14 articles from the academic literature. Sources originated from the USA (7), Australia (4), Canada (2) and 1 from Italy. Long-term care residents were the focus of 12 of the articles. Older adults reported limited access and information regarding continence care and services and variable abilities of care staff to deliver care. Older adults wanted to be actively involved in decisions about their care, preserve their autonomy and independence and wanted care to enhance their well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Studies examining the perspectives of older adults regarding the quality of their continence care are few. Older adults value person-centredness, expert advice regarding their condition, allowing preservation of self-determination and independence where possible. Older people value meaningful relationships with empathetic care providers. There remains a need for education of care providers in continence care and for policies and practices to support continence in a dignity-preserving framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://osf.io/bprq9/">https://osf.io/bprq9/</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silverglow, A., Milsom, I., Kennedy, M., Wijk, H., Wagg, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107685</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107685</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Continence care quality from the perspective of older adults in long-term care or in receipt of home care: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107685</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107685</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108063?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prescribing for older people with sensory impairment: a qualitative interview study with independent prescribers in primary care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108063?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore prescribers&rsquo; awareness of medicine-related challenges of older people (&ge;65 years) with sensory impairment (hearing, visual or dual impaired) and identify the influences on prescribing behaviours for these patient populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews were completed online.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care-based prescribers in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Independent prescribers working in primary care. Participants were recruited through professional networks and organisations, social media and using snowballing. Purposive sampling was used to ensure variation in roles, practice/organisational settings and geographical location.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>15 prescribers participated, including general practitioners (n=6), pharmacists (n=5), nurses (n=3) and one optometrist. Many demonstrated limited awareness of sensory impairment and suggested that outdated patient records contribute to it being easy to overlook. Prescribers underestimated sensory impairment prevalence, with one predicting that only a small proportion of older patients had hearing loss. Formal training on prescribing for older people with sensory impairment was minimal, and most relied on experiential learning. Prescribers employed strategies to support safe prescribing, such as simplifying regimens and selecting lower-risk medications. The prescribers also reported a lack of evidence-based guidelines or resources tailored to these patient populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Prescribers currently receive minimal training to support their prescribing practices for older people with sensory impairment. Given the increasing prevalence of age-related sensory impairment, evidence-based resources and training are needed to support prescribing for these patient populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morrison, B. C., Lennon, M., Watson, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108063</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108063</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prescribing for older people with sensory impairment: a qualitative interview study with independent prescribers in primary care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108063</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108063</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108550?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108550?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>People with disabilities are underrepresented in clinical trials, which impacts generalisability and ethical integrity of results. Despite international mandates to diversify participants, there is a lack of guidance on how to make trials disability-inclusive. This scoping review identifies and synthesises guidance, practices and recommendations supporting the inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a scoping review following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for scoping reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Medline (OVID) and Public Affairs Information System Index (October 2024) searches identified peer-reviewed articles. Grey literature was identified through targeted advanced Google searches and website reviews (February&ndash;March 2025). Google Scholar was searched to identify recently published documents between March and April 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>Documents with guidance or policies related to inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials published in English from 2019 to 2025 were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full texts and extracted data, with adjudication by a third reviewer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 69 documents met inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis identified eight recommendation domains: (1) inclusive and universal trial design, (2) accessible recruitment, (3) inclusive data collection, (4) equitable data analysis, (5) accessible reporting and dissemination, (6) ethical oversight and institutional review board inclusion, (7) supported and accessible consent processes and (8) the inclusion of people with disabilities as researchers and stakeholders. Themes cutting across all domains included guidance emphasising universal design, anti-ableist frameworks, supported decision-making, flexible protocols and engagement with disability communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Disability-inclusive clinical trials are essential to ensure the validity of clinical trial results, uphold ethical responsibilities and advance health equity. While emerging frameworks offer direction on how to include people with disabilities in trials, current implementation remains inconsistent and largely voluntary. Clear, enforceable standards are needed to support governments, ethics boards, institutions and funders in making clinical trials more disability-inclusive.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo, G., Castro, F., Cerilli, C., Varadaraj, V., Rosman, L., Kamenov, K., Barrett, D., Swenor, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108550</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108550</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108550</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108550</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108718?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HIV testing and prevalence in fishing communities in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study of 3197 individuals within SchistoTrack]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e108718?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To compare HIV testing coverage, prevalence and care cascade engagement between fisherfolk and the general population, and to assess the relevance of individual and community-level definitions of fisherfolk in understanding variation in HIV status and testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Primary data collection and cross-sectional analysis in 1 year of the SchistoTrack community-based cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>52 shoreline villages in Pakwach, Buliisa and Mayuge districts in rural Uganda.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 3197 individuals aged 5&ndash;92 years were tested for HIV in 2024. A subset of 124 HIV-positive participants had viral load measured in 2025. Statistical analyses focused on 1931 adults aged 15 years and older.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were lifetime HIV testing, testing in the past 12 months and current HIV status. Secondary measures included self-reported care cascade outcomes and viral load suppression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 6.94% (134/1931) of adult participants aged 15 years and older were with HIV (people with HIV (PWH)), of whom 22.39% (30/134) were newly diagnosed. 6% (25/415) of adults reporting fishing activities were HIV-positive. Of those, 80% (20/25) were status-aware, 76% (19/25) were on antiretroviral therapy, and 100% (8/8) of those who knew their viral load reported viral suppression. No significant differences in care cascade engagement were found between PWH reporting fishing activities and the general population. Measured viral suppression was 70.59% (72/102) among PWH with no significant differences by fishing activities. Fishing activities were significantly associated with higher odds of ever testing for HIV (OR 1.76 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.54)), but not with testing in the past 12 months or HIV status. No consistent district-level differences were observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Individuals reporting fishing activities had higher lifetime testing and comparable HIV prevalence and care cascade engagement to the general population. Gaps remain in recent testing, status awareness and viral suppression for fisherfolk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bui, H. L., Wilburn, L., Nsimbe, S. W., Nabatte, B., Oromcan, G. W., Mujuni, R., Nabonge, J., Kabatereine, N. B., Smith, A., Chami, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108718</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108718</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HIV testing and prevalence in fishing communities in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study of 3197 individuals within SchistoTrack]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108718</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108718</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109409?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence, factors and association with academic performance of anaemia in Kandahar schoolchildren: a cross-sectional analytical study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109409?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of anaemia and its association with the academic performance of schoolchildren in Kandahar, Afghanistan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional analytical study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>This was a school-based study conducted among 1866 schoolchildren aged 6&ndash;14 years in Kandahar city from September to December 2023. Haemoglobin concentration was measured using a portable HemoCue Hb 301 analyser, while the WHO age-adjusted cut-off for haemoglobin was used to classify anaemia. Data were analysed by using descriptive statistics, the &sup2; test and multivariate logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In this study, the mean age of the children was 9.1 years, 61.1% (1138/1866) were boys, 83.6% (1560/1866) had illiterate mothers, and 81.3% (1517/1866) belonged to poor families. Prevalence of anaemia among schoolchildren was 64.1% (1196/1866), while 20.8% (388/1866), 41.7% (778/1866), and 1.6% (30/1866) were suffering from mild, moderate and severe anaemia, respectively. Main associated factors of anaemia were being male (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7, p=0.003), unemployed father (AOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.2, p=0.020), poor family (AOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.9, p&lt;0.001), large family (AOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.6, p=0.048), history of intestinal helminths (AOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.6, p=0.017) and decreased meat consumption (AOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.5, p&lt;0.001). Children with anaemia had significantly lower academic performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Prevalence of anaemia was very high and is a severe public health problem in schoolchildren of Kandahar. Based on the known consequences of anaemia on academic performance, the education and health authorities of Afghanistan should take serious steps to alleviate this problem. Periodic iron supplementation and deworming, as well as daily iron-rich mid-day meal programmes, should be started for both boys and girls in schools.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahimi, B. A., Lali, W. M., Saeed, K. M. I., Ahmadzai, S. A. H., Akbari, K., Mukhlis, A. H., Azimi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109409</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109409</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence, factors and association with academic performance of anaemia in Kandahar schoolchildren: a cross-sectional analytical study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109409</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109409</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109414?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising the care pathway of febrile children via capillary C-reactive protein assay in primary care: the CRP-CAP cluster randomised stepped-wedge study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109414?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Fever is the leading reason for consultation among children in general practice. 20% of febrile children require additional tests to distinguish between viral infections and severe bacterial infections. Point of care capillary C-reactive protein (POC CRP) testing provides on-site results within 5 min but remains underutilised in primary care settings in France. This study will demonstrate how the use of POC CRP could optimise the care pathway for febrile children, saving time for physicians and patients, and making economic savings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a multicentre, prospective, cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial that will take place from September 2025 to March 2026. The required sample size is estimated at 420 patients. The primary outcome is the difference in referral rates to facilities equipped for emergency laboratory testing (medical biology laboratories, emergency departments) when using POC CRP versus standard care. The study will be conducted in primary care practices and out-of-hours clinics in south France among febrile children aged 3 months to 15 years, over the 6-month viral and bacterial epidemic period. A cost-consequence analysis and a budget impact assessment will also be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol was approved by the Ile de France VII Committee for the Protection of Persons (2024-A02844-43), the French Advisory Board on Medical Research Data Processing and the French Personal Data Protection Authority. The study was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06910631">NCT06910631</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffiths, K., Badin, M., Bouvet, S., Silvente, L., Demattei, C., Sikirdji, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109414</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109414</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising the care pathway of febrile children via capillary C-reactive protein assay in primary care: the CRP-CAP cluster randomised stepped-wedge study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109414</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109414</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110381?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Culturally appropriate sexual health interventions for STBBI and HIV among racialised immigrant communities in Western nations: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110381?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Racialised immigrant communities in Western nations face disproportionate risks for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) due to systemic barriers, including racism, stigma and limited access to culturally appropriate care. While the need is well-established, a comprehensive synthesis of effective, culturally responsive sexual health interventions is lacking. This scoping review aims to map the available evidence on sexual health intervention needs and protective factors of racialised immigrants, and to identify and describe existing culturally appropriate programmes in Western nations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and be reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic search strategy, developed and peer-reviewed by a health sciences librarian, will be executed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus, alongside grey literature sources, with no date limit. Two independent reviewers will screen titles/abstracts and full texts against the inclusion criteria. Data will be extracted using a standardised tool, analysed via narrative synthesis and framed by a socio-ecological model to categorise interventions across individual, interpersonal, community and structural levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this review. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, academic presentations and tailored summaries for community organisations and policy-makers to ensure practical application.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Review registration</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://osf.io/9qah6">https://osf.io/9qah6</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwame, A., Maina, G., Langman, E., Ndubuka, N., Caine, V., Spence, C., Maposa, S., Kamrul, R., Mason, N., Etowa, J., Eaton, A. D., Caron-Roy, S., Abdulrasheed, A., Guliak, D., Chowdhury, I., Ahmed, A., Nyoni, N., Hanson, J., Alvarez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110381</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110381</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Culturally appropriate sexual health interventions for STBBI and HIV among racialised immigrant communities in Western nations: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110381</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110381</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111045?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Attributable societal cost of antimicrobial resistance in Ghana: a microsimulation study focusing on sociodemographic groups]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111045?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We performed a microsimulation analysis predicting the societal cost of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which represents the potential cost savings if Ghana eliminates AMR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study combined bacterial resistance epidemiology and cost data from Ghana to perform a microsimulation analysis focusing on sociodemographic groups, predicting the potential societal cost savings should Ghana eliminate AMR. The nationally representative data were collected from 12 reference laboratories across Ghana&rsquo;s three geographical belts between June 2021 and December 2023. Case definition was enterobacterial third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) resistant infections, methicillin-resistant <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant <I>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</I>. Using an adapted microsimulation framework, the simulation incorporated four integrated data modules: population demographics, infection epidemiology, healthcare resource use and expenditure and labour market characteristics. This approach allowed for the construction of synthetic individuals from national data sets and the projection of annual outcomes over a 7-year horizon. Costs were calculated from a societal perspective under a status quo scenario, assuming that admission rates, resistant infection probabilities and mortality rates remain the same. This analysis also considers a 2.1% annual population growth rate, a 5% discount rate for future costs and age-specific resistance risk profile. We stratified the outcome of interest by age groups, sex and wealth quintiles to account for distributional effects and reported the costs in purchasing power parity equivalent in international US dollars.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Ghana in West Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A simulated population of AMR patients of all ages and sex.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Societal cost attributable to AMR in Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Assuming probabilities of all-cause hospital admissions of 0.102 for females and 0.093 for males, along with probabilities of AMR infections of 0.239 and 0.193, we predicted nearly 78 000 (95% CI 72 000 to 83 520) annual AMR infections and approximately 6300 (95% CI 3900 to 8638) attributable deaths. MRSA and 3GC-resistant infections made up 20.2% and 79.2% of the predicted annual infections, corresponding to an estimated mean societal cost of about US$435 million. In decreasing order of magnitude, the estimated mean annual cost of productivity loss due to AMR attributable mortality accounted for 40.6% of the mean annual societal cost, followed by the cost to healthcare providers (24.1%), direct medical cost to patients and caregivers (22.4%), productivity loss for surviving patients and caregivers (10.4%) and direct non-medical costs to patients and caregivers (2.6%). Resistant infections in children under 5 and adults over 60 years contributed 48.2% and 26.9% of the estimated annual societal cost, respectively. Except for the number of resistant infections, the estimated mean annual costs between wealth quintile groups were significantly different (p=0.03) due to differences in productivity costs between wealth quintile groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study shows that the societal cost implications attributable to AMR are enormous, requiring a concerted effort by society to mitigate the development and spread of AMR organisms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fenny, A. P., Otieku, E., Amoah, R. O., Jejeti, M., Labi, A.-K., Hedidor, G. K., Enemark, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111045</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111045</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Attributable societal cost of antimicrobial resistance in Ghana: a microsimulation study focusing on sociodemographic groups]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111045</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111045</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long sleep duration and suboptimal glycaemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Ningbo, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate the impact of sleep duration on glucose homeostasis in individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary-level maternity care at two centres in Ningbo, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 381 women with GDM were included (median age 30.6 years (IQR 28.2&ndash;33.1); median gestational age 26.0 weeks (IQR 25.0&ndash;27.0)). All participants underwent 2 weeks of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and nocturnal sleep duration was assessed using a structured questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>CGM-derived summary metrics were analysed using multivariable linear regression, and 24-hour glucose trajectories were evaluated using functional data analysis (FDA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Long sleep duration (&gt;9 hours/day) was associated with higher mean glucose, time above range, coefficient of variation, the pregnancy-specific glucose risk index and lower time in range (<I>&beta;</I> values were 2.41 mg/dL, 1.84%, 1.04%, 1.88% and &ndash;1.85%, respectively; all p&lt;0.05). Each additional hour of sleep increased glucose levels, variability and risk (<I>&beta;:</I> mean glucose 1.29 mg/dL, time above range 0.89%, coefficient of variation 0.45%, pregnancy-specific glucose risk index 0.91%; all p&lt;0.05), while reducing time in range (<I>&beta;=</I>&ndash;0.87%; p&lt;0.05). The FDA showed that participants with long sleep (&gt;9 hours/day) had elevated glucose by 2.1&ndash;5.8 mg/dL from 10:55 to 00:45, lasting for 13.8 hours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In GDM, long sleep duration was associated with less favourable glucose patterns, suggesting possible windows of greater vulnerability in glucose regulation. These findings indicate that sleep behaviours may represent an important behavioural characteristic relevant to clinical glucose management in pregnancy and warrant further investigation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, Y., He, D., Wang, B., Ye, W., Liu, H., Zhu, H., Li, B., Wu, Q., Chen, F., Ji, L., Xu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111197</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111197</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long sleep duration and suboptimal glycaemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Ningbo, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111197</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111295?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and processes of care by patient and physician sex: a single-centre retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111295?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Prior research, mostly from North America, suggests improved clinical outcomes for female patients treated by female physicians. Whether these findings apply in European healthcare systems and how underlying processes of care vary by sex remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether in-hospital outcomes and processes of care differ by patient sex, physician sex or their interaction, in a European setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>General internal medicine division of a Swiss tertiary teaching hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult inpatients (&ge;18 years) hospitalised between 2014 and 2024 and their primarily responsible physicians, classified by administrative sex (male vs female). The cohort included 20 094 hospitalisations (44.6% female patients) and 216 physicians (48.1% female).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission, as well as processes of care (resource use, advance care planning and cardiovascular low-value care). Multilevel mixed-effects regression models adjusted for patient and physician characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Female patients had lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.89) and 30-day mortality (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87), lower hospitalisation costs (&ndash;4.26%, 95% CI &ndash;6.08% to &ndash;2.41%), fewer diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (&ndash;6.44%, 95% CI &ndash;9.76% to &ndash;3.01%), fewer blood tests (&ndash;8.95%, 95% CI &ndash;12.98% to &ndash;4.73%) and were less likely to have resuscitation orders (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.71) or intensive care unit transfer orders (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.73). They were, however, more likely to receive non-indicated antihypertensive treatment (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.51). No significant differences were observed by physician sex or patient&ndash;physician sex interaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In a European tertiary teaching hospital with universal healthcare coverage, in-hospital outcomes and processes of care did not differ by physician sex or patient&ndash;physician sex interaction. Nevertheless, disparities by patient sex persisted, underscoring the need for sex-disaggregated quality monitoring and sex-sensitive medical training.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moeschler, S., Yi, S., Clair, C., Vollenweider, P., Marques-Vidal, P., Mean, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111295</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111295</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and processes of care by patient and physician sex: a single-centre retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111295</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111334?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hydrocortisone replacement therapy in patients with glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome after cessation of glucocorticoid treatment: REPLACE, a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 16-week study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111334?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Glucocorticoid therapy is prescribed for a variety of inflammatory conditions and is associated with severe adverse effects. A glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) may occur after prolonged glucocorticoid treatment&mdash;with or without biochemical glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency (GIAI). Previously, GWS was not considered an entity, probably due to the overlap between symptoms of GWS and GIAI. The Addison&rsquo;s disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (AddiQoL-30) is a validated tool for quantifying symptoms of adrenal insufficiency resembling GWS. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that patients with a low AddiQoL-30 score and/or low cortisol response to a short Synacthen test (SST), after cessation of prednisolone treatment, may benefit from low-dose hydrocortisone therapy without increasing the risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease during prolonged cortisol exposure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>REPLACE is a multi-centre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis after cessation of prednisolone treatment. Criteria for randomisation are an AddiQoL-30 score &le;85 and/or plasma cortisol response to SST, 30-min p-cortisol &gt;100 and &lt;420 nmol/L. Patients will be randomised to oral hydrocortisone (10 mg two times a day) or placebo for 16 weeks. Baseline and follow-up examinations comprise AddiQoL-30 questionnaire, SST, blood samples, standardised blood pressure, physical function tests and assessment of bone quality and body composition. At baseline, two comparator groups include: (1) patients with a SST-stimulated cortisol &ge;420 nmol/L and AddiQoL-30 score &gt;85; and (2) patients with a SST-stimulated cortisol &le;100 nmol/L.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, registered at the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS: 2024-513822-53-00) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05193396), and publications will be in accordance with the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The trial is monitored by local independent Good Clinical Practice units and overseen by the Danish Data Protection Agency (journal no. 21/27119), the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (project ID: S-20210076), the Danish Patient Safety Authority and the Danish Medicines Agency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05193396">NCT05193396</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dreyer, A. F., Hansen, S. B., Borresen, S. W., Al-Jorani, H., Bislev, L. S., Boesen, V. B., Christensen, L. L., Glintborg, D., Jensen, R. C., Jorgensen, N. T., Klose, M. C., Lund, M. L., Frederiksen, J. S. S., Tei, R., Feldt-Rasmussen, U., Jorgensen, J. O. L., Andersen, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111334</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111334</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hydrocortisone replacement therapy in patients with glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome after cessation of glucocorticoid treatment: REPLACE, a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 16-week study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111334</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111334</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112124?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of computer-aided detection chest X-ray screening for improving tuberculosis diagnostic yield in Chinese primary healthcare settings: study protocol for a prospective cluster randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112124?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a globally concerning infectious disease, and significant challenges persist in attaining the 2030 targets set by the WHO. With the rapid advancements in computer-aided detection (CAD) technology, CAD-assisted Chest X-Ray (CAD-CXR) has been applied in TB patients triaging, but the practical application value of the CAD-CXR system in real-world primary healthcare settings in China for TB prevention and control has not been fully elucidated. This protocol reports a design of a cluster randomised controlled trial (CRCT), which aims to evaluate the effectiveness and clinical pathway of CAD-CXR in enhancing TB diagnostic yield in primary healthcare settings, thereby contributing to global TB elimination strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Scheduled for September 2025, this CRCT will recruit 22 townships in Yichang of Hubei Province, China. These townships will be randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to either the CAD-CXR system intervention group or the control group. In the intervention group, healthcare providers will use the CAD-CXR analysis system to assist in TB screening, whereas the control group will rely solely on conventional CXR interpretation by radiologists. The primary outcome of the study is the TB diagnostic yield; the secondary outcomes include diagnostic delay duration and the accuracy of the CAD-CXR system. These metrics will be comprehensively evaluated to assess the effectiveness of the CAD-CXR intervention. Findings from this study are anticipated to offer evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal application scenarios and implementation pathways for CAD-CXR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Peking Union Medical College (CAMS&amp;PUMC-IEC-2025-044). Findings of this study will be disseminated through traditional academic pathways, including peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>  <A HREF="NCT06963606">NCT06963606</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, X., Zhang, H., Jiang, W., Xin, Y., Dai, Z., Li, Z., Xiong, J., Sun, R., Shao, J., Yu, J., Wang, Y., Su, X., Liu, J., Li, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112124</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112124</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of computer-aided detection chest X-ray screening for improving tuberculosis diagnostic yield in Chinese primary healthcare settings: study protocol for a prospective cluster randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112124</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112124</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115773?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of digital intervention in the self-management of depressive symptoms: the MENTINA trial - a study protocol for a randomised controlled parallel-group trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e115773?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Depression and sub-diagnostic depressive syndromes are prevalent and associated with suffering and reduced life expectancy. Access to care is limited even in countries with developed healthcare systems. In this context, it is important to strengthen the self-management expertise of people suffering from depressive symptoms. Smartphones offer the possibilities for improved self-management based on long-term monitoring of symptoms.</p>
<p>The present multicentre randomised controlled trial (the Protecting mental health in times of change (MENTINA) trial) aims to evaluate whether (1) daily smartphone-based monitoring and automatic rule-based feedback+smartphone-based outcome evaluations versus (2) smartphone-based outcome evaluations alone will improve depressive symptoms and other clinically relevant outcomes in participants with current depressive symptoms and/or one or more prior depressive episodes during a 12-month trial period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The MENTINA trial is a multicentre randomised controlled parallel-group trial conducted in Denmark, Germany and Spain. Participants with current depressive symptoms and/or one or more previous depressive episodes are invited to participate. The included participants will be randomised to (1) daily smartphone-based monitoring and automatic rule-based feedback+outcome evaluations via smartphone (intervention group) or (2) outcome evaluations via smartphone alone (control group). All participants can continue with ongoing treatment in case they receive it. The trial started in May 2025 and has currently included 115 participants. The outcomes are differences between the intervention group and the control group in (1) Patient Health Questionnaire 9-items (PHQ-9) measured every 14th day during the 12-month trial period (primary), (2) WHO Quality of Life-BREF, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, monthly change in PHQ-9, proportion of participants with &ge;50% reduction in PHQ-9, remission rate defined as PHQ-9&le;9 and &ge;5-point improvement, PHQ-9 scores after 6 months, area under the curve for PHQ-9 over the 12 months trial period, subgroup analyses in PHQ-9 in participants with or without lifetime depression, Perceived Stress Scale, user-reported healthcare contacts, usability of the app and negative effects, number of depressive episodes+duration and depressive-free days based on PHQ-9. A total of 660 participants will be included in the MENTINA trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The MENTINA trial is funded by the European Union under Grant Agreement No. 101 080 651. Ethical approval and approval from Medical Agencies have been obtained from Denmark (CIV-25-02-051094), Germany (CIV-25-02-05109) and Spain (CIV-25-02-051094). The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals, presented at scientific meetings and disseminated to patients&rsquo; organisations and media outlets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06919133">NCT06919133</A>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Protocol version</st>
<p>Version 6, January 2026.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faurholt-Jepsen, M., Dyreholt, M. S., Kyster, N. B., Iversen, N., Kortsen, E. M., Amann, B. L., Hogg, B., Gatto, D., Cordoba, C. d., Petrovic, M., Allenhof, C., Schnitzspahn, K., Reich, H., Budtz-Jorgensen, E., Kessing, L. V., Hegerl, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115773</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-115773</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of digital intervention in the self-management of depressive symptoms: the MENTINA trial - a study protocol for a randomised controlled parallel-group trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e115773</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e115773</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e073200corr1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: Effect of Elastic-band Baduanjin exercise on older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e073200corr1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Wang H, Pei C, Liu J<I>, et al</I>. Effect of Elastic-band Baduanjin exercise on older adults with type two diabetes mellitus in China: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. <I>BMJ Open</I> 2023;13:e073200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023&ndash;0 73<sup> </sup>200</p>
<p>This article has been corrected since it was first published as funding statement is updated.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T06:16:32-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073200corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2023-073200corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: Effect of Elastic-band Baduanjin exercise on older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e073200corr1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e073200corr1</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110184?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Life expectancy of people with intellectual disability: a retrospective cohort study from New South Wales, Australia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110184?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To comprehensively analyse the life expectancy at birth of people with intellectual disability, including people with Down syndrome, to inform health equity and service planning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Residents of New South Wales (NSW), Australia, with intellectual disability from birth onwards between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Our study sample comprised 100 089 individuals with intellectual disability in the dataset, spanning from birth onwards, between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>All cause mortality. Life expectancy was estimated using ordinary and abridged life table methods, based on age-specific population count, and compared with the general NSW population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Life expectancy at birth of people with intellectual disability was 67 years, 16 years shorter than the NSW average. Males and females with intellectual disability had a similar life expectancy. Individuals with Down syndrome had a life expectancy of 54 years, significantly shorter than those without Down syndrome. The life expectancy gap for people with intellectual disability narrowed with increasing age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>People with intellectual disability in Australia experience a substantial life expectancy gap, with greater disparities for those with Down syndrome. These findings underscore the need for targeted health and social interventions to address systemic inequities and improve health outcomes across the lifespan.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srasuebkul, P., Trofimovs, J., Trollor, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-04T05:10:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110184</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110184</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Life expectancy of people with intellectual disability: a retrospective cohort study from New South Wales, Australia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110184</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099915?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adverse birth outcomes and associated factors among adolescent mothers in Nabdam District, Ghana: a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099915?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Pregnancy and childbirth among adolescents have a higher risk of adverse outcomes than among older women. Adolescent mothers often lack physiological, psychological, social and financial capabilities, risking adverse birth outcomes such as preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), asphyxia and stillbirth. We investigated birth outcomes and associated factors among adolescent mothers in the Nabdam District of Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective, health facility-based, cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>12 health facilities in Nabdam District, January 2021 to December 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Census of all 373 births recorded in the maternity registers of the selected health facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The main outcome measure was adverse birth outcome, a composite outcome measured as the presence of at least one of PTB, LBW, asphyxia and stillbirth. The data collected were analysed using SPSS V.22. Proportion, mean, <sup>2</sup> and binary logistic regression models were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>141 (37.8%) of the adolescent mothers in the selected health facilities had at least one adverse birth outcome: PTB (78, 20.9%), newborn with asphyxia (56, 15.0%), LBW (55, 14.7%) and stillbirth (1, 0.3%). Adolescents in the Pelungu subdistrict were 2.95 times (95% CI 1.44 to 6.05) more likely to have an adverse birth outcome compared with those in the Zanlerigu subdistrict. Lower odds of adverse birth outcomes were found among adolescents aged 16&ndash;19 years (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.89) and those with eight or more antenatal care (ANC) visits (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.96) compared with those younger than 16 years and those with fewer than eight ANC visits, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Adverse birth outcomes were common among adolescent mothers in the district and were more likely among younger adolescents, those living in disadvantaged subdistricts and those with fewer ANC visits. These findings indicate the urgent need for targeted interventions and support for this vulnerable population, as well as those directed towards improving access to comprehensive prenatal care, promoting proper nutrition during pregnancy and enhancing the overall well-being of adolescent mothers in resource-limited settings, in order to facilitate the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals 3.1 and 3.2 on reducing maternal mortality and improving foetal health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nborah, S. A., Saah, F. I., Gyamera, O. G., Amu, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099915</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099915</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adverse birth outcomes and associated factors among adolescent mothers in Nabdam District, Ghana: a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099915</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099915</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099918?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying emotional variations in Spanish oncology patients during treatment decision consultations: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e099918?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This qualitative study aims to identify which themes cause the most emotional variation in patients&rsquo; decisions about cancer treatment. Patients&rsquo; emotional variations are analysed to detect negative and positive variations to certain themes during the consultations. This analysis helps to detect what themes or elements affect patients&rsquo; experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and settings</st>
<p>A total of 31 clinical consultations from cancer care pathways were recorded, transcribed and analysed. Patients were followed up until they decided and started treatment for their cancer. An inductive content analysis is followed to interpret patients&rsquo; emotional variations. All patients were from Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet of Zaragoza, Spain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Twelve patients participated in the study, consisting of eight with breast cancer and four with melanoma. Of these patients, nine were female and three were male. Eligible participants were required to be new to the care pathways or to have used them more than 10 years ago. Participants were also required to be aged 18 or older, be fluent in Spanish and be available to participate for 3 months. Participants were excluded if the authors or oncologists noticed poor health conditions that could be exacerbated by the stress and additional effort involved in participating in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Patients&rsquo; emotional variations identify five main themes: clinical history, cancer diagnosis, discussion of possible treatment choice, side effects (possible side effects of the selected treatment) and next steps (require complementary medical tests and more consultations to decide the treatment). Most of the emotional variations detected were negative and were mostly grouped into the categories of treatment, side effects and next steps. The most pronounced negative variations were related to delays in starting treatment and the possibility of hair loss.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The themes and emotional variations identified in this study can help to understand patients&rsquo; experiences during their initial oncology consultations. These results represent a significant step towards enhancing communication and the patient experience within oncology practices. Oncologists could use these data and procedures to identify where patients experience negative emotions and respond appropriately.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanudo, Y., Aguado-Gonzalez, L., Medina Castillo, A., Sierra-Perez, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099918</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099918</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying emotional variations in Spanish oncology patients during treatment decision consultations: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099918</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099918</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100311?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ctDNA guided immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide Danish, randomised, intervention study (PRELUCA--PRediction in LUng CAncer Treatment) - study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e100311?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>PRELUCA is a randomised, intervention, non-inferiority study designed to use real-time, longitudinal circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) measurements to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary outcome is overall survival between the two groups: the standard of care group (computer tomography scan evaluation) and intervention group (ctDNA evaluation).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The inclusion and exclusion criteria align with European Society for Medical Oncology treatment guidelines and permit broad inclusion of NSCLC patients, ensuring &lsquo;real-world&rsquo; representativeness. The study uses a tumour-informed method, using baseline next generation sequencing analyses to design patient-specific droplet digital PCR assays, which are run with collected blood samples 1 week prior to the intended treatment, enabling real-time evaluation via ctDNA Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Inclusion began in July 2023 and patients are now being actively included in five locations across Denmark. Approval by The Committee on Health Research Ethics of Region Zealand was gained on 4 May 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05889247">NCT05889247</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andersen, M. E., Nyhus, C. H., Szejniuk, W. M., Wahlstrom, S., Timm, S., Pallisgaard, N., Madsen, M. G., Mikkelsen, M. D., Ahlborn, L. B., Gehl, J., Frank, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100311</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100311</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ctDNA guided immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide Danish, randomised, intervention study (PRELUCA--PRediction in LUng CAncer Treatment) - study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100311</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100311</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of long covid symptoms in Tuscany, Italy: a population-representative cross-sectional telephone survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Long covid affects over 36 million individuals in the European region, but its clinical profile is still poorly defined, particularly in the general population with less severe acute disease. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of a broad spectrum of symptoms potentially linked to long covid in the general population of Tuscany, Italy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was conducted in January&ndash;February 2024 using Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviews in a representative population sample of Tuscany. Based on the WHO questionnaire long covid symptom list, data on 33 symptoms experienced in the past 6 months were collected, along with demographic and clinical characteristics. After excluding patients with COVID-19 within the past 6 months and those failing a screening cognitive test, symptom prevalence and ORs adjusted for sex, time since infection, smoking and concurrent diseases (aOR) were calculated according to COVID-19 history.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After excluding 129 failing the cognitive test (6.4%) and 123 recent COVID cases (6.1%), among 1753 participants interviewed, 1013 (57.8%) had a history of COVID-19. The symptoms significantly more prevalent in individuals with previous COVID-19 were fatigue (12.8% vs 8.9%, aOR 1.6 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.2)), concentration impairment (5.5% vs 2.4%, aOR 2.2 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.8)) and skin rashes (4.5% vs 2.4%, aOR 1.9 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.3)). Prevalences and ORs were higher in more recent COVID-19 cases, particularly females and individuals with concurrent diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We identified in a population-based study some symptoms significantly more common in individuals with previous COVID-19. This approach complements data collected in clinical settings and in patients selected by greater disease severity. The findings may help future surveillance efforts and targeted public health interventions directed at optimising care pathways and mitigating long-term consequences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruschi, M., Del Riccio, M., Lorini, C., Profili, F., Zanobini, P., Biagi, C., Papini, E., Floridia, M., Onder, G., Francesconi, P., Bonaccorsi, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101321</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101321</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of long covid symptoms in Tuscany, Italy: a population-representative cross-sectional telephone survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101321</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101820?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can we enhance neurorehabilitation through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation? A mixed-methods evaluation of NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e101820?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine whether neurorehabilitation can be enhanced through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation, we implemented the NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL) innovation regionally and evaluated scale-up from a systems perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational, exploratory service evaluation using a mixed-methods convergent parallel design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Stroke and neurological rehabilitation services from four organisations across a regional healthcare system in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Therapy staff from community-based services and patients with a stroke or neurological condition receiving active community rehabilitation including NROL from April 2022 to March 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>A regional multidisciplinary group-based neurological telerehabilitation innovation (NROL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Selected Proctor&rsquo;s implementation outcomes, to establish system-level adoption, acceptability and sustainability of the regional NROL innovation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>NROL was adopted by all intended organisations and continues as part of usual care with participation growing. It was acceptable to therapy staff and patients across the region, well-used, valued and supported increased therapy provision. For sustainability, staffing and travel efficiencies were identified through effective collaborative regional systems working. The importance of continued wide stakeholder engagement, robust evaluation and alignment was highlighted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>NROL was successfully embedded into real-world practice at a system level and enhanced neurorehabilitation. Looking forward, longer-term sustainment of this innovation will require a compelling business case and value proposition for decision-makers, addressing economic, equality and operational efficiency considerations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ackerley, S., Mason, T., Partington, A., Peel, R., Vernon, H., Connell, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101820</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101820</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can we enhance neurorehabilitation through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation? A mixed-methods evaluation of NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101820</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101820</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103467?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gender differences in gastric cancer care and its adherence to guidelines in Germany (MaGen): protocol for an observational retrospective cohort study with administrative routine and cancer registry data from 2017 to 2021]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e103467?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer globally and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality. While gender and sex differences in gastric cancer care are underexplored in Germany, international studies have revealed disparities in aspects such as histology, comorbidities, treatment approaches and survival outcomes. This study aims to explore gender/sex-specific variations in clinical management and their impact on mortality, complications and survival rates in gastric carcinoma patients in Germany. The findings may inform revisions to clinical guidelines and support the development of more personalised treatment strategies. This study aims to improve the quality of care for gastric cancer patients and promote more individualised, sex-sensitive medical practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This nationwide, retrospective cohort study will analyse data from the German Diagnosis-Related Groups statistic and regional clinical cancer registries from 2017 to 2021. The study will evaluate both datasets separately, providing a comprehensive view of sex differences in gastric cancer care. Primary outcomes include hospital mortality and survival rates, while secondary endpoints include surgical complications, treatment modalities and postoperative outcomes. The analysis will investigate whether sex influences tumour characteristics, access to treatment and therapy effectiveness. Statistical methods such as descriptive analysis, regression models and survival analysis will be applied to identify sex-related variations in diagnosis, treatment and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study uses anonymised secondary data; thus, ethics approval is not necessary. Findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, reported to the Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee of Germany, and a patient leaflet for the involved self-help groups will be made.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06902337">NCT06902337</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weber, U., Kress, L., Hunger, R., Schildberg, C., Mantke, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103467</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103467</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gender differences in gastric cancer care and its adherence to guidelines in Germany (MaGen): protocol for an observational retrospective cohort study with administrative routine and cancer registry data from 2017 to 2021]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103467</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103467</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104408?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for the PROSECCA study: a new approach for predicting radiotherapy outcome using artificial intelligence and electronic population-based healthcare data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e104408?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Within the UK there are 33 deaths every day from prostate cancer, second only to lung cancer as the most common cause of cancer death in males in the UK. Of the 55 000 new cases each year, up to 50% of these patients will receive radiotherapy either alone or after prostatectomy. Although there have been significant improvements in the accuracy of radiotherapy delivery leading to better tumour targeting and a reduction in dose to normal tissues, significant permanent genito-urinary or gastrointestinal-related side effects are all too common. With nearly 80% of patients with prostate cancer surviving for 10 years or more, minimising life-limiting radiation damage to normal tissues is vitally important. However, at present, it is not possible to identify which patients will suffer a poorer outcome after radiotherapy. The aim of this study, improving radiotherapy in <b>PROS</b>tate cancer using <b>E</b>le<b>C</b>tronic population-based health<b>CA</b>re data (PROSECCA), is to do this by using the existing information in a patient&rsquo;s digital healthcare record. By linking primary, secondary and tertiary clinical data, including digital image information, with radiotherapy treatment plans and outcome data, the PROSECCA study will identify de novo predictive biomarkers of radiation response and provide clinicians with a tool to individualise a radiotherapy dose and plan to maximise cure and minimise toxicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The PROSECCA study is a large multidisciplinary project, the purpose of which is to analyse healthcare records from up to 15 000 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radiotherapy in the treatment of their cancer in Scotland between 2010 and 2022. Through the linkage of data obtained specifically for radiotherapy and data held within each patient&rsquo;s unique electronic health record (EHR), the factors that indicate why some patients have a poor response to treatment, or an increased risk of side effects from radiation, will be identified. This will be made possible by the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AL/ML), which will help to identify at-risk patients earlier and allow adaptation of their treatment accordingly.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is being conducted in accordance with the ethical principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice that respects and protects the rights, and maintains confidentiality, of all trial participants. The study protocol (V.1.0) was reviewed by the South Central Oxford A Research Ethics Committee (REC) on 13 December 2021 and received a favourable opinion subject to each National Health Service (NHS) organisation confirming permission for patients treated within their area. Approval for the use of unconsented healthcare record data for patients included in the study and treated at one of the five Scottish Cancer Centres required an application to the NHS Scotland Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for Health and Social Care (HSC-PBPP). Full approval from the HSC-PBPP panel was received on 1 July 2024, which covered the use of pseudoanonymised EHR data for all patients participating in the study. The study is publicly listed on the NHS Health Research Authority site, with IRAS ID 306245 and REC reference 21/SC/0402. Dissemination of the study findings will take place through field-leading cancer, radiation oncology and medical physics journals. All manuscripts will be approved by the main study team and authorship determined by mutual agreement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06714630">NCT06714630</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nailon, W. H., Noble, D. J., Harrison, E., Yang, Z., Elliot, S., MacNair, A., Beckett, G., Hallam, A., Sheikh, A., Mills, N., Halliday, R., Morrison, D., Chalmers, A., Cameron, D., Gourley, C., Hall, P., Lilley, C., Carruthers, L. J., Trainer, M., Burns, D., Dee, F., Andiappa, S., Lonsdale, A., Couper, M., Farnan, K., McLellan, J., Miller, A., Ogg, J., Moses, J., Colligan, S., MacDonald, G., McPhail, N., Niblock, P., MacLeod, N., Davies, M. E., Laurenson, D. I., Hopgood, J. R., Boyle, D., Paterson, C., Grose, D., Phillips, I., Harrow, S., Berger, T., Shelley, L. E. A., Sanders, I., Henderson, S., Duffton, A., Mitchell, J., Rutherford, A., McLaren, D. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104408</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104408</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for the PROSECCA study: a new approach for predicting radiotherapy outcome using artificial intelligence and electronic population-based healthcare data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104408</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104408</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106667?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Frailty and subsequent decline in self-rated health among older adults in Southern Switzerland: 13-month cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e106667?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Frailty is a multidimensional concept of vulnerability closely associated with ageing and adverse health outcomes, including mortality, chronic diseases and functional impairments. Despite its clinical relevance, the conceptualisation of frailty remains challenging, highlighting the need to explore how it relates to general health decline over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate whether a Frailty Index is associated with subsequent decline in self-rated health (SRH) over 13 months in older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal cohort design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>A total of 660 community dwelling participants aged 65 and older from Canton Ticino, Southern Switzerland, were included. The follow-up period, conducted as part of the Corona Immunitas study, spanned from September 2020 to November 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Rockwood Frailty Index categorised participants into frail, prefrail and robust groups based on 30 variables across seven domains. SRH trajectories were analysed over time using linear mixed-effects models, adjusting for socio-demographic and health-related covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From 660 participants, 41.5% were robust, 48.2% prefrail and 10.3% frail at baseline, with baseline mean SRH 4.22, 3.74 and 2.97, respectively. SRH declined over 13 months in all groups (&beta;=&ndash;0.009, p&lt;0.001), with the frail group experiencing the steepest decline (&beta;=&ndash;0.014, p&lt;0.001). Linear mixed-effects models confirmed significant associations between frailty status, time and SRH (p&lt;0.01), independent of age, gender, income satisfaction and confirmed COVID-19 infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Frail individuals experience a more pronounced decline in SRH compared with robust and prefrail individuals, highlighting their heightened vulnerability. The Rockwood Frailty Index was associated with health deterioration over time and clearly distinguished between frailty states, supporting its use to identify older adults at higher risk of subsequent health decline and to inform early detection and prevention strategies in older populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casillas-Clot, J., Jiang, M., Amati, R., Corna, L., Crivelli, L., Annoni, A. M., Albanese, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106667</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106667</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Frailty and subsequent decline in self-rated health among older adults in Southern Switzerland: 13-month cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106667</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106667</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107208?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Establishing the prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder among young people in Youth Justice residences in Aotearoa, New Zealand: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107208?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a diagnostic term that describes the neurodevelopmental and physical effects resulting from prenatal exposure to alcohol. Individuals living with FASD can experience lifelong challenges, yet with a diagnosis and sufficient support for the individual and their wh&#x0101;nau (families), people can live fulfilling lives. Currently, little is known of the prevalence and impact in Aotearoa, New Zealand (NZ). Our aim is to identify the prevalence and understand the needs of young people living with FASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders in Youth Justice (YJ) residences in Aotearoa, NZ. One study will investigate the prevalence of FASD in this setting. The outcomes of both studies may demonstrate barriers and enablers, as well as strengths and gaps in YJ services of Aotearoa, NZ. The outcomes of both studies may guide reinforcing of current best practices as well as highlight necessary and novel initiatives together providing best support for the children and adolescents and their wh&#x0101;nau as well as staff across YJ residences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Extensive consultation with M&#x0101;ori and Pacific Advisory groups, researchers and experts in FASD and justice settings, individuals living with FASD and YJ staff together informed the development of this study.</p>
<p>Children and adolescents (hereafter young people) aged 10 to 18 years and currently residing in YJ residences are eligible for participation and assessment for FASD through assenting and consenting to provide personal and social histories and completed physical and neuropsychological assessments. The comprehensive FASD histories, screening and assessment will be conducted by a neuropsychologist and paediatrician employing standardised assessment practices and instruments. The team will also collect information from health, education and care and protection records; from the young people themselves; and from their family and staff. The study will reference Whakakotahitanga, the newly released (2024) guidelines for screening and diagnosing FASD in Aotearoa, NZ while also acknowledging the differences imposed under constraints of funding research including, for example, time and money. An individualised report will be prepared for each young person and their wh&#x0101;nau. Study data will be analysed with descriptive statistics as appropriate. Our findings will be considered by the M&#x0101;ori and Pasifika advisory groups for framing and culturally secure translation, disseminated with all participating young people, translated to YJ services and staff, government and community neurodiversity sectors. Outcomes will be made available through community hubs, conferences, reports and peer-reviewed journal publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received ethical approval from the Southern Health and Disability Ethics Committee (2024 Full 20065). Locality ethical approval has been granted from Oranga Tamariki (Ministry of Children), and a privacy impact evaluation has been undertaken. The findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publication, local and national conferences and with key agencies including Oranga Tamariki.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chu, J. T. W., McCormack, J. C., McGinn, V., Bullen, C., Gibbs, A., Seaford, A., Ware (Ngapuhi), F., Mutch, R., Jones, H., Umali, E., Gardiner, C., Wilson, H., Moki, H., Faiai, A., Parag, V., Newcombe, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107208</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107208</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Establishing the prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder among young people in Youth Justice residences in Aotearoa, New Zealand: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107208</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107208</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107785?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of redeployment on healthcare staff well-being and retention: a survey of staff in the UK National Health Service]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e107785?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The redeployment of healthcare staff from their normal place of work and duties to alternative activities is not a new phenomenon and has typically been used as a temporary measure to address capacity gaps. While redeployment supports the mobilisation of a flexible healthcare workforce, it also presents as a source of tension in relation to staff well-being and retention. This paper reports findings from a survey of staff in the UK National Health Service (NHS), exploring the impact of redeployment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>An online survey was administered by YouGov (2023), addressing contemporary evidence on variables impacting staff health, well-being and disposition to remain in NHS employment. The sample comprised NHS employees representing the principal healthcare job families and grades across acute hospitals, mental health, community and ambulance services. Statistical analysis (SPSS V.29.0.2.0) compared (independent samples t-test, z-test and <sup>2</sup> test for trend) redeployed and non-redeployed staff response profiles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The staff who had experienced redeployment in the 6 months prior to spring 2023 showed higher rates of submitting applications for non-NHS jobs (22%; non-redeployed staff 12%). Redeployed staff reported higher stress, lower morale and less ability to switch off from work than non-redeployed staff (p&lt;0.01). They also showed higher ratings of symptoms of burnout (p&lt;0.0001), higher rates of sickness presenteeism (66% redeployed; 54% non-redeployed), greater worry over current working conditions (p&lt;0.05) and lower confidence in their improvement in the near future (p&lt;0.01), than non-redeployed staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings highlight the negative impacts associated with staff redeployment and challenges to staff health, well-being and disposition to remain employed in healthcare. Despite a growing consensus regarding the need to support the redeployed, evidence regarding &lsquo;what works&rsquo; remains under-researched. Such insight is particularly pertinent given the growing interest in technological solutions for a more agile workforce, where deployment flexibility is a key feature.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weyman, A., Glendinning, R., OHara, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107785</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107785</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of redeployment on healthcare staff well-being and retention: a survey of staff in the UK National Health Service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107785</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107785</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109648?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between repeat caesarean section and postpartum depression: an observational cohort study in Shanghai, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109648?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Although caesarean section (CS) has been reported as one of the potential risk factors for postpartum depression (PPD), there is uncertainty about the association between repeat CS and the risk of developing PPD. We sought to explore whether repeat CS will further increase the risk of PPD compared with primary CS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary maternity hospital in Shanghai, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>571 women, aged 20 years and older, full-term parturients with singleton scheduled for elective primary or repeat CS were enrolled between December 2020 and September 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>An increased risk of PPD was defined as the total scores of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale &ge;11. The primary outcome was the risk of PPD at 6 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included the risk of postpartum depressive symptoms at 48 hours after CS, pain situation at 48 hours after CS and 6 weeks postpartum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the 571 women included in the final analyses, PPD at 6 weeks postpartum occurred in 41 women (24.0%) in the repeat CS group (n=171) versus 93 (23.3%) in the primary CS group (n=400). After adjusting for the confounders, repeat CS was not associated with higher odds of PPD at 6 weeks postpartum (adjusted relative risk (aRR), 1.04 (95% CIs 0.73 to 1.45); adjusted risk difference (aRD), 0.03 (95% CI &ndash;0.32 to 0.37), p=0.84). Compared with primary CS, women with repeat CS were more likely to report significant uterine contraction pain (NRS &ge;4) at 48 hours after CS (aRR, 1.51 (95% CI 1.23 to 2.03); aRD, 0.41 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.71), p&lt;0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups for incidence of postpartum depressive symptoms at 48 hours after CS (aRR, 1.13 (95% CI 0.42 to 3.09); aRD, 0.13 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.13), p=0.81), and pain at 6 weeks postpartum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Repeat CS was not associated with the increased risk of PPD at 6 weeks postpartum in comparison to primary CS. But women undergoing elective repeat CS were more likely to suffer significant uterine contraction pain in early postoperative stage.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, R., Shuai, W., Yu, Y., Ma, R., Zhou, X., Luo, W., Shen, F., Xu, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109648</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109648</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between repeat caesarean section and postpartum depression: an observational cohort study in Shanghai, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109648</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109648</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109741?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership to identify the most important research priorities addressing respiratory health disparities affecting the Black community in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e109741?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Respiratory diseases affect millions of people in the UK, with a disproportionately high burden seen among many marginalised communities. They are the third leading cause of death in the UK and a major driver of morbidity, disability and healthcare service use. Many respiratory conditions cause debilitating symptoms and deterioration in patients&rsquo; health and quality of life over time, resulting in substantial increases in National Health Service (NHS) expenditure. Social inequalities, including occupational, housing and environmental disparities, have led to a disproportionate burden of respiratory disease among the Black community. For many Black people living in the UK, respiratory conditions have been under-recognised, misdiagnosed or inadequately treated, further contributing to disparities in health outcomes. Despite the need to address these urgent challenges, research in this area is fragmented and rarely informed by the views and opinions of those most affected. Research prioritisation provides a structured methodology to address this unmet need. The Equal Breath Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) aims to identify the 10 most urgent research priorities in respiratory health for people of Black heritage through meaningful collaboration with people with lived experience of respiratory disease, their caregivers and family members and the healthcare professionals caring for them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The top 10 research priorities for the Equal Breath PSP will be established using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method. A steering group comprising approximately 12 people from key stakeholder groups will first be assembled to guide the PSP. Once the context and scope of the PSP has been agreed, the first survey will be developed and disseminated among stakeholder communities to identify evidence uncertainties. Data analysis of the survey responses will create summary questions and critical appraisal of available evidence will verify which of these are evidence gaps. A longlist of approximately 50 summary questions derived from the first survey will be shared with stakeholders in a second shortlisting survey. The highest ranking questions from this survey will be taken into a workshop where the top 10 research priorities will be established through a consensus process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This PSP employs the JLA methodology, which does not constitute research as defined by the Health Research Authority. Survey respondent data will be stored in accordance with UK General Data Protection Regulation by Asthma+Lung UK. The final 10 research priorities will be shared with funders, policymakers, professional bodies and relevant communities to inform future investment and promote equity in respiratory health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolffs, K., Etti, M., Zelzer, R., Punja, P., Kinsella, S., Kennington, E., Adebajo, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109741</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109741</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership to identify the most important research priorities addressing respiratory health disparities affecting the Black community in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109741</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109741</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110207?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence on the preparedness and practice needs of the home care workforce to support older LGBTQ+ people: a rapid review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110207?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Older people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer or other marginalised sexualities and gender identities (LGBTQ+) still face significant barriers and inequalities when accessing adult social care services. Little is known about the preparedness of the care workforce to support older LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly within home care services. While a few previous reviews have examined the perspectives of older LGBTQ+ people on the preparedness of the home care workforce, none have included the perspectives of the workforce itself or compared both perspectives. This is a protocol for a rapid review that aims to explore what is known about the preparedness and practice needs of the home care workforce to support older LGBTQ+ people, with a particular focus on workforce perspectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A rapid review method was selected to expedite the review process to support further study development and dissemination. Two electronic databases, SCOPUS and Web of Science, will be searched, as well as six subject-specific databases, including Social Care Institute for Excellence, Skills for Care, Social Care Wales, Homecare Association, Stonewall UK, LGBT Foundation UK and SAGE US. There are no search date restrictions. Study quality will be assessed using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations considerations will be used to consider certainty of evidence. Data will be synthesised using narrative synthesis, including a descriptive summary of included studies and their methodological quality. All preferred reporting items for review protocols have been included, as recorded by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for the protocol and review. Manuscripts for the protocol and completed review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, and findings will be shared in webinars for the home care workforce and at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251038242.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keemink, J. R., Stander, W. J., Thomas, B., Willis, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110207</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110207</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence on the preparedness and practice needs of the home care workforce to support older LGBTQ+ people: a rapid review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110207</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with ischaemic heart disease and type 2 diabetes in Swedish primary care: a cross-sectional analysis of regional primary care registry data (QregPV)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) among patients with coexisting ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in primary care, in relation to European guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>209 primary healthcare centres in Region Va&#x0308;stra Go&#x0308;taland, Sweden (population 1.8 million in 2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>14 414 patients with registered prevalent diagnoses of coexisting IHD and T2D, September 2023, in QregPV, the regional primary care quality of care register in Region Va&#x0308;stra Go&#x0308;taland. Data on dispensed drugs were retrieved from the regional prescribed drug register, Digitalis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with dispensed SGLT2i or GLP-1 RA in relation to sex, age and primary healthcare centres (including private vs public ownership). The secondary outcome was estimated additional prescription costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>SGLT2i was dispensed to 37.2%, less often to women (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.64 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.70)). GLP-1 RA was dispensed to 10.0%, with no sex difference (aOR 1.04 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.18)). Use of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA declined with age (p&lt;0.001). Use across primary healthcare centres (95% central range) varied from 17.1% to 56.4% for SGLT2i and 0.0% to 23.4% for GLP-1 RA, without differences between private versus public primary healthcare centres (SGLT2i: aOR 0.95 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.06); GLP-1 RA: aOR 1.06 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.26)). Variation across primary healthcare centres was substantial (SGLT2i: adjusted median OR (aMOR) 1.29 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.36); GLP-1 RA: aMOR 1.48 (95% CI 1.37 to 1.62)). Treating all patients would increase the annual prescription costs, 3.9 million for SGLT2i and 10.4 million for GLP-1 RA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA were underutilised in patients with coexisting IHD and T2D. The sex disparity in SGLT2i use warrants attention, as does the substantial variation between primary healthcare centres and the challenges of implementing costly cardioprotective therapies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andersson, T., Bager, J.-E., Hellgren, M., Aberg, M., Mourtzinis, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110395</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110395</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with ischaemic heart disease and type 2 diabetes in Swedish primary care: a cross-sectional analysis of regional primary care registry data (QregPV)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110395</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110531?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The self-management support needs of people diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis: a realist review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e110531?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a form of inflammatory arthritis linked to psoriasis. Previous research from the UK has found that many people feel unsupported when diagnosed with PsA and lack confidence in managing their condition. This realist review aims to understand what works and does not work for whom and in what circumstances, in relation to healthcare professionals engaging with people to support them in developing self-management skills.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol was developed by defining the scope of the review, using a brief directed literature review to support discussion by an expert group of researchers, healthcare professionals and a patient partner. A theoretical domains framework was generated, consisting of nine initial programme theories. These were further refined with input from Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement groups and used to develop a database search strategy.</p>
<p>A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare and APA PsycINFO will be carried out, supplemented by citation tracking, exploration of grey literature and a mixed methods survey of rheumatology health professionals. Data selection will be performed by a minimum of two reviewers and data from included sources will be extracted using a template. Data will be synthesised narratively with respect to the identified initial programme theories, using these data to refine or refute these theories. This will generate refined programme theories to explain what works for whom and in what circumstances.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for the health professionals survey was granted through the Research Ethics Committee, University of the West of England (Project ID: 10991848). Outputs will be disseminated to the research community through conference presentations and a peer-reviewed journal article. The strategy for sharing outputs with patients and health professionals will be discussed and agreed with knowledge user groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fishpool, K., Silverthorne, C. A., Brooke, M., McHugh, N., Morris, L., Ovens, J., Smith, T., Tillett, W., Dures, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110531</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110531</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The self-management support needs of people diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis: a realist review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110531</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110531</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111350?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Shortened High-dose Palliative Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer (SHiP-Rt): protocol for a single-arm, multicentre, phase II study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111350?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Significant advances in systemic therapy have improved survival for patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the present treatment strategies and dose-fractionation for high-dose palliative radiotherapy (RT) are based on trials from the 1990s, when RT planning was simple with less precise delivery. Contemporary lung RT uses 4D-CT, volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy, aided by online verification using cone beam CT, which enables greater accuracy and better target volume coverage, while reducing doses to normal organs at risk. The Shortened High-dose Palliative Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of reducing the number of RT fractions and RT duration, using contemporary planning, verification and delivery techniques.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-arm, multicentre, phase-II study will test the shortened hypofractionated accelerated palliative RT regimen of 30 Gy in 6 alternate-day fractions, with strict normal tissue dose constraints. We aim to recruit 37 patients across 4 sites within the West Midlands. Quality assurance for the RT is supported by the Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA). Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who are candidates for high-dose palliative RT, before or after first-line systemic therapy, are eligible for recruitment. The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety of the proposed dose-fractionation. Secondary objectives include evaluating toxicity profiles, patient-reported outcome measures, time to progression, feasibility and the National Health Service cost-saving.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study is conducted in accordance with the International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) guidelines and all applicable regulatory frameworks, including, but not limited to, the UK policy framework for health and social care research, as well as the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales regulations. Approval for the study was granted on 18 April 2024 (IRAS project ID: 332998; REC reference: 24/WM/0032). The chief investigator is responsible for obtaining informed consent from participants. Any individual delegated this responsibility is thoroughly authorised, trained and competent to conduct the informed consent process. On completion of the trial, the results will be shared with participants in a plain language summary and will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. If successful, this study will inform a phase III randomised controlled trial to assess efficacy. For updates on the study, visit the study web page (<A HREF="https://research.mededcoventry.org/About-Us/Meet-The-Team/TMU/Ship-Rt">https://research.mededcoventry.org/About-Us/Meet-The-Team/TMU/Ship-Rt</A>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06483308">NCT06483308</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shrimali, R. K., Griffin, E., Sturgess, V., Jones, M., Hiller, L., Rogers, J., Hamilton, J., Peebles, C., Jones, B., Dunn, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111350</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111350</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Shortened High-dose Palliative Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer (SHiP-Rt): protocol for a single-arm, multicentre, phase II study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111350</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111350</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111622?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Device-assessed sleep health among older patients with heart failure: a cross-sectional study using actigraphy]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111622?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Poor sleep is common among patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The utility of actigraphy in sleep assessment, especially among older adults, remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess sleep health among older adults with HF using actigraphy and explore associations between sleep parameters and cardiac biomarkers, functional performance and quality of life (QoL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at an outpatient HF clinic within a tertiary cardiology service in a National Health Service hospital in the UK between March and October 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 150 older adults aged &ge;65 years with a diagnosis of HF were enrolled.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Participants were given a wrist-accelerometer to wear for 7 days. On Day 0, patients completed a 4-metre walk test (4MWT), handgrip strength test (HGST), Timed Up and Go test (TUGT), Barthel Index (BI), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) and frailty assessment (Clinical Frailty Scale, CFS). Subsequently, they were fitted with an accelerometer, with the device configured to start recording the following day (Day 1). Sleep outcomes were calculated after a 7-day wear period and averaged across valid nights (minimum 3 nights of recording, noon-to-noon with &ge;16 hours wear-time). Sleep parameters studied include average sleep efficiency, sleep period time window, sleep duration, sleep onset and wake up time, wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep interruptions and Sleep Regularity Index (SRI). Inefficient sleep was defined as sleep efficiency &lt;80%. Regression analysis was used to examine associations between sleep parameters and the previously stated tests and assessments, adjusting for age, gender and comorbidities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome measure was sleep efficiency; all other sleep parameters were classified as secondary or exploratory outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Accelerometry data from 145 participants were analysed; 42% had inefficient sleep based on average sleep efficiency across valid nights. These patients had significantly higher plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (p=0.044). No statistically significant difference was noted in 4MWT, HGST, TUGT, BI, KCCQ-12 and CFS between patients with sleep efficiency &lt;80% and those with sleep efficiency &ge;80%. Lower sleep efficiency was associated with lower BI scores (adjusted &beta;=0.271, p=0.016) and worse frailty (adjusted &beta;=&ndash;0.017, p=0.014). Lower SRI was associated with worse New York Heart Association class (adjusted &beta;=&ndash;0.009, p=0.007), BI scores (adjusted &beta;=0.310, p&lt;0.001), frailty (adjusted &beta;=&ndash;0.017, p&lt;0.001) and QoL (adjusted &beta;=0.344, p=0.001); longer WASO was associated with slower gait speed (adjusted &beta;=&ndash;0.039, p=0.040).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Older adults with HF who had inefficient sleep had significantly higher NT-proBNP levels. Lower sleep efficiency was associated with higher functional dependence and frailty. Sleep irregularity was linked to HF symptom load, frailty, functional performance and QoL, while sleep fragmentation was associated with impaired gait speed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krishnan, S., Taylor, S., Edwardson, C. L., Rowlands, A. V., Squire, I. B., Sze, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111622</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111622</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Device-assessed sleep health among older patients with heart failure: a cross-sectional study using actigraphy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111622</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111622</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111664?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adult survivors of sickle cell disease, transfusion-dependent beta-thalassaemia and childhood acute leukaemia in England: protocol for a mixed methods data linkage and health-related quality of life survey study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e111664?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Recent advances in treatment and care have improved survival rates for children and young adults with severe blood disorders such as sickle cell disease (SCD), transfusion-dependent beta-thalassaemia (TDT) and acute leukaemia. However, their quality of life and reproductive and psychosocial outcomes are not yet well studied. For SCD and TDT, robust survival data are mainly limited to North America. Thus, there is a need to fill these knowledge gaps to guide improvements in care, address unmet clinical needs and rigorously assess the efficacy of emerging novel therapies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is an observational population-based mixed-methods study of individuals diagnosed with SCD, TDT or acute leukaemia when under the age of 18 in England, involving a data linkage component and a patient-reported outcomes measures survey. Data linkage-eligible participants will be identified from national and regional databases, including the Hospital Episode Statistics, Yorkshire Specialist Register of Cancer in Children &amp; Young People and the National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Diseases Registration Service. Data linkage will be processed within the NHS England and the University of Leeds&rsquo; secure, trusted research environments. Data will be accessed without consent under section 251 and approval by the confidentiality advisory group. It will assess survival rates for SCD and TDT as well as clinical, educational and mental health outcomes for SCD, TDT and acute leukaemia diagnosed in childhood.</p>
<p>Survey-eligible participants for SCD, TDT and acute leukaemia cohorts will be checked for their suitability to participate by the North of England clinical care teams. An NHS-approved survey provider will facilitate data checks with the NHS National Data Opt-Out Service. Consent is required for participation in the survey and for subsequent data linkage to existing databases. Surveys are conducted in various formats (online, paper and phone), with reminders sent after 21 days. The survey will assess quality of life and psychosocial and reproductive outcomes. Participants can withdraw at any time, and support is available via telephone helplines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received ethical and information governance approval from the Health Research Authority (Reference 24/YH/0186) and the Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG 24/CAG/0138) to process identifiable data without consent. Study results will be available to patients, physicians, researchers, stakeholders and others through open-access publishing, results sharing via media platforms and presentations at conferences and meetings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed, K., Holloway, I., Absolom, K., Mason, S. J., Mujica-Mota, R., Gkountouras, G., Martin, A., Flannery, T., Richards, M., Astwood, E., Ackroyd, S., Greystoke, B., Greenfield, D. M., Hill, Q., James, B., Kwok- Williams, M., Murray, R. D., Samuelson, C., Simcox, D., Snowden, J. A., Sharif, J., Sadasivam, N., Feltbower, R., Glaser, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111664</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111664</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Haematology (incl blood transfusion)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adult survivors of sickle cell disease, transfusion-dependent beta-thalassaemia and childhood acute leukaemia in England: protocol for a mixed methods data linkage and health-related quality of life survey study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Haematology (incl blood transfusion)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111664</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111664</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112134?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Embedding ethics into Genomics Englands Generation Study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112134?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Generation Study is a large-scale research initiative led by Genomics England in partnership with the National Health Service, aiming to evaluate the use of whole genome sequencing in newborn screening, as well as ongoing research use of these genomic data. The Generation Study will sequence 100 000 newborn genomes in England to potentially identify approximately 200 rare and treatable conditions. This paper outlines the study&rsquo;s approach to embedding ethics from inception through implementation. A model of &lsquo;ethical embeddedness&rsquo; that emphasises transparency, trustworthiness and responsiveness to uncertainty is utilised. Drawing on the deliberations of a multidisciplinary Ethics Working Group, public dialogue findings and design research, the paper presents key decisions and our approach to complex ethical challenges including consent, potential impact of the study on clinical services and navigating uncertainty. The paper also reflects on the ethical tensions inherent in balancing research ambitions with operational realities, particularly in a context of evolving genomic science and sometimes limited regulatory clarity. By embedding ethics into the study&rsquo;s design and delivery, we hope to foster public trust and inform future policy and practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Etheredge, H., Banner, N., To, M., Pichini, A., Ziff, J., Leblond, M., Tuff-Lacey, A., Scott, R., Thomas, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112134</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112134</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Embedding ethics into Genomics Englands Generation Study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ethics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112134</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112510?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-3 (OGAAP-3): protocol for a stratified approach to surgical technique and rehabilitation in lower limb amputees]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/2/e112510?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-3 (OGAAP-3) presents the latest iteration of a structured, prospective, clinical-based protocol for single-stage osseointegration surgery in lower limb amputees. Building on the foundational work of OGAAP-1 and OGAAP-2, this protocol incorporates a decade of institutional experience and over 1000 cases using the Osseointegrated Prosthetic Limb system. OGAAP-3 introduces stratified rehabilitation categories&mdash;immediate, standard, slow and delayed loading&mdash;based on intraoperative findings, residual limb characteristics and patient-specific physiological factors. The surgical approach remains a single-stage procedure, with modifications described for transfemoral and transtibial levels, including primary amputation with simultaneous implant placement. The aim is to enhance safety, optimise functional outcomes and broaden access to osseointegration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>OGAAP-3 is a prospective registry-based protocol enrolling approximately 50 patients annually at the Osseointegration Group of Australia and affiliated centres, with data collection ongoing since mid-2023 and planned until 2027. Eligibility criteria include adults (aged 18 years or over) with unilateral or bilateral transfemoral or transtibial amputations, as well as primary amputees undergoing concurrent osseointegration. All patients receive osseointegrated implants which are press-fitted into the residual bone. Functional and quality-of-life outcome measures are recorded preoperatively and at defined postoperative follow-up intervals up to 2 years. Postoperative adverse events are also recorded. The preoperative and postoperative values will be compared for each outcome measure, and the outcomes of the OGAAP-3 procedure will be compared with the results of the OGAAP-1 and OGAAP-2 protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethics approval by Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. The study outcomes will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed academic journals and presentations at relevant clinical and orthopaedic conferences with final outcome analyses planned following completion of 2-year follow-up in 2027.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Muderis, M., Oomatia, A., Al-Maawi, Q. M. J., Tetsworth, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-02T07:02:01-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112510</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112510</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated Protocol-3 (OGAAP-3): protocol for a stratified approach to surgical technique and rehabilitation in lower limb amputees]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112510</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112510</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e091880?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of anterior intrusion-based vertical control versus conventional sagittal retraction in adolescents with hyperdivergent mandibular retrognathia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e091880?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hyperdivergent skeletal class II malocclusion in adolescents is characterised by mandibular retrognathia with excessive vertical growth and clockwise mandibular rotation, which can worsen facial profile and airway-related morphology. Although mandibular advancement approaches are commonly used, they may increase the vertical dimension and are suboptimal for patients with long-face patterns. This randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate a micro-implant-assisted protrusion correction technique designed to flatten the occlusal plane and promote counterclockwise mandibular rotation, thereby improving facial profile and pharyngeal space.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR; ChiCTR2100054105). This is a two-arm, multicentre, randomised, parallel-controlled trial. Ninety adolescents will be recruited from Shanghai Stomatological Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital (Fudan University), and Xinhua Hospital (Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine), and will be randomly allocated (1:1) to the test or control group. The control group will receive conventional anterior teeth retraction, whereas the test group will receive a micro-implant-assisted vertical control protocol with occlusal plane flattening. The primary outcome is the change in the A point&ndash;nasion&ndash;B point angle. Secondary outcomes include changes in the occlusal plane, incisor and molar heights, and facial height. Measurements will be assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment and at 12 months after treatment completion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shanghai Stomatological Hospital (approval no. (2022)006). The results of this study will be made available in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2100054105.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shi, S., Zhang, W., Zhang, W., Lin, M., Chenyi, X., Lu, Y., Liu, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091880</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-091880</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of anterior intrusion-based vertical control versus conventional sagittal retraction in adolescents with hyperdivergent mandibular retrognathia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e091880</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e091880</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of self-management interventions for asthma control and healthcare utilisation among school-aged children in minority families in the United States: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This study aims to identify the effectiveness of asthma self-management interventions for school-aged children 6&ndash;17 years old in the US. The research questions include: (1) What interventions are conducted for asthma self-management among school children and adolescents aged 6&ndash;17 with asthma from minority families in the US? (2) Which asthma self-management intervention(s) are effective and feasible to reduce acute healthcare utilisation and improve asthma control among school-aged children 6&ndash;17 years and (3) Are there any differences in the effectiveness of self-management interventions by age groups (children 6&ndash;11 years vs adolescents 12&ndash;17 years) and by income groups (low income vs high income minority families)?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A thorough search of the literature is conducted in multiple electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus/Embase, EbscoHost, CINAHL-full text, PsycINFO and clinical trials. This review focuses on studies of school-aged children and adolescents 6&ndash;17 years old with asthma from minority families that employ self-management intervention to enhance asthma control compared with a standard intervention/control group. The search strategies are developed following the population, intervention, comparison and outcome framework. The primary outcomes of this study are healthcare utilisation (ie, asthma-related urgent care/emergency department visits and hospitalisation), symptom control and asthma control. The process involves developing a search strategy along with inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting relevant data, assessing the risk of bias (RoB) and analysing the data. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines will be used for reporting of the systematic review. The Cochrane Risk of Bias revised tool will be used to assess the RoB. The findings will be presented descriptively using tables, visual aids and a narrative summary. A meta-analysis will synthesise the results, exploring the impact of various interventions on asthma self-management in low-income and minority adolescents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this study since this is a systematic review of existing literature. This study will synthesise evidence of asthma self-management interventions among school-aged children with asthma from minority and low-income families and identify research gaps. The findings in the meta-analysis will offer valuable insights into designing tailored evidence-based, effective, self-management interventions for school-aged children and adolescents with asthma in the future. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024567466.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pudasainee-Kapri, S., Gyawali, J., Kandel, P., Rajbanshi, M., Bhandari, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of self-management interventions for asthma control and healthcare utilisation among school-aged children in minority families in the United States: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104923?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Digital versus face-to-face gut-directed psychotherapy for irritable bowel syndrome: a protocol of systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104923?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder worldwide. Although not life-threatening, its chronic and recurrent nature greatly impacts patients&rsquo; quality of life. There is strong evidence that gut-directed psychotherapies (GDPs) help improve IBS symptoms. With technological advances, digital GDP is increasingly used as an alternative to traditional face-to-face GDP. This study will compare the clinical effectiveness of digital versus face-to-face GDP for IBS through network meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will search English databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science) and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP and Chinese Biomedical Database) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of digital or face-to-face GDP for IBS. The search will cover the period from database inception to May 2025. We will perform multivariate network meta-analyses within a frequentist framework, using the mvmeta command in STATA V.16 software, and traditional pairwise meta-analysis using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool (V.2) will be used to assess the RoB of each RCT, and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool will be used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review, as it involves the collection and synthesis of data from previously published primary studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>OSF registration</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (OSF) registration: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/87463.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, Y., Wan, R., Li, N., Thitinun, B., Lai, R., Hou, Y., Zeng, X., Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Zheng, Q., Li, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104923</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104923</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Digital versus face-to-face gut-directed psychotherapy for irritable bowel syndrome: a protocol of systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104923</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104923</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105768?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Benefits and challenges in everyday life for patients performing subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment at home: a qualitative interview study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105768?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Across medicine, new therapies are shifting treatment from clinic to home settings. At-home subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment for immunodeficiency is an example of one such therapy. In this qualitative interview study, we investigated experiences of patients living an everyday life with subcutaneous immunoglobulin at-home treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design, setting and participants</st>
<p>24 Danish patients participated in semistructured interviews. Six patients were interviewed in individual home-visit interviews, while the remaining 18 participated in one of six subsequent group interviews using an online video format. Participants represented three patient groups: patients with primary immunodeficiency, patients with secondary immunodeficiency, and patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or multifocal motor neuropathy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>According to the interviewed patients, at-home treatment provided a high degree of flexibility and freedom in everyday life. When transitioning to at-home treatment, a sense of security had been achieved through individualised training and access to healthcare professionals. Some patients experienced uncertainty or insecurity during the initial period of administering treatment at home; however, this typically receded over time. For the patients, at-home treatment had become embedded in everyday life either through incorporation into existing everyday routines or through the development of new routines. The time-related and place-related flexibility of the at-home treatment had benefits for several arenas of everyday life: work, family, and leisure. Patients associated at-home treatment with a sense of freedom, which they ascribed both to independence from the hospital and to not being confronted with medical conditions and other patients in the hospital setting. A small minority of the patients viewed the reduced contact with healthcare professionals as a disadvantage, describing feelings of being alone and responsible for their treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients who had established at-home treatment routines in their everyday lives found the benefits of at-home treatment to outweigh the challenges.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johansen, M. B., Kass, E. D., Christensen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105768</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105768</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Benefits and challenges in everyday life for patients performing subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment at home: a qualitative interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105768</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105768</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105923?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of novel dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores with the incidence of diabetes, hypertension and chronic kidney disease among adults: results from a large US cohort with 12-year follow-up]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105923?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the associations between the inflammatory potentials of diet and lifestyle, as measured by the Dietary Inflammation Score (DIS) and Lifestyle Inflammation Score (LIS), with the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting</st>
<p>This retrospective cohort study used data collected between 2000 and 2012 from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort, which was conducted across six US communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study sample included 4736 participants for the analysis of T2DM, 2149 participants for hypertension and 4631 participants for CKD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcomes were the incidence of T2DM, hypertension and CKD during follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>During a median follow-up of 9.0 years, 537 participants developed T2DM, 1019 developed hypertension and 1067 developed CKD. DIS was not associated with T2DM in the overall population; however, women in the third quartile of DIS had a 52% higher risk of developing T2DM (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.15). Also, individuals in the third quartile of DIS had a 22% higher risk of hypertension (1.22; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.47) in the overall population; however, no significant linear trend was observed across the quartiles (P-trend=0.397). Individuals in the fourth quartile of LIS had over twice the risk of developing T2DM (2.15; 95% CI 1.57 to 2.95), although no significant linear trend was observed across quartiles (P-trend &lt;0.001). Additionally, the fourth quartile of LIS was associated with a 39% higher risk of hypertension (1.39; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.66) with a significant trend across quartiles (P-trend=0.001). The significant association between LIS and DIS and the risk of CKD was attenuated after adjusting for study confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlights the role of diet and lifestyle-related inflammation in the development of hypertension and T2DM risk, providing novel evidence from a large, multiethnic US cohort. The findings underscore the potential of dietary and lifestyle strategies that target inflammation to reduce cardiometabolic disease risk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramezankhani, A., Hadaegh, F., Asghari, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105923</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105923</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of novel dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores with the incidence of diabetes, hypertension and chronic kidney disease among adults: results from a large US cohort with 12-year follow-up]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105923</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105923</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107625?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Country-level and global burden of diseases caused by group A Streptococcus: protocol for a multicountry epidemiological study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107625?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Group A <I>Streptococcus</I> (Strep A) causes a wide spectrum of diseases, ranging from pharyngitis and impetigo to severe invasive infections and immune-mediated conditions such as acute rheumatic fever, rheumatic heart disease and acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis. Contemporary data on the global burden of Strep A diseases are lacking. The proposed study aims to use administrative data from numerous jurisdictions to estimate age-specific incidence or prevalence of Strep A diseases, with an emphasis on severe clinical endpoints. Depending on the availability of data, a secondary objective will be to estimate the economic burden of Strep A diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This population-based descriptive study will use routine health data obtained from different low-income and middle-income and high-income countries through international research collaborations to estimate the country-level and global burden of Strep A diseases. Data will be primarily obtained and collated from hospital or national health laboratory databases for individuals across all age groups, along with emergency department, primary care and microbiological datasets where available. Strep A disease endpoints will be identified using International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision or other relevant coding systems and microbiological diagnosis. Age-specific incidence and prevalence rates will be computed using population denominators, and country-level age-adjusted rates will be applied to standard global reference populations to estimate the number of cases globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Western Australia (reference: #2024/ET000401) and governance approval was obtained from The Kids Research Institute Australia. The findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at Strep A Vaccine Global Consortium collaborative meetings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taye, B. W., Cannon, J., Van Beneden, C., Bowen, A. C., Engel, M., Baker, M. G., Guy, R. L., Lamagni, T., Carapetis, J., Moore, H. C., on behalf of Strep A Vaccine Global Consortium (SAVAC) 2.0]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107625</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107625</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Country-level and global burden of diseases caused by group A Streptococcus: protocol for a multicountry epidemiological study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107625</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107625</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107647?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determining the burden of falls amongst community-dwelling older people in Ireland to inform falls care delivery: secondary data analysis from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing - the defined study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107647?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Falls represent the most frequent reason older people are admitted to hospital and significantly increase the likelihood of functional decline, healthcare utilisation and early mortality. The aim of this study is to comprehensively delineate the burden of falls amongst community-dwelling older people in Ireland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Population-representative analysis of Wave 6 of the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) estimating incidence of falls requiring medical attention and emergency department (ED) attendance, fractures and fear of falling over 12 months. Additional data detailing falls-risk increasing drugs (FRIDs) and prior falls were also analysed.</p>
<p>Using Central Statistics Office Census 2022, the population of older people in Ireland was multiplied by the proportion of TILDA participants with each outcome of interest to yield population-level estimates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants/Setting</st>
<p>Population-representative sample of 2299 (55% female) community-dwelling people in Ireland aged &ge;70 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Almost 12% (proportion 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.13)) of participants, corresponding to almost 62 000 older people in Ireland, reported a fall requiring medical attention in 12 months, with 6% (proportion 0.06 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.07)), or over 32 000 people, attending ED due to a fall. Over 3% (proportion 0.03 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.04)) reported sustaining a fracture. Almost half of participants reporting a fall requiring medical attention were prescribed FRIDs, and over half had also reported a fall when assessed at the prior wave of the study (ie, 2 years ago).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The burden of falls amongst community-dwelling older people is considerable; 1 in 8 required medical attention for a fall and 1 in 16 attended the ED with falls over 12 months.</p>
<p>Currently, there is no national falls strategy in Ireland. These findings, alongside our ageing population, underscore the need for strengthened falls-prevention strategies to reduce avoidable morbidity and healthcare utilisation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Briggs, R., Ward, M., Scarlett, S., van der Velde, N., Hernandez, B., Romero-Ortuno, R., Tysinger, B., May, P., Ahern, E., Kenny, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107647</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107647</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determining the burden of falls amongst community-dwelling older people in Ireland to inform falls care delivery: secondary data analysis from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing - the defined study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107647</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107647</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107687?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breathing control training as a treatment for functional seizures (BREATHS trial): a multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled efficacy and acceptability trial study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107687?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Functional seizures (FS) are events that resemble epileptic seizures, but are not attributed to brain pathology and are instead thought to be due to psychological factors. A small, multisite, open-label, single-arm, pilot trial of a breathing intervention known as breathing control training (BCT) found it to be safe and effective in reducing seizure frequency in FS. We propose a protocol for a study to confirm these results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A 24-week, multicentre, individually-randomised, assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group efficacy and acceptability trial of BCT versus control (Befriending) in 220 participants &ge;16 years of age with FS. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to receive two sessions of either BCT or Befriending over a 4-week period. Sessions will be delivered by a respiratory physiotherapist at a clinical care site or via telehealth. They will complete assessments prior to commencing treatment and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after their initial session of BCT/Befriending. The trial will be conducted alongside treatment as usual. An economic evaluation including cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will be carried out from health sector and societal perspectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by The Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/84335/Austin-2022) and the New Zealand Central Health and Disability Ethics Committee (2022 FULL 12324). Findings will be reported to trial participants and consumers; presented at local, national and international conferences; and disseminated by a peer-reviewed scientific journal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kanaan, R., Duncan, R., Mihalopoulos, C., Braat, S., OBrien, T. J., Velakoulis, D., Kwan, P., Mulder, R. T., Cook, M., Mullen, S., Mayne, D., Oliver, G., Eleftheriadis, D., Ameen, O., Chatterton, M. L., DSouza, W., Nicolo, J.-P., Perucca, P., Winton-Brown, T., Zaloumis, S., Berlowitz, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107687</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107687</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breathing control training as a treatment for functional seizures (BREATHS trial): a multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled efficacy and acceptability trial study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107687</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107687</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108329?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic inequalities of the hand infections pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis and septic arthritis and risk of opioid overuse following diagnosis: a registry-based nationwide retrospective cohort study in Sweden]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108329?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the associations between socioeconomic position (SEP) and the incidence of serious hand infections&mdash;pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (PFT) and septic arthritis (SA)&mdash;as well as risks of opioid overuse following diagnosis using nation-level data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>In a registry-based nationwide retrospective cohort study, (1) associations between SEP and incidence of PFT/SA; (2) SEP and infection-type effects on opioid overuse in the general population and (3) SEP and clinical predictors of opioid overuse among individuals diagnosed with PFT/SA were examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and outcome measures</st>
<p>Using linked Swedish national registers (2010&ndash;2015), (1) a multinomial regression to assess SEP and infection risk (n=5 697 865); (2) logistic regression on opioid overuse (&ge;2 dispensations within 3 months) related to SEP and infection status and (3) a restricted analysis among diagnosed individuals (n=3701) to isolate clinical determinants of opioid overuse was conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the study population, 0.04% had PFT and 0.02% had SA. In the general population, 0.31% received two or more opioid prescriptions, compared with 4.5% of those with PFT and 6.8% of those with SA. Male sex, older age, being native, low occupational qualification, comorbidity and&mdash;specifically for SA&mdash;low income were associated with higher infection risk. Both infections independently predicted opioid overuse (adjusted OR for PFT: 13.23 (95% CI 10.92 to 16.02); adjusted OR for SA: 15.16 (11.99 to 19.17)). Additional predictors of overuse included low SEP, female sex, older age, native birth, living alone and comorbidity. Infected individuals with SA were more likely to overuse opioids than those with PFT, but SEP had limited predictive power within this subgroup.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite universal healthcare, socioeconomic disparities exist in hand infection incidence and opioid prescribing. PFT and SA increase the risk of opioid overuse, but SE inequalities, except comorbidity, are less relevant among individuals. Targeted, equitable pain management strategies that reduce unnecessary opioid exposure while ensuring adequate care are needed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lunden, K., Perez, R., Zimmerman, M., Merlo, J., Dahlin, L. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108329</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108329</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic inequalities of the hand infections pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis and septic arthritis and risk of opioid overuse following diagnosis: a registry-based nationwide retrospective cohort study in Sweden]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108329</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108329</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108752?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in India: study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108752?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Women living with HIV (WLHIV) face a higher risk of developing cervical cancer. India carries a significant burden of HIV, with an estimated 2.5 million people living with HIV in 2023. While the introduction of more effective antiretroviral therapy has improved the life expectancy of WLHIV, it has also extended the risk window for persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical disease progression. Cervical cancer prevention through HPV vaccination and regular screening remains the cornerstone of public health efforts. This study specifically aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various cervical cancer screening strategies (at different intervals) among WLHIV in India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study will be conducted in three interlinked components. First, a meta-analysis will be undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different screening strategies in detecting cervical lesions in WLHIV. Second, primary data collection will be carried out to estimate the treatment costs of cervical cancer and HIV among WLHIV. This phase will also include the collection of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data, to inform utility estimates for the modelling component. A total of 135 participants will be enrolled for cost data assessment. Of these, a subset of 71 participants will also be included for HRQoL assessment. This data collection will be undertaken in four tertiary public sector hospitals located across four Indian states, that is, Mizoram, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. Lastly, a decision analytical model will be developed to simulate the process of screening, diagnosis and treatment for cervical cancer in a hypothetical cohort of WLHIV. A structured comprehensive review of literature will be undertaken to inform model input parameters related to the natural history of cervical disease, progression and mortality among WLHIV. Model calibration will be performed using a likelihood-based approach to ensure consistency with empirical epidemiological data. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis will also be conducted to assess the impact of joint parameter uncertainty on model outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from Ethics Committees of Indian Council of Medical Research&ndash;National AIDS Research Institute (NARI), Pune (Protocol No. NARI/EC/Approval/2024/716); B. J. Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune (Ref. No. BJGMC/IEC/Pharmac/ND-0824297-297); Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai (Ref. No. IEC/2024/Nov-07); the Mizoram State Cancer Institute, Zemabawk, Aizawl (Ref. No. D.12016/2/2013-MSCI/IEC) and the KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka. The study findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nirmalkar, A. P., Mamulwar, M., Godbole, S., Shahabuddin, S. M., Bembalkar, S., Chauhan, A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108752</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108752</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in India: study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108752</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108752</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109328?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Update of the Novara Cohort Study (NCS): protocol evolution of a population-based longitudinal study on ageing in Northern Italy - cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109328?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Novara Cohort Study (NCS) was established to investigate the biological, psychological and social factors that influence ageing in the general population. The study aims to identify early risk factors for frailty, allostatic load and cognitive decline, and to uncover molecular and functional markers of accelerated biological ageing. NCS addresses the need for detailed life-course data from Southern Europe to support personalised prevention and early diagnosis, and to promote healthy longevity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>NCS is a population-based, longitudinal cohort in the Novara province (Northern Italy), originally enrolling adults aged 35 and older. The inclusion criteria were later expanded to encompass all residents aged 18 and over, facilitating the study of ageing trajectories from early adulthood onward. As of mid-2025, about 1000 participants have been enrolled, and recruitment is ongoing. The cohort&rsquo;s diversity in age, employment status and health conditions enhances its value for life-course analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>Following a pilot phase in 2022&ndash;2023, the whole study protocol now includes detailed demographic, clinical, behavioural, cognitive and psychosocial data, along with biological samples stored in the UPO Biobank. The protocol incorporates validated tools, comprehensive physical and cognitive assessments, and over 90 laboratory biomarkers covering inflammation, metabolism, hormonal function and coagulation. Additionally, a subset of participants underwent advanced inflammatory profiling by simultaneous measurement of 92 immune-related proteins and comprehensive genomic profiling using Illumina Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays, capturing common genetic variation across multiple biological domains. Preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of integrating deep phenotyping, reveal the roles of frailty in ageing and show initial evidence of age-related changes in inflammatory proteins.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>NCS plans to enrol at least 10 000 participants and will conduct long-term follow-up using both passive methods, such as linking with clinical records and administrative health databases, and active in-person reassessments. Future phases will integrate clinical, behavioural and cognitive data with large-scale omics analyses, including genomics, proteomics, metabolomics and transcriptomics. Machine learning techniques will be employed to model biological age, identify early signs of age-related decline and develop personalised prevention strategies. By combining high-resolution phenotyping with multidimensional data, NCS aims to find modifiable risk factors and molecular signatures of ageing, supporting national and European research efforts and encouraging collaborative studies through open data-sharing frameworks.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cracas, S. V., Garro, G., Venetucci, J., Martorana, M., Antona, A., Bettio, V., Rossato, D., Briacca, L., Viola, E., Caristia, S., Colombo, V., Capuzzi, L., Roveda, C., Varalda, M., Rolla, R., Sacchetti, S., Tillio, P. A., Faggiano, F., Capello, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109328</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109328</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Update of the Novara Cohort Study (NCS): protocol evolution of a population-based longitudinal study on ageing in Northern Italy - cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109328</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109328</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110684?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding female smoking in urban China: motivations, stigma and shifting social norms--a qualitative focus group study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110684?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Although female smoking prevalence in China remains low, emerging evidence suggests that social acceptance may be increasing, with tobacco marketing increasingly targeting women. This study explored women&rsquo;s smoking behaviours, motivations and societal perceptions toward this in urban China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Between May and October 2019, 28 semistructured focus groups were conducted in Beijing, Changsha and Shenzhen with 288 participants: 12 groups of female smokers, 6 of female former smokers, 6 of female never-smokers and 4 of men. Participants were recruited both online and offline, and smoking status was verified with a carbon monoxide monitor. Discussions were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using dual coding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four themes emerged. First, while stigma against female smoking persisted, social acceptance is growing, especially among younger generation. Second, three initiation stages were identified: adolescence, early career and post-retirement, often triggered by peer influence, occupational stress and life transitions. Third, many female smokers concealed their behaviour, reflecting tension between shifting descriptive norms and enduring injunctive norms, which may contribute to underreporting in surveillance data. Fourth, misconceptions about smoking harms and quitting were common, with most women who smoke relying on willpower and showing limited interest in cessation support; pregnancy was one of the few strong motivators for quitting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Findings suggest gradual normalisation of female smoking in urban China, driven by evolving gender roles and targeted marketing. Public health responses should prioritise gender-specific health education, strengthen promotion of cessation services and tighten restrictions on tobacco marketing towards women to prevent future increases in female smoking.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xie, X., Di, X., Yin, X., He, W., Chan, S. S. C., Xiao, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110684</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110684</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Smoking and tobacco]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding female smoking in urban China: motivations, stigma and shifting social norms--a qualitative focus group study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Smoking and tobacco</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110684</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110684</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110772?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stroke Investigation Group in North and Central London (SIGNAL): cohort profile of a prospective large-scale comprehensive stroke registry]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110772?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Large-scale stroke registries can provide critical insights into disease mechanisms, progression and healthcare needs, informing prevention and care. However, few collect detailed demographic, brain imaging, and comprehensive long-term follow-up data. To address this, we established the prospective Stroke Investigation Group in North And central London (SIGNAL) registry in 2017.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The SIGNAL registry included 3931 adults aged &ge;18 years with confirmed acute stroke (cerebral ischaemia or intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH)) admitted to the University College London Hospital hyperacute stroke unit between January 2017 and 2020, drawn from an ethnically diverse North and Central London population (~1.6 million). Baseline data included demographic, clinical, brain imaging and next-of-kin information. Six month follow-up included measures of functional status and non-motor outcomes (anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep, pain, language, continence, social participation, cognition) via face-to-face, telephone or postal follow-up methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>The mean age of individuals included in the SIGNAL registry was 72.1 years, and 1806 (45.9%) were female. The ethnic distribution comprised 2365 (60%) white, 649 (16.5%) black and 511 (13%) Asian. Stroke diagnoses included 3371 (85.8%) with cerebral ischaemia and 560 (14.2%) with ICH. On admission, 2240 individuals (57.0%) had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score &gt;4, indicating moderate stroke severity. At hospital discharge, the median functional outcome, measured by the modified Rankin Scale, was 3 (IQR 1&ndash;4), indicating moderate disability. At 6 months, functional outcomes measured with mRS were available for 3755 individuals (95.6%) with a median score of 1 (IQR=0&ndash;3) and non-motor outcomes were available for 3080 individuals (92.3%). The most prevalent adverse non-motor outcomes were fatigue 1756 (57%), reduced social participation 1694 (55%) and sleep disturbance 1663 (54%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>Further analyses of SIGNAL registry data will investigating associations between stroke mechanisms, subtypes and neuroimaging features and 6-month functional status, non-motor outcomes and cognitive impairment. Longer term follow-up of survivors for ~10 years is also planned.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ozkan, H., Ambler, G., Nash, P. S., Browning, S., Mussa, R., Leff, A., Ja&#x0308;ger, H. R., Nachev, P., Perry, R., Chan, E., Simister, R., Werring, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110772</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110772</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stroke Investigation Group in North and Central London (SIGNAL): cohort profile of a prospective large-scale comprehensive stroke registry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110772</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110772</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111036?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Internal Regulation Core as a hub of disruptive innovation in hospital management: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111036?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This scoping review protocol aims to examine the role of the Internal Regulation Core (IRC) as an intra-hospital governance structure that coordinates capacity and patient flow and may function as a strategic hub for disruptive innovation in hospital management. By integrating organisational routines, rules and, when available, enabling technologies, IRCs may strengthen operational efficiency and contribute to higher-quality care delivery. As hospitals face increasing operational complexity and constrained resources, clarifying what IRCs are, how they are implemented across settings, and what innovations and impacts are reported has become a priority.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search will be conducted across five databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS) and grey literature sources, without language or date restrictions. The searches were conducted up to 6 July 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data using a standardised form; disagreements will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. Findings will be synthesised descriptively and thematically, with results presented in tables and narrative summaries, including innovation streams.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/HWZJS).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomes, L. M., Moreira, F. d. M. B., Junior, G. F. X., Duani, H., Andrade, M. V. M. d., Ferrari, T. C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111036</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111036</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Internal Regulation Core as a hub of disruptive innovation in hospital management: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111036</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111036</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112086?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lower versus standard dose-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112086?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The 2012 Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcomes clinical practice guideline recommends prescribing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) doses in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) between 20 and 25 mL/kg/hour, with a need to consider further augmentation to 25&ndash;30 mL/kg/hour. Observational data have shown that lower-dose CRRT (&lt;20 mL/kg/hour) may be tolerated and reduce adverse effects related to higher or guideline-directed standard dose-intensity CRRT. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence regarding tolerability, safety and clinical outcomes of lower CRRT dose-intensity compared with guideline-directed standard dose-intensity CRRT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library will be searched for studies from inception to present. We will evaluate the risk of bias using the modified Cochrane tool for randomised controlled trials and the Cochrane Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies&mdash;of Interventions tool for cohort studies. Two reviewers will independently complete study selection, data extraction and bias assessment. Inclusion criteria will be randomised controlled trials and observational studies (cohort) including patients with AKI receiving CRRT. The exposure will be lower dose-intensity CRRT (&lt;20 mL/kg/hour) compared with guideline-directed standard dose-intensity CRRT (&ge;20&ndash;40 mL/kg/hour). Outcomes will include intensive care unit and hospital mortality, dialysis duration and dependence and indicators of metabolic control. Pooled random-effect meta-analysis ORs with 95% CIs will be reported, if able.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Findings of this review will be disseminated through peer-related publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251135606.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lumlertgul, N., Kusirisin, P., Kung, J. Y., Duquette, D., Fujii, T., Zarbock, A., Wald, R., Bagshaw, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112086</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112086</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lower versus standard dose-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112086</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112086</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e116111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional epidemiological assessment of lymphatic filariasis situation in areas under post-mass drug administration surveillance and the associated risk of transmission in the context of migrants in India: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e116111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>India targets to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (LF) in alignment with the global goals. By 2024, 106 out of a total of 345 endemic districts have passed all three serial transmission assessment surveys (TAS) and are under post-mass drug administration (MDA) surveillance for a variable period. However, the current epidemiological situation of LF is not known in these districts. With increased mobility of population from the endemic districts currently under MDA to these post-MDA areas, resurgence of LF in these areas cannot be ruled out. Therefore, a study is planned to understand the current LF status in areas under post-MDA surveillance with the following objectives: (1) To assess the epidemiological situation of LF in terms of human and vector infection prevalence in selected evaluation units (EUs) under different durations of post-MDA phase and (2) to estimate the filarial infection (in terms of filarial antigen and microfilaria) among migrants (from endemic districts) in these EUs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study will measure the filarial infection in (1) adult population aged &ge;20 years (following the WHO 2025 protocol for monitoring and evaluation of MDA) among general population (n=3150 per EU), (2) migrant population (aged 2 years and above) in the post-MDA area originating from endemic areas (n=1000 per EU) and (3) vectors (n=7500 per EU) using molecular xenomonitoring (MX) to confirm sustenance of transmission interruption or identify any potential risk of resurgence in three EUs under post-MDA phase. In one MDA-naive EU that shares borders with endemic districts, filarial infection status will be assessed in (1) school children aged 9&ndash;14 years (as per WHO mini-TAS protocol, n=480), (2) migrants (aged 2 years and above) from endemic areas (n=1000) and (3) vectors (n=7500). EU-wide prevalence of microfilaria, circulating filarial antigen and vector infection rates with 95% CIs will be estimated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis will be carried out to find factors associated with LF positivity. In addition, knowledge, attitude and practice surveys will also be conducted among the adult migrants (n=1000 per EU). Thirty in-depth interviews will be conducted among the migrants, local community and health workers (in each EU) and the results will be suitably analysed and triangulated. The study results will enable the national programme to confirm sustenance of transmission interruption or assist in taking a decision to reinitiate MDA in these areas under post-MDA surveillance. It will also enable devising specific strategies to treat migrants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the institutional ethics committee (IHEC 03-0824/N/F). A workshop will be held with all stakeholders to disseminate the study findings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srividya, A., Dinesh, R. J., M M, M. J., Kishanthini, M., Dogra, V., Tripathi, B., Sharma, R., Jain, T., Rahi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T02:06:02-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-116111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-116111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-sectional epidemiological assessment of lymphatic filariasis situation in areas under post-mass drug administration surveillance and the associated risk of transmission in the context of migrants in India: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e116111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e116111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095529?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Generating actionable insights to support point-of-care suicide risk decision-making in a safety-net healthcare system: a machine learning approach to predicting dynamic risk of intentional self-harm]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095529?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Suicide rates have increased over the last couple of decades globally, particularly in the United States and among populations with lower economic status who present at safety-net healthcare systems. Recently, predictive models for suicide risk have shown promise; however, a model for this specific population does not exist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop a predictive risk model of suicide and intentional self-harm (ISH) for patients presenting at the psychiatric emergency department (ED) of JPS Health Network, a safety net medical and mental healthcare system in Texas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The study used structured and unstructured electronic medical record (EMR) data (2015&ndash;2019) and local medical examiner data (2015&ndash;2020) to create predictors and outcome variables. All psychiatric ED notes during calendar years 2018 and 2019 were reviewed using natural language processing to identify presentations for any level of self-harm and subsequent manual review of identified visits to accurately classify ED presentations for treatment of an act of intentional self-harm meeting study criteria. Data from 15 987 patients were used to develop and validate a machine learning-based predictive model that leverages rolling window methodology to predict risk repeatedly across a patient&rsquo;s trajectory. Feature engineering played a prominent role in defining new predictors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>The best model (XGBoost) achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 for 30-day predictions and demonstrated concentration of ISH and suicide attempt events in high-risk quantiles of risk (65% had events in top 0.1% quantile). The predicted risk can be translated into a propensity of events (80% at the highest predicted risk) to facilitate clinical interpretation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Machine learning-based models can be used with standard EMRs to identify patients presenting at the psychiatric ED with a high risk of ISH and suicide attempts within the next 30 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Clinical implications</st>
<p>Integration of a predictive model can significantly aid clinical decision-making in safety-net psychiatric EDs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarkar, J., Ghosh, A., Liu, S., Martinez, B., Teigen, K., Rush, J. A., Blackwell, J.-M., Shaikh, S., Claassen, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095529</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095529</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Generating actionable insights to support point-of-care suicide risk decision-making in a safety-net healthcare system: a machine learning approach to predicting dynamic risk of intentional self-harm]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095529</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095529</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097874?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A systematic review of the scope and impact of rural primary healthcare innovations using digital health technology]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097874?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Digital technology in primary healthcare service delivery can enhance accessibility, service delivery and health outcomes in rural populations. The objective of this systematic review is to review and synthesise the scope and impact of digital health technology innovations within rural primary healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Articles published on PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE and CINAHL between January 2013 and October 2025 were searched using key search terms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Patient, intervention, context, outcome model criteria guided article eligibility. Included articles were undertaken in rural populations, used digital health technology for treatment or management, explored the impact of digital health technology on rural primary healthcare and reported on healthcare outcomes. Included articles were in the English language and presented peer-reviewed primary research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Extraction was performed using a bespoke standardised template by multiple reviewers. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Descriptive analysis and conventional inductive content analysis were applied to quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. The review is written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>66 studies were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n=26). Most studies focused on adult patient populations, with limited representation of Indigenous (In=3) and paediatric populations (n=2). Telemedicine/telehealth interventions using audio, video or both were the most common (n=36). Remote patient monitoring or point-of-care testing was integrated into 21 studies. Physical health conditions, particularly diabetes (n=17), cardiovascular diseases (n=11) and general primary healthcare concerns (n=13) were commonly reported. Others reported on areas including mental health, hypertension, obesity and pregnancy care.</p>
<p>Conventional inductive content analysis identified key themes: cost and time effectiveness, quality healthcare provision, consumer acceptance from both patients and practitioners, and healthcare service provider perspectives. Uptake barriers included staff workload and patient non-compliance, while facilitators encompassed process standardisation and practitioner acceptance and endorsement. Consumer acceptance was linked to satisfaction, willingness to engage and improved health outcomes and well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Digital health interventions in rural primary healthcare offer significant potential to improve healthcare delivery, reduce costs and enhance patient access, satisfaction and health outcomes. However, careful consideration of factors such as feasibility, consumer and practitioner acceptance, and recognition of limitations is crucial for successful implementation. The review underscores the importance of flexible policies to support emerging digital healthcare solutions, including the integration of artificial intelligence. Overall, digital health interventions offer a promising avenue to improve healthcare outcomes in rural areas and should be prioritised for government funding and investment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42023477233.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacAskill, W., Gill, P., Woloszczuk, C., Alam, K., Wallis, K., McGrail, M. R., Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, S., Nasir, B. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097874</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097874</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A systematic review of the scope and impact of rural primary healthcare innovations using digital health technology]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097874</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097874</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100070?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comprehensive Cancer Networks in the Netherlands: how do they affect quality and costs of care for colon or pancreatic cancer? A retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100070?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Concentration of care and collaborations between hospitals increasingly reorganise oncological care into Comprehensive Cancer Networks (CCNs), aiming to improve care outcomes and reduce costs. This study aims to evaluate the effect of four CCNs on healthcare cost and outcomes for patients with colon or pancreatic cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We performed a retrospective cohort study based on claims data in the Netherlands. Data included patient characteristics, health insurance claims and healthcare activities. All costs were indexed to Euro 2023. We performed propensity score matching per CCN and applied regression models with a difference-in-difference design, adjusting for non-linear trends before the start of a CCN.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted within the Dutch healthcare system, analysing claims data representative of hospital-based cancer care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 92 309 patients with colon cancer and 25 630 patients with pancreatic cancer were included. Patients were identified through health insurance claims between January 2013 and June 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Implementation of four CCNs, which included structured collaboration between healthcare organisations. Follow-up duration was 2 years post-diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes included 2-year oncological healthcare costs and 2-year mortality rate. Secondary outcomes involved care process indicators: referral rates and double diagnostics (an identical diagnostic activity performed within 4 weeks after referral to a secondary hospital).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For colon cancer, one CCN showed a significant decrease in 2-year oncological costs (&ndash;1899). One CCN showed a significant decrease in referrals (&ndash;3.6%) and one a significant increase (+4.4%). No significant effect on 2-year mortality and double diagnostic activities was found. For pancreatic cancer, one CCN showed a significant decrease in 2-year oncological costs (&ndash;3747) and one CCN showed a significant increase in double diagnostic activities (+8.6%). No significant effect on referrals and 2-year mortality was found.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>CCNs do not consistently reduce costs or affect referral patterns or redundant diagnostics. No impact on mortality was found. Additional insights into determinants of CCN success are required before broad implementation is warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vrinzen, C. E. J., Stadhouders, N., Bloemendal, H. J., Hayen, A., Reitsma, J., ten Hove, M., Jeurissen, P. P. T., Merkx, M. A. W., Hermens, R. P. M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100070</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100070</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comprehensive Cancer Networks in the Netherlands: how do they affect quality and costs of care for colon or pancreatic cancer? A retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100070</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100070</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102358?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and associated factors of optimal dietary practices during pregnancy in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102358?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Maternal dietary practices are vital for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, comprehensive information about optimal dietary practices among pregnant women is limited in Ethiopia. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of optimal dietary practices and its associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, African Journals Online and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published in English before 25 March 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>Observational studies reporting the prevalence of optimal dietary practices and/or associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data were independently extracted by two reviewers, and the quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle&ndash;Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional research. Review Manager V.5.4.1 and STATA V.14 software were used for data synthesis and statistical analysis. A random-effects and/or fixed-effects model was employed to calculate pooled ORs and 95% CIs to determine the correlation between dependent and independent factors. We checked heterogeneity using the <I>I</I>&sup2; statistic and conducted subgroup analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity among the included studies. Funnel plots and Egger&rsquo;s regression test were used to determine publication bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 22 studies with 10 915 participants were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of optimal dietary practice was 35.83% (95% CI 28.35 to 43.32). The overall study&rsquo;s quality was high, and we detected significant publication bias (Egger&rsquo;s test, p value=0.001). Monthly income &ge;5000 ETB/90 US$) (pooled OR (OR=2.56, 95% CI 1.12 to 5.88), formal education (OR=2.74; 95% CI 1.22 to 6.16), good dietary knowledge (OR=4.1; 95% CI 3.19 to 5.25), ownership of radio/television (OR: 5.64, 95% CI 2.05 to 15.52), favourable attitude (OR=3.90, 95% CI 3.05 to 4.99) and food security (OR: 4.48; 95% CI 3.03 to 6.61), urban residency (OR=6.25, 95% CI 4.06 to 9.63), family size &lt;5 (OR=3.48; 95% CI 1.78 to 6.80) and absence of illness (OR: 1.80, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.37) were significantly associated with optimal dietary practice during pregnancy in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Only one in three pregnant women in Ethiopia practises optimal dietary behaviours. Several modifiable individual and sociodemographic factors influence dietary practices. Interventions focusing on improving nutrition knowledge, enhancing attitudes, expanding access to media-based nutrition information and strengthening antenatal nutrition education, particularly for rural and less educated women, may improve dietary practices and pregnancy outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024542652.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gudeta, T. G., Sori, S. A., Terefe, A. B., Mengistu, G. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102358</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102358</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and associated factors of optimal dietary practices during pregnancy in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102358</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102358</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103547?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Discharge outcomes and associated patient-level factors in Ontarios remote care monitoring programme: a population-based survival analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103547?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study examined discharge outcomes and their predictors among patients enrolled in remote patient monitoring (RPM) support in Ontario, Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A 6-month competing risk survival analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-dwelling patients in Ontario, Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients enrolled between 1 April 2024 and 27 February 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>RPM programme patients are provided with wearable smart devices to monitor falls, medication non-adherence and wandering. Alerts from these devices trigger a response from the programme team, ranging from just a call back to further escalation support channels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Four competing discharge outcomes were analysed: (1) positive discharge, (2) death, (3) admission to long-term care (LTC) or hospice and (4) discontinuation due to functional incompatibility with devices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Within 6 months, 208 (2.2%) patients died, 118 (1.2%) were admitted to an LTC/hospice, and 82 (0.9%) discontinued due to device unsuitability, while 185 (1.9%) achieved &lsquo;positive service discontinuation&rsquo;. A dementia diagnosis at enrolment was consistently associated with all negative discharge outcomes: positive discharge (HR 0.00, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.00), admission to LTC or hospice (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.04) and mortality (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.12). And unsurprisingly, a cancer diagnosis at enrolment was associated with higher hazards of death (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.52), while language spoken and escalation events were associated with discharge outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Most RPM programme patients remain in the programme 6 months after enrolment, while a few achieve positive discontinuation. Discharge outcomes were influenced by several factors, most notably dementia diagnosis at enrolment. By leveraging predictive factors such as diagnosis at enrolment, escalation events and referral contexts, RPM programmes can optimise interventions to enhance patient transitions and improve outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Egbujie, B. A., Kilby-Lechman, D., Woo, K., Tran, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103547</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103547</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Discharge outcomes and associated patient-level factors in Ontarios remote care monitoring programme: a population-based survival analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103547</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103547</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104757?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104757?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to explore perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative&rsquo;s (PIC&rsquo;s) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) among clinicians, with a focus on awareness, frequency of use, applicability and areas for improvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting</st>
<p>Cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Clinicians working in all Australian states and territories. Recruitment was via non-probability convenience sampling. Invitations to participate in the online survey were posted on national- and state-level paediatric organisations, networks and groups. Survey participants could express interest in taking part in a follow-up online interview.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 466 clinicians, including consultants/specialists (46.1%), specialists in training (residents/registrars: 20.4%), nurses (17.8%), allied health professionals (4.7%) and general practitioners (3.6%) participated in the survey. Findings indicated a high level of usage, with two-thirds of participants (63.9%) using the guidelines weekly. Most participants (91.8%) deemed the CPGs highly applicable to their practice settings, and over half (57.9%) had referred to more than 10 different PIC CPGs in the past month. Patterns of use reflected experience, seniority and scope of practice, with utilisation significantly higher among specialists in training, those working in emergency settings and those with less practising experience. Ten clinicians were interviewed to gain deeper insights, reinforcing that PIC CPGs serve multiple purposes, such as to check practice and for self-learning, for teaching more junior staff, and to reinforce treatment decisions with parents and patients. The guidelines were noted as being useful for all members of the multidisciplinary team in providing consistent language and uniform care. Key areas for improvement included enhancing accessibility in time-pressured environments, such as incorporating human factors-based navigation features and standardised layouts, and integrating additional tools and localised referral information.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>PIC CPGs are viewed as a source of credible, evidence-based information that was valued across medical, nursing and allied health professionals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellis, L. A., Long, J. C., Brook, P., Starr, M., Hibbert, P. D., Saba, M., Churruca, K., Harding, K., Arnolda, G., Zurynski, Y., Braithwaite, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104757</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104757</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104757</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104757</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105101?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are play and screen time associated with British preschoolers mental health? Cross-sectional findings from the British Preschool Childrens Play Survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105101?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate associations between adventurous play, outdoor play and screen time and mental health (MH) in British preschool-aged children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A nationally representative sample of caregivers of 2&ndash;4 years old (n=1066) in England, Scotland and Wales (Britain), recruited through an online research data and analytics group (YouGov UK).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Caregivers of 1018 children provided valid complete-case data (age 2: n=298 (29%), age 3: n=365 (36%), age 4: n=355 (35%); female n=481 (47%); white: n=878 (81%)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Four outcomes, derived from parent-report questionnaires: internalising and externalising scores (using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) and positive and negative affect scores (using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children-P). Linear regression was used to explore associations between the three exposures (time (in hours per week) a child spent: (1) playing adventurously; and engaging in (2) educational screen time and (3) recreational screen time) and the four outcomes; interactions between play and screen time variables were also tested. Models were adjusted for child and parental demographic variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For each additional hour per week a child engaged in adventurous play, they had lower internalising scores (&ndash;0.02 (&ndash;0.03 to &ndash;0.01)) and higher positive affect scores (0.04 (0.02 to 0.05)). More hours per day (vs &lt;1 hour/day) of educational screen time and recreational screen time were associated with higher internalising and negative affect scores. Greater educational screen time was associated with lower positive affect and higher externalising scores, with adventurous play moderating the association between higher educational screen time, internalising and negative affect.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>In British preschoolers, adventurous play is associated with better MH outcomes, whereas higher educational screen time was associated with poorer MH, indicating that adventurous play may benefit preschoolers&rsquo; MH or that preschoolers with better mental health are more likely to engage in adventurous play. Adventurous play may also offset possible negative associations with screen time.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hesketh, K. R., Dodd, H. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105101</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105101</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are play and screen time associated with British preschoolers mental health? Cross-sectional findings from the British Preschool Childrens Play Survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105101</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105140?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sociodemographic and maternal-related correlates of childrens movement behaviours from preschool to adolescence in Singapore: a longitudinal cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105140?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Current evidence is unclear due to methodological limitations. We bridge critical knowledge gaps by quantifying the longitudinal changes in movement behaviours and their correlates from early childhood through adolescence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal observational cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>General healthy child and adolescent sample in Singapore.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Growing Up in Singapore Towards healthy Outcomes study participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>We used wrist-worn accelerometry and proxy-reported data to examine movement behaviours (sleep, inactivity, light physical activity (PA; LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and screen-viewing) at ages 5.5, 8, 10 and 12 years and the sociodemographic and maternal lifestyle-related correlates using linear regression models with generalised estimating equations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 837 children, sleep, LPA and MVPA declined by 3% (from 9.1 to 8.8 hours/day), 24% (from 5.8 to 4.4 hours/day) and 44% (from 71.3 to 40.1 min/day), respectively, while inactivity and screen viewing increased by 26% (from 8.0 to 10.1 hours/day) and 155% (from 1.8 to 4.6 hours/day), respectively, from ages 5.5 to 12 years. The greatest annual increase in inactivity (0.6 hour/annum) and screen-viewing (0.8 hour/annum) and decrease in LPA (0.3 hour/annum) and MVPA (10.4 min/annum) occurred from ages 8 to 10 years. Girls of Malay ethnicity and lower socioeconomic status, and whose mothers had less favourable movement behaviours, had significantly less sleep, higher inactivity and screen-viewing and/or lower PA. Maternal PA levels and/or sitting time were associated with children&rsquo;s sleep, inactivity and MVPA up to age 8 years, while maternal sitting and screen-viewing behaviours were associated with children&rsquo;s screen-viewing at all ages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Using contemporaneous datasets relevant to the present day, we confirmed that children become less physically active and have longer screen-viewing as they transition into adolescence and highlighted characteristics to be prioritised in future interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, S. Y. X., Edney, S. M., Padmapriya, N., Tan, S. L., Chong, Y. S., Tan, K. H., Yap, F., Godfrey, K., Lee, Y. S., Eriksson, J. G., Bernard, J. Y., Mu&#x0308;ller-Riemenschneider, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105140</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105140</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sociodemographic and maternal-related correlates of childrens movement behaviours from preschool to adolescence in Singapore: a longitudinal cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105140</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105713?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychosocial burden in type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional network analysis in the SFDT1 study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105713?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Using network analysis, which takes a holistic approach to health systems, we aimed to identify which psychosocial burden dimensions are the most central and, thus, critical to prioritising to improve the overall health of people with type 1 diabetes (PwT1D).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional network analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>We used data from participants attending 44 diabetes centres in France, who were enrolled in the SFDT1 cohort study between June 2020 and February 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We included 1430 PwT1D (52% women, median age (IQR) 41 (31&ndash;52.8) years) who had completed questionnaires on diabetes burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The items from questionnaires on diabetes distress, fear of hypoglycaemia, quality of life, treatment burden and the impact of diabetes on education and work.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The network was highly stable (correlation stability coefficient=0.75). We observed nine domains within the network; &lsquo;Loneliness, Worrying &amp; Burnout&rsquo; was the most influential. We further grouped the domains into three distinct syndromes labelled &lsquo;Diabetes Distress&rsquo;, &lsquo;Treatment Burden&rsquo; and &lsquo;Impact of Diabetes on Life&rsquo;. These syndromes reflect the most relevant pillars of the psychosocial burden in PwT1D.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We observed that &lsquo;Loneliness, Worrying &amp; Burnout&rsquo; is the most influential psychosocial burden network domain to prioritise for type 1 diabetes care. This new network-based approach opens the path to defining personalised interventions targeting the most critical burden parameters to expect the most significant overall beneficial impact on PwT1D&rsquo;s health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04657783">NCT04657783</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aguayo, G. A., Martin, V. P., Canha, D., Cosson, E., Arnault, G., Delenne, B., Guerci, B., Berot, A., Barraud, S., Riveline, J.-P., Fagherazzi, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105713</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105713</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychosocial burden in type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional network analysis in the SFDT1 study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105713</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105713</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107453?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strengthening active outdoor living among children residing in two disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Copenhagen, Denmark: a mixed methods study protocol for the Happy Healthy Active Children initiative]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107453?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Happy Healthy Active Children (HHAC) initiative is a multicomponent community-based initiative aimed at promoting physical activity, food literacy and nature literacy among children in early childhood kindergarten and primary school settings. Developed in collaboration between Activity Experts and Community Stakeholders, HHAC integrates thematic activities (Play, Nature, Food) across kindergartens, schools and the broader community. The initiative responds to growing concerns about declining physical activity levels, insufficient contact with nature and poor dietary habits in childhood, factors known to influence long-term health and well-being. This protocol outlines the design, implementation and planned evaluation of the HHAC initiative.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>HHAC is carried out within the long-term strategic initiative Tingbjerg Changing Diabetes. Following the Supersetting approach, HHAC addresses inequity in health by mobilising resources across local settings (kindergartens, schools and the local community arenas) and population groups (children, parents, staff and other community members) to develop and implement contextually relevant activities promoting outdoor play, cooking and nature experiences. Activities are evaluated using a within-subject design in kindergartens, while in schools a quasi-experimental design with matched control groups is applied. Data is collected at baseline and follow-up through accelerometry, validated questionnaires and structured observations. Primary outcomes include physical activity levels, food literacy and nature literacy. Analyses apply linear mixed-effects models to account for repeated measures and clustering at the institutional level. The evaluation also investigates implementation processes and context-mechanism configurations through a comprehensive realist evaluation. This includes developing a programme theory, conducting interviews with children, parents, staff and other local stakeholders and participant observations aiming to explore experiences and the mechanisms through which the activities contribute to changes in behaviour and well-being. All data will be analysed and condensed for a model for transferability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and public engagement activities targeting educators, policymakers and health professionals. The intervention materials will also be made freely available to support broader implementation. The study procedures were registered and approved by The Capital Region&rsquo;s centre for data reviews &lsquo;Videnscenter for Dataanmeldelser&rsquo; (Reference: P-2023&ndash;14277). All procedures were carried out under relevant regulations and guidelines. Written information about the study was given to all school principals, teachers and parents/guardians before the start of the study, and written informed consent is obtained from all legal guardians of all participants in their native language prior to child enrolment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stougaard, M., Termansen, T., Stjernqvist, N. W., Borring, A. S., Villersholt, N. L., Friis, N., Mu&#x0308;llertz, A. L. O., Elsborg, P., Mejsner, S. B., Bloch, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107453</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107453</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strengthening active outdoor living among children residing in two disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Copenhagen, Denmark: a mixed methods study protocol for the Happy Healthy Active Children initiative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107453</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107453</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108130?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patterns in meperidine distribution and associations with income and obesity in the USA and Puerto Rico between 2019 and 2023: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108130?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Meperidine, once viewed as relatively safe, is now discouraged in clinical settings due to its associated risks. Previous studies have identified a significant decrease in meperidine distribution across the USA from 2000 to 2021. Regional disparities accompanied this decline. The goal of this study was to investigate if the decrease in meperidine distribution has continued in recent years, 2019&ndash;2023, and if regional variations persist. This investigation also aimed to identify correlates of meperidine distribution, including adult obesity prevalence and annual income, to provide insight into the regional variation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective observational study using data from the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System Drug Retail Summary Reports by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Census Bureau.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>USA, including Puerto Rico.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>US population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the meperidine distribution across the US between 2019 and 2023. Secondary outcomes included associations between meperidine distribution and adult obesity prevalence and median household income.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Total meperidine distribution across the USA dropped by 57.8% from 2019 to 2023. A substantial geographic variation was found with southern states accounting for the second, third and fourth highest in meperidine use per capita in 2023, only behind Puerto Rico. In contrast, northeastern states accounted for four of the five lowest states. A significant relationship was found between annual income and meperidine distribution in 2022 (r(49) = &ndash;0.38, p&lt;0.005) and 2023 (r(49) = &ndash;0.58, p&lt;0.0001). A significant relationship was also observed between adult obesity prevalence and meperidine distribution in 2023 (r(50) = +0.35, p=0.01) in addition to a non-significant positive trend between the two variables in 2022 (r(52) = +0.24, p=0.078).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our study revealed a continued decrease in meperidine distribution and sustained presence of geographical variation from 2019 to 2023. Furthermore, novel relationships were identified between meperidine distribution, annual income and adult obesity prevalence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gonzalez, B., Healy, L. G., Harrison, L. R., Piper, B. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108130</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108130</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patterns in meperidine distribution and associations with income and obesity in the USA and Puerto Rico between 2019 and 2023: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108130</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108130</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108641?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Functional decline and social support in older patients during hospitalisation: a cross-sectional study of some determinants of care in a poor resource setting, Southeast Nigeria]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108641?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>There is a high level of older people neglect in Nigeria, especially in the rural setting, and they did not receive much attention in terms of their overall health and well-being. Government social interventions are usually geared towards the children, adolescents, pregnant women and lactating mothers. Evaluating the level of functional decline and social support among these groups and how it affects their overall well-being will enable policy formulations geared towards holistic care for them. This study aimed to determine the level of functional dependence in some basic activities of daily living (ADLs: mobility, dressing, grasp and bathing) and social support in older people to enhance evidence-based advocacy to all stakeholders in older people care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study of 160 (75 males and 85 females) older people aged 65&ndash;98 years selected through systematic random sampling. The 2 test, t-test and logistic regression were used for analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The response rate was 100%. The mean age of male respondents was 76.31&plusmn;8.34 years and that of the female respondents was 76.87&plusmn;7.47 years. A statistically significant association was found between age &gt;75 years, absence of a spouse, low education level and functional dependence in all ADLs studied. Although age independently predicted dependence in all studied ADLs, except dressing and grasp, marital status predicted dependence in dressing and bathing, and availability of care also predicted dependence in mobility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Age is an independent risk factor for functional dependence in mobility and bathing, and marital status independently predicted dependence in dressing and bathing. Not receiving care also independently predicted dependence in mobility. Thus, improvements in the biopsychosocial, biomedical and economic well-being of older people will ameliorate the impact of poor care on functional status and ADLs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anyigor-Ogah, C. S., Ekechi, A. N., Chukwuonye, M. E., Nweke, I. C., Idika, I. M., Ovuoba, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108641</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108641</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Functional decline and social support in older patients during hospitalisation: a cross-sectional study of some determinants of care in a poor resource setting, Southeast Nigeria]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108641</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108641</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111817?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and cost utility of a nurse-led Heart Failure Follow-Up Program: a quasi-experimental multicentre study protocol in three Spanish public hospitals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111817?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This study aims to evaluate a structured nurse-led follow-up programme coordinated by an advanced practice nurse (APN) as an alternative to conventional postdischarge care for patients with heart failure (HF). The main objective is to assess the clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency of the programme using quality-adjusted life years and healthcare costs related to resource use as outcome measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A quasiexperimental multicentre study will be conducted including an intervention group and a comparison group of patients discharged with HF from three public hospitals in the province of M&aacute;laga, Spain. The intervention group will be followed by an APN using a structured follow-up model, while the comparison group will receive standard care. Sociodemographic, clinical, quality of life, self-care, therapeutic adherence and healthcare resource utilisation data will be collected. The economic evaluation will be conducted from the perspective of the public healthcare system through a cost-utility analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the corresponding Research Ethics Committee. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to inclusion. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mesa Rico, R., Gomez-Garcia Olias, S., Carbonell-Munoz, P., Codes-Perujo, M., Lloreda-Palma, L., Atienza-Carrasco, J., Bravo-Marques, R., Canca-Sanchez, J. C., Romero, A., Jodar-Sanchez, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111817</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111817</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and cost utility of a nurse-led Heart Failure Follow-Up Program: a quasi-experimental multicentre study protocol in three Spanish public hospitals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111817</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111817</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112442?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding opioid use within the substance use journeys of adults receiving treatment: a qualitative study protocol of the participant-led timeline mapping approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112442?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The opioid crisis remains a significant public health emergency. Key contributors to this crisis include an increasingly toxic drug supply and inadequate health policies that rely on strategies to address opioid-related harms and underutilise primary prevention and early intervention approaches. To inform comprehensive prevention and early intervention strategies, research is needed to explore pathways involving hazardous opioid use (ie, daily opioid use that results in, and may arise from, disruptions to health, relationships, work or social functioning) and the individual, social and structural factors that shape such pathways. This qualitative study aims to address this research gap by exploring the substance use journeys of adults with lived or living experiences of hazardous opioid use who are receiving substance use treatment at a large Canadian mental health hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A qualitative descriptive study informed by the life course perspective will be conducted. Data will be collected using participant-led timeline mapping in combination with semistructured interviews. Participants will include 20&ndash;30 adults who are receiving or have received substance use treatment from the hospital where the study is being conducted. Timelines and interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis. A brief demographic questionnaire will also be administered to describe characteristics of the sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was granted on 1 October 2025 by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Research Ethics Board (Protocol no. 2025/026). Findings will be reported through peer-reviewed publications, lay language reports and/or academic conferences on mental health and substance use health research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Estrella, M. J., Wells, S., Foy, R., Quilty, L., Bozinoff, N., Buckley, L., Lincoln, S., Patenaude, S., Ali, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-29T05:19:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112442</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112442</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding opioid use within the substance use journeys of adults receiving treatment: a qualitative study protocol of the participant-led timeline mapping approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112442</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112442</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e092409?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research waste in total knee arthroplasty studies: an observational study on registered trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e092409?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Timely publication of preregistered study outcomes is not self-evident. Discrepancies can lead to significant research waste.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess timely (within 7 years) and consistent publication of preregistered primary outcomes and associated factors of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) studies registered between 2000 and 2017 over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.Gov, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Registered TKA trials at ClinicalTrials.Gov between 2000 and 2017.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.Gov&rsquo;s required and optional data elements for registering a study and the preregistered and published primary outcome, defined as the outcome stated in the primary outcome field on ClinicalTrials.Gov. We used descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>1352 registered TKA (1072 interventional; 280 observational) studies were included, with 967 (811 interventional; 156 observational) unique references. Regarding the publication of preregistered primary outcomes within 7 years, the results for interventional trials were 0% (2000), which increased to 59.6% (2017). Observational studies were timely published in 0% (2000) and 37.5% (2017). Interventional trials and observational studies not funded by industry were more likely to have timely and consistent publication of their primary outcomes. Drug intervention trials were more likely to be timely and consistently published than procedure-focused trials. Phase 3 interventional trials were more likely, while phase 1 trials were less likely to be consistently published on time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Despite ongoing efforts to improve publication rates, over a third of interventional trials remain unpublished within 7 years. For observational studies, the rate is even lower, with only two-fifths published on time, contributing to significant research waste.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42021246599.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iken, A. R., Schaap, M., Poolman, R. W., Gademan, M. G. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092409</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-092409</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research waste in total knee arthroplasty studies: an observational study on registered trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e092409</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e092409</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100593?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictive value of stress hyperglycaemia ratio and haemoglobin glycation index for mortality risks in critically ill patients: a comparative retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database using machine learning-based predictive modelling]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100593?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to evaluate the association between the stress hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR) and the Haemoglobin Glycation Index (HGI), and mortality risks in critically ill patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective study and machine learning (ML)-based predictive modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This retrospective cohort study used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 3106 patients were included in the study and were divided into different groups according to the value level of SHR and HGI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>360-day mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>When treated the SHR as a continuous variable, a significant correlation exists between the SHR and 360-day mortality risks in critically ill patients (HR, 1.32; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.55). When regarded the SHR as a categorical variable, patients in the highest group were significantly associated with an increased risk of 360-day mortality compared with that of those in the lowest group (HR, 1.38; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.68). HGI, when treated as a continuous variable, was also closely associated with 360-day mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.00). According to the results, the SHR index outperformed HGI at predicting all-cause 360-day mortality and adding the SHR index to the basic model for 360-day mortality improved its predictive ability (area under the curve, 0.818 for the basic model vs 0.821 for the basic model+SHR index). Furthermore, the ML-based model demonstrated the crucial contribution of SHR in predicting 360-day mortality risk of critically ill patients. Consistent with the 360-day mortality results, similar and statistically significant trends towards higher mortality at both 30 days and 90 days were observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>SHR and HGI showed a strong association with 360-day and short-term mortality risks. The SHR index appears to be the most promising index for prevention and risk stratification in critically ill patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, W., Zheng, M., Wu, T., Shi, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100593</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100593</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictive value of stress hyperglycaemia ratio and haemoglobin glycation index for mortality risks in critically ill patients: a comparative retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database using machine learning-based predictive modelling]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100593</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100593</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101367?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence and associated factors of emergency department visits for violent behaviour: a retrospective cohort study in Romagna, Italy]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101367?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the population-level incidence of emergency department (ED) visits for violent behaviour, identify associated factors and quantify the contribution of people presenting to ED for violent behaviour on the total number of ED visits for mental health problems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Regional healthcare authority serving a population of 1.2 million in Romagna, Italy, January 2022 to December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>871 119 residents (70% of the regional population; 55.6% female) alive on 1 January 2022 with data on comorbidities. Participants were followed until 31 December 2023 with censoring at death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcome: incidence of ED visits for violent/homicidal. Factors associated with violent ED visits were examined. Secondary outcome: quantification of the contribution of people presenting to ED for violent behaviour on the total number of ED visits for any mental health problem.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>286 individuals (76.9% male) had 573 ED visits for violent behaviour, representing 4.2% of all psychiatric ED visits with an annual incidence rate of 3.48 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI 3.21 to 3.78). Male sex was associated with violent behaviour (OR 3.85, 95% CI 2.60 to 5.70; OR 4.64, 95% CI 3.12 to 6.92 among mental health service users). High comorbidity and prior mental health service use increased the risk. Having an ED visit for violent behaviour was associated with higher odds (OR 10.9, 95% CI 8.02 to 14.96) and higher incidence rate (incidence rate ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.69) of psychiatric ED visits for other mental health problems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ED visits for violent behaviour occur at relatively low population rates but predominantly affect high-risk groups: males with prior mental health service contact and either minimal or very high comorbidity. These findings supported the need for tailored interventions that address both the immediate risk of violence and underlying mental health issues, especially for high-risk groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perna, B., Vallicelli, G., Reno, C., Portoraro, A., Strada, A., Bravi, F., Grilli, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101367</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101367</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence and associated factors of emergency department visits for violent behaviour: a retrospective cohort study in Romagna, Italy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101367</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101367</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102546?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patterns of ICD-10 diagnoses in emergency departments of public hospitals in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102546?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the distribution and frequency of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), codes in emergency departments (EDs) across Malaysia, providing insights into the most common diagnoses. The aim is to support the development of a principal diagnosis short list for implementing ED-specific diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) to enhance resource allocation and healthcare efficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study conducted as part of a functional exercise by the Ministry of Health Malaysia, with systematic retrospective data collection over a 6-week period in 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>13 public emergency hospitals across Malaysia, representing state, major specialist, minor specialist and non-specialist hospitals, including facilities from Sabah and Sarawak for geographical diversity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>10 247 ED visit records were collected through systematic random sampling, of which 9942 complete and valid records were retained for analysis after the exclusion of incomplete or erroneous entries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study included 9942 ED patient records from 13 public hospitals across Malaysia over a 6-week period. Of these, 54.4% were male, and 45.5% were female. Malaysian citizens comprised 96.1% of the study population. The most frequently reported diagnoses were respiratory diseases (21.2%), followed by injuries and poisoning (13.2%) and digestive system disorders (8.4%). A total of 946 unique ICD-10 codes were identified, with 73.7% used fewer than five times. The top 20 diagnoses accounted for 42.9% of all records. Acute upper respiratory infection (J06.9) was the most commonly reported diagnosis (961 cases), followed by COVID-19 (U07.1, 608 cases) and gastroenteritis of unspecified origin (A09.9, 313 cases). The data demonstrated variation in the distribution of ICD-10 diagnoses across participating hospitals, highlighting key diagnostic categories relevant for future DRG development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study highlights the diversity of diagnoses in Malaysian EDs and underscores the need for tailored DRGs to optimise healthcare resource allocation. The findings suggest that a principal diagnosis short list may support future efforts to improve classification consistency and inform resource planning, although its effect warrants empirical evaluation. Given the concentration of diagnoses within a limited number of ICD-10 codes, implementing DRGs in emergency care is both feasible and necessary. Future research should expand data collection to capture seasonal trends and refine the principal diagnosis list to further support DRG categorisation and ensure its applicability across varying healthcare demands.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azzeri, A., Yunus, K., Jaafar, H., Dahlui, M., Shahari, M. R., Ali, F. Z., Hairi, N. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102546</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102546</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patterns of ICD-10 diagnoses in emergency departments of public hospitals in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102546</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102546</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104454?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gompertz proportional hazards survival analysis of time to first birth among childbearing women in Somaliland (2020): a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104454?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The timing of a woman&rsquo;s first birth is significantly associated with maternal and child health outcomes and socioeconomic opportunities. Delaying the first birth is associated with reduced risks of adolescent pregnancy complications, improved birth outcomes and enhanced interpregnancy intervals, all of which contribute to better maternal and child health. In Somaliland, early childbearing is prevalent, necessitating an understanding of its associated factors. Early childbearing, defined as a first birth before age 20, is prevalent in Somaliland, with 47.02% of women having their first birth by this age, significantly higher than the average for sub-Saharan Africa (approximately 30%) and global figures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to identify the sociodemographic factors associated with age at first birth among married women in Somaliland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The median duration from marriage to first birth was 3 years, with a median age at first birth of 21 years. Women residing in the Sool (adjusted HR: 1.318, 95% CI 1.138 to 1.527) and Sanaag (adjusted HR: 1.265, 95% CI 1.095 to 1.462) regions had a significantly higher hazard of first birth compared with those in Awdal (reference). Conversely, women in the middle (adjusted HR: 0.821, 95% CI 0.685 to 0.985) and highest (Adjusted HR: 0.799, 95% CI 0.663 to 0.964) wealth quintiles had a significantly lower hazard of first birth compared with the lowest wealth quintile. Age at first marriage was a strong factor associated with the outcome; marrying at age 20 or older (adjusted HR: 0.699, 95% CI 0.644 to 0.759) was associated with a significantly lower hazard of first birth compared with those who married before age 20. After adjustment, other factors including residence, media exposure and husband&rsquo;s employment status were not significantly associated with the timing of first birth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Region, wealth quintile and age at first marriage are critical factors associated with first birth timing in Somaliland. Interventions should focus on addressing regional disparities and promoting delayed marriage to improve maternal and child health outcomes. Further research is needed to explore the complex social and cultural drivers of these findings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hussein, M. A., Yousuf, A. M., Muse, A. H., Esse, A. A., Abdi, A. N., Osman, A. A., Abdikarim, H., Chesneau, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104454</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104454</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gompertz proportional hazards survival analysis of time to first birth among childbearing women in Somaliland (2020): a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104454</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104454</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104637?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epidemiology and risk factors of postherpetic neuralgia worldwide: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104637?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a debilitating complication of herpes zoster (HZ) that significantly impairs quality of life, disrupting sleep, daily activities and work capacity. Globally, PHN represents a major public health challenge, with marked heterogeneity in its epidemiological patterns across different regions and demographic groups. The escalating incidence of both HZ and PHN underscores the urgent need to elucidate modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, which is critical for implementing targeted prevention strategies and optimising therapeutic interventions. Although previous studies have examined PHN risk factors, there remains a paucity of comprehensive, up-to-date systematic analyses evaluating its global epidemiological trends and associated determinants. This protocol presents the methodology of a planned systematic review to assess an updated global estimate of PHN epidemiology and synthesises critical risk factors associated with PHN prevalence or severity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We will search MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, CNKI, Wanfang and CBM for English/Chinese studies published from inception through April 2025. Eligible studies will include adults (&ge;18 years) with HZ or PHN that report PHN prevalence/incidence or relevant risk factors (eg, age, vaccination status, acute pain severity, comorbidities). Two reviewers will independently screen records, extract data (including study characteristics, demographics, risk factors and pain metrics) and assess risk of bias using Joanna Briggs Institute tools and ROBINS-I. Random-effects meta-analyses (R V.4.0) will pool PHN prevalence (logit-transformed Wilson scores) and ORs for risk factors, with subgroup analyses by geography, income level, clinical/demographic factors. Heterogeneity (I&sup2;&ge;50%) will trigger meta-regression or narrative synthesis. Sensitivity analyses will address bias robustness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics committee approval is not required. The results of the review will be published through an open access journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024510329.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liao, X., Xu, S., Wang, Y., Zheng, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104637</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104637</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epidemiology and risk factors of postherpetic neuralgia worldwide: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104637</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104637</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104660?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient engagement in digital health: a preliminary observation on user-centred and stakeholder feedback]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104660?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>In this pilot study, we recruited patients from a secondary pain clinic in Boston, Massachusetts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>In this pilot study, we recruited patients from a secondary pain clinic within the Spaulding Rehabilitation network in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. We enrolled 37 patients who initially came in for a clinical visit with the principal investigator of the study. Of the 37 patients, 14 patients who continued to enrol/join after December 2024 received the &lsquo;DigitalPulse&rsquo; to drive engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To present a roadmap for our efforts to contextualise engagement in our digital health technology study and showcase our attempts to incorporate an engagement approach inspired by the Method for Program Adaptation through Community Engagement. Building on this, we further incorporated continued feedback and revision beyond the prototype of the user-centred feedback form (&lsquo;DigitalPulse&rsquo;) to include expanded stakeholders such as clinicians and research assistants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From these patients, we observed that our approach produced highly variable changes in engagement with slight increases at the group level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>From our observations, we have found that it is important to incorporate iterative refinements and expanded stakeholder involvement in designing patient-centred digital health tools to improve engagement. Overall, we report a process to address engagement and emphasise the need for continuous personalisation in digital health interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdelkader, K., Barile, C. F., Jobe, N. I., Huey, N., Isaac, Z., Sarno, D., Kurz, J., Barron, D. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104660</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104660</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient engagement in digital health: a preliminary observation on user-centred and stakeholder feedback]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104660</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104660</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104916?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What is the ideal glucose range for a patient with sepsis in the ICU? A retrospective analysis of MIMIC-IV]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104916?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Importance</st>
<p>Clinical trials have produced inconclusive results regarding the optimal glucose range for a patient with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU) receiving insulin treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate the optimal glucose range in patients with sepsis in the ICU independent of confounding covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Targeted trial emulation of glucose ranges using causal inference targeted maximum likelihood estimation and longitudinal mixed-effects models combined with survival models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Single-centre, academic referral hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults fulfilling sepsis 3 criteria with at least three glucose readings and insulin treatment from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database (2008&ndash;2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Exposure</st>
<p>Five predefined glucose distributions with means at 100, 130, 160 (baseline), 190 and 220 mg/dL mimicking current guidelines&rsquo; recommendations (140&ndash;180 mg/dL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome and measure</st>
<p>The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Modified counterfactual treatment-policy risks across distinct time-weighted glucose ranges were estimated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 73 181 eligible patients, 8002 patients with a median age of 66 years (41% women, 67% white ethnicity, 57% diabetes) were included. There was a U-shaped curve between glucose range and mortality in patients without diabetes, but overall, this association was not significant (mean glucose at 100 mg/dL with 21% mortality and mean glucose at 220 mg/dL with 26% mortality, p-for-trend 0.26). Mortality was lowest at 17%, with mean glucose between 130 and 160 mg/dL. Hypoglycaemic events (&lt;80 mg/dL) became increasingly more frequent with tighter glucose control 16% at 220 mg/dL compared with 77% at 100 mg/dL (p-for-trend 0.01). Joint modelling corroborated these results and did not identify covariates that would favour lower glucose ranges in subsets of patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion and relevance</st>
<p>Our data suggest a U-shaped association of glucose and mortality with an optimal average glucose between 160 and 190 mg/dL. These results confirm current guideline recommendations. Together with recent results from randomised controlled trials, intensivists should aim for a liberal glucose range in most patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Struja, T., Hansen, L. H., Matos, J., Gomez, J., Pardo, A., Lourentzou, I., Hejazi, N., Celi, L. A., Waschka, A. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104916</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104916</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What is the ideal glucose range for a patient with sepsis in the ICU? A retrospective analysis of MIMIC-IV]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104916</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104916</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106318?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring barriers to integrated care for children under 5 living in temporary accommodation: a qualitative study of professionals experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in England]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106318?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This research aims to explore the factors that hinder professionals in delivering integrated care for children under 5 in temporary accommodation (TA) and understand their experiences of collaboration during the pandemic to inform recommendations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Semistructured qualitative interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>England, UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>45 professionals working across health, housing, education and non-profit sectors in England. Purposive and snowball sampling was employed to recruit a representation of key professionals across England. Those not eligible to take part in the study included people who did not work with families and/or children in TA settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>To explore cross-sector learnings that are applicable to improving integrated care and to tailor recommendations to the needs of families and children under 5 experiencing homelessness in the UK today.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>This study highlights the complex, multilevel barriers that professionals face when delivering integrated care to children under 5 in TA. Findings are organised using a framework that distinguishes between practice-level, organisational and systemic challenges. From siloed working practices and limited training to staffing shortages and restrictive data-sharing policies, these challenges collectively hinder service continuity and collaboration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Although this project was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the challenges identified reflect deeper, long-standing issues in service delivery. As services continue to recover and prepare for future crises, these insights remain highly relevant and can inform more resilient, integrated recovery plans to support children in TA beyond the pandemic context. Addressing these barriers, through improved collaboration, training and data-sharing, is key to strengthening care for this vulnerable population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pierce, P. A. S., Svirydzenka, N., Adil, H., Allaham, S., Ankers, M., Parry, Y. K., Heys, M., Ucci, M., Lakhanpaul, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106318</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106318</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring barriers to integrated care for children under 5 living in temporary accommodation: a qualitative study of professionals experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in England]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106318</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106512?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic primary crural repair versus additional circular bioabsorbable mesh reinforcement in hiatal hernia (PRIME-II trial): an RCT protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106512?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Laparoscopic hiatal hernia (HH) repair is associated with a high recurrence rate. Repair reinforced with mesh lowers short-term recurrence but can cause dysphagia and visceral erosion. Results of the PRIME trial, in which non-absorbable mesh reinforcement of the posterior crural repair was investigated, showed equal recurrence compared with primary suture repair after 6 months. This study investigates the use of circular absorbable mesh reinforcement in primary HH repair.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Prospective double-blinded randomised controlled superiority trial comparing two laparoscopic procedures for HH repair (110 vs 110). Adult patients with proven HH Skinner types II&ndash;IV (defined by preoperative CT scan) are included. Patients are randomised to undergo a laparoscopic primary crural repair with sutures alone or suture repair augmented with biosynthetic absorbable, circular mesh at the hiatus. Radiologic integrity of the hiatal repair 1 year after surgery is the main endpoint. Secondary objectives are clinical recurrence of the hernia, development of postoperative reflux disease, postoperative side effects and satisfaction with surgical outcome. Outcome assessors are blinded to allocation. Data are collected at baseline, and follow-up includes interviews and digital questionnaires at 3, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, as well as CT scan at 12 and 60 months. All patients randomised will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval has been obtained by the local ethics committee at Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands (Medical Ethics Review Committee (METc) Isala, study number: 190516). METc Isala is no longer active; all duties have been taken over by METc of the University Medical Center Groningen. The trial&rsquo;s results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed international journal as well as (inter)national conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Registered in the Dutch national trial registry: OMON (NL-OMON48062).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Haas, J. W. A., Geerts, J. H., de Boer, E., Brohet, R. M., Hazebroek, E. J., Wassenaar, E. B., Nieuwenhuijs, V. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106512</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106512</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic primary crural repair versus additional circular bioabsorbable mesh reinforcement in hiatal hernia (PRIME-II trial): an RCT protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106512</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106512</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106590?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Microbes and ageing beyond the gut: the oral microbiome and frailty, sarcopenia and neurocognitive disorders in the elderly - a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106590?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Population ageing is a global phenomenon that has resulted in an increase in the number of patients with chronic diseases and geriatric syndromes. Frailty, sarcopenia and neurocognitive disorders are among the most prevalent conditions affecting older adults and have a direct effect on their quality of life, and can impact the burden and budgets of health systems. Recently, the oral microbiome has gained attention as it may be a factor that potentially influences the onset and progression of these syndromes. However, this is still a new line of research that has not been deeply explored. This scoping review protocol aims to explore how the oral microbiome may be associated with the onset of prevalent geriatric syndromes, frailty, sarcopenia and neurocognitive disorders, providing a picture of the current evidence and potential gaps for future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The scoping review will follow the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and will be reported accordit to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines (PRISMA-ScR). Searches will be conducted in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, LILACS and Epistemonikos from inception to December 2025. Independent reviewers will perform the study selection and data extraction. A descriptive analysis of information will be conducted, highlighting oral microorganisms associated with these syndromes and emerging trends in the evidence. Original research studies in any language will be included. We will include randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case&ndash;control studies and other relevant designs if they investigate the oral microbiome and its relation to geriatric syndromes in adults aged 65 or older, regardless of geographic location or setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murcia-Soriano, L. F., Venegas-Sanabria, L. C., Arias-Blanco, D., Baracaldo Gomez, S. d. P., Borda, M. G., Sanchez, G., Buitrago-Garcia, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106590</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106590</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Microbes and ageing beyond the gut: the oral microbiome and frailty, sarcopenia and neurocognitive disorders in the elderly - a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106590</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106960?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Variations in bronchopulmonary dysplasia prevalence and outcomes by definition: a multicentre cohort study from the Chinese Neonatal Network]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106960?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) epidemiological data in Chinese very preterm infants and compare agreement between four diagnostic definitions and their predictive accuracy for discharge outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational epidemiologic study of a multicentre cohort of the Chinese Neonatal Network (CHNN).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Tertiary neonatal intensive care units participating in the CHNN.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>42 664 preterm infants born at &lt;32 weeks&rsquo; gestational age from 2019 to 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measures</st>
<p>BPD was diagnosed using four definitions: Shennan 1988, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 2001 and 2018, and the Neonatal Research Network (NRN) 2019 definitions. BPD prevalence and severity were examined. Agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. Predictive accuracy for discharge outcomes was evaluated using c-statistics from multivariable generalised estimating equation models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 42 664 infants (mean gestational age, 29.0 weeks; 43.1% females), BPD prevalence varied significantly: Shennan 1988: 37.0%, NICHD 2001: 51.1%, NICHD 2018: 37.0%, NRN 2019: 37.0%. NICHD 2001 and 2018 definitions classified more infants as severe BPD (16.4% and 10.1%, respectively), while NRN 2019 classified more as grade 2 (moderate; 15.0%). Shennan 1988 showed good agreement with NICHD 2018 (=1.0) and Jensen 2019 (=1.0). Shennan 1988 (c-statistic range: 0.921&ndash;0.974), NICHD 2018 (0.948-0.978) and NRN 2019 (0.949-0.982) demonstrated higher discriminative accuracy for discharge outcomes than NICHD 2001 (0.854&ndash;0.925).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study found a high prevalence of BPD among very preterm infants in China, varying by definitions. The Shennan 1988, NICHD 2018 and NRN 2019 definitions showed good agreement and better predictive accuracy for outcomes at discharge compared with NICHD 2001. These definitions could be prioritised for clinical use in our population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, G., Wang, L., Gao, C., Li, W., Zhao, F., Cao, Y., Zhou, W., Du, L., Chen, C., Lee, S. K., Yang, J., Zhang, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106960</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106960</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Variations in bronchopulmonary dysplasia prevalence and outcomes by definition: a multicentre cohort study from the Chinese Neonatal Network]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106960</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106960</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a machine learning-based model for prediction of diabetes risk in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a leading chronic liver disorder closely linked to diabetes mellitus (DM) and its cardiovascular and renal complications. Early identification of diabetes risk in this population is essential for timely intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop machine learning (ML) models to predict diabetes risk in individuals with MASLD and to identify key predictive factors using a nationally representative dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data from 6310 MASLD participants (2007&ndash;2018) were analysed and classified into DM and non-DM groups. Feature selection was performed using Random Forest, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination. Based on selected features, nine ML models were developed. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, area under the curve, F1 score, Rank Score and Brier Score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for interpretability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eight key variables (age, urinary albumin (Ualb), total cholesterol (TC), lipid accumulation product (LAP), urinary creatinine, white blood cell count, uric acid and Visceral Adiposity Index) were identified and used for model construction. Among nine algorithms, the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model showed superior predictive performance. SHAP analysis revealed that Ualb, age, TC and LAP were the most influential predictors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our ML-based model effectively identifies individuals with MASLD at high risk for developing DM. The LightGBM algorithm outperformed other models in both accuracy and interpretability. Key predictors such as Ualb and LAP highlight the importance of renal and metabolic markers in early diabetes risk prediction, offering a new approach for individualised intervention and clinical decision-making.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, S., Mo, R., Wang, W., Zhen, P., Han, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107239</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107239</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a machine learning-based model for prediction of diabetes risk in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107239</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interruptive versus Non-Interruptive Reminders for Statin tHerApy in Primary Care (INIRSHA-PC): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108123?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Statins are a cornerstone of cardiovascular disease prevention yet remain underused among eligible patients. Clinical decision support systems embedded in electronic health records (EHRs) are commonly used to encourage guideline-concordant prescribing. Interruptive reminders (eg, pop-ups) may be effective but interfere with clinical workflows and contribute to alert fatigue. Non-interruptive alerts are less intrusive, but their effectiveness remains unclear. The Interruptive versus Non-Interruptive Reminders for Statin tHerApy in Primary Care (INIRSHA-PC) trial is designed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of interruptive and non-interruptive reminders on statin-prescribing rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>INIRSHA-PC is a single-centre, pragmatic, three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial embedded in the EHR at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The trial will enrol adults aged 18&ndash;74 seen in primary care who are eligible for, but not currently prescribed, statin therapy. The planned sample size is 3000 patients (1000 per arm). Enrolled patients will be randomised 1:1:1 to (1) interruptive reminder, (2) non-interruptive reminder or (3) no reminder (usual care). The primary outcome is statin prescription within 24 hours of enrolment. Secondary outcomes are statin prescribing within 12 months and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels measured between 30 days and 12 months after enrolment. Enrolment began on 14 August 2024. The study is expected to be completed on 19 November 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial has been approved by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Institutional Review Board with waiver of patient informed consent (IRB number: 240419). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presentation at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06456658">NCT06456658</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wright, A. P., Choi, L., Nairon, K. G., Gatto, C. L., Dear, M. L., Van Winkle, G., Lagalante, S., Neal, E. B., Wright, A., Rice, T. W., for the Vanderbilt Center for Learning Healthcare, Bernard, Dittus, Luther, Pulley, Self, Semler, Qian]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108123</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108123</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interruptive versus Non-Interruptive Reminders for Statin tHerApy in Primary Care (INIRSHA-PC): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108123</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108216?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants for the implementation of a combined lifestyle intervention for patients with knee osteoarthritis and overweight: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108216?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Lifestyle changes&mdash;such as adopting healthy nutrition and increasing physical activity&mdash;are essential for alleviating symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and overweight, with weight loss being a key outcome of these changes. Since 2019, healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the Netherlands have been able to refer these patients to a reimbursed combined lifestyle intervention (CLI). This study aims to identify determinants affecting CLI implementation for individuals with knee OA and overweight from both patient and HCP perspectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Semistructured interviews were conducted in a qualitative study with 23 individuals with knee OA and overweight and 16 HCPs (general practitioners (GPs) and lifestyle coaches). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded independently by two researchers using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care, including GPs and lifestyle coaches from the Greater Rotterdam region in the Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>23 individuals with knee OA and overweight and 16 HCPs (GPs and lifestyle coaches).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Determinants were explored within four CFIR domains: innovation, outer setting, inner setting and individuals. Key facilitators included recognition of the programme&rsquo;s potential, strong social support and positive participant&ndash;coach relationships. Major barriers involved the absence of an exercise component, financial constraints limiting its inclusion, scepticism among GPs about care quality, limited expertise of lifestyle coaches addressing OA-specific needs and difficulties adapting the programme to participants&rsquo; diverse knowledge levels and health literacy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>To improve the implementation of the CLI for patients with knee OA, it is essential to incorporate a tailored exercise component, strengthen lifestyle coaches&rsquo; expertise, address financial barriers and build trust among GPs through education and clear communication of programme outcomes. Tailoring the CLI to better meet participant needs is crucial to ensure its long-term effectiveness and sustainability as a treatment for individuals with knee OA and overweight.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registeration number</st>
<p>Netherlands Trial Registry (NL9355).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gharbaran, P., Jansen, N. E., Merkelbach, I., van Middelkoop, M., Schiphof, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108216</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108216</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants for the implementation of a combined lifestyle intervention for patients with knee osteoarthritis and overweight: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108216</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108616?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of free door-to-door transport to increase the uptake of breast screening appointments in Yorkshire: a cluster randomised GP feasibility trial (DOORSTEP protocol)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108616?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Breast screening uptake remains low in parts of the UK, partly due to barriers including limited transport access. Offering free transport to screening appointments may help address this and improve uptake. This general practitioner (GP) cluster-randomised feasibility trial will assess whether offering free door-to-door transport alongside routine screening invitations increases attendance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Eight general practices in Yorkshire will be randomised to either the intervention (routine invitation plus information about booking free door-to-door transport) or control (routine invitation only) group. Around 8000 women due for routine breast screening will be included. Primary feasibility outcomes include GP recruitment and randomisation, intervention fidelity, proportion of women from the 10% most deprived areas, acceptability and data transfer processes. Secondary outcomes include understanding travel behaviour, cost-effectiveness and screening uptake. Data will be collected from routine National Health Service (NHS) screening records, data linkage with NHS England, travel surveys and qualitative interviews exploring experiences and acceptability. Patient and public involvement is embedded throughout with members contributing to advisory and oversight roles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial has received ethical approval from the London&ndash;Harrow Research Ethics Committee, Section 251 approval from the Confidentiality Advisory Group and other relevant regulatory bodies. The University of Hull is the study sponsor. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and plain English summaries for participants and the public. Findings will inform the feasibility and design of a potential larger trial to improve breast screening uptake via transport support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN17087898">ISRCTN17087898</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haji Sadeghi, M., Cohen, J., Bamidele, O., Roberts, H., Williams, B., Acaster, B., Miles, H., Huang, C., Pitel, L., Dawkins, B., Abass, W., Peacock, L., Macleod, U., Kelly, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108616</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108616</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of free door-to-door transport to increase the uptake of breast screening appointments in Yorkshire: a cluster randomised GP feasibility trial (DOORSTEP protocol)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108616</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108616</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109817?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation (LLA) and prosthetic rehabilitation in low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings: a qualitative systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109817?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify outcome domains of importance to adults undergoing prosthetic rehabilitation following lower limb amputation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), based on their lived experiences described in qualitative literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and qualitative synthesis informed by a critical realist perspective and reported according to ENTREQ (Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research) guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Trip databases were searched from inception to April 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included qualitative studies exploring the views and experiences of adults (&ge;18 years) using lower limb prosthesis in LMICs (World Bank definition). Studies including upper limb amputees, non-prosthetic users, mixed samples that could not be disaggregated or not reporting first-person accounts were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened studies using predefined criteria. Data were extracted from results sections, including participant quotations and author interpretations. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to identify outcome domains across studies. Study quality was appraised using the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) qualitative checklist; no studies were excluded based on quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five studies involving 55 participants from Nepal, Kenya, Cambodia, Bangladesh and Kiribati met the inclusion criteria. Four outcome domains were identified: (1) The importance of a prosthesis: highlighting access, socket comfort, durability and functional suitability; (2) valued activities: particularly the importance of work and participation in daily living tasks; (3) acceptance following limb loss: encompassing community participation and self and social acceptance; and (4) independence: including reduced reliance on family and greater control over daily life. Across settings, participants emphasised prosthesis durability, work participation and culturally relevant function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Evidence on meaningful outcomes of prosthetic rehabilitation in LMICs is extremely limited. Findings indicate that access to a comfortable and durable prosthesis enabling work and daily living is central to recovery, alongside social acceptance and independence. These domains may provide initial insights into outcome measurement and development in low-resource settings. Further primary research across diverse LMIC contexts is urgently needed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fewins, C. J., Ostler, C., Donovan-Hall, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109817</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109817</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation (LLA) and prosthetic rehabilitation in low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings: a qualitative systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109817</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109817</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110244?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family interventions in dementia mental health environments (FIND ME): a mixed-methods protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110244?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Admission to a mental health ward can be distressing for people living with dementia and their carers. While carer involvement is associated with improved outcomes, carers often report feeling excluded from decision-making and support during admissions. There is limited understanding of how wards engage with carers and what strategies might enhance involvement. This study seeks to address this gap by exploring carer and patient experiences during and after admission and co-producing evidence-based strategies for improved support and involvement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The FIND ME study uses a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. A national online survey will map provision of mental healthcare for people with dementia across the UK. Narrative interviews will be undertaken with carers of current inpatients (n=24) and recently discharged individuals (n=24), with opportunities for dyadic interviews with people with dementia. Ethnographic fieldwork across three wards (30 days per site) will provide insight into organisational cultures, staff practices and carer involvement. Evidence-based co-design workshops with carers, people with dementia and staff will use these findings to identify priorities and develop practical strategies for service improvement. Finally, a feasibility study will test the acceptability, relevance and potential for implementation of these co-designed strategies. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, while qualitative data will undergo narrative and thematic analysis. Triangulation across datasets will ensure rigour.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been granted by London Camberwell St Giles Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority (REC Ref: 25/LO/0040). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, with capacity assessed in line with the Mental Capacity Act (2005). Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and freely available multilingual resources for carers, people with dementia and ward staff, supported by NHS and third-sector partners.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>NIHR161439</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolverson, E., Gillam, J., Dunn, R., Hoe, J., Underwood, B. R., Mwale, S., Credland, N., Robertson, M., Wyatt, M., Lane, R., Featherstone, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110244</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110244</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family interventions in dementia mental health environments (FIND ME): a mixed-methods protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110244</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110244</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110452?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The PROTECT trial: Effect of titrated versus conventional induction of general anaesthesia using a target-controlled infusion system on haemodynamics in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery - protocol for a multicentre, expertise-based randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110452?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hypotension is a frequent complication after induction of general anaesthesia leading to end-organ injury, for which elderly and multimorbid patients are particularly susceptible. The extent of hypotension depends, among other factors, on the dose and rate of propofol administration. Target-controlled infusion systems are widely used to administer short-acting anaesthetics such as propofol and remifentanil. Commonly, induction is started with a fixed effect-site concentration. Titration, an alternative method of induction using an incremental augmentation of propofol, leads to a reduced induction dose and rate of propofol. We hypothesise that the titration method improves haemodynamic stability compared with conventional induction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, expertise-based randomised controlled trial takes place at four Swiss hospitals. Patients &ge;55 years of age undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia using propofol target-controlled infusion are randomised to either a conventional or a titrated anaesthesia induction method. Patients, statisticians and, if resources allow, outcome assessors will be blinded. The primary endpoint is the mean arterial pressure under the individual baseline mean arterial pressure (area under threshold) during the first 30 min after start of induction. Secondary endpoints include the maximum deviation from baseline mean arterial pressure, haemodynamic rescue methods, propofol consumption and neurocognitive recovery after regaining consciousness.</p>
<p>A total of 320 patients are required to have an 80% chance of observing superiority of titration for the area under the threshold as significant at the 5% level, assuming a true difference of 100 mm Hg*min. The area under threshold and the maximum deviation will be compared between arms using mixed linear regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from all responsible ethics committees (BASEC2025-01007). The results will be presented at international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals and may contribute to a change in clinical practice for anaesthesia induction using target-controlled infusion systems with propofol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>clinicaltrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT06980688">NCT06980688</A>) and www.humanforschung-schweiz.ch (HumRes67022).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Funk, S., Lohri, M. D., Kopp Lugli, A., Schindler, C., Wiencierz, A., Mnich, K., Schla&#x0308;pfer, M., Gaberdiel, A. P., Puhan, M. A., Steiner, L. A., Gomes, N. V., Dell-Kuster, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110452</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110452</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The PROTECT trial: Effect of titrated versus conventional induction of general anaesthesia using a target-controlled infusion system on haemodynamics in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery - protocol for a multicentre, expertise-based randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110452</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110452</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110739?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Statistical analysis plan for the Strategy to Avoid Excessive Oxygen using Autonomous Oxygen Titration Intervention (SAVE-O2 AI) trial: protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110739?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Administering supplemental oxygen to prevent hypoxaemia is a fundamental treatment for patients hospitalised with acute injury or illness. However, the amount of oxygen administered frequently exceeds that needed to maintain normoxaemia, causing patients to experience hyperoxaemia and wasting supplemental oxygen. Closed-loop, autonomous oxygen titration systems are designed to optimise oxygen delivery by administering the lowest possible oxygen flow that maintains peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<SUB>2</SUB>) within a predefined range. For adults hospitalised with an acute injury or illness, it remains uncertain whether the use of a closed-loop, autonomous oxygen titration system safely increases the proportion of time spent in normoxaemia (SpO<SUB>2</SUB> 90%&ndash;96%) compared with usual care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Strategy to Avoid Excessive Oxygen using Autonomous Oxygen Titration Intervention trial is a multicentre, unblinded, parallel-group, randomised trial being conducted at four level 1 trauma centres in the USA. The trial compares an autonomous oxygen titration system versus usual care among 300 adults hospitalised for major trauma, burn, acute care surgery or acute respiratory illness. The primary outcome is the proportion of patient-time spent within the targeted normoxaemia range (SpO<SUB>2</SUB> 90%&ndash;96%) as measured by continuous non-invasive pulse oximetry, during the first 72 hours after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include the amount of supplemental oxygen administered and the proportion of time spent in hypoxaemia (SpO<SUB>2</SUB>&lt;88%) and hyperoxaemia (SpO<SUB>2</SUB> &gt;96%). Specifying the protocol and statistical analysis plan before the conclusion of enrolment increases the rigour, reproducibility and interpretability of the trial. Enrolment began on 6 May 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial protocol was approved by the single institutional review board at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and the Office of Human Research Oversight at the Department of Defense. We will present the results at scientific conferences and submit them for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06374225">NCT06374225</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douin, D. J., Rice, J. D., Xiao, M., Beaty, L., Guo, C., Withers, C., Sullivan, A., Anderson, E. L., Cheng, A. C., Banasiewicz, M. K., Semler, M. W., Lloyd, B. D., Maiga, A., Gibbs, K. W., Stettler, G. R., Khan, A., Sally, M. B., Wright, F. L., Aggarwal, N., Bebarta, V. S., Ginde, A. A., On behalf of the SAVE-O2 AI Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110739</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110739</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Statistical analysis plan for the Strategy to Avoid Excessive Oxygen using Autonomous Oxygen Titration Intervention (SAVE-O2 AI) trial: protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110739</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110739</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111232?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The efficacy of trauma-informed yoga in treating post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in trauma-exposed adults: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111232?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction&nbsp;</st>
<p>Research indicates that most individuals will experience at least one traumatic event in their lifetime. Some individuals may develop post-traumatic stress disorder, while others may exhibit subclinical levels of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms alongside comorbid conditions such as depression and anxiety. As a body-based adjunctive intervention, trauma-informed yoga is increasingly used to mitigate post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in individuals who have experienced trauma, including those with or without a formal post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis. However, the efficacy of this approach remains a topic of contention in published studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>To identify relevant trials, a literature search will be conducted across seven electronic databases. We will include randomised controlled trials and pre-post studies that assess trauma-informed yoga in trauma-exposed adults. Data obtained from these sources will be synthesised and analysed meta-analytically using RevMan 5.4. The primary outcome measure will be the total score of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, while secondary outcome measures will encompass anxiety and depression scores. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included trials will be evaluated using the 12-item National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool and the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (version 2). Furthermore, the overall strength of the evidence will be rated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Appraisals, Developments and Evaluations framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No formal research ethics approval is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251113495.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Y., Xing, Y., Meng, X., Cao, W., Dou, J., Sun, C., Fu, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111232</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111232</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Complementary medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The efficacy of trauma-informed yoga in treating post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in trauma-exposed adults: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Complementary medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111232</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111265?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparing ovulation induction strategies for unexplained infertility: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111265?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Unexplained infertility affects about 30% of couples seeking help for infertility, yet the optimal ovulation induction strategy remains largely unclear. Letrozole, clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins are widely used, alone or in combination, with or without intrauterine insemination (IUI), but evidence of comparative effectiveness and safety is inconsistent. Most reviews are restricted to pairwise comparisons or mixed infertility populations. This protocol describes a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare ovulation induction strategies specifically in unexplained infertility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including women aged 18&ndash;40 years with unexplained infertility, will be eligible. Interventions include letrozole, clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, combination regimens and expectant management/ placebo, with or without IUI. The primary outcome will be live birth per woman randomised; if unavailable, ongoing or clinical pregnancy will be considered. Secondary outcomes include ovulation, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, ectopic pregnancy, neonatal outcomes, time to pregnancy, adverse events and cycle cancellation rates. Databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science), trial registry (ClinicalTrials.gov), and grey literature (postgraduate theses, conference abstracts and dissertations) will be searched from inception to September 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen, extract data and assess risk of bias (RoB-2). Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses will precede a Bayesian and frequentist NMA (if sufficient network). If feasible, component NMA will be performed to estimate marginal effects of drug and procedural components. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using the CINeMA framework (GRADE for NMA). Publication bias will be assessed using funnel plots and Egger&rsquo;s test, where feasible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethics approval is required. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and made available through open-access repositories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO Registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251145492. The review was registered prospectively; the review start date is 11 September 2025 and the anticipated end date is 3 March 2026.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehta, P., Jajodia, S., Sulochanadevi, B. C., Poornima, M., Kalabharathi, H. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111265</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111265</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Reproductive medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparing ovulation induction strategies for unexplained infertility: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reproductive medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111265</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111663?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Femoral versus radial arterial pressure monitoring in cardiac surgery patients: protocol for a randomised controlled multicentric superiority trial (FERARI)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111663?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Accurate arterial pressure monitoring is critical in cardiac surgery to guide haemodynamic management and vasopressor therapy. Radial arterial pressure monitoring may systematically underestimate central aortic pressure compared with femoral monitoring, potentially leading to inappropriate vasopressor escalation and associated complications. Recent evidence demonstrates that excessive norepinephrine exposure is associated with acute kidney injury and increased mortality in cardiac surgery patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine whether femoral arterial pressure monitoring reduces norepinephrine use compared with radial monitoring in cardiac surgery patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind, superiority trial conducted at two French university hospitals (CHU Besancon and CHU Dijon). Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass will be randomised 1:1 to receive either femoral or radial arterial pressure monitoring. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients treated with norepinephrine from anaesthetic induction to postoperative day 7. Secondary endpoints include acute kidney injury according to KDIGO criteria, cardiac complications, vasoactive-inotropic scores, duration of vasopressor therapy, vascular complications, and 7-day and 30-day mortality. Sample size calculation indicates 340 patients (170 per group) are needed to detect a 15% absolute reduction in norepinephrine use with 90% power and &alpha;=0.05, and an anticipated loss to follow-up rate of 5%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the French Ethics Committee (Comit&eacute; de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest II, no. 2024/897) and will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06952907">NCT06952907</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guinot, P.-G., Bronnert, R., Grelet, T., Bouhemad, B., Nguyen, M., Besch, G., FERARI study group, Berthoud, Kabbout, Radhouani, Martin, Constandache, Durand, GrosJean, Bahr, Anciaux, Bernard, Morgant, Jazzayeri, Bernard, Ghalifa, Lubin, Nays, Guilhot, Alardin, Pili-Floury, Bataillard, Tissot, Jelicic, Delacroix, Fouace, Rideau, Hattab, Nonnenmacher]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111663</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111663</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Femoral versus radial arterial pressure monitoring in cardiac surgery patients: protocol for a randomised controlled multicentric superiority trial (FERARI)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111663</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111663</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112102?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Direct and indirect effects of distance from health facility on zero-dose children in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional secondary analysis of performance monitoring for action cohort I data, 2025]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112102?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to assess the effect of distance from the nearest health facility on zero-dose children in Ethiopia by using a generalised structural equation modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional secondary analysis of longitudinal data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-based study in five regions of Ethiopia (Tigray, Oromia, Amhara, Southern Nation Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) regions, and Addis Ababa city).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The final analysis included a weighted sample of 1973 mother&ndash;child pairs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the direct effect of distance to the nearest health facility on zero-dose children. The secondary outcome was the mediating effect of maternal reproductive health service utilisation on this relationship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Result</st>
<p>The prevalence of zero-dose children was 15.7%, with significant urban (2.2%) and rural (19.7%) disparities. The median distance to the nearest health facility was 1.93 km, with median distances of 2.10 km for rural and 1.26 km for urban residents. Similarly, the mean distance to the nearest public health facility was 2.09 km (SD = &plusmn;1.72). Each additional kilometre from the nearest public health facility was associated with 14.2% higher odds of a child being zero-dose (aOR: 1.14 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.28)). This effect was predominantly direct, accounting for 89.4% of the total effect (aOR: 1.13 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.26)), while the indirect effect mediated through maternal reproductive health service utilisation was minimal and not statistically significant (aOR: 1.01 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.05)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study suggests that greater distance to the nearest health facility increases the likelihood of children being zero-dose. Therefore, improving physical access to health services through expanded outreach programmes and mobile vaccination services, and strengthening maternal health services, particularly antenatal care and facility delivery, is essential for reducing the burden of zero-dose children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yitayew, Y. A., Getaneh, F. B., Wudu, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112102</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Direct and indirect effects of distance from health facility on zero-dose children in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional secondary analysis of performance monitoring for action cohort I data, 2025]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112202?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and determinants of assistive device use among older adults in India: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112202?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To estimate the prevalence and identify the determinants of assistive device usage in daily life among older adults in India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative survey data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>India</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 66 316 adults aged &ge;45 years with complete information on assistive device use from Wave 1 of the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India, 2017&ndash;2018.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was self-reported use of any assistive device, including visual, hearing, mobility or other assistive devices. There were no predefined secondary outcome measures. Sociodemographic and health-related variables were analysed as covariates to assess factors associated with assistive device use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of assistive device use was 38.61% (95% CI: 37.73% to 39.50%). Use increased with age, from 34.48% among adults aged 45&ndash;59 years to 52.07% among those aged &ge;75 years (adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) 1.30; 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.35). Prevalence was higher among men (40.94%) than women (37.51%) (aPR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.09), among individuals with education above primary level (54.28%) compared with those with up to primary education (28.35%) (aPR 1.42; 95% CI: 1.36 to 1.48), and among urban residents (53.88%) vs rural residents (31.16%) (aPR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.22). A clear socioeconomic gradient was observed, with prevalence increasing from 27.65% in the poorest to 50.66% in the richest wealth quintile (aPR 1.32; 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.39). Assistive device use was higher among participants with chronic conditions (47.30%) than those without (28.16%) (aPR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.19) and was markedly higher among those with a prior eye or vision diagnosis (64.93%) compared with those without (14.61%) (aPR 3.94; 95% CI: 3.78 to 4.11). Among users, spectacles or contact lenses were most common (89.26%), followed by walking sticks or walkers (11.62%) and dentures (6.15%). State-level prevalence varied widely, ranging from 71.27% in Goa to 13.44% in Arunachal Pradesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Assistive device use was reported by less than half of Indian adults aged &ge;45 years. The findings reveal clear socioeconomic and geographic inequities in access to assistive devices, with substantially lower use among older adults with less education, those in poorer wealth quintiles and rural residents. These disparities highlight the need for equity-focused interventions that improve accessibility to assistive devices, particularly for socially and economically disadvantaged groups and individuals with chronic conditions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi, R., Olickal, J. J., Adoor, A., Sireesha, V. N., Devasia, J., Thankappan, K. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112202</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112202</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and determinants of assistive device use among older adults in India: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112202</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112982?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of YOga in people with chronic non-specific low BACK pain and poor PROgnosis (YOBACK-PRO): protocol for a randomised clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112982?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Yoga has been shown to improve pain and function compared with no exercise in people with chronic low back pain (LBP), but treatment effects are small. Given that yoga is a mind&ndash;body intervention that addresses physical as well as psychological factors, it may be more effective for patients with chronic LBP who are at high risk of poor prognosis. The study aims to investigate the efficacy of a 12-week yoga programme combined with education in reducing pain and disability for individuals with chronic LBP at high risk of poor prognosis at short (12 weeks) and intermediate (24 weeks) terms, compared with a control group receiving education only.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A randomised controlled trial will include 110 adults with chronic non-specific LBP reporting an average pain intensity of 3 points or more on a 0&ndash;10 scale over the past week and classified as high risk of poor prognosis (ie, scoring 50 points or above) on the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire short-form. Participants in the control group will receive an educational booklet and attend three face-to-face lectures over a 3-month period. In the intervention group, in addition to the booklet and lectures, participants will attend group yoga sessions twice a week for 12 weeks, totalling 24 yoga sessions. The primary outcome is disability assessed at 12 weeks, measured using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Protocol number CAAE: 57028022.0.0000.5149). Findings will be disseminated to trial participants, clinicians and the broader public and scientific community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05953155">NCT05953155</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nunes, S. M., Rizzo, R. R., Franco, M. R., Ferreira, F. R., Barros, L. J. G., Maciel, I. T., Santos, R. L., Nascimento, R. R., Couto, A. J., Quaresma, L. S., Fontes, R. M., Ferreira, E. M. R., Maher, C. G., McAuley, J. H., Pinto, R. Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112982</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112982</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of YOga in people with chronic non-specific low BACK pain and poor PROgnosis (YOBACK-PRO): protocol for a randomised clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112982</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112982</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113207?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A patient-mediated strategy to improve nutrition care after transition from hospital to home for pancreatic cancer surgery: a pilot randomised controlled trial study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113207?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Nutrition counselling is recommended after pancreatic cancer surgery given the complex nutritional problems patients experience. In practice, access and delivery of nutrition counselling after pancreatic surgery varies across settings. To address this gap, our study team developed the Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance (STRONG) programme, an implementation strategy that addresses common barriers to nutrition care delivery in oncology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The STRONG programme includes a standardised protocol to specify the timing and amount of nutrition counselling that should be delivered and patient-mediated implementation strategies including collection of patient-reported information, an educational brochure summarising common nutrition problems and recommended dietary strategies after pancreatic surgery and a question prompt list for the patient-dietitian encounter. A pilot randomised controlled trial will be conducted to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the STRONG programme compared with usual care in pancreatic cancer surgery patients after hospital discharge (n = 80). The trial is designed to be pragmatic and integrated into existing workflows and clinic teams. The primary goal will be to compare feasibility and acceptability outcomes against pre-planned benchmarks. Data will be collected from patients and caregivers and healthcare providers who assist with STRONG implementation. Secondary goals include collecting preliminary data on effectiveness and implementation outcomes that will support a future definitive hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Moffitt Cancer Center Institutional Review Board of Record, Advarra (Pro00071143). Participants will be required to provide written consent prior to enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through plain language summaries, conference abstracts and peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov <A HREF="NCT06001268">NCT06001268</A>. Registered on 21 August 2023, prior to participant enrolment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turner, K., Milano, J., Santiago, C., Coutinho, J., Sprow, O., Hume, E., Nardella, N., Alishahi Tabriz, A., Islam, J. Y., Hodul, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T05:51:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113207</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113207</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A patient-mediated strategy to improve nutrition care after transition from hospital to home for pancreatic cancer surgery: a pilot randomised controlled trial study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113207</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e094885?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical effects of the use of a novel oropharyngeal airway in painless gastroscopy in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e094885?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Obstructive sleep apnoea&ndash;hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterised by partial or complete obstruction of the upper respiratory tract. Owing to their relevant physiological anatomy, patients with OSAHS often experience severe respiratory complications, such as airway obstruction and hypoxaemia, during painless gastroscopy. In addition, the use of the shared airway approach increases the difficulty of airway management. At present, simple and effective tools for airway management for use during gastroscopy in clinical practice are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate whether a novel oropharyngeal airway designed for use in endoscopy can effectively relieve airway obstruction and prevent hypoxaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>In this prospective, randomised, controlled clinical study, 130 patients with OSAHS diagnosed via polysomnography monitoring will be randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group will receive the novel oropharyngeal airway, whereas the control group will receive a conventional bite block. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hypoxia (75%&le;SpO<SUB>2</SUB> (pulse oxygen saturation)&lt;90%, &le;60 s), and the secondary outcome measure will be the incidence of severe hypoxia (SpO<SUB>2</SUB>&lt;75% or 75%&le;SpO<SUB>2</SUB>&lt;90%, &ge;60 s). The rate of airway intervention, the doses of additional drugs used during the operation, endoscopist and patient satisfaction with the procedure, and the incidence of various adverse events will be recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The Institutional Review Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Qianfoshan Hospital) approved the experimental protocol on 22 August 2024 (ethics number: YXLL-KY-2024(084)). The results of this study will be reported in peer-reviewed journals and relevant academic conferences or related research platforms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT:06594380">NCT06594380</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[You, Q., Liu, X., Meng, Y., Zhu, Y., Sun, C., Wu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094885</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-094885</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical effects of the use of a novel oropharyngeal airway in painless gastroscopy in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome: a randomised controlled trial protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e094885</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e094885</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095486?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness analysis of low bone mass prevention in Chinese older men with excessive alcohol consumption: a modelling study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095486?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>China has a high disease burden of low bone mass, and elderly men with excessive alcohol consumption may be underdiagnosed and undertreated given the adverse effects on skeletal health. This study implemented an economic evaluation to assess the screening plus receiving anti-osteoporotic medication for low bone mass prevention in older men with excessive alcohol intake.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>A patient-level Markov model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Chinese men aged over 60 years with excessive alcohol consumption.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Receiving screening plus medication considered with two eligibility strategies for therapy: osteoporosis and osteopenia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcomes</st>
<p>The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime cost and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated for different strategies relative to no screening. Scenario analyses were conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness associated with risk factors, study perspectives and selection of medication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>From the healthcare perspective, the prevention strategies for men aged over 70 years were cost-effective with the ICER of $28 403/QALY for osteoporosis and $24 560/QALY for osteopenia. Scenario analyses revealed screening strategies were cost-effective in men with risk factors aged over 60 years. In the selection of medication, denosumab might be dominant. From the societal perspective, prevention for osteopenia aged from 60 years was cost-effective at the ICER of $36 524/QALY.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings suggest that prevention strategies for Chinese older men with excessive alcohol consumption would be cost-effective. Early screening initiation will aid efforts in improving skeletal health for men with excessive alcohol intake in China and reducing humanistic and economic burdens.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, X., Liu, J., Wang, L., Liu, T., Zhang, Y., Moriwaki, K., You, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095486</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095486</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness analysis of low bone mass prevention in Chinese older men with excessive alcohol consumption: a modelling study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095486</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095486</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e096313?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic factors for mortality in patients infected with New World hantaviruses: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e096313?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>One of the challenges in managing patients with hantavirus infection is accurately identifying individuals who are at risk of developing severe disease. Prompt identification of these patients can facilitate critical decisions, such as early referral to an intensive care unit. The identified prognostic factors could be of utility in guiding medical care to enhance the management of hantavirus infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify and evaluate prognostic factors associated with mortality in hantavirus infection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-reported systematic review following Cochrane guidance adapted for prognosis. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biblioteca Virtual de Sa&uacute;de or Lilac and EMBASE, from 1 January 1993 to 2 October 2025. We included studies evaluating individual prognostic factors or risk assessment models of New World hantavirus infections, with no restrictions on study design, publication status or language. When feasible, we conducted meta-analyses for prognostic factors using the inverse variance-based method with random effect model. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 25 studies with a total of 7284 participants. We identified the following prognostic factors for which we found moderate to high certainty that are associated with increased mortality: age over 18 years, female sex, rural residence, elevated creatinine levels, increased haematocrit, signs of bleeding and the presence of infiltrates on chest radiographs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Our systematic review identified prognostic factors for mortality in patients with New World hantavirus infection. These factors can inform clinicians in making more informed management decisions. Furthermore, our findings lay the groundwork for the future development of a clinical prognostic model, potentially enhancing patient care and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42021225823.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tortosa, F., Ragusa, M. A., Neumann, I., Perre, F., Guaresti, G., Donato, M., Izcovich, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096313</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096313</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic factors for mortality in patients infected with New World hantaviruses: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096313</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096313</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097650?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of small airtime rewards linked to unsolicited text messages on uptake of a tuberculosis self-screening app in South Africa: a randomised trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097650?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The objective of this study was to test whether an airtime reward increased tuberculosis (TB) Check screening uptake. This served as a feasibility study for the planned Phase 2, which aimed to test behavioural messaging to boost take-up of TB testing among users who were advised to get tested by TB Check.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The study was a randomised controlled trial with a parallel design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study assessed mHealth support to boost TB testing in high-burden Cape Town clinics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Patients aged 18 or above with a valid mobile phone number that had been added within the last 5 years were invited by the Western Cape Department of Health and Wellness through unsolicited text messages to screen for TB using TB Check.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients in the intervention group (n=1250) were additionally offered R15 airtime for completing the screening and participating in the research study. Patients were allocated to the intervention or control group through parallel randomisation with equal group size.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the number of TB Check screenings completed within 1 week of the SMS invitation being sent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Messages were successfully delivered to 616 patients in the control group and 633 patients in the intervention group. Uptake of the invitation by the intended recipients was very low. Eight users in the control group and 20 users in the intervention group initiated a self-screening (1.3% vs 3.2% of delivered messages; 95% CI of difference (0.2 to 3.5)), but only three users in the control group and seven users in the intervention group successfully completed a self-screening (0.49% vs 1.11% of delivered messages; 95% CI of difference (&ndash;0.4 to 1.6)). Low delivery of text message invitations (50.0%) and low completion of users who started the screening (35.7%) posed additional challenges. No adverse events were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The addition of a small airtime participation reward to unsolicited text message invitations did not appear to be an effective tool to reach targeted individuals in this context. The results of Phase 1 reported here suggested that Phase 2 would not be feasible, so we did not proceed with the planned Phase 2. However, uptake of incentivised self-screening was unexpectedly high among users who were not originally invited (presumably known contacts of the original invitees). Within 5 days of the invitations being sent, 1962 unique self-screenings had taken place using the incentive code; only 7 of these users were originally invited. The lessons learnt from this study can help to inform future efforts to promote TB self-screening, mHealth initiatives and attempts to engage with patients via text message.&nbsp;</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>The study was pre-registered with the South African National Clinical Trials Registry (Phase 1 trial no DOH-27-112023-9045, Phase 2 trial no DOH-27-112023-4944) and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (Phase 1 trial no PACTR202311529334858).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich, K., Burger, R., Boulle, A., Goldberg, D., Gqada, N., Hynek, J.-P., Loff, A., Naidoo, P., Nair, D., von Delft, A., Rieger, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097650</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097650</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of small airtime rewards linked to unsolicited text messages on uptake of a tuberculosis self-screening app in South Africa: a randomised trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097650</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097650</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099539?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of digital supportive supervision (DiSS) on the extent of maternal and child healthcare service utilisation in India: a sequential mixed-methods quasi-experimental study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099539?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the impact of digital supportive supervision (DiSS) for maternal and child healthcare on utilisation of services in Rajasthan state of India, as well as exploring the perceived enablers and barriers to the implementation of DiSS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We employed a sequential mixed-method study design. Routine monthly service data from April 2016 to March 2023 were analysed using an interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis with a control group, followed by qualitative in-depth key-informant interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study is set at the primary healthcare level in Rajasthan state in India, where maternal health, child health and nutrition (MCHN) sessions are conducted at village level to deliver essential maternal and child health services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Based on the proportion of MCHN sessions supervised digitally, two districts demonstrating high DiSS uptake were selected as intervention districts, and two matched districts were identified as comparator districts, creating a quasi-experimental design. Using routine data extracted from the pregnancy, child tracking and health services database, a segmented regression analysis using ITS was undertaken to assess temporal changes in service utilisation. For the qualitative component, we purposively sampled supervisors in intervention districts (ranked by DiSS supervisory volume) and conducted interviews until thematic saturation (n=18).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>The intervention involved digitising the traditional paper-based supportive supervision of MCHN sessions in Rajasthan through a DiSS tool. Supervisors across state, district, block and sector levels used smartphones or tablets to record MCHN session data offline, which was automatically analysed and reported on dashboards on submission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measure</st>
<p>The study aims to measure the change in the monthly rate of MCHN service uptake following the rollout of DiSS in Rajasthan state.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Pentavalent and inactivated-polio vaccine uptake significantly improved in the intervention group, while no change was observed in the comparator group. Both groups showed significant improvement in the iron and folic acid supplementation among pregnant women and uptake of BCG, Hepatitis B birth dose and Measles vaccines among children, with greater increase in the intervention group. Notably, pneumococcal-conjugate-vaccine uptake declined significantly in the comparator group, whereas no significant change occurred in the intervention group. Limited digital literacy during the initial rollout and compatibility restriction of the digital application to Android devices were chief barriers. Among the enablers, its user-friendly interface, offline functionality, GIS-based monitoring and automated report generation were reported to enhance the timeliness, accountability and efficiency of supportive supervision. This, in turn, strengthened the feedback loop, empowering programme managers to promptly identify and address any shortcomings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>DiSS has the potential to strengthen the healthcare system and significantly improve the utilisation of MCHN services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharda, S., Singh, P., Trakroo, A., Agrawal, P. K., Goyal, A., Agarwal, A., Chawla, M., Joshi, A., Singh, S., Singh, R., Kshtriya, P., DAquino, L., Kumar, S., Prinja, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099539</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099539</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of digital supportive supervision (DiSS) on the extent of maternal and child healthcare service utilisation in India: a sequential mixed-methods quasi-experimental study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099539</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099539</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099627?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breaking barriers: feasibility of a cluster randomised trial evaluating an instrument for identifying and ameliorating adverse drug reactions]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099627?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the ADRe Profile in UK primary care. The ADRe Profile is a patient monitoring system to identify and address adverse drug reactions (ADR) and ADR-related issues to pre-empt clinical deterioration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A preliminary study to test the feasibility of an RCT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>General practices (GPs) in South-West Wales, UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>20 patients aged &gt;64 and prescribed &gt;4 long-term medicines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants reported their health-related problems using the ADRe-Profile. Participants completed the profile independently initially, then with researcher support, capturing vital signs, clinical observations and patient-reported symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Feasibility was assessed based on recruitment, retention, adherence to protocols, potential for clinical impact and staff costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We recruited two GP practices (0.94% of 213 contacted), and 20 patients aged &gt;64 (51.3% of those approached). Retention was 100%. ADRe Profiles had a 98.29% completion rate, identifying 289 clinical problems, including pain (16 of 20 patients), dyspnoea (10/20), dizziness (8/20), bleeding/bruising (7/20) and falls (4/20). Most problems (90%) and vital signs (78%) recorded on ADRe Profiles were absent from existing patient records. Researchers recommended further investigations (164 instances) and interventions (126 suggestions). Despite the potential for clinical benefits, engagement from clinicians was limited. Cost estimates for ADRe administration ranged from &pound;40 to &pound;73, within the funding available from Health and Care Research Wales.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>An RCT of the ADRe Profile was feasible, despite gatekeeping by clinicians. Recruitment of GP practices was challenging, with &lt;1% of eligible practices participating. In contrast, patient recruitment and retention were successful. ADRe aligns with WHO patient safety goals and could improve healthcare by addressing ADR-related problems proactively in this vulnerable population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04663360">NCT04663360; Pre-Results</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Logan, V., Hughes, D., Turner, A., Carter, N., Jordan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099627</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099627</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Pharmacology and therapeutics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breaking barriers: feasibility of a cluster randomised trial evaluating an instrument for identifying and ameliorating adverse drug reactions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Pharmacology and therapeutics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099627</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099627</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100781?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Qualitative study on body image disturbance in young and middle-aged women with breast cancer in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100781?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore how young and middle-aged Chinese women with breast cancer perceive and emotionally respond to changes in their physical appearance and function during treatment and social interactions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive phenomenological qualitative study using Colaizzi&rsquo;s seven-step analysis method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Breast surgery departments of two tertiary hospitals in North and Central China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study included a purposive sample of 18 young and middle-aged women (18&ndash;59 years old) with pathologically confirmed breast cancer who had received a mastectomy and obtained a score &ge;10 on the Body Image Scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data collection and analysis</st>
<p>In-depth, semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted from January to October 2024 to collect data. The data were analysed using Colaizzi&rsquo;s phenomenological analysis method to identify and interpret the main themes representing participants&rsquo; lived experiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four main themes and 11 sub-themes were identified. Theme 1, &lsquo;Perceived social group pressure&rsquo;, included family burdens, peer influence and public scrutiny. Theme 2, &lsquo;Emotional reactions to social pressure&rsquo;, covered strong desire to survive, ambivalence towards visits and existential confusion. Theme 3, &lsquo;Perception of physical changes&rsquo;, involved feelings of physical weakness, hair loss and body shame, weight and self-image bias. In Theme 4, &lsquo;Coping and Meaning Reconstruction&rsquo;, there were social withdrawal and the experience of positive psychological growth after encountering adversity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The research describes the psychological and social pressures breast cancer patients and survivors experience during treatment and gives recommendations to garner understanding and support for this patient group concerning body image disturbance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, H., Wang, L., Gao, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X., Gao, Y., Guo, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100781</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100781</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Qualitative study on body image disturbance in young and middle-aged women with breast cancer in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical management</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100781</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100781</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of positive parental involvement in preventing drug and substance misuse among young people in Zimbabwe: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Our study explores the potential of positive parental involvement in preventing drug and substance misuse among young people in Zimbabwe.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We adopted a qualitative approach to explore the role of positive parental involvement in preventing drug and substance misuse. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with purposively sampled young people, parents/caregivers and key informants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in Harare, Zimbabwe, in a suburb known as Highfield. Highfield is a high-density suburb located in the southern part of the capital city.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The participants for the study included young people (n=15), aged 16 years and older, with or without a history of drug and substance misuse; parents/caregivers (n=15), aged 18 years and older, experiencing drug and substance misuse in the household or community and key informants (n=10), aged 18 years and older, knowledgeable about drug and substance misuse.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>The study aimed to explore the potential of positive parental involvement in preventing drug and substance misuse among young people in Zimbabwe.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We established several strategies for positive parental involvement in preventing drug and substance misuse. Parents should be unequivocal and set clear rules within the family that they do not condone the misuse of drugs and substances. However, this should be done in an environment that allows young people to share their views and opinions. Parents should also consistently monitor the actions and behaviours of their children. This is key in establishing signs of early indulgence in drug and substance misuse, allowing activation of appropriate support and care. Most young people are not aware of the dangers of drug and substance misuse; hence, parents need to raise awareness. Barriers to positive parental involvement include absenteeism of parents due to livelihood demands, making it difficult to enforce consistent supervision, as well as the lack of skills to engage young people in a way that enhances their appreciation of the effects of drug and substance misuse. However, initiatives like parenting programmes can potentially equip parents with the requisite skills that are needed to be able to steer young people away from drug and substance misuse.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Positive parental involvement is key in preventing drug and substance misuse by young people. However, positive parental involvement should be complemented by community efforts in the form of drug-intolerant communities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kusemwa, C., Kabonga, I., Mazuruse, I., Musara, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102153</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102153</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of positive parental involvement in preventing drug and substance misuse among young people in Zimbabwe: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102153</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103171?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a two-stage machine learning model for personalised type 2 diabetes screening in the All of Us Research Program and UK Biobank]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103171?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop and externally validate a two-stage machine learning framework that integrates polygenic risk and clinical variables for early identification of individuals at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a prospective prediction study using data from the All of Us Research Program for model development and the UK Biobank for external validation. Two models were constructed. Stage 1 used gradient boosted decision trees (XGBoost) with cross validation, automated hyperparameter optimisation and class weighting to predict 5-year incident type 2 diabetes using demographic, clinical and polygenic predictors. Stage 2 incorporated glycated haemoglobin or fasting glucose measurements to refine risk estimates. Model interpretation used SHapley Additive exPlanations values and permutation importance, and logistic regression and random forest models served as comparators. Discrimination of all models was compared using the DeLong test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The Stage 1 model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.81 in All of Us and 0.82 in UK Biobank, performing significantly better than the phenotype-only model in UK Biobank (DeLong p=1.05<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;</sup>&#x2077;&#x2076;). Higher polygenic risk quartiles were associated with increased incidence of type 2 diabetes in both cohorts (global <sup>2</sup> p&lt;0.001). The Stage 2 model achieved AUROC values of 0.78 in All of Us and 0.77 in UK Biobank. Subgroup performance was consistent across sex and ancestry groups, with CIs reported. Cost analysis suggested potential net savings compared with the American Diabetes Association test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A two-stage machine learning framework that integrates genetic and clinical information can support personalised screening for type 2 diabetes across diverse populations. The approach demonstrated robust performance across cohorts and offers a practical structure for early risk identification.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khattab, A., Chen, S.-F., Sadaei, H. J., Wineinger, N. E., Torkamani, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103171</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103171</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and validation of a two-stage machine learning model for personalised type 2 diabetes screening in the All of Us Research Program and UK Biobank]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103171</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103943?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient satisfaction and associated factors in plastic and hand reconstructive surgery at ALERT hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study using PSQ-18 and O-PAHC scales]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103943?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess patient satisfaction and identify associated factors in plastic and hand reconstructive surgery at ALERT Comprehensive Specialised Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from February to March 2023 using a structured questionnaire that incorporated the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form and the Outpatient Assessment of healthcare scales. Patient satisfaction was measured using a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression were employed using Stata V.17.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>ALERT Comprehensive Specialised Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 391 systematically selected adult patients attended the plastic and hand reconstructive surgery outpatient departments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Overall patient satisfaction and factors influencing satisfaction with surgical services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 379 respondents (response rate 96.9%), 51.2% were male. The overall patient satisfaction rate was 75.7%. However, 78.6% experienced long waiting times (mean: 2 hours 15 min), 84.4% reported inadequate information provision, and 90.3% indicated that medical care was unaffordable. Significant factors associated with higher satisfaction included age 30&ndash;39 years (AOR=2.7; 95% CI 1.09 to 6.83), having laboratory tests ordered (AOR=2.03; 95% CI 1.03 to 4.03) and X-ray/ultrasound imaging (AOR=2.20; 95% CI 1.19 to 4.06). Patients who received care free of charge were less likely to be satisfied compared with those paying out of pocket (AOR=0.23; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.82).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Although overall satisfaction was moderately high, significant dissatisfaction was reported regarding service accessibility, waiting times, communication and affordability. Targeted interventions in these areas are recommended to improve patient-centred care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birrye, N. D., Kumsa, T. H., Kiltu, A. B., Tafesse, D. S., Sahile, A. T., Achalu, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103943</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103943</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient satisfaction and associated factors in plastic and hand reconstructive surgery at ALERT hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study using PSQ-18 and O-PAHC scales]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103943</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103943</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104359?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the impact of automated devices for enhancing health and reducing medication errors in older adults with long-term health conditions (ADHERE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes, UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104359?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Medication non-adherence in older adults with long-term conditions contributes to significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. While adherence support tools exist, many interventions fail to reach those most at risk. Automated medication dispensers (AMDs) show promise in improving adherence and health outcomes, but their integration into routine community pharmacy practice remains underexplored. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an AMD intervention with SMS reminders in enhancing medication adherence among older adults and to evaluate how this technology can be integrated into community pharmacy workflows.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This randomised controlled trial involves 144 participants recruited from eight community pharmacies who will be randomised to receive either the AMD intervention or usual care. Primary outcomes include medication adherence, measured through pharmacy records and self-report at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes include Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, health-related quality of life (SF-12), and healthcare resource use. A nested mixed methods process evaluation will explore uptake, acceptability and implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been approved by the University of Bedfordshire Institute for Health Research Ethics Committee (IHREC1039), the NHS and the local authority Research Governance and Research Ethics Committee (NHS REC reference: 25/EE/0026). The findings will be disseminated via a final report, peer-reviewed journal publications and presentations at relevant conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN18849739">ISRCTN18849739</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wainwright, J. E., Bennett, A., Randhawa, G., Pappas, Y., Singh, H., Cook, E. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104359</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104359</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the impact of automated devices for enhancing health and reducing medication errors in older adults with long-term health conditions (ADHERE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes, UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104359</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104802?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the acceptance of medical marijuana among Malaysian adults: a cross-sectional online survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104802?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Global discussions surrounding the medical use of marijuana have gained momentum; yet in Malaysia, cannabis remains strictly prohibited under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952. Despite its legal status, there is growing public discourse on its potential therapeutic benefits. Understanding public acceptance is critical for informing future health policies and public education efforts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study used a cross-sectional design, web-based survey among Malaysians aged 18 years and above using convenience and snowball sampling methods. The survey collected data on sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors (eg, smoking and drug use), awareness of medical marijuana and perceived risk. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with acceptance of medical marijuana decriminalisation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of 2047 respondents, 88.4% supported medical marijuana decriminalisation based on clinical evidence. Key predictors of acceptance included male gender (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.71; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.26), higher education (Bachelor&rsquo;s degree AOR 1.56; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.23 and Master&rsquo;s/PhD AOR 2.04; 95% CI 1.34 to 3.10), self-employment (AOR 1.84; 95% CI 1.22 to 2.77) and private sector employment (AOR 1.40; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.89). Behavioural factors, such as smoking (AOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.27), prior drug use (AOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.67) and low perceived risk (AOR 5.82; 95% CI 3.48 to 9.73), were also significantly associated with acceptance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A large proportion of Malaysian adults supported the clinical use of medical marijuana. Acceptance was strongly associated with demographic and behavioural factors, particularly gender, education and perceived risk. These findings may guide the development of targeted public health education and inform future discussions on regulatory approaches in Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahman, A. B., Naserrudin, N. A., Seman, Z., Zin, Z. M., Dapari, R., Hassan, M. R., Rashid, A. A., Dahaban, M. U. M., Jahaya, N. H., Balamurugan, H., Krishnan, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104802</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104802</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the acceptance of medical marijuana among Malaysian adults: a cross-sectional online survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104802</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104802</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105511?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bridging the gap in the UKs National Health Service integrated care systems: insights from a mixed methods implementation evaluation of UCLP-PRIMROSE, a care innovation to reduce physical health inequalities for people with severe mental illness]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105511?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We aimed to determine whether UCLP-PRIMROSE (a care innovation to reduce physical health inequalities for people with severe mental illness) could be set up in the current UK National Health Service (NHS) context and identify the processes, barriers and facilitators to implementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We employed a convergent mixed methods approach, combining interviews, ethnographic site visits and the collection of meeting notes and uptake data for core model components. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, and all qualitative data, including interview transcripts, were analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Qualitative work and insights from implementation uptake frequencies were integrated using Normalisation Process Theory.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>We evaluated implementation in Yorkshire and three London boroughs, mainly within general practices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We conducted interviews with 39 staff members who were implementing and/or delivering UCLP-PRIMROSE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>UCLP-PRIMROSE is an integrated evidence-based care pathway developed to reduce cardiovascular disease risk and mental health relapse in people with severe mental illness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Adaptation and delivery varied in completeness and consistency across 24 general practices and their wider care teams. Factors outside the implementation teams&rsquo; influence challenged the embedding of UCLP-PRIMROSE. Factors included the impact from the immaturity of NHS integrated care systems, unintended consequences of the incentivised NHS severe mental illness physical health check and limited capacity for implementing in a system facing resourcing challenges. Drivers of successful implementation included staff being aligned with the values of the UCLP-PRIMROSE model and system leaders acting as champions. Supportive foundational processes acted as facilitators: these included protected and prioritised time for reflection, learning and problem solving.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Implementation of UCLP-PRIMROSE was moderately successful in a relatively short period of time. At the end of the research, all teams wanted to sustain delivery. However, further pathway simplification and additional resources are required to spread UCLP-PRIMROSE beyond early pockets of good practice.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaw, P., Khurshid, Z., Lamb, D., Stevenson, F. A., Russell, G., Hudson, K., Rehill, N., Copsey, G., Kearney, M., Beveridge, E., Prenelle, I., Osborn, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105511</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105511</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bridging the gap in the UKs National Health Service integrated care systems: insights from a mixed methods implementation evaluation of UCLP-PRIMROSE, a care innovation to reduce physical health inequalities for people with severe mental illness]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105511</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105511</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106730?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Direct, indirect and intangible costs incurred by leptospirosis patients: the magnitude, aspects and methods of assessing the costs - a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106730?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Leptospirosis is a significant public health concern worldwide, as it imposes a substantial economic burden on the global economy. Despite a comprehensive search of the relevant literature, few studies evaluating the economic burden experienced by leptospirosis patients were identified. In particular, very few studies thoroughly examined the cost components, including direct, indirect and intangible costs. This paucity of evidence further motivates the need to conduct a more focused search using a systematic review approach. Thus, this study aims to systematically review the global literature on the magnitude and aspects of the direct, indirect and intangible costs incurred by leptospirosis patients and the methods available for assessing these costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2015 guidelines. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design framework was used to develop the review questions. The search strategy will comprise two key term blocks: &lsquo;Leptospirosis&rsquo; and &lsquo;Economic cost&rsquo;. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EconStor and IDEAS to collect publications from inception to July 2025. The search will be limited only to English-language and peer-reviewed publications. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to assess the quality of eligible studies. Extracted cost data will be categorised into direct, indirect and intangible costs. A meta-analysis will be conducted to quantify the magnitude of these costs if sufficient methodological and contextual homogeneity exists. Moreover, a narrative synthesis will be performed to analyse the qualitative data related to intangible costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this study will use secondary data, ethical approval is not required. The systematic review&rsquo;s findings will be published in a scientific journal and presented at relevant conferences to address the knowledge gap regarding the economic burden (including direct, indirect and intangible costs) faced by leptospirosis patients. The results of this systematic review will guide policies for prioritising prevention, improving surveillance and efficiently allocating resources to control leptospirosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>PROSPERO CRD 42024585056.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayasinghe, M. S., Warnasekara, J., Gunarathna, S. P., Wickramasinghe, N. D., Agampodi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106730</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106730</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Direct, indirect and intangible costs incurred by leptospirosis patients: the magnitude, aspects and methods of assessing the costs - a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106730</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106730</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106790?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevention of secondary infections by interferon-gamma in ICU-acquired sustained immune suppression in France: study protocol of the PLATINIUM randomised trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106790?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Some intensive care unit (ICU) patients develop an extremely deep and sustained immunosuppression that increases the risk of secondary infections and can ultimately compromise survival. Thanks to an easily accessible and simplified immune monitoring to identify immunological failure, a personalised immune restoration approach is now feasible. Among the different therapeutic strategies in this field, interferon gamma (IFN-) is probably the most interesting drug to reduce the burden of secondary infections in the ICU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a two parallel group multicentre blinded add-on randomised trial comparing immunorestoration by subcutaneous injection of IFN- to standard of care in targeted ICU patients. The study will be performed in 23 ICUs in France. Patients hospitalised in the ICU for a week, with multiple organ failure defined by a sequential organ failure assessment score &ge;6 during this first week, will be enrolled. If within 96 hours after inclusion, these patients express immunosuppressed features defined by a low absolute lymphocyte count (&lt;1000/<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>9</sup>/L) and low expression of human leucocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) on monocytes (&lt;8000 antibodies bound per cell [Ab/c]) they will be randomised (1:1) to receive either five subcutaneous injections of IFN- or placebo in addition to standard of care. The primary outcome will be the incidence of secondary infection episodes at day 90 validated by an independent adjudication committee based on the current definitions (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance definitions). Secondary outcomes will be all-cause ICU mortality at day 90, length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital at day 90, antibiotic and antifungal consumption at day 90, percentage of biological immune restoration (defined as a monocytic HLA-DR &gt;13 500 antibodies bound per cell and an absolute lymphocyte count &gt;1200 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>9</sup>/L) at day 10, healthcare costs at day 90 and rate of serious adverse reactions and suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction at day 90. We plan to randomise 326 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study will be implemented in accordance with European regulations and was independently reviewed and approved by the French Ethics Committee <I>Comit&eacute; de Protection des Personnes Ile de France III</I> (EUCT number: 2024-516780-93-00). The results will be reported in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at international and national conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06774235">NCT06774235</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hernandez Padilla, A. C., Daix, T., Hotchkiss, R. S., Monneret, G., Tadie, J. M., Jeannet, R., Plateker, O., Vaidie, J., Durand-Zaleski, I., Magne, J., Giraudeau, B., Francois, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106790</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106790</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevention of secondary infections by interferon-gamma in ICU-acquired sustained immune suppression in France: study protocol of the PLATINIUM randomised trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106790</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106790</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107061?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[BPD prediction model for very preterm infants integrating chest X-ray scores within 7 days: a retrospective case-control study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107061?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To identify risk factors and develop an early prediction model for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants with a gestational age (GA) under 32 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A single-centre, retrospective case&ndash;control study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Fujian Province, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>762 infants (GA under 32 weeks, survived beyond the corrected GA of 36 weeks) who were hospitalised in our department between January 2018 and December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the diagnosis of BPD at 36 weeks of corrected GA, with diagnostic criteria based on the 2018 criteria established by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 762 infants was enrolled in the study, including 572 in the training cohort, among whom 138 (24.13%) had BPD. Multivariate logistic regression identified the following as independent predictors for BPD development: birth weight (OR=0.997, 95% CI 0.996 to 0.998, p&lt;0.001), chest X-ray score within 24 hours of birth (OR=1.777, 95% CI 1.253 to 2.521, p=0.001), chest X-ray score at day 7 after birth (OR=1.756, 95% CI 1.264 to 2.440, p&lt;0.001) and extended invasive mechanical ventilation to day 7 after birth (OR=4.280, 95% CI 2.149 to 8.526, p&lt;0.001). In training and validation cohorts, the area under the curve was 0.873 (95% CI 0.839 to 0.907) and 0.848 (95% CI 0.778 to 0.917), respectively. In addition, the calibration curves showed good agreement between the column-line graph model and the actual observations. A decision curve analysis indicated a significantly better net benefit of the model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Higher chest X-ray scores within 7 days of life and extended invasive mechanical ventilation to day 7 after birth were significantly associated with BPD. The model had good predictive performance for predicting BPD using birth weight, chest X-ray scores within 24 hours of birth and at day 7 after life, and the state of invasive mechanical ventilation at day 7 after birth.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xu, L., Dai, S., Lin, L., Chen, W., Shi, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107061</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107061</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[BPD prediction model for very preterm infants integrating chest X-ray scores within 7 days: a retrospective case-control study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107061</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107061</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107608?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial of a Bivalent VaccInation against Salmonella Typhi and Paratyphi A (BiVISTA) using a controlled human infection model of paratyphoid A infection: study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107608?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Enteric fever, primarily caused by <I>Salmonella enterica</I> Typhi and <I>Salmonella enterica</I> Paratyphi A (SPA), is endemic mainly in South Asia, disproportionately affecting school-age children. Although typhoid conjugate vaccines (TCVs) are effective and implemented in many countries, no licensed vaccine exists against paratyphoid A. Bivalent vaccines targeting both S. Typhi and SPA may address this gap. Although field efficacy trials are not considered feasible, controlled human infection models (CHIMs) offer an alternative pathway for evaluating vaccine efficacy. This will be the first efficacy study of a bivalent vaccine against typhoid and paratyphoid A using a paratyphoid CHIM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a phase II multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy and immunogenicity of a bivalent conjugate vaccine candidate, Serum Institute of India Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine (Bivalent) (SII-TCV(B)), against SPA using a CHIM in healthy UK adults aged 18&ndash;55 years. A total of 192 participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either SII-TCV(B) or a licensed Vi-polysaccharide typhoid vaccine (Vi-PS). All participants will be orally challenged with S. Paratyphi A (strain NVGH308) 28 days postvaccination. Participants will be monitored closely for 14 days and treated at 14 days postchallenge or promptly on diagnosis, according to prespecified criteria. The primary objective is to evaluate vaccine efficacy of SII-TCV(B) against paratyphoid infection using a CHIM. The coprimary immunogenicity objective is to assess non-inferiority of the typhoid IgG response compared with a licensed Vi-PS control.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received ethical approval from the Berkshire Research Ethics Committee (24/SC/0309) and regulatory approval from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN65855590">ISRCTN65855590</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paganotti Vicentine, M., McCann, N., Hennigan, O., Maria, N., Juarez Molina, C. I., Koleva, S., Islam, M. K., Jones, E., Flaxman, A., Day, N., MacDonald, A., Adnan, M., Singh, N., Vernon, S., Wilson, E., Potey, A. V., Dharmadhikari, A., Gaidhane, S., Kulkarni, P. S., Robinson, H., Aley, P., Kim, Y. C., Angus, B., Liu, X., Ramasamy, M. N., Pollard, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107608</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107608</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial of a Bivalent VaccInation against Salmonella Typhi and Paratyphi A (BiVISTA) using a controlled human infection model of paratyphoid A infection: study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107608</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107608</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107775?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of melatonin versus placebo for the prevention of delirium among medically hospitalised older patients: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial (project RESTORE)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107775?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the efficacy of melatonin, a neurohormone regulating the sleep&ndash;wake cycle, in preventing delirium within 5 days of hospitalisation among older adult patients (&ge;65 years) admitted to general medical wards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Single-centre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>General medical wards of a tertiary hospital in Oman.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients aged &ge;65 years admitted within 24 hours to general medical wards were screened. Key exclusion criteria included prevalent delirium, use of vasopressors, non-invasive ventilation, intensive or high-dependency unit admission and aphasia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 5 mg or 8 mg of melatonin or a placebo nightly for up to 5 days during hospitalisation or until discharge, whichever occurred first.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within 5 days, assessed using the 3-Minute Diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method. Secondary outcomes included delirium treatment, average sleep duration or sleep maintained, 28-day mortality and 28-day readmission. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, with per-protocol (PP) analyses conducted for robustness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study was terminated early due to futility. At termination, a total of 115 participants were recruited, 109 of whom were included in the ITT analyses: 55 in the melatonin group (5 mg or 8 mg) and 54 in the placebo group. The overall incidence of delirium by day 5 was 2.75%, 3.64% in the melatonin group and 1.85% in the placebo group (p=1.000). No statistically significant differences were found in the average sleep duration (p=0.136), 28-day mortality (3.64% vs 1.85%, p=1.000) or 28-day readmission (21.82% vs 20.37%, p=0.853). PP analyses and subgroup sensitivity yielded similar findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this trial, melatonin did not significantly reduce the incidence of delirium. The lower-than-expected numbers of outcome events and resultant early termination for futility limited the study&rsquo;s power. As a result, the study findings should be interpreted with caution, and further research is necessary before definitive recommendations can be made.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06509191">NCT06509191</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Alawi, A. M., Al Busaidi, S., Al Rasbi, S. K., Al Farsi, R. S., Al Zeedy, K., Al Huraizi, A. R., Al-Maqbali, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107775</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107775</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical management]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of melatonin versus placebo for the prevention of delirium among medically hospitalised older patients: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial (project RESTORE)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical management</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107775</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107775</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108171?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a core outcome set for intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in preterm infants: a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108171?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) remains a major contributor to mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment among preterm infants, particularly those born extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight. Although extensive research has investigated various facets of IVH, including prevention, therapeutic interventions, underlying pathophysiology and long-term outcomes, the heterogeneity in selection, measurement and reporting across studies significantly impairs data synthesis through meta-analysis and limits the translation of evidence into clinical practice. To address this issue, we propose the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS) for IVH research in preterm infants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study will follow established guidance from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative and COS-Standards for Development. The sequential phases include: (1) a systematic review to comprehensively identify outcomes previously reported in IVH research involving preterm infants; (2) qualitative interviews with diverse stakeholders (clinicians, researchers and caregivers) to explore perspectives and identify additional relevant outcomes; (3) a multiround Delphi survey to achieve consensus on core outcomes; and (4) a consensus meeting to finalise the COS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The entire project has been approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital (No. 2022-069). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to participation. Study findings will be disseminated through conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dou, H., Li, Y., Li, Y.-X., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Liu, D., Mao, Y., Shi, J., Tang, J., Xiong, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108171</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108171</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a core outcome set for intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) in preterm infants: a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108171</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108171</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109137?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of remimazolam versus propofol under deep sedation for elderly patients during prostate biopsy: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109137?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>With the rapid increase in the ageing population, the use of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for diagnostic procedures such as prostate biopsy in older adults is increasing. However, elderly patients are particularly susceptible to respiratory depression during PSA testing and have a significantly higher risk of hypoxaemia during procedures requiring deep sedation. Although propofol combined with fentanyl is commonly used, it frequently causes hypoxaemia and apnoea. Remimazolam, a novel ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, may be a safer alternative with less respiratory compromise; however, the supporting evidence remains limited. This study aims to assess whether remimazolam combined with fentanyl reduces the incidence of respiratory depression compared with propofol combined with fentanyl in elderly patients undergoing prostate biopsy under deep sedation requiring immobility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, participant and assessor-blinded (with pragmatic blinding of participants), parallel-group, superiority randomised controlled trial conducted at the Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Centre, Japan. Eligible participants are men aged &ge;70 years who are scheduled to undergo prostate biopsy under intravenous sedation. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either remimazolam or propofol, each administered in combination with fentanyl at a fixed effect-site concentration. The primary outcome is the incidence of severe apnoea (&ge;1 min). The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, implemented practically as a full analysis set analysed using a complete case approach. Sensitivity analyses will include a per-protocol analysis and multiple imputations of missing data. A subgroup analysis of patients aged &ge;75 years was performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Jichi Medical University Central Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 24JMU001S-2) and was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on 11 November 2024. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrolment. These findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>jRCTs031240478.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fukano, K., Fukuda, Y., Chiba, Y., Kondo, S., Sawada, I., Miyazawa, K., Otsuka, Y., Iizuka, Y., Shiotsuka, J., Sanui, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109137</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109137</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of remimazolam versus propofol under deep sedation for elderly patients during prostate biopsy: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109137</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109331?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of hearing loss across age groups in Nepal: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109331?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Hearing loss is a global health problem. It is not only an impairment of hearing but also has debilitating effects on the social, emotional and cognitive domains. It also imposes costs on a country&rsquo;s healthcare sector, which must first be identified to prevent the prevalence of the impairment. In a low- and middle-income country like Nepal, there is no published systematic review on the prevalence of hearing loss. We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the national prevalence of hearing loss in Nepal across all age groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will report our findings in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. We will search the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Nepal Journals Online databases for publications in Nepali and English. Google Scholar will also be used to broaden the search scope. We will also search grey literature, like government reports. Studies that report the prevalence of hearing loss in Nepal will be included. Titles and abstracts of the studies will be independently screened by both reviewers (PB and SA) using Rayyan software. Full-text articles that pass the initial screening will also be independently reviewed by both reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion at all stages. If necessary, a third reviewer will be invited, and the original author will be contacted where appropriate (e.g., when data are missing in the original study). We will perform a narrative synthesis of the study results. Cochran&rsquo;s Q test and the I&sup2; statistic will be calculated to assess heterogeneity. I&sup2; values of 25%, 50% and 75% will be interpreted as indicating low, moderate and high heterogeneity, respectively. We will conduct a meta-analysis using a random-effects model, which accounts for both within-study and between-study variability. We will perform a sensitivity analysis to examine whether a single study disproportionately contributes to heterogeneity. Potential publication bias will be evaluated using both visual and statistical approaches (Funnel plot and Egger&rsquo;s test). In addition, if funnel plot asymmetry is observed, trim-and-fill analysis will be conducted. Statistical tests will be performed in R (V.4.3.1) using RStudio (V.2023.06.1+524) with the metafor package for meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this protocol. This review and meta-analysis are based entirely on secondary data; no primary data will be collected. Our findings will be useful to quantify the national prevalence of hearing impairment in Nepal. They may be useful for developing intervention policies and furthering research agendas for government agencies and hearing-health researchers alike. The results will be presented at conferences, published in peer-reviewed journals and shared with relevant policy-making bodies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251120903.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhandari, P., Aryal, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109331</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109331</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of hearing loss across age groups in Nepal: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109331</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109331</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109388?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Agreement testing of AMSTAR-PF, a tool for quality appraisal of systematic reviews of prognostic factor studies]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109388?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To test the agreement and usability of a novel quality appraisal tool: A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews of Prognostic Factor studies (AMSTAR-PF).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>14 appraisers of varied experience levels and backgrounds, including undergraduate, master&rsquo;s and PhD students, postgraduate researchers, research fellows and clinicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study procedure</st>
<p>Eight systematic reviews were rated by all reviewers using AMSTAR-PF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Planned measures included intrapair and inter-pair agreement using Cohen&rsquo;s and Fleiss&rsquo; kappa, time of use and time to reach consensus. Interrater agreement was an added measure, and Gwet&rsquo;s agreement coefficient was calculated and presented due to its greater stability across agreement levels. The percentage of intrapair agreements identical or one category apart was also presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Interrater agreement averaged 0.59 (range 0.21&ndash;0.90), inter-pair agreement 0.61 (range 0.24&ndash;0.91) and intrapair agreement 0.75 (range 0.45&ndash;0.95) across the domains, with agreement for the overall rating 0.46 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.62) for interrater agreement, 0.46 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.74) for inter-pair agreement and 0.68 (range of averages 0.22&ndash;1.00) for intrapair agreement. The majority (60.7%) of intrapair ratings were identical, with 94.6% of final ratings either identical or only one category different for the overall appraisal. The time taken to appraise a study with AMSTAR-PF improved with use and averaged around 34 min after the first two appraisals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Despite some variance in agreement for different domains and between different appraisers, the testing results suggest that AMSTAR-PF has clear utility for appraising the quality of systematic reviews of prognostic factor studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry, M. L., OConnell, N. E., Riley, R. D., Moons, K. G. M., Shea, B. J., Hooft, L., Wallwork, S. B., Damen, J. A. A. G., Skoetz, N., Appiah, R. P., Berryman, C., Crouch, S. M., Ferencz, G. A., Grant, A. R., Henry, K. M., Herman, A. M., Karran, E. L., Koralegedera, I., Leake, H. B., MacIntyre, E., Mouatt, B., Phuentsho, K., Van Der Laan, D. A., Welsby, E., Wiles, L. K., Wilkinson, E. M., Wilson, M. K., Wilson, M. V., Moseley, G. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109388</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109388</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Agreement testing of AMSTAR-PF, a tool for quality appraisal of systematic reviews of prognostic factor studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109388</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109388</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109633?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of low-dose esketamine on hypoxaemia during thoracoscopic non-tracheal intubation anaesthesia: protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109633?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-tracheal intubation anaesthesia for thoracoscopic surgery is associated with intraoperative hypoxaemia. Esketamine has both sedative and analgesic effects, which can increase lung compliance, reduce airway resistance and relax the respiratory smooth muscles. This study will investigate the effectiveness of low-dose esketamine in reducing the incidence of intraoperative hypoxaemia and other adverse events in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery without intubation anaesthesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This randomised controlled trial will enrol patients scheduled for non-intubation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery at Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the esketamine group or the normal saline (placebo) group. The primary outcomes are the incidence of hypoxaemia and the time to its onset, with hypoxaemia defined as an intraoperative pulse oximetry &le;90% lasting for at least 10 s. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of intraoperative hypercapnia (Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO<SUB>2</SUB>) &ge;60 mm Hg); concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 at the end of surgery; postoperative Visual Analogue Scale scores; time to recovery of spontaneous respiration after laryngeal mask placement; time to laryngeal mask removal (measured from the end of surgery); awakening time; incidence of bradycardia (heart rate &lt;60 beats per minute) and hypotension (a &gt;20% reduction in blood pressure from the baseline value); incidence of &le;24-hour postoperative nausea and vomiting and hoarseness; time to ambulation, drinking and eating postoperatively; incidence of pulmonary complications within 2 weeks postoperatively; and length of hospital stay. All analyses will be performed based on using a modified intention-to-treat population principle.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong First Medical University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, with approval number SWYX 2025&ndash;714. The trial is also registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under the identifier ChiCTR2400094821. On completion, the study findings will be prepared for publication and submitted to a relevant peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2400094821.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tian, J., Xu, M., Li, S., Liu, Y., Li, W., Sun, W., Gu, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109633</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109633</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of low-dose esketamine on hypoxaemia during thoracoscopic non-tracheal intubation anaesthesia: protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109633</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109633</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110204?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protective factors for maternal mental health and life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110204?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Mothers&rsquo; mental health and life satisfaction may have been negatively affected due to challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the risk of future crises, knowledge of possible mitigating factors in this population is essential. This study aims to examine whether the pandemic affected the level of protective factors such as social support, physical activity and employment situation, and how these factors are associated with mental distress and life satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were mental distress (measured by the eight-item version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist) and life satisfaction (measured by the Satisfaction With Life Scale). As the first step, we investigated changes in the levels of social support (defined by the number and frequency of social contact), physical activity (average hours of physical activity during a week), employment situation (actively working vs sick leave or unemployed), alcohol consumption (measured by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption) and relationship satisfaction (measured by the five-item version of the Relationship Satisfaction Scale).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We analysed data from two waves of the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (n=~18 000 mothers); one pre-pandemic wave and one wave where half of the sample responded after the onset of the pandemic, with pandemic exposure being defined by questionnaire response timing rather than cohort recruitment. To assess changes in protective factors over time and pandemic exposure, we used difference-in-differences analyses and regression discontinuity design. Associations between protective factors with mental distress and life satisfaction, and possible moderation by pandemic exposure, were investigated using multiple regression models with interaction terms adjusted for potential confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Apart from physical activity, which declined less across time in the pandemic group (B=0.09, 99% CI 0.05 to 0.12), protective factors did not change during the pandemic. Social support, employment situation and relationship satisfaction were associated with mental distress and life satisfaction, whereas physical activity showed a unique relationship with mental distress. Most associations were similar across pandemic exposure groups, except employment situation which appeared to have a stronger protective effect in the pandemic group (&beta;=&ndash;0.12, 99% CI &ndash;0.24 to &ndash;0.00).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Changes over time in self-reported levels of protective factors were generally consistent among mothers independent of the pandemic. These factors appear to play an equally important role for mental distress and life satisfaction both under ordinary circumstances and during public health crises. Our findings enhance the understanding of how potential protective factors among mothers are associated with mental distress and life satisfaction in the context of a global stressor. Future studies should investigate additional mitigating factors that may be particularly relevant during global crises and explore the causal relationship between protective factors, mental health and life satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johannessen, P. M., Madsen, C., Hart, R. K., Lund, I. O., Pettersen, J. H., Gustavson, K., Roysamb, E., Nesvag, R., Brandlistuen, R. E., Ask, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110204</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110204</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protective factors for maternal mental health and life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110204</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110425?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Balloon plus oxytocin or oral misoprostol for labour induction in prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM): protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RUBAPRO2)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110425?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The optimal strategy for induction of labour (IOL) in cases of prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) with an unfavourable cervix is elusive. No study conducted in nulliparous women has shown any one induction method to be superior to any other. In this project, we seek to determine whether IOL with balloon catheter and oxytocin can (1) increase rate of delivery &lt;24 hours and (2) increase patient satisfaction, compared with a low dose of oral misoprostol.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We are conducting a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label therapeutic trial with two parallel arms on nulliparous women with unfavourable cervix showing PROM at term without spontaneous labour.</p>
<p>After 12 hours of PROM, women are randomly assigned to one of two study groups. One group is treated with a balloon catheter for 12 hours, with oxytocin administered after 6 hours. If the balloon is expelled earlier than 6 hours after insertion and the cervix is still unfavourable, another balloon is placed. The other group (control) is treated with 25 &micro;g oral PGE1 every 2 hours until labour starts. After a maximum of eight administrations and a timelapse of 4 hours, if there are no effective uterine contractions, the induction is continued with oxytocin infusion and epidural analgesia if the patient requests it. A total of 520 women will be recruited in five university hospitals in France and randomised at a 1:1 ratio with stratification by study centre.</p>
<p>Main inclusion criteria are nulliparous women with gestational age &ge;37 weeks, PROM without labour beyond 12 hours, unfavourable cervix (Bishop score &lt;6), and singleton pregnancy with cephalic presentation. Main exclusion criteria are contraindication for vaginal delivery, oxytocin, balloon or misoprostol, intrauterine infection, scarred womb, suspicion of genital herpes, known HIV seropositivity, abnormal fetal heart rate and fetal death.</p>
<p>The hierarchical primary endpoints are: (1) Proportion of patients vaginally delivered &lt;24 hours and (2) patient satisfaction according to an EXIT survey before hospital discharge. Three dimensions are explored on the EXIT scale: time taken to give birth, discomfort with IOL and experience of subsequent contractions. We hypothesise that the rate of delivery &lt;24 hours will be 15% higher in the group induced with balloon plus oxytocin (estimated at about 85%) compared with the misoprostol group (estimated at about 70%) (with a two-sided type-1 error of 0.05 and 90% statistical power). For the EXIT dimensions, we aim to demonstrate a difference greater than an effect size of 0.4 (with two-sided type-1 error at 0.017 and 95% power).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The RUBAPRO2 trial was approved by the French national agency for drug safety and committee for protection of persons involved in biomedical research on 15 September 2022. Informed written consent will be obtained from all participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05568745">NCT05568745</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rouzaire, M., Triolaire, A., Vayssiere, C., Sentilhes, L., Barjat, T., Luton, D., Groupe de Recherche en Obstetrique et Gynecologie (GROG) Investigators, Davoust, E., Cabrespine, A., Pereira, B., Gallot, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110425</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110425</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Balloon plus oxytocin or oral misoprostol for labour induction in prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM): protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RUBAPRO2)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110425</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110425</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110765?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PhyCARE reporting guidelines for physiotherapy case reports: a consensus-based development]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110765?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Case reports (CRs) are essential in physiotherapy, yet reporting remains heterogeneous and insufficiently standardised. The 2013 CAse REport (CARE) guideline improves transparency but lacks physiotherapy-specific detail. This study aimed to develop a consensus-driven extension of the CARE reporting guideline to support structured reporting of physiotherapy CRs, encompassing physiotherapy-specific assessments and interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An e-Delphi consensus process study following the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Online.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Forty-four international experts in physiotherapy practice, research and education, along with six core committee members.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Experts objectively scored items for relevance (5-point Likert scale) and provided open-ended responses for each item of the drafts. Scores and responses were analysed to facilitate iterative refinement of the Physiotherapy CAse REport (PhyCARE) reporting guidelines. Consensus was predetermined at over 70% agreement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Round 1 had the majority of items achieving &ge;70% agreement, except two items that did not meet the threshold were revised and replaced with an alternative. Five new items addressing physiotherapy-specific reporting needs were added, and 10 items were relocated. In round 2, all 35 items across 13 domains achieved 84%&ndash;100% agreement. The nomenclature of one domain was revised to &lsquo;Outcomes and Follow-up&rsquo;. Following two e-Delphi rounds, consensus was achieved, and suggestions from online meeting, piloting led to item rephrasing, after which the PhyCARE guidelines were finalised.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The PhyCARE guidelines have the potential to provide a physiotherapy-specific extension of CARE to support structured, transparent and reproducible reporting of physiotherapy CRs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naqvi, W. M., Mishra, G. V., Shaikh, S. Z., Pashine, A. A., Sanchez Romero, E. A., Swaminathan, N., Jiandani, M. P., Herrero, P., Zazulak, B., Macpherson, C. E., Goyal, C., Zadro, J. R., Sahni, P., Innocenti, T., Quazi Syed, Z., Hoogeboom, T., Kiekens, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110765</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110765</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PhyCARE reporting guidelines for physiotherapy case reports: a consensus-based development]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110765</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110765</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111973?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The evidence base of supplementary feeding programmes and SBCC interventions on nutritional and behavioural outcomes globally: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111973?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Suboptimal feeding practices in children under five remain a critical concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Integrated Supplementary Feeding programmes (SFPs) combined with Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) interventions have shown potential, yet global evidence on their design and effectiveness remains scattered across diverse settings and varies widely in scope and quality. This review aims to map global evidence on integrated SFP and SBCC interventions for children aged 6&ndash;59 months, assessing their impact on anthropometric, biochemical, nutritional, health, developmental, functional, microbiological and infant and young child feeding (IYCF) outcomes, and to identify contextual factors, evidence gaps and successful strategies. The review will also aim to document cost effectiveness and economic outcomes of this integrated intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, applying the Population&ndash;Concept&ndash;Context framework and the review title has been registered in Open Science Framework (OSF) (<A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZJ5BG">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZJ5BG</A>). Eligible studies published between 2000 and 2025 will include community-based interventions for children under five that combine SFP and SBCC. The review will focus on SFP interventions delivered through community-based or public health platforms, including but not limited to take home ration, hot cooked meal, micronutrient powders, coupled with SBCC modalities such as home visits, mobile health and mass media campaigns. Comprehensive searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and organisational websites. Two independent reviewers will screen, extract and appraise studies using Covidence and JBI tools. Data will be analysed using descriptive statistics to summarise study characteristics, intervention types and reported outcomes, helping understand patterns across time and settings. Qualitative findings will be synthesised through descriptive content analysis involving coding and theme development. Expected outcomes include a range of study designs from different settings across the globe, covering diverse delivery models of integrated SFP and SBCC with reported outcomes including dietary indicators, anthropometry, nutritional biomarkers, caregiver practices and cost-effectiveness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review is part of a larger cluster randomised controlled trial (NECCTAR) which has received ethical approval from the independent institutional ethics committee of all the participating institutes. The current review will involve only publicly available literature and does not have a separate institutional ethics committee approval. Findings will be disseminated through academic conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration details</st>
<p>The review title has been registered in OSF (<A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZJ5BG">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZJ5BG</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gupta, N., Zode, M., Nair, S. C., Sharieff, S., Padi, S., J, P., Kandpal, V., Swaminathan, S., Kuriyan, R., Jerath, S. G., Kulkarni, B., Lyngdoh, T., NECCTAR Trial Collaborating Group, Radhika, Jaleel, Teena, Chowdavarapu, Ramadass, Das, Kokane, Singhal, Pakhare, Syed, Gaidhane, Telrandhe]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T03:49:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111973</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111973</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The evidence base of supplementary feeding programmes and SBCC interventions on nutritional and behavioural outcomes globally: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111973</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111973</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103227?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between rurality and mortality from major diseases in Japan: an ecological study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103227?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to examine rural&ndash;urban disparities in healthcare outcomes in Japan using the Rurality Index for Japan (RIJ). It evaluated the association between rurality and mortality from five major diseases prioritised by the Japanese government, accounting for socioeconomic and demographic factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An ecological study using publicly available data at municipal and administrative district levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All municipalities and administrative districts within government-designated cities in Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1897 municipalities and administrative districts were analysed, excluding areas with zero population. The total number of the population was approximately 126 million.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Exposure</st>
<p>Rurality was measured using RIJ.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were used for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cerebrovascular diseases (stroke and haemorrhage), cancer and suicide. The standardised claim ratio (SCR) for diabetes outpatient care served as a proxy measure due to the unavailability of mortality data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Greater rurality, as quantified by RIJ, was associated with higher SMRs for cerebrovascular diseases and male suicide. A dose-response relationship was observed among SMRs for cerebrovascular disease and male suicide, whereas AMI mortality was higher in rural areas but lacked a strict dose-dependent trend. No significant association was found between rurality and cancer mortality or diabetes in outpatient SCR. Additionally, RIJ was positively correlated with the proportion of older adults (Spearman&rsquo;s =0.67) and the Arial Deprivation Index (=0.55).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These findings highlight the need for targeted rural health policies that improve access to emergency care and mental health services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaneko, M., Ikeda, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-26T16:06:46-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103227</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103227</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between rurality and mortality from major diseases in Japan: an ecological study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103227</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103227</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098795?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effective coverage of maternal, neonatal and child health services based on District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2) data in Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098795?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Our objective was to assess the feasibility of using the routine health information system data source, District Health Information System (DHIS2) to measure the effective coverage of selected health service indicators in Ethiopia and to explore stakeholder perceptions of those measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>We conducted a mixed-methods study. We mapped the availability of data elements in DHIS2 between July 2022 and June 2023 for five indicators (four or more antenatal care visits (ANC4+), skilled birth attendance, postnatal care, sick child care and child nutrition care). We defined effective coverage cascade steps for each indicator, assessed data quality and analysed data using STATA V.17. Finally, qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 key stakeholders, and the data were analysed thematically for reflections on the DHIS2 output.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The data were captured from all public health facilities of 11 regions and 2 administrative cities in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was better availability of data elements for maternal healthcare than for child healthcare. It was possible to estimate the intervention-adjusted coverage of ANC4+ (16% nationally) and the process-quality-adjusted coverage of skilled birth attendance (19% nationally). Postnatal care, sick child care and child nutrition indicators lacked data across multiple cascade steps. The quality of data for effective coverage measurement differed by region. The key informants expressed concerns about the adequacy and appropriateness of DHIS2 data for this analysis. While all acknowledged its potential for decision-making, respondents emphasised the need for standardised methods and data sources to enhance comparability and acceptability of the findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings underscore the need for system-level improvement of data availability and quality, and adoption of a standardised approach to calculating effective coverage using DHIS2. There was a concern that the findings may not be accepted by policymakers; however, the local level granularity made possible through DHIS2 was appreciated.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lemma, S., Getachew, F., Achamyeleh, H., Tesfa, A., Yihun, B., Kassahun Gelaw, S., Getachew, T., Persson, L. A., Schellenberg, J., Marchant, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098795</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-098795</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effective coverage of maternal, neonatal and child health services based on District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2) data in Ethiopia: a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098795</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098795</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105479?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk of developing pneumococcal disease in individuals under 19 years of age with chronic medical conditions: a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese insurance claims database]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105479?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the risk of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and non-bacteraemic pneumonia (NBP)/acute otitis media (AOM)/sinusitis in Japanese individuals under 19 years of age with chronic medical conditions (CMCs) compared with those without.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An observational, retrospective, cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A large, longitudinal health insurance claims database in Japan (JMDC database).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 12.3 million individuals aged &lt;19 years identified between 2006 and 2022 were included in the analysis. Seventeen CMCs as well as IPD and NBP/AOM/sinusitis were identified using diagnostic codes from the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems V.10.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for IPD and NBP/AOM/sinusitis for individuals with CMCs versus those without CMCs were calculated using multivariate Poisson regression models with age and sex as covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The incidence rate of IPD was higher in individuals with a CMC (0.9 (95% CI: 0.8 to 0.9)) than in those without (0.1 (95% CI: 0.1 to 0.1)). A similar trend was observed for the incidence rate of NBP/AOM/sinusitis, with rates of 928.7 (95% CI: 927.4 to 929.9) in individuals with a CMC compared with 433.2 (95% CI: 432.8 to 433.7) in those without. The risk of IPD increases with the number of CMCs. The IRRs for IPD for those with one CMC and with two or more CMCs were 7.2 (95% CI: 6.4 to 8.1) and 128.1 (95% CI: 114.8 to 143.0), respectively, compared with individuals without a CMC. The IRRs for IPD in the immunocompromised and immunocompetent groups were 156.1 (95% CI: 133.4 to 182.7) and 16.3 (95% CI: 14.6 to 18.1), respectively. The IRRs for NBP/AOM/sinusitis were 1.9 (95% CI: 1.9 to 1.9) and 2.1 (95% CI: 2.1 to 2.2) for individuals with one CMC and with two or more CMCs, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Individuals aged &lt;19 years with CMC are at higher risk of developing IPD and NBP/AOM/sinusitis, compared with those without. Our findings suggest the importance of vaccination against pneumococcal diseases in paediatric populations with CMCs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yano, A., Imai, K., Kim, Y., Sando, M., Ishiwada, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105479</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105479</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk of developing pneumococcal disease in individuals under 19 years of age with chronic medical conditions: a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese insurance claims database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105479</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105479</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105579?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological therapies for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea: protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105579?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) significantly impairs patients&rsquo; quality of life. Although various non-pharmacological interventions show promise, evidence on their comparative effectiveness remains limited. This protocol outlines a systematic review and network meta-analysis designed to comprehensively evaluate and rank the efficacy and safety of guideline-recommended non-pharmacological therapies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will systematically search PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Database, Wanfang Data and VIP Database from inception to January 2025. Eligible studies will include randomised controlled trials assessing guideline-recommended non-pharmacological interventions, probiotics, acupuncture, cognitive&ndash;behavioural therapy, dietary modifications and faecal microbiota transplantation in adults diagnosed with IBS-D based on Rome III or IV criteria. The primary outcome is the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Score. Secondary outcomes include the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data and evaluate risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Network meta-analysis will be performed using frequentist methods with Stata and R software. Transitivity, heterogeneity, consistency and publication bias will be assessed. Certainty of evidence will be graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology, supplemented with trial sequential analysis to determine the required information size.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this secondary analysis as it uses published data. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations to inform clinical practice and guideline development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration</st>
<p>INPLASY202470112.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, Y., Yan, X., Yang, J., Zhang, D., Fang, Y., Huang, J., Zhu, M., Li, L., Zhang, T., Zhang, Q., Jiang, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105579</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105579</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological therapies for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea: protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105579</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105579</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105751?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Attitudes towards supervised consumption sites and e-health overdose response interventions: development and reliability of the Canadian National Questionnaire on Overdose Monitoring (CNQOM)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105751?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To detail the development of the Canadian National Questionnaire on Overdose Monitoring (CNQOM), a questionnaire aimed at assessing the perspectives of key stakeholders towards elements of overdose prevention interventions&mdash;supervised consumption sites (SCSs) and overdose hotlines and applications (ORHAs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Canadian health system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>English or French speaking adults from four key informant groups: people who use substances (PWUS), health professionals, emergency responders and the general public.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Test&ndash;retest reliability of CNQOM items.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A novel questionnaire was developed. Item development followed a standard approach, with face validity verified by representatives from the four informant groups. Input from experts in harm reduction and addiction medicine enhanced content and face validity of the questionnaire. A rigorous response validation approach was undertaken to ensure respondents were human and from Canada. Test&ndash;retest reliability items were assessed using Spearman&rsquo;s rank correlation, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Cohen&rsquo;s kappa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After data cleaning and response validation, 4445 valid responses were obtained from the four key informant groups. Respondents represented a range of sociodemographic backgrounds and housing scenarios from all provinces and territories in Canada. Test&ndash;retest reliability was assessed using a small subsample of 142 participants (primarily from general public informants). Questionnaire items demonstrated slight to substantial stability in responses (kappa coefficients: 0.15&ndash;0.58; Spearman&rsquo;s r: 0.08&ndash;0.66).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The CNQOM is the first online questionnaire in Canada designed to capture perspectives and attitudes towards specific elements of SCSs and ORHAs among diverse key informant groups. Our questionnaire was administered to a large, geographically diverse sample and designed to capture the perspectives of four key informant groups. Lower than expected test&ndash;retest reliability may be explained by lack of participant familiarity with SCS and especially ORHAs and the impersonal nature of the instrument content among some respondents. Future work will elucidate key informant perspectives on these services based on the data.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rider, N., Seo, B., Viste, D., Rioux, W., Sedaghat, N., Pan, B., Al Hamarneh, Y. N., McCormack, G. R., Aghajafari, F., McDougall, L., Ghosh, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105751</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105751</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Attitudes towards supervised consumption sites and e-health overdose response interventions: development and reliability of the Canadian National Questionnaire on Overdose Monitoring (CNQOM)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105751</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105751</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107644?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Participatory development of an evaluation and data model for teleconsultations in long-term care: study protocol based on the MRC framework]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107644?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Demographic change is resulting in a growing number of individuals requiring nursing care, while the availability of professional caregivers is simultaneously declining. This imbalance places increasing pressure on care provision, particularly in home settings and rural areas. Primary care services are also under pressure. Digital solutions such as teleconsultations are considered promising strategies to support intersectoral collaboration in long-term care and to mitigate existing gaps in service provision.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Seven teleconsultation projects in long-term care are being conducted using a mixed-methods design aligned with the phases of the Medical Research Council framework: with a focus on the feasibility phase. Data on structural conditions, usage patterns and user acceptance will be collected through standardised instruments (including Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Fit between Individuals, Task and Technology). In addition, focus groups and interviews will be carried out. The quantitative analysis will include descriptive and inferential statistical methods and will be complemented by a cost&ndash;consequence analysis. The qualitative data will be analysed using structuring content analysis. The aim is to provide a context-informed and theory-informed assessment of the implementation and potential impact of telemedical consultations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee in Tu&#x0308;bingen. Participation is voluntary and based on written informed consent. Data protection is ensured in accordance with the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation); all data are pseudonymised and processed separately. Results will be communicated in a target group-appropriate manner and published in scientific journals. Practice-oriented recommendations will be developed to support the further advancement of telemedical care in nursing.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woessner, S., Hahn, L., Kaltenbach, C., Joos, S., Mahler, C., Henschke, C., Koch, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107644</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107644</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Participatory development of an evaluation and data model for teleconsultations in long-term care: study protocol based on the MRC framework]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107644</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107644</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110232?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Voices beyond the margins: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of Indigenous patients experiences accessing mainstream healthcare services in Canada]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110232?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>First Nations, Inuit and M&eacute;tis Peoples in Canada continue to face significant disparities in healthcare access compared with non-Indigenous populations. Understanding their experiences in accessing healthcare is essential for addressing systemic barriers and promoting equitable, patient-centred care. Although existing studies have identified various barriers and facilitators to accessing healthcare, a lack of synthesised qualitative evidence delves into the intricacies of patients&rsquo; experiences. This systematic review aims to investigate Indigenous patients&rsquo; experiences with mainstream Canadian healthcare services and their recommendations for service improvement through a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Meta-aggregation will be used to conduct a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative components of mixed-methods studies exploring experiences of Indigenous patients accessing mainstream healthcare services in Canada. Papers published in English will be searched using electronic databases, including MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Health, the Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples in North America and Web of Science. A comprehensive list of non-indexed and grey literature will also be searched to ensure the inclusion of community-based and non-peer-reviewed evidence. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool. The review will involve the extraction of findings, categorisation into themes and synthesis into broader insights guided by the JBI meta-aggregation approach. An Indigenous advisory committee will guide the process, including interpretation of findings and ensuring alignment with Indigenous health research principles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this study as it is based on a secondary analysis of publicly available primary studies. The completed review will be published in a peer-reviewed manuscript. Findings will also be shared with relevant Indigenous organisations and community partners through plain-language summaries and community-engaged knowledge-sharing activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420250656486.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damag, S., Villanueva, E., Damag, N., Plante, M., Steinke, C., Middha, S., Oster, R., Chatsis, A., Awosoga, O. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110232</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110232</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Voices beyond the margins: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of Indigenous patients experiences accessing mainstream healthcare services in Canada]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110232</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110232</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111373?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of an innovative family-centred care and prevention intervention for children with overweight and obesity: a mixed-methods study protocol of the randomised controlled fruehstArt study in Germany]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111373?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Childhood overweight and obesity pose a growing public health problem with increasing prevalence both in Europe and globally. Reasons can be found in behavioural factors such as a sedentary lifestyle, eating habits or low exercise levels and to a lesser extent in a genetic predisposition or a metabolic disorder. Preventing children with obesity and overweight to grow into obese teenagers is therefore of high importance. However, there are currently no established care and prevention programmes in Germany for the early reduction of overweight and prevention of obesity in children aged 3&ndash;6 years. fruehstArt aims to close this gap with a cross-sector outreach and family-centred personal counselling approach, where parents receive support from paediatricians and trained coaches who conduct consultations in the home of the family. The main research question is whether the fruehstArt programme reduces overweight and obesity in children aged 3&ndash;6 years within 12 months, as measured by the body mass index-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>fruehstArt has been developed as a new form of care, which includes a family intervention with motivational interviews provided by paediatricians and individual home-based counselling provided by a trained coach on eating behaviour, exercising, sleeping behaviour and age-appropriate use of electronic devices. fruehstArt will be accompanied by an efficacy study (summative evaluation of change in BMI-SDS). In addition to German, the project is also offered in Turkish in order to reach families with a migration background and language barriers. 812 children with overweight or obesity and their families in the region North Rhine will be included and observed over 12 months. Recruitment of children occurred from December 2023 to April 2025 with the final visits scheduled for April 2026. The study is conducted as a randomised controlled trial with a social-ecological intervention approach, considering children in their living environment and conditions. Moreover, a formative evaluation at the process level, and the system level will be carried out and complemented by a health economic analysis. Those are carried out to provide information about the intervention&rsquo;s success and relevant costs. Thus, fruehstArt is realised in the form of an effectiveness&ndash;implementation hybrid design that combines the analysis of effectiveness with an evaluation of the implementation process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study received ethics approval in a coordinated procedure from the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty University hospital of Cologne and the ethics committee of the North Rhine Medical Association. For all collected data, the relevant national and European data protection regulations will be considered. All personal data (contact details) will be removed for the data analysis in order to ensure pseudonymisation. Dissemination strategies include reports and quality workshops for organisations, peer-reviewed publications and the presentation of results at conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The aim of the unique form of care fruehstArt is to improve the care of preschool children with overweight or obesity through innovative home-based counselling, cross-sectoral service integration and to address the cultural needs of Turkish families.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00030749 (29-09-2023)</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hagemeier, A., Oberste, M., Rosenberger, K. D., Roth, R., Hellmich, M., Fluegel, V., Ruettger, K., Dadaczynski, K., Joisten, C., Mause, L., Scholten, N., Glaubach, J., Hehn, M., Bernhard, I., Aydemir, I., Redaelli, M., Simic, D., Alayli, A., Lemmen, C., Stock, S., fruehstArt Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111373</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111373</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of an innovative family-centred care and prevention intervention for children with overweight and obesity: a mixed-methods study protocol of the randomised controlled fruehstArt study in Germany]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111373</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111373</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Strategies to improve antimicrobial stewardship in surgery: insights from an ethnographic study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>There is an urgent need to improve surgical antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), to enhance individual care and reduce population-level antimicrobial resistance, but it is a complex issue.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We aimed to conduct an ethnographic study asking what would work in practice to improve surgical antibiotic prescribing behaviour?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Adopting a socio-cultural-historical perspective, we undertook ethnographic observations of clinical practice (43.5 hours) and semistructured interviews (n=31) with surgical staff, AMS staff and patients at two English National Health Service hospitals. Interview transcripts and observational fieldnotes were analysed using the Framework Approach. Additionally, we integrated stakeholder engagement throughout to ensure the findings were meaningful.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our analysis of all fieldnotes (based on 43.5 hours of observation) and interview transcripts (n=31 from interviews with 31 different participants) identified that, while surgical staff were aware of antimicrobial resistance, they seldom considered AMS urgent or important in the acute setting where lack of time and the desire to mitigate perceived risk often prevailed. Other <I>surgical</I> issues were perceived to dominate senior decision-makers&rsquo; focus, thus perpetuating the status quo. Furthermore, attention to AMS was not always prioritised at the organisational level or by resource-limited AMS teams. Consequently, there was an absence of relationships and tools that foreground AMS. Electronic prescribing systems frequently hindered antimicrobial review and exacerbated patterns of siloed inter-disciplinary working, and feedback on antimicrobial prescribing and patient outcomes was largely absent. To improve AMS, surgical teams wanted sustainable improvements which effectively account for the hierarchical relationships, division of labour, rapid workflow and high staff turnover. Infection experts should better integrate into surgical teams to build relationships and trust, and to proactively contribute to patient care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We offer data-driven, theoretically informed strategies to support change. Contextually appropriate improvements that address the status and visibility of AMS in surgery will be key. Further research is needed to assess the impact and sustainability of the suggested approaches.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker, H., Day, J., Frost, J., Bethune, R., Hollyman, M., Hand, K., Kajamaa, A., Mattick, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112333</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112333</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Strategies to improve antimicrobial stewardship in surgery: insights from an ethnographic study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112333</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measurement instruments for assessing support needs of dementia caregivers: a COSMIN-based systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Supporting dementia caregivers is essential for improving patient outcomes and reducing caregiver burden, and it has become a core element of comprehensive dementia care. Accurate assessment of caregivers&rsquo; support needs is crucial for designing effective and targeted interventions. Although several instruments have been developed to assess these needs, there is limited evidence from systematic reviews regarding their measurement properties. Conducting a systematic review of the psychometric evidence for these instruments is therefore necessary to inform the selection and application of reliable tools in both research and practice. This review aims to identify and evaluate existing instruments for measuring support needs among dementia caregivers, summarise their psychometric properties and provide evidence-based recommendations for their use and future development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2015 guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted in eight electronic databases from 1 August 2025 to 31 January 2026 to identify studies reporting the development or use of instruments measuring support needs among dementia caregivers. Two reviewers will independently perform literature screening, data extraction and methodological quality assessment, with disagreements resolved by discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. The measurement properties of the included instruments will be appraised in accordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this study as it will use data from previously published literature. The results of this systematic review will be disseminated through presentations at national and/or international conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251129741.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xiang, C., Shen, Y., Zhuo, Y., Zhao, X., Qiao, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113468</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113468</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measurement instruments for assessing support needs of dementia caregivers: a COSMIN-based systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113468</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114437?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcome measures used in the conservative management of people with non-specific thoracic spine pain (NTSP): a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114437?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-specific thoracic spine pain (NTSP) is an under-recognised musculoskeletal condition associated with functional limitations, reduced quality of life and significant healthcare utilisation. Conservative management, including manual therapy, exercise and education, is widely used across physiotherapy, osteopathy and chiropractic practice. However, outcome measures used in NTSP research remain heterogeneous and inconsistently defined, limiting evidence synthesis and hindering progress toward developing a core outcome set (COS). This scoping review aims to systematically map the outcome measures reported in studies evaluating conservative care for adults with non-specific TSP, thereby identifying key outcome domains to inform future COS development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and is registered on the Open Science Framework. Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, AMED) will be searched from July 2005 to July 2025, supplemented by searches of PROSPERO and Google Scholar. Eligible studies will include adults (&ge;18 years) receiving conservative care for TSP in non-hospital settings, reporting at least one outcome measure, and published in English. Study selection will involve two independent reviewers using Covidence, with data extracted using an iterative extraction tool. Findings will be synthesised narratively and presented in tables, with a preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses flow diagram used to report study selection. No quality appraisal will be undertaken, consistent with scoping review guidance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this review uses published data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and engagement with a patient and public involvement and engagement group to support relevance and translation into future COS development.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kovanur Sampath, K., Fleischmann, M., Vaughan, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-23T03:55:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114437</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114437</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcome measures used in the conservative management of people with non-specific thoracic spine pain (NTSP): a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114437</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114437</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099920?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trajectories of cigarette smoking and exposure to welding fumes and their impact on lung cancer risks: a latent class modelling approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099920?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Traditional epidemiological approaches usually assume a constant relationship between cumulative exposure and disease, which implies that exposure duration and intensity contribute equally to the studied outcome. But individuals with the same cumulative exposure but different temporal exposure patterns may show different risks. Trajectory classification is a good way to assess exposure&ndash;risk associations and leads to a better understanding of lifetime variability in exposure levels. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate lung cancer risk according to the exposure trajectory classes on welding fumes and cigarette smoking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Two population-based German case&ndash;control studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>3498 male lung cancer cases and 3539 male control subjects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Separate latent class mixed models (LCMM) were determined to identify profiles of exposure trajectories of cigarette smoking and occupational exposure to welding fumes. To investigate the risk of lung cancer by class membership, ORs with 95% CI were estimated via multiple logistic regression analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>LCMM each identified four latent classes of smoking and welding-fume exposure. Classes of smokers showed much higher risk of lung cancer compared with never smokers or subjects exposed to welding fumes. Smokers in one class characterised with the highest exposure over the past 10 years had the highest adjusted lung cancer risk (OR=39; 95% CI 29 to 53). For welding, the highest lung cancer risks were found for the class in which exposure to welding fumes in the past 10 years prior to the diagnosis of lung cancer was highest and the duration of welding was also quite high (OR=1.71; 95% CI 0.92 to 3.15).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In summary, LCMM opens a new perspective on dose&ndash;effect relationships and could be employed to complement established epidemiological methods.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kendzia, B., Taeger, D., Pohlabeln, H., Ahrens, W., Wichmann, H.-E., Jo&#x0308;ckel, K.-H., Bru&#x0308;ning, T., Behrens, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099920</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099920</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trajectories of cigarette smoking and exposure to welding fumes and their impact on lung cancer risks: a latent class modelling approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099920</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099920</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102831?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How do chronic diseases affect personal and household income? A double debiased machine learning analysis of the China health and retirement longitudinal study (CHARLS) in older adults]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102831?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the impacts of chronic diseases such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes on personal and household income among ageing Chinese adults. The primary hypothesis was that these chronic diseases have differential effects on the socioeconomic status of individuals and households, with gender and age influencing these relationships.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study using double/debiased machine learning (DDML) techniques to analyse data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Nationally representative sample of ageing Chinese adults, with data collected from multiple regions across China. The sample represents a variety of both urban and rural settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 69 457 participants entered the study, with 69 457 completing it. The sample included both male and female participants, with the majority being of Han Chinese ethnicity. Participants were selected based on the presence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes, and exclusion criteria included: no information on age (n=4307), no information on gender (n=12), no information on medical insurance (n=177).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome measures, as outlined in the study protocol, were the associations between three chronic diseases (hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes) and personal income (LPI) as well as household income (LHI). These associations were measured using the DDML method, which provided both overall measurements and gender-specific subgroup analyses. There were no significant deviations between the planned and actual outcome measures, and all outcomes were assessed as originally intended.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Dyslipidaemia was positively associated with LPI (coefficient=0.078, 95% CI 0.052 to 0.105) but negatively associated with LHI (coefficient=&ndash;0.049, 95% CI &ndash;0.084 to &ndash;0.015). Diabetes showed stronger positive effects on LPI (coefficient=0.093, 95% CI 0.052 to 0.135) and negative effects on LHI (coefficient=&ndash;0.094, 95% CI &ndash;0.147 to &ndash;0.041). Gender-specific analyses revealed that dyslipidaemia had a stronger association with LPI in males (95% CI 0.080 to 0.163) compared with females (95% CI 0.007 to 0.075). For diabetes, males experienced larger increases in LPI (95% CI 0.053 to 0.190) compared with females (95% CI 0.015 to 0.117). Additionally, reductions in LHI were more pronounced in females with diabetes (95% CI &ndash;0.187 to &ndash;0.043).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Chronic diseases, particularly dyslipidaemia and diabetes, significantly affect the socioeconomic status of ageing Chinese adults, with distinct gender-specific impacts. These findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions to address the income disparities linked to chronic diseases. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of disease management on socioeconomic outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Prospective, observational, community-based cohort study using 2011&ndash;2018 CHARLS data from 28 provinces in mainland China, with the registration number IRB00001052-11015, following ethical approval from the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Peking University.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhi, T., Chen, C., Shang, W., Li, Q., Zhang, S., Wang, Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102831</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102831</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How do chronic diseases affect personal and household income? A double debiased machine learning analysis of the China health and retirement longitudinal study (CHARLS) in older adults]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102831</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102831</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104145?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring and Modifying BarrieRs to enhance ACcess to mental health support for Ethnic minority Children and Young People (CYP) in acute paediatric settings (EMBRACE) in England: a realist review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104145?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Globally, up to 15% of children and adolescents experience a mental health (MH) condition. In the UK, an increasing number of children and young people (CYP) are presenting to acute paediatric settings (paediatric emergency departments and paediatric medical wards) with MH issues. However, the literature suggests that the MH support available in acute paediatric settings is insufficient and unsafe in England. A key principle in NHS England&rsquo;s plan for joint working to support CYP with MH needs in acute paediatric settings is for care to be personalised to the needs of CYP. However, there is a paucity of research that explores the needs of ethnic minority CYP with MH issues in acute paediatric settings, and recent research has highlighted racial disparities in the accessibility and outcomes of MH services for CYP. This is significant as MH issues in childhood are associated with lifelong inequalities in health, employment, education and mortality outcomes in later life. We aim to explore how, why and under what circumstances acute paediatric settings support (or do not support) ethnic minority CYP to access appropriate MH support, and to develop a refined programme theory for the important contextual factors and mechanisms that can influence whether acute paediatric settings support ethnic minority CYP in accessing appropriate MH support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will use the realist approach developed by Pawson and Tilly which involves six steps: (1) Clarifying the scope of the review, (2) Searching for evidence, (3) Selecting and appraising the primary studies, (4) Extracting and organising the data, (5) Analysing and synthesising the findings and (6) Disseminating the findings. We will search OVID Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and SCOPUS. Relevant data will also be sought through snowballing and backward citation searching on included studies, seeking document recommendations from relevant professionals, and grey literature searches on Grey Matters, Health Management Information Centre and Google Scholar. The search will cover documents published from database inception. Documents featuring Black and/or Mixed-Black CYP with MH issues in acute paediatric settings will be included. Documents that do not separately report the results of CYP (&lt;18 years old) from Black ethnic groups, or are unavailable in English will be excluded. An advisory group of key stakeholders will be recruited and involved throughout all stages of the review to promote the design and outputs of the realist review reflecting the experiences of (a) Ethnic minority CYP with MH issues and (b) The professionals involved in their care and the acute paediatric setting. The output of this process will be a refined middle-range theory that will provide a detailed understanding and explanation of the key contextual factors and mechanisms involved in ethnic minority CYP accessing MH support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This realist review will only involve secondary data, so ethical approval will not be required. The developed programme theory will be disseminated through the advisory group, peer-reviewed publications, discussions with relevant stakeholders and presentations at relevant research conferences and community events. Additionally, the theory will inform a primary realist evaluation study where the theory will be tested and refined further.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>PROSPERO, CRD420251009912.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Da-Silva-Ellimah, M., Darko, N., Kotera, Y., Sayal, K., Manning, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104145</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104145</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring and Modifying BarrieRs to enhance ACcess to mental health support for Ethnic minority Children and Young People (CYP) in acute paediatric settings (EMBRACE) in England: a realist review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104145</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104427?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Building a functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in healthcare: a systematic review on how steps are reported, defined and supported by data]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104427?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) is increasingly used to analyse healthcare processes. FRAM uses four steps to analyse a process and its potential variability. We systematically reviewed studies using FRAM in healthcare on how the four steps in FRAM are reported, defined and supported by data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses 2020 guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, Dimensions and Lens were searched up to December 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>All peer-reviewed studies using FRAM in a healthcare context that presented a FRAM visualisation were included. The papers had to be written in English.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and subsequently the full text of selected papers. Data was extracted reporting on the steps of FRAM, how functions were supported by data, and the functions and couplings of the visualisations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Sixty-eight papers were included, of which 20 (29%) reported at least one aspect of all four steps in FRAM. While most studies (85%) described how functions were supported by data, the methods used varied widely. Terminology was interpreted differently concerning variability, the output of variability and the effect of combined variability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Most FRAM studies in healthcare do not report all steps of FRAM, and interpretations of key terms differ. FRAM studies should more clearly describe which steps of the method are conducted, and how data is collected and analysed. Refinement of FRAM guidelines, particularly on data use and terminology, would enhance consistency and comparability across studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024592858.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luijcks, N. M., Bazuin, T., Adriaensen, A., Visser, A., Dongelmans, D., Groeneweg, J., van der Laan, M. J., Marang-van de Mheen, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104427</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104427</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Building a functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in healthcare: a systematic review on how steps are reported, defined and supported by data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104427</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104427</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104815?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Subsequent risk of non-keratinocyte skin cancers in adult cancer survivors: a SEER-based cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104815?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To characterise the risk of subsequent primary non-keratinocyte skin cancers (NKSCs) among adult-onset cancer survivors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Data analysis of this population-based cohort study was conducted from September to November 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The data are based on 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries from 2000 to 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Survivors of first primary cancers diagnosed in individuals aged 20&ndash;84 years between 2000 and 2021, across 17 registries in the SEER Program</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome and measure</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were a statistically significant increase in the incidence of subsequent NKSCs. Standardised incidence rate (SIR) and excess risk analysis were used to evaluate the risk of subsequent NKSCs after different primary cancers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 5 691 336 survivors (51.3% male), 31 529 subsequent NKSCs were observed during a total follow-up of 36 440 569 person-years (mean, 6.4 years). The risk of subsequent NKSCs was increased after the first primary cancer (SIR, 1.12 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.13)). Across 35 first primary cancers, 19 showed a statistically significant rise in subsequent NKSC incidence. The highest SIR for subsequent NKSCs was observed after eye and orbit cancer (SIR, 2.96 (95% CI 2.55 to 3.41)), followed by cutaneous melanoma (SIR, 2.67 (95% CI 2.41 to 2.94)) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (SIR, 2.24 (95% CI 2.10 to 2.38)). Across NKSC types, cancer survivors were more likely to develop subsequent hemangiosarcoma (SIR, 2.66 (95% CI 2.31 to 3.05)), adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (SIR, 2.14 (95% CI 1.53 to 2.91)) and sebaceous adenocarcinoma (SIR, 1.70 (95% CI 1.57 to 1.83)). 10 specific first primary cancers demonstrated a consistently high risk of several specific NKSCs throughout the study period. Furthermore, the risk of subsequent NKSCs among cancer survivors was largely elevated following radiotherapy or chemotherapy (range, 13%&ndash;18%), especially for hemangiosarcoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions and relevance</st>
<p>Several types of primary cancers were strongly linked to an increased risk of subsequent NKSCs, underscoring the critical importance of implementing continuous surveillance and proactive prevention strategies to mitigate the risk of developing subsequent primary NKSCs among cancer survivors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiayuan, L., Luo, Z., Guo, Z., Chen, D., Deng, G., Xu, S., Yao, L., Sun, Y., Zeng, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104815</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104815</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Subsequent risk of non-keratinocyte skin cancers in adult cancer survivors: a SEER-based cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104815</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104815</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106050?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between vitamin D supplement use and cognitive functioning: a longitudinal cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106050?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The real-world evidence on the association between vitamin D supplementation and cognitive outcomes has been scant and controversial. We aimed to investigate the longitudinal association between vitamin D supplement use and subsequent cognitive functioning among US older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A nationally representative ageing cohort in USA: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were drawn from the HRS wave 12 and included respondents who had complete data on dietary supplement use and cognitive assessment. A total of 5065 participants (mean age: 67.5&plusmn;10.2 years, 61.6% female, 76.6% White ethnicity) were included, of whom 2004 (39.6%) participants were vitamin D supplement users.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Change in cognitive function scores over 6 years of follow-up (from HRS waves 12&ndash;15), estimated by linear mixed model adjusted for multiple covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with non-users, vitamin D users had an accelerated decline in global cognitive function (difference in the rate of change: &ndash;0.052 points/year; 95% CI &ndash;0.092 to &ndash;0.013, p=0.010) and in executive function score (difference: &ndash;0.021 points/year; 95% CI &ndash;0.037 to &ndash;0.005, p<I>=</I>0.010). Sensitivity analysis suggested that accelerated cognitive decline was only observed among supplement users with normal baseline serum 25(OH)D level (p=0.004), but not the group with insufficient/deficient levels (p=0.826).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings do not support vitamin D supplementation as a means of preventing or slowing cognitive decline in older people with adequate vitamin D status. While healthcare providers should encourage adequate vitamin D intake from dietary sources and moderate sun exposure, caution should be taken when recommending such supplements to older adults without a clear indication for it.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hua, R., Lam, C. S., Mok, V. C. T., Cheung, Y. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106050</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106050</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between vitamin D supplement use and cognitive functioning: a longitudinal cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106050</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106050</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106485?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing the decision to accept or decline aortic valve replacement for asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a nested longitudinal qualitative substudy of the EASY-AS randomised trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106485?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine how patients and family members decide whether to accept a highly invasive intervention (aortic valve replacement (AVR)) when their condition (aortic stenosis (AS)) is asymptomatic and its course uncertain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Nested, longitudinal, qualitative substudy of an ongoing randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT04204915) testing early intervention (EI) versus watchful waiting (WW) in patients with asymptomatic severe AS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Six select UK sites of the RCT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Select participants of the RCT, their next-of-kin and some who declined RCT participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>73 interviews were conducted, with 41 participants.</p>
<p>Few knew much about AS before diagnosis. Uncertainty and the need for reliable information regarding symptoms and progress was a significant problem.</p>
<p>While some expressed unease at a major intervention for an asymptomatic condition, there were no outright objections to the idea.</p>
<p>Those who declined participation in the RCT did so for personal reasons, for example, their home circumstances did not permit the required period of recovery or they felt too old to risk intervention.</p>
<p>Reasons for accepting early intervention included the belief that the condition was serious and likely to deteriorate, and so better to have the intervention before such deterioration, as well as avoiding long waiting lists. Trusting clinicians&rsquo; judgement played a part in some decisions. Patients also wanted choice in the type of intervention received.</p>
<p>The longitudinal interviews (n=32) showed satisfaction in the early intervention group despite some problems in the the early recovery phase, especially for those undergoing surgical AVR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Where evidence supports major intervention for an asymptomatic condition, patients are likely to accept the offer, although personal circumstances play an important role in decision-making. Where a condition is not well known to the public, such as AS, patients rely on clinicians and other resources to help decide. Liaison with patient groups in developing shared decision-making resources may help with complex decisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04204915">NCT04204915</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allmark, P., Taylor, B., Tod, A. M., Ryan, T., Dweck, M., McCann, G. P., Singh, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106485</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106485</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing the decision to accept or decline aortic valve replacement for asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a nested longitudinal qualitative substudy of the EASY-AS randomised trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106485</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106485</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106788?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying facilitators and barriers to implementing the Feverkidstool, a clinical decision tool, in the emergency department: a qualitative study in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106788?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to identify determinants that hinder or facilitate implementation of the Feverkidstool, a clinical decision support tool offering a quantitative, evidence-based approach, to manage children with fever in the emergency department (ED) setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using semistructured interviews, analysed through directed content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary and tertiary paediatric emergency departments in three hospitals in the Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Eighteen potential end users of the Feverkidstool, including paediatricians and paediatric residents working in the ED and involved in the care of febrile children, participated in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>Determinants of Feverkidstool implementation, categorised by CFIR domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals and implementation process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Respondents (n=18) perceived the evidence-based guidance by the Feverkidstool and its potential to reduce antibiotic use as valuable. However, concerns were raised about its applicability to critically ill children and those with comorbidities. User-friendliness was seen as a facilitator, whereas the need for C reactive protein testing and lack of integration with electronic health records were mentioned as barriers. The ability to standardise care for febrile children was considered an important benefit of using the Feverkidstool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Barriers and facilitators across all CFIR domains are identified. Addressing these will facilitate implementation. When effectively implemented, the Feverkidstool has the potential to improve care for children presenting with fever in the ED. This may potentially lead to a more standardised approach and reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vrijlandt, S., Ista, E., Kuiper, R., van Veen, M., van Wermeskerken, A.-M., Ropers, F., Oostenbrink, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106788</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106788</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying facilitators and barriers to implementing the Feverkidstool, a clinical decision tool, in the emergency department: a qualitative study in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106788</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106788</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108249?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of frailty on postoperative delirium in ICU patients aged 65 and older: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108249?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The objective was to assess whether frailty is associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium (POD) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients aged 65 years and older.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between August 2014 and January 2025, assessing frailty with validated instruments and reporting POD during ICU stay. While the search strategy was not limited to a specific study design, only observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Due to methodological heterogeneity, results were synthesised narratively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This review targeted the intensive care setting specifically, including studies conducted in hospital-based ICUs in various countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 655 records, five studies (n=3045) met inclusion criteria. Frailty prevalence ranged from 10% to 34.9%. Tools used included the Fried Frailty Scale, modified Frailty Index (mFI), FRAIL Scale (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, and Loss of weight), Comprehensive Assessment of Frailty and Edmonton Frailty Scale. Frail patients had higher POD incidence and experienced more complications such as acute kidney injury, prolonged mechanical ventilation and reoperation. NOS scores ranged from 5 to 7, indicating moderate quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Frailty appears to be associated with an increased risk of POD in ICU patients aged 65 and older. Given the limited number and heterogeneity of studies, further research is needed to validate this relationship and to inform targeted prevention strategies in critical care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7TWQ8">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7TWQ8</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schindele, D., McDonough, J., Mu&#x0308;ller-Wolff, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108249</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108249</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of frailty on postoperative delirium in ICU patients aged 65 and older: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108249</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109715?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Postgraduate digital health training programmes for primary care physicians: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109715?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The digital transformation of healthcare has created an urgent need for primary care physicians (PCPs) to acquire competencies in digital health. However, the structure and scope of postgraduate training programmes remain poorly defined and unevenly implemented worldwide, and no scoping review has yet synthesised the evidence. This review aims to map existing postgraduate digital health training programmes for PCPs, including their content, structure and delivery approaches.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. A systematic search will be conducted across five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and Web of Science) and relevant grey literature, covering publications from January 2019 to June 2025. Studies describing postgraduate digital health training programmes for PCPs will be eligible for inclusion. Data will be extracted and synthesised descriptively and thematically using an inductive approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this study is based on a review of publicly available literature, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations and will inform future curriculum development and policy in digital health education for PCPs. The results may also inform national curriculum reforms and accreditation standards, supporting more consistent and competency-based digital health education globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration details</st>
<p>This scoping review protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leon-Herrera, S., Anjos De Almeida, V., Yokus, S. E., Li, E., Batista, S. R. R., Teixeira, J., Neves, A. L., Gomez Bravo, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109715</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109715</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Postgraduate digital health training programmes for primary care physicians: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109715</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109715</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of 12 weeks with a 30-min nap opportunity during the night shift of healthcare workers on early cardiovascular risk biomarkers: the NAPWORK study protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Night shift work is well known to cause health disruption in the short and long term. Among healthcare workers, sleep deprivation is a common concern with many nurses reporting sleep of &lt;6 hour per 24-hour period. Consequences of this chronic sleep restriction have been associated with long-term health issues such as endothelial dysfunction, which plays a key role in the development of cardiovascular diseases, arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes. While countermeasures such as nap at work have been suggested to mitigate these deleterious effects, the impact of such intervention on endothelial function remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study will be to investigate the effect of a 30 min nap opportunity during night shift work on endothelial function in healthcare workers working in 12-hour shifts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A 12-week randomised controlled trial will be performed with two conditions: (1) a 30 min nap opportunity during night shift work in a dedicated quiet room with a bed and (2) a control condition including a 30 min rest period in a break room. A total of 80 nurses and assistant nurses from interventional care units working a 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>12 hour shift schedule will be recruited. The main outcome will be endothelial dysfunction assessed through the reactive hyperaemia index using the EndoPAT device. Secondary outcomes will include other cardiovascular risk biomarkers, including arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity), blood pressure, heart rate variability, proinflammatory blood parameters, self-reported fatigue, recovery needs, sleep quality and sleepiness, which will be assessed using validated questionnaires. Our study will address whether napping on the night shift can decrease cardiovascular risk through early cardiovascular biomarkers, including endothelial function, arterial stiffness and heart rate variability. If effective, such interventions could contribute to the development of more sustainable and health-conscious shift work practices, benefiting both workers and the organisations that employ them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol is in accordance with ethical principles established by the 18th World Medical Assembly (Helsinki 1964) and received approval from an institutional review board &lsquo;comit&eacute; de protection des personnes EST III&rsquo; (23CH138). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05955729">NCT05955729</A>; ClinicalTrials.gov 2023-A01109-36 Registered on 21 July 2023.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bouchou, Y., Monnier, M., Roche, F., Pelissier, C., Berger, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of 12 weeks with a 30-min nap opportunity during the night shift of healthcare workers on early cardiovascular risk biomarkers: the NAPWORK study protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110108</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110183?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Haemoglobin vesicles as artificial red blood cells developed for use as a transfusion alternative: an open-label, single-centre phase Ib study protocol in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110183?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Haemoglobin vesicles (HbVs) (product name, NMU-HbVs [Nara Medical University-Haemoglobin Vesicles]), which contain purified human haemoglobin encapsulated within liposomes, have been developed as a potential alternative to blood transfusions in emergency situations. A previous phase I study examined doses up to 100 mL in 11 healthy volunteers. Here, we describe the protocol for a phase Ib study, wherein we will evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of NMU-HbV in healthy Japanese adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, open-label, dose-escalation study will enrol 16 healthy volunteers divided into four cohorts. Planned doses are 100 mL for cohorts 1 and 2, 200 mL for cohort 3 and 400 mL for cohort 4, with infusion rates gradually increasing to a maximum of 5.0 mL/min. The primary endpoint will be safety, which will be assessed as the incidence of adverse events within 14 days and significant clinical changes within 72 hours after administration. Safety evaluations will include subjective symptoms, vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory test results compared with the baseline. The secondary endpoint will be pharmacokinetics, which will be assessed as changes in NMU-HbV concentration immediately after infusion until day 4 to determine the maximum blood concentration, time to reach the maximum blood concentration, area under the blood concentration-time curve and elimination half-life. This study will provide data on the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of NMU-HbV at doses up to 400 mL. The findings are expected to support the further development of NMU-HbV as a viable alternative to emergency transfusions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nara Medical University on 10 December 2024. Dissemination plans include publishing in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentation at international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2051240249). Registered on 27 January 2025 (<A HREF="https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2051240249">https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2051240249</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sakai, K., Asada, K., Watanabe, Y., Azuma, H., Sakai, H., Kasahara, M., Matsumoto, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110183</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110183</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Haematology (incl blood transfusion)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Haemoglobin vesicles as artificial red blood cells developed for use as a transfusion alternative: an open-label, single-centre phase Ib study protocol in Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Haematology (incl blood transfusion)</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110183</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110183</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110199?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-reported adherence of ambulance nurses to acute chest pain guidelines in Southern Sweden: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110199?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine the self-reported adherence of ambulance nurses to acute chest pain guidelines and analyse how demographic and professional characteristics influence this adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Regional ambulance service in southern Sweden (18 ambulance stations).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Ambulance nurses (registered and specialist nurses). Of the 397 ambulance nurses invited, 261 responded (65.7%) in 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data analysis</st>
<p>Descriptive statistics; independent-samples t-tests and <sup>2</sup> tests for group comparisons; Pearson correlation; and stepwise linear regression to identify predictors of adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary: adherence to the prehospital acute chest pain guideline, measured with the 5-item Self-Reported Adherence scale (5&ndash;25). Secondary: medication-specific adherence; guideline-access sources.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study involving 261 ambulance nurses from 18 ambulance stations in southern Sweden. Adherence to acute chest pain guidelines was assessed using a validated instrument. Data collected in autumn 2023 were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including stepwise linear regression analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study revealed an average self-reported adherence score of 19.2 out of 25 for acute chest pain guidelines. Mobile applications were the most commonly used source for accessing acute chest pain guidelines, while ambulance managers were the least used. Notably, older and more experienced ambulance nurses reported higher adherence scores. Additionally, a positive attitude towards the guidelines was correlated with higher adherence. Prioritisation of guidelines and age were predictors of adherence. In contrast, other demographic variables, such as sex and specialist nursing education, were not found to be associated with adherence.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study indicates that self-reported adherence to acute chest pain guidelines among ambulance nurses is influenced by how highly they prioritise these guidelines and by their attitudes towards them, as well as their age and professional experience. Enhancing educational programmes and digital resources, particularly for younger and less experienced nurses, may improve adherence and patient outcomes in prehospital settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hansen, M. U., Axelsson, M., Vejzovic, V., Jakobsson, U., Zdravkovic, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110199</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110199</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-reported adherence of ambulance nurses to acute chest pain guidelines in Southern Sweden: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110199</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110931?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer in Africa: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110931?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This review identified and mapped the current evidence on emergency presentation of colorectal cancer in Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review based on methodology by Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Medline (via PubMed), Embase and African Journals Online were searched between 29 January 2025 and 6 March 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies published in English and describing the burden, risk factors and management options for emergency presentation of colorectal cancer in Africa were included. Full-text articles of all epidemiological study designs were considered with no publication date limit. Grey literature such as conference abstracts and letters to the editor were considered if sufficient study detail was provided to map data to the research questions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers extracted data from the included studies onto a standardised electronic form. Data were narratively synthesised using predefined themes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Twenty-seven studies are included in this review. There was wide variability in reported emergency presentation colorectal cancer rates (8.3% to 64.9%). There were few data on early mortality, and none on long-term outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer. Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer was characterised clinically by bowel obstruction, bowel perforation and peritonitis. Only one study reported on risk factors for emergency presentation of colorectal cancer. Use of diagnostic modalities was variable and depended on resource availability. Surgery was the mainstay of treatment. Endoscopic stenting was only available as a treatment option in South Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is a significant clinical, oncological and health system metric, yet there is a dearth of evidence on the subject in the African context. Available evidence demonstrates the need for more studies on emergency presentation of colorectal cancer, focused on risk factors, prevalence, treatment options and short-term and long-term outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chinyowa, S., Murewanhema, G., Katsidzira, L., Moodley, J., Chirenje, M., Muguti, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110931</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110931</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer in Africa: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110931</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110931</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111616?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the impact of a recommended shift in glycaemic management targets for older adults on clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditures in Japan: a protocol for interrupted time-series analysis using a nationwide health insurance claims database]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111616?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In 2017, the Japan Diabetes Society and Japan Geriatrics Society published the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetes in older adults, marking a major shift in glycaemic management policy for older adults. The guidelines represented a transition from conventional, uniform targets, originally developed for the general adult population, to stratified glycaemic goals tailored to the complex care needs of older patients, including comorbidities and frailty. Although the 2017 guidelines aimed to promote individualised care and reduce adverse events such as severe hypoglycaemia, the real-world impact on patient outcomes, clinical practice and healthcare expenditures has not been evaluated at the national level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method and analysis</st>
<p>A population-based interrupted time-series analysis will be conducted using data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan, which captures nearly all insured healthcare encounters nationwide. This study will include individuals aged &ge;65 years with diabetes who received insurance healthcare services between April 2016 and June 2019. Outcomes will be evaluated across three domains: patient outcomes, clinical practice and healthcare expenditures. Specifically, these will include the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia, acute coronary syndrome, hyperglycaemic emergencies such as diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state, number of antidiabetic prescriptions and total healthcare expenditures. Primary analyses will use generalised linear mixed-effects models assuming Poisson or negative binomial distributions with adjustments for facility-level heterogeneity. Stratified analyses will be performed according to comorbidity burden, frailty status and receipt of relevant healthcare services. Sensitivity analysis will assess the robustness of the results using an alternative definition of severe hypoglycaemia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Centre for Geriatrics and Gerontology (No. 1752), and the need for informed consent was waived owing to the use of anonymised administrative data. These findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Takashi, N., Omura, T., Iijima, H., Ohtera, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111616</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111616</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the impact of a recommended shift in glycaemic management targets for older adults on clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditures in Japan: a protocol for interrupted time-series analysis using a nationwide health insurance claims database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111616</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111616</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112309?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of a mobile application-based geriatric assessment and communication support intervention for older adults with cancer: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial (MAPLE2 pilot)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112309?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Older adults with cancer have ageing-related vulnerabilities that influence their treatment tolerance and decision-making. In our previous randomised controlled trial (MAPLE), integrating geriatric assessment (GA) with communication support using a question prompt list (QPL), delivered by trained intervention providers, facilitated patient&ndash;oncologist communication, increased implementation of GA-guided management (GAM) and improved patient outcomes. However, its widespread adoption has been limited by the need for trained personnel and dedicated time. To enhance scalability and sustainability, we developed a mobile application-based intervention to deliver GAM and communication support. This MAPLE2 study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the intervention using this mobile application-based GA and QPL among older adults with cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This multicentre, open-label, pilot randomised controlled trial will be conducted at two academic hospitals in Japan. Patients aged&ge;70 years with solid cancer or lymphoma initiating or changing systemic therapy will undergo baseline GA. Patients with any GA impairment will be randomised to receive either (1) a mobile application-based intervention providing feedback of GA summary with tailored GAM recommendations and QPL or (2) usual care. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants who complete all of the following interventions using the mobile application: (1) self-administered GA, (2) receipt of the tailored GAM recommendations and QPL and (3) confirmation that their oncologists review the tailored GAM recommendations and QPL at subsequent visits. Forty participants are planned to be enrolled.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center, Japan (approval number: 2025-089). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be presented at academic conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial status</st>
<p>Recruitment has been initiated from 8 September 2025 and is planned to be completed by 31 August 2026, with a follow-up period by 31 August 2027.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>UMIN000058887</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matsuoka, A., Konishi, Y., Boku, N., Takashima, A., Okusaka, T., Mori, K., Akechi, T., Tsubata, Y., Majima, Y., Uchitomi, Y., Nagashima, F., Fujimori, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112309</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112309</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of a mobile application-based geriatric assessment and communication support intervention for older adults with cancer: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial (MAPLE2 pilot)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112309</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112309</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112705?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Decisional needs among patients and physicians in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia: a qualitative analysis in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112705?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Treatment advancements in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) have made the disease manageable but carry significant risk of side effects. Bridging information gaps between patients and physicians through shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly favoured, yet understanding treatment complexities remains a challenge. This study sought to identify decisional and informational needs of both patients and physicians in CML care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted to investigate the opinions, attitudes and preferences of both patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia and physicians.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Patients and physicians were recruited through the Dutch CMyLife platform, an initiative of haematologists, patients and patient organisations. They were provided with the participant information and invited to participate if interested.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 15 interviews (n=10 patients, n=5 physicians) were conducted between April and October 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>A pre-defined interview guide was developed based on the Decisional Needs Assessment questionnaire. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eight themes and 28 sub-themes were observed, highlighting patient needs, treatment choices and informational preferences. Patients emphasised the importance of understanding medication options and side effects, while physicians stressed the necessity of delivering up-to-date and comprehensible information. Almost all participants had experienced professionals making the treatment decision, without patient involvement, especially when initiating treatment. Some patients expressed too little information and missed partnership with professionals at treatment onset. Peer support, decision-making dynamics and the role of caregivers were also significant considerations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Both shared and distinct perspectives on CML treatment decision-making between patients and physicians were revealed, underscoring the complexity of decisional needs in CML management. The findings emphasise the importance of patient-centred care, SDM and tailored communication strategies to optimise patient outcomes and satisfaction. Improved communication and evidence-based decision-making tools can significantly impact patient well-being. Further research and interventions are necessary to address the challenges in decision-making processes in CML care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mingels, S., Cloots, M. J. J., Smit, Y., Blijlevens, N. M. A., Posthuma, E. F. M., Dekker, A. L. A. J., Fijten, R. R. R., Wener, E., Kromkamp, C. C. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112705</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112705</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Decisional needs among patients and physicians in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia: a qualitative analysis in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112705</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112705</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114815?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PEP-Hep: A cluster randomised controlled trial of a prison education programme to improve hepatitis B and C testing uptake and treatment initiation in Ghana - A study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114815?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Viral hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) infections remain major public health threats in Ghana, with prevalence rates significantly higher in prison populations than in the general population. Despite this, incarcerated individuals are frequently excluded from national testing and treatment programmes. Overcrowding, poor sanitation and limited access to healthcare create a high transmission risk. There is an urgent need for targeted, evidence-based interventions to address this health inequity and support Ghana&rsquo;s progress towards viral hepatitis elimination.</p>
<p>This protocol describes a study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multicomponent targeted educational intervention in increasing knowledge, intention to test, testing uptake and treatment initiation for HBV and HCV among adult prison inmates in the Greater Accra and Eastern Regions of Ghana.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a 1:1 parallel design will be conducted in eight prisons stratified by gender (six male, two female) with 208 inmates per arm. The intervention group will receive the Prison Education for Prevention of Hepatitis Intervention, comprising an education programme (posters, infographics, film screenings, peer-led discussions and structured health education) alongside HBV and HCV testing, treatment and care linkage. The control group will receive standard health education and basic printed materials. Testing intentions, uptake, prevalence and treatment outcomes will be measured. Cost-effectiveness analysis will inform sustainability and scale-up. The primary endpoint is uptake of hepatitis B and C testing. Secondary outcomes include changes in hepatitis knowledge and testing intentions, prevalence of hepatitis B and C, treatment uptake among diagnosed inmates, linkage to hepatitis care services and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.</p>
<p>Data will be analysed, accounting for prison clustering, using mixed-effects models and regression methods. Outcomes include testing uptake, knowledge, intentions, prevalence, treatment initiation and sustained virologic response, adjusted for key covariates. Baseline characteristics and intervention reach will be summarised descriptively. Analyses will follow intention-to-treat and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. Cost-effectiveness will estimate Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICERs) per inmate tested, infection detected and treatment initiated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The RCT was approved by the College of Health Sciences ethics and protocol review committee (no. CHS-E/M.1-P 4.7/2025&ndash;2026). Results will be presented at relevant national and international meetings and conferences and will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. Furthermore, we plan to communicate the results to relevant stakeholders in the Ghanaian Prisons and Healthcare systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>PACTR202512558588684.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senoo-Dogbey, V. E., Dzansi, G., Akpagloh, M. C., Wuaku, D. A., Owusu Darkwa, I., Boadu, A. A., Michael, D. A., Dzantor, E. K., Anatsui, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T04:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114815</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114815</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PEP-Hep: A cluster randomised controlled trial of a prison education programme to improve hepatitis B and C testing uptake and treatment initiation in Ghana - A study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114815</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114815</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103464?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impacts of alcohol health warning labels in a real-world setting: protocol for a randomised controlled trial among supermarket customers in Barcelona]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103464?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Alcohol is causally related to more than 200 diseases and injuries. Alcohol health warning labels are a promising intervention to address alcohol-related harm with multiple possible roles, but research on its real-world impacts is lacking. This study aims to experimentally evaluate the impact of exposure to two types of content (responsibility and cancer message) and positioning of the message (front or back) on knowledge of alcohol causing cancer as the primary outcome and alcohol consumption behaviour, intentions, risk perception, emotional response, product appeal and policy support as secondary outcomes. The study also aims to assess the potential testing effect of pre-measurement on the primary outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Participants (of the legal drinking age in Spain (18 years or older), purchased at least one alcoholic beverage (with alcohol by volume (ABV) &ge; 1.2% for their own consumption and speaking Catalan or Spanish) will be recruited outside of supermarkets in Barcelona after purchasing alcohol, randomly assigned into one of the eight experimental groups, complete a baseline questionnaire (with half of the sample answering baseline questions measuring knowledge) and receive label stickers displaying either responsibility or cancer message, and applied to either front or back of every alcohol container they have purchased. They will complete follow-up surveys measuring the primary and secondary outcomes 1 week and 1 month after the intervention, either online or via telephone. The key hypotheses are that the label containing a cancer message will have a greater impact on the primary and secondary outcomes compared with the responsibility label. To evaluate the impact of health warning labels on knowledge of alcohol causing cancer, logistic regression will be employed to model the probability of a correct response as a function of the key independent variables, with results reported as ORs. Secondary outcomes will be modelled through linear regressions for continuous variables, and through logistic regressions for dichotomic variables or categorical variables that will be dichotomised a priori. The target sample size is 1300 participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee for Research with Medicines (CEIm) IDIAP Jordi Gol (24/228-P) and the Ethical Research Committee of the WHO (ERC.0004213). The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, on social media and policy fora in national, European and global context, and will inform WHO and European Union-level policy recommendations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Funding</st>
<p>European Commission, Directorate General for Health and Food Safety, SANTE/2022/SI2.883729.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06915298">NCT06915298</inter-ref>. <inter-ref locator="https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06915298" locator-type="url">https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06915298</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kokole, D., Neufeld, M., Correia, D., Rehm, J., Ferreira-Borges, C., Hobin, E., Rovira, P., Segura Garcia, L., Colom Farran, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103464</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103464</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impacts of alcohol health warning labels in a real-world setting: protocol for a randomised controlled trial among supermarket customers in Barcelona]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103464</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103464</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105722?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring differences in health-related benefit status in the year before, during and after specialist rehabilitation: a Norwegian case-control study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105722?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore differences in health-related benefit status over 3 years, focusing on patterns of sick leave, work assessment allowance and disability benefits, between people who underwent rehabilitation and a matched control group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study using registry data over three consecutive years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Secondary specialist rehabilitation services at 17 institutions across Norway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients (n=2710), 42% with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, aged 18&ndash;65 years referred for multidisciplinary rehabilitation at one of the participating institutions. They were propensity score matched with 37 760 controls from the national sick leave registry, based on sociodemographic factors and health-related benefit status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes, commonly lasting 3 weeks (range: 1 week to 6 months), tailored to individual needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Days on health-related benefits (sick leave, work assessment allowance (WAA) and disability benefits) were quantified as lost workdays per month. Differences between groups were analysed using Generalised Estimating Equations across three consecutive years: the year before rehabilitation, the rehabilitation year and the year after rehabilitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The rehabilitation group had more days on health-related benefits per month than controls throughout the observation period. During the rehabilitation year, they had on average 1.7 more days on sick leave (95 % CI 1.3 to 1.9), 2.3 more WAA days (95% CI 1.9 to 2.7) and 0.2 more days on disability benefits (95% CI 0.1 to 0.3). In the year after rehabilitation, they had 0.6 fewer days on sick leave (95% CI &ndash;0.8 to &ndash;0.3), but 3.7 more days on WAA (95% CI 3.1 to 4.2) and 0.6 more days on disability benefits (95% CI 0.4 to 0.8). Patterns were similar for the subgroup with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>People undergoing rehabilitation had more days on health-related benefits and a greater increase in long-term benefits, even after matching, indicating a higher disease and support burden than controls. Tailoring interventions and health-related benefits is an essential aspect of rehabilitation for people with complex work participation needs. Future research should include longer observation periods to explore long-term outcomes of rehabilitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trail registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT03764982">NCT03764982</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skinnes, M. N., Uhlig, T., Johansen, T., Morvik, H. K., Farsund, N., Fossen, J., Skardal, R. F., Tollin, G., Degirmenci, A. E. T., Habberstad, A., Sexton, J., Kollerud, R., Kjeken, I., RehabNytte Consortium, Wilkie, R., Moe, R. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105722</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105722</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring differences in health-related benefit status in the year before, during and after specialist rehabilitation: a Norwegian case-control study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105722</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105722</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105897?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy-based intervention on depression and anxiety in high-risk pregnant women: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105897?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>High-risk pregnant women with physical or obstetric complications may develop depression and anxiety disorders that may worsen depending on the consequences of treatment and management during pregnancy. Therefore, their psychological well-being requires particular attention under these conditions. Consideration of specific and effective interventions for depression and anxiety would help improve the psychological outcomes of these women. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy-based interventions for depression and anxiety in high-risk pregnant women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The searches will be conducted in English in the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Additionally, the Ichushi Web will be searched in English and Japanese. Sources of unpublished studies will be searched using ClinicalTrials.gov and the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry. Grey literature will be searched using DANS Data Stations. The JBI guidelines will be used for screening studies, study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction and integration. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to evaluate the certainty of the findings by two independent reviewers. If possible, statistical meta-analyses will be pooled. Additionally, the statistical heterogeneity will be assessed. Subgroup analysis will be performed according to participant and intervention characteristics. Funnel plots, Egger, Begg and Harbord tests will be used to detect publication bias, if necessary.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review does not require an ethics approval, as the data will be evaluated from previously published studies. The findings will be disseminated through publication in an international peer-reviewed journal and presented at research conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024522468.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanii, C., Miyoshi, M., Iizuka, Y., Ueki, S., Shimizu, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105897</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105897</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy-based intervention on depression and anxiety in high-risk pregnant women: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105897</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105897</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106277?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mortality patterns in multimorbid populations: cross-sectional population-wide analysis of Czech national registry data, 2014-2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106277?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The aim is to (i) examine the evolution of (multi-)morbidity in Czechia, (ii) analyse changes in mortality by (multi-)morbidity between 2014 and 2023 and (iii) analyse factors driving mortality change in these subpopulations, using national health registry data, which is unique among countries of the former Eastern Bloc.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional population-wide analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Czechia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adult population aged 30 and above (n~7.5 million).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>1-year period prevalence proportion by age, age-specific and disease-specific occurrence-exposure mortality rates and their coefficient of variation, contributions of age composition, multimorbidity composition and mortality rates to mortality change.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Between 2014 and 2023, the prevalence of no or single diseases remained stable at 55%, while complex multimorbidity patterns (3+ diseases) decreased, especially in the 60+ group (from 20% to 16%). Despite additional diagnoses being associated with elevated mortality, especially for those with diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), mortality risks homogenised across (multi)morbid groups, and overall mortality declined (9 pp in neoplasm and COPD, 7 pp in cerebrovascular diseases and 3 pp in diabetes). This decline was primarily due to shifts in multimorbidity composition; without this, mortality in groups with cerebrovascular diseases, diabetes and COPD would have risen.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The change in mortality over the past decade in Czechia among people with chronic diseases is mainly driven by shifts in multimorbidity composition, rather than pure effects of decline in mortality, contributing to diverging patterns of change between individuals with and without chronic conditions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ukolova, B., Strozza, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106277</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106277</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mortality patterns in multimorbid populations: cross-sectional population-wide analysis of Czech national registry data, 2014-2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106277</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108069?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding acute vertigo in emergency care in a large London teaching hospital: patient and physician perspectives on diagnostic challenges and digital support]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108069?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Acute vertigo is a common but diagnostically challenging presentation in emergency departments (EDs), where rapid distinction of life-threatening conditions&mdash;like stroke&mdash;is critical. Patient and clinician perspectives are often overlooked, and real ED needs and possibilities remain poorly understood. While smartphone-based clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) show promise, evidence on required features for trust and adoption is limited. The UK&rsquo;s 2025 10-Year Health Plan highlights digital innovation and AI in urgent care, underscoring the need to address these gaps.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the experiences of emergency physicians and patients with acute vertigo during the diagnostic process; identify real-world challenges, needs and opportunities within the ED setting; and assess participants&rsquo; perceptions of the acceptability of implementing a smartphone-based decision-support tool (CDST) to aid in acute vertigo diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Emergency Department of University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>10 emergency physicians with experience in managing acute vertigo and 10 patients who had recently presented to the ED with symptoms of acute vertigo.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analyses identified challenges and needs when diagnosing acute vertigo in the ED and participants&rsquo; views on future smartphone-based CDST development to assist the diagnostic process. Clinicians emphasised diagnostic complexity, limited training and system-level constraints&mdash;like lack of space, time and resources&mdash;as major challenges. Patients emphasised the need for better communication and clearer diagnostic pathways. Both groups saw potential in smartphone-based CDSTs to improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy by offering structured assessments and helping clinicians identify serious conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study offers insights into real-world constraints of diagnosing acute vertigo in the ED. Findings suggest that aligning CDST design with clinical workflows, user trust and environmental realities may facilitate adoption and impact in emergency care settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cortese, E., Ramsay, A. I. G., Koohi, N., Kaski, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108069</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108069</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding acute vertigo in emergency care in a large London teaching hospital: patient and physician perspectives on diagnostic challenges and digital support]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108069</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108069</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using real-world evidence to evaluate the long-term health and economic impact of the digital tool Grohealth W8Buddy supporting access to specialist weight management services: a protocol for a cohort observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Obesity affects over a quarter of the UK population and can lead to serious health issues. NHS Specialist Weight Management Services (WMS) offer treatments including lifestyle advice, psychological support and medications, but access and availability vary by region. Although around 4 million people could be eligible for NHS Specialist WMS annually, capacity is limited to 35 000, severely limiting overall access for those who need it. While digital technology has started to be used in WMS, more evidence is needed to confirm its long-term effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness. This study explores the use of Gro Health W8Buddy, a digital platform and app providing remote Specialist WMS. It aims to determine the long-term health benefits of remote WMS pathway Gro Health W8Buddy compared with standard NHS WMS delivered in hospitals, and to improve patients access to services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study is a real-world evaluation with observational data collection. We will recruit 450 study participants from four NHS specialist WMS who will choose either standard NHS WMS or the digital pathway Gro Health W8Buddy. Participants are being given the option to choose their pathway to generate real-world evidence. We will measure and analyse health outcomes including weight loss, time taken to be treated and cost-effectiveness, at 18 months and follow up at 24 months for later analysis (outside of this core funding). We will gather experiential data from patients and healthcare professionals through surveys, observation and interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from NHS Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) (Supplementary Figure 3) (REC reference: 25/EM/0147). Our findings will be disseminated through academic publications, conference presentations and stakeholder engagement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN89168871">ISRCTN89168871</A>; Pre-results.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deo, P. S., Grove, A., Zhang, M., Abrams, K. R., Auguste, P., Barber, T. M., Gazeley, T., Green, R., Griffiths, F., Hazlehurst, J., Hee, S. W., Kaura, A., Mallipedhi, A., OToole, S., Panesar, A., Parsons, N., Scott, E., Summers, C., Thind, M., Thorpe, M., Zalin, A., Hanson, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using real-world evidence to evaluate the long-term health and economic impact of the digital tool Grohealth W8Buddy supporting access to specialist weight management services: a protocol for a cohort observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multifactorial approach training for anterior shoulder instability after a Latarjet procedure: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The Latarjet procedure is the mainstay treatment in high-demand patients with substantial glenoid bone loss or after failed capsulolabral repairs. Patients typically return to sport (RTS) within 6 months postoperatively, requiring intensive rehabilitation. Current rehabilitation protocols focus on mobility, strength and stability. Yet, psychological factors, such as fear of reinjury, are the main reason not to RTS. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether integrating psychological interventions into postoperative rehabilitation improves patient-reported shoulder function compared with physical therapy alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This monocentric randomised controlled trial will enrol 52 patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability. Participants will be equally and randomly assigned to either postoperative physical therapy combined with cognitive behavioural therapy or physical therapy alone. Eligibility criteria include patients aged 18&ndash;67 years undergoing an open or arthroscopic Latarjet procedure at our institution. Exclusion criteria include posterior or multidirectional instability, rotator cuff tear, prior shoulder surgery, anxiety disorder, using anxiolytics, neurological disorder, systemic disease, previous hospitalisation for shoulder pain and proximal humerus fractures.</p>
<p>The primary outcome is the Western Ontario Shoulder Index at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include incidence of recurrent dislocations, RTS and return-to-work rates, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia for Shoulder Instability, subjective shoulder value and visual analogue score for pain at 6 months postoperatively as well as the Shoulder Instability Return to Sport after Injury scale at 4.5 months postoperatively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the French Committee of Person Protection West I. The national registration number is 2023-A02057-38. The study has been registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with trial registration number NCT06154889. Patients are not financially compensated for participation and are allowed to withdraw from the study at any time without any preconditions. The final results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and an abstract of the study will be submitted to international scientific meetings by the end of 2026. Data will be made available by the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Registration details</st>
<p>The study has been registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with trial registration number NCT06154889. The trial sponsor is Vivalto Sant&eacute;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06154889">NCT06154889</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soares, M. N., Shirinskiy, I. J., Schachner, J., MATASI collaborator group, M. c. g., Macken, A. A., Kling, A., Lafosse, T., van den Bekerom, M. P. J., Buijze, G. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109378</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109378</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multifactorial approach training for anterior shoulder instability after a Latarjet procedure: protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109378</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110935?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Weight-loss effects of macronutrient-based diets modified by genetic variants: a protocol for systematic review of randomised controlled trials]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110935?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Personalised nutrition that incorporates genetic results into dietary interventions holds significant potential to optimise weight management and metabolic outcomes. While traditional calorie-restricted diets remain effective, emerging evidence suggests that variations in macronutrient distribution may offer additional benefits. Genetic variants help explain interindividual differences in dietary responses, with certain alleles showing enhanced weight loss and metabolic improvements with specific macronutrient distributions. However, comprehensive reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining genotype-based dietary effects, particularly those focusing on macronutrient distribution metabolic pathway interactions, are lacking, limiting the development of robust evidence-based guidelines for nutrigenetic counselling. This systematic review aims to assess the influence of genetic variants on weight loss outcome in adults in response to varying macronutrient distribution diets (eg, low-fat, low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets) using evidence from RCTs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will systematically review RCTs examining weight loss outcomes of macronutrient-varied diets in adults with genotype stratifications to risk and protective allele. Multiple databases, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Science Direct and Google Scholar, will be used. Reviewers will screen studies, extract data on study characteristics, weight loss, metabolic marker outcomes and genetic data, and assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 tool.</p>
<p>All eligible RCTs will first be summarised in structured tables describing study characteristics, macronutrient distribution and genetic variants and will be analysed with narrative synthesis. For quantitative analysis, interventions will be grouped into three predefined diet types (high-protein, low to moderate carbohydrate and low-fat diet). Because heterogeneity across diet categories is expected, pooled effects will be estimated separately within each diet subgroup using random-effects meta-analysis, expressed as mean differences in weight change (kg). Within each subgroup, and when at least 10 studies or data are available, random-effects meta-regression will be used to examine potential moderators, including intervention duration, physical activity and ancestry. Heterogeneity will be evaluated using I<sup>2</sup> and <sup>2</sup>, and publication bias assessed when feasible. Evidence certainty will be graded using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this protocol as it involves the analysis of data from primary studies. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. Any enquiries regarding research integrity of this protocol may be directed to the Head of the Doctoral Program in Medical Health and Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada via the institutional email address s3fk@ugm.ac.id, as the responsible academic authority for research integrity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251050587.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Subardjo, Y. P., Khairunnissa, N. M., Kusuma, R. J., Huriyati, E., Susetyowati, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110935</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110935</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Weight-loss effects of macronutrient-based diets modified by genetic variants: a protocol for systematic review of randomised controlled trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110935</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110935</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110977?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accuracy of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of paediatric adenoid hypertrophy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110977?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Adenoid hypertrophy (AH) is a prevalent otolaryngological condition that primarily affects children aged 3&ndash;10 years and may adversely impact their growth and development. The choice of treatment largely hinges on the severity of hypertrophy. Currently, the main diagnostic modalities for AH include nasal endoscopy, lateral nasopharyngeal radiography, CT and MRI. In recent years, ultrasonography has emerged as a novel diagnostic tool for AH. This review aims to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography for detecting AH in children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a systematic literature search in five databases&mdash;PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and CNKI&mdash;to identify studies evaluating the use of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of paediatric AH. The search period will span from database inception to 31 March 2025. Only studies published in Chinese or English will be considered. All retrieved records will be independently screened by two reviewers at the title and abstract level to identify eligible studies. Data extraction will also be independently performed by two reviewers. The methodological quality of the included studies will be evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. To synthesise diagnostic accuracy, pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios will be obtained through a bivariate random-effects approach in combination with the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. When notable heterogeneity is detected, subgroup analyses and meta-regression will be conducted to examine whether estimates of diagnostic accuracy differ according to country, ultrasound probe type or operator experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this review is based exclusively on previously published studies, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study registration</st>
<p>PROSPERO, CRD420251080754.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, F., Liao, J., Mou, D., Peng, S., He, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110977</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110977</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accuracy of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of paediatric adenoid hypertrophy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110977</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110977</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111500?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of a community-led intervention on the uptake of childhood vaccines in Liverpool: a protocol for a synthetic control evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111500?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Vaccines are our best defence against infectious diseases, yet uptake of childhood immunisation programmes has consistently declined in the UK, with growing concerns around socioeconomic inequalities. Liverpool, in particular, demonstrated some of the lowest uptake rates in England since 2019. In response, the Health Equity Liverpool Project (HELP) implemented a hyper-localised community-led initiative between September 2023 and June 2024 to tackle vaccine hesitancy. Activities included outreach events and school-based engagement across nine sites within Liverpool. Despite promising qualitative evidence, the intervention&rsquo;s impact on childhood vaccine uptake has not yet been quantified. We aim to evaluate the population level impact of the HELP intervention on the uptake of five childhood vaccines (first and second doses of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR1, MMR2), 6-in-1 vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine booster dose (PCV) and rotavirus vaccine) using synthetic control methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will analyse publicly available quarterly vaccine uptake data (between April 2019 and March 2025) from the Cover of Vaccination Evaluated Rapidly programme for general practices (GPs) in England. The intervention group will be defined as practices located within a 1 km radius of the intervention sites. A synthetic control group will be constructed using non-intervention GPs matched on pre-intervention vaccine uptake, and linked demographic, socioeconomic and healthcare capacity covariates. Primary outcomes are the uptake of MMR1 and MMR2 vaccines. Secondary outcomes include the uptake of 6-in-1, PCV and rotavirus vaccines. Average treatment effects will be estimated as the post-intervention difference in uptake between intervention and synthetic control groups. Sensitivity analyses will examine spillover effects, alternative spatial definitions of exposure, the biasing effect of concurrent interventions and the feasibility of analysis at small area neighbourhood level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study will be conducted as part of the ReCITE project, which has received ethical approval from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 24&ndash;018) and is funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council (Project Number: AH/Z505341/1). Findings will be shared with the project funder and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amin, M. S., Zhang, X., Green, M. A., Holford, D., Hemingway, C., Ismail, A., Moran, J., Doyle, V., Taylor, C., Taegtmeyer, M., Hungerford, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111500</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111500</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of a community-led intervention on the uptake of childhood vaccines in Liverpool: a protocol for a synthetic control evaluation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111500</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111500</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114062?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of self-harm across urgent and emergency care settings among young people and factors associated with reattendance: protocol for a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114062?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Self-harm represents a significant public health concern and is a common reason for contact with urgent and emergency care (UEC) services among young people. Although young people frequently interact with multiple components of the urgent care system following self-harm, there is limited system-level evidence describing patterns of service use, transitions between services and repeat emergency department (ED) attendance. An improved understanding of how young people use UEC services after self-harm is needed to inform the design of more effective and appropriate care pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This protocol describes a prospective cohort study using an extract from the Centre for URgent and Emergency care research database (CUREd+) research database, which comprises routinely collected, linked healthcare data from the National Health Service 111 (NHS 111), ambulance services, urgent care centres, walk-in centres and EDs across Yorkshire and the Humber, England. The study population will include young people aged &le;25 years presenting to UEC services between April 2019 and March 2022 with self-harm coded as the reason for attendance. Analyses will describe the prevalence of self-harm presentations across UEC settings, quantify the proportion of NHS 111 and ambulance contacts resulting in ED attendance within 24 hours and examine factors associated with ED reattendance at 3 and 12 months. Mixed-effects logistic regression models will be used to account for repeated attendances, confounding variables and temporal variation, including changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Anticipated analysis period: January 2026&ndash;January 2027.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been granted by the University of Leeds (MREC 22-079 Amd1) and the University of Sheffield (Ref 068194). The CUREd+ research database operates under Research Ethics Committee approval (23/YH/0079) and Confidentiality Advisory Group approval (18/CAG/0126). Individual consent is not required as all data are pseudonymised at source. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and public-facing outputs coproduced with patient and public involvement groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Romeu, D., Relton, S., Burton, C., Crum, A., Chambers, E. V., Cottrell, D., Guthrie, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114062</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114062</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of self-harm across urgent and emergency care settings among young people and factors associated with reattendance: protocol for a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114062</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114062</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e093419?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk prediction models for detecting a new diagnosis of heart failure within 5 years in the community: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e093419?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Earlier heart failure (HF) diagnosis in the community could allow timely treatment initiation and prevent unnecessary hospitalisation, but identifying those at risk remains challenging. We aimed to summarise the performance of risk prediction models for a new diagnosis of HF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review of multivariable incident HF risk prediction models in the community setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to 9 November 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Observational, community-based studies reporting prediction model performance for incident HF within a 5-year time horizon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Where possible, C-statistics (or area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) with 95% CIs were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool and certainty of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Eighteen studies described 45 prediction models, 27 used traditional statistical methods and 18 applied machine learning. Most (39/45) demonstrated acceptable discrimination (C-statistic &gt;0.70). Overall, C-statistics ranged from 0.675 to 0.954, typically with narrow 95% CIs. External validation was performed for 31 models, but only two&mdash;the modified PCP-HF models for white men and women&mdash;were validated in three cohorts, the highest among all the models. Exploratory random-effects meta-analysis of these models showed pooled C-statistics of 0.82 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.82) for men and 0.85 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.88) for women, indicating excellent discrimination but more heterogenous performance among women. Model performance was at high risk of bias due to unreported or inappropriate handling of missing data, and the certainty of evidence was very low.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Risk prediction models for a new diagnosis of HF in the community performed well, but were at high risk of bias and lacked external validation. Future model development requires appropriate data sources, robust handling of missing data, external validation and clinical testing to assess their impact on earlier HF diagnosis and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42022347120.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thaitirarot, C., Sze, S., Jones, N., Barker, J., Chan, A., Hobbs, F. D. R., Taylor, K. S., Taylor, C. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093419</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-093419</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk prediction models for detecting a new diagnosis of heart failure within 5 years in the community: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e093419</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e093419</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098713?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perinatal challenges for mothers of Haitian origin and their newborns in French Guiana: a historical cohort from 2013 to 2021]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098713?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe the sociodemographic characteristics of mothers of Haitian origin and the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of their newborns born in French Guiana between 2013 and 2021 in order to identify specific vulnerabilities within this population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive, population-based study using data from a comprehensive birth cohort including all deliveries in French Guiana from 2013 to 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All maternity units in French Guiana, a French overseas territory located in South America.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 66 485 live births were recorded during the study period, including 14 065 (21.2%) births to mothers of Haitian origin.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Sociodemographic characteristics, antenatal care indicators and neonatal outcomes were compared between mothers of Haitian origin and mothers of other origins. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CI were calculated for key outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with mothers of other origins, Haitian mothers had higher odds of delivering a newborn small for gestational age (aOR=1.41, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.50), neonatal hospitalisation at birth (aOR=1.19, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.28), having an insufficient number of antenatal visits (aOR=1.32, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.38) and lacking health insurance coverage (aOR=2.83, 95% CI 2.52 to 3.17). Conversely, they had a lower risk of adolescent pregnancy (&lt;20 years; aOR=0.24, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.26). The risk of preterm birth did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.24).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Mothers of Haitian origin in French Guiana experience distinct social and perinatal vulnerabilities. Strengthening equitable access to healthcare and implementing targeted community-based interventions are essential to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes in this population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laumonnier, J., Alcouffe, L., Vendittelli, F., Covis, S., Bernard, S., Nacher, M., Elenga, N., Osei, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098713</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098713</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perinatal challenges for mothers of Haitian origin and their newborns in French Guiana: a historical cohort from 2013 to 2021]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098713</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098713</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100708?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maternal out-of-home care experience and offspring symptom development across domains: a latent profile analysis of a UK longitudinal population sample]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100708?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This prospective longitudinal study of a general population sample investigates whether maternal experience of out-of-home care (OHC) constitutes an independent risk factor for the development of externalising and internalising symptoms in offspring, after adjusting for other commonly associated aetiologic risks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>18 810 families in the UK Millennium Cohort Study with complete information provided by the birth mother regarding her OHC experience and ethnicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Offspring externalising and internalising symptoms assessed by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as reported by the birth mother.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Latent profile analysis of offspring behavioural adjustment trajectories to identify distinct patterns of co-occurring internalising and externalising problem trajectories from age 3 to 17 years. The role of maternal OHC experience and other risk factors as predictors of adjustment patterns were examined descriptively and using multinomial regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five groups of symptom trajectories were identified: two normative groups with very low (33%) and low symptom levels (40%) and three problem behaviour groups including high externalising/moderate internalising (10%), high internalising/high externalising (5%) and moderate internalising/high externalising (12%). Compared with the normative group, higher symptoms were predicted by family socioeconomic status (SES), housing conditions, maternal health, parent&ndash;child relationship and child characteristics. Maternal OHC experience was a significant risk factor for all three problem groups, with the highest relative risk (RRR 4.82) observed for children showing high internalising/externalising symptoms. However, after controlling for the other risk factors, maternal OHC experience was no longer significantly associated with higher symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Maternal OHC experience is associated with an elevated risk of offspring presenting adjustment problems, characterised by co-occurring internalising and externalising symptom trajectories. However, the impact of maternal OHC experience on their children&rsquo;s adjustment was fully attenuated by other common etiological risks, suggesting that these factors play a critical role in mediating the risk.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schoon, I., Parsons, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100708</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100708</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maternal out-of-home care experience and offspring symptom development across domains: a latent profile analysis of a UK longitudinal population sample]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100708</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100708</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100947?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paternal postpartum depression and its associated factors among partners of postpartum women at Dessie Town, Northeast Ethiopia, 2023: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100947?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Paternal postpartum depression among fathers of newborns is a new concept in Ethiopia. It is an emerging public health concern because it produces insidious effects on the well-being of newborns as well as on the whole family. However, there is limited evidence on the prevalence of paternal postpartum depression and its associated factors among partners of postpartum women in Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted in Dessie town, Amhara Regional State, Northeast Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>634 partners of postpartum women participated in the study between 10 January and 10 February 2023. The study included fathers whose spouses had given birth in the last 12 months and who had been of the randomly selected kebeles for at least 6 months. Fathers aged &lt;18 years at the time of data collection were excluded from the study. Data were collected through the structured and pretested Amharic questionnaire through face-to-face interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>A standardised and validated depression-screening instrument (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale) was used to assess paternal postpartum depression. Variables with a P value&lt;0.25 in the bivariable analyses were used as the cut point for eligibility in the multivariable binary logistic regression model. Finally, statistically significant associated factors or secondary outcomes were declared at a p value&lt;0.05 and were reserved in the final model with 95% CI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>610 fathers were interviewed, with a response rate of 96.2%, and the prevalence of paternal postpartum depression was 19% (95% CI 16.0 to 22.3). This study showed that not being comfortable with income (adjusted OR (AOR)=2.32 (95% CI 1.16 to 4.66)], substance use (AOR=2.48 (95% CI 1.22 to 5.05)), prior parenting experience (AOR=1.89 (95% CI 1.02 to 3.50)), unplanned pregnancy (AOR=2.81 (95% CI 1.50 to 5.25)) and infant sleep problems (AOR=4.59 (95% CI 1.80 to 7.18)) were significantly associated with paternal depression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion and recommendations</st>
<p>This study revealed that nearly one-fifth of fathers had paternal depression. Factors significantly associated with PPD were not being comfortable with family income, substance use, experience of childbirth, unplanned pregnancy and infant sleeping problems. This suggests the need to provide health education to decrease substance use and counselling on the utilisation of family planning to minimise unplanned pregnancy and support offered to multiparous fathers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Assefa, A., Workie, A., Assefaw, M., Abate, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100947</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100947</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paternal postpartum depression and its associated factors among partners of postpartum women at Dessie Town, Northeast Ethiopia, 2023: a community-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100947</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100947</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102185?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient experience and preference while waiting for elective cardiac surgery: a mixed-methods cross-sectional survey across four major National Health Service hospitals in London]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102185?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Waiting for cardiac surgery is a stressful life event for most patients. Exploring what people experience while waiting and understanding their preferences and views on how waiting time could be improved will help to inform new strategies for more efficacious waiting list management. In this study, we explored experiences and views of people waiting for elective cardiac surgery across four major London hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Mixed-methods cross-sectional survey, with explanatory concurrent design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Four cardiac surgery services across two National Health Service Trusts in London.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients on waiting lists for elective cardiac surgery at Royal Brompton, Harefield, St Thomas and King&rsquo;s College hospitals between October 2023 and March 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Experience of waiting for surgery, and preferences about how waiting time could be improved.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>554 out of 1041 invited participants agreed to participate (recruitment rate 53.2%). Among them, 274 fully completed the survey (completion rate 49.5%). Most participants (from 52.2% to 70.9%) reported their daily and social activities were impacted by their cardiac condition, and worrying was an ubiquitous feeling (reported by 86%). Psychological distress was reported differently across women and men (higher in women). Eight themes were identified: worrying, daily activities, family/friends and social activities, sexual life, waiting list experience and feelings, communication, most important factors for surgery and suggested improvements. Communication with the surgeon and clinical team, and regular updates on waiting list progress are suggested as crucial factors to alleviate stress, thus potentially improving the experience of waiting for the surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study highlights the importance of emotional support, clear communication, regular updates on waiting list progress and building trust with the clinical team to improve patient-centred care while waiting for elective cardiac surgery. This finding can offer valuable insights for managing waiting lists in other surgery waiting list contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05996640">NCT05996640</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russo, M., Richards, K. L., Kumar, R., Burridge, J., Chaplin, H., Chua, K.-C., Hardy, D., Avlonitis, V. S., Baig, K., Bhudia, S., Noorani, A., Khan, H., Petrou, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102185</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102185</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient experience and preference while waiting for elective cardiac surgery: a mixed-methods cross-sectional survey across four major National Health Service hospitals in London]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102185</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102976?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations between shift work patterns and sleep disturbance: an analysis of cross-sectional data from UK Biobank]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102976?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate associations between shift work patterns and sleep disturbance, and to assess if the association is modified by demographic factors, socioeconomic factors, anthropometric and lifestyle factors, health conditions or sleep traits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Analysis of cross-sectional data obtained from the UK Biobank baseline assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>UK Biobank, a large-scale prospective cohort study which recruited half a million participants aged 40&ndash;69 years between 2006 and 2010 from across the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 285 175 employed or self-employed participants at baseline (2006&ndash;2010), including 148 296 (52.0%) females and 136 879 (48.0%) males. The sample comprised 94.0% White, 0.7% Mixed race, 0.36% East Asian, 2.0% South Asian, 1.8% Black and 0.89% from other ethnic backgrounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Sleep disturbance was defined as the presence of both insomnia and excessive sleepiness symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 42 181 (14.8%) participants had sleep disturbance defined based on insomnia and excessive sleepiness. 236 200 (82.8%) were non-shift workers, while 48 975 (17.2%) were shift workers, which included 24 062 (49.1%) working day shifts only, 17 940 (36.6%) working night shifts sometimes or usually, and 6973 (14.2%) working night shifts always. Compared with non-shift workers, all shift workers had higher multivariable-adjusted odds of sleep disturbance: (non-night shifts: OR in model 3 (OR) 1.21 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.27); sometimes/usually night shifts: OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.44) and always night shifts: OR 1.50 (95% CI 1.38 to 1.63)). The association between shift work pattern and sleep disturbance was modified by age (p<SUB>interaction</SUB>&lt;0.0001), ethnicity (p<SUB>interaction</SUB>=0.0005) and smoking status (p<SUB>interaction</SUB>=0.04).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Shift work is associated with a higher odds of sleep disturbance compared with non-shift work in all participants, with greatest odds observed among those always working night shifts. The association was stronger among individuals who were younger than 55 years old, from an ethnic minority background and never smokers. Future large-scale longitudinal studies are needed to further investigate these associations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, X., Ray, D. W., Kyle, S. D., Smith-Byrne, K., Holmes, L., Keane, A., Parsaeian, M., Travis, R. C., Richmond, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-21T05:38:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102976</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102976</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations between shift work patterns and sleep disturbance: an analysis of cross-sectional data from UK Biobank]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102976</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102976</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106299?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of greenhouse gas emission of type 2 diabetes management in adults: a modelling study in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106299?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The carbon footprint of end-to-end healthcare deliveries by the National Health Service in England totalled 25.0 megatons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<SUB>2</SUB>e) in 2019. Optimal and sustainable healthcare can lead to better health outcomes as well as a lower environmental footprint.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the potential impact of prevention and effective management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in adults on both the clinical outcomes and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the UK healthcare setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Research design and methods</st>
<p>We incorporated an environmental module into the existing IQVIA core diabetes model to estimate the impact of improving clinical outcomes on GHG emissions over a lifetime horizon. We assessed two hypothetical scenarios: (1) preventing progression from pre-diabetes to T2DM through diet and exercise versus no intervention and natural disease progression to T2DM; and (2) well-controlled T2DM using interventions with clinical benefit on glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and renal and cardiovascular outcomes versus uncontrolled T2DM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Preventing progression to T2DM led to 6.357 additional undiscounted life years and 67% less kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e emissions compared with subsequent natural progression to T2DM for a person with pre-diabetes over a lifetime (emissions of 9586 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e over 37.115 years vs 28 716 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e over 30.758 years, respectively). Well-controlled T2DM led to 1.947 additional undiscounted life years and 21% less kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e emissions per patient over a lifetime compared with uncontrolled T2DM (emissions of 14 545 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e over 22.772 years vs 18 516 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e over 20.825 years, respectively). In both scenarios, the GHG emission savings were primarily due to reduced emissions related to avoidance of treating complications of T2DM including cardiovascular, renal and eye diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Effective prevention and management of T2DM through implementation of evidence-based clinical guidelines can improve patient outcomes while reducing the healthcare-related environmental impacts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lund, N., Maslova, E., Chen, J., Giannini, J., Soro, M., Culligan, I., Richards, G., Taneja, L., Varghese, S., Li, Y., Xu, W., Gonzalez, J., Valentim, J., Tour, P. d. L., Adshead, F., Moore, K., Puggina, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T14:31:27-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106299</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106299</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Press releases, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of greenhouse gas emission of type 2 diabetes management in adults: a modelling study in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106299</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106299</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e096388?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cardiovascular disease risk perception and stages of preventive behaviours: a community survey in Pokhara Metropolitan, Nepal]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e096388?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading cause of mortality in Nepal. Risk perception is crucial for the prevention of CVD-related behaviours. This study assessed CVD risk perceptions and the stages of preventive behaviours among adults in Pokhara Metropolitan, Nepal by integrating two theoretical models&mdash;the Health Belief Model and the Transtheoretical Model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This study used a cross-sectional design with data collected through a survey using a semistructured questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted from July 2024 to August 2024; among community people aged &ge;20 residing in 11 wards of Pokhara Metropolitan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 384 community people residing in Pokhara Metropolitan, Nepal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome and explanatory variables</st>
<p>The primary outcome measure was stage of preventive behaviours of CVDs using Fuster BEWAT components (blood pressure, exercise, weight, diet and tobacco), while explanatory variables were sociodemographic characteristics and CVD Health Beliefs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 384 adults participated (response rate=95%). The mean age was 42.3 years (SD&plusmn;14.5), with equal representation of males and females. More than half of the participants (55.5%) perceived low susceptibility to CVDs, 40.4% perceived high severity, 78.4% perceived high benefits and 49.5% perceived moderate barriers. Most respondents were in the precontemplation stage for blood pressure control (43%) and weight management (30.5%), whereas maintenance was most common for physical activity (41.1%), healthy diet (51.3%) and smoking abstinence (80.1%).</p>
<p>Ordinal logistic regression revealed that low perceived benefits significantly hindered behavioural progression (p=0.001&ndash;0.012), where low perceived barriers significantly facilitated advancement across all behaviours (p&lt;0.05). The association for perceived susceptibility and severity was inconsistent. Overall, enhancing perceived benefits and reducing barriers were the strongest predictors of progression through stages of change in CBD preventive behaviours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Perceived benefits and barriers were key predictors of progression in CVD prevention behaviours. While many adults maintained healthy diets, physical activity and smoking abstinence, most were in the early stage for blood pressure and weight control strategies. Strengthening perceived benefits and reducing barriers can enhance the adoption of healthy behaviours in Nepal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adhikari, S., Adhikari, C., Bhatt, P. R., Mishra, R., Adhikari, K., Bhandari, P., Pudasainee, M., Rana, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T05:17:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096388</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096388</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cardiovascular disease risk perception and stages of preventive behaviours: a community survey in Pokhara Metropolitan, Nepal]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096388</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096388</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104512?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pregnancy Risk, Infant Surveillance, and Measurement Alliance (PRISMA) Maternal and Newborn Health Study: protocol for a multisite, prospective, open cohort study of pregnancy and postpartum health outcomes in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104512?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Maternal and child mortality has markedly decreased worldwide over the past few decades. Despite this success, the decline remains unequal across countries and is overall insufficient to meet the Sustainable Development Goals. South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa bear most of the burden of maternal and child morbidity and mortality. Major gaps persist in our understanding of the causes, timing, diagnostic thresholds and risk factors for adverse outcomes in these regions. Addressing these gaps requires new ways to prevent and treat disease, from novel diagnostics to precision public health strategies, all of which rely on high-quality clinical data from diverse populations. The Pregnancy Risk, Infant Surveillance, and Measurement Alliance (PRISMA) Maternal and Newborn Health Study aims to estimate population-level prevalence of morbidities and mortality and to assess biological, clinical and sociodemographic risk among mother&ndash;infant pairs in India, Pakistan, Kenya, Ghana and Zambia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a prospective, open cohort study with a planned recruitment of about 6000 women annually across six research sites in five countries. Participants are pregnant women enrolled less than 20 weeks gestation, as determined by ultrasound, identified through active house-to-house and facility-based surveillance. Robust clinical data will be collected at 12 scheduled study visits during antenatal care, labour and delivery, and through 1 year postpartum. A total of 34 outcomes will be captured. The primary analysis will estimate the burden of adverse outcomes and examine associated risk factors to inform future intervention strategies. Data will also be used to develop normative values for pregnant and postpartum women, as well as predictive models to assess pregnancy risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>PRISMA received institutional and national ethical approvals. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed open-access journals and disseminated at national and international forums to inform clinical guidelines and public health practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05904145">NCT05904145</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pregnancy Risk, Infant Surveillance, and Measurement Alliance (PRISMA) Investigators, Smith, Mores, Pan, Seager, Baumann, Marquis, Sudfeld, Hoodbhoy, Nisar, Jehan, Hotwani, Yazdani, Khan, Shaheen, Farooqui, Chatterjee, Dang, Dang, Venketeshwar, Mazumder, Sharma, Jadaun, Talukdar, Wylie, Akelo, Mwebia, Were, Gethi, Abaja, Ouma, Owuor, Otieno, Cherian, Benjamin, Mohan, Vijayalekshmi, Varghese, Sugirtha, Jebakumar, James, Kasaro, Bridget Spelke, Mutale, Mbewe, Mwape, Freeman, Vwalika, Sampa, Asante, Newton, Agyemang, Adjei, Agyemang, Adu-Gyasi, Odei-Lartey, Gyaase, Lamberti]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T05:17:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104512</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104512</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pregnancy Risk, Infant Surveillance, and Measurement Alliance (PRISMA) Maternal and Newborn Health Study: protocol for a multisite, prospective, open cohort study of pregnancy and postpartum health outcomes in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104512</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104512</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105915?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of Helicobacter pylori infection and eradication failure among healthcare workers in a high-exposure clinical setting: a single-centre retrospective cohort study in China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105915?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at potential risk of <I>Helicobacter pylori</I> (<I>H. pylori</I>) infection due to occupational exposure, yet epidemiological data in this population remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, eradication efficacy and antibiotic resistance patterns of <I>H. pylori</I> infection among HCWs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary hospital in Beijing, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>725 HCWs who underwent <I>H. pylori</I> testing via urea breath test between January 2020 and December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, symptomatic presentations, treatment regimens and antibiotic resistance profiles were extracted from electronic medical records. Univariate analyses using &sup2; tests identified associations between variables, followed by multivariate logistic regression to adjust for confounders and determine independent predictors of <I>H. pylori</I> eradication failure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall <I>H. pylori</I> positivity rate was 22.9% (166/725). Male gender (OR=1.76, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.59) and alcohol consumption (OR=2.40, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.58) were identified as independent risk factors. Notably, <I>H. pylori</I>-positive individuals had a lower incidence of acid reflux symptoms (9.1% vs 17.3%, p=0.011). The eradication rate was 92.0% (95% CI 84.3% to 96.7%), but clarithromycin resistance reached 47.1% (95% CI 36.4% to 58.0%), with 12.8% (95% CI 6.6% to 21.5%) showing dual resistance to clarithromycin and quinolones.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Targeted screening for male HCWs and alcohol users, along with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, is recommended. High clarithromycin resistance underscores the need for local antibiotic stewardship.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xie, D., Cheng, J., Zhao, X., Fan, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T05:17:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105915</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105915</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Occupational and environmental medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of Helicobacter pylori infection and eradication failure among healthcare workers in a high-exposure clinical setting: a single-centre retrospective cohort study in China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Occupational and environmental medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105915</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105915</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106653?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hydroxychloroquine as an adjunct therapy in the management of type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106653?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The increasing incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among women of reproductive age poses significant health risks for both mothers and their fetuses. Optimising blood glucose levels during pregnancy is particularly challenging, even with a combination of oral antidiabetic agents and insulin therapy. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been shown to lower glucose levels in non-pregnant populations and has demonstrated safety in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid diseases. In addition to its glucose-lowering effects, HCQ also exhibits immunomodulatory, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Given that both T2DM and pregnancy are pro-inflammatory states, inadequate glycaemic control may exacerbate adverse pregnancy outcomes. We hypothesise that adjunctive treatment with HCQ in this cohort could improve glycaemic control, reduce systemic inflammation and subsequently lower the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial involving 56 pregnant women diagnosed with T2DM. Participants will be randomly allocated, using computerised randomisation software, into either a control group receiving standard care or an intervention group receiving standard care with HCQ 200 mg daily. The primary outcomes will be the difference in glycaemic parameters and inflammatory markers. Secondary outcomes include the assessment of pregnancy outcomes between the groups, such as gestational age at delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, fetal macrosomia and shoulder dystocia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This protocol has been approved by the National University of Malaysia Ethics Committee (JEP-2023&ndash;866). Study findings will be disseminated via presentations at academic conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals and professional training and meetings to healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (<A HREF="NCT06319560">NCT06319560</A>) on 23 January 2024.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Basri, N. I., A Wahab, N., Mohammed Nawi, A., Ishak, S., Murthi, P., Abd Rahman, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T05:17:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106653</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106653</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hydroxychloroquine as an adjunct therapy in the management of type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106653</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106653</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107391?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Qualitative study of information needs in advanced ovarian cancer: communication among patients, caregivers and healthcare providers regarding the disease, pharmacological treatment and non-pharmacological support]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107391?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Qualitative evidence in ovarian cancer (OC) doctor-patient-caregiver communication is scarce. This study explored the information needs of patients and caregivers, comparing these to healthcare professionals&rsquo; (HCPs) perspectives, to uncover why gaps exist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative, observational, multicentre and cross-sectional study with OC patients, their caregivers and HCPs. Qualitative data were collected through remote semistructured interviews. Themes were identified using thematic analysis. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and the disease-specific EORTC QLQ-OV28 were collected as quality of life measures and analysed descriptively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Patients were recruited during their routine visits in five university hospitals in Spain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients were &ge;18 years of age in stages III or IV according to FIGO classification, were on first line treatment or recurrent and platinum sensitive with the most complex molecular profiles. 19 patients, 7 caregivers and 10 HCPs participated in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three main themes emerged: (a) patient information needs about the disease and pharmacological treatments, (b) patient information needs about non-pharmacological support and (c) caregiver information needs. The first theme was viewed through three differing attitudes (the Involved, Trusting and Indecisive), with HCPs&rsquo; agreeing with the attitudes but without adjusting transmitted information accordingly. For the second theme, patients expressly desired more information on psychosexual issues, psychological support and patient associations (PAs), and HCPs concurred with a need for more non-pharmacological support. Regarding the third theme, caregivers expressed not being engaged by HCPs, despite HCPs recognising their importance, with nurses being more empathetic than oncologists on this matter.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These results highlight the importance of understanding the information needs of OC patients and their caregivers. This understanding enables HCPs to provide better support, helping patients and caregivers make more informed health decisions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rubio Perez, M. J., Sanchez-Heras, A. B., Maximiano Alonso, C., Garcia Garcia, Y., Alfaro Oliver, N., Marcos Corrales, R., Rubio Renau, R., Sola Marsinach, C., Bolea Bosque, S., Quindos Varela, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T05:17:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107391</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107391</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Qualitative study of information needs in advanced ovarian cancer: communication among patients, caregivers and healthcare providers regarding the disease, pharmacological treatment and non-pharmacological support]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107391</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107499?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adverse childhood experience among patients with severe mood disorders in Gedeo Zone Public Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia:A multisite cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107499?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess prevalence and associated factors of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among patients with severe mood disorders (SMDs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An institution-based cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Gedeo Zone Public Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>374 patients with SMDs were recruited using a systematic sampling technique.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The data were collected using an interview-administered questionnaire and medical chart review. The outcome variable was assessed using the ACEs questionnaire. Data were coded and entered into Epi Data 3.1 and analysed using SPSS V.26. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with ACEs. The presence of an association was examined using an adjusted OR (AOR) with a 95% CI. Variables with P-values less than 0.05 were considered a statistically significant association.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall prevalence of ACEs among patients with SMDs was 51.6% (95% CI 49.2 to 53.9), and the prevalence of ACEs among patients with severe bipolar disorders and depressive disorders was 14.7% with (95% CI 46.8 to 52.4) and 36.9% with (95% CI 46.7 to 55.8), respectively. Having low socioeconomic status (SES) (AOR=2.04 (95% CI 1.40 to 3.45), poor social support (AOR=2.43 (95% CI 1.74 to 4.17)), low resilient coping strategies (AOR=1.48 (95% CI 1.21 to 2.83)) and severity of depressive symptoms (AOR=3.82 (95% CI 2.89 to 6.00)) were significantly associated with ACEs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study reveals a high prevalence of ACEs among patients with SMDs, with more than half of the participants reporting at least one ACE. Low SES, low resilient coping strategies and poor social support were factors significantly associated with ACEs, and severe depressive symptoms were significantly associated with ACEs. Therefore, these findings underscore the importance of early screening and appropriate intervention for SMDs and ACEs, and providing more holistic mental healthcare for SMDs and ACEs, improving access to education and economic support, strengthening social support networks, enhancing resilience-building programmes and integrating routine ACEs assessments into mental health evaluations could potentially contribute to improved clinical outcomes and support long-term recovery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>Not applicable</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mekuriaw, B. Y., Amede, E. S., Shono, M. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T05:17:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107499</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107499</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adverse childhood experience among patients with severe mood disorders in Gedeo Zone Public Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia:A multisite cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107499</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107499</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110212?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of falls prevention interventions on falls and the risk factors for falls among cancer survivors: protocol for a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110212?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Falls are a significant health concern and associated with cancer survivorship. Falls can result in negative psychosocial consequences for cancer survivors and economic sequelae for healthcare delivery. There are cancer-specific fall risk factors relevant to cancer survivors which can contribute to increased fall risk. However, fall prevention may not be addressed in standard care for cancer survivors. This review aims to synthesise the findings from published research to explore the intervention characteristics and the effectiveness of fall prevention interventions on the incidence of falls and risk factors for falls in cancer survivors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic search in CINAHL Ultimate, PubMed, Scopus, Embase and supplementary search Google Scholar will be conducted in November 2025. We will include randomised controlled and controlled trials that describe the characteristics of the programme and report falls or risk factors for falls as outcomes. Title, abstract and full-text screening will be performed independently by two reviewers. The Tool for the assEssment of Study qualiTy and reporting in EXercise (TESTEX), Risk Of Bias instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials (ROBUST-RCT) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tools will be used to assess the quality and certainty of evidence. We will provide a summary of the intervention characteristics and perform a meta-analysis or narrative synthesis of the findings as appropriate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review as we will include papers published in peer-reviewed journals and original data will not be collected. The findings of this systematic review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed publication and presented at relevant conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>ID 1240723.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clifford, A. M., Mackenzie, L., Fallon, E., Allardyce, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T05:17:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110212</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110212</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of falls prevention interventions on falls and the risk factors for falls among cancer survivors: protocol for a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110212</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101735?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Addressing Commercial Health determinants: Indigenous Empowerment and Voices for Equity (ACHIEVE)--protocol for a multiphase study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101735?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The commercial determinants of health (CDoH) are a rapidly growing field of research and global health priority. Despite being disproportionately affected, Indigenous Peoples&rsquo; voices and perspectives are conspicuously absent from CDoH research and policy. This article outlines the protocol for Addressing Commercial Health determinants: Indigenous Empowerment and Voices for Equity (ACHIEVE), an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-led project in Australia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>ACHIEVE integrates four research streams, using a novel combination of methods. The first three streams will (i) conceptualise the CDoH using Indigenous yarning methodology, (ii) evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies to reduce exposure to harmful marketing and (iii) assess the impacts of specific commercial entities on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health using case studies. The final stream will consolidate findings from streams 1&ndash;3 and work with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) to co-create strategies for addressing the commercial determinants of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for streams 1&ndash;3 has been granted by Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee. ACHIEVE is guided by a governance model that prioritises Indigenous data sovereignty, community and ACCHO partnerships, capacity building and knowledge translation. Findings will be shared with participants, ACCHOs and policymakers to maximise research impact.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cubillo (Larrakia/Wadjigan), B. J., Browne, J., Sherriff, S., Walker (Yorta Yorta), T., Hill, K., Crocetti, A., Mitchell, F., Backholer, K., Maddox, R., Brown, A., Allender, S., Wright, C. J. C., Lacy-Nichols, J., Chamberlain, C., Ropitini (Ngati Kahungunu/Ngati Maniapoto iwi/Trawlwoolway), A., Taylor, N., Blair, N., Richards, G., Huxley, R. R., Ananthapavan, J., Hedges, J., Poirier, B., Peeters, A., Nguyen, P., Swinburn, B., Atkinson-Briggs, S., Yeomans, L., Paradies, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T19:54:37-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101735</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101735</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Addressing Commercial Health determinants: Indigenous Empowerment and Voices for Equity (ACHIEVE)--protocol for a multiphase study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101735</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101735</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e094141?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a personal recovery questionnaire for older adults with bipolar: a qualitative integrated knowledge translation approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e094141?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To report on the development and refinement of a questionnaire of personal recovery for use by older adults with bipolar disorder.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An integrated knowledge translation approach was used to structure collaboration of individuals with clinical, research and service users. Focus groups, online meetings and online feedback were used to support information sharing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Knowledge users from across the UK including older adults with experience of bipolar, clinicians and academics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>A final draft of the Bipolar Recovery Questionnaire for Older Adults with bipolar (BRQ-OA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Five service users and 15 stakeholders engaged with the study. The views and recommendations of the groups were integrated into the development of the BRQ-OA across four phases. Service users identified factors of personal recovery they felt had changed with ageing, including the impact of physical health and the importance of finding a purpose following changes to role. Collaboration with key stakeholders allowed for the development of a personal recovery questionnaire relevant to the experiences of older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>An integrated knowledge translation approach successfully structured engagement with key stakeholders to allow for active and meaningful engagement. Collaboration of individuals with experience of bipolar, clinicians and academics allowed for the development of the first questionnaire of personal recovery specifically adapted for older adults with bipolar. Future research is needed to validate the BRQ-OA in older adult samples so that it can be used in mental health services and intervention studies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthewson, J., Tyler, E., Haddock, G., Jones, S. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094141</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-094141</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a personal recovery questionnaire for older adults with bipolar: a qualitative integrated knowledge translation approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e094141</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e094141</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experiences of conflicting decision-making by surrogate decision-makers in neurocritical care in China: a descriptive qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to explore the experience of decision conflict among surrogate decision-makers for patients with critical illness undergoing neurosurgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative descriptive research design was used. Participants were selected using a purposive sampling method, and semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data, which were then analysed using Colaizzi&rsquo;s seven-step analysis method.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study included 15 surrogate decision-makers for patients with critical illness undergoing neurosurgery as interview participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In this interview study, two main themes and nine subthemes were identified&#xFF1A;(a) core conflict in the decision-making process: conflicts between the quality of life and the length of life, conflict between patient and surrogate preferences and conflict between the expected and realistic treatment outcomes; and (b) complex causes of decisional conflict: the burden of decision-making in critical care, inadequate decision-making information, erosion of patient-physician trust, socio-cultural pressures, overwhelming financial burden and negative emotional distress.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Surrogate decision-makers for patients with neurological critical illness often experience complex decision conflicts during the clinical decision-making process. This underscores the need for healthcare providers to identify high-risk individuals for decision conflicts early on and provide personalised decision support strategies to mitigate such conflicts and enhance decision quality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mao, s., Cao, Q., Li, Q., Wu, Y., Zhang, X., Jiang, J., Zeng, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Intensive care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experiences of conflicting decision-making by surrogate decision-makers in neurocritical care in China: a descriptive qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Intensive care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097266</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103416?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Womens experiences of wound dehiscence of a second-degree perineal tear and choice of treatment in Denmark: a qualitative interview study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103416?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to describe women&rsquo;s experiences of perineal wound dehiscence of a second-degree perineal tear and choice of resuturing or conservative treatment in the first two months after birth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative descriptive study using individual semistructured interviews was conducted. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke&rsquo;s reflexive thematic analysis approach to explore women&rsquo;s experiences and perspectives on dehisced perineal wounds of a second-degree perineal tear. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed concurrently with data collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Perineal clinics at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at two large University Hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>17 women with dehisced perineal wound of a second-degree perineal tear.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three main themes were identified: (1) The unforeseen troubles: for the women with perineal wound dehiscence, the pain intensified immensely after the birth. It was an unexpected complication, and it affected the women negatively in various ways. (2) The emotional turmoil: it was a crisis for the women that their lower bodies were not intact. They were terrified, and they wondered if they had themselves to blame. Most women emphasised that choosing between resuturing or conservative treatment was a difficult and lonely decision. (3) Living with changes: regardless of treatment approach, women in both groups reported gradually managing their complicated healing and pain, but were concerned about their genitals and future births.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The findings indicate that wound dehiscence was related to a painful postpartum period and an altered body image, and that the women generally found choosing between resuturing or conservative treatment difficult.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moestrup, L. V., Jango&#x0308;, H., Bergholt, T., Klarskov, N., Hogh, S., Hegaard, H. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103416</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103416</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Womens experiences of wound dehiscence of a second-degree perineal tear and choice of treatment in Denmark: a qualitative interview study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103416</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103416</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105497?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of vitamin D non-reimbursement policy on therapy discontinuation in the general and rheumatic population in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105497?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the impact of the non-reimbursement policy on vitamin D therapy discontinuation in patients from the general and rheumatic populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Research institute specialised in health research and two outpatient pharmacies in the Netherlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Patients from the general and rheumatic population with an active prescription for vitamin D supplementation therapy were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data collection and analysis</st>
<p>Data were collected between April and May 2023 through self-reported questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed using STATA V. 17. P value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who discontinued vitamin D supplementation therapy following the implementation of the non-reimbursement policy. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported reasons for therapy discontinuation and the association between patient-related characteristics and the risk of therapy discontinuation. In addition, the proportion of patients who switched to an alternative supplement and whether this switch had been made in consultation with a healthcare provider was examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 4800 patients, 302 (6.4%) patients discontinued their vitamin D therapy. The three most frequently reported reasons for therapy discontinuation were the inability to afford supplements without reimbursement, not willing to pay for supplements without reimbursement and being unaware of the alternative vitamin D supplements to switch to. Younger age, financial constraints and limited health literacy were significantly associated with vitamin D therapy discontinuation (p&lt;0.05). Among the 1478 patients that switched to an alternative supplement, 706 (17.9%) patients indicated that they made the switch in consultation with a healthcare provider.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The implementation of the non-reimbursement policy resulted in a small proportion of patients discontinuing their vitamin D therapy. Elevated discontinuation rates were associated with specific patient-related characteristics including patients aged &lt;50 years, those experiencing financial constraints and those with limited health literacy, suggesting the need for developing interventions and preventive strategies to support patients at risk of therapy discontinuation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, A., Huiskes, V. J. B., van den Bemt, B. J. F., van Ameijden, H., Nurmohamed, M. T., Spijkers, K. M., Vervloet, M., Brabers, A. E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105497</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105497</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of vitamin D non-reimbursement policy on therapy discontinuation in the general and rheumatic population in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105497</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105497</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106554?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gender dynamics in authorship of scientific publications in obstetrics and gynaecology: a 10-year bibliometric analysis of six high-impact journals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106554?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Although obstetrics and gynaecology (O&amp;G) is a predominantly female specialty, previous studies have suggested that women remain under-represented in academic authorship. This study evaluates trends in female and male first and last authorship in six leading O&amp;G journals (<I>Human Reproduction Update</I>, <I>American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</I>, <I>British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</I>, <I>Obstetrics and Gynecology</I>, <I>Gynecologic Oncology</I> and <I>Best Practice &amp; Research Clinical Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology</I>) between January 2013 and December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science database. The gender of the first and last authors was determined using Genderize.io, with a probability threshold of &ge;75% for classification. Binary logistic regression was performed to model the probability of authorship by gender across journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 57 310 publications, 38 455 first (43.8% male and 56.2% female) and 38 950 last authors (58.6% male and 41.4% female) were identified and analysed. Over the past decade, female authorship has shown a clear upward trend, with first authorship increasing from 43% (1141/2636) in 2013 to 69% (2769/4036) in 2023, and last authorship increasing from 29% (770/2700) to 54% (2180/4047). First authorship was statistically more likely to be held by women in <I>Human Reproduction Update</I> (1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48), <I>American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</I> (1.63, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.70) and <I>Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</I> (2.33, 95% CI 2.22 to 2.45). However, female last authorship was significantly more likely only in <I>Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</I> (1.21, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.27).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Despite an increasing trend in female representation in first and last authorships over the past decade, a significant gender disparity persists. While women now constitute the majority of first authors, last authorship remains disproportionately male, reflecting ongoing barriers to female leadership in O&amp;G research. These findings highlight the need for targeted institutional efforts to promote gender equity in academic medicine.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobotis, S., Stathi, D., Verigos, E., Geropoulos, G., Arsenaki, E., Paraskevaidi, M., Tzafetas, M., Mitra, A., Kyrgiou, M., Kechagias, K. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106554</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106554</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical publishing and peer review]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gender dynamics in authorship of scientific publications in obstetrics and gynaecology: a 10-year bibliometric analysis of six high-impact journals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical publishing and peer review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106554</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106554</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107038?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Screening for hypertension in the inpatient environment (SHINE): a prospective diagnostic accuracy study among adult hospital patients]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107038?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Hypertension is the leading risk factor for death globally. Undiagnosed hypertension is common, but the incidence in hospitalised patients is unclear. There are calls for universal facility-based screening for hypertension among all attending patients. The hospital inpatient setting, where blood pressure (BP) is measured routinely and repeatedly, presents an ideal opportunity. However, international hypertension guidelines do not include inpatient BP thresholds for diagnostic or treatment purposes. We investigated the performance of current UK community BP thresholds for diagnosing hypertension in the hospital setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Investigate the diagnostic performance of the current UK ambulatory BP diagnostic thresholds for systolic and diastolic hypertension in the hospital setting against the reference test of community-based ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A prospective diagnostic accuracy study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Hospital inpatients admitted to three UK centres were approached. Follow-up ABPM was delivered in the community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Eligible patients were aged between 18 and 80 years, with no prior diagnosis of, or prescription for hypertension, and whose mean cumulative daytime BP was 120 mm Hg to 179 mm Hg systolic and &le;109 mm Hg diastolic from the 24th hour of their hospital admission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Participants received 24-hour ABPM 4&ndash;26 weeks post-discharge, as the reference test for hypertension, with UK diagnostic thresholds of an average daytime BP of &ge;135 mm Hg systolic and &ge;85 mm Hg diastolic applied. Participants found to be severely hypertensive at the ABPM fitting appointment were also considered reference-test positive but did not proceed with ABPM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The diagnostic performance of a mean daytime in-hospital BP of &ge;135 mm Hg systolic or &ge;85 mm Hg diastolic (index test) for the prediction of hypertension diagnosed on ABPM (reference test) was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) as primary outcome measures. Additionally, we explored the accuracy of a range of alternative in-hospital systolic and diastolic BP thresholds against the same reference test.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>351 participants were enrolled and 206 completed the study protocol. The average age of the 206 participants was 53 years, 55% were male, and 91 (44%) had daytime community hypertension on ABPM reference testing. Of 107 participants with raised in-hospital daytime BP, 59 (55%) had daytime community hypertension. When assessing the performance of the index test for detecting daytime community hypertension, sensitivity was 65% (59/91, 54% to 75%) and specificity was 58% (67/115, 49% to 67%). The PPV was 55% (59/107, 45% to 65%) and NPV was 68% (67/99, 58% to 77%), respectively. A further 45/206 participants (23%) had night-time community hypertension when assessed using European diagnostic thresholds for nocturnal hypertension (120 mm Hg systolic or 70 mm Hg diastolic), while 25/107 of those with raised in-hospital daytime BP (23%) had night-time community hypertension. When assessing the performance of the index test for detecting either day or night-time community hypertension, sensitivity was 62% (84/135, 53% to 70%) and specificity was 68% (48/71, 55% to 78%). The PPV was 79% (84/107, 70% to 86%) and NPV was 48% (48/99, 38% to 59%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Undiagnosed hypertension is common in hospitalised patients, particularly those with raised in-hospital BP. While in-hospital BP alone is an imperfect predictor and should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic test, this could serve as a trigger for further assessment of BP in the community after discharge.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The study protocol was registered with the ISCTRN Registry (<A HREF="ISRCTN80586284">ISRCTN80586284</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armitage, L. C., Roman, C., Lawson, B. K., Mahdi, A., Biggs, C., Young, L., Edmundson, H., Fanshawe, T., Tarassenko, L., Farmer, A., Watkinson, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107038</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107038</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Screening for hypertension in the inpatient environment (SHINE): a prospective diagnostic accuracy study among adult hospital patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107038</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107038</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108955?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interventions aimed at improving psychosocial safety climate in the workplace: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108955?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Psychosocial safety climate (PSC) is increasingly recognised as an important organisational resource for promoting mental health at work and preventing psychosocial risks, which are aspects of work design, organisation and management that could threaten employees' psychological or physical well-being. While substantial theoretical and empirical evidence supports the role of PSC as a protective factor, limited research has explored how PSC can be deliberately and sustainably enhanced through organisational interventions. This scoping review aims to map PSC-related interventions, synthesise how PSC is conceptualised and operationalised, and identify elements that studies have reported as contributing to strengthening PSC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will follow established methodological frameworks and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to systematically identify and synthesise studies describing organisational interventions related to PSC. A comprehensive search strategy will be implemented across several databases, including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ABI/INFORM and Business Source Premier. Eligible studies must describe, implement or evaluate interventions explicitly targeting PSC. Data on intervention types, mechanisms, outcomes and contextual factors will be extracted and narratively synthesised to address the descriptive research questions and map how PSC interventions have been conceptualised and implemented across organisational contexts. This protocol does not involve human participants. The review is not yet registered. Findings will inform future research and organisational practices related to PSC-focused interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This review involves analysis of published literature only and does not require ethics approval. Findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant academic and professional conferences. Results will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and will inform the development of future organisational interventions aimed at enhancing PSC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fouquet, E., Legault, M.-E. B., Biron, C., Poulin-Daigle, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108955</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108955</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interventions aimed at improving psychosocial safety climate in the workplace: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108955</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108955</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109969?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative care utilisation in migrant populations: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109969?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Migrants are vulnerable to structural barriers that compromise their health status and simultaneously decrease their access to healthcare, including palliative care. Literature on palliative care access in migrant populations is limited by a focus on migration to high-income countries; under-representation of refugees, asylum seekers and migrant workers; and no investigation of intersectional factors. We seek to conduct a scoping review of palliative care utilisation in migrant populations, including both academic and grey literature, including articles from low- to middle-income countries and about refugees, asylum seekers and migrant workers. The review will map out what is already known and what remains unknown about palliative care utilisation in migrants; identify the factors associated with palliative care utilisation; and determine the extent to which intersectionality has been examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will adhere to the methodological framework developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute, and reporting will be in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines. A search strategy developed by a health sciences librarian will be conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO in addition to grey literature sources up to 7 July 2025. Articles will be included if they studied migrant populations and reported on palliative care utilisation. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts and review full texts. Data extraction will be performed independently and in duplicate using a standardised, pilot-tested form. Findings will be synthesised thematically, with particular attention to countries of destination, migrant subgroups and intersectional factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Since this is a scoping review and uses only previously published data, it does not require approval by a research ethics board. Findings will be disseminated as an abstract for presentation at a palliative care conference and a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Open Science Framework (gy75v).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gao, A., Kutty, A., Lau, C., Chopra, M., Cutler, C., Chakraborty, A., Ni, D. Y., Nolen, A., Bonares, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109969</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109969</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative care utilisation in migrant populations: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109969</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109969</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110297?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Suicide attempts among Korean adolescents before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110297?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to examine the prevalence of suicide attempts among Korean adolescents before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic and explore cross-sectional associations with demographic, psychological, behavioural and academic characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analysis of three nationally representative survey waves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The Korean Youth Risk Behavior Survey (KYRBS), an annual school-based nationwide survey in South Korea.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adolescents with available data on key variables who participated in the 2017 (n=61 861), 2020 (n=54 809) and 2023 (n=52 802) KYRBS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was a suicide attempt in the past 12 months. Secondary measures included age, sex, perceived socioeconomic status, sadness, perceived stress, alcohol use, tobacco use, lifetime drug use and subjective academic performance. These variables were measured using standardised single-item questions in the KYRBS, whereas associations were examined using multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for all covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Several characteristics demonstrated consistent associations with suicide attempts. In 2017, suicide attempts were most strongly associated with sadness (OR 6.47, 95% CI 5.68 to 7.37), drug use (OR 5.60, 95% CI 4.34 to 7.24) and stress (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.63 to 1.85). During the pandemic (2020), sadness (OR 6.35, 95% CI 5.39 to 7.48), drug use (OR 4.56, 95% CI 3.38 to 6.14) and stress (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.94 to 2.28) preserved the strong association. In 2023, the associations persisted for sadness (OR 5.06, 95% CI 4.48 to 5.71), drug use (OR 5.31, 95% CI 4.42 to 6.39) and tobacco use (OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.15 to 2.98). Socioeconomic status showed no significant association in 2017 (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.04) but demonstrated modest associations in 2020 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.97) and 2023 (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.94). Subjective academic performance showed inverse associations in 2017 (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96) and 2020 (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97) but not in 2023 (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.00).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Across three survey years, suicide attempts among Korean adolescents co-occurred with multiple emotional, behavioural and contextual characteristics. The magnitude of these associations varied before, during and after the pandemic, suggesting that broader social and educational conditions may shape patterns of distress linked with suicidal behaviour. Integrated approaches addressing overlapping emotional, behavioural and socioeconomic challenges may support youth suicide prevention efforts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, S. I., Kim, J. S., Kim, S. M., Hyun Han, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110297</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110297</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Suicide attempts among Korean adolescents before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110297</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110297</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112722?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nursing students perception of health in South Korea: a qualitative content analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112722?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Health is a highly valued outcome and state of being in human society. The health perceptions that nursing students develop during their education significantly influence their future patient care. However, there is limited understanding of how these perceptions evolve throughout nursing education.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to explore nursing students&rsquo; personal perceptions of health and how these perceptions evolve from the first to the fourth year of their education.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A qualitative content analysis was conducted using data from semi-structured group interviews with 14 first-year and 17 fourth-year nursing students recruited through purposive sampling from three nursing colleges in South Korea. Data were analysed using Graneheim and Lundman&rsquo;s code-subcategory-category-theme framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>First-year students themed health as &lsquo;full wellness and possibility in life&rsquo;, viewing it as a passive, static state, while fourth-year students themed it as &lsquo;fundamental values for wellbeing and possibilities for life&rsquo;, seeing it as an active, dynamic state linked to problem-solving and life&rsquo;s value. Categories included &lsquo;state,&rsquo; &lsquo;ability&rsquo; and &lsquo;meaning&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study reveals a significant evolution in nursing students&rsquo; health perceptions throughout their education. The findings suggest a need to shift nursing education from a disease-centred to a health-centred approach, providing insights for curriculum development to better prepare future nurses for comprehensive healthcare delivery.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, H.-O., Lee, I., Lee, B.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T07:08:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112722</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112722</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nursing students perception of health in South Korea: a qualitative content analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112722</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112722</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Visual content and thematic analyses of images shared on social media before and after episodes of self-harm in a UK clinical youth sample]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Little is known about how young people use social media during periods of self-harm. This study aimed to explore how they express themselves online through images posted on social media before and after self-harm and how this expression may change across these periods, employing visual content and thematic analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A prospective cohort study, with qualitative analysis conducted using a recurrent cross-sectional approach and codebook methodology, accounting for chronological changes across time points before, during and after episodes of self-harm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Participants were recruited from a mental health NHS Trust in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Image data during episodes of self-harm was available for 20 participants. The majority of whom were aged 18 years or older (n=15), female (n=14) and met criteria for moderate or severe anxiety and depression (n=18). The sample reflected diverse ethnic backgrounds, with six participants identifying as Asian or Mixed/Multiple ethnic backgrounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>None of the images investigated had direct visual presentations of self-harm. A few images referenced self-harm through the medium of text, and this was largely to normalise and promote help-seeking. Several themes were identified, including participation in activities that support well-being, love and relationships, connecting through humour, expressions of distress, and promoting mental health awareness and support. Subtle temporal changes were also observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Findings suggest that young people may temporarily withdraw from social media on the day of a self-harm event and rarely post graphic self-harm images around that time. This may reflect concerns about being stigmatised, but also improved platform moderation. Instead, platforms may serve as spaces for expressing self-care behaviours and connecting with others about both positive and challenging emotions, and across a range of topics including mental health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov: <A HREF="NCT04601220">NCT04601220</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bye, A., Trevillion, K., Wilson-Lemoine, E., Leightley, D., Carter, B., Liakata, M., Hopper, J., Dutta, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T04:31:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103456</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103456</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Visual content and thematic analyses of images shared on social media before and after episodes of self-harm in a UK clinical youth sample]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103456</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102765?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heterogeneity in job preferences among young physicians in Chinese tertiary hospitals: a discrete choice experiment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102765?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Physicians&rsquo; preferences for financial and non-financial incentives significantly influence their job satisfaction and career choices. A comprehensive understanding of these preferences can aid in the optimisation of incentive policies. While prior studies have examined these preferences using discrete choice experiments (DCEs), the effects of intrinsic motivations, such as altruism and job satisfaction, on incentive responsiveness remain poorly understood. Understanding this heterogeneity is essential for designing incentive policies that are effective and tailored to the healthcare context in China. This study aimed to assess how physicians&rsquo; altruism and job satisfaction shape their preferences for financial and non-financial incentives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study employed a DCE methodology and surveyed 886 physicians from urban tertiary hospitals. The DCE design was based on a comprehensive literature review and focus group interviews, assessing physicians&rsquo; preferences regarding attributes such as work environment, workload, career development opportunities and career identity. Mixed logit models were used to estimate the willingness to pay for each attribute and analyse heterogeneity across subgroups based on levels of altruism and job satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Financial incentives were the most important factor for physicians, followed by attributes such as work atmosphere and workload. On average, physicians expressed a willingness to sacrifice 4859.035 &yen; for an improved work atmosphere and 4335.008 &yen; in exchange for reduced workload. Subgroup analysis showed that physicians with low- and medium-altruism prioritised improvements related to working conditions, while those with high-altruism placed greater emphasis on intrinsic career development and career identity. Furthermore, physicians reporting low-job satisfaction demonstrated heightened sensitivity to both financial and non-financial incentives, whereas those with high-job satisfaction showed weaker preference for financial incentives and greater preference for improvements in work atmosphere (<I>&beta;</I>=1.002) and work environment (<I>&beta;</I>=0.876).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings highlight the need to align incentive policies with physicians&rsquo; intrinsic motivations and current job satisfaction. Financial incentives remain a key driver of job preferences. Non-financial factors, including improvements in the work atmosphere, work environment, workload, career development and professional identity, also play an important role in supporting physicians&rsquo; job satisfaction and retention. Considering differences in altruism and job satisfaction can help healthcare institutions and policymakers develop more targeted and context-specific incentive strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, Q., Zhang, Q., Han, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-17T05:36:11-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102765</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102765</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heterogeneity in job preferences among young physicians in Chinese tertiary hospitals: a discrete choice experiment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102765</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102765</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095831?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitude and practice towards glaucoma among ophthalmic inpatients: a cross-sectional study in Hunan, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095831?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy caused by the gradual degeneration of retinal ganglion cells. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) towards glaucoma among ophthalmic inpatients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A web-based questionnaire.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Local hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Ophthalmic inpatients (n=1238).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the patients&rsquo; KAP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that rural residence (OR=0.488, 95% CI 0.313 to 0.762, p=0.002), college education or above (OR=4.996, 95% CI 2.942 to 8.483, p&lt;0.001) and a history of glaucoma surgery (OR=3.511, 95% CI 2.234 to 5.520, p&lt;0.001) were independently associated with good knowledge. The knowledge scores (OR=1.592, 95% CI 1.461 to 1.734, p&lt;0.001), high or technical school education (OR=1.911, 95% CI 1.037 to 3.523, p=0.038), college education or above (OR=2.402, 95% CI 1.045 to 5.522, p=0.039) and a history of glaucoma surgery (OR=1.993, 95% CI 1.041 to 3.816, p=0.037) were independently associated with positive attitude. The multicollinearity tests showed no collinearity among the variables included in the multivariable models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Ophthalmic inpatients might have moderate knowledge and attitude, but a proactive practice towards glaucoma. A history of glaucoma, previous glaucoma surgery, education level, residency and alcohol consumption were potentially associated with knowledge and attitudes towards glaucoma among ophthalmic inpatients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, Y., Wu, P., Liao, L., Zhang, J., Zhou, D., Sun, W., Dong, F., Ye, C., Duan, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095831</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095831</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge, attitude and practice towards glaucoma among ophthalmic inpatients: a cross-sectional study in Hunan, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095831</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095831</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103782?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global scoping review of key domains of patient-reported experience of care measures across life stages and healthcare technical areas]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103782?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are measures of patients&rsquo; perceptions of care they receive. PREMs are critical in developing and evaluating programmes that aim to improve patient healthcare experiences and quality of care (QoC) according to patient-defined needs. This review aims to map key domains of PREMs across distinct healthcare technical areas and life stages from globally available literature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A scoping review adapting Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley&rsquo;s framework and Joanna Briggs Institute&rsquo;s guidelines for the conduct of scoping reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Google Scholar, PubMed, WHO, US Academy of Medicine and USAID Momentum.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility</st>
<p>PREMs literature from electronic repositories of grey and peer-reviewed publications, published in English historically up to September 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and analysis</st>
<p>Two lead reviewers with support from the technical working group co-created a review framework of healthcare technical areas, life stages and PREMs domains. We screened eligible articles, prioritising reviews except for technical areas with no reviews, where we then selected individual studies. We charted, analysed and synthesised data from 52 eligible articles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>PREMs literature has recently increased, especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), although studies in high-income countries (HICs) dominate in proportion (n=38; 73.1%). Out of 52 eligible articles, technical areas with most publications were sexual and reproductive health (n=21; 40.4%) and general outpatient care (n=11; 21.2%). Studies in adulthood (n=24; 46.2%) and from pregnancy and birth to postnatal (n=16; 30.8%) were most represented. PREMs studies reported mostly on communication and rapport (n=33; 63.5%) and respect and dignity (n=42; 80.8%) domains. Nearly a quarter (n=12; 23.1%) of the articles included only validated tools; the rest included a combination of validated and unvalidated measures. Of the tools relating to life stages of babies, younger children and older adults, the majority (n=17; 94.4%) included patient proxies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>PREMs, as an important component of QoC measurement, are increasing across several healthcare technical areas and life stages with commonalities and notable distinctions in measurement domains and tools. Evidence on PREMs largely comes from HICs. Evidence on critical, yet sometimes overlooked domains, highlights key QoC implementation gaps. The adaptation and utilisation of PREMs in programmes, especially in LMICs and under-represented technical areas, present opportunities to close the QoC disparities in those settings. Strategic, concerted efforts towards the harmonisation of PREMs tools across multiple life course stages and technical areas are critically needed in high-level quality improvement efforts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habib, H. H., Zhang, C., Hill, K., Vaz, L. M. E., Rawlins, B., Tuncalp, O., Muzigaba, M., Brownwood, I., Afulani, P. A., On behalf of the Person-Centered Care Task Team of the WHO Life Stages Quality of Care Metrics Technical Working Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103782</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103782</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global scoping review of key domains of patient-reported experience of care measures across life stages and healthcare technical areas]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103782</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103782</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104334?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Traditional, complementary and integrative medicine use in the UK population: results of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104334?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To describe the prevalence and characteristics of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM) practice and product use by the population of the UK providing up-to-date data on the landscape of TCIM use in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>A cross-sectional online survey, administered using the Qualtrics platform, among adults (aged 18 years and over) residing in the UK (England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland). Data were collected between May and October 2024. The 40-item instrument covered four domains: demographics, health status, use of health products and practices, and use of health services. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise survey responses, and &sup2; tests were applied to assess associations between participant characteristics and TCIM use. Backwards stepwise logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of TCIM use across four outcome categories (p&le;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The sample (n=1559) was broadly representative of the UK population. Prevalence of any TCIM use over a 12-month period was 65.9% with 19.1% consulting a TCIM practitioner and 63.3% using any TCIM product or practice. Bodywork therapists (massage therapists 9.4%, chiropractors 7.9%, yoga teachers 5.0%) and homeopaths (4.1%) were the most commonly consulted TCIM practitioners and Anthroposophic doctors were the least commonly consulted (2.1%). Among TCIM products, vitamin and mineral supplements were the most commonly used (37.3%) and relaxation or meditation practices were reported by 19.4% of respondents. TCIM users were more likely to be female, identify as Asian or Black, have a chronic disease diagnosis, report good health, possess private health insurance, have a higher education level, be employed (or seeking employment) and sometimes experience financial management difficulties.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is substantial use of TCIM across the UK adult population and there is a need for more research on integrating TCIM into mainstream healthcare and the National Health Service. Clear strategies are necessary to enhance communication between TCIM and conventional healthcare providers, ensure patient safety and promote person-centred, coordinated models of care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Werf, E. T., Foley, H., Carter, T., Roberts, R., Adams, J., Steel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104334</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104334</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Traditional, complementary and integrative medicine use in the UK population: results of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104334</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104334</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105551?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intradialytic kinetics of cardiac biomarkers during high-flux haemodialysis and postdilution haemodiafiltration: study protocol for a randomised crossover trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105551?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in patients undergoing chronic haemodialysis (HD). However, relatively few data exist regarding the influence of dialysis treatment on cardiac biomarkers such as high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T (hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), complicating their interpretation in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome and heart failure. This study aims to investigate the intradialytic kinetics of hs-cTnT, hs-cTnI and NT-proBNP, during HD and haemodiafiltration (HDF), in patients treated with chronic HD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Single-centre, randomised, open-label, crossover study, comparing high-flux HD (FX 100 dialyser) and postdilution HDF (FX 1000 dialyser), regarding their potential clearance of hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP, in 24 stable patients treated with in-centre HD without acute CVD. The study will investigate changes in concentrations during and after high-flux HD and postdilution HDF and calculate reduction ratios, dialyser clearance and clearance by adsorption to the membrane of the selected cardiac biomarkers. Blood samples will be collected at baseline, after 10, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min of dialysis and 30 min postdialysis. After 120 min of dialysis, dialysate will also be collected from the dialyser outlet line. The primary outcome is change from baseline in concentrations of hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP during high-flux HD and postdilution HDF.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has been approved by the North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (N-20240016). Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at national and international research meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06526702">NCT06526702</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drivsholm, C. L., Nygaard, L., Glerup, R. I., Birnum, A. T. S., Jensen, J. D., Svensson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105551</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105551</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intradialytic kinetics of cardiac biomarkers during high-flux haemodialysis and postdilution haemodiafiltration: study protocol for a randomised crossover trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105551</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105551</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107996?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Residual factors associated with poor oral hygiene among Japanese kindergarten children: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107996?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify behavioural and household factors associated with poor oral hygiene among Japanese kindergarten children in a population with high health awareness, using the Debris Index-Simplified (DI-S) as a clinical proxy for early oral hygiene deterioration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Seven kindergartens in Sapporo city, Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Of the 1229 kindergarten children invited, 871 provided parental consent (consent rate: 70.9%). Among them, 675 children aged 1&ndash;6 years who completed both the questionnaire and oral examination (completion rate: 54.9%). Most post-consent losses were due to logistical and staffing constraints. Children were stratified into &le;3 year and &ge;4 year academic classes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was oral hygiene status based on the DI-S scores (categorised as good (DI-S=0) or poor (DI-S&gt;0). The secondary outcome was the presence of dental caries, defined as decayed, missing and filled primary teeth: dmft&ge;1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate associations between poor oral hygiene and behavioural and household factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among the 675 children, 168 children (24.9%) exhibited poor oral hygiene (DI-S&gt;0) and 89 children (13.2%) had dental caries (dmft&ge;1). In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic, dental and dietary variables, poor oral hygiene was significantly associated with being from a multiple-child household (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.42) and irregular juice consumption (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.38). Age-stratified analysis revealed that these associations persisted among those in the &ge;4 year class, with additional significance for infrequent tooth brushing (&lt;2 times/day; OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.00 to 3.26). Sensitivity analysis using dmft revealed that the significant associations differed: male sex, age and irregular snacking were significant, while household composition and juice consumption were not.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In a high health awareness Japanese preschool population, poor oral hygiene was independently associated with household composition and juice consumption, rather than traditional dental behaviours. These findings suggest the need to broaden preventive strategies beyond routine dental guidance to include family structure and dietary patterns, particularly in low-prevalence settings. Differential associations between DI-S and caries experience emphasise the utility of early clinical indices in oral health promotion.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oiwa, D., Oura, A., Hayashi, T., Nakata, K., Nakata, M., Koyama, M., Himuro, N., Ohnishi, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107996</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107996</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Dentistry and oral medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Residual factors associated with poor oral hygiene among Japanese kindergarten children: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Dentistry and oral medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107996</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107996</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108618?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementing multi-component intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care of rural China: a qualitative process evaluation of the trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108618?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The overuse of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections in primary healthcare in rural China is a particular challenge and is highly related to antibiotic resistance. Our research team designed a multi-component intervention focusing predominantly on health practitioners to reduce antibiotic prescriptions in rural communities of China. The effects of the intervention were evaluated through a randomised controlled trial. This study was conducted alongside the trial to develop a contextualised understanding of the implementation of the intervention and related influencing factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative process study nested in a randomised controlled trial, including observation and semi-structured interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary healthcare in rural China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>27 health practitioners from township health centres assigned to the intervention arm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Intervention</st>
<p>A complex intervention to reduce antibiotic prescriptions in rural communities of China, which includes the following components: training for health practitioners, a public letter of commitment, patient leaflets, a decision support system and a peer support group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The overall multi-component intervention was described as useful in reducing antibiotic prescribing, with a particularly high acceptance and use of patient leaflets and the public letter of commitment among health practitioners. There were mixed views on the decision support system and peer support group. Practitioners reported usability-related barriers to using the decision support system during consultations. Practitioners did not understand the role or benefits of the peer support group and found it difficult to initiate group discussions, due to the lack of any existing clinical team at the primary care level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The multi-component intervention appears to be acceptable and useful in primary healthcare in rural China. Successful implementation requires a comprehensive understanding of the contextual characteristics of the setting. Interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing in China in the future could consider wider stakeholders including patients, retail pharmacies and health authorities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN30652037">ISRCTN30652037</A> (01/12/2020).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, T., Shen, X., Chai, J., Liu, R., Wang, D., Yardley, L., Lambert, H., Cabral, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108618</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108618</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementing multi-component intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care of rural China: a qualitative process evaluation of the trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108618</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108618</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109470?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to implementing the living guideline development framework in oncology: a mixed methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109470?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore stakeholder experiences with implementing the living guideline (LG) development framework in oncology, and to identify barriers, facilitators and solutions to support its uptake and sustainability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was used, beginning with qualitative semi-structured interviews with guideline development stakeholders, analysed thematically; and followed by a cross-sectional survey to quantitatively rate the importance of factors identified in phase one.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>National and international oncology guideline development programmes using the LG development framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Stakeholders involved in LG development, including expert panel co-chairs, panel members, patient representatives, methodologists and administrative staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Nine stakeholders participated in qualitative interviews, and 45 completed the survey. Most participants were male (5/9:56% qualitative; 26/45:58% quantitative) and based in the US (7/9:78% and 29/45:64%, respectively). Overall, the results from both the qualitative and quantitative strand revealed seven themes (34 subthemes) as barriers and six themes (21 subthemes) as facilitators. Additionally, 9 themes were proposed as solutions. The most frequently reported barriers included evidence timeliness, interpretation and publication delays. Prominent facilitators included effective management, resource optimisation and panel engagement. Participants strongly endorsed investment in artificial intelligence enhanced tools to improve the speed and efficiency of evidence acquisition and review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>While the LG framework provides strong methodological guidance, its practical application presents notable challenges, particularly in resource demands and implementation logistics. Successful adoption requires adequate infrastructure, expertise and oversight. These findings highlight critical considerations for developers aiming to implement sustainable LG models in oncology and beyond.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ismaila, N., Harvey, B. E., Einhaus, K., Mbuagbaw, L., Ma, J., Thabane, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109470</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109470</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers and facilitators to implementing the living guideline development framework in oncology: a mixed methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109470</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109470</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109620?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of the Atalante exoskeleton in the rehabilitation of French patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective, monocentric, open, uncontrolled, interventional protocol, EXALS]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109620?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Robotic rehabilitation on locomotion is a new approach in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and previous studies showed its feasibility. In this study, we aim to evaluate safety, patient&rsquo;s experience and efficacy of a gait training programme with the Atalante exoskeleton, compared with usual care, on walking ability, functional capacity and other symptoms associated with ALS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>EXALS is a monocentric, prospective, interventional, open trial. 20 slowly progressing patients with gait deficits will be recruited. The study is conducted in three phases, each lasting 6 weeks, following the ABA procedure. Phase B represents the intervention phase, during which patients practise their gait training at a rhythm of three sessions/week, as an add-on to usual care. In the two phases A, patients receive usual care with no additional treatment. An evaluation is planned before, in the middle and at the end of each phase. The primary outcome of the study is safety and tolerability of the Atalante exoskeleton. Secondary outcomes include: participants&rsquo; subjective impact and experience, attitude and motivation, efficacy and interactivity of the exoskeleton, walking ability, functional capacity, spasticity, balance, postural stability, lower limb muscle strength, quality of life, pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression. Statistical analyses will include descriptive methods for all variables and adverse events. Quantitative outcomes are analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA (analysis of variance) across the seven visits, with post hoc tests applied when appropriate. Nominal outcomes are evaluated using Cochran&rsquo;s Q test with McNemar pairwise comparisons when significant. Associations between variables are examined using Spearman correlation coefficients. Missing data will be replaced using linear interpolation, and sensitivity analyses will be planned. Qualitative interview data are analysed using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the French ethics committee CPP Nord-Ouest I (no. 23.02378.000201). Participant data are anonymised and securely stored in the laboratory&rsquo;s database, accessible only to the research team. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.</p>
<p><A HREF="NCT06199284">NCT06199284</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trad, G., Lenglet, T., Ledoux, I., Querin, G., Blancho, S., Marchand-Pauvert, V., Hogrel, J.-Y., Pradat, P.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109620</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109620</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of the Atalante exoskeleton in the rehabilitation of French patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective, monocentric, open, uncontrolled, interventional protocol, EXALS]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109620</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109620</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109733?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of poliovirus environmental surveillance in Ghana: an indicator-based performance evaluation across seven regions, 2018-2022]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109733?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the performance of Ghana&rsquo;s environmental surveillance (ES) system for poliovirus (PV) detection from 2018 to 2022 using standardised indicators developed by the WHO and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A retrospective performance evaluation using 10 key indicators benchmarked against global targets for PV surveillance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Seven regions across Ghana, participating in the national ES programme implemented under the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Surveillance coverage</st>
<p>Wastewater sampling was conducted at designated ES sites, supported by field collection teams and laboratory personnel responsible for sample acquisition, processing and reporting of PV detection results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Detection rates of PV and non-polio enteroviruses (NPEVs), timeliness of sample collection and reporting, data quality and system stability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 738 wastewater samples were collected. The system demonstrated high sensitivity, detecting circulating vaccine-derived PV type 2 in 51 (6.9%) of samples, Sabin PV types 1 and 3 in 61 (9.5%) and 114 (17.8%), respectively, and NPEVs in 491 (66.5%) of samples. Over 80% of samples met the recommended 21-day collection-to-reporting time frame. Data quality exceeded the &ge;80% threshold, and workflows remained stable throughout the evaluation period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Ghana&rsquo;s ES system for PV was found to be flexible, stable and effective in generating high-quality data for early detection and public health response. These findings underscore the system&rsquo;s critical role in supporting polio eradication efforts and highlight its potential as a model for surveillance in similar settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obodai, E., Asante Ntim, N. A., Duker, E. O., Gberbi, E., Antwi, C. N., Mensah, J. Y., Odame, D., Boakye, J. D., Bimpong, S. A., Agbotse, G. D., Odoom, N., Adams, P. L., Acquah, N. K., Dickson, A. E., Odoom, C., Achempem, K. K., Baffoe-Nyarko, I., Egbi, G., Laryea, D., Asiedu-Bekoe, F., Odoom, J. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109733</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109733</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of poliovirus environmental surveillance in Ghana: an indicator-based performance evaluation across seven regions, 2018-2022]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109733</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109733</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109950?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mitigating chronic respiratory disease through the lens of multimorbidity: the MARES mixed-methods study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109950?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are among the leading non-communicable diseases (NCDs) worldwide. However, diagnosing CRDs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains challenging due to limited access to spirometry and trained professionals. Aggravating the burden, CRDs often coexist with other NCDs, increasing healthcare costs, reducing quality of life and elevating mortality. These challenges highlight the need for simple case-finding approaches for CRDs, such as the COPD in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries Assessment (COLA-6) questionnaire, to support prompt identification and appropriate care within NCD services in LMICs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the discriminative accuracy, feasibility and implementation of the COLA-6 questionnaire in identifying and managing CRDs in Brazilian Primary Healthcare (PHC) services for NCDs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Multimorbidity Approach for REspiratory Solutions (MARES) study consists of three work packages to be conducted in PHC services in S&atilde;o Carlos/SP and S&atilde;o Paulo/SP, Brazil.</p>
<p>MARES-1: A cross-sectional observational study enrolling 859 individuals with at least one NCD receiving care in PHC. The COLA-6 questionnaire will be administered by the research team and compared with quality-assured spirometry. The Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will also be assessed. The diagnostic performance of COLA-6 for identifying CRDs&mdash;including COPD, asthma, preserved ratio impaired spirometry, restriction and overlaps&mdash;will be assessed using area under receiver operating characteristic curves and 95% CIs.</p>
<p>MARES-2: A cross-sectional observational study enrolling 20 healthcare professionals (physicians, physiotherapists, community health agents and nurses) from five PHC services. These professionals will apply the COLA-6 during routine NCD care to a total sample of 1000 patients. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to explore barriers and facilitators to the implementation of COLA-6, using deductive thematic analysis.</p>
<p>MARES-3: A longitudinal, prospective observational study in which patients from MARES-1 and MARES-2 will be reassessed at 6-month follow-up. A total sample of 473 participants with abnormal spirometry, a diagnosis of CRD or high risk for CRDs is expected. Participants will undergo spirometry, and a subset will be interviewed to explore their healthcare experiences through qualitative thematic analysis. Access to diagnostic and treatment services in Brazil will be assessed. Changes in spirometry values, FeNO, CAAT and ACQ-7 scores from baseline to 6 months in patients from MARES-1 will be analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Ethics Committees of Federal University of S&atilde;o Carlos and University of Santo Amaro (UNISA). Ethical approval was also granted by the University College London. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed medical journals and presentations at international conferences. Results will improve identification of CRDs, addressing a significant gap in current PHC settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07050823">NCT07050823</inter-ref>/<inter-ref locator="NCT07093021" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT07093021</inter-ref>/<inter-ref locator="NCT07134855" locator-type="clintrialgov">NCT07134855</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mendes, R. G., Leonardi, N. T., Castello-Simoes, V., Kawakami, D. M. d. O., Souza, J. V. R., Schafauser-Segundo, N. S., Simoes, R. P., Pinto, F. G., Araujo, G. H. G., da Silva, M. M. C., Moriguchi, C. S., Franco, F. J. B. Z., Pires Di Lorenzo, V. A., Jordan, R., Martins, S., Siddharthan, T., Al Sharmah, S., Barber, J., Hurst, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109950</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109950</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mitigating chronic respiratory disease through the lens of multimorbidity: the MARES mixed-methods study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109950</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109950</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110444?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors associated with access to post-sepsis care: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110444?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The objective of this scoping review is to identify and describe factors that affect access to post-sepsis care. Considering the burden faced by sepsis survivors, it is important to understand the facilitators and barriers to accessing post-sepsis care to facilitate the design and implementation of patient-centred and equitable pathways to care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will include studies that consider individuals who have experienced sepsis and any factors that may affect access to care, including comorbidities, discharge setting and social determinants of health. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, HealthSTAR and Scopus will be conducted. The extracted data will be summarised and presented thematically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approval from a research ethics board is not required for this review as it is a synthesis of information from studies where the primary investigators have already received approval from their respective ethics boards. Once complete, the review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and the findings will be shared to local and national forums.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration details</st>
<p>This review has been uploaded and registered under Open Science Framework. <A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JMFW2">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JMFW2</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kolesnik, K., Sheikh, F., MacIsaac, M., Fox-Robichaud, A., Schwartz, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110444</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110444</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors associated with access to post-sepsis care: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110444</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110444</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111644?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Study protocols for the GEPard project: systematic analysis of sex- and gender-specific differences in the efficacy of perioperative pain management - a two-pronged approach]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111644?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Postoperative pain is common, with approximately one-third of surgical patients experiencing severe acute pain and 10&ndash;20% developing chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP). Evidence shows that female patients are at higher risk of pain after sex non-specific surgery, thus sex- or gender-specific differences in pain treatment efficacy with potential consequences for perioperative pain management are to be expected. Considering the clinical and societal burden of poorly managed postoperative pain, the GEPard project comprises two systematic reviews, GEPard 1: sex- and/or gender-specific differences in efficacy of perioperative pain management for certain (major) surgical procedures in adult patients; and GEPard 2: sex- and/or gender-specific differences in the dosing, efficacy and adverse effects of the most common systemic perioperative non-opioid- and co-analgesics across all sex non-specific surgical procedures in adult patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The reviews will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and PsycINFO will be searched. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses reporting outcomes disaggregated by sex and/or gender in adult surgical patients. For GEPard 1, this applies to selected major surgical procedures; for GEPard 2, to all non-sex-specific surgical procedures. Interventions include regional anaesthesia, systemic analgesics and psychological strategies for GEPard 1 and non-opioid- as well as co-analgesics for GEPard 2. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract the data. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (RoB 2) and AMSTAR 2 tools will assess study quality. Random-effects or Bayesian meta-analyses will be performed where possible; otherwise, narrative synthesis will be applied. GRADE methodology will assess evidence certainty.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is required for these reviews. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, patient organisations and professional societies. Data will be shared via Zenodo or Open Science Framework (OSF), following FAIR principles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>The systematic review protocols for both reviews have been registered in PROSPERO on 29 August 2025 (Registration-ID: CRD420251121393 (GEPard1), CRD420251121536 (GEPard2).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Floren, S., Segelcke, D., Machacek, P. A., Vollert, J., Norda, H., Rohde, I., Gilron, I., Pogatzki-Zahn, E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111644</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111644</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Study protocols for the GEPard project: systematic analysis of sex- and gender-specific differences in the efficacy of perioperative pain management - a two-pronged approach]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111644</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111644</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112173?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rationale and design of the REMECHOQUE multicentre registry protocol: evaluating therapeutic trends in cardiogenic shock]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112173?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome characterised by primary cardiac dysfunction. Despite advances in therapeutic options such as mechanical cardiac support, it remains associated with high mortality. Although previous registries have described heterogeneous populations and outcomes across different centres, contemporary real-world data on management practices remain limited. This gap is particularly evident in low- and middle-income countries, where there is no robust registry that clearly defines the current state of CS management. Therefore, a multicentre registry is needed to better characterise current practices and outcomes. Our study aims to gain insight into current therapeutic trends in Mexico, a low- to middle-income country with a significant cardiovascular disease burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The Mexican Registry of Cardiogenic Shock is a quality initiative that aims to identify therapeutic trends, demographic characteristics and clinical presentations. It also aims to evaluate outcomes, including mortality and cognitive function at in-hospital and 1-year follow-ups, and to identify areas for improvement in the care process across the broad spectrum of CS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for this multicentre study was obtained from the local research ethics committees of all participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated to all participating institutions in the form of summary reports and presentations on completion of the analysis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimenez-Franco, V., Rodriguez Rivera, J., Jerjes-Sanchez, C., Castillo Perez, M., Flores Zertuche, M., De La Pena, E., Torre-Amione, G., Pena-Blade, A. G., Quevedo-Salazar, R., Odin De Los Rios, M., Arias-Mendoza, A., Magana Serrano, J. A., Rojas Velasco, G., Antezana, J., Macedo, L., Luis Leiva-Pons, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112173</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112173</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rationale and design of the REMECHOQUE multicentre registry protocol: evaluating therapeutic trends in cardiogenic shock]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112173</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112173</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112350?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sources, impacts and mechanisms of non-pharmacological artefacts in processed electroencephalography monitoring during anaesthesia and intensive care: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112350?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Processed electroencephalography (pEEG) monitoring is commonly employed to assess the level of hypnosis under anaesthesia, although it is susceptible to various non-brain-related artefacts. Several sources of artefacts have been published, but how these sources affect the pEEG and their related hypnotic indices have not been summarised before. This scoping review will summarise the published literature on how non-pharmacological artefacts affect pEEG monitoring during anaesthesia andintensive care, including their influence on the hypnotic index and the underlying mechanisms of interference.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Non-pharmacological, non-brain-related sources of artefacts affecting human patients under anaesthesia or intensive care will be included. The covered concepts include the sources of interference affecting pEEG in which the artefact causes the hypnotic index to no longer be reflective of the depth of hypnosis, how they affect the hypnotic index, and the suspected mechanism by which they affect the pEEG monitor. Databases to be searched will include PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and the Web of Science. Grey literature will include sources from Google Scholar, the Web of Science, preprint repositories and reference lists of included studies and review papers. The search will be conducted on 19 June 2025, followed by a later repeat search for new articles once the data from the initial search have been extracted. The search will be limited to English articles. Search results will be imported into Covidence for screening. Data extraction will be conducted by two extractors independently, and the data will be summarised in tables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>There are no ethical or safety concerns associated with this study. Ethics approval was not obtained as this scoping review will summarise data from previously published sources, and the findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beg, A., Kim, C. N., Tung, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112350</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112350</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sources, impacts and mechanisms of non-pharmacological artefacts in processed electroencephalography monitoring during anaesthesia and intensive care: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112350</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112350</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112492?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for the development of a global core outcome set for the surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal teratoma in children: a systematic review and international Delphi study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112492?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Outcome reporting in studies on sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is highly heterogeneous, which limits comparability across studies and thus hampers the development of international treatment guidelines.</p>
<p>Variation in treatment and access to facilities contributes to differences in outcome reporting between centres and countries. Establishing a Core Outcome Set (COS) can improve consistency in outcome reporting and facilitate global collaboration and data comparison. We therefore aim to develop a Core Outcome Set for SCT (COS-SCT) using the Delphi method to achieve consensus on key outcomes. This will enhance the standardisation of outcome reporting and improve the quality of research and clinical care for SCT patients globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The development of the COS-SCT will consist of three phases. First, a systematic review will be performed to identify outcomes reported in studies on the surgical treatment of SCT in children. Second, an international Delphi survey will be conducted among key stakeholders, including clinicians, researchers and patient representatives, to establish consensus on outcome prioritisation. Finally, a consensus meeting with representatives from all stakeholder groups will be held to ratify the final Core Outcome Set. The study will follow methodological guidance from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and will be developed and reported in accordance with the Core Outcome Set Standards for Development (COS-STAD) and Core Outcome Set Standards for Reporting (COS-STAR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The medical research ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC) confirmed that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study, and therefore a full review by the ethics committee is not required. This study is registered in the COMET initiative database. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals and conference presentations.</p>
<p><b>Trial registration number:</b> COMET registration number 3485</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dongen, M. C., van Rijn, R., Sharma, S., Raphael, M. F., de Vries, R., Abouzeid, A. A., Bugiani, M., Chirdan, L. B., van Heurn, E. L. W., Derikx, J. P. M., Kremer, M. E. B., Steering Group, S.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:44:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112492</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112492</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for the development of a global core outcome set for the surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal teratoma in children: a systematic review and international Delphi study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112492</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112492</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098784?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breast and cervical cancer care in Ghana: a qualitative exploratory study of stakeholder perspectives on National Health Insurance Scheme coverage]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098784?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Breast and cervical cancers are among the most commonly diagnosed cancers in Ghana and impose substantial financial burden on households. Although diagnosis and treatment for these cancers are included in the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) benefits package, stakeholders report limitations in the scope and implementation of coverage, leading to out-of-pocket payments and potential delays in care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To characterise NHIS coverage for breast and cervical cancer care and to explore challenges affecting implementation from the perspectives of key stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative exploratory study using semi-structured key informant interviews and a focused desk review of national guidelines and NHIS policy documents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 key informants were purposively sampled based on roles in cancer policy, financing or service delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Although the NHIS officially lists coverage for consultation, diagnosis, radiotherapy and selected chemotherapy medications, participants reported that these benefits are not fully realised in practice. Respondents described persistent out-of-pocket payments for breast and cervical cancer services due to incomplete or delayed reimbursement of screening and diagnostic costs, limited inclusion of costly imaging procedures and the exclusion of some essential and innovative therapies, including immunotherapy. Delayed NHIS reimbursement was cited as a recurrent problem that constrains facility cash flow and contributes to co-payments at the point of care. Stakeholders also highlighted misalignment between NHIS reimbursement tariffs and actual service costs, which discourages some facilities from providing certain listed services and thereby limits patient access.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>NHIS coverage for breast and cervical cancer care still contains significant gaps, particularly in preventive services and access to advanced therapies. Policy actions should focus on strengthening preventive coverage (including screening and human papillomavirus vaccination), aligning tariffs with service costs, ensuring timely reimbursements and updating the medicines list through transparent, evidence-informed review processes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amankwah, I., Gone, M., Jaliu, A., Morand, M., Owusu, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098784</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-098784</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breast and cervical cancer care in Ghana: a qualitative exploratory study of stakeholder perspectives on National Health Insurance Scheme coverage]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098784</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098784</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098806?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of healthcare seeking for tuberculosis symptoms in the private healthcare facilities: findings from a cross-sectional population-based survey in Tamil Nadu]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098806?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify the factors influencing the choice of private healthcare facilities among individuals experiencing tuberculosis (TB) symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The data for this study were obtained from a cross-sectional population-based TB prevalence survey conducted in 33 districts of Tamil Nadu, a state in southern India, between February 2021 to July 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>130 932 individuals, 15 years and above, residents of the selected cluster for the past 1 month, were included. Hospitalised patients, sick/morbid individuals and the institutional population were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 143 005 eligible individuals, 130 932 (91.6%) participated. Among them, 9540 individuals were found to have at least one TB symptom. Of these symptomatic individuals, 2678 sought healthcare, with 62.7% in the public facilities and 37.3% in private facilities. Factors associated with seeking care in the private healthcare facilities included working in organised sector (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.7; p&lt;0.05), being a housewife (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.7; p&lt;0.05), having symptom of expectoration (aOR: 1.3; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.6; p&lt;0.05) and fatigue (aOR: 1.5; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.9; p&lt;0.05).</p>
<p>Conversely, individual with symptom of weight loss (aOR: 0.4; 95% CI 00.3 to 00.6; p&lt;0.05), loss of appetite (aOR: 0.8; 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9; p&lt;0.05), chest pain (aOR: 0.6; 95% CI 0.5 to 0.7; p&lt;0.05), history of past TB care (aOR: 0.4; 95% CI 0.3 to 0.5; p&lt;0.05), age &gt;25 years (aOR: 0.6; 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9; p&lt;0.05), living in a rural area (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI 0.6 to 0.8; p&lt;0.05) and living below the poverty line (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9; p&lt;0.05) were less likely to seek care in the private healthcare facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study highlights the distinct factors that could affect healthcare seeking for TB symptoms in the public and private healthcare settings for TB and the need for tailored interventions and customised healthcare policies to address such gaps and distinctions in care seeking.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giridharan, P., Arangba, S., Nagarajan, K., Frederick, A., Thiruvengadam, K., Selvaraju, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098806</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-098806</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of healthcare seeking for tuberculosis symptoms in the private healthcare facilities: findings from a cross-sectional population-based survey in Tamil Nadu]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098806</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098806</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100875?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the utility of fractional excretion of urea in distinguishing intrinsic and prerenal acute kidney injury in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100875?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant challenge in hospital settings, and accurately differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal AKI is crucial for effective management. The fractional excretion of urea (FEUN) has been proposed as a potential biomarker for this purpose, offering an alternative to traditional markers such as fractional excretion of sodium. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FEUN for differentiating intrinsic from prerenal AKI in hospitalised patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Designs</st>
<p>We conducted a systematic review and bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. The study followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 1 November 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We included observational studies that focused on patient with AKI and reported FEUN data sufficient to reconstruct a complete 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>2 contingency table (true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives) for evaluating its diagnostic accuracy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers extracted data, assessed risk of bias with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and graded certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) were calculated; heterogeneity was measured with I&sup2;. A prespecified subgroup restricted to patients receiving diuretics served as a sensitivity analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>12 studies involving 1240 patients were included, with an overall occurrence rate of intrinsic AKI of 38.8%. FEUN had a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.84) and specificity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.87), with positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.76 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.83) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81), respectively. The SROC curve showed a pooled diagnostic accuracy of 0.83. Heterogeneity was substantial (I&sup2;&gt;90%) for sensitivity and specificity. In a diuretic-only subgroup (six studies) specificity rose to0.87 and heterogeneity declined (I&sup2;=56%). Overall certainty of evidence was low owing to inconsistency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>FEUN is a biomarker with moderate diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal AKI in hospitalised patients. Its application could enhance AKI management; however, the high heterogeneity observed in our study highlights the need for further research to evaluate its utility across diverse patient populations and clinical settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024496083.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pan, H.-C., Jiang, Z.-H., Chen, H.-Y., Liu, J.-H., Chen, Y.-W., Peng, K.-Y., Wu, V.-C., Hsiao, C.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100875</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100875</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Renal medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the utility of fractional excretion of urea in distinguishing intrinsic and prerenal acute kidney injury in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Renal medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100875</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100875</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101973?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protocol for the development of the WHO gestational weight gain charts]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101973?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Gestational weight gain (GWG) is an important indicator of maternal nutrition to be monitored during pregnancy. However, there is no evidence-based tool that can be used to monitor it across all geographic locations and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) categories. The WHO is undertaking a project to develop GWG charts by pre-pregnancy BMI category, and to identify GWG ranges associated with the lowest risks of adverse maternal and infant outcomes. This protocol describes all the steps that will be used to accomplish the development of these GWG charts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This project will involve the analysis of individual participant data (researcher-collected or administrative). To identify eligible datasets with GWG data, a literature review will be conducted and a global call for data will be launched by the WHO. Eligible individual datasets obtained from multiple sources will be harmonised into a pooled database. The database will undergo steps of cleaning, data quality assessment and application of individual-level inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity of maternal weight and GWG will be assessed to verify the possibility of combining datasets from multiple sources and regions into a single database. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape will be applied for the construction of the centile curves. Diagnostic measures, internal and external validation procedures will also be performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This project will include an analysis of existing study de-identified data. To be included in the pooled database, each included study should have received ethics approvals from relevant committees. Manuscripts will be submitted to open-access journals and a WHO document will be published, including the GWG charts and cut-offs for application in antenatal care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rangel Bousquet Carrilho, T., Oladapo, O. T., Hutcheon, J. A., Gatica-Dominguez, G., Rasmussen, K. M., Flores-Urrutia, M. C., Kumapley, R., Tuncalp, O., Bahya-Batinda, D., Fayed, A. A., Bogaerts, A., Papageorghiou, A. T., Munoz-Manrique, C., Farias, D. R., Ohuma, E., Sachdev, H., Wahabi, H. A., Teede, H. J., Johansson, K., Bodnar, L. M., Wang, M., Perumal, N., Hasan, S. M. T., Phelan, S., Borghi, E., Kac, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101973</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101973</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protocol for the development of the WHO gestational weight gain charts]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101973</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101973</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nutritional knowledge, attitudes and practices and their determinants among pregnant women attending healthcare centres in southern Tehran]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess nutrition-related knowledge, attitudes and practices among pregnant women, and identify socioeconomic and healthcare determinants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study on maternal nutrition during pregnancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Pregnant women attending primary healthcare centres in the south of Tehran from December 2022 to March 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1535 pregnant women of all ages living in the south of Tehran (both Iranian and non-Iranian).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measures</st>
<p>Pregnant women were systematically selected from primary healthcare centres. Data were collected via validated questionnaires and electronic health records. Statistical analyses included multivariate logistic regression (adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs) and generalised linear mixed models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The findings revealed that a majority of pregnant women (83.3%; 95% CI 81.2% to 85.3%) exhibited low levels of nutritional knowledge (scores below 12), whereas 14% demonstrated moderate knowledge (scores between 12 and 17), and only 2.7% (95% CI 1.9% to 3.8%) possessed high nutritional knowledge (scores above 18). In terms of attitudes, 36.9% of respondents expressed positive views toward nutrition, with higher education significantly associated with positive attitudes (aOR=1.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5, comparing higher vs lower education levels). Dietary variety was consistently reported by 65.4% of participants, while 8.5% lacked dietary variety. Statistically significant associations were observed between educational attainment, socioeconomic status and nutrition-related practices (p&lt;0.05). Women with a university-level education achieved knowledge scores 3.2 times greater (95% CI 2.1 to 4.9) than those with only primary education. Moreover, individuals in the highest wealth quintile demonstrated practices that were 2.1 times superior (95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) to those in the lowest quintile. Nutritional counselling by professionals was positively correlated with improved attitudes (aOR=2.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 3.4).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>As a cross-sectional study, these findings highlight substantial gaps in nutrition knowledge among pregnant women in Tehran, with socioeconomic status and education playing crucial roles in shaping dietary behaviours. Improving nutritional education through healthcare interventions is essential for enhancing maternal and fetal health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajaeieh, G., Bakhtiari, A., Gholami, M., Ghavidel, F., Mostafavi, H., Zabihi, M., Mohamadi, E., Olyaeemanesh, A., Takian, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102117</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102117</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nutritional knowledge, attitudes and practices and their determinants among pregnant women attending healthcare centres in southern Tehran]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102117</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102444?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neurofilament light chain as a potential biomarker of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102444?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Although neurofilament light chain (NfL) is used as a biomarker of neurodegenerative decline, its application in surgery- and anaesthesia-induced acute cognitive dysfunction remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesise existing evidence to evaluate the potential of NfL as a biomarker for perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials were systematically searched up to March 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Observational studies&mdash;including cohort, case-control and cross-sectional designs&mdash;were included if they reported cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood NfL levels in individuals with and without PND.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Three independent reviewers assessed each article. Quality scoring was conducted, and the extracted data were analysed using STATA. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle&ndash;Ottawa Scale. Meta-analytical model selection was guided by the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, with I<sup>2</sup>&le;40% indicating low heterogeneity and the use of a fixed-effect model; random-effects models were used when this threshold was exceeded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Within-group analyses showed significant postoperative increases in blood NfL levels in both the postoperative delirium (POD) group (standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.64) and the no-POD group (SMD=0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.81). Between-group comparisons revealed significantly higher preoperative CSF NfL levels in the POD group (SMD=0.27, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.47). Both preoperative and postoperative blood NfL levels were also significantly elevated in the POD group (SMD=0.53, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.66, and SMD=0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.73, respectively).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This meta-analysis suggests that NfL may be a potential biomarker for POD. Further research is needed to clarify the association between CSF and blood NfL levels and other forms of PND.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024516907.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, F., Wu, Z.-X., Chen, Q., Zuo, D.-K., Ye, X.-M., Li, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102444</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102444</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neurofilament light chain as a potential biomarker of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102444</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102444</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102715?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and factors associated with pre-diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in Cambodia: cross-sectional study based on the World Health Survey Plus 2023]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102715?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with pre-diabetes and undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (UDD) in Cambodia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This analysis used data from the WHO World Health Survey Plus, which was collected using a cross-sectional design with a GIS-based, three-stage sampling approach. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify key associated factors, based on a significance level of p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Data were collected from all 25 provinces in Cambodia between 12 March 2023 and 31 May 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>4427 individuals aged 18 years or older, residing in the selected household for at least 6 months in the past year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Pre-diabetes (Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 5.7%&ndash;6.4%) and UDD (HbA1c&ge;6.5%), without prior knowledge of having type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The weighted prevalences of pre-diabetes and UDD were 26.4% (95% CI 24.0% to 29.0%) and 9.3% (95% CI 7.9% to 11.0%). Pre-diabetes prevalence was higher in urban areas compared with rural areas (adjusted OR, aOR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.4), males (aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.3), individuals aged 40&ndash;49 (aOR=1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4), individuals aged 50+ years group (aOR=2.9, 95% CI 2.3 to 3.6) compared with the 18&ndash;39 years group, overweight individuals (aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), obese (aOR=2.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) and those with elevated total triglycerides (aOR=1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.5). Similar risk factors were identified for UDD, with the addition of hypertension (aOR=1.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.0) and high waist circumference (aOR=2.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.7).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The high prevalence of pre-diabetes and UDD in Cambodia is a pressing public health concern. Urgent and intensive interventions are needed to effectively prevent and manage T2D, particularly among urban residents, older persons and individuals with metabolic risk factors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chhim, S., Ku, G. V., Kowal, P., Te, V., Sorithisey, M., Ngor, C., Walton, P., Maung, K. T., Ng, N., Naidoo, N., Por, I., Klipstein-Grobusch, K., Chhea, C., Sopheab, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102715</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102715</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and factors associated with pre-diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in Cambodia: cross-sectional study based on the World Health Survey Plus 2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102715</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102715</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102836?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does CMR improve aetiological sub-phenotyping beyond echocardiography in patients with elevated LV filling pressure? A prospective registry study (PREFER-CMR)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102836?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the incremental diagnostic value and sub-phenotyping capability of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) compared with Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE) in patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective registry study. [Results from ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05114785]</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A single NHS hospital in the UK.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the rate of diagnostic discordance between TTE and CMR. Secondary outcomes included the characterisation of specific pathologies identified by CMR where TTE was normal, non-diagnostic or provided a non-specific diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>CMR demonstrated diagnostic discordance with TTE in 74% (n=194) of cases. In patients with a normal TTE (n=54), CMR identified heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in 46% (n=25) and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in 19% (n=10). For non-diagnostic TTE cases (n=15), CMR detected HFpEF in 53.3% (n=8) and IHD in 26.7% (n=4). Among those with non-specific left ventricular hypertrophy on TTE (n=47), CMR revealed HFpEF in 45% (n=21) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 34% (n=16).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>CMR markedly improves diagnostic precision and sub-phenotyping in patients with elevated LVFP, identifying key conditions like HFpEF, IHD and specific cardiomyopathies that TTE frequently misses. These findings highlight CMR&rsquo;s critical role as a complementary imaging tool for refining diagnoses and informing management strategies in cardiovascular conditions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bana, A., Li, R., Mehmood, Z., Rogers, C., Grafton-Clarke, C., Bali, T., Hall, D., Jamil, M., Ramachenderam, L., Dudhiya, U., Spohr, H., Underwood, V., Girling, R., Kasmai, B., Nair, S., Matthews, G., Garg, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102836</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102836</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Radiology and imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does CMR improve aetiological sub-phenotyping beyond echocardiography in patients with elevated LV filling pressure? A prospective registry study (PREFER-CMR)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Radiology and imaging</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102836</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102836</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103794?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations between psychosocial factors and health service utilisation and self-management in older Australian women with type 2 diabetes or pre-diabetes: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103794?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Diabetes is highly prevalent in older women worldwide. This study explores the associations of psychosocial factors with both health service utilisation and self-management in older women aged 68 to 73 years with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or pre-diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>This cross-sectional study used data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women&rsquo;s Health (ALSWH), which is a national population-based cohort study that has collected information on factors related to women&rsquo;s health and well-being over 20 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Women aged 68&ndash;73, born between 1946 and 1951, participated in ALSWH and self-reported their diagnosis of T2D or pre-diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Resilience, dispositional optimism and perceived control were the measures of psychosocial factors. The associations between these factors and diabetes self-management behaviours, healthcare visits and preventive service use were examined by numerous regression models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There were 939 women aged 68&ndash;73 years with T2D or pre-diabetes. Women with T2D who exhibited higher dispositional optimism had significantly higher odds of participating in moderate/vigorous physical activity (OR: 1.06), visiting a dentist (OR: 1.07) and a lower rate of general practitioner (GP) visits (rate ratio (RR): 0.99). Women with T2D with greater resilience were likely to have a lower rate of consulting with mental health professionals (RR: 0.63) and higher odds of blood sugar level checks (OR: 1.68). The rate of GP visits within a year decreased by 16% for women with pre-diabetes who had a higher resilience score (RR: 0.84), and women with pre-diabetes with greater resilience had a 13% lower rate of visits to a nurse (RR: 0.87).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Psychosocial aspects of diabetes care may be important for supporting the physical and mental well-being of older women with T2D or pre-diabetes. Healthcare providers may consider whether integrating assessments of resilience and optimism into routine diabetes management might help identify older women who could benefit from targeted psychosocial support.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lin, S., Peng, W., Rahman, M. S., Sibbritt, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103794</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103794</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations between psychosocial factors and health service utilisation and self-management in older Australian women with type 2 diabetes or pre-diabetes: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103794</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103794</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103884?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trajectory, healthcare utilisation and recovery in 3590 individuals with long covid: a 4-year prospective cohort analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103884?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To characterise long-term trajectory of recovery in individuals with long covid.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Single-centre, specialist post-COVID service (London, UK).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Individuals aged &ge;18 years with long covid (hospitalised and non-hospitalised) from April 2020 to March 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Routine, prospectively collected data on symptoms, quality of life (including Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) and EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), return to work status and healthcare utilisation (investigations, outpatient and emergency attendances). The primary outcome was recovery by self-reported &gt;75% of &lsquo;best health&rsquo; (EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale) and was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models over 4 years. Linked National Health Service England registry data provided secondary care healthcare utilisation and expenditure.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We included 3590 individuals (63.3% female, 73.5% non-hospitalised, median age 50.0 years, 71.9% with &ge;2 doses of COVID-19 vaccination), who were followed up for a median of 136 (0&ndash;346) days since first assessment and 502 (251&ndash;825) days since symptom onset. At first assessment, 33.2% of employed individuals were unable to work. Dominant symptoms were fatigue (78.7%), breathlessness (68.1%) and brain fog (53.5%). 33.4% of individuals recovered to &gt;75% of best health prior to clinic discharge (recovery occurred median 202 (94&ndash;468) days from symptom onset). Vaccinated individuals were more likely to recover faster (pre: HR 2.93 (2.00&ndash;4.28) and post: HR 1.34 (1.05&ndash;1.71) COVID-19 infection), whereas recovery hazard was inversely associated with FAS (HR 0.37 (0.33&ndash;0.42)), myalgia (HR 0.59 (0.45&ndash;0.76)) and dysautonomic symptoms (HR 0.46 (0.34&ndash;0.62)). There was high secondary care healthcare utilisation (both emergency and outpatient care). Annual inpatient and outpatient expenditure was significantly lower in hospitalised individuals while under the service. When compared with the prereferral period, emergency department attendances were reduced in non-hospitalised patients with long covid, but outpatient costs increased.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In the largest long covid cohort from a single specialist post-COVID service to date, only one-third of individuals under follow-up achieved satisfactory recovery. Fatigue severity and COVID-19 vaccination at presentation, even after initial COVID-19 infection, was associated with long covid recovery. Ongoing service provision for this and other post-viral conditions is necessary to support care, progress treatment options and provide capacity for future pandemic preparedness. Research and clinical services should emphasise these factors as the strongest predictors of non-recovery.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prashar, J., Hillman, T., Wall, E. C., Sarna, A., Mi, E., Bell, R., Sahota, J., Zandi, M., McNamara, P., Livingston, R., Gore, R., Lunken, C., Bax, E., Nyam, R., Rafie Manzelat, A. M., Hishmeh, L., Attree, E., Cone, S., Banerjee, A., Heightman, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103884</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103884</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trajectory, healthcare utilisation and recovery in 3590 individuals with long covid: a 4-year prospective cohort analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103884</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103884</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106400?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled community trial assessing efficacy of the AWACAN-ED public toolkit to improve cancer symptom awareness and intention to seek help in South Africa and Zimbabwe: study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106400?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite the benefits of early diagnosis, most cancers in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are diagnosed at an advanced stage due to late presentation of symptoms, inadequate referral systems and poor diagnostic capacity. Health communication interventions have been used extensively in high-income countries to increase people&rsquo;s awareness of cancer symptoms and encourage timely help-seeking. However, in SSA, there is still limited evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions and existing evaluations are mainly focused on communicable diseases rather than cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A randomised, multisite, controlled community trial will evaluate a culturally tailored health infographic toolkit delivered in rural and urban settings in the Western Cape Province in South Africa and Harare and surrounding provinces in Zimbabwe. Participants will be randomised to receive one of three African aWAreness of CANcer and Early Diagnosis (AWACAN-ED) cancer awareness tools, coproduced with local communities, comprising health communication infographics with descriptions of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer symptoms plus messages to encourage consultation with primary care providers if symptoms occur, all presented in English and four local languages. We will recruit 144 participants in each of the three intervention groups (N=432). The primary outcome will be recall of symptoms and the secondary outcomes will be (1) intention to seek help, (2) emotional impact and (3) acceptability of the toolkit. Outcomes will be measured preintervention and at two points postintervention: after 15 min and 1 month.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained in both participating countries, South Africa (148/2025) and Zimbabwe (363/2021). All participants will be required to provide written informed consent prior to participation. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and the AWACAN-ED programme website.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>PACTR202505475803308.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott, S., Lurgain, J. G., Day, S., Guzha, B. T., Pazukhina, E., Arendse, K. D., Govender, S., Chirenje, M., Sills, V. A., Harries, J., Jacobs, R., Moodley, J., Walter, F. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106400</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106400</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised controlled community trial assessing efficacy of the AWACAN-ED public toolkit to improve cancer symptom awareness and intention to seek help in South Africa and Zimbabwe: study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106400</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106400</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108877?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Muslim communities perspectives and preferences regarding end-of-life symptom management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108877?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To provide a synthesis of the published research evidence on Muslims&rsquo; perspectives and preferences regarding end-of-life symptom management to inform future practice and research priorities aimed at providing sensitive end-of-life care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review and narrative synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ASSIA, The Cochrane Library and Global Health were searched from 1 January 1994 to 10 July 2024, alongside reference searches of included papers and hand searches of two journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>The included papers presented primary research on end-of-life care among Muslims in the British Isles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data were collected on publication details, study aims, participants, methods and results. Studies were appraised using Gough&rsquo;s weight of evidence framework. An inductive narrative synthesis consisting of three steps was conducted. This involved conducting a preliminary synthesis of findings, exploring relationships between studies and assessing the robustness of the synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>18 papers were included in the synthesis. Patients prioritised conformity between religion, culture and end-of-life symptom management. Symptom management preferences were also influenced by patients&rsquo; desire to maintain a sense of control at the end of life. Family-based care is culturally accepted, and indeed expected, to achieve a peaceful death. Healthcare professionals experienced challenges in providing sensitive symptom management given their unfamiliarity with the religious needs of Muslims.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Co-design research methods are essential to better understand care priorities within diverse Muslim communities. Meaningful collaboration among patients, families and healthcare professionals is necessary to identify mutually acceptable and beneficial approaches to promote culturally and religiously sensitive end-of-life symptom management.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mourhli, J., Sosnowski, K., Kuhn, I., Bowers, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108877</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108877</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Muslim communities perspectives and preferences regarding end-of-life symptom management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108877</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108877</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110009?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Healthcare utilisation among mothers of newborns with invasive group B Streptococcus disease: a 20-year national cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110009?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Long-term healthcare utilisation (HCU) among mothers of infants with neonatal, invasive group B <I>Streptococcus</I> disease (iGBS) remains understudied; identifying these patterns could provide better support for affected families and address the iGBS public health burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Population of Denmark.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1565 mothers of infants with iGBS and 44 976 matched comparators from 1997 through 2021, with follow-up until 2022, using national health and social registry data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>HCU including primary, inpatient, outpatient, psychiatric and surgical care was evaluated as period prevalence ratio (PPR) and rate ratios compared across three time periods (0&ndash;6 years, 7&ndash;13 years and 14&ndash;20 years) using a modified Poisson regression model and negative binomial regression with 95% CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mothers of newborns with iGBS had higher PPRs of psychiatric care contacts in the first 0&ndash;6 years and 14&ndash;20 years following iGBS compared with the comparison cohort (RR<SUB>0&ndash;6</SUB>1.12 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.35), RR<SUB>14&ndash;20</SUB>1.24 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.58)). Exposed mothers had similar PPRs of primary, inpatient and outpatient care use as comparators, except for a slightly higher inpatient care use 7&ndash;13 years following iGBS. Exposed mothers had higher RRs for primary, inpatient, outpatient and psychiatric care contacts than mothers in the comparison cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Mothers of iGBS-exposed infants had elevated psychiatric healthcare use and increased primary, and outpatient care visits compared with matched comparators, suggesting heightened healthcare needs and psychosocial burden of caregiving up to 20 years post-iGBS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lykke, M. R., Sorensen, H. T., Lawn, J., Horvath-Puho, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110009</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110009</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Healthcare utilisation among mothers of newborns with invasive group B Streptococcus disease: a 20-year national cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110009</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110009</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111413?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding preferences for behaviour change support as part of the NHS Health Check: a qualitative study with adults from underserved minoritised ethnic communities]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111413?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>NHS Health Checks (NHSHCs) provide individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores alongside advice and signposting to behaviour change support. A particular problem is that the support people receive is often poorly delivered, absent or not tailored to the needs of people in deprived communities, which risks exacerbating health inequalities. Improving this support is critical if NHSHCs are to achieve their goals of prevention and equity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore needs and preferences for behaviour change support among adults in deprived areas, using a digital prototype presenting CVD risk information and signposting to services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A longitudinal qualitative study involving focus groups and semi-structured follow-up interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants and setting</st>
<p>Adults from minoritised ethnic groups eligible for NHSHCs, recruited online and through a community centre, with both methods targeting high-deprivation areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Participants were first shown the digital prototype in focus groups to generate discussion. Follow-up interviews captured more in-depth reflections on needs for behaviour change support. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We conducted four focus groups and 20 follow-up interviews with 23 adults, predominantly of South Asian ethnicity living in areas of high deprivation. We developed three themes: (1) Trusted information to counter confusion and misinformation; (2) Support that makes change feel possible and meaningful, through culturally and personally relevant advice that addresses unhelpful beliefs about risk reduction and behaviour change and (3) Ensuring access to inclusive, socially connected environments that feel supportive and conducive to action.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>For minoritised ethnic adults in deprived areas, NHSHC support should build on everyday practices and foster positive perceptions of services. Alongside service-level changes, policy action is needed to remove structural barriers (eg, cost, safety) that limit people&rsquo;s ability to act on advice. Such changes could enhance the programme&rsquo;s contribution to reducing inequalities in CVD prevention.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffiths, S., Bartlett, Y. K., French, D. P., McMillan, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111413</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111413</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding preferences for behaviour change support as part of the NHS Health Check: a qualitative study with adults from underserved minoritised ethnic communities]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111413</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111413</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111869?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Testing a mobile peer support intervention for persons with serious mental illness (DigiPer) in community mental health services: a feasibility study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111869?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Persons with serious mental illness (SMI) often have coexisting medical conditions and experience a significantly reduced life expectancy compared with the general population. Peer support is considered an effective care approach for this population, and with rapid technological advancements, digital peer support, such as the DigiPer mobile application, can be a feasible self-management tool for persons with SMI. The study aims to assess the feasibility of DigiPer for persons with SMI in the Norwegian community mental health service settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This feasibility study will incorporate both qualitative and quantitative methods. The study consists of three phases: (1) simulation-based training among peer support workers using qualitative individual interviews; (2) pre&ndash;post study of DigiPer among peer support workers and service users using quantitative questionnaires and (3) process evaluation for peer support workers and service users using qualitative individual interviews. Peer support workers (n=5) and service users with SMI (n=15) will be recruited to evaluate the feasibility of DigiPer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was granted from the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics (reference no. 853041), along with an assessment of processing of personal data by the Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research (reference no. 810990). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant national and international scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, B., Mundal, I., Fortuna, K., Gronvik, C. K. U., Eines, T. F., Muzny, M., Skjaerpe, J. N., Storm, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-14T06:37:40-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111869</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111869</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health informatics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Testing a mobile peer support intervention for persons with serious mental illness (DigiPer) in community mental health services: a feasibility study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health informatics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111869</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111869</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109050?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Complications and costs to the UK National Health Service due to outward medical tourism for elective surgery: a rapid review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109050?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Outward medical tourism is when people seek medical treatment in a different country to the one they live in. We aimed to identify all studies that describe the impact on the UK National Health Service (NHS) of patients who require treatment due to outward medical tourism for elective surgery and report on complications, costs and benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A rapid literature review. Medical and grey literature databases were searched, limited to literature published between 2012 and 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Selection criteria</st>
<p>Studies published in the English language, conducted in any NHS setting, describing complications, costs or benefits due to outward medical tourism for elective surgery were included. We excluded emergency and semi-urgent surgery, dental and transplant surgery, cancer treatment and fertility treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were costs and savings to the NHS. Secondary outcomes were type and frequency, demographics, procedures, complications, treatment, follow-up care and use of NHS resources. Results were summarised narratively. Study quality was assessed using JBI critical appraisal tools and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for certainty of evidence for costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Some 35 case series and case reports and two surveys of NHS plastic surgeons were identified. Case studies described 655 patients treated in specific NHS hospitals between 2006 and 2024 for postoperative complications due to metabolic/bariatric surgery (n=385), cosmetic (n=265) and ophthalmic (n=5) surgery tourism. No cases relating to other surgical specialities were identified in the literature. Most patients were women (90%), with an average age of 38 (range 14&ndash;69) years. The most common destination for surgery was Turkey (61%). Complications were not well described for metabolic/bariatric surgery tourism; but for cosmetic surgery tourism, infection and wound dehiscence were most commonly reported. There was evidence that some patients needed complex treatment involving long hospital stays and multiple surgical interventions. Very low certainty evidence indicated that costs to the NHS from outward medical tourism for elective surgery ranged from &pound;1058 to &pound;19 549 per patient in 2024 prices. We found no studies that reported on the benefits of outward medical tourism.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A systematic approach is needed to collecting information on the number of people who travel abroad for elective surgery and the frequency and impact on the UK NHS of treating complications. Without these data, we cannot fully understand the risk of seeking surgery abroad.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[England, C., Bromham, N., Needham-Taylor, A., Hounsome, J., Gillen, E., Ingram, B.-J., Davies, J., Edwards, A., Lewis, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T14:31:07-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109050</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109050</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Press releases, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Complications and costs to the UK National Health Service due to outward medical tourism for elective surgery: a rapid review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109050</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109050</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101863?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers to and facilitators of exercise in children with asthma: protocol for a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101863?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>With the increasing prevalence of asthma in children, exercise has become an essential component of asthma management, playing a significant role in improving overall health and quality of life. However, children with asthma face numerous challenges when participating in exercise, including physical limitations due to symptoms, fear of exacerbations and lack of parental support. In addition to these barriers, some factors can promote or facilitate exercise in this population. Therefore, this qualitative meta-synthesis aims to explore these barriers and facilitators through a qualitative meta-synthesis, to provide a basis for developing targeted exercise interventions, optimising asthma management and improving the health status and quality of life of children with asthma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This qualitative metasynthesis will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework. The final systematic literature search will be performed in the following electronic databases to include publications from their inception until 31 December 2025: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The search strategy will include controlled terms and keywords related to &lsquo;asthma&rsquo;, &lsquo;child&rsquo;, &lsquo;exercise&rsquo; and &lsquo;qualitative research&rsquo;. The inclusion criteria will comprise qualitative or mixed-methods studies published in English that explore the barriers to and facilitators of exercise participation in children under 14 years of age with asthma, their families or healthcare providers. Grey literature and non-English studies will be excluded. Study selection, data extraction and methodological quality assessment (using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist) will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data will be synthesised using thematic synthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval will not be required for this qualitative synthesis, as it solely encompasses data derived from previously published research. Findings will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and submission to a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study registration</st>
<p>PROSPERO, CRD42025641502.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yi, X., Sunzi, K., Wu, X., Yang, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101863</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101863</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers to and facilitators of exercise in children with asthma: protocol for a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101863</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101863</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102277?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of brain-computer interface interventions in autism spectrum disorder rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102277?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterised by impairments in social interaction, communication and the presence of repetitive behaviours. Recent advancements in brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies have demonstrated potential benefits in enhancing cognitive, social and communication skills in individuals with ASD. However, the effectiveness of BCI-based interventions in ASD rehabilitation remains inconsistent across studies. Therefore, this protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness of BCI-based interventions for ASD rehabilitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We will conduct a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) and so on, to identify relevant studies published from inception to the present. The search will be supplemented by screening the reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts and full texts of identified studies for eligibility based on predefined criteria. Data extraction will be performed using a standardised form, and the risk of bias (RoB) will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool. Heterogeneity will be evaluated using the I&sup2; statistic, and a random-effects or fixed-effects model will be selected for meta-analysis based on the degree of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses will be conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, including participant age, ASD severity, type of BCI intervention and duration of the intervention. The review will be conducted from January 2026 to April 2026.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for this study, as it does not involve the collection of primary data from individual patients. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251010496.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhu, H., Gan, Y., Ye, J., Li, Y., Yu, J. Z., Li, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102277</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102277</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of brain-computer interface interventions in autism spectrum disorder rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102277</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102372?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigating the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with active sensory training on upper limb motor recovery after stroke: protocol for a randomised, sham-controlled, single-centre trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102372?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and upper extremity manipulation training have demonstrated clinical effectiveness in stroke rehabilitation. Post-stroke, the affected cerebral cortex often shows reduced excitability, which can limit the optimal outcomes of conventional manual training. To address this, we developed a new upper limb training method integrating TMS with active sensory training (AST) to enhance the fine motor ability in the upper limbs following stroke, potentially improving overall rehabilitation efficacy. However, the clinical effectiveness of this approach remains unclear. Importantly, we demonstrated the efficacy of the new rehabilitation strategy by using TMS in conjunction with AST in patients experiencing upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-centre, single-blind, sham stimulation, randomised controlled clinical trial investigated the efficacy of AST combined with TMS in patients with stroke and upper limb motor dysfunction post-stroke (1&ndash;24 months post-onset) at Brunnstrom stages III&ndash;V. Upper limb motor function was evaluated before and 2 weeks after the intervention. The primary outcome was the Action Research Arm Test result, and the secondary indicators included results on the Fugl&ndash;Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Scale, Modified Barthel Index, Semmes&ndash;Weinstein Monofilament, Erasmus MC revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment Scale, Embodied Sense of Self Scale (stroke version), functional near-infrared spectroscopy and neuroelectrophysiology. Between-group differences were analysed using independent t-tests, and within-group differences were examined with paired t-tests, with statistical significance set at p&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai for ethical application (Approval number: 2024-34-01). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at local and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2500097067.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiang, Y., first authorship, Zhu, G., first authorship, Huo, C., Wu, J., Li, W., Mao, M., Hu, F., Xia, J., Xu, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102372</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102372</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigating the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with active sensory training on upper limb motor recovery after stroke: protocol for a randomised, sham-controlled, single-centre trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102372</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102372</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104027?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of a booster intervention of the 'More Time at Patients Side programme on patients and healthcare professionals in a Swiss hospital: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104027?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Healthcare professionals are increasingly burdened by clerical tasks, contributing to reduced job satisfaction, heightened burnout and potential risk for patient safety. Despite ongoing efforts to promote patient-centred care, direct interaction time with patients remains limited, affecting both professional fulfillment and the quality of patient experience. In response, hospitals have begun implementing structured programmes to enhance protected patient time, though their effectiveness remains uncertain. The Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) developed the &lsquo;More Time at Patients&rsquo; Side&rsquo; (MTP) programme, integrating Lean management and Design Thinking principles to optimise clinical interactions. This study aims to evaluate an MTP booster intervention, designed to reinforce selected programme elements, using a cluster-randomised controlled trial focusing on patient pain management and healthcare professional job satisfaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The MTP Booster will be implemented in selected units at HUG across internal medicine, surgery, rehabilitation, palliative care and paediatrics units. Originally launched in 2017, the MTP programme introduced structured medical rounds, delegated clerical tasks and communication tools such as patient whiteboards. The booster intervention follows a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised design, with immediate reactivation in intervention units and delayed implementation in control units. The intervention consists of two key components: (A) a collaborative selection of MTP elements to reinforce, based on their feasibility and perceived usefulness and (B) structured integration of audit and feedback into daily routines, including on-site observations and staff training. The primary outcome is the quality of pain management, measured by the timely administration of analgesia. Secondary outcomes include pain documentation, patient satisfaction, healthcare professional work satisfaction, burnout levels, turnover risk and absenteeism. Other MTP-related audits are suspended during the study to preserve methodological integrity, and concurrent institutional initiatives will be documented as potential confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial has a declaration of no objection by Swissethics (2024-00169). All final results will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extended for cluster-randomised trials. We intend to publish the results of this trial in an international peer-reviewed journal, irrespective of the results.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The trial is currently in the pre-results stage and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: <A HREF="NCT06491797">NCT06491797</A>, 9 July 2024.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buclin, C. P., Bu&#x0308;rgisser, N., Mongin, D., Le Mauguen, A., Farhoumand, P. D., Berner, A., Daverio, J. E., Barrios, J., Reny, J.-L., Courvoisier, D. S., Agoritsas, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104027</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104027</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Patient-centred medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of a booster intervention of the 'More Time at Patients Side programme on patients and healthcare professionals in a Swiss hospital: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Patient-centred medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104027</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104027</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104210?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The journey to healing: exploring travel challenges and associated costs for cancer care at a tertiary care centre in Puducherry, Southern India - a mixed methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104210?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to assess travel time, associated costs, challenges and factors influencing healthcare facility choices among persons with cancer in Southern India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An explanatory sequential mixed methods study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in the cancer care outpatient department at a tertiary care centre in Puducherry, Southern India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 192 persons with cancer aged 18 to 65 years, diagnosed with breast, lip and oral cavity, cervical, lung or upper gastrointestinal cancers, and attending the cancer care centre between 2023 and 2024, were enrolled in the study through systematic random sampling. Additionally, 10 in-depth interviews were conducted using purposive sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 192 participants, 89 (46.4%) belonged to a lower socioeconomic group, and 178 (92.7%) reported experiencing financial hardship while undergoing cancer treatment. The median travel time to a tertiary care centre was 4.3 hours (IQR: 2.07&ndash;7.3), with a median direct non-medical cost of Indian Rupees (INR) 453 (IQR: 200&ndash;987). Median expenditures for travel, food and accommodation were INR 200 (IQR: 123&ndash;400), INR 360 (IQR: 150&ndash;613) and INR 30 (IQR: 20&ndash;60), respectively, per single visit. A significant proportion of participants (n=146, 76%) were unaware of nearby cancer treatment centres and relied on peer recommendations when choosing their place of treatment. Key challenges identified included long-distance travel, financial burden due to high food and transportation costs and limited affordability for accommodation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study highlights that prolonged travel time and associated costs pose substantial financial strain on cancer-affected families. Enhancing awareness of available healthcare facilities, implementing patient-friendly travel and accommodation support systems and decentralising cancer care services can improve accessibility and mitigate both travel and financial burdens.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Devaraj, L., Ayiraveetil, R., Arikrishnan, K., Sahu, S. K., Ganesan, P., Karunanithi, G., Auroprem, S. P., Srinivasan, T. S., Thulasingam, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104210</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104210</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The journey to healing: exploring travel challenges and associated costs for cancer care at a tertiary care centre in Puducherry, Southern India - a mixed methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104210</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105328?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global lifetime risk of developing myocarditis, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105328?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Age-standardised incidence rates of myocarditis have been widely reported; this metric primarily provides a cross-sectional view of risk based on a fixed standard population and does not capture the effects of population ageing. Lifetime risk represents the probability of developing myocarditis over an individual&rsquo;s lifespan and incorporates both demographic ageing and competing mortality, thereby offering a complementary perspective that reflects the burden experienced in real-world populations. This study aimed to estimate the global lifetime risk of myocarditis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a systematic analysis using publicly available aggregated data from Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study included 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>We used deidentified data from the general population to measure the lifetime risk of developing myocarditis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the estimated lifetime risk of developing myocarditis at the global, regional and national levels. Secondary outcomes included long-term trends in lifetime risk using the average annual percentage change (AAPC), variation in lifetime risk by age and sex, differences across Sociodemographic Index (SDI) levels assessed with concentration indices, and future risk estimated using an Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The global lifetime risk of developing myocarditis increased from 1.33% (95% CI 1.32% to 1.33%) in 1990 to 1.50% (95% CI 1.49% to 1.50%) in 2021 (AAPC: 0.388%, 95% CI 0.314% to 0.462%). High and high-middle SDI countries had the greatest risks. In 2021, risk was higher in males (1.59%, 95% CI 1.59% to 1.60%) than in females (1.40%, 95% CI 1.39% to 1.40%). People over 40 years, especially older women, had higher lifetime risks. Forecasts based on the ARIMA model suggest that the risk will continue to rise through 2050.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>From 1990 to 2021, the global lifetime risk of developing myocarditis has shown an upward trend. It is crucial to enhance early detection and diagnostic capabilities in primary care settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ji, C., Li, Y., Wan, Y., Yang, Z., Zeng, M., Wang, T., Li, W., Liu, J., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105328</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105328</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global lifetime risk of developing myocarditis, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105328</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105328</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105490?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Three decades of clinical trials in Portuguese-speaking Africa: a comprehensive scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105490?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Published clinical trials offer valuable insights into the clinical research landscape in Portuguese-speaking African countries (PSAC)&mdash;Angola, Cabo Verde, Guinea-Bissau, S&atilde;o Tom&eacute; and Pr&iacute;ncipe and Mozambique. The objective of this comprehensive scoping review is to systematically map and analyse randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacological interventions conducted in PSAC from 1995 to 2024, in order to identify research trends, targeted diseases, geographic distribution and evidence gaps to better understand the development and evolution of clinical trials in the region. This is the first comprehensive scoping review to examine the clinical trials landscape in PSAC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review adheres to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, which builds on the Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley methodological framework (refined by Levac <I>et al</I>) and will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A dual-search strategy will be used, consulting 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, African Index Medicus, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials) and 3 clinical trials registries platforms (Clinicaltrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry). Eligible studies will include RCTs conducted in at least one of the PSAC. Extracted data will include trial characteristics, targeted diseases, phases and designs, funding and ethical compliance. Risk of bias (RoB) will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool V.2.0 to evaluate the quality of the evidence included in the scoping review. Conclusions will be drawn upon the comparison between countries and their scope of clinical research, together with comparison with countries from other geographies, considering disease profiles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation and in plain language in social media, both in Portuguese and in English.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>This protocol is registered in the Open Science Framework <A HREF="https://osf.io/5nhc9">https://osf.io/5nhc9</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Batista, J. P. B., Teixeira, M. M., Torre, C. d. M., Sepodes, B., Abecasis, A., Mota-Filipe, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105490</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105490</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Three decades of clinical trials in Portuguese-speaking Africa: a comprehensive scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105490</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105490</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106694?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding barriers and facilitators to education and rehabilitation interventions for South Asian people with long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-ethnography]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106694?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>South Asian populations in the UK experience increased health risks related to long-term conditions, exacerbated by underdiagnosis, cultural differences in help-seeking behaviours, language barriers, low health literacy and a lack of culturally sensitive services. We know that group interventions that include education and rehabilitation, such as cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation, are highly effective, but people from diverse communities often face barriers to access and engage with them. This review aims to synthesise evidence on the barriers and facilitators to education and rehabilitation interventions experienced by South Asian people living with long-term conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic review of qualitative studies using meta-ethnography as the analytical approach to synthesis was conducted, following Noblit and Hare&rsquo;s approach, eMERGe Reporting Guidance for Meta-Ethnography, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Systematic searches were performed across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CENTRAL, EMBASE and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts from database inception through March 2024 (updated April 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost platform), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), EMBASE (Ovid), Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ProQuest platform) were searched from inception to March 2024 (updated April 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included qualitative research exploring the attitudes, views and experiences of South Asian adults (outside of South Asia) with diabetes, cardiovascular disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) regarding group treatments for these conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers searched, screened and coded studies, while remaining authors peer-reviewed. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data extraction and synthesis followed eMERGe and PRISMA reporting guidance, with findings synthesised qualitatively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 8348 identified citations, 17 studies met inclusion criteria, providing data from South Asian people living with cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. No studies including people with COPD met the inclusion criteria. Synthesis revealed four overarching themes, each incorporating both barriers and facilitators: faith, culture, communication, and safe space and professional relationship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Findings indicate that current group education and rehabilitation interventions are not fully inclusive of South Asian needs, often lacking cultural sensitivity, which impedes engagement. Special attention is required for South Asian women, who can face additional cultural and societal barriers. Addressing these challenges through culturally sensitive care, such as flexible intervention scheduling around religious practices, gender-sensitive adaptations and culturally tailored communication strategies, has potential to improve engagement in education and rehabilitation interventions, and therefore long-term condition outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024493644.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shiel, E. V., Miah, J., Chattopadhyay, T., Rauf, A., Dalton, C., Husain, N., Blakemore, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106694</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106694</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding barriers and facilitators to education and rehabilitation interventions for South Asian people with long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-ethnography]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106694</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106694</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107050?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) notifications and trends in the transmission cycles from infants and young children to older adults in Ireland: an analysis of incidence shifts over a decade]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107050?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Understanding the epidemiological shifts of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is essential to inform public health interventions, particularly given its increased burden on healthcare systems post-COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to examine age-specific trends and seasonal variations in RSV incidence, considering the recent introduction of a newborn RSV immunisation programme in Ireland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A surveillance time series study analysing routinely collected RSV notification data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>National-level weekly RSV notifications collected by the Health Service Executive-Health Protection Surveillance Centre in Ireland from 2012 to 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Infants (&lt;1 year), young children (1&ndash;4 years) and older adults (&ge;65 years) with laboratory-confirmed RSV, from within the corresponding Irish population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Annual trends in RSV epidemiology with special reference to the pre- and post-COVID-19 winter surges, and the time lag in age-related transmission to peak incidence among the various age groups. Data were analysed to evaluate incidence rates, peak timing, age-related transmission trends and lag times before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study examined the increasing incidence of RSV post-COVID-19 and a significant shift toward earlier RSV peaks in recent years (2021/2022, 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 seasons) in Ireland, with the onset and peak of the season nearly 2 months earlier than in pre-COVID-19 pandemic seasons (p&lt;0.01). Cross-correlation factor analysis indicated a sequential spread of RSV infections, where a peak in older adults followed an initial rise in cases among infants and young children, within a 3- to 5-week period (maximum cross-correlation=0.86 at lag 4 weeks, p&lt;0.001). Post-pandemic, infants exhibited higher infection rates, with incident rates significantly higher in all seasons post-COVID-19 (p&lt;0.001) and peak intensities increasing by over 60% from 2021/2022 to 2023/2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This analysis highlights an early seasonal onset and intensified RSV burden among infants in recent winters (2021/2022, 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 seasons). Quantifying the time lag for the community-level RSV transmission from infants and young children to older adults will offer insights to optimise RSV intervention strategies as a &lsquo;life-course approach&rsquo; to alleviate healthcare system pressures during peak seasons.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip, R. K., Mangroo, K., Gendy, N., Purtill, H., Kelly, E., Domegan, L., OLeary, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107050</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107050</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) notifications and trends in the transmission cycles from infants and young children to older adults in Ireland: an analysis of incidence shifts over a decade]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107050</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107050</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107660?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Data-driven strategies for model-informed decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107660?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To systematically review data-driven modelling studies that evaluated the effectiveness of interventions implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify which measures were most frequently reported as effective in controlling disease spread.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review of modelling studies focused on data-driven, model-informed decision-making for COVID-19 interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Embase, covering publications from 1 January 2020 to 16 October 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Studies were included if they: (1) used real-world data; (2) had sufficient sample sizes and (3) assessed at least one intervention with measurable outcomes.</p>
<p>Meta-analyses and purely theoretical modelling studies were excluded. Papers were further filtered using a structured screening process to ensure empirical and intervention-based modelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Data were extracted from eligible studies and categorised according to modelling approaches, data sources, intervention types and reported effectiveness. Descriptive synthesis was performed to summarise modelling trends and intervention performance. Studies were classified into major intervention categories, including tracing, testing and isolation (TTI); physical and social distancing (PSD); vaccination; lockdowns; mask-wearing; home office or stay-at-home (HOSH) and health infrastructure enhancement (HIE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of 2297 studies identified, 126 met inclusion criteria. Compartmental models were the most frequently used approach, primarily relying on case and death counts to assess intervention impact. The most commonly reported effective interventions were TTI, PSD, vaccination, lockdowns, mask-wearing and HOSH. When considering effectiveness relative to study frequency, the top six interventions were TTI, HOSH, mask-wearing, HIE, PSD and lockdowns. The relatively lower representation of vaccination reflects that most included studies were conducted during the early stages of the pandemic, before widespread vaccine rollout and availability of empirical vaccination data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This review highlights the critical role of data-driven models in guiding COVID-19 response strategies. Evidence supports the combined effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions, robust testing and tracing systems and health infrastructure strengthening. Real-world impact, however, remains dependent on local healthcare capacity, socioeconomic conditions and cultural contexts. Continued research is essential to refine adaptive modelling approaches and strengthen preparedness for future public health emergencies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lotfi, M., Kaderali, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107660</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107660</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Data-driven strategies for model-informed decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107660</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107660</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108118?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coping outcomes among women living with infertility in Kumasi, Ghana: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108118?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Women experiencing infertility employed various coping strategies to overcome the diverse stressors encountered. These coping strategies had their peculiar consequences or outcomes. This study aimed to explore the outcomes deduced from the coping strategies employed by women with infertility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>The study employed a qualitative descriptive research design to gain an in-depth understanding of the outcomes of coping strategies used by women with infertility. In-depth interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings and participants</st>
<p>The study was carried out at a private fertility and specialist hospital within the Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly, where 15 women diagnosed with primary infertility were interviewed for 45 min to 1 hour each. With all participants completing the study, interviews were audiotaped with consent, transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The findings revealed that women with infertility used various coping strategies to mitigate the psychosocial stressors encountered. The coping strategies employed had a varying impact on the well-being of women with infertility, from long-term (physical health, mental health and life satisfaction) to short-term (composure and reduced state anxiety) coping outcomes. The result of the coping strategy employed had a varying impact on the well-being of women with infertility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Women with infertility shared how they experienced good physical health, mental health and life satisfaction after employing adaptive coping strategies like seeking social support. They also shared how they exercised composure and had reduced state anxiety after using some maladaptive coping strategies, such as self-control and avoidance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Konadu, L., Kyei, J. M., Naab, F., Armah, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108118</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108118</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coping outcomes among women living with infertility in Kumasi, Ghana: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108118</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108118</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108975?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global, regional and national burden of glaucoma from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2050: a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108975?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study assessed the global burden of glaucoma using data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study. The analysis of epidemiological trends aimed to inform future public health prevention strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>None.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Analysis of 1990&ndash;2021 GBD data on glaucoma prevalence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), age-standardised prevalence rates (ASPR), and age-standardised DALY rates (ASDR). Estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) were calculated, Joinpoint regression identified trend changes, and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) modelling projected the burden for the year 2050.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Globally, the number of prevalent glaucoma cases increased from 4 072 106.59 (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 3 489 888.7 to 4 752 867.3) in 1990 to 7 587 672.9 (95% UI 6 522 906 to 8 917 725.4) in 2021. Concurrently, DALYs increased from 467 600.4 (95% UI 323 490.5 to 648 641.6) in 1990 to 759 900.2 (95% UI 530 942.9 to 1 049 127.2) in 2021. In contrast, the ASPR and ASDR declined to 90.1 per 100 000 population (95% UI 77.8 to 105.5) and 9.1 per 100 000 population (95% UI 6.3 to 12.5) in 2021, respectively. During the COVID-19 pandemic period (2019&ndash;2021), the slowest growth rates in crude case numbers and overall disease burden were observed, accompanied by the most pronounced decline in annual percentage change of ASPR. The highest estimates for both case counts and DALYs were identified in the 70&ndash;74 age group, with males demonstrating higher prevalence rates than females. Furthermore, regions with lower Sociodemographic Index (SDI) values bore a disproportionately higher burden of glaucoma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These findings underscore the need to strengthen early screening and treatment of glaucoma, particularly in ageing populations, male groups and low SDI regions. We urge cautious interpretation of COVID-19 related data and vigilance against potential post-pandemic surges in burden. Critical strategies include enhanced screening and intervention for high-risk groups, targeted prevention measures and integration of ophthalmic care into public health emergency frameworks to alleviate the disease burden.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peng, Y., Han, L., Jiang, Q., Liu, J., Liu, X., Jiang, G., Li, Z., Qin, S., Zhuo, Y., Su, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108975</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108975</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Ophthalmology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global, regional and national burden of glaucoma from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2050: a retrospective cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Ophthalmology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108975</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108975</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109248?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Searching for type 2 diabetes prevention interventions in public health and community settings: protocol for a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109248?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Type 2 diabetes is a growing global health challenge that requires effective prevention strategies. Public health and community-based approaches play an essential role in reaching vulnerable populations and addressing broader determinants of health. This protocol outlines a scoping review aimed at systematically mapping the existing evidence on lifestyle-based diabetes prevention interventions implemented in public health and community contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic literature search will be conducted to identify relevant studies published in English or German from 1 January 2014 onwards. The following databases will be searched: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL (via EBSCO), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (via OVID) and ClinicalTrials.gov. Relevant websites and grey literature sources will be searched to identify further eligible studies. (Cluster-)randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and clinical trials will be included. These must examine nutrition-based, physical activity-based or lifestyle-based interventions aimed at preventing type 2 diabetes in healthy adults or individuals with pre-diabetes, implemented in public health or community settings. Case reports and studies involving medical therapies or pharmacological interventions will be excluded. The literature search started in May 2025 and is expected to be completed by the end of December 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As this scoping review is based on the secondary analysis of publicly available data, no ethical approval is required. Our dissemination strategy includes publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at academic conferences and targeted dissemination to relevant interest holders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study registration</st>
<p>This project has been registered at Open Science Framework (<A HREF="https://osf.io/zafg5/">https://osf.io/zafg5/</A>), as PROSPERO does not accept registrations for scoping reviews.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michels, D., Walter, C., Grathwohl-Karl, A., Pfau, J., Haumann, H., Joos, S., Fro&#x0308;hlich, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109248</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109248</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Searching for type 2 diabetes prevention interventions in public health and community settings: protocol for a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109248</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110114?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Attitudes of maternity care providers toward regional centralisation of vaginal breech birth: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110114?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore maternity care providers&rsquo; attitudes toward regional centralisation of vaginal breech birth (VBB) care and gather their recommendations for maintaining clinical proficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>10 hospital-based maternity care professionals (nine obstetricians and one clinical midwife), purposively sampled to represent experience and institutional diversity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>10 hospital maternity units in a metropolitan region of the Netherlands.</p>
<p>Key themes describing provider attitudes towards two proposed models of centralised care (mobile breech team, designated referral centre) and alternative strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three core themes emerged: (1) proficiency&mdash;providers valued regular exposure, formal training and peer support, expressing concern that centralisation would reduce overall workforce readiness; (2) organisation&mdash;concerns included unequal access, staffing burden, legal risks and inefficiencies in mobile teams and (3) alternatives&mdash;participants preferred a regional breech network with shared training, joint video review and expert on-call support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Maternity care providers opposed full centralisation of VBB, favouring a networked model that distributes expertise and preserves local access. These insights highlight the importance of involving frontline providers in service redesign.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luiting-Wagenaar, D., van Dijk, M., Ganzevoort, W., Moll, E., Scheele, F., Velzel, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110114</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110114</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Attitudes of maternity care providers toward regional centralisation of vaginal breech birth: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110114</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the mechanisms of yoga-based cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure via assessment of endothelial function, genomics and arterial health (Yoga-EndOmics): a study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Heart failure (HF) remains a major global health challenge, particularly in low-resource settings where access to comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is limited. Yoga, a culturally contextualised mind-body intervention, holds promise as an adjunctive therapy in CR. The Yoga-EndOmics study aims to evaluate the effects of Yoga-based cardiac rehabilitation (Yoga-CaRe) on gene expression, endothelial function, vascular biomarkers and clinical outcomes in systolic HF, providing mechanistic insights into its potential integration into conventional cardiac rehabilitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) mechanistic trial enrolling 78 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a structured Yoga-CaRe intervention or enhanced standard care for 3 months. The Yoga-CaRe group will attend 20 supervised sessions with guided home practice involving tailored asanas, pranayama and meditation. Primary outcomes are changes in endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and functional exercise capacity at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in arterial compliance and stiffness, circulating biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress and inflammation, and immediate changes in global gene expression profiles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells following the Yoga-CaRe intervention. Data will be analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for between-group comparisons and significant analysis of microarray (SAM) for global gene expression profiles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, India (<b>SDMIEC/2025/1072</b>) and is registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and stakeholder engagement platforms to inform future integrative strategies in HF management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>CTRI/2023/12/060758</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shetty, V. V., Patil, L. R., Patil, S. G., Aithal, K., Oli, A. K., Yenagi, V. A., Kaulgud, R. S., Dharne, M., Chandra Sekaran, A. M., Prabhakaran, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110239</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110239</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the mechanisms of yoga-based cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure via assessment of endothelial function, genomics and arterial health (Yoga-EndOmics): a study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110239</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112545?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Specialist PrE-hospital rEDirection for ischaemic stroke thrombectomY (SPEEDY): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial with included health economic and process evaluations]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112545?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Outcome from large vessel occlusion stroke can be significantly improved by time-critical thrombectomy but treatment is only available in regional comprehensive stroke centres (CSCs). Many patients are first admitted to a local primary stroke centre (PSC) and require transfer to a CSC, which delays treatment and decreases the chance of a good outcome. Access to thrombectomy might be improved if eligible patients could be identified in the prehospital setting and selectively redirected to a CSC. This study is evaluating a new specialist prehospital redirection pathway intended to facilitate access to thrombectomy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study is a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with included health economic and process evaluations. Clusters are ambulance stations (or teams) which are work bases for ambulance practitioners. Intervention allocated ambulance practitioners use the Specialist PrE-hospital rEDirection for ischaemic stroke thrombectomY (&lsquo;SPEEDY&rsquo;) pathway which comprises initiation according to specific criteria followed by contact with CSC staff who undertake a remote assessment to select patients for direct CSC admission. Control allocated ambulance practitioners continue to provide standard care which comprises admission to a local PSC and transfer to a CSC for thrombectomy if required. A co-primary outcome of thrombectomy treatment rate and time from stroke symptom onset to thrombectomy treatment will evaluate the impact of the pathway. Secondary outcomes include key aspects of emergency care including prehospital/hospital time intervals, receipt of other treatments including thrombolysis, and performance characteristics of the pathway. A broad population of all ambulance practitioner suspected and confirmed stroke patients across participating regions is being enrolled with a consent waiver. Data about SPEEDY pathway delivery are captured onto a study case record form, but all other data are obtained from routine healthcare records. Powered on a &lsquo;primary analysis population&rsquo; (ischaemic stroke patients with pathway initiation criteria), 894 participants will detect an 8.4% difference in rate and data from 564 thrombectomy procedures will detect a 30 minute difference in time to treatment. The full study population is estimated to be approximately 80 000. Regression modelling will be used to examine primary and secondary outcomes in several analysis populations. The economic analyses will include cost-effectiveness and cost&ndash;utility analyses, and calculation of willingness to pay at a range of accepted threshold values. The process evaluation involves semi-structured interviews with professionals and patient/family members to explore views and experiences about the SPEEDY pathway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has ethical, Health Research Authority and participating NHS Trust approvals.</p>
<p>Dissemination of study results will include presentations at national and international conferences and events, publication in peer-reviewed journals, and plain English summaries for patient/public engagement activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN77453332">ISRCTN77453332</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaw, L., Allen, M., Day, J., Ford, G. A., James, M., McClelland, G., McMeekin, P., Mossop, H., Pope, C. J., Simmonds, R. L., White, P., Wilson, N., Price, C. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112545</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112545</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Specialist PrE-hospital rEDirection for ischaemic stroke thrombectomY (SPEEDY): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial with included health economic and process evaluations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112545</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112545</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113578?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay as a treatment monitoring tool for pulmonary tuberculosis: protocol for a prospective longitudinal study in Nairobi, Kenya]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113578?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Treatment failure remains a major challenge in tuberculosis (TB) management. Rapid and objective assessment of treatment response is essential, as existing tools have limited accuracy and slow turnaround times. The PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay (PATHFAST-LAM), an automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, was developed to quantify lipoarabinomannan (LAM) in sputum within 1 hour. Previous studies have shown a strong correlation between sputum LAM concentration and culture-based bacterial load. However, its clinical utility for predicting poor outcomes during treatment has not been prospectively evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a prospective longitudinal study enrolling newly diagnosed, bacteriologically confirmed patients with pulmonary TB at Rhodes Chest Clinic and Mbagathi County Referral Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. We will follow participants throughout the 6-month treatment course, attempting to collect sputum weekly during weeks 1&ndash;4, biweekly during weeks 5&ndash;12 and monthly during months 3&ndash;6. We will measure LAM concentrations at these time points using the PATHFAST-LAM assay. The primary outcome is to assess whether changes in sputum LAM concentration during the intensive phase (baseline to week 4 and/or week 8) predict a composite poor outcome, defined as positive sputum culture at month 6, treatment failure, death during treatment or relapse within 3 months after treatment completion. The primary endpoint is the area under the curve from the receiver operating characteristic analysis, representing the predictive performance of changes in sputum LAM concentration for the composite poor outcome. We will identify the optimal cut-off value for LAM change and estimate sensitivity and specificity with 95% CIs using 2<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>2 tables. We will apply an adaptive design that allows sample-size re-estimation after interim analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI/SERU/CRDR/124/5241) and Nagasaki University (250619327). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT07157904">NCT07157904</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Takaizumi, Y., Kinoti, J., Hikone, M., Orina, F., Meme, H., Ong'ango, J. R., Muriithi, B., Mueni, E., Kaneko, S., MacLean, E. L.-H., Sato, S., Saito, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-13T06:20:35-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113578</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113578</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay as a treatment monitoring tool for pulmonary tuberculosis: protocol for a prospective longitudinal study in Nairobi, Kenya]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113578</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113578</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e085006?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[UNIversity students LIFEstyle behaviours and Mental health cohort (UNILIFE-M): study protocol of a multicentre, prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e085006?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Students enrolling in higher education often adopt lifestyles linked to worse mental health, potentially contributing to the peak age onset of mental health problems in early adulthood. However, extensive research is limited by focusing on single lifestyle behaviours, including single time points, within limited cultural contexts, and focusing on a limited set of mental health symptoms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The UNIversity students&rsquo; LIFEstyle behaviours and Mental health cohort (UNILIFE-M) is a prospective worldwide cohort study aiming to investigate the associations between students&rsquo; lifestyle behaviours and mental health symptoms during their college years. The UNILIFE-M will gather self-reported data through an online survey on mental health symptoms (ie, depression, anxiety, mania, sleep problems, substance abuse, inattention/hyperactivity and obsessive/compulsive thoughts/behaviours) and lifestyle behaviours (ie, diet, physical activity, substance use, stress management, social support, restorative sleep, environment and sedentary behaviour) over 3.5 years. Participants of 69 universities from 28 countries (300 per site) will be assessed at university admission in the 2023 and/or the 2024 academic year and followed up for 1, 2 and 3.5 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was first approved at a national level in Brazil (CAE:63025822.8.1001.5346). Study sites outside Brazil obtained additional ethics approval from their institutions using the main approval. Results from the UNILIFE-M cohort will be disseminated through scientific publications, presentations at scientific meetings, press releases, the general media and social media.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schuch, F. B., Waclawoscky, A., Tornquist, D., Oyeyemi, A. L., Sadarangani, K. P., Takano, K., Teychenne, M., Balanza-Martinez, V., ONeil, A., Romain, A. J., McGrath, A., Anselmi, A., Andrade-Lima, A., Zanetti, A. C. G., Trompetero-Gonzalez, A.-C., Heissel, A., Silva, A. F. D., Benavides, A. C. Z., Ruusunen, A., Cristi-Montero, C., Weise, C., Pires, D. A., Silva, D. R. P., Pelupessy, D. C., dos Santos, E. B., Caputo, E. L., Critselis, E., Dragioti, E., Matthews, E., de Jesus-Moraleida, F. R., Gomes, F. A., Bachtiar, F., Silva-Junior, F. L. e., Sallem, H., Moura, H., Womboh, I., Grabovac, I., Meyer, J. D., Ramos-Diaz, J., Bueno-Antequera, J., de Oliveira, J., Deenik, J., Soto-Sanchez, J., van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Leo Ng, J., Lopez-Gil, J. F., Firth, J., Teixeira, J. A., Nikonov, J. R., Hoyer, J., Carneiro, L., Zou, L., Farrer, L. M., Woud, M. L., Solmi, M., Guimaraes, M. E. A., Gerber, M., Reichert, M., Jenkins, M., Savage, M. J., Hoffmann, M. S., Hutchesson, M., Gonzalez Henao, M. E., Chong, M. J. M., Morina, N., Galvao-Coelho, N. L., Heinrichs, N., Montoya-Hurtado, O. L., Ewah, P. A., Salameh, P., De Boni, R., Cheung, R. Y. M., Monteiro-Junior, R. S., White, R. L., Haider, S., Baldew, S.-S., Gow, S., Rosenbaum, S., Hallit, S., Piccinin, S. G., Heinzel, S., Torres, S., Rashid, T., Matias, T. S., Rohe, T., Meireles, T., Reyes-Ferrada, W., Zhang, Y., Frei, A. K., Deslandes, A., Wolf, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085006</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-085006</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[UNIversity students LIFEstyle behaviours and Mental health cohort (UNILIFE-M): study protocol of a multicentre, prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e085006</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e085006</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099891?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Defining chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions in Malaysia: a collaborative consensus study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099891?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This paper aims to describe the development of an inventory of chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) relevant to the Malaysian context and identify potentially preventable hospitalisations in the Malaysian Ministry of Health (MOH) facilities based on the developed list.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Consultative panel discussion, multi-panel modified Delphi and secondary health data analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting:</b> Malaysian MOH healthcare facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>42 experts from the family medicine and internal medicine specialties (modified Delphi), and 2022 inpatient data from MOH hospitals (secondary health data analysis).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>A list of chronic ACSCs tailored to the Malaysian context and the proportion of potentially preventable hospitalisation in MOH hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>10 conditions were identified as chronic ACSCs for Malaysia, namely angina, asthma, chronic kidney disease, convulsions and epilepsy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, hypertension, iron deficiency anaemia and ischaemic heart disease. In 2022, these conditions accounted for 8.6% of potentially preventable hospitalisations among the total hospitalisations in MOH hospitals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study provides a base list of chronic ACSCs tailored to the Malaysian context, which enables monitoring of potentially preventable hospitalisations due to chronic conditions. The findings underscore a proportion of hospital admissions that could potentially be avoided through interventions that enhance outpatient care. The conditions identified as ambulatory care sensitive provide specific targets for policy action and resource allocation to optimise outpatient health services and thus reduce the burden of hospitalisations in the country.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Malaysian National Medical Research Register, NMRR ID-23&ndash;02149-TBZ (<A HREF="https://nmrr.gov.my/research-directory/45c901d6-f121-4e79-9f38-dd7d283ec9a6">https://nmrr.gov.my/research-directory/45c901d6-f121-4e79-9f38-dd7d283ec9a6</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Md.Sharif, S., Fun, W. H., Chidambaram, S. K., Saw, P. S., Mohd Nasarruddin, A., Mohd Fauzi, N., Azali, A., Jailani, A.-S., Sararaks, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099891</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099891</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Defining chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions in Malaysia: a collaborative consensus study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099891</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099891</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100021?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Definition of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers for salivary gland cancer from the intratumoural and systemic immune status: detailed protocol of the prospective, observatory ImmoGlandula study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100021?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Salivary gland carcinomas (SGC) are rare tumours. The term SGC is not more than an umbrella for a variety of histogenetically, morphologically and biologically distinct entities. Accordingly, SGCs have not been sufficiently investigated to date. Their rarity makes it difficult to reach high patient numbers for individual entities in clinical studies, leading to pooling patients with different histological subtypes to attain sufficient participants. The different histological subtypes of SGC differ significantly in their clinicopathological features, such as their grading, their occurrence and their outcome. SGCs are usually stratified into low-grade, intermediate-grade or high-grade tumours. In most kinds of SGC, specific targetable molecular markers are lacking. The inclusion of immunotherapy (IT), however, might improve the outcome of patients suffering from high-grade SGCs. In order to integrate IT as a therapeutic option for SGC and to facilitate therapeutic decisions based on tumour (immune) biology, predictive and prognostic immunological biomarkers are indispensable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this prospective study, 500 patients will be enrolled, who are distributed in three arms. The observational cohort includes patients with malignant salivary gland tumours, whereas patients with benign tumours of a salivary gland are grouped in the control group 1. In the control cohort, 2 patients do not have a salivary gland tumour but have a planned functional surgery of the nose or ear or a maxillofacial surgery. The local immune status from the tumour tissue and the microbiome will be sampled before treatment. In addition, the systemic immune status from peripheral blood will be analysed before and after surgery and after the adjuvant and definitive chemoradiotherapy, if applicable. Clinical baseline characteristics and outcome parameters will additionally be collected. Data mining and modelling approaches will finally be applied to identify interactions of local and systemic immune parameters and to define predictive and prognostic immune signatures based on the evaluated immune markers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approval from the institutional review board of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universita&#x0308;t Erlangen-Nu&#x0308;rnberg was granted in September 2023 (application number 23-292-B). The results will be disseminated to the scientific audience and the general public via presentations at conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06047236">NCT06047236</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donaubauer, A.-J., Frey, B., Agaimy, A., Lange, F., Mogge, L., Fietkau, R., Iro, H., Munoz, L. E., Weber, M., Kesting, M., Gaipl, U. S., Haderlein, M., Mu&#x0308;ller, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100021</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100021</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Definition of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers for salivary gland cancer from the intratumoural and systemic immune status: detailed protocol of the prospective, observatory ImmoGlandula study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100021</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100021</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103434?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research on Eating and Adolescent Lifestyle (REAL) 2.0: 15-year follow-up study of eating disorders and weight-related trajectories, mental health and substance use health from early adolescence to early adulthood--a Canadian cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103434?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>Few studies have examined how psychosocial risk and protective factors in adolescence shape mental health outcomes and other multimorbid conditions in adulthood, particularly among Canadian youth. The Research on Eating and Adolescent Lifestyle (REAL) 2.0 study was a 15-year follow-up cohort study designed to investigate how early etiological factors, including body image and disordered eating symptoms in adolescence, contribute to the development of eating, weight-related concerns, mental health and substance use health problems in early adulthood. In this paper, we describe the REAL 2.0 cohort&rsquo;s demographic and clinical characteristics alongside an overview of the study procedures, laying the groundwork for collaboration on future learnings with this unique data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The cross-sectional REAL study initially surveyed middle and high school students from 2004 to 2010 (n=3043) across 43 schools in the Ottawa, Canada region. Of those, respondents in grade 7 or 9 (n=1197 from 25 of the 43 original schools) were asked to participate in a longitudinal arm of the study that consisted of yearly follow-ups. From the longitudinal cohort, there were 278 participants (29.1% male; M<SUB>age</SUB>=28.6) from those who consented to be re-contacted (n=912), who completed the REAL 2.0 survey electronically (30.4%), providing comprehensive data on demographic, clinical, eating and weight-related behaviour, psychological, social, environmental and substance use health factors in adulthood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>9.4% of REAL 2.0 participants met DSM-5 criteria for an eating disorder, while 17.6% met criteria for disordered eating. Moderate to severe anxiety was reported by 28% of participants, while 21.6% experienced moderate to severe depressive symptoms. Regarding substance use, 16.9% engaged in hazardous drinking, 16.9% used cannabis daily or almost daily, and 4.3% reported daily tobacco use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>REAL 2.0 has the potential to answer multiple research questions about several mental health outcomes, but its priority focus is to answer questions related to risk and protective factors of multimorbidity in adulthood. Additionally, profiling work, linked to health service utilisation data for systems planning work and predictive modelling studies are secondary goals. By leveraging the Health Data Nexus (HDN) platform, we welcome collaboration with interested researchers who would like to utilise the breadth of data both in adolescence and adulthood to answer other pertinent aetiological questions in mental health and substance use health outcomes. Future plans to conduct additional follow-ups remain feasible.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obeid, N., Buchholz, A., Bradley, A. H., Mistry, N., Vaillancourt, T., Colman, I., Tasca, G. A., Corace, K., Maras, D., Goldfield, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103434</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103434</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research on Eating and Adolescent Lifestyle (REAL) 2.0: 15-year follow-up study of eating disorders and weight-related trajectories, mental health and substance use health from early adolescence to early adulthood--a Canadian cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103434</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103434</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenges in shared decision-making about major lower limb amputation: the PERCEIVE qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Shared decision-making is widely advocated in policy and practice, but how it is to be applied in a high-stakes clinical decision such as major lower limb amputation due to chronic limb-threatening ischaemia or diabetic foot is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the communication, consent, risk prediction and decision-making process in relation to major lower limb amputation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study (done as part of a broader mixed-methods study) using <b>s</b>emi-structured interviews. Interview transcriptions were analysed using thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Vascular centres in three large National Health Service hospitals in Wales and England, UK, between 1 October 2020 and 30 September 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A purposive sample of 18 patients for whom major lower limb amputation was considered as a treatment option/carried out, with interviews conducted before or within 4 months of amputation and 4&ndash;6 months after amputation. A further purposive sample of 20 healthcare professionals (including eight surgeons) involved in supporting or conducting major lower limb amputation decision-making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Five major categories were identified that highlighted the challenges of ensuring shared decision-making associated with major lower limb amputation: (i) patients&rsquo; limited understanding, (ii) variable patient attitudes to decision-making, (iii) healthcare professionals&rsquo; perceived challenges to sharing decision-making, (iv) surgeons&rsquo; paternalism and (v) patients&rsquo; and healthcare professionals&rsquo; decisional regret/possible consequences of challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Amputation is a life-changing decision for both patients and healthcare professionals, with huge consequences. Despite being considered the gold standard, our findings highlight several challenges to effective shared decision-making for major lower limb amputation. Shared decision-making training for healthcare professionals is paramount if these limitations are to be addressed and patients are to feel confident in being adequately informed about the treatment decisions that they make.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04903756">NCT04903756</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prout, H., Waldron, C.-A., Gwilym, B., Thomas-Jones, E., Milosevic, S., Pallmann, P., Harris, D., Edwards, A., Twine, C. P., Massey, I., Burton, J., Stewart, P., Jones, S., Cox, D., Bosanquet, D. C., Brookes-Howell, L., PERCEIVE Study group, PERCEIVE Study, Prout, Waldron, Gwilym, Thomas-Jones, Milosevic, Pallman, Harris, Edwards, Twine, Massey, Burton, Stewart, Jones, Cox, Bosanquet, Brookes-Howell]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104407</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104407</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenges in shared decision-making about major lower limb amputation: the PERCEIVE qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104407</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106811?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[When a fall leads to a hospital emergency department visit: a focus group study on factors influencing the adoption of falls prevention measures]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106811?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Studies have demonstrated the positive impact of falls prevention interventions for high-risk older adults who have experienced a severe fall. However, uptake and adherence rates remain low. The purpose of this study is to assess the capabilities, opportunities and motivations of older adults following a fall with subsequent presentation to the emergency department and direct discharge home in relation to falls prevention measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>This study, conducted as part of the &lsquo;Sentinel fall presenting to the emergency department&rsquo; project at the Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg in Germany, involved a participatory research team (PRT). It was a qualitative study based on focus group interviews undertaken between June and October 2022, analysed in accordance with qualitative content analysis following Kuckartz. The Theoretical Domains Framework forms the basis of the deductive category system. PRT members collaborated as co-researchers in conducting and analysing the focus groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>12 focus groups were conducted (N=52). The participants were older adults (&ge;60 years) who had received outpatient care in an emergency department following a fall (N=41) and their relatives (N=11).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Interviewees indicated that both knowledge of available support options and the ability to self-evaluate are important following a fall. Additionally, health circumstances, such as limitations resulting from fall-related consequences, influence the adoption of falls prevention measures. Social influences, as well as environmental context and resources, were also discussed, reflecting participants&rsquo; preferences for intervention design, such as having a central point of contact and specific courses on fall training. Moreover, the fall event itself may strengthen the perceived need for preventive measures, whereas a fear of falling can lead to reduced or modified activity levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>To improve the engagement of older adults in falls prevention interventions following a fall, the establishment of a central point of contact could be considered. Individual tailored interventions, including psychological support as well as specific fall training, are needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>DRKS00025949.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reeck, N., Vo&#x0308;lkel, A., Mammes, M., Urbahn-Schiefer, D., Reineking, B., Brushinski, E., Stuckenschneider, T., Zieschang, T., Bru&#x0308;tt, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106811</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106811</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[When a fall leads to a hospital emergency department visit: a focus group study on factors influencing the adoption of falls prevention measures]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106811</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106811</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106817?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of self-directed learning ability on undergraduate nursing students learning engagement: the chain-mediating role of academic buoyancy and academic burnout in a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106817?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To explore the chain-mediating role of academic buoyancy and academic burnout between self-directed learning ability (SDLA) and learning engagement in undergraduate nursing students.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>This study was conducted in December 2024, involving 239 nursing undergraduates from a university in Daqing city, Heilongjiang province.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Independent samples t-tests and analysis of variance were employed to examine the relationships between undergraduate nursing students&rsquo; characteristics and learning engagement. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyse the correlations among the variables. Based on self-determination theory, the chain-mediating effects of academic buoyancy and academic burnout between self-directed learning ability and learning engagement were tested using Model 6 of the SPSS PROCESS macro (V.3.5), with bootstrap samples set to 5000.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 239 undergraduate nursing students were included in the analysis, of whom 84.94% were female. The sample comprised students from all academic years, including first-year (27.62%), second-year (33.47%), third-year (17.57%) and final-year students (21.34%). Most participants selected nursing as a voluntary major choice (62.34%), and 43.51% were from urban areas. The 239 undergraduate nursing students scored 72.26&plusmn;10.26 on SDLA, 14.90&plusmn;2.64 on academic buoyancy, 53.75&plusmn;9.33 on academic burnout and 50.81&plusmn;7.64 on learning engagement. SDLA and academic buoyancy were positively correlated with learning engagement (all p&lt;0.05), while academic burnout was negatively correlated with learning engagement (p&lt;0.05). The chain-mediating effect of academic buoyancy and academic burnout between SDLA and learning engagement was identified, with a total indirect effect of 0.255, accounting for 37.89% of the total effect. Notably, academic buoyancy served as a significant mediator between SDLA and learning engagement, whereas the mediating effect of academic burnout between SDLA and learning engagement was not statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>SDLA is associated with higher learning engagement among nursing students through academic buoyancy and reduced academic burnout. These findings highlight the importance of developing SDLA and clarify the mediating roles of academic buoyancy and burnout in this relationship, providing valuable insights for enhancing learning engagement in nursing education.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, Y., Sun, J., Yang, B., Li, Y., Shi, P., Li, X., Wang, P., lu, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106817</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106817</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of self-directed learning ability on undergraduate nursing students learning engagement: the chain-mediating role of academic buoyancy and academic burnout in a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106817</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106817</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107037?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gamification design and engagement in preregistration nurse education: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107037?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The complexity of modern healthcare has driven an increase in the complexity of the preregistration nursing curricula. Diverse learning needs in this population are best served by inclusion of diverse approaches to teaching. Gamification offers an approach to enhance motivation and engagement, allowing for sustained motivation to keep learning. However, current research concerning gamification within preregistration nursing is still limited, particularly surrounding underlying design and the impact this has on long-term engagement and motivation. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and map gamification design elements used in preregistration nursing education, using the Octalysis framework, and to evaluate how these designs influence student engagement and motivation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This scoping review will use the updated Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology and will be reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA - ScR). The search will be conducted using Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Education Resources Information Cente (ERIC), EBSCO, Web of Science Core Collection, PROquest, SCOPUS, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and PsycINFO. Grey literature, conference proceedings and relevant digital platforms will also be considered. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts. Data extraction will include gamification design elements, engagement and motivation outcomes and their alignment with the Octalysis framework. Synthesis and presentation of findings will be completed using the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice, Research recommendations framework. The planned start for performing the scoping review is November 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this review will synthesise published and publicly available evidence. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and stakeholder engagement within higher education.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McMillan, K., Valler, T., Swift, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107037</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107037</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gamification design and engagement in preregistration nurse education: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107037</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107037</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107535?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Virtual reality for visions (VRV): a proof-of-concept study examining the development of a new treatment for distressing visual hallucinations in people with psychosis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107535?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Visual Hallucinations (VHs) (seeing things that others do not, or visions) are a common feature of psychosis, causing significant distress and disability. Services rarely ask about these important experiences, and crucially there are no proven beneficial psychological treatments. There are at least two key challenges faced when treating VHs. First, people report not knowing why they see things others don&rsquo;t, which leads them to feel alone and different from others. Second, they feel they cannot trust their own eyes to tell what is real or not, which can lead to fears they will be hurt or harmed by the VH, or even if they know the experience is not real, they may fear that they are losing their mind, or that they are not able to control or manage their experiences. For these reasons, they may struggle to put skills and strategies into practice when in the presence of the VH. Consequently, we have developed a novel treatment that addresses these core issues. First, we have a psycho-education and coping strategies package called Visual Unusual Sensory Experiences (VUSE) that uses the best aspects of digital technology (animations, videos) to explain why people have VHs and provides normalising information to help the person to feel less alone. It introduces coping strategies that are then tested in Virtual Reality sessions (VR for Visions VRV) where a representation of the visual experience is provided, enabling the person to safely develop skills and gain a sense of mastery and empowerment. We now plan to test this approach in a proof-of-concept study to help determine if this will help people use these skills in the real world and so help reduce distress, improve functioning and quality of life. We will address uncertainties in the feasibility of developing and delivering this treatment and inform its future use in a larger trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The study is a single arm feasibility trial (n=16) evaluating VUSE+VRV and treatment as usual. The study is recruiting people with psychosis and distressing VHs in one NHS Trust and uses independent but non-blind research assistants to undertake assessments before, during and after treatment (at baseline, 6, 12 week) and at follow-up (16 weeks). Quantitative information on recruitment rates, adherence and completion of outcome assessments (VHs, other psychiatric symptoms, quality of life and perceived recovery) will be collected. Qualitative interviews will capture service-users&rsquo; experience of therapy. Analyses will focus on feasibility outcomes and provide initial estimates of intervention effects. Thematic analysis of the qualitative interviews will assess the acceptability of the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial has received NHS Ethical and Health Research Authority approval (25/EM/0077). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated directly to participants, and services as well as through open access peer-reviewed publication(s).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN11350954">ISRCTN11350954</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dudley, R., Sargeant, S., Gibbs, C., Prentice, L., McCartney, L., Aynsworth, C., Maskey, M., Skeggs, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107535</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107535</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Virtual reality for visions (VRV): a proof-of-concept study examining the development of a new treatment for distressing visual hallucinations in people with psychosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107535</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107535</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107766?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[International perspective on healthcare provider gender bias in musculoskeletal pain management: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107766?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Musculoskeletal pain is a global issue affecting millions of individuals. Healthcare provider gender bias (HCP-GB) in pain management or treatment may have implications. This study aimed to systematically (1) identify and map the scientific and grey literature as it relates to HCP-GB in the assessment, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal pain, and (2) identify current gaps that necessitate further research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>The following databases were searched: PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus (Elsevier), CINAHL Complete (Ovid), Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost), Pre-Prints Database (National Library of Medicine) and Rehabilitation Reference Center from inception to August 2022 and updated in May 2025. Relevant grey literature was identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting articles</st>
<p>All screening was performed by two reviewers during title/abstract screening and full-text screening stages. Articles published in English, Spanish and German were included if they involved participants with musculoskeletal pain and examined HCP-GB as the dependent variable.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently extracted data from the bibliometric, study characteristics and pain science variables. Results were descriptively mapped, and the frequency of concepts, population and characteristics was narratively reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>21 full-text articles were included. All articles were published in North America and Europe. A total of 3694 healthcare providers from various specialty areas were examined. A majority of studies (57.1%; n=12) measured HCP-GB using written case vignettes, 33.3% (n=7) used case vignettes plus virtual human pictures/videos, and 9.5% (n=2) used real patients. The influence of patients&rsquo; sex in HCP pain assessment was reported in 28.5% (n=6) of the articles, while 42.9% (n=9) reported gender bias regarding HCP non-pharmacological treatment recommendations. Male patients were more likely to receive exercise recommendations for back pain and laboratory testing, whereas female patients received more psychological treatment recommendations and counselling from their HCP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>While there appears to be inconsistent use of the terms sex and gender, the literature informing this review suggests an existence of gender bias in the management of patients with musculoskeletal pain. Future research should be more purposeful in the use of sex/gender-related terms and consider exploring the impact of implicit bias training to rectify potential gender biases present in HCP.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilford, K. F., Mena-Iturriaga, M. J., Vugrin, M., Wainer, M., Seeber, G. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107766</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107766</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[International perspective on healthcare provider gender bias in musculoskeletal pain management: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107766</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107766</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108080?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Telehealth-delivered exercise and nutrition intervention to improve outcomes in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for the multicentre STARLighT phase II (neoadjuvant) and phase III (adjuvant) trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108080?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), recurrence is frequent despite surgery and systemic treatments. Observational studies suggest that physical exercise and nutrition could improve outcomes, such as survival and treatment tolerance; however, solid evidence is lacking. The STARLighT trial aims to assess the effects of a telehealth-delivered combined exercise and nutrition intervention on clinical, biological and patient-reported outcomes in early stage NSCLC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>STARLighT is a multicentre master protocol study conducted in Italy, comprising two cohorts of patients affected by early stage NSCLC (stages IB&ndash;IIIA) <I>epidermal growth factor receptor</I> and <I>anaplastic lymphoma kinase</I> wild type. Cohort A will include 46 patients with resectable NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant treatment and will exploit a single-arm phase II design. Cohort B will enrol 268 patients undergoing adjuvant treatment (including as a part of a perioperative strategy) and proposes a randomised controlled phase III design. Patients in Cohort A and those allocated to the interventional arm in Cohort B will receive a tailored telehealth-delivered exercise and nutritional intervention. The control group will receive the usual care plus educational material. For cohort A, two coprimary endpoints are set: pathological complete response and quality of life, whereas the primary endpoint for cohort B is 2-year disease-free survival. Secondary and exploratory endpoints include a series of clinical (eg, overall survival and safety), biological (immune&ndash;inflammatory markers, gut microbiota and transcriptomics) and patient-reported outcomes (eg, sleep habits, physical activity, anxiety and depression and distress) evaluations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Verona (Prot. No. 33979) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07042724). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific meetings, public forums and guideline updates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Clinicaltrial.gov: <A HREF="NCT07042724">NCT07042724</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avancini, A., Giannarelli, D., Ugel, S., Mafficini, A., Fiorini, P., Scaglione, I., Adamoli, G., Borsati, A., Belluomini, L., Eccher, S., Trestini, I., Tregnago, D., Sposito, M., Insolda, J., Schena, F., Scarpa, A., Derosa, L., Milella, M., Novello, S., Pilotto, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108080</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108080</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Telehealth-delivered exercise and nutrition intervention to improve outcomes in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for the multicentre STARLighT phase II (neoadjuvant) and phase III (adjuvant) trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108080</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108080</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108668?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Catalysing Artificial Intelligence for Paediatric Tuberculosis Research (CAPTURE): protocol for a global multicentre study establishing a paediatric chest X-ray repository to evaluate computer-aided detection algorithms]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108668?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The substantial case detection gap in the field of child tuberculosis (TB) disease is largely driven by inadequate diagnostic tools and approaches. Chest radiographs (CXRs) remain a key component in the evaluation of children and young adolescents (0&ndash;15 years) with presumptive TB, aiding clinicians in making the diagnosis and discriminating children with TB from those with other diseases. Widespread use and optimal interpretation of CXR is hampered by a lack of access to well-trained specialists to interpret images. Artificial intelligence CXR interpretation software, termed computer-aided detection (CAD), is now well developed for adults, yet few products have been evaluated in children. The CXR features of child TB are different from those of adults, and as a result, the performance of these CAD algorithms, largely developed for use in adults, will be suboptimal when used in children. Adapting, or fine-tuning adult CAD algorithms, using CXR images from children with presumptive TB, could allow optimisation of these products for use in children. We, therefore, set out to develop a large image and data repository collected from children evaluated for TB (called Catalysing Artificial Intelligence for Paediatric Tuberculosis Research, CAPTURE) with the purpose of evaluating current CAD products and then working with developers and other partners to optimise CAD algorithms for use in children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We identified approximately 20 studies, from which potentially up to 11 000 CXRs could be used for the proposed project. CXRs and data were eligible for inclusion in the CAPTURE repository if collected from high-quality child TB diagnostic studies that enrolled children with presumptive TB and if CXRs were obtained as part of the baseline assessment. All lead investigators of these studies are members of the CAPTURE consortium. The images and metadata contributed are centrally collated and the key variable of TB case classification as confirmed, unconfirmed or unlikely TB, using an established consensus case definition, is available. All CXRs included in the CAPTURE repository have a consensus radiological interpretation allocated by a panel of independent expert child TB CXR readers who have classified them as &lsquo;unreadable&rsquo;, &lsquo;normal&rsquo;, &lsquo;abnormal typical of TB&rsquo; or &lsquo;abnormal not typical of TB&rsquo;. To determine diagnostic performance of existing CAD products, we will evaluate these against a primary composite clinical reference standard (confirmed TB and unconfirmed TB vs unlikely TB), as well as other secondary microbiological and radiological reference standards. A subset of images will be subsequently allocated to a &lsquo;training set&rsquo; and made available to developers, academic groups or other parties to either develop novel paediatric CAD products or fine-tune existing adult ones, which will then be re-evaluated by the CAPTURE team using an image subset (&lsquo;validation set&rsquo;) that is independent of the training set.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The CAPTURE study has been approved by Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee (N22/09/113), with additional ethics approval or waivers by relevant local authorities obtained by consortium members contributing data if required. The final pooled, harmonised and cleaned dataset, as well as the deidentified, renamed CXR images, is stored on a secure cloud-based server. All analyses of existing CAD products, as well as the paediatric-optimised products, will be published in peer-reviewed publications and shared with other stakeholders like the WHO and donor and procurement organisations to guide policy updates and procurement pathways to ensure widespread uptake.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palmer, M., Kik, S. V., Kohli, M., Fataar, A., Anyebe, V., Frey, N., Castro, R., Nerurkar, R., van der Westhuizen, J.-N., Mace, A., Ruhwald, M., Seddon, J. A., Jaganath, D., CAPTURE Consortium group, Amanullah, Anderson, Andronikou, Aurilio, Balestre, Borand, Breton, Bonnet, Chabala, Daware, Franke, Garcia-Basteiro, Goussard, Gupta, Gupte, Hesseling, Kamath, Khosa, Kinikar, LaCourse, Leroy-Terquem, Lopez-Varela, Marcy, Mave, Myint, Moh, Mwanga-Amumpaire, Myo, Nduba, Nliwasa, Ntinginya, Olbrich, Otero, Paradkar, Parente, Peinado, Pinheiro Mascarenhas, Pitcher, Poublan, Ribeiro, Sabi, Sant' Anna, Schaaf, Taguebue, van der Zalm, Walters, Wobudeya, Zar, Chagaluka]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108668</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108668</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Catalysing Artificial Intelligence for Paediatric Tuberculosis Research (CAPTURE): protocol for a global multicentre study establishing a paediatric chest X-ray repository to evaluate computer-aided detection algorithms]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108668</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108668</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109320?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Which medical subspecialties use qualitative research? A bibliometric analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109320?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Qualitative research addresses &lsquo;how&rsquo; and &lsquo;why&rsquo; questions in healthcare. It captures the complexity of clinical practice by providing insights into experiences, behaviours and context often missed by quantitative methods. The objective of this review was to explore the volume, trends and adherence to reporting standards in qualitative research across hospital-based medical subspecialties.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Longitudinal bibliometric review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>Ovid Medline, Embase and Emcare were searched for qualitative research published between 2000 and 2024 in 12 medical subspecialties. For each subspecialty, the number and percentage of qualitative publications was identified. Adherence to reporting standards was assessed in a random sample of publications covering all subspecialties.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Between 2000 and 2024, 715 471 qualitative research studies were published across 12 medical subspecialties, representing 1.36% of all studies (52 620 042). Neurology and oncology had the highest number of qualitative studies (116 835 and 106 360). Although infectious diseases contributed a lower absolute number of qualitative studies (59 947), they had the highest proportion relative to all studies (4.07%). Conversely, nephrology and haematology exhibited the lowest number of qualitative studies (14 510 and 29 198) and smallest proportions (0.90% and 0.81%). Overall, the annual proportion of qualitative research increased from 0.64% (6052/945 008) in 2000 to 1.95% (56 909/2 919 825) in 2024. However, the relative positions remained largely stable over time.</p>
<p>Adherence to reporting standards was generally good, particularly in relation to methodological coherence. However, there was under-reporting of positionality (where researchers consider how their identity and standpoint may influence the research process) and reflexivity (where researchers critically reflect on how their assumptions and decisions shape the study).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Qualitative research is under-represented in medical subspecialties but has increased steadily over time, with notable variation in adoption between subspecialties. While overall adherence to reporting standards is good, greater attention to positionality and reflexivity is needed to enhance transparency and rigour.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gittus, M., Sutton, A., Lagojda, L., OCathain, A., Fotheringham, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109320</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109320</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Which medical subspecialties use qualitative research? A bibliometric analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109320</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110671?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of digital health interventions in influencing the primary prevention of non-communicable diseases: protocol for an umbrella review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110671?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) currently contribute to over 50% of the global disease burden. Digital tools bear the potential to mitigate the risk of NCDs by facilitating personalised, preventive healthcare. It is therefore pertinent to examine the specific components that contribute to the success or constrain the impact of digital health interventions (DHIs), with particular attention to the sustainability of their long-term effects. Additionally, it is important to provide an up-to-date perspective on emerging interventions and technologies that have not yet been comprehensively addressed in the literature. This protocol defines the methodology for an umbrella review to synthesise the available high-quality evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding effectiveness of DHIs in influencing the primary prevention of NCDs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Using a rigorous search strategy, the subsequent databases will be searched in December 2025: MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus and Epistemonikos. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, the selected literature will be screened based on predefined inclusion criteria. This includes systematic reviews and meta-analyses published within the last 5 years, without restrictions on country or language, that evaluate the effectiveness of any DHI aimed at the primary prevention of NCDs. Suitable full-text articles will be extracted by four researchers and independently assessed for methodological quality by two researchers using the AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) tool. The results will be presented in a summary table aligned with the review question and subquestions, accompanied by a narrative synthesis that explores the findings and their relevance to the research aims.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as no primary data will be collected. The findings of this umbrella review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251139744.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeleff, M., Dorner, T. E., Ban, M., Scho&#x0308;n, M., Lischka, C., Lichtenegger, K., Du&#x0308;r, M., Hochwarter, S., Feichtner, F., Haider, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110671</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110671</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of digital health interventions in influencing the primary prevention of non-communicable diseases: protocol for an umbrella review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110671</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110671</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111712?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Meaning-making of existential aspects of motherhood transition: a systematic qualitative review protocol using framework synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111712?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Evidence-based, compassionate practice is a key objective in midwifery care, with particular emphasis on existential aspects of women&rsquo;s experiences during the transition to motherhood. In 2014, a scoping review was published exploring this phenomenon. The interest in this review exemplified the growing scholarly and clinical interest in this subject. However, the scoping review is outdated and does not meet up-to-date methodological standards. This qualitative systematic review will synthesise qualitative studies that explore the existential aspects of becoming a mother, aiming to identify potential unmet needs and articulate women&rsquo;s preferences for care during motherhood transition. Findings from this synthesis may contribute valuable insights for developing evidence-informed clinical guidelines that promote person-centred and holistic maternal care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This qualitative systematic review will use framework synthesis based on Peter la Cour&rsquo;s model of Existential health. The data will be collected from five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science), which will be searched from 2010 to the present day. Study selection will prioritise the transition to motherhood in contemporary Western countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required for a review, and findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, conferences and social media.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251018563.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moos, C., Sejrsgaard, M., Damm, M. F., Prinds, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111712</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111712</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meaning-making of existential aspects of motherhood transition: a systematic qualitative review protocol using framework synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111712</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111712</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112887?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social prescribing within five European countries: a protocol of a cross-country qualitative analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112887?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Social prescribing is an approach to addressing non-medical issues affecting people&rsquo;s health and well-being (eg, loneliness, housing or financial problems). It has gained international traction over recent years as complementary to medical care. A larger research project, comparing social prescribing across European countries, is considering how to tailor provision for the following groups: (a) LGBTIQ+persons, (b) refugees and first-generation immigrants and (c) older adults living alone. As part of this research, a qualitative study will address the question: <I>What are the enabling and limiting factors associated with implementing social prescribing, across different European countries, from the perspective of key stakeholders?</I></p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Five European countries (Austria, England, Germany, Poland, Portugal) will be involved. Researchers from each country will conduct approximately 20 semi-structured interviews (total number will be 100). Interviewees will be people receiving, delivering, managing and funding/commissioning social prescribing. Interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed. A cross-country analysis will be undertaken; framework analysis will support this process, with a chart developed in Excel in which data from across the five countries is summarised by the researchers involved. Summaries will be based on a thematic framework that researchers from the five countries develop together after initially analysing their own data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was initially secured through the University of Oxford&rsquo;s Medical Sciences Interdivisional Research Ethics Committee (IDREC 1806086) for data collection in England. This approved application was then used to secure ethics approval in Austria (through Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft), Germany (through Bergische Universita&#x0308;t Wuppertal), Poland (through Wroclaw Medical University) and Portugal (through NOVA University of Lisbon). Dissemination will include an academic journal article and presentation at relevant conferences. It will also include short videos, written summaries/policy briefs and an infographic.</p>
<p>This project has received funding from the European Union&rsquo;s Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No 101155873. Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tierney, S., Westlake, D., Rezvani, F., Rojatz, D., Ko&#x0308;berlein-Neu, J., Bommhardt, T., Dias, S., Marques, M. J., Kurpas, D., Napierala, H., Herrmann, W., Husk, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112887</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112887</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social prescribing within five European countries: a protocol of a cross-country qualitative analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112887</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112887</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113566?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Climate change, transactional sex, HIV/AIDS and sustainable livelihoods among fishing communities around Lake Victoria: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113566?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The objective of this scoping review is to map out what has been published in the scientific literature on the relationship between climate change-related events and how these overlap with associated changes in resource availability, transactional sex and HIV incidence and prevalence, within fishing communities in the Lake Victoria basin. This objective is informed by the fact that climate change and the associated natural resource strains in the Lake Victoria region have exacerbated existing inequities within fishing communities. Vulnerable populations, especially women, engage in strategies such as transactional sex to cope with the uncertainty of natural resource-dependent livelihoods. This practice greatly increases women&rsquo;s risk of contracting HIV in this region, with prevalence rates four to five times the national averages. This scoping review will thus show how the existing empirical literature reports on climate change, transformation in natural resources and livelihoods, and transactional sex and HIV in the Lake Victoria region.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Studies that meet the following inclusion criteria will be included: align with at least two of the major concepts of interest, including climate change, transactional sex, HIV/AIDS, Lake Victoria Basin and/or empirical studies; are published in English and after 2012; and focus on the Lake Victoria basin. The scoping review will be guided by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis: Scoping Reviews, supported by the standard principles of Arksey and O&rsquo;Malley. The specific search strategies to be implemented were developed with guidance from an experienced research librarian to align with the inclusion criteria. The search will be conducted in relevant global databases, with two reviewers screening the results and extracting relevant data points. Finally, results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews flow diagram, and summarised in figures, tables and text.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The scoping review is designed to comprehensively scope the existing literature and document the coverage of linkages between transactional sex, HIV/AIDS and sustainable livelihoods in the context of climate change with a view to informing health systems responses to human health specific to the HIV epidemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Scoping review registration</st>
<p>The proposed scoping review is registered with the Open Science Foundation (OSF), registration number:<A HREF="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9DTW4">https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9DTW4</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Were, L. P. O., Kachingwe, O. N., Goldman, T., Ma, Y., Awuor, F. J., Nyamweya, C., Okechi, J., Kaufman, L., Gopal, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T06:08:38-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113566</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113566</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Climate change, transactional sex, HIV/AIDS and sustainable livelihoods among fishing communities around Lake Victoria: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113566</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113566</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e086005?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CapeOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) combined with sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) for first-line treatment of advanced gastric or oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a single-arm, phase Ib/II trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e086005?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>A combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has been demonstrated to be effective as a first-line treatment of gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. The conventional treatment strategy for patients with advanced/metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative G/GEJ cancer is recommended. However, the response rate and enhancements in survival are still significantly insufficient. The present study will investigate the efficacy and safety of incorporating a bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305 into chemotherapy and immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic G/GEJ cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-arm, open-label, prospective phase Ib/II clinical study will involve 57 participants. In phase Ib of the trial, patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ cancer will receive capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOX) together with sintilimab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) and IBI305 (7.5, 10 or 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks) in a 3+3 dose-escalation design to evaluate dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) within 6 weeks of treatment initiation. In phase II, the patients will receive CapeOX combined with sintilimab and IBI305 at the recommended phase II dose. The primary objectives will be to assess DLTs (phase Ib) and the objective response rate (phase II). The secondary objectives will include progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rate, duration of response, adverse effects, quality of life and safety.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital and ClinicalTrials. The final results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal upon completion of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05640609">NCT05640609</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dai, R., Zhang, P., Cheng, M., Bi, F., Zhou, J., Liu, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086005</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-086005</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CapeOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) combined with sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) for first-line treatment of advanced gastric or oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a single-arm, phase Ib/II trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e086005</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e086005</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101218?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stakeholders perspectives on implementation of a clean fuel: clean stove intervention for reduction of household air pollution and hypertension in Lagos, Nigeria - a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101218?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To identify stakeholder perceived challenges and facilitators for implementing a clean fuel and clean stove intervention to reduce household air pollution and hypertension in Lagos, Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study guided by the Exploration and Preparation phases of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, using focus group discussions and in-depth semi-structured interviews with inductive and deductive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Peri-urban communities across the five administrative divisions of Lagos State, Nigeria.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>128 stakeholders from 32 communities, including community, religious, market and youth leaders, primary healthcare staff, and household decision makers. Approximately half were female.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>This was a pre-implementation needs assessment that included demonstrations of the clean stove and fuel.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Thematic domains describing barriers and enablers to adoption and implementation, mapped to EPIS inner, outer, and bridging factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Stakeholders reported barriers that included stove stacking, upfront stove cost, concerns about long-term fuel price and availability, equipment durability and maintenance, safety, mistrust of new technology, and uncertainty about stove performance for dishes requiring high heat and long cooking times. Reported facilitators included payment flexibility and subsidies, opportunities to test the stove, perceived benefits of cleaner and faster cooking with less soot, endorsement by community leaders, and interest in local retail and distribution to improve access.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Implementation planning for clean fuel and clean stove programmes should address affordability, reliable fuel supply chains, durability and service, culturally relevant cooking needs, and trust building through community leadership. These findings inform adaptation strategies for scale-up in similar low-resource settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05048147">NCT05048147</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Onakomaiya, D. O., Mishra, S., Colvin, C., Ogunyemi, R., Aderibigbe, A. A., Fagbemi, T., Adeniji, M. R., Li, S., Kanneh, N., Aifah, A., Vedanthan, R., Olopade, C. O., Wright, K., Ogedegbe, G., Wall, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101218</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101218</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stakeholders perspectives on implementation of a clean fuel: clean stove intervention for reduction of household air pollution and hypertension in Lagos, Nigeria - a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101218</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101218</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102879?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding psoriasis care costs and the impact of comorbidities: a time-driven activity-based costing analysis in an integrated practice unit]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102879?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The study aims to evaluate the cost of managing psoriasis and its comorbidities across multiple medical departments and to identify cost determinants based on patient, disease and treatment characteristics. Additionally, it compares the cost of care with reimbursements under the fee-for-service (FFS) system to assess how well they reflect patient-specific care needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Seven-step, time-driven activity-based costing (TD-ABC) analysis based on direct observations and interviews to generate patient-level cost estimates over the full cycle of care for participants prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>An integrated practice unit (IPU) at a Belgian University Hospital, centred around the treatment of psoriasis, including the management of associated comorbidities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 52 patients meeting the trial&rsquo;s inclusion criteria, enrolled between January 2023 and November 2023, undergoing treatment within the IPU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The individual cost of care over a 6-month period ranged from 169.78 to 1454.97, highlighting significant variability. Major cost drivers included mental health status and disease severity. Additionally, the presence of one or more comorbidities had a substantial impact on care costs, affecting not only expenses directly related to comorbidity management but often also those associated with dermatological care. Finally, a comparison between the TD-ABC cost variability and reimbursement tariffs variability revealed disparities, indicating that current tariffs do not sufficiently account for patient-specific cost differences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Healthcare delivery and costing studies often adopt a fragmented approach, limiting cost insights into the full cycle of care for a medical condition. The TD-ABC methodology can address this gap by generating detailed, patient-level cost estimates for both primary illness management and related comorbidities. Our findings underscore the importance of including comorbidity-related costs when discussing a condition&rsquo;s overall economic burden while also revealing significant cost variability among patients with the same disease. Notably, these variations are not sufficiently addressed by the current FFS reimbursement system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05480917">NCT05480917</A> (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borzee, J., Cardoen, B., Roodhooft, F., Vyvey, E., Lambert, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102879</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102879</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding psoriasis care costs and the impact of comorbidities: a time-driven activity-based costing analysis in an integrated practice unit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102879</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102879</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105161?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advancing the definition and methodology of environmental scans in the context of health service delivery: an online modified Delphi study in real time]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105161?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>While health services leaders rely heavily on information gathered via environmental scans (ESs) to guide strategic decision-making, formal guidance on how to conduct these scans is notably absent. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of agreement on essential components of a definition and a methodological framework for ESs. The goals were to (1) advance our working definition to a concept definition for ESs and (2) develop a methodological framework to guide health service researchers conducting ESs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design and setting</st>
<p>We used a real-time, modified Delphi survey in a virtual platform setting to seek perspectives on statements related to ESs from individuals who were recruited based on having verifiable experience designing or conducting ESs in health services delivery research. Surveylet, an online software, was used to facilitate asynchronous data collection and to determine the level of agreement on the statements with an a priori threshold of 75% set for agreement on each statement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>21 panellists provided opinions on 59 statements related to a proposed ES definition and on 69 statements specific to components of a methodological framework for ESs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Panellists from four countries participated in the survey representing 2 to &ge;11 years of experience with ESs and having completed 1 to &ge;7 ESs. Agreement was achieved in 28 of the 59 statements related to the ES definition and for 51 of 69 statements related to a methodological framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The agreement on many elements deemed essential for a definition of ES support development of a proposed concept definition of ES in health service delivery research. As well, the agreement on components deemed necessary for a methodological framework will help in future development of such a framework to guide stakeholders in the planning and implementation of ESs. These results provide a starting point for a common understanding of ESs in the field of health services delivery research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nagel, D. A., Kean, T., Charlton, P., Kelly, K. J., Lamontagne, M.-E., Fahim, C., Tricco, A. C., Azar, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105161</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105161</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Research methods]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advancing the definition and methodology of environmental scans in the context of health service delivery: an online modified Delphi study in real time]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research methods</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105161</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105161</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106427?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Symptom clusters in oesophageal cancer patients during varying phases of postoperative chemotherapy: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106427?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To summarise the symptom clusters (SCs), assessment tools and their evolution at different stages of postsurgical chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients, providing reference for future research design and precise symptom management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A systematic search and literature review were conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology framework and PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Databases searched include PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHAL), Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP Chinese Journal and China Biomedical Literature Database. The search covered the period from database inception to 30 November 2024, and references were traced backward.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>Patients aged &ge;18 years with postsurgical oesophageal cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy; studies focusing on SCs before, during or after chemotherapy; original quantitative research; published in Chinese or English. Exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant or palliative chemotherapy, reviews, conference abstracts and inaccessible full-text articles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>Two independent reviewers screened, extracted and cross-checked the data. Content analysis was employed to summarise the SCs, assessment tools and phase-related changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 11 studies were included (8 in Chinese, 3 in English). Twelve SCs were identified, with gastrointestinal-related, eating-related and physical function-related clusters being the most common. Eleven assessment tools were used, with MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Gastrointestinal Cancer Module and its Chinese version being the most frequently applied. Difficulty eating was the most prominent SC before chemotherapy, gastrointestinal symptoms were the most severe during chemotherapy and psychological-physical symptoms dominated in the postchemotherapy phase.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The composition of SCs in oesophageal cancer chemotherapy evolves dynamically across different stages. However, the existing evidence is mainly derived from small sample cross-sectional studies, with high heterogeneity in tools and methods. Standardised assessment criteria and longitudinal validation are needed to develop stage-specific, evidence-based interventions that can be widely applied.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhi, Q., Liao, Y., Ke, H., Wang, H., Zhan, Y., Wang, W., Li, W., Liu, Y., Yu, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106427</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106427</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Symptom clusters in oesophageal cancer patients during varying phases of postoperative chemotherapy: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106427</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106427</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106630?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of oral vancomycin in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis with/out inflammatory bowel disease in Italy: study protocol of VanC-IT trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106630?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the classical hepatobiliary manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). No therapy currently halts disease progression. The strong gut&ndash;liver axis implicated in PSC pathogenesis supports the investigation of microbiome-targeted treatments. Oral vancomycin (OV), an antibiotic with potential immunomodulatory properties, has shown encouraging results in improving clinical symptoms and liver biochemistry in PSC. However, prospective data on its safety and efficacy remain limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Oral Vancomycin for primary sclerosing Cholangitis in ITaly (VanC-IT) is a phase II, dose-finding, randomised, placebo-controlled, trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OV in patients with PSC, with or without underlying IBD. Adults and adolescents aged 15&ndash;75 years will be enrolled following a 10-week screening and run-in period and randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either placebo, OV 750 mg/day or OV 1500 mg/day for 24 weeks. Randomisation will be stratified by baseline liver stiffness (&lt; or &ge;14.4 kPa). Participants will be followed at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment. The primary efficacy outcome is the change in serum alkaline phosphatase at 24 weeks. Key secondary outcomes will assess the safety, the impact of OV on liver biochemistry, PSC risk scores, circulating and imaging markers of liver disease, IBD activity, quality of life and incidence of PSC-related clinical events. Key translational aims include sequencing of the faecal microbiota, metabolomic profiling of serum and stool samples and immunological profiling of serum associated with OV treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee CE Brianza on 10 February 2023, number 4017. Trial registration number NCT05876182. Participants will be required to provide written informed consent. The results of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05876182">NCT05876182</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cristoferi, L., DAmato, D., Maino, C., Bernasconi, D., Dinelli, M. E., Malandrin, S. M. I., Facciotti, F., Vigano, C., Pirola, L., Festa, M. M., Gerussi, A., Rossi, E., Malinverno, F., Tettamanti, P., Cazzaniga, M. E., Corso, R., Ippolito, D., Galimberti, S., Invernizzi, P., Carbone, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106630</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106630</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of oral vancomycin in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis with/out inflammatory bowel disease in Italy: study protocol of VanC-IT trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106630</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106630</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107146?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the effects of reductions in local government expenditure on food safety services in England, 2009-10 to 2019-20: a longitudinal ecological study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107146?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To understand how reductions in resource allocation affect food safety services in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This longitudinal ecological study analysed secondary observational data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>England, data at the local authority level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Ecological study, without human participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome measures were the number of staff, represented by the number of full-time equivalents per capita, number of interventions per establishment, and proportion of hygiene-compliant establishments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A &pound;1 decrease in food safety expenditure per capita was associated with a 2% (&ndash;3.3 to &ndash;0.7) decrease in staffing levels and a 1.6% (&ndash;3.2 to &ndash;0.1) decrease in the number of interventions achieved per establishment. A one-unit reduction in staff was associated with a 42.2% (&ndash;80.5 to &ndash;11.9) decrease in the number of interventions achieved. No evidence of an association was found between expenditure or staff levels and the proportion of compliant establishments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Spending reductions negatively affected the capacity of food safety teams to provide key services. Reductions in food safety expenditure significantly affected food hygiene staff levels and service provision. This finding raises concerns about the capacity of food safety teams to operate and the potential for increased public risk of gastrointestinal infections.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murrell, L., Clough, H. E., Zhang, X., Gibb, R., Chattaway, M. A., Green, M. A., Buchan, I. E., Barr, B., Hungerford, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107146</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107146</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the effects of reductions in local government expenditure on food safety services in England, 2009-10 to 2019-20: a longitudinal ecological study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107146</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107557?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abuse of people with mental illnesses perpetrated by healthcare professionals: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107557?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This scoping review addresses the underexplored issue of abuse of people with mental illnesses by healthcare professionals. We mapped the existing literature to establish the nature, prevalence, contributing factors and experiences of this abuse.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources and study selection</st>
<p>We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ichushi-Web during the period from 3 July to 22 August 2024. Eligible studies reported abuse of people with mental illnesses by healthcare professionals, with no restrictions on year or language.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and analysis</st>
<p>Two reviewers independently extracted data from the selected articles. The data were synthesised to examine prevalence, associated factors and experiences of people with mental illnesses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Of 5793 records, 61 met the inclusion criteria, with 32 from the USA and Japan (16 from each). Abuse types reported across 17 countries included physical, psychological, sexual and economic abuse, neglect and human rights violations. Histories of physical and sexual abuse were frequently reported as possible contributing factors to further abuse. Recommendations for prevention were identified at multiple levels, including individual care, organisational and institutional systems, and broader policy and society.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This review mapped the literature on abuse by healthcare professionals in mental health services and identified critical research gaps, including a lack of methodologically robust studies. Further research is needed to build an evidence base for prevention strategies and to establish institutional safeguards.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matoba, K., Teshima, T., Yayama, S., Koto, Y., Miki, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107557</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107557</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abuse of people with mental illnesses perpetrated by healthcare professionals: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107557</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107557</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108681?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Primary care for depression before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective pre-post study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108681?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To compare primary care for depression among patients detected in the first 21 months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic to patients detected pre-pandemic, and examine whether depression care was associated with patient characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective pre&ndash;post study using de-identified data from electronic medical record data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care clinics enrolled in CPCSSN from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Population</st>
<p>Patients with a valid CPCSSN case definition of depression detected between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2021 were included in the cohort and categorised by detection date (pre-pandemic or during Canadian pandemic waves).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary care encounters, psychotropic prescriptions and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) prescriptions were observed at 3 and 12 months post-detection. Multivariable regression evaluated associations between patients&rsquo; depression detection timing and depression care, adjusting for age, sex, rurality, neighbourhood deprivation quintile, province, number of observable comorbidities and pre-detection psychotropic use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>91 453 patients with depression were identified, of whom 53% were detected pre-pandemic. Patients detected during the pandemic were younger and less comorbid than those detected pre-pandemic. Proportions of patients with any encounter, psychotropic prescriptions and SSRI prescriptions were higher for patients detected during every pandemic wave compared with patients detected pre-pandemic. The adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) of number of encounters (aIRR=1.15; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.17), psychotropics (aIRR=1.11, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.13) and SSRIs prescribed (aIRR=1.12; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.15) within 3 months of detection were higher among patients detected during the first pandemic wave compared with those detected pre-pandemic. Socio-demographic characteristics had weaker associations with outcomes compared with timing of detection. Results were similar within 12 months of detection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Overall, primary care for depression was maintained during the pandemic despite challenging circumstances. Increases in paediatric encounter rates and increased prescribing in younger adults warrant further investigation to understand the factors driving these patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov <A HREF="NCT05813652">NCT05813652</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard, M., Freeman, K., Hafid, S., Vanstone, M., Queenan, J., Aubrey-Bassler, K., Drummond, N., Nicholson, K., Mangin, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108681</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108681</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, General practice / Family practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Primary care for depression before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective pre-post study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>General practice / Family practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108681</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108681</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109226?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Demographic and occupational factors associated with work-life balance among physician assistants/associates: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109226?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine demographic and occupational attributes associated with work-life balance (WLB) satisfaction among physician assistants/associates (PAs) using a national dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This is a cross-sectional study using 2023 national data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included 149 909 board certified PAs who updated, confirmed or verified their profile questions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Descriptive and bivariate statistics, followed by multivariate logistic regression, were conducted to identify factors associated with WLB satisfaction among PAs. The primary outcome was a binary variable derived from a 7-point scale assessing PAs&rsquo; satisfaction with WLB. Responses of &lsquo;Somewhat&rsquo;, &lsquo;Mostly&rsquo; and &lsquo;Completely&rsquo; satisfied were coded as &lsquo;<I>Satisfied&rsquo;</I>, while &lsquo;Neither/Nor&rsquo;, &lsquo;Somewhat&rsquo;, &lsquo;Mostly&rsquo; and &lsquo;Completely&rsquo; dissatisfied were coded as &lsquo;<I>Not satisfied&rsquo;</I>. Our analytical sample comprised 86,000 PAs who responded to a question inquiring about their satisfaction with WLB.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Over two-thirds (71.7%) of PAs indicated satisfaction with WLB. The multivariate logistic regression revealed that the types of specialties that PAs practised were among the strongest factors associated with WLB satisfaction. Compared with PAs in primary care, those practising in dermatology (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.83; 95% CI 1.66 to 2.02), general surgery (aOR=1.64; 95% CI 1.48 to 1.83), pain medicine (aOR=1.63; 95% CI 1.41 to 1.89) and hospital medicine (aOR=1.52; 95% CI 1.37 to 1.68) had higher odds of being satisfied with WLB (all p&lt;0.001). Moreover, compared with females, male PAs indicated nearly 25% higher odds of being satisfied with WLB (p&lt;0.001). Lower odds of WLB satisfaction were observed among PAs with any education debt, those seeing more than 40 patients weekly, those working over 40 hours a week, and PAs in their mid- and late-career stages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our findings revealed that PAs practising in non-primary care specialties had the highest odds of reporting satisfaction with WLB. Identifying factors strongly associated with PA work-life balance can aid in developing targeted interventions. However, further research is needed to understand the intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing PAs&rsquo; WLB.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruza-Augatis, M., Nash, T., Puckett, K., Kozikowski, A., Morton-Rias, D., Goodman, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109226</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109226</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Demographic and occupational factors associated with work-life balance among physician assistants/associates: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109226</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109226</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109402?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mental health and the knowledge and attitude towards insomnia among medical staff in China: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109402?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess Chinese medical staff&rsquo;s knowledge and attitudes towards insomnia and explore their association with mental health status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A multicentre cross-sectional survey conducted across hospitals in China using convenience sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Multiple hospitals across different regions of China; level of care primarily secondary.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 654 medical staff enrolled from 23 hospitals between April and June 2023, with 420 (64.22%) nurses. Inclusion criteria encompassed hospital staff involved in patient care; exclusion criteria included those on leave or unwilling to participate. Data on sex and ethnicity were collected but not specified in the abstract.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes included insomnia knowledge and attitudes, assessed by a structured questionnaire. Secondary outcomes encompassed mental health status, measured via the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale (DASS)-21 (stress, anxiety and depression). The interactions between these variables were analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the participants, 392 (59.94%) reported insomnia symptoms. The median scores for insomnia knowledge and attitudes were 16.0 (range 0&ndash;24) and 27.0 (range 7&ndash;35), respectively. The median DASS-21 score was 30.0; 189 (28.90%) experienced stress, 400 (61.16%) anxiety and 302 (46.18%) depression. SEM analysis indicated that night shift work (&beta;=&ndash;0.101, p=0.024) and job satisfaction (&beta;=&ndash;0.258, p&lt;0.001) had direct effects on mental health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Medical staff showed limited understanding of insomnia and a high prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression. Targeted education, optimised shift scheduling and accessible mental health support are recommended to promote staff well-being and improve care quality. Nevertheless, the findings should be interpreted with caution because of the cross-sectional design and convenience sampling method.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tang, T., Zhang, N., Qu, L., Zhang, J., Yang, D., Shen, S., Du, B., Du, X., Liu, N., Cui, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109402</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109402</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mental health and the knowledge and attitude towards insomnia among medical staff in China: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109402</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109402</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109777?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations between food-related behaviours, nutrient intake and nutritional status through Structural Equation Model (SEM) among clients undergoing Community-Based Treatment and Rehabilitation (CBTaR): A cross-sectional study in Kelantan, Malaysia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109777?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine the associations between food-related behaviours and nutrient intake on nutritional status among clients undergoing Community-Based Treatment and Rehabilitation (CBTaR) in Kelantan, Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional analytical study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Seven CBTaR centres (n=7) across the state of Kelantan, Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 393 adult clients (aged 18 years and above) enrolled in CBTaR programmes between June and December 2022 were selected through stratified random sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was nutritional status, assessed using body mass index. Secondary outcomes included nutrient intake (macronutrients and micronutrients) and food-related behaviours (emotional eating, external eating, restrained eating and food addiction), measured through Bahasa Malaysia validated questionnaires and 24-hour dietary recalls. All variables were introduced into the structural equation modelling to examine the associations among these variables and their association with nutritional status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results revealed that food-related behaviour was significantly associated with the nutrient intake (&beta;=&ndash;0.524, p&le;0.001). Additionally, the drug use profile significantly determined the food-related behaviour (&beta;=&ndash;0.129, p=0.006) and nutritional status (&beta;=&ndash;0.134, p=0.007). Nutrient intake was found to be a significant predictor of nutritional status (&beta;=&ndash;0.213, p&le;0.001). Sociodemographic and drug use profiles were significantly correlated with nutritional outcomes through behavioural and dietary associations. Importance-performance map analysis identified nutrient intake as the most impactful variable, highlighting the need for urgent intervention (R<sup>2</sup>=0.272).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study highlights that nutrient intake is a significant predictor associated with food-related behaviours on nutritional status among individuals with substance use disorder. Integrating nutrition counselling and behavioural interventions into CBTaR services may improve recovery and long-term health outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aji, A. S., Rohana, A. J., Geik, O. P., Rafdinal, W., Wan Mohammad, W. M. Z., Mohd Yasin, M. A., Tengku Ismail, T. A., Vanoh, D., Mohamed, N. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109777</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109777</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nutrition and metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations between food-related behaviours, nutrient intake and nutritional status through Structural Equation Model (SEM) among clients undergoing Community-Based Treatment and Rehabilitation (CBTaR): A cross-sectional study in Kelantan, Malaysia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nutrition and metabolism</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109777</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109777</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110417?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sustaining community self-help groups beyond donor support: lessons from a qualitative study of self-help groups, including persons affected by leprosy and disability in rural India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110417?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Leprosy remains a significant public health challenge in many low and middle-income countries, including India. People affected by leprosy face multifaceted challenges: physical, psychological, social and economic. In response, donors support self-help groups (SHGs) to improve health, social integration and economic circumstances for marginalised people, including those with leprosy. This study aims to assess the sustainability of SHGs in India after the withdrawal of donor support by examining whether they remain functional and exploring the key factors, barriers and facilitators that influence their long-term social and economic viability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the functionality of SHGs after withdrawal of donor support, and to explore the factors, barriers and facilitators influencing their long-term social and economic sustainability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using qualitative methods, we conducted semistructured interviews with 40 key informants associated with five SHGs formed under the Self-Help Community Development Project implemented in an endemic state of India and funded by The Leprosy Mission Trust India.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>It was an exploratory qualitative study using interviews with SHG members and key informants, situated within the self-help community-based project.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>While some SHGs demonstrated resilience and adaptability, others faced challenges such as internal discord, loss of members to migration and lack of access to government schemes. Thematic analysis revealed key drivers and barriers to sustainability and realising the benefits of SHGs, highlighting variations in leadership, governance, economic performance and social engagement across groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion and conclusion</st>
<p>SHGs are often sustained after the funding and managerial donor support have been withdrawn. The findings emphasise the importance of strong leadership, community support and external facilitation in sustaining SHGs and enhancing their impact on marginalised populations. This study contributes to understanding the role of SHGs in addressing the socioeconomic challenges faced by individuals affected by leprosy and offers insights for improving their long-term viability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darlong, J., Charles, M. V., Ilozumba, O., Govindasamy, K., Shrivastva, A., Choudhury, S., Sartori, J., Lindenmeyer, A., Lilford, R. J., Griffiths, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110417</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110417</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sustaining community self-help groups beyond donor support: lessons from a qualitative study of self-help groups, including persons affected by leprosy and disability in rural India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110417</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110417</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111220?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimising community pharmacy PrEP delivery for cisgender female sex workers in Uganda: Protocol for a mixed-methods study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111220?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among cisgender female sex workers (FSWs), a population at disproportionately high HIV acquisition risk in Uganda, remains suboptimal. Uptake and continued use are constrained by barriers, such as limited clinical hours, long distances to access facility-based PrEP services, and high mobility among FSWs. Community pharmacies may offer a more accessible PrEP delivery model due to extended operating hours and convenient locations. This study aims to evaluate the accessibility and capacity of pharmacies in Kampala, Uganda, to serve as potential sites for PrEP delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will conduct a concurrent mixed-methods study combining geospatial mapping, structured surveys, a discrete choice experiment (DCE), and in-depth interviews (IDIs). First, the study will compare the reach and accessibility of PrEP services through community pharmacies versus public healthcare facilities. To highlight PrEP service reach, we will use geospatial analysis to map pharmacies, PrEP clinics, FSW hotspots (i.e., areas where sex is exchanged), and HIV incidence. We will also calculate a PrEP facility needs ratio (number of PrEP facilities/HIV incidence) for each of Kampala&rsquo;s administrative divisions and estimate travel distance and time to access PrEP services using cost&ndash;distance analysis. Perceived accessibility of PrEP services will be assessed through FSW surveys (n=50) and IDIs (n=20&ndash;30), guided by Levesque&rsquo;s framework. Then, we will evaluate pharmacy capacity via surveys (n=274) and IDIs (n=20&ndash;30), exploring infrastructure, resources, and staff perspectives, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Additionally, a DCE will be embedded in the pharmacy survey to elicit staff preferences for delivery approaches and analysed using mixed logit models. Finally, we will integrate quantitative and qualitative findings to provide a broad assessment of whether pharmacies are suitable venues for PrEP delivery to FSWs in Kampala. Enrolment will begin by April 2026 for FSWs and July 2026 for pharmacy staff.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Infectious Diseases Institute Research Ethics Committee (IDI-REC-2025-175) and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS6178ES). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. We will disseminate study findings through stakeholder meetings, scientific conferences, and peer-reviewed publications.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Segawa, I., Ortblad, K. F., Kadama, H., Natukunda, D., Muwonge, T. R., Laker, E. A. O., Nsubuga, R., Akello, S., Tamale, W. J., Kiragga, A., Mujugira, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T05:17:09-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111220</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111220</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimising community pharmacy PrEP delivery for cisgender female sex workers in Uganda: Protocol for a mixed-methods study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111220</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097323?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breastfeeding and later depression and anxiety in mothers in Ireland: a 10-year prospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097323?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Although breastfeeding is associated with lower postnatal depression and anxiety, limited research exists regarding long-term maternal mental health outcomes. This study examined the association between breastfeeding and depression and anxiety in women of later reproductive age (mid 30s to menopause).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a 10-year prospective longitudinal cohort study. Self-reported questionnaires were used to collect lifetime breastfeeding behaviour at 10 years, and health history including depression, anxiety and medication use was collected at each study timepoint.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary level maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>168 parous women from the ROLO Longitudinal Cohort with lifetime breastfeeding behaviour and health history data available at 10 years were included (22% of total cohort). Women currently pregnant or breastfeeding at 10-year follow-up were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mean (SD) age at study end was 42.4 (3.8) years. 72.6% (n=122) of women reported ever breastfeeding. Median lifetime exclusive breastfeeding was 5.5 weeks (IQR 35.8, range 0&ndash;190). 37.5% of women (n=63) breastfed for &ge;12 months over their lifetime. 13.1% (n=22) reported depression or anxiety at 10 years, and 20.8% (n=35) reported depression or anxiety over the whole study period. Ever breastfeeding was associated with less depression and anxiety at 10 years (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.94, p=0.04). Ever breastfeeding, longer exclusive breastfeeding and lifetime breastfeeding &ge;12 months were associated with lower depression and anxiety over the whole study period (ever breastfeeding OR 0.4, p=0.03; exclusive breastfeeding OR 0.98/week, p=0.03; lifetime breastfeeding &ge;12 months OR 0.38, p=0.04).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>There may be a protective association between breastfeeding and self-reported depression and anxiety. Further studies are required to confirm the findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN54392969">ISRCTN54392969</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McNestry, C., OReilly, S. L., Twomey, P. J., Crowley, R. K., Callanan, S., Kasemiire, A., Douglass, A., Delahunt, A., McAuliffe, F. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T14:30:45-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097323</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097323</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Press releases, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breastfeeding and later depression and anxiety in mothers in Ireland: a 10-year prospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097323</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097323</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e089565?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chinese caregivers preferences and predicted uptake of HPV vaccination: a study protocol for two discrete choice experiments]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e089565?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have been introduced in the Chinese market since 2016. However, the HPV vaccine coverage is still remarkably low among adolescent girls in China. This study will employ discrete choice experiments (DCEs) to elicit the preferences of Chinese caregivers for HPV vaccine-related profile characteristics and service delivery methods for adolescent girls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Two DCEs will be conducted with caregivers of girls aged 9&ndash;18 in China. The first DCE will focus on caregivers&rsquo; preferences regarding the HPV vaccine-related profile for girls aged 9&ndash;18, with potential attributes including level of protection against cervical cancer, level of protection against genital warts, risk of severe side effects, number of dose(s), place of manufacture, waiting time and cost for one dose. The second DCE will assess Chinese caregivers&rsquo; preferences for vaccination service delivery methods, with the potential attributes including source of recommendation, information channel, message framing, how to make an appointment, location for receiving the vaccine and incentives. A total of 300 participants will be recruited to complete the DCEs. We will summarise the key socio-demographic characteristics of participants and use latent class and mixed logit models to assess preferences and preference heterogeneity in HPV vaccination services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethical and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee at Nanjing Medical University. Findings from this study will be disseminated widely to relevant stakeholders via scheduled meetings, webinars, presentations at conferences and in peer-reviewed journal manuscripts.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fang, H., Mu, J., Chow, E. P., Ong, J. J., Wu, D., Zhang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089565</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-089565</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chinese caregivers preferences and predicted uptake of HPV vaccination: a study protocol for two discrete choice experiments]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e089565</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e089565</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097495?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Economic evaluation protocol for the PRevention Of sudden cardiac death aFter myocardial Infarction by Defibrillator implantation: the PROFID EHRA trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097495?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a cardiac device recommended for use to prevent the occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The evidence informing this guidance comes from landmark trials that are now more than 20 years old. The risk-benefit profile of ICD for the contemporary target population may have changed substantially since then, which raises the question of whether there is evidence for sparing patients a procedure associated with potentially severe complications and high healthcare costs. A main part of the PRevention Of sudden cardiac death aFter myocardial Infarction by Defibrillator implantation (PROFID) project is the PROFID EHRA trial, which is supported by the European Heart Rhythm Association. PROFID EHRA is a European Union-funded, prospective, randomised, multi-centre, non-inferiority study designed to compare optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone to ICD with OMT, for post-MI patients with reduced LVEF. The study also describes economic evaluation methods to quantify the cost and health implications of using OMT alone in place of ICD implantation plus OMT in this group of patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The economic evaluation has been designed to conduct a pre-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) prior to the availability of trial data, followed by a within-trial cost-consequences analysis (CCA) and a long-term post-trial CEA, conducted from the National Health Service and Personal Social Service perspective in England. The pre-trial CEA uses simulation modelling informed by available evidence to assess the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years of OMT alone and ICD+OMT in post-MI patients with reduced LVEF at risk of SCD, as defined in the PROFID EHRA trial. The within-trial CCA is intended to summarise the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healthcare resource use and associated costs observed during the PROFID EHRA trial follow-up period. The post-trial CEA updates the pre-trial model by incorporating contemporary evidence about the HRQoL and costs observed during the trial and the occurrence of those events and outcomes accruing during the trial follow-up period and projecting them into the expected lifetime of the patients. Sensitivity analyses are performed to assess the robustness of the CEA results with respect to both model assumptions and uncertainty in the value of the model input parameters. Finally, a value of information analysis will identify the key drivers of uncertainty surrounding the model conclusions regarding the optimal treatment strategy, establishing if further research may be required.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The PROFID EHRA trial, under legal sponsorship of Charit&eacute;&mdash;Universita&#x0308;tsmedizin Berlin, Germany, received its first ethics approval by the Medicine Research Ethics Committee of the La Paz University Hospital in Madrid, Spain (reference number LHS-2019-0209). Before including patients, for all participating study centres, the required local, central and/or national ethical approval has to be obtained. As of the date 13 November 2025, at least one participating study centre in the following countries has received ethical approvals from relevant ethics committees: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Israel, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain. Results will be shared with the general public through various media channels and additionally with healthcare professionals and the scientific community through scientific meetings, conferences and publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05665608">NCT05665608</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qian, Y., Roque, C. R., Woods, B., Iglesias Urrutia, C. P., Gc, V. S., Gur Arie, M., Fischer, D., Dagres, N., Hindricks, G., Manca, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097495</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097495</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health economics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Economic evaluation protocol for the PRevention Of sudden cardiac death aFter myocardial Infarction by Defibrillator implantation: the PROFID EHRA trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health economics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097495</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097495</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097647?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disitamab vedotin in combination with lenvatinib for patients with HER2-positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: study protocol of a phase II clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e097647?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Chemotherapy is the standard second-line treatment option for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), but its therapeutic efficacy is suboptimal. Disitamab vedotin (RC48) and lenvatinib have demonstrated promising efficacy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive BTC and other malignancies. In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RC48 in combination with lenvatinib in second-line or above treatment for HER2-positive advanced BTC.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This is a single-centre, single-arm, open-label, exploratory phase II clinical study in patients with HER2-positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BTC who have failed prior therapy. 31 patients will be enrolled in this study to receive the combination of RC48 and lenvatinib. The primary study endpoint is objective response rate, and the secondary study endpoints are disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (approval No. (2023)0367-01). Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and through other appropriate media channels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2300076406.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, Y., Zhang, J., Wu, Z., Liu, D., Tang, J., Xue, J., Wu, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097647</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-097647</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disitamab vedotin in combination with lenvatinib for patients with HER2-positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: study protocol of a phase II clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e097647</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e097647</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098309?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Surgery and Medicine on the Impact of Diverticulitis (COSMID) trial: a protocol for a pragmatic randomised study of diverticulitis treatment in the USA]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098309?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Each year, millions of people experience recurrent diverticulitis episodes. Elective sigmoid colon resection reduces the risk of recurrence, but The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons recommends individualising surgical decisions based on the impact of the condition on a patient&rsquo;s quality of life (QoL). However, no threshold for QoL impairment has been established to guide decision-making, and evidence comparing elective colectomy with medical management in terms of QoL limitation is limited. To address these gaps and to guide treatment decision-making, we designed the Comparison of Surgery and Medicine on the Impact of Diverticulitis (COSMID) trial.</p>
<p>The COSMID trial is a large, pragmatic randomised trial including patients with QoL-limiting diverticulitis that aims to determine if partial colectomy is superior to medical management and explore subgroups that are more likely to respond to each treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>COSMID will recruit 250 English-speaking and Spanish-speaking adults with imaging-confirmed and QoL-limiting diverticulitis (defined using a modified diverticulitis-related QoL survey). Participants are randomly assigned to undergo elective partial colectomy or receive comprehensive medical management (eg, selected from options including fibre, probiotics, mesalamine and rifaximin). A total of 100 patients who decline randomisation but consent to follow-up will be included in a parallel observational cohort. The primary outcome is the time-averaged score of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index at 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include clinical adverse events, healthcare utilisation, recurrent episodes of diverticulitis and additional patient-reported outcomes like the Diverticulitis Quality of Life instrument, decisional regret and work productivity. Exploratory analyses aim to identify differential treatment effects based on patients&rsquo; characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This trial was approved by the Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board (IRB) on 26 August 2019 (IRB #191217). Vanderbilt serves as the institutional review board of record for the following study sites: Albany Medical College, Allegheny Health, Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Boston University Medical Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UT Health Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, New York-Presbyterian Queens, Stanford University, University of Pennsylvania, University of California San Diego, University of California San Francisco, University of Colorado Denver, University of Florida, University of Iowa, University of Utah, University of Washington Medical Center, University of South Florida, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Lahey Hospital &amp; Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center and Northwell Health. Rush University Medical Center (approved 8 January 2020), Columbia University Medical Center (approved 28 January 2020), Northwestern University (approved 19 March 2020), Mount Carmel Health System (approved 5 May 2020) and Memorial Health University Medical Center (approved 4 April 2022) are regulated and were approved by their respective IRBs. Results from this trial will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04095663">NCT04095663</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hantouli, M. N., Schmicker, R. H., Tufte, J. E., Ali, F. G., Bennett, R. D., Cohan, J. N., Comstock, B. A., Curran, T., Davidson, G. H., Eisenstein, S., Fischkoff, K. N., Fleming, F. J., Gribovskaja-Rupp, I., Jafari, M. D., Kessler, L. G., Krane, M. K., Lawrence, S. O., McCormick, J. T., Millas, S. G., Morris, A. M., Pullar, K. M., Reinke, C. E., Saraidaridis, J. T., Simianu, V. V., Watkins, S. P., White, N. B., Wick, E. C., Wieghard, N., Flum, D. R., Read, T. E., COSMID Collaborative, Hantouli, Schmicker, Tufte, Ali, Bennett, Cohan, Comstock, Curran, Davidson, Eisenstein, Fischkoff, Fleming, Gribovskaja-Rupp, Jafari, Kessler, Krane, Lawrence, McCormick, Millas, Morris, Pullar, Reinke, Saraidaridis, Simianu, Watkins, White, Wick, Wieghard, Flum, Read]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098309</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098309</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Surgery and Medicine on the Impact of Diverticulitis (COSMID) trial: a protocol for a pragmatic randomised study of diverticulitis treatment in the USA]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098309</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098309</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099386?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chinese neuroimmunological disease (NIDBase) cohort study: cohort profile]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099386?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Chinese neuroimmunological disease database (NIDBase) cohort was established to explore genetic and environmental risk factors, clinical features, multi-omics data and prognostic biomarkers. The aim is to enhance our understanding of central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating diseases. Additionally, the establishment of this cohort will address the critical issue of the lack of comprehensive genetic data and biological samples for precision diagnosis and treatment research related to neuroimmunological diseases in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>56 hospitals in various regions of China were selected to participate in this study. The patients diagnosed with CNS demyelinating diseases were recruited, including clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) and autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy (GFAP-A).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Finding to date</st>
<p>At the time of patient enrolment, the clinical information is designated as baseline data. The collected baseline data include demographic information, disease history, clinical features of each demyelinating event, treatment records, standardised scales, questionnaire assessments and laboratory test results. Furthermore, biological samples, MRI and high-density electroencephalography (hd-EEG) data will be collected at baseline. All patients will be followed up at 3 months and 6 months and annually thereafter. As of December 2024, 3866 patients with CNS demyelinating diseases have been enrolled, including 84 CIS, 282 MOGAD, 1405 MS and 2095 NMOSD. Our findings indicate that CNS demyelinating diseases, particularly NMOSD, are more prevalent in women in China, with significant age differences observed among NMOSD patients compared with those with CIS, MS and MOGAD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>In future, all patients in our cohort will be followed up at 3 months and 6 months and then annually. By the end of December 2024, the database has been locked and is now being processed and analysed, while our data continue to be updated and expanded for further analysis. Both prospective and retrospective observations will be included in this study. Subsequent publications will emerge from this multicentre cohort, encompassing genomics, clinical cohort studies, hd-EEG biomarkers, imaging-based radiomics and electrical stimulation therapies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trail registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06443333">NCT06443333</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, M., Han, J., Xia, J., Lin, M., Chen, T., Ruan, S., Wang, Q., Men, Y., Gao, R., Zheng, H., Li, J., Qi, Y., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Tang, Y., Li, D., Yang, X., Qiu, Z., Liu, Z., Dong, H., Zhao, Y., Hao, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099386</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099386</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chinese neuroimmunological disease (NIDBase) cohort study: cohort profile]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099386</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099386</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100402?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex-specific machine learning models for carotid plaque prediction in individuals with fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100402?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Early detection of carotid plaque prevents stroke and myocardial infarction. Individuals with fatty liver might be at an increased risk of developing carotid plaque, yet limited access to carotid artery ultrasound underscores the need for predictive models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Aims</st>
<p>We aimed to construct six predictive models for males and females separately to predict carotid plaque among individuals with fatty liver disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>We included 8361 participants aged &ge;40 years (4871 males; 3490 females) with fatty liver who underwent at least one health check-up between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The sex-stratified dataset was randomly divided into 70% training and 30% internal testing datasets. With 24 potential predictors, we applied four machine learning (ML) algorithms and two conventional logistic regression (LR) models: stepwise LR and LR based on ML-selected features (LR-ML) to develop sex-specific carotid plaque prediction models. The performances were evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, accuracy, calibration curve and decision curve analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Carotid plaque was determined when the local carotid intima-media thickness was &ge;1.5 mm in any of the arterial segments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four predictors (age, hypertension, total bilirubin, total cholesterol and white blood cell count) in males and three (age, systolic blood pressure and fasting blood glucose) in females were identified by consensus across the four ML algorithms and subsequently used to construct LR models. Among all 4 ML and two LR models, the gradient boosting machine model demonstrated the best overall performance in males (AUC=0.773, 95% CI 0.749 to 0.797), while the LR-ML model was optimal in females (AUC=0.817, 95% CI 0.791 to 0.843). Calibration and decision curve analyses further demonstrated satisfactory agreement and higher net benefit across sexes. Risk stratification identified distinct low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups with progressively higher observed prevalence of carotid plaque (20.25%, 48.58% and 69.41% in males; 15.28%, 50.89% and 66.56% in females).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Our findings highlight significant sex differences in practical carotid plaque prediction, providing crucial insights for public health implications in the early identification and risk assessment of carotid plaque among individuals with fatty liver.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheng, Y., Yang, J., Zheng, H., Yin, H., Yin, D., Wang, H., Wang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100402</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100402</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex-specific machine learning models for carotid plaque prediction in individuals with fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100402</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100402</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100910?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Middle managers as barriers or enablers in tackling racial discrimination in the NHS: a qualitative research study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100910?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the role of senior and mid-level managers as barriers or enablers to change in tackling the discriminatory challenges experienced by Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) employees working in the National Health Service (NHS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A multi-level, multi-sourced qualitative study of five NHS Trusts in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>26 qualitative interviews with senior leaders and BME network chairs (27 participants) and five focus groups (37 participants) with BME employees, across five NHS Trusts in England.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Our findings revealed that discrimination, racial harassment, incivilities, lack of progression and exclusion experienced by BME employees appear to be deeply ingrained in the culture of the NHS. Despite numerous national and local initiatives aimed at promoting inclusivity and addressing discriminatory behaviours, our findings also revealed a notable disparity between what senior leaders thought was effective in addressing discriminatory behaviours and the actual lived experiences of BME employees. Finally, a key finding was the pivotal role middle managers played in setting the tone for whether discriminatory behaviours are challenged or allowed to persist, which directly impacts on the overall experiences of BME employees within the NHS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our results provide evidence that not only does racial discrimination continue to be experienced by NHS BME employees, but that middle managers are key to addressing and improving this situation. Despite there being national policies and initiatives addressing racial discrimination, our study found that positive change, whether at an individual or organisational level, is dependent on the actions and commitment of middle managers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Long, J., Buchan, S., Sampson, F. C., Otaye-Ebede, L., Dawson, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100910</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100910</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health services research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Middle managers as barriers or enablers in tackling racial discrimination in the NHS: a qualitative research study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health services research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100910</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100910</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103948?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of bulbar urethral strictures with Optilume drug-coated balloons in a previously untreated population (FIRST-CARE): protocol for a single-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103948?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Minimally invasive endoscopic procedures constitute the cornerstone of first-line treatment for bulbar urethral strictures, although their long-term effectiveness is limited by high recurrence rates. The Optilume drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a novel intervention combining mechanical dilation with localised delivery of paclitaxel to reduce recurrence by inhibiting scar tissue formation. While its efficacy has been demonstrated in patients with recurrent strictures, its potential as a first-line option in treatment-nai&#x0308;ve patients remains unexplored. The FIRST-CARE trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Optilume DCB compared with standard endoscopic treatment in treatment-nai&#x0308;ve patients with bulbar urethral strictures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Design: Two-arm, randomised, single-blind (participant), investigator-initiated, parallel-group, multicentre clinical trial. Patients: The study will enrol 140 adult male patients with treatment-nai&#x0308;ve, single bulbar urethral strictures &le;3 cm in length. Interventions: All patients will undergo the assigned procedure under general anaesthesia with 1.5 g intravenous cefuroxime. Optilume group patients will receive &ge;5 min balloon dilation with localised paclitaxel delivery. The control group will receive standard endoscopic treatment (eg, direct visual internal urethrotomy, laser or dilatation). In both groups, a 12&ndash;14 French Foley catheter will be left in place for 3&ndash;5 days. Primary outcome: Freedom from repeat intervention within 12 months of follow-up. Primary analysis: Time-to-event will be defined from the date of intervention to the date a repeat intervention is decided (indicated and planned) due to confirmed recurrence, with censoring at 12 months. Groups will be compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. Cox regression and modified Poisson regression will be used to estimate HRs and relative risks.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial is approved by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics (2401370) and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and principles of Good Clinical Practice. In line with national guidelines, all eligible patients are counselled regarding available treatment options prior to enrolment. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and scientific presentations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06827210">NCT06827210</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahdi, M. B., Haase, R. N., Sander, L., Tuckus, G., Liltorp, D. L., Jorgensen, L., Graugaard-Jensen, C. H., Weinreich, H., Pennisi, C. P., Nielsen, T. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103948</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103948</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Urology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment of bulbar urethral strictures with Optilume drug-coated balloons in a previously untreated population (FIRST-CARE): protocol for a single-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Urology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103948</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103948</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105317?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Narrative systematic review for autism spectrum disorders screening tools in school settings]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105317?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Early screening for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can enhance educational and health outcomes for affected children. This narrative systematic review explores school-based screening tools used around the world to identify children with ASD and explore the differences across socio-demographic groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Systematic review of electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane and Scopus) in October 2024 of papers published between 2011 and 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Mainstream school-based settings globally.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Children aged 4&ndash;16 years old attending mainstream school.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>School-based screening tools for ASD, including all types of informant and format of tools reported in eligible studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes included prevalence of screen positives, sensitivity and specificity of the screening tools. Secondary outcomes included participants&rsquo; sex, socioeconomic status and ethnicity, and the relation of this to the primary outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 7765 eligible articles, 14 studies were included in this review. We identified eight different school-based ASD screening tools. Study populations ranged from 103 to 16 556 children, with sensitivity and specificity varying by screening tool used, age group, setting and ASD prevalence. The percentage of children screening positive for ASD ranged from 0.7% to 8.5%. Studies were conducted in Europe (n=6), Western Pacific (n=4), the Americas (n=3) and Eastern Mediterranean (n=1) regions. No studies explicitly explored accuracy or validity outcomes based on ethnicity or socioeconomic status. Half of the 14 studies (n=7) reported the sensitivity and specificity of the screening tools; sensitivity ranged from 58% to 94% and specificity from 61% to 100%. There was insufficient evidence to recommend any single ASD screening tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ASD screening tools vary widely across the globe, with limited standardisation. Evidence is lacking on how ethnicity and socioeconomic status affect their effectiveness in schools. Given the dearth of scientific evidence in this field, collaboration among educators, researchers and policymakers is needed to establish the evidence base for universal screening, identify optimal tools, coordinate their use and ensure their validation for specific populations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCann, L. J., Bakhti, R., Fonseka, N., Nicholls, D., Hargreaves, D. S., Amati, F., Lazzarino, A. I., Mitra, R., Narayan, K., Weston, A., Gnani, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105317</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105317</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Narrative systematic review for autism spectrum disorders screening tools in school settings]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105317</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107163?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paediatric Resuscitation Outcome in Children with Heart Disease (ProCHD): protocol of a Germany-wide multicentre, prospective open registry]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107163?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>While paediatric cardiac arrest is a rare event, consequences for the patients are significant with a considerable risk of morbidity, disability and mortality. The risk of cardiac arrest is substantially increased in children with congenital heart disease. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data concerning this population. To close this knowledge gap, this multicentre, prospective, open registry aims to implement a standardised structure for data collection and follow-up of paediatric cardiac arrests associated with heart diseases in Germany.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>All paediatric patients who experience a cardiac arrest and receive at least 2 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation are invited to participate in this registry. The dataset comprises demographical, clinical, resuscitation and outcome data, collected in accordance with the Utstein guidelines. Neurological assessments, cognitive and motor tests are conducted at fixed intervals. Additionally, patient-reported outcome measures will be surveyed. Primary outcomes are survival to discharge and neurodevelopmental outcome after discharge and 2 years. The data are pseudonymised prior to submission to an online REDCap database, which is centrally hosted on a server located in Leipzig, Germany.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study follows the Declaration of Helsinki and received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee in Leipzig. Registry results will allow us to understand the epidemiology, guideline adherence, risk factors and will be presented at conferences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT05373498">NCT05373498</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markel, F., Kramer, P., Anand, J., Heimberg, E., Herbsleb, V., Amann, V., Herberg, U., von Borell du Vernay, F., Seidemann, K., Liem, L., Michaelis, A., Schmitt, K., Weidenbach, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107163</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107163</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paediatric Resuscitation Outcome in Children with Heart Disease (ProCHD): protocol of a Germany-wide multicentre, prospective open registry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107163</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107455?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients lived experiences and coping mechanisms following mitral valve replacement at the National Cardiac Institute in Tanzania: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107455?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To qualitatively explore patients&rsquo; lived experiences and coping mechanisms following mitral valve replacement (MVR) at the National Cardiac Institute in Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A descriptive qualitative study using in-depth interviews and thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted at the National Cardiac Institute, located in Dar es Salaam, the sole tertiary cardiac centre in Tanzania offering open-heart surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>17 participants were purposively sampled. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged &ge;18 years, had at least 28 days post-MVR, without chronic conditions (eg, diabetes and HIV) and attending postoperative cardiac clinics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews conducted in May 2024 using an interviewer guide explored post-MVR challenges, daily life adjustments, patient-provider interactions and coping strategies. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three primary themes emerged: (1) <I>Quality of life after MVR</I>, encompassing physical, social, economic and psychological challenges; (2) <I>Quality of care after MVR</I>, highlighting patient-provider interactions and access to services; and (3) <I>Adapting to post-MVR life</I>, including psychological adaptation and lifestyle modification. Participants reported improved quality of life through shared experiences and support.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patients experienced physical, socio-economic and psychological challenges post-MVR. However, quality of life improved through access to care, peer support and adaptive coping. Adaptation to life with an artificial valve is feasible with robust support systems, even in resource-limited settings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kisangija, J. P., Buluba, S. E., Ndile, M. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107455</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107455</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients lived experiences and coping mechanisms following mitral valve replacement at the National Cardiac Institute in Tanzania: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107455</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107455</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107577?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adverse effects of non-invasive brain stimulation as a treatment for mental disorders: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107577?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Mental disorders affect nearly one billion people worldwide, posing major challenges to public health. While conventional treatments like psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy are effective for many patients, they are often associated with adverse effects and high non-response rates, underscoring the need for alternative approaches. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial electric stimulation and transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation are increasingly used to treat psychiatric conditions. Although these methods show promising efficacy, data on their adverse effects remain fragmented and inconsistently reported. This meta-analysis aims to systematically compare the type and frequency of adverse effects, tolerability, and acceptability across different brain stimulation techniques and mental disorders. The findings will help improve safety monitoring and support more personalised, well-tolerated treatment strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic literature search of the Embase, MEDLINE(R), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine) and APA PsycINFO via OVID will be performed. Eligible studies include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare active treatments or an active treatment with sham control, including both parallel group and cross-over studies, as well as prospective non-randomised studies such as case&ndash;control studies and pre&ndash;post studies investigating adverse effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in psychiatric populations. Included studies report on the frequency of adverse effects in a standardised manner. Primary outcomes comprise the incidence of specific adverse effects, dropout rates due to adverse effects (tolerability) and overall dropout rates (acceptability). Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and the NHLBI quality assessment tool for pre&ndash;post studies. The quality of case&ndash;control studies will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Provided that sufficient data are available and the network of comparisons is adequately connected, a network meta-analysis will be conducted to compare adverse effects and tolerability across interventions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>No ethical approval is needed to conduct this work. The findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251164554</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koelsch, C., Mirlach, T., Kinfe, T. M., Hurlemann, R., Mutz, J., Selaskowski, B., Kiebs, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107577</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107577</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adverse effects of non-invasive brain stimulation as a treatment for mental disorders: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107577</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107577</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107793?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Living lab approaches in rural healthcare: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107793?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Living labs represent a user-centric approach to solving real-world challenges by encouraging active participation of external stakeholders in co-designing the research and innovation process. Highlighted by contextual research and user co-creation, living labs are ideal for addressing the challenges of providing optimal healthcare to patients living in rural and remote regions. Our objective was to synthesise the existing research on the living lab approach in co-designing, developing or implementing a rural healthcare service, clinical intervention or health-related technology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>A search was conducted on 10 May 2025, to identify articles from three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st>
<p>We included published literature that presented a living lab approach to improve the provision of healthcare services in a rural environment. We excluded articles examining social determinants of health (eg, physical activity and general health promotion) without a direct link to clinical service innovation or healthcare delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>We collected data on study methodologies, settings, stakeholders and innovation types. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers using a standardised form. We used frequencies and a narrative synthesis to map characteristics, methods and contexts of living lab applications in rural healthcare.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The search identified a total of 1080 articles and ultimately included 11 articles. Studies were published between 2016 and 2025 and conducted in Canada (n=3), the USA (n=3), Australia (n=2), Guatemala (n=1), Uganda (n=1) and France/Portugal (n=1). Study settings included rural hospitals, regional health networks, Indigenous communities, farming and fishing communities and underserved rural regions. Health issues targeted included cardiovascular disease, diabetes, musculoskeletal conditions, perinatal care, palliative care and infectious disease management. Study methodologies included formalised, theory-driven frameworks (n=4), community-based participatory research (n=4), user- or human-centred design (n=3) and co-design workshops and interviews (n=3). Only one study explicitly used the term &lsquo;living lab&rsquo; to describe their innovation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Relatively few living lab approaches have been meaningfully applied in rural health. There is a need for greater global diversification, expanded domains of focus and more robust evaluation to fully understand the potential and impact of living labs in rural healthcare.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joyal, R., Tounkara, F. K., Singhroy, D., Fleet, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107793</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107793</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Emergency medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Living lab approaches in rural healthcare: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Emergency medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107793</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107793</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109052?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of international observerships on Ukrainian healthcare professionals during the war: a cross-sectional survey study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109052?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>This cross-sectional survey study evaluates the influence of international observerships organised by the coalition of healthcare professionals from academic institutions&mdash;the Ukrainian Alliance for Medical Exchange and Development (UA-MED)&mdash;on the professional development, knowledge transfer and clinical practice improvement of Ukrainian healthcare professionals during the war.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 263 international observerships were facilitated for 204 Ukrainian medical professionals across the institutions in the USA, Canada, Europe and Australia during 2022&ndash;2024. To assess the impact of these observerships, a survey was administered focusing on overall satisfaction, procedural knowledge gained and challenges faced when implementing new techniques on return. The primary outcome was the success score, defined as a composite score of implementing new procedures, initiating quality improvement projects and knowledge dissemination efforts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 128 medical professionals from 45 Ukrainian institutions who completed 138 observerships in 27 institutions abroad participated in the survey (response rate of 62.7%). Observers varied by profession: surgeons (32.8%), radiation oncologists (14.8%), medical oncologists (11.7%), anaesthesiologists (11.7%) and others. Observerships lasted a median of 4 weeks; 74.1% included conference attendance. The average success and satisfaction scores were 6.5/10 and 9.3/10, respectively.</p>
<p>The majority (92.7%) reported a shift in perception of how to practise medicine and 75.5% implemented new procedures on returning to Ukraine. Encouraged to disseminate knowledge, participants provided informal training to colleagues (67.3%), prepared presentations for their institutions (65.5%) and national conferences (32.7%), incorporated learnt materials into educational lectures (39.1%) and engaged in all the activities above (15.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The international observerships played an important role in enhancing the reported skills and knowledge of Ukrainian healthcare professionals during the war. Improvements were reported in clinical practice, medical education and the implementation of new procedures. The success of these observerships underscores the potential for similar programmes in other low-income and middle-income countries/upper-middle-income countries.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kovalchuk, N., Zinchuk, A., Beznosenko, A., Semikov, R., Poylin, V., Vash-Margita, A., Mims, M., Davis, D., Uboha, N., Suchowerska, N., Iakovenko, V., Hart, J., Poznansky, M., Kacharian, A., Kizub, D., Melnitchouk, S., Melnitchouk, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109052</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109052</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of international observerships on Ukrainian healthcare professionals during the war: a cross-sectional survey study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109052</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109052</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients across pandemic waves at a tertiary acute care hospital in Narita, Japan: a single-centre retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to describe the characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients in a tertiary care hospital close to an international airport in Japan and to compare these characteristics among different waves during the pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Retrospective observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Tertiary care centre in Japan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>All patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who were hospitalised between January 2020 and April 2022 were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measurements</st>
<p>Clinical characteristics, characteristics of admission, treatments and outcomes were investigated and compared among six pandemic waves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 827 patients were included. The median age was 58.0 years. More than half of the patients (58.3%) had at least one comorbidity. The majority of patients (89.0%) were domestically infected patients admitted under the Infectious Diseases Law, while the remaining patients (11.0%) were those diagnosed during airport quarantine and admitted under the Quarantine Act. Hospital-acquired COVID-19 infection occurred in 7.0% of cases, and mainly during the sixth wave. Overall, some form of oxygen therapy, high-flow oxygen devices, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was provided in 46.3%, 10.4%, 4.5% and 1.5% of cases, respectively. Only 1.8% of patients were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU), and 59.5% of patients on IMV were managed in the non-ICU ward. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.8%. Median age, percentages of some comorbidities, vaccination coverage, medications for COVID-19, types of supportive care and ICU admissions differed significantly among waves.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study suggests that patient characteristics, vaccination coverage, standard of treatment and severity of illness changed across waves during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intensive care delivery in non-ICU wards was unavoidable due to limited ICU capacity, which may be a key consideration when preparing for future pandemics.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hase, R., Kurata, R., Niiyama, Y., Matsuda, N., Ueda, H., Kikuchi, K., Ishida, K., Kubota, Y., Fujii, M., Kurita, T., Muranaka, E., Sasazawa, H., Mito, H., Yano, Y., Oku, R., Tateishi, Y., Toishi, S., Obata, S., Noguchi, Y., Nakanishi, K., Sunami, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109380</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109380</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients across pandemic waves at a tertiary acute care hospital in Narita, Japan: a single-centre retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109380</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109883?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of claims data to identify adverse events after colonoscopy in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial in Norway: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109883?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Accurate identification of adverse events after colonoscopy is essential for quality assurance in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Review of medical records is labour intensive as adverse events are infrequent. The object of this study was to investigate the accuracy of claims data in identifying adverse events after colonoscopy in CRC screening.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional, retrospective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>Males and females aged 50&ndash;74 years were randomised to once-only sigmoidoscopy or biennial faecal immunochemical test in a CRC screening trial at two screening centres in Norway. Participants in the present study underwent follow-up colonoscopy from 2012 to April 2020 after initial positive screening test. We reviewed medical records for adverse events within 30 days following 11 205 colonoscopies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome of the study was to assess the sensitivity of claims data from the Norwegian Patient Registry to identify lower gastrointestinal bleeding using emergency contact International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision diagnostic code sets under two definitions: a stringent definition (codes explicitly identifying bleeding) and a broad definition (including suggestive codes). Secondary outcome measures included the sensitivity to identify perforation using a stringent and a broad definition. Additionally, we assessed whether incorporating procedure codes and non-emergency contacts improved accuracy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>87 cases of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and eight perforations were confirmed. Sensitivity for bleeding differed between the centres (p&lt;0.001). At centre 1, sensitivity was 48.6% (95% CI 31.9% to 65.6%) using the stringent and 89.2% (95% CI 74.6% to 97.0%) using the broad definition. At centre 2, sensitivity was 36.0% (95% CI 22.9% to 50.8%) and 50.0% (95% CI 35.5% to 64.5%), respectively. Combined sensitivity for perforation was 37.5% (95% CI 8.5% to 75.5%) using the stringent and 62.5% (95% CI 24.5% to 91.5%) using the broad definition. Adding procedure codes and non-emergency contacts slightly increased sensitivity but increased false positives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Use of claims data underestimated adverse event rates following colonoscopy. Difference in coding practice across hospitals underscores the need for standardised reporting in screening programmes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT01538550">NCT01538550</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rognstad, O. B., Botteri, E., Hoff, G., Bretthauer, M., Nguyen, H. D., Schult, A. L., Holme, O., Randel, K. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109883</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109883</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of claims data to identify adverse events after colonoscopy in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial in Norway: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109883</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109883</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111643?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of influenza viral genetic information with severity markers in patients hospitalised with influenza: multicentre retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111643?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The objective of this study was to determine the association between viral subtype/clade and disease severity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multicentre retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study used data from the Global Influenza Hospital Surveillance Network (GIHSN). The dataset comprised hospitalised influenza patients with viral sequencing data across 14 countries, collected from August 2022 through October 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 761 hospitalised patients were enrolled during the study period, and 745 patients were included in the analysis. We excluded patients with missing data on explanatory or outcome variables, those infected with viral clades represented by fewer than 11 sequences, and those enrolled at study sites contributing fewer than 5 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Disease severity was defined by admission to intensive care unit (ICU), receipt of non-invasive oxygen supplementation, 3-variable definition (ICU, mechanical ventilation or death) or 4-variable definition (3-variable plus oxygen supplementation).</p>
<p>Outcomes were analysed in association with subtype or clade using the mixed-effects logistic regression models, adjusting for age group, sex, underlying medical conditions, influenza vaccination status, antiviral use, country income level and epidemic period, while study site was included as a random effect.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>745 patients were included: 263 A(H1N1)pdm09, 380 A(H3N2), 102 B/Victoria. A(H1N1)pdm09 infection was associated with increased odds of ICU admission (adjusted ORs (aORs) 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.8) compared with A(H3N2). 6B.1A.5a.2a.1 clade of A(H1N1)pdm09 was associated with increased severity compared with 6B.1A.5a.2a clade (aOR 3.0, 95% CI 1.0 to 9.5) and (aOR 5.4, 95% CI 1.6 to 18.3) for the 3-variable and 4-variable definitions respectively. Among A(H3N2), the (3C.2a1b.2a.)2b clade showed a trend toward increased severity using the 4-variable definition compared with the 2a.1b clade (aOR 2.9, 95% CI 0.8 to 10.0).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This analysis highlights the differential impact of influenza subtypes and clades on disease severity in hospitalised patients. Future research should investigate the role of specific viral mutations of these clades in modulating immune evasion or disease severity. These findings reinforce the GIHSN&rsquo;s critical role in global surveillance. Ongoing genomic surveillance is crucial for understanding the clinical impact of emerging influenza variants and informing public health responses.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myint, A. P., Shirreff, G., Baillie, V., Bal, A., Boutros, C. F., Burtseva, E., Coulibaly, D., Danilenko, D., Dbaibo, G., Destras, G., Dia, N., Draganescu, A. C., Giamberardino, H. I. G., Komissarov, A. B., Koul, P. A., Laguna-Torres, V. A., LeBlanc, J. J., Mira-Iglesias, A., Mironenko, A., Orrico-Sanchez, A., Otieno, N. A., Sandulescu, O., Simon, V., Sominina, A., Sordillo, E., Tanriover, M. D., Teteriuk, N., Unal, S., Van Bakel, H., Andrew, M. K., Bresee, J., Lina, B., Lopez-Labrador, F. X., Ortiz, J. R., Raboni, S. M., Zhang, W., Chaves, S. S., Cacciapaglia, G., Josset, L., Chauvel, C., Nunes, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111643</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111643</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of influenza viral genetic information with severity markers in patients hospitalised with influenza: multicentre retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Epidemiology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111643</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111643</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112155?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimal timing of induction of labour to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes: protocol for an individual participant data and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112155?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite advances in maternity care, stillbirth remains a major burden. It disproportionately affects black and Asian mothers, those with obesity and women over the age of 35 years. Induction of labour may benefit these women, but there is no clear evidence to guide recommendations on optimal timing of induction because of variations in the intervention and insufficient power in primary trials for rare outcomes such as stillbirth and perinatal mortality, or to assess whether effects differ by maternal characteristics. We will conduct an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised trials to assess the overall and differential effect of induction of labour, according to timing of induction and maternal characteristics, on adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes. We will also rank induction of labour timing strategies by their effectiveness to inform clinical and policy decision-making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will identify randomised trials on induction of labour by searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, BIOSIS, LILACS, Pascal, SCI, CDSR, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP, ISRCTN registry, CENTRAL, DARE and Health Technology Assessment Database, without language restrictions, from inception to June 2025. Primary researchers of identified trials will be invited to join the OPTIMAL Collaboration and share the original trial data. Data integrity and trustworthiness assessment will be performed on all eligible trials. We will check each study&rsquo;s IPD for consistency with the original authors before standardising and harmonising the data. Study quality of included trials will be assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We will perform a series of one-and-two-stage random-effects meta-analyses to obtain the summary intervention effect on composite adverse perinatal outcome (stillbirth, neonatal death or severe morbidity requiring admission to neonatal unit) with 95% CIs and summary treatment&ndash;covariate interactions (maternal age, ethnicity, parity, socioeconomic status, body mass index and method of conception). Heterogeneity will be summarised using tau<sup>2</sup>, I<sup>2</sup> and 95% prediction intervals for effect in a new study. Sensitivity analysis to explore robustness of statistical and clinical assumptions will be carried out. Small study effects (potential publication bias) will be investigated using funnel plots.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251066346) and ethics approval is not required. We will disseminate findings widely to women, healthcare professionals and policymakers through academic, professional bodies and social media channels, and in peer-reviewed journals to achieve impact.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251066346.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meacham, H., Ona-Igbru, A., McNeill, R., Ajayi, R., Pickering, E., Grobman, W. A., Black, M., Khalil, A., Mccourt, C., Miranda, A., Mol, B. W., Walker, K., Wilson, A., Zamora, J., Thangaratinam, S., Allotey, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112155</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112155</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obstetrics & Gynaecology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimal timing of induction of labour to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes: protocol for an individual participant data and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Obstetrics and gynaecology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112155</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112155</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114522?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrating the Common Elements Treatment Approach and motivational interviewing to improve HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis engagement among women who use drugs in Tanzania: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e114522?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Women who use drugs in Tanzania face a disproportionately high burden of HIV and mental health disorders. Despite the availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), uptake remains low, highlighting the need for integrated, scalable interventions that address co-occurring substance use and mental health challenges. Motivational interviewing (MI) and cognitive-behavioural approaches, such as the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA), show promise for enhancing HIV prevention outcomes in this population. This study presents the protocol for a pilot feasibility trial assessing the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of MI for PrEP (MI-PrEP) and a combined CETA and MI-PrEP intervention (CETA + MI-PrEP) to improve PrEP engagement among women who use drugs in Tanzania.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This individually randomised, parallel-group pilot trial will be conducted in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, guided by the situated Information, Motivation and Behavioral Skills model. Eligible participants are adult women who use heroin, report recent drug-related or sex-related HIV risk behaviours, are HIV-negative and exhibit symptoms of depression, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder. Participants are randomised to one of three arms: MI-PrEP, CETA + MI-PrEP or enhanced treatment as usual. Interventions are delivered face-to-face by trained counsellors. Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using recruitment and retention data, surveys and qualitative interviews. Preliminary effects will be measured for PrEP initiation, symptoms of common mental disorders and substance use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval has been obtained from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (25580), the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences Ethics Review Committee (MUHAS-REC-12-2023-1994) and the National Health Research Ethics Committee at the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/4830). Results will be disseminated through ClinicalTrials.gov, peer-reviewed publications, conferences, presentations and research briefings to community stakeholders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: <A HREF="NCT06835751">NCT06835751</inter-ref>. Initially registered 14 February 2025, <inter-ref locator="https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06835751" locator-type="url">https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06835751</A>, last updated 5 December 2025.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saleem, H., Atkins, K., Skavenski, S., Nonyane, B. A., Chitamwebwa, F., Mtaita, S., Mwansa, D., Luswetula, A., Murray, L. K., Likindikoki, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-08T04:18:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114522</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-114522</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrating the Common Elements Treatment Approach and motivational interviewing to improve HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis engagement among women who use drugs in Tanzania: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>HIV/AIDS</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e114522</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e114522</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e092353?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient and public perspectives on the availability of their health and advance care planning information to support care at the end of life: a mixed-methods questionnaire study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e092353?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore patient and public views and experiences of health professional access to patient health records and advance care planning information to support care at the end of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional national online survey of patients and the public using a convergent-parallel approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The survey was distributed across the UK by Compassion in Dying and promoted via newsletters and social media channels of the Professional Records Standards Body and NHS England&rsquo;s digital workstream network. These partners were purposively selected for their active involvement in end-of-life care, including hospices, clinicians and related charities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 1728 participants from 103 UK counties responded, including people with a terminal condition (n=33), with long-term condition (n=442), who provide or have provided care to a person with a long-term or terminal illness (n=229) and who identified as healthy and interested in planning for the future (n=1024).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measures</st>
<p>Both quantitative data (multiple-choice responses and numerical ratings) and qualitative data (open-ended comments) asking about experiences and views of access to their health and advance care planning information to support their care at the end of life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Confidence that recorded care preferences would be accessed when needed was low for carers (median=2, IQR 1&ndash;4) and moderate for patients (median=3, IQR 1&ndash;4). Four themes derived from free-text responses included (1) experience of sharing health information; (2) preparation, communication and understanding; (3) concerns, unknowns and assurance seeking; and (4) preserving dignity and respect: understanding individual contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Respondents acknowledged the opportunity for digital systems to enable access to health and advance care planning information but expressed doubts that professionals would retrieve it when needed, citing past failures. Confidence in record accuracy could be strengthened by patient and carer access. Future research should examine whether such access improves alignment of care with patients&rsquo; wishes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birtwistle, J., Russell, A. M., Relton, S. D., Easdown, H., Grieve, U., Allsop, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092353</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-092353</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient and public perspectives on the availability of their health and advance care planning information to support care at the end of life: a mixed-methods questionnaire study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e092353</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e092353</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095243?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Meanings and practices of solidarity in global health: a qualitative investigation - study protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095243?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Solidarity in global health is often invoked as an ethical imperative to guide responses to global health challenges. Its meanings and practices across diverse contexts, however, remain under-explored. Deepening an understanding of how solidarity is conceptualised, enacted and perceived by a diverse array of actors within the global health ecosystem is crucial to advancing meaningful and measurable application of this commitment in global health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This qualitative study uses interpretive research methodology to explore perspectives on solidarity among key global health stakeholders: community-level leaders in civil society organisations working on global health issues; research institute directors in the Global South; and individuals with experience of funding decision-making with major global health funding and agenda setting organisations (&lsquo;global health influencers&rsquo;). Data will be gathered through semi-structured interviews and analysed using inductive and deductive reflexive thematic analysis, to identify patterns and differences in how these global health stakeholders recognise and define solidarity or its absence in their day-to-day work, while remaining attentive to conceptual tensions, participant interpretations of solidarity that may be unfamiliar to our team, and our role as researchers in shaping what we register and emphasise as significant in our reporting of findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethics approval was obtained from the Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (HSREB) in Ontario, Canada # 2024-123965-87873 and the Ethics Committee for the Humanities, University of Ghana # ECH 163/23&ndash;24 and University of Oxford, Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC) waiver dated 10 April 2024. Study results will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication. Results will also be summarised in an open access report and presented at various stakeholder meetings and in online webinars.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Protocol registration</st>
<p>The final protocol was registered with Open Science Framework on 28 October 2023. View only link: <A HREF="https://osf.io/gryp5/?view_only=8baff435a35847f09a342408d38ee35b">https://osf.io/gryp5/?view_only=8baff435a35847f09a342408d38ee35b</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nouvet, E., Ndu, M., Pratt, B., Arguedas Ramirez, G., Prainsack, B., Karunakara, U., DeVries, J., Owusu, S. A., Atuire, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095243</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095243</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meanings and practices of solidarity in global health: a qualitative investigation - study protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095243</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098109?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychometric validation of the Internalised Stigma Scale for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (ISS-GDM): a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098109?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop and validate the Internalised Stigma Scale for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (ISS-GDM), a questionnaire measuring self-reported internalised stigma among women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We hypothesised that internalised GDM stigma could be reliably and validly assessed through a short psychometric instrument.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional validation study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Follow-up data from the Danish, multicentre Face-it trial for women with prior GDM and their families.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>In total, 248 women completed the ISS-GDM approximately 1 year after their GDM affected pregnancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was psychometric properties of the ISS-GDM, assessed using Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis (RA). Secondary outcomes included identification of item anomalies (local response dependence, differential item functioning).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A large proportion of respondents endorsed statements reflecting self-disappointment, self-blame and an altered self-perception. Less endorsed statements included feeling inferior to other mothers or guilt towards family members due to GDM. The ISS-GDM demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. CFA indicated that item 2 assessing self-perceived capabilities as a mother did not load onto the main factor, while CFA and RA identified local response dependence and differential item functioning by body mass index. After adjustments, a two-factor solution supported calculating a sum score of items 1 and 3&ndash;11, with item 2 retained as a stand-alone indicator of perceived parenting capabilities. The 10-item scale demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha=0.78).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The ISS-GDM is a reliable and valid tool for assessing internalised stigma among women with prior GDM. Our findings further suggest that a substantial proportion of women with prior GDM experience self-blame and an altered self-perception due to their diagnosis. The ISS-GDM scale enables research into its prevalence, severity and consequences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davidsen, E., Maindal, H. T., Christensen, K. B., Damm, P., Byrne, M., Dahl-Petersen, I. K., Mathiesen, E. R., Jensen, D. M., Vinter, C., Kampmann, U., Ovesen, P. G., Kragelund Nielsen, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098109</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098109</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychometric validation of the Internalised Stigma Scale for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (ISS-GDM): a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098109</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102411?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mobility and strength training with and without protein supplements for pre-frail/frail older people with low protein intake: maximising mobility and strength training (MMoST) feasibility randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102411?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The first objective was to establish the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of mobility and strength training with or without protein supplements for pre-frail/frail older people with low protein intake. The second objective was to finalise outcome measures for a definitive trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting and participants</st>
<p>Four National Health Service (NHS) community trust physiotherapy departments. We recruited via clinical caseloads, an existing cohort study and community advertising. Participants were adults aged &ge;60 years, frail or pre-frail, reporting walking difficulties or slow walking and low protein intake (&lt;1 g protein/kg of body weight (kgBW)/day). The recruitment target was 50 participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>All participants undertook two times a week mobility and strength training supported by a physiotherapist for 24 weeks. Half of the participants were randomised (1:1) to receive 24 weeks of daily protein supplements to increase protein intake up to 1.6 g/kgBW/day.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary feasibility objectives</st>
<p>Feasibility outcomes assessed recruitment, intervention fidelity, adherence, tolerance and study retention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Secondary objectives</st>
<p>We assessed clinical data collection at baseline and 5&ndash;8 month follow-up including the short physical performance battery (SPPB), 6 min walk test (6MWT) and participant-reported outcomes. Outcome assessors were blinded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Statistical methods</st>
<p>All participants were analysed in the groups as randomised provided they were not withdrawn from the study before their treatment started and contributed outcome data (modified intention to treat). Our primary feasibility and secondary outcome measures were summarised using descriptive statistics such as mean and SD, median and IQR or counts with percentages. Secondary objectives were exploratory, and mean between group differences at follow-up were estimated for each continuous outcome using linear regression models adjusted for baseline outcome score and frailty status, and presented with associated 95% CIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Initially, recruitment focused on existing caseloads, but patients were more unwell and disabled than anticipated and ineligible. No participants were recruited from the cohort. A community recruitment strategy was implemented. We screened 952 older adults and 20 participants were randomised. We ran out of time to reach our target.</p>
<p>We achieved good intervention fidelity for both interventions. The median number of exercise sessions completed was 10.5/16 (IQR 7&ndash;13). Six participants received supplements which they tolerated well and took regularly. 14 participants (70%) attended follow-up assessments with no difference in retention between arms.</p>
<p>The median age of participants was 76 years (IQR 68.5&ndash;80.0) and 15/20 (75%) were frail. All clinical outcomes showed a trend towards larger improvements in the exercise and protein arm, but these were not statistically significant. For example, SPPB scores (mean difference 0.93, 95% CI (&ndash;2.70 to 4.56)) and 6MWT (mean difference 41.92 m, 95% CI (&ndash;39.05 to 122.89)) were both higher in the exercise and protein arm compared to control.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The study was not feasible based on the original protocol. Recruitment was the biggest challenge. We established a more efficient route to recruitment (community advertising) which requires further refinement. Clinical outcomes consistently favoured the exercise and protein group, which should be interpreted cautiously but suggest this question is worthy of further investigation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN30405954">ISRCTN30405954</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williamson, E., Biggin, K., Morris, A., Marian, I. R., Mwema, C., Carver, A., Lamb, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102411</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102411</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mobility and strength training with and without protein supplements for pre-frail/frail older people with low protein intake: maximising mobility and strength training (MMoST) feasibility randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102411</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102411</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103683?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of rubella and parvovirus B19 IgM positivity and suspected rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis from a large US national reference laboratory (2014-2023)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103683?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Rubella and parvovirus B19 (B19V) infections can present with arthritis-like symptoms in adults instead of typical dermatological symptoms. We quantify associations between rubella and B19V, respectively, with arthritis-like complications using real-world diagnostic testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional and retrospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Reference laboratories across the USA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants with IgM tests for rubella (N=211 917) or B19V (N=644 473) performed at Labcorp from 2014 to 2023. Among these participants, participants with IgM tests for rubella (N=1867) or B19V (N=22 683) and longitudinal laboratory testing through Labcorp were followed for diagnostic tests for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) up to 1.5 years after the viral IgM tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Primary outcomes were arthritis-like suspicions by providers and diagnostic testing for RA-associated biomarkers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Higher proportions of suspicions of arthritis (1.4%, p&lt;0.001) and same-day RA-associated diagnostic testing (1.3%, p&lt;0.001) and positivity (26.4%, p=0.003) were identified in rubella IgM-positive adults compared with rubella IgM-negative adults. A higher proportion of B19V IgM-positive adults had suspected arthritis (12.6%) compared with B19V IgM-negative adults (8.1%, p&lt;0.001). While a higher proportion of B19V IgM-positive adults (21.3%) received RA-associated diagnostic testing compared with B19V IgM-negative adults (14.3%, p&lt;0.001), a lower proportion of B19V IgM-positive adults with RA-associated diagnostic testing (12.8%) tested positive (B19V IgM-negative: 15.5%, p&lt;0.001). There was a 33% increased risk of a suspected RA diagnosis in B19V IgM-positive participants compared with B19V IgM-negative participants (HR=1.33, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.61).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Increased awareness of non-typical RA symptoms may facilitate differential diagnosis between rubella, B19V and RA. Recent B19V infections do not occur concurrently with RA; recent B19V infections should be considered in the differential diagnosis for RA when patients present with polyarticular joint symptoms.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, M. K., Alfego, D., Naides, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103683</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103683</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of rubella and parvovirus B19 IgM positivity and suspected rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis from a large US national reference laboratory (2014-2023)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rheumatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103683</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104310?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding recruitment to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) during liver transplantation: an observational mixed-methods Study Within A Trial (SWAT)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104310?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Perioperative randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in liver transplantation are relatively infrequent. RCTs performed in this complex patient population need to be robustly conducted to maximise patient benefit and graft utility given the scarcity of donor organs. Recruitment challenges can compromise RCTs and studies in this population face unique challenges due to recipient illness severity, their comorbidities, demographics and the geographical constraints of specialist transplant centres. Emergency presentation and after-hours admission may further limit patients&rsquo; capacity or readiness to consider trial participation. This Study Within a Trial (SWAT) specifically explored motivators and barriers to recruitment in patients awaiting liver transplantation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>An observational mixed-methods &lsquo;Study within a Trial&rsquo;, nested within a feasibility RCT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was dual centred at two Tertiary National Health Service Hospitals; The Royal Free Hospital, a liver transplant centre in North London and University Hospital Birmingham, a liver transplant centre in Birmingham.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Adults who were eligible for liver transplantation and recruitment into the associated RCT were eligible for inclusion into the SWAT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Interventions</st>
<p>Completion of an 18-question validated written questionnaire which explored motivation for accepting or declining participation in the RCT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Through completion of the questionnaire, participants shared their perspectives on the RCT and their rationale for consenting or declining participation. Responses were analysed, providing feedback to the Trial Management Group (TMG) to refine recruitment strategies for future trials. An additional component, comprising interviews and audio recordings of recruitment consultations, was planned if the RCT recruitment rates fell below prespecified thresholds or concerns were raised by the RCT TMG, neither of which occurred.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>84 completed questionnaires were received. Motivators included patients believing that the trial will benefit others, interest in helping with research, perception that benefits outweigh risks and belief that it offered the best treatment. Barriers included concerns about randomisation, feeling overburdened and a perception of lack of support from family or friends.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This is the first study exploring recruitment to a perioperative RCT involving patients undergoing liver transplantation. Key motivators were altruism and perceived safety, while barriers included concerns about randomisation and lack of family support. Future focus during recruitment should be on neutral patient-centred consultations, adequate information sharing, fostering of patient trust, improved explanation of randomisation and engagement of the patient&rsquo;s support network.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04941911">NCT04941911</A> (Health Research Authority) and SWAT 152 (the Study With A Trial Database).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coppack, K. E. S., Kantsedikas, I., Brodkin, E., Loh, E. N., Ambler, G., Moonesinghe, S. R., Fabes, J., Hannon, V., Spiro, M., Wagstaff, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104310</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104310</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding recruitment to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) during liver transplantation: an observational mixed-methods Study Within A Trial (SWAT)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104310</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104310</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104991?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between common respiratory pathogens and disease severity, and pathogen-specific seasonality in the Caribbean pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104991?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) cause significant child morbidity and mortality. Periodical influenza vaccination and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prophylaxis can reduce this burden in risk groups. However, in the Caribbean, the optimal timing of these interventions is unclear due to a lack of epidemiological data. We aimed to investigate pathogens associated with RTI disease burden and pathogen specific seasonality in the Caribbean in the context of COVID-19 to achieve optimal timing of preventive measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a retrospective study using patient records and pathogen detection data from St. Maarten Medical Center from 1 September 2018 to 1 September 2023. We performed regression to associate pathogens with outcomes and seasonality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>RTI diagnoses accounted for 50.8% (N=7380) of outpatient cases and 28.0% (N=508) of inpatient cases. RSV and rhino/enterovirus were associated with more frequent oxygen requirement (OR 5.1 (95% CI 2.3 to 11) and OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.3), respectively) and tachypnoea/dyspnoea (OR 4.9 (95% CI 2.0 to 13) and OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.6 to 5.2), respectively) than other pathogens post-COVID-19. RSV consistently peaked during June/July and September/October, preceding RSV prophylaxis administration in October.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The overall burden on the healthcare system due to RTI visits and admissions was high. Higher disease severity was associated with RSV and rhino/enterovirus infections; therefore, universal RSV prophylaxis should be considered, and timing should be optimised based on seasonality.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Engels, S., Tilanus, M., Juliet, J., Euson, M., Stastny, N., Maria, C., Baboe-Kalpoe, S., Baboe, F., Fleming, C. K. A., Carty-Fleming, S., Holaman, S., Baan, K., Holiday, F., Van den Borne, S. C. F., Plantinga, R. F., Wong Chung, D., van de Maat, J., de Jonge, M. I., Steingrover, R., Verhagen, L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104991</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104991</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between common respiratory pathogens and disease severity, and pathogen-specific seasonality in the Caribbean pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104991</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104991</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106641?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mixed-methods, participatory action research study exploring palliative and end-of-life care for LGBTIQ+ people in Switzerland: a protocol for the TRUST-PALL study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106641?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, queer/questioning and other sexual and gender minorities (LGBTIQ+) face systemic barriers and discrimination in healthcare settings, leading to significant health disparities. These challenges persist in palliative and end-of-life care (PEOLC), where older LGBTIQ+ people often lack family support and experience social isolation. Despite the increasing ageing of the LGBTIQ+ population in Switzerland, there is limited evidence on their specific PEOLC needs. Additionally, healthcare providers&rsquo; knowledge and practices regarding LGBTIQ+ inclusivity in these settings remain understudied. This study aims to address these gaps by co-creating knowledge and developing best practice recommendations for inclusive PEOLC in Switzerland.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This study employs a mixed-methods participatory action research approach across three work packages (WPs). WP0 ensures participatory engagement through advisory boards, workshops and co-design processes across Switzerland&rsquo;s four linguistic regions. WP1 investigates the palliative and PEOLC needs of LGBTIQ+ people and their (chosen) families through qualitative interviews (n30) and a quantitative survey embedded in the Swiss LGBTIQ+ Panel. WP2 explores healthcare providers&rsquo; perceptions and practices regarding LGBTIQ+ patients through qualitative interviews (n30) and a nationwide quantitative survey among palliative and PEOLC professionals. Data will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis for qualitative data and multivariate regression models for quantitative data. Findings will be synthesised through a specific data integration framework, integrating community and healthcare perspectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has received ethical approval from the relevant Swiss Ethics Committees. The participatory approach promotes inclusivity, empowering LGBTIQ+ people and healthcare providers in shaping recommendations. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, stakeholder workshops and the co-created Rainbow Book, a best-practice guide for LGBTIQ+ inclusive palliative and PEOLC in Switzerland.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deml, M. J., Meier, C., Letras, C., Canova, N., Martinelli, P., Jones, L., Colussi, G., Larkin, P. J., Eisner, L., Ha&#x0308;ssler, T., Bosisio, F., Gamondi, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106641</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106641</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mixed-methods, participatory action research study exploring palliative and end-of-life care for LGBTIQ+ people in Switzerland: a protocol for the TRUST-PALL study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106641</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106641</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenges of multicultural healthcare practice in type 2 diabetes care: a qualitative study of Australian healthcare professionals]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study explores the challenges experienced by Australian healthcare professionals (HCPs) in delivering type 2 diabetes care to people of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. We examined how sociocultural, linguistic and health systems factors influence their clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews was conducted from April to October 2024. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke&rsquo;s reflexive thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes in HCPs&rsquo; experiences, guided by a constructivist perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Settings</st>
<p>The study was conducted in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, across primary and tertiary healthcare settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A purposive sample of 11 Australian HCPs from diverse disciplines, including general practice, pharmacy, nursing, endocrinology, dietetics and podiatry, participated. All had provided type 2 diabetes care to people of CALD backgrounds within the previous 12 months. Participants included both male and female professionals, many from ethnically diverse backgrounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three overarching themes were identified, reflecting HCPs&rsquo; perceived challenges to providing culturally responsive type 2 diabetes care to people of CALD backgrounds. These themes illustrated the multilevel challenges encountered by HCPs at the patient, organisational and provider levels, namely: (1) healthcare provision across diverse health literacy and cultural contexts, (2) navigating system gaps in multicultural clinical practice and (3) workforce preparedness gaps in culturally responsive care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>HCPs remain committed to providing culturally responsive type 2 diabetes care but continue to face constraints, including limited cross-cultural training and exposure, inadequate interpreter access, time pressures and insufficient culturally adapted resources. Effective care in multicultural settings requires recognising patients&rsquo; culturally shaped beliefs about health and illness and embedding cultural humility, reflexivity and competence within professional practice, essential steps towards advancing equitable type 2 diabetes care across Australia&rsquo;s diverse communities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gargya, D., Chan, V., Thrimawithana, T., Stupans, I., Ko, K. K. H., de Courten, B., Lim, C. X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108187</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108187</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenges of multicultural healthcare practice in type 2 diabetes care: a qualitative study of Australian healthcare professionals]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108187</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109530?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the delivery of trauma and orthopaedic education in UK medical schools: a national cross-sectional survey protocol (TENDON study)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109530?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions account for up to one-third of general practice consultations and over one-fifth of emergency department attendances in the UK. Postpandemic, the elective orthopaedic surgery backlog remains one of the most substantial across surgical specialties. Despite this burden, undergraduate exposure to trauma and orthopaedics (T&amp;O) remains limited and inconsistent. Most UK medical students receive only 2&ndash;3 weeks of T&amp;O teaching, with up to 40% of foundation doctors feeling underprepared to manage MSK conditions. The Evaluation of Trauma and Orthopaedic Teaching in Medical Schools Nationally (TENDON Study) aims to evaluate the current state of undergraduate T&amp;O education in UK medical schools from both student and educator perspectives.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This national, prospective, cross-sectional survey will be conducted between 25 July and 27 October 2025. A dual-instrument electronic survey was developed through Qualtrics, informed by the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) Undergraduate Curriculum and UK Medical Licensing Assessment content map. Participants will include medical students (Years 1&ndash;6), foundation doctors and orthopaedic educators recruited through British Orthopaedic Medical Students Association and BOA networks, and designated school representatives. Survey domains include curriculum coverage, teaching methods, clinical exposure and self-reported competence. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics; qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis. Reporting will follow the Checklist for Reporting Of Survey Studies framework, with relevant elements drawn from the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys checklist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Biology Research Ethics Committee, University of Cambridge. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and summary reports to curriculum leads and relevant educational bodies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nazar, N., OHanlon, C., Kolhe, S., Bellamy, M., Barberon, M., Khajuria, A., Low, W. X., Geetala, R., Chahal, K., Banaszkiewicz, P., McCaskie, A., McDonnell, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109530</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109530</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the delivery of trauma and orthopaedic education in UK medical schools: a national cross-sectional survey protocol (TENDON study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109530</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109530</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110121?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics (ORBIT-UK): protocol of a single cohort usability study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110121?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Tourette syndrome is a common, disabling childhood-onset condition. Exposure and response prevention (ERP) is an effective treatment for tics, yet access remains limited due to a shortage of trained therapists and uneven geographical distribution of services. The ORBIT trial demonstrated that internet-delivered ERP is both clinically and cost-effective, but was developed on a university research platform, not suitable for widescale roll-out. To enable adoption by the National Health Service (NHS) in England, ORBIT has been redeveloped on an NHS compliant platform. This study will evaluate the usability, acceptability and preliminary outcomes of ORBIT on the new platform within an NHS tic disorder service.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This single-cohort usability study will recruit 20 children and young people (aged 9&ndash;17) with tics and their chosen supporters (parents/carers). Participants will receive a 10-week online ERP intervention supported by trained coaches. Outcomes include uptake, adherence, system usability, satisfaction and clinical measures such as the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale, Parent Tic Questionnaire and Goal-Based Outcomes. Qualitative feedback will be collected via semi-structured exit interviews. Usability metrics and adverse events will be monitored throughout.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received ethical approval from North West Greater Manchester Research Ethics Committee (ref: 25/NW/0107). The findings from the study will inform future NHS adoption. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="ISRCTN82718960">ISRCTN82718960</inter-ref>. Registered 10 July 2025. <inter-ref locator="https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN82718960" locator-type="url">https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN82718960</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hastings, O., Brown, B. J., Prentice, K.-M., Babbage, C. M., Davies, E. B., Kilgariff, J., Murphy, T., McGarry, G., Guo, B., Greenhalgh, C., Hollis, C., Hall, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T03:24:44-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110121</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110121</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics (ORBIT-UK): protocol of a single cohort usability study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110121</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of alcohol misuse on the evolution of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in France: results from CONFINS cohort]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>to describe the evolution of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in France and to assess whether it differed according to pre-existing alcohol misuse.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A prospective longitudinal study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A French online cohort: CONFINS. Data has been collected since the first lockdown in April&ndash;May 2020 until January 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1868 participants being at least 18 years of age and who had been confined in France by government measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measure</st>
<p>The primary outcome was anxiety, measured through <I>Generalised Anxiety Disorder &ndash; seven</I> items (GAD-7). Its association with alcohol misuse (defined using AUDIT-C score) was estimated using segmented linear mixed models. Interactions with gender and perceived loneliness at baseline were evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 1868 included participants, 729 responded to at least one follow-up questionnaire (median follow-up time: 46 weeks). We identified 58% as having pre-existing alcohol misuse. Alcohol misuse was significantly associated with an increased GAD-7 score starting at the second lockdown in women (&beta;=0.30; p=0.014) and in participants having a high perceived loneliness (&beta;=0.59; p=0.011).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Pre-existing alcohol misuse appeared to be a risk factor for anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for women and those with high perceived loneliness. Mental health support should be proposed to these vulnerable groups in the event of a future health crisis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galesne, C., Arsandaux, J., Macalli, M., Texier, N., Schu&#x0308;ck, S., Tzourio, C., Kinouani, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T23:05:58-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105567</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105567</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of alcohol misuse on the evolution of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in France: results from CONFINS cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105567</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e096547?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is practice variation determined in the needs assessments performed by Dutch home care nurses? A cross-sectional multilevel analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e096547?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>While needs assessment is the starting point of good quality care, there is anecdotal evidence of patients receiving different care in similar circumstances. This study aims to investigate whether practice variation exists in needs assessments conducted by home care nurses and to identify the factors influencing these assessments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional, quantitative retrospective study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Primary care; home care nursing in the Netherlands in 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Sampling was based on criterion sampling. Home care organisations were approached based on the following inclusion criteria: organisations providing home care nursing in the Netherlands, organisations from various regions of the country and organisations offering different types of home care nursing (eg, paediatric or palliative care), funded under the Dutch Health Insurance Act (Zvw). Organisations were excluded if they provided home care nursing funded by sources other than the Dutch Health Insurance Act. Home care nurses were recruited from participating organisations, each of whom had recently assessed the care needs of at least five patients. In total, 28 organisations and 258 home care nurses participated in this study, thereby yielding data from 1615 patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Assessed and delivered minutes of home care per patient per week.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Variation was primarily associated with patient-related factors. After accounting for these factors, 83% (assessed minutes) and 88% (delivered minutes) of the total variation was attributed to the patient level, 8% (assessed minutes) and 10% (delivered minutes) to the home care nurses&rsquo; level and 9% (assessed minutes) and 2% (delivered minutes) to the organisational level. Due to inadequate documentation in electronic health records, many missing values were identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The lack of nursing documentation suggests that missing factors may have contributed to variations in needs assessments. Thus, further research should comprehensively explore the patient-related factors currently absent from nursing documentation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Dorst, J. I., Schwenke, M., Hameleers, N., Bleijenberg, N., Brabers, A. E., de Jong, J. D., de Vries, E., van den Bulck, A. O., Zwakhalen, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096547</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-096547</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is practice variation determined in the needs assessments performed by Dutch home care nurses? A cross-sectional multilevel analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e096547</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e096547</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098988?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[24-hour movement behaviours and cardiometabolic health in adults with type 2 diabetes: a comparative cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098988?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Meeting the recommended guidelines for physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and sleep, collectively referred to as 24-hour movement behaviours (24h-MBs), is crucial for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management and is associated with favourable health outcomes. However, it is suggested that adults with T2DM spend more time in SB and less time in PA compared with adults without diabetes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to compare 24h-MBs between adults with and without T2DM (ie, controls with similar characteristics except for having T2DM), investigate how this is associated with cardiometabolic health, and assess changes in 24h-MBs after two years of follow-up (FU) in adults with T2DM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional and longitudinal study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Community-dwelling adults with T2DM and controls in Belgium.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>This study took place between September 2021 and December 2023. The 24h-MBs were measured using accelerometers (Actigraph wGT3X+); cardiometabolic variables (adiposity, blood pressure and advanced glycation end-products) were collected in both groups. In adults with T2DM, fasting blood samples were collected at baseline and second FU. Compositional data analysis was used to explore group differences in 24h-MBs using multivariate analysis of variance, and regression models analysed associations with cardiometabolic health. Changes in 24h-MBs over time in adults with T2DM were assessed using a linear mixed model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>52 adults with T2DM (mean age 63.2 SD 10.6) and 74 controls (mean age 62.7 SD 9.4) were included in the cross-sectional analysis. The 24h-MBs of adults with T2DM differed significantly from the controls (p=0.026). Adults with T2DM spent significantly less time in light (&ndash;34.7 min/day) and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) (&ndash;24.1 min/day) compared with controls. In adults with T2DM, reallocating 30 min from any behaviour to MVPA was associated with a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (sleep: 5.05 mg/dL (2.45; 7.80), standardised effect size (ES)=0.53; SB: 4.53 mg/dL (1.93; 7.27), ES=0.47; light PA: 5.29 mg/dL (2.07; 8.73), ES=0.55) whereas in the control group significant decreases in waist circumference were found when reallocating 30 min from SB to sleep (2.42 cm (0.86&ndash;3.97), ES=0.34). 37 (mean age 65.0 SD 9.5) and 22 (mean age 67.0 SD 7.7) adults with T2DM provided valid data after 1 year and 2 years of FU, respectively. No significant changes in 24h-MBs were found after 1-year (p=0.93) or 2-year (p=0.79) FU among adults with T2DM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Adults with T2DM have a less favourable 24h-MB composition compared to adults without T2DM, indicating the need for additional effort to achieve and maintain the guidelines. Despite the limited associations found, time reallocations from other behaviours to MVPA theoretically suggest the biggest health benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04993482">NCT04993482</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bogaert, L., De Craemer, M., Dirinck, E., Calders, P., Lapauw, B., Willems, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098988</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-098988</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[24-hour movement behaviours and cardiometabolic health in adults with type 2 diabetes: a comparative cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098988</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098988</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099842?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tobacco use in the context of natural disasters: a scoping review pertinent to tobacco control in Indonesia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099842?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>In Indonesia, the second most natural disaster-prone country in the world, the tobacco industry exploits such crises via corporate social responsibility. The objective of this study was to map existing evidence on natural disasters and tobacco use in order to understand how tobacco control policies could be optimised in disaster-prone regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Scoping review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>ScienceDirect, PubMed and Google Scholar, with searches conducted twice: between January and April 2024 and again in August 2025.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study selection</st>
<p>All studies examining natural disasters, smoking behaviours and the tobacco industry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction</st>
<p>Studies were assessed primarily on reports of tobacco use change, tobacco control policy enforcement, tobacco industry interference and mention of the role of stress. Data on country, disaster type, type of research study and sample details were also collated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>27 of the 611 identified studies were included in the final analysis. Two-thirds of studies reported an increase in smoking rates following disasters. No studies mentioned tobacco control policy enforcement or tobacco industry interference during disasters. Most of the studies (74%) which examined the relationship between disaster-related stress and smoking found a positive association. About half (51.9%) of the studies described disasters in the Americas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Smoking rates often rise after stress-inducing disasters. More evidence is urgently required to assist countries like Indonesia in enforcing tobacco control and preventing tobacco industry interference.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kodriati, N., Wijaya, O., Affan, A., Nursholihah, U. F., Rosemary, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099842</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099842</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tobacco use in the context of natural disasters: a scoping review pertinent to tobacco control in Indonesia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099842</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099842</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099970?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What is the psychological and cognitive impact of returning Alzheimer disease dementia research results to healthy research participants? a delayed-start randomised clinical trial protocol for the WeSHARE study (Washington University study of having Alzheimer disease research results explained)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099970?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Returning research results that indicate risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia&mdash;a disease for which no meaningful treatments or cure exist&mdash;to cognitively normal participants is controversial. AD is thought to begin many years before clinical signs and symptoms begin. During this time, individuals are cognitively normal but have biomarkers that indicate pathophysiological changes in the brain. With this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of returning research results on cognitively normal participants recruited from a longitudinal observational cohort on ageing at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Centre (Knight ADRC) at Washington University in St. Louis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Our study uses a 2-year, delayed-start randomised clinical trial design. Participants are randomised to receive their research results either 2 weeks or 1 year after informed consent. This study was approved to recruit up to 450 participants with existing genetic and biomarker testing results from the Knight ADRC. During the study period, 260 individuals were eligible and approached for entry into the study. The primary cognitive outcomes are 1-year change in subjective cognitive score on the clinical dementia rating sum of box scores and the objective cognitive score on cognitive composite score. The primary psychosocial outcome is change in geriatric depression scale score 1 year after return of research results. The study was powered to answer primary outcomes with 140 participants (70 per study arm).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study has been approved by the Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM) Institutional Review Board and the Human Research Protection Office. Results from these trials are shared through conferences and publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT04699786">NCT04699786</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hartz, S. M., Goswami, S., Oliver, A., Evans, A., Jackson, S., Linnenbringer, E., Moulder, K. M., Morris, J. C., Mozersky, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099970</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099970</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Geriatric medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What is the psychological and cognitive impact of returning Alzheimer disease dementia research results to healthy research participants? a delayed-start randomised clinical trial protocol for the WeSHARE study (Washington University study of having Alzheimer disease research results explained)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Geriatric medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099970</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099970</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Critical appraisal and comparison of clinical practice guideline recommendations for the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>In chronic kidney disease (CKD), anaemia develops and evolves as kidney dysfunction progresses. The treatment of anaemia is described in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), which are designed to report the most relevant evidence for clinical practice in disease management. This study will analyse CPGs for transparency, methodological quality and quality of recommendations for their implementation over time, and also compare recommendations for the treatment of anaemia outlined in these documents.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>CPGs will be identified by conducting a systematic search of the data sources CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Scielo, Scopus, ProQuest, Trip Database, Virtual Health Library, Web of Science, and guidelines on websites, published between January 2009 and December 2025. Three reviewers will, independently, evaluate the methodological quality of the guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool and the quality of recommendations using the AGREE &ndash; Recommendations Excellence tool. The treatment recommendations for anaemia in CKD will be summarised and compared. Results will be presented in tables and descriptive statistics will be compiled for all domains of the tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This is a literature-based study and, therefore, no ethical approval will be required. Results of the study can be submitted for publication in high-impact, peer-reviewed scientific journals, and also presented at national and international conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Prospero registration number</st>
<p>CRD42024629656.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agnelli, J. C. M., Costa, W. R. d., Iwami, R. S., Franques, R. T., Lopes, L. C., Barberato-Filho, S., Bergamaschi, C. d. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100279</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100279</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Critical appraisal and comparison of clinical practice guideline recommendations for the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100279</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100978?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Birth intervals and the risk of perinatal mortality in Indonesia: findings from a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100978?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the association between birth intervals and perinatal mortality in Indonesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study using reproductive calendar data from the 2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Nationally representative households in Indonesia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 17 171 women aged 15&ndash;49 with pregnancies in the 5 years preceding the survey. Women with missing data or multiple births were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Perinatal mortality, defined as stillbirths and early neonatal deaths.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The perinatal mortality rate was 22 per 1000 births. Short birth intervals (&lt;12 months) were associated with a fourfold increase in perinatal mortality compared with intervals of 24&ndash;35 (adjusted OR (AOR=4.07; 95% CI 1.71 to 9.69), while long intervals (&ge;60 months) showed nearly threefold (AOR=2.94; 95% CI 1.42 to 6.09). First births also had increased odds (AOR=3.55; 95% CI 1.67 to 7.56). Women with no antenatal care visits also had increased odds (AOR=5.93; 95% CI 3.57 to 9.85). Older maternal age was associated with a greater risk (AOR per year 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06). Being male was also associated with greater odds of perinatal mortality compared with being female (AOR=1.65; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.26).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Short and long birth intervals were associated with higher perinatal mortality in Indonesia, with additional associations observed for antenatal care visits, maternal age and newborn sex. These findings underscore the importance of promoting healthy birth spacing within maternal and child health programmes and integrating postpartum family planning into routine care. Further longitudinal research is needed to confirm causal pathways and inform targeted interventions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gayatri, M., Kistiana, S., Puspitasari, M. D., Nasution, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100978</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100978</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Birth intervals and the risk of perinatal mortality in Indonesia: findings from a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100978</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100978</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond one-size-fits-all: leveraging mixed-methods qualitative analysis of local stakeholders to tailor validated prehospital care solutions in the Cameroonian cultural context]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Prehospital care, though critical to injury survival, is largely unavailable in many low and middle-income countries, including Cameroon. Lay first responder (LFR) programmes train persons with high injury exposure in first-aid and emergency transport, but stakeholder buy-in from trainees and healthcare workers (HCWs) is essential. To design a context-appropriate prehospital care system, we evaluated barriers and facilitators of implementing a driver-based LFR programme in Cameroon.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In April 2023, we performed a mixed-methods evaluation targeting commercial mototaxi drivers and HCW in Limbe, Cameroon. Drivers were recruited for focus groups through union leaders. Trauma HCW at Limbe Regional Hospital completed Likert surveys and a subgroup completed semistructured interviews. Data collection focused on perceptions, barriers and facilitators of LFR programme implementation. Survey data were summarised using median and IQR. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, translated and analysed with open and axial coding using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 92 mototaxi drivers and 34 HCWs participated in the LFR programme assessment. Among the HCW surveyed, 93% felt mototaxi drivers were capable of training as LFR but only 44% felt that drivers would be able to provide care safely. Interviews identified negative HCW perceptions of drivers, including drivers being uneducated and financially motivated, as key barriers, whereas driver exposure to injury was identified as a facilitator to LFR programme implementation. Driver groups demonstrated a positive perception of LFR training but identified unpaid time spent transporting injured persons as a significant barrier. Both groups described a need for hospital involvement in trainings and bidirectional standardised communication with HCW.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In Cameroon, driver-based LFR may facilitate increased prehospital care but further exploration of possible systems of collaboration that promote long-term success of the programme is required. Specifically, sustainable implementation will need to include clear bidirectional communication guidelines and provide driver incentive commensurate to effort.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[OConnor, K., Hayashi, A., Tabe, V., Dissak-Delon, F. N., Nsen, L., Joel, M., Tanue, E. A., Oke, R., Delaney, P. G., Eisner, Z., Chichom Mefire, A., Juillard, C., Christie, A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101186</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101186</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Global health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond one-size-fits-all: leveraging mixed-methods qualitative analysis of local stakeholders to tailor validated prehospital care solutions in the Cameroonian cultural context]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Global health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101186</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101559?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health behaviours in patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis following hip or knee arthroplasty: latent profile analysis and influencing factors based on a cross-sectional study in Urumqi, China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101559?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aims to categorise health behaviours in patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis and explore the factors that influence these behaviours.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This study was conducted in four tertiary general hospitals in Urumqi, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>This study included a total of 544 participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>Self-rated abilities for health practices, health behaviour motivation, social support and health behaviour were the primary outcome measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Model 3 demonstrated superior fit across indices, supported by an Entropy value of 0.806 and a significant bootstrap likelihood ratio test (p&lt;0.001). The generalised linear mixed model identified self-rated abilities for health practices (p&lt;0.05), health behaviour motivation and social support (both p&lt;0.001) as factors associated with health behaviour latent profile subgroups among patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis following hip or knee arthroplasty.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Three latent health behaviour subgroups, namely low, moderate and good, were identified among patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis following hip or knee arthroplasty. Self-rated abilities for health practices, health behaviour motivation and social support were associated with these subgroups. These findings may provide preliminary insights for developing targeted interventions to support health behaviour improvement in this patient population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hu, N., Tang, X., Yang, M., Li, Y., Yan, P., Li, Y.-l.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101559</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101559</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health behaviours in patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis following hip or knee arthroplasty: latent profile analysis and influencing factors based on a cross-sectional study in Urumqi, China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101559</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101559</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102830?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative medicine physicians experiences using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain assessment in patients with advanced cancer: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102830?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to describe palliative medicine physicians&rsquo; experiences performing pain assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)&mdash;one of the most widely used pain assessment tools&mdash;for patients with cancer receiving specialised palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Study design</st>
<p>This qualitative study used reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>The study was conducted in specialised palliative care settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 palliative medicine physicians in specialised palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Analysis</st>
<p>The interviews were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four themes were identified: &lsquo;Striving to create a shared understanding&rsquo;, &lsquo;Meeting individual needs&rsquo;, &lsquo;Interpreting and managing ratings&rsquo; and &lsquo;Importance of organizational structures&rsquo;. This can be seen as a process that moves from creating a shared foundation through individual patient meetings and handling NRS ratings to organisational-level challenges.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The study shows the complexity needed within palliative cancer care when using the most common pain assessment tool in Sweden, the NRS. The tool may seem simplistic, but, as shown in this study, the physicians found interpreting the assessments challenging for the whole team. This complexity should be incorporated into future healthcare education and training within the palliative care area, where patients often have chronic pain conditions in combination with cognitive impairment. Future research needs to focus on developing reliable pain assessment methods for patients who are cognitively impaired because of the cancer.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinsson, L., Bra&#x0308;nnstro&#x0308;m, M., Fransson, P., Andersson, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102830</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102830</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative medicine physicians experiences using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain assessment in patients with advanced cancer: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102830</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102830</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104709?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors associated with early initiation of antenatal care in Bangladesh: a survival analysis using Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104709?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aims to identify factors associated with early antenatal care (ANC) initiation using a survival analysis approach applied to nationally representative data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st>
<p>This study used a cross-sectional design based on data from the nationally representative 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. The survey was conducted at the community level across all administrative divisions of Bangladesh. A total of 5128 ever-married women aged 15&ndash;49 years who had a live birth within 5 years prior to the survey were included in the analysis. Women with missing or incomplete information regarding the timing of their first ANC visit were excluded from the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome</st>
<p>The primary outcome was early initiation of ANC, defined as the first ANC contact within the first trimester.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Materials and methods</st>
<p>The study applied survival analysis methods, including Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests and an Accelerated Failure Time model, to assess the determinants of early ANC initiation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings</st>
<p>Only 37.9% (95% CI 36.0% to 39.9%) of women in Bangladesh initiated ANC within the first trimester. Early ANC initiation was associated with higher maternal age, education, skilled employment, wealthier households, media exposure, higher decision-making autonomy, higher husband&rsquo;s education and urban residence. Women who reported that distance to a health facility was not a big problem had initiated ANC earlier than those who considered distance a major barrier. Regional disparities were also evident, with women from Barishal, Chattogram, Rajshahi, Khulna and Rangpur accessing ANC later than those in Dhaka.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Persistent inequalities in early ANC initiation highlight the need for targeted policies to reduce financial barriers, improve healthcare accessibility and strengthen awareness campaigns to ensure equitable maternal healthcare in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Islam, M. S., Noor, S. T. A., Asha, R. A., Islam, R. B., Rahman, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104709</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104709</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors associated with early initiation of antenatal care in Bangladesh: a survival analysis using Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104709</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104709</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104810?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Burden and characteristics of revision total hip arthroplasty in China: a national study based on hospitalised cases]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104810?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>This study aimed to investigate the burden and characteristics of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A national retrospective study was conducted based on the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) in China. Patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 2013 and 2018 were included. Revision burden was calculated as the ratio of revision procedures to the total number of THA procedures. Demographic and hospital characteristics, hospitalisation charges, clinical indications and patient migration patterns related to revision THA were analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Tertiary hospitals across China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 13 029 revision THA cases from HQMS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Revision burden, indications for revision, hospitalisation charges, hospital level, patient migration and their trend.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>During the study period, 13 029 revision THA cases were identified. The revision burden showed an increasing trend from 2013 to 2018 (4.5% to 5.4%; p for trend=0.002). The hospitalisation charges continued to increase between 2013 and 2016 and decreased over the next 2 years. The leading indications for revision THA were prosthesis loosening (44.0%), prosthesis dysfunction (13.7%) and fracture (10.7%). More than 60% of patients were hospitalised in provincial hospitals, but this proportion gradually decreased over time. 14.8% of patients were hospitalised in a hospital outside the province of their residence. Shanghai and Beijing were the most preferred migration destinations, with 63.5% and 52.0% of patients from outside provinces, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study provided epidemiological data on revision THA in China based on a national database. During the study period, there was an increasing trend in the revision burden, and hospitalisation costs shifted from an annual increase to a decrease. China exhibits distinct characteristics regarding indications for revision THA. Additionally, significant regional disparities in revision THA were evident, leading to a considerable phenomenon of migration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feng, H., Wang, Y., Xie, D., Long, H., Chen, H., Xiao, Y., Yang, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104810</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104810</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Burden and characteristics of revision total hip arthroplasty in China: a national study based on hospitalised cases]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104810</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104810</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105393?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between age-specific preconception thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and birth weight: a retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105393?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Maternal thyroid function affects fetal birth weight and age is an important factor in regulating thyroid function. Thus, we aimed to explore the association between age-specific preconception thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and birth weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 97 755 preconception Chinese women aged 20&ndash;39 years old from the National Free Preconception Checkups Project were included.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Participants were divided into four age groups: 20&ndash;25 years, 25&ndash;29 years, 30&ndash;34 years and 35&ndash;39 years. The preconception TSH levels within 6 months before pregnancy and fetal birth weight, including large for gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age (SGA) and appropriate for gestational age (AGA), were collected and analysed using restricted cubic spline regression. Logistic regression investigated the relationship between various TSH groups and birth weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>(1) Preconception TSH levels differed among four age groups; (2) in the 20-24 years group, preconception TSH was associated with the incidence of LGA and AGA (p&lt;0.001). The TSH range for OR of LGA lower than 1.0 was 1.32&ndash;2.12 mIU/L and OR of AGA higher than 1.0 was 1.80&ndash;2.06 mIU/L; (3) there were no significant associations between age-specific TSH and risks of LGA, SGA or AGA in the 25&ndash;29 years, 30&ndash;34 years and 35&ndash;39 years groups; (4) compared with TSH 1.32&ndash;2.12 mIU/L, lower (&lt;1.32 mIU/L) and higher (&gt;2.12 mIU/L) TSH were associated with a higher risk of LGA and lower incidence of AGA in 20&ndash;24 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Preconception TSH exhibited a significant association with LGA and AGA in the 20&ndash;24 years age group, but not in the 25&ndash;39 years age group. Young preconception women should not neglect paying attention to their thyroid function, associated with the risk of LGA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bai, X., Zhou, Z., Guo, X., Yang, H., Du, H., Zhu, H., Chen, S., Pan, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105393</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105393</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diabetes and Endocrinology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between age-specific preconception thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and birth weight: a retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diabetes and endocrinology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105393</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105393</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105453?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Schulthess Clinic Zu&#x0308;rich Shoulder Instability Registry: a local registry for multimodal data collection and enhanced care]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e105453?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>The Shoulder Instability Registry (SIR) was established in 2019 to systematically capture and monitor outcomes following surgical treatment of shoulder instability (SI). The aim of this cohort profile is to describe the purpose, design, data structure and baseline characteristics of the SIR, and to outline how the registry supports longitudinal assessment of safety, functional recovery, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of SI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The registry includes all patients treated surgically for SI. Data collection includes medical history of instability, surgical techniques and intraoperative findings. Clinical assessments include range of motion, instability-specific tests, hyperlaxity signs, Constant Score, subjective shoulder value and SI-specific scores such as the ROWE Score and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Radiological evaluations included initial and follow-up imaging via X-rays and CT to assess bony lesions and SI-related arthropathy, as well as MRI for soft tissue injuries. Data are documented preoperatively, at 6 months and at 24 months postoperatively. Although the SIR is an observational cohort rather than a randomised clinical trial, treatment effectiveness is evaluated through longitudinal changes in validated patient-reported outcomes, clinical performance measures and imaging findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Findings to date</st>
<p>Between January 2019 and December 2024, 668 patients have been registered (mean age 31 years, 82% men, mean body mass index of 25). According to the American Association of Anesthesiology (ASA) Classification, 66% of patients were classified as ASA I, 33% as ASA II and only 1% as ASA III. 69% of admissions were due to accidents and 31% due to illness. Mean surgery duration was 75 min, and the median hospital stay was 2 days. 38% of patients were insured privately and had general insurance in 62%. 85% of cases were treated arthroscopically, and 15% were treated openly. Baseline clinical scores showed a mean Constant Score of 77 points, mean subjective shoulder value of 49%, mean ROWE Score of 46 points and mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index of 53. Based on Gerber&rsquo;s classification, 68% of cases were type B2, 29% B3, 2% B5 and fewer than 2% were classified as B4 or B1. 85% of cases suffered from anterior instability, while only 13% experienced posterior instability, the remaining 2% showed multidirectional instability. Among posterior cases, Moroder&rsquo;s classification identified 58% as type B2, 19% as A2, 7% as A1, 6% as B1, 6% as C1 and 4% as C2. Regarding osteochondral lesions, 20% showed none, 31% showed a glenoid defect, 54% showed a Hill-Sachs lesion and 13% showed a cartilage defect. Scheibel&rsquo;s classification identified glenoid defects as type 3a in 38% of cases, type 2 in 24%, type 1a in 13% of cases, type 3b in 11%, type 1b in 8% and type 1c in 5% of cases. Positive Gagey and Walch signs were observed in 29% and 27% of cases, respectively. Dislocations presented as primary events in 24% of cases, while 76% were recurrent. Surgical interventions included 459 (70%) Bankart repairs, 6 Bankart plus repairs (&lt;1%) and 108 (16%) Remplissage procedures for soft tissue stabilisation. Bony reconstructions included 52 fragment fixations (8%), 41 coracoid transfers (6%) and 87 iliac crest bone grafts (13%). Additional pathologies were addressed in 533 cases (81%), while 38 cases required revision surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Future plans</st>
<p>We will continue prospectively enrolling and monitoring patients that receive surgical treatment of SI. There are no current plans to halt the data collection in the near future, thereby consistently increasing the number of patients in the registry. A larger availability of data will additionally allow us to apply machine learning modelling and develop risk-prediction tools with the goal of aiding surgical decision making.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schneller, T., Delliehausen, N., Brune, D., Bo&#x0308;hm, E., Moroder, P., Lazaridou, A., Scheibel, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105453</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-105453</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Sports and exercise medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Schulthess Clinic Zu&#x0308;rich Shoulder Instability Registry: a local registry for multimodal data collection and enhanced care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Sports and exercise medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e105453</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e105453</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107698?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding the role of knowledge and attitudes of community pharmacy staff in non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing practices in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107698?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical public health issue in Bangladesh, exacerbated by the widespread practice of non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing. This study seeks to assess their knowledge and attitudes, particularly how these factors influence non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing practices in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A total of 287 pharmacy staff across four regions of Bangladesh were included in the study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study found that 92.4% of respondents dispensed antibiotics without prescriptions. The practice was significantly more prevalent among those with poor knowledge (99.28% in below-average vs 86.09% in above-average knowledge groups, p&lt;0.001) and negative attitudes (97.6% in below-average vs 88.41% in above-average attitude groups, p=0.004) regarding antibiotic use. Only 11.9% respondents understood antibiotics&rsquo; ineffectiveness against viral infections and 47.0% were unaware of prescription requirements. While 93.0% recognised non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing as a risk of AMR, 65.9% cited profit concerns as a barrier to refusing non-prescribed sales. Multivariable analysis identified poor knowledge (adjusted OR 15.7, p=0.01) as a key predictor of inappropriate dispensing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These findings highlight knowledge and attitude towards antibiotic dispensing play a vital role where weak regulation, education and economic incentives further worsen the situation. Urgent interventions, including improved pharmacist training, prescription monitoring and public awareness campaigns, are essential to reduce non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing and align practices with Bangladesh&rsquo;s National Action Plan on AMR.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sultana Samapti, M. M., Hossain, K. M., Riha, F. A., Showkat, N. B., Begum, T., Rahman, M. A., Rasul, M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107698</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107698</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding the role of knowledge and attitudes of community pharmacy staff in non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing practices in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107698</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107698</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107964?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Midazolam oral solution for neonatal MRI: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107964?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Current medications used for neonatal MRI sedation may lead to complications such as decreased oxygen saturation, apnoea and bradycardia. There has been no study investigating the application of midazolam oral solution in neonatal MRI examinations. Therefore, this study aims to observe the safety and efficacy of midazolam oral solution for sedation during neonatal MRI examinations, providing a reference for clinical application.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We designed a double-blind randomised controlled trial. A total of 140 neonates who underwent MRI are included. The neonates are randomly assigned into two groups of n=70 each to receive either midazolam oral solution or chloral hydrate oral solution. The primary outcome indicator of the study is the success rate of sedation as assessed by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). In addition, the time to a UMSS score of 2 or greater after drug administration, the number of sedation remedies, the behavioural scores of the children while taking the drug and the movement scores during the MRI performed are collected as secondary outcome indicators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Chengdu Women&rsquo;s and Children&rsquo;s Central Hospital (Approval No. 2023 (18)&ndash;2). The study findings will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication in a scientific journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>ChiCTR2300069996.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheng, Z., Xu, L., Lu, Z., Wang, H., Song, T., Cui, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107964</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107964</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Midazolam oral solution for neonatal MRI: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107964</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107964</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109055?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Implementation strategies by leaders and health professionals to improve the safety climate in the operating room: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109055?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This scoping review aims to map evidence or literature on improvement strategies used by health leaders and professionals to strengthen the safety climate in the operating room.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A scoping review was performed on the basis of the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and applied to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extension.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>16 academic and grey literature data sources were searched using search terms on 17 January 2025, namely, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online via Pubmed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences via the Virtual Health Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, WorldCat, Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Brazilian Association of Surgical Center Nurses, Center for Material and Sterilization and Anesthetic Recovery, Association of Portuguese Operating Room Nurses, Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses, Institute for Healthcare Improvement, WHO and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility</st>
<p>Study selection, data extraction and synthesis were based on the following eligibility criteria based on the acronym PCC (participants, concept, context): participants (health leaders and professionals), concept (strategies to improve the safety climate) and context (operating room). This scoping review considered studies published from 2009 onwards.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction</st>
<p>Information on the objective, method and findings addressing improvement strategies employed to strengthen the safety climate in the surgical centre was retrieved. The findings are presented in tables and in a qualitative thematic summary.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 26 studies were analysed, published between 2009 and 2024, with the USA as the country of origin of the publications with the highest number (11 studies). As for the methodological approach, intervention and quasi-experimental studies stand out. When the studies in this review were mapped, strategies that strengthened the safety climate in the operating room were identified and grouped into two main axes that are interrelated: communication tools and training programmes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>It is evident that the implementation of tools that promote communication and training programmes enhances safe surgical care, as they contribute substantially to the domains of the safety culture. The use of communication protocols in the operating room is recommended as a perioperative safety tool.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>This scoping review adhered to a protocol previously published in this journal and that is registered on the Open Science Framework website (<A HREF="https://osf.io/zg8nu/">https://osf.io/zg8nu/</A>).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alves Ferreira, R., Santos, E. J. F., Ribeiro, O. M. P. L., Henrique, D. M., Camerini, F. G., Bueno, A. A. B., de Abreu Pereira, S. C., Schutz, V., Rosa Lima, M. V., Fassarella, C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109055</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109055</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Evidence based practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Implementation strategies by leaders and health professionals to improve the safety climate in the operating room: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Evidence based practice</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109055</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109055</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109122?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative analysis of the manufacturing carbon footprint of biologics for severe asthma]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109122?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To quantify, compare and analyse the carbon emissions of biologic treatments for severe asthma.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cradle-to-gate carbon emissions (from raw materials to finished product) for six monoclonal antibody therapies, benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab, reslizumab and tezepelumab, were estimated using Medicine Carbon Footprint Classifier, a standardised, mass-based method for medicine carbon footprinting. A representative patient, eligible for all therapies, was defined to enable comparisons. Sensitivity, scenario and pairwise analyses were conducted to explore variations in emissions and opportunities for reduction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was first-year carbon emissions of biologic treatments for a representative patient with severe asthma, expressed in kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e. Additional outcome measures were the effect of varying the electricity source on treatment emissions and emissions associated with alternative biologic choices.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>First-year treatment emissions for the representative patient ranged from 1.1 kg CO<SUB><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>e with benralizumab to 188.9 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e with dupilumab, a 172-fold difference. Variation was driven by the active pharmaceutical ingredient per preparation (30&ndash;300 mg), number of preparations required for first-year treatment (8&ndash;52) and manufacturer&rsquo;s proportion of non-fossil fuel electricity (NFFE) (22%&ndash;91%). Sensitivity analysis showed that increasing NFFE to 100% could reduce emissions by 29%&ndash;90% and the difference between the highest and lowest emission treatments by 91%. Pairwise comparison showed that selecting any biologic instead of dupilumab could reduce emissions by 134&ndash;188 kg CO<SUB>2</SUB>e per patient-year, equivalent to 340&ndash;478 car miles. The emission differences between treatment with benralizumab, mepolizumab and tezepelumab were minimal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The carbon footprints of biologic treatments for severe asthma vary widely, driven primarily by differences in dose and manufacturer electricity sources. Our analyses highlight near-term opportunities to reduce emissions, including replacing fossil fuel electricity with renewable or nuclear sources (NFFE) and optimising dosing practices. The approach can be applied across other therapeutic areas to support carbon-informed prescribing and healthcare decarbonisation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor, H., Rahman, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109122</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109122</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative analysis of the manufacturing carbon footprint of biologics for severe asthma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109122</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110493?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Timing of orthopaedic surgical interventions and factors contributing to delays in femoral fracture management among adults in South Africa: insights from a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e110493?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To determine the time intervals between injury and orthopaedic admission, admission and surgery, and postsurgery length of stay and to elucidate factors contributing to delays in accessing orthopaedic services.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary hospital in the rural Eastern Cape province of South Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>413 adult patients admitted with femur fractures between January 2024 and July 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary and secondary outcome measures</st>
<p>The primary outcome was the time interval from injury to surgical fixation. Secondary outcomes included time from admission to surgery, length of hospital stay and reasons for delays.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 413 patients, only 22% (n=91) received surgical intervention within 48 hours of admission. The median time from injury to admission was 4 days (IQR 0&ndash;12), and injury to surgery was 13 days (IQR 0&ndash;713). Systemic factors, including limited theatre capacity and bed shortages, were the main reasons for delays. In the multivariate analysis, cardiac disease (adjusted OR, AOR=9.62), diabetes mellitus (AOR=4.36) and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of &lt;8 (AOR=30.17) were significantly associated with higher mortality rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Significant delays in femoral fracture fixation were observed, with fewer than 10% receiving surgery within 48 hours of injury. Addressing surgical capacity and referral pathways is essential to improving timely access to care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam, N., Adeniyi, O. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110493</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-110493</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Timing of orthopaedic surgical interventions and factors contributing to delays in femoral fracture management among adults in South Africa: insights from a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e110493</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e110493</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111034?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring recovery from anorexia in autistic adults: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111034?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine the barriers and facilitators of anorexia nervosa (AN) recovery in adults with autism.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with autistic adults who identified as being in recovery or having recovered from AN.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Participants were recruited via advertisements on social media and an eating disorder (ED) forum. Online Zoom interviews with 12 participants were conducted from October to November 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Overall, 12 autistic adults who identified as being in recovery or recovered from AN were included (11 women and 1 man; aged between 18&ndash;50 years).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Four key themes were identified: &lsquo;Sensory Experiences&rsquo;, &lsquo;Recovery in progress&rsquo;, &lsquo;Changing to healthy mindsets&rsquo; and &lsquo;Engaging with treatment&rsquo;. Results indicated that recovery for participants did not follow a linear path, with the role of autistic traits, such as sensory sensitivities, interoception and the internal voice, making recovery challenging.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This study provides insight into the challenges and motivations experienced during the recovery process. Findings highlight the need for further research to improve guidelines and autism awareness in ED services.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McIntosh, A., Hunter, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111034</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111034</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring recovery from anorexia in autistic adults: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111034</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111034</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111195?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[End-of-life knowledge, attitudes and behaviours associated with hospice care preference in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional survey from Mainland China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e111195?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To examine end-of-life knowledge, attitudes and behaviours associated with hospice care preference in community-dwelling older adults from Shanghai, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional study recruiting community-dwelling older adults from Shanghai. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were conducted to identify associated factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Seven community health service centres in Shanghai, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>A total of 404 community-dwelling older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>Participants were asked to provide their hospice care preference (&lsquo;If you were to become critically ill with limited life expectancy, would you choose hospice care?&rsquo;) and related reasons. To evaluate knowledge, attitudes and planning behaviours related to end-of-life issues, a structured questionnaire was developed through a multistep process. Demographic and clinical characteristics were also collected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Nearly two-thirds of participants (65.8%) reported awareness of hospice care. Most of the participants (81.2%) reported they would choose hospice care at the end-of-life stage. Bivariate analyses showed that marital status, living status, education background and disposable personal income were significantly associated with hospice care preference. After controlling for confounding variables, the logistic regression analysis suggested the significant effects of knowledge level of hospice care (&beta;=0.318, 95% CI (1.156 to 1.636), p&lt;0.001), truth-telling about terminal prognosis (&beta;=1.005, 95% CI (1.071 to 7.704), p=0.036) and preferred place of death (&beta;=&ndash;1.073, 95% CI (0.120 to 0.972), p=0.044) on opting for hospice care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The Chinese older adults&rsquo; knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards end-of-life issues in metropolitan areas has been changing. Their preference towards hospice care provides a good foundation for the utilisation of hospice care in the future. Community-based educational interventions should target demographic characteristics such as being unmarried, living alone and having lower levels of education and income among older adults to enhance their knowledge and family communication about hospice care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao, W., Zhong, J., Lai, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111195</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-111195</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Palliative care]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[End-of-life knowledge, attitudes and behaviours associated with hospice care preference in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional survey from Mainland China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Palliative care</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e111195</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e111195</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112020?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using administrative data to predict the outcomes of prematurity (EB-POC): a protocol for a linkage study from an Australian Neonatal Network]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112020?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Perinatal healthcare providers need access to accurate and current outcome data to counsel parents facing the birth of extremely premature infants. Parents want to know their infant&rsquo;s risk of mortality, as well as the risk of hospital morbidities and neurodevelopmental outcomes, if their infant survives. Such data must be personalised to the precise infant-specific circumstances, including antenatal and perinatal risk factors unique to that infant.</p>
<p>The evidence-based preterm outcome calculator (EB-POC) cohort study uses linked population data to design, model, construct and validate an EB-POC to predict outcomes of premature birth (mortality, hospital complications and neurodisability).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Information from eight routinely collected administrative databases will be linked for all births registered in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and New South Wales, Australia, between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2022 (or the latest available at the time of linkage). Key outcome measures will include an EB-POC to predict mortality, hospital morbidities and neurodisability. Data analysis will be conducted using Minitab and R software.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Approval was obtained from the ACT Human Research Ethics Committee (2022.LRE.00164 and 2024.LRE.00188), ACT Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Consumer Reference Group and the eight data custodians. The results are expected to be released in December 2025. The results will be presented at medical conferences and published in peer-reviewed academic journals. The calculator will be available free of charge through a user-friendly website and a mobile app, enabling prospective parents of premature babies and clinicians to make evidence-based, personalised, precision-based decisions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdel-Latif, M., Nanda, P., Ovalles, G., Dyson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T19:50:48-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112020</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112020</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using administrative data to predict the outcomes of prematurity (EB-POC): a protocol for a linkage study from an Australian Neonatal Network]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112020</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112020</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102581?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hemopurifier device in patients with solid tumours who have stable or progressive disease while on a treatment that includes pembrolizumab or nivolumab: protocol for an Australian safety, feasibility and dose-finding study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102581?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Immunotherapy with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) inhibitors has revolutionised the treatment of many solid tumours, however, only 30&ndash;40% of patients will have a lasting clinical response. Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been implicated in the spread of solid tumours and resistance to these agents. A lectin-affinity plasmapheresis device called the Hemopurifier (HP) has been developed and shown to remove EVs in vitro and in patients. We hypothesise that the treatment of patients who are not improving on a regimen that includes an anti-PD-1 agent will be safe, decrease EV concentrations and improve antitumour T cell activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This safety, feasibility and dose-finding study is designed in a 3+3 safety study design with three treatment cohorts. Participants who are determined not to be responding to a regimen that includes an anti-PD-1 agent will be assigned to receive either one, two or three (HP) treatments over a 1-week period prior to their next scheduled dose of anti-PD-1 antibody. Advancement from one cohort to the next will be determined by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Data collection will include adverse events, safety labs, EV concentrations and T cell measurements, repeat imaging and survival status.</p>
<p>The primary outcome of the study will be the safety of the HP in this population, with additional endpoints to include the kinetics of EV removal and rebound following HP treatment, in addition to the effects on T cell numbers and activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The clinical protocol and amendment to the study protocol have been approved by the Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee for Royal Adelaide Hospital (reference number 2024/HRE00031) and the Bellberry Human Research Ethics Committee for Pindara Private Hospital and Genesis Care/Royal North Shore Hospital (reference number 2024-06-724-A-6). The Therapeutic Goods Administration has been notified. The clinical trial is listed on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Informed Consent is obtained from all participants prior to any protocol procedures being performed. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>Australia New Zealand registration number ACTRN12624000732583.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brown, M. P., Matos, M., Clarke, S., Coates, P. T., Pollock, C., Kurtkoti, J., Grau, G., Edinburg, K., Bloesch, A., de Necochea Campion, R., Khin, N. Y., Shin, J., LaRosa, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T15:50:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102581</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102581</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hemopurifier device in patients with solid tumours who have stable or progressive disease while on a treatment that includes pembrolizumab or nivolumab: protocol for an Australian safety, feasibility and dose-finding study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102581</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102581</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098383?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of patient empowerment on continuity of care needs in patients with stable COPD: the mediating role of eHealth literacy in a cross-sectional study from China]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e098383?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To explore the relationships among continuity of care needs, patient empowerment and eHealth literacy in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to further identify the potential mediating role of eHealth literacy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>A tertiary care hospital (Level 3A, the highest level in the Chinese hospital classification system) in Shanghai, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study participants consisted of 219 patients with stable COPD who visited or underwent follow-up at the outpatient clinic between December 2023 and May 2024.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Outcome measures</st>
<p>The Continuity of Care Needs Questionnaire, COPD Patient Empowerment Evaluation Scale and eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) were used to assess 219 patients with stable COPD. Univariate analysis, Pearson correlation analysis and mediation analysis were performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The mean Continuity of Care Needs score was 24.17 (SD=2.74), with medication guidance needs being the highest-scoring domain. The COPD Patient Empowerment score was 84.37 (SD=11.58), and the eHEALS score was 23.37 (SD=6.06). Pearson correlation analysis showed that continuity of care needs were negatively correlated with patient empowerment (r=&ndash;0.930, 95% CI &ndash;0.946 to &ndash;0.910) and eHealth literacy (r=&ndash;0.976, 95% CI &ndash;0.982 to &ndash;0.969), while patient empowerment was positively correlated with eHealth literacy (r=0.919, 95% CI 0.895 to 0.937) (all p&lt;0.001). Mediation analysis suggested that eHealth literacy partially mediated the relationship between patient empowerment and continuity of care needs, with an indirect effect of &ndash;0.169 (95% CI &ndash;0.247 to &ndash;0.091), accounting for 74.91% of the total effect. The direct effect was &ndash;0.051 (95% CI &ndash;0.067 to &ndash;0.035) and the total effect was &ndash;0.220 (95% CI &ndash;0.231 to &ndash;0.208).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients with stable COPD demonstrated high continuity of care needs, with eHealth literacy partially mediating the relationship between patient empowerment and continuity of care needs. Healthcare providers should consider patients&rsquo; eHealth literacy to enhance patient empowerment and develop personalised continuity of care strategies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, C., Feng, J., Cai, B., Qian, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098383</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-098383</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Nursing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of patient empowerment on continuity of care needs in patients with stable COPD: the mediating role of eHealth literacy in a cross-sectional study from China]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Nursing</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e098383</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e098383</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101060?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and evaluation of a diagnostic aiding tool for differentiating tropical fevers using artificial intelligence approach: a study protocol from tertiary care hospital in South India]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e101060?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Application of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the healthcare setting gains importance especially in the domain of disease diagnosis. Numerous studies have tried to explore AI in the diagnosis of various diseases, including tropical fevers such as dengue and malaria. However, there is a lack of standard guidelines to develop the AI models, the gap between clinical and engineering expertise and clinical validation of the models, and hence there is a critical need for the development of an integrated diagnostic tool which uses demographical, laboratory variables and epidemiological parameters of patient and provides early prediction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The present study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine-learning (ML) prediction tool for differential diagnosis of tropical fevers for adult patients (&gt;18 years) using a three-phase approach in a tertiary care centre in South India by January 2026. Phase  involves identification of the prevalent tropical fevers and associated clinical parameters to develop the AI model through a retrospective audit and qualitative interview. Phase &#x2161; involves retrospective data collection from hospital medical records for finalised diseases (1000 cases per disease) and clinical parameters, with data being used for model development using the Python language. Support vector machine, logistic regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Nai&#x0308;ve Bayes and ensemble models such as decision tree and Random Forest will be employed along with explainable AI techniques. They are used as they are easy to understand and interpret, well established, most effective for structured data, enhancing the transparency and interpretability of the predictive machine learning models, and their use has been widely supported in previous studies across various contexts. Suitable statistical parameters like specificity, sensitivity and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) will be applied to evaluate model performance. In phase , the developed model will be implemented prospectively to assess the feasibility of model implementation. Model performance such as specificity, sensitivity and AUROC will be calculated, and the finally developed model will be implemented in a single tertiary care hospital to evaluate its overall performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval for the study has been obtained from the institutional ethics committee of the Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital, Manipal (IEC number: 6/2024). Informed consent will be taken for obtaining the data of the patient for the evaluation of the model in the third phase of the study, and data will be kept confidential. The study results will be disseminated by publishing them in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p>The protocol has been registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) (CTRI/2024/04/065866) and approved on 16 April 2024.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chitrapady, S., Rajendran, R., Haritha, K., Tejashree, M. U., Rashid, M., Poojari, P. G., Kunhikatta, V., Varma, M., Devi, V., Acharya, D., Khan, S., Thunga, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101060</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-101060</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Diagnostics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and evaluation of a diagnostic aiding tool for differentiating tropical fevers using artificial intelligence approach: a study protocol from tertiary care hospital in South India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Diagnostics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e101060</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e101060</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102687?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['The paper brochure is worth its weight in gold: a qualitative study of older adults experiences and preferences for information delivery prior to elective hospitalisation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Norway]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e102687?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Older adults can have difficulties understanding and recalling information prior to hospitalisation for elective treatment. Limited research exists regarding how older adults perceive the accessibility and comprehensibility of the information provided by the hospital prior to elective hospitalisation. This study aims to explore how older adults undergoing elective hospitalisation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) experience the information received from the hospital and their preferences for modes of information delivery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative design was used. Data were collected through individual semistructured interviews with older adults prior to hospital discharge following elective TAVI. The data were analysed using reflective thematic analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All patients scheduled for elective hospitalisation for TAVI at a public university hospital in Norway were screened for eligibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>18 older adults participated in the study. Their median age was 82 years (range 67&ndash;91), and two thirds were males.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The data were categorised into four main themes: &lsquo;The paper brochure is worth its weight in gold&rsquo;, &lsquo;Combination of different modes of information delivery increased understanding and recall&rsquo;, &lsquo;Trust reduced the need to access and understand information&rsquo; and &lsquo;Family played a crucial role in accessing and interpreting health information&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Older adults undergoing elective hospitalisation found the traditional brochure valuable, alone or in combination with the digital material, which included an animated film. The participants emphasised that support from family members was required to access the digital information.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brors, G., Larsen, M. H., Fagerheim, T., Ree, C. H., Lines, B., Vaga, B. I., Nost, T. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102687</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-102687</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['The paper brochure is worth its weight in gold: a qualitative study of older adults experiences and preferences for information delivery prior to elective hospitalisation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Norway]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e102687</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e102687</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103297?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Telemedicine-based individualised aerobic exercise training in Chinese adults with inactive or mildly active inflammatory bowel disease: study protocol for a single-centre, semi-crossover randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103297?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in China exhibit critically low levels of physical activity, yet evidence for telemedicine-based aerobic exercise interventions remains scarce, particularly with objective physiological validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this single-centre, open-labelled, semi-crossover randomised controlled trial, 28 inactive/mildly active adult IBD patients with low level of baseline physical activity will be randomly assigned to immediate or delayed 12-week telemedicine-based aerobic exercise training. The exercise prescription, stratified by baseline activity level, is designed to progressively elevate physical activity levels to moderate intensity. The telemedicine-based programme used fitness bands synchronised to a mobile app, WeChat-based real-time feedback and online group support and communication. The primary outcome is change in peak oxygen uptake measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Secondary outcomes include other cardiorespiratory fitness parameters measured by CPET, physical activity level measured by International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form, Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale, clinical disease activity, inflammatory markers, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, nutritional indices, Fatigue Severity Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University (KY2024SL379-01). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06804733">NCT06804733</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, Y., Liu, H., Qian, X., Zhang, X., Xu, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103297</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103297</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Gastroenterology and hepatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Telemedicine-based individualised aerobic exercise training in Chinese adults with inactive or mildly active inflammatory bowel disease: study protocol for a single-centre, semi-crossover randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Gastroenterology and hepatology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103297</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103297</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103985?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing participation of patients who had a stroke in rehabilitation shared decision-making: a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103985?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>By adopting the shared decision-making (SDM) model, this study aims to improve treatment adherence and patients&rsquo; subjective initiative. It intends to systematically explore the barriers and facilitating conditions for patients who had a stroke to participate in rehabilitation SDM through the analysis and integration of qualitative research methods. The ultimate goal is to provide a basis for optimising the formulation of rehabilitation plans, enhancing the quality of nursing services and improving patients&rsquo; medical experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The following databases were searched, with only literatures published in English or Chinese included: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), CBM (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) and Wanfang Database. The search covered the period from the establishment of each database to 1 March 2025. The quality of the included literatures was evaluated using the Qualitative Research Quality Assessment Tool provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute in 2016, with a focus on factors affecting participation of patients who had a stroke in rehabilitation SDM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 1502 articles were retrieved in the preliminary search, and 10 were finally included. From these included literatures, 31 findings were extracted. Similar results were categorised and grouped into 10 new categories, which were further integrated into 3 core integrated findings: (1) patient-related factors, including interference from negative emotions, the gap between rehabilitation expectations and reality, the impact of socio-demographic factors and self-efficacy with stage-specific autonomous needs; (2) family-related factors, including family support, the impact of patients&rsquo; sense of responsibility to their families on decision choices and trade-offs forced by economic burden; (3) healthcare provider and environmental factors, including paternalistic models undermining autonomy, insufficient information and difficulty in screening hindering decision-making and discontinuity in the rehabilitation system and lack of resources increasing decision-making burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Through the meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, this research shows that negative emotions and realistic gaps reduce patients&rsquo; participation in decision-making. While family support helps enhance patients&rsquo; confidence in decision-making, economic burden affects their decision choices. Additionally, one-way doctor&ndash;patient communication, insufficient information support and discontinuity in the rehabilitation service system increase patients&rsquo; decision-making burden.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zang, S., Ye, M., Qi, W., Wu, Z., He, M., Lou, Q., Cui, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103985</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103985</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Neurology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing participation of patients who had a stroke in rehabilitation shared decision-making: a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Neurology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103985</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103985</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104892?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting burnout, anxiety and depression among Canadian healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional secondary analysis study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e104892?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study aimed to identify the predictors of burnout, anxiety and depression among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A secondary quantitative analysis of data from the Mental Health Research Canada (MHRC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Healthcare professionals across Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>1439 Canadian healthcare professionals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measures</st>
<p>Data from MHRC, collected between April 2020 and January 2024, including sociodemographic factors and measures of burnout, anxiety and depression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 1439 participants were included in the analysis. Women (OR: 2.25; 95% CI 1.46 to 3.48), younger workers (OR: 2.29; 95% CI 1.29 to 4.06) and mental health professionals (OR: 2.59; 95% CI 1.11 to 6.01) were more likely to experience burnout. Meanwhile, men (OR: 2.05; 95% CI 1.40 to 3.00), younger workers (OR: 8.58; 95% CI 4.12 to 17.86) and physicians (OR: 2.01; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.46) had an increased likelihood of being diagnosed with anxiety. Similar findings were obtained for depression, where men (OR: 1.74; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.56), young workers (OR: 5.22; 95% CI 2.68 to 10.18), physicians (OR: 2.11; 95% CI 1.22 to 3.64), visible minorities (OR: 2.29; 95% CI 1.55 to 3.38) and those with a physical impairment (OR: 4.79; 95% CI 2.55 to 8.97) were more likely to receive a diagnosis since the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These findings underscore the need for targeted clinical interventions among healthcare professionals during and beyond public health emergencies. Specifically, healthcare institutions should implement accessible mental health programmes, regular psychological assessments and workload management strategies for those who face increased vulnerabilities to mental health struggles.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balakrishnar, K., Long, B.-Z. S., Premji, R., Choi, C., Sathananthan, A., Choppella, M., Mazur, M., Nowrouzi-Kia, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104892</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-104892</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Mental health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting burnout, anxiety and depression among Canadian healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional secondary analysis study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Mental health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e104892</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e104892</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106251?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Parental preferences for generic substitution policies for children in China: a discrete choice experiment]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106251?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate Chinese parents&rsquo; preferences regarding generic drug substitution policies for children, to provide references for optimising these policies, enhancing parental acceptance rates of generic drug substitution for children, and improving paediatric medication accessibility.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A discrete choice experiment was employed, and voluntary sampling was used to select parents with at least one child aged 0&ndash;12 years from three cities located in the eastern, central and western regions of China for a questionnaire survey. A mixed logit model was used to estimate preference coefficients for various policy attributes, the relative importance (RI) of these attributes and the acceptance rates of different policy scenarios.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 411 participants were included. Except for the generic registration standards, the differences in all other included attributes of the paediatric generic drug substitution policy were statistically significant (p&lt;0.01). Generic consistency evaluation (GCE) (RI=41.30%) and medication control (RI=31.29%) were the most important attributes influencing participants&rsquo; choice preferences. The acceptance rate of the current paediatric generic drug policy among Chinese parents was only 55.42%. However, if the policy scenario included differentiated registration standards, all generic drugs passing GCE, a 10% increase in reimbursement rate, autonomous choice of generic drugs and full postsubstitution management for all generic drugs, the acceptance rate could reach 83.31%.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Chinese parents show a stronger preference for GCE and medicine use control within paediatric generic drug substitution policies. To enhance policy acceptance rates, it is recommended to continue implementing GCE and to respect parents&rsquo; autonomy in selecting medications for their children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pu, T., Tan, J., Xin, W., Zhang, L., Shao, R., Yan, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106251</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106251</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Health policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Parental preferences for generic substitution policies for children in China: a discrete choice experiment]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Health policy</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106251</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106452?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of parental involvement on neonatal growth, neurodevelopmental outcome, parental bonding in neonatal care: a systematic review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e106452?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Improving neonatal health&mdash;including growth, weight gain, neurodevelopment and parent&ndash;infant bonding&mdash;relies heavily on active parental involvement in neonatal care. Family-centred care models emphasise parental participation, which has been associated with improved physiological stability in infants, reduced parental stress and enhanced emotional bonding. This systematic review aims to synthesise existing evidence on the benefits of parental involvement in neonatal care, highlight best practices and identify gaps requiring further research. A rigorous methodology has been outlined to ensure the reliability and transparency of the review process.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A comprehensive search strategy will be implemented across major databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science, supplemented by manual searches. The review will include randomised controlled trials published between 2000 and January 2025. Studies will be screened according to predefined inclusion criteria, and outcomes of interest will include neonatal growth, weight gain, neurodevelopmental outcomes and parent&ndash;infant bonding. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data from included studies will be synthesised using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. If studies are sufficiently homogeneous in design, interventions and outcomes, a meta-analysis will be conducted using appropriate effect measures (eg, mean difference or standardised mean difference for continuous outcomes, and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>As no primary data will be collected, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be presented at relevant conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251000485.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hullumani, S., Qureshi, I., Raghumahanti, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106452</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-106452</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of parental involvement on neonatal growth, neurodevelopmental outcome, parental bonding in neonatal care: a systematic review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e106452</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e106452</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107642?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing resilience in siblings of children with disabilities and chronic illnesses: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107642?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Siblings of children with disabilities or chronic illnesses often face significant challenges during their upbringing. Despite these difficulties, many develop a positive outlook and adapt successfully. To help individuals navigate developmental challenges in a healthy and manageable way, this study focuses on the concept of resilience. Although previous studies have primarily focused on the challenges and difficulties faced by siblings of children with disabilities and chronic illnesses, the factors influencing resilience in these siblings remain unclear. This review aims to inform the development of effective support systems for siblings of children with disabilities and chronic illnesses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>We will search PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science and Ichushi-Web (a Japanese Medical Literature Database). Two independent reviewers will apply the inclusion and exclusion criteria to screen the titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles. Full texts of relevant studies will be reviewed. This scoping review focuses on studies addressing resilience in siblings of children with disabilities and chronic illnesses during childhood, with particular focus on the perspectives of siblings. The review will exclude conference proceedings, abstracts, posters, editorials, commentaries, opinion papers and review papers. However, important documents found during the search will be added if relevant. Using a custom data extraction method developed for this review, the researchers will extract relevant data, inductively and comprehensively organise similar codes, and identify key components of resilience.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study does not involve human subjects and therefore does not require approval from an ethics committee for human subjects research. The results of this exploratory review will be disclosed through conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed academic journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="https://osf.io/p34ex/">https://osf.io/p34ex/</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsuchiya, S., Sato, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107642</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107642</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Paediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing resilience in siblings of children with disabilities and chronic illnesses: a scoping review protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Paediatrics</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107642</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107642</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107670?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mentorship-infused initiatives for postgraduate research supervision in African higher institutions of learning: a systematic review and meta-synthesis protocol]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e107670?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Strengthening research capacity in Africa is vital for tackling pressing health, educational and socioeconomic challenges facing the continent. At the core of this effort is the cultivation of innovative research leaders through postgraduate training programmes that incorporate mentorship-infused supervision. Such models have demonstrated potential in improving research skills, boosting academic productivity and fostering leadership development among emerging scholars. This systematic review and meta-synthesis protocol aims to examine existing mentorship-infused supervision practices across African higher education institutions. The review seeks to identify effective models, uncover common challenges and barriers, and generate evidence-based recommendations to develop sustainable, contextually relevant strategies. Insights from this work will inform policies and practices to enhance postgraduate research training, advance research leadership and contribute to the broader goal of strengthening research ecosystems across Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>A systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis will be undertaken, focusing on qualitative research studies as well as the qualitative components of mixed-methods studies. Relevant studies published in English will be identified through a comprehensive search strategy. The electronic databases, including Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, African Journals Online, EMBASE and CINAHL, will be searched to capture a wide range of peer-reviewed articles and grey literature. Databases will be searched from March 2026. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction, quality assessment and evaluation of risk of bias, using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This systematic review and meta-synthesis will analyse publicly available literature and does not require ethical approval, as it involves no primary data collection. It will adhere to established ethical and methodological standards, including proper citation and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The findings will be widely disseminated through open-access journal publication, conference presentations and targeted reports for universities, research institutions and policymakers to inform and support mentorship-based postgraduate research supervision across Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CDR420251049878. Available from <A HREF="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251049878">https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251049878</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oladimeji, O., Londani, M., Moyo, S., Seekoe, E., Saidi, A., Mothiba, T. M., Feza, N. N., Davhana-Maselesele, M., Maart, R., Babalola, J. O., Okoh, A. I., Okonofua, F., Ntusi, N. A. B., Sibiya, M. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107670</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-107670</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Qualitative research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mentorship-infused initiatives for postgraduate research supervision in African higher institutions of learning: a systematic review and meta-synthesis protocol]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Qualitative research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e107670</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e107670</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108315?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between depression, anxiety and loneliness with internet addictions among public university students in Malaysia]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e108315?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence of internet addiction and examine its association with psychological factors specifically depression, anxiety and loneliness among Malaysian public university students.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Cross-sectional study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>All public universities in Malaysia, 20 universities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>The study included 7278 students from 20 public universities in Malaysia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Main outcome measures</st>
<p>Statistical analyses were performed usingSTATA V.17 software. Descriptive statistics summarised participants&rsquo; demographic characteristics, prevalence of internet addiction and psychological distress (depression, anxiety and loneliness). Pearson&rsquo;s correlation was used to assess bivariate relationships between internet addiction and psychological variables, while multiple logistic regression identified independent factors associated with internet addiction after adjusting for significant confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The study found that 38.6% of the students showed signs of internet addiction, along with a high level of psychological distress; 24.8% had depressive symptoms, 32.4% experienced anxiety and 35.5% reported loneliness. Moderate positive correlations were observed between internet addiction and depression, anxiety and loneliness (p&lt;0.00). Multivariate analyses adjusted for field of study, gender and ethnicity confirmed these associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The findings indicate significant associations between internet addiction and psychological factors such as depression, anxiety and loneliness. A comprehensive, multifaceted approach is essential to address psychological distress among university students and reduce the risk of internet addiction.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muhamad, N. A., Maamor, N. H., Tengku Baharudin Shah, T. P. N., Jamalluddin, N. H., Leman, F. N., Rosli, I. A., Nik Azhan, N. A. F., Chemi, N., Muhamad Rasat, M. A., Abdullah, N., Abdul Jabbar, N., Ibrahim, N., Mohamad Isa, M. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108315</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-108315</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Addiction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between depression, anxiety and loneliness with internet addictions among public university students in Malaysia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Addiction</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e108315</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e108315</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109628?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among adults aged 45 years and above in rural Sidama, Ethiopia: a two-step community-based cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109628?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes and identify associated factors using a two-step diagnostic method combining fasting blood sugar with confirmatory glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing among adults 45 <I>years and above</I> in rural Sidama, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A community-based cross-sectional design was conducted from 1 April to 31 July 2024. Data were collected through a census of adults aged 45 years and above using a pretested WHO-STEPwise questionnaire. Physical and biochemical tests were performed following standard protocols. Data were analysed using Stata V.17.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>Selected rural kebeles of Shebedino district, Sidama, Ethiopia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>2875 adults aged 45 years and above.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Primary outcome measures</st>
<p>Undiagnosed diabetes confirmed by HbA1c levels (&ge;48 mmol/mol or &ge;6.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes confirmed by HbA1c was 1.2% (35 of 2871; 95% CI: 0.9% to 1.7%). Previously diagnosed diabetes was found in 0.5% (14 of 2875; 95% CI: 0.3% to 0.8%). The total diabetes prevalence, confirmed by HbA1c or prior diagnosis, was 1.7% (49 of 2871; 95% CI: 1.3% to 2.3%). A total of 1327 out of 2875 (46%) participants were undernourished. Advanced age (&beta;=0.21; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.32, p=0.001), and estimated annual income (&beta;=0.15; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.28; p=0.029) were significantly associated with elevated fasting blood sugar levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes among rural adult population was low. Older age and higher income were significantly associated with elevated fasting blood sugar. Routine community-based diabetes screening among older population, health education and nutrition-focused interventions are recommended to sustain the low burden and address undernutrition.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hibstu, D. T., Likka, M. H., Areru, H. A., Birhanu, B. E., Lindtjorn, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109628</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109628</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among adults aged 45 years and above in rural Sidama, Ethiopia: a two-step community-based cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109628</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109628</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112257?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex-specific differences in obesity among adults in Bangladesh: a nationally representative cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112257?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Bangladesh is facing a growing obesity epidemic; however, evidence on sex-specific patterns and socioeconomic determinants is limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We aimed to investigate sex differences in obesity prevalence and to assess how socioeconomic and demographic factors influence obesity risk among adult men and women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We analysed data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022. Prevalence of obesity (body mass index &ge;25.0 kg/m&sup2;) among men and women was estimated by sociodemographic characteristics. Two multinomial logistic regression models were fitted: first, to quantify sex-specific odds of obesity with socio-demographic variables as interaction terms for effect modification; and second, adjusted sex-stratified models to assess determinants of obesity separately in men and women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, 30% of our participants had obesity, with women more affected than men (36% vs 20%; adjusted OR (aOR) 2.75, 95% CI 2.53 to 3.00). Interaction analyses showed attenuation of the female-male difference among those with higher education (interaction aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.74), richest quintile (interaction aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.83) and urban residence (interaction aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.96). Obesity was positively associated with age, education, wealth and urban residence, with stronger effects in men, except for higher education (interaction aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.89), richest quintile (interaction aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.98) and urban residence (interaction aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.98).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Obesity disproportionately affected women, although association with socio-demographic factors was stronger in men. Targeted sex-specific interventions that address socioeconomic and contextual determinants are needed to mitigate obesity burden in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafi, M. A., Anika, U. S., Hossain, M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112257</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112257</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex-specific differences in obesity among adults in Bangladesh: a nationally representative cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112257</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112929?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers and delays in access to cleft surgery among children with cleft deformities in Rwanda: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e112929?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Although timely surgery is essential for improving general health and psychosocial outcomes, delays in cleft surgery remain common in low- and middle-income countries, including Rwanda, where little is known about the underlying causes. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing delays in cleft surgery in Rwanda using the four-delay framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted between April and July 2024. We conducted 29 in-depth interviews with 15 caregivers of children with orofacial clefts and 14 healthcare providers involved in cleft care. Transcripts were analysed thematically using an inductive&ndash;deductive hybrid approach in MAXQDA (V.24), guided by the four-delay framework while allowing themes to emerge from the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>This qualitative study was conducted across six Operation Smile-supported hospitals in Rwanda. Operation Smile is a non-governmental organisation providing cleft care in several low- and middle-income countries, including Rwanda. Among these facilities, one is a tertiary-level hospital located in Kigali city, while the others are secondary-level hospitals distributed across all provinces of the country.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Participants were purposively selected and comprised caregivers of children who underwent cleft surgery at Operation Smile-supported hospitals between 2023 and 2024, as well as healthcare providers with a minimum of 6 months&rsquo; experience delivering cleft care at these facilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Six major themes and 15 subthemes emerged. Limited caregiver awareness, cultural beliefs and inconsistent knowledge of clefts among healthcare providers influenced delays in seeking care. Reaching care was impeded by long distances, poor road infrastructure and inadequate transportation options. Receiving care was delayed by patient-related factors such as poor nutritional status of children and systemic issues, including shortages of specialised cleft care workforce (such as plastic surgeons, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, anaesthesiologists, etc) and surgical infrastructure. Remaining in care was affected by the absence of multidisciplinary follow-up services. Despite these barriers, caregivers appreciated the support services provided by Operation Smile, including nutrition, transportation and coverage of surgery costs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Cleft surgery delays in Rwanda are driven by multifactorial barriers across all stages of care. Strengthening early identification, public awareness, health provider training and post-operative support systems is essential to reducing delays and improving outcomes. Findings support the need for integrated cleft care within national surgical plans and broader health system strengthening efforts, and encourage the social and psychological support to affected children and caregivers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mukanahayo, E., Umugwaneza, O., Mukundwa, P. N., Sheferaw, E. D., Riviello, R., Dukundane, A., Murithi, G., Ntirenganya, F., Alayande, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112929</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-112929</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers and delays in access to cleft surgery among children with cleft deformities in Rwanda: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e112929</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e112929</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Functional Assessment for Surgery by a Timed Walk (FAST Walk) study: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study of the 6 min walk test for preoperative risk stratification in major non-cardiac surgery]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Poor cardiopulmonary fitness is an important risk factor for postoperative complications, yet a feasible, objective and prognostically accurate method to assess preoperative fitness has not been established. The 6 min walk test (6MWT) is a simple, inexpensive and widely applicable measure that shows promise for predicting postoperative risk. However, robust data are lacking on whether the 6MWT accurately predicts complications, provides incremental prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors or outperforms simpler alternatives such as questionnaires, cardiac biomarkers or grip strength testing. The Functional Assessment for Surgery by a Timed Walk (FAST Walk) study is designed to address these knowledge gaps by evaluating whether the 6MWT improves prediction of key postoperative outcomes compared with clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>The FAST Walk study is an international multicentre prospective cohort study of 1672 adults (&ge;40 years) undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery at centres in Canada, Hong Kong, Australia, Spain and the Netherlands. Participants complete a preoperative 6MWT and baseline assessments of comorbidities, self-reported cardiopulmonary fitness (MET: Re-evaluation for Perioperative Cardiac Risk questionnaire), biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and grip strength. The primary outcome is 30-day death or major postoperative complication, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher. Secondary outcomes are (1) death or new significant disability at 90 days after surgery and (2) days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery. Disability is measured using the short-form WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 instrument. Multivariable regression models and complementary metrics of prediction performance will be used to determine whether 6MWT distance adds prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The FAST Walk study has received research ethics board approval at all participating sites. Recruitment commenced in June 2024, with completion of participant follow-up expected in 2026. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, with the primary results anticipated in 2027.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06412367">NCT06412367</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wijeysundera, D. N., Salbach, N. M., Chan, M. T. V., Alibhai, S. M. H., Puts, M. T. E., Jerath, A., Khadaroo, R., Ehtesham, S., Pazmino-Canizares, J., Ladha, K. S., Granton, J. T., Amado, L., Duceppe, E., Hladkowicz, E., Lee, S. M., Macdonell, S.-Y., Parotto, M., Perlas, A., Serrano, P. E., Thorleifson, M. D., van Vlymen, J. M., van Waes, J., Racz, E., Wilmhurst, L., McIsaac, D. I., FAST Walk Study Investigators, Chesney, Dubowitz, Vives, Alphonsus, Nankam, Thomas, Nayar, Goel, Pereira, Angkurawanit, Quintero Beltran, Rao, Syeda, Syeda, Zahin, Gunaseelan, Louridas, Tahasildar, Hutton, Hour, Trudi, Vandenbroucke-Menu, Comeau, Martin, Lapointe, Chergui, Boko, Avramescu, Kerelska, Charummoottil, Lo, Daramola, Preston, Tejani, Pierini, Doornick, Camire, Dumerton, Gurbhele, Tod, Mahale, Wang, Khan, Siddiqui, Zasso, Ming, Russell, Bagry, Monterola, Girling, Li, MacKenzie, Lo, Chisholm, Mozel, Babul, Van Roekel, Kaur, Flexman, Alexis, Robertson, Edwards, Evans, Mills, Alhusseini, Luyan, Lee, Bastos, Rojas, Choi, Shaheen, Sumathi, Kaustov, Khodaei, Karanicolas, Cuthbertson, Giron-Arongo, Chowdhury, McCluskey, Poonawala, van Klei, Santa Mina, Lapierre, Stobart, Runions, Watkins, Chan, Lau, Chan, Lee, Lau, Lam, Ng, Cheng, Lee, Hui, Chan, Kam, Yau, Ng, Yip, Riedel, Naydenova, Krasner, Arki, Lie, Raptis, Sathasivam, Xu, Lebovic, Keown-Stoneman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-05T03:39:42-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113111</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113111</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Anaesthesia]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Functional Assessment for Surgery by a Timed Walk (FAST Walk) study: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study of the 6 min walk test for preoperative risk stratification in major non-cardiac surgery]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Anaesthesia</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113111</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095116?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stakeholders perceptions and experiences towards dental research training programmes and projects in undergraduate education in Tehran, Iran: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e095116?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Dental research enhances students&rsquo; understanding of evidence-based dentistry and improves clinical decision-making. This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of students and staff regarding mandatory undergraduate dental research projects and identify the related challenges and facilitators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>A qualitative study using focus group discussions and semi-structured individual interviews. Data were analysed using a framework approach and reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Setting</st>
<p>School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Participants</st>
<p>Students and staff who were involved in undergraduate dental research projects. Seven sessions were held (three focus groups and four interviews). Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three key themes were identified: (1) attitudes towards the necessity and value of the research project; (2) barriers, including financial constraints, topic selection, mentorship issues, administrative and laboratory challenges, lack of motivation and time pressure; and (3) facilitators such as effective communication, revising course arrangements and improved financial support. Students and staff expressed differing views on the necessity, relevance and perceived benefits of the project.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>While both groups recognised the educational value of research engagement, the mandatory format, limited mentorship and resource constraints negatively affected motivation and project quality. Introducing flexible, interest-based or collaborative research formats and revising course timing may enhance engagement and learning outcomes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohebbi, S., Razeghi, S., Nemati, S., Najar Nobari, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-03T22:46:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095116</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2024-095116</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Medical education and training]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stakeholders perceptions and experiences towards dental research training programmes and projects in undergraduate education in Tehran, Iran: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Medical education and training</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e095116</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e095116</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099658?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intelligent monitoring to predict atrial fibrillation (NOTE-AF): clinical study 1 for the 'Health virtual twins for the personalised management of stroke related to atrial fibrillation (TARGET) project - a protocol for a prospective cohort analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e099658?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide affecting an estimated 5% of people over the age of 65 and is a leading cause of stroke and heart failure. Identification of patients at risk allows preventative measures and treatment before these complications occur. Conventional risk prediction models are static, do not have flexibility to incorporate dynamic risk factors and possess only modest predictive value. Artificial intelligence and machine learning-powered health virtual twin technology offer transformative methods for risk prediction and guiding clinical decisions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>In this prospective observational study, 1200 patients will be recruited in two tertiary centres. Patients hospitalised with acute illnesses (sepsis, heart failure, respiratory failure, stroke or critical illness) and patients having undergone high-risk surgery (major vascular surgery, upper gastrointestinal surgery and emergency surgery) will be monitored with a patch-based remote wireless monitoring system for up to 14 days. Clinical and electrocardiographic data will be used for modelling the risk of new-onset AF. The primary outcome is episodes of AF &gt;30 s and will be described as ratio of episodes/patient and as percentage of patients having episodes of AF. Secondary outcomes include 30-day and 90-day readmission rates and complications of AF.</p>
<p>The aim of this study is to generate data for the development and validation of health virtual twins predicting onset of AF in an at-risk population. The intelligent monitoring to predict atrial fibrillation (NOTE-AF) study is part of the TARGET project, a Horizon Europe funded programme which includes risk prediction, diagnosis and management of AF-related stroke (<A HREF="https://target-horizon.eu/">https://target-horizon.eu/</A>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study has received approval by the Health Research Authority and the National Research Ethics Service (REC reference 24/NW/0170, IRAS project ID: 342528) in the UK and has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06600620). Results will be disseminated as outlined in the TARGET protocol to communicate project ideas, activities and results to diverse audiences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06600620">NCT06600620</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Essa, H., Johnston, B., Lip, G. Y. H., Ortega-Martorell, S., Williams, K., Welters, I. D., TARGET Consortium, Ortega-Martorell, Olier, Mistry, Knowles, Bellfield, Aikodon, Lotto, Jones, Dawson, Thijssen, Maganaris, Baltzopoulos, McDowell, Smith, Ohlsson, Peterson, Bjorkelund, Lip, Lane, Zheng, El-Bouri, Proietti, Welters, Valls, Rashwan, Yadav, Oller, Giralt-Steinhauer, Guillen-Sola, Balado, Conde, Jansen, Omelina, Swinnen, Raedt, Dan, Degelaen, Embrechts, Chambon, Mouysset, Itu, Benedek, Benedek, Rat, Blindu, Rodean, Halatiu, Gerculy, Rosca, Mihaila, Errey, Akkas, Hillerkuss, Horton, Tuladhar, Cate, Fairbairn, Tidbury, Lobban, Johnston, Essa, Hose, Raidou, Tomaszuk, Sagi, Frings, Lluch, Vivani, Anastasia, Tsaopoulos, Nikolopoulos, Risvas, Kalaganis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-03T22:46:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099658</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-099658</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Cardiovascular medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intelligent monitoring to predict atrial fibrillation (NOTE-AF): clinical study 1 for the 'Health virtual twins for the personalised management of stroke related to atrial fibrillation (TARGET) project - a protocol for a prospective cohort analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Cardiovascular medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e099658</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e099658</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100029?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-efficacy in exercise behaviour in persons with a diagnosed condition: a systematic evidence map]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e100029?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Self-efficacy is a major factor in enabling individuals to follow behavioural goals. This applies to health behaviours including physical activity and exercise behaviour, a health topic especially important for persons suffering from health conditions. In subjects with already existing conditions, self-efficacy in exercise behaviour is a research field with a high volume of published articles, yet it has never been charted in its entirety. This systematic evidence map (SEM) provides a comprehensive overview of the current state in published empirical research.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Design</st>
<p>Collecting, categorising and visualising the breadth of evidence via SEM following the Methods of Evidence Mapping by Schmucker <I>et al</I>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data sources</st>
<p>Medline (via PubMed) and PsycINFO (via EbscoHost).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</st>
<p>We searched for the terms &lsquo;self-efficacy&rsquo; and any of the search terms &lsquo;sport&rsquo; and &lsquo;exercise&rsquo; in titles and abstracts. We included all empirical research studies published until 2022 that measured self-efficacy in relation to exercise. This SEM includes all studies on humans with a pre-existing condition. We extracted the data points authors, title, year, sample size (N), age groups, pre-existing condition(s), surveyed sport and method of measuring self-efficacy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st>
<p>We extracted the data points from the full text (if available). In addition to a data table, we created a freely accessible evidence map in the form of graphs in this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The number of publications grew over time from single publications per year in the 1980s to over 100 per year in the beginning of the 2020s, adding up to 1342 included studies. Most research focuses on middle-aged and older adults. Research covers a wide variety of conditions, with endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (22%) as well as diseases of the circulatory system (19%) being the most common disease groups. Most included studies (71%) do not specify a sport. Most (55%) papers used validated scales to measure self-efficacy, and we discovered 235 individually named scales among them.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This paper offers the first ever comprehensive list of empirical publications on self-efficacy in exercise behaviour in persons with pre-existing conditions in the form of a SEM. The research field was as wide as anticipated concerning total numbers, number of individual scales for measuring self-efficacy, as well as range in diagnosed conditions. Most research focusing on advanced age may be due to many diseases only manifesting later in life, and the lack of specification in types of sport points to the choice of sport being less important than getting enough exercise in general. Future research should examine the strength of evidence and the robustness and comparability of self-efficacy scales as well as underrepresented disease groups for public health considerations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Since no primary data was collected, an ethics approval is not required for the presented work. In addition to the result being disseminated via the publication at hand, the data is being shared in detail via the Open Science Framework platform.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill, V., Sonsmann, F., Rottscha&#x0308;fer, J. R., Wilke, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-03T22:46:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100029</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-100029</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Public health]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-efficacy in exercise behaviour in persons with a diagnosed condition: a systematic evidence map]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Public health</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e100029</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e100029</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103827?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevention of postoperative complications with negative pressure wound therapy after complex breast cancer surgery: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (TPN-SEIN)]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e103827?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Complex breast surgery, including immediate breast reconstruction and oncoplastic procedures, is increasingly performed to optimise oncologic and aesthetic outcomes. Postoperative wound healing complications remain a major concern, particularly in high-risk patients. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to improve wound healing in various surgical fields. However, its effectiveness in oncologic breast surgery remains insufficiently studied. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT in reducing wound healing complications in complex breast cancer surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The TPN-SEIN study is a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase III clinical trial. A total of 254 patients undergoing complex breast cancer surgery will be randomised either to arm 1 (NPWT immediately postoperatively for 7 days) or arm 2 (standard wound care). The primary endpoint is the rate of wound healing complications at day 30, defined as at least one of the following: deep postoperative infection of the prosthetic pocket, wound dehiscence or incomplete healing. Secondary endpoints include surgical site infection at day 90, reoperation rate, hospital readmission rate, time to complete healing, time to adjuvant treatment initiation, quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire and breast cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30)), patient satisfaction and medico-economic outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>The study was approved by the French national ethics committee (Comit&eacute; de Protection des Personnes Est II, 5 December 2024, reference 24.04416.000295) and the institutional review board (IRB&ndash;COMERE, reference ICM-RCM 2024/11). The French National Agency for the Safety of Health Products has been notified. The study results will be presented at both national and international conferences and will also be published in a peer-reviewed journal.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Trial registration number</st>
<p><A HREF="NCT06265558">NCT06265558</A>.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neron, M., Delmond, L., Gourgou, S., Delaine, S., Chalbos, P., Moussion, A., Taoum, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-03T22:46:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103827</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-103827</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevention of postoperative complications with negative pressure wound therapy after complex breast cancer surgery: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (TPN-SEIN)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Surgery</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e103827</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e103827</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109967?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of the effectiveness and safety of virtual reality-based telerehabilitation in improving motor function, balance and gait in patients with Parkinsons disease: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e109967?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Virtual reality-based telerehabilitation (VR-TR) combines gamified exercises with remote supervision for people with Parkinson&rsquo;s disease (PD). Its effectiveness and safety in PD remain uncertain. This protocol outlines methods to evaluate the effects of VR-TR on functional and clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>Randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies will be identified in PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Scopus (Elsevier), Cochrane CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) and PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) from inception to June 2026, with additional searches of grey literature and trial registries. Eligible participants are adults with idiopathic PD. Interventions include immersive or non-immersive VR-TR with remote supervision, compared with conventional physiotherapy, usual care or other active non-VR interventions. Primary outcomes are balance, gait and global motor function; secondary outcomes are quality of life and adverse events. Two reviewers will independently screen, extract data and assess risk of bias. Where possible, meta-analyses will be conducted using RevMan V.5.4, and the certainty of evidence will be appraised with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>This study does not involve human participants and uses data from published studies; therefore, ethics approval is not required. However, as per institutional requirements, ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DMIHER) (Ref. No.: DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2025/204). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>CRD420251009423.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naqvi, I. W., Vardhan, V., Khatib, M. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-03T22:46:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109967</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-109967</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Rehabilitation medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of the effectiveness and safety of virtual reality-based telerehabilitation in improving motor function, balance and gait in patients with Parkinsons disease: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Rehabilitation medicine</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e109967</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e109967</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113229?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preventing vertical transmission of hepatitis B in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on vaccination uptake and determinants among pregnant women]]></title>
<link>http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/16/1/e113229?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Effective prevention of maternal-fetal transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in highly endemic settings depends on targeting vaccination efforts to key priority groups, including pregnant women. However, the extent of HBV vaccination and determinants of uptake in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have not been systematically examined. This systematic review aims to estimate HBV vaccination among pregnant women in SSA and identify the broader factors influencing uptake.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods and analysis</st>
<p>This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, African Journals Online and Google Scholar in November 2025. We will include published observational studies that assess HBV vaccination among pregnant women in SSA countries from database inception to October 2025. A meta-analysis will be conducted using random-effects models to pool estimates of HBV vaccination and multivariable-adjusted ORs for vaccination-associated factors. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed using the I&sup2; statistic.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Ethics and dissemination</st>
<p>Ethical approval is not required as this review will not involve primary data collection. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at regional and international public health conferences, and, where applicable, shared with policymakers and health authorities in SSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st>
<p>This protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, registration number CRD420251120357.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Afolabi, I. B., Phillips, J. C., El-Chaar, D., Bainbridge, S. A., Phillips, K. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-03T22:46:57-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113229</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:bmjopen;bmjopen-2025-113229</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Infectious diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preventing vertical transmission of hepatitis B in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on vaccination uptake and determinants among pregnant women]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Infectious diseases</prism:section>
<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e113229</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e113229</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>